Suddenly ... Elvira Nabiullina is recognized as the best of the leaders of the central banks of the world

322
We do not appreciate the head of the Russian Central Bank, we do not appreciate ... But the European Economic Journal Euromoney really appreciates. The magazine published materials that stated that the head of the Bank of Russia Elvira Nabiullina was recognized as the “leader of the year” - the best among all the leaders of the central banks of the countries of the world. The arguments of the specialists who have determined the best of the best come down to the fact that with a significant drop in oil prices and with tougher economic sanctions against Russia, the Russian economy “did not go into a tailspin”.

RIA News leads the translation of a piece of material published in the journal Euromoney:

Faced with painful sanctions and a correction in oil prices, economists gave credibility to the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and her team for drastic steps to stabilize the foreign exchange market by raising interest rates, as well as measures to strengthen the ruble and provide liquidity to financial institutions. These measures, combined with the freely floating ruble and inflation targeting, increased the confidence of foreign investors.


Elvira Nabiullina has already commented on the award of the “Best Leader of the Central Bank of the Year” award to her. According to her, this is an assessment not only of her work, but also of the work of the entire Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

Suddenly ... Elvira Nabiullina is recognized as the best of the leaders of the central banks of the world


It should be noted that the magazine Euromoney It is published in Britain since 1969 and annually (since the beginning of 90's) awards prizes in the field of economics. Considering the fact that Russian politicians and economists rarely favor leading Western publications with laudatory reviews, and often ignore them in terms of awarding prizes, recognition of Mrs. Nabiullina’s merit by a British magazine looks somewhat ambiguous.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

322 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +99
    16 September 2015 17: 43
    Bad sign!!! Definitely! We need to think about the GDP and speak well with the best head of the Central Bank in the world!
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +3
        16 September 2015 23: 29
        Or it is a provocation in order to discredit.
      2. +2
        17 September 2015 07: 19
        "What our enemies like is bad for us" J.S. Stalin
        I read it here http://fishki.net/1630917-20-citat-stalina-o-rodine-vragah-i-kommunizme.html
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -51
      16 September 2015 17: 48
      I am poorly versed in management and banking, but I have a different opinion. I think she (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition

      Added: the above comments were deleted so the context is lost.
      it was written there that Nabiulina was awarded with good reason. supposedly she is a western instigator. something like this
      1. +89
        16 September 2015 17: 53
        (Nabiullina) earned this recognition,
        so Kudrin was at one time the same, recognized as the best minister. I think for the continuation of Kudrin’s reforms, and this one was awarded the best ....., the ellipses are free.
        1. +25
          16 September 2015 18: 37
          So when its Western communists are praising the opponents of the US banking system, this is good,here you can readwhen evromani writes about it - bad.
          And now think about the means for which the military-industrial complex has been updated in recent years.
          Kudrin was a categorical opponent of sponsoring the military-industrial complex. And why, unlike Kudrin, Russia is now reducing US T-bills.
          And yet Nabiullina each month destroys another laundry bank or simply banks that could not report, which was not the case with Kudrin. But the state money was allocated to Rosnani and the Rain.
          And Nabiullina supported the creation of vegetable stores in the state funds.
          And such vegetable stores will destroy food inflation, which does not depend on the dollar exchange rate.
          1. Alf
            +14
            16 September 2015 19: 03
            Quote: Sid.74
            And such vegetable stores will destroy food inflation, which does not depend on the dollar exchange rate.

            You have not been to grocery stores for a long time?
            1. +20
              16 September 2015 19: 09
              Quote: Alf
              You have not been to grocery stores for a long time?


              And what is there to do ... to look at decreasing the "volume" or weight of the packages? Or "rising" prices for ... palm oil? wassat +! drinks
              1. +9
                16 September 2015 20: 43
                Quote: Sid.74
                They tried to rob us, and this fragile woman did not allow it to be done.

                I didn’t want to write, but after reading this I could not stand it. Zhenya, wait for the next year (just a little bit left) and you will be the first to be eager to hang her on the first bitch that comes across.
                PS We have already been robbed, but this is still a big secret. Remember how it was in Ukraine, everything seems to be fine, but how you poked your head, but there is no money. what
                1. +10
                  16 September 2015 21: 49
                  Quote: baltika-18
                  PS We have already been robbed, only this is a big secret.

                  Greetings!hi 150 billion in lost profits and capital outflows due to sanctions as well as a fall in oil prices.
                  Ulyukaev needs to be hanged, not Nabiullinu. The CB is not the Ministry of Development. But from Ulyukaev he just jars on me, because instead of developing, he suggests waiting for high oil prices and a favorable investment climate.
                  Nobody says that everything is gorgeous and good. We have a lot of problems, with excessive bureaucracy, with banks that went to the edge, with capital outflows offshore in gray schemes.
                  But Nabiullina was scolded above all by the Russian liberals. For me, this is a far greater indicator than the praise of euromania.
                  We still have speculative capitalism, there will be full control over the system, then social capital will emerge with strong state-owned enterprises and targeted financing of the sectors of the economy necessary for the state.
                  1. +1
                    17 September 2015 08: 38
                    Read Khazin, Glazyev, Delyagin, Katasonov and others.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                  3. 0
                    17 September 2015 09: 00
                    Quote: Sid.74
                    then social capitalism will appear

                    Sorry, Zhenya, but "social capitalism" is fool full cuckoo.
                2. -4
                  16 September 2015 22: 25
                  Quote: baltika-18
                  I didn’t want to write, but after reading this I could not stand it. Zhenya, wait for the next year (just a little bit left) and you will be the first to be eager to hang her on the first bitch that comes across.
                  PS We have already been robbed, but this is still a big secret. Remember how it was in Ukraine, everything seems to be fine, but how you poked your head, but there is no money.

                  Oh, just do not sow confusion. Do you want to send your children to WHO in Transbaikalia or to the Far East?
                3. SSR
                  0
                  16 September 2015 23: 46
                  Quote: baltika-18
                  Quote: Sid.74
                  They tried to rob us, and this fragile woman did not allow it to be done.

                  I didn’t want to write, but after reading this I could not stand it. Zhenya, wait for the next year (just a little bit left) and you will be the first to be eager to hang her on the first bitch that comes across.
                  PS We have already been robbed, but this is still a big secret. Remember how it was in Ukraine, everything seems to be fine, but how you poked your head, but there is no money. what

                  Quote: ancient
                  Quote: Alf
                  You have not been to grocery stores for a long time?


                  And what is there to do ... to look at decreasing the "volume" or weight of the packages? Or "rising" prices for ... palm oil? wassat +! drinks

                  Guys, why did you fall off the palm tree? You probably don't know about purchases. Today infa on the news passed that some people asked for 36000000 million for the goods just on the shelf .... For many it is a shock, and I have been "meeting" with such an epidemic for fifteen years .... The worst enemy is internal and there are a lot of them! Someone is sanctioned and someone's mother is dear, change the packaging and throw a discount through the cape ... Oh ye naive!
                4. +1
                  17 September 2015 09: 50
                  Quote: baltika-18
                  PS We have already been robbed, only this is a big secret.

                  Why is the secret? Is December 16, 2014 - this is for someone else a secret?
              2. +6
                16 September 2015 22: 30
                Quote: ancient
                to look at reducing the "volume" or weight of packages?

                I've already seen 830 grams of a "liter" bottle of milk ... And sour cream - 200 grams each. And in Soviet times, draft sour cream was sold in liters. I went to the store with a three-liter can ...
            2. +15
              16 September 2015 19: 23
              Quote: Alf
              You have not been to grocery stores for a long time?

              I do not understand your question. Since food inflation depends on the dollar? This is a speculative scheme, when grocery chains using their dominant position do what they want. And the price of buckwheat does not depend on the dollar at all.
              Here is a good example.
              A criminal case is being investigated against the chief technologist in the direction of "cooking" of CJSC "Trading House Perekrestok" Olga Parinova ... Parinova, together with Syromyatnikov, who also previously worked in retail chains, demanded money from representatives of a company that sells domestic food products. the amount of at least 36 million rubles for the possibility of supplying their products to the counters of the stores of the Perekrestok and Karusel retail chains ... The problem of relations between domestic food producers and representatives of retail chains has existed for several years. It is no secret that it is often possible for a domestic manufacturer to supply their products to network corporations only through large bribes ... This criminal case will be a good signal for those who are still engaged in extortion in this area. Well, if this lesson does not suit them for the future, then the TFR, together with other law enforcement, controlling and supervising bodies, intends to establish strict order here. "
              1. Alf
                +5
                16 September 2015 19: 48
                Quote: Sid.74
                I did not understand your question

                Vaults are built. Food prices are rising. For hell, it was necessary to fence the garden, if there were no 2 fundamental things to contain food inflation, without which the idea itself would lose all meaning — there are no state grocery stores and no state purchases of food for these stores.
                Here is a good example.
                A criminal case is being investigated against the chief technologist in the direction of "cooking" of CJSC "Trading House Perekrestok" Olga Parinova ... Parinova, together with Syromyatnikov, who also previously worked in retail chains, demanded money from representatives of a company that sells domestic food products. the amount of at least 36 million rubles for the possibility of supplying their products to store shelves ... This criminal case will be a good signal for those who are still engaged in extortion in this area. Well, if this lesson does not suit them for the future, then the TFR, together with other law enforcement, controlling and supervising bodies, intends to establish strict order here. "

                Bet the suspects will jump off? At best, they will receive conditionally.
                Well, our TFR can only seriously inflate cheeks in such cases "here we are."
                1. +3
                  16 September 2015 20: 33
                  Quote: Alf
                  Storages built.

                  Eshki dolls, in essence, what then tell me?
                  To build vegetable stores in conditions where vegetables from the EU are cheaper than domestic ones did not make any sense. It was generally impractical to do so.
                  And in the conditions of expensive currency, the Russian embargo, targeted financing of the holding companies is advisable.
                  May 27, TASS - http://tass.ru/ekonomika/1999142
                  "The Central Bank proposes to allow NPFs and insurance companies to invest in vegetable stores
                  "Food should depend less on the dollar exchange rate, and more on infrastructure," said First Deputy Chairman of the Bank of Russia Sergei Shvetsov.

                  "The Bank of Russia proposes to expand the list of investment projects in which funds of private pension funds and insurance companies can be invested by adding infrastructure related to the storage and processing of fruit and vegetable products," First Deputy Chairman of the Bank of Russia Sergey Shvetsov told reporters at the International Legal Forum.
                  "Now the State Duma is considering the issue of expanding the list of concessions to improve the lives of citizens. We offer infrastructure facilities related to the processing and storage of fruit and vegetable products. In the Russian Federation, high volatility in food prices, this gives rise to increased inflationary expectations. For us, as a regulator money supply, as a responsible body for inflation, it is very important, "- said Shvetsov, adding that in the structure of the consumer price index in the Russian Federation, food products account for 37%"

                  May 29 - http://www.banki.ru/news/lenta/?id=8030569
                  "The Finance Ministry supports the Central Bank's idea to allow NPFs to invest in vegetable stores," Deputy Minister Alexei Moiseev told reporters.
                  “We generally support this idea, although it needs some work,” he said.

                  "11 июня: - http://top.rbc.ru/finances/11/06/2015/55797f7d9a7947885e4516ad
                  Leader Management Company is ready to invest pensioners' funds in vegetable stores proposed by the Bank of Russia
                  As RBC learned, the company Leader, which manages the funds of nine major pension funds, starting with Gazfond, sent a letter to the Minister of Agriculture Alexander Tkachev, in which it stated that it was possible to invest in agro-industrial complexes and asked to include it in the interdepartmental Commission at the Ministry of Agriculture for the implementation of such projects.

                  Do you understand what kind of chain is built and what conditions should be matched, so that it all became possible? The grinders of the Lord grind slowly, but inexorably.
                  1. +2
                    16 September 2015 21: 37
                    Quote: Sid.74
                    To build vegetable stores in conditions where vegetables from the EU are cheaper than domestic ones did not make any sense. It was generally impractical to do so.
                    And in conditions of expensive currency, the Russian embargo, targeted financing of agricultural holdings, it is advisable
                    But will you tell me: if the Russian state follows this logic, then what is its goal - providing low-quality, high-quality products to the end user (ensuring food security), or the opportunity to be welded for the huckster-owner?

                    For whom, following this logic, does this state ultimately work, eh?

                    "We must think about what to do, how to build our policy. Of course, we will act in the logic of a market economy."
                    (V. Putin 21.01.2015/2015/01 http://www.rg.ru/21/XNUMX/XNUMX/putin-ekonomika-site.html)
                    1. +4
                      16 September 2015 22: 01
                      Quote: Uncle Joe
                      But will you tell me: if the Russian state follows this logic, then what is its goal - providing low-quality, high-quality products to the end user (ensuring food security), or the opportunity to be welded for the huckster-owner?

                      Ie it was necessary to build vegetable storehouses for vegetables from the EU?
                      It is amazing zhezh.V loss and at its own expense to create an infrastructure for products from abroad.
                      Quote: Uncle Joe
                      "We must think about what to do, how to build our policy. Of course, we will act in the logic of a market economy."

                      And why is it not so, is it socialism, didn’t the USSR collapse under the strict guidance of the Communist Party in 91? Tell me please, what is it in China? Socialism or controlled capitalism?
                      1. +4
                        17 September 2015 00: 52
                        Quote: Sid.74
                        Ie it was necessary to build vegetable storehouses for vegetables from the EU?
                        What prevented the state from creating state agricultural (and not only) enterprises?

                        Or is the lack of our own real sector (we have survived - we cannot fill vegetable stores with our products) is it good for the end consumer (society, population, people) that can ensure the country's food security?

                        What have you been doing for 15 years, and in whose interests?

                        At a loss and at their own expense, create an infrastructure for products from over the hill
                        Who is at a loss?

                        Maybe you think that the purpose of the functioning of a normal state is not the maximum possible satisfaction of the needs of citizens and the fair regulation of social relations, but economic profit - like a businessman’s?

                        And why is it not so, do we have socialism, did not the USSR collapse in the 91st under the strict guidance of the Communist Party?
                        Firstly, who decides socialism or not? What is this schizophrenic given?

                        Secondly - 3.1. The bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in the Russian Federation is its multinational people.

                        And the source of power chose it - 7.1. The Russian Federation is a social state whose policy is aimed at creating conditions ensuring a decent life and free human development - i.e. social relations differing from socialism only in the presence of private ownership of the means of production (which should not be privatized, but created from scratch) and the minimum level of exploitation allowed.

                        Please tell me, but in China, what? Socialism or controlled capitalism? And then I’m directly guessing.
                        Capitalist welfare state.


                        But all this is irrelevant.

                        I asked you 2 specific questions, and I repeat them:

                        1 If the Russian state follows this logic, then what is its purpose - providing cheap high-quality products to the final consumer (ensuring food security), or the opportunity to weld for a huckster-owner?

                        2 For whom, following this logic, does this state ultimately work?

                        Do you have the courage to answer specifically, or will you answer the question again, try to chat the topic, or just keep silent? smile
                      2. +4
                        17 September 2015 01: 36
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        If the Russian state follows this logic, then what is its goal - the provision of cheap, high-quality end-user products (ensuring food security), or the opportunity to be welded for the huckster-owner?

                        Providing affordable products of good quality to the final consumer. But it’s impossible to exclude the seller-buyer from the system a priori. In the USSR, behind the counters, sellers also had a deficit that traded from under the floors and criminal cases on store directors were also started. And the system with scarce goods and kings -Directors ultimately destroyed the USSR. Cooperatives finished off.
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        Who, following this logic, does this state ultimately work for?

                        And how do you remove the huckster from the producer-seller-buyer system? The Central Bank printed money, gave it to the bank, the bank to the manufacturer, the manufacturer made the goods, the store bought the goods, the store sold the goods to the final consumer, the store paid the state tax on the profits.
                        And at almost every stage the state will receive its interest and this will affect the final price for the final consumer. And yet, after all, logistics, storage, bank interest, security. Production costs, equipment costs, fuel and lubricants, etc., and the buyer’s receipt. profits in this chain all seek.
                        In my opinion, you need to strive for balance and compliance with the laws. The problem is not the profit of the huckster, the problem is that the greed of the huckster sometimes knows no boundaries. Well, I don’t know how to eradicate human greed.
                      3. 0
                        17 September 2015 01: 46
                        Quote: Sid.74
                        Quote: Uncle Joe

                        If the Russian state follows this logic, then what is its goal - the provision of cheap, high-quality end-user products (ensuring food security), or the opportunity to be welded for the huckster-owner?

                        Providing affordable products with appropriate quality to the end user

                        Nah .. don’t be fooled - the question is initially sub-sub laughing

                        Uncle Joe, I answered down there .. let's play? wink
                      4. 0
                        17 September 2015 02: 30
                        Quote: Cat Man Null
                        let's play
                        E-2 - E-4 - subvert ide?

                        And the ideal answer?
                      5. +1
                        17 September 2015 02: 43
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        And the ideal answer?

                        Duc .. below .. on the 3rd page belay
                      6. 0
                        17 September 2015 03: 00
                        Quote: Cat Man Null
                        Duc .. below .. on the 3rd page
                        So below - it is below, and below on the 3rd page - it is below on the 3rd page
                      7. 0
                        17 September 2015 02: 21
                        Quote: Sid.74
                        The deficit in the USSR was characteristic of certain periods, had deliberate political decisions, and at the moment has not gone away, but increased 3-5 times, changing its form from commodity to monetary.

                        But this is not the case.

                        Most drugs negatively affect the liver, but they justly do not refuse them, since it is better to treat the liver later than now, wallowing with pneumonia, to mentally prepare yourself for another world.

                        The same thing in economics and trade - the presence of dishonest sub-traders is not a reason to abandon the model, which, despite all its possible jambs (which should be addressed by the relevant authorities), is able to provide much more complete satisfaction of needs.

                        And how do you remove the huckster from the producer-seller-buyer system?
                        Legislatively.

                        The Central Bank printed the money, gave it to the bank, the bank to the manufacturer, the manufacturer made the goods, the store bought the goods, the store sold the goods to the final consumer
                        The Central Bank emits loot for goods already produced - we have monetarism based on Thatcherism, you know.

                        the store paid tax to the state on profit
                        If the store were state-owned, all the profits with which the store paid only 20% would either go to the treasury, or prices would be reduced by the same amount in the store.

