Belated remorse, or the truth about Putin’s billions

388
Let's talk about repentance at the end, but let's start with the truth. The bitter and hard truth about the billions earned or stolen by Putin. After all, this film is devoted to the Air Force film "The Truth about Putin's Riches." Wealth with a capital letter - not in vain. It is precisely the Wealth, since we are talking about amounts that are not that fantastic, but, so to speak, weighty.

The film is small, so you can throw out of your life a little time and evaluate the quality of the work of the Air Force. It’s worth seeing, after all, the British nationwide public broadcaster.



The film directly tears the soul. Unhappy people hiding in the dark corners of the world from the long arm of the Kremlin, risking their lives and health, give such important readings, past which it is simply impossible to pass.

However, there are nuances that make you think more deeply than the filmmakers had planned. In general, the Air Force expected more thoughtful and profound work than an emotional kindergarten.

The evidence base is missing in principle. And the tales in the style of "we know everything, but do not say where we took it" causes a kind of slight bewilderment and a burnt-up chair.

The newest yacht allegedly donated to Putin by Abramovich, as it turns out, was built in the 2014 year. Well, in no way could Abramovich present it to Putin in 2002, unless he has no time machine. If you have noticed and documented the fact of the gift, so show this gift, and do not invent something that is sewn with white thread.

The display of "financial documents" is designed for the mentally retarded. Sorry, gentlemen British, but any student on his printer for a couple of euros will make you a mountain of such "documents." What apparently happened. But the figure in 202 million was voiced very clearly and loudly. Why 202? Why not 404? What trifle?

Evidence document is a document from which it can be concluded who, to whom, when, and how much. And the schoolboy’s creativity shown by the authors of the film costs exactly as much as paper and ink on it.

A separate masterpiece is the story of the lady that Putin has SUCH things that European billionaires never dreamed of. Pay attention to the video series accompanying his words. One gets the impression that European billionaires are some kind of half-bombs who cannot afford a normal training room. By the way, the hall is good, but I do not think that it was filmed in Putin’s apartment. The size is not the same.

Further. Tricycle ... Well, yes, where do billionaires have such a technique, right? A collection of expensive watches ... Yes, this is scary. Although the collection was not shown. Probably too secret. Or, quite possibly, the same allegations as the "documents". A tracksuit for 3 000 dollars is an exorbitant waste for any wealthy person in the world. Yes, back to the video. Are these pants worth 1500 bucks? For the European rich becomes scary.



In one I agree with the authors. Yes, Putin is truly one of the most influential people. And it's not at all in how many sports suits he has for 3 000 dollars and watches. Probably, the fact is that Putin has the whole Russia behind his back. But let's move on.

Separate words deserve witnesses in the film. Such a bunch of "I think," "most likely," "so they say," "reliably known," and the like. In short, all the same radio "One Grandma said," no more. I do not know what was difficult to find such witnesses, what were the difficulties.

In general, it seemed that the correspondent stupidly missed all the money on his business trips, then he found someone willing to make a couple of words in the camera, and he calmed down. But the creative group so well rode the world at the expense of the institution.

Interestingly, the accounting department was not stunned by the reports? Especially in St. Petersburg, where the group traveled long and dreary to the house where Putin lived as a child. To remove the 10 seconds panorama of the courtyard. By the way, St. Petersburg, do not enlighten, be sure to swim on a boat to this place? Or is it just minutes 10 walk from the subway?

And what is the essence of the accusation, based on the results of the trip to St. Petersburg? And the fact that Putin made a gang in St. Petersburg from the same people who wanted to get rich, and with it he came to power. A terrible accusation. Apparently, presidents are grown all over the world in test tubes and kept there until the start of the presidential campaign. Yes, according to some politicians of the West, it is possible to draw such a conclusion. But they, nevertheless, have their own teams.

And the numbers ... the numbers just touches. Belkovsky was dragged out of oblivion in order to name the sum. Given who Stanislav Belkovsky is, it is not surprising that he received the figure "from secret sources." 40 billion in "shares of the largest Russian companies." Naturally, no accurate data. Where did they get them. Oh yes, from the telephone records. And why 40? Why not 100 or 150? So surely.

Who wrote? Where did you write? Whose talk is this? Frank nonsense. Calling on the phone the alleged number in the thousands do not understand what, saying that for Mikhail Ivanovich. It is not even a kindergarten. These are nurseries for children with cerebral palsy. Who is Mikhail Ivanovich? Ah, yes, of course, this is Vladimir Vladimirovich! Well, only a frank oligophrenic will not understand this alignment. Apparently, I'm oligophrenic, I confess. I was "not inserted."

Why Mikhail Ivanovich? Why not Sergey Vladimirovich or Vitaly Evgenevich? Oh, they so encrypted ... No words. Bi-bi-si, buy me a recording of a telephone conversation, where one very famous person, close to who you know, talks with a man who promises one million for organizing a meeting with Fyodor Petrovich. Nothing that a voice recorder today is in any more or less decent phone. The main thing is that in the next fairy tale Putin may be called Fyodor Petrovich for the sake of conspiracy. The essence of this will not change, but there will be hot proof on hand.

And about the poor robbed oligarchs like you? They are silly, they thought that they are taking levies on health care, and with this money Putin built himself locks and bought yachts. Nothing that he never appeared in the castles and apartments in Spain, and did not get on board the yacht even once. The main thing is that there are locks, and there are yachts. So, Putin will once be able to use them. What is an unequivocal proof of his guilt.

The only thing missing is a telephone conversation recording, where it would be announced that the money that allegedly went to Putin was stolen from the budget or from the Pension Fund. It would be quite good.

So, we have a president who has been robbing our country since 2002. He owns shares, naturally, through nominees, has yachts and supercars, which are not used by apartments and castles, in which his legs were not. And tell me, how can a person who not only eats into his head, take it all on faith? Does not work.

Apparently, indeed, in order to devour all this, we must comply with the postulate that “not everyone can look today in tomorrow. Rather, not only everyone can watch, few can do it. ” And see not only smells.

Gentlemen, opponents, of course, will say that this is another attempt to whitewash Putin. Naturally unsuccessful. Because the Air Force cannot lie to the entire planet in this matter. Can not...

I must say that I did not pursue such a goal. There is no need to whitewash Putin, and the Air Force. For it was given to the ears.

Now back to repentance. There is such a feeling. I repent, respected this channel. For good series, for great programs about nature, for World even when it was Civilization. And now sort of ... At the level of a gang of teenagers from Yutub, who imagines himself to be great detectives. Selected a fairy tale.

