Suddenly ... Elvira Nabiullina is recognized as the best of the leaders of the central banks of the world

16 September 2015 322

We do not appreciate the head of the Russian Central Bank, we do not appreciate ... But the European Economic Journal Euromoney really appreciates. The magazine published materials that stated that the head of the Bank of Russia Elvira Nabiullina was recognized as the “leader of the year” - the best among all the leaders of the central banks of the countries of the world. The arguments of the specialists who have determined the best of the best come down to the fact that with a significant drop in oil prices and with tougher economic sanctions against Russia, the Russian economy “did not go into a tailspin”.

RIA News leads the translation of a piece of material published in the journal Euromoney:

Faced with painful sanctions and a correction in oil prices, economists gave credibility to the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and her team for drastic steps to stabilize the foreign exchange market by raising interest rates, as well as measures to strengthen the ruble and provide liquidity to financial institutions. These measures, combined with the freely floating ruble and inflation targeting, increased the confidence of foreign investors.

Elvira Nabiullina has already commented on the award of the “Best Leader of the Central Bank of the Year” award to her. According to her, this is an assessment not only of her work, but also of the work of the entire Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

Suddenly ... Elvira Nabiullina is recognized as the best of the leaders of the central banks of the world

It should be noted that the magazine Euromoney It is published in Britain since 1969 and annually (since the beginning of 90's) awards prizes in the field of economics. Considering the fact that Russian politicians and economists rarely favor leading Western publications with laudatory reviews, and often ignore them in terms of awarding prizes, recognition of Mrs. Nabiullina’s merit by a British magazine looks somewhat ambiguous.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

kachurov2015

0

16 September 2015 20: 57

It was 19% of the loan, but it became 25%. Progress!
1. Tor5
  
  +1
  
  16 September 2015 22: 29
  
  And, incidentally, for the fact that she is against the indexation of pensions, and therefore for an increase in mortality, because this is interconnected, no money - no medicine (bread, milk...).
Vladimir Io

-2

16 September 2015 21: 04

If the West praises, moreover suddenly, after or before S. Glazyev’s speech with an analytical report on economic problems, then the West clearly does not want this person to be removed from his post. At one time, A. Chubais was recognized as an outstanding banker of all times. There is no need to explain his role in the collapse of the country’s economy to anyone. This is a signal that Nabiulina urgently needs to be replaced with a more worthy candidate; the sooner, the better for Russia.
The comment was deleted.
ASG7

+1

16 September 2015 21: 24

It's like recognizing the best tail of a tiger, which is well preserved after a brutal beating of a cat.
arnulla

+1

16 September 2015 21: 48

Well... Everything is correct - the people are impoverished, the head of the Central Bank receives a Western bonus. The West is pleased with the result. At one time, Kudrin received the same bonus, and from the same ones. Our current situation in the economy, the result, including , and Kudrinsky’s “works”...
1. anip
  
  +1
  
  17 September 2015 09: 44
  
  Quote: arnulla
  Our current situation in the economy is the result, among other things, of Kudrinsky’s “works”.
  
  And also Putin's.
arnulla

+1

16 September 2015 21: 50

One word - creatures
Radical

0

16 September 2015 21: 54

Elvira Nabiullina has already commented on her being awarded the “Best Central Bank Manager of the Year” award. According to her, this is an assessment not only of her work, but also of the work of the entire Central Bank of the Russian Federation
Amazing! There is just a feeling that something is still missing... . Oh, yes - US State Department awards, then the picture will be complete!
Karabin

+3

16 September 2015 22: 28

Bravo Sakhipzadovna! Pleased everyone. Both the West and the President of the Russian Federation, who is sort of an antagonist to the West. At least worthy of an order.
GraveBezKresta

-1

16 September 2015 22: 45

In any normal country, with a normal economy, this Elvira Naeba... oh, sorry, I typed it wrong, Nabiullina. At best, they would put him in charge of a public toilet. In an oligarchic, perverted picture, where economics and finance are completely perverted, without any doubt, a monster like Elvira is the BEST. And who doubts?
Owl

