On the possible consequences of the application of TOC "Sunchild" in Syria

249
East is a delicate matter. Too thin. And to understand the affairs of the Eastern with the brains of a European is not that difficult, but it’s just that everything is a little different than what we think.



Seeing the message that we brought the Sunshine to Syria, I honestly thought hard. On the one hand, the system is very effective. And test it in combat conditions, as they say, God himself commanded. Moreover, it is about such circumstances of application that she is sharpened.

On the other hand, what is the "sun"? Heavy flamethrower system. Here the key word is flamethrower. Who will this system be used against? Most of them are not only Muslims, they are also Arabs. And there is a small complexity.

I don’t know how in Arabic, but in Farsi, the worst insult for a man sounds like “the son of a burned father”. And it says a lot. Afghanistan, of course, is not close to Syria, but the essence is the same as the Persians, the Arabs. That is, Sunni Muslims. Which constitute the main majority of the warring on the side of ISIS and other gangs.

I will not go into particular religion, than one category of martyrs is different from the other, the point is that the soul does not enter heaven from the burned body. Say, it's the 21 century in the courtyard, and this is complete nonsense? Maybe. However, some savagery is observed even in an enlightened Europe, then what about the Middle Eastern countries? Wildness enough. At least with the destruction of monuments of examples is more than enough.

When religion and the desire to blindly follow it overshadows the mind, then we observe what is happening. Wildness, barbarism and other pleasures performed by fanatics from ISIS.

And here flamethrowers? It's simple. The war in Syria is a war on a religious basis. And religion is firmly seated in the heads of all the warring, especially among those who are against Assad. They are fighting not only with apostates, but also with infringing their rights and freedoms. It is difficult to underestimate.

The fanatic burned by TOS, whose soul does not fall into his paradise for us, is in principle not a big problem. For a dead terrorist is wonderful. But for his colleagues and supporters this is a slightly different point of view.

The same "Al-Jazeera" with its huge audience will undoubtedly be happy to show kebabs, which ISIL fighters turn into in the sun or there, "moderate terrorists." And it will be filed as the fact that the Christians have barbarously killed Muslims. By burning them.

What will it give? Yes, the influx of new adepts. A new wave of jihad, but not against Assad, but against Russia. That is against us. Each such burnt martyr will definitely become not just a martyr hero, but an object to be avenged. And it will go. There, in the east, with this no problems.

In general, I think that our leaders in the operation have calculated everything. Hope so. Because the practice of Moscow, Volgograd, and Volgodonsk showed that it is not easy to defend oneself from a fanatic who has tied up with explosives. And fanatics are abundant there.
249 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +81
    14 October 2015 05: 48
    And to cut off heads alive - how is it? I do not think that there will be a bunch of people who want to fry on the "Sun". Everyone wants to live.
    1. +37
      14 October 2015 06: 00
      CBT was created "without a second thought." But in the United States, they began to sell bullets to kill Muslims that would prevent them from going to heaven, this was done on purpose.
      http://www.rg.ru/2013/06/27/puli.html
      1. +104
        14 October 2015 06: 15
        As young people say: "The author is Burning ...."
        Let us wrap each terrorist in a sheet and dig up a grave, and apologize to our relatives for the fact that he died killing "infidels" .......?!
        1. +100
          14 October 2015 06: 22
          Quote: Bone
          As young people say: "The author is Burning ...."
          Let us wrap each terrorist in a sheet and dig up a grave, and apologize to our relatives for the fact that he died killing "infidels" .......?!


          For once I disagree with the author - the effect will be exactly the opposite, hearing about the "sunshine" will only skimp on the way .. and in general it is desirable to hang more of them with a piece of bacon in your mouth - that's when the martyr is guaranteed to fly past the box office (paradise) ..
          1. +36
            14 October 2015 07: 04
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            For ever I disagree with the author

            Yes, Roma is this, not at all.
            And even more so put on Al Jazeera, along with CNN.
            1. +23
              14 October 2015 07: 39
              Romchik is quite "that", in his old age. Like showing burnt corpses on TV, increasing the number of those who want to be burned alive? Well, nonsense.
              1. +14
                14 October 2015 09: 16
                When religion and the desire to blindly follow it overshadows the mind, then we observe what is happening. Wildness, barbarism and other pleasures performed by fanatics from ISIS.

                What kind of fanatics are they if they started to run away and panic because of the loss of initiative in hostilities? In Afghanistan, the Mujahideen fought with the overwhelming superiority of the Soviet group. And those who fight in Syria are ordinary mercenaries who are not ready to die for money. Of course, they may be believers or their activity is covered by religion, but here how far it is to fanaticism.
            2. +7
              14 October 2015 10: 13
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Yes, Roma is this, not at all.

              - I did not expect this from the author (with whom I was always in solidarity, almost always) that after approving the entry into the battle, he would have concerns - and not whether the fanatic-enemy would respond.
          2. -20
            14 October 2015 07: 18
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            having heard about the "sunshine" they will skiddle only on the way


            Bandiuk - of course they will be draping, only the picture that AlJazeera will show - these will not be burnt militants. will show a woman with a child. And the problem in Pinocchio is that it is called-FIREWORKS. There are quite a few ammunition doing the same. but non-showing no negative effect.
            VALJAZIRA it will be announced simply
            -Russians brought flamethrowers and burn children and women.
            and then prove who is here d.u.r.a.k.
            You can’t imagine power like Al Jazeera. so social. networks in the billionth Muslim world.
            1. +49
              14 October 2015 07: 55
              Quote: atalef
              You can’t imagine power like Al Jazeera. so social. networks in the billionth Muslim world.

              Dear, it’s not worth to pile everything. The power of beliefs, fanaticism, the wrath of the Muslim world ..... Well, the Americans mocked the Koran in Iraq, and their American priest burned the Koran, and the French drew caricatures of the prophet and what? A wave of protests in all Muslim countries - and they are fighting under American money, with American weapons for American interests. Where are the fanatics punishing Europe and the USA, if they have abused the main shrines? One Boston bombing and one attack on Charlie’s editorial staff. ISIS (Iblisites) themselves burn prisoners alive. The author exaggerates.
              1. -29
                14 October 2015 09: 48
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                Quote: atalef
                You can’t imagine power like Al Jazeera. so social. networks in the billionth Muslim world.

                Dear, it’s not worth to pile everything. The power of beliefs, fanaticism, the wrath of the Muslim world ..... Well, the Americans mocked the Koran in Iraq, and their American priest burned the Koran, and the French drew caricatures of the prophet and what? The wave of protests in all Muslim countries - and they’re fighting under American money, American weapons for American interests. Where are the fanatics punishing Europe and the USA, if they have abused the main shrines? One Boston bombing and one attack on Charlie’s editorial staff. ISIS (Iblisites) themselves burn prisoners alive. The author exaggerates.

                ===
                the problem is that rf does not have that kind of money and opportunities to influence public opinion
                1. +4
                  14 October 2015 14: 09
                  You are an hour, the wallet of the Russian Federation with the wallet of its dwarf republic is not confused?
                  1. -4
                    15 October 2015 23: 13
                    Quote: north
                    You are an hour, the wallet of the Russian Federation with the wallet of its dwarf republic is not confused?

                    ===
                    stupid, carefully re-read the post, some do not get the point right the first time. excuse me for being straightforward, this also applies to 26 minusers.
                    the republic has nothing to do with it, because I am a citizen of the Russian Federation
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. +18
              14 October 2015 09: 21
              Quote: atalef
              VALJAZIRA it will be announced simply
              -Russians brought flamethrowers and burn children and women.
              and then prove who is here d.u.r.a.k.

              Al Jazeera will show all this without TOS.
              Quote: atalef
              You can’t imagine power like Al Jazeera. so social. networks in the billionth Muslim world.

              We imagine this very well, it’s a technology worked out to the smallest detail that has shown itself in all its glory in the ruin. She is really scary, but this does not mean that you need to stick your head in the sand and wait.
              Something I can’t recall the reasoning of the Israeli leaders on the topic of whether to shoot at terrorists (who and how was identified as terrorists - another question), because there are a lot of them and what their media will show. For some reason, they immediately give out and, besides, to everyone that is.
              1. -12
                14 October 2015 09: 31
                Quote: Firstvanguard
                Al Jazeera will show all this without TOS.

                Of course, but TOS will look extremely photogenic and convincing

                Quote: Firstvanguard
                Something I can’t recall the reasoning of the Israeli leaders on the topic of whether to shoot at terrorists (who and how was identified as terrorists - another question), because there are a lot of them and what their media will show. For some reason, they immediately give out and, besides, to everyone that is.

                You can’t imagine how much this is taken into account.
                Sometimes think about why there is no death penalty for terrorists in Israel and there wasn’t (even when all of Europe and the USA were still hanging) and why. you don’t see a terrorist who was shot and then finished off. No, if he didn’t die, the police protect him from the wrath of the tops first, and then the ambulance arrives and takes him to the hospital. Do you think out of love for them? You are deeply mistaken. Heroization is much more dangerous than death (bandyuk) as a martyr.
                1. +5
                  14 October 2015 09: 45
                  Quote: atalef
                  You don’t see any terrorist who was shot and then finished off. No, if he did not die, the police first protect him from the wrath of the tops, and then the ambulance arrives and takes him to the hospital.

                  And then he’ll probably treat him, let him go and give some more cookies.
                  Quote: atalef
                  Heroization is much more dangerous than death (bandyuk) as a martyr.

                  Therefore, your military and the police probably do not kill them (bandits).
                  And yet, it is customary for cultured people to address "you" if the interlocutor is not a close friend.
                2. +9
                  14 October 2015 11: 13
                  The bandits will be heroized no matter what kind of death they died. Even if they themselves stumbled and broke their head. Pinocchio can also be used not with incendiary ammunition. And it seems to me that it is most likely that thermobaric charges will be used. On the other hand, why not think about the opposite effect: maybe, having the prospect of being "burned," the number of those wishing to join the ranks of Islamists will decrease? After all, burning will not give the road to heaven, and this, as far as I understand, is one of the main sources of their "heroism". For the road to heaven, fanatics put on a suicide belt.
                3. +6
                  14 October 2015 19: 08
                  Quote: atalef
                  and why . you don’t see any terrorist who was shot and then finished off.

                  Today they showed news about Israel and showed why. A guy with a knife attacked a policeman, so he and his colleagues chopped the guy up with lead in a matter of seconds, so he didn’t need to finish it.
                  And I generally do not really condemn the police, although I could have taken them alive. But since there is no death penalty, it’s easier to shoot on the spot, especially since there will be nothing ...
                4. +3
                  14 October 2015 19: 18
                  Quote: atalef
                  and why . you don’t see any terrorist who was shot and then finished off

                  Why not? The rules say that a fallen terrorist needs to be neutralized no matter how he knocks out a weapon, firing a bullet in the head or hitting him in the head. In my humble opinion, those who do not fire a neutralizing shot, especially in a crowd of people, take on a huge responsibility, more than once or twice after the first came the second and if you don’t neutralize the first one, he will shoot you in the back. In addition, many of them put on a shahid’s belt and after falling he may decide to undermine. It depends on the situation, of course.
                5. +10
                  15 October 2015 00: 00
                  Quote: atalef
                  Sometimes think about why in Israel there is no death penalty for terrorists and there wasn’t (even then, when the whole of Europe and the USA were still hanging) and why. you don’t see a terrorist who was shot and then finished off. No, if he didn’t die, the police protect him from the wrath of the tops first, and then the ambulance arrives and takes him to the hospital.

                  Why should I remind such a bright patriot of Israel as atalef, about Michael Harari and his Mitzvat Elohim? Probably because there is no death penalty in Israel?
                  In the nine months since the Munich tragedy, Committee X was directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of several dozen Palestinian terrorists. They were hunted down and destroyed all over the world: in Paris, Rome, Nicosia, Beirut ... Terrorists were shot point blank, blown up in their own houses, shot down on cars speeding at high speed ... Even those who are at any slightest danger the last moment managed to slip out from under the nose of Israeli foreign intelligence and get lost somewhere in Europe or the Middle East. Revenge has overtaken all ...
                  Terrorists are not executed, they are shot and blown up all over Europe and beyond. Of course, after Munich-72 this is the right thing to do, but juggling facts to please the political situation is an ingrained habit of "liberal circles".

                  It is a bad habit to say anyhow what, if only "Russia does everything wrong, Russia is to blame for everything, but here in Israel ..."

                  May God grant happiness and prosperity to Israel and to you, atalefpersonally. Live happily and do what you want with YOUR terrorists. At least give them medals. And Russia, without Israeli advice, I assure you, will figure out what to do with its own.
                  1. 0
                    15 October 2015 17: 00
                    I agree with you 1000 percent.
                6. +4
                  15 October 2015 16: 42
                  then the ambulance arrives and takes him to the hospital

                  Write dear, which is better? what Instant death or slow medical murder, or maybe your aesculapians are doing brainwashing and at the exit a puppet man, or maybe just a "vegetable". wassat IMHO
              2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +4
              14 October 2015 11: 50
              The Russians brought flamethrowers and a tourniquet of children and women.
              The Russians will not participate in the ground operation in Syria, they are not fools in the General Staff. wink
            4. The comment was deleted.
            5. +4
              14 October 2015 12: 11
              Quote: atalef
              VALJAZIRA it will be announced simply
              -Russians brought flamethrowers and burn children and women.
              and then prove who is here d.u.r.a.k.
              - Given the current situation with the "truth" in the media, your argument does not look very convincing.

              There will be no flamethrowers, but the command will be "face!" - will find a reason. I have no doubt about it.

              Do not go uncle to Syria bullet.
              In Syria, missiles, evil planes
              There are big flamethrowers in Syria!