                        and this will affect the final price for the end user
                        Take away private banks and shops, and reduce intermediaries to a minimum - the price will drop.
                        Legislatively set an upper margin limit - the price will drop.
                        Create state networks (with the goal not in the form of profit, but in the form of going to zero) as a competitor to commercial ones - the price will decrease.

                        Means - the sea, but they depend on the goal.

                        And also, logistics, storage, bank interest, security. Production costs, equipment costs, fuel and lubricants, etc., etc.
                        And aliens, demons and flashes in the sun ...

                        Without changing anything in the current economic model (that is, without prejudice to the interests of all those cut with the Rothenbergs), improvements are obviously impossible to achieve.

                        In my opinion, you need to strive for balance and compliance with laws
                        Written in whose interests?

                        The problem is not the profit of the huckster, the problem is that the greed of the huckster sometimes knows no boundaries
                        And the huckster accidentally is not greedy for profit? smile

                        In general, you once again decided to talk about the topic, and you didn’t have enough courage to answer the questions specifically.
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                  2. +1
                    16 September 2015 21: 52
                    Quote: Sid.74
                    Russian embargo, targeted financing of agricultural holdings is advisable.

                    Only the Central Bank will not finance.A Ministry of Finance.
                    Naibulin has nothing to do with financing
                2. 0
                  16 September 2015 21: 07
                  TFR will remain silent from modesty.
                3. +3
                  16 September 2015 22: 41
                  Quote: Alf
                  Vaults are built. Food prices are rising. For hell, it was necessary to fence the garden, if there were no 2 fundamental things to contain food inflation, without which the idea itself would lose all meaning — there are no state grocery stores and no state purchases of food for these stores.

                  And for whom vegetable stores? Rent out the same "Magnet"?

                  I go to the dacha past the former collective farm. Every year they plow something, sow something ... And in the fall they don't harvest anything, stupidly plow it together with the "harvest". And now there is spring wheat (or rather, already lying) and blackened dried sunflowers. And recently, a knowledgeable person told me why all this is. If nothing is done, the land will be taken away, it will be "agricultural"! They take a loan in the spring, they sow and plow on it, they plunder it. And in the fall they say "crop failure", they sell several hectares of the same arable land for cottages, pay off the loan, plunder some of them, and in the spring they go around again. A prestigious place, 20 km from the city, lakes all around. Land for cottages is expensive. Is it easier to sell it than to plant something on it? I'm not saying that this collective farm (I have been driving past it for 30 years) once had two cowsheds, a pigsty and a poultry house ... Now only reinforced concrete ribs are left of them.

                  This is our agriculture. And for him a vegetable store?
                  1. +1
                    16 September 2015 22: 48
                    Quote: Zoldat_A
                    in the fall they say "crop failure" sell several hectares of the same arable land for cottages

                    Quote: Zoldat_A
                    If nothing is done, the land will be taken away, she will "agricultural purpose"

                    It seems to me alone that something here "does not hit" .. or "does not fit"? What land - from a poor harvest - has ceased to be agricultural purposes? And if not, how to sell it for cottages?

                    Charade.. belay

                    Quote: Zoldat_A
                    Here is our agriculture

                    Strange you agriculture, that's for sure ..
                    1. +1
                      17 September 2015 11: 28
                      Quote: Cat Man Null
                      It seems to me alone that something here "does not hit" .. or "does not fit"? What land - from a poor harvest - has ceased to be agricultural purposes? And if not, how can you sell it for cottages?

                      No charades. You can sell, you can plow, you can build a market. You can’t just lie idle. These are our laws. And such we Agriculture. I don’t know, maybe you another? hi
                4. +2
                  16 September 2015 22: 46
                  Everything is clear and clear without explanation. The West praises our Central Bank chairman as the ruble falls. The greater the fall, the better the chairman. In the place of this lady, a normal person would have applied for dismissal or shot himself.
              2. +1
                16 September 2015 20: 19
                This is a common networking scheme.
              3. +3
                16 September 2015 20: 45
                Quote: Sid.74
                This is a speculative scheme when grocery chains, using their dominant position, do what they want

                That is, you suggest that we ignore the dollar exchange rate at all? Like "let him ride!"?
                In this case, recommend the oil companies to provide AT LEAST reasonable fuel prices for the agricultural complex. And at the same time organize a full-scale production of domestic feed and fertilizers! Your "smart" Naye ... Nabiullina for some reason did not think about HOW AND WHAT the vegetable stores you indicated will be filled with.
                1. +1
                  16 September 2015 20: 58
                  The Central Bank leader should think about this with his hands or a SUPERPREMEER iPhone player. Yes, at least zaminusuyte to calluses.
            3. +16
              16 September 2015 19: 24
              Western praise is a bad sign for a Russian official.
              1. +12
                16 September 2015 20: 03
                That people quite rightly swears that the ruble has seriously sunk.
                Is it just Nabiullina’s fault? After all, we are in conditions of Western sanctions, an embargo on the supply of sophisticated high-tech equipment, and in order to make high-tech machines, we need high-tech machines, and still huge financial uncertainty around the world. Since China, as a driver of the world economy got up, lost a huge amount of trillion dollars on his stock exchange. The US economy immediately began to spit blood, the New York Stock Exchange was stopped a day a thousand times, at a rate of 10-30 times.
                But representatives of Zyuganov and Fedorov (in his youth, who willingly helped Hakomade, feel ) They carry the same crap about the wrong Central Bank, which supposedly does not belong to Russia.
                And it was necessary to burn all the gold and currency reserves of Russia, so that the dollar we had for 30 rubles. Well, what good fellows, just take it aback.
                If you want to scold and hang someone, then hang Ulyukaev and Gref, that's where the real compradors-Westerners, who carry some crap about investments and cheap Western loans.
                Nabiullina retained the most important thing, a resource for the development of the country, in currency and gold. Which is very, very useful to us in the conditions of a financial tornado.
                If you do not understand what is happening, I will explain that Great Britain lost over billion dollars in 360 as a net outflow of funds that year never happened. Before that, all Europe raped Cyprus, now they rape Greece even more perversely than the Cypriots.
                China devalued the yuan and lost trillion, the norgs unpacked their nuggets. The Turkish lira fell below nowhere in its entire history.
                Credit ratings were cut by everyone. LA's currencies fell to the level of 90-x. Today they lowered the rating of the Japanese.
                This included a dollar vacuum cleaner, because it cannot be printed endlessly.
                Think about why the EU countries sharply worried about their gold reserves? Think about why in the US about 30 million people get ration cards?
                They tried to rob us, and this fragile woman did not allow it to be done.
                Kudrin was given a prize for the stabilization fund of Russia.
                1. +7
                  16 September 2015 20: 21
                  Quote: Sid.74
                  Here are the people ...

                  My regards hi colleague! Your comments are like a ray of sanity in the dark realm of ignorance.
                  1. 0
                    16 September 2015 20: 59
                    Quote: SPACE
                    My respect is a colleague!
                  2. +4
                    16 September 2015 22: 27
                    Quote: SPACE
                    Quote: Sid.74
                    Here are the people ...

                    My regards hi colleague! Your comments are like a ray of sanity in the dark realm of ignorance.

                    And from me, plus you and Sid.74!
                2. MrK
                  +4
                  16 September 2015 21: 21
                  Quote: Sid.74
                  But representatives of Zyuganov and Fedorov (in his youth, who eagerly helped Khakomada) carry the same nonsense about the wrong Central Bank, which supposedly does not belong to Russia.


                  Dear Sid.74. I understand that Zyuganov, Fedorov, Starikov, Khazin, Grigoriev and Glazyev are dumbass. But go to the Central Bank website. Section founders. And you will find that the founder of the Central Bank are three Jews, a US citizen.
                  Open the constitution of the Russian Federation and you will see that the Central Bank is an independent commercial organization. And she has no right to give money to the Russian government.
                  And who invented and forced Russia to peg to the dollar? Not the liberals to whom Nabiulin belongs?
                  The less dollars come into the country, the less rubles in the economy. And from here budget cuts.

                  Quote: Sid.74

                  And it was necessary to burn all the gold and foreign exchange reserves of Russia, so that the dollar we had at 30 rubles.


                  And why, in all oil-producing countries, the currency depreciated by a maximum of 30%, while in our country it is almost a hundred.

                  And why does our corporate debt exceed 500 billion dollars?
                  Because the government allowed to take loans abroad. And debts must be repaid. And if you give everything away at once, then there is not enough gold reserves. Therefore, they released the ruble into free swimming.

                  And why all our leading companies are funded abroad with the permission of the government. Because the Central Bank has set such a rate that it is impossible to take a loan for a long period, even to leading monopolists.

                  And the fact that in the world with the economy is bad, so who is to blame: Bush, Abama, Fyul and Boroz?
                  It is not clear that the crisis is an integral part of the capitalist economy. And today, three types of crises overlapped.
                  And it will not be better.
                  1. +2
                    16 September 2015 22: 06
                    Quote: mrark
                    But go to the Central Bank website. Section founders. And you will find that the founder of the Central Bank are three Jews, a US citizen.

                    Well, do not write nonsense.
                    1.http: //www.cbr.ru/
                    there is no section "founders"

                    2. you will also not find the founders in the statement




                    3. on the one hand:
                    Article 2. (on the Central Bank) The authorized capital and other property of the Bank of Russia are federal property.

                    4.Other in 2000, Putin tried to nationalize the Central Bank, but his initiatives did not pass the State Duma. Not a single party supported him. And Putin himself does not have the right to write laws (or no longer wants to force, or can not).
                    1. +4
                      17 September 2015 01: 02
                      Quote: opus
                      4.Other in 2000, Putin tried to nationalize the Central Bank
                      What was he trying ?! belay laughing

                      And Putin himself has no right to write laws
                      Article 84 President of the Russian Federation:
                      d) submit bills to the State Duma;
                      1. 0
                        17 September 2015 14: 06
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        What did you try?


                        11.10.2000 Nationalization of the Central Bank and the entire banking sector.

                        who else, if not the state, can own the Central Bank, after all, but not Viktor Gerashchenko? It turns out the nationalization of ownerless property (according to the text of the current law on the Central Bank, it is so independent that it is not even state-owned). And this despite the fact that the bank has huge assets and is the most important subject of economic policy.



                        At the end of September, Vladimir Putin introduced his amendments — a month and a half later, after the official deadline for their introduction; the Duma's banking committee had to specifically extend it, otherwise they could not be legalized. The meaning of the presidential amendments is the nationalization of the Central Bank.
                        Agreed:
                        The Central Bank "leaves" commercial banks, in response, the requirement to separate the banking control body from the Central Bank is removed.

                        19.02.2002
                        Power - to the Council (the policy of the Central Bank will be determined not by the board of directors and the chairman of the bank, but by the National Banking Council (NBS))
                        Money - Premiere (central banks of other countries usually have a special status and do not belong to the branches of state power. In the Russian Constitution, the Central Bank is also not identified as an authority of any authority. And the law on the Central Bank means that the Central Bank is the central bank, no more, but no less. A special structure, the authorized capital and property of which, however, belong to the state. But the state does not automatically answer for the obligations of the Central Bank, and the Central Bank - for the obligations of the state)
                        ==================================
                        Both attempts actually failed
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        Article 84 President of the Russian Federation:

                        and?
                        Contributes and WRITES TWO different functions in terms of meaning.

                        Contributes: read what they gave and contributed, brought to the State Duma.
                        Semantic load: a postman with special confidence

                        State Duma called lawdative authority, but in its powers only to pass laws that fall there. But if Russian officials do not write laws, then who writes them?
                        According to our laws:
                        Legislation are being developed By the Government of the Russian Federation, and submitted to the State Duma, the draft regulatory laws include changes to federal laws on federal budgets for the coming financial year, as well as to planning periods on all issues relating to the subjects of legal regulation of these federal laws.
                      2. 0
                        17 September 2015 14: 07
                        (Is it possible to master the text below?)

                        Rights Objects legislative initiatives in accordance with the Russian constitution may propose draft federal laws on amendments to federal laws on federal budgets for the upcoming fiscal year and planning period, in particular, changes in the main characteristics and departmental structures of federal financing expenses in the coming year, in the situation of overstatement of the total revenues approved by the Federal Law on the Federal Budget for the upcoming planned year and period excluding the oil and gas profits of the federal budgets and the income from the financial management of the reserve fund and national welfare funds less than ten percent under the conditions that the government of the Russian Federation proposes to the State Duma the necessary bills within ten days from the date of consideration by the State Duma of reports on the implementation of federal budgets for periods in which excess is provided.

                        ================================================== ===================


                        Option who "writes" the laws for our country:


                        Fact:
                        Recently, USAID (the United States Agency for International Development) officially recognized that it was with his participation that Constitution of the Russian Federation written 1993 of the year, and then - Tax, Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and later (already under Putin) - and Land Codeallowed to sell land.
                      3. 0
                        17 September 2015 16: 03
                        Quote: opus
                        Still, links to this journalism nonsense would be given, and the picture would be complete laughing

                        Nationalization - change of ownership from private to state (where it is indicated that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is in whose ownership?)

                        The Central Bank is not a bank with the name "Central", but a state body, a state institution, on a par, for example, with the Ministry of Finance.
                        He is not owned by anyone - he is part of the state along with ministries, the government, parliament and the presidency.

                        Trying to understand the issue, you need to read not journalism letters, but government documents: here is the text of Putin’s amendments - find at least a word about nationalization

                        http://www.lawmix.ru/lawprojects/67317

                        But the attempt is not frail diversion, in the form of a proposal of mutual responsibility for obligations between the Russian Federation and the Central Bank, you can find there.

                        Contributes and WRITES TWO different functions in terms of meaning.
                        Don’t pull the owl on the globe: is there a ban on writing a bill by the president or deputy?

                        So the question is closed.
                      4. 0
                        17 September 2015 17: 28
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        and a state body, state institution, on a par, for example, with the Ministry of Finance.

                        Here is nonsense.
                        The Central Bank is not a state body and not a state institution, and not any "on a par with the Ministry of Finance"

                        1. The Bank of Russia carries out independently of federal state authorities, state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local authorities. The independence of the status of the Bank of Russia is reflected in Article 75 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as well as in Articles 1 and 2 of the Federal Law “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)”.
                        http://www.cbr.ru/ today /? PrtId = bankstatus

                        “The key element of the legal status of the Bank of Russia is the principle of independencewhich manifests itself primarily in that the Bank of Russia acts as a special public law institutionhaving the exclusive right to issue money and organize money circulation.

                        2. Laws are formulations. Emotions are not inherent in laws. Everything is very clearly written in them.
                        Federal Law No. 152-FZ on Personal Data
                        “Based on and pursuant to federal laws government bodies, Bank of Russia local government within the limits of their authority, they may adopt regulatory legal acts, regulatory acts, legal acts (hereinafter referred to as regulatory legal acts) on certain issues relating to the processing of personal data. ”

                        the law clearly tells us: there are government bodies, and there is the Bank of Russia.
                        ---------------
                        Conclusion:
                        1. The law on the Central Bank of Russia directly states that he is not a public authority.
                        2. It also states that the Central Bank of Russia is a special public law institution. I emphasize - special. Special NON-STATE Institute.
                        3. The law says that the Bank of Russia performs its functions regardless of all types of state power in Russia.
                      5. 0
                        17 September 2015 17: 29
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        find a word about nationalization

                        Nationalization - the transfer into the ownership of the state ... of banks ..

                        Above, I proved to you on the basis of
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        government documents:
                        , not based on
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        scribbles
                        type http://www.lawmix.ru/lawprojects/67317
                        there answers yuryst:

                        here at it and take an interest, about pisyunek or pisyulek

                        -------------------
                        I will not read such fucking
                        =================================
                        that the Central Bank of Russia is not a state bank, it has nothing to do with the "authorities".
                        This means that the term "nationalization" is applicable to what the GDP wanted, although it did not explicitly write about nationalization
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        Do not pull the owl onto the globe: h

                        I don’t know that you are pulling an owl there on your globe or the rubber product No. 2 on your head (it looks like walking with it)
                        but the question is NOT "closed", and it cannot be closed.
                        Arguments are frail
                        Quote: Uncle Joe
                        Is there a ban on writing a bill by the president or deputy?
                      6. 0
                        17 September 2015 19: 00
                        Quote: opus
                        The Central Bank is not a state body or a state institution
                        The Central Bank (CB) is the main link in the monetary system of the state, a bank created by the government to regulate the circulating money supply and the exchange rate of the national currency, endowed with the monopoly right to issue banknotes and regulate the activities of commercial banks. Ts.b. is a bank of banks, a body that helps the state, the government to establish money circulation, manage the budget. Ts.b. endowed with the right of monopoly issue of banknotes, money management, control over credit institutions, storage of official gold and foreign exchange reserves. In different countries Ts. B. are called differently: "national", "state", "national". (Encyclopedic Dictionary of Economics and Law)

                        Constitution, article 75

                        1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Money emission is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank Russian Federation. The introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation is not allowed.
                        2. Protection and ensuring the stability of the ruble - the main function of the Central Bank Russian Federationwhich he exercises independently of other public authorities.
                        Article 1 1. Russian Federation - Russia is a democratic federal legal state with the republican form of government.
                        2. The names of the Russian Federation and Russia are equivalent.

                        1. The Bank of Russia carries out independently of the federal bodies of state power, bodies of state power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local authorities
                        Constitution 75.2. Protection and ensuring the stability of the ruble - the main function Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which he carries out independently...

                        ... which he exercises independently from others bodies of state power.

                        Are you specifically independent from imbeciles, or from other imbeciles?
                      7. 0
                        17 September 2015 19: 01
                        The independence of the status of the Bank of Russia is reflected in Article 75 of the Constitution
                        Independence in terms of the fulfillment of its main function - it alone performs it independently, which is what the Russian language says in the constitution.

                        Bank of Russia acts as a special public law institution
                        Public service as a public law institution
                        http://politeh24.com/?p=111

                        Laws are formulations; emotions are not inherent in laws. Everything is very clearly written in them.
                        Exactly.
                        Laws are a field of law, and law is formalized to the limit.

                        Therefore, one should not think up, to the extent of one's own corruption, the strictly defined meaning of the terms used.

                        the law clearly tells us: there are government bodies, and there is the Bank of Russia
                        It is an appendix of the Ministry of Finance with special powers arising from its main function.

                        The law on the Central Bank of Russia explicitly states that he is not a public authority.
                        Open our eyes and read again:

                        N 86-ФЗ Article 1.
                        Functions and powers stipulated by the Constitution Russian Federation and this federal lawBank of Russia exercises independently from others federal government bodies, public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local authorities.

                        Not one of the other bodies of state power of the subjects, not from other bodies of local self-government, and not from federal bodies, but FROM OTHER FEDERAL AUTHORITIES.

                        I emphasize - special. Special NON-STATE Institute.
                        I emphasize - do not interpret the terms to the extent of your own corruption, but learn their meaning.

                        but the question is NOT "closed", and it cannot be closed.
                        Closed and clogged with boards.
                  2. +1
                    16 September 2015 22: 22
                    Quote: mrark
                    go to the website of the Central Bank. Section founders. And you will find that the founder of the Central Bank are three Jews, a US citizen
                    wassat
                    It already smells like a clinic laughing

                    Have you been in for a long time? http://www.cbr.ru/

                    Z-n about the Central Bank 2. The authorized capital and other property of the Bank of Russia are federal property.

                    Open the constitution of the Russian Federation and you will see that the Central Bank is an independent commercial organization
                    75.1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Money emission is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (1.1.Russian Federation - Russia is a democratic federal legal state with the republican form of government. 1.2. Names Russian Federation and Russia are equivalent). The introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation is not allowed.

                    2. Protection and ensuring the stability of the ruble - main function Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which he carries out independently from other bodies of state power.

                    3. The system of taxes levied on the federal budget and the general principles of taxation and fees in the Russian Federation are established by federal law.

                    4. State loans are issued in the manner determined by federal law and are placed on a voluntary basis.

                    Well, the idea of ​​an independent commercial? feel

                    And she has no right to give money to the Russian government
                    З-н о ЦБ 22. The Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to the Government of the Russian Federation to finance the federal budget deficit, to buy government securities at their initial placement, except as required by federal law on the federal budget.

                    The law on the budget is annually adopted and amended several times by the State Duma of the Russian Federation, that is, the Central Bank does not have the right to credit the government without the permission of the Duma.

                    And who invented and forced Russia to peg to the dollar?
                    And in what way is this link expressed, and in what normative act is it fixed?
                  3. +4
                    16 September 2015 22: 31
                    Quote: mrark
                    I understand that Zyuganov, Fedorov, Starikov, Khazin, Grigoriev and Glazyev are stupid.

                    Fedorov is who, for he has never engaged in any financial activity, but he is a vile economist. Where he came from and where he got money for websites, agitation of his beloved is really unknown.
                    Well at least Starikov came to his senses and left him in time.
                    I will not even discuss Zyuganov, he keeps saying the same thing, and when on May XNUMX I started praising Obama for how he "raised" the US economy, it became clear to me how well he knew about economics.
                    Khazin and Glazyev deserve to listen to them. But this does not mean at all that you have to agree with everything.
                3. +5
                  16 September 2015 21: 43
                  Quote: Sid.74
                  After all, we are in the conditions of Western sanctions, an embargo on the supply of sophisticated high-tech equipment, and in order to make high-tech machines, we need high-tech machines, and also a huge financial uncertainty around the world
                  And also aliens, demons, black holes and other blah blah blah lol

                  And the question rests on what was done over 15 years of rising from the knees so that sanctions, embargoes and other rubbish do not affect the domestic economy.
                  1. +3
                    17 September 2015 04: 12
                    Quote: Uncle Joe
                    the question rests on what was done over 15 years of getting up from the knee

                    Not so little has been "done": judging by the ratio "oil price - dollar rate", then our country has "fallen in price" by more than two times request :
                    In 2004, at a cost of oil of $ 53 (fall), the exchange rate was 29,5 rubles per dollar.
                    In 2015, at the SAME oil price, the rate is 65-68 rubles ..
                    These are pure facts, without any emotions ..
                    1. 0
                      17 September 2015 04: 24
                      Quote: avia1991
                      our country has "fallen in price" by more than two times
                      Well, what can I say ...

                      But here we have the best minister Kudrin, the best head of the Central Bank of Nabiullina, the most influential politician Putin, and the armata with pakfa, which will surely tear everyone ... someday in parallel reality crying
                4. 0
                  17 September 2015 09: 15
                  $ 9 billion in July for Amer’s obligations, how is it?
              2. MrK
                +4
                16 September 2015 20: 45
                Quote: figvam
                Western praise is a bad sign for a Russian official.

                I agree. And Stalin I.V. said (not a quote) -If in the West we are scolded, then we are all right.
            4. +21
              16 September 2015 19: 47
              Do you know why wholesalers of networkers buy potatoes? I will surprise you a little 5-6 rubles. kg And in the store? Tomatoes 7 rub. kg, watermelons 3 rub. kg, pepper 8rub. kg I’m the manufacturer myself and I know the price tag. So next year we open our vegetable shops in Volgograd and not a foot to the setivists.
              1. +3
                16 September 2015 20: 55
                Networkers can hire thugs, buy state. the structure of "watchers". The way out is the union of entrepreneurs with their own sales network. Those. well-tested in our country and, for example, in Spain, unions of cooperators.
              2. +3
                16 September 2015 21: 18
                Do you know why wholesalers of networkers buy potatoes?


                Dear, Respect to you that you are a manufacturer. But. The dictates of network markets, the common fault. This is the fault of the government, this is the fault of the manufacturer. And the biggest fault, the consumer’s fault. The government is guilty of shortsightedness, the manufacturer is that he let himself be seduced by giving everything online and not trying to bring his product directly to the consumer, because it is troublesome. The consumer is what was written in a compote (and continues) from these supermarkets, which are packed to capacity by customers and full parking, where carts with goods are being transported. Supermarkets kill the shopkeeper class, namely the hard worker, and raise office speculators and consumers with dope in their heads. For example, supermarkets are banned in Hong Kong, it is a city of small shopkeepers, which is why it is one of the richest cities in the world.
                1. +1
                  16 September 2015 23: 13
                  EAC also used to have vegetable stalls, we worked with them, but then began to collapse. It turned out that the tax rate under a store like Hypermarket of squares by 10000 and a shop by 50 squares differs by about two. Ie hyper pays 50000 rubles. per year, and a bench 25000rub. Compare the momentum and calculate what you need to trade the bench to justify the imbalance?
                2. +1
                  17 September 2015 04: 18
                  Quote: Asadullah
                  Supermarkets kill the shopkeeper class, namely the hard worker, and raise office speculators

                  ??? How can you ?!
                  Mr. Shuvalov, our esteemed Deputy Prime Minister .. ( lol ) recently spoke with enthusiasm about Sergei Galitsky (owner of "Magnit"), citing him as an example to Russian entrepreneurs, and arguing that "our economy is supported by such people!" wassat
            5. +1
              16 September 2015 20: 04
              Quote: Alf
              You have not been to grocery stores for a long time?

              Yesterday I bought carrots in the "Magnet" chain - 19 rubles per kilo, Sunflower oil 2 liters - 251 rubles per check for 2 bottles.
              At the tomato market ala "ladies' fingers" - 35 rubles per kilo.
              I will dry the tomatoes and put them in jars, pouring oil with garlic, basil, etc.
            6. +5
              16 September 2015 22: 28
              Quote: Alf
              Quote: Sid.74
              And such vegetable stores will destroy food inflation, which does not depend on the dollar exchange rate.

              You have not been to grocery stores for a long time?

              Perhaps Naebullina is building a vegetable store in Egypt - for potatoes, in Poland - for apples and in Israel for carrots? Who does not believe - let him go to "Magnet" - also, by the way, on the 23rd place in the list of the most innovative companies according to Forbes. Innovators, damn it, sell Israeli carrots and dill - take it cheaper, wind it up more. All science ....
              1. +3
                16 September 2015 23: 15
                The loan rate of the agricultural bank 18% per annum - this is for a loan for 7 years, if the loan for the season rate of 45%. Well, are you ready to tackle farming at such a rate?))) Does the Central Bank actively help farmers to bend, and then again, will we beg the Bush legs for the whole country? The Chinese came to want to buy pork meat, offered to help build a pig farm for 100000 heads. The native administration of the Volgograd region helped them forget about this project. Just asked along with the pig farm to give Volgograd a training stadium worth 210 million rubles. The Chinese did not understand such a business and left.
                1. +1
                  17 September 2015 04: 21
                  Quote: Maxom75
                  The Central Bank is actively helping bend farmers,

                  100500 +!
                  Unfortunately .. I wish I had a reason to put you a "minus" for such words! Alas - life has proved you are right. hi
            7. +2
              16 September 2015 22: 28
              And what, in your store prices are falling ???
          2. +9
            16 September 2015 19: 09
            Quote: Sid.74
            So when its Western Communists, opponents of the US banking system, are praised - that's good

            If you do not go into economic terms, the result of Nabiulin’s work should be visible in every pocket.
            1. +9
              16 September 2015 19: 34
              The central bank is the main regulatory body of the credit system of a country or group of countries.

              Central banks perform the following main functions:
              issue of banknotes and coins;
              pursuing monetary policy;
              it is a “bank of banks” - they serve as the settlement center of the banking system, provide loans to it, in some countries they supervise the activities of banks;
              refinancing of credit and banking institutions (including by setting the refinancing rate, lombard rate, etc.);
              management of official foreign exchange reserves;
              pursuing a monetary policy;
              regulation of credit institutions.

              There is not a single word about caring for your or my pocket.
              The pockets are taken care of by the government and the finance minister.

              Ms. Nabiullina is a worthy student of the US Federal Reserve.
            2. +1
              16 September 2015 20: 42
              Quote: APASUS
              Quote: Sid.74
              So when its Western Communists, opponents of the US banking system, are praised - that's good

              If you do not go into economic terms, the result of Nabiulin’s work should be visible in every pocket.

              So it can be seen there, it does not grow unequivocally, more and more the other way around ...
          3. 0
            16 September 2015 19: 13
            I support Sid.74! I agree with our commentators that if our "foes" praise ours, especially in the field of finance, there is reason to think and ask the question: "What's the catch? Where is the dog buried?"
            However, personally I, without praise of Euromoney, sympathize with Elvira N.
            In order not to be unsubstantiated and cut off the shoulder and to be objective, I propose to indicate with what and what actions our commentators and their proposals specifically agree or disagree with what they would do in her place.
            1. +3
              16 September 2015 19: 35
              Quote: APASUS
              If you do not go into economic terms, the result of Nabiulin’s work should be visible in every pocket.

              As long as our number of banks is more than 300, until food inflation is reduced to nothing, until the entire agro-industry and industrial enterprises are financed exclusively by Russian banks, we will not see extra money. And this is not one year.
              The public sector only under the conditions of the sanctions was able to get out from under the heels of the Euro-American capitalists, or rather did not get out yet, just started.
              1. +3
                16 September 2015 19: 52
                Quote: Sid.74
                Quote: APASUS
                If you do not go into economic terms, the result of Nabiulin’s work should be visible in every pocket.

                As long as we have a bank number of more than 300, until product inflation is reduced to zero, until all agricultural industry and industrial enterprises are funded exclusively by Russian banks, we will not see any extra money. And this is not one year.
                The public sector only under the conditions of the sanctions was able to get out from under the heels of the Euro-American capitalists, or rather did not get out yet, just started.

                The Central Bank should conduct a monetary policy in the interests of the national producer, regardless of the ownership of the owner. In the meantime, we have a fifth, sixth column dominated by interests of whom it is not clear who and only conversations ...........
            2. +4
              16 September 2015 20: 47
              Quote: Asadali
              ... personally, even without Euromoney's praise, I sympathize with Elvira N ...

              Well, love is evil ... you cannot command your heart ...
              Hold on, man ...
            3. 0
              16 September 2015 20: 57
              Quote: Asadali
              with what and what actions our commentators and their proposals specifically agree or disagree with what they would do in her place.

              I suggest you recall the 98-99th years. Default, a country on the verge of collapse, money - candy wrappers .. what did Primakov and Gerashchenko do in 9 (!) Months? This was a real manifestation of work for the benefit of the people and the country!
              What we are observing now, with all the colorfulness of the arrangement, is a FICTION ..
              1. 0
                17 September 2015 09: 37
                Glazyev now offers about the same thing, But will liberalists allow this?
            4. 0
              17 September 2015 18: 23
              Quote: Asadali
              In order not to be unsubstantiated and cut off the shoulder and to be objective, I propose to indicate with what and what actions our commentators and their proposals specifically agree or disagree with what they would do in her place.

              And why do not you understand that Nabiulina is oppressing the line of Kudrin and pursuing a monetary policy in favor of the interests of others.
              After all, no new monetary policy was introduced under Nabiulina, everything goes according to the worked out scheme.
              If these explanations did not satisfy you, then write and tell me for what actions her predecessor received similar rewards.
          4. +3
            16 September 2015 21: 20
            Quote: Sid.74
            Russia is now cutting US GKO
            Aha - in a parallel world laughing

            May 18, 2015 Russia in March 2015 increased investments in US government bonds by $ 300 million, to $ 69,9 billion, according to the US Treasury.
            http://www.dp.ru/a/2015/05/18/Vpervie_za_polgoda_Rossija/

            July 17, 2015 Russia in May increased investments in US Treasury bonds (US Treasuries) by $ 4,1 billion, according to the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, released on Friday night.
            http://www.interfax.ru/business/454313

            On August 18, 2015, Russia in June increased investments in US government bonds by $ 1,4 billion - up to $ 72 billion, follows from a report by the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve on foreign holders of treasury bonds of the country.
            http://vz.ru/news/2015/8/18/761813.html
            1. 0
              16 September 2015 21: 42
              Quote: Uncle Joe
              evidence from the US Treasury

              Bravo! It is useful to dilute the "pink fog" with "the prose of life"! lol
            2. +2
              16 September 2015 22: 50
              Quote: Uncle Joe
              Aha - in a parallel world

              And how many were five years ago? Current purchases do not reflect the overall picture. The total volume is steadily decreasing.
              1. +1
                17 September 2015 01: 19
                Quote: Sid.74
                And how old was five years ago?
                Do not pull the owl on the globe - she does not like it laughing

                http://www.rg.ru/2015/03/17/bumagi-anons.html

                17.03.2015 The Russian Federation continues to reduce the amount of free financial investments in US government securities. In January, this figure fell by 3,8 billion dollars - from 86 billion in December 2014 to 82,2 billion. It is reported by TASS with reference to the US Treasury.

                This trend is noted since last Augustwhen US government securities in the Russian portfolio amounted to 118,1 billion dollars.
          5. +1
            16 September 2015 21: 47
            Quote: Sid.74
            on what means the military-industrial complex was updated in recent years.

            On taxes (mine and yours incl.), But not like money from the Central Bank and money by Naibulina
            Article 2 of the Federal Law on the Central Bank "The state is not responsible for the obligations of the Bank of Russia, and the Bank of Russia - for state obligationsunless they have assumed such obligations or unless otherwise provided by federal laws. "

            Article 22. about the Central Bank " The Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to the Government of the Russian Federation to finance the "federal budget deficit", to buy government securities at their initial placement, with the exception of cases when it is provided for by the federal law on the federal budget.
            The Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to finance "budget deficits" of state extra-budgetary funds, budgets of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local budgets."
            The Central Bank of the Russian Federation, unlike the US Federal Reserve, cannot provide the Russian Federation with the money supply in the required amounts.
            Quote: Sid.74
            And Nabibulin every month destroys another laundry bank or just banks that could not report, which was not when Kudrin

            yep
            Okay private investors - their deposits are insured (to a certain limit)
            What about legal entity?
            "But thanks to Naibulina" thousands of companies, ICHP - there is no money on the file cabinet, there is no chance of getting it (after she and Co. closed the "laundries") - ZERO
            ================================
            Great Recession, the global recession of 2009, the global crisis
            The fall of the economy in the countries of the world by the end of 2008 (in red where it "fell" more). Here is an indicator of efficiency! (For 2015 they will bring soon, we will be red too)


            Or the behavior of the NZD / JPY currency pair between 2002 and 2005. During the indicated time, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand raised the basic interest rate from 4,75% to 7,25%. In Japan, by contrast, interest rates were kept at zero.
            1. +2
              16 September 2015 23: 11
              The Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to finance "budget deficits" of state extra-budgetary funds, budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local budgets. "

              That's right, but banks with state participation also have the right to finance, knowing where these banks will make money.
              Quote: opus
              thousands of companies, ICHP- on the card index without money, chances of getting it (after she and Co. closed the "laundries") - ZERO

              Ie it was unnecessary to close them ... request Let the black cash be washed off and not pay taxes? Well, even this money would be scrolled from honest commercial activity, through such banks they finance Maidan and terrorism, and even through such banks they launder money for drugs. milestone stolen budget funds.
              1. 0
                17 September 2015 04: 30
                Quote: Sid.74
                Let them continue to wash the black cash and not pay taxes?

                Are you sure that the closure of all these banks was objective?
                But do not tell me why state employees are practically forcibly transferred to servicing in Sberbank?
                And where do the assets of those IPshniks and other LLCs (very sickly, in total!) That kept funds in closed banks go? .. Not in the know? I’ll give a hint: there is such a surname - Gref .. whose protégé is actually Ms. Nabiullina, by the way. Complete the logical chain yourself ..
                1. 0
                  17 September 2015 04: 42
                  Quote: avia1991
                  Are you sure that the closure of all these banks was objective?
                  Why are state employees transferred to Sberbank for service?
                  Where are the assets of those IPshniks and other LLCs (very sickly, in total!) That kept funds in closed banks? ..
                  There is such a surname - Gref .. whose protégé is actually Ms. Nabiullina, by the way.

                  Complete the logical chain yourself ..

                  Damn, all this joke does not give me rest:

                  The girl is told: "My fish .." The girl .. thinks ..

                  - Fish is a pike
                  - Pike are teeth
                  - Teeth is a dog
                  - The dog is a cyka

                  - Lyuyuudi! He called me earthworm a woman of easy virtue !!

                  This is called a spirology horse.

                  What you wrote is also called that.

                  hi
              2. BIG
                0
                17 September 2015 08: 50
                Let them continue to wash the black cash and not pay taxes?

                Excuse the illiterate. I am aware that there are companies "professionally" engaged in cashing, but that banks are engaged in this ... nope, I have not heard. Can you tell me the diagram?
                Through such banks, stolen budget funds are taken abroad.

                This issue is not being resolved by closing banks, but by introducing tight currency controls. The ban on the free movement of capital. At the same time, the ruble can also be protected from sharp fluctuations in the exchange rate, breaking off stock speculators.
              3. 0
                17 September 2015 13: 50
                Quote: Sid.74
                with state participation has the right to finance, knowing where these banks will give money.

                Well, you see, it's a little silly compared to the Fed.
                The Central Bank gives money to banks at the% rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, they add their 5%, and already at 20-30% (for today) they finance the programs of the Government of the Russian Federation ...
                This makes no sense
                Quote: Sid.74
                Ie it was unnecessary to close them ... Let them continue to wash the black cash and did not pay taxes? And

                1. As for "no need", I don't know. By law, there is a reason: to close
                but so that the person does not suffer a legal entity (what does it have to do with it?)
                2. You are not "going there", I'm talking about legal entities who got (left without their money on the account) because of Naibulina and the actions of her team
                3. I’m a little familiar with the topic, they closed it, they do not always garbage, closed (and will be) by order.
                You can not close it (you need a change in the law), but external state administration (if there is a violation): the money of depositors and legal entities is intact, accounts are not blocked, activity continues, there is no blood clot, and the competent authorities calmly sorted it out.
                4. All frauds were done not by banks, but by firms through banks.
                These are two big differences.
                banks have a lot of control from the Central Bank, and this is not included in their type of activity.
                And if the Central Bank spoiled, so the first to punish the Central Bank and this Madame Naibulin
                Quote: Sid.74
                such banks finance both Maidan and terrorism, and even through such banks launder money for drugs


                Quote: Sid.74
                Through such banks, stolen budget funds are taken abroad.

                why the Central Bank, UWC, Finmonitoring, SB Bank, tax, OBEP, transaction passport, certificate of foreign exchange transactions, certificate of supporting documents, explanations of the timing of fulfillment of obligations, control of the TCF on the transfer (tax and FCS automatically receive the data of the sender / receiver, contract CoVO, PS during the DAY, after completing the transfer)?
                I’ll not tell you a big secret- all foreign transfers from the Russian Federation they go through correspondent accounts controlled by our VEB, the Chekists, that is, and "just like that" not to be taken away, if they were taken away: then "by agreement" and I will leave.
                -----------------------------------------------------------
                stop speculating in currency, and left transfers abroad, like two fingers about ...
                Without any effort
          6. 0
            17 September 2015 08: 35
            In July, bought more than 9 billion. $
          7. 0
            17 September 2015 12: 26
            Quote: Sid.74
            And Nabiullina every month destroys another laundry bank or just banks that could not report, which was not with Kudrin.

            And Nabiullina half destroyed the ruble, and, as a result, led to an accelerated impoverishment of the population.
        2. +9
          16 September 2015 21: 04
          The polar difference. Kudrin invested gold and foreign exchange reserves in US bonds, Nabiullina stupidly reduced debit with credit, fulfilling the general decision of the government. And she is undoubtedly right, this is the merit of the entire Central Bank, for the work was titanic. I can enlighten the reader in more detail, for most are guided by the emotions of Dunno, in his adventures on the moon.

          First, why were Western financial sanctions imposed? In order that the Central Bank, in order to maintain the popularity of the government, threw as much currency as possible into the market. Foreign investors would immediately transfer this currency into the shade beyond the jurisdiction of Russia. How long could this situation persist? For China, a hundred years. For Russia, several months. What would follow then? I would have to get into debt. And here it doesn’t matter to whom. The West would give with the smallest percentages, but with conditions and requirements. Of which everyone knows.

          Second, what followed? The ruble began to fall. The standard of living began to decline. Gold and foreign exchange reserves remained virtually unchanged. The government and the President personally have changed their popularity to resistance to sanctions. And we survived. Each did his own thing, Putin his, Nabiullina his, we, our citizens. Each of us paid for it with his own. Guys, but honestly, your wealth has really fallen? Did you really suffer? It was not worth changing the car once to win the financial war? And her premises arose this week, this is her Stalingrad.

          Third, that scenario of the country's financial life turned out to be the mildest, spit in the face of anyone who says that it was possible to do things differently, to take away and share from someone. Such a method has never brought stabilization to the situation; it has never made people richer, but only introduced the country into turmoil and war. Each time he returned to Russia, he was struck by the ratio of the dollar-ruble and prices in stores. Yes, this situation allowed many to travel abroad, buy imports, even more than that, import alone and continue to ruin the country's economy. Now the road to import is closed and you want-you do not want, but you have to replace it, developing your production. And for this we all paid too. I believe that this is millions of times better than arranging a new dispossession and starting to dig which channel in the North. Following cheap populism would only lead to such a scenario. And now, the country is in its rut, the speed is still not great, but it is growing, and the state is not jumping along other people's roads and gardens.
          1. -1
            16 September 2015 21: 38
            Quote: Asadullah
            First, why financial sanctions were introduced Of the West? In order that the Central Bank, in order to maintain the popularity of the government, threw as much currency as possible into the market.
            Already funny ..
            You think too highly of our government if you think that it will "drain" the currency from the state reserve in order to "preserve its popularity"! The government doesn’t care about his popularity - it will ensure its high level with the help of the media.
            In addition, in matters of monetary policy, the Central Bank is not subordinate to the Government. So your conclusions .. are not entirely correct.
            Quote: Asadullah
            It’s worth not changing the car once, for victory in a financial war?
            What social stratum of the population are you trying to convert?
            Most are concerned not at all with changing cars (well, if only for something cheaper!) - but with ensuring the slightest degree of food stability! And then: where did you get the idea that we are winning the "financial war"? With the "efforts" that the Government and the Central Bank continue to undertake regarding "import substitution", we may not just "lose" - we may not even notice how we will lose!
            1. +4
              16 September 2015 22: 11
              With those "efforts" that the Government and the Central Bank continue to undertake regarding "import substitution"


              Do you want to become the largest producer of dummies in the world in a year? Or do you think that the task of Nabiullina is to build the largest factory of dummies? In addition, in order to build it, one must also sell them, and the price must be correct.

              In addition, in matters of monetary policy, the Central Bank is not subordinate to the Government.


              Formally, yes. But you can always change the leadership of the Central Bank, if something goes wrong.
              1. 0
                17 September 2015 04: 38
                Quote: Asadullah
                you can always change the leadership of the Central Bank, if something goes wrong.

                Torment changing: too many "stakeholders" are involved.
                Quote: Asadullah
                Do you want to become the largest producer of dummies in the world in a year?

                Well, why in a year? What - the policy of the Central Bank with the advent of Nabiullina has changed a lot? And what have our managers been doing for so many years before that ?!
                The only innovation is the "free swimming" of the Ruble .. damn it, a strong association with a child who is taught to swim in the most primitive way: just by throwing it into the water! Swim out - well done, no - yes, and x ... with you! Do you see "effective management" in this?
                In Recent History there is an example of a much more effective leadership of the country in overcoming the crisis .. more, incidentally, difficult.
          2. +1
            16 September 2015 22: 00
            Quote: Asadullah
            Gold and foreign exchange reserves remained virtually unchanged
            Yah?
            1. +2
              16 September 2015 22: 05
              Yah?


              So what? Compare with the happy Poland, which was not announced any sanctions and did not cut credit rations.
              1. 0
                17 September 2015 01: 29
                Quote: Asadullah
                So what? Compare with happy Poland
                What does happy Poland have to do with your false statement? smile
        3. 0
          16 September 2015 21: 11
          very suddenly
        4. +3
          16 September 2015 22: 21
          Quote: kotvov
          (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition,,
          and Kudrin was once the same, recognized as the best minister.I think for the continuation of Kudrin’s reforms, and this one is assigned, the best .....

          Did they recognize Humpbacked as the best Secretary General of the USSR? He has, after all, "merits" to the West, perhaps more than Naebulina and Kudrin combined. Only Yeltsin could compete with Gorbaty in "merits" - so he received his well-deserved award for 8,5 years. Sorry, not from me personally. I would like him as General Bessonov ("Hot Snow"): "Everything that I can ... On my own ..." Only not orders, but something else ... am
        5. 0
          17 September 2015 10: 45
          I will repeat myself once again. In my opinion, conferring the title of "Best" in the West is an undeniable basis for initiating a criminal case under the article "Treason to the Motherland." Remember, at least, "the best German" or "the best Ministry of Finance."
      2. +24
        16 September 2015 17: 56
        I am sure that this mmm .... fairy really deserved this title in the West. But in fact, the same title means a subscript article on citizens of the Russian Federation. to shoot without trial.
        1. +19
          16 September 2015 18: 27
          Why without trial and investigation? Nabiulina strangled industry and agriculture with a high "prohibitive" lending rate in the absence of the possibility of lending abroad due to the sanctions war. In addition, in accordance with the Russian Constitution, the Central Bank is independent of the Russian government and subordinate to the US Federal Reserve.
          So judge as a foreign agent, causing enormous economic damage to Russia.
          1. +3
            16 September 2015 19: 07
            Quote: ARS56
            Why without trial and investigation? Nabiulina strangled industry and agriculture with a high "prohibitive" lending rate in the absence of the possibility of lending abroad due to the sanctions war. In addition, in accordance with the Russian Constitution, the Central Bank is independent of the Russian government and subordinate to the US Federal Reserve.
            So judge as a foreign agent, causing enormous economic damage to Russia.

            I completely agree. Credit policy is aimed at strangling the business as such. I faced it myself last September - the banks refused to give "overs" despite the fact that the requested circulating assets were ten times less than the average monthly turnover of the company. The Rosselkhoz came up with a bunch of reasons, until he honestly said that until he "settled down" we can smoke. I had to take a wild interest from a private owner. Now the situation is the same, and the state on its contracts requires execution on time, the prepayment is delayed. Those who do not have their own funds are forced to cave in under corruption schemes - the so-called "assistance" from the state customer in obtaining an advance payment.
          2. +5
            16 September 2015 19: 12
            Here it’s like an adult, and write such a muin ..

            Quote: ARS56
            in accordance with the Constitution of Russia, the Central Bank is independent of the Russian government and submits to the US Federal Reserve

            Where is it written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation?

            To manage the Central Bank of the Russian Federation there is such a little thing:

            Quote: http://www.banki.ru/wikibank/natsionalnyiy_bankovskiy_sovet/
            The National Banking Council (NBS) is a collegial governing body of the Bank of Russia. It includes 12 people.

            The composition of the NBS is determined as follows:

            - 2 participants are sent by the Federation Council - from among the senators;
            - 3 - from among the deputies of the choice of the State Duma;
            - 3 are appointed by the President of the Russian Federation;
            - 3 - by the government;
            - 12-th member of the Council - Chairman of the Bank of Russia.
            ...
            Its functions include:

            1) consideration of the annual report of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation;

            2) approval on the basis of proposals of the Board of Directors of the Bank of Russia income and expenses for the coming year;

            3) approval, if necessary, on the basis of proposals by the board of directors of additional costs;

            4) consideration of improving the banking system of the Russian Federation;

            5) consideration of the draft and the final version of the main directions of the unified state monetary policy;

            6) resolving issues related to the participation of the Bank of Russia in the capital of credit organizations;

            7) the appointment of the chief auditor of the Central Bank and the consideration of his reports;

            8) a quarterly review of the information of the board of directors on the main issues of the current activities of the Bank of Russia, including the implementation of the main directions of the unified state monetary policy, banking regulation and banking supervision, the implementation of the foreign exchange regulation and foreign exchange control policy, the organization of the settlement system in the Russian Federation, execution cost estimates of the Bank of Russia, as well as the preparation of draft legislative acts and other regulatory acts in the field of banking;

            9) determination of the audit organization - auditor of the annual financial statements of the Central Bank;

            10) approval on the proposal of the board of directors of accounting and reporting rules for the Bank of Russia;

            11) submitting proposals to the State Duma on the verification by the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation of the financial and economic activities of the Bank of Russia, its structural divisions and institutions;

            12) approval on the proposal of the board of directors of the procedure for the formation of provisions of the Bank of Russia and the procedure for the distribution of profits remaining at the disposal of the Central Bank;

            13) approval, at the proposal of the board of directors, of a report on the Bank of Russia expenditures on the maintenance of Central Bank employees, their pensions, life insurance and medical insurance, on capital investments and other administrative and business needs.

            The participants of the National Banking Council, with the exception of the Chairman of the Bank of Russia, are not employees of the Central Bank and do not receive remuneration for their activities. The Council meets at least once a quarter. From among the participants, the chairman of the NBS is elected. The quorum is seven people, the decision is made by a simple majority of votes

            And where are you, plin, representatives from the US Federal Reserve? fool
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              16 September 2015 19: 51
              The representative of the US Federal Reserve just determines the powers of this Council, on which practically nothing depends. The bank is private, the state will let it in laughing
              1. 0
                16 September 2015 20: 04
                And, for the sake of curiosity, see if the Central Bank pays income taxes laughing Or does our state pay for the activity of some other private trader?
                1. +4
                  16 September 2015 20: 12
                  Quote: siberalt
                  see if the Central Bank pays income taxes

                  Oddly enough - pays .. and not acidic such a tax ..

                  Quote: http://www.banki.ru/news/lenta/?id=7206065
                  Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law obliging The Central Bank to transfer to the federal budget on an ongoing basis 75% of its profit instead of 50%, as it was before. The corresponding document was posted on Monday in the database of normative and administrative acts.

                  Amendments are made to Section 26 of the Law “On the Central Bank”, the latest version of which provided for the transfer to the federal budget of 50% of the Central Bank’s profit. However, this rule was suspended until January 1, 2016 - instead of 50%, the Central Bank should transfer 2013% of the profit remaining after taxes and fees at the end of 2014 and 75.

                  The new law provides the regulator with an obligation on an ongoing basis to transfer 75% of its profits to the budget. According to the developers, this will be one of the measures to mobilize additional federal budget revenues.

                  For three years, the budget can receive from the Central Bank about 540 billion rubles. In 2015, 150 billion can be transferred, in 2016 - 180 billion, and in 2017 - 210 billion.

                  “The amendment shall enter into force on January 1, 2016. The new size is applied to legal relations on the transfer of profits actually received at the end of 2015 and subsequent years, ”the statement to the document says.


                  That's something like belay
                  1. +4
                    16 September 2015 21: 01
                    Quote: Cat Man Null
                    Quote: siberalt
                    see if the Central Bank pays income taxes

                    Oddly enough - it pays .. and not acidic such a tax ... belay

                    The Central Bank does not have to pay tax, and everything that it "earned" should be transferred to the treasury, every penny. Making money is not a function of the Central Bank, it is not a commercial office, but an institution of the state. Central Bank officials should "sit" on a solid state salary, determined by the relevant law! I think something like this ...
              2. +4
                16 September 2015 20: 20
                Quote: siberalt
                The representative of the US Federal Reserve determines the powers of this Council.

                The powers of the Council are determined by the Regulation on the NBS of the Russian Federation. Have you read it though? wink

                Quote: siberalt
                of this Council, on which practically nothing depends

                Reread powers. Exactly - nothing depends? belay

                Quote: siberalt
                The bank is private, the state will let it in

                Lying is bad..

                And, yes - once again - we re-read the composition of the NBS of the Russian Federation. Composition, not powers now..

                Who is not from the state? Further..

                Quote: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=182811;fld=134;
                dst = 1000000001,0; rnd = 0.037044948898255825

                FEDERAL LAW ON THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (BANK OF RUSSIA) July 10, 2002 N86-ФЗ

                Article 2. The authorized capital and other property of the Bank of Russia are federal property. (...)

                If it is a private bank, then I am a telephone box ..

                PS: About the "income tax" - see below ..
                ZZY: "Thorough it is necessary, thorough" (c) laughing
                1. -3
                  16 September 2015 20: 35
                  Whether you are a booth or not, you know better. Just powers are different. The owner of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is the US Federal Reserve. On the proposal of the Russian Federation, he approves the candidacy of the manager. And for the rest, it introduces some limited powers, which the owner is up to the bulb, if not contrary to his interests. Something in these powers is not visible as the Council controls the issue of our own rubles, decides on the interest rate, or has the right to disperse the board of directors. On the rights to provide an opinion on the nationalization of the Central Bank, I’ll be silent. laughing This is not even allowed to the president.
                  1. +4
                    16 September 2015 20: 41
                    Quote: siberalt
                    The owner of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is the US Federal Reserve. On the proposal of the Russian Federation, he approves the candidacy of the manager

                    Arctic fox is just ..

                    Where did you get this from? Just show me where you found it .. and I’ll believe you right there.

                    So far, I see just an unproven repetition of the same thesis, no more Yes

                    Quote: siberalt
                    Something in these powers is not visible as the Council controls the issue of our own rubles, decides on the interest rate ...

                    So-so-so .. inattentively read, I see .. again:

                    5) consideration draft and final version of the main directions of the unified state monetary policy;

                    Other - from the same opera .. and again "nationalization" .. Find Wasserman, about "nationalization", to understand the term correctly wink

                    Once again: "It should be thorough .." (c) Arkady Raikin
          3. 0
            16 September 2015 22: 34
            Quote: ARS56
            In addition, in accordance with the Constitution of Russia, the Central Bank is independent of the Russian government and submits to the US Federal Reserve
            In what article of the constitution is such a schiz written?
            1. 0
              16 September 2015 22: 58
              Quote: Uncle Joe
              In what article of the constitution is such a schiz written?

              Uncle Joe, I was already having fun on this topic there. The passenger did not show up No.

              He, campaign, just went to catch the pros ..
              1. 0
                17 September 2015 01: 31
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                He, campaign, just went to catch the pros ..
                And bring them numbers laughing
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +10
          16 September 2015 18: 42
          Quote: Oladushkin
          I’m sure this mmm ...


          And exactly ... "sure" wink lol
          Then ... quick reference wassat :

          - From May 22, 2012 to June 24, 2013 - Assistant to the President of the Russian Federation for Economic Affairs [20].

          - March 12, 2013 nominated as a candidate for the post of chairman of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
          Well, who "nominates" you probably know wink

          - On April 9, 2013, the State Duma made a decision (i.e., approved the "wishes" of the tsar fellow ) on her appointment since June 24, 2013.

          Well, where did she come from .. "appeared", so this is ...



          So that "in fact, the same title means ......" you would somehow be ... more accurate, or something recourse
          After all .. "holy" and .. "their" .... "touch" b ... LOWER wassat

          1. +7
            16 September 2015 19: 15
            Quote: ancient
            After all .. "holy" and .. "their" .... "touch" b ... LOWER


            Watching ... MINUSS on .. "guard" laughing

            Well then .. "take an interest" .. "activity" lol Russian Venture Company OJSC (RVC) bully ..though..who am I ... telling lol

            Well, I remind you that Nabiullina was also a member of the council Directors of Gazprom and RAO UES, and also attended the board of trustees of the Skolkovo Foundation wassat
            1. +5
              16 September 2015 19: 50
              Quote: ancient
              Well then .. "take an interest" .. "in the activities" of the Russian Venture Company OJSC (RVC)



              As far as I understand, the theoretical concept of "venture financing" gives oooo huge practical opportunities for the prospects for cutting any dough, if only it was ??? I mean budget dough, not private capital ...

              Hmm ... something I have again the mood for the night looking to spoil the beginning ...

              PS You guys are relying on what I will say: but I am still naive ... I still try to believe in something sacred, human ... Life for the seventh decade is screaming in my ears: "This is not so !!! "... And I, damn it, I still believe ... Only a fraction of faith, like shagreen skin, is getting smaller and smaller ...

              PPS True, I try neither cynicism nor (that is, naivety) granddaughter - not to instill ... So, softly, something average ... I don’t want the bitch to become, but I don’t want the stuffed fool in life to be ...
              1. +2
                16 September 2015 21: 18
                Quote: veksha50
                I’m still naive ... still trying to believe in something sacred, human ..

                Hello to you! And what - in your opinion, this is not ?!
                But what about Friendship, Love, Family? Favorite work, the richest history of our Motherland, famous commanders and researchers, famous and nameless Heroes who covered the name "RUSSIA" with Glory - and the very concept of "RUSSIAN"?! .. We have something to believe in and something to be proud of! And the "state" - in the sense, a bunch of narcissistic eaters who for some reason decided that they have the right to dispose of our destinies - in this sense, the state cannot be associated with the COUNTRY RUSSIA AND THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE. These "..." will leave as they came - and Russia WILL ALWAYS!
                feel So ... I think THIS should be important to us. And who is extolling whom, who stole how much .. this is not news - this is routine, the usual way of life of the "powerful of this world", BUT NOT THE MAJORITY OF RUSSIANS. So is it worth puzzling over this?
                Better keep believing! smile Thought, as you know, is material, and therefore, the more BELIEVERS are, the stronger will be RUSSIA! .. well, and we with her Yes
                1. +2
                  16 September 2015 22: 12
                  Quote: avia1991
                  Hello to you! And what - in your opinion, this is not ?!



                  Hello !!! Plus I put it to you, but I’ll ask you - did you understand my naive comment ??? Who are you trying to talk about pride in Russia, Russianness and so on ??? To the one who gave his whole life for her ???

                  What are the reproaches ???

                  Oh, boys, boys ... before you write - yes, read about what a person writes ... but did not understand - so pass by ...

                  PS I feel it's time to just come to visit, look at the news and the reaction of the new shoots to them, and silently leave ... By God, guys, sometimes after visiting the forum I sometimes have problems with at least pressure and sugar ...

                  Or maybe it’s such a life - striped, but there are more and more black bars for old age more and more ??? This harmfulness is called ...
                  1. +1
                    17 September 2015 03: 51
                    Quote: veksha50
                    Who are you trying to talk about pride in Russia, Russianness and so on ???

                    Not a kid and I, although I did not serve "for the good" as much as you do.
                    You did not quite understand me: given the age you indicated, I understand that you do not need to "explain" something. But the topic was raised, that's why he answered - so that those who are younger, REMEMBER that we have something to be proud of! Yes The situation when two are discussing, it seems, their own - but they say FOR THE THIRD, which is nearby ..
                    It seemed to me that this would not hurt "speak out loud" again. Sorry if this offended you hi
                    1. 0
                      17 September 2015 11: 13
                      Quote: avia1991
                      It seemed to me that it would not hurt to "speak out loud" again. Sorry if this has hurt you



                      Everything is fine ...
        4. +1
          16 September 2015 20: 53
          Quote: Oladushkin
          I am sure that this mmm .... fairy really deserved this title in the West. But in fact, the same title means a subscript article on citizens of the Russian Federation. to shoot without trial.

          Phi, how can I? To shoot women? This was not even done under the tsar or under Stalin.
          Under the tsar, however, sometimes they hung them, but didn’t shoot them, that's for sure ...
      3. +24
        16 September 2015 17: 57
        Kudrin, Chubais and Co. were also recognized as the best .. am
        1. +6
          16 September 2015 18: 57
          And also Gorbachev and his friends.
      4. +8
        16 September 2015 18: 09
        "I don't know much about management and banking, but I have a different opinion. I think she (Nabiullina) has earned this recognition."
        I, too, do not know much about everything, in some places I don’t understand a damn thing, periodically, not everything, sometimes I’m cunning, in general, “oak-oak”, but to Nbiullina, but not for nothing - BREAKING! belay
      5. Alf
        +6
        16 September 2015 18: 33
        Quote: KERTAK
        I am poorly versed in management and banking, but I have a different opinion. I think she (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition

        These measures have increased the confidence of foreign investors.

        We already know what a foreign investor is. This is a transfer of Russian money over a hill. Yes, she deserved it.
        Same
        by raising interest rates,
        The Central Bank under its wise management began to ruin the domestic industry, so it does not shine with vitality.
      6. +8
        16 September 2015 18: 52
        If I had the opportunity to directly ask the question of Nabiullina, I would ask two: What kind of disgrace is happening in the Banking Supervision (is that why the money goes from Russia, and then it is returned by the same people laundered as loans).
        And the second question: what does her husband have to do with educational reform and textbooks?
        1. +3
          16 September 2015 19: 20
          Quote: Balu
          If I had the opportunity to directly ask a question of Nabiullina


          So who's in the way? ... How many "meetings" have already been, both big and .. small wink

          Vladimir Putin said he was satisfied with the work of the Bank of Russia.

          “I have no big complaints about the work of the Central Bank. It is possible to criticize the Bank of Russia for delaying the decision to raise the key rate. But in general, all experts believe that The Central Bank acts professionally and efficiently ”- said the President of the Russian Federation.



          There is also a desire ... to "ask questions" lol
          1. +1
            16 September 2015 19: 31
            Write her in a personal? She is such a busy affair, she won’t answer. In a personal meeting, I’ll definitely ask or try on this one like her. What else would an ancient colleague advise? drinks
      7. 0
        16 September 2015 18: 59
        Quote: KERTAK
        I am poorly versed in management and banking, but I have a different opinion. I think she (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition

        You are right Oleg, in the short term, her actions were correct. But now we need to think about the development of industry, and at a key rate in 11% of cheap loans for the real sector of the economy, where profitability rarely exceeds 10-12%, we will not see. It is necessary to create tools that allow lending to the real sector with cheap money in 5-6% per annum, but they are not yet
      8. 0
        16 September 2015 19: 19
        if you do not understand well, why write?
      9. +4
        16 September 2015 19: 43
        Deserved, deserved! Kudrin is also the best min. finance was still unraveling stagnation in the economy. It was processing that prevented him; he did not want to develop petrochemistry. And why he answered the questions: high oil prices, we’ll buy everything. So the new excellent student with a minus sign.
      10. +4
        16 September 2015 19: 55
        just so the west does not reward
      11. -1
        16 September 2015 20: 28
        It is curious if all the minuscoters were now paid bricks, if they worked at a silicate factory, or crystal, if they worked at a crystal factory. Everyone forgot how it was in the 90s? Unhappy people were selling the products of their enterprises on trains, which they paid for their own labor. Honestly, I expected the same thing as a result of the current crisis. And, if all the minus signers didn’t drink their own brains, we should thank Nabiulina and her team for preventing the transition to barter. We, as always, work alone, and all the others are sorry, shit ... The Nabiulina team worked very expertly in these conditions. It is possible that some mistakes were made, but in general, very competently. And shouting that Nabiulina is shitty because toilet paper has risen 25% in price is not comme il faut. The trouble is, since the cobbler will start the pies ...)))
        1. 0
          16 September 2015 21: 29
          Clever people who are always right. For example, start now the Central Bank to drop dollars, like, supposedly, to support the ruble ... What happens. Someone from the wise men thought that this action is not strengthening the ruble, but ONLY a dollar ??? Do not meddle, I apologize again, but, nevertheless, not in my own business. In it, you understand exactly as much as I do in ballet or in nuclear physics. A boy in a kindergarten must still write in a pot, and not climb on a toilet bowl intended for adults ...)))
          1. 0
            16 September 2015 23: 29
            Wise guys? And you were not interested in why there was such a rush of demand for currency in November? The Central Bank gave money to banks in debt, they bought currency, the Central Bank did not sell currency, the currency went up. The difference in two weeks reached 82%, and the Central Bank gave the bank at 8% per annum - is it a qualified banker? Then the banks sold and returned the loan to the Central Bank, the banks became richer, and you? All agricultural loans are given through a bank, he is subsidized by the state rate, all over the world subsidize hectares of cultivated land to a farmer. Credit is given to him at a rate fixed by the state. Even the fuel is painted in a different color and sold at a discount to the farmer. In Germany, in general, everything is redeemed by the state, then it is redistributed among networkers and wholesalers. Try to raise the price of a cent, the control authorities will eat you up. This achieves a low price for products. We have everything in a wild field.
        2. +2
          16 September 2015 22: 29
          And you didn’t read in the news that they still give out salaries with a brick? Look, in my opinion in Tula. The delay in salaries is wild. Two days ago there was news. Google.
          1. +5
            16 September 2015 22: 58
            Well yes. Of course, Nabiulin is to blame. And, by and large, take it even higher that trifle. The king was not reported, but the boyars ... Well, as always. And an ineffective manager ... Well, they didn’t know where to teach. And why didn’t they? Yes, because in the Ministry of Education such a minister. And why did they put such a minister, and who? In short, a fairy tale about a white bull. Oh, ma! Former Soviet people ... (((
      12. +2
        16 September 2015 20: 32
        Quote: KERTAK
        I am poorly versed in management and banking, but I have a different opinion. I think she (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition ...

        It would be better if she achieved recognition at home, and so "the recognition of the merits of Mrs. Nabiullina by the British magazine looks somewhat ambiguous."
        Whose recognition is dearer to her? Recognition of far from friendly foreigners or the majority of compatriots? In whose interests does it work? In the interests of their country, or in the interests of foreign "investors" whose interest is mainly in the freedom to export their margins out of the country? Or is our country not her country for her? ...
      13. +1
        16 September 2015 20: 38
        Quote: KERTAK
        I have a different opinion. I think she (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition

        In that case, you are a British spy laughing :
        recognition of the merits of Mrs. Nabiullina british magazine It looks somewhat ambiguous.
        Who, besides the spy, will support the opinion of the anti-Russian British press ?!
        PS I’m not negative - you already have enough opinions of other colleagues wassat I recommend reading an interview with Glazyev:
        http://www.glazev.ru/econom_polit/448/
      14. 0
        16 September 2015 21: 04
        To Kolyma! Lifetime!
      15. +3
        16 September 2015 21: 09
        I was simply touched by one of her recent phrases that the decline in lending has a positive effect on inflation.
        We are often told that it is banks that should contribute to the growth of industry with their loans. And if there are no loans, then there is no development of industry, then there is no living money in the pockets of workers, then there is nothing to buy, then low inflation. Was that what she achieved?
        Applause turning into a stormy ovation and a curtain!
      16. 0
        16 September 2015 21: 09
        The whole joke (all of a sudden)
      17. +1
        17 September 2015 01: 43
        Quote: KERTAK
        I think she (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition

        He deserves something else.
        Something like ropes towels fluffy and scented soaps.
      18. 0
        17 September 2015 02: 56
        Quote: KERTAK
        I have a poor understanding of management and banking, but I have a different opinion

        but is it not better then to shut up?
    4. +23
      16 September 2015 17: 50
      Britain praised, it is a hundred times worse if Hitler praised!
      1. jjj
        +14
        16 September 2015 17: 54
        In Russia, there is such a good omen: how is any figure from the financial sphere recognized as "the best in the world", so soon he will have things to go
        1. +10
          16 September 2015 18: 21
          Yeah! And eight years ... conditionally. According to tradition.
          1. +4
            16 September 2015 19: 07
            ... and lead to the border with the orchestra, hand over the skis and ... come on dear ye ue goodbye.
      2. +1
        16 September 2015 18: 08
        don't have to be so simple. arrogant people are not so simple. may have deliberately been praised. And special merits, as well as reproach her for nothing special ...
    5. +4
      16 September 2015 18: 14
      Unambiguously approved by the USA.
    6. +1
      16 September 2015 18: 14
      Unambiguously approved by the USA.
    7. +9
      16 September 2015 18: 26
      If enemies praise, then this is a clear sign that a person works for them. And not any kind of setup. With the advent of Nabiullina, the situation with the Central Bank has not changed, it is still hostile to us.
    8. +5
      16 September 2015 18: 33
      Looking back:
      As I remember, at one time Mikhail Sergeyevich applauded all of Europe, and in the USSR he was christened the Bear-labeled ... negative
      1. +6
        16 September 2015 18: 39
        Quote: yuriy55
        Looking back:

        A year before the default of 1998, the red line of Chubais, was recognized as the best finance minister on the planet ..... You need to know this, remember, wait for next August and be ready for something terrible.
        1. 0
          16 September 2015 22: 03
          BANK, IT'S A MORNOR. And usurers, this is Tolmud.
      2. -7
        16 September 2015 19: 00
        As I remember, at one time Mikhail Sergeyevich applauded all of Europe, and in the USSR he was christened the Bear-labeled ...

        I also remember that before the collapse of the USSR, Gorbachev did not decide anything. The princes on the ground wanted sovereignty (and our Western non-comrades encouraged come on, come on). These issues were resolved without MS, he was put in Foros (where he was forced to leave) before the fact.
        1. +2
          16 September 2015 21: 03
          Power is not given, power is taken (if you are talking about Foros). But the whole country knew about the affiliation of the MSG since the time of Prohibition and some other actions. And dirty tricks were expected from him. The "Belovezhskaya signature" burst out, many expected, but they did not know to what extent the threat would be, now we know - we will disentangle it.
          1. -1
            16 September 2015 22: 34
            Quote: NDR-791
            Power is not given, power is taken (if you are talking about Foros). But the whole country knew about the affiliation of the MSG since the time of Prohibition and some other actions. And dirty tricks were expected from him. The "Belovezhskaya signature" burst out, many expected, but they did not know to what extent the threat would be, now we know - we will disentangle it.

            What are you talking about?
            1. 0
              17 September 2015 08: 04
              Quote: GOgaRu
              Quote: NDR-791
              Power is not given, power is taken (if you are talking about Foros). But the whole country knew about the affiliation of the MSG since the time of Prohibition and some other actions. And dirty tricks were expected from him. The "Belovezhskaya signature" burst out, many expected, but they did not know to what extent the threat would be, now we know - we will disentangle it.

              What are you talking about?

              It always amazes me when young (Russian bottling) home-grown "specialists" begin to talk about what I have a vague idea of ​​from school history books.
    9. +2
      16 September 2015 18: 46
      Fear the praise of your enemies.
    10. +3
      16 September 2015 18: 49
      Kudrin became the best economist in the world after every six months he invested our money in American candy wrappers such as mortgage credit firms, etc., which were covered with a copper basin.
    11. +5
      16 September 2015 18: 50
      We need to think about GDP and talk well
      You are behind the times.

      As you can see, the president is pleased.
    12. +6
      16 September 2015 18: 50
      If your enemy praises you, then you have done stupidity. Gorbachev is the best German of the year, Kudrin is the best minister of finance, Nabiullina from the same rank.
      1. +1
        16 September 2015 19: 53
        Quote: Grenader
        Gorbachev is the best German of the year,



        Hmm ... EBN also seems to have worked as the best German or German of the year ...

        I do not continue further, the night is ahead, my mood is deteriorating, and I will face a dilemma - drink Corvalol and related pills or tin a glass of vodara ...
    13. +5
      16 September 2015 18: 51
      Bad sign!!! Definitely! We need to think about the GDP and speak well with the best head of the Central Bank in the world!

      So he too: "the most influential man in the world." Copper pipes, however.
    14. +4
      16 September 2015 18: 57
      Quote: neri73-r
      Bad sign!!! Definitely! We need to think about the GDP and speak well with the best head of the Central Bank in the world!

      I agree with you, and there’s nothing to talk about .. It’s time for the current government to resign, especially Lebanon. Red faces mlin, no words ...
    15. +2
      16 September 2015 19: 37
      Whose bank recognized Nabiullina as the best. When Kudrin crushed our economy, he was also recognized as the best minister of finance. Well, none of the Westerners can recognize someone as good if he acts in the interests of Russia.
    16. +3
      16 September 2015 19: 52
      neri73-r
      Bad sign!!! Definitely! We need to think about the GDP and speak well with the best head of the Central Bank in the world!

      There was "The Best German!" - this is the ... "tagged" Misha G ..., who destroyed the USSR
      There was the "Best Foreign Minister" - Mr. Kozyrev ... he completely placed foreign policy under the orders of the "Washington Regional Committee" ... now he is planning to overthrow the current government through a coup in distant America ...
      He was the best finance minister who drove hundreds of our billions of oil and gas dollars into the US economy ... instead of investing in the Russian economy ... and now ... almost every day, he tells everyone ... what we are make a mistake by investing this money in the development of the Russian economy ...
      Now "The Best Banker" !!! ... What can Russians expect now? Although this is already clear to everyone ...
      Maybe we have enough of the "BEST" IMPOSED ON US BY WESTERN POLITICS ... ONLY AND DREAMING TO DISRUPT RUSSIA !! Really the experience of the story about the FIFTH COLUMN DIDN'T TEACH US MIND-MIND ???
    17. +4
      16 September 2015 20: 12
      Article 75 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, clause 2: "Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it carries out independently of other government bodies." Not a single currency in the world has depreciated more than twice in a year, like the ruble ( from 33 rubles per $ to 68 rubles per $, today, up to 65 rubles per $) Yes, the currencies of developing countries have fallen in price, but on average, by 20-25% per year, that is, if we take 33 rubles per $, then 20 % will be about 39-40 rubles per $. For such "ensuring the stability" of the national currency in any other country, at best, will be fired .., but at worst ...))) Do you think I'm wrong ???
      1. +1
        16 September 2015 22: 56
        Quote: Znayka
        For such "ensuring the stability" of the national currency in any other country, at best, will be fired
        Central Bank Law

        14. The Chairman of the Bank of Russia may be removed from office only in the following cases:
        ... violations of federal laws that govern issues related to the activities of the Bank of Russia.

        20. Chairman of the Bank of Russia:
        7) bears full responsibility for the activities of the Bank of Russia;


        Constitution

        83. The President of the Russian Federation:
        d) submit to the State Duma a candidate for appointment to the post of Chairman of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation; raises the question of the dismissal of the Chairman of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation before the State Duma;
    18. +2
      16 September 2015 20: 22
      Quote: neri73-r
      Bad sign!!! Definitely! We need to think about the GDP and speak well with the best head of the Central Bank in the world!


      Even the great I.V. Stalin said: "If our enemies scold us, then we are doing everything right ..."
      Proceeding from this postulate - as the head of the Central Bank, an accomplice of the enemy and they directly recognize this themselves.
      Only here, for some reason, our leadership has a different look ...
    19. +2
      16 September 2015 20: 25
      Well, yes, to shave off 100 lard of greenery reserves in 2014 is unknown to anyone and it is not known why - this, you know, is an achievement ...
    20. +1
      16 September 2015 21: 04
      Quote: neri73-r
      Bad sign!!! Definitely! We need to think about the GDP and speak well with the best head of the Central Bank in the world!

      fool What else can I say ....
    21. +1
      16 September 2015 21: 12
      Quote: neri73-r
      We need to think about GDP and have a good talk with the best head of the Central Bank in the world!
      When he appointed her (Kudrin, Gref, Medvedev - their name is legion) to think, then it was not necessary, but now it was needed ...

      Or maybe you should think about who and what you hope for?

      Maybe it’s worth thinking about what this irrational hope looks like for a specialist?
    22. KAV
      -2
      16 September 2015 21: 48
      And if they are thus trying to substitute her and remove her from the post of head of the Central Bank?
      1. Alf
        +3
        16 September 2015 22: 03
        Quote: KAV
        And if they are thus trying to substitute her and remove her from the post of head of the Central Bank?

        And what is the hype for? Meadow was removed quickly and without a preliminary splash, simply "on loss of confidence."
        1. KAV
          0
          16 September 2015 23: 19
          No, I mean our "partners" ... They praised her - she was taken into development - and then according to the script. Thus, perhaps they are trying to weaken the president's team?
    23. 0
      16 September 2015 22: 08
      So he also praises her every hour and every minute. They say over a bottle of British whiskey sent to "the best head of the Central Bank in the world."
    24. 0
      16 September 2015 22: 37
      Yes, it must be judged for treason to the Motherland !!!!!!!!!!!! and all the fat liberals !!!!!!!!
      1. 0
        17 September 2015 01: 35
        Quote: KvVtSr
        Yes, it must be judged for treason to the Motherland !!!!!!!!!!!! and all the fat liberals !!!!!!!!
        Start lol

        Vladimir Putin: “You see, we have not experienced any large-scale nationalization or a slide towards general administrative regulation. We have preserved free movement of capital and the convertibility of the ruble. I am sure that all this served as a convincing signal for investors, and I want to emphasize once again and say: there will be no return to the past. Russia will remain a liberal market economy. Today I want to repeat once again: we will consistently continue the line of encouraging private initiative, of integration into the world economy, on the formation of a favorable investment climate ".
        http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=317679
    25. 0
      17 September 2015 00: 48
      Fraud! For any setup! They decided to set everyone up against her, she just makes the right decisions, so now everything seems to be good in the country in terms of economic indicators, despite long-standing forecasts.
    26. 0
      17 September 2015 11: 39
      Yes Yes! We already had the "world's best finance minister" Kudrin ... who diligently injected Russian money into the American economy ... These "Western partners" will never praise someone who works for his country, not for them.
  2. +14
    16 September 2015 17: 43
    Whose central banks? American?
    1. +4
      16 September 2015 18: 01
      Yes, in general, all the central banks of the world are American ...
    2. +1
      16 September 2015 18: 36
      And all these Central Banks make the dollar - a bagel, and the national currency - a hole from the bagel ... Yes
  3. +21
    16 September 2015 17: 45
    As he used to say Winnie the Pooh by voice Evgenia Leonova: "This is w-w-w - not without reason!" If the enemies praise, then maybe it’s worth thinking about it, but is work being done in that direction? And for the good of whose country is this work?
    1. +3
      16 September 2015 18: 05
      Quote: Sergey-8848
      As he used to say Winnie the Pooh by voice Evgenia Leonova: "This is w-w-w - not without reason!" If the enemies praise, then maybe it’s worth thinking about it, but is work being done in that direction? And for the good of whose country is this work?

      But it is possible that they know that we know about it. laughing
      1. +2
        16 September 2015 19: 15
        I agree with you. Do not underestimate the enemy. There are also no fools.
  4. oof
    +12
    16 September 2015 17: 45
    If the enemy praises, it means a lot. It’s time for the GDP to ponder who steers on his behalf and, most importantly, where.
    1. +12
      16 September 2015 17: 59
      Quote: olf
      If the enemy praises, it means a lot. It’s time for the GDP to ponder who steers on his behalf and, most importantly, where.


      Do you really think that he is not in the know? It's just that those who are on the bridge and those who are stuffed into the holds for ballast (this is about us) have completely different perceptions of life.
  5. +17
    16 September 2015 17: 45
    What ??? !!! belay

    This is with what hu .... ????

    The best head of the Central Bank of the world ???? !!!! Well then, I'm the Emperor of the Universe!


    "with a significant drop in oil prices and with tougher economic sanctions against Russia, the Russian economy" did not go into a tailspin. "

    And what is her merit? What did speculators give money and earn on the ruble depreciation?
  6. +1
    16 September 2015 17: 45
    On the one hand, it pleases. On the other, it makes you think. But no matter how: Sanctions do not strangle Russia!
    1. +9
      16 September 2015 17: 54
      Quote: sl22277
      On the one hand it pleases.

      And why rejoice, Chubais also did the best. Then, too, were you happy?

      "In 2010, Alexei Kudrin, then head of the Russian financial department, was recognized as the" Minister of Finance of the Year "by the magazine. In 1997, Anatoly Chubais was awarded the same title from the magazine."
    2. +2
      16 September 2015 18: 10
      Quote: sl22277
      On the one hand it pleases.



      Let me ask - with what ??? ...
      1. +1
        16 September 2015 18: 29
        Quote: veksha50
        Quote: sl22277
        On the one hand it pleases.



        Let me ask - with what ??? ...

        The failure to congratulate the best Minister of Defense.
        1. +2
          16 September 2015 19: 54
          Quote: Strezhevchanin
          The failure to congratulate the best Minister of Defense.



          And he had enough material "reward" even without congratulations ...
      2. -1
        16 September 2015 19: 19
        Xocelolprox said this well, I think this answer is reasonable to all the ironic remarks: “You don’t need to be the Minister of Economy to understand what titanic work our Central Bank was able to do, stopping the slide of the economy into the abyss. Obama and his“ their economy is torn to pieces And moreover, with all this pressure on our country, control over the movement of capital was not introduced, which could have strengthened the ruble, but ultimately hit our economy even harder. All steps of the Central Bank were aimed at long-term perspective (popular support created a credit of trust), and not for the momentary “sausage imitated.” Everything that happened has demonstrated what no stability of our economy, plus now in the hands of our enemies, the trump cards have greatly diminished.
        ps And Fedorov's adherents need to either consult a doctor, or better get acquainted with economic concepts. "
  7. +15
    16 September 2015 17: 45
    Just today I was listening to Solovyov, how he walked around the Central Bank ... And here is the news ....
    For me, this is how our "partners" present awards to our citizens, if only they are especially distinguished in sabotage and sabotage ....
  8. FID
    +21
    16 September 2015 17: 45
    The State Department and the Federal Reserve will also give her a medal !!! Kudrin, Nabiulina, Gaidar, Chubais (both) .... The list will take VERY much space!
    1. +2
      16 September 2015 18: 11
      Quote: SSI
      . The list will take VERY much space!



      Sergey Ivanovich, do not worry ... If there are not enough medals (according to the list), the states will still stamp ...
  9. +15
    16 September 2015 17: 45
    Looks like the Russian denyushka is correctly located in a foreign country, Liberulina has spread too much, world-eaters noted! stop
  10. +10
    16 September 2015 17: 46
    Here is the best American overseer - THIS SOUNDS Proudly.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +2
    16 September 2015 17: 47
    Probably Rothschild himself pointed to her, dismiss without a golden parachute!
  13. +4
    16 September 2015 17: 47
    I want to say a lot of obscene things about these assessments but lowering them. Maybe we just give what we like according to good tradition?
    1. +2
      16 September 2015 18: 49
      And here, without mother words:

      I read the article in half a minute ...
      Is this our central bank?
      Or am I ... th (poorly studied)? laughing
  14. +15
    16 September 2015 17: 47
    The bourgeoisie scorch their bad guys, oh scorch!
  15. +12
    16 September 2015 17: 49
    The title of the best best leader of the Central Bank of all countries of the world for a good deed will not be given, so you definitely need to remove it.
  16. +14
    16 September 2015 17: 50
    Once praised by the vorog .... it's time to the wall.
  17. +8
    16 September 2015 17: 51
    Kudrin, not so long ago, was also recognized as the best minister of finance. Respect the breaker.
  18. msm
    msm
    +4
    16 September 2015 17: 54
    "This surname" speaks for itself - "Nab-ebulina". Or wrong - then excuse me!
  19. +2
    16 September 2015 17: 55
    Kudrin was also fired after such news)
  20. +7
    16 September 2015 17: 55
    I can’t understand being happy or crying. Either a provocation, or it was time for her to rest, until the Nobel Prize was awarded. No.
  21. +15
    16 September 2015 17: 56
    Hello, we woke up, the Central Bank is controlled from the outside, and if the key rate rises, then it will be bad for us, if it drops, it’s good, until article 15, paragraph 4, is removed from the Constitution of the Russian Federation, we do not expect anything good.
    1. 0
      16 September 2015 18: 58
      That would take the Central Bank or some other financier and said to banks operating in the Russian Federation:
      - Work guys. Give loans, trade currency, only ... dollar spread (the difference between buying and selling currency) will be equal to one penny.
      That would be good... good
  22. +20
    16 September 2015 17: 57
    Suddenly ... Elvira Nabiullina is recognized as the best of the leaders of the central banks of the world

    Well, why be surprised? We Grachev was the best minister of defense and Serdyukov is quite a competent person ....
    Let's take the momentary essence of the twitching of the Central Bank - I think many have already guessed that we are talking about giving money to "their" (and the adjoining medium-small riffraff) and cutting off "strangers" - in fact, this is the quintessence and essence of almost ALL actions of the top of the Russian Federation for everything the time of its existence.
    With a sharp increase in the rate of "strangers" at the "entrance" they cut off, and "friends" are playing out today (count under a trillion, you can't shove it up so quickly!). Now they need to cut off the "strangers" at the "exit" - not only cut them off, but also leave them at a loss in order to present their "heads" to the President and the public / crowd. If they succeed in this, well, then Gerashchenko raised / left a good shift and bred speculators. But not financial strategists on the scale of Russia - he himself, a good COMMERCIAL banker and their regulator, has never been a strategist, in the Central Bank of a normal country his ceiling was the position of the head of department.
    Well, if they can’t do this, they are absolutely useless people.
    A step by the Central Bank to increase the refinancing rate would be justified under the following conditions:
    - The Central Bank conducts massive currency interventions, stopping speculation,
    - the rate of the Central Bank will be dramatically reduced (below 10% for sure!)
    - The Central Bank will be provided with money for carrying out massive readjustments / liquidations / mergers of commercial banks (there are enough rubles - they cannot be missing! - but according to the current rules, the Central Bank cannot provide them - i.e., finally, these the most "rules")
    - the remaining commercial banks will lend to enterprises (primarily industrial and agricultural) according to government orders / decrees, in accordance with approved development programs.
    1. +7
      16 September 2015 18: 16
      Quote: Novel 1977
      the remaining commercial banks will begin lending to enterprises (primarily industrial and agricultural) according to the orders / decrees of the Government, in accordance with the approved development programs.



      Oh, dream ...

      So for this, except his Central Bank, you still need to have and its government !!!
  23. +11
    16 September 2015 17: 59
    Quote: neri73-r
    Bad sign!!! Definitely! We need to think about the GDP and speak well with the best head of the Central Bank in the world!


    And we also had the "best finance minister" in the world, who simply gave 100 billion (minimum!) Damn bucks in 2008 to the ruined super-reliable US funds, after which he hid under the plinth, and now broadcasts with terrible force on all TV channels in as a damn analyst and says that the government would not mind working for the good of the Motherland ...
    1. +1
      16 September 2015 18: 17
      Quote: iliitch
      and says that he would not mind working in the government for the good of the motherland ...



      But was he born in the USA ???
  24. +7
    16 September 2015 18: 00
    But what, could you expect another? The head of the Fed branch is recognized as the best, so it's really good! BUT! This is good for the West! But not for Russia at all.
  25. +8
    16 September 2015 18: 00
    If she is the best according to the British, then let her be taken to her. laughing
    1. 0
      16 September 2015 19: 01
      Quote: afrikanez
      If she is the best according to the British, then let her be taken to her. laughing

      Well, the next day, HSBC Bank will take away the license from the next day, this is the collapse of the global economy)))
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. +8
    16 September 2015 18: 03
    All actions of the Central Bank for this year were the height of incompetence and post-situational response ... There is no credit for the domestic real economy, as well as it was not ...
    1. +1
      16 September 2015 18: 22
      Quote: Altona
      There is no credit for the domestic real economy, however, it wasn’t.



      It's strange ... Judging by the information offered to "consumers", for example, Sberbank of Russia and its subsidiaries are doing nothing but investing in the real economy ...

      Other banks with state (!!!) participation are also talking about the same thing ...

      However, even if you look at their financial statements posted on the site (Oh !!! How did they become a "Public" joint-stock company instead of "Open", on the contrary, all the information was "screwed up"), then you see that the activity is in the field of lending investment loans - super maker ...
  28. +6
    16 September 2015 18: 04
    It's easy to become "the best head of the central bank" if you manage "candy wrappers". It's another matter when you manage the national currency.
    However - "who are the judges?" Those. which awarded the first place.

    The sooner the "best economists" like Siluanov and Nabiullina are trampled from the country's leadership, the sooner our economy will take the path of development.
  29. +7
    16 September 2015 18: 04
    Quote: KERTAK
    I am poorly versed in management and banking, but I have a different opinion. I think she (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition

    You can not understand, but watch the news? ASTRONOMIC refinancing rate (in the world 0,5-1,5%) of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation-AUTOMATICALLY increases the cost of loans to other banks and naturally to customers (manufacturers). It remains to buy and sell, but the production costs! If the enemy (or competitors) praises the chairman of the Central Bank for a reason, this is a mishandled Cossack. Has she studied, trained, participated in various programs in the USA? negative hi
  30. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 05
    You are wrong, citizens! This Euromani recorded Elya as the "best" apostle, as Putya praised her very much.
    And he praised his sidekick too. If this is a Judah’s kiss, then it’s good, if in fact, then you, citizens, will soon see a furry animal and not one ....
  31. The comment was deleted.
  32. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 06
    But the European economic magazine Euromoney really appreciates


    The title will be given soon. Best German, British, American. See how happy.
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. +7
    16 September 2015 18: 07
    Hmm ... a paradox! sad In China, for such a fall nat. she probably would have shot her currency .... Although if this is praise for wrecking, then everything is logical Yes
  35. +5
    16 September 2015 18: 07
    "Elvira Nabiullina is recognized as the best of the leaders of the central banks of the world" ...

    Something it reminds me of ... Ah, yes - the best finance minister of the world Kudrin !!!

    In general, the praise of the British magazine is the best characteristic for the fastest dismissal of Nabiullina from her post !!!
  36. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      16 September 2015 22: 44
      Thanks for the link.
    2. +1
      16 September 2015 23: 39
      Quote: dengy12
      support the gcd
      Show that you're coming wassat

      Cancel Art. 15 part 4 on the priority of generally recognized principles and norms of international law over Russian laws
      15.4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If international treaty Russian Federation rules other than those provided by law are established, the rules of the international treaty apply.

      Repeal of article 13, part 2, ban on ideology (without ideology, the country has no goal, national idea)
      Ideology is a system of political, legal, moral, religious, aesthetic and philosophical views and ideas in which people’s attitudes to reality are recognized and evaluated (value system)

      Simply put, NOD offers to enable the State Duma of the Russian Federation to legislatively establish the correct way of thinking and responsibility for its violation (and rightly so - why do slaves need their own thoughts laughing )

      Amend article 9, part 2, on natural resources (withdraw the right to private property, nationalize natural resources)
      Subsoil Law 1.2. Subsoil within the borders of the territory of the Russian Federation, including underground space and minerals contained in the subsoil, energy and other resources, are state property. Issues of ownership, use and disposal of mineral resources are jointly the responsibility of the Russian Federation and the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
      Subsoil plots may not be subject to purchase, sale, donation, inheritance, contribution, pledge or alienated in any other form. Subsoil use rights may be alienated or transferred from one person to another to the extent that their circulation is permitted by federal laws.

      The abolition of Article 75, Part 2, on the independence of the Central Bank (nationalization of the Central Bank, lower rates, the ability to print your own ruble).
      Nationalization is the transfer of private enterprises and sectors of the economy to state ownership.

      75.2. Protection and ensuring the stability of the ruble - the main function Central Bank of the Russian Federation (1.1. Russian Federation - Russia is a democratic federal legal state with the republican form of government), that he exercises independently from others bodies of state power.

      NCDs are typical opportunists, or, more simply, enemies of the people involved in chattering the true causes of negativity.
  37. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 11
    Decrypted in full. Order of her slouch from our people.
  38. -1
    16 September 2015 18: 11
    You can spit, but the proposal of "NOD" was not accepted by the central bank, Looks like GDP has not yet gained strength. Even Zhirik was for, why? Who pays ?
    Who in the subject, he will understand. And the spears broke, and cursed. Quotations from the constitution. And things aren’t there. sad And Nabiulina is a completed stage.
  39. +5
    16 September 2015 18: 12
    An urgent need to hold a referendum on the nationalization of the Central Bank, otherwise we are a karachun!
  40. +4
    16 September 2015 18: 12
    Kudrin was also the best while our loot sent to the Americans, so this one is there too.
  41. +4
    16 September 2015 18: 13
    But the European economic magazine Euromoney is very appreciated.
    Of course. The most failed currency. So MANAGE !!! necessary. To study for a long time and try hard. Appreciated.
  42. -2
    16 September 2015 18: 15
    Quote: KERTAK
    I am poorly versed in management and banking, but I have a different opinion. I think she (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition

    There is no need to be the Minister of Economy to understand what titanic work our Central Bank was able to do, stopping the slide of the economy into the abyss. Obama, with his "their economy is torn to shreds", has done a good job. Moreover, with all this pressure on our country, no control over the movement of capital was introduced, which could have strengthened the ruble, but ultimately hit our economy even harder. All the steps taken by the Central Bank were aimed at the long-term perspective (popular support created a credit of trust), and not at the momentary "sausage imitated". All that has happened has demonstrated what kind of stability of our economy, plus now in the hands of our enemies, the trump cards have greatly diminished.
    ps And the adherents of Fedorov need to either consult a doctor, or better familiarize themselves with economic concepts.
    1. +1
      16 September 2015 19: 07
      Who is Obama? A small, African-American political figure ... during the time of Vladimir Russia. Central Bank ... long-term ... plus ...
      The only pity is to live in this beautiful time
      I don’t have to - neither to me, nor to you ...


