And one of our Su-24 in the sea warrior!

April 16 2014 220

The Pentagon admitted that the imitation of the Su-24 attack on the US Navy destroyer had a demoralizing effect on the crew.

27 destroyer crew members filed resignation reports (information not confirmed. - Ed. "IN"). Commenting on their actions, they said they did not intend to put life in danger.

The Pentagon on Monday issued a statement in which it claimed that the Russian Su-24 bomber flew several times on Saturday near the US Navy destroyer Donald Cook in the Black Sea and at the same time imitated a combat attack several times.

Pentagon spokesman Col. Stephen Warren told Reuters that a Russian bomber had flown twelve times at a low altitude not far from an American destroyer. Warren called such maneuvers frightening and unacceptable. They demoralize the personnel of the ship and adversely affect the overall psychological climate among the military.

Warren noted that the destroyer patrolled the waters in the west of the Black Sea when the incident occurred. According to him, the ship is now safe in the Romanian port, where it was urgently evacuated. Members of the crew of the ship undergo the necessary procedures with a psychologist to recover from the transferred stress.

"Donald Cook" - the third ship of the US Navy, which was sent to the Black Sea lately. Earlier, the United States had already sent the Taylor frigate to the sea, but the ship ran aground near the Black Sea coast of Turkey, because of which it was unable to continue its mission.

According to international maritime treaties, American ships can not be in the Black Sea more than 14 days. Exceeding this period gives Russia the legal right to make a rocket attack and destroy these ships without declaring war on the United States. Knowing this possibility, the crew members and commanders of the American ships are naturally experiencing their lives. And although the Pentagon promised to increase the insurance sums of military personnel from 1 million dollars to 3 million dollars, very few people calmed down. Survival on the open sea and then receive an insurance payment is not enough chances. And dead money is not needed.

As a result of the events described, the crew of the Donald Cook was forced to sail with a shortage of personnel. The further dismissal of 27 crewmembers, possibly followed by others, threatens the destroyer’s continued successful execution of the task. (Anton Chumakov, news agency novorus.info)

It's like, dear?

But what about the intrepid fleet of the United States? Where, then, is the latest Aegis air defense system? This is generally what then, if for a “bearish disease” one (not the most sophisticated one, I note) of a Russian bomber is missing?

This, you know, shame the jungle.

Could not resist, called a friend. He served on the Pacific Fleet, as part of the defense, served (on the "Quick"). I asked him how this situation? “And then, a free target would be worked out. I would behave greyhound - would frighten. Only they never behaved greyhounds. Point is weak. ” That's the whole answer.

In vain "Cook" waited with protest rallies in Odessa. Soaking in the rain. Apparently, our pilot did not know about the upcoming protest rally, so he broke off the whole prospect.

And now the luxurious trough "establishes ties with the Romanian Navy." Before the Romanian frigates flaunts. And obviously not going to Odessa.

The perspective is still being drawn: at this rate, soon the entire water area of the Black Sea will be filled with all kinds of troughs “performing patrols”. American, French, English, who else will tighten there?

I wonder what will happen if the old “drying” is not released, but the “carcass”? Of those in the Crimea are now tanning? So, fly?

Probably not. Well this traffic jam at the entrance to the Bosphorus will be steeper than on Andropov Avenue in Moscow. And they will beat again ...

Oh, guys, well, where are you taking? Well this is not Iraq. This is Russia. And in our life alone there was a warrior in the field. And at sea. And in heaven. It was about our pilots Vysotsky wrote: “There are eight of us - two of us. The alignment before the fight is not ours, but we will play. ” So they would sit at home, take care of the nerves. And we will populate here somehow.

Laughter

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

jekasimf

+2

April 16 2014 14: 37

Well then. Like the version:
In light of all of the above, I see the situation as follows. On April 10, 2014, the above-mentioned destroyer arrived in the neutral waters of the Black Sea to carry out an act of intimidation and a show of force - in connection with Russia’s inflexible position on Ukraine and Crimea. Before this, another American missile destroyer, Trakstan, was located in the Black Sea, in violation of the Montreux Convention. That is, the typical mouse fuss beloved by the Americans took place - saber rattling and international rudeness. Russia's reaction was calm, but deadly: on April 12, the great day of cosmonautics, ours equipped an unarmed SU-24 for a flight in neutral waters, BUT with Khibiny missiles under the wing. Then everything developed approximately according to this scenario: “Kuk” spotted the approach of the “drying” from afar, sounded a combat alarm and stopped at the combat posts. Everything was going as normal, the radars were calculating the approach course to the target, and the Aegis was properly controlling the guidance systems. And suddenly - bang! Everything went out. "Aegis" does not work, the screens show dregs, even "Phalanxes" cannot receive target designation! Meanwhile, the SU-24 passed over the deck of the Cook, made a combat turn and simulated a missile attack on the target. Of course, successful - because there is no opposition! Then he turned around and faked another one. And so on - another 10 times! All attempts by technicians to revive the Aegis and provide target designations for air defense failed, and only when the silhouette of the “drying” disappeared into the haze over the Russian coast did the screens come to life, and the guidance systems faithfully showed the clear April sky shining with emptiness.

I summarize. Most likely, after the SU-24 turned on in the immediate vicinity of the Cook, the Khibiny, the entire destroyer air defense failed. Ours, checking the effectiveness of the electronic warfare system, 12 (!) Times simulated an attack on an American ship. For all this time, the crew of the ship was unable to reanimate the extinguished BIOS. She earned only when the SU-24 went heading for the base. It was then that, realizing their own powerlessness against the EW complex of an ordinary bomber, 27 people submitted reports on leaving.

http://atnews.org/news/khibiny_protiv_idzhis_ili_chto_tak_silno_ispugalo_pentago

n / 2014-04-16-14350
Calter

+1

April 16 2014 19: 53

Quote: aktanir
Early to celebrate just don't start. The information is not confirmed, and far-reaching dreamy conclusions are already being made. The destroyer is not a merchant ship or a tanker, there are military men who know what they are going to. Who would have fought in Afghanistan and Iraq if the Americans are so sensitive and weak-hearted? And who would have allowed the old drying up to the ship at all if a war had been officially unleashed between Russia and the USA? There is only one positive point - in practice, the attack on a ship of a foreign state has been tested. This is really an experience for the pilot! Everything else is speculation.

At least one sane thought.
It looks like a duck to me.
If any plane (or even Israel or Germany, not to mention Russia) began to “simulate an approach” to attack a ship, they would immediately hit it with all guns without further ado (and only then they would sort it out, what and how). This time.
Secondly, the cap hints that if 1 aircraft had a more or less real chance of destroying a modern warship equipped with air defense and missile defense systems, then the surface fleet would simply disappear as a class, because a) the cost of the ship and aircraft b) the number of ships and aircraft in the arsenal of different countries are simply incomparable (after all, we are talking about 1:1 losses).
The chance of destroying a ship by a lone aircraft, even one “tailored” for anti-ship warfare, is approximately equal to the chance of destroying a mosquito with a machine gun. As far as I know, this happened only once in the Anglo-Argentine conflict in the Falkland Islands.
razved

0

April 16 2014 20: 58

The warriors suck. We are used to fighting against technically backward and weak countries. As the saying goes: well done among the sheep, but well done by the sheep itself.
Login

0

April 16 2014 21: 57

And isn’t it a shame to spread such misinformation?
Here, read the primary sources: http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=122052
Remi

0

April 17 2014 10: 35

I don’t know about anyone, but I liked the article)
Respect to the author!
Tim2008

0

April 19 2014 11: 51

Let them go home! They are used to mocking the weak! And then they will take it to the fullest. Warriors))))))))))))
Kostya pedestrian

0

28 July 2014 13: 23

War with the USA is cool. Personally, this is to our advantage in Australia. We will watch the new Japanese show Gadzilla vs Pterodactyl.

I just don’t want the Arabs to consider me a kafir, or as the stupid Turks say, “gavur.” I personally believe in the Lord and the Life-Giving Cross, but I don’t believe in God. The Mother of God is a separate conversation. It's like a transitional Volkswagen model. I haven’t written about the Teutonic Challenge Banner Ford AU1999 yet, but I have written about their casino.

Now "so who is not faithful?"

Me, who declares that 2x2=4, or the Mitsubishi infidel? الكافر‎‎ - unbeliever, non-believer (Mitsubishi 123456789, and that Toyota 3x0=8?)

By the way, if you read Volkswagen, you might think about Boston 5x3=15.

"GYaUR" from Orlovka from under the "Swiss" street. GAYA

Yes, God can be seen in the Junkers, and for me, as a Belarusian, as for any Londoner, this word evokes horror. I think that in St. Petersburg, both red and light green, I will understand when they think about who and why abandoned the Winter Palace, leaving only the female regiment of Junkers to fight? So the Khaza ry(nk) KA-52 is on your tail!
Kostya pedestrian

0

28 July 2014 13: 32

To develop the economic potential of our Rashi, a small excerpt from Wikipedia in English:

The Nikkei 225 (日経平均株価 Nikkei heikin kabuka?, 日経225), more commonly called the Nikkei, the Nikkei index, or the Nikkei Stock Average[1][2] (/ˈnɪkeɪ/, /ˈniːkeɪ/, or /nɪˈkeɪ/ ), is a stock market index for the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE). It has been calculated daily by the Nihon Keizai Shimbun (Nikkei)

By the way, my car number is GMA552. You yourself know who the immortals are - Fallen soldiers. What did you think about? Yes, well, why did you drive the stake? Yes, NOT a double student, but a student!!!!!! Have you heard about “risen from HELL?”

About 3 years ago, I read about Prince Harry that he would take 5. Five Jaguars?