              Terrorist - remember and tell a fellow:
              In Syria, the terrible Che-bu-ra-tor!
            6. +4
              14 October 2015 12: 38
              And the problem in Pinocchio is that it is called-FIREBAR.
              Funny you kids from the state of Israel. Teach others about the humanity of the use of weapons, while you yourself do not sign or comply with any conventions. As an example:
              The convention banning the use of napalm was adopted by 99 of the states of the world, more than half of all represented in the UN. Among them are Russia (then the RSFSR), Ukraine (Ukrainian SSR), Belarus (BSSR) and all of Europe (San Marino and Andorra have no armies, therefore they did not participate in the process of limiting lethal means). Countries that were in a state of war or are awaiting it, abstained from signing or ratifying. Among them are the USA, Israel, Turkey, the Republic of Korea, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Sudan, Nigeria and some others. After the collapse of the USSR, the four former republics (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan) also did not join the convention (the third protocol).
              wink feel
            7. The comment was deleted.
            8. +1
              14 October 2015 18: 45
              Quote: atalef
              Quote: afdjhbn67
              having heard about the "sunshine" they will skiddle only on the way


              Bandiuk - of course they will be draping, only the picture that AlJazeera will show - these will not be burnt militants. will show a woman with a child. And the problem in Pinocchio is that it is called-FIREWORKS. There are quite a few ammunition doing the same. but non-showing no negative effect.
              VALJAZIRA it will be announced simply
              -Russians brought flamethrowers and burn children and women.
              and then prove who is here d.u.r.a.k.
              You can’t imagine power like Al Jazeera. so social. networks in the billionth Muslim world.

              The minus did not set either you or Roman. There is a rebuke. Dear forum users, you, like no one else, should know that TOC will not flamethrow, at least it will be the same flamethrower as Tornado or ... a cannon from the time of Ivan the Terrible ... but how did the dance jump out of the barrel too ... Brown the minced meat of course, from the insides of the TOS heap, but the horror is not roasting, but in the form of a corpse swollen like a deep-sea fish raised to the surface ...
            9. 0
              14 October 2015 22: 57
              "You do not represent the strength of both Al-Jazeera and social networks in the billion-dollar Muslim world."

              And now there are cartoons about the good Russian show?
          3. The comment was deleted.
            1. +32
              14 October 2015 07: 36
              Presumably, Iraq bought from us Solntsepeki exclusively for Christians, Jews, Hindus, etc.?
              And kosher bullets are not far away)))
              Funny logic - KILL, BUT BY THE RULES!
              This is a clinic, gentlemen, comrades! Relish whom and how they killed.
              It’s not ethical to kill if it’s not a defense!
              We have weapons (miscellaneous), their use is lawful primarily according to universal standards, the punishment of violence by violence, the offender must be punished! Jew, Christian, Muslim, atheist, idolater No matter the crime must be punished!
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. -14
                14 October 2015 09: 34
                Quote: Reduktor
                And kosher bullets are not far away))) Funny logic - KILL, BUT BY THE RULES!


                no, kill, but with the head.
                I will give you one example
                So, for a general understanding.
                Suppose a soldier died in battle or was caught crucified on a cross.
                Like here and here - death, But the reaction of society is completely different. As well as the number of citizens who wanted revenge. those. what have you achieved? Instead of one fighter, they got another 10.
                The novel does not say that bandits should not be destroyed; he means that they would be destroyed without producing new ones.
                1. +17
                  14 October 2015 09: 55
                  Quote: atalef
                  Oman does not say that bandits should not be destroyed; he means that he would destroy them without producing new ones.

                  Let me repeat myself, bandyukov bears fruit:
                  - financing and information support from the Persian monarchies;
                  - training, weapons and political support from the Washington;
                  - the distribution channel of Syrian oil through the Turkish border, as well as the possibility of these bandits snooping through this border, on vacation, replenishment, weapons, etc.
                  - attacks of the Turkish Air Force on the formation of the Kurds fighting with these same bandits.
                  CBT, in the case of bandits, thins them.
                  Focusing on the religious aspect of the application of TOC, this is just a diversion from the main to the secondary.
                2. +22
                  14 October 2015 11: 06
                  Stop writing nonsense. That the author is talking nonsense, now you have decided to catch this idiocy. If they thought about their soul, they would not be engaged in murders, robberies, violence, etc. And these are all attempts to justify the wreck ... with a religious theme. And they sponsor completely different things by sponsoring interested states.
                  1. +4
                    15 October 2015 00: 15
                    Quote: AlexSK
                    Stop writing nonsense. That the author is talking nonsense, now you have decided to catch this idiocy. If they thought about their soul, they would not be engaged in murders, robberies, violence, etc.

                    If you think about the soul all the time - yours or your enemy, then there will be no time to fight. The soul is not a military category, and after the war it is possible to think about it if you are lucky. And in the war, I think, the main thing is to do our job. And the job is to destroy the enemy. And the more enemies I destroy, the better I do my job. The method of destruction does not matter. There is an enemy and we are. All. We were taught this way ... Honestly, I don't know anyone who would dream of "bloody boys". Those who have gone on the attack at night for the past 30 years - I know of them, but think about the soul - let others pray for us ...

                    And further. Somehow, about 15 years ago, on TV, they asked about the "bloody boys" the major who shot down the spy Boeing over Sakhalin in 83. No, he says, they don't dream. "And why? I carried out the order to protect the borders of the Motherland. And I fulfilled it " Right man! soldier
                3. +1
                  14 October 2015 12: 32
                  Quote: atalef
                  no, kill, but with the head.

                  - And what did you come up with (in terms of rites) so that the Muslim terrorist shahid didn’t go to heaven posthumously? wink
                4. +1
                  14 October 2015 15: 05
                  The novel in its article reflected only one side of the coin, but the coin also has a second side. And this side is fear, fear is not for life, many of them no longer have this fear, but fear for the soul.
                  Fear that the soul after death does not go to heaven. The basis of the training and ideology of training suicide bombers is the ideology that the soul of this person after death will go to heaven. And this is almost almost the main reason and motivation.
                  In this situation, the soul burned out, it is not there, and there is nothing to go to heaven for. This factor must then have a key role.
                  This is the second side of the coin, so to speak. And personally, in my opinion, this particular aspect will be more effective than the one that Roman wrote about.
                5. +5
                  14 October 2015 17: 03
                  atalef (9) IL Today, 09: 34 ↑
                  no, kill, but with the head.
                  I will give you one example
                  So, for a general understanding.
                  ...
                  Nonsense.
                  For your general understanding, take as many examples as you want from any number of conflicts and wars. War (use of weapons) is an extreme measure of conflict of interest, the goal is to kill, destroy, coercion to accept conditions under threat of destruction. The actions themselves are already immoral. ESSENTIAL FACTORS (for the people of my world) - the initiator of aggression, justice.
                  By the way, the principle of waging war by the tribe of your flag "for 1 eye of an Israeli -10 eyes of Palestinians" does not diminish those who want to kill. but it won't stop you ...
            2. +2
              14 October 2015 07: 50
              If they dare quickly, they don’t have time to show anything, and if they do it, then only fakes or stage plays for the Western media (although I have no doubt that they can burn both children and women alive for spectacular commercials).
            3. +1
              14 October 2015 07: 52
              Good morning hi Have you been demoted? what
          4. +4
            14 October 2015 07: 36
            Scatter pork skins at the IG position with a note. wassat
          5. The comment was deleted.
          6. +10
            14 October 2015 07: 47
            And bury the pieces of martyrs in pig's clothing, adopting the experience of Great Britain.
          7. -2
            14 October 2015 08: 57
            Shoot, burn, cut, that's for sure! But about the fat you are wrong. This is an abuse.
            1. +11
              14 October 2015 10: 28
              about fat you are wrong. This is an abuse
              over fat
              1. 0
                14 October 2015 14: 33
                Quote: BecmepH
                about fat you are wrong. This is an abuse
                over fat

                100500%
                1. +1
                  14 October 2015 17: 32
                  Quote: BecmepH
                  BecmepH (1) SU Today, 10: 28 ↑ New

                  about fat you are wrong. This is an abuse
                  over fat

                  Quote: papik09
                  100500%

                  Here "non-brothers" do not see and do not read you. For such disrespect for the national shrine, they would definitely call you "gilyak" laughing
            2. 0
              14 October 2015 13: 28
              Abuse of pure innocent FAT ...
          8. mihasik
            +10
            14 October 2015 09: 44
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            For once I do not agree with the author - the effect will be exactly the opposite

            I agree. In Iraq, "Solntsepek" is successfully used against ISIS, and that "avengers" are not being added.
            And in the ranks of the militants (from radio intercepts) at the mention of "Solntsepek" panic begins.
          9. +5
            14 October 2015 09: 53
            The British, at one time, stopped the terrorist attacks, wrapping the remains of terrorists in pork skins and so buried
          10. 0
            14 October 2015 17: 54
            Well, for sure! Nafig need to fight, if you do not get to heaven, and it hurts to burn, spruce-burned ...
          11. -1
            15 October 2015 16: 11
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            For once I disagree with the author - the effect will be exactly the opposite, hearing about the "sunshine" will only skimp on the way .. and in general it is desirable to hang more of them with a piece of bacon in your mouth - that's when the martyr is guaranteed to fly past the box office (paradise) ..

            The same "Al-Jazeera" with its huge audience will undoubtedly be happy to show kebabs, which ISIL fighters turn into in the sun or there, "moderate terrorists." And it will be filed as the fact that the Christians have barbarously killed Muslims. By burning them.

            What will it give? Yes, an influx of new adherents. A new wave of jihad, but not against Assad, but against Russia. ..... it’s important for a fanatic to go to paradise, the absence of this prospect plunges him into horror: they will drape and forget about jihad ...
        2. -4
          14 October 2015 07: 14
          Quote: Bone
          As young people say: "The author is Burning ...."
          Let us wrap each terrorist in a sheet and dig up a grave, and apologize to our relatives for the fact that he died killing "infidels" .......?!

          What is your purpose? win or ensure a constant influx of new bandits in ISIS?
          No one is talking. what do not need to destroy the bandits, the question is in the methods.
          If the methods are such that by killing one, a motivation is generated for the influx of a dozen in his place - then you need to think and change something.
          Remember the uprising in India, which ultimately led to the fall of colonial rule.
          it started with little things. the British began to execute a shot from a gun. when the Hindu's body was torn and the soul did not enter a new circle of objection.
          A trifle like. but how did it end?
          1. +23
            14 October 2015 07: 16
            Quote: atalef
            win or ensure a constant influx of new bandits in ISIS?

            Sanya, well, you outfitted the gas sector — did this lead to an influx of new militants in Hamas? If so, then maybe it’s not worth bombing, they themselves will die out maybe winked
            1. -15
              14 October 2015 08: 06
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Quote: atalef
              win or ensure a constant influx of new bandits in ISIS?

              Sanya, well, you outfitted the gas sector — did this lead to an influx of new militants in Hamas? If so, then maybe it’s not worth bombing, they themselves will die out maybe winked

              SANIA, on Saturday I will give you a whole lecture on this subject, and on the methods of warfare and the consequences, but you have to understand one difference - we have a survival war, Syria is not your war, and if its result will be even greater for Russia the number of enemies and the loss of face in the Muslim world - then what have you achieved?
              1. +18
                14 October 2015 08: 34
                Quote: atalef
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Quote: atalef
                win or ensure a constant influx of new bandits in ISIS?

                Sanya, well, you outfitted the gas sector — did this lead to an influx of new militants in Hamas? If so, then maybe it’s not worth bombing, they themselves will die out maybe winked

                SANIA, on Saturday I will give you a whole lecture on this subject, and on the methods of warfare and the consequences, but you have to understand one difference - we have a survival war, Syria is not your war, and if its result will be even greater for Russia the number of enemies and the loss of face in the Muslim world - then what have you achieved?

                This type of sunshine you have to decide which war is ours and which is not ??? Can you take it on yourself ??? Kohl dumped from the country, sit quietly in your Jewry and don’t buzz, we’ll figure it out without singing along.
              2. +24
                14 October 2015 08: 37
                Quote: atalef
                SANIA, on Saturday I will give you a whole lecture on this subject, and on the methods of warfare and the consequences, but you have to understand one difference - we have a survival war, Syria is not your war, and if its result will be even greater for Russia the number of enemies and the loss of face in the Muslim world - then what have you achieved?


                for them to survive, and here we looked at the light cleanly with a canister of solariums ... and for us it's that ... we were backed up already from all sides ... therefore we decided to play ahead of time so that later as Israelis do not go to polls uniforms and machine guns through the streets ... the more news I read, the more I come to a conclusion ... the world has three problems ... the Jews - the Arabs have the Japanese earthquake and all the rest, along with the Jews and the Japanese, are Russian laughing By the way, what is there, this optimist Francois was going to build for us again
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. +3
                14 October 2015 09: 01
                it’s not ours yet, but if the igil is not stopped, it will become ours and we will not bomb anymore, but send soldiers to the borders of the former USSR, keep hordes on the transparent borders of Asia, why turn it into ours?
                1. +2
                  14 October 2015 09: 42
                  Well, for the "hordes" just "Solntsepek" is good.
              5. +3
                14 October 2015 09: 09
                Quote: atalef
                SANIA, on Saturday I’ll give you a lecture on this subject


                Sasha on Saturday seems not kosher .. not Saturday for a person .. laughing
                1. -4
                  14 October 2015 10: 15
                  Quote: afdjhbn67
                  Quote: atalef
                  SANIA, on Saturday I’ll give you a lecture on this subject


                  Sasha on Saturday seems not kosher .. not Saturday for a person .. laughing

                  wink
                2. -3
                  14 October 2015 10: 15
                  Quote: afdjhbn67
                  Quote: atalef
                  SANIA, on Saturday I’ll give you a lecture on this subject


                  Sasha on Saturday seems not kosher .. not Saturday for a person .. laughing

                  wink
              6. +1
                14 October 2015 10: 02
                Do you work on Saturday?
                If we are already talking about the semantic filling of methods of suppressing enemy forces,
                then one cannot help but recall that the religion of the ancient Persians was fire worship.
                And then the use of Solntsepek, as an instrument of retribution, takes on special significance.
                Who knows: there are no prophecies about "fire from heaven"?

                Does the use of TOC neutralize the poison gas?
            2. -2
              14 October 2015 19: 03
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Quote: atalef
              win or ensure a constant influx of new bandits in ISIS?