Anyone who has seen this movie around the world, will draw its own conclusions. Someone Putin will remain a scarecrow robbing Russia. Someone will have a different opinion. There is already depending on the ability to use the head. To each his own.
388 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    29 January 2016 11: 43
    So we are going the right way!!!
    1. +3
      29 January 2016 13: 37
      You are now speaking on behalf of Sechin-Kostin-Miler-Rotenberg or on behalf of retired doctors and teachers. Please check. I'm afraid these are still different opinions.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. -1
    29 January 2016 11: 48
    Unfortunately, this is Russia and these films and investigations will not change anything
    The FSB is blowing up Russia. who was responsible for this?
    Putin was directly accused that it was he who gave the order to blow up houses, where are the investigations? they simply don't exist!
    and the pumping up of the country is such that if in the morning Medvedev turns to the population and says that this is all true, then in the afternoon I will recognize him as a “Western spy.” and in the evening TV will tell how he undermined the “right-wing bonds.” and people love it!!! (With)
    1. -4
      29 January 2016 12: 55
      Where do you need to change? Anal detected smile And it’s good to make fun of “skrepa” and “people”, then sincerely wonder why they hate you. But for this very thing - unrequited, distant, ambitious insults. There's a war going on, that's why there's pumping. But you brought in Medvedev unsuccessfully - he left such a memory of himself that it’s unclear how he still occupies this place and it’s high time
      Quote: Ajjh
      I recognize him as a “Western spy.”

      In general, you are on the wrong site, “get off the moped!”©
      1. -3
        29 January 2016 13: 02
        War? and who started it? you started and then got offended.
        ayyyy!
        PS
        The Yankees are coming now, the Masons have arranged everything...
        enemies! There are enemies all around...
  4. +2
    29 January 2016 11: 55
    How can they not choke in their own vomit?
  5. +3
    29 January 2016 11: 56
    In general, it is clear that the Amer Hydra has stepped on the tail of the Amer Hydra and is now starting, although it seems to me that nothing has stopped. They know how to influence weak or distant minds. Western perverts. Therefore, this game-film with all the components of footage and sound can be taken as a hysterical show. Nonsense! Whether he has or doesn’t have billions, we still won’t know! The main thing is that the country is strong and healthy spiritually, morally and economically!!! We’ll put everyone in their place and hoist the flag, and no one will need billions! laughing
  6. 0
    29 January 2016 11: 58
    “The Englishwoman shits” A saying for centuries!
  7. 0
    29 January 2016 12: 00
    As I understand, all discussions about Putin’s wealth are made on the basis of the nonsense of our Russian “ass positionists,” they are also “human rights activists.” I didn’t watch the whole film (I’m a pity for time to watch all this nonsense), but I watched excerpts from the film where his main accusations were shown. Well what can I say? Earlier, when I heard Kadyrov compare this public with enemies of the people, I thought, well, this is too much. Now I understand - Ramzan Akhmedovich is right, well done, he was not afraid of the howl of this pack and told the truth. Now we need to grab them all by the ear and into the sun. But there is no need to imprison these characters - too much honor. It is necessary that they cannot enter a public toilet without someone pointing a finger at them and saying, look who’s coming.
  8. +2
    29 January 2016 12: 05
    Quote: Boos
    I don’t care whether Putin is rich or poor, more important to me is what he did for Russia and its peoples, I need to think about it. And how he fulfills the promise. And you don’t need to go to extremes, making an icon out of it. Fanaticism in any case does not bring to good.

    Did not watch. Was there anything about Raspadskaya?
    Yes, keeping what you promised is cool! The Russians don’t give up their own. And for them it makes no difference whether they are Crimeans or Donetsk residents.
  9. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 06
    After a minute of watching, I turned off this nonsense. So anyone can be criticized if he were the president of Russia. But the president really has wealth, these are the people of Russia. In addition to this, there are a lot of problems with the same people. As people say... everyone is forcibly sweet You would not ... They would sit these Penosov Air Force and sniffed in two holes and identify their police actions in the destruction of peaceful nigers and their soldiers on the battlefields of FSHA unleashed by the FSHA themselves. Think of your stool!
  10. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 07
    I agree V.V. Putin is a very rich man, because he is the president of the largest territory, 1/6 of the land mass after all...
  11. -1
    29 January 2016 12: 10
    Yes, he deserved more......
  12. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 10
    Film complete G
    author-->author-->the author didn’t even ask the question “Why the hell does Putin need a yacht?” Without being an ardent fan of Putin (mainly because of his warm circle), it is impossible not to note that he is a workaholic and only Lenin worked more than him in our history. And after the deadline, he won’t need the yacht either, because... will rot by then :)) I think that the entire elite in our country is corrupt to one degree or another, but who does the West offer? Hodera, white and fluffy?
  13. +3
    29 January 2016 12: 13
    (Pay attention to the video that accompanies his words. One gets the impression that European billionaires are some kind of semi-homeless people who cannot afford a normal training room.)

    Well, yes, the poor fellows spend their entire lives (especially in wartime) making pitiful “crumbs” with their calloused hands and subsequently distributing these “crumbs” to the needy poor - the last shirt off their shoulders. crying
  14. +3
    29 January 2016 12: 17
    Quote: Shurale
    Actually, this is the standard of living of the people of Russia, the state of the economy and the armed forces !!!

    Putin is the president of Russia.
    With him:
    1) The interest in banks from 25 to 30% per annum, in the West the profit in 6% is considered very good, it is not enough in a developed country, in a developing country, with 25% per annum a DEVELOPMENT IS IMPOSSIBLE !!! More or less, only subsidized and state-ordered plants survive. In our city there are only three city-forming enterprises, this year on each of them people have reduced interest on 30-40, these are terrifying numbers for a small town with 120 000.
    2) Corruption. There are countries where the level of corruption was so serious that Russia did not even dream of, Italy for example. However, laws restricting it were developed and tested there, and in these countries it practically disappeared, that is, there are EXERCISED TIME-TESTED LAWS DESTROYING CORRUPTION. No need to reinvent the wheel, it just needs to be applied WITHOUT CHANGE. We still have only talk.
    3) Education. The old type of education, proven over the years and technical breakthroughs, has been destroyed. They put in place what even in America they are already subjected to strong criticism - and we are introducing it. The country needs specialists, but where to get them? Only growing in ourselves. But the type of education that we are being planted does not allow this. By the way, I heard that in higher military institutions the old type of education is already being returned, since the ARMY IS NECESSARY for us, and therefore it is being returned. So not fools - then they understand. So the army is needed, but the rest is not. Raising the army to the article began after Gaddafi.
    4) Medicine. I will not say obvious things.
    5) National wealth. They are in the hands of a small handful of people. The state has a percentage from them, and then they say that the state has no money. NATIONALIZE - and the money will be enough for everyone, and all the people will not have to collect money for an expensive operation for a three-year-old child in Germany.