      Wolves herd completely cut out ... Eat, not eat, - it is not known ... stocks were made ... laughing
    2. 0
      16 September 2015 19: 12
      Support. Plus!
  43. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 15
    I think she will go along the path of Kudrin!
  44. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 17
    "Elvira Nabiullina is recognized as the best of the leaders of the central banks of the world"

    They all lie.
    The best is our Kalimbetov!
    Already up to 301 tenge per dollar reached today (and on August 19 there were 188 tags per dollar)
  45. +5
    16 September 2015 18: 17
    The best undertaker in the world of national currency, how come.
  46. +1
    16 September 2015 18: 22
    It is necessary as soon as possible to zababiulit this elvira away from the central bank.
  47. +6
    16 September 2015 18: 23
    Quote: afrikanez SU
    If she is the best according to the British, then let her be taken to her. laughing


    Only first check all accounts and relatives too! am
  48. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 26
    The henchman of the West in the center of the banking system of Russia! Hence the "best". But really, it is a time bomb in the very heart of the State! Who overlooked ... or so nuno! ??? Who? (IMHO.)
  49. +10
    16 September 2015 18: 26
    “THE BANK OF RUSSIA CONTINUES TO SERVE THE INTERESTS OF FOREIGN CAPITAL”

    To conduct an independent policy, it is necessary to manage its economic development. By controlling the reproduction of the national economy, the adversary can manipulate the behavior of the business community, critically affecting the living conditions of society. The war with him in such circumstances cannot be won, which makes it impossible to pursue an independent foreign policy. It follows from this that the independent foreign policy course of the Russian leadership should be supported by the restoration of national sovereignty and control over the reproduction and development of its own economy.

    The most important condition for neutralizing Western sanctions is the transition from external to internal sources of credit. Proposals repeatedly made by Russian scientists and experts to solve this problem are categorically rejected by the leadership of the Bank of Russia, which continues to focus on serving the interests of foreign capital in its policy.

    Until now, despite the sad experience of the outflow of foreign speculative capital in 1998, 2008 and 2014, the Bank of Russia continues to pursue a policy of full openness of the Russian financial market, without taking proper measures both to counteract the export of capital and to create internal sources of credit. Due to this policy, the money supply in the Russian economy is formed mainly against foreign liabilities and remains clearly insufficient to finance even the simple reproduction of fixed capital. Its result was a deep external dependence of the Russian economy on the external market, its raw material specialization, the degradation of the investment sector and the decline of the manufacturing industry, the subordination of the financial system to the interests of foreign capital, in favor of which an annual transfer of 120-150 billion dollars is made (Appendix 3) . The Bank of Russia policy of raising interest rates and limiting the volume of credit against the backdrop of freezing external sources of credit entails a contraction in money supply, a drop in production and investment, as well as a chain of bankruptcies of enterprises with negative social consequences.
    The economic recovery, which, due to the objective state of production factors last year was to amount to 3-5% of GDP growth, was stopped by a sequential increase in the key interest rate of the Central Bank over the average level of profitability of the real sector of the economy. This increase was made on the basis of the standard IMF recommendation to reduce inflation by raising interest rates.

    In practice, such a policy leads to the economy falling into a stagflation trap. Numerous studies have been carried out over the past two decades, indicating that raising interest rates and tightening the money supply, as a rule, do not lead to a decrease in inflation, but always and everywhere entail a drop in production and investment, as well as a banking crisis and an avalanche of bankruptcies. In addition, in our conditions of demonetization and monopolization of the economy, they are accompanied not by a decrease, but by an increase in inflation.

    The second blunder of the Central Bank was the transition to free float of the ruble. There is no scientific evidence of its need for inflation targeting. On the contrary, in conditions of the Russian economy being overly open, its exports dependent on oil prices and a high share of imports in the consumer market, free exchange rate formation is incompatible with ensuring macroeconomic stability. Fluctuations in prices on the world market, an attack by financial speculators or any other change in foreign economic conditions may overturn plans to achieve the inflation target.


    Report by Sergey Glazyev: “Speech on urgent measures to repel threats to the existence of Russia”
  50. +4
    16 September 2015 18: 26
    Only the nationalization of the Central Bank!
    1. +2
      16 September 2015 18: 39
      Friend, I’ll tell you a terrible secret, you can’t nationalize what is already the property of the state ...
      1. 0
        16 September 2015 19: 27
        And I will reveal to you an even more terrible secret
        Article 1 of the Federal Law of July 10, 2002 No. 86-ФЗ “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)” states:

        The status, objectives, functions and powers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia) are determined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, this Federal Law and other federal laws.

        The functions and powers stipulated by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and this Federal Law are performed by the Bank of Russia independently of other federal government bodies, government bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local governments.

        The Bank of Russia is a legal entity. The Bank of Russia has a seal with the State Emblem of the Russian Federation and with its name.
        1. +2
          16 September 2015 19: 46
          If you read the entire Wikipedia article with which you copied this quote, you probably would have noticed the following:
          "In accordance with the Federal Law of the Russian Federation" On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia) ", the Bank of Russia is a legal entity. The authorized capital and other property of the Bank of Russia are federal property, while the Bank of Russia is endowed with property and financial independence. "..." The financial independence of the Bank of Russia is expressed in the fact that it carries out its expenses at the expense of own income".
          And from your quote:
          "The status, goals of activity, functions and powers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia) are determined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, this Federal Law and other federal laws." That, as it were, hints to us, the Central Bank, having a fair amount of independence, still operates within the strictly limited framework of legislation and law, its actual "owner" - the state.
          1. -1
            16 September 2015 20: 01
            "The status, goals of activity, functions and powers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia) are determined Constitution of the Russian Federation, this Federal Law and other federal laws. "And now we read the Constitution 15.4. (The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than are provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty shall apply).What matters now, the Central Bank branch of the IMF!
            1. +2
              16 September 2015 20: 14
              I see only what I want to see, right?
              Can you imagine the difference between the concepts of a treaty (as the relationship between two economic entities), international law and state law?
              Apparently not ... Otherwise, problems with the interpretation of this provision would not have arisen.
              1. +1
                16 September 2015 20: 24
                Heh .. the Yeltsin’s constitution was written by American advisers in order to have problems with interpretation. The Central Bank is not under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, the prosecutor's office cannot check it. You are mistaken if you think that the Central Bank is state property.
                1. +2
                  16 September 2015 20: 30
                  Quote: 35lisment35
                  The Central Bank is not within the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, the prosecutor’s office cannot check

                  Where did you read this? And where does the prosecutor’s office?

                  Quote: http://www.banki.ru/wikibank/natsionalnyiy_bankovskiy_sovet/
                  11) making proposals to the State Duma on conducting an audit Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation financial and economic activities of the Bank of Russia, its structural divisions and institutions;


                  The Accounts Chamber - it’s better than the prosecutor’s office, so you know .. laughing
            2. +1
              16 September 2015 20: 36
              Quote: 35lisment35
              The status, objectives, functions and powers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia) are determined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, this Federal Law and other federal laws

              Well yes.. wink

              Quote: 35lisment35
              And now we are reading Constitution 15.4. (The universally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If the international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those prescribed by law, then the rules of the international treaty apply)

              One to the other - it just doesn’t belong to any side ..

              Quote: 35lisment35
              What matters now, the Central Bank branch of the IMF!

              Like in a joke almost:

              Given: the girl was called "a fisherman". The girl (blonde, hike) begins to think:

              - Fish is a pike ..
              - Pike are teeth ..
              - Teeth is a dog ..
              - A dog is a suka ..

              Aloud, loudly: "People, he called me a fuck!"

              So it’s exactly the same for you .. if you hadn’t climbed, something incomprehensible in you.

              Although - plus Oh, hammer in, do not hesitate laughing
            3. -1
              17 September 2015 00: 03
              Quote: 35lisment35
              If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than are provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty shall apply).What questions now
              Very simple:

              Who signs international treaties on behalf of the Russian Federation?

              Who will ratify them in the form of federal laws?

              Who signs these federal laws?

              What to do with the first part of article 1, and with the 15th part of article 6 of the constitution?
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. -3
            16 September 2015 20: 25
            And what is "the actual owner"? what It’s kind of like lying on the road and someone picked it up? There are legal grounds for the emergence of property rights. In none of them is the CBR state property.
            1. -1
              16 September 2015 20: 27
              Quote: siberalt
              There are legal grounds for the emergence of property rights. In none of them is the CBR publicly owned

              The Bank itself is not. His property is yes.

              FEDERAL LAW ON THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (BANK OF RUSSIA) July 10, 2002 N86-ФЗ

              Article 2. The authorized capital and other property of the Bank of Russia are federal property. (...)
              1. -3
                16 September 2015 20: 37
                And what is the property in general? Property is a building, furniture, appliances, it is federal property. But the Central Bank does not have an independent right to issue ruble.
                1. 0
                  16 September 2015 20: 52
                  Quote: 35lisment35
                  Property is a building, furniture, appliances, yes it is federal property

                  Yeah .. as well as all of the Bank’s assets, you’ll be surprised ..

                  Quote: 35lisment35
                  the Central Bank does not have an independent right to issue ruble

                  Stir warm with soft again ..

                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  Quote: Zubilo

                  Fact is that now Russia can print rubles as much as it has dollars (+/-). This is the basic rule of the IMF - "Full Reserve"

                  This rule is mandatory for the IMF creditor countries (see Washington Consensus). The Russian Federation repaid IMF loans and is not obliged to follow this rule

                  Explain available yet?

                  I repeat: do not argue about what you don’t understand anything about ..
                  1. 0
                    16 September 2015 21: 01
                    The ax is rusted!
              2. 0
                16 September 2015 20: 46
                Article 1 of the Federal Law of July 10, 2002 No. 86-ФЗ “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)” states:
                Functions and powers provided for by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and this Federal Law, The Bank of Russia carries out independently of other federal bodies of state power, bodies of state power subjects of the Russian Federation and local governments.
                Once again, INDEPENDENT from public authorities !!!!
                1. 0
                  16 September 2015 20: 57
                  Quote: 35lisment35
                  Once again, INDEPENDENT from public authorities !!!!

                  I know it by heart .. And what ?? Why is it bad, clearly explain already wink

                  - The property of the Central Bank is the property of the Russian Federation
                  - The Central Bank itself is controlled by this:

                  The National Banking Council (NBS) is a collegial governing body of the Bank of Russia. It includes 12 people.

                  The composition of the NBS is determined as follows:

                  - 2 participants are sent by the Federation Council - from among the senators;
                  - 3 - from among the deputies of the choice of the State Duma;
                  - 3 are appointed by the President of the Russian Federation;
                  - 3 - by the government;
                  - 12-th member of the Council - Chairman of the Bank of Russia


                  What's wrong? Where is the insidious enemy? Asya ?? fool
                  1. 0
                    16 September 2015 21: 09
                    WHAT'S NOT SO? The fact that this office is not controlled by anyone on the territory of Russia. The enemy in this is the interest on loans, the rate we have now .... It is naive to believe that the Fed is state property) collegial management body of the Bank of Russia- these are people who sign papers with the IMF, they do not produce governing documents. And the people are being hammered into their heads "such an economic situation" has developed. And think for yourself, if this is state property to what then the ruble is tied? And why did we have reserves in 2014 of 500 billion dollars and the exchange rate was not supported ... winked
                    1. 0
                      16 September 2015 21: 20
                      Quote: 35lisment35
                      this office is not controlled by anyone in Russia

                      National - (damn) - Banking - Council.. is appointed by the State Duma, the Government of the Russian Federation, the President, hereinafter in the text .. holds the Central Bank by the Adam's apple literally .. "is not controlled"? Phe ..

                      Quote: 35lisment35
                      hence the interest on loans

                      Commercial banks earn interest on loans, the Central Bank rate is quite loyal compared to their interest ..

                      I’ll tell you a terrible secret: the Central Bank does not lend to enterprises and private traders. Has no right. Only commercial banks secured by them, commercial banks, assets .. and they lend to enterprises and you .. without forgetting to bite off your (sickly) piece.

                      You ask what the Central Bank rate is right now, and what - on consumer loans, at least .. Schaub I lived like a commercial woman.

                      Quote: 35lisment35
                      It is naive to believe that the Fed is state property

                      Does anyone think so? belay
                      1. 0
                        16 September 2015 21: 29
                        Key rate + bank margin percentage = huge lending rate at the end .... and now look what the key rate is in Europe, America, Japan - why can't we bring it down to 0% ?? Or are we "underdeveloped"?
                      2. -1
                        16 September 2015 21: 51
                        Quote: 35lisment35
                        see what is the key rate in Europe, America, Japan, why we can not reduce it to 0%

                        Envy is not good laughing

                        Read the literature, delve into ..

                        Quote: 35lisment35
                        Or are we "underdeveloped"?

                        And this, by the way, is also .. but not only that what

                        Quote: 35lisment35
                        Key rate + bank margin percentage = giant loan interest output

                        While there is no real control over the commercial banks - you lower the Central Bank rate to at least -10 - the output will be the same .. and for commercial banks the margin will increase ..

                        But there is no control - real - yet. Movements in this direction are being made, and quite right for myself .. I say the same:

                        Quote: A.S. Pushkin
                        ... Learn, my son: science shortens
                        Us experiences of fast-moving life

                      3. 0
                        16 September 2015 21: 54
                        Quote: Cat Man Null
                        Quote: 35lisment35
                        see what is the key rate in Europe, America, Japan, why we can not reduce it to 0%

                        Envy is not good laughing

                        Read the literature, delve into ..

                        Quote: 35lisment35
                        Or are we "underdeveloped"?

                        And this, by the way, is also .. but not only that what


                        Well explained, thanks.
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. 0
                16 September 2015 20: 46
                Yeah. Still, the budget funds invested in the Central Bank would become the Bank's own property. This is nonsense. One Kennedy was spanked only because he raised the question of the nationalization of the Fed. laughing And that is why Russia does not have the right to open a state bank, of which the so-called "developed states" are allowed to have a separate issue directly related to financial and therefore economic sovereignty.
                1. 0
                  16 September 2015 20: 59
                  From the fact that you have opened a personal account in the bank, you do not become the owner of this Bank.
                  The state is when his bank, telegraph (communication) and station (railway). Only by analyzing this, did Lenin build a new state in 5 years. And the Russian Federation gave back to private traders. So what?
                2. 0
                  16 September 2015 21: 00
                  Quote: siberalt
                  Still, the budget funds invested in the Central Bank would become the Bank's own property

                  Sibiralt .. eco flakes you .. but a competent person ..

                  Quote: siberalt
                  And this is why Russia has no right to open a state bank, which the so-called "developed states" are allowed to have

                  - where is it written that "has no right"? And why "open" if there is already a Central Bank? I don't understand (c)
                  - a list of "developed countries" with such fluffy white "state banks" - into the studio ..

                  PS: No .. I’m dreaming, and I’m dreaming about all this laughing
              5. -3
                16 September 2015 21: 00
                _ People are corrupt!
  51. +2
    16 September 2015 18: 26
    I see that people appreciated the award)))
  52. +4
    16 September 2015 18: 26
    Quote: Vadim12
    But what, could you expect another? The head of the Fed branch is recognized as the best, so it's really good! BUT! This is good for the West! But not for Russia at all.


    Well, of course, here they are, rubbing their sweaty, sticky little hands! But we have the best privatizer in the world. I won’t list the achievements of this organism - everyone knows, I know one thing for sure - we will have breakthroughs in nanotechnology at the “nano” level, and the question arises: “HOW LONG?” this public will rule.
  53. +4
    16 September 2015 18: 29
    I think this is in gratitude to her for the joint (together with the DAM government) final ditching of the farming or peasant economy of the Russian Federation, by completely cutting off this category of our citizens from lending. Thus, ruining the very opportunity for us to feed ourselves with our own agricultural products, and not buy imported products grown using the most modern Western technologies.

    And since they cannot crush us by force, they will crush GMOs.
    Ek I got carried away. But my soul is surprisingly disgusting. And this news is especially disgusting after the elections.
    That’s it, I stop, I’m afraid I’ll end up declaring my love for GDP.
    1. +1
      17 September 2015 12: 23
      Quote: Vladimir 1964
      I think this is in gratitude to her for the joint (together with the DAM government) final ditching of the farming or peasant economy of the Russian Federation, by completely cutting off this category of our citizens from lending.

      And who put them in their places? Would you like to say “thank you” to him?
  54. +6
    16 September 2015 18: 30
    We do not appreciate the head of the Russian Central Bank, we do not appreciate ... But the European economic journal Euromoney appreciates very much. The magazine published materials that stated that the head of the Bank of Russia Elvira Nabiullina was recognized as the “leader of the year” - the best among all the leaders of the central banks of the countries of the world.