0

16 September 2015 23: 06

Yes, these “gods from Olympus” don’t give a damn about the People and the State! They are pushing the population towards the final (deadly) revolution! They must be tried for treason against the Motherland!
propovednik

-2

16 September 2015 23: 34

Fucking old man)) the Soviets' brains are just boiling..., although praise from enemies leads to certain thoughts, but we must give it its due - with such pressure from outside, the country's economy functions normally!
Comrades, our government is not enemies after all; for 25 years now, we have not had a soviet system, but a market one!
Weyland

0

16 September 2015 23: 56

Elvira Nabiullina is recognized as the best among the heads of central banks of the world

How about grandfather Krylov in the fable “The Lion and the Leopard”:

Once upon a time, in the old days,
The Lion and the Leopard waged a long war
For disputed forests, for wilds, for dens.
To sue for rights is not their disposition;
Yes, the strong in rights are often blind.
They have their own charter for this:
Whoever overcomes is right.

However, finally, you can’t fight forever -
And the claws will become dull:
The heroes rightfully decided to figure it out;
We decided to stop the military affairs,
End all strife
Then, as usual, we conclude eternal peace
Before the first quarrel.

"Let's appoint as soon as possible
We are secretaries from ourselves, -
Bars offers Leo, and how their minds judge,
Let it be.

For example, I will define Cat:
The animal may be unsightly, but its conscience is clear;
And you appoint a Donkey: he is of noble rank,
And, by the way, say here,
Where is he from you, you enviable beast!

Believe me as a friend: the advice and yard are all yours
His hooves are hardly worth it.
Let's rely on this
On what
He’ll be fine with my Kitty.”

And Leo approved Bars’s thought
Without a doubt;
But not the Donkey, he dressed up the Fox
He will analyze this on his own behalf,
Saying to himself (apparently he knew the world):
“Whoever the enemy praises us is surely of no use.”
Asadali

0

17 September 2015 01: 12

Quote: Cat Man Null
And where are you, plin, representatives from the US Federal Reserve?

Of course, I respect Starikov, and especially since I’m not an economist, but in this case. To put it mildly, I disagree with him. Why with him? Yes, because he is “fooling people’s brains”, that the Central Bank is under the Federal Reserve System.
Legally, no matter who the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is under, in fact it is completely subordinate to the GDP. Whatever the GDP gives the go-ahead for, Nabiulina and everyone else will do.
Cat man null

-1

17 September 2015 01: 26

Quote: Uncle Joe
Quote: Sid.74

To build vegetable stores in conditions where vegetables from the EU are cheaper than domestic ones did not make any sense. It was generally impractical to do so.
And in conditions of expensive currency, the Russian embargo, targeted financing of agricultural holdings, it is advisable

But will you tell me: if the Russian state follows this logic, then what is its goal - providing low-quality, high-quality products to the end user (ensuring food security), or the opportunity to be welded for the huckster-owner?

Yes.. masterpiece

Would you mind telling me

Now... easy

if the Russian state follows this logic

Which one, excuse me?

- we have - like - a “market economy”. This is a given, get over it
- in the market, the one who sells cheaper wins. In rubles. So?
- There used to be a situation when imports won. Now the situation has changed and domestic products are winning. So?
- the Russian state decides (sic!) to allow (not force - allow) “mega-investors” to invest in infrastructure that will ensure the storage and processing of domestic products.

What's wrong with that? Everything seems smooth and very market-like..

Quote: Uncle Joe
What is his goal - to provide cheap, high-quality products to the end consumer (ensuring food security), or the opportunity to make money for the huckster owner?

Neither one nor the other can be the “goal” of the state. The goals of the state are:

- preserving yourself, your loved one. For this purpose - ensuring defense capability (outside) and acceptable level of existence and order (inside)
- “ensuring food security” and “providing cheap, high-quality products to the end consumer” are different things. We look at the word “acceptable” in the paragraph above, stick it in..

Quote: Uncle Joe
For whom, following this logic, does this state ultimately work, eh?

To myself. Like any state

PS: Uncle Joe, don't exaggerate. Well, it doesn't suit you
1. Uncle Joe
  
  +1
  
  17 September 2015 02: 57
  
  Quote: Cat Man Null
  Now... easy
  And where?
  
