Russian fighter overflew the destroyer Donald Cook

345
Russian fighter overflew the destroyer Donald Cook


The Russian fighter for a half hour made a series of maneuvers near the US destroyer Donald Cook. The ship's command issued several warnings to the fighter.

According to Interfax, citing a representative of the US armed forces, on Saturday, the fighter flew to the destroyer a thousand yards (about a kilometer) at an altitude of about 500 feet (150 meters). The fighter had no weapons, and the maneuvers ended without incident.

The destroyer Donald Cook, equipped with the Aegis missile defense system and Tomahawk cruise missiles, entered the Black Sea area of ​​10 in April. According to reports, the American destroyer will take part in joint military exercises with Romanian ships in the territorial waters of Romania, as well as in international waters.

Against the background of a sharp aggravation of the situation in Ukraine and around it, NATO is rapidly increasing its naval presence in the Black Sea region. Soon a powerful group will be created in the region.
345 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 14 2014 23: 32
    Quote: svetlomor
    Quote: leon17
    Without armament - it’s in vain, the ship is then armed !!!
    It was a polite plane.


    Never mind, the next polite plane will arrive with polite rockets and launch them with all its politeness. The Americans can only politely leave in English without saying goodbye.
  2. 0
    April 14 2014 23: 34
    Quote: Yuri11076
    Quote: kirieeleyson
    I will argue about the expression "beautiful ship". Even from a height it looks like a "beautifully twisted spiral".
    Arly Burke - the ugliest ships of the US Navy.
    Any of our BDK looks much more beautiful and interesting. look in search engines. As they write now - "google".

    Look at our ships, planes, tanks, it’s really beautiful, but theirs is something different, not at all pleasant. There is no such beauty inherent in Russian weapons...

    Yeah. American destroyers look more beautiful at the bottom of the sea, don’t you think?
    By the way, I like the TU-160 better than the B1B. Sorry for the possible off-topic
  3. 0
    April 14 2014 23: 35
    These shameful Yankees are still afraid of the Russians.
  4. Elena2014
    0
    April 14 2014 23: 37
    Eh, the photos are in good resolution, they didn’t put them on the Internet, it’s a pity...
  5. 0
    April 14 2014 23: 37
    Cadets learn to approach a target. The best scenario for training)
  6. +1
    April 14 2014 23: 48
    Quote: Little Muck
    Ours with a brush! hi drinks


    HOW MANY WET DIAMPERS ARE IN “OUR” BLACK SEA AT THE SAME TIME...)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
  7. +4
    April 14 2014 23: 50
    Quote: leon17
    Without armament - it’s in vain, the ship is then armed !!!
    it was a warning flight...I think Russia will also build up muscle in the Black Sea...and with weapons...
  8. 0
    April 15 2014 00: 04
    Su 24 is not exactly a fighter))
  9. fedul
    +2
    April 15 2014 00: 06
    if the "knights" had flown over, then the "cook" could have been left without a crew. Prove later that there are no Bermudas here))))
  10. Mih
    0
    April 15 2014 00: 08
    But really, these homosexuals in white, when the dry walked on them 15 times, shit their pants, despite all the defense of the destroyer.
    I watched the video on TV - the officer on deck had, in my opinion, ruined pants.
    Piss when you're scared. This is not to offend little ones, as well-educated British-Americans should know.
  11. Mih
    -1
    April 15 2014 00: 17
    But really, these homosexuals in white, when the dry walked on them 15 times, shit their pants, despite all the defense of the destroyer.
    I watched the video on TV - the officer on deck had, in my opinion, ruined pants.
    Piss when you're scared. This is not to offend little ones, as well-educated British-Americans should know.
  12. Mih
    +1
    April 15 2014 00: 20
    Yes, shoot at them, as Toledo did at Kursk, and say: there was a mistake, we didn’t want to. .
    1. 0
      April 15 2014 00: 23
      there was a mistake, we didn’t mean to...
      Is it like: “there was an unauthorized missile launch”? laughing
      1. Mih
        -2
        April 15 2014 00: 31
        "an unauthorized missile launch occurred"?
        Well, yes, it seems that way, whoever didn’t hide is not my fault. Remember the children's game? And now gentlemen in nice suits play it, and childhood is long gone. lol
  13. Mih
    0
    April 15 2014 00: 24
    Quote: bender8282
    Su 24 is not quite a fighter

    Yes, this is a fighter-bomber, and not a front-line one at all. Multi-purpose. Ha.
  14. Mih
    0
    April 15 2014 00: 27
    then "cook" could remain
    And the cookies ate the cookies. In the east - this is fate.
  15. machinetchik_39
    +1
    April 15 2014 00: 33
    Now Cook needs to rush home, the crew has probably used up all the toilet paper in 12 visits, and they’ve also run out of antidepressants...
  16. +1
    April 15 2014 00: 40
    How tired of these s! If you do it, it’s your fault, if you don’t do it, it’s your fault!
    IT IS NECESSARY THAT VVP X Y Y PUT ON THEM, WITH A PART AND DO IT AS NECESSARY!!!
  17. 0
    April 15 2014 00: 44
    The guy on the plane didn’t even have the option of not having weapons; imagine his thoughts when he saw the enemy ship, for the sake of which he was destroyed in the military institute!
  18. Good Dad
    0
    April 15 2014 00: 49
    A bale right in the crown... And no Cook tongue
  19. ed.sew
    0
    April 15 2014 00: 54
    Good night everybody! Friends, I’m not a righteous person either, but let’s try without swearing.
  20. +2
    April 15 2014 00: 56
    Quote: Sharingan
    But here the jingoistic patriots have already written that the Americans lost their shit when they saw one Russian plane.

    What did you have to “write”?
    That the Americans would have shot him down in one go? So they write on other sites where enemies, traitors and liberal rot gather.
    Go to your people.
  21. Aland
    0
    April 15 2014 01: 25
    OH guys I'm not a coward
    been through a lot of things
    in every war they die
    people, fucked peace is better than war
    while peace we can sit in the chat right now
    when it comes to
    Kalasha means politicians are...
    1. ed.sew
      0
      April 15 2014 03: 44
      I agree with you! I’m 41 years old, I’ve also had a lot of fun in my life. Let there be anything, just not war!
  22. princess
    +3
    April 15 2014 01: 33
    Well, try our plane - it will mean that you have come on your last trip. We are proud of our Russia!!! keep it up
  23. Smiles to you
    +1
    April 15 2014 01: 37
    We are not happy to see you...Pedal until they give up....
  24. FromTheNewWorld
    +2
    April 15 2014 01: 45
    From the Ukrainian site
    The US Department of Defense reported an incident in which a Russian military aircraft made repeated low-altitude passes near a US warship in the Black Sea.
    The event occurred on April 12, Radio Liberty reports.
    According to Pentagon spokesman Colonel Stephen Warren, the actions of the Russian plane the day before yesterday were provocative and unprofessional.
    Warren said that the Russian Su-24 aircraft, for about an hour and a half, passed 12 times at low altitude directly next to the American destroyer Donald Cook, which has been in the Black Sea since April 10. At the same time, the plane pilot did not respond to repeated radio warnings about the danger of his actions."
    They say the plane's actions were "unprofessional" laughing The plane, not the pilot laughing
    1. 0
      April 15 2014 04: 20
      And the airplane was without a pilot and without markings (like a Black Sea dolphin)..?! It would have been a laugh when the 24th would have taken the drunken Cook “to ram” on the 13th orbit... Who should I ask..? The risk in “such” penetrations into inland seas is always high...
      On the basis of the aircraft, modifications to the scout and jammer were created. Su-24M / MP / MP / M2 are equipped with a refueling system in the air.
      Here, along the way, they also demonstrated something .. and maybe Cook will hang in the port to replace electronic equipment ..
  25. +1
    April 15 2014 01: 49
    Pentagon: Russian Su-24 overflight of an American destroyer was a provocation.
    I consider the appearance of an American destroyer in the Black Sea a provocation.
  26. +4
    April 15 2014 01: 56
    Dear “partners”.. Fluff your locators and listen to the supplement to our telegraph... A red peeling stump on your collar so that the collar does not get dirty and your head does not hang out!
  27. 0
    April 15 2014 02: 02
    Disappointed. We're at home. The United States behaves more aggressively in such cases. It’s time to check the Navy leadership for professional suitability. Here’s how it should be6 http://youtu.be/BYq79uCiU_4
  28. +2
    April 15 2014 02: 05
    Here's how to do it 6
  29. 0
    April 15 2014 03: 30
    How's the deck? They're still scrubbing! laughing
  30. 0
    April 15 2014 04: 22
    "The fighter was unarmed and the maneuvers were completed without incident."

    But in vain. Any case can happen. And such flights, I think, should be continued. Tickle the nerves of the Americans.
  31. ken
    +5
    April 15 2014 04: 27
    [media=http://itar-tass.com/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/1120719]. Apparently, it was a big surprise for the Amers. good good good
  32. 0
    April 15 2014 04: 38
    They should have stuck a cruise missile in his side. He was going to conduct training here.
  33. DimychDV
    +2
    April 15 2014 04: 50
    It is necessary to act according to their rules of spelling and propaganda: “The aggressive intentions of the ship finally became clear when it positioned itself at a course of 45 degrees, which, as is known, if extended by 2000 km, would lead directly to the developed industrial regions of the Urals. After which it was accepted decision to IMMEDIATELY prevent the obvious threat of a ship’s invasion into the territorial lands of the Central Urals (the breadbaskets of the Kuban region, into the Russified territorial waters near the Tuzla sand spit, into the memorial waters above a torpedo bomber killed in the war, you never know...)"

    However, the problem is that we do not know how to wage propaganda wars: all the press in the West is paid for from the pockets of the customers of this coven. Well, since this is beyond our ability, why not explain separately at the UN Security Council and in telephone conversations with these son-of-a-bitch children: Russia will not abandon its own people, save some money for your online newspapers. And we will start with our social traitors. Let's give them a free excursion to Olkhon Island - and let them drink the cleanest water in the world and build their New Rainbow City there. Even if they try to reproduce through LGBT people, the land there is sacred, and everything can dry up to hell. Let them try to build it themselves, without NGOs and payments due to rubles - as long as they pay taxes. And we will build the City of the Sun. Do you want to share? We just have to press the button...
  34. Everest2014
    0
    April 15 2014 04: 51
    Am I the only one who read that the plane was flown over by the destroyer Donald Duck? sad
  35. 0
    April 15 2014 05: 49
    I wonder when this basin spotted us and the interception range. We can write off these readings, well, for the sake of general development. Maybe it's crawling quietly.
  36. 0
    April 15 2014 06: 37
    There’s no point in all sorts of destroyers sailing under our fighters and getting in the way!!!
  37. +2
    April 15 2014 07: 06
    Today is April 15th Day of the Radio-Electronic Warfare Troops (EW) and our aircraft apparently was practicing tasks to identify and search for countermeasures to their electronic means. Happy Holidays, electronic warfare fighters. Keep it up,
  38. 0
    April 15 2014 07: 07
    Well, why are you the main bastards?
  39. 0
    April 15 2014 09: 42
    Is there a possibility that a mine from World War II will surface?
  40. 0
    April 15 2014 11: 11
    The ship's command issued several warnings.

    Yeah, something like "don't come near me or I'll scream..."
  41. 0
    April 15 2014 16: 17
    Quote: dmit-52
    And we did not invite them here!


    according to international law, they must go home in 14 days, otherwise the khan soldier
  42. The comment was deleted.
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. 0
    April 15 2014 22: 49
    Must be tested on a live target)

    Neither Aegis nor Tomahawks will help him)
  45. The comment was deleted.
  46. ABV
    0
    April 16 2014 00: 34
    2 years on this site....yeah, what have the comments really become?????? Previously, intellectual and mutually respectful dialogues, now sometimes it’s not clear whether you’ve wandered into a Rambler.... some kind of shit with each other, banter, stupid low-grade jokes.... nope!!! We are degrading at full speed!!! urrr upgraded.....uh....they crap on "Military Review"!!!!!!!!!!!

    Here's a cry from the heart!
  47. 0
    April 16 2014 06: 00
    Quote: andrei332809
    had to tu-xnumx

    Well guys, why is it so cruel?

    One small plane flew by - and 27 people couldn’t raise their hands to do their jobs (and... maybe not only couldn’t raise their hands wink )

    Do you want to send the carcass
    This could leave a trail of bloody diarrhea across the entire Mediterranean Sea.
    I feel sorry for the fishermen smile
  48. 0
    April 16 2014 16: 10
    It is believed that ours used the Khibiny electronic warfare system. This explains the confidence of our pilot and the fear on the destroyer.
  49. 0
    April 16 2014 17: 06
    “A Russian fighter flew over the destroyer Donald Cook” Yesterday on the news on RenTV I heard that after our fighter flew over the destroyer, 23 sailors on the destroyer submitted reports of dismissal due to fear for their lives!!!!
  50. JETFLAG
    +1
    April 17 2014 10: 24
    Continuing the theme of our SU-24 mocking the American destroyer Donald Cook. Very interesting article. Read)

    “Khibiny” is the latest Russian electronic warfare system, which will be installed on all promising Russian aircraft. No matter how much I looked for it, I couldn’t find any data about it, but here it is written that the SU-24 was already used in exercises in Buryatia. So, nothing can demoralize a military man more than his own powerlessness! In light of all of the above, I see the situation as follows. On April 10, 2014, the above-mentioned destroyer arrived in the neutral waters of the Black Sea to carry out an act of intimidation and a show of force - in connection with Russia’s inflexible position on Ukraine and Crimea. Before this, another American missile destroyer, Trakstan, was located in the Black Sea, in violation of the Montreux Convention. That is, the typical mouse fuss beloved by the Americans took place - saber rattling and international rudeness. Russia's reaction was calm, but deadly: on April 12, the great day of cosmonautics, ours equipped an unarmed SU-24 for a flight in neutral waters, BUT with Khibiny missiles under the wing. Then everything developed approximately according to this scenario: “Kuk” spotted the approach of the “drying” from afar, sounded a combat alarm and stopped at the combat posts. Everything was going as normal, the radars were calculating the approach course to the target, and the Aegis was properly controlling the guidance systems. And suddenly - bang! Everything went out. "Aegis" does not work, the screens show dregs, even "Phalanxes" cannot receive target designation! Meanwhile, the SU-24 passed over the deck of the Cook, made a combat turn and simulated a missile attack on the target. Of course, successful - because there is no opposition! Then he turned around and faked another one. And so on - another 10 times! All attempts by technicians to revive the Aegis and provide target designations for air defense failed, and only when the silhouette of the “drying” disappeared into the haze over the Russian coast did the screens come to life, and the guidance systems faithfully showed the clear April sky shining with emptiness.

    I summarize. Most likely, after the SU-24 turned on in the immediate vicinity of the Cook, the Khibiny, the entire destroyer air defense failed. Ours, checking the effectiveness of the electronic warfare system, 12 (!) Times simulated an attack on an American ship. For all this time, the crew of the ship was unable to reanimate the extinguished BIOS. She earned only when the SU-24 went heading for the base. It was then that, realizing their own powerlessness against the EW complex of an ordinary bomber, 27 people submitted reports on leaving.
  51. 0
    April 17 2014 19: 22
    I can imagine with what pleasure the Russian pilot did all this... He would do it and do it...
  52. 0
    April 17 2014 20: 03
    am lklkllklkljlllklklklljlj