In the lunar scam of the United States put a bullet!

843
In the lunar scam of the United States put a bullet!


Published a death interview with renowned filmmaker Stanley Kubrick, in which he told in detail and thoroughly that all lunar landings were fabricated by NASA and how he shot all the frames of American lunar expeditions on Earth ... Thus, in many years of unprecedented lunar fraud by the United States itself worldwide recognized by the Hollywood master of directing put bold and final point.





The interview is published later 15 years after death. Director T. Patrick Murray interviewed Stanley Kubrick three days before his death in March 1999. He was previously forced to sign an 88-page non-disclosure agreement (NDA) for the contents of the interview during 15 years from the date of Kubrick's death.

Here is a transcript of an interview with Stanley Kubrick (in English).

Kubrick’s deathbed interview in recent days has become a real sensation all over the world.

In 1971, Kubrick left the United States for Great Britain and never again appeared in America. All his subsequent films were shot only in England. For many years, the director led a reclusive life, fearing murder. According to the English newspaper San, the director "was afraid of being killed by US intelligence agencies following the example of other participants in the tele-support of the lunar scam of the United States."

The director died suddenly, allegedly from a heart attack at the end of the editing period of the film With Eyes Wide Shut, in which Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman played the main roles. It was Kidman in July 2002, in an interview with the American newspaper The National Enquirer that Kubrick was killed. The director called her 2 hours before the official time of the "sudden death" and asked not to come to Hertfordshire, where, as he put it, "all of us will be poisoned so quickly that we don’t even have time to sneeze." According to British journalists, employees of the US National Security Agency for the first time tried to kill Kubrick back in 1979 year.

The violent nature of the death of Kubrick 7 in March 1999, in an English estate near Harpenden (Hertfordshire) later became the cause of his widow's revelations. In the summer of 2003, in an interview with French television, and later, 16 in November, 2003, in the program “The Dark Side of the Moon” (CBC Newsworld TV channel), the director’s widow, German actress Christiane Suslanne Harlan made a public confession, the essence of which was:

At a time when the USSR was already mastering space with might and main, US President Richard Nixon, inspired, according to the widow, by her husband’s science fiction film epic, which history as one of the best Hollywood masterpieces, 2001: Space Odyssey (1968), called the director along with other Hollywood professionals to “save the national honor and dignity of the United States.” What the masters of the “dream factory” headed by Kubrick did. The decision on fraud was taken personally by the President of the United States.

Similar statements from the participants of the "project" were made earlier.

In particular, missile engineer Bill Keising (Will Kaysing), who worked at Rocketdyne, the company that built the rocket engines for the Apollo program, is the author of the book We have never flown to the moon. The 30 Billion Dollar American Deception "(" We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar "), released in 1974 and co-authored with Randy Reid, also stated that under the guise of a live coverage of NASA's lunar module landing spread a fake shot on Earth. For the filming was used military ground in the desert of Nevada. In pictures taken at various times by Soviet reconnaissance satellites, one can clearly see the huge hangars, as well as a large portion of the "lunar surface" dotted with craters. It was there that all the “lunar expeditions” filmed by Hollywood experts took place.

Daredevils were even among the astronauts themselves. So, the American astronaut Brian O'Leary (Brian O'Leary), responding to a direct question, said that "can not give 100-percent guarantee that Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin really visited the moon."

However, it is only now, after the direct confessions of Stanley Kubrick himself - the world-renowned Hollywood master of directing - that the final and bold point is set in the American lunar scam.


Directed by Stanley Kubrick, Nevada, Military Ground, 1969 Year.
843 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    21 December 2015 14: 25
    Quote: Bayonet
    http://galspace.spb.ru/nature.file/08099.html

    For such “evidence” it would not be shameful to give 50 minuses.
    They tell you about alternative sources of information, but you provide links to murky photographs of the American LRO.
  2. +2
    21 December 2015 14: 53
    But how is this to be understood? http://www.neveroyatno.info/news/bolshoj_kosmicheskij_obman/2015-11-20-2732
    There are a lot of questions not only about the lunar program. one thing is for sure, everything was filmed in the studio. there were flights, BUT everyone was shown a “movie.” The reality was behind the scenes.
    1. +1
      21 December 2015 15: 47
      Here is the reality - how the rocket and everything else were created http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gb6Otwd7Ff4, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQTr8Yibu-o, http://www.youtube .com/watch?v=SwjWHky0Mo8, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qWaygpjIe0, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1Pf_Vbkp1U, http://www.youtube.com /watch?v=Al0VojLSRnw.
  3. 0
    21 December 2015 15: 07
    Firstly, this is called in Russian “breaking into an open door.” Lucas said more than once during his lifetime that NASA asked him to film several frames of the landing on the Moon, because they were not sure of the quality of the picture, and no one persecuted Lucas for this or tried to kill him. Secondly, there is an undisputed authority who lives next to us, in Russia, speaks Russian, and is an expert in astronautics, manned flights, and spacewalks. His name is Alexey Arkhipovich Leonov. Luntchik-cosmonaut of the USSR, if anyone has forgotten or did not know. Arkhipov repeatedly and clearly said: US astronauts WERE on the Moon. Leonov gave a specialist’s explanation to all questions, including the flag “swaying in the wind” and clear prints on the lunar soil. The question is closed, and enough of this nonsense out of the blue.
    1. +6
      21 December 2015 15: 09
      Leonov spouts nonsense in his speeches, which even NASA itself REFUTES and you propose to believe him?
      1. +2
        21 December 2015 16: 40
        How strange, why should I not believe the respected, honored, wonderful man Leonov and should believe some NASA, which is part of a lying country?
        1. 0
          21 December 2015 21: 34
          http://www.manonmoon.ru/articles/st55.htm

          Why Leonov is consistent in defending the American version of flights to the Moon.
        2. 0
          2 February 2018 16: 14
          Who you believe is your problem. You are a technically illiterate person, and experts are trying to tell you the truth that the United States is a show-off and a lie, and nothing more. They flew into space 11 years after Gagarin, but they couldn’t get to the moon.
    2. 0
      13 February 2018 22: 23
      Leonov was shown how the United States makes models, plus they paid him, and he is ready to lie about anything, money has no smell. But Leonov is lying, he saw a UFO, and something else that they asked him to say. How money spoils people is just a nightmare.
  4. +2
    21 December 2015 15: 11
    Quote: Gormengast
    Ours made monster rockets because believed that the amers had real ones. Those politicians believed was closer in time and had incomparable intelligence data (as opposed to site readers).
    Otherwise they wouldn't make any rockets; there would be no need to.

    Iron logic... The USSR made rockets for its own lunar program, and not because someone else was trying to make them. At the same time, the USSR missiles did not fly, and the USSR was seriously ahead of the United States in technology, but the US missile did fly, en masse. After this incredible breakthrough, the Americans suddenly, as it turned out, did not have a heavy carrier and bought rocket engines from us. They probably had all the blueprints for their incredible breakthroughs in rocket science stolen by aliens.
  5. -3
    21 December 2015 15: 14
    the once serious resource "Military Review" has turned into an analogue of "Military Secrets" with Igor Prokopenko on REN TV: propaganda + conspiracy theories + total cuts of the military-industrial complex of NATO countries, slightly diluted with truly interesting articles on military topics.
    1. 0
      26 December 2015 14: 29
      sorry, xRenTV fans
      1. 0
        2 February 2018 17: 19
        Don't like RenTV, it's complete nonsense.
        I don’t like the USA, it’s a lying, lying country.
        By the way, they flew into space only after they received the appropriate Soviet technology. The USSR even gave them the hatch on Apollo because they couldn’t do it themselves.
        Later, yes, they somewhat clumsily overtook the USSR, the Proton weighs 750 tons and launches 24 tons into orbit, and the Shuttle launches 25 tons of payload, and another 60 tons of its own weight, which is only needed for descent from orbit, and the launch weight is 1800 tons, 2.5 times larger than the Soviet Proton. And returning 25 tons from orbit to Earth... give at least one case.
        That is, a useless launch of mass into orbit, irrational and thoughtlessly expensive. Considering that their economy rules there, it is nonsense that they could fly to the moon.
  6. 0
    21 December 2015 15: 16
    Can you comment on your minus?)
  7. -1
    21 December 2015 15: 31
    Minus to the author. They were there, otherwise the Soviet cosmonauts Leonov and Grechko would also be covered up. It’s just that this director finally decided, after his death, to annoy the US authorities and make fun of him. This is a simple PR move, in which Americans are great masters
  8. +4
    21 December 2015 15: 50
    Take the trouble to look where Leonov worked in recent years, in which bank, and it will immediately become clear who is who! For many years, he considered the photographs and filming of astronauts on the Moon to be authentic, and only recently admitted with a squeak that the supposedly “authentic” photographs, some of them were taken in pavilions on Earth! By the way, there is a book by the Russian Yuri Ekhlov “As long as there are fools in the world,” where, from the point of view of a professional film cameraman, he completely destroyed NASA’s hackwork, after which we can confidently close up this shop about NASA’s “flight” to the Moon!
    1. -3
      21 December 2015 16: 47
      And you know, in the footage of the 41 parade they show Stalin on the podium, and it’s not snowing. From this we can conclude: 1) There was no parade, and the chronicle shows a later staging. 2) Stalin was not in Moscow, he was hiding underground in the Urals. 3) There was no war at all, so there could not have been a parade in principle. The Germans attacked, we almost surrendered, but the valiant Americans came and saved everyone, and this is post-war Soviet propaganda. The Americans again have the evidence. But by and large, I don’t care whether they were there or not. This did not affect the life of the Earth in any way.
      1. -1
        21 December 2015 17: 05
        Well, no one has ever hidden the fact that I. Stalin’s speech was recorded later, since the filmmakers did not have time for the start of the parade, and snow is falling in the newsreel footage of the parade. YOUR comparison is lame!
        1. +1
          21 December 2015 18: 06
          How is it that they didn’t make it in time for the start of the parade, and the parade was filmed. Stalin - did he come out, stand for two minutes and leave? When were people told about this? Right away? Here too, it seems to me, there was filming in a pavilion, which does not prove anything, neither landing nor falsification. Like "reconstruction of events".
          1. 0
            21 December 2015 18: 19
            For security reasons, the parade was moved from 10 a.m. to 8 a.m., forgetting to warn the filmmakers; they galloped to the parade when Stalin had already given a speech and filmed the newsreel from the middle, and Stalin gave a speech later in the pavilion.
            1. 0
              22 December 2015 02: 07
              That's what we're talking about! You never know the reasons why the shooting didn’t work out, even though there was an event. They filmed the “re-enactment” later. Therefore, there are a lot of inconsistencies. Speaking of the waving flag, what if they filmed in the pavilion, how did it fly? As for the parade, I don’t know how you can forget to warn someone about such an event, but filmmakers usually show up for such things a couple of hours in advance, just in case. Filming Stalin would definitely have turned out badly: at 8 am in November during a snowfall there was poor lighting, then from what point could they film with their equipment, and even ugly - the falling snow obscures the face plus steam from the mouth. That's why we filmed later and indoors.
              1. 0
                2 February 2018 17: 25
                The USA is a liar, and it only went into space in 1971. 11 years after Gagarin.
                Supporters of the USA are very stupid, blindly believing in the power of the USA, but for the Americans it was very bitter and insulting that the USSR was flying into space, OVERTAKING AMERICA!!!, and they could only launch satellites the size of oranges, and yet the Americans are the best, the most advanced , the first nation in everything, pioneers, scientists, etc., etc.
                And here it’s such a mess, the USSR flies into space, and the USA’s rockets explode at the start, and it seems that the best German minds are working on them, but nothing comes of it.
                Therefore, the United States began to lie like raveling American dogs, that they almost did not have time, because in the USSR they were the first to fly into space through corpses, but still stole technology from the United States. But in fact, Korolev did not sit in any zone, it was German intelligence that was left in the cold, he was provided with all the conditions for work, and therefore the USSR was decades ahead of the United States in the missile field.
                And the lying, deceitful Americans got what they know how to do best, lie and deceive.
  9. +1
    21 December 2015 16: 17
    Pilot cosmonaut Leonov:

    “Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans have not been to the Moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about footage allegedly fabricated in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves.”

    http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201512131157-c0mm.htm
    1. 0
      2 February 2018 17: 26
      Leonov was lying.
  10. 0
    21 December 2015 16: 24
    I read the article and a few comments. Ha, of course they weren’t! requestIn the end, I think that they weren’t. Well, the flag can’t flutter like in the wind. A simple, but for me, convincing fact.
  11. +1
    21 December 2015 16: 46
    Quote: unsinkable
    Well, the flag cannot flutter like in the wind. A simple, but for me, convincing fact.

    I also thought that the flag could not develop, and then I remembered physics. In a flask sealed on a needle there was a “butterfly” made of foil, which did not move in the shade, but began to rotate from the solar “wind”.
    PS There were so many visual experiments in physics before, but now everything is virtual, animated, and children must believe it. How everyone believed in American cinema.
  12. 0
    21 December 2015 16: 48
    In our country, too, there are plenty of idiots who denigrate their own history.
    Like man's entry into space, an expedition to the Moon is an achievement of mankind, whether Soviet or American is no longer important, the main thing is that it is. We can do it and they can do it.
    More such epoch-making achievements for both countries and the whole world.
    1. 0
      21 December 2015 17: 09
      So you deigned to present those who doubt as i.d.i.otami, this is too much! Take the trouble to apologize!
      1. 0
        21 December 2015 17: 21
        Try to be smart! If possible.
        Doubters these are OUR Russian (Soviet) citizens who doubt that the Americans were on the moon.
        А denigrating OWN story is the American Stanley Kubrick who launched the “misconception” that the citizens of his country, the astronauts, were not on the Moon. Or are you American?
        Now, if you said that Yu.A. Gagarin did not fly into space, I would call you personally and everyone who supports you an idiot, but I didn’t do it. Astronaut Shepard was not in space, but made a suborbital flight. Everyone in the USA and many in Russia know this, and no one is indignant.
        1. -1
          21 December 2015 17: 42
          Please don't be rude, you are not at the market or in a pub! And don't judge others by yourself!
          1. +2
            21 December 2015 18: 03
            Fine. Sorry about "Try to be smart." Maybe I spoke harshly. And I wish you to read the text.
            1. -2
              21 December 2015 18: 28
              Accepted! By the way, off topic, but regarding those who doubted, in the 60s, the USSR Academy of Sciences banned criticism of Einstein’s general relativity, well, how did it end, already in the 70s, many scientists strongly doubted the truth of the postulates of general relativity, but now the Academy itself is ashamed for banning criticism! Science rests on doubters!
              1. +2
                21 December 2015 18: 41
                I agree.
                But it is one thing to doubt facts or what is presented as facts - this is a matter of politics. ("Khatyn", "Holodomor", the death of the "Lusitania")
                Another thing is doubting theories and hypotheses - this is science. This is how different scientific schools arise, and the country in which there are many of them has greater development potential than others. Because this country has different-minded scientists who are capable of solving problems in different ways.
                1. 0
                  21 December 2015 18: 54
                  The fact is different, our government recognized the fact of the execution of the Poles in Katyn, although there are undeniable facts that this was the work of the Germans, this is a matter of politics.
    2. 0
      2 February 2018 17: 43
      An achievement would be a real flight to the moon, and not a show concocted in a pavilion.
      The USA are liars, they flew into space only in 1971, this is Soyuz-Apollo, previously manned flights into Earth orbit... The USA has never been able to.
  13. 0
    21 December 2015 16: 52
    Wait and see. Maybe this is also one of the stages of information wars.
  14. -3
    21 December 2015 16: 56
    The USA is certainly a nasty little country. And yet THEY were there!!!
    1. 0
      21 December 2015 17: 13
      Well, YOU just believe in the Holy Trinity recklessly! The motto of the English Academy of Sciences is “Not a word, on faith!” NASA has too many inconsistencies.
    2. 0
      2 February 2018 17: 45
      Quote: flax
      The USA is certainly a nasty little country. And yet THEY were there!!!

      They are so disgusting that they never flew at all until 1971, when the USSR gave them some of the technology. This is a deceitful nation with a deceitful smile trained in the morning, living off show-offs and convincing themselves that they are the highest and first race in everything.
  15. +4
    21 December 2015 16: 59
    And the defenders of flights to the Moon at least piss in the eyes of God's dew...
  16. +1
    21 December 2015 16: 59
    Everything will fall into place as soon as the Chinese begin populating the Moon, in no less than 50 years.
  17. +3
    21 December 2015 17: 01
    The following facts speak in favor of falsifying the landing:

    1. The US lunar program was implemented in a suspiciously short time: about 8 years had passed from the start of the program to the time of landing. For comparison, the time frame for creating the fifth-generation fighter F-22 (from the start of the program to the first flight) is about 16 years, that is, twice as long.

    2. NASA's missions to the Moon suddenly stopped. The assertion that flights to the Moon have lost all meaning after man has been there has no basis. The next logical step would be to develop technologies for creating long-term settlements and stations there similar to the ISS. As we can see, human flights into low-Earth orbit in no way made further flights unnecessary.

    3. The lack of development of the lunar program, which in the event of a real landing attempt would lead to disaster. As we know, the last spacecraft to land on the Moon before Apollo 11 was Surveyor 7, which landed there a year earlier. This device weighed about 300 kilograms (Apollo 11 weighed about 15 tons) and did not even take off from the surface of the Moon. That is, the most difficult stage of the lunar expedition: takeoff and docking in lunar orbit in the conditions of the inhomogeneous gravitational field of the Moon was never worked out.

    4. The planned “return” to the Moon, announced by the George W. Bush administration in 2004, was supposed to take about 16 years. That is, twice as much time as was spent on the first program. Despite the fact that the flight technologies had allegedly already been worked out - that is, it should have taken 16 years to “repeat” the flight.

    In addition to the above facts, there are still many questions and inconsistencies (whether it is the disappearance of lunar soil, or various artifacts of video recordings of the landing), which with a high degree of probability make it clear that there was no actual landing on the Moon.
    1. +1
      21 December 2015 17: 57
      And yet, undocking and turning the lunar module by 180 degrees. and again docking with Apollo before “landing” on the Moon with a weak computer and practically no experience of successful dockings. Besides, Van Allen's belt has not been canceled.
    2. 0
      2 February 2018 17: 47
      And here is a photo from space, not photoshopped by US censors:
      https://aircargonews.ru/uploads/posts/2017-12/151
      3505759_app-astronaute-1920x1080.jpg
      Just need to remove the space between the reference lines, between .../151 and 3505....

      This is roughly the sky that Armstrong should have seen if he had flown into space on the Gemini, where he had a window right in front of his lying American face the entire flight, or when he walked onto the surface of the Moon. And the stars are so bright that a good filter on the helmet will not allow you to see your hands, but the stars will still be visible.
      The stupid rednecks don’t know the laws of physics, and blindly believe in everything that the American gods say. Sadly.
  18. +2
    21 December 2015 17: 09
    There is simply no evidence, but I would be happy to believe it. They destroyed all the films by accident or lost them, and in general NASA themselves admit that a lot of it was filmed on the ground. There is no soil, again lost, disappeared, what exists and is being verified is a fake and a scandal (recently there were regular scandals with the gift of supposedly lunar soil to a Dutch queen, apparently). They don’t know how to make engines; they buy kerosene engines from Russia, but they can’t even replicate their own, with supposedly unique characteristics. Moreover, when they are objectively shown and proven that engines built according to such a scheme with such a nozzle design simply could not have such characteristics, they simply shrug their shoulders. We had everything, but we lost everything, drawings, specialists, we forgot how it was all done - but believe me, that’s how it all happened!! Well, isn't it bullshit?
    During testing, Saturn 5 bombarded the MCC with messages about failures and then went into the ocean altogether and after that the NEXT flight... well, of course - a flight with people around the Moon and all the chicks. Reliability is 100% (the Americans themselves say so), but the tests are horror and darkness. And this can go on ad infinitum, the critics of the program suddenly all died, like Inspector Baron, but his report on the ship about the lunar program is well known, you can read it and be amazed...
    There are a lot of questions about the condition of the crew, about the design of the descent module and inconsistencies between the cyclograms and the stories of the astronauts, the return of the ship to the earth at the second cosmic speed with supposedly such accuracy, simply phenomenal and not real until now, with the hypnosis of the astronauts themselves and reactions to hypnosis, behavior after the flights (no one remembers a thing about the flights and this causes panic attacks in those who allegedly flew), etc. There are a lot of questions and the answer is silence and sweet smiles from the Americans - just believe me and that’s it
    1. +1
      21 December 2015 18: 35
      Compare the filming, our cosmonauts are carried out in their arms, and the Americans jump out of the landing module like fleas and immediately give funny interviews an hour later! Just CYBORGS!
      1. -1
        21 December 2015 19: 08
        Quote: Djozz
        Compare the filming, our cosmonauts are carried out in their arms, and the Americans jump out of the landing module like fleas and immediately give funny interviews an hour later! Just CYBORGS!

        Here's the question... Why don't Jews fly into space?
        1. 0
          2 February 2018 17: 53
          We flew on the shuttle before the war with Iraq.
          In general, Jews have nothing to do with it. The center of earthly lies, vileness and abomination is located in Buckingham Palace.
  19. 0
    21 December 2015 17: 53
    We've been puffing ourselves up for so many years and still screwed up, aha-ha*)
  20. +1
    21 December 2015 17: 53
    I think there were no Americans on the moon, and Russia (USSR) of course knows about this scam, apparently the USA offered something to the Soviet Union so that the USSR would play under them. Knowing what a deceitful policy the USA has, you are no longer surprised by anything
    1. +1
      21 December 2015 18: 38
      They allowed the USSR access to loans and lifted the ban on the supply of large-diameter pipes for pumping gas to the west. Europe.
    2. Erg
      +2
      21 December 2015 22: 50
      Lifting the embargo on oil exports. Supply of wheat at prices two times lower than on the US domestic market, the Olympics... This is when the Cold War is in full swing. Nixon came to visit (distribute treats to our leaders laughing ). Our party members sold their conscience and honor. And then they lost the country...
      1. 0
        2 February 2018 17: 55
        Until now, no matter what sanctions the United States imposes, they do not dare touch the export of oil and gas from Russia. Oil in exchange for a flight into space and to the moon. But in reality, until 1971, the Americans did not spend a second in orbit.
  21. -1
    21 December 2015 18: 08
    laughing I was pleased with the arrows, but it was possible to do without the spears
  22. 0
    21 December 2015 18: 10
    Quote: barbiturate
    There are a lot of questions about the condition of the crew
    with hypnosis of the astronauts themselves and reactions to hypnosis

    Perhaps they were under strong psychotropic drugs during the program, since there are periodic inclusions in the radio conversations, according to some docs. films, that they saw luminous bodies, someone was watching them, something flashed.
  23. 0
    21 December 2015 18: 19
    They were or were not, the answer is in the question - why is there no glare on the moon? Look at the ball, at any illuminated curved surface. A bright spot from the light source and penumbra are visible, diverging in circles with decreasing brightness. But the light bulb does not glare, and neither does the mirror. But there is no way to fit both assumptions into our ideas about the world.
    1. Erg
      0
      22 December 2015 22: 37
      The answer is in the nature of lunar gravity. The rule “the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection” does not apply on the Moon. The Internet has all the answers. Just don't read Einstein and other inventors. And, of course, exclude physics textbooks - they often create confusion. hi
      1. 0
        2 February 2018 17: 57
        To believe in the American flight to the Moon, you really have to abandon the laws of physics and astronomy. And really, what is more important, a superior race, or some lines from a textbook?
  24. +1
    21 December 2015 18: 31
    Like any reasonable person, you take the side where the argument is stronger.
    So for the last 15 years. Having read a lot of literature, I can say unequivocally that there were no amers on the moon.
    I’m generally silent about the soil they brought from the Moon.
  25. +3
    21 December 2015 18: 43
    - May you fail, seekers of unclouded truth! “No one has been to the Moon, and there’s not much to do there”, “The canals of Mars are natural formations...”, “Shangri-La is a myth!”, “Man descended from a monkey!”... How gray, how unbearably boring reality... You bastards... Are you going to feel much better from the proof that you are sadly right?!
    - “A society of social justice is impossible...”, “Organ transplantation is unthinkable...”, “There is no God!”...
    - What is there? Is a trough of grub the only, undeniable, tangible reality?
    - Come on, come on.... Santa Claus is a fairy tale for idiots, all these Little Red Riding Hoods, Ivanushka-d.u.rachki, Ilyusha Muromets, Alice in Wonderland and the Wizards of the Emerald City are nonsense... But how can you dream? Where did all geniuses start - with a dream, with fantasies about something that shouldn’t happen! Man has always been prone to beautiful illusions - and you grab dreams and drag them into the autopsy room, gut them, turning out their guts! How disgustingly boring all this is...
    - Even if no one has been to that Moon, this is a reason to go there... and not a reason for a criminal case of fraud... Let's fantasize, gentlemen! Without this, you can’t lift your head from the trough! smile
    1. 0
      2 February 2018 17: 58
      So you need to fly to the moon, and not deceive that you flew there.
  26. +3
    21 December 2015 18: 53
    The “bold points” in such matters are not put by actors, directors, political scientists, ananists, fagots and other riffraff. And clear, clear and understandable, logical and technical substantive evidence. Engineers, intelligence officers, designers, investigators, simply people who have not lost the ability to think clearly and logically, understand the essence of things and have a clear perception of causes, consequences and logical chains of events. So, based on SUCH conclusions and research, and not “one-woman-said-inform”, it was clear and understandable a long time ago that this lying mattress scum was NOT STANDING NEAR there! And those who were then in the USSR covered up this lie will still be damned as traitors and degenerates who sold and betrayed the honor and glory of the Russian people.
  27. +1
    21 December 2015 18: 55
    In what form was the rover delivered to the Moon? If it was assembled, then how it was lowered to the surface, and if it was assembled on the spot, then try using the gloves of the space suit to tighten at least one nut, and then, in the same gloves, attach the flying wing with tape. But about the lunar soil: a theft occurred at the Stockholm Museum of Natural History. Among the stolen exhibits was a “piece of the Moon” donated by the Americans, which the student thieves, mindful of the fabulous price of a gram of the Moon on the black market, decided to anonymously put up for auction. It was then that they were “tied up.” At the trial, the students’ lawyer, don’t be a fool, asked the judge to test the stolen stone for “lunarity.” After all, if the stone is not from the moon, then it’s worthless, and, accordingly, your client’s sentence for stealing valuables from a museum can be significantly reduced. The analysis showed that the stolen stone is... an ordinary meteorite. NASA stated that the stone in question was given to Sweden by the US government during an official visit; that it is lunar and was brought precisely by astronauts from the Moon. It was announced that this was indeed a meteorite, which astronauts picked up on the surface of the Moon, mistaking it for a moon rock.
    1. Erg
      -1
      21 December 2015 22: 57
      Why go through the dirty laundry of these liars and PR people? We know the truth. hi
    2. Erg
      0
      21 December 2015 22: 57
      Why go through the dirty laundry of these liars and PR people? We know the truth. hi
  28. 0
    21 December 2015 19: 26
    I wonder what Leonov will say to all this now. He foamed at the mouth and argued that he had seen and heard everything himself.
    1. 0
      2 February 2018 18: 13
      Leonov was lying. They showed him the Saturn-5 rockets; they were actually being manufactured, although they were never finalized to working condition, and he believed them.
      But there is a catch with the rockets, they weren’t even tried to be launched with a payload, they were made for the public so that everyone could see that they were being made. For the first time, Americans went into space during the joint Apollo-Soyuz flight; during this program, the USSR transferred a lot of technology to them for the future “détente of international tensions,” and they also began selling oil to capitalist countries, a lot and steadily... But at the time of the “flight” to the Moon" The United States had never been in orbit, and they lied, trying to successfully prove that they are the number one nation, and they are first in everything, and everything was stolen from them.
      And, since they never flew into space at all, they themselves could not make rockets to fly to the Moon. They made them specifically to show their superiority, specifically to advertise the USA, but they didn’t even try to fly for real. In fact, they had a complete ass with a large mass in orbit, they made huge rockets to launch a couple of hundred kilograms...
  29. +3
    21 December 2015 19: 32
    Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
    Quote: Djozz
    Compare the filming, our cosmonauts are carried out in their arms, and the Americans jump out of the landing module like fleas and immediately give funny interviews an hour later! Just CYBORGS!

    Here's the question... Why don't Jews fly into space?


    Answer: because five minutes before launch they manage to sell two stages of the rocket out of three...

    But seriously, only a liberal can believe in the American landing on the moon! And Leonov is not an argument at all here - firstly, he is a military man and is obliged to obey orders, and secondly - there was such an order! If we remember all the preferences of the Union received from the States, then any sane person himself would agree to assent to the Amers for their gifts, and not to an individual(s), but to the entire Union! It’s just the amazing benefits (you can’t find another word) that make you doubt the landing, and if you turn on your brain - when it was the Americans - they gave something like this to someone from the master’s shoulder, when they were already in chocolate? The Union has received a lot of wealth for its silence, and even more so - judging by the fact that this topic is still classified in Russia as a matter of secrecy!
  30. +1
    21 December 2015 19: 33
    Whether it’s a bluff or not, time will tell. The main point is the shame of America as a pathetic buffoon capable of lying.
    1. 0
      2 February 2018 18: 14
      It’s a bluff, but the United States won’t allow it to be revealed for a long time.
      I think that someday the models will be delivered to the Moon, and then only other countries will be allowed to fly to the Moon.
  31. 0
    21 December 2015 19: 38
    30 billion have been spent, but a mosquito won’t hurt your nose, we are waiting for Aldrin’s death, and what will emerge after his death.
  32. 0
    21 December 2015 19: 43
    In response, we need to show a film about how the Russians flew to Mars in 1976, because it’s true, I believe it!!! Life without “sleepwalkers” is boring!!!
  33. +2
    21 December 2015 20: 03
    I think it's true.
  34. +2
    21 December 2015 20: 15
    They were there.
    But not everything can be shown.
    There was also a movie, filmed for a different purpose.
    PS: I'm so tired of these stuffings.
  35. +2
    21 December 2015 20: 22
    Dumb article, but there are already more than 500 comments belay wassat At the end of the 80s, the union was full of all sorts of “Kashmarovsky and Co.”, publications about all sorts of “NONSENSE”, etc. Since the beginning of 92, this has sharply disappeared in Russia. I heard the theory that the above was arranged by the KGB in the late 80s to distract the “masses” from problems in the country and society, and with the introduction of “shock therapy” the people had no time for “Yeti and Co.”, so everything disappeared. All sorts of liberal rottenness "Suvorov and Co." What do you think, colleagues, is the same “operation” going on again with all these “drains”? what
    1. 0
      21 December 2015 20: 29
      - There was such a story... smile - “Perestroika” is a KGB project aimed at maintaining the fading faith in a bright future, using the “reverse” method - to let the people “grab with their whole mouth” a honey of capital values, so that they are set on edge, until they vomit... So that the people themselves can figure out: Where he still has to go...
      1. 0
        21 December 2015 20: 53
        Quote: saygon66
        saygon66 RU Today, 20:29 ↑

        - There was such a story... smile - “Perestroika” is a KGB project aimed at maintaining the fading faith in a bright future, using the “reverse” method - to let the people “grab with their whole mouth” a honey of capital values, so that they will set their teeth on edge, until they vomit. .. So that the people themselves can figure out: Where should they go after all...

        Yes, I heard that version. It seems to be confirmed by the fact that Gorbachev is Andropov’s protégé. If it’s true, then Gorbachev should be given 3 stars of Hero of the USSR because he is still performing this operation. And how can one explain the appearance of a KGB colonel at the head of the state? belay It's probably time to see a shrink what belay wassat
  36. +2
    21 December 2015 20: 24
    Filming in Hollywood does not cancel the flight yet!
    First of all, our reputation (or rather the USSR), which recognized the flight, is at risk, and it certainly made no sense for us to shield them...
    1. 0
      2 February 2018 18: 16
      The flight was recognized by politicians, in exchange they received the right to use American banks and store money stolen from the people there.
  37. +1
    21 December 2015 20: 26
    And the fact that the person in the video is simply not Kubrick?
    Moles and the like don't match?
  38. +1
    21 December 2015 20: 30
    Quote: Gormengast
    Question: WHY did the USSR close the program if there was a chance to expose the amers and get PRIORITY?


    Two landing modules. One is inhabited. Guaranteed to fall on its side when landing. The astronaut on the Lunokhod (there are special steps in the back) moves to the second module. Official part. Departure.
    The probability of return is 30%. We decided not to risk it. The program was cancelled. At least I heard this version during the demonstration of our lunar module. From the teacher.
    1. +1
      22 December 2015 01: 29
      There is another version:

      If we actually didn’t fly anywhere, then why didn’t the Soviet Union notice the forgery? Or didn't you want to notice? I have some thoughts on this matter. While our army was fighting communism in Vietnam, we were selling megatons of grain to the Soviet Union at an ultra-low price. On July 8, 1972, our government shocked the whole world by announcing the sale of about a quarter of our harvest to the Soviet Union at a fixed price of $1,63 per bushel (36,4 liters - A.P.). The Russians would receive the next harvest another 10-20% cheaper. Grain prices within the country immediately rose from $1,50 to $2,44. Prices for bread and meat jumped, reflecting the unexpected shortage. How much money did this Moon cost us?

      Ralph Rene, "How NASA showed America the Moon"


      Chemical plants were built in exchange for the finished products of these same plants, that is, the USSR received modern enterprises without investing a penny. KAMAZ was built with active American participation. And much more...
      1. 0
        2 February 2018 18: 21
        Quote: Lev Leshchenko
        There is another version...

        And since then, the USSR, and now Russia, has been steadily selling oil to Europe, and no Obama sanctions dare change this. Sanctions are bullshit, but take out the currency for oil and put it away!
        Only the price of oil, and nothing else can be done.
  39. MMX
    0
    21 December 2015 20: 37
    After you've been pooping at each other and discussing the fake stuff invented by marketers, you can safely go and watch what this topic was raised in the media for...

    Moonwalkers, genre - comedy, 2015 Premiered in Russia in 2016.
  40. 0
    21 December 2015 21: 48
    Quote: Loreal
    If Stanley Kubrick filmed something this walk on the moon still does not cancel.

    No one has canceled the walks, but these are not walks for Americans hi
  41. +2
    21 December 2015 22: 32
    The fat point will be put when the Russian spacecraft with our cosmonauts lands on the moon in the place where, as the Americans say, the person has already been.
  42. Erg
    +1
    21 December 2015 22: 37
    I'm glad that everyone is finally starting to see the light. I received so much negativity when I said ten years ago that the Americans on the Moon were a scam. And far from the first and last. I’m surprised when there is an analysis of “evidence” and skepticism. You need to have a little technical training, and then it will become clear that humanity will not be able to land on the Moon for at least another thirty years. Yes, by the way, Leonov simply made money from his lies. Like Grechko...
  43. +1
    21 December 2015 22: 41
    Well, at least the landing facts confirm:
    1) Operating laser reflectors installed by the Americans on the moon
    2) Wheel marks from cars used by astronauts
    3) Samples of lunar soil, after all
    1. +1
      22 December 2015 00: 08
      There was a problem with the soil samples. According to one version, this entire pile (more than 300 kg) was loaded into a top-secret storage facility at a top-secret institute, where secret people examined it through glass. On the other hand, it never existed.

      A fragment of lunar soil, stored in the Dutch Rijksmuseum museum, turned out to be a piece of petrified wood. The opening is reported by BBC News.

      The exhibit was presented to the Prime Minister of Holland by the US Ambassador to that country. The ambassador, in turn, received the stone from the Apollo 11 astronauts shortly after their return from the Moon in 1969. After the death of the Prime Minister, the stone went to the museum. It was insured for $500 thousand.

      Experts doubted the authenticity of the stone back in 2006. Finally, this suspicion was confirmed by an analysis of the exhibit, conducted by specialists of the Amsterdam Free University, reports the Associated Press. The US government has not yet commented on the situation.

      http://lenta.ru/news/2009/08/28/fake/
  44. 0
    21 December 2015 22: 43
    Currently, on the Internet you can find articles by astrophysicists that convincingly present the real colors of the soil of the Moon and Mars. So, somehow these colors do not match the NASA color photographs. So I admit that the journeys of the Mars rovers are filmed in Devon.
    1. 0
      22 December 2015 21: 30
      If anyone is interested, type “Brown Moon - Jade Hare” into the search engine. And enjoy stunning views of the moon's brown surface captured by China's rover.
      And in color photographs from NASA there is a beautiful colored stars and stripes flag and the dark gray surface of the Moon. I also recommend typing “Mars is filmed in Devon.”
  45. 0
    21 December 2015 23: 12
    Quote: opus
    From 1969 to 1972, about 382 kg of lunar matter were delivered to Earth by American astronauts.

    And where did this pile go?

    http://bolshoyforum.com/wiki/%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%B3%D1%80%D
    1%83%D0%BD%D1%82_NASA_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%
    B9_%D0%A1%D0%A1%D0%A1%D0%A0
  46. +1
    21 December 2015 23: 22
    Quote: Engineer
    Well, they would also say that Saturn 5 was only in the layout? And the Apollo Union Mosfilm fiction? This is not one expedition landed. I will tell you as an engineer that such systems as, say, Abacus were developed and used to design and calculate this project. And now the whole world uses them for engineering calculations and designing and does not know that all this is one invention of a famous director.

    For some reason, a lot of “qualified” engineers stand up for the Americans, but the Russians are still taking them into space. I don’t know in what field you are an engineer, but I worked in the field of aircraft construction for a long time, and I can say with full confidence that flying to the moon, even with modern technologies, is at this stage of development a very difficult (one might say insoluble) problem. If in the 60s. years, the Russians could not even fly to the moon, but to the moon, and no one could. Watch Mukhin's film "Maximum Lies and Stupidity." The film is of course rough, but it gives answers to general questions.
    1. -1
      21 December 2015 23: 57
      Here is an interesting program on the same subject.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDS6Av_gzds

      Not as condensed as Mukhin, at times thoughts spread throughout the tree, but, nevertheless, very interesting.
  47. +4
    21 December 2015 23: 45
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    Quote: Army 2
    For 50 years now, gentlemen, journalists and "experts" have been answering the question: "Were the Americans on the moon or not?" The best answer to this question was the cosmonaut Leonov. Said that the entire US lunar program was accompanied by our national trackers. And, if there were no Americans on the moon, the USSR would not fail to declare this.

    we only know what we are allowed to know ...

    It’s very surprising, but how advanced were the USSR’s tracking tools at that time? The question is very interesting - were they or not? At one time, our intelligence “bought” or was cleverly deceived into the SDI program, the worst thing is that our government believed in it and began investing crazy and last “money” in opposition to the American SDI program. This was one of the main factors in the collapse of our economy. One gets the feeling that there is simply a “weak” scam going on, if you don’t believe me, fly away.
  48. +1
    22 December 2015 00: 08
    there were comments about stars. They say they are not visible. Right now on Euronews they are showing a video of the exit and work in space on the ISS in the nocomment section. So, black black space in the background. Are they filming in the studio too?

    The lunar programs cost both the USA and the USSR fabulous space money. Into space! The United States landed and collapsed because it was very expensive. We really stopped because at that time everything was done only in the style of “the USSR was the first in the world to implement it, etc.” If not for the first time, then it was no longer a priority. Well, there was something to do.

    And they buy our engines because they are profitable. Another question is why we are selling. I hope it's also beneficial.
    1. 0
      2 February 2018 18: 27
      Quote: looker-on
      there were comments about stars. They say they are not visible. Right now on Euronews they are showing a video of the exit and work in space on the ISS in the nocomment section. So, black black space in the background. Are they filming in the studio too?

      You've been scammed like a sucker. This is what space really looks like, and all sorts of security cameras are of very low resolution, by the way, Armstrong was guided by them when he and other American liar-actors were trained on what to answer.
      https://aircargonews.ru/uploads/posts/2017-12/151
      3505759_app-astronaute-1920x1080.jpg
      The space in the link must be removed so that it looks like this: 12/1513505759_app
      By the way, the American photo, they get tired of barking like dogs.
  49. 0
    22 December 2015 06: 22
    Don't forget who was the President of the United States at that moment. Nixon could easily have decided to do this. Personally, I believe that they flew to the moon. But if it turns out that it doesn’t, I won’t be surprised. It was not for nothing that doubts arose. And even if the Americans falsified the evidence, I think they wouldn’t do it in such a way that everyone would immediately guess.
    There is a possibility that they were there, but lost the records. And they were forced to remove everything as it was.
    1. 0
      2 February 2018 18: 29
      The US did not fly into space at all until 1971, Soyuz-Apollo, with Soviet docking ports, this was the first US manned flight into space.
  50. +2
    22 December 2015 07: 51
    The USA is a country of liars and scoundrels.
  51. +3
    22 December 2015 08: 33
    The Americans already knew how to make great fakes... That's where their faith in “Exceptionalism” comes from... How EXTREMELY cunning this pseudo-nation, the Americans, is..
    1. 0
      2 February 2018 18: 35
      They are racists and consider themselves superior to everyone. There was no way they could lag behind in the most complex set of technologies - space flights. And if you can’t actually fly, they immediately, right away, begin to lie. Lying nation of racists.
      They didn't call blacks "African-Americans" for nothing. Every American knows that other nations are inferior, semi-human. But they agreed to meet these savages and allowed them to call themselves “half-Americans.” That's how kind and fluffy they are, and really, they're not racists?
  52. -6
    22 December 2015 09: 37
    Our talented cosmonaut Leonov says that there were mattresses on the moon. There is no reason not to believe him.
  53. -2
    22 December 2015 09: 40
    No matter how much we would like to convict America of a monstrous lie, the fact that the video was filmed on Earth (and this obviously was even before Kubrick’s revelation) does not yet prove that there was no flight to the Moon.
    1. 0
      13 February 2018 22: 37
      The fact that Armstrong had never been in space at all in his life is proven by his own words that he threw something, some kind of badge, or a dollar, and “only it flashed in the sky of the Moon.” But there were no stars. But he, Armstrong, also flew on Gemeni, and the entire flight, right in front of his lying face, there was a porthole (the design of the ship is such), through which he could see until he was blue in the face what the sky looks like in space, and how many stars there are on it, not hidden earth's atmosphere. The stars are cold, bright, and do not twinkle. They are impossible not to notice. And Amstrong didn’t notice them, because the pictures don’t convey them, the resolution is not enough. But the Americans had no other types of space...
      By the way, I retired as a senior lieutenant from the Strategic Missile Forces in 1989.
  54. -3
    22 December 2015 10: 45
    They buy the most valuable from you - the Mi-8 rocket engines and helicopters for Afghanistan and Iraq, so that you don’t have enough for your programs!
    Also, for pennies, they launch their spacecraft with the help of your expensive missiles, so that your Soviet stocks run out faster! Fools! Come on!
    1. +3
      23 December 2015 13: 03
      Quote: Kanatbek
      They buy the most valuable from you - the Mi-8 rocket engines and helicopters for Afghanistan and Iraq, so that you don’t have enough for your programs!
      - yeah, and we sell gas so that we don’t have enough! Yes, you are an economic genius! laughing
  55. +1
    22 December 2015 11: 22
    Stanley wouldn't talk in vain. Wrong person.
  56. +5
    22 December 2015 12: 09
    Didn't understand. They finished off the opus and the section began to move? He did the job here in half the time. He is too lazy to write about short waves and parabolic antennas. About radar.
    1. The further apart the two antennas connected to a common network are, the better. I’m not sure that we had them.
    2. From the theory of radio waves. They bend around objects comparable in size to the wavelength, so you need centimeter ones to see something and antenna spacing.
    3. Short waves are reflected from the ionosphere, so VHF and higher are needed.
    4. A large parabolic antenna on centimeters and decimeters has a wild gain in transmission and reception.

    Now on to the flight.
    1. Our people were bribed with a large loan, let’s say. It’s unlikely that anyone would have spilled the beans anyway.
    2. Ours haven’t been somewhere either, and this is an exchange of pleasantries. This is more serious, but they would have spilled the beans anyway.
    3. Basic version. They beat our specialists. How?
    There was a rocket, perhaps it flew to the Moon, but without people, I admit the landing of the block.
    Some kind of device flew into the orbit of the Moon, it’s hard to see. There are no people there, but there is a repeater.
    What is this? Transceiver. Receives on one frequency, transmits on another. For reliability, we install a scrambler on the transmission to the ship. This is a signal decoder. The transmission from the ship to Earth takes place over an open channel so that everyone can see the astronauts' flight. That's it, you can fool Soviet scientists. If you want, you can land this structure on the moon.
    Then Hollywood works. There are no stars in the sky? They were in such a hurry, they didn’t drill holes in the vault of heaven, or didn’t install flashlight bulbs.
  57. +6
    22 December 2015 14: 36
    ... "American astronaut Neil Armstrong took the first step in history onto the surface of the Moon and uttered a pathetic phrase, previously invented for the solemn moment: “This small step of a man is a big leap for all mankind.”
    So where did this pseudo-astronaut actually step if he didn’t fly to the Moon! Now it’s clear where - to a pile of crap!
    There are countless inconsistencies and absurdities in this lunar program. I would not be surprised that American automatic spacecraft are now traveling not on Mars, but, for example, on the Grand Canyon - after all, some quite earthly objects have been caught in the camera lens several times. Well, traveling in space is much cheaper and safer this way!

    It was easy for the swindlers from the USA of that time (and even today) to deceive the ordinary pendos, because the life of a pendo is Hollywood. And Hollywood is a weapon of propaganda. Hollywood is their culture, their religion. But in reality, Hollywood is a pseudoculture, an ersatz. I have always been indignant that all the p.endos constantly refer to the words and actions of the moronic heroes of their stupid films for all life situations. It’s as if there is not and never has been classical literature, music, world-famous thinkers, etc. in the world. Hollywood even distorts rare films based on the works of great classics in its own, Pendosian way to such an extent that it is impossible to recognize them! The classics are turning over in their graves! How do they humiliate other nations in their films? But the Pendos are shown there as the greatest people; and their culture, their vision of the world is the only true one!

    Here you have a “great” people; This is what the USA really is - a bunch of scammers and scoundrels from all over the world!
  58. -5
    22 December 2015 14: 52
    Well, how can we convey to the humanities that a scam on such a scale is, in principle, impossible due to the number of people involved and a number of technical subtleties that respected humanities, unfortunately, will not perceive as a fact). Starting from signal direction finding and ending with God knows what). YES there were fake shots. Staged. But this does not detract from the fact itself.
    1. +4
      22 December 2015 16: 13
      Is it really impossible? Are you so sure about this?
      In 1963, in the United States, the president was killed, and the people were given the version of a lone killer, despite the fact that the version was bursting at all the seams. And nothing, they gobbled it up.... And those who didn’t gobble it up either kept quiet, or some other misfortune happened...
      In the USSR everything was both simpler and more complicated.
      1. It’s easier with the fact that those who knew and doubted had nowhere to dump their knowledge, except in the kitchen or to a colleague (who most likely understood everything perfectly well). There was no problem silencing those who were actively doubting.
      2. What is more difficult is that in terms of the level of education of the people we were higher than the Americans. But in relation to the “very literate”, point 1 will do just fine.

      And don’t think that in the 70s in Russia specific offices “slurped cabbage soup.” If there was a conspiracy between the Americans and the Central Committee of the CPSU (and without a conspiracy, the scam was doomed to failure!), then there was someone to take care of the operation to cover up the scam on the part of the USSR. And the repeater could be shot into space so that the signal comes from where it’s supposed to, and so on and so forth...

      I had doubts about the “moon landing” for a long time, but I read about doubts about Soyuz-Apollo via the link in this topic...
      1. Erg
        +6
        22 December 2015 23: 02
        In 75, mattress covers did not have a connecting block... Therefore, the topic is murky. But I haven’t really studied it, so I’ll refrain from drawing conclusions. I also want to throw in a topic - ours sent the Lunar Rover-1 a year after the American “landing”. Why automatic? What if a person has already “set foot” on the Moon? And I already wrote that not a single university in the world with a space focus studies materials on the flights of Americans to the Moon. Nothing to study!!! Some "funny pictures" wassat And for fans of the landing, who declare the impossibility of a conspiracy between the USSR and the USA, let me remind you of September 11, 2001... Such productions as Pearl Harbor and the Boston terrorist attack deserve attention... But why turn to the past? ISIS. And everything is clear.
        1. 0
          13 February 2018 22: 47
          And when Lunokhod-2 was driven to the landing site of the Americans, the leadership of the program was changed from above, and the new manager drove the Lunokhod into a hole, so that the solar panel was filled with dust, and it died before reaching the target... Everything turned out well accidentally.
  59. +2
    22 December 2015 14: 55
    Quote: sssla
    Quote: tux.topwar
    They could not deceive, but to make a major concession to the Soviet Union

    Never say never. Read
    there are only two real lunar modules on Earth - one is in a museum, where no filming has ever been conducted, and it is even forbidden to walk with a camera, and the other is in Hollywood, where, to develop the logic of what is happening on the screen, additional filming of the American landing on the moon was made, " said the Soviet cosmonaut.

    Why was studio photography used?

    Alexei Leonov explained that in order for the viewer to be able to see the development of what is happening from beginning to end on the movie screen, elements of filming are used in any movie.

    "It was impossible, for example, to film the real opening by Neil Armstrong of the hatch of the descent ship on the Moon - there was simply no one to remove it from the surface! For the same reason, it was impossible to film the descent of Armstrong to the Moon along the ladder from the ship. These are the moments that were really taken Kubrick in Hollywood studios to develop the logic of what was happening, and laid the foundation for numerous gossip that the entire landing was allegedly simulated on the set, "explained Alexey Leonov.

    Where the truth begins and the installation ends

    Here, most likely, there is a mutual agreement between the USA and the USSR: we are silent that they did not land on the Moon, And they are silent that the same Leonov did not go into outer space, or worse...
  60. aba
    +1
    22 December 2015 15: 53
    Although I personally have certain doubts about the US lunar program, the problem is that a search for an interview with Stanley Kubrick gives links to some frivolous sites.
  61. +2
    22 December 2015 16: 24
    Quote: aba
    Although I personally have certain doubts about the US lunar program, the problem is that a search for an interview with Stanley Kubrick gives links to some frivolous sites.

    It even appeared on the air (and on the website) of Russian First:
    http://www.1tv.ru/news/world/298597
    But the report itself is mildly exculpatory.
  62. -2
    22 December 2015 16: 49
    We disagree that the video clip is fake.
    http://hueviebin1.livejournal.com/213618.html
  63. +1
    22 December 2015 17: 06
    One engine is built for 8 months, then tested and adjusted. It takes a lot of time.
    The same helicopter.
    The United States buys it for $ 1 million.
    And in Russia, the national reserves in foreign currency in American banks are enough to live comfortably. All the same, this currency, with the collapse of the dollar by the US Federal Reserve, depreciates half in half a year)))
    Here is such arithmetic ...
    In a word, I’ll say that they buy from you the most valuable for their pieces of paper, so that your army is left without helicopters, and their companions so that you can’t get out, there was nothing! And not because they don’t know how to make helicopters and rocket engines!
    1. 0
      13 February 2018 22: 50
      And let them buy our gas so that we run out faster!
  64. +5
    22 December 2015 17: 21
    Colleagues, before you start downvoting (ME), I highly recommend reading Yuri Mukhin’s book “The Americans Were Never on the Moon.” There, with all the mathematical, physical and theoretical calculations and calculations, it was clearly proven that the Americans were NOT on the Moon!
    I had the opportunity to communicate with two people who are directly related to Space. At first they insisted that everything was so “open” there that it was impossible to hide anything.... POSSIBLE!
    After reading the book and making their calculations, both agreed that this was a scam (what level, should we clarify?).
    Conclusion - I, Stanley Kubrick, BELIEVE,
    1. +3
      22 December 2015 17: 41
      I understand that for some “generals,” smart books are a priori inaccessible.
      Downvote further, coward.
    2. 0
      13 February 2018 22: 55
      Even without calculations, go through the logical chain:
      - Amstrong didn’t see any stars on the Moon
      - Amstrong flew on Dzhemeni before this
      - On Dzhemeni, in front of the astronaut’s face, there is a porthole throughout the entire flight, everyone has one.
      - It turns out that Armstrong has never been in space at all.
      Let's finish the picture? The Americans claim that part of the film was shot on Earth for clarity. Now they need to add that some of the astronauts were replaced by actors who had never been in space, but were hired only for filming, because their acting better conveys the spirit of America’s space and technological achievements.
  65. +2
    22 December 2015 17: 24
    I never believed that they were, because... there was no continuation and don’t let my mind be blown away by uselessness, aliens and other nonsense. Another thing is that our people fell for it, who sold out?
    1. 0
      22 December 2015 18: 23
      Another thing is that our people fell for it, who sold out?


      There may be several reasons, one of them is ordinary, trivial:
      Someone at the top “got into trouble” and decided to put it off for a rainy day by buying real estate abroad with party money (CPSU). Quite possible... request
      1. +2
        23 December 2015 12: 56
        Quote: yuriy55
        There may be several reasons


        Here is what the American researcher of the history of the lunar race R. Rene writes about this:

        “The logical question that many have asked and continue to ask: if we actually didn’t fly anywhere, then Why didn’t the Soviet Union notice the forgery? Or didn't you want to notice? I have some thoughts on this matter. While our valiant army fought against communism in Vietnam and other countries in Southeast Asia, we sold megatons of grain to the Soviet Union at an ultra-low price. On July 8, 1972, our government shocked the whole world by announcing the sale of about a quarter of our harvest to the Soviet Union at a fixed price of $1,63 per bushel (36,4 liters - Ed.). The Russians would receive the next harvest another 10-20% cheaper. The domestic market price for grain was $1,50, but immediately jumped to $2,44. Guess who paid the difference? That's right, our taxpayers. Our prices for bread and meat instantly jumped, reflecting such an unexpected shortage. How much money did this Moon cost us? Huge money was at stake, not to mention American prestige. The end in this case justified any means.”
        1. 0
          13 February 2018 23: 23
          I went to school in the early to mid-70s, I REMEMBER that in the USA farmers blocked the port so that grain would not be transported to the USSR, like “we sell it to the enemy.” I remember it, I saw it with my own eyes, I heard it with my own ears!
  66. -6
    22 December 2015 18: 15
    All of the above illiterate nonsense is refuted by the systematic successes of the United States in astronautics. A flight to the edge of the solar system to Pluto is something beyond belief!
    The same cavemen, for example, American ignoramuses, can swear that Gagarin’s flight was filmed by high school student Nikita Mikhalkov. I didn’t expect it, I thought at least there would be less aggressive dense ignorance on this site. Disappointed.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      22 December 2015 18: 46
      To enlighten our denseness and dot the i's, it was possible to launch (or is there already?) high-resolution camera filming of landing sites and other crap that would enlighten... but no, we are launching to the edge of the universe... and where guarantee that this filming is not a Kubrick-2 project?

      Everything is correct. We always doubt if there are reasons not to trust. Refute... Film this the way they filmed "The Arrival of a Train", when the audience ran out of the halls... Here is the Moon, this is us, this is a feather (and not some kind of iron blob that looks like a feather), this is - a hammer, here they fall together... and here they fall together, a hammer on a flag stand;
      and here is a flag made of reinforced (?) fabric in a case, and here it is installed and does not move (after the internal stresses of the reinforced wires have disappeared);
      and here - jumping (with the risk of tearing the spacesuit and dying?), and here - I launched a spear (tripod, hammer, pen, crowbar) and it (it) flew "X" meters, although on Earth it would have been "x" meters ...
      And so, I believe...
      1. +1
        22 December 2015 18: 59
        yuriy55 Forgot to indicate how they played GOLF. Surely the Americans (taxpayers) were happy.
      2. -4
        22 December 2015 19: 39
        [quote=yuriy55]To enlighten our denseness and dot the i's, it was possible to launch (or is there already?) high-resolution camera filming of landing sites and other crap that would enlighten... but no, we are launching to the edge of the universe ...and where is the guarantee that this filming is not a Kubrick-2 project?

        I beg your pardon, but why on earth should Americans justify themselves to Russian “experts” in their astronautics? They don’t want to know anyone except themselves and their loved ones.
        The I's have been dotted a long time ago. I don’t understand why this fake was launched on VO.
        Alexei Leonov has denied rumors that American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin did not land on the moon.

        “Specialists, including myself, and our lunar group watched one to one online as it happened. And Borman’s flight with the flyby, and the landing, and Apollo 13 too,” Leonov said.

        In a comment to the website of the Zvezda TV channel, the cosmonaut pilot, twice Hero of the Soviet Union, explained that some of the footage about Armstrong and Aldrin’s flight to the Moon was actually filmed in the studio. But this was done only so that the viewer could see “the development of what is happening from beginning to end.” The actual filming begins after Armstrong installs a highly directional antenna for broadcast to Earth.

        “Who will film the hatch opening from the side when there is no one there on the Moon?” - Leonov explained why additional footage of the landing was needed.

        The video of American astronauts landing on Earth's satellite has been causing controversy for decades. Rumors of a fake mission to Earth's satellite spread after the widow of American director Stanley Kubrick said that Nixon, inspired by her husband's film 2001: A Space Odyssey, asked the director to film the flight of American astronauts to the Moon.

        “Reporters came to Kubrick’s wife, and she said: yes, he worked hard when they made the film “Landing on the Moon.” These are her words verbatim. And this (rumors about the falsification of the flight to the Moon - editor's note) is already speculation. And how the flag was dangling, but there was no wind. And the flag was reinforced and twisted. When they put it in the ground, they removed the cover - the reinforced tape untwisted, and it seemed as if it was dangling in the wind,” explained the legendary cosmonaut.

        In 2009, Alexei Leonov already spoke out about rumors claiming that the Americans were not on the Moon in 1969. In an interview with the RIA Novosti agency, the Soviet cosmonaut emphasized that only “absolutely ignorant people” can believe in such things.

        “Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans have not been to the moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about footage allegedly fabricated in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves,” Alexey Leonov noted then.

        The day before, American Patrick Murray published an alleged interview with Stanley Kubrick, where the famous director admits that the videos of Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin landing on the moon were filmed by him in an ordinary studio on Earth. The interview with the film director has only now appeared, since Murray had to sign an 80-page non-disclosure agreement for the content of the conversation for 15 years from the date of Kubrick's death.

        However, there is no evidence that this interview is actually real. Perhaps the footage is just an actor who looks very much like a famous director.
        1. +1
          22 December 2015 20: 38
          Actually, in my fabrications I did not rely on the interview, especially since it was not in Russian. Actually, I was not familiar with Kubrick, if only with the ship?

          I beg your pardon, but why on earth should Americans justify themselves to Russian “experts” in their astronautics?


          I beg your pardon, but why on earth should the Russians trust the professionals of American astronautics? I will also “believe” this:
      3. 0
        13 February 2018 23: 26
        Nonsense is American flights into space until the early 70s.
        The USSR was 10 or more years ahead then... And then they screwed up with our Presidium of the Supreme Council, or rather, the Americans helped them become oligarchs, and all the achievements of Soviet science went down the drain... (((
  67. +4
    22 December 2015 19: 07
    Remember the footage of the astronaut falling onto the “lunar” soil, they did not realize that there could be sharp stones on the surface, rupture of the spacesuit and instant death; on the Moon there is no water in the form of rivers or seas, which means there are no round stones. The astronaut comes out completely D, EB, IL, or the photos were taken in the pavilion, where there is no direct danger.
  68. +4
    22 December 2015 20: 24
    The hoax of the so-called “flight to the Moon” has been studied by many authors. The position of Dr. FMN, A.I. Popov, in the book “Man on the Moon? What evidence?” author's website manonmoon.ru. It provides not only arguments, but links to verifiable sources.
    I see no point in reprinting. If anyone is interested, read it for yourself. Informative.
  69. +3
    22 December 2015 20: 36
    Sorry robbihood, but following your logic (In a comment to the website of the Zvezda TV channel, the pilot-cosmonaut, twice Hero of the Soviet Union, explained that part of the footage about Armstrong and Aldrin’s flight to the Moon was indeed filmed in the studio. But this was done only so that the viewer could see “the development of what is happening from start to finish." The actual filming begins after Armstrong installs a highly directional antenna for broadcast to Earth.) Was the first spacewalk filmed on the pavilion?
    1. Erg
      +1
      22 December 2015 23: 09
      Russia has ALWAYS been the first in space! And ours will be the first to land on the moon! soldier
    2. 0
      13 February 2018 23: 32
      Armstrong did not see the stars in space, although he still flew on Dzhemeni, with a porthole in front of his face. You can't help but see stars in space. Armstrong studied views of the Earth and space from photographs from satellites, and there is not enough resolution, especially for television cameras. Try to photograph the sky at night yourself. So the Americans didn’t know, and they made a mistake.
      In addition, in Dzhemeni the astronaut is sitting in such a way that during a real launch he will die from a cerebral hemorrhage. It’s just that back then the Americans thought that going into space was the same as going on an airplane, only flying higher. They didn’t think about overloads, and didn’t count on them, and the Russian centrifuge, on which cosmonauts are trained for us, was a top secret object for a long, long time.
  70. +3
    22 December 2015 23: 32
    I think that even with modern technology, you can only take a one-way ticket to the moon. smile
  71. -3
    23 December 2015 03: 40
    Quote: voyaka uh
    The "dying" interview itself is a pure fake.
    Since Kubrick himself died, he could no longer refute the fake.

    More interesting why Americans canceled flights
    three more Apollo: 18,19 and 20. Although ships and missiles were already built, and crews
    were fully prepared?


    Because they actually landed from Apollo 14-17 and did everything that was required.
  72. -5
    23 December 2015 06: 50
    I trust the USSR cosmonauts who say that the Americans were on the moon. And you don’t respect yourself to believe any theorists.
    1. 0
      13 February 2018 23: 37
      Faith is a consequence of limited mind. You have to use your brain.
      The Americans were neither on the Moon nor in manned space at all until about the Soyuz-Apollo flight, when the Americans were in diapers, and there was room in Apollo for only three Americans pissing under themselves, and in the Soyuz all the Americans and Soviet cosmonauts fit, plus even more amenities in in the form of a toilet, a kitchen, and, they say, there was also a shower.
  73. +3
    23 December 2015 07: 24
    In principle, it seemed before that the landing was a falsification, I would like more facts to be sure...
    1. +3
      23 December 2015 13: 16
      Quote: Tigerixon
      In principle, it seemed before that the landing was a falsification, I would like more facts to be sure...


      A lot of materials have been collected here:
      http://bolshoyforum.com/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%A3%D0%9D%D0%9E%D0%9F%D0%95%D0%94%D0%98%D0
      %AF


      You can watch the discussion of Russian scientists:
  74. -1
    23 December 2015 09: 41
    Especially for the fat ones, Leonov said in an interview that they watched that same broadcast and it was broadcast from the Moon.
    1. +1
      23 December 2015 18: 47
      Maybe it’s enough to cite Leonov’s OPINION as evidence?
      Now, if Leonov, in addition to the stories that he watched the broadcast of the “American landing on the Moon,” gave a reasonable explanation for at least some of the inconsistencies in the “landing” story, there would be a topic for conversation. And so...
      No, I personally believe he WATCHED it. But only what was SHOWN to him. So what does this prove? IMHO, the only thing is that Leonov is either honestly mistaken or deliberately lying.
      At one time there was a story about Gagarin's landing after the first space flight... In reality, the descent module was abandoned by Gagarin at altitude and he landed by parachute (it was more reliable) and this was announced. The official version, announced a little later, is that Gagarin landed in a descent module, so the triumph of Soviet space exploration, in the opinion of the “tops,” looked more significant. Well, as a result, at press conferences we received an extremely uncomfortable question from bourgeois correspondents: “How did you land, by parachute or in a capsule?” With any answer, the following unpleasant question was guaranteed.... Maybe it was a story, or maybe that’s exactly what happened.
      Incl. there is no need to talk about the fact that someone (even a very authoritative one!!!) looked at something somewhere and this is evidence of the authenticity of what was shown.
      The criterion for the reliability of an event, IMHO, is the only one - the consistency and consistency of ALL data about this event. ALL!!! If there is even the slightest inconsistency, this is a reason for doubt.
      1. 0
        13 February 2018 23: 39
        It’s strange, they didn’t show it to anyone in the USSR, the leadership of the USSR was embarrassed to show this performance to the people, but they showed it to Leonov...
        Armstrong, having never been in space, lied to the whole world that he had taken a big step for humanity. Well, why shouldn’t some Leonov also shave off?
  75. -2
    23 December 2015 13: 05
    Well, there were as many as six moon landings! the last one in 1972!
  76. 0
    23 December 2015 15: 49
    Quote: Kanatbek
    I explain for the dull: one engine is built for 8 months, then it is tested and adjusted. It takes a lot of time.
    The same helicopter.
    The United States buys it for $ 1 million.
    And in Russia, the national reserves in foreign currency in American banks are enough to live comfortably. All the same, this currency, with the collapse of the dollar by the US Federal Reserve, depreciates half in half a year)))
    Here is such arithmetic ...
    Or more details, more details to chew?

    In a word, I’ll say that they buy from you the most valuable for their pieces of paper, so that your army is left without helicopters, and their companions so that you can’t get out, there was nothing! And not because they don’t know how to make helicopters and rocket engines!

    laughing they forgot one nuance, we PRODUCE all this, the technologies are not lost or sold, moreover, they purchase engines for light-class rockets for launching satellites and trucks, so no damage is caused to our interests. Stop smoking fool
  77. +1
    23 December 2015 16: 05
    Wait, the students will launch the satellite. He will take a photo of the landing site.
  78. +1
    23 December 2015 16: 37
    Quote: Admin
    In an interview, Leonov insisted that the letter “S” on the stone was supposedly written by Eugene Cernan and he was proud of it.
    It later turned out that the photo was taken during Apollo 16, where Cernan did not participate.


    I agree completely) NASA stated that this was a speck on the film and removed it from subsequent photographs. Although the photos do not raise the main questions at all, I’m just wondering who screwed who and how? laughing Cernan told Leonov (which Leonov himself talked about) that he drew this letter C on a moon rock and the only person in the world who left an autograph on the Moon was he, Cernan. Leonov told us this, and NASA denied both. They should at least lie smoothly and cheerfully, otherwise it would amuse everyone laughing
    And it amuses Leonov, who watched a closed broadcast of the alleged landing and now declares himself a sort of “initiate” into the secrets of the lunar program laughing I watched what the rest of the world (except North Korea) watched and thought, how important I am, they let me watch)) Then he tells Cernan’s nonsense, etc. Who is Leonov for Americans? Who told him the truth? They keep him for revelations like Cernan and pay for it bucks in the bank, where he occupies a very high position as a cover, a businessman with his mother’s leg))) So that with his position as a great cosmonaut he would justify the nonsense of the Americans.
  79. 0
    23 December 2015 17: 59
    2. The astronauts were on the moon, but for some reason (photos and vedeo materials were damaged, damaged, of poor quality, or something that could not be shown to the general world).
    In the states, you should live in the states. Ufology is at the level there. We would learn a lot of interesting things. The state is even doing this.
  80. +1
    23 December 2015 21: 55
    Just in case, I remind you that spacesuits and spaceships of the 1960-1970 model did not have protection from hard cosmic radiation. So they could still fly, but walking and so on is unlikely. The corpses would definitely come back. Anticipating your questions, I will say further: all spaceships in low-Earth orbit are in the Earth’s magnetic field and it protects against this very harsh cosmic radiation. But the Moon is already behind the Earth’s protective field, so it’s a mistake, American guys. You didn’t expect that science would develop faster than you would actually fly to the moon.
  81. +3
    23 December 2015 23: 14
    There is no reliable evidence of the American landing on the moon.
    1. 0
      13 February 2018 23: 41
      But there are reliable flaws in the American evidence.
  82. +1
    23 December 2015 23: 39
    It is reliably known that the astronauts met a Chinese man on the Moon. They ask: “How did you end up here?” “And so: they stood on top of each other...”
    You can get answers to any questions regarding the technical implementation of the “lunar project”. But no one knows the answer to the most important question: why is all this necessary?
    1. 0
      13 February 2018 23: 55
      Quote: iouris
      ...But no one knows the answer to the most important question: why is all this necessary?

      That is how it is"they do not know"!?
      Americans and Anglo-Saxons are racists, they do not consider other nations to be people, the whole world for them is half-humans, sub-humans, inferior races, and so on. In the Anglo-Saxon language, the name of any race sounds like this: “semi-monkeys.” And the highest race should be the first in everything, it is the smartest, it will be from it that people of the next stage of development will be born (that’s why the Anglo-Saxons have such a feature - superman, superman, Wolverine, Hulk...), it is the highest American race that will be the first to have the power of thought move objects and remotely detonate missiles in Russian and Chinese mines.
      And then, bummer, the USSR launched Gagarin... And the USA doesn’t even know how this is possible. It's technology, technology, and technology. This is industry, science, and damn the communists. And the United States is unable to launch an orange into orbit, despite the gloomy genius of German science. How so???????
      THEY ARE THE BEST IN THE WORLD, THEY ARE AMERICANS!!!!
      And they immediately, instantly, begin to concoct a lie that they also flew away. They immediately concoct a lie that the USSR stole everything from them, and over the corpses of the astronauts, dozens of them directly died, flew first into space. And the Americans thought first of all about convenience, and like safety.
      And then they went into a frenzy: if flights to orbit are falsified with impunity, then why not fly to the Moon? It was a big bummer when it turned out that the USSR was actually going to the Moon... A very big bummer. But they managed to come to an agreement with the future oligarchs from the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR. Is it for nothing that their presidents and children live there in America, while our families are sent abroad? Only Khrushchev honestly ended up as a personal pensioner, but he also said that: “The Americans will be launching satellites the size of oranges for a long time.” He did not know that a little later the Politburo would sell science, the Motherland, and the Soviet people.
  83. +2
    24 December 2015 00: 18
    I think so, whoever wants to believe in the “fairy tales” of the Americans should continue to believe in them. Just one request. do not impose your point of view on this issue on sensible people!
  84. -1
    24 December 2015 09: 26
    No (nonsense) they flew to the moon NASA is a “no-frills organization” the information war is in full swing... they’re telling the world about Gagarin, we’re looking for a catch with their lunar program
    1. 0
      14 February 2018 00: 00
      They didn't fly to the moon. Technically, they still can’t do this.
      But this is a political question, a question of the prestige of the racist Anglo-Saxon race.
      First of all, they must convince themselves that their purpose is to decide the destinies of other people, because they are the smartest, the most fair. They also knew better than the blacks that working for the Anglo-Saxons ennobles them and makes semi-humans out of monkeys. That is, slavery is a good thing for blacks.
  85. kig
    -1
    24 December 2015 10: 24
    Author, why don’t you first read what our cosmonauts think about this? For example, Alexey Leonov. Well, since you use quotes from different articles, I will answer the same:

    True, Kubrick’s widow did not recognize her own husband in these shots and stated that Kubrick never gave any interview to any Murray. Moreover, the author of the interview claims that it was filmed in May 1999. We have to admit that he has supernatural abilities - after all, by May 1999, Kubrick had been dead for two months. Finally, in the unedited version of the video, the interviewer can be heard referring to the pseudo-Kubrick as Tom several times.
    1. +4
      24 December 2015 10: 42
      With all due respect to the Soviet cosmonauts, their opinion on this matter is not worth a penny and does not constitute any evidence.
      It would be much more interesting to know the content of Soviet intelligence reports of that time on this issue. But we definitely won’t see them.

      I fully admit that Kubrick's interview is a phony. So what, how does this prove the “moon landing”? No way!! Doubts about the American landings are based not only and not so much on film blunders. In other areas, the mistakes made by the Americans are through the roof and they are unable to give them a clear explanation. Only days they call: “Believe us, we were there!!!”, and they would also add: “I swear to my mother..”.
      1. 0
        26 December 2015 18: 52
        Quote: tolancop
        I admit that Kubrick's interview is a phony. So what, how does this prove the “moon landing”? No way!!

        a strange perversion in logic - but should his interview, like himself, do this?
  86. +1
    12 January 2017 03: 55
    opus, you were wrong about the incandescent lamp. The priority of her invention belongs to several European ones, incl. Russian (Lodygin, Yablochkov) engineers through a series of successive approximations, starting with a platinum thread in the air (Delarue, England, 1840).

    Edison created the TECHNOLOGY for the production and use of incandescent lamps, and also brought it to large-scale industrial implementation, unlike all other inventors of the light bulb. Moreover, some patents were also obtained by him personally, but this is not so important.
    1. 0
      14 February 2018 00: 03
      No, Edison didn't create anything. Swan made the light bulb from the British, and Edison simply patented it in his own name. And they, the Anglo-Saxons, can do this. Creatures, sir.
  87. 0
    21 August 2017 16: 52
    Let's wait for official comments from the US government. In the meantime, long live the Moon Slayer.
    1. 0
      14 February 2018 00: 04
      Officially, the United States will lay down bones, drown the whole world in war, but will prove that the Anglo-Saxons are the superior race, and the lot of everyone else is to be their slaves. This is also the root of the lunar scam.
  88. 0
    23 August 2017 09: 23
    Kanatbek,
    We are developing production technology. We train unique, highly qualified specialists. WE use AMERICAN money to improve plant equipment and develop new engines. THEY receive only the finished product. Have you heard the parable about a man who was fed fish so that he would not learn to fish?
  89. 0
    25 August 2017 09: 37
    Kanatbek,
    My friend, in your homeland they don’t even buy, but take everything they need for FREE.
  90. The comment was deleted.
  91. 0
    26 August 2017 09: 43
    The more monstrous the lie, the more similar it is to the truth. Firstly, solar radiation, from which there was no way to protect ourselves. A thermonuclear reaction occurs in the sun, resulting in the formation of hard gamma radiation, as well as a flux of positrons. Secondly, how was the lander docked to the mother ship? Without atmosphere (no aerofoils) using shunting thrusters? There, if the impulse is not extinguished in time, you will be spinning without stopping. How were the coordinates combined in space, how were the velocities equalized, and how, finally, did they observe the orbital ship through a telescope? And we must also take into account that the astronauts are in spacesuits that are inflated by internal pressure, and their fingers cannot be bent. Circus, and that's all.
  92. +1
    26 August 2017 15: 36
    [quote=GDP]The Americans did not broadcast video from the moon! There were no such technologies then. According to NASA, everything was shot on regular film.
    The original film disappeared without a trace...
    What an unexpected coincidence :lo
    No technology? Well, what about the broadcast of Gagarin’s flight, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r0EiOouSEo. and this considering that the USSR lagged significantly behind the states in the field of electronics. Who prevented them from filming the process of undocking and docking of the lunar module? Why are there traces on the dust near the lunar module, because it shouldn’t have been there, the engines would have blown it away during landing. and many more inconsistencies.
  93. +1
    27 August 2017 23: 12
    The probability that the United States was on the moon is 0 - in order to launch a person into the earth’s orbit, we conducted dozens of launches and tests of systems capable of ensuring a person’s stay for at least 1 orbit and how many emergency situations there were during takeoffs, landings, etc. And here, having no experience and launches of even unmanned vehicles, “a whole super program with crews on board”, not a single death or accident - and then suddenly all the soils, films, etc. were stolen, disappeared... and everyone who was involved in this fake suddenly they did not die a natural death on earth either...probably there were Apollo flights, but not further than the orbit of the earth.
  94. 0
    28 August 2017 21: 59
    Quote: 23424636
    when they deceived the whole world, and this is clearly due to the fact that they can’t repeat it, I really do not want to believe that it also became a sucker. The next puncture of foreign intelligence and the masters of eating the budget is catching up with the chimera. By the way, where did 200 kg of lunar soil disappear. Yes, it was not there.

    Not 200 but 380 kg. This is declared property of the United States and they do not want to share it with anyone.
  95. 0
    28 August 2017 22: 16
    Quote: cniza
    Who needs such stuffing?

    ))) Ghu! The children's answer is a children's answer. For the INVISIBLE. And for the slow-witted I will explain.
    That the Americans didn’t have (6) moon landings until 1972. I’m not talking about the first one, supposedly July 25, 1969, since they had no engine before the roses of the USSR shaft, to restart and return from the moon to the earth. They appeared only thanks to Gorbachov. Where the American designers themselves honestly admitted.
    And those in the head have manure and sawdust. and with logic not so hot. A little hint for a little intelligence development. Why Americans allegedly brought 380 kg of moons of soil from the moon. And not one country in the world, including the allies, was given a single gram for study. He announced that this is American real estate, and he is not sharing with anyone who is not living. But when the USSR automatic station delivered lunar soil to the earth of some 100 grams. Then the Americans eagerly began to beg for themselves at least one gram - to study. For some reason, they forgot that they have as much as 380 kg. Any thoughts do not arise in the head. Yes, in the USSR they knew that there were no Americans on the moon. But why they were silent on this subject, I do not know.
  96. The comment was deleted.
  97. 0
    4 September 2017 11: 23
    opus,


    We will talk about how the Americans confused longitudinal vibrations with transverse ones, why the anti-pulsation partitions turned out to be a complete profanation, and why, when creating engines for the Space Shuttle, the Americans renounced the F-1 and completely followed Glushko’s path...
  98. 0
    4 September 2017 11: 27
    saturn.mmm,

    Wow!

  99. 0
    4 September 2017 11: 35
    Quote: opus
    (Velor number 2 - I personally velor 7 corrections of the message, corrected quickly)


    But there were two brave souls, encrypted under the names Peregrev and VSVOR, who went into battle with me on the essence of the issue.
    As they say, for courage - five points, for knowledge of the subject - two points.

    Arkady Velurov ©


    I'm sorry, who, "Overheating" or "VSVOR"?
  100. 0
    4 September 2017 11: 45
    Quote: Alexandra1970
    You didn’t expect that science would develop faster than you would actually fly to the moon.


    They didn’t know then that every inquisitive mind has a Photoshop distribution kit with a magnifying glass... laughing