  Which one, excuse me?
  "Liberal" - "market".
  
  We have, like, a “market economy.” This is a given
  We once didn’t have it, and that means this is not a given, but the frills of the country’s leadership that are contrary to the constitution.
  
  All other fabrications make no sense.
  
  And what's wrong with that?
  Russian Federation - social state, whose policy is aimed at creating conditions that ensure a decent life and free development person.
  
  That is, everything is wrong.
  
  The goals of the state are: preserving oneself, one’s loved one
  What is a state, what exactly is this something that preserves itself? (so that I understand the level of your understanding)
  
  In general, Man, his rights and freedoms are the highest value. Recognition, observance and protection of human and civil rights and freedoms is the responsibility of the state.
  Human and civil rights and freedoms are directly applicable. They determine the meaning, content and application of laws, the activities of the legislative and executive authorities, local self-government and provided with justice.
  
  To myself. Like any state
  We look at the previous question and articles 2, 7, and 18 (ideally chapters 1 and 2)
  
  do not distort
  do not distort
  1. Cat man null
    
    0
    
    17 September 2015 03: 25
    
    Quote: Uncle Joe
    We once didn’t have it, and that means this is not a given, but the frills of the country’s leadership that are contrary to the constitution
    
    Well, yes.. and even before there was nothing at all, but only dinosaurs..
    
    Move out, let's go...
    
    Quote: Uncle Joe
    All other fabrications make no sense
    
    Is it these? You shouldn’t be doing that.. I just broke down into components what you called
    
    Quote: Uncle Joe
    "Liberal" - "market" (logic)
    
    Again :
    
    Quote: Cat Man Null
    - in the market, the one who sells cheaper wins
    - imports used to win. Now domestic products win
    - The Russian Federation decides to allow investment in something that will ensure storage and processing of domestic products
    
    Everything seems simple and clear, no?
    
    Quote: Uncle Joe
    The Russian Federation is a social state whose policy is aimed at creating conditions ensuring a decent life and free human development.
    
    That is, everything is wrong.
    
    What a starting point to take... compared to some Syria there - everything is just super
    
    Quote: Uncle Joe
    What is a state...
    
    Figurines. Definitions - like dogs... bring any that you like, and I will explain to you what
    
    The goals of the state are: preserving oneself, one’s loved one..
    
    Quote: Uncle Joe
    Man, his rights and freedoms are the highest value
    
    A-ha.. during the Union there was an appropriate joke:
    
    The Chukchi went to Moscow for the CPSU Congress, returned and said:
    “We do everything for the good of man, everything in the name of man.” The Chukchi saw this man and shook his hand..
    
    Am I clear? It didn't work like that. Never..
    
    The state, like any complex system, is primarily concerned with the issue of its survival. Preferably comfortable.
    
    According to Le Chatelier's principle, if you like
    
    Quote: Uncle Joe
    do not distort
    
    You technically omitted your passage about
    
    "ensuring food security" = "providing cheap, high-quality products to the end consumer"
    
    So... it's not the same. This is the distortion, it is also a subvert.
    
    IMHO, essno
    1. Uncle Joe
      
      0
      
      17 September 2015 04: 10
      
      Quote: Cat Man Null
      Well, yes.. and even earlier
      
      Quote: Uncle Joe
      You shouldn’t be doing that.. I just broke down into components what you called
      Yeah - based on the "given"
      
      The original thesis is not correct in principle, and therefore all constructions based on it are pulling an owl onto a globe (we are not analyzing the possibilities within the framework of a specific economic model)
      
      Again :
      - the one who wins in the market
      Change the logic and model, at least in accordance with the law, and you will be absolutely clear as to which huckster wins under what conditions.
      
      What a starting point to take... compared to some Syria there - everything is just super
      In everyday life, do you also look up to the worst possible outcome?
      
      In Syria before the war, by the way, conditions were much better than in the Russian Federation.
      
      bring whatever you like
      An instrument for regulating social and interstate relations always works in the interests of the ruling class.
      
      It didn't work like that. Never.
      It worked, and should work, with the only difference that - The exercise of human and civil rights and freedoms should not violate the rights and freedoms of others.
      