              Sanya, well, you outfitted the gas sector — did this lead to an influx of new militants in Hamas? If so, then maybe it’s not worth bombing, they themselves will die out maybe winked

              Here, Sash, you know how to read.
              Why does everyone go to extremes?
              If not CBT, then nothing?
              No, keep bombing, but don't use what causes more problems than good.
              It really is not clear that neither all weapons nor anywhere can be used. There are mental peculiarities and they need to be taken into account in BV, but to whom - to whom, and you know this.
          2. 0
            14 October 2015 07: 21
            Yes, it seems not bad and naturally ended?
          3. +9
            14 October 2015 09: 26
            Quote: atalef
            What is your purpose? win or ensure a constant influx of new bandits in ISIS?

            The influx of carcasses into the IG will continue as long as there is funding. Everything else blah blah blah. There will be no dough, no IG. And what they will bring down, finally to the bulb.
          4. mihasik
            +4
            14 October 2015 11: 00
            Quote: atalef
            it started with little things. the British began to execute a shot from a gun. when the Hindu's body was torn and the soul did not enter a new circle of objection.
            A trifle like. but how did it end?

            Yes, everything would be like that, but to call the war in Syria religious? Then the grandmother said in two. Yes, and ISIS has what religion, if the Sunnis themselves say that they are atheists. "Grandma" is the main religion there.
            1. -12
              14 October 2015 11: 13
              Quote: mihasik
              Yes, everything would be so, but call the war in Syria religious? Then the grandmother said for two

              Michael - the war in Syria has a 100% religious component.
              Look at the confessional composition of the warring parties and you will understand.
              by the way, like one interesting thing
              We have all heard of thousands of volunteers from all over the world (including fucking women from at least Europe, at least from Russia) in the ranks of ISIS and AL Nusra.
              Why have we never heard of such volunteers in the assad of Assad troops?
              Will you say money? There is enough money for this both on one side and on the other, but for some reason they go to Assad, why?
              Your opinion ?

              Quote: mihasik
              And ISIS has some religion, if the Sunnis themselves say that they are atheists.


              Are Sunnis Atheists? belay
              only Muslims do not say it. these atheists 90% of the Islamic world

              Quote: mihasik
              "Grandma" is the main religion there.

              If this were so, then hundreds of thousands would be fought for Assad, and Iran would not spare money for that.
              1. mihasik
                +3
                14 October 2015 11: 45
                Quote: atalef
                Are Sunnis Atheists?
                only Muslims do not say it. these atheists 90% of the Islamic world

                Read carefully. Atheists are not Sunni, but those who support the ISIS ideology, and at least our Sunites directly speak about this.
                We have already seen this "100% religious component" in the form of "Free Ichkeria" in Chechnya.
                And the fact that ISIS has a large number of recruits from all over the world, the "members" caught from us admit that they fought there for "loot" and not for an idea.
                But, if you are still right and the majority of religious fanatics are there (although no one counted them there, and the PR companies are at their best), I can only say with regret that the number of bloodthirsty freaks in the world is increasing mathematically.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. -6
                  14 October 2015 12: 00
                  Quote: mihasik
                  Read carefully. Atheists are not Sunni, but those who support the ISIS ideology, and at least our Sunites directly speak about this.

                  and therefore in their ranks (ISIS) the Russians are fighting before 3, and on the side of Assad - not a single one (I mean a Muslim from Russia)
                  Correct me if I'm wrong

                  Quote: mihasik
                  We have already seen this "100% religious component" in the form of "Free Ichkeria" in Chechnya.

                  Was she not there?
                  Quote: mihasik
                  the fact that ISIS has a large number of recruits from all over the world, the "members" caught from us admit that they fought there for "loot" and not for an idea.

                  Of course. article easier
                  Quote: mihasik
                  But, if you are still right and the majority of religious fanatics are there (although no one counted them there, and PR companies are at their best), I can only say with regret that the number of bloodthirsty freaks in the world is increasing mathematically

                  their resource base (in this war) is 1 billion and there are enough grandmas.
                  1. +3
                    14 October 2015 12: 11
                    Quote: atalef
                    and therefore in their ranks (ISIS) the Russians are fighting before 3, and on the side of Assad - not a single one (I mean a Muslim from Russia)
                    Correct me if I'm wrong


                    By no means, you are not mistaken; on the contrary, you are deliberately trying to "inflate" the alleged religious overtones of the conflict. This became obvious the day before yesterday, when you, too intrusively, and openly tried to covertly convince those present on the site that, they say, the leadership of Russia does not enjoy the support of Muslim compatriots and their clergy.

                    Everything is clear with you ... It remains to be determined whether someone is behind you, or you are acting alone, guided by hatred of the former Motherland ...

                    Or (guess what ), you come from Ukraine, and your anti-Russian position has double roots?
                    1. -6
                      14 October 2015 12: 29
                      Quote: Good Me
                      By no means, you are not mistaken, on the contrary, you are deliberately trying to "inflate" the alleged religious overtones of the conflict

                      imaginary ? disprove. I confirm my words with facts, you confirm your

                      Quote: Good Me
                      This became apparent the day before yesterday, when you, too obsessively, and not openly, tried to covertly persuade those present on the site that the Russian leadership allegedly did not enjoy the support of Muslim compatriots and their clergy

                      Unlike you, I look at the facts (again) - ask of course - we will certainly support the answer, but how else.
                      But the facts show that in the ranks of ISIS, Muslims from Russia are fighting and we are talking about thousands, but on the side of Assad - no.
                      And so (in words) of course support
                      Quote: Good Me
                      Everything is clear with you ... It remains to be determined whether someone is behind you, or you are acting alone, guided by hatred of the former Motherland

                      I hate Russia ? Why do you think so ? Great country, great people.
                      They did nothing wrong (personally to me and my family), but this does not mean that I am blind and do not have the right to speak out about what I disagree with
                      Quote: Good Me
                      Or (guess), you come from Ukraine, and your anti-Russian position has double roots?

                      I AM ? From Ukraine ? belay
                      1. +3
                        14 October 2015 12: 34
                        Quote: atalef
                        I hate Russia ? Why do you think so ? Great country, great people.
                        They did nothing wrong (personally to me and my family), but this does not mean that I am blind and do not have the right to speak out about what I disagree with


                        Speak out as much as you like, but as you like, but know the measure and the line.

                        Your bunches from Israel, regarding the Muslims of Russia, and their relationship to Syria, are very similar, at least, to an unfriendly gesture.

                        Go ahead ...
                  2. mihasik
                    +3
                    14 October 2015 12: 46
                    Quote: atalef
                    Was she not there?

                    Was there? Or do you consider the popularized brand "World Caliphate" a religion?
                    and therefore, up to 3 tons of Russians are fighting in their ranks (ISIS), and not a single one is fighting on the side of Assad (I mean a Muslim from Russia)

                    This confirms that the "religious component" there is 0%. Galimovye guest-workers.
                    their resource base (in this war) is 1 billion and there are enough grandmas
                    And this is just an incentive for a frostbitten trip to earn extra money.
                    Just after the actual bombing, the flow of those wishing to defend the religion of Jihad there diminished, and the flows went in the opposite direction. We ran across Turkey, Jordan, Libya and Europe - it’s safer to defend our "ideals" there. Is not it?
            2. -7
              14 October 2015 11: 13
              Quote: mihasik
              Yes, everything would be so, but call the war in Syria religious? Then the grandmother said for two

              Michael - the war in Syria has a 100% religious component.
              Look at the confessional composition of the warring parties and you will understand.
              by the way, like one interesting thing
              We have all heard of thousands of volunteers from all over the world (including fucking women from at least Europe, at least from Russia) in the ranks of ISIS and AL Nusra.
              Why have we never heard of such volunteers in the assad of Assad troops?
              Will you say money? There is enough money for this both on one side and on the other, but for some reason they go to Assad, why?
              Your opinion ?

              Quote: mihasik
              And ISIS has some religion, if the Sunnis themselves say that they are atheists.


              Are Sunnis Atheists? belay
              only Muslims do not say it. these atheists 90% of the Islamic world

              Quote: mihasik
              "Grandma" is the main religion there.

              If this were so, then hundreds of thousands would be fought for Assad, and Iran would not spare money for that.
            3. -1
              14 October 2015 13: 42
              The establishment of the New World Order provides for the reformatting of all states. Syria is just next in line, then Iran, followed by possibly Russia ... This is a purely religious war. It is written: "he will wage war with the saints and win." It's about the beast ...
          5. +1
            15 October 2015 02: 40
            Quote: atalef
            it started with little things. the British began to execute a shot from a gun


            Yeah ... they started to be executed in 1857, after the sepoy uprising - and after a miserable 90 years the impudent people had to give India independence! laughing
        3. +22
          14 October 2015 07: 15
          Quote: Bone
          Let each terrorist be wrapped in a sheet

          The British in Afghanistan acted easier - they wrapped the terrorist in pork skin. The effect was very impressive, since touching an unclean animal automatically deprived the martyr of a pass to the guria. The number of people wishing to die just so sharply decreased.
          And with the "flamethrower" Roman is wrong. By and large, TOS has a volume-detonating ammunition, and not a jet of kerosene-oil-oil and other mixtures like a classic flamethrower. And the Persians are not Arabs, like the Afghans, the mentality is also different, it is not necessary to lump everything in a heap.
          Again, the Mossy Nose have so many people mixed in that they get stuck determining who is who. In short, Maxim died - and to hell with him. Allah will sort whoever is necessary, even if he himself understands it and steers in a stream of charred bearded men.
        4. +6
          14 October 2015 08: 52
          I agree, there is no point in such courtesies ..... on the contrary, it is the prospect of not going to heaven (janat) that should reduce the flow of people who want to join the ranks of jihadists ...
        5. WKS
          +2
          14 October 2015 10: 06
          Pig skins instead of sheets and more.
        6. +4
          14 October 2015 11: 17
          Harness authors who did not see the war in person!
          In the same way, various kinds of experts are annealed, who didn’t even have a machine gun in their hands, but they know where, when and how to use or not use the army.
          It’s just that sometimes you want to break a zombie hunter when you watch all kinds of analytical programs and shows. Especially when it seems like competent patriots (to summarize, so to speak) begin to illiterate object to different gozman.
          Stupidly, you need to demand not verbal diarrhea, but specific solutions. You can’t, do not hell with advice!
          And the fifth column and listen, do not respect yourself. What they need to speak about everywhere and always, and not justify themselves for sure!
          And in general, the fifth column, the essence - ENEMIES!
          And the enemy must be destroyed!
          So taught our ancestors!
        7. +7
          14 October 2015 11: 45
          Quote: Bone
          As young people say: "The author is Burning ...."
          Let us wrap each terrorist in a sheet and dig up a grave, and apologize to our relatives for the fact that he died killing "infidels" .......?!

          Burning the Syrians in the cells, drowning them in the same cells alive, cutting off their heads and teaching their children this is the norm? These cries about the use of Solntsepek are more likely from fear than from the idea of ​​getting new fighters into our ranks. Trying to make ourselves martyrs, not murderers and rapists, this is another round of information warfare. But I’m sure every day there will be less and less willing people to join ISIS. .A I see the cries of the lawlessness and cruelty of the Russians as convulsions of that hydra, which they beat painfully and sensitively, from which it all twitches and wriggles with a clear sense of its speedy end.
        8. 0
          14 October 2015 13: 06

          Kostyara (2)  Today, 06:15 ↑ New


          As young people say: "The author is Burning ...."
          Let us wrap each terrorist in a sheet and dig up a grave, and apologize to our relatives for the fact that he died killing "infidels" .......?!


          Well said. hi
        9. The comment was deleted.
        10. +2
          14 October 2015 14: 10
          The author of the coward played, or what? First, lay large and striped on al-jazeera along with its interpretations.
          Secondly, what do you propose to consult with a terrorist, how to blame him, and "take into account his cultural characteristics?" Are you serious, or tired and blurted out with lack of sleep? Wildness do they have (and wow, even in Europe, oh!)? And what, it is necessary to respect her, this wildness? And about the fact that these oslotrahi will trample on us, since then our specialists have become much more serious, no jokes. Well, you will get tired of looking for Persians in Afghanistan, for this is a Pashtun region. And they speak Urdu there, so your sayings are hardly heard. So, Roman Skomorokhov (I would like to call Skomorokh Romanov) tighten up your education, wipe your snot and start whining ..
        11. 0
          16 October 2015 02: 12
          Quote: Bone
          As young people say: "The author is Burning ...."
          Let us wrap each terrorist in a sheet and dig up a grave, and apologize to our relatives for the fact that he died killing "infidels" .......?!

          the author’s surname very accurately reflects the meaning of this set of letters, misunderstood as an article
      2. +2
        14 October 2015 09: 27
        These same jihadists are waging war in order to subsequently go to heaven! But if they are fried, then many will think about whether it is worth fighting when you are fried and you will remain on mortal soil.
    2. +18
      14 October 2015 06: 01
      ... not an article, but a bunch of letters ........ scarecrows, intimidators, chants ..... when a meat grinder, what difference does it make on which side the meat will burn ?????
      1. +8
        14 October 2015 06: 39
        The article is delusional. Terrorists make no choice in the means and methods of murder. They cut, burn, blow up ... And nevermind who - children, women, old people. Without making an exception to anyone in any respect, incl. and religious. Does the author suggest playing gentlemen? But in war as in war. These ceremonies are useless.
        1. +5
          14 October 2015 07: 05
          Quote: Karabanov
          The article is delusional.

