He is only Putin

November 30, 2013 420

After Forbes magazine named President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin the most influential person on the planet, I remembered an article in a Finnish newspaper that was published many years ago. It was material on why the Finns do not have the right to vote in the presidential elections of the Russian Federation, although the Russian president affects the life of the Finns more than the president of Finland. I note that this was the position of the leading Finnish newspaper.

Interesting. The material came out almost 10 years ago, when Putin was already in power. Such a text is proof that Putin’s influence at that time was already larger and wider than the borders of Russia. But then the world did not know who he really was.

He knows today. The latest events prove that, together with Putin, Russia's influence and prestige have grown much higher than the authority of an organization like the UN, which could not solve the problem of Syria. And the Russian president could. He practically prevented the attack of the United States and NATO on Syria and thus prevented the start of the third world war. And Putin’s moral position in relation to Syria is much higher than that of opponents of Russia, who at the same time support terrorists in the fight against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and demand immediate military intervention.

Putin’s initiative has proven that he not only protects Syria from the aggression of the United States and NATO, but also protects the sovereignty of any nation, as well as the will of the people of any democracy.

Putin is interesting because, unlike most Western politicians, he does not play the role of president. He is only Putin. Many other presidents behave like actors at best and like Robots. One often gets the impression that the president of France or the prime minister of Great Britain, for example, has a life completely separate from that which is "on the stage." Obama is a brand new actor on the scene, but he plays his part with a mask on. His mask is a way to hide the real, much tougher politics. At the same time, the viewer can say that Putin behaves like at home. He can normally smile, joke or laugh. And he does all this absolutely spontaneously, as any person in a good mood does.

Therefore, it is very difficult to hate Putin. All his political enemies and opponents can easily expose themselves to clowns. For example, recently it became known that the so-called non-systemic opposition of Russia has no political program. It was absurd.

There is a feeling that the Russian president always expresses his opinion. This is also surprising and unprecedented. Putin, for example, organizes press conferences, during which he answers questions from journalists and the people live for hours on end. Other politicians tried to imitate this, but often they simply did not succeed, because they often do not have their own opinions.

Why? Because in the West the president is a politician who repeats the words of his sponsors. He cannot express his opinion.

Putin is an experienced manager, unlike Western leaders, who are mostly professional collectors of campaign sponsorship.

Another problem for Western colleagues is that Putin is defending Russia's national interests. It can be seen everywhere and in everything. Western presidents fear that their people will also begin to demand protection from them for their national interests.

Some experts, long before the start of the elections, began to accuse Russia that all its future elections were falsified in advance. Then in Russia they organized another unprecedented experiment: video surveillance was installed at all polling stations, and any person on the planet could watch the election process online. Already, all Western presidents and politicians are in shock. They fear that their people will also demand online video monitoring of the elections. How will the sponsors respond to this? In the US, for example, no one can check how these “selective” computers operate and what programs they have.

By this Putin, of course, represents a certain threat for the Western states. A lawyer by training, he likes compliance with laws and international conventions. And this, in turn, does not like his Western colleagues, who are used to doing everything in their own way. But even more dangerous is the fact that Putin is really popular not only in Russia, but also abroad.

At the same time, Putin is almost impossible to compare with other rulers of Russia or leaders of other countries. It seems that he does not compare himself with anyone. This is a good example: why should a person constantly compare himself with someone?

Naturally, he looks good against the background of Yeltsin or Gorbachev. But their background was different. Gorbachov was against the background of the USSR, Yeltsin was against the background of the ruins of the USSR. Putin’s peculiarity is that his background is Russia. So Putin is a man against the background of Russia.

Putin’s main danger is that he is a normal Russian person. This is his main threat to the West. After all, this means that he will normalize Russia. The only role in which Russia feels natural is the role of the Empire.

Russia cannot be a nationalist, mono-ethnic state, otherwise it will disintegrate as a state. Therefore, one of Putin’s main tasks is to eliminate bourgeois nationalism. In Russia, there is practically no Russian nationalism, unlike all European countries, which are practically so-called national states. In Russia, there is a healthy patriotism, which in the West does not exist.

As the famous Russian scientist, American professor Daniel Rancourt-Laferiere writes, the term “Russian Federation” “mysteriously sounds like a temporary one.” The patriotism of today's Russia is the patriotism of a new multinational, multi-confessional empire. Therefore, to normalize Russia is to create a Eurasian Empire, which has nothing to do with Russian nationalism. We see here a multi-confessional, multi-ethnic state, which is built on the principles of free market relations and equality between people.

It is worth remembering the former CIA officer and whistleblower of US global espionage Edward Snowden, who became a milestone in Putin’s career. After all, Snowden showed by his example that if earlier people were looking for a better life in the West, now they are looking for it in the East.

By the way, I wonder why there is no Lavrov in the Forbes list, but only Putin? After all, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is also one of the most influential people on the planet. His influence is greater than the influence of some chancellors and prime ministers. To be honest, Lavrov also needs to be added to this list, and it was biased to put only one person from Russia in the list. Apparently, in this way, the creators of the list wanted to demonstrate once again that they are ignoring Russia's present influence in the world.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

tomich

-2

30 November 2013 20: 59

tomich
Calm down, I didn't mean myself. I am not a serviceman of the Russian Armed Forces.

And the attempt to justify one’s rightness by the presence or absence of minuses makes a pathetic impression. Fail. Try again. :))) Moreover, even this argument is not in your favor.

And please, indicate who you are addressing, if you are afraid to answer your opponent directly and push your answer down... if you don’t know how, I’ll explain - under the comment there is a virtual button - reply - click there. Otherwise, I accidentally came across your answer and was almost deprived of the happiness of seeing it. :)))

And lastly, but perhaps most importantly, you did not answer my question about the candidate you would prefer to see in Putin’s place. I understand that I have little guts to answer directly, but such attempts to wriggle out look too unsightly; an association arises with a half-crushed worm, since it was not possible to wriggle out. And your point of view is about as valuable as a damaged worm.... again a failure. :)))

You are a loser, sir. :))))

and you are such a flawed comrade that you think that there is not a person in the country who will not replace your deity?))) so you consider the Russian people to be cattle, incapable of changing power
1. smile
  
  -1
  
  30 November 2013 21: 45
  
  tomich
  When you contact someone, it’s enough to write your opponent’s nickname at the beginning and it’s not at all necessary to copy the entire comment in order to attribute a couple of your lines to him. :)))
  
  Sorry, but it was you who showed your inferiority, duplicity and rare resourcefulness.
  So where is the answer to the question? Where am I asking? :))) :)))I asked to name your candidacy...damn, this is the third time I’ve asked. :)))
  And what? No answer. Tomich dodges and it is quite obvious that, like any lying nonentity who doesn’t even know how to lie believably, he has nothing to answer....:)))
  My condolences......:)))
  
  And lastly, by insulting the choice of the people of Russia, you naturally try to attribute it to me. It is you who think that people are - if you think that they have the same thoughts as the brainless swamp hamster herd... well, like you in general. :)))
  Fortunately, this is not the case. We have very little swamp trash.
  