      You technically omitted your passage
      Food security = cheap high-quality products - the stump of your own production is clear (otherwise your electorate will starve, get sick and die)
      1. Cat man null
        
        -1
        
        17 September 2015 04: 34
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        we do not analyze the possibilities within the framework of a specific economic model
        
        You started there with vegetable storage facilities, which at first were not built, and then suddenly they began to be built. Within the current (specific) economic model.
        
        Sorry, your thought somehow... escapes
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        Change the logic and model at least in accordance with the law, and you will be absolutely clear as to which huckster wins under what conditions
        
        Yes, it’s purple for me anyway. And the law of the market - “the one who sells cheaper will sell” (with equal, of course, quality) - has not yet been canceled. And it won't cancel
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        In everyday life, do you also look up to the worst possible outcome?
        
        Yeah... because I've seen worse
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        An instrument for regulating social and interstate relations always works in the interests of the ruling class.
        
        In-in.. and this instrument - on me separately (you, Petya, Manya) - should be placed with a parting. Are you dead? Are you benefiting? Aren't you particularly excited? Well, the bolt is on you...
        
        And I don’t care what kind of “ruling class” there is. The state always first of all protects itself (as a system).
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        It worked and should work
        
        Did not see. Maybe you did.
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        Food security = cheap high-quality products - the stump of your own production is clear (otherwise your electorate will starve, get sick and die)
        
        Depends on the needs of the electorate. If what he has is enough for him, why bother? And that imports must be removed by all means - so you don’t need to explain to me, I’m in the know
        
        Something like this..
        
        Uncle Joe
        
        0
        
        17 September 2015 05: 08
        
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        your thought somehow... slips away
        You don't get it.
        
        What you are missing is that you are trying to consider a systemic issue in isolation from the system.
        
        Yes, it’s purple for me anyway. And the law of the market - “the one who sells cheaper will sell” (with equal, of course, quality) - has not yet been canceled. And it won't cancel
        And there is no need to abolish it - what needs to be abolished is the market in its current form, and the ultimate beneficiary of this “market”
        
        Yeah... because I've seen worse
        When I felt bad, I consoled myself with the thought that it could be even worse...
        And somehow it just got worse
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        and put this instrument - on me separately (you, Petya, Manya) - with a parting
        The instrument is an inanimate object, due to which it is not capable of placing on anyone, and does not perceive the difference between Petya, Manya and itself.
        
        The instrument cannot engage in self-preservation because this is nonsense, and therefore this is your la-la from the series
        
        Have not seen
        Education, house, guaranteed job, etc. before 90 from where?
        
        Depends on the needs of the electorate
        And the electorate - dwarfs who prefer to dress in rags and eat from the trash heap?
        
        In short, go get a potbelly stove, otherwise you’ll freeze on the balcony
        
        Cat man null
        
        0
        
        17 September 2015 13: 57
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        systemic issue
        
        Formulate the question clearly already, right? So far I’ve only heard from you about vegetable storage
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        The market in its current form, and the ultimate beneficiary of this “market”, must be abolished
        
        In what form? What in return? And who is this “beneficiary”?
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        A tool is an inanimate object, due to which
        
        Let's move out, dear...
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        Education, house, guaranteed job, etc. before 90 from where?
        
        Mom and dad earned money. But I already earned the rest myself..
        
        Khatu, by the way, too - himself.
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        And the electorate - dwarfs who prefer to dress in rags and eat from the trash heap?
        
        No need to exaggerate.. we moved out again..
        
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        In short, go get a potbelly stove, otherwise you’ll freeze on the balcony
        
        I already said that... it’s unlikely
        
        Uncle Joe
        
        0
        
        17 September 2015 14: 31
        
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        Formulate the question clearly already, right? So far I’ve only heard from you about vegetable storage
        Not from me, but from Sid.
        
        And the question has long been clearly formulated - this is a question of goals and the actions of the state in the economy over the past 15 years stemming from them.
        
