Rating employee Blackwater on the combat capability of the military from different countries

282
Opinion of one of the Blackwater employees about mercenaries and regular armed formations

Rating employee Blackwater on the combat capability of the military from different countries


8. African tribes.
It's not even interesting to fight them. They shoot randomly, they don’t know about aiming shooting. Often they scrub the ground under their feet.
Habitual get into his.
Run away to the side after several casualties or a shot from tank.
Rating - meat.

7. African regulars.
Differ from their wild counterparts only in the presence of the form and modest skills aimed fire. They are combat-ready against savages, but clashing with a more capable adversary, even Arabs, leads them into panic and flight.
Act in harmony with armored vehicles do not know how in principle.
Rating - meat in the package.

6. Arabs.
Mercenaries, rebels, many regulars ...
The concepts of tactics and strategies for them are as far as the delights of Samantha Fox to an average homosexual from the banks of the Seine. Their war is to shoot ammunition boxes in the direction of the enemy, while calling to the bar and periodically blowing themselves up with everything that comes handy. However, the latter does not apply to regulars, they are relatively silent and disciplined, they know how to use grenades.
Cowardly, but not alarmist.
Rating is a convenient target.

5. American regulars.
How many films are shot about the invincible American army ... There is only one BUT.
The Yankees are absolutely unable to fight without artillery preparation, tanks and air strikes.
If the territory was not burned to the state of a deserted desert, the soldiers will not go there. And if they do, they do not return back.
They shoot very well, well coordinated, but are timid in front of any resistance. Then become easy prey.
Losses are going through hard, until the complete loss of combat capability. Underpants.
Rating - biting dogs.

4. American mercenaries.
Good fighters. They know how to act as a team, and alone, beautiful shooters. There are desperate individuals that are sometimes difficult to cope with.
But they have a very weak point - morality. And the lack of motivation, except money. The corpse does not need money, so most of them do not climb there,
where it is absolutely hot. And in every possible way avoid the first line of fire.
Dogs of war, if evaluated.

3. Asians.
I did not come across regulars. Mercenaries are able to deliver a painful headache to any opponent. If act as a group.
What is in their heads is not clear, but they are capable of any folly. They shoot beautifully, they often act from ambushes, into which the enemy enters according to a cunning plan. Asians do not care about the support of equipment, aircraft and shells.
They do not care if there are cartridges or not. The main thing is the presence of fellows.
But alone, alas, they become useless.
Rating - the army of the emperor.

2. Caucasians and Afghans.
Strong warriors. Fine arrows. Hardy, brave.
Able to act in groups, alone, motivated and insidious. In combat, they act competently, they know tactics and strategy. They are not afraid of technology and air strikes, they effectively operate from ambushes
They have the only weak point - unable to fight to the last breath, a rare fighter is able to sacrifice themselves for the sake of common victory. Unless he is a shahid, but this is completely different. story...
Rating - real fighters.

1. Russians.
To oppose the platoon of Russian mercenaries is a fierce, bloody kapets.
They fight to the end, to the last bullet, and when ammunition runs out, they use everything they have at hand. Mortally wounded Russian? Do not touch him, most likely before his death - he squeezed a grenade without checks.
Russian inventive, have excellent intuition. And ... they don't care.
Did the plane arrive? Anyway, knocked down with a sapper shovel. Tank? Anyway, if not broken arms. Fighters who have never held SVD are able to get out of it at the critical range at a critical moment.
And still, that it was the last cartridge, they will beat the enemy with the rifle itself. Tactics and strategy? Easily! Any composition, from the army to the half-dead cripple, holding alone the company of the enemy ...
Russians, even mercenaries, are not able to retreat.
And if they retreat, they can be sure they are just running for the cartridges.
All of the above applies to the army, who are more or less fired.
However, for this, in most cases, sufficient - the only clash ...
Ranking - Warriors!
282 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Rabbit
    +1
    2 May 2014 19: 38
    Rus' is power laughing
  2. 0
    2 May 2014 20: 47
    Quote: Asadali
    I wrote this not about all Caucasians, namely about Dagestanis, but more specifically, about my nation - Avars.