  So, just in case, for the fourth time I ask - state your last name... and stop dodging - just name your candidacy... and that’s it...:))))
2. JIaIIoTb
  
  -1
  
  1 December 2013 09: 07
  
  Quote: tomich
  and you are such a flawed comrade that you think that there is not a person in the country who will not replace your deity?))) so you consider the Russian people to be cattle, incapable of changing power
  
  However, you are a troll.
Megre

+1

30 November 2013 21: 17

Oil, gas, timber......
tomich

+6

30 November 2013 21: 21

During Putin’s reign, at least 140 million people left 2 millionth Russia. Let me remind you that in any country, 4% of the population is considered active, creative. As Pasteur said, remove 100 people from the history of France - and there will be no France. For comparison: Norway and Canada - two commodity countries with not the best climate - have a constant influx of emigrants.
In addition to the emigrants themselves, there are also Putin’s officials and friends. Russia accuses the US of violating human rights, but Putin's buddies buy apartments in Manhattan. And Finnish citizen Gennady Timchenko lives in Geneva. We present an amazing spectacle: the Pushkovs and Yakemens are tearing their throats out that the damned West is plotting against the great Putin. But at the same time, the owners of Pushkov and Yakemen women send their children to study in England, buy villas in Nice, and keep the money in Switzerland. They do not buy real estate in wonderful North Korea and do not send their children to study in no less wonderful Syria.
During Putin’s reign, all members of the Lake cooperative became billionaires. I can’t name a single person who over the 12 years of no one has become a billionaire and who would not be familiar to Putin. That is one more time. All of Putin’s good friends have become billionaires. None of the people unfamiliar to Putin became a billionaire.
Most of Putin's ministers are also billionaires. An investigation is underway against the former Minister of Communications Leonid Reiman in Germany. When Reiman was in charge of communications, only companies flourished in Russia. When Igor Shuvalov began to supervise it, the N-vision company began to flourish. The offshore company of the same Igor Shuvalov provided Alisher Usmanov with $50 million. to purchase shares of Corus Group, and less than a year later Usmanov returned $100 million to this company.
The state modernization project began with the curator of Skolkovo, Mr. Vekselberg, buying a building from the Hungarian government for $21 million. and immediately sold it to the state for $116 million.
During Putin's reign, the country received 1,5 trillion. petrodollars and has not built a single road that meets highway standards. The Lena federal highway, the only road connecting Russia with a territory that is larger in size than England, France, Germany, Holland, etc. combined, is a swamp. It is built exactly the same way roads were built in the 17th century. There is no continuous asphalt road from Moscow to Vladivostok.
For comparison: China has been building 5-6 thousand km all these years. highways every year and now has the second largest road network in the world after the United States.
During Putin's rule, unpunished killings of people on the roads have become the norm. Officials and oligarchs kill ordinary people and get away with it. If the relatives of the victims try to fight, like the relatives of the murdered son of Defense Minister Svetlana Beridze, criminal cases are opened against them. The last high-profile murder of pensioner Yuri Druzhinin, committed while speeding at 200 km. at one o'clock by the motorcade of the Smolensk governor Misharin, happened on the eve of the elections.
Gazprom's share in the European gas market has declined sharply. But the cost has increased. Russia never began development of the Shtokman.
Nord Stream, an agreement on which was signed in 2005, will cost Russia at least $16 billion. For comparison: in 2006, China signed an agreement with Turkmenistan on the construction of a gas pipeline, and it has already been built. Construction cost $2 billion. Without exaggeration, we can say that the only successful project that has actually been implemented is the restoration of the city of Grozny. This successful project, however, has many other side effects.
1. Russ69
  
  +1
  
  30 November 2013 22: 41
  
  Quote: tomich
  Nord Stream, an agreement on which was signed in 2005, will cost Russia at least $16 billion. For comparison: in 2006, China signed an agreement with Turkmenistan on the construction of a gas pipeline, and it has already been built. Construction cost $2 billion.
  
  The complexity of the projects is not even comparable...
  Quote: tomich
  Gazprom's share in the European gas market has declined sharply.
  
  At the same time, volumes have increased, and as for the share, much is influenced by both the season and the state of the economy... For reference; after the crisis, by 2010, it fell by 10%, and by 2012 it grew by 17%...
  As for the rest, no one says that everything is fine. Just behind the obvious negative sides, you shouldn’t ignore the positive ones...
  1. RSNV.
    
    +1
    
    1 December 2013 00: 01
    
    Quote: Russ69
    Just behind the obvious negative sides, you shouldn’t ignore the positive ones...
    
    Definitely not worth it. Here are the most prominent ones:
    -The first stage of the Eastern Siberia - Pacific Ocean oil pipeline. Now Russian oil is pumped not only to the West, but also to the East;
    -Oil and gas production in the sea off the coast of Sakhalin. Almost everything is for export;
    -Gas pipeline on Sakhalin, from north to south to the gas liquefaction plant;
    -A natural gas liquefaction plant was built on Sakhalin to ship it by sea to foreign consumers;
    -The Nord Stream underwater gas pipeline, increasing gas exports to Europe;
    -Construction of the South Stream gas pipeline to increase gas exports;
    -An oil loading terminal was built in Primorsk, the terminal increases oil exports;
    -Completion of the Bureyskaya hydroelectric power station. Construction began in 1984; in 1990-1998, virtually no construction was carried out. In 2011, the Bureyskaya HPP reached full capacity, but continues to be in the final stages of construction; its commissioning into permanent operation is scheduled for 2014. In total, it took “only” 12 years to complete the construction of one power plant in the Russian Federation (see Soviet five-year plans). Electricity is mainly supplied to China;
    -Izhora Pipe Plant. Manufactures large diameter pipes for oil and gas projects;
    -Foreign cars of Russian screwdriver (mostly) assembly;
    -Screwdriver production of foreign grain combines;
    -Trading networks for the sale of food and goods (mainly imported).
    All these achievements, however, are not unambiguously positive, since some increase the volume of exports of irreplaceable resources and work to further transform Russia into a raw materials colony. And others - screwdriver production and foreign trade networks - are turning the country into a market for foreign goods. That is, all these new construction projects are typical for a raw materials colony. The question arises: will they benefit the people? Doubtful. After all, over the past 14 years, raw materials have been sold for TRILLIONS of dollars, with these funds it would have been possible long ago to completely modernize the entire industry, build our own new full-fledged high-tech enterprises, update the housing and communal services... None of this has been done.
    1. Russ69
      