        In what form? What in return? And who is this “beneficiary”?
        In the form of a lack of vegetable storage facilities and their own products to fill them.
        In return, the presence of vegetable stores and their own products to fill them.
        The beneficiary, of course, is Benya Fiziar - they are to blame for everything
        Beneficiary - beneficiary (look for who benefits)
        
        Let's move out, dear
        Where? Do not confuse the state (the political system and its institutions) with the ruling class, in whose interests this system works, and which (and not the state, mind you) really has its own “comfortable survival” as its goal.
        
        Mom and dad earned money
        Well, now not everyone can make money, while then such losers, of whom 90% are now absent in principle?
        
        No need to exaggerate
        Where am I exaggerating? The needs correspond to the historical period and are constantly growing.
        20 thousand years ago you would have been satisfied with an unheated cave, the opportunity to eat once every 3 days, and a female with the appearance of a Baba Yaga, but now it’s unlikely.
        
        I already said
        Laughter and laughter, but in fact, 95 percent of the population (including you, who declares that this is a given) have been living on just such a balcony for the last 23 years, while the uncle you mentioned lives in their apartment.
        
        So don’t engage in bravura self-deception and go for the potbelly stove.
kobussubok

-1

17 September 2015 06: 15

Quote: neri73-r
Bad sign!!! Definitely! We need to think about the GDP and speak well with the best head of the Central Bank in the world!

That's what it's designed for! They (the West) already know that in this way they can cast a shadow of doubt and suspicion on the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, given the not the warmest relations between East and West. In this way they are trying to remove her from her post through the hands of the GDP... .
1. anip
  
  0
  
  17 September 2015 09: 46
  
  Quote: kobussubok
  In this way they are trying to remove her from her post through the hands of the GDP.
  
  That is, there is no reason to remove it? By the way, it’s precisely Putin who won’t remove her; he’s happy with her work.
mr.vasilievich

0

17 September 2015 06: 41

In recent years, I have begun to be wary of all Western ratings, awards and other praise. I don’t believe in sincerity and expect a catch everywhere. The policies of the West are very dirty and deceitful.
press officer

0

17 September 2015 07: 19

Quote: kotvov
(Nabiullina) earned this recognition,
so Kudrin was at one time the same, recognized as the best minister. I think for the continuation of Kudrin’s reforms, and this one was awarded the best ....., the ellipses are free.

The IMF also directly admired her! It seems they are just as happy for Nabiulina as for Parashenok.. Maybe we’ll start to doubt that something is clearly wrong here?
1. anip
  
  0
  
  17 September 2015 09: 48
  
  Quote: press attache
  Maybe we’ll start to doubt that something is clearly wrong here?
  
  Are you just getting started? And just doubt???
  I haven't doubted it for a long time now.
trophy

0

17 September 2015 08: 16

Well, let them take this bitch for themselves.
Laksamana besar

0

17 September 2015 09: 37

Thanks for the confirmation, now it’s clear exactly who she works for.
anip

0

17 September 2015 09: 43

Is anyone surprised by anything? In my opinion, everything is natural.
By the way, questions for the hurray-patriots: your favorite once stated that he was satisfied with the Central Bank and Nabiullina personally in their work to stabilize the national currency, so what currency did you mean? And you will still continue to shout “slavapu” and extol “kakrabanagalerah”?
vladimirvn

-2

17 September 2015 10: 35

In the meantime, as ...... we are waiting for the meeting of the US Federal Reserve System (FRS), which will be held tonight, which determines the near future of oil prices, the dollar and, ultimately, the ruble.
anip

0

17 September 2015 12: 41

Russia invested $2015 billion in US government debt in July 9,7, according to the US Treasury Department.

Google.
"Slavapu"!!!
bykoffroman

0

17 September 2015 21: 24

Nabiulina destroyed the strict and well-functioning system structure of the Central Bank. Mr. Luntovsky essentially liquidated the collection service of the Central Bank and transferred almost all transportation of funds to Rosinkass, a structure controlled by him. At the same time, Rosinkass is categorically not ready for this. Lack of normal equipment and personnel. Penny salaries for collectors and, as a result, terrible turnover. The Central Bank's own special transportation service has been dispersed. Except for Moscow, of course. I worked in St. Petersburg as a Central Bank collector for almost 20 years. And now I and almost a hundred of my colleagues are on the street. Just like that.