    By the way, if all these problems are resolved - there will be no socialism - as some scare us, all this can happen in a capitalist state, no problems, it’s just ECONOMY. HEALTHY ECONOMY.

    Now answer - do we need such a president?

    I do not care about his palaces, I do not care about his money and yachts. Why do I need a president who does not engage in their direct duties ??????????

    PYSYA Do you really think that the president was not aware of everything that the Fursenka and the stools were doing? Oh well ....

    A lot of angry words, so what? Can you please announce an alternative? What ? No? Or there is, but only a master of wagging his tongue, the one who talks a lot, is always in opposition. Trust any business to such a person, he will only puff out his cheeks and ruin everything. For such a person, only the appearance of power is important. Moscow, as they say, was not built in a day. The country After Stalin, they were falling apart for decades. But there’s no need to take the piss. We’re done. That’s enough.
  15. 0
    29 January 2016 12: 23
    The film itself is quite crazy, I only watched the third part. The film is replete with all sorts of compilations and speculations, sometimes with outright substitution of concepts. Putin asks Abramovich to sponsor the 2018 World Cup, he’s not asking for himself. Pants for 3000 lollars, what’s in them for 3000 dollars? He can take any suit of the Olympic team, which at the regional level are issued to promising athletes and they cost a maximum of 300 dollars, there is simply nothing to sew on for a large amount. The lower right corners of some financial documents, on which sometimes there are not even signatures, mysteriously appear. Putin lives on full state support, his salary is transferred to a card, suits are purchased by the protocol service, cars from the state garage. When should he use the “incalculable riches”? After Stalin, they found a minimum of things - 3 pencils for notes and resolutions, a pair of jackets, an overcoat and worn-out boots. he had a whole empire in his hands and he personally didn’t need any pennies.
  16. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 32
    After such a “film”, let some liberal fart about “Kiselev’s propaganda”... The level is below the plinth. But there are no poor presidents anywhere, alas... It will not be long before we see Stalin with his asceticism. Yes, and Churchill and Roosevelt, I think, compared to today’s ones, were simply hungry... Capitalism has become more cynical, politicians are more corrupt than before, some are in the direct service of transnational corporations. So the stigma is in the dust for everyone. And if various “tops” there have a “golden parachute,” then why shouldn’t the president have one tucked away for a rainy day? There are no angels in politics, just as there are no exceptions to this rule. Whether you are Putin or Obama three times.
  17. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 34
    I am not a fan of GDP mainly because of domestic politics; this stupid, incompetent liberalism will not lead to any good, and the results show that this is true. But all these tales about $40 billion. I’ve been hearing about stocks, yachts, and villas since 2003, only the amounts and quantities of the above-mentioned items change, and after 2007, more precisely after the Munich speech, this has already become the norm and with some frequency it constantly appears here and there, now the BBC has done it here. You can say this, the West is completely ROTTEN and ROTTEN and we are not on the same path with them, let them live among their pederasts, migrants who fuck their women and all the wickedness that they want to impose on US, a flag in their hands, a drum around their necks. WE have friends in the world, normal people, THEY understand US, they want to be friends with us. And this Western GARDEN and GOMORRAH will come in time to be destroyed or simply die out and disappear from the face of history.
  18. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 42
    Stalin was also unloved, although apart from a pipe and some trinkets he left nothing behind!!! And even if the GDP has something, then for the head of state it is natural, unlike the 18-year-old scumbags messing around in Moscow
  19. +2
    29 January 2016 12: 43
    All this nonsense is designed to resonate with ordinary people. And of course, ordinary people in Russia will pick it up by protesting against the “bloody regime”...
    No matter how the gentlemen from the West manage to overthrow the unwanted Putin.
    And then there will be more and more dirt!...Even on social networks they took up Putin and his entourage. It would seem that what does Odnoklassniki have to do with it!? After all, the site was created for communication between classmates, colleagues, work colleagues, but even there The dirt is already pouring...
  20. +2
    29 January 2016 12: 50
    Today I look in the mailbox, and there is a newspaper from the Rotten Apple party. And an article about Putin is exactly like a BBC movie, only with more dirt. I want to appeal to Yavlinsky: don’t give me your waste paper anymore, I use toilet paper!
  21. 0
    29 January 2016 12: 52
    You're a complete loser. God forbid you find out what a child with cerebral palsy is. I wanted to spit in your face. And yes, I voted for Putin and will vote again. And the article is minus for your words.
  22. 0
    29 January 2016 13: 29
    A person who stands so high and whose words are listened to and draw conclusions, in principle, there is nothing to steal at all; one game on the stock exchange is needed, and you are not a millionaire, but a billionaire. Is it really that one word is not clear and prices change and billions are made from this?
  23. +2
    29 January 2016 13: 33
    And how our liberals rushed to post and multiply this fake film. When will we take care of them like adults, tearing off the treacherous, deceitful heads of this Kasyan-Navalno-Yashin bastard?
  24. +2
    29 January 2016 13: 36
    As I understand it, we were supposed to blush, be amazed and at least cry?

    Honestly, all this outreach would have been a success (maybe)
    if the motive and director of this lie were not clear.
    Motive - Blow up Russia from the inside! As they already did with the neighbors.

    It’s also cheaper; there’s no need to wage costly wars with an unknown ending.
    And "by someone else's hands." And then they will install a hired “serf Poroshenko”, who will finish
    collapse of the country.

    This means you are doing everything right, dear comrade Vladimir Vladimirovich!
    The Anglo-Saxons got so nervous!
  25. 0
    29 January 2016 13: 52
    ha ha ha, well, these American scumbags are stuffed, they could have come up with something better in their Hollywood))) especially at the end: “he stole the whole country.” They probably miss the 90s, when all the money flowed to them over the hill???
  26. +3
    29 January 2016 14: 08
    The film is made clumsily and does not convince of the truth of the accusations presented, but the world created by the bourgeoisie in Russia can testify to this. Comrade Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin could be accused of cruelty and tyranny, but not of corruption and greed for profit. But if a country is mired in corruption, it is difficult not to be suspected of it.
  27. -1
    29 January 2016 14: 09
    They are all bursting with envy there! Still would! Many would like to see such a president in their country, this is not Poroshenko or some Obama!
  28. 0
    29 January 2016 14: 20
    Quote: Kunar
    The most amazing thing about this lie is that it is a lie from the first to the last word..."

