And one of our Su-24 in the sea warrior!

220
And one of our Su-24 in the sea warrior!


The Pentagon admitted that the imitation of the Su-24 attack on the US Navy destroyer had a demoralizing effect on the crew.

27 destroyer crew members filed resignation reports (information not confirmed. - Ed. "IN"). Commenting on their actions, they said they did not intend to put life in danger.

The Pentagon on Monday issued a statement in which it claimed that the Russian Su-24 bomber flew several times on Saturday near the US Navy destroyer Donald Cook in the Black Sea and at the same time imitated a combat attack several times.

Pentagon spokesman Col. Stephen Warren told Reuters that a Russian bomber had flown twelve times at a low altitude not far from an American destroyer. Warren called such maneuvers frightening and unacceptable. They demoralize the personnel of the ship and adversely affect the overall psychological climate among the military.

Warren noted that the destroyer patrolled the waters in the west of the Black Sea when the incident occurred. According to him, the ship is now safe in the Romanian port, where it was urgently evacuated. Members of the crew of the ship undergo the necessary procedures with a psychologist to recover from the transferred stress.

"Donald Cook" - the third ship of the US Navy, which was sent to the Black Sea lately. Earlier, the United States had already sent the Taylor frigate to the sea, but the ship ran aground near the Black Sea coast of Turkey, because of which it was unable to continue its mission.

According to international maritime treaties, American ships can not be in the Black Sea more than 14 days. Exceeding this period gives Russia the legal right to make a rocket attack and destroy these ships without declaring war on the United States. Knowing this possibility, the crew members and commanders of the American ships are naturally experiencing their lives. And although the Pentagon promised to increase the insurance sums of military personnel from 1 million dollars to 3 million dollars, very few people calmed down. Survival on the open sea and then receive an insurance payment is not enough chances. And dead money is not needed.

As a result of the events described, the crew of the Donald Cook was forced to sail with a shortage of personnel. The further dismissal of 27 crewmembers, possibly followed by others, threatens the destroyer’s continued successful execution of the task. (Anton Chumakov, news agency novorus.info)

It's like, dear?

But what about the intrepid fleet of the United States? Where, then, is the latest Aegis air defense system? This is generally what then, if for a “bearish disease” one (not the most sophisticated one, I note) of a Russian bomber is missing?

This, you know, shame the jungle.

Could not resist, called a friend. He served on the Pacific Fleet, as part of the defense, served (on the "Quick"). I asked him how this situation? “And then, a free target would be worked out. I would behave greyhound - would frighten. Only they never behaved greyhounds. Point is weak. ” That's the whole answer.

In vain "Cook" waited with protest rallies in Odessa. Soaking in the rain. Apparently, our pilot did not know about the upcoming protest rally, so he broke off the whole prospect.

And now the luxurious trough "establishes ties with the Romanian Navy." Before the Romanian frigates flaunts. And obviously not going to Odessa.

The perspective is still being drawn: at this rate, soon the entire water area of ​​the Black Sea will be filled with all kinds of troughs “performing patrols”. American, French, English, who else will tighten there?

I wonder what will happen if the old “drying” is not released, but the “carcass”? Of those in the Crimea are now tanning? So, fly?

Probably not. Well this traffic jam at the entrance to the Bosphorus will be steeper than on Andropov Avenue in Moscow. And they will beat again ...

Oh, guys, well, where are you taking? Well this is not Iraq. This is Russia. And in our life alone there was a warrior in the field. And at sea. And in heaven. It was about our pilots Vysotsky wrote: “There are eight of us - two of us. The alignment before the fight is not ours, but we will play. ” So they would sit at home, take care of the nerves. And we will populate here somehow.

Laughter
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

220 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +49
    April 16 2014 06: 36
    Well, I understand scary when such a fool comes to you. But to submit reports from the soldiers who took the oath is already too much))). And how are they going to fight?
    1. ded10041948
      +42
      April 16 2014 06: 47
      How how? "Without putting your lives in danger"!
      1. +33
        April 16 2014 06: 49
        The crew members undergo the necessary procedures with a psychologist to recover from the stress.
        I still don’t understand if it’s a warship or a pleasure yacht of Washington Kindergarten No. 142. They are scared, they work with a psychologist - PIZ ... C. The army is a reference to clowns !!! Do not scare our gentle Americans, they are very afraid to endanger their lives.
        1. +11
          April 16 2014 06: 50
          And who will clean the ship from shit now? Romanians what?
          1. +36
            April 16 2014 07: 14
            Quote: Stalevar
            And who will clean the ship from shit now? Romanians what?

            Yes, there are plenty of people who want to, they will drive them off to the Baltic with tongues wiped dry.
            The fact is that Russia is not Libya or Iraq and the plane can actually sink this vessel. The USA faced an adversary that was not inferior to them in strength and sailors feel it in their own skin. Usually they are used to hollowing peaceful cities .......... ..
            1. GDP
              +5
              April 16 2014 09: 26
              Under international maritime treaties, American ships cannot be in the Black Sea for more than 14 days. Exceeding this period gives Russia a legal right to launch a missile attack and destroy these ships without declaring US war.

              good
              The US military experienced extreme psychological stress

              And in Kromatorsk, much more serious fighter maneuvers, and some say a real attack - provoked only outrage and an attempt to fire at the plane from a Kalashnikov assault rifle ...
              The junta should draw conclusions ...
          2. +44
            April 16 2014 07: 22
            Early to celebrate just don't start. The information is not confirmed, and far-reaching dreamy conclusions are already being made. The destroyer is not a merchant ship or a tanker, there are military men who know what they are going to. Who would have fought in Afghanistan and Iraq if the Americans are so sensitive and weak-hearted? And who would have allowed the old drying up to the ship at all if a war had been officially unleashed between Russia and the USA? There is only one positive point - in practice, the attack on a ship of a foreign state has been tested. This is really an experience for the pilot! Everything else is speculation.
            1. +33
              April 16 2014 07: 36
              Quote: aktanir
              Early to celebrate, just do not start. The information is not confirmed, and far-reaching dreamy conclusions are already being made.

              Dear! Information on 12 flights of SU-24 is on the Pentagon's website. And the fact that they just ... is natural. In the eighties I served at the airport in Severomorsk-3, in 89 only the regiment of Sushek from Afghanistan was withdrawn. So here they are, in order not to lose professional skills, they sometimes made military calls at our facilities (drive stations). I can say from my own feelings - it’s not pleasant enough (this despite the fact that I knew there will be no attack), and they also have such a pretty powerful siren on board and if it turns it on when diving, then I want to burrow somewhere.
              Unfortunately, the article made a small slip of the pen, ships are allowed to stay not 14, but 21 days!
            2. +1
              April 16 2014 08: 15
              Well, not Iraq. It's Russia. And in our life there was one warrior in the field. And at sea. And in heaven. This is about our pilots Vysotsky wrote: “There are eight of them - we are two. The alignment before the battle is not ours, but we will play. ”

              We also had a flag demonstration.
            3. +7
              April 16 2014 08: 32
              Quote: aktanir
              Who would have fought in Afghanistan and Iraq if the Americans are so sensitive and weak-hearted?

              and they are fighting there?
              1. 77bob1973
                +1
                April 16 2014 09: 50
                They are in Afghanistan at bases behind three perimeters and don’t show their nose!
                1. 0
                  April 16 2014 11: 52
                  "They are in Afghanistan at bases around three perimeters, and they don’t show their nose!"
                  Yes, and the field commanders are covered that they would not be touched.
              2. 0
                April 16 2014 11: 48
                Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                and they are fighting there?

                Yeah sometimes like that hi
            4. +6
              April 16 2014 08: 41
              Quote: aktanir
              The information is not confirmed, and far-reaching dreamy conclusions are already being made.

              Information verified. Alas and ah!
              Quote: aktanir
              The destroyer is not a merchant ship or a tanker, there are military men who know what they are going to. Who would have fought in Afghanistan and Iraq if the Americans are so sensitive and weak-hearted?

              Yes, it is true who, and most importantly, HOW?
              If remote shooting of infants is considered great valor, then yes, they know what they are going to.
              And how they fight Fallujah and Kalai Dzhangi to you as an example.
              And don’t forget to recall pipiphax strikes.
              And platoon visits to the shop for cigarettes ...
              Quote: aktanir
              And who would have allowed the old drying up to the ship at all if a war had been officially unleashed between Russia and the USA?

              And who would not let?
              Those who got it?
              Honestly, I doubt it ...

              Naturally, hat-making is not worth it, but you should not dismiss reality.
              A sober picture will have some advantages. Terrible is not only the underestimation, but also the reevaluation of the probable adversary.
              1. +1
                April 16 2014 10: 58
                it’s better to overdo it than overdo it.
            5. +4
              April 16 2014 08: 57
              Quote: aktanir
              And who would have allowed the old drying up to the ship at all if a war had been officially unleashed between Russia and the USA?

              Western media actively represent Russia as a rude and aggressive power capable of violating all Western foundations and international agreements. Therefore, even without declaring war, Western troops, who were the first victims of their own informational suggestion, react with fear of a real attack to the maneuvers of our armed forces.
              1. +8
                April 16 2014 09: 17
                In Soviet times, they know the desperate disposition of our sailors, this is about how our watchmen in bulk beat their cruiser with a destroyer. Well, they intersect with pilots for the first time, and understand that the pilots are no less desperate. 12 attacks, this is not weak. That's why diarrhea.
              2. +2
                April 16 2014 10: 37
                Quote: sir.jonn
                Therefore, even without declaring war, Western troops, who were the first victims of their own informational suggestion, react with fear of a real attack to the maneuvers of our armed forces.

                We do not yet know about the reaction of the servicemen, only from their "officials", besides, the Yankes probably declared an alarm for the same training purposes and worked out their air defense measures well - I don't think there was time to be particularly scared.
              3. +1
                April 16 2014 11: 01
                One of the Air Force commanders of America, said on TV that they did not show their pilots (by video) the flights of the Russian aviation, so as not to demoralize the spirit of American pilots.
            6. mirexes
              +1
              April 16 2014 10: 19
              in part it may be true, notice when they are fighting on ships their opponents do not dive because the opponents do not have airplanes, and who have planes they shoot them with tomahawks from a very long distance, I think that they don’t do their own thing (they don’t train) , so this was the first thing that happened to the Amerov sailors
            7. 0
              April 16 2014 10: 28
              Quote: aktanir
              Early to celebrate just don't start.

              and rightly so, I would like to add pro -And now a luxurious trough - there are no analogues in our fleet and is not yet expected.
            8. Apostle
              0
              April 16 2014 11: 44
              ... Who would have fought in Afghanistan and Iraq if the Americans are so sensitive and weak-hearted? ..

              Well, certainly not the sailors from "Cook" ...
          3. +6
            April 16 2014 07: 32
            Quote: Stalevar
            And who will clean the ship from shit now? Romanians what?

            Well, who else? Ukraine is only being prepared for such missions so far ...
          4. +5
            April 16 2014 07: 37
            No) Moldovans. They really want to be Romanians) Let them work out)
            1. +2
              April 16 2014 09: 15
              Quote: Docent1984
              No) Moldovans. They really want to be Romanians) Let them work out)

              It seems that UKRAINIANS really want to be Moldovans ... (see my comment above)
          5. The comment was deleted.
          6. 0
            April 16 2014 08: 41
            on this and went there)) leave humus for fertilizer
          7. +2
            April 16 2014 10: 12
            Quote: Stalevar
            And who will clean the ship from shit now?

            Their mournful labor will not be lost
            Romanians will come, pick up!
            Another thing is interesting. According to information from another place, the "fighter" SU-24, this is how they poured the plane, performed their actions at an altitude of 150 meters and at a distance of 1 km along the course from the ship. Practice your air defense missions calmly, and they put them in their pants. Ugh, panties.
          8. 0
            April 16 2014 11: 56
            Aha! Their role in all anti-Russian coalitions was to clean up the crap after the "yubermens" who were raking from Russia, and boiled down ...
          9. Aleksandr68
            0
            April 16 2014 12: 03
            Quote: Stalevar
            And who will clean the ship from shit now? Romanians what?

            And what else are such NATO allies capable of? Remember how they fought in World War II.
        2. +15
          April 16 2014 07: 03
          Quote: Stalevar
          I did not understand, this is a warship or a pleasure yacht of Washington Kindergarten No. 142.

          And when they signed the contract, no one promised them that a Russian plane would fly over them.
          1. 0
            April 16 2014 07: 07
            Well, I probably don’t see another reason))).
          2. +6
            April 16 2014 07: 13
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And when they signed the contract, no one promised them that a Russian plane would fly over them.

            The creatures felt that this was not the coast of Somalia-Libya-Iraq and were not afraid of them here! wassat
        3. 0
          April 16 2014 11: 41
          The EC from the BE-200 would have 12 tons of water on it, but on satellite slingshots of it, so that they would be remembered for a lifetime. laughing
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. 0
          5 March 2015 23: 45
          like children, I swear! when the American army or navy arrives somewhere, everyone else must hide in fear under the bench, it’s a pity that our pilots didn’t hear about this rule. These kids started playing war games and it’s time for our adult uncles to spank them and drive them home.
      2. +9
        April 16 2014 06: 51
        Quote: ded10041948
        How how? "Without putting your lives in danger"!

        Their army is not used to endangering their lives.

        PS At least one good news in the morning.
      3. +16
        April 16 2014 07: 02
        Quote: ded10041948
        How how? "Without putting your lives in danger"!

        This is when the enemy has no right to resist.
        The Russians are completely insolent, brave sailors of the most powerful fleet in the world, do not have time to remove their trousers from the brown mass and ventilate the ship’s premises from accumulated gases laughing
        1. +2
          April 16 2014 10: 18
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          ventilate ship spaces from accumulated gas

          Greetings, Sasha.
          There is one understatement in this matter. Very much these brave warriors, love to eat legumes, and legumes, one way or another, cause flatulence. They are already used to living among these gases. laughing
      4. yustas
        +7
        April 16 2014 07: 18
        we must also tell them that Sosa-Sol freezes in Siberia, so they will be offended and will leave, not to mention the fact that the shower and toilet do not function at sub-zero temperatures =) those are still warriors
        1. mamba
          +2
          April 16 2014 10: 26
          Quote: yustas
          shower and toilet in sub-zero temperatures do not function at all

          And an attempt to meet a small need in the cold leads to freezing of the urethra to the stream. And with the realization of great need in the cold, it is better to wait until spring. laughing
    2. +9
      April 16 2014 06: 49
      In Romania, diapers will rise in price. The warriors were frightened by the sight of one plane, and what will happen to them when Russia imitates a link of planes?
      It’s interesting, what will happen if you don’t release the old “dryer”, but the “carcass”?

      For good, they should not see it, strategists attack with missiles, and understand what happened to them only shines on a liferaft, those who are lucky.
    3. +6
      April 16 2014 06: 57
      He did not go out on them, but only flew not far. Maybe he greeted them and took pictures for memory.
      1. Orc-xnumx
        +1
        April 16 2014 08: 55
        Imitation of an attack - it just came out!
      2. +1
        April 16 2014 10: 22
        Quote: cergey51046
        Maybe he greeted them and took pictures for memory.

        The funniest thing is that they also try to fly around our ships at meetings. Our guys do not seem to complain very much.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +8
      April 16 2014 07: 10
      Quote: Stalevar
      Well, I understand scary when such a fool comes to you. But to submit reports from the soldiers who took the oath is already too much))). And how are they going to fight?

      They are able not to fight, but to kill ... punishers, in a word!
    6. +2
      April 16 2014 07: 33
      Piss when scared! bully
    7. 0
      April 16 2014 07: 51
      SASHA-Stalevar

      I ask you - say SMART, SMART
      1. +2
        April 16 2014 08: 39
        Well, the Yankees can’t sit at home, if combed, then patrol your Gulf of Mexico well, at worst let us patrol the Hudson River, and we will put things in order in our sea! Well, how much can you pollute the ecology of the Black Sea with all sorts of foreign trash? After all, it (the World Cup) has not yet fully coped with what the Nazis left at its bottom! And in general, have fun at home and there is nothing to poison and scare fish, there is little left in the Black Sea!
    8. +7
      April 16 2014 08: 44
      Two days ago, I wrote and got to the point, as they say laughing
      major071 RU 14 April 2014 21: 22 | Russian fighter flew around destroyer Donald Cook
      If they from one unarmed aircraft put in their pants to the fullest, what will happen if the link flies? They are used to fighting at a distance when there is no one to reach them. And here, I'm sorry, move, this is not Somalia-Libya-Iraq, everything is serious here. I feel that the laundries on the ship work in full. And the smell of gov.ets behind the ship.

      That is the whole essence of the American "military", pipifax is over, Coca-Cola has not been delivered, there are no hamburgers - they will not fight. And then a terrible Russian plane flew by. Everyone, urgently go home to mom. hi
    9. Ural guys
      0
      April 16 2014 08: 53
      They’re not going to either. Immediately captured.
      They think that they will feed them here.
    10. Ural guys
      0
      April 16 2014 08: 53
      They’re not going to either. Immediately captured.
      They think that they will feed them here.
    11. +1
      April 16 2014 09: 11
      Su-24 is very noisy. Back in the 70s, I served next to the airfield on which the latest SU-24s were based. Passing by, ears are laying from the noise of engines. Therefore, the Americans were scared. And the noise in this plane is not the main weapon. So in vain they were afraid of this. It is necessary to be afraid of his weapons, which he has not yet used. And the noise of the weapon, when used, they may not hear.
    12. 0
      April 16 2014 09: 15
      It’s good that the Kingstons didn’t open it.
    13. 0
      April 16 2014 10: 00
      Maybe a duck. Something is hard to believe ... Well this is a warship, with military on board ...
      But if this is not propaganda, then a disgrace.
      Where can I read the confirmation?
      1. Marine One
        +2
        April 16 2014 10: 28
        Quote: Alexandr Volkov
        Where can I read the confirmation?


        Nowhere. Warren's official statement regarding the Drying Pass, incl. translated into Russian from Russia Today is googled in 10 seconds. A story about insurance, resignations and the demoralizing effect was launched by the Novorossiya website, and frankly lying, citing a non-existent article by Reuters.
        And in general it is unclear with what fright completely ordinary events - the entry of a warship into the Black Sea and the flight of our scout over it, over the past few days have caused such verbal diarrhea.
        1. Shatt
          0
          April 16 2014 12: 41
          Not a scout, but a bomber
          1. Marine One
            0
            April 16 2014 12: 44
            They say the SU was in a reconnaissance modification. In any case, the bomber acted as a scout in this situation.
    14. +9
      April 16 2014 10: 03
      In 1982 and 1984 he took part in two cruises to the shores of Pin ... stan aboard a large radio intelligence ship "Crimea". And in Mediterranean, and in the Atlantic, and off the coast of the United States, we were constantly visited on low level flight by all and sundry. Not a single sailor did not hear a word of apprehension, only made fun of him. Although our ship was unarmed - only AKMs for self-defense.
    15. The comment was deleted.
    16. +2
      April 16 2014 10: 08
      In theory, they could easily knock down our dryer from air defense systems, but they didn’t shoot them down ... they didn’t pass their nerves ... I doubt the enemy about the reports, they should not be underestimated. And our pilot is well done !!! The psychological effect will be unambiguous !!!!
      1. +2
        April 16 2014 11: 31
        A flyby with a combat aircraft is a "normal" practice from the category of reliably established. Something was flying above us almost in non-stop mode (more often in this sequence after our departure from the base point - "Orion" Norwegian, "Nimrod" + "Sea Links" British, "Atlantic" Spanish + "Orion" USA, " si king "Italian, and" intruder "from" Nimitz "was also" interested "). After the flight, we had fun "catching" the acoustic buoys dropped by them, the cable there is of high quality, I still use it.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    17. WKS
      0
      April 16 2014 11: 35
      (information not confirmed. - Ed. "VO"). Pay attention to this footnote.
    18. 0
      April 16 2014 11: 49
      DUCK, QUICKLY EVERYTHING.
    19. Dezzed
      +2
      April 16 2014 12: 09
      the author did not bother to check the sources, but I escaped.

      quote from the original article by Anton Chumakov, novorus.info news agency:

      | "27 members of the destroyer's crew submitted their resignation reports (information not confirmed. - Ed." VO "). Commenting on their actions, they said they did not intend to endanger their lives."

      as you see the source of the woman Klava.
    20. 0
      April 16 2014 12: 27
      Pentagon spokesman Col. Stephen Warren told Reuters that a Russian bomber had flown twelve times at a low altitude not far from an American destroyer. Warren called such maneuvers frightening and unacceptable. They demoralize the personnel of the ship and adversely affect the overall psychological climate among the military.

      Remember how your NATO aircraft flew around our ships during the Soviet era. Debt good turn deserves another.
    21. +5
      April 16 2014 15: 14
      Dear VO community! Today, surfing the Internet, I came across this interesting comment:

      "This ship is armed with two 6-barreled Falanx launchers and up to 74 RIM-66 SM-2 Standard-2 missiles. In other words, the specialization of this ship is not only a fight against such low-speed, low-maneuverable targets, like the SU-24, but also with targets is much more difficult - with anti-ship missiles, which both have a higher speed of movement and their maneuverability is not limited by overloads in the crew and in stealth they are many times superior to the SU-24. - sit for yourself, turn on the air defense, "Aegis", but practice in close to real conditions, repelling the attack of the aircraft of a potential enemy! But no, the crew was demoralized, 27 people wrote statements with the wording - "They are not going to risk their lives." happened in neutral waters? I believe the answer lies behind such a mysterious name as “Khibiny.” According to Wikipedia, the Khibiny is a mountain range on the Kola Peninsula, in the Murmansk region, located 150 km north its Arctic Circle :) However, of course, the destroyer crew was intimidated by the wrong Khibiny. "Khibiny" is the newest Russian electronic warfare system, which will be installed on all promising Russian aircraft. I did not find any data about it, no matter how much I looked, but here it is written that the SU-24 has already been used in exercises in Buryatia. So, nothing can demoralize a military man like his own impotence! In light of the above, I see the situation as follows. On April 10, 2014, the above-mentioned destroyer arrived in the neutral waters of the Black Sea to carry out an intimidation and demonstration of force - in connection with Russia's adamant stance on Ukraine and Crimea. Before that, another American missile destroyer Trakstan was in the Black Sea, in violation of the Montreux convention. That is, there was a typical, beloved by Americans, mouse fuss - saber rattling and international rudeness. The reaction of Russia was calm, but deadly: on April 12, on the great day of cosmonautics, ours equipped an unarmed SU-24 for overflight in neutral waters, BUT with the Khibiny under the wing. Then everything developed approximately according to the following scenario: "Cook" noticed the approach of "drying" from a distance, played a combat alert and froze at the combat posts. Everything went smoothly, the radars calculated the course of approach to the target, the Aegis regularly controlled the guidance systems. And suddenly - bang! Everything went out. The Aegis does not work, the screens show dregs, even the Phalanxes cannot receive target designation! SU-24, meanwhile, passed over the Cook's deck, made a combat turn and simulated a missile attack on the target. Successful, of course - there is no opposition! Then he turned around and imitated another one. And so on - 10 more times! All attempts of technicians to revive Aegis and give target designation for air defense failed, and only when the silhouette of the “drying” melted in a haze over the Russian coast, the screens came to life, and the guidance systems faithfully showed the clear, shining empty April sky.

      Let me summarize. Most likely, after the SU-24 switched on in the immediate vicinity of the "Cook", "Khibiny", the entire air defense of the destroyer went out of order. Ours, while checking the efficiency of the electronic warfare system, simulated an attack on an American ship 12 (!) Times. During all this time, the ship's crew could not reanimate the extinguished CIUS. She earned it only when the SU-24 headed for the base. It was then that, realizing their own powerlessness against the electronic warfare complex of an ordinary bomber, 27 people and filed a resignation report. "

      I ask you to express your opinion. Waiting for an answer, like a fool advice =)
      1. in emerald
        0
        April 17 2014 21: 58
        KRET enterprises are constantly working on new
        electronic warfare systems. 12 aircraft and ground are under development
        systems. In particular, by order of the Ministry of Defense
        design work to create a unique complex
        "Khibiny-U".
        The new complex will surpass all types of electronic warfare
        air-based, now in service. Them
        It is planned to equip front-line aircraft of the Air Force. During
        development work the complex will be placed on
        multifunctional fighter Su-30SM.

        http://nevskii-bastion.ru/khibiny/
    22. 0
      April 16 2014 17: 17
      The following version of this event appeared:
      I summarize. Most likely, after the SU-24 turned on in the immediate vicinity of the Cook, the Khibiny, the entire destroyer air defense failed. The Russians, checking the effectiveness of the electronic warfare system, 12 (!) Times simulated an attack on an American ship. For all this time, the crew of the ship was unable to reanimate the extinguished BIOS. She earned only when the SU-24 went heading for the base. It was then that, realizing their own powerlessness against the EW complex of an ordinary bomber, 27 people submitted reports on leaving.

      http://pvo39.ru/GAZETA/Statyi_glavnaya/Hibini_vs_Idzhisa.html
      1. 0
        April 16 2014 20: 23
        I wonder how realistic this opinion is) is this possible in principle? Really in electronics we were able to surpass the most modern military developments of the USA and so easily were able to suppress them!
        1. WatchDog
          0
          April 21 2014 18: 45
          You may be surprised, but about "can you really surpass" I will say this, you shouldn't underestimate our electronics engineers and programmers. Personally, in the 80s, I worked at a plant that produced onboard computers. This model was already in production for a little less than ten years, and was considered obsolete (but secret). One of its functions was "look and forget". That is, he looked in the direction of the target and pressed the button. The rest will be done by the onboard VC. For me it was a matter of course for all technically developed countries. And imagine my surprise when, at the beginning of the XNUMXs, such a system was presented as the latest achievement of the states in the field of military aviation :)
    23. 0
      April 16 2014 18: 12
      And if not the Su-24 flies, and which is heavier and faster, will they start jumping overboard and wave with white shirts?
  2. sanek0207
    +6
    April 16 2014 06: 37
    What liquid are these Americans? They saw the plane and began to obsserat the deck of the ship, give them a psychologist, a nanny with my mother !! And what would happen if Sushka launched a real attack? Therefore, so that they do not nudge ships, you need to shoot at them with what is invisible, it’s a pity for the equipment, very!
    1. Alex 241
      +12
      April 16 2014 06: 51
      This is Russia, son! So take your rattles, and for quiet sadness, to the house. And then suddenly our strategists really want to look at your bucket with bolts from the height of a bird’s plane!
      1. +10
        April 16 2014 07: 11
        Greetings, Alex!
        What the guy has on my head is mine.
        And also at my KOTE. Only he uses it differently ... belay
        Well, cattle ..... what to take from him .... laughing
  3. +15
    April 16 2014 06: 39
    And our choice is sometimes too small
    But remember the guy that he didn’t betray his family,
    And take a step forward so that he becomes a legend.
  4. +5
    April 16 2014 06: 42
    The crew members undergo the necessary procedures with a psychologist to recover from the stress.

    the ship also replenishes diapers am
    1. +4
      April 16 2014 07: 02
      Quote: spech
      ship replenishes diapers

      This is mandatory on ALL SHIPS IN THE WORLD. As well as flyers on a mission.
      In addition to their "main" purpose, diapers can be used as a dressing material.
      In a combat situation, there is certainly an application.
  5. 0
    April 16 2014 06: 42
    they said they did not intend to endanger life

    And do these tsykuns want to rule the whole world?
    1. +3
      April 16 2014 06: 58
      Quote: Denis
      these tsykuns want

      Not these ... "These" are the SEAMLESS. Although slightly blued and refined, they are sailors. The world ALREADY RULED others. With the help of these. If there were no first, then the second would not be required. On military ships ...
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. +8
    April 16 2014 06: 46
    They wrote about, got rid of in full ...
    I don’t want to take risks for candy wrappers, but they don’t know how to take homeland
    1. +1
      April 16 2014 08: 14
      Country of immigrants
      That's where the homeland is - Zimbabwe and Swaziland. Harlem ...
  8. +7
    April 16 2014 06: 48
    Imagine if the Tu-22 dived unobtrusively. The day of delivery of humanitarian diapers would be announced in the states.
  9. +6
    April 16 2014 06: 49
    the most powerful army in the world, you can still say kule laughing
  10. Berimor 2
    +3
    April 16 2014 06: 49
    27 people filed reports. And this despite the fact that, according to the acknowledgment of the American sailors themselves, the plane did not approach them at a distance of less than 1 kilometer. It is terrible to imagine what would happen if he passed over the ship itself!
    1. +3
      April 16 2014 07: 00
      Quote: Berimor 2
      27 people filed reports. And this despite the fact that, according to the acknowledgment of the American sailors themselves, the plane did not approach them at a distance of less than 1 kilometer. It is terrible to imagine what would happen if he passed over the ship itself!

      Not very pleasant for some time the Black Sea smacked. laughing
      1. +1
        April 16 2014 07: 40
        We hope that they have a bio-toilet there, and not a point with a direct release into the sea. We still have rest this summer)))
        1. 0
          April 16 2014 07: 52
          Quote: Docent1984
          We hope they have a biosort there

          Hope in vain ... There is no toilet there - there is a GALYUN. There are some pictures for comparison ...
          1

          2

          3
          1. Ural guys
            +2
            April 16 2014 08: 56
            Well .... well, they are!
            You can see immediately the guardhouse there is not carried!
            1. 0
              April 16 2014 14: 11
              And what, somewhere guardhouse carry in the clean and jerk? belay Original and informative ...

              Here they are ...
              Why ... After all, this is the C-189 of the 613 project, which stands in St. Petersburg, as a museum .... Pichal ... sad
              Not what is worth, but what is in this state.
          2. Ural guys
            0
            April 16 2014 08: 56
            Well, and they!
            You can see immediately the guardhouse there is not carried!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      April 16 2014 08: 03
      Quote: Berimor 2
      27 people filed a report.


      Already there were no combat losses. And in the event of a real turmoil with Russia, they will definitely surpass the Georgian army in "back-marathon". crying
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        April 16 2014 08: 22
        ABOUT! One American sirun was already cowardly minusanul. laughing
    4. Orc-xnumx
      0
      April 16 2014 09: 04
      Then they would have the right to shoot down. It's all nerves! Everything is not thin! That crap ... Now in Romania, the pants are dried.
    5. 0
      April 16 2014 09: 18
      Quote: Berimor 2
      It is terrible to imagine what would happen if he passed over the ship itself!

      --------------------------
      Maneuvers of combat aircraft over the deck of a warship are secretly prohibited, as a particularly provocative provocation ...
      1. +2
        April 16 2014 10: 19
        Prohibited "flights in the dangerous proximity of the ship" OFFICIALLY treaty of 1972. The pins ... they didn't really respect them, especially after the downing of a Korean Boeing in September 1983. They imitated attacks on us all the time. the helicopters were hovering about 10 meters away - he even suggested that they jump onto the deck. They answered with obscene gestures "in Russian" feel
  11. +2
    April 16 2014 06: 51
    Colonel Stephen Warren, a Russian bomber, flew twelve times at low altitude not far from an American destroyer. Warren called such maneuvers intimidating and unacceptable. They demoralize the personnel of the ship and negatively affect the overall psychological climate among the military.
    Only flew not far, but already a victory.
    1. +5
      April 16 2014 08: 49
      Ay-ay-ay, and this "bastard" forgot how their planes flew almost over the masts of our cargo ships during the Cuban Missile Crisis? And that characteristically none of our sailors even ducked their heads, by the way, all latrines after the voyage shone with naval cleanliness .Eh wretched, on whom you "lift" your leg, "a fence under tension"! Look, and you will not understand not only legs, but also what is between them! "Bezayatsovye" disabled mental workers!
  12. 0
    April 16 2014 06: 51
    Ah ha ha !!! Three times. laughing
  13. +4
    April 16 2014 06: 52
    do it and die with an American soldier, that they don’t want to do anything, so that they wouldn’t die later, they can only fight against papus, against those who go with arrows and shoot at them, then they are heroes. Soviet (Russian, Kazakh, Belorussian) soldiers will die, but even execute the order dead. it is interesting to read about the 13th company of the 226th Zemlyansky regiment of the Russian Empire
  14. +6
    April 16 2014 06: 52
    simulated attack Su-24 to the US Navy destroyer

    Very controversial infa from various sources, how it all happened in reality.
    Flyers, correct if I'm mistaken. But, according to unwritten laws (??) ATTACK IDENTIFICATIONAnd is the exit of the plane to COMBAT COURSE... Or on the bow (stern), or "to the side".
    And this was not in principle. All sources point precisely to the DESCRIBED CIRCLES, and in the distance. So why did overseas sailors stare so?
    Yes, and the modification of the aircraft, apparently, was used Sioux 24MR (product T6MP) tactical reconnaissance aircraft
    designed to conduct comprehensive all-weather reconnaissance day or night at a depth of up to 400 km beyond the line of contact between the troops.)
    Unlike the basic machine - the Su-24M front-line bomber, the scout does not have offensive weapons. For defense on the external sling under the left plane, two P-60 missiles can be suspended.
    The reconnaissance equipment of the aircraft is represented by the BKR-1 airborne reconnaissance complex, consisting of:
    The “Bayonet” side-view radar provides viewing of an area of ​​24 km wide on each side of the course line, with an unseeable 8 zone of meters directly below the aircraft. The radar resolution is 5-7,5 m.
    Panoramic aerial camera AP-402M
    Advanced A-100 Aerial Camera
    IR Intelligence Equipment
    The “Ether-1M” radiation detection container and the Shpil-2M laser equipment container are located on the external sling. Received reconnaissance information can be processed directly on board the aircraft in flight. Information is transmitted to the earth through closed communication channels, photo information can be dumped in special containers.

    / From Wikipedia /
    1. 0
      April 16 2014 07: 05
      Pedivikia is still that source.
      In any case, the desired effect is achieved. Yankees put on pants.
    2. +1
      April 16 2014 09: 50
      Quote: Ptah
      Yes, and the modification of the aircraft, apparently, was used by the Su-24MP (product T6MP) tactical reconnaissance aircraft
      designed to conduct comprehensive all-weather reconnaissance day or night at a depth of up to 400 km beyond the line of contact between the troops.)

      -----------------------------
      In any case, the American sailors had something to fear. Firstly, this trough is not intended for acting alone, and secondly, Aegis just doesn’t work as it should, thirdly, she sensed their priest that they are already targeting the coastal missile batteries of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, -fifth, by agreement of Montreux, any ship outside the Black Sea fleets, delayed in time, can be destroyed without declaring war ... Something like this, I suppose ... Well, it's really scary when the attack aircraft cuts circles around you, according to the charter, they must shoot down all flying combat crap immediately upon detection, without approaching critical distances, and move the whole crowd ... sorry, squadron ...))
    3. 0
      April 16 2014 10: 16
      Flyers, correct if I'm mistaken about anything. But, according to the unwritten laws (??), the DESIGNATION OF THE ATTACK is the exit of the aircraft to the BATTLE COURSE. Or along the bow (stern), or "to the side".
      And this was not in principle. All sources point precisely to the DESCRIBED CIRCLES, and in the distance. So why did overseas sailors stare so?
      Yes, and the modification of the aircraft, apparently, was used by the Su-24MP (product T6MP) tactical reconnaissance aircraft
      designed to conduct comprehensive all-weather reconnaissance day or night at a depth of up to 400 km beyond the line of contact between the troops.)

      Did the sailors KNOW this? After all, Crazy Rashen is flying.
  15. +10
    April 16 2014 06: 52
    I recall the reaction of our guys with similar overflights in Middle-earth (with visits from provocative courses) .....
    If only they would allow ... He would fly off to ... mom.
    And here - psychologists, reports ...
    I am proud of my colleagues !!!!
    1. Filon
      +10
      April 16 2014 08: 39
      Quote: pticas
      I remember the reaction of our guys ...

      Father told me from personal experience:

      He worked in the Northern Sea Shipping Company, as a ship electrician on dry-cargo vessels of the "P" series, namely, at the "Petrokrepost". Well, it happened to them to go to Cuba. In short, when the next episode of the series "about the sea" was being played over the landscape, an American plane appeared, which began to circle and maneuver around the Soviet dry cargo ship. The fleet was a merchant, there were no weapons on board, but the Russian spirit was present in the crew: when the pilot went to the next turn to pass near the ship again, someone from the crew jumped to the fire hydrant and imitated "targeting" ... sniffed, the captain had a little fight, and the crew whinnied for a long time laughing
  16. Lara
    +1
    April 16 2014 06: 53
    And I remember the film 72 meters-remember where they caught the buoy? What did the Janissaries tell them?
    And Basharov's hero completes the plot - "... and then there would be one superpower ... But definitely not America!"
    1. Alex 241
      +9
      April 16 2014 07: 01
      Quote: Lara
      And I remember the film 72 meters-remember where they caught the buoy? What did the Janissaries tell them?
  17. +5
    April 16 2014 06: 53
    Laughter laughs, but nerds with such a psyche are dangerous .Never when you do not know for sure that the faint of heart will soak.
    1. Alex 241
      +13
      April 16 2014 06: 57
      Russian Su-27 fighters abused the American aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk 9-01-2014,

      Source: http://politikus.ru/events/10711-rossiyskie-istrebiteli-su-27-nadrugalis-nad-ame

      rikanskim-avianoscem-kiti-hok.html
      Politikus.ru
      1. +4
        April 16 2014 07: 06
        Quote: Alex 241
        Russian Su-27 fighters abused the American aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk 9-01-2014,

        Abused -Is raped or something laughing
        Hi Sanya.
        1. Alex 241
          +1
          April 16 2014 07: 16
          Hi Sash, read the link. laughing
        2. +3
          April 16 2014 08: 08
          On the contrary, they abandoned the process.
      2. Ural guys
        0
        April 16 2014 09: 11
        These are photos from 2000, but where are the new ones?
      3. Ural guys
        0
        April 16 2014 09: 11
        These are photos from 2000, but where are the new ones?
      4. ipshum
        +1
        April 16 2014 09: 26
        Landing Tu-95 on an American aircraft carrier

        Source: http://politikus.ru/articles/10694-posadka-tu-95-na-amerikanskiy-avianosec.html
        Politikus.ru
        Another mockery of the Americans.
    2. +1
      April 16 2014 08: 28
      Quote: Humpty
      Laughter laughs, but nerds with such a psyche are dangerous .Never when you do not know for sure that the faint of heart will soak.

      And assuming that rulers are like their own people, well, or vice versa! In the process of detection, they can click on the red button, and then the whole world is in ruin! hi
  18. +1
    April 16 2014 06: 54
    ded10041948 (1) Today, 06:47 ↑ New
    How how? "Without putting your lives in danger"!

    I also don’t care. How can I serve in the army, without endangering my life? Apparently, an institution like the Committee of Soldiers' Mothers with Amers has long started.
  19. +4
    April 16 2014 06: 56
    I’m also somehow in touch, they haven’t even shot yet, and the sailors are already scared, and if there is a real war, it’s clear that they won’t have time to blink, but the ship’s rocket protects them, but there’s a duty and an oath, in World War II the Pacific Ocean is not bad fought.
    1. Grenz
      +2
      April 16 2014 07: 33
      They fought just not really ...
      At one time, revealing the victories of our fleet in the Black Sea, Admiral Fyodor Ushakov said: "The Turkish guns do not have Russian sailors !!!"
      Indeed, if, with that power in ships and aircraft, we could add the Russian spirit, I don’t think that the Japs would resist for a long time (in 1945 all of China was liberated in a month).
      An example is the "Battle of Gaudalkanal".
      When landing on one of the islands, the Americans lost 143 (not exactly, but about) the Marine.
      The attack was canceled. The commander was dismissed.
      Then, over the course of several days, the island was treated from the air and only one sailor died during the landing - it was crushed by a ramp ramp.
      The Japanese did not show resistance, because even in the living from the blast waves the meat departed from the bones of the skeleton.
      That's the price of victory.
      Of course, the conclusion. If some of our commanders also took care of their soldiers, then the Tiergarten in Berlin would have less marble slabs.
      They would have mixed Berlin with the earth - probably Merkel, knowing the prospect, wouldn’t have grinded her teeth like that. And now there would be no polls - to remove tanks from the pedestal or not.
      1. +4
        April 16 2014 08: 50
        There are more fun landings in the US Army.
        In 1943, when landing on the island of Kyska, the Americans lost more than 300 people killed. One destroyer was blown up by a mine, etc.
        And the most interesting thing is that at that time there was not a single Japanese on the island. The casualties were mostly from friendly fire. It was all called Operation Cottage.
    2. +4
      April 16 2014 09: 35
      Well, something like this.
      1. +1
        April 16 2014 10: 50
        Great, Alex! Half a hundred eyes to you!
  20. +6
    April 16 2014 06: 57
    Information is not confirmed (see commentary IN), so do not underestimate a potential enemy in advance. I do not think that the US Navy is recruiting cowardly recruits capable of being frightened of the fighter’s maneuvers. This is still the Navy, which defeated the Japanese fleet in the Pacific War. And the Japanese were great warriors. Less emotions and more verified facts, dear ...
    1. +5
      April 16 2014 07: 07
      Americans never seriously fought. And to refer to the events of 70 years ago - well, I'm sorry ...
    2. +3
      April 16 2014 07: 28
      Quote: Sergey7311
      Information is not confirmed (see commentary IN), so do not underestimate a potential enemy in advance. I do not think that the US Navy is recruiting cowardly recruits capable of being frightened of the fighter’s maneuvers.

      It is clear that the information is "raw". And who will officially confirm this? But, there are a lot of such cases, here are a couple:
      1. Times of the USSR. The maneuvers and exercises of the US Navy, in the midst of exercises near the aircraft carrier, our submarine pops up and asks directly to help our sailor (or something similar). Admiral of the Americans hysterically calls the Pentagon, those in response - Are you crazy? What is the Russian submarine ???? How not to notice? How is this even possible? Generally stole, and then the admiral was removed.
      2. An example is not long ago, as soon as our ships were designated off the coast of Syria. The AUG of the USA rather quickly faded from there.
      3. The same not long ago, though I don't remember exactly where. When our planes made a call to their aircraft carrier (simulated attack) with a photograph of it. If the first case is still so, on the verge of rumors (although I heard from "seasoned" sailors). The rest have real confirmation.
      1. HAM
        +3
        April 16 2014 08: 05
        And do you remember the patrolmen who drove the more serious ships off the coast of Crimea "in bulk"? There is even a video ...
    3. -1
      April 16 2014 10: 11
      Quote: Sergey7311
      Information is not confirmed (see commentary IN), so do not underestimate a potential enemy in advance. I do not think that the US Navy is recruiting cowardly recruits capable of being frightened of the fighter’s maneuvers. This is still the Navy, which defeated the Japanese fleet in the Pacific War. And the Japanese were great warriors. Less emotions and more verified facts, dear ...

      Finally, at least one normal comment, but then, there are a lot of bloggers who boast, "go to the army." The American contract, it seems to me, disciplines well enough and hardly provides for the right of a soldier to "pull off" at any moment.
      1. +1
        April 16 2014 10: 53
        It seems so to you. Google about the number of deserters during the Iraqi company.
    4. +1
      April 16 2014 10: 38
      Then the real Americans fought, on appeal, motivated by patriotism, and not the outcasts motivated by the green card and dough.
  21. +4
    April 16 2014 06: 59
    "According to international maritime treaties, American ships cannot stay in the Black Sea for more than 14 days. Exceeding this period gives Russia the legal right to launch a missile attack and destroy these ships without declaring war on the United States."

    What a good contract. Tremble the Americans. Train your psychologists. They will have a lot of work.
  22. JoylyRoger
    +3
    April 16 2014 07: 00
    The pilot must be awarded, as well as the one who gave the order for such training drinks
    But the Indians rotted through and through, sailors, ...
  23. +2
    April 16 2014 07: 00
    Warren called such maneuvers intimidating and unacceptable. They demoralize the personnel of the ship and negatively affect the overall psychological climate among the military.

    An unpleasant surprise, but they thought that they were waiting here?
    The crew members undergo the necessary procedures with a psychologist to recover from the stress.

    Is the crew exactly military?
    And where then is the latest Aegis air defense system?

    Aegis is effective at sharing several ships, and even then not very, and on a single ship it is inefficient.
  24. +6
    April 16 2014 07: 01
    Peaceful American destroyer, and you are his Dryer. You are angry. wassat
    1. 0
      April 16 2014 09: 31
      Quote: Soviet_Union
      Peaceful American destroyer, and you are his Dryer. You are angry.

      Not))))) At the same time, we are still good, if we were evil - we could also welcome a rocket on board soldier laughing
  25. +1
    April 16 2014 07: 03
    Guys, that's why they are against the Russians. They have incited the Russians !!! We must quickly take our Ukraine!
    1. 0
      April 16 2014 09: 41
      Oh, at least it dawned on someone. Only Russians can defeat the Russians! Do not give pin.dos.am a chance to embroil us !!!
    2. 0
      April 16 2014 10: 16
      Quote: avia12005
      Guys, that's why they are against the Russians. They have incited the Russians !!! We must quickly take our Ukraine!

      Take it - take it, but how then to carry it away? The gut is thin in our budget. A wave of a saber - a lot of brains are not necessary.
  26. Quantum
    +4
    April 16 2014 07: 06
    Somehow, in the Norwegian Sea, on a fishing vessel, near Bear Island, NATO planes were also close and made combat calls at low altitude.
    We, of course, were all on deck, laughing and showing fists and other
    fak-yu. And no one was afraid, of course. One sailor even took off his pants and showed
    his mighty p ... u.
    1. -1
      April 16 2014 07: 23
      Quote: Quantum
      One sailor even took off his pants and showed
      its mighty p ... u.

      What did the sailor show? P ... do? And really powerful? And where did he get it. In the cockpit hung ...
      1. +1
        April 16 2014 09: 04
        In vain you are so, he just out of politeness did not call the ASS by his name, but wrote n ... y! I had to serve in Ukraine in the city of Uzin, and so in the newspapers they wrote about the sea trials of the US Navy aircraft carrier "CHESTER W. NIMITZ". And the next day, checking the order in the fighters' nightstands, I found gorgeous photos of him from all angles (for the demobilization album), I will add that it was in the construction battalion (we were reconstructing the airfield of the "strategists"), and then what can we say about the division's combat regiments!
  27. +5
    April 16 2014 07: 07
    Training flight really destroy 27 people laughing If the truth is truly worthy of encouragement.
    1. +3
      April 16 2014 07: 21
      The reward pilot is allowed to perform another flight.!
  28. +3
    April 16 2014 07: 09
    Quote: Lyton
    in World War II they were not bad at war in the Pacific.

    With overwhelming superiority, even from the Japs they raked.
  29. +1
    April 16 2014 07: 10
    The American destroyer urgently replenished the stock of toilet paper)))
  30. +3
    April 16 2014 07: 10
    Some kind of nonsense ... It's their job to fight. They are paid money for this. What is the help of a psychologist ??

    Although I really hope that this is not from the field of inform war ..)))
  31. Grenz
    +3
    April 16 2014 07: 13
    "... the ship's crew members undergo the necessary procedures with a psychologist to recover from the stress they endured."

    He previously claimed that in the course of such an imitation of the attack, the Americans filled the air with screams and farting so that, apparently, all the Romanian sailors in the raid stopped their noses from the stench.
    And if you came to Odessa. Poor Duke would have fallen off the pedestal.
    There wasn’t such a thing yet - the ... soldiers are demonstrating their support for the same regime.
    The last destroyer, stranded, is also apparently obroz .... at the sight of a re-scoping of our boat.
    Russians are coming!!!
    Apparently for them there is no "nicer" this appeal, if in due time after this phrase the former US Secretary of Defense jumped from the 14th floor.
    To the glory of the warriors. Only they can spoil liquidly and vilely.
    And not Colt now they have the main weapon, but a drone.
  32. Rusin Dima
    +4
    April 16 2014 07: 16
    bold americans driving drones flying in pakistan
    1. +2
      April 16 2014 09: 11
      But in the Crimea they were weaned from flying (the US intelligence team is based in Kirovograd), three of their drones landed, here you are not here, as one foreman said. Do not confuse Russia with Mumbo Yumba (your president’s historical homeland), we don’t have bananas grow, but there are a lot of things that you won’t like very much!
      1. +1
        April 16 2014 09: 43
        Quote: kartalovkolya
        we don’t grow bananas, but there are a lot of things that you won’t like very much!

        That's for sure, dumb bananas)))) But Poplars grow very well, and Buki, as well as Peonies, Chrysanthemums and Acacia with Tulips ... And we also really like to arrange Balls in Crimea)))))))) soldier drinks good laughing
  33. +5
    April 16 2014 07: 19
    The warriors, crap one’s liquid, pissed .... Infa is not verified, and IMHO is false.
    Please, do not bump into such "urapatriotism" and shapkozakidatelstvo. Let's then take the USA with two airborne brigades! Remember? so someone spoke about Chechnya))
    It is very dangerous to underestimate the enemy.
    1. +4
      April 16 2014 07: 28
      I agree. It is necessary to carefully and pedantically check all the info. Although there is a large share of truth in it.
    2. Ural guys
      0
      April 16 2014 09: 16
      If such a task is set, then it will certainly be completed!
    3. The comment was deleted.
  34. +25
    April 16 2014 07: 21
    Quote: Floock
    The warriors, crap one’s liquid, pissed .... Infa is not verified, and IMHO is false.

    the essence is different! what have they experienced!

    Khibiny vs. Aegis, or what scared the Pentagon so much?


    So what happened in neutral waters? I suppose the answer lies behind such a mysterious name as "Khibiny". According to Wikipedia, the Khibiny is a mountain range on the Kola Peninsula, in the Murmansk region, located 150 km north of the Arctic Circle :) However, of course, the destroyer crew was intimidated by the wrong Khibiny. "Khibiny" is the newest Russian electronic warfare system, which will be installed on all promising Russian aircraft. I did not find any data about it, no matter how much I looked, but here it is written that the SU-24 has already been used in exercises in Buryatia. So, nothing can demoralize a military man like his own impotence! In light of the above, I see the situation as follows. On April 10, 2014, the above-mentioned destroyer arrived in the neutral waters of the Black Sea to carry out an intimidation and demonstration of force - in connection with Russia's adamant stance on Ukraine and Crimea. Before that, another American missile destroyer Trakstan was in the Black Sea, in violation of the Montreux convention. That is, there was a typical, beloved by Americans, mouse fuss - saber rattling and international rudeness. The reaction of Russia was calm, but deadly: on April 12, the great day of cosmonautics, we equipped an unarmed SU-24 for overflight in neutral waters, BUT with the Khibiny under the wing. Then everything developed approximately according to the following scenario: "Cook" noticed the approach of "drying" from a distance, played a combat alert and froze at combat posts. Everything went on as usual, the radars calculated the course of approach to the target, the Aegis regularly controlled the guidance systems. And suddenly - bang! Everything went out. "Aegis" does not work, screens show dregs, even "Phalanxes" cannot receive target designation! SU-24, meanwhile, passed over the Cook's deck, made a combat turn and simulated a missile attack on the target. Successful, of course - there is no opposition! Then he turned around and imitated another one. And so on - 10 more times! All attempts of technicians to revive Aegis and give target designation for air defense failed, and only when the silhouette of the “drying” melted in a haze over the Russian coast, the screens came to life, and the guidance systems faithfully showed the clear, shining empty April sky.
    I summarize. Most likely, after the SU-24 turned on in the immediate vicinity of the Cook, the Khibiny, the entire destroyer air defense failed. Ours, checking the effectiveness of the electronic warfare system, 12 (!) Times simulated an attack on an American ship. For all this time, the crew of the ship was unable to reanimate the extinguished BIOS. She earned only when the SU-24 went heading for the base. It was then that, realizing their own powerlessness against the EW complex of an ordinary bomber, 27 people submitted reports on leaving.
    At the end of the article, I want to note that all of the above is just my logical construction and they are designed to bring at least some logic into what happened. If moderators find the post inappropriate, delete :)
    Sincerely.
    1. +3
      April 16 2014 07: 49
      Now, if this were confirmed ...
    2. +2
      April 16 2014 09: 17
      If so, even better than we thought! Apparently it was not for nothing that one of my acquaintances expressed the degree of discontent or delight with the following tirade: "Your mother is apatite to the Khibiny" - well, what to take from a Soviet ensign!
  35. +7
    April 16 2014 07: 22
    “... Sailing was quite easy and interesting: 54 days at sea, 4 in the port and 45 flight hours in October alone! (for comparison, many pilots of the Russian Air Force have an annual raid of about 45-60 hours with the necessary 200-250) Yes, we flew our asses! Since I became one of the squadron commanders, I have been flying a lot. Here is an interesting story (and this is not bullshit).

    So, I’m sitting there and chatting about all kinds of garbage with my deputy, and we hear a bell ringing from the BIC (the combat information center - the "brain" of the ship) .- They say: "Sir, we spotted Russian planes."

    The captain replies: "Announce the alarm, raise the fighters." From the center they say: only “Alarm-30” can be declared (departure in 30 minutes (!) From the moment of announcement). The captain swore and said: "Take into the air all that is possible, as quickly as possible!". I ran to the navigator's telephone and contacted the squadron duty officer. Our squadron was not on duty that day, so I told him to find out who was on duty and have them raise their asses and race to the flight deck (only Alarm-7 suggests that you are already on the take-off deck and ready to go up into the air: “Alarm-30” means that you are still sitting in the waiting room).

    Soon, the Russian Su-27 and Su-24 at a speed of 500 knots passed directly above the Kitty Hawk bridge. Just like in the movie "Top Gun"! Officers on the bridge spilled their coffee and said ...! (An obscene expression, which has a very emotional Russian counterpart.) At that moment I looked at the captain - his face was crimson.

    The Russian fighters made two more steep turns at low altitude before we finally launched our first plane from the deck. It was ... ЕА-6В "Prauler" (electronic warfare aircraft). Yes, yes, we launched the unfortunate "Prawler" one on one against the fighter right above the ship. Our pilots already asked for help when finally the F / A-18 from the "sister" squadron (I use this term literally, because they looked like a company of "easy-going women" (the phrase in quotation marks has been replaced by a more decent administration note), flirting with the Russians) took off in the air to perform an interception. But it was too late. The whole team lifted their heads and watched the Russians make a mockery of our wretched attempt to stop them.

    The funny thing is that the admiral and the commander of the aircraft carrier were in the command room at the morning meeting, which was interrupted by the rumble of turbines of Russian aircraft circling the aircraft carrier’s cabin. An officer in the headquarters of the commander told me that they looked at each other, at the flight plan, were convinced that the launch was planned for that day only a few hours later, and asked: “What was that?”
  36. +2
    April 16 2014 07: 22
    The Pentagon issued a statement on Monday stating that the Russian Su-24 bomber ...

    Warren called such maneuvers intimidating and unacceptable. They demoralize the personnel of the ship and negatively affect the general psychological climate among military personnel ...

    According to him, now the ship is safe in the Romanian port, where it was urgently evacuated. The crew members undergo the necessary procedures with a psychologist to recover from the stress ...

    And although the Pentagon promised to increase the insurance sums of military personnel from 1 million dollars to 3 million dollars ...


    Dear author, will the proofs be for the article?
    All this, of course, is beautiful, like all of us - I am glad for any successes of our soldiers and equipment ... BUT!
    Somehow too all these quotes are given by comedy.
    It’s not a sin to laugh at mattresses, but only a little is believed in what the author wrote.
    request
  37. +3
    April 16 2014 07: 24
    Four days later, the Russian intelligence service sent an e-mail to the Kitty Hawk commander, photographs of our pilots rushing about on the deck, desperate to lift planes into the air ... ”

    The events described in the letter took place in the area of ​​the Korean Strait 17 on October 2000. Two Su-24МР reconnaissance aircraft and the Su-27 fighter-interceptor unit from the 11 Air Force and Air Defense covering them . According to the then Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Air Force Anatoly Karnukov, "it was a planned reconnaissance, during which, however, unusual tasks were solved." Moreover, no international agreements were violated by the Russian side.
  38. +4
    April 16 2014 07: 26
    article is complete nonsense! Of course it’s nice to think that we are the most. But do normal people really believe this? The plane flew by, and the Americans were overthrown. do you believe it yourself? It is clear that this is an information war, but to go down to the level of a kindergarten is already too much.
    1. +1
      April 16 2014 07: 30
      good Scha zaminusutsya ....
      1. +2
        April 16 2014 07: 51
        Plus
        Where are the proofs for the article?
        About peaceful Soviet tractors write a lot.
        Keep the caps guys, everything in moderation should be soldier
    2. +1
      April 16 2014 07: 48
      I think that they were not guessed by the type of aircraft, but by the radar jamming that they had set for us.
      1. +1
        April 16 2014 07: 55
        Good theory, good)
        But, as Lyube sang - "Yes, I want to believe, but my soul does not order" wink
        Share links suitable for the application?
    3. +1
      April 16 2014 08: 00
      Yeah, "flew by" ... 12 times. Through portals! It is, you know, demoralizing laughing
      They didn’t get fucked up, they politely complained: "Russians are evil, why are you doing this? We are scared!" MO did not comment on this cute rebuke, because from childhood they were used to sleeping with a cast-iron pistol under their pillow, and not with a plush toy from Disneyland ... Although it is hard to believe that 27 digs resigned, despite Reiters:
      According to Reuters, after the story of the Russian Su-24 overflying the USS Donald Cook, 27 (twenty-seven!) Crew members submitted their resignation. According to them, they "do not intend to endanger their lives."
      Read in full: http://yablor.ru/blogs/27-raportov-ob-otstavke-posle-prole/4331919
      1. 0
        April 16 2014 08: 56
        Quote: Ulairy

        Read in full: http://yablor.ru/blogs/27-raportov-ob-otstavke-posle-prole/4331919


        From your link:
        PS The words about 27 resignation reports turned out to be fake. Well, henceforth I will know how I feel about the site of Novorossiya, which has already removed its words about "27 reports". Well, for me - henceforth science: take your time and double-check on the Reuters website. I apologize, but I will not change the text - I was mistaken, it means I was mistaken.
  39. +2
    April 16 2014 07: 27
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    And when they signed the contract, no one promised them that a Russian plane would fly over them.


    At their recruiting points, an advertising post for the Navy sounds like this: "This is not a service - this is an adventure!" So they are worried about their priceless lives, apparently no one explained about the death during the adventure ...
    And so - do not hell with them in the Black Sea. How many times they came, so many times they received snot.
  40. +1
    April 16 2014 07: 28
    For me, this is a hat-shouting, cheers-patriotic "duck" to cheer up from the morning. Never think that your opponent is blind and deaf. Or a coward, as it is written here. There is official confirmation that they are there ... ..fight? No. The Americans, unfortunately for us, know how to fight, and they fight in a new way. And the British, in general, are an extremely inconvenient enemy, but that makes them more interesting.
  41. +3
    April 16 2014 07: 30
    And they did not say that the destroyer is a warship? They thought that they went on a yacht on the Black Sea? pissed, what else can I say ... Sailors would have sailed home while you’ve remembered, and it’s not even an hour, the carcass will still militate.
  42. +2
    April 16 2014 07: 33
    The bottom line: most likely the aircraft pumped the destroyer air defense and flew away, the data is being processed. The rest is lyrics.
    I completely agree with the danger of the completely dense underestimation of the enemy.
  43. +14
    April 16 2014 07: 33
    Hello everyone hiI leave it here soldier.
  44. +2
    April 16 2014 07: 37
    E-mine, how gentle we are, what nervous we are institutes. But Libya and Yugoslavia didn’t piss bomb, SUKI angry
  45. 0
    April 16 2014 07: 42
    It turns out that Russia no longer needs to arm itself - one plane closed the Black Sea!
  46. +1
    April 16 2014 07: 42
    Maybe hatred. But in the American Army there is a shortage of contractors, more than half are not US citizens at all. Officially allowed to serve ped.kam and pregnant women.
  47. +3
    April 16 2014 07: 45
    from the Don.

    Somehow, a ram quickly forgotten by amers with our ship of theirs! The USSR is gone, but the Russians remained!
  48. +3
    April 16 2014 07: 46
    International rudeness ov from permissiveness and invulnerability. Rub on those little bitches who are sitting in the bunker bombed by drones, like they play a computer. And then there was what it really was about. And when jo-pa is wet, then you don’t want to serve anymore, it’s not comfortable
  49. w2000
    +2
    April 16 2014 07: 48
    imitation of the attack of the Su-24 on the destroyer of the U.S. Navy had a demoralizing effect on the crew of the ship. 27 destroyer crew members resigned


    The crew members undergo the necessary procedures with a psychologist to recover from the stress.


    Under international maritime treaties, American ships cannot be in the Black Sea for more than 14 days. Exceeding this period gives Russia a legal right to launch a missile attack and destroy these ships without declaring US war.


    The article smacks of delirium composed for high school patriots.
    1. +2
      April 16 2014 08: 02
      Quote: w2000
      The article smacks of delirium

      The author is a well-known here "master of artistic whistle the words "Banshee" (Victor). THANKS to him for that !!!
      That's how he sees the situation. And that’s it ...
      For informativeness - "-".
      For positivity from the morning - "+".
      Eventually - ?????????????????
  50. +4
    April 16 2014 07: 54
    Quote: another RUSICH
    there was something really real about it. And when jo-pa is wet, then you don’t want to serve anymore, it’s not comfortable

    Really, at exercises, when attack aircraft fall on your head, believe me, the "sensations" are still those, even though I am a clumsy dozen, while they do not even shoot, but I already want to sit on my ass.
  51. 0
    April 16 2014 07: 55
    Why worry so much, there was probably a scout - just think, they took pictures for history! wassat
  52. +1
    April 16 2014 07: 59
    I smiled, although it’s hard to believe :)
  53. +1
    April 16 2014 08: 00
    Has the bomber pilot been nominated for the award yet?
  54. 0
    April 16 2014 08: 04
    there was such a thing) http://pikabu.ru/story/posadka_tu95_na_amerikanskiy_avianosetsbyil_574964
  55. 0
    April 16 2014 08: 09
    The article amused me) Apparently the team was made up of gay couples)) They are vulnerable.. They go hiking with their wives..) They are probably already on antidepressants))
  56. +1
    April 16 2014 08: 19
    We are all ready to laugh. Only the article is harsh sarcasm about the combat effectiveness and morale of the Stars and Stripes. But there are only two facts - their destroyer and our plane. That's all! The rest is speculation. But I liked it. You can also laugh.
  57. +1
    April 16 2014 08: 22
    “These maneuvers demoralize the ship’s personnel... The ship is now safe in the Romanian port, where it was urgently evacuated... The ship’s crew members are undergoing the necessary procedures with a psychologist to recover from the stress they suffered...”

    What text! What words! Hey misters! Shame on you? Are you military sailors - or what?? Are you on board a warship - or where?? We burst into tears like little girls... At least no one put their pants in their pants? Frankly, I had a higher opinion of the US Navy personnel.
    1. Com T-64a
      +1
      April 16 2014 08: 35
      Laugh!!! Second day! laughing
  58. HAM
    +1
    April 16 2014 08: 30
    I am pleased with the variety of greetings for “guests” in the Black Sea, sometimes “bulk”, sometimes “flight”.
  59. ken
    +2
    April 16 2014 08: 38
    In February 1988, Soviet intelligence reported that Yorktown and Caron were planning to repeat the action of two years ago in the near future. The command of the Black Sea Fleet received orders to fight back. Read more here: [media=http://www.aif.ru/society/army/1149939]
  60. 0
    April 16 2014 08: 41
    So that’s why they are switching to drones en masse. they are afraid that the pilots will shit themselves...
  61. +1
    April 16 2014 08: 42
    Laughter

    It’s funny to sell nonsense to people and watch how they believe it and spread nonsense further across the Internet... If before there was OBS - One Grandmother Said, now One Blogger Said...
  62. +2
    April 16 2014 08: 47
    From the article "... a Russian bomber flew twelve times at low altitude not far from an American destroyer. Warren called such maneuvers intimidating and unacceptable."

    Let the author of the article go a little overboard, but let’s assume that something in the article is true? If at the same time the US seafarers got scared, then what should civilians do in the south-east of Ukraine? Su-27s and crocodiles are flying over them in low-level aircraft, armored personnel carriers and tanks are on the roads. In this situation, following the example of the amers, they should go into a coffin, but they still stand and do not give up. And where is the vaunted Western media and its concern for human rights? It’s just that the “overseas owner” said to be silent while he plays his game.
  63. 0
    April 16 2014 08: 48
    it's all Hollywood and Pearl Harbor)))
  64. +1
    April 16 2014 08: 48
    Yes, of course. The article is bravura. It’s nice to read, of course, that we still have gunpowder in our flasks, and the Sushka pilot is generally respected and fully respected (inadequate people could have launched something in his direction, you also need to have strong balls). The only thing that confuses me in the article is the information about the 27 reports submitted by you. What, did the HR department call and tell you? No. Well, this is at the mercy of the author. And this is a normal demonstration of the flag and intentions on our part. That's how it should be. Send strategists to such small things - but to hell with it, they will self-flood))

    Quote: Ptah
    This is mandatory on ALL SHIPS IN THE WORLD. As well as flyers on a mission.
    In addition to their "main" purpose, diapers can be used as a dressing material.
    The question is, how many diapers should a destroyer have then? It’s clear that the pilots don’t have toilets in the cockpit, but the ship has plenty of this stuff... Or is it based on the fact that during the active phase of a combat conflict there is no time to run to the latrine? Then the tankers should be given it out, and the rest too...
    If anyone knows anything about this issue, please share the information.
    1. +1
      April 16 2014 11: 08
      Quote: Corsair0304
      During the active phase of a combat clash, there is no time to run to the latrine? Then the tankers should be given it out, and the rest too...

      1. That's it. And not only with BS.
      2. A thought that is not devoid of meaning. This is what is being done. It may not be advertised.

      During my service, diapers only became widely available and had not yet reached the fleet. But there were so-called technical wipes used as cleaning rags. 1 sq.m. this one absorbed up to 4-6 liters of water. And every self-respecting and prudent fighter always kept a piece of this on his BP. There were cases of using them, that is, not “for their intended purpose.” Nothing unnatural. All people and nothing human is alien.
      I don’t know about that, but I keep a couple of diapers in my car. For city traffic jams... Along with this.
      1


      But this one is for the “girls”.
      "In Deutschland produziert"
      1. +3
        April 16 2014 11: 27
        Quote: Ptah
        I don’t know about that, but I keep a couple of diapers in my car. For city traffic jams... Along with this.

        Hi Vadim!
        hi
        Very informative...
        But I would also like to get acquainted with the contents of the trunk of your car, your home....
        PS I almost forgot... How about the keys to the apartment...? laughing
        1. 0
          April 16 2014 12: 45
          Greetings, Ilyich!!!!!! drinks
          What's in the trunk? I don’t really know myself... I haven’t cleared it out yet... We only unloaded the aquarium and some dishes.
          I just arrived from Mecklenburg last night. By ferry through Helsinki and St. Petersburg. Tired as hell...
          The devices discussed are needed only in Europe, in Russia you can still go to the side of the road, and if you are in a traffic jam, in the middle of traffic, then turn on the emergency lights, raise your collar higher, and with an independent look the whole family proceed.... Where?
          Behind the nearest stall, probably... belay

          I haven’t gotten acquainted with the contents of the “glove compartment” for a very long time. They are big and there are three of them. House. The house is a full cup. Putty, tiles, parquet boards, drywall, etc. And protracted repairs... And also dried up tomato seedlings on the windowsills.
          There are no problems with the keys to the apartment. I'm ready to give it away in a month. Change the door anyway... tongue
          1. +3
            April 16 2014 13: 07
            Quote: Ptah
            I'm ready to give it away in a month. Change the door anyway...

            Congratulations on your move!
            Good luck!
            hi
  65. Shatt
    +1
    April 16 2014 08: 52
    Americans are real pricks. There was a case long ago when the loss of two aircraft demoralized the morale of the entire crew of an aircraft carrier. The planes took turns patrolling the border of the S-200 missiles, and they were shot down with two of these missiles each.
    The frigate was also grounded. Things didn't work out for them. How long has this destroyer been in the Black Sea? If ours were going to sink, then I think with calibers and torpedoes
  66. Artem1967
    +1
    April 16 2014 08: 55
    All that is certain is that there was a ship and there were planes flying over it. Everything else is the wild imagination of the author, not confirmed by anything. They didn’t go to Odessa after learning about mass protests and deciding not to escalate the situation. The Cook anti-aircraft gunners were also clearly not dozing, but were practicing repelling a training attack. You shouldn’t treat a potential enemy as a cowardly idiot, it could backfire. Congratulations to the Air Force command and the pilot!
  67. GRune
    0
    April 16 2014 08: 57
    According to international maritime treaties, American ships cannot stay in the Black Sea for more than 14 days.
    As far as I remember, any warships of countries that do not have access to the Black Sea and it seems like 21 days, not 14.
  68. +2
    April 16 2014 09: 01
    Here's more about amers:
    “Yu. Trushechkin, our rocket scientist, who shot down D. McCain during the Vietnam War, the same current Republican senator who is still alive and feels pathological hatred for Russia, wrote a book of memories about the war in Vietnam. So in it Yu. Trushechkin writes: “The best trophy for us was, as we called it, the “beggar’s flag.” This is a patch on the uniform of an American pilot with the inscription: “I, an American citizen, am in distress. Help, whoever can!” - and so on in five languages. They surrendered without complaint, gave us all the information, maps and tearfully asked for one thing - to save their lives." American soldiers are bad and rely only on their equipment.

    Source: http://politikus.ru/events/10711-rossiyskie-istrebiteli-su-27-nadrugalis-nad-ame
    rikanskim-avianoscem-kiti-hok.html


    Maybe the Americans were good warriors during the Second World War, I can’t say anything, and they drove convoys, and in Normandy they landed something like a second front (J. Stalin spoke about this: “...Battles of local significance... "). But now they seem to be in a steep decline in morale. We are used to fighting remotely.
  69. +1
    April 16 2014 09: 02
    Who put downvotes here? Respond rats, the news is positive! Does it really hurt your eyes?
    1. 0
      April 16 2014 11: 20
      Quote: exiv200gt
      Answer the rats

      And why do you need it? What, a pest control agent or what? Are you afraid of losing your professional skills?
      You still can’t formulate the “thought”...
      Quote: exiv200gt
      The news is positive!

      It was like that... Until the bored rat-catcher "boy Nils" appeared...
      1. -1
        April 18 2014 13: 01
        Why are you so bold? Fortunately, I have a different profession, but your knowledge in the field of rat extermination is amazing)) Do you sometimes make a living from this? Besides sitting and jerking off at the monitor.
  70. tnship2
    0
    April 16 2014 09: 08
    Maybe it's just misinformation? Just in the spirit of the Americans. They confuse their tracks.
  71. 0
    April 16 2014 09: 09
    Quote: Stalevar
    Well, I understand scary when such a fool comes to you. But to submit reports from the soldiers who took the oath is already too much))). And how are they going to fight?

    Well, it’s written (the information has not been confirmed. - Ed. “VO”). Well, where does this information come from? Who saw these reports? Well, kindergarten is a word
  72. Dyk
    Dyk
    0
    April 16 2014 09: 15
    Hard to believe, more like a joke.
    1. HAM
      +1
      April 16 2014 11: 27
      It's not funny, but there's a lot of talk!!!
  73. +1
    April 16 2014 09: 16
    I dealt with the Americans back in the USSR. If it’s not written down in the contract, they’ll die, but won’t do anything. And in terms of technical training, they’re sheep.
  74. 0
    April 16 2014 09: 18
    We should mention the pilots, although they already had fun))))))
  75. Max_Damage
    0
    April 16 2014 09: 25
    I want to believe)))) But in general it’s nonsense to think that everyone is a coward. They had big fights in Iraq with the infantry.

    In general, war kills both those who were killed and those who killed. Every hour in the United States, a veteran of local wars ends his life. It makes no difference whether you are brave or a coward.
  76. +1
    April 16 2014 09: 31
    It’s clear that Sushka was flying, but let’s look at things soberly... It’s unlikely that the Americans wrote reports about the write-off... Although the article is positive, I liked it... Therefore, I add it.
  77. +5
    April 16 2014 09: 34
    Quote: aktanir
    Early to celebrate just don't start. The information is not confirmed, and far-reaching dreamy conclusions are already being made. The destroyer is not a merchant ship or a tanker, there are military men who know what they are going to. Who would have fought in Afghanistan and Iraq if the Americans are so sensitive and weak-hearted? And who would have allowed the old drying up to the ship at all if a war had been officially unleashed between Russia and the USA? There is only one positive point - in practice, the attack on a ship of a foreign state has been tested. This is really an experience for the pilot! Everything else is speculation.

    .... Yes, this is not an attack... The pilot of the plane provoked the destroyer to turn on electronic warfare systems and other radio junk in order to remove the characteristics of its systems (electronic magnetic fields), and at the same time took a photo - a drying reconnaissance aircraft.... What is it for?? ? And then to enter the parameters of such a target into the on-board target identification systems of our anti-ship missiles....
  78. simbeer
    0
    April 16 2014 09: 36
    Google translation from the Pentagon website

    WASHINGTON, April 14, 2014 - A Russian attack aircraft repeatedly flew near the USS Donald Cook in international waters in the Black Sea on April 12, a Pentagon spokesman said today.


    Click on image for screen resolution image Sailors derail man as Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer Donald Cook arrives at Rota Naval Base, Spain, February 11, 2014. Donald Cook is the first of four Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyers to be stationed at Rota. US Navy photo of Seaman Edward Guttierrez III (Click on image for screen resolution image); High resolution images are available.


    The USS Cook was on patrol in the western Black Sea when an unarmed Russian Su-24 attack aircraft repeatedly flew near the Navy ship, Army Col. Steve Warren told reporters.

    "The aircraft did not respond to multiple requests and warnings from Donald Cook, and the event ended without incident in approximately 90 minutes," Warren said. "This provocative and unprofessional action by Russia does not comply with international protocols and previous agreements on professional interaction between our military."

    Two Russian aircraft were present, but only one took part in the provocative actions, Warren said. The plane flew from near sea level to a couple of thousand feet, he added, but never made a flyby of the US Arleigh Burke-class destroyer.

    "The Russian plane made a total of 12 passes," he said.

    The wingman stopped at a significantly higher altitude, Warren said.

    Officials later said the plane came within about 1000 meters of the ship. USS Cook was never in danger, Warren said.

    "Donald Cook is more than capable of defending himself against two Su-24s," the colonel said.

    Warren said he didn't think this was an example of a young pilot taking a ride. "I would find it hard to believe that two Russian pilots, on their own, would have made a decision about which action to take," he said. "We have seen the Russians behave unprofessionally and in violation of international norms in Ukraine for months, and these continued provocations and unprofessionalism do nothing to de-escalate the situation in Ukraine, which we have called on the Russians to do."

    Cook arrived in the Black Sea on April 10. The vessel is currently calling at the port in Constanta, Romania
  79. The comment was deleted.
  80. +2
    April 16 2014 09: 42
    They consider Ukraine a zone of their interests. Like we came for a visit, and then someone dared to circle the ship. They are indignant. Our sworn friends are simply unaccustomed to the fact that fighters of a Foreign State can circle over their ships, that their planes can be shot down... I don’t like it when their theory of world domination looks somehow faded.
    But it would be interesting to see what possible operation ours have prepared to neutralize this destroyer...

    I hope such pictures will remain only in the memories of Sevastopol residents. Never again would a single infection enter a raid.
    But this is the very hero who most likely annoys the amers.
  81. 0
    April 16 2014 09: 47
    I find it hard to believe
  82. 0
    April 16 2014 09: 48
    I laughed heartily. Interesting article.
  83. chastener
    +1
    April 16 2014 09: 58
    Article plus! I laughed heartily)) laughing
  84. mihasik
    0
    April 16 2014 10: 02
    What if there is war? They don’t have enough psychiatrists for everyone!))
  85. 0
    April 16 2014 10: 10
    Oh, little ones, we crap ourselves! A secret: Georgians still have the toilet paper that you sent them in 2008. It's not far from here.
  86. 0
    April 16 2014 10: 25
    As I understand it, we decided not to miss the opportunity to train pilots and at the same time photograph a modern American ship in detail. Well, from the American side, flying an unarmed plane at a distance can only be regarded as a friendly visit :)
  87. Freemason
    0
    April 16 2014 10: 31
    Oh, guys, well, where are you taking? Well this is not Iraq. This is Russia. And in our life alone there was a warrior in the field. And at sea. And in heaven. It was about our pilots Vysotsky wrote: “There are eight of us - two of us. The alignment before the fight is not ours, but we will play. ” So they would sit at home, take care of the nerves. And we will populate here somehow.

    Know ours)) although why be surprised... we had a case with the teachings of the amers. We knew that they couldn’t fight without bio toilets. But there was one case, I’ll tell you about it later in soldiers’ tales))
  88. +3
    April 16 2014 10: 34
    The article is some kind of nonsense. There is no need to portray the enemy as such idiots and cowards.
    Some kind of “hat-kicking” moods...
  89. +3
    April 16 2014 10: 36
    But I don’t believe this article. It’s very much in the spirit of the Soviet Union. The armor is strong and our tanks are fast. What is it designed for? Earning points? I’m generally pleased with the commentators on this site. One makes a comment like “they’re tough and will be for a long time.” wash the deck of crap." Immediately boom + 30!!! Sometimes it’s even disgusting.
    Do you really believe that they were very scared of this old SU 24? Yes, they laughed at him. And at his antics. Moreover, they themselves saw perfectly well that he was without weapons. I don’t find a logical explanation for this idiocy at all. Even with intelligence, I can’t explain this.
    Minus. I'll cry.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      April 16 2014 11: 13
      Quote: jekasimf
      But I don’t believe this article. It’s very much in the spirit of the Soviet Union. The armor is strong and our tanks are fast. What is it designed for? Earning points? I’m generally pleased with the commentators on this site. One makes a comment like “they’re tough and will be for a long time.” wash the deck of crap." Immediately boom + 30!!! Sometimes it’s even disgusting.
      Do you really believe that they were very scared of this old SU 24? Yes, they laughed at him. And at his antics. Moreover, they themselves saw perfectly well that he was without weapons. I don’t find a logical explanation for this idiocy at all. Even with intelligence, I can’t explain this.
      Minus. I'll cry.


      Dear, there is no need to cry, the newest Russian electronic warfare complex “Khibiny-U”, that’s where all the fuss is, as you write “junk SU-24” they could only observe visually.
      1. +1
        April 16 2014 11: 28
        So what? To do this, you had to fly 12 times at an altitude of 150 m?
        1. +2
          April 16 2014 11: 53
          Quote: jekasimf
          So what? To do this, you had to fly 12 times at an altitude of 150 m?
          How do you know how much data you need to record for double-checking? It's classified. Well, perhaps the Americans switched on various equipment in sequence, so the scout recorded it. Well, plus the psychological effect.
      2. 0
        April 16 2014 14: 41
        I admit. There is a version. I installed + Havoc.
  90. 0
    April 16 2014 10: 42
    Yes, they are nothing new, and the reason why they are so worried is that in the Montreux Treaty there is a point about the possibility of using weapons without declaring war, and these children of wild monkeys know that we will not rust, so the TURKS will make a couple of passes and from their ships as from There will be public toilets, from cabin boy to captain!
  91. dimadimadima
    0
    April 16 2014 10: 44
    Because in their understanding, war is shelling unarmed people with Tamogaws.
  92. 0
    April 16 2014 10: 57
    I can offer the only explanation for this incident, if you fantasize: There was a provocation on the subject of “the damned Yankees shot down our peaceful plane.” Now we are opening fire back. In principle, even I am ready to accept this, but on one condition, that the plane is without a pilot. ....
  93. 0
    April 16 2014 11: 01
    Quote: Soviet_Union
    Peaceful American destroyer, and you are his Dryer. You are angry. wassat

    So Patamu is peaceful and in the Black Sea lol And how the pins squealed a month ago: “The Russians are coming!!!” regarding the entry of an UNARMED Russian reconnaissance ship into Cuba on a business (refueling and food) visit. Now we need to send FIGHTING ships there more often. Squadrons.
  94. 0
    April 16 2014 11: 02
    The Americans also always loved to hang around our ships and bombers. So everything is fine.
  95. 0
    April 16 2014 11: 16
    I don’t understand American humor: D why join the army if you are afraid to defend your homeland or its interests. It’s funny, of course, about the fact that they say “they are afraid for their lives, and after that they also needed a psychologist” American girls. (I would shake hands with the pilot who scared the intrepid Americans) :D
  96. 0
    April 16 2014 11: 17
    According to the latest data, there were two Su-24s, while one performed exercises around the destroyer and destroyed the Americans as he wanted, the second hung nearby and did not allow them to twitch. Beautiful!
  97. +1
    April 16 2014 11: 41
    And in general, foreign troughs have nothing to do in the Black Sea, no matter how sophisticated they are, no matter how old or new. Let them fight with bananas.
  98. Aleksandr68
    0
    April 16 2014 12: 13
    I can recommend to fearless sailors a folk remedy - a decoction of oak bark (it strengthens the intestines well). But I don’t think anything can instill loyalty to the oath.
  99. +2
    April 16 2014 12: 36
    No comments!
    1. Shatt
      0
      April 16 2014 13: 12
      Thank you, I had a good laugh
  100. 0
    April 16 2014 14: 25
    I do not believe.
    1. The professional selection in USA will be better than ours.
    2. Why dump your shame on display.
    Or the scale of the reaction is greatly exaggerated,
    or they’ll just twist it like this,
    that the Russian Air Force attacked the peaceful Yusovsky destroyer.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"