    I want to make a small addition. In the Middle Ages, some sovereigns (not ours) considered it an honor to have a personal guard of Chechens.
    1. 0
      18 May 2014 15: 19
      And ours too. Personal convoy of His Imperial Majesty
  3. -1
    2 May 2014 21: 12
    About four years ago, several hundred dushmans descended on our outpost somewhere in the south. The outpost fought back to the last... and only when our people rushed to the rescue did they retreat... 8 people out of 45. I remember one boy - 19 years old... a first-year with a short haircut... the guy frowned at his feet and spat... and when they asked him, are you okay? he replied:
    - We need to go back.
    Take yours.
    And you have to pay.
    I don’t know what the future fate of the young border guard was... but that he is a MAN is without a doubt.
    In PoK, we have the first commandment - border guards do not abandon their own.
    1. +1
      4 May 2014 03: 31
      That was 21 years ago, not 4.
      Border guards remember and know these things for sure.
      12 outpost of the Moscow border detachment, July 1993. The last Soviet call.
  4. juancarlos
    -1
    2 May 2014 21: 40
    The Americans never knew how to fight.
  5. Tanechka-clever
    +1
    2 May 2014 22: 54
    “Easy! Any composition, from the army to a half-dead cripple holding an enemy company alone...”

    One foreigner in his memoirs told why it is difficult to fight with the Russians. In any army, if you kill the commander, the army will scatter. If you kill a Russian commander, then his place will immediately be taken by another with the words “I take command” and he will be in front, and if they are killed, his place will be taken by the next one
  6. Damir
    +1
    2 May 2014 23: 09
    Both Blackwater and Graystone are ordinary workers, without ideas or patriotism. They just do their job like clerks in an office or workers in a factory. But when it gets hot and in case of an emergency, there is no trace of them. IMHO of course!
  7. raf
    0
    2 May 2014 23: 35
    It’s rightly said about the Russians and about them “don’t wake up the trouble while it’s quiet”))))), “they harness slowly, but drive quickly”)))), etc. Well, the Obamas had enough brains or some of the more or less sober-minded were dissuaded don’t send your soldiers to Ukraine, otherwise you’d definitely get the worst deal!))))))
    1. +1
      4 May 2014 01: 00
      Quote: raf
      "they harness slowly, but drive quickly"

      This story about “harnessing slowly” appeared at the beginning of the twentieth century. It appeared on the basis of the time frame for the deployment of the wartime army, which (the time frame) significantly exceeds similar indicators in neighboring countries due to the vast territories of Russia. This fiction has no real justification: the Russians “drive fast” and “harness quickly,” this can be seen in the example of the evacuation of industry from the western regions to the east.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +3
    3 May 2014 01: 49
    Quote: Militia
    Probably the difference between an American soldier and a Russian is that an American soldier goes to the army to earn money and as much as possible, and a Russian soldier goes to the army to repay his debt to his mother Motherland.

    This is commendable, of course, but maybe you should study the question before writing? what is the amount of salary in the army (not to mention privates, whose minimum service life is 3 years) and those employed in the civilian sphere, i.e. the so-called "middle class" of the USA, compare! income is 1,5-2 times lower. At least in the USA they see a difference between work as earning money and service. In the Russian Federation, everything is turned upside down, junior personnel in the army, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Emergency Situations earn more than highly qualified workers in factories for sure (I was in the Urals), I won’t mention pensions, this is by the way about the so-called . revitalization of industrial production in Russia, are we generally relying on administrative and managerial personnel, if you haven’t noticed? nomenclature up to 70 years of age and a chair by inheritance, hurt yourself! (what they tried to get away from since 1985, this is what they came to). So among the people, the proud name of the Russian soldier can be replaced by the backbone, of which there are already many.
    And an American soldier joins the army to receive a free education upon completion of his service, and at the same time gain practical knowledge.
  10. +1
    3 May 2014 09: 01
    A fairy tale to raise our self-awareness.
  11. 0
    3 May 2014 10: 30
    I would like to see the original source, because it is very strange for the Blackwater employee to praise the Russians, and also because the original source indicated at the end of the article is blocked.
  12. GREAT RUSSIA
    0
    3 May 2014 10: 47
    2. Caucasians and Afghans.
    Strong warriors. Fine arrows. Hardy, brave.
    Able to act in groups, alone, motivated and insidious. In combat, they act competently, they know tactics and strategy. They are not afraid of technology and air strikes, they effectively operate from ambushes
    They have the only weak point - they are unable to fight to the last breath, a rare fighter is able to sacrifice himself for the sake of a common victory. Unless he is a martyr, but that’s a completely different story ...
    Rating - real fighters.

    1. Russians.
    To oppose the platoon of Russian mercenaries is a fierce, bloody kapets.
    They fight to the end, to the last bullet, and when ammunition runs out, they use everything they have at hand. Mortally wounded Russian? Do not touch him, most likely before his death - he squeezed a grenade without checks.
    Russian inventive, have excellent intuition. And ... they don't care.
    Did the plane arrive? Anyway, knocked down with a sapper shovel. Tank? Anyway, if not broken arms. Fighters who have never held SVD are able to get out of it at the critical range at a critical moment.
    And still, that it was the last cartridge, they will beat the enemy with the rifle itself. Tactics and strategy? Easily! Any composition, from the army to the half-dead cripple, holding alone the company of the enemy ...
    Russians, even mercenaries, are not able to retreat.
    And if they retreat, they can be sure they are just running for the cartridges.
    All of the above applies to the army, who are more or less fired.
    However, for this, in most cases, sufficient - the only clash ...
    Ranking - Warriors!

    I was happy for the Caucasians, after all, I was born in the North Caucasus, I live and a representative of one of the nations. I’m no less happy for the Russians, so why write an article, so everything is clear.
  13. GREAT RUSSIA
    0
    3 May 2014 12: 00
    The article is complete nonsense. Any brat from any nation can be turned into an ardent patriot and an excellent fighter. The main thing is to educate patriotism from childhood, with films, stories, examples, you need to teach the guy camaraderie, and then in the army, if the training system is good, then he will become great a fighter. You have to teach him from childhood. This is a matter of upbringing and training. You can’t just judge and make ratings of the military of different nations. You can’t underestimate, but overestimating will be costly.
  14. 0
    3 May 2014 16: 38
    I somehow doubt that this was written by a foreigner. Of course, I am with both hands in favor of the fact that our soldiers are some of the best in the world and that few armies will be able to fight normally in the conditions in which our army can, but nevertheless, something in this article worries me.
  15. 0
    3 May 2014 17: 49
    I’m not sure on all points, but I’ve come across it - it seems to be true.
    PS
    Regarding the phrase of a certain “290980”: “Yes, besides, this resource is not completely objective or is filled with laudatory articles, but we are also not fools and served in the SA and lived in the Union. Where are these soldiers about whom the article writes?
    what did they do with them?”, I’ll answer, do you at least respect anyone besides your beloved self?
  16. Gorelnik
    0
    3 May 2014 17: 52
    Nice. But this is all strange. Very strange...
  17. +1
    3 May 2014 21: 03
    Just a joke, but the main thing is that there are patriots who have not sold themselves to the German auto industry and the Chinese mobile phone. Not like in the 41st, not equipped to hold back the enemy, but to be so prepared that they were afraid to come here at all.
  18. +5
    3 May 2014 23: 50
    They fight to the end, to the last bullet, and when the ammunition runs out, they use everything they have at hand.
    Memoirs of a US elite soldier about the Russians (the article was published 5-6 months ago, here is an excerpt): ...the next time I encountered the Russians was in Kosovo.

    It was a crowd of untrained idiots, with machine guns from the Vietnam War, armored armor probably left over from the Second World War, heavy, inconvenient, no navigators, night vision devices, nothing else, just a machine gun, a helmet and armored armor. They drove their armored personnel carriers wherever they wanted and wherever they wanted, passionately kissed the civilian population, baked bread for them (they brought a bakery with them and baked bread). They fed everyone their own porridge with canned meat, which they cooked themselves in a special cauldron. We were treated with disdain and constantly insulted. It wasn't an army, but who knows what. How can you interact with them? All our reports to the Russian leadership were ignored. Somehow we got into a serious fight, we didn’t share the route, if it weren’t for the Russian officer who calmed these monkeys down, we could have reached the trunks. These idiots needed to be punished. Give it a fuck and put it in its place. Without weapons, we only needed Russian corpses, but to understand. They wrote a note in Russian, but with mistakes, like the Serb wrote that nice guys were gathering at night to give p...d to the insolent Russian bastards. We prepared thoroughly, light body armor, police batons, night vision devices, stun guns, no knives or firearms. We approached them, observing all the rules of camouflage and sabotage. They didn’t even put up these posts, so that means we’ll fuck the sleeping ones, we deserve it. When we almost approached the tents, we heard the sound of “RY-YAY-AAA”. And from all the cracks these idiots crawled out, for some reason dressed only in striped shirts. I accepted the first one.

    I woke up at the base. Easy contusion. They told me later that the guy took pity on me, hit me flat, if he had really hit, he would have blown off his head. I, b…, an experienced fighter of an elite unit of the US Marine Corps, is cut down in 10 seconds by a Russian, skinny bastard — and with what ??? And you know what? Garden Shantsevoy tool.
    1. +1
      4 May 2014 03: 40
      That the article is the fruit of the pen of an Internet agitator, that the passage you cited is the fruit of the pen of a science fiction writer.
      I can even indicate the exact title of the book: Land of Shining Power, from the series “Treasures of the Valkyrie,” author T. Alekseev.