    Putin is a normal person and he doesn’t need Abramovich’s yachts or Berezovsky’s palaces. He's a normal person. He understands perfectly well that it is better to remain in the history of Russia as the PERSON who saved this country, and not the owner of golden loaves. This whole article is nonsense. He is an officer trained in the KGB. These are other people. These are not Abramovichs. I'm sure of it.
  29. 0
    29 January 2016 14: 25
    there are zero facts and you can watch all kinds of nonsense in a cinema
  30. +1
    29 January 2016 14: 31
    All these “fugitive patriots”. How much did they steal from Russia? Huh? Disgraceful dogs. They all need to be treated like Trotsky. And they are all hiding from the FSB, but some correspondent found them and even interviewed them. Nonsense.
  31. +1
    29 January 2016 14: 33
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: st25310
    What are they counting on? What am I going to overthrow Putin after watching this movie?

    This is not for you and not for us, it is for their citizens. Similar films have already been in relation to Gaddafi and Milosevic. Putin is an enemy for them, and the Air Force is six, they will show what the government needs. They ordered the material.

    Thank God we are not Libya or Yugoslavia, they will be tortured to democratize...
  32. +1
    29 January 2016 14: 47
    Will those who executed and ordered this get away with all this slander? We must give a fitting rebuff for such things.
    It’s clear that we can’t wash ourselves like this, but there is a limit to everything. No one ever had the idea of ​​denigrating (or rather whitewashing) Obama, and yet this Nobel laureate gave a lot of reasons. He is saved only by his closeness to his ancestors. This is the only justification similar behavior. A banana in his hands.
  33. -1
    29 January 2016 14: 47
    If V.V.P. keeping the aligarchs under control - this is great, but it can end badly.
    "influence from Ukraine to Syria" - CHEAP!!! BBC - too small even for them!
  34. +2
    29 January 2016 14: 49
    Every country has its own Andrei Karaulov. True, TVC is not comparable to the BBC. But now the latter has sunk to their level.
    And the correspondent was afraid to meet even with Abramovich’s lawyer in person. Apparently he was afraid that they would punch him in the face.
    And the general impressions of the plot gathered all those offended by the authorities and diluted them with the opinion of the US Treasury from the category of “we know everything, but we won’t say anything specific.”
  35. +1
    29 January 2016 14: 52
    Yes, PUTIN is the richest man on the planet not because he has billions of dollars, but he has billions of Russians and not only Russians who support him, he has values ​​that he values, he has RUSSIA and we who will support him in difficult times time and will endure to harm all our common enemies and no Western CBB will shake our faith in their rightness and love for the Motherland...
  36. +2
    29 January 2016 14: 58
    Quote: st25310
    Or are they consumed by envy?

    I remembered the story about how Stalin was informed that Rokosovsky had a mistress: a beauty, an actress, a young woman, etc. They reported and asked what we were going to do with Rokosovsky? Stalin answers after thinking a little: what are we going to do, what are we going to do? - We'll be jealous.
    It’s just that these people can’t be envious in silence
  37. The comment was deleted.
  38. +1
    29 January 2016 15: 18
    Quote: Author
    Belated remorse, or the truth about Putin’s billions

    Why bother with this topic?
    Why the indistinct mutterings of our play-battle Peskov (the same with the corresponding wristwatch)?
    If there IS a fact of Slander and DAMAGE is caused to the dignity and honor of an individual (attacks on the state, after all, the GDP of the PRESIDENT of the Russian Federation):
    -to court.
    TWO claims = personally from the President and from the Russian Federation.
    In an English court or in an American one.
    Yes ...
    Great Britain has its own characteristics that diverge from the traditions of domestic justice.
    First of all, this is the duration of the trial. “The process in Russia can take a year. If you use “curly” lawyers – one and a half. In the West, it can take decades, but everything ends in a settlement, and not always in favor of the right side. Getting a final decision “there” within a year is a fantasy. Everything is more mobile with us"
    Secondly, the high cost of litigation makes It’s unpleasant to wince even for oligarchs. “The cost of libel and defamation cases in UK courts is one hundred and forty times higher than in all other European countries"-
    “British lawyers specializing in preparing libel and defamation cases charge per hour, ranging from mind-boggling £1200!
    So what? Russia will survive, and so will Putin.

    But what advantages!

    In civil law countries, including Russia, defamation can be considered at the same time as a criminal offense, and as a civil offense, while Traditionally, the practice of criminal prosecution has been preferred. But although in the countries of the Old World, in a number of cases, imprisonment is provided as a possible punishment for slander and insult, this type of punishment is almost never imposed. According to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), actual imprisonment for “crimes by speech” is used in practice mainly in the countries of “young democracies” - the former republics of the USSR, as well as a number of states in Eastern Europe and the Balkans.

    In common law states, defamation is more often defined as a tort (civil wrong), although in some cases a person who causes harm by disseminating defamatory information may become the object of criminal prosecution.

    In the United States, the main type of liability for defamation is compensation for damage caused. Depending on what damages the plaintiff is seeking, the court may apply different legal principles. American law distinguishes two forms of damages: compensation damages, which are awarded for actual damage suffered (moral, which has a specific expression - for example, loss of ability to work due to stress, legal costs, etc.) and punitive damages, awarded with the purpose of punishing the offender and warning him against future offenses. The defendant also pays punitive damages to the plaintiff.
    (the precedent of Gertz v. Welch spoils the prospect a little, the decision on which requires the plaintiff toprovide sufficient evidence of real damage, both property, including economic, and moral.)
    1. +7
      29 January 2016 15: 20
      So sho?
      Use as evidence the deficit of the state budget of the Russian Federation, Russia's losses, a barrel of oil, hair loss, accelerated formation of baldness, gastric upset (bills from the Kremlin), etc., etc.

      In general: if there is something to protect, YOU MUST PROTECT it.
      And only so.
      And no amount of articles by Roman Skomorokhov (they simply don’t read them there) or bleating by Peskov (they don’t believe him) will help


      I'll remind you of "fresh"

      Former head of Rosgranitsa Dmitry Bezdelov detained in Italy




      The Investigation Department of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs announced in April on the federal wanted list for the former head of the Federal Agency for Border Development of the Russian Federation (Rosgranitsa) Dmitry Bezdelov. Together with his accomplices, he is suspected of stealing almost 1 billion rubles.

      I’ll “keep silent” about Serdyukov.
      That's why the BBC produces such gems.
      No, if this article is for “internal use” - then Yes. A crowd of idiots has already come running and is already tearing their sweatshirts...
  39. +1
    29 January 2016 15: 30
    As one of the Western analysts said, I can’t vouch for the literalness of the quote, but the meaning is this: “It’s simply a sin to trust specialists on Russia who have not been in their homeland for years.” And, to the vaunted BBC, od others and the Minister of Propaganda, Goebbels - failure and expulsion from the educational institution. To the army, to military service, to the trenches, to feed parasites and smell mustard gas!
  40. 0
    29 January 2016 15: 31
    Quote: Stock Officer
    "Who is Mikhail Ivanovich? Why Mikhail Ivanovich?"

    Quote from the Diamond Hand:
    - I have to consult with the boss.
    - With Michal Ivanovich?
    - With Michal Ivanovich.
    As I understand it, the evidence base is at the level of Gaidai's comedies.


    The BBC probably guessed from the film that Putin trades in diamonds, Oh, Gaidai, he went and revealed his worst secret..
  41. +2
    29 January 2016 15: 33
    The Russians have a very good saying: THE DOG HAS NOTHING TO DO, IT LICKS THE EGGS! That's what the Air Force does! They denigrate not PUTIN but the whole of RUSSIA. because it is impossible to find fault with RUSSIA. Hence RUSSIA IS THE AGGRESSOR, and PUTIN, the THIEF of THIEVES, is a THIEF. "Gentlemen" from the Air Force, look at yourself in the mirror and tell me who YOU ​​are, and then blame others.
  42. +2
    29 January 2016 15: 41
    Quote: 78bor1973
    They will look and forget, but if the GDP had so much money in the banks would the "partners" really leave it that way, people wipe their eyes!

    Unfortunately, the people do not want to be friends headlong, especially in the West, not to mention the “offended” Ukraine. Somehow it happened that everything said on TV is taken at face value. Think with your head about why Putin (the most hated man in the West) needs castles in openly hostile countries, or billions of dollars in bank accounts of the same hostile states? And many believe, especially in Ukraine, that there is only talk about Putin’s billions. As Nietzsche wrote: “If you want to understand something in this life, you need to be a skeptic,” that is, not take anyone’s word for it. Zadornov keeps talking about stupid Americans; as practice shows, all other countries with “victorious democracy” are no better.
  43. +1
    29 January 2016 15: 46
    I think the British should look at their leaders and count the money in their pockets. Why are they trying to rummage through strangers?! Or are all the Camerons, Merkels and so on, such saints and spineless people?! It is beneficial for their leaders that the president of a foreign country is rinsed while the Camerons and so on are stealing from the people of England and Germany......
  44. -4
    29 January 2016 16: 06
    Quote: There are a lot of us
    It's time the BBC to deprive accreditation in Russia and the American ambassador to throw on h.er

    It would be you instead of Lavrov or Putin!!! This is real foreign policy. Any other ideas? Maybe the Iron Curtain or a nuclear strike on enemies? Outline a development plan for Russia. There would be people like you for President. That would be life..Wow, they would heal!!!! They definitely wouldn’t have been watching the oil, there wouldn’t have been any time for it anymore)))))
  45. +2
    29 January 2016 16: 25
    flock of sheep
  46. +6
    29 January 2016 16: 32
    - The head of one of the most corrupt countries, isn’t he corrupt?!
    Do you believe this, Stanislavsky?
    - No, Danchenko, I don’t believe it, unless he is very gullible and naive. Although simplicity is always worse than theft!
  47. vmo
    -1
    29 January 2016 16: 38
    Freeze, vile Europe!

    Why does V.V. Putin call this gop partners with relish?
    Thief after thief and the same thing, and it’s great how afraid they are of Putin! THE ENEMY WILL NOT PASS!!!! Yes, not the Air Force, but one woman, she told the woman!
  48. +10
    29 January 2016 16: 51
    Well, they didn’t lie about Putin’s friends, everyone became rich, and what a rich one at that. Rotenberg built a pipe production plant and accidentally won a tender for a gas pipeline, now he will build a bridge to Crimea. Rotenberg’s son won the tender for truck drivers!
    1. +1
      30 January 2016 16: 07
      Darling, the events were just a year ago. Were you in deep lethargy? There was not a single person willing to build the bridge. Rotenberg simply agreed to build it, apparently so as not to let his friend down. You know, as students, we “did something similar” during field practices: we had to voluntarily take on work that no one wanted to do (hard, tedious, dirty, unfamiliar) so as not to embarrass our managers position and not be forced to beg, persuade and force. Are you not familiar with this?
  49. gcn
    -3
    29 January 2016 17: 06
    Well, let’s say it’s partly true why the Air Force suddenly found out. Our foreign policy has indicated and this defeats all their trump cards. I might have believed it, but they confused everything so much that if the film is for us or the oligarchs, you will feel the difference...
  50. +2
    29 January 2016 17: 19
    Quote from the article:
    Why 202? Why not 404? Why waste time on trifles?

    404 is not possible because such a country already exists.
    They have a patent for this number.
    The Verkhovna Rada may sue the High Court of London.
  51. The comment was deleted.
  52. +1
    29 January 2016 17: 27
    The people themselves will give him everything, even for one hope for a better future for our children, for the safety of life. For the most part, the people of Russia are not greedy and they don’t need much...
  53. +3
    29 January 2016 17: 43
    Seekers of compromising evidence, including those from the Air Force, bite your elbows. After all, with your template film you increased PUTIN’s rating and he will now be elected President for another term.
    I'll briefly explain why. Even the average person understands and knows:
    1). That Putin was a KGB colonel, and not its head, so there is no need to lie.
    2). It was not Putin who appointed the “oligarchs,” but he kicked out the careless ones with confiscation, and the rest
    forced them to work for the state and not in vain, since RUSSIA gained full sovereignty by restoring the DEFENSE AND ARMY, and the rest, as they say, will follow.
    3). If Putin is a TSAR, then he is a good TSAR-OWNER, since he increased the gold reserves of RUSSIA to 1246 tons, which after Stalin’s 2500 tons were wasted to 290 tons. Putin is the PRESIDENT - the guarantor of the Constitution and the custodian of not only $40 billion, but also the entire wealth of RUSSIA, and therefore must be protected by the entire power of law enforcement agencies.

    Putin built not only a palace with the money of the oligarchs and took away the yacht, but forced them to invest not only in the Sochi Olympics, but for the average person this is a balm for the soul, because all that remains of the TSAR becomes the People's Museum - or a museum, like the HERMITAGE, or a sanatorium, like LIVADIA.
    He does not need separate palaces, since he can use, as needed, everything that is in the state, including any palaces, yachts, planes, submarines, ships.

    The funniest thing here is that the creators of the film, without suspecting it themselves, figuratively speaking, “threw a grain of crystallization into the seething SOCIETY,” which turns into a CRYSTAL, against which any spiteful critics will break their foreheads. Therefore, you will have to reconcile and come to an agreement, shaking the outstretched hands of friendship, for “ WHO DOESN’T WANT TO EXTRACT HANDS, CAN EXTRAST LEGS.”
    1. +1
      30 January 2016 06: 14
      dedvladimir
      "+" from me
    2. 0
      30 January 2016 07: 03
      Quote: dedvladimir
      ...