      +2
      
      1 December 2013 01: 55
      
      Quote: rsnv
      -A natural gas liquefaction plant was built on Sakhalin to ship it by sea to foreign consumers;
      
      Well, let’s not sell oil, although all countries with reserves sell it. What's next ? We will close down the industry for the most part, we will fire a bunch of people, and not only in oil and gas, but we will also close other enterprises that serve it. And we will shout together that GDP has closed a bunch of factories...
      Quote: rsnv
      With these funds it would have been possible long ago to completely modernize the entire industry, build our own new full-fledged high-tech enterprises,
      
      What kind of factories should we build specifically? So that it is profitable.
      1. RSNV.
        
        -1
        
        1 December 2013 16: 18
        
        Quote: Russ69
        Well, let’s not sell oil, although all countries with reserves sell it. What's next ? We will close down the industry for the most part, we will fire a bunch of people, not only in oil and gas, but we will also close other enterprises
        
        You attribute to me something that I did not say or mean; this is a dishonest way of conducting a discussion, or, more simply, cheap demagoguery. For you and for everyone who has vision problems, I repeat:
        Over the past 14 years, raw materials have been sold for TRILLIONS of dollars, with these funds it would have been possible long ago to completely modernize the entire industry, build our own new full-fledged high-tech enterprises, update the housing and communal services... None of this has been done.
        
        Quote: Russ69
        What kind of factories should we build specifically? So that it is profitable.
        
        How would it be profitable in Russia? M. Thatcher already answered this question in the late 80s. I will quote it (not verbatim) for those who do not know or have already forgotten: It is necessary to sell oil and gas (only raw materials), and also reduce the population to 20 - 30 million, which is enough to extract raw materials and maintain their transportation systems in order. And everything will be as it should be, i.e. very, very cost effective.
        
        Quote: Russ69
        What kind of factories should we build specifically?
        
        And now specifically for those in the tank.
        In the Russian Federation, the basic branches of modern industry have been destroyed:
        - machine tool building;
        -instrument making;
        -electronic engineering;
        -microelectronics production;
        -electrical industry;
        -civil aircraft manufacturing;
        -production of high-tech structural materials.
        
        Without recreating the above-mentioned industries, and this is a very costly and absolutely unprofitable matter in the short term, all the talk about increasing Russia's defense capability, about the mass production of the latest weapons systems, and simply about the state sovereignty of the Russian Federation is empty chatter aimed at simpletons.
      2. rusmat73
        
        0
        
        6 December 2013 14: 33
        
        Our heavy engineering factories have collapsed...and light industry also needs to be lifted off the floor, since China is ahead of the rest = which is very sad...
        bearing factories are very necessary! Our bearing plant in Izhevsk disappeared overnight (the machines were taken out at night, and people who came in the morning were told “HELP!”) now in the place of the plant there are shops, business centers... (about other factories that were destroyed and not only in Izhevsk , but regarding Russia I will modestly keep silent...)
        We need to take care of children and teenagers, education!!! there is no one to replace people of retirement age in factories, there is no continuity, those who come do not know how to work and most importantly cannot use their heads to work...NOBODY WILL SOON BE WORKING...there will be no industry - who will go to stores with empty pockets?
voliador

+3

30 November 2013 21: 37

If he is so influential, why doesn’t he restore order in the country? Corruption and extortion of bribes at all levels of government! The Smerdyukov case alone is worth something!
tomich

+1

30 November 2013 21: 52

Lukashenko, for the especially stupid
1. smile
  
  +1
  
  30 November 2013 23: 06
  
  tomich
  Wow, Tomsk, I finally gave birth... congratulations... at least some result.
  So, another question - tell me - when did Lukashenko run for the presidency of the Russian Federation? Or when he hung around our squares with the swamps, fascists and homosexuals and demanded power for himself?
  I answer - never - he is a normal guy.
  
  Therefore, this attempt to get out is also considered unsatisfactory. Two again! :))) Abydna, right? :)))
  Neither the legislation of the Republic of Belarus nor the legislation of the Russian Federation allows Lukashenko to take the post of our president. Although, if we had it instead of an elbong, it would, of course, be better. By a couple of orders of magnitude. And no Putin would have appeared in Russia - the old man would have ruled all these twenty years.
  
  So, since you have shown that you belong to the herd of especially stupid ones, I repeat the question for the FIFTH TIME. Well, maybe you’ll understand for the fifth time? :)))
  Of the real candidates who have applied and are currently applying for power, who do you consider a more worthy candidate than Putin...
  
  I beg you, answer me, please...I won’t be able to sleep until I see the result of your intense thinking.... :))) Or repent - I’m kind, I’ll forgive everything! :))))
tomich

0

30 November 2013 21: 55

and you mean a herd with brains?))) judging by the statements that your limited thinking gives out, it’s unlikely)))
1. smile
  
  0
  
  30 November 2013 23: 12
  
  tomich
  "Are you passionate, Paramosha"! :))))Commendable stubbornness...:)))excuse me, but are you sure you weren’t subjected to domestic violence as a child? :))))There are simply signs of masochism and victimized behavior - remember this joke about a blonde and three Caucasians..:))) There is also the phrase “No. Tomato!” :))))
  
  I answered your top gem - please answer too. :)))
  
  For those who are especially unique, I repeat the question for the SIXTH TIME! :))))
  
  "Which of the real candidates who have applied and are currently applying for power do you consider a more worthy candidate than Putin..."
  Just don't make me laugh like that anymore - I'm already tired of laughing...:)))
striker

+1

30 November 2013 22: 38

Putin’s admiration for “worshipping” jingoists stems from a misunderstanding of one simple truth:

PUTIN IS NOT FIGHTING THE WEST FOR RUSSIA. PUTIN FIGHTS WITH THE WEST FOR CONTROL OVER RUSSIA.

For control over gas pipelines and oil pumping stations of “their” clan. They need Russia not as a STATE, but as a TERRITORY. Therefore, the only thing they are ready to “invest” in in Russia is the production of hydrocarbons, the accompanying infrastructure and security forces to retain the territory and “establish order.” All their other interests are in the West. They don’t care about Russia as a STATE. Moreover, they don’t care about the Russian People.
The comment was deleted.
The comment was deleted.
Black

+5

30 November 2013 22: 45

It was necessary to bend over in order to lick like that!!!
"Putin's initiative has proven that he......defends the sovereignty of any nation, as well as the will of the people of any democracy."

The author knows that the periphery of the Russian Federation is on the verge of collapse.
Municipalities (and these are the working cells of any government entity) are drowning in poverty.
It seems to me that the greatness of the leader of a country should be measured in the well-being of his own people. And not in the number of cameras at polling stations
The comment was deleted.
moskal68

+2

30 November 2013 22: 54

Quote: Damask
I'm proud of Putin.
Well, little dessies, what?
The comment was deleted.
basmach

+3

30 November 2013 23: 07

Putin is a man who sold the honor of an officer and betrayed his oath. The fosterling of Sobchak and EBN, who helped them plunder and ruin the country. Forget about fairy tales about the rise of the country, look at our recent history and you will see a coincidence - the promotion of Putin and the rise in oil prices (in which there are no personal merits of his) from 11-12 dollars to 100. Only this saved Russia (alas, for a very short period of time) from collapse and collapse. Think for yourself (if there is at least one twist) - WHY Serdyukov ruined the army for so long, but the Supreme Commander-in-Chief (i.e. Putin) didn’t stop him, and why wasn’t he put up against the wall (as they would have done in 37) for this very collapse, but was appointed to another position (appointed by the same Putin)! The Moor did his job the Moor can leave. And Shoigu won’t do anything, because he plays in the same orchestra, where the conductor is the same VVP, and without his knowledge and approval nothing happens, and all of Shoigu’s window dressing is IBD (imitation of vigorous activity - for those who did not serve). And there is no need to whine about the fact that he knew nothing. Otherwise, what kind of commander-in-chief is this and the leader of the country, under whose nose the Army and Navy (the basis of the defense and the very existence of the country and the people) are being destroyed, and he knows nothing, poor fellow It's time to learn to think and think a little!
1. smile
  
  +1
  
  1 December 2013 00: 16
  
  basmach
  Eh. Comrade Basmach...Chonov’s saber is crying for you...:)))
  When the country collapsed, the price of oil was exactly the same as at which the UNION was destroyed. Putin, with such an oil price, on the contrary, consolidated the country and stopped its rapid fall into the abyss... with a whistle... At the same time, everything was already stolen. the country received practically nothing from hydrocarbons. Tell me, under what government did the fall of the USSR take place? Which party was in power? Who compiled the entire nomenclature for EBN. Who made all the liberals who plundered the country to the last nail in the nineties?
  
  Or do you think that the communists are a couple of orders of magnitude worse than Putin? I personally don’t think so. On the contrary...But it was under the communists that everything was about...but everything was stolen...it was among them that corruption arose.
  
  The scale of theft and corruption in that decade exceeded today by orders of magnitude - everything was stolen. Forgive....is there everything that is possible and what is not...
  But it’s all Putin’s fault...it’s funny to hear about it. especially in view of that. that you will learn all the facts of corruption from Putin’s media. After that. how abuses are revealed by Putin's law enforcement officers... and it was he who first shouted that corruption must be fought... no one had shouted before... and here you are... spreading drool all over the table... whistleblower... figs....too lazy to even write to you...goodbye.
  1. RSNV.
    
    -1
    
    1 December 2013 00: 35
    
    Quote: smile
    The scale of theft and corruption in that decade exceeded today by orders of magnitude - everything was stolen. Forgive....is there everything that is possible and what is not...
    
    How can you prove your words that you personally controlled these processes?
    Quote: smile
    After that. how abuses are revealed by Putin’s law enforcement officers... and it was he who was the first to shout that corruption must be fought... no one had shouted before...
    
    The President and the law enforcement agencies under his control MUST fight corruption and eradicate it, and “not yell,” so that no real fight against corruption is visible, as always just an imitation of vigorous activity and soap bubbles for fools.
    And yet, you probably know that the loudest “stop the thief” is the thief himself, so you shouldn’t frame the “savior of the fatherland”
  2. RSNV.
    
    0
    
    1 December 2013 01: 02
    
    Quote: smile
    When the country collapsed, the price of oil was exactly the same as at which the UNION was destroyed. Putin, with such an oil price, on the contrary, consolidated the country and stopped its rapid fall into the abyss...with a whistle...
    
    In 1987-1989, oil prices fluctuated in the range of about 15 - 18 dollars per barrel.
    In 1991, the average annual oil price was $20 per barrel.
    During the reign of the EBN, from 1992 to 1999, the average oil price was $17,4 per barrel.
    In 2000, the average annual oil price was $28 per barrel.
    28 is not equal to 18 or even 20 dollars per barrel, so your statement is false and is essentially deliberate misinformation.
  3. basmach
    
    +1
    
    1 December 2013 01: 46
    
    It’s hard to catch a black cat in a dark room, especially if it’s not there. If it’s not clear, then I’ll explain. It’s hard to fight corruption if you’re the head of it, and the loudest of all: “Stop the thief,” the thief himself shouts. And about the checker, a smart person there are arguments, a stupid person is trying to insult his interlocutor. Your writings are not arguments, draw your own conclusion. As for GDP, he and EBN, and Sobach and his associates were communists and the question arises - if they were loyal communists, they came to the party for conviction and betrayed their ideals and promises when joining the party, then they are simply traitors, but if they came to the party for self-interest, then who are they? And in any case, such people and those like them were despised by all peoples and at all times. And these are the kind of shifters that you admire. I have never been a communist, although a career officer (graduated from the Military University in 1990), but now I came to them myself, out of awareness and conviction, because I took an oath to protect my people from the enemy, which includes the current government. And under Soviet power Neither such corruption nor such theft has NEVER existed!
    1. smile
      
      -2
      
      1 December 2013 04: 53
      
      basmach
      Who leads our corruption? Isn’t it the one under whom it dropped to the pan-European level? And this is really so...and American blood is much higher - they simply legitimized corruption. calling it lobbying...you apparently have no clue about that. what was going on here in the nineties....including in law enforcement and judicial bodies...sad...and now, you are right. yelling "Stop the thief" Oh? The loudest swamp opposition is swindlers and thieves. those striving for power... who are even worse than those who are already in power... and they scream, based on the facts that Putin’s henchmen have revealed...:))))
      I'm tired of asking questions to the opposition members screaming "Down with" - who are you a supporter of...tell me. please...otherwise there is a lot of heat. but it’s of little use... I repeat, which of the real contenders for the position of president, in your opinion, would be better? I'm waiting for an answer. like the nightingale of summer...either. like a gray heron at the end of the hunting season....:))))
      Just don’t dodge like your colleagues - just say - Who... last name.... I’m interested... here... :)))) If you don’t name it, Chonov’s saber will go over your hump... :)) )
      By the way...dear basmach...I did not admire anyone...even you should understand this....:)))) and be calm....emotions, they say. destroy nerve cells...in the head muscle as well....and you don’t have very many of them there anyway....:))))
      And I respect your choice - the communists... since I am their - old - supporter and ardent admirer... but the new ones are no match for them - but now they are not communists - they are communists.... and there are communist oligarchs. and in general, calling this amorphous party real communists... is an insult to communists. whom I respect...that's it...although I sincerely think so. that even the Communist Party members are the only normal opposition...which is worth listening to only because there are rare communists left in it...and so...all Communist Party members...discrediting the very concept of “Communist Party”...That’s it.
      1. basmach
        
        0
        
        1 December 2013 12: 32
        
        smile
        I wonder where such deep knowledge about corruption comes from (which always expands from top to bottom and therefore cannot be eradicated, otherwise it is easily destroyed), especially about its size. Believe less in official propaganda, otherwise soon you and Obama and his associates will become fighters for democracy. Regarding all the “swamp” leaders, they themselves are connected with this power and at one time they were fed and treated kindly by it to solve certain problems, after which they tried to get rid of them, and their voices began to emerge. Regarding emotions - I read some of your statements (and on other articles), so everything you said applies more to you, and not to your opponents. Your comments are very similar to TV - emotions, loud phrases, general reasoning and no specifics. Before you talk about anything, you need to understand at least a little the essence of the issue, and general blah-blah and emotions with attempts at insults (which I already wrote to you about) leave it to the leaders of the nobility. In just your phrase about Putin’s henchmen, one can easily guess the old fairy tale about a good, good, but, alas, tsar who knows nothing about affairs in the country. It’s time to grow up and stop believing in Arina Rodionovna’s fairy tales. Regarding your question, WHO is I’ll answer, at the moment there are NO such people (and obviously not Putin) I don’t include Zyuganov here either (even though he is a smart, competent politician, he doesn’t have those qualities that would attract people, as they say now - he’s not a charismatic person ), I won’t even talk about the rest. As for the current communists, they are the same people as all of us (just talk to them first), but many of them have an IDEA (which you are unlikely to have), and at least only therefore, they are already a step above you. And lastly. In my first com-ria, I gave a specific and fresh example of the actions of your adored (judging by his defense) GDP in relation to Serdyukov (that’s exactly who the saber is crying for). However, not in Your answer alone does not say a word about the specific betrayal of Russia (let’s call a spade a spade). Do you have nothing to say or don’t you have your own opinion? In this case, everything you said above is verbiage and demagoguery (although literally translated from ancient Greek, a demagogue is the leader of the people, this does not apply to you). First of all, answer, not even to me, but to yourself , but will you go to fight and defend the current government - not the people and the country, but THIS AUTHORITY! And think about whether your answer to yourself is sincere
        
        smile
        
        -1
        
        1 December 2013 14: 48
        
        basmach
        My truly deeper knowledge of corruption, especially in law enforcement agencies, arose in connection with my professional activities. Even though I don't serve in the police. And taking into account this knowledge, I can absolutely objectively state that you have no understanding of the situation at all... zero... and don’t be offended by me, but you are simply voicing propaganda cliches... that’s all... no more constructive... This is especially true the extent of corruption...
        Regarding the swamp people, the version that they are favored by the authorities is not even funny...it seems that Putin personally sent Baba Lera and all sorts of other Chirikovs, Kasparovs, Nemtsovs to report to the American senators...well, completeness...too much... We are trying to pull off the orange scenario. worked out in dozens of countries... in the swamp, in a single formation, there are rabble-rousers, homosexuals, fascists and just idiots, and you say that it’s all the government’s fault... interesting. Why then are they screaming the same thing...the perestroikaists screamed in exactly the same way in 91 - down with the corrupt party apparatchiks. Earlier in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese perestroikas also shouted - down with the corrupt bureaucrats, now the intoxicated herd is lowing - down with swindlers and thieves.... I won’t even tell who... everything is obvious... Should I continue?
        I am happy that you paid attention to my comments...:))) I also dare to note that in this comment of yours, as well as in all the others that caught my eye, there is no specificity at all... ...there’s not even enough common sense there...so what? You can be characterized by Vovochka’s phrase from the joke: “And these people forbid me to pick my nose?”
        So, leave the mentoring tone, it’s really time to grow up, grow up, take off the blinders, look around, compare with what happened before and think... think with your head..
        About the communists - I talked and talk with them... and came to the conclusion that this is a dead end... the party was ruined and judging by those who are in the nomenklatura, there is no one to restore it... at least for now... by the way, There are exactly as many swindlers and thieves there as there are in a bucket...and there are practically no ideological ones, but that’s it. that without having an idea behind the soul. they pretend to be ideological, puts them one step below...everyone...
        
        smile
        
        -1
        
        1 December 2013 14: 49
        
        Basmach - continuation of the comment.
        
        So. calling for it. that Putin needs to be...relieved from his post, you yourself say that. that at the moment there is no one to replace him... Right? So. Do you know who rides all the protest sentiments in such cases? There is experience - the Navalnys and Udaltsovs, hanging around the embassies, are breaking through to power... and if they get to power. The Elbon era will seem like a fairy tale to you...what. Haven't you thought about that either?
        And about Stoolkin...you are strange... :))) So, I am not an unconditional admirer of the authorities...which I have repeatedly expressed. and I don’t approve of everything
        . some things are not clear to me, some are completely inexplicable...
        I just don’t want a repeat of the destruction of the country, which was allowed and carried out by members of the party you know... ideological ones... one step above me...
        
        So. what we have? Putin's law enforcement officers caught Serdyukov's gang committing fraud. Some of the fraud was revealed. Putin's media spread the news of this to every ear. We . clear pepper is furious. Because Serdyukov is not sitting. If I were Putin, I would have jailed him for populist reasons anyway. regardless. what the investigation uncovered. I don’t know what Putin will do. I don’t understand why Putin brought up all this crap himself. and then slams on the brakes. And in order for me to draw conclusions. I don’t have enough information... I’m not going to be like the Barrrrans, who have everything clear. although they don't know anything...
        
        What about betrayal? Well...I believe that those who hang out in the swamp, who call for barricades, demand blood, revolution, are traitors. Those. who screams down with Putin. without imagining. who comes to power, or without thinking about it - clinical ide...you.
        And lastly, please stop saying that I adore anyone - I will put them in their place. By the way, if all your statements are as justified as this, then it’s time for you to throw your mind in the trash - it’s lying to you
        
        basmach
        
        0
        
        2 December 2013 23: 27
        
        smile
        Well, here it is, a lot of text and nothing concrete. In general, diarrhea of words and constipation of thoughts. After all, I read a lot of your books (not only in relation to me) and everywhere it’s the same thing, and in the absence of arguments - an insult to the opponent (for rudeness is the first sign of narrow-mindedness), which speaks for itself and is not in your favor. Regarding the same From what you said, we can conclude that you have deep knowledge of corruption:
        a) either you yourself are from this “glorious” cohort and
        b) You are a lawyer (which in general is even worse and more vicious than point a. (and as far as I understand, you have never had anything to do with the army)
        And people like you never have enough information (the standard and very good answer for all cases), they weren’t taught to think (or rather, think, everyone thinks).
        And it was the leaders of the party known to you who destroyed the country - EBN, Sobchak, VVP, Grachev and others, others and others
        In general, you alone are d'Artagnan and everyone else....
2. Russ69
  
  +2
  
  1 December 2013 02: 05
  
  Quote: basmach
  Putin is a man who sold the honor of an officer and betrayed his oath.
  
  Let's be honest. The oath of office, in 91, almost everything was changed and blaming everything on Putin is stupid.
  Quote: basmach
  The fosterling of Sobchak and EBN, who helped them steal and ruin the country
  
  Half of EBN’s helpers, like Gusinsky, Khodor, Bereza, stopped their activities just under the GDP.
  Quote: basmach
  Serdyukov has been ruining the army for so long
  
  Stop poking Serdyukov forever. Besides the collapse, even the generals who always criticized him approve of many things.
  1. basmach
    
    -1
    
    1 December 2013 12: 46
    
    Russ69
    Those who betrayed their oath in 91 were those who did not go out to be shot at the White House, or those who remained to serve without receiving pay for several months and when your family lived from hand to mouth (I remember this, I went through this), or those who, along with the green fighters, were sent to Chechnya to die. It was they who betrayed their oath. Just don’t tell any of them this to their faces, they’ll immediately turn their heads completely off.
    Quote: Russ69
    Quote: basmach
    Putin is a man who sold the honor of an officer and betrayed his oath.
    
    Let's be honest. The oath of office, in 91, almost everything was changed and blaming everything on Putin is stupid.
    Quote: basmach
    The fosterling of Sobchak and EBN, who helped them steal and ruin the country
    
    Half of EBN’s helpers, like Gusinsky, Khodor, Bereza, stopped their activities just under the GDP.
    Quote: basmach
    Serdyukov has been ruining the army for so long
    
    Stop poking Serdyukov forever. Besides the collapse, even the generals who always criticized him approve of many things.
  2. basmach
    
    -1
    
    1 December 2013 13: 39
    
    Russ69
    Almost all of them are those who did not shoot at the White House, or those who were sent to Chechnya along with the green boys to die for establishing “constitutional order” (maybe you were among them), or those who remained serving in the 90s , when they didn’t pay money for several months and the families of the officers had nothing to eat (I remember this well, I went through it), those who continued to serve honestly, so that you can now be clever about the oath. None of them are aware of this tell me, otherwise there will be one more disabled person.
    I won’t even talk about the second phrase. It’s clear even at the kindergarten level why and why they stopped their activities.
    And I wonder which of the generals approved of it. Would it be those who accepted non-opening parachutes (even though it was before Serdyukov, but they would definitely have approved of it), or for the collapse of the military education system and the wild reduction of military schools, or for unprecedented theft in the Army, or maybe for the reform of military districts, when instead of the Siberian Military District, Western Military District and Far Eastern Military District they created one, no more in number than any of the above (and as a result, all of Siberia and the Far East are virtually defenseless), or maybe for the transfer of shoulder straps from shoulders on the chest (for would-be generals, this is just so that they won’t be confused with a forester). Therefore, there is no need to write about something you have no idea about. You will look smarter.
Samsebenaum

+1

30 November 2013 23: 20

Why should we actually applaud the Guarantor?
Let's take a better look at what happened until recently.
China peacefully continues to seize the Far East, they lost Georgia, and Moldova too. Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and Turkmenistan are also not eager to cooperate closely with Russia.
Ukraine has reached the boiling point, it almost left... Syria is also balancing and it is not known how it will all end.
I repeat, the situation has developed in such a way that we simply have nowhere to go... Like on hot coals.
Imagine that Ukraine left. It’s hard to think of a bigger failure for GDP.
This time it passed... For how long?
But there are more losses than it might seem. Let's just keep quiet about this.
Well, we can only praise GDP for its sharp and apt language, and for its friendship with Merkel...
It was she who played an inconspicuous, but most important role in this performance...
1. RSNV.
  
  +2
  
  1 December 2013 00: 18
  
  Quote: Samsebenum
  Ukraine has reached the boiling point, it almost left... Syria is also balancing and it is not known how it will all end.
  
  In Ukraine, things are moving towards the fact that it will “go away”; there is no need to create illusions. The GDP should have thought and fussed with its head earlier, and not defended the interests of oil and gas hucksters. Syria is still balancing, but its fall is only a matter of time; only a miracle can help it.
2. Russ69
  
  0
  
  1 December 2013 02: 09
  
  Quote: Samsebenum
  They lost Georgia, and Moldova too.
  
  You propose to conquer again...
  Quote: Samsebenum
  Kyrgyzstan,
  Here with varying success.
  Quote: Samsebenum
  Turkmenistan
  With her gas reserves, she can generally put it on everyone...
  Quote: Samsebenum
  Syria is also balancing and it is not known how it will all end.
  
  What about Syria? You offer to fight for her. Enough political and military support.
The comment was deleted.
tomich

-2

30 November 2013 23: 48

smile (2) i (with you - changed by moderator) I do not enter into polemics. I sincerely feel sorry for you and others like you
1. smile
  
  -3
  
  1 December 2013 00: 30
  
  tomich
  Well, if you don’t join, then don’t join...
  Of course, there is nothing to answer, my head is empty.....
  Only then why are you......changed by me so as not to get hit in the neck from the moderators.....they tried so hard to kick back pathetically - you wrote as many as six comments. proving that you do not enter into polemics with me, the bad one....:))) just...:))) would there be a polemic if you scribbled sixty? :)))
  Although, of course, the tactics are correct.
  But it dawned on you too late - you didn’t have to argue with me - I’ll smear you - and not because I am superior to you in some way, no... but because you are lying, and your entire ideology is based on lies, and you have nothing but lies...that's it.
  
  By the way, should your convulsive attempt to kick out of answering the question be understood as meaning that you are squealing about “down with Putin.” Not only do you have no idea who needs to be put in his place, but you haven’t even thought about it. since for you it’s either purple or you don’t have enough brains to come up with any option?
  
  Okay...swim with God...I'm letting you go....without worrying about your fate...that's not sinking. :))))
The comment was deleted.
konvalval

+1

1 December 2013 00: 10

Quote: Cherdak
Quote: Arberes
I always dragged more from Gorbachev!

• And I warned: it is time for our citizens to come to the conclusion that it is unacceptable to walk so godlessly, not to feel sorry for yourself or your loved ones.
• I leave you fertilized...
• Now I will go with an even bigger visor!
• We've all been there. Fifty-four States of Europe. Already after, no, thirty-five, sorry, fifty-four - this is now, when the Soviet Union. Thirty-five states.
• Give, I will say what I said.
• She needs to, so that’s what it is.
• These organizations and foundations (non-governmental) are used to calmly come here and do something with unclean hands.
• How will he shape those who will rule Russia?
• How did I get into politics? He brought the upper classes to meet the water - then it was an event! He broke the lesson, but approved the Komsomol district committee.
• I like Putin. Character ... Clever turned out to be ...
• The people have already clarified who is pulling back the country, who has thrown us this life.
• But they are not going to fight against us, nor are we against them, in the end, neighbors, and let's because of this relationship, in the end.
• Drinking was everywhere. Both in production and in departments. I know this from the work of Raisa Maksimovna.
• Reforms must be completed by the one who started them. And I started them!
• Russian becomes frank only with a glass or a glass. The anti-alcohol campaign is over, and I can have a drink.
• I am in this case with Jesus Christ. He was the first socialist with us. There is nothing to be done.
• I will answer you in Gorbachev’s way. You know it will be more difficult than simpleherdak]
Quote: Arberes
I always dragged more from Gorbachev!

• And I warned: it is time for our citizens to come to the conclusion that it is unacceptable to walk so godlessly, not to feel sorry for yourself or your loved ones.
• I leave you fertilized...
• Now I will go with an even bigger visor!
• We've all been there. Fifty-four States of Europe. Already after, no, thirty-five, sorry, fifty-four - this is now, when the Soviet Union. Thirty-five states.
• Give, I will say what I said.
• She needs to, so that’s what it is.
• These organizations and foundations (non-governmental) are used to calmly come here and do something with unclean hands.
• How will he shape those who will rule Russia?
• How did I get into politics? He brought the upper classes to meet the water - then it was an event! He broke the lesson, but approved the Komsomol district committee.
• I like Putin. Character ... Clever turned out to be ...
• The people have already clarified who is pulling back the country, who has thrown us this life.
• But they are not going to fight against us, nor are we against them, in the end, neighbors, and let's because of this relationship, in the end.
• Drinking was everywhere. Both in production and in departments. I know this from the work of Raisa Maksimovna.
• Reforms must be completed by the one who started them. And I started them!
• Russian becomes frank only with a glass or a glass. The anti-alcohol campaign is over, and I can have a drink.
• I am in this case with Jesus Christ. He was the first socialist with us. There is nothing to be done.
• I will answer you in Gorbachev's way. You know that this will be more difficult than the simple answer.

This is verbiage, and in political language, demagoguery.
konvalval

-3

1 December 2013 00: 28

Never in the world in post-Soviet times has Russia been taken into account so much.
konvalval

-2

1 December 2013 00: 28

Never in the world in post-Soviet times has Russia been taken into account so much.
Victor-M

-2

1 December 2013 00: 31

The fight against theft and corruption, in the highest echelons of power and not only there, will be crowned with success when human rights activists and lawyers, or at least some part of them, change their views from material values to moral ones, and begin to refuse to protect those the thieves themselves, thereby allowing the latter to think about the inevitability of punishment for their deeds, and universal contempt.
Victor-M

-2

1 December 2013 00: 31

The fight against theft and corruption, in the highest echelons of power and not only there, will be crowned with success when human rights activists and lawyers, or at least some part of them, change their views from material values to moral ones, and begin to refuse to protect those the thieves themselves, thereby allowing the latter to think about the inevitability of punishment for their deeds, and universal contempt.
tomich

-1

1 December 2013 00: 53

smile (2), I outlined my position in detail above and it is supported, you even manage to lose on your own field. Yes, for you, any candidate other than Putin is the wrong candidate, even if you crap on Lukashenko
1. smile
  
  0
  
  1 December 2013 05: 17
  
  tomich
  You haven't stated anything specific.
  You couldn't name a single real candidate.
  You couldn't offer anything at all.
  You squirmed to avoid answering direct questions, like a louse on a comb.
  
  And in the end, you, having written six comments in which you tried to deflect (unsuccessfully), fussed and wrote a seventh (the pepper is clear - without polemicizing with me :)))) , declaring that you will not polemicize with me... and on for you....one more squeezed out drop...I won’t say what...question: did you push for a long time? :))))
  
  I’m too lazy to smear you...but I’ll still ask for the SEVENTH TIME - which of the applicants, in your opinion, had the greater right. Why should Putin take the presidency?
  It’s clear that I don’t hope for an answer - those who are at their wit’s end are never able to answer directly... but still... suddenly a miracle happens... and you say what you think... or in general think about it...I really hope...although I hope in vain....:))) but I'm an optimist! :)))
  
  And the last thing - wow! I’m not going to argue with you - who won where, on what field....:)))) You understand that you not only didn’t “win” - you shit yourself head over heels, with all your lies and weak-minded excuses, with the help who tried not to answer one single direct question.... Seven comments in order not to answer one single question... assuring that you will not polemicize with me.... tttle!..... this is an achievement! :))))......you are a rare...........polemicist. :)))))
bevatec

0

1 December 2013 06: 18

Putin, for example, organizes press conferences, during which he answers questions from journalists and people live for several hours - from the article. Look on YouTube “Vova answers Masha. Full version” http://youtu.be/W0f9ffAivCk - this is how he answers an elementary question - worthy of Gorbachev, when the system of strict filtering and selection of “convenient” questions fails. Soon after a year, the promises made in this “answer” regarding Serdyukov are becoming less and less believable. It is very pleasant to be proud of Russia’s achievements in the international arena. But I also want to be proud of internal achievements such as “the well-being and standard of living of all (and not just the “popularly elected”) Russians is growing,
prices for food, fuel, electricity are steadily decreasing with a constant increase in salaries and pensions" and so on and so forth about roads, education, medicine, defense. Possible
but from Finland the author sees it this way, but for some reason it’s the other way around for me from the inside.
saag

-1

1 December 2013 09: 22

Quote: smile
HE screams in the square, demanding power?

Whoever really goes to power does not yell in the squares, this is the lot of those who are deprived of resources, they have only one trump card - to yell in the squares so that they pay attention to him. I have indicated a more or less real candidate, I don’t see others yet.
1. smile
  
  0
  
  2 December 2013 00: 30
  
  saag
  Well, why...the experience of the orange bacchanalia in a number of countries, which fortunately failed for us. indicates just the opposite. And you cannot help but admit it. Should I give examples? :)))
  And yes, I don’t see it yet either. Let's see.
  Minus: not mine. :))))
saag

0

1 December 2013 09: 25

Quote: Bevatec
prices for food, fuel, electricity are falling with a constant increase in wages and pensions

Economics, however, how will high salaries and pensions be formed if prices for fuel and electricity are reduced? Now it’s capitalism, not socialism with state subsidies
veteran56

+2

1 December 2013 11: 17

There are enough worthy candidates for the presidency. I do not take into account the leaders of pocket parties. Even if Putin does not run for president in the upcoming elections, he has a completely worthy replacement in the person of several candidates such as Shoigu, Rogozin, Sobyanin. Who are able to pursue policies to strengthen Russia’s position in the world political arena. There are a lot of spiteful critics who speak negatively about the current leadership in their comments. Not everything is smooth and sweet in our state, but where can we now find a paradise country that would suit every single one of them. Even Berezovsky realized that without Russia he is nothing, without today’s Russia with this president! Neither the Nemtsovs nor the Kasyanovs will ever understand that their time has long gone into oblivion, that the pseudo-intellectuals who follow them look pathetic, like a bunch of bored people who have never crossed the Moscow Ring Road. They will never be able to understand that Russia does not need in them. Maybe emotionally, but it’s true!
1. smile
  
  0
  
  2 December 2013 00: 34
  
  veteran56
  If grandmother had wheels, she would not be a grandmother, but a steam locomotive.
  You can only consider those candidates who themselves wished to run - everything else is empty chatter.
  When they announce their presidential ambitions, then it’s worth discussing them. In the meantime, don’t pick the argument out of your ear.
moskal68

-1

1 December 2013 11: 41

Quote: Alexander Romanov
Quote: 68
And how are your pennies related to his ability to speak?

I do not understand, so the ability to conduct a conversation is a minus?
This is not an answer to the question.
moskal68

+1

1 December 2013 11: 41

Quote: Alexander Romanov
Quote: 68
And how are your pennies related to his ability to speak?

I do not understand, so the ability to conduct a conversation is a minus?
This is not an answer to the question.
Victor-M

-1

1 December 2013 14: 35

How many swamp “patriots” have come out, there are no arguments, so let’s get down to handjobs. You wanted freedom, keep it, but you forgot to apply your brains to it, now it’s not a joy.
Victor-M

-1

1 December 2013 17: 09

Quote: S_mirnov
Quote: Victor-M
Not afraid to fall under this very purge?

No I'm not afraid. I earn my living by honest labor. But to die at the hands of thieves is quite possible. So here we must be aware that nothing will change by itself. And if you don't want to risk anything, admire those around you and express your approval! Only then it is better not to think about the future, but as the TV teaches - "take everything from life" and "live in the present."

Who knows? It’s not written on your avatar how decent you are, and the scribblings you left behind are just the position of a loser and a worthless character, and your cohabitation and constant whining will not make life any better. Set an example for others, go out into the street and first remove the trash near your house, and then we’ll talk.
Victor-M

0

1 December 2013 17: 19

Quote: S_mirnov
I earn my living by honest work.

For your loved ones, do you earn everything honestly, but have you done anything for the country as a whole, or do you only demand from others? If possible, a specific example of what you did for its countries, except shaking the air and typing on the keyboard?
Victor-M

-1

1 December 2013 17: 23

Quote: Christian
Migrants are always for Putin, but so far they are not yet 50%!

But homosexuality is against it, and thank God there are even fewer of them.
The comment was deleted.
sashka

+1

1 December 2013 17: 32

Apparently this is called the word “sailed”...
jiz sibiri

0

1 December 2013 18: 08

something I read the comments and concluded that the majority here again is for Putin

I somehow don’t understand
Are you all living well?

So I want to tell you that in western Siberia, 90% of the population does not share your opinions on Putin

Draw conclusions
1. The comment was deleted.
2. Megre
  
  0
  
  1 December 2013 19: 34
  
  You're not entirely right. Censorship.
3. Megre
  
  0
  
  1 December 2013 19: 34
  
  That's probably still the case.
4. rusmat73
  
  0
  
  6 December 2013 14: 51
  
  My personal opinion is that the authorities of the republics MUST WORK for the good of their region!!! go to Moscow and ACHIEVE solutions necessary for the region, BUT everything is fine for them anyway) so when Siberia turns its back to Moscow, then only Moscow will think about where to get the finances... SIBERIA will be with China, sad as it is... then and the Urals will join... and then the third world war will break out for water and fossil resources...
  and no one will care... (where are the bulk of the revolutionaries and traitors to the aristocrats????
The comment was deleted.
Victor-M

-1

1 December 2013 22: 11

Quote: kris
HOW MUCH WISHING TO LICK THE AUTHORIZED ASS!

Indