France called the conditions for the transfer of Russia "Mistral"

October 10 2014 242

After the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs made a complaint on France the day before about the indecision regarding the delivery of Mistral-type helicopter carriers, the French Ambassador to Russia, Jean-Maurice Ripert, decided to justify himself. Reaper says that the decision on the transfer of Mistral to Russia depends on how the situation in Ukraine will unfold further. Logic, giving away Western rottenness ...

France called the conditions for the transfer of Russia "Mistral"

Reaper quotes news agency TASS:

We will make a decision as soon as the peaceful situation in Ukraine is restored, including the provisions of the Minsk Protocol.

When an effective cease-fire with effective control of the borders between Russia and Ukraine manifests itself, and when conditions begin to begin a political process to determine the future Constitution of Ukraine, which will guarantee the rights of the south-east of the country, then the supply issue will be resolved.

Here, it turns out, how ...

Following the logic of the French ambassador, Russia could, in response, announce that it would agree to take the Mistrals from France and refuse to receive billions of euros in penalties if ISIL ceases to exist in the Middle East and the Ebola fever completely disappears in the world. ..

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Papania

0

11 October 2014 14: 18

They are Franks in life...
Prager

0

11 October 2014 15: 03

Yes, we need to refuse these troughs, demand a penalty to be paid for violating the contract, we don’t need these troughs. Moreover, during tests with a crew on board, they revealed increased pitching, which is not inherent in domestically built ships.
refines

0

11 October 2014 16: 33

How can peace be established in Ukraine if it is ruled by stupid people! If the USA and the whole of Europe want peace for Ukraine, why do some NATO countries supply weapons to these fucking Ukrainians, obviously not for the peaceful resolution of the “conflict”
Straight

0

11 October 2014 17: 21

Was there a clause in the Mistral supply agreement about the situation in Ukraine?
Hitrovan07

0

11 October 2014 18: 29

I am gnawing at the thought that the northern barbarians (i.e. from Paris) practically destroyed the flourishing Aquitaine. Russia needs to support the struggle of the enlightened South against the so-called France, a territory that appeared on the maps of Europe only under Cardinal Richelieu.
Hmm... and what would LGBT addicts Hollandi and Co. say to this?
serge siberian

0

11 October 2014 18: 40

Quote: PENZYAC
What makes you think that Russia cannot?
The selling "5th column" does not give - it does not mean that we ourselves cannot.

Why not give this 5th column a kick? Or its composition is not known.
serge siberian

0

11 October 2014 19: 11

Quote: Bat_Omsk
Damn, you either give back the ships or the money - within a strictly specified time frame. If neither one nor the other is available at the appointed time, raise the St. Andrew’s Flag and dump it under the Farewell of the Slavyanka!

It wouldn’t hurt to throw some ammunition with the accompanying weapons there and install it. That’s a good idea.
I’m not a naval officer, excuse me, I’m a specialist, but judging by the picture, the surface part seems more underwater, and from this I conclude: with increased pitching and wind >25m, it will lie on board and take a sip of water.
The comment was deleted.
gdv

0

11 October 2014 20: 07

- Doctor, when will I finally be discharged?
- Immediately, as soon as your cardiogram straightens.
gdv

0

11 October 2014 20: 07

- Doctor, when will I finally be discharged?
- Immediately, as soon as your cardiogram straightens.
colonel manuch

0

11 October 2014 22: 11

They'll give it up, they won't go anywhere!
1. Mih
  
  0
  
  11 October 2014 23: 18
  
  polkovnik manuch They’ll give it up, they won’t go anywhere!
  Your words are in God's ears. But the French, this is not even Chubais with vouchers.
Mih

0

11 October 2014 22: 56

Following the logic of the French ambassador, Russia could, in response, announce that it would agree to take the Mistrals from France and refuse to receive billions of euros in penalties if ISIL ceases to exist in the Middle East and the Ebola fever completely disappears in the world. ..

And the Dutchman, high on marijuana, the President of France - Holland, asked permission from great Poland? Did you ask permission from Latvia? Well, I’m generally silent about Arabs...
Mih

0

11 October 2014 23: 06

Juborg
The longer the product is not given, the greater their percentage, as a result, even if the French side transfers ships, they will in any case fall under a fine.

That’s the whole point, that they have an “excuse” ready and they won’t pay. There is no need to cave in to the Western world - it will beat us up. (paraphrase) To Serdyukov - warm pioneer greetings. (from the French)
Mih

0

11 October 2014 23: 10

Giant thought
Oh, we don’t need your Mistral, gentlemen of the French, you just return the money to us with a forfeit, and that’s all, we will peacefully disperse.

What would the French give anything? - you are a giant of thought!!!!
Sergey1454

0

11 October 2014 23: 24

We need to pose the question, as they say, point-blank! Either they hand over the Mistral by a specific date (must be specified in the contract), or after the specified date they give the money back along with a penalty. In general, it would be better if they took back their junk, because it’s high time to put Serdyukov on a bunk for such contracts.
dchegrinec

0

12 October 2014 05: 47

This means that Russia has few ways to influence this country. It is necessary to work strictly with the contract in this regard, there are deadlines that must be met. If they cannot fulfill it, let them pay a penalty. The conversation is generally short. There is a European Court of Justice, after all, there are many more ways pressure.
iov

0

12 October 2014 07: 32

Quote: Iline
French Ambassador to Russia Jean-Maurice Rieper decided to make excuses.

This shows the level of European diplomacy - the inclusion of a fool. You, morons, do not ask your thoughts about the conditions of the transfer. You are asked whether or not you will transfer your iron boxes according to the contract at the agreed time. And the answer must be unequivocal, and not engage in philosophy, you can’t get rid of sanctions and the penalty of verbiage.

Well, now the policy of 2nd standards is in trend;)
GUKTU

0

12 October 2014 07: 52

An instructive lesson for lovers of Western technology. Serdyukov planted a good pig
awersa

0

12 October 2014 08: 08

The behavior of French officials is reminiscent of the behavior of that young lady who wanted to eat the cake and... sit down, but in life it doesn’t work out that way, here it’s either money for a barrel and their citizens are bent, or they give the Mistral and the State Department will be forced.... in general In any case, Holland will have to develop his anus, so this unpleasant moment is delayed
Erg

0

12 October 2014 09: 34

why so much talk on this topic? There are deadlines. There is a penalty. The time will come - let's *talk*.
1. Cynic
  
  0
  
  12 October 2014 10: 04
  
  Quote: Erg
  why so much talk on this topic?
  
  It is in the presence of conversations.
  Here the matter is different, as far as I remember, there was information about the adoption or submission for discussion in the EU of a by-law document, which stipulates that in case of violation of contracts due to sanctions, the violating party WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE!
  This is such a quirk of the gay European consciousness.
  We can talk about this, but here, like with Kosovo, it’s a tactical win with very bad strategic consequences. One of the main fundamental principles of state relations is being destroyed.
  Kidalovo legalized at the interstate level!
  Case law however!
  Now they are violating the contract with the Russian Federation and there are no consequences, but tomorrow who is next in line?
parafoiler

0

12 October 2014 10: 11

Damn! What does grandma's galoshes have to do with it?!
yuri.k

0

12 October 2014 10: 31

find the difference......
Dinko

0

12 October 2014 11: 24

Let them pay the penalty, we can do without them! The main reason for buying the Mistrals was the lack of technology for building such ships in our country, however, according to Rogozin, we already have them!
1. Cynic
  
  0
  
  12 October 2014 11: 56
  
  Quote: Dinko
  !The main reason for purchasing the Mistrals was the lack of technology for building such ships in our country, but according to Rogozin, we already have them!
  
  It’s worth thinking about: before the order for the construction of the Mistrals, there was no technology, but now, after the joint construction, there already is?!
  InterEsnaya the picture is drawn.
Foxmara

0

12 October 2014 12: 10

Shaw, again? Let them put a woman in charge, the French men seem to have gone crazy
kotev19

0

12 October 2014 13: 46

“Promises don’t build a house,” but I think that French shipowners will fulfill everything and deliver the ships on time...
xomaNN

+1

12 October 2014 14: 01

If the French have not yet exceeded the contractual delivery dates, this is one calico. And if the delivery is under contract in early November, Russia will stop being altruistic. Maximum fines and negative reputational noise in the media and business circles. Oland should get it in full
Diter

0

12 October 2014 14: 14

Shouldn't they go with their Mistrals to Japan, to Mount Khu Yam?
Roll 8R

0

12 October 2014 16: 20

So France, once upon a time, curried favor with the Fuhrer until he “bent over the Eiffel Tower”?...Are they showing off with these two “troughs” as if Russia couldn’t do without them? With this money, what it costs, you can build more necessary, useful weapons.
65 Centurion

0

12 October 2014 18: 20

Penalty, and in full!
LINKor55

0

12 October 2014 18: 51

Quote: USSR 1971
5. The ships built in Crimea should be called "Kutuzov" and "Borodino".

Or Berezina... :) Good proposal, I support it
bzbo

0

12 October 2014 20: 15

Hey little Russian! Let's go! You live on Cossack land, you bastard, but you don’t want to give way?
Mikhail Sholokhov Quiet Don.
press officer

0

13 October 2014 06: 36

Following the logic of the French ambassador, Russia could, in response, announce that it would agree to take the Mistrals from France and refuse to receive billions of euros in penalties if ISIL ceases to exist in the Middle East and the Ebola fever completely disappears in the world. ..

Or maybe it’s worth saying that? Let's see their reaction..
maxxdesign

0

13 October 2014 09: 12

and who knows when, according to the contract, these troughs are supposed to be given back? Maybe it’s time to abandon these miracle vessels and demand a refund of the money with interest on the penalty?
Bormental

+1

13 October 2014 11: 13

Will Hollande's point survive the return of the Mistrals?
1. Fire
  
  0
  
  13 October 2014 11: 59
  
  Well comedians
Siberian

0

13 October 2014 11: 48

The French are just shocked from the attacks of Polish diplomacy, that’s why they talk nonsense
SAM 5

0

13 October 2014 12: 50

I went to... T. Reaper.
Albus

0

13 October 2014 13: 05

In a situation of confrontation between the West and Russia, there are no guarantees that the filling will be of high quality, without firmware, bugs and other “surprises”. So, we don’t need these Mistrals any more than we need them.
Inferno

0

13 October 2014 13: 35

Yes, let them shove our Mistrals where America shoves them. Just let them pay the fine. We lived without these “ferries” and will continue to live. Or we’ll order from China!!!!
Rohon

0

13 October 2014 16: 35

However, pasta makers will have to fork out.........
jurijsv

0

13 October 2014 17: 23

And why do Russia need these irons????
Observer

0

13 October 2014 22: 08

I just thought. Why on earth is the transfer or absence of this Mistral by France to Russia tied to the geopolitical situation? Very curious, what is written in the contract? Topic for our lawyers.
chunga-changa

0

14 October 2014 18: 10

The fact that America will “force France to peace” is understandable, the only question here is not to return the money. Now, obviously, everything is being prepared for this; I think one of the conditions for the return of money or ships will be the resignation of the “world aggressor” of the GDP and the return of the “occupied territories.” And then, if the coup happens, there will be a gradual disarmament of aggressive Russia, and then, if this happens, they will simply show nothing, it is clear that no one will return anything to a country without a leader and an army.