      "+" to you...It's very good when they say that the glass is half FULL!!! fellow


      P.S. This will pass with age... Yes
  54. 0
    29 January 2016 17: 54
    I watched the film, Alexander Ivanovich Lebed said this very well in his book “It’s a shame for the state...”:
    “We must remember that every idea goes through three phases in its development:
    - Yes, this is bullshit!
    - Wait, wait, there’s something in this!
    “So this is clear to a goat.”
    Many of Lebed’s associates claimed that the helicopter crash was staged and he was killed. If they killed him, it was the enemies of Russia who did it...
    If Lebed had stayed alive, he would have had every chance of ruling Russia. It is unlikely that such films would be made about him as about Putin...
    1. +1
      29 January 2016 18: 09
      Grave Without a Cross (2) Today, 17:54
      I watched the film, Alexander Ivanovich Lebed said this very well in his book “It’s a shame for the state...”:
      “We must remember that every idea goes through three phases in its development:
      - Yes, this is bullshit!
      - Wait, wait, there’s something in this!
      “So this is clear to a goat.”
      Many of Lebed’s associates claimed that the helicopter crash was staged and he was killed. If they killed him, it was the enemies of Russia who did it...
      If Lebed had stayed alive, he would have had every chance of ruling Russia. It is unlikely that such films would be made about him as about Putin...


      If I lived in Krasnoyarsk, I wouldn’t write such garbage.
      1. -1
        29 January 2016 18: 20
        Quote: kush62
        If I lived in Krasnoyarsk, I wouldn’t write such garbage.

        I’ll answer you: I didn’t live in Krasnoyarsk, but I lived under the ministers whom Vova Putin took into his government. About Lebed: no one has heard of Lebed’s billions of dollars. And they won't hear. Unlike Putin's billions. This secret is no longer a secret. All those around him are dollar billionaires, and Putin lives on the presidential salary? Funny! hi
        1. 0
          29 January 2016 18: 54
          The conversation is not about Putin, but about Lebed. Perhaps he was a real general, but he was not a politician or business executive.
        2. +1
          29 January 2016 18: 54
          Lebed would never rule Russia. Lebed is a cheap populist. Write an article about him and post it on VO.
          1. 0
            29 January 2016 19: 22
            To the sleeping Saiyan: wake up and read his book “It’s a shame for the state...”. It looks like he was killed for this book...
        3. 0
          30 January 2016 06: 29
          Grave Without a Cross (2) "
          ......About Lebed: no one has heard of Lebed’s billions of dollars. And they won't hear. Unlike Putin's billions..."
          I’m sure you’re wrong: I would go against the domination of the United States, all Western and our “liberals” - 100, and maybe more, custom-made materials appeared.
  55. +2
    29 January 2016 18: 01
    What has not been done with expensive oil and what will the crooks take away from the people with cheap oil?
    The film looks more like a fake, but there is some truth in every joke. If I was Putin's neighbor or a classmate from the Ozero cooperative, I was an oligarch, is this fake or reality?
  56. gcn
    +1
    29 January 2016 18: 56
    I read the comments and think, but that’s how it all began in ’17, everyone wanted... (democracy) damn the Quiet Don. Sholokhov and it’s not in vain that the fratricidal war
  57. 0
    29 January 2016 19: 07
    he said correctly https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZF11i5rBMk
  58. 0
    29 January 2016 19: 08
    Everywhere you look, every kosher cares for the simple Russian soul, as if the President is robbing his people. And where do they get such love? It would be better to consider how much they are pumping out themselves and through the 5th column from Russia. As it was said somewhere - a lawyer, a banker, an artist - this is not a profession, but a nationality! Previously, factories were built, housing - now, wherever you spit, you can’t miss either you end up in a bank or a pawnshop. I only withstood 3 minutes of this film, then the current for the 6th ward. They fuss, bite elbows, trying to bring Russia to its knees. God is with us and we have nothing to fear, and with them is mammon, aka the golden idol - the dollar. The environment is more worrying than Putin himself; there is a lot of darkness here.
  59. 0
    29 January 2016 19: 28
    Cinema for downs!? 1/3, somehow finished watching it through force. The Air Force doesn't seem to care about its reputation at all...
  60. 0
    29 January 2016 19: 29
    They showed a funny video. Of course, I believed them right away. The Kremlin demanded to present evidence, to which they moaned, like we don’t have it.
  61. +1
    29 January 2016 19: 39
    This film is complete nonsense! It speaks volumes about the level of intelligence and simply about the intelligence of the State Department.
  62. +2
    29 January 2016 19: 45
    How they are afraid of Putin, how they are afraid of RUSSIA! Here is Yeltsin, he was unmercenary. Well, he took everything and drank it all away. Yes. everything is still in the family, everything is in the family. In your own way, of course. And he traded in Russia wholesale and retail. And Putin is just something. What has he brought RUSSIA to? After all, even the army has already been liquidated, so only one name remains. And this one is from St. Petersburg. Not only does he go out of his way, but Shoigu also brought him in; in three years you won’t recognize the army. Moreover, the weapons are updated. Well, if you don’t throw mud at such a person, then the Western shit-cracy will get it. Not a person, not a COUNTRY, but just some kind of horror. God willing, the time will come when all this scum will understand its place and not bark at RUSSIA.
    1. -1
      29 January 2016 20: 06
      May God grant the Star of David to shine brighter throughout the Kremlin :)
  63. +2
    29 January 2016 20: 08
    This is in the traditions of a brazenly pagan civilization - a split personality. Let's remember Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the invisible man, etc. They also say about their own that one slept with a pig, the other did not come out of the beach naked. Well, if you didn’t steal, then go steal after the pig.
    Here we need to take a broader view. Russian industrialists and entrepreneurs, influential politicians are made to understand that they will not be accepted anywhere into the “high society”, into the elite of humanity, if they cherish the idea of ​​preserving and increasing Russia, the Russian, Russian people, if they do not renounce their independence, do not forget their language , your history, your father and mother. That's what.
  64. +1
    29 January 2016 21: 22
    So I read and watch this latest nonsense and think: they are all idiots there in London or they are just pretending. They don’t let loose on our Putin, but the fact that they have a monarchy and their Lisa owns almost half the world (or did) is in the order of things. They teach everyone democracy, but they themselves have a despotic royal regime. I'm so tired of being treated like idiots, even though they are idiots themselves. Yes, even if Putin has three yachts, it doesn’t bother me at all, the main thing is that he doesn’t let the Americans go down, and those defective ones from the Air Force. For the first time, we have a smart president who can straighten the brains of anyone without a piece of paper, including these idiotic (judging by the questions they asked) German journalists. And this fact makes me very happy. Why don't they count how much money Obama or their Cameron have? They're not poor either. It’s already getting worse and I want to advise Putin: Volodya, fuck them all... that’s all! But it’s impossible, he’s polite, you see, and let them pray that he’s not as polished as, for example, Zhirik. He would give them heat.
  65. 0
    29 January 2016 21: 35
    For d.....v, b...b©, the film was made.
  66. -3
    29 January 2016 21: 51
    It’s crazy how biased the VO site is...
    I have never seen such enchanted deer as here.
    1. +3
      29 January 2016 22: 25
      Quote: hoot
      I have never seen such enchanted deer as here.