          I agree with you, delusional. If only because the author of the article poorly understands the main factors of the impact of the TOS ammunition on the enemy. He simply "clung" to the word "flamethrower" ... In fact, the bodies do not burn, they are simply turned inside out and grind with a pressure surge and a blast wave.
          1. +6
            14 October 2015 09: 12
            Quote: Alexey Lobanov
            In fact, the bodies do not burn, they simply turn them inside out and grind them with a surge of pressure and an explosive wave.


            immediately somehow it felt better .. laughing good
    3. +23
      14 October 2015 06: 02
      There is no more in common between IS and Islam than between Bolsheviks and Orthodoxy. What does religious prejudice have to do with it? According to their concept, they cannot be hung up, because the soul leaves the body through the mouth, and will be forced to exit through the anus. The British, on the contrary, the corpses were sewn up in pork skins, a very effective tool turned out to be.
      And so it turns out that the author wishes these inhumane people a joyful death so that they would not let the dog not offend them.
      1. +3
        14 October 2015 06: 14
        Quote: Mahmut
        the author wishes these nonhumans a joyful death so that they would not let the dog not offend them.

        Well said! good
      2. +3
        14 October 2015 06: 29
        Quote: Mahmut
        There is no more in common between IS and Islam than between Bolsheviks and Orthodoxy.

        Alas, not so, Wahhabism is the course of Islam and in the historical perspective it did not appear yesterday.
        According to the content of the article, the jihad of Russia has already been announced, with or without CBT, it does not matter. Not the first time though. With all due respect, Roman to your work on your favorite site, you somehow missed the flip side of the coin. No Wahhabi would want to die without a chance to go to heaven. This is an argument.
        For those who are not in the subject of what Wahhabism is. "One caliph, one mosque, one Allah. Submission or death."
        As we see, there is no smell of compromise, and therefore doubts and half measures regarding the opposition to these fanatics are not appropriate. IMHO.
    4. -9
      14 October 2015 06: 22
      Quote: Alex Nick
      But cutting off heads alive is how?

      oddly enough, but you are trying again to jam the European mentality in the BV.
      Cutting off the head is remarkably invested in their understanding of the world and their role in jihad against the unbelievers. Like (maybe it doesn’t meet with some individuals), but in general it doesn’t cause any negative emotions in the main mass, I have some pride among the youth.
      Quote: Alex Nick
      I don't think there will be a bunch of people who want to fry on the "Sun"

      It’s not about how to destroy them with the sunshine is impossible to achieve, but the negative effect of the use of such weapons will exceed all tactical advantages.
      Let me give you an example, if you go to explain something to the deaf, then nothing will come of your cries.
      If you want to be heard, i.e. you have influenced the situation - YOU SHOULD SPEAK IN THE UNDERSTANDING LANGUAGE OF THE OPPONENT,
      using Solntsepeki, only one will be created
      Al Jazeera picture with fried bodies and signature
      Russians (Christians) with heretics (Shiites) - burn the faithful Muslims. Burnt to paradise will not fall.
      This is about the same effect as being buried in the pork skin, I certainly understand that some of the audience will begin to rub their hands and scream - That's right !!
      Maybe it’s necessary, but the first photo of a burnt child or woman - innocent SHAHID, who didn’t go to paradise. Al Jazeera, who you believe, will be replicated hour after hour by a billion Sunni Muslims with corresponding comments, and a couple of tens of thousands more will be put under ISIS banners. or more fighters.
      And to even greater radicalization of the Sunnis and their attitude towards Russia.
      If someone wants such a result? It is necessary to calculate the mentality in any war, and especially religion (in the war), sometimes a small mistake can lead to disastrous consequences that will be impossible to fix. IMHO,
      1. +1
        14 October 2015 06: 32
        Quote: atalef
        Quote: Alex Nick
        But cutting off heads alive is how?

        oddly enough, but you are trying again to jam the European mentality in the BV.
        Cutting off the head is remarkably invested in their understanding of the world and their role in jihad against the unbelievers. Like (maybe it doesn’t meet with some individuals), but in general it doesn’t cause any negative emotions in the main mass, I have some pride among the youth.
        Quote: Alex Nick
        I don't think there will be a bunch of people who want to fry on the "Sun"

        It’s not about how to destroy them with the sunshine is impossible to achieve, but the negative effect of the use of such weapons will exceed all tactical advantages.
        Let me give you an example, if you go to explain something to the deaf, then nothing will come of your cries.
        If you want to be heard, i.e. you have influenced the situation - YOU SHOULD SPEAK IN THE UNDERSTANDING LANGUAGE OF THE OPPONENT,
        using Solntsepeki, only one will be created
        Al Jazeera picture with fried bodies and signature
        Russians (Christians) with heretics (Shiites) - burn the faithful Muslims. Burnt to paradise will not fall.
        This is about the same effect as being buried in the pork skin, I certainly understand that some of the audience will begin to rub their hands and scream - That's right !!
        Maybe it’s necessary, but the first photo of a burnt child or woman - innocent SHAHID, who didn’t go to paradise. Al Jazeera, who you believe, will be replicated hour after hour by a billion Sunni Muslims with corresponding comments, and a couple of tens of thousands more will be put under ISIS banners. or more fighters.
        And to even greater radicalization of the Sunnis and their attitude towards Russia.
        If someone wants such a result? It is necessary to calculate the mentality in any war, and especially religion (in the war), sometimes a small mistake can lead to disastrous consequences that will be impossible to fix. IMHO,


        Sasha we Russians have such a proverb - "they are afraid of wolves, do not go to the forest" ... and since we are in the "forest" then ala ger com ..
        He put a plus sign, or they’ll bring a good opponent to the ban .. laughing
        The funny thing is, change the flag and would be a marshal .. apparently how the rag affects the bulls ..
        1. -1
          14 October 2015 07: 05
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          Sasha we Russians have such a proverb - "they are afraid of wolves, do not go to the forest" ... and since we are in the "forest" then ala ger com ..

          with us - To live with wolves, howl like a wolf.
          Maybe that's why we survive?
          Fighting is not a number. and skill .- doesn’t resemble anything?

          Quote: afdjhbn67
          The funny thing is, change the flag and would be a marshal .. apparently how the rag affects the bulls ..

          No, brother, but how to live then with this?
          1. +5
            14 October 2015 07: 19
            Quote: atalef

            No, brother, but how to live then with this?

            Sanya, and you change the flag and put your passport in your pocket at that moment, let’s say Russia. Everything will be honest and conscience is clear and the passport is correct. Then you put another in your pocket and change it again. Do you want to live? laughing
            1. +1
              14 October 2015 10: 21
              There was such an old joke - they beat me not according to my passport, but according to ...!
          2. 0
            14 October 2015 07: 33
            [quote = atalef] Fighting is not a number. and skill .- doesn’t resemble anything?
            [/ Quote]


            You are probably talking about ours in Syria laughing




            [quote = afdjhbn67] The funny thing is, change the flag and would be a marshal .. apparently like a rag on the bulls acts .. [/ quote]
            No, brother, but how to live then with this? [/ Quote]

            So I do not offer you to sell their homeland .. laughing
            minus totally, any comment ..
        2. +1
          14 October 2015 07: 10
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          ala ger com.

          your beautiful French inspired a picture: a glove in the face, swords ... perhaps this is how you need to sort things out with a fucking Igilovites ... you give a regiment of airborne musketeers! lol
          1. +1
            14 October 2015 07: 36
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            ala ger com.

            your beautiful French inspired a picture: a glove in the face, swords ... perhaps this is how you need to sort things out with a fucking Igilovites ... you give a regiment of airborne musketeers! lol


            Gascon accent, what can you do .. laughing
        3. +3
          14 October 2015 08: 13
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          He put a plus sign, or they’ll bring a good opponent to the ban ..

          Come on. we do not have adequate opponents on the site. And the respected atalef of minuses grabbed at times up to the gray epaulettes. And his point of view on events in the world, although sometimes radically different from ours, is very interesting to listen to. In any case, he never stooped to the banal trolling and obsiralov.
          1. 0
            14 October 2015 08: 45
            Quote: lewerlin53rus
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            He put a plus sign, or they’ll bring a good opponent to the ban ..

            Come on. we do not have adequate opponents on the site. And the respected atalef of minuses grabbed at times up to the gray epaulettes. And his point of view on events in the world, although sometimes radically different from ours, is very interesting to listen to. In any case, he never stooped to the banal trolling and obsiralov.


            So I about the same, I agree with you .. hi
          2. 0
            14 October 2015 09: 35
            Quote: lewerlin53rus
            In any case, he never stooped to the banal trolling and obsiralov.

            To say that the American economy is the healthiest and most promising, is it trolling or not?
            I wanted to quote a respected atalef, but here is the misfortune from our conversation with him, one of the moderators carefully rubbed all his posts, there were only mine request
            Attention! You do not have permission to view hidden text.
            1. 0
              14 October 2015 09: 59
              Quote: Firstvanguard
              To say that the American economy is the healthiest and most promising, is it trolling or not?

              I think no. rather, it’s just a fallacy. The other question is what this economy holds onto.
            2. -1
              14 October 2015 10: 21
              Quote: Firstvanguard
              To say that the American economy is the healthiest and most promising, is it trolling or not?

              Did I say that?
              1. +1
                14 October 2015 10: 27
                Now that all the posts are worn out, and in mine, where I quoted the opponent, without specifying a nickname, you can say whatever your heart desires and build naive eyes.
                1. -2
                  14 October 2015 10: 35
                  Quote: Firstvanguard
                  Now that all the posts are worn out, and in mine, where I quoted the opponent without giving a nickname, you can say whatever you like and build naive eyes.


                  The American economy is not the healthiest and the most promising, I never use such terms at all, because it has something in common with no analogues in the world.
                  But I affirm that America’s economy is strong, and the most promising of the economies of post-industrial, developed countries is on the rise.
                  1. +2
                    14 October 2015 10: 39
                    Quote: atalef
                    The American economy is not the healthiest and not the most promising , I generally never use such terms as it resonates with no analogs in the world.
                    But I affirm that America’s economy is strong, is on the rise and the most promising from the economies of post-industrial, developed countries.



                    yep
                    Only the economies of undeveloped countries, Nigeria there or Sudan are more promising.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. +1
                      14 October 2015 10: 47
                      Quote: Firstvanguard
                      Quote: atalef
                      not the most promising


                      Quote: atalef
                      the most promising of the economies of post-industrial, developed countries.

                      yep

                      I understand the problems with reading comprehension.
                      There are developing countries, whose economic growth rates are much higher than the US ones, but if we take developed countries that are at the level of post-industrial development, the United States is the most promising economy.
                      Can you object? Give an example. hi
                      1. +1
                        14 October 2015 10: 57
                        Quote: atalef
                        I understand the problems with reading comprehension.

                        Rude is not necessary.
                        Quote: atalef
                        The USA is the most promising economy.

                        Quote: atalef
                        I never use such terms at all because it resonates with no analogs in the world.

                        We have a different understanding of prospects, I personally see the prospect of a bursting bubble of public debt. Any prospects for eliminating this bubble? Or an example of such a successful elimination?
                        having no taxes in the world - this is just about the US public debt wassat
        4. +4
          14 October 2015 09: 42
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          The funny thing is, change the flag and would be a marshal .. apparently how the rag affects the bulls ..

          Not a sign at all, bullshit goods pushing and the customer is indignant from this.
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Everything will be fair and conscience is clear and the passport is correct

          And where is thinking, where is thinking?
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          minus totally, any comment ..

          Surrrow and from the bottom of my heart. good
          Quote: EvgNik
          I consider it incorrect to cite the states (bullets for Muslims) for many reasons (remoteness of the country, anonymity of the shooter, and a number of others)

          Yaplakal!
          Not much different from "The war in Syria is a war on a religious basis".
          I have seen a lot of Masulman who "do not drink vodka or eat bacon". laughing
      2. +6
        14 October 2015 06: 38
        Quote: atalef
        Which you can believe, Al Jazeera will be circulating hour after hour for a billion Sunni Muslims with relevant comments

        As practice shows, even if there is no TOS, VKS aviation and the Russian military contingent will be exclusively engaged in guarding the Navy base in Tartus, sooner or later a picture will appear in the information space
        Quote: atalef
        Which you can believe, Al Jazeera will be circulating hour after hour for a billion Sunni Muslims with relevant comments

        The soldiers of the information fronts absolutely do not care what the picture is and where it came from, and the photo of burnt bodies on the network is full these days, sadly.
      3. -3
        14 October 2015 06: 42
        Quote: atalef
        sometimes a small mistake can lead to disastrous consequences

        For once, I agree with you. The consequences will be quite predictable - a wave of acts across Russia. What then will those who minus the article say? I consider it incorrect to cite the states (bullets for Muslims) for many reasons (remoteness of the country, anonymity of the shooter, and a number of others). So one should not rejoice ahead of time.
        1. +7
          14 October 2015 06: 59
          Quote: EvgNik
          The consequences will be quite predictable - a wave of acts across Russia

          Here is no need to "croak" and turn upside down.
          wave of acts across Russia

          This is what is planned for Russia without any CBT and even before the intervention in Syria. Moreover, the intervention in Syria is a "knight's move" in advance. And preventing the dreams of fascinating theorists. Will it be effective? Wait and see. We will live and find out. We will survive - we will take into account.
          1. 0
            14 October 2015 15: 49
            Quote: Firstvanguard
            Here is no need to "croak" and turn upside down.


            Speaking of the fight against terror - in our city today, all cars were evacuated from schools and kindergartens, they drove right in and loaded onto tow trucks ... apparently the pointer already arrived ..
        2. +1
          14 October 2015 08: 59
          Quote: EvgNik
          Quote: atalef
          sometimes a small mistake can lead to disastrous consequences

          For once, I agree with you. The consequences will be quite predictable - a wave of acts across Russia. What then will those who minus the article say? I consider it incorrect to cite the states (bullets for Muslims) for many reasons (remoteness of the country, anonymity of the shooter, and a number of others). So one should not rejoice ahead of time.