      Don’t embarrass yourself, please don’t cite this text as a recollection of an American Green Beret, told in some bar to some of our comrades, who is now presenting this story as “the pure truth.”
      It's right to be proud of your own. But why pass off outright nonsense as memoirs, real stories. I don't understand this. If they catch you, they will laugh at you. And they will do the right thing. Because it's shameful.
      Don’t we have real stories that any army in the world would be proud of?
      1. G
        G
        +2
        5 May 2014 00: 33
        Real story please. wink

        Yugoslavia, late 90s. Kosovo. UN peacekeepers (SDK or KFOR), according to the international mandate, occupy sectors of responsibility in the province of Kosovo. The joint headquarters of the peacekeepers command includes Russian officers (um, to be honest, Russians (especially the French and Americans) and Poles (the same Americans and French) were also often sent here as part of other armies). The commander of KFOR (Bundeswehr General Klaus Reinhardt at that time ) goes with a group of UN officers and representatives for an inspection.
        American checkpoint: A flat area in an open field near a dirt road. The armored vehicles are surrounded by sandbags (did they bring something with them?). One tent in the middle - the checkpoint commander and the officers hang out there. Kind of settled in. There are zero living conditions, all the Americans are in line - they complain about the unbearable conditions of service, they say they stand for a week, eat dry rations, but there is no support, no one to provide comfort. Commander - we'll sort it out.
        French checkpoint: Not far from the village. There is barbed wire and armored vehicles around the perimeter. The basis of the post is the skeleton of the barn. At least they opened up the kitchen. They cook something and eat it... They say the locals wear it. They're lying. The French have always been famous for their cuisine and incredible resourcefulness in obtaining food (read Louis Boussenard). They also complain about the discomfort of the service, the commander promises support and will deal with the suppliers.
        Russian checkpoint: some kind of rock or hill dominating what used to be a road. A kilometer away they started stopping me and asking me to show my documents. The checkpoint is surrounded by a network of trenches and some kind of prehistoric rampart made of a mixture of clay and stone... like a wall. In the corners the equipment's muzzle is scratching. Inside there is a continuous ordnung. The tents are stretched out. The kitchen is cooking something. Tolkans rise in the outskirts. The commander is freaking out. Meanwhile, the checkpoint commander (seniors) reports that everything is fine, there were no incidents, no losses, etc.
        Commander: How long ago did you turn around?
        Starley: Two days.
        K.: What equipment was used when deploying the checkpoint?
        S.: Just a shovel, Herr General.
        K.: Is it all with shovels?
        S.: Not at all, in some places with explosives.
        K.: Complaints? Requests?
        S.: No, everything is fine. But don’t you want to go to the bathhouse?
        K.: Do you have a bathhouse? How long have you been serving?
        S.: Yavol, I graduated from Ryazanka two years ago.
        K., addressing the UN inspectors: If only we had more senior lieutenants like this in KFOR, we would have pacified everyone long ago. And (the words of a true German) they would have saved so much money.
        Whispers in a group of Russian officers: "Some have ALREADY saved..."
  19. +1
    4 May 2014 01: 14
    It’s nice to read... however, “mischief-making” is our old disease. Repetitions of '41 should not be allowed. It’s just that the situation is different and there may not be a historic chance a second time...
  20. 0
    4 May 2014 05: 00
    they don’t give up and don’t give up, it’s in the blood...
  21. vas1964
    0
    4 May 2014 06: 55
    Is it possible to fight without a cup of coffee in the morning and hot toast or croissants? Nonsense.
  22. +4
    4 May 2014 20: 53
    Quote: NEXUS
    you didn’t understand me again, Mr. Setras... 3 million prisoners of war, this is the figure that was stated by that same forum member, not Rezun... read the comments to the article and you will find it...

    The nickname of that gentleman is 290980! And as I saw, you had already talked with him... and you yourself saw that he named such a number...
  23. 0
    6 May 2014 04: 32
    There are many nationalities in Russia. During war, you get a cocktail, each with its own disadvantages and advantages. So it turns out that together we are invincible.
  24. dmitrij.blyuz
    +2
    8 May 2014 12: 07
    It is impossible to conquer us. This is one of the reasons. And what other country has created such equipment for household use? And there are no such people anywhere else. Only in Russia.
    1. 0
      18 May 2014 15: 31
      lol There was also MTLB)))))))))
    2. 0
      30 June 2014 22: 14
      HEALTHY !!!!
  25. Serg93
    0
    30 May 2014 01: 23
    Beautifully said about American regulars!!!
  26. 0
    27 June 2014 21: 14
    I read the article and comments. Ratings, comparisons... But war is not football or the like. For some reason I remembered the song Do Russians Want War!?
  27. 0
    30 June 2014 18: 52
    Quote: lirik
    Hatred and intelligence working at the limit to destroy the enemy.

    Well said. This is a brief description of Russian.
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. 0
    30 June 2014 19: 09
    And who are the Americans raising their hands against? AGAINST RUSSIANS AND CAUCASIANS STANDING IN THE SAME ORDER.
    And do they still hope for something?