      Are you responsible for your words?!
      ...

      You, the enchanted goat, should have been sent back to Stalin's times - I would have tried to blather then...
    2. 0
      31 January 2016 12: 47
      On ..... came, did someone call you?
  67. +2
    29 January 2016 22: 11
    That’s why the film was “made” not about Erdogan’s business in stolen oil and his connections with ISIS, and not about the business of Poroshenko, who and his comrades really robbed Ukraine, but about the president of the country, who has done much more and more successfully in 4 months in Syria than their entire vaunted Western coalition in 4 years! This provocation clearly has tailor-made “ears.” And the witnesses with their “smeared” ass are absolutely “impressive”. Yes, the British Air Force failed
    arrogance - like the crowd and this is the ultimate truth, they have completely forgotten how to make quality films!
    The entire calculation is on the “offended” in Russia and its undiscriminating public, accustomed to its own internal corruption scandals of politicians! stop
  68. The comment was deleted.
  69. +2
    29 January 2016 22: 51
    Well, if our “partners” are so angry and talk such bullshit in their media about Putin, it means he really “got” them, that means, despite that. that on many internal issues in domestic politics I do not agree with him, he needs to be supported, because the West was and remains an enemy of Russia, and if he attacks Putin with such anger, then Putin really defends the interests of Russia, its sovereignty, and in the current Under these conditions, this is already a lot, because you can talk a lot about what Russia should be, but first you need to ensure its survival and independence in the conditions of the West’s aggressive attack on it.
  70. +1
    29 January 2016 23: 08
    I think this material was made to sell to citizens of NATO countries to motivate an increase in the military budget, that's all - who benefits from this - of course, weapons manufacturing countries - I'm talking about manufacturers from NATO countries - that's all - well, America is clear there, their lobby is always happy to invest in weapons it is thanks to him that they have the whole world for now - the rest will act like sheep - the leader acts like this, which means we will do so - that is, there will be an increase in the budgets of the NATO countries - but why worry about developed countries, they usually make the weapons themselves - The highlight is in the NATO countries of the poor - so to speak, NATO homeless people - Romania, Poland, the Baltic states and other third world countries - there the growth of the Defense Ministry budget will be simply unrealistic.
    And the most important thing is that the financiers will even give money for all this to the IMF and other structures, no matter who - but the same developed countries will sell their weapons to these Papuans - as a result, developed countries will receive profit from debts to the Papuans and the development of their military-industrial complex and scientific and technological progress, and at the same time their people they will take up work - the short ones will solve a bunch of problems in one fell swoop - they will essentially pay for all this second-class countries in NATO)) Beauty! And the most important thing in this whole process - all these second-class countries in NATO do not have any right to vote or weight - they just grab everything - Well, isn’t it true that NATO is an ideal union for scamming suckers? And I forgot to add all these second-class countries that in NATO in the event of a conflict they will also become a buffer - that is, they will be completely destroyed or military operations will be conducted on their territory - ideal! Bravo!
  71. +1
    30 January 2016 01: 57
    In general, I expected more thoughtful and thoughtful work from the Air Force than an emotional kindergarten.


    Propaganda always hits emotions. That's how she works.
  72. +1
    30 January 2016 03: 30
    I throw mud at you
    Those I'm afraid of
    Putin is very strong
    I'll have a blast on it.

    Air Force Corporation.
  73. +2
    30 January 2016 04: 36
    The film is simply wonderful! I looked at it myself, showed it to the children, and invited my mother-in-law, the cat and the parrot to watch. Thanks to the BBC - they confirmed our opinion that Zadornov is a thousand times right when he talks about stupid partners. So, I myself, the cat, mother-in-law and parrot - we doubted that suddenly Mikhail Nikolaevich was going too far. But no! He's generally modest. They are not only stupid, they are also completely unscrupulous. To pour such dirt on the first person of a sovereign country must be so vile and greyhound that it does not fit into the human framework of perception of conscience.
    PS for BBC. Did you (Gay Europeans and American Americans) think that after watching we would all rush to burn tires and protest in the Maidan in friendly ranks!? Du.ra.ki YOU!!! If YOU came up with such rubbish, then OUR president is the coolest, most honest, smartest man. And YOU are offended for your p.i.d.o.r.a.s.t.o.v, so you get mad!
  74. 0
    30 January 2016 04: 46
    So what? Putin doesn’t even have a normal car. Look, he rides different Kalinas....
    Author, it’s better to tell about the “friends” of the guarantor, who plundered the country behind his back.
  75. The comment was deleted.
  76. 0
    30 January 2016 07: 06
    What's wrong with this idiot's ears?
  77. +1
    30 January 2016 08: 01
    A separate masterpiece is the story of the lady that Putin has SUCH things that European billionaires never dreamed of. Pay attention to the video series accompanying his words. One gets the impression that European billionaires are some kind of half-bombs who cannot afford a normal training room. By the way, the hall is good, but I do not think that it was filmed in Putin’s apartment. The size is not the same.

    Further. Tricycle... Well, yes, why would billionaires have such equipment, right? A collection of expensive watches... Yes, it's scary. Although the collection was not shown. Probably too secret. Or, quite possibly, the same unfoundedness as the “documents”. And a $3 tracksuit is an exorbitant expense for any wealthy person in the world. Yes, returning to the video sequence. These pants cost 000 bucks?

    I’m not a rich man, but it would be a shame if our president played sports in the basement and without pants...
  78. +2
    30 January 2016 08: 56
    As the satirist Zadornov says: “If Putin is engaged in entrepreneurial activities for the benefit of Russia, then let him do it for his health. By the way, in the photo under the article, Putin is working out on a fitness machine for his health.
  79. -1
    30 January 2016 10: 10
    Quote: Pilgrim07
    By the way, the state as the owner is a very inefficient manager. Any economist will tell you this, and even the communist one!

    Iron argument. When there is nothing to say.
  80. +1
    30 January 2016 11: 47
    A rich country - a rich ruler! Who would you trust in the country with its wealth?
    1. +2
      30 January 2016 16: 13
      The white yacht is beautiful. But! Putin's press secretaries need to tell the entire West, with Australia, Japan and the Americas in addition, that this is just a raft from a yacht in the picture, they are fooling people, where is the yacht itself? And the palace, the one in the photographs, is an outbuilding for the dog servants, why didn’t they photograph the palace itself? Well, and the plane, of course...
  81. 0
    30 January 2016 13: 51
    Where do they give money to Putin? Something tells me that people are not averse to funding something. winked
    1. +1
      30 January 2016 16: 14
      Takes it in the nightstand
  82. -2
    30 January 2016 16: 12
    Something like this ...
  83. 0
    30 January 2016 18: 18
    The film is an ordinary “cheap propaganda” in which a group of offended people who fled Russia “throws out” their resentment against their former country in the person of its President. There have always been renegades. This is nothing new. And Putin’s main fault is that Russia “does not listen to America” and is trying to live by its own rules. So they decided to compromise Putin by any means necessary. They hope that either a “Westerner” or a “second Yeltsin” will come to power. Well, well... Puff yourself up, dear British-Americans and others like them...
  84. 0
    30 January 2016 18: 47
    For my respected Vladimir Vladimirovich, it’s enough to say “I also drink the blood of babies” and half the world will laugh at this nonsense
  85. 0
    30 January 2016 19: 35
    Here is another statement about the fact that this bullshit video is just the hysteria of Western nits. tore them up like a hot water bottle
  86. The comment was deleted.
  87. 0
    30 January 2016 20: 35
    Putin and his gang from St. Petersburg went to power? So why are Europe and America now surprised at the successes of the Russian army? Putin and his team did this. He removed the drunkard EBN (otherwise this degenerate would have drunk everything and everyone) in 2000 and began to restore order. This happened on time. God grant Putin health and strength.
  88. -1
    30 January 2016 20: 52
    That is, the Rottenbergs, Sechin, Kovalchuk, Miller are not all Putin’s friends?
    1. +1
      30 January 2016 21: 55
      If only I knew... I am firmly convinced that none of the forum participants sat at the table with them and listened to their revelations.
      And one more thing - now I’ll probably surprise you all very much: Putin has nothing to do (from the word “at all”, the test word is Federal Law 44 of the Russian Federation) with auctions (especially electronic ones), this is not his responsibility.
  89. -1
    30 January 2016 22: 21
    from the Internet
  90. 0
    30 January 2016 23: 12
    The West is preparing its population for war. Russia is denigrated, the image of an enemy is imposed, so that when the United States starts a war, no one doubts that it was Russia that attacked peace-loving Europe. Specifically for Europe, because The United States will stage a grandiose provocation in Europe, turning into a big war. The United States needs war and they are purposefully leading the Europeans towards it, like a herd of sheep. .
    Perhaps it’s enough to hope for the prudence of the Europeans; it’s time to openly prepare for an almost inevitable war. It is useless to talk, prove and convince the deaf and blind. They don't want to hear us. Let it be their problems now, not ours.
  91. 0
    31 January 2016 08: 03
    When Borya was drinking the country away and breeding corruption, then for the West he was a democratic president working for the benefit of Russia. But here...if Putin is scolded by our enemies, then HE is doing everything right.
  92. 0
    31 January 2016 11: 44
    But this is already a signal. It seems to me that first they will denigrate Putin in the eyes of their citizens, and then they will want him to seem like a traitor in our eyes. Do they imagine themselves as gods? I think we need to adequately answer this.
  93. 0
    31 January 2016 12: 27
    Seekers of compromising evidence, including those from the Air Force, bite your elbows, because with your template film you have increased PUTIN’s rating and he will now be elected President for another term.
    I'll briefly explain why. Even the average person understands and knows:
    1). That Putin was a KGB colonel, and not its head, so there is no need to lie.
    2). It was not Putin who appointed the “oligarchs,” but he kicked out the careless ones with confiscation, and the rest
    forced them to work for the state and not in vain, since RUSSIA gained full sovereignty by restoring the DEFENSE AND ARMY, and the rest, as they say, will follow.
    3). If Putin is a TSAR, then he is a good TSAR-OWNER, since he increased the gold reserves of RUSSIA to 1246 tons, which after Stalin’s 2500 tons were wasted to 290 tons. Putin is the PRESIDENT - the guarantor of the Constitution and the custodian of not only $40 billion, but also the entire wealth of RUSSIA, and therefore must be protected by the entire power of law enforcement agencies.

    Putin built not only a palace with the money of the oligarchs and took away the yacht, but forced them to invest not only in the Sochi Olympics, but for the average person this is a balm for the soul, because all that remains of the TSAR becomes the People's Museum - or a museum, like the HERMITAGE, or a sanatorium, like LIVADIA.
    He does not need separate palaces, since he can use, as needed, everything that is in the state, including any palaces, yachts, planes, submarines, ships.

    The funniest thing here is that the creators of the film, without suspecting it themselves, figuratively speaking, “threw a grain of crystallization into the seething SOCIETY,” which turns into a CRYSTAL, against which any spiteful critics will break their foreheads. Therefore, you will have to reconcile and come to an agreement, shaking the outstretched hands of friendship, for “ WHO DOESN’T WANT TO EXTRACT HANDS, CAN EXTRAST LEGS.”
  94. 0
    31 January 2016 13: 35
    All such films and materials in general are a play on the basest feelings of the lumpen proletariat (which is intensively cultivated by the Westernized education system and the media belonging to the same West); this category does not need evidence and high-quality work of journalists. It’s enough for this public that they were shown the “box”, and if they also showed the Air Force, then they’ll shoot them right away....
  95. 0
    1 February 2016 01: 53
    Welcome to my absolutely private new videochat right now with a lovely model.
    I invite all curious men to a personal video chat.

    I am here till this evening: http://minyetki.ru If you are already eighteen, knock here.
  96. 0
    2 February 2016 11: 38
    a great movie! Thanks BBC! I haven't laughed so much for a long time))))))
  97. 0
    2 February 2016 15: 46
    I fell asleep, I fell asleep. You'll have to watch it a second time from the middle.
    Very often when watching BBC films the question arose: Who are they for? For what level of development?
    This film doesn't stand out from the crowd.
  98. 0
    2 February 2016 17: 29
    If Putin has nothing to say other than “everything is nonsense.” Then he behaves like Erdogan. This behavior does not inspire respect. Where is that macho and cool guy who killed everyone in the toilet!?
  99. The comment was deleted.
  100. 0
    9 November 2017 06: 59
    And I know that Vladimir Vladimirovich, whom I respect, has. Something that no one can take away. He has a country.


    And, as far as I know. And I talk to my installers every day in the smoking room. They are for Putin, and for Shoigu, and for Lavrov...


    Dixi.