          If the wave of terror starts, then the component from the use of "sunshine" in Syria will be negligible .. therefore, the shaitans must be destroyed as efficiently as possible (completely real) and extremely cruel (which is unfortunately impossible) - tolerance and other snot in the form of int. societies. opinions ..
          Otherwise, we’ll get to an apology as Akhedzhakova ..
        3. +2
          14 October 2015 10: 21
          I am absolutely sure that there would have been a "wave of terrorist attacks" in any case (whether or not our aircraft had strikes). The only difference is in time. Thus, according to the official version, the terrorists detained in Moscow arrived there for a terrorist attack before the start of the bombing. Indirect confirmation - they were "led" two weeks before the arrest, and the kneading in Syria with our participation began a little later. And they began to prepare for this even earlier. Now about CBT. Does a fire as a result of bombing (which often occur, judging by the Ministry of Defense reports) leads to an increase in the number of terrorists? The Syrian Defense Minister is Sunni. I guess who else but him to know about what to do and how. I'm not sure that Russia is voluntarily and forcibly shoving weapons into the Syrian army. So I personally also put a minus for the horror stories. And in general, the religious component is constantly and deliberately bulging.
      4. 0
        14 October 2015 19: 10
        atalef
        ..... but the negative effect of the use of such weapons will exceed all tactical advantages.


        ...... you want to say that the Arabs still have not won the war against the Israelis just because they did not think of filming and showing on television the charred troupes of their heroes burned ...... by the Israelis ????????. Today you do not sniff dill case .... hi
    5. +4
      14 October 2015 06: 25
      I don’t think there will be a bunch of people who want to fry on the "Sun". Everyone wants to live.
      I thought about that too. Perhaps the fear of being burned will cool fanatical heads. Let it not cool, but make you think about your soul and give strength to your legs. Not the people to avenge a neighbor. If they hide behind children and women, and the equipment is hidden under the walls of mosques.
    6. +11
      14 October 2015 06: 42
      Good morning to everyone! I always read Roman’s articles with pleasure, but I couldn’t believe my eyes. Roman, igil, an nusra are not Islam, these shaitans only dishonor Islam and place them a wad for all their deeds, where Solntsepek will deliver them, and new adherents will think before they take up a knife
      1. +4
        14 October 2015 06: 58
        Complete nonsense, pull religious things to the type of weapon. The author either had a hard morning, or funny evening and night. There is such a pamphlet in the firebox.
    7. +3
      14 October 2015 06: 58
      Quote: Alex Nick
      But cutting off heads alive is how?

      For someone who did not read the Quran normally.
    8. +1
      14 October 2015 07: 00
      Quote: Alex Nick
      to cut off heads alive - how is it? I don’t think there will be a bunch of people who want to fry on "Solntsepёk"

      TOS "throws" like not fire, but charges of a volumetric explosion ("vacuum").
      And where in the war can not be burned?
      And ordinary bandits are unlikely to understand the dogmas of Islam. Here, it’s more likely ours versus ours, they don’t give life request, and even keep in check, and most importantly, the Saudis, etc. pay well for the war.
      1. +4
        14 October 2015 07: 15
        If the author is not aware, then the Syrian army has long been using weapons with a similar action - UR-77 Zmey Gorynych. She uses for rats from Igil and ordinary jet flamethrowers. So I do not see any moral problems.

        Well, yes, in Iraq they were already tested on Igil even earlier. :)
        1. -6
          14 October 2015 07: 40
          Quote: kayman4
          Gorynych. She uses for rats from Igil and ordinary jet flamethrowers. So I do not see any moral problems.

          Any war pursues some kind of strategic goal (otherwise why get into it), the war in Syria is not Russia's own war.
          ISIS threatens Russia at the moment, I think a little less. than Israel, but not about that.
          Russia entered Tula, pursuing specific goals, and I am sure that the personal fate of the Assad is in them last but one place.
          Russia acted as an Assad, initially in a weak position.
          The world is divided into 4 nodes of power.
          1. America
          2.Europe
          3China
          4.arabic (Sunni world)
          Of course, I anticipate the cries of the cheers of the patriots - where is Russia here?
          let's call it the 5th node, although we will be honest at the moment it is not one. Neither for economic development nor for human resources (compare with the previous 4), I do not want to belittle the role of Russia and its possession of nuclear weapons. but it will not be applied. and for the rest, there are no strategic advantages over India itself (nevertheless, it is not included in these centers of power)
          with America and Europe - relations are ruined
          With the Islamic Sunni world - rapidly deteriorate
          China sat like a tree with a policy of no interference. and it will sit (removing foams)
          Russia sided
          Shiites. and this is Iran. half of Iraq (they practically do not participate in the war on the side of Assad). Hisbullah .iii .... Everything
          The position is weak initially. it is a fact . again, whether someone likes him or not
          So here. if Russia wants to turn this war into its own (which all parties will be happy with) - then of course yes, you can pull TOZs.
          Only the result will be one - Russia will get stuck there for a long time, with a waste of resources. of money . victims (maybe the operation will have to expand and expand) to the general joy of the States. Europe. Monarchy of the Gulf, etc.
          and the inexhaustible human resources of the Islamic world.
          What am I leading to?
          If you get in - do not forget about the strategic goals of shopping mall. getting into a war is much easier than getting out of it
          and if you climbed. so do not make your position even more vulnerable. not thoughtful actions.
          1. +5
            14 October 2015 08: 03
            I agree in general terms, But:
            - with the Sunnis for a long time and interference or not interference will not help here (if you allow to blow up the station, then it will explode without Syria).
            - if Syria itself with the support from the air shows the results, then it will remain a country (or a half-country by the sea), if not, then no one will fight for it.
            - In relation to large countries, China is our neighbor less predictable, as we are for it, and the USA and Europe themselves have embarked on a path of enmity. We either lie under them or curse, otherwise they cannot.
            On this 1.not get into major conflicts, 2. Economy. 3. Help in creating problems in the territories where the troops of the United States and Europe

            and to transfer the TOZ to the Syrians in the right amount, as no one had better invented anything for the storming of the city for an army with defective aircraft.
            1. -2
              14 October 2015 10: 26
              Quote: Zaurbek
              and transfer the TOZ to the Syrians in the right amount, as no one had better invented anything for the assault on the city for an army with defective aircraft


              to storm the cores with TOZs?, well, checkers on the head and the trap.
              1. +1
                14 October 2015 11: 23
                Are you going to leave the city to the Islamists? Go around, cut off from the supply, offer to surrender, send a red cross and ... Then fry.
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            14 October 2015 08: 03
            I agree in general terms, But:
            - with the Sunnis for a long time and interference or not interference will not help here (if you allow to blow up the station, then it will explode without Syria).
            - if Syria itself with the support from the air shows the results, then it will remain a country (or a half-country by the sea), if not, then no one will fight for it.
            - In relation to large countries, China is our neighbor less predictable, as we are for it, and the USA and Europe themselves have embarked on a path of enmity. We either lie under them or curse, otherwise they cannot.
            On this 1.not get into major conflicts, 2. Economy. 3. Help in creating problems in the territories where the troops of the United States and Europe

            and to transfer the TOZ to the Syrians in the right amount, as no one had better invented anything for the storming of the city for an army with defective aircraft.
          3. +4
            14 October 2015 08: 50
            Quote: atalef
            Quote: kayman4
            Gorynych. She uses for rats from Igil and ordinary jet flamethrowers. So I do not see any moral problems.

            Any war pursues some kind of strategic goal (otherwise why get into it), the war in Syria is not Russia's own war.

            What am I leading to?
            If you get in - do not forget about the strategic goals of shopping mall. getting into a war is much easier than getting out of it
            and if you climbed. so do not make your position even more vulnerable. not thoughtful actions.



            Here you are deeply wrong - the war in Syria is part of the mosaic and is aimed at undermining Russia as the largest importer of oil and gas to Europe. How much is ISIS driving oil at 20 tanks per barrel?

            So here you are just very wrong; Russia in Syria is retaining its interests and those of its companies, but the West wanted to kill these interests with rebellion
          4. +7
            14 October 2015 09: 12
            Quote: atalef
            although we will be honest at the moment it is not it. Not for economic development or for human resources (compare with the previous 4,)

            Compare the USSR in human resources and economic development with Europe under the wise management of Nazi Germany. Did you have to wrap yourself in a shroud and crawl to the churchyard?
            Quote: atalef
            The position is weak initially. it is a fact . again, whether someone likes him or not

            Choose an ally only by the criterion of quantity / strength? Scoring on all imaginable criteria including moral ??

            Quote: atalef
            with America and Europe - relations are ruined
            With the Islamic Sunni world - rapidly deteriorate

            We did not spoil them, and was there a relationship? Europeans and Americans only have a user attitude towards others.
            Quote: atalef
            it is a fact . again, whether someone likes him or not

            Being a resource for them because there are more?
            With the Sunnis (we read "Arab monarchies") no comment at all, with such friends and enemies to nothing.
            The bottom line is, wrapping up in a shroud is not our way, butting with quantity will not work, there are no more enemies. Only skill remains. Russia has some traditions in this direction. Time will tell.
          5. 0
            14 October 2015 09: 54
            In general, I agree with you, but if you do nothing, then the 5 center of power will never be formed in principle. There is evident an attempt by Russia to actively play its game (well, at least so far it seems) in very difficult conditions. It must be carried out very carefully. So far, at the moment, we can say that this is more or less obtained. What will happen next is not yet known. Nobody has used TOSs yet, they are judged by 4 photos without any reference to the terrain. Perhaps it will not even come to their application, and the very threat of their application may affect the morale of the militants. I would like to believe in it.
            In general, the article is very sound, put it a plus.
          6. 0
            16 October 2015 18: 44
            Quote: atalef
            Shiites. and this is Iran. half of Iraq (they practically do not participate in the war on the side of Assad). Hisbullah .iii .... Everything

            Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Yemen ...

            well and the little things.

            and so you are right: Sunnis make up about 85–87% of Muslims, and the number of Shiites does not exceed 10%.
            Quote: atalef
            What am I leading to?

            thought rude, grounded.
            It is not very clear for what you are poured and asleep "-" .. Like "I ran past it"
            ---------------------------
            \ Please comment on this poster:

            About:
            Quote: atalef
            Russia acted as an Assad, initially in a weak position.
            The world is divided into 4 nodes of power.

            Israel does not seem to be included in either 4k or 5k.
            And equally opposed to the Sunnis and Shiites and all Muslims, and they all hate him.
            Or I'm wrong?
            How do you "experience" this?
      2. 0
        14 October 2015 07: 22
        Quote: Alekseev

        TOS "throws" not fire, but charges of a volumetric explosion ("vacuum")

        Salvo tos
    9. +5
      14 October 2015 07: 20
      Quote: Alex Nick
      But cutting off heads alive is how?

      Normally, fanatics jihadists like this and their worldview does not contradict. Apparently according to the logic of the author of the article, only Igilovites can take revenge for their dead, and the rest should look at killing people like rams in a slaughterhouse.

      PS And by the way, what these geeks, when they burned in the cage of a captive pilot, a Muslim was not afraid that his soul would not go to Paradise.
      In general, a new word has been proposed in the fight against terrorism: "Let us kill terrorists, but in such a way that they are not very angry with us for it." Creatively.
    10. 0
      14 October 2015 07: 55
      Why are the Iraqi leaders not interested in these "subtleties"?
      1. +3
        14 October 2015 08: 06
        A new wave of jihad, but not against Assad, but against Russia
        About Russia, and not such waves broke, do not write to yourself Skomorokhov, we will cover you, if cho!
      2. 0
        14 October 2015 08: 09
        Because they are Arabs and burn Arabs.
      3. -4
        14 October 2015 10: 29
        Quote: vyinemeynen
        Why are the Iraqi leaders not interested in these "subtleties"?

        Yes, because it’s a showdown between your own. Raven - the raven’s eye will not peck.
        1. 0
          15 October 2015 05: 42
          atalef
          Raven - the raven’s eye will not peck.


          ..... not that the heads of the eye fly. This war is programmed by the School of Law and Politics ...... to create the CHAOS ZONE !!!!
          Just like in the ruin .....
    11. +1
      14 October 2015 08: 21
      Afraid of wolves - do not go to the forest. One must either not fight or not think about such issues. Although a chemical weapon. There are recipes from which no trace is left in an hour. Yes, even if they stayed.
      1. +1
        14 October 2015 08: 39
        Speaking of birds - “I don’t know how in Arabic, but in Farsi the most terrible insult for a man sounds like“ the son of a burnt father. ”And that says a lot. Afghanistan, of course, is not close to Syria, but the essence is that the Persians have, that of the Arabs. That is, the Sunni Muslims. Who make up the majority of those fighting on the side of ISIS and other gangs. "

        The whole point is that in the region of Afghanistan there used to be such a faith as Zaraustra, the heathen worshipers. So, this is the same as saying, your father is an unfaithful pagan, like you who burned him :) That is, you are a heretic.

        In Arabia, there was no zaraustra - so you don’t need everything to fit in one comb
    12. +3
      14 October 2015 08: 40
      Not an article, but nonsense! Or the goal is the non-delivery of sunflowers to Syria so that they do not fry the journalist's friends.
    13. +4
      14 October 2015 09: 16
      I completely agree with Alex Nick and I want to add that they do not bother when they themselves burn Muslims ...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmDSVqctyuA
    14. 0
      14 October 2015 09: 23
      Until now, I arrived in the belief that the worst death for a Muslim is hanging .... Guys ... are there true Muslims? Mosht explain what and how really?
    15. 0
      14 October 2015 10: 06
      Yes, let these devils burn in ADU, from the beginning of the earth from the sunshine then in the afterlife from Allah.
    16. +8
      14 October 2015 10: 43
      Here the author, again twenty, pushes the idea of ​​liberals, Solovyov also asked Putin such an liberal question in an interview: Are you not afraid that terrorist acts in Russia will not become more frequent due to our intervention? He answered him something like this and he is right: the risk that there will be a terrorist act, it was and exists regardless of whether Russia intervenes in the Syrian conflict or not. We beat Wahhabis there who can invade the North Caucasus (Dagestan, Ingushetia), let it be better to kill them there than they will encounter them in Russia, in our cities.