    Maybe we’ve had enough of leaders who are valued in the West - the hunchbacked Judas who destroyed the Union and received the Nobel Prize for it, Pokhmeltsin, whom the West approvingly patted on the shoulder while Russia, with the help of American advisers, was in shock and was sliding into the abyss, and others of lesser rank, who were diligently trying to “place” Russia in the wake of the west! Isn’t it time to consider this Western praise as a reason for serious “organizational conclusions”, since it’s not just about praising Nabiullina, but it’s time, together with the entire pro-Western lib..al team steering the Russian economy, to drive with a filthy broom!
  55. -3
    16 September 2015 18: 31
    And the fact that the Russian economic system is maintained in conditions of falling oil prices and the value of the ruble, a reduction in GDP, economic sanctions, and huge external debts of domestic companies only thanks to the actions of the central bank, no matter how interesting it is to anyone?
    “If they praise it, it means she is working for the enemy” (c)???
    Dear forum users, maybe it’s time to turn on your brain a little and stop communicating (thinking) only with slogans? sad
    1. +6
      16 September 2015 18: 45
      Let me turn on my brain and ask you a few questions. Namely:
      1. Rescue of our banking system, namely the injection of funds into private banks with a controlling stake of the state. Is this not speculation on exchange rates?
      2. We seem to be under sanctions and “with all our might” we are striving to become “technically and product independent.” For this reason, even a “turn to the East” was initiated and practically carried out. Have you ever seen the line - RMB RATE?
      Apart from the dollar and the euro, and sometimes even the pound, I haven’t seen anywhere. Even on state TV channels. Following the praises of the Eastern Partnership comes the exchange rate of the above currencies...
      3. At this very convenient moment, who is stopping us from saying that starting tomorrow we will sell our hydrocarbons, timber, precious metals only for rubles!!!. If we are under sanctions, then who said that we cannot do this? We have every right not only to ban sprats. But no... We’ll save the buck and the euro.
      1. -2
        16 September 2015 18: 58
        1. They themselves answered - saving private banks = saving deposits and legal accounts. and physical persons Or do you think that if these banks began to close en masse, and depositors who lost all their money in these banks began to gather at their doorsteps, it would be better?
        2. A generally meaningless set of words: “yuan exchange rate”, “technically and product-independent”, “turn to the East”. What does all this have to do with the internal policy of the Central Bank aimed at stabilizing our economy?
        3. We can say whatever our heart desires, even if we sell oil by weight for diamonds. Just who cares? Trade is an equal relationship between buyer and seller, and if one of them sets unacceptable conditions, then interaction between them will not work. And even if so, we will sell this oil for rubles, but who will take them when we need to pay off our foreign partners? And yes, the Central Bank has nothing to do with this....
        1. +2
          16 September 2015 20: 25
          1. And how many people have already had their licenses taken away? Someone's fate is legal. physical cared about people other than themselves?
          2. How will the Central Bank stabilize OUR economy? Only the dollar-oil balancer? and redistribution of funds from these speculations? After all, the internal currency - the Ruble - in this case plays a secondary role.
          3. That’s it, “equal relations” - do you want gas? First buy a ruble on the stock exchange, then for this ruble buy technology from Israel (something that we need), supply that technology to us, and we will supply gas to you. The difference in cost is determined by political will and the need for gas or technology. But we pay off the difference in rubles. They will run to buy rubles!!! How can they run!!!
          1. +1
            17 September 2015 03: 32
            1. Do you watch the news at least sometimes? If not, then look for a list of banks with revoked licenses over the past year. And by the way, the Central Bank reimburses the funds of these investors from its own funds. Suddenly, right?
            2.Increasing the credit rate, maintaining the ruble exchange rate through foreign exchange interventions, supervision and control over the activities of banks and other financial institutions and much more...
            3. "The difference in cost is determined by political will and the need for gas or technology." Holy shit, explain to me what this has to do with the Central Bank of Russia??? This organization is not involved in such issues at all!!!
          2. +1
            17 September 2015 04: 15
            Quote: NDR-791
            How will the Central Bank stabilize OUR economy? Only the balancer "dollar-oil"

            “Dollar-oil” is not determined by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. It is determined by foreign exchanges, which have nothing to do with the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, yes..

            Quote: NDR-791
            domestic currency - the ruble in this case plays a secondary role.

            “The devaluation of the national currency leads to an increase in the competitiveness of the national economy.”. learn the ABCs, or something..

            What did the Central Bank do? In fact, the ruble devalued.. ABOUT HOW what

            Quote: NDR-791
            want gas? Buy a ruble on the exchange first, then for this ruble, buy technology from Israel, for example (anything that we need), supply that technology to us, and we will give you gas.

            Did Israel itself tell you that it is ready to sell something for rubles? Those rubles didn't hurt him...

            Total: what nonsense you are talking about, my dear.. negative
        2. 0
          16 September 2015 20: 53
          Moreover, our dispute is not over yet. Do you want answers? I have a LOT of them!
      2. 0
        17 September 2015 04: 02
        Quote: NDR-791
        1. Rescue of our banking system, namely the injection of funds into private banks with a controlling stake of the state. Is this not speculation on exchange rates?

        Loans to commercial banks are secured by their assets. Turn on your brain wink

        Quote: NDR-791
        3. At this very convenient moment, who is stopping us from saying that starting tomorrow we will sell our hydrocarbons, timber, precious metals only for rubles!!!. If we are under sanctions, then who said that we cannot do this? We have every right not only to ban sprats.

        Hmm... imagine the situation:

        - you borrowed 100 rubles from a neighbor
        - and instead of 100 rubles they brought him N Mongolian tugriks, for example. The sum is the same
        - Guess three times where your neighbor will put these tugriks for you?

        There are contracts denominated in dollars. The same agreements between Gazprom and the EU. And the partner has the right to pay whatever is convenient for him. That is, in bucks.

        All other tricks (of Gazprom, for example) immediately fall into the category of force majeure, followed by fines (and they are clearly spelled out there), and so on.

        There is movement in this direction, look on the Internet for “St. Petersburg International Commodity and Raw Materials Exchange” - you will learn a lot of new things Yes

        Quote: NDR-791
        2. We seem to be under sanctions and “with all our might” we are striving to become “technically and product independent.” For this reason, even a “turn to the East” was initiated and practically carried out. Have you ever seen the line - RMB RATE?

        Hmm... well, for example:
  56. +2
    16 September 2015 18: 36
    Here is another similar example of “objectivity”:

    In the latest “democracy ranking” published by the international organization Freedom House, Estonia received second place in the list of 29 states of the former socialist camp of Central and Eastern Europe.

    It all comes down to a well-known expression: "And who are the judges?"
  57. +1
    16 September 2015 18: 36
    Shaigu, Lavrov are not the best, Nabiulina? to Putin. This is dangerous.
  58. +1
    16 September 2015 18: 38
    Quote: fake
    You are wrong, citizens! This Euromani recorded Elya as the "best" apostle, as Putya praised her very much.
    And he praised his sidekick too. If this is a Judah’s kiss, then it’s good, if in fact, then you, citizens, will soon see a furry animal and not one ....

    They (fur-bearing animals) live with us... on a regular basis.
  59. +1
    16 September 2015 18: 38
    Quote: Lyapis
    Dear forum users, maybe it’s time to turn on your brain a little and stop communicating (thinking) only with slogans?

    Well, they turned it on! Who should I send to X.ER? smile ? For slogans I’ll do 20 pull-ups 42 times.
    1. +2
      16 September 2015 18: 42
      Who should I send to X.ER? smile

      Anyone! Fortunately, permission is not required for this. laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        16 September 2015 21: 25
        Well, they turned it on! Who should I send to X.ER? Anyone! Fortunately, permission is not required for this. laughing smile? For slogans I’ll do 20 pull-ups 42 times.
        STRR Swarm on the windowsills!!! There was no team to growl at each other! And in general, a good day “drunkard” is only the day after tomorrow!
  60. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 44
    Quote: KERTAK
    I am poorly versed in management and banking, but I have a different opinion. I think she (Nabiullina) deserves this recognition

    Yes, she really deserved it by working hard for Western “partners”, and not for Russia and its citizens, considering that according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Central Bank is not controlled by the government of the Russian Federation! Its actions are managed by the IMF, of which the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is a branch, like many other banks in developing countries. And now it is clear why the work of the Central Bank and Ms. Naebulina was recognized by the leadership of the IMF as successful - the country cannot get rid of the dominance of the dollar, even within the Russian Federation, i.e. Russia, with the help of the Central Bank, remains on a short leash with the IMF and the real rulers in this world of pseudo-liberal capitalism. And this leash does not allow Russia to rise from its knees! laughing am
  61. +4
    16 September 2015 18: 46
    People, don’t be idiots, look at the key rate of the Central Bank - not a single business can take out a loan!!! Only our oil and gas industry is profitable... We are a colony of the West, that’s a fact!
  62. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 47
    Kudrin was also recognized as the best finance minister in the world. Oh, this is not good. Enemies praise that the chairman of the Central Bank must be urgently changed.
  63. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 48
    Is the hit list growing?
  64. The comment was deleted.
  65. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 50
    Yeltsin and GorbAtogo were also praised, you know FOR WHAT!!! recourse
  66. +7
    16 September 2015 18: 52
    Elvira Nabiulina stabilizes the ruble
  67. +4
    16 September 2015 18: 54
    “Euromoney magazine really appreciates...” let them take it for themselves... you can stuff both mudrin and khref into the “bank steamer”...
  68. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 57
    Yeah... Such a “good manager” was framed. But don’t flatter yourself, friends, they still won’t remove her from such a feeding trough. Because, like Mr. Taburetkin, he manages his estate correctly. And only the people have complaints about her. But who will listen to him...
  69. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 58
    When enemies praise....))))))))))))
    This is something like Klitschko’s “best measure”.

    In general, they made a subtle joke on us.

    But the really good leaders are those who don’t have a crisis in their country.
    1. 0
      16 September 2015 19: 05
      When there is no crisis in the country, even a mediocre leader can cope. A good head is one that can overcome a crisis.
  70. -3
    16 September 2015 18: 58
    SHOOT!
  71. +3
    16 September 2015 18: 58
    Quote: kotvov
    Nabiullina) deserved this recognition,
    so Kudrin was at one time the same, recognized as the best minister. I think for the continuation of Kudrin’s reforms, and this one was awarded the best ....., the ellipses are free.


    Eh.. In the history of Russia there were everyone... - great rulers, and great commanders and doctors, and poets and scientists.
    But I don’t remember any great ECONOMISTS... Maybe it’s time for these liberal creatives and PR people to go to Siberia, otherwise they replace each other, one by one, and everyone is celebrating old age over the hill.
    The first bell rang...
  72. +3
    16 September 2015 19: 02
    They praise Gorbachev, Chubais and Yeltsin. State Department agent Elvirka! Praised for good work
    1. +2
      16 September 2015 19: 19
      Quote: Million
      They praise Gorbachev, Chubais and Yeltsin. State Department agent Elvirka! Praised for good work

      no matter what you say on the forum. drained the country. when did such Elvirs and Chubais appear?
  73. +2
    16 September 2015 19: 08
    And I think everything is simpler! In Russia there is such a post. Woman. In the European Parliament they want to make half of the deputies female. Ordinary feminism and grafting it into Russia. Here the article was about research by the US Marine Service. For some reason, mixed groups are inferior to purely male groups. And why? And why do women high jump 203 and men 242? And why are women playing chess with women at championships? In general, they became equal to men from some pies? Let them make PIES! Then there will definitely be no war.))))
  74. +2
    16 September 2015 19: 11
    Well, mattress makers openly congratulate their agents
  75. +2
    16 September 2015 19: 12
    In short, she pleased them. the forum members are right. the enemy is already here
  76. +2
    16 September 2015 19: 13
    This means we need to change it urgently. If your partners praise you, expect trouble.
    1. 0
      16 September 2015 19: 15
      Quote: KRIG55
      This means we need to change it urgently. If your partners praise you, expect trouble.

      Here. exactly
    2. -3
      16 September 2015 19: 23
      But in the last couple of days, foreign media have come out with the following headlines:
      “Putin is capable of pushing Washington around,” “The West is to blame for the bloodshed in Ukraine and Syria, and Putin holds the key to breakthrough decisions,” etc.
      It seems like partners praise... So what? Are we urgently changing Putin???
      1. 0
        16 September 2015 22: 25
        Quote: Lyapis
        It seems like partners praise... So what? Are we urgently changing Putin???

        But they didn’t officially celebrate him in any way, they didn’t even give him the Nobel Peace Prize - it was all for his friends. So Putin is in no way suitable to be a friend of the West, rather the opposite, but about Nabiulina you can really think about it, very...
  77. +5
    16 September 2015 19: 17
    This is how our banks turn out
    1. +2
      16 September 2015 19: 21
      Quote: RuslanNN
      This is how our banks turn out

      Yes, this thing has been among bankers for a long time. Look at the happy faces in the photo. like after the grandiose "Obbank"
  78. +1
    16 September 2015 19: 20
    Considering that Russian politicians and economists are rarely given laudatory reviews by leading Western publications, and are often ignored in terms of awarding prizes, recognition of Ms. Nabiullina’s merits by a British magazine looks somewhat ambiguous


    If an enemy praises your friend, then he is your enemy!
  79. dsi
    +1
    16 September 2015 19: 21
    I guess this is a "black mark". The Central Bank has been ruling as it wants for many years - its own state within a state. In China, for example, the central bank employs 2500 employees, in the USA -12500, and in Russia - 71000, and our central bank is the worst.
    Why do they praise that they have started to change the system, and therefore they don’t speak badly about the dead...
    1. 0
      16 September 2015 19: 25
      Quote: dsi
      I guess this is a "black mark". The Central Bank has been ruling as it wants for many years - its own state within a state. In China, for example, the central bank employs 2500 employees, in the USA -12500, and in Russia - 71000, and our central bank is the worst.
      Why do they praise that they have started to change the system, and therefore they don’t speak badly about the dead...

      It’s just a plus for you that they started talking about the dead. and in the event of a revolution, the nabiuina will be dug up and buried again.
  80. 0
    16 September 2015 19: 23
    Nabiulina is twirling our ruble. laughing
  81. +1
    16 September 2015 19: 23
    “Partners” began to praise us, we urgently need to change Nabiulina
  82. +1
    16 September 2015 19: 25
    Quote: Asadali
    I support Sid.74! I agree with our commentators that if our "foes" praise ours, especially in the field of finance, there is reason to think and ask the question: "What's the catch? Where is the dog buried?"
    However, personally I, without praise of Euromoney, sympathize with Elvira N.
    In order not to be unsubstantiated and cut off the shoulder and to be objective, I propose to indicate with what and what actions our commentators and their proposals specifically agree or disagree with what they would do in her place.

    I combed through the subordinates Who control commercial banks to begin with Core assets And at the same time I would reduce the number of loafers at least to the level of China (and there are only 2300 people working there) And this should have been done YESTERDAY Or she left if she has a conscience (although where did officials of such a high rank come from? conscience) for those who lost their deposits and accounts with postings in commercial banks during reorganizations and went bankrupt For the waste of people's money when paying deposits by the Deposit Insurance Agency to clients of stolen banks
  83. +2
    16 September 2015 19: 27
    Well, if they are “for her”. it means she is doing everything right for them. consider this assessment to be its exposure. to jail for twenty. American agent.
  84. +1
    16 September 2015 19: 27
    here you go!
    if this is the best, then show me the worst...
  85. +3
    16 September 2015 19: 29
    Oh, it’s not without reason that she was so appreciated, it’s not without reason!
    Remember, 1997 - Chubais is the best MF, 2007 - Kudrin.
    What happened a year later in both cases, I must say, we all remember.
    We will still experience the consequences of this “betterness” to the fullest... and no one will be to blame.
    1. +1
      16 September 2015 19: 32
      Quote: VladimS
      Oh, it’s not without reason that she was so appreciated, it’s not without reason!
      Remember, 1997 - Chubais is the best MF, 2007 - Kudrin.
      What happened a year later in both cases, I must say, we all remember.
      We will still experience the consequences of this “betterness” to the fullest... and no one will be to blame.

      why no one? Chubais or his relatives (blood feud) will hang on a lamppost with Nabiulina or his relatives
  86. 0
    16 September 2015 19: 34
    Well, what a face you have, my dear...
  87. +3
    16 September 2015 19: 37
    Compared to how much harm Nabiulina and her organized crime group brought to Russia, all Western sanctions are just childish pranks. Shooting this scum from a cannon, as the Chinese do, is the best thing to do. wassat
  88. dsi
    0
    16 September 2015 19: 43
    Quote: ARS56
    in accordance with the Russian Constitution, the Central Bank is independent of the Russian government and is subordinate to the US Federal Reserve

    And where are you, plin, representatives from the US Federal Reserve?

    Who said anything about representatives? You probably don’t know that a number of these citizens of the “sole superpower” wrote the Russian constitution, and wrote it in such a way that they do not need to be present here to confirm their exclusivity.
  89. +1
    16 September 2015 19: 48
    I agree with those who write that it is time for the GDP to resolve the issue with the economic bloc in the government. This doesn't look like a throw-in.
  90. 0
    16 September 2015 19: 52
    In short, this pinda is fucked up
  91. SAA
    +1
    16 September 2015 19: 54
    Somehow they rated her poorly. Gorbachev was given an order and a cash prize for the collapse of the USSR. And she just has good words. It's time for her to open a foundation in Germany and move there to lecture.
  92. +1
    16 September 2015 19: 56
    The pinnacle of a career. And recognition of great services to America. It is a pity that in the USA there is no award under the sonorous name “Hero of the United States”. All some kind of Masonic eagles, and medals.
  93. +1
    16 September 2015 19: 57
    We don’t appreciate the head of the Russian Central Bank, we don’t... But the European economic magazine Euromoney really appreciates him.
    This means that she is pursuing the wrong policy for Russia. Otherwise, why would the British suddenly start praising her?
  94. 0
    16 September 2015 19: 59
    In those areas, “whose experience is it from?” it is difficult to make out, as in group adult films. Since she was recognized as the best, it means she worked well. Actions and decisions that suck today turn out to be quite the opposite tomorrow. This Naibulina girl is not on her own and does not work on her own. They manage it in every way. Global "chess" implies a variety of "pieces" on the board. Praising the rook or another piece does not mean that it will not be sacrificed on the next move. Exchange for championship on the board.
  95. +1
    16 September 2015 20: 02
    But Kudrin is the best economist, according to the Western version, and now Nabiulina... Something is alarming. Something like this: what is good for a Russian is death for a German, or vice versa...
  96. The comment was deleted.
  97. +1
    16 September 2015 20: 14
    When the enemy praises you, you should think about whether you are rowing in the right direction!
    I remembered the case of Gorbachev, who was also once recognized as the best German and given silver coins...
    For Nabiullina, this is the first wake-up call and it will come back to haunt her!
  98. The comment was deleted.
  99. 0
    16 September 2015 20: 30
    Glazyev in her place and listen to their screams...
  100. +1
    16 September 2015 20: 50
    I am overcome by “vague suspicions” that this award is connected with Glazyev’s report presented to the Security Council on September 15.09.15, XNUMX: “On additional measures to neutralize threats to the economic security of the Russian Federation in the context of international sanctions.” Glazyev has previously repeatedly harshly criticized the actions of the Central Bank in the current situation....so the Anglo-Saxons “insured themselves” IMHO.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"