On the possible consequences of the application of TOC "Sunchild" in Syria

249
East is a delicate matter. Too thin. And to understand the affairs of the Eastern with the brains of a European is not that difficult, but it’s just that everything is a little different than what we think.



Seeing the message that we brought the Sunshine to Syria, I honestly thought hard. On the one hand, the system is very effective. And test it in combat conditions, as they say, God himself commanded. Moreover, it is about such circumstances of application that she is sharpened.

On the other hand, what is the "sun"? Heavy flamethrower system. Here the key word is flamethrower. Who will this system be used against? Most of them are not only Muslims, they are also Arabs. And there is a small complexity.

I don’t know how in Arabic, but in Farsi, the worst insult for a man sounds like “the son of a burned father”. And it says a lot. Afghanistan, of course, is not close to Syria, but the essence is the same as the Persians, the Arabs. That is, Sunni Muslims. Which constitute the main majority of the warring on the side of ISIS and other gangs.

I will not go into particular religion, than one category of martyrs is different from the other, the point is that the soul does not enter heaven from the burned body. Say, it's the 21 century in the courtyard, and this is complete nonsense? Maybe. However, some savagery is observed even in an enlightened Europe, then what about the Middle Eastern countries? Wildness enough. At least with the destruction of monuments of examples is more than enough.

When religion and the desire to blindly follow it overshadows the mind, then we observe what is happening. Wildness, barbarism and other pleasures performed by fanatics from ISIS.

And here flamethrowers? It's simple. The war in Syria is a war on a religious basis. And religion is firmly seated in the heads of all the warring, especially among those who are against Assad. They are fighting not only with apostates, but also with infringing their rights and freedoms. It is difficult to underestimate.

The fanatic burned by TOS, whose soul does not fall into his paradise for us, is in principle not a big problem. For a dead terrorist is wonderful. But for his colleagues and supporters this is a slightly different point of view.

The same "Al-Jazeera" with its huge audience will undoubtedly be happy to show kebabs, which ISIL fighters turn into in the sun or there, "moderate terrorists." And it will be filed as the fact that the Christians have barbarously killed Muslims. By burning them.

What will it give? Yes, the influx of new adepts. A new wave of jihad, but not against Assad, but against Russia. That is against us. Each such burnt martyr will definitely become not just a martyr hero, but an object to be avenged. And it will go. There, in the east, with this no problems.

In general, I think that our leaders in the operation have calculated everything. Hope so. Because the practice of Moscow, Volgograd, and Volgodonsk showed that it is not easy to defend oneself from a fanatic who has tied up with explosives. And fanatics are abundant there.
249 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    14 October 2015 19: 27
    War is war. whoever can and fights. Shouldn't we fight with swords today?
  2. 0
    14 October 2015 19: 32
    Fuck these ghouls, not heaven. From the flames of "Sunlight" to the flames of hell...
  3. +1
    14 October 2015 20: 21
    The article corresponds to the author's last name - this is off the top of my head. Yusiei started a war in the Middle East, and her ears are sticking out in the formation of the ISIS organization. Remember how the terrorists easily took the city, and almost half a billion dollars was already left in the bank for them - this was the first contribution from the US to the establishment of ISIS, and you don’t have to talk about weapons, was it planned that way or did plans change during the bombing of Iraq? . The participation of our Aerospace Forces in Syria is quite logical and is conditioned by achieving the country’s security on the distant approaches. The author’s mention of the sacred fire is nothing more than a threat to the coalition countries fighting terrorism, which has put on the guise of perverted Islam. The author was ordered to frame this war as nothing other than religious. Such propaganda is one of the best ways to play off any faiths and concessions. But the meaning of using these weapons has nothing to do with religion. I really want to smoke out the bandits from dugouts, basements and various underground communications, like cockroaches, so that they cause us as little inconvenience as possible. Who likes to cut off heads... Is this, hey, author Skomorokhov, Christian, Muslim? But burning someone alive, doused with gasoline, that’s what it’s like. What do you think of death by drowning? And it is barbaric to destroy world history. So they got us to the very liver with this. In your opinion, we should be afraid of revenge and remain silent, huh? Skomorokhov... And for me, it’s a barbecue with family, accompanied by kvass with young vigorous horseradish.
  4. 0
    14 October 2015 21: 22
    By the way, the article was republished on Newsland. Despite the large number of Russia’s enemies there, the article mostly received negative comments. That’s it.
  5. 0
    14 October 2015 21: 23
    So in war, everything is grown-up and all methods are good, either you or you, there are not many options. The one who is brave and has better weapons wins.
    The victim no longer cares how he was killed, in the sun or from a slingshot.
    And as for religions and various showdowns over the right and wrong believers, I repeat - in the face of death, all this is in the background, there is only one thing, whose side are you on. On the light side and for a just cause - a hero, on the dark side and for selfish interests - an anti-hero.
  6. 0
    14 October 2015 23: 11
    Sorry Roman, you have a mess in your head. Persians (Iranians) are Shiites. The Assadites are basically Alawites. How you brought Christian Russians in is incomprehensible to me. (The Suns were purchased by Assad BEFORE the war).
    As a result, this is a continuation of a long-standing litigation. “It doesn’t matter whose stone it is, what matters is WHO threw it.”
  7. 0
    15 October 2015 01: 11
    The author dug into the Russian term “Heavy flamethrower system”. To the studio to translate it into Arabic for semi-literate Wahhabis. Or does the author think that the entire Sunni world will begin to learn Russian, IN ORDER TO CORRECTLY TRANSLATE the name of this shaitan trumpet? The author simply made the problem out of thin air.
    As Putin said - soak in the toilet! And it doesn’t matter what.
  8. 0
    15 October 2015 02: 34
    I don’t know how it is in Arabic, but in Farsi the worst insult for a man sounds like “son of a burned father.” And that says a lot. Afghanistan, of course, is not close to Syria, but the essence is the same between the Persians and the Arabs. (...) the point is that from a burned body the soul does not go to heaven.

    The author heard the ringing...
    1. Persians are Aryans, Arabs are Semites.
    2. “son of a burned father” is the worst insult for Zoroastrian, but not for a Muslim! For a Muslim, the worst execution is not burning, but hanging (that’s why they hanged Saddam!) - the Gurias abhor the souls of those hanged, because they left the body not through the throat, but... well, you get the idea!
  9. 0
    15 October 2015 03: 38
    health
    put a minus. my logic is simple. If Alah created people, then the one who kills people is the enemy of Alah. well, childish excuses like they are not the people whom Alah created. They will break about the karan where it is written, Allah created people. ALL !!!! broadcast this thought from all channels. and burn the enemies of Allah with the sun’s heat, Allah will not let his enemies into heaven anyway.
  10. 0
    15 October 2015 10: 49
    We urgently need to come up with a system that does not burn but freezes :)
  11. 0
    15 October 2015 12: 56
    In my opinion, the article is provocative and is aimed at weakening the combat capabilities of the anti-terrorist group created by the Russian Federation. If a war is started, then it is waged decisively using all available effective combat means, since victory in the war must be achieved in the shortest possible time. The call to fight “according to Sharia law” is an ideological sabotage aimed at recognizing terrorists as subjects of international law.
  12. 0
    15 October 2015 17: 38
    And I think that the author is fundamentally wrong. The use of flamethrower systems can be perceived from a religious perspective in a completely different way. For ISIS militants, this will be like a curse from above. After all, true Muslims are against war in principle, if anyone has read the Koran, of course.
  13. 0
    15 October 2015 20: 39
    The author is clearly not aware of how TOC works - defeat is not due to temperature, but due to the enormous pressure of the volumetric explosion generated during the explosion of the ammunition. You can't grill shish kebab on it. Lots of chatter...
  14. 0
    29 October 2015 20: 36
    It was rightly said that Eastern people are more religious, and even more so Muslims. They are very afraid of being burned, and therefore they will think. Example - if you want to get information from a Muslim, tell him that after death he will be sewn into pigskin. It works. And therefore Solntsepek is also a propaganda weapon. By the way, in Afghanistan they shied away from him with terrible speed.
  15. 0
    5 November 2015 13: 12
    The author starts "burbot for a snag". In order not to anger the Mujahideen, it is better not to touch them. This one has worn out! Well done author!! What kind of enemies are these? Don’t draw caricatures of them, you can’t use fire to them. Well, let’s go, we’ll give up right away and that’s it. Well, how can such a mediocre thought come into your head?