      And now I remind forum users that when, after a short victory of the Czechs in the first war, they were left alone, they lived a couple of years on their own, so what? calmed down? no matter how! invaded Dagestan, and began Beslan and the Nord-Ost. Apart from the Arabs, those Afghans who fought against the Soviets in the 80s joined the bands of bandits, by the way, they were also left alone at the time. The essence is clear - the more you make concessions to the bandits, the more they become impudent. Therefore, it is necessary to ruthlessly crush reptiles anywhere on the Planet. Threaten - Get it! They only understand the language of power, the tougher you deal with them, the better.
      And all ordinary citizens just need to increase vigilance and civic responsibility, I saw a suspicious person, thing, call where you need to. And in general, those who are afraid of politics do not go into it, and they know their job.
      More deaths in Russia from car accidents and diseases, and not from the deeds of such igil.
    17. The comment was deleted.
    18. 0
      14 October 2015 13: 20
      moreover, the head of the sun is not cut off
    19. BMW
      0
      14 October 2015 13: 22
      Quote: Alex Nick
      fry in the "Sun"

      Well, we crossed "Cheburashka" and religion and began another am
    20. -3
      14 October 2015 13: 27
      It says something else. It is necessary to fight the enemy, but it must be done so that it is more difficult for the enemy to feed on new forces and provoke the growth of the enemy’s forces - clearly not worth it.
      1. +2
        14 October 2015 17: 19
        Come on, the conclusions are wrong.

        A phrase was taken from Farsi, which arose as a result of real reasons (the spread on this territory of the faith of Zoraaostrzm-fire-worshipers who burned their own dead) To say "son of a burnt father" is to accuse you of being unfaithful. To the east - Arabia. it will not spread. By the way, they used Greek fire for a long time.

        We eat further - the Syrians have been using flamethrowers and URKs for a long time, the Iraqis have already bought Solntsepeke six months ago - and the ammunition of a volume explosion is not flamethrowers.

        But the most interesting thing is that TOSs, RPOs, and conventional flamethrowers, napalm were used back in Afghanistan - that is, where they talked about "the son of a burnt father". Well, what next? A wave of terror swept over us?

        The author kill yourself against the wall with your "East is a delicate matter" - we ourselves are the east, we live here, we ourselves are a delicate business, and you spread only defeatist mirages with your fantasies.

        Now think about the asymptotic row

        1. Putin says that we will not intervene in Syria
        2. Putin’s meeting with Bardak Obama instead of 45 minutes and an hour and a half - both came out unhappy
        3. The Federation Council adopts a resolution on the use of the RF Armed Forces in Syria.

        As for me, the conversation was about the fact that the United States should not interfere in the zone of interests of the Russian Federation - Obamka tried to talk with Putin as with "slaves" from Europe - the result is obvious. And the fact that now "moderate" come is not sweet is not the consequences. The launch of 26 rockets on the day of the GDP was a subtle hint that the aircraft carrier T. Roosevelt understood by dumping outside the radius.

        And the fact that the Armed Forces of Ukraine suddenly abruptly intensified was not accidental — the United States will now launch the Ukrainians in the hope of distracting the Russian Federation from igil, since Isil harms the Russian economy more than Ukraine. And do not care that now is not the right time for the offensive - rascutstva and all that.
    21. +1
      14 October 2015 17: 05
      Similar moralists are purebloods, like our human rights activists, who have sucked up the foreign Department of State, always have humane arguments on the side of geeks.
    22. 0
      16 October 2015 22: 37
      The civilian Basmachi in Central Asia were horrified by the mounted attack of our cavalrymen - death from a saber strike was an insurmountable obstacle to paradise.
      With the sun, I see about the same situation.
  2. +14
    14 October 2015 05: 49
    Let the fanatics get out of Syria and then avoid burning. After all, did they burn the Jordanian pilot alive? Let now in their own skin experience what this man experienced.
    1. +1
      14 October 2015 15: 58
      Quote: Tatar 174
      Let the fanatics get out of Syria and then avoid burning.

      It does not matter in what way to destroy this infection, the main thing is that the more and faster, the better; no concessions should be made, and there should be no doubt about the rightness of their cause - and victory will be just around the corner ...
  3. +18
    14 October 2015 05: 53
    Possible consequences of the use of TPS "Solntsepek" in Syria
    - it smells fried, and literally ... Yes and the fact that our VKS shredded bearded dozens and hundreds does not give a reason to take revenge on us? stop late, bring down and catch up terribly by all means, I think so ...
  4. +9
    14 October 2015 05: 53
    Everything is simple. The war in Syria is a war on a religious basis.

    The controversial statement, I would say, is incorrect. The dollar is not coping, the streams of free oil are blocked, and the war is so necessary for the United States and the neighbors of the SAR, so they are promoting a war on religious grounds - and Assad is no longer a villain, it turns out. And "sunshine" is what the doctor ordered against terrorist holes. soldier
  5. +8
    14 October 2015 05: 55
    Something the author confuses. Now militants are fleeing from Syria en masse, so as not to fall under the blow of dryers. There are also suns ... What is the point of being a hero if the soul does not fall into paradise? Or is that what I don’t understand?
    1. 0
      14 October 2015 06: 20
      you need to review the names of all the equipment and if there is something like that - urgently to Syria
      1. 0
        14 October 2015 06: 30
        Purely informative deliver to Syria and voice. They will quickly think that their soul does not go to heaven and will scatter. You don’t even have to shoot))))
  6. +5
    14 October 2015 05: 55
    GOOD TERRORIST - DEAD TERRORIST! And a candidate for "good" terrorists should know that his "soul" will NEVER GO TO PARADISE! And what kind of soul can a terrorist have - only BLACK, FUCKING, PIG-LIKE - THE DIRECT ROAD to IBLIS (SATAN)! And IS has already declared war on us, RUSSIA.
    1. 0
      14 October 2015 06: 31
      And if his soul is black, then he will be "Friday" (The Adventures of Robinson).
  7. +4
    14 October 2015 05: 55
    "What will it give? Yes, an influx of new adherents. A new wave of jihad, but not against Assad, but against Russia. That is, against us. Each such burnt martyr will definitely become not just a hero-martyr, but an object for which one must avenge." And they will go. "

    Is not a fact. Most likely, they will be more afraid, and run away in advance. And the influx of volunteer fanatics there already was ... until recently. I think that the use of TOC will weaken this stream even more.
  8. +2
    14 October 2015 05: 56
    Of course, you can try to drive all the ISIS and their ilk into a heap and start hanging up corny, but they don’t agree recourse , which means that there will be much more trouble ...
  9. +7
    14 October 2015 05: 56
    I think that this topic did not need to be discussed. A terrorist who is fighting a legitimate government must lay down his arms or die. This is his choice. I personally, like thousands of people, do not really care what method of terrorism is destroyed. And you can bring any crime under some religious laws, which happens. Which crime is not from this point of view. What universal laws does a terrorist fulfill? Except those invented by him or him, which have nothing to do with Islam.
  10. +6
    14 October 2015 05: 58
    An eye for an eye, ISIS did not hesitate to burn the captive pilot - a MUSLIM in an iron cage alive (there is a video on the network), I don’t see a problem ...
    1. -6
      14 October 2015 08: 12
      Quote: m262
      An eye for an eye, ISIS did not hesitate to burn the captive pilot - a MUSLIM in an iron cage alive (there is a video on the network), I don’t see a problem ...

      The question is, what result did you get and why is it no longer harnessed?
  11. +5
    14 October 2015 05: 59
    The same "Al-Jazeera", with its huge audience, will undoubtedly be happy to show a barbecue, which ISIS fighters will turn into in the sun or there, "moderate terrorists"

    ... after which the rest of the fanatics will think hard - and should they climb into Syria or better stay away from it, so as not to lose the chance to go to paradise. Well, those who are not fanatics will also think hard - whether they should climb into Syria or better stay away from it, since the burnt corpse does not need money.
    1. +6
      14 October 2015 08: 00
      After Solntsepek, something got sick of me in ISIS request
  12. +4
    14 October 2015 06: 01
    In the fight against terror, all means are good. It is necessary to destroy these creatures by all means at hand. What a paradise for killers of civilians and thugs? Creatures that violate all human and religious laws must be DESTROYED !!!
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +4
    14 October 2015 06: 10
    do not look for a black cat in a dark room if it is not there. Bodies are also burnt from the KAB-500, and possibly ODAB-500 HE. The religiosity of the Islamists of the Islamic Republic, etc., is greatly exaggerated, behind the slogans are drugs, the thirst for profit.
  16. +2
    14 October 2015 06: 13
    What is the religious basis there? At first, the loot, the armament of the Americans. Now the loot is kind of its own, (oil sales) weapons are again Americanos. So what religion do Americans profess? Well, these are just tools and in any religion, murder is not taken as a basis. Well, they are all good and shaitan.
  17. +2
    14 October 2015 06: 13
    I think Roman is mistaken in this case. The effect will be the opposite. At the mention of the arrival (or rumor) of sunshine, the enemy will have demoralization. By the way, this is not the only Muslim hammam. Previously, the Turks (and not only them) were terribly afraid of our bayonet attacks.
  18. +2
    14 October 2015 06: 14
    yeah I found there Muslims in ISIS, fried in paradise will not go to others, science will be, we must still bury them with pork
    1. 0
      14 October 2015 12: 23
      And a pig - for what?
      Better a bandyuk - separately, a pig - separately - for sausage or ham, s .....
  19. +1
    14 October 2015 06: 15
    Quote: Lehlk
    The war in Syria - a war on a religious basis

    Of course, after all, on the American coin the inscription: "We believe in God" ... hi But in general, what do we care about the religious beliefs of terrorists? Well, they won’t go to heaven, so let Iblis complain about us, they are the first candidates to visit him anyway! am And then there will be an information war, and who will win we’ll see ... Normal Muslims will understand correctly, and the militants have already announced Russian dshihad, there is nothing to lose ...
  20. +1
    14 October 2015 06: 17
    If someone wants to find a reason for his hatred and anger, he will always find it. And nothing to do with TOC and bombs. Christian bullets will not say all this. There is no need to throw ideas for bandits here. They will find without us.
  21. +4
    14 October 2015 06: 18
    It’s funny. The author of the article is afraid of the step taken in the same direction as the previous one. Started to fight - go on, and even before scattering ashes on your head, you can roll, in the best traditions of our liberals.
  22. +3
    14 October 2015 06: 19
    The terrorist has no soul. The author is not right. The more reptiles run over, the more they will burn, the earth will be cleansed of the creatures of the Saudi. Burn them hellish fire!
  23. +3
    14 October 2015 06: 21
    The fact is that although the TOS is called a "flamethrower", it uses thermoBAR ammunition and one of the main, if not the main damaging factor, is the strongest pressure jump that occurs when they are detonated. Moreover, it is also significantly enhanced due to the almost simultaneous detonation of several such ammunition in one place. So that the acre of "kebabs" there will be a lot of quite intact "200s"
  24. +2
    14 October 2015 06: 26
    From a bumblebee, they shied somewhere, nicknamed shaitan - a pipe, and here CBT, impressions in full.
  25. +1
    14 October 2015 06: 27
    The very same "Al-Jazeera", with its huge audience, will undoubtedly be happy to show a barbecue, which will be turned in the sun by ISIS fighters or there, "moderate terrorists".

    So they already showed "barbecue" (according to the author) only from their opponents. So, following the author's logic, terrorists are allowed everything, but against them it is impossible because some point of faith is being touched upon. And this can lead to an influx of recruits into their ranks.
  26. +4
    14 October 2015 06: 30
    Maybe even every dushman is a lawyer? The author confused the podium.
  27. 0
    14 October 2015 06: 33
    dead terrorist that's fine

    Horrible concepts of beauty in you.
    1. 0
      14 October 2015 09: 26
      Plus for the beauty of the statement. The sum came out "zero".
  28. +2
    14 October 2015 06: 33
    The author may fumble about religious subtleties, but, apparently, not quite Copenhagen in arms. "Well, of course, if the system is flamethrower, then logically it incinerates everything." And to read smart books or articles on the Internet, broke off. The thermobaric projectile with which the mentioned system is armed is somewhat different from the incendiary times of the Second World War. After an instantaneous detonation, the pressure rises sharply, and then drops below atmospheric by about 160 mm Hg. Thus, even if the enemy managed to survive after the explosion, the pressure drop leads to his guaranteed death from rupture of internal organs. Nobody is there and nothing is burning. In any case, not more than from an ordinary explosion of an ordinary fragmentation, etc. projectile.
  29. +2
    14 October 2015 06: 34
    at the beginning of the last century, the British buried kamikaze Muslims in pork skins, which significantly reduced the flow of people who wanted to become martyrs.
  30. +1
    14 October 2015 06: 34
    This scribbler, just a liberal!
    terrorists need to burn fire for anyone.
  31. 0
    14 October 2015 06: 35
    A peculiar point of view, but an interesting look. But, developing the topic, I would look at it from a different angle: if we talk about the fact that the soul of the burned person does not go to "heaven" - then these flamethrower systems are a good reason for thugs to think about their path ...
  32. 0
    14 October 2015 06: 35
    There is no need to equate a terrorist and a Muslim. Find where the Quran says "Kill the wrong one"
  33. 0
    14 October 2015 06: 35
    Kadyrov, on this score, has long spoken out = Shaitans must be destroyed! And the ways to do this
    wishes do not play a role!
  34. 0
    14 October 2015 06: 42
    We can agree that in addition to outright scumbags in ISIS, there are people who can and should be tried to withdraw from these ranks (for example, former Iraqi army officers of Saddam). The concern can be shared so that when using the CBT, civilians will not suffer. Otherwise, it is hardly right to treat terrorists as believers, these are Satanists, nonhumans. Let’s be afraid, it’s necessary at all levels to voice that bandits by any means will not go to heaven, their place in hell.
  35. 0
    14 October 2015 06: 46
    What will it give? Yes, an influx of new adherents.



    The inflow will be - while investments in this project continue.
    And, as for morality, ethics and other snot in syrup - these creatures (or their PR people) are to blame. They are already perceived as a different species. Like, for example - insects from Starship Troopers. That is, restrictions on the means of destruction, in this case, can be due only to environmental considerations.
  36. +1
    14 October 2015 06: 46
    << The war in Syria is a war on a religious basis. >>
    The author really does "anneal". Religion in this war is only one of the mechanisms, far from being of primary importance, that turn the flywheel of the Syrian war. If the only question was who would take the Syrian throne - a Sunni or a Shiite, or a "Varangian" from the Papuans of New Guinea, money would not be injected from overseas into the veins of the so-called. "moderate opposition". But ... Remember, from whose submission, with whose active participation, assistance and generous funding, wars and overthrow of the so-called totalitarian regimes were unleashed over the past (at least) five decades in the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia and, of course , Europe. Therefore, I believe that religion in the Syrian war is somewhere far below. Anyone can do Washington. Even though the devil is bald, if only he followed all the orders of the State Department, the CIA and the Pentagon, well, I would also think about American bases on the territory of his country ... where it would be more convenient to place them in order to get closer to Russia.
  37. 0
    14 October 2015 06: 58
    Do you know how the Caucasian War was actually won? The caught "militants" were hanged. A shameful death for the then Muslims. The soul cannot go out through the throat, and the soul soiled in excrement was not taken to heaven. And that's all, actually.
    Why are you waiting for an influx of "revenge-seekers"? Or maybe wait for the outflow of those wishing to go to heaven? After all, having come to take revenge, they too can be burned.
    1. -1
      14 October 2015 11: 34
      You are probably a specialist in the Caucasian war? The Caucasian war was won after the capture of the Crimea and the victory over the Turks. Cut off from the supply. Then another 100 years, they cleared and suppressed the uprisings by the method of scorched earth, killing everything and everyone. Read about Yermolov. Then the laggards were evicted to Turkey, Syria, Jordan. And divided into different subjects of the Russian Federation. Here is a brief description of the Caucasian war
      1. +2
        14 October 2015 13: 05
        Quote: Zaurbek
        You are probably a specialist in the Caucasian war? The Caucasian war was won after the capture of the Crimea and the victory over the Turks. Cut off from the supply. Then another 100 years, they cleared and suppressed the uprisings by the method of scorched earth, killing everything and everyone. Read about Yermolov. Then the laggards were evicted to Turkey, Syria, Jordan. And divided into different subjects of the Russian Federation. Here is a brief description of the Caucasian war

        Quote: Zaurbek
        You are probably a specialist in the Caucasian war? The Caucasian war was won after the capture of the Crimea and the victory over the Turks. Cut off from the supply. Then another 100 years, they cleared and suppressed the uprisings by the method of scorched earth, killing everything and everyone. Read about Yermolov. Then the laggards were evicted to Turkey, Syria, Jordan. And divided into different subjects of the Russian Federation. Here is a brief description of the Caucasian war

        This is just a brief description. A brief description of the Second World War: The factories were evacuated beyond the Urals, fired a sufficient amount of military equipment, mobilized and defeated Hitler. And about what efforts and how exactly - this is particular.
        So it is in the Caucasian War. Those very "100 years of cleansing" are just the METHODS and METHODS of stopping the terror. Hang. Just hang up. Hang hostages. No need to rattle about "blood feud". The bloodlines also have a neck.
        By persuasion, especially people who perceive ordinary politeness as a sign of weakness, you can not convince. And current speeches, for example, in Chechnya, against perpetuating the memory of Ermolov, speak for themselves. Obey not weak. And not good. Weak - cut. Good people are robbed. Submit to the strong. One who can TAKE OFF. Take everything away, including life.
        No matter how beautiful words are woven, this is precisely the essence of any power.
  38. +1
    14 October 2015 06: 58
    "It's simple. The war in Syria is a war on a religious basis."
    Not certainly in that way. The International, gathered under the banner of IS, and especially its leading part, are not religious fanatics at all. These are practical thugs seeking to get out of the worldly power and enjoy the chaos in their habitat. That is, it is a gang of bandits who want to ensure themselves the constant satisfaction of their needs without being prosecuted. The religious component works only in terms of attracting recruits, "cannon fodder". There are separate structures, not IS, for which it is beneficial to direct IS in the right direction to solve geopolitical problems with the hope of controlling IS and eliminating it to work out its tasks. It is this structure that is trying to give all this fuss a religious character, which there is no more than in the ordinary life of a secular state. That is, there are, of course, individual fanatics, but they do not determine the general spiritual attitude. About the essence of the work of thermobaric ammunition has already been written here, it is probably not worth repeating. In short, the author's ears were passed over and he panicked. If we are involved in a war, we must fight in the most effective way, without sentimentality, assuming that the opposing side will try to inflict the greatest damage on us even if we display the maximum liberalism. A la guerre comme à la guerre.
  39. 0
    14 October 2015 07: 00
    This is how the TOS is called flamethrower, rather because it is in service with the units of the RHBZ. That is, this definition "flamethrower" is rather organizational than constructive. And in fact, this is a MLRS for firing at visually observed targets directly on the battlefield (and not from closed positions with ballistic calculations like Grad or Hurricane).
    Well, as far as I know, nothing really burns there, after the defeat. In the ammunition there seems to be no napalm or other combustibles. Just a volumetric explosion of an aerosol cloud. Where is the burning here?
  40. +3
    14 October 2015 07: 12
    some kind of nonsense ... Maybe he can also coordinate the time and place of striking with them, but what if a terrorist reads namaz ?????!
  41. 0
    14 October 2015 07: 12
    I personally think that no one interferes with this mercenary, martyr, etc., etc. just put the machine gun on the ground and make your legs towards the house, your beloved wife. Who makes them fight ??? Only the head-like "they are of the wrong faith." So it's better to put up with it and recognize their right to live in their faith and live in their own, without using a machine gun, cutting off heads and all that. It's a way to make them think - no more. Personal opinion
  42. 0
    14 October 2015 07: 12
    What will it give? Yes, an influx of new adherents. A new wave of jihad, but not against Assad, but against Russia. That is, against us. Each such burnt martyr will definitely become not just a martyr hero, but an object for which it is necessary to avenge. And they’ll go. There, in the east, there are no problems with this.

    Well, make a "barbecue" of them, otherwise there are a lot of them, if everyone is trampled from the open southern border - it will not seem a little.
  43. +1
    14 October 2015 07: 18
    For the first time, I put a minus in an article from a simple proposition - they don’t climb into a strange monastery with their charter, but if you get in, blame yourself regardless of what you get in the face, with a wet rag or fire.
  44. +1
    14 October 2015 07: 19
    Otduhi amused Comrade Buffoons!
    It seems that the author is a secret follower of ISIS.
    I would like to ask him: who cares how the children of the terrorists will perceive the fact of frying their father? They violated the laws of humanity, kill the innocent, thereby putting themselves outside the law!
  45. +2
    14 October 2015 07: 22
    We will burn more fanatics in the trenches, and there will be less of them in cities tied with explosives. If you think about how to kill a terrorist without violating the commandments of the Koran / Torah / Bible, then the war will go on for centuries. These idiots, hiding behind the Koran, hiding behind Muslim customs and faith, cut heads and shoot civilians, and we will choose what "bullet" to put into their empty heads? There will be too much honor.
  46. +2
    14 October 2015 07: 32
    Harmful article ...
    These bastards, cut out and devour hearts, cut off their heads in the name of "Allah", everyone else should think that a hair from their beard would not fall in the wrong way.
    It’s a shame for them if they are killed by a Woman. So preparing women with snipers.
    That's the only way to destroy those, making it clear that they will not end up in any Paradise, but will be cursed by Allah. Then they will think about why they were born and why, how the nits will be destroyed!
  47. dpu
    +2
    14 October 2015 07: 38
    Living shekhids, seeing what awaits them in return for paradise with free women, are unlikely to want to be fried. This is tantamount to wrapping the late Shekhid in a pig's skin. It will have an impressive effect on the living. And since the East is a delicate matter, many "migrant workers" - terrorists will prefer another way to earn money. And don't blame everything on religion. By the way, "Solntsepёk" acts very quickly and for a short time, and even the clothes will not burn on the dead if there is no fuel nearby. "Solntsepёk" is not a flamethrower, but in fact an explosive of volume-blasting action, if I may say so. I think it will be very useful for the Shekhids and for Obama and the Saudis. As well as the caliber 533 mm.
  48. 0
    14 October 2015 07: 53
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: Bone
    As young people say: "The author is Burning ...."
    Let us wrap each terrorist in a sheet and dig up a grave, and apologize to our relatives for the fact that he died killing "infidels" .......?!

    What is your purpose? win or ensure a constant influx of new bandits in ISIS?
    No one is talking. what do not need to destroy the bandits, the question is in the methods.
    If the methods are such that by killing one, a motivation is generated for the influx of a dozen in his place - then you need to think and change something.
    Remember the uprising in India, which ultimately led to the fall of colonial rule.
    it started with little things. the British began to execute a shot from a gun. when the Hindu's body was torn and the soul did not enter a new circle of objection.
    A trifle like. but how did it end?

    But! They began to execute after of how the rebellion began. India in any case, one way or another, he would have freed himself from the colonialists. An example is the countries of Africa.
  49. +1
    14 October 2015 07: 58
    The author is funny. Nothing about BV is boom.
    I don’t know how in Arabic, but in Farsi, the worst insult for a man sounds like “the son of a burned father”. And it says a lot. Afghanistan, of course, is not close to Syria, but the essence is the same as the Persians, the Arabs. That is, Sunni Muslims. Which constitute the main majority of the warring on the side of ISIS and other gangs.

    The author in Afghanistan has no Persians. The majority of Pashtuns live there. And they have not Farsi, but Urdu, Pashto language.
  50. +1
    14 October 2015 08: 07
    Morality in the war is the 25th, if the system works well, then it must be applied. A couple of groups with Turkish officers burn in the village and it will be good! And the Turks will calm down and the Arabs will be easier.
  51. +1
    14 October 2015 08: 14
    The author of this opus is fundamentally wrong. If a Muslim is afraid of being burned so that his soul does not go to heaven, then he will give up a hundred pounds and the number of associates of radical Islam will sharply decrease. Sunshine is a good motivator for correction.
  52. 0
    14 October 2015 08: 24
    How long have you been from Circus Roma? crying
  53. +1
    14 October 2015 08: 26
    the psychological background for the use of TOS of the "Solntsepek" type in Syria can be summed up correctly, however, having landed on our sinful land, it is worth noting that the use of TOS is justified primarily by its purely tactical properties with reference to a specific section of the theater of operations (taking into account the features of the terrain, etc. .),those. high efficiency unlike other artillery systems...
  54. +1
    14 October 2015 08: 27
    Or maybe look at this from a different angle? If the ideology of fanatics is built on the principle that everyone who died in battle with the infidels is guaranteed paradise. The sunshine may cool (pardon the pun) some hotheads. You'll get fried and won't go to heaven without comme il faut am
  55. +1
    14 October 2015 08: 28
    I didn’t understand the author. Should we raise our hands? We’re arguing with the United States, what if they get offended? We are afraid of Qatari propaganda, we are afraid of world public opinion, we are afraid of everything! The one who is afraid always loses! The right way to fight with these is to cause fear, the wildest animals are pacified. Terrorist attacks are not organized without money. Everything is paid not by Muslim enthusiasts, but by sponsors about whom we know. The sun should be applied closer to them.
  56. +1
    14 October 2015 08: 41
    Ishilo nits must be destroyed by ANY means, including weapons of mass destruction....
    1. 0
      14 October 2015 19: 34
      Quote: Alexandr2637
      including weapons of mass destruction....

      Not our method... Our military is selectively, politely eradicating this infection. Yes
  57. The comment was deleted.
  58. 0
    14 October 2015 08: 49
    Roman Skomorokhov, take a sedative at night and in the morning you will wake up like a baby. And I assure you that it will never even occur to you to write any nonsense like this article. I don’t even want to comment on this nonsense.
  59. +1
    14 October 2015 08: 51
    What exactly is the problem? TOS-1A is in service with RKhBZ units - right? And according to rumors, ISIS militants make (or stole a lot of) mustard gas - right? Well, if so, then the use of TOS-1A is justified. After all, it is necessary to prevent contamination of the territory by chemical agents. Well, who didn’t hide....... request
  60. +1
    14 October 2015 08: 52
    The author does not quite seem to understand what a person does to the body - all the other “garbage” created by people to destroy their own kind!
  61. +1
    14 October 2015 08: 57
    As far as I know, the Israelis wrap terrorists, after liquidation, in pork skins, and many “true believers” are already thinking - maybe they shouldn’t mess with the Jews))
  62. +1
    14 October 2015 09: 02
    Fry in pork lard. Yes, I’m sitting at my computer at home, far from military operations, but it’s no less “offensive” for the power when such authors express fears about revenge on the part of the terrorists. So maybe then we should immediately apologize for our pilots and also give Assad to them in a gift box with bow...? Let them piss with boiling water along with the whole West and their blowjobs at the phrase “The Russians are coming”, than WE will again remain in “F” both for ourselves and for the Territories and for the West and for the allies.
  63. -2
    14 October 2015 09: 09
    The East is a delicate matter, the hero of the Desert Sun rightly asserted.

    Russia entered the East with planes and missiles, forgetting that there are situations in which you have to pay a ruble for entry and ten for exit. This is exactly the situation where we have found ourselves.



    Having thrust a stick into a wasp’s nest and thoroughly poked around there (now also with the Sunshine), of course, one can be surprised that the wasps will sting instead of one individual, in a whole swarm. And you shouldn't be surprised.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  64. +1
    14 October 2015 09: 13
    That's not what you're thinking about, Roman. Terrorists announced long ago that they would cut off the heads of Russians, but we should be afraid to kill them...
  65. +1
    14 October 2015 09: 22
    What kind of lamentation? Even if everything goes like this - the use of such systems will cause a new round of aggression on the part of Muslims, then this is of course bad, on the one hand, and good on the other. How to fight cancer? They cut it out. Then we can compare.... The problem needs to be solved, and not kept in the state of a smoldering mattress - it seems you can live, but it stinks and is impossible to breathe.
  66. +1
    14 October 2015 09: 30
    The use of "Pinocchio" in Afghanistan did not make the Mujahideen want to sign up for suicide bombing and go to Russia to take revenge.
    I respect the author, but in this case I do not agree with his conclusions.
  67. +1
    14 October 2015 09: 32
    The author is blowing from the side of the liberals.
    According to his logic, law enforcement agencies should absolutely be afraid of criminals and not put them in prison, otherwise they will suddenly take revenge. Nonsense.
    What are we talking about?
    Should the Great Power be afraid of gopnik bandits? Even if they are covered by a mattress frame.
    Laughter and more!
  68. 0
    14 October 2015 09: 43
    I read in some article that in some year there was a similar situation in the Arbian countries and what they didn’t do there. You yourself know that fanatics are difficult to deal with, then one of the rulers ordered the fanatics to be wrapped in pork skin and buried alive. Only this field was restored order. The fact that solcepek is not the worst thing for an Islamist.
  69. 0
    14 October 2015 09: 43
    I'm from the East myself. I have never heard such an expression as “son of a burned father.” I know that the grave should not be allowed to burn down (often happens due to dry grass on the graves). The curse sounds: “May your grave burn!”
  70. 0
    14 October 2015 09: 47
    And here Russia sold weapons, as many countries do. The Syrians know better than to fight better. I think the Syrians took into account both religious and political motives; war is always a dirty “game”.
  71. +1
    14 October 2015 09: 50
    Well, we have a godless time, well, there is nowhere for a believer to come from, even if Mohammed or Allah appeared. They fight for money, for money.
  72. 0
    14 October 2015 10: 18
    Before applying SOLNTSEPEK, apply SALOMET - there will be an effect. If after the shelling of SALOMET the Muslims do not scatter, then use SOLTSEPEK.
  73. 0
    14 October 2015 10: 41
    I don’t know how in Arabic, but in Farsi

    Afghanistan, of course, is not close to Syria, but the essence is the same between the Persians and the Arabs

    Since when did Persians start living in Afghanistan and when did they start speaking Farsi there??? those. Persians speak Farsi, but in a completely different country. Have you heard of Iran?
  74. +1
    14 October 2015 10: 54
    The author demonstrates an absolute lack of understanding of the issue.
    Jihad - From their point of view a commandment, the purpose of which, like any other commandment, is to raise the soul, the consequence of which will be (including but not only) placing it, the soul, in Jannat (paradise).
    Actions that do not lead to the elevation of the soul, but, on the contrary, to its “lowering” are not a commandment, but a sin. Accordingly, these actions are not only meaningless in the spiritual and religious context under consideration, but also harmful.
  75. +1
    14 October 2015 11: 21
    the sheriff doesn’t care about the problems of the Indians... If there is an effective means of defeating the enemy, then it would be stupid not to use it... And there will be suicide bombers blowing up something on the territory of the Russian Federation or not, this is fortune telling on coffee grounds, problems should be solved as needed their receipts. The fact that such a problem would arise as terrorist attacks on the territory of the Russian Federation as a result of the operation in Syria was clear to any sane person, but for some reason the author of the article does not understand that there have been and will be attempts at such terrorist attacks without the Solntsepeks, moreover, even if there were no If there were operations in Syria, they would still come to us with terror. Therefore, Russia has no choice but to act proactively and destroy terrorists outside the country.
  76. +1
    14 October 2015 11: 24
    Yes, it's cruel. What to do if the enemy does not surrender - they destroy him. And they deserve such destruction
  77. +1
    14 October 2015 11: 26
    The author of the article is clearly a layman, and even a subtle provocateur! They say you can’t destroy the poor ISIS members, faith doesn’t allow you, but let’s hit them on the cheek with our palm until we kill them. You have to try hard to write such nonsense, but what about American napalm bombs - they also kill kindly, and ours are no weaker. As soon as we start supply the Syrians with better-quality weapons than the bandits, so the liberals with white ribbons begin the Amerian shaking - ala human rights activists in the service of America!
  78. +2
    14 October 2015 11: 55
    Hmm, I didn’t expect it. It turns out that zealous intercessors about the afterlife of bandits and terrorists have appeared here. It would be nice if they came from behind the hill, everything is clear with them. But here, here, this is beyond the comprehension of the mind. Although, if the author of the article is inclined towards Islam or are in fact Muslims, then his writing becomes clear. Then maybe the author will justify cutting off the heads of prisoners by ISIS? Everything will work out just like Muslims. It turns out that we can’t use TOS, otherwise they won’t go to heaven with the Gurias, but we can cut off heads. What - the author has recently become inappropriate. Of course, now we will be offended, saying that the author meant something or other. But as they say, what is written with a pen cannot be cut down with an ax. And even if the author is a Muslim or one of them sympathizer, then let him remember. We, the Orthodox, don’t care. The enemy will be beaten by what we ourselves choose with TOS, missiles, bullets, pigskins, pigs’ heads, bombs, and no one will force us to show pity for the enemy who cuts the heads of unarmed people. You can ban me, you're good at it.
  79. +1
    14 October 2015 11: 59
    Well, finally, they brought the most effective means for war in the ruins... It’s a rotten business to pick out militants from the city ruins with a machine gun. The more ruins, the easier it is to hide in them. But “Sunshine” is guaranteed to send everyone to Allah in bulk...
  80. 0
    14 October 2015 12: 10
    "Akela missed"... that's what they call it.
    Fears appeared out of nowhere.
    Firstly, TOS does not burn bodies into ashes....it simply burns all kinds of infection along with oxygen (toxic substances, in particular, which is why Solntsepek is in service with the Russian Chemical Defense Plant).
    Secondly, in Islam it is believed that DEATH is sent by Allah and carried out by Azrael. So, the kind of death Allah has sent, this kind of death must be met calmly. Because the Almighty knows exactly what to whom.
    There are nuances, but they are not significant.
    \You can read it here - https://lossofsoul.com/DEATH/Religion/islam.htm
    Thirdly, war....and nothing more. To be crushed in Islam is more shameful than to be burned in battle. This cremation is not allowed; this is how cremation is done not in combat conditions.
    And fourthly, and fourthly.....does Roman have confidence that this is reality and not a rumor - the arrival of TOS in Syria with the aim of conducting military operations? And not for the purpose of exerting moral pressure?
    We all walk under God, no matter what his name is.
  81. 0
    14 October 2015 12: 21
    Yes, there is an influx of new adherents. New wave of jihad

    yeah, those who dream of not getting into Paradise. Yes, they are recruited under the promise of Paradise with a thousand virgins.

    You need to take care of yourself and your values ​​and not about the offended feelings of the State Department and other terrorists they support.
  82. 0
    14 October 2015 12: 41
    I propose to sign a petition where we will apologize to the ISIS terrorists that their children will be insulted...
  83. +1
    14 October 2015 12: 42
    The article is complete nonsense, because you cannot be a pacifist in this world, and even with such an argument. They'll eat it right away! If you want to live, have weapons and an army, the very best. And apply it! By the enemy, regardless of his religion..
  84. 0
    14 October 2015 12: 56
    When SAA troops enter positions abandoned by ISIS and Al-Nusra, they sometimes find many intentionally burned bodies of militants. Fanatics who so want to go to heaven with 72 sheep calmly burn their dead, so don’t be here
  85. +1
    14 October 2015 13: 24
    read the article...
    according to the author, should I stand and applaud the way they cut off heads?
    the fact that they will try to act here is not to go to a fortune teller. For me, it’s better to start incinerating them away from Russia.
  86. 0
    14 October 2015 13: 45
    This, just like a moderate terrorist or an immoderate one, has already been discussed. There has never been and will never be such a thing in war as to choose a humane weapon or an inhumane one, whether it is suitable for this or that religion (nonsense). And nuclear weapons would have already been used if they weren’t afraid to destroy the whole world. Likewise with other weapons (chemical and biological), they don’t use them openly only because it won’t hurt everyone.
  87. +2
    14 October 2015 14: 01
    Everything is turned inside out in this article!
    Those who fight in IS are those who have it drilled into their heads that death in a “holy war” will automatically lead to heaven. So they “went wild”, implicitly understanding that even while they were alive and experiencing the hardships of war, it was still better than hopelessly hunching over every day. But if the method of their death suddenly calls into question “automatically to heaven,” then the sun can cause fear and reluctance to fight by the mere fact of its presence.
  88. The comment was deleted.
  89. +1
    14 October 2015 14: 08
    The use of Solntsepeka in fortified areas outside of settlements is just right, but in cities and towns it is better, of course, a smaller caliber - Bumblebee, etc. and specifically at firing points.
  90. +1
    14 October 2015 14: 14
    ODAB-500, RPO “Shmel” Can’t be used either? Then soon the rest of the ammunition will have to be made halal. That's sad ;(
  91. +2
    14 October 2015 14: 20
    the first article where I downvoted. rave
  92. +1
    14 October 2015 14: 37
    For some reason, the author allegedly attracts the facts. In Moscow, Volgograd and other places, terrorist attacks occurred despite the fact that thermoboric ammunition was not used. Moreover, they have been practically used for a long time, actively in the DRA. The author clearly fulfilled the order, he fulfilled it and let him take the cookie.
  93. +1
    14 October 2015 14: 47
    i.e. can it be used in Iraq? but not in Syria. where is the logic. The Iraqis are already using CBT
  94. +2
    14 October 2015 14: 48
    Hmmm. Sometimes I am surprised by Roman. Either he's naive or he's working for...
    How long can you flog SUCH nonsense?!
    Otherwise we don’t know such subtleties! We've known for centuries!
    IS killed Christians, TORTURED them before this! We generally have the right to righteous revenge! From the point of view of these very subtleties. And the reasons were provided, and with the same joy and helpfulness, by the same mentioned “Al-Jazeera”!
    And therefore - burn the Satanists and so that they don’t go to heaven!
    However, this weapon is a great scarecrow. And since IS is hiding behind a human shield, it is unlikely that it will actually be used... Although who knows...
    The “pigs” were ALREADY running away when the Bear arrived!
    ISIS, like Banderlog, is a raging “swine flu”. And that’s why they don’t even set foot in heaven. And Al Jazeera knows this too.
  95. -1
    14 October 2015 14: 59
    I don’t really understand why Roman was downvoted. The point of view, in general, has the right to life. Time will show. Simply for indicating one of the possible consequences, i.e. elaboration of a possible scenario, gave +. Although I don’t really agree with the conclusions. This will not change the number of fanatics much, but the number of people who want to avoid going to heaven in a given local battle zone will significantly decrease. Flamethrower systems of this type, in my opinion, after the first real use will turn into a strong psychological factor on the battlefield. There is a non-zero probability that one mention or receipt of information about the transfer of this system to the battle area will be enough for a breakthrough.
    1. 0
      14 October 2015 16: 01
      You, comrade, with pacifist-liberal views need to go to Venediktov for the “Ear of Matza”. There they will understand and love you, and if you continue on a larger scale, then it’s possible to get a grant. Your nickname is just right for them. With us the hunchbacked pacifist surrendered everything that was possible and impossible in the last century to the United States, right up to the GDR. Therefore, excuse me, but when I hear the word “pacifist,” I remember tents in an open field with the wives and children of military men, the work of the military, whoever has to do it, instead of defending the Motherland, Clinton’s laughter and the expansion of NATO, SS-18 explosions in mines for the needs of the Pentagon, the Army and the Navy, driven into a corner. Don’t bother your soul with your pacifism.
      1. 0
        14 October 2015 18: 35
        And I strongly advise you, comrade, to sober up and stop imagining who knows what, and also turn on your brain and, in addition to loud statements with a stigma attached to the point, do not be lazy and read the posts, including the one that you so wonderfully inappropriately commented on, carefully.
        1. 0
          14 October 2015 21: 29
          I read it very carefully. Just like the article itself. The article picked up cons not only on the local site, but also on Newsland. So, who among us read it carefully? Or are everyone who put downvotes stupid or something? Then you, being smart, hold the cards in your hands.
  96. 0
    14 October 2015 16: 02
    yah. Allahakbars, having learned that it is unrealistic to get to heaven through a war with Syria, will, on the contrary, run away, since it is so valuable to them. A good reason to leave. And revenge...what's the point of considering why they cut heads? Chop more, so that they are afraid, they don’t understand another language. There's no need to be altruistic
  97. +1
    14 October 2015 16: 07
    What a sanctimonious point of view! Maybe send invitations to the spirits for a humane euthanasia? This is war! War! Shoot from all guns, and don’t hesitate, otherwise we risk becoming “cut up fathers of our sons.”
  98. +1
    14 October 2015 17: 06
    With each new article by the author, there is less and less doubt about his common sense and bias towards everything that does not suit him personally! The other day, they sent me a link where Mozgovoy gave an assessment of his journalistic activities.
    I'll share - https://youtu.be/3i3SgqbbvRc
    1. 0
      14 October 2015 21: 48
      Thanks for the information. Very informative.
  99. 0
    14 October 2015 17: 11
    IMHO: The author Roman Skomorokhov is intimidating with overkill.
    I heard that Ariel Sharon, being a military general, in order to stop the wave of terror, gave the command to bury the corpses of terrorists SEWED IN PIG SKINS, which closed the road to heaven for the martyr and put horseradish in one place instead of serving 72 virgins on a plate.
    I heard that at that time this event had a radical effect. I don’t understand why they don’t apply this to suicide bombers now!
    1. 0
      15 October 2015 02: 49
      Actually, the impudents successfully used this method 100 years before Sharon - after the sepoy uprising...
  100. 0
    14 October 2015 17: 23
    The fanatic burned by TOS, whose soul does not fall into his paradise for us, is in principle not a big problem. For a dead terrorist is wonderful. But for his colleagues and supporters this is a slightly different point of view.
    The point of view is one and specific - if you want to go to heaven, don’t fall under the “Sunshine”, i.e. don’t pick up a machine gun, stay at home. And whoever didn’t hide, it’s not my fault.
    1. 0
      16 October 2015 20: 27
      The author pours words in defense of the fanatics. He felt sorry for them and in such a sophisticated way he is trying to “cover” them from the “suns.” If it is a sin to die in fire, then throw away your weapons, live, work and pray. Allah Akbar can and will forgive mistakes and posthumously to will send it to the Gurias. If you don’t want to go to heaven, burn and lose your immortal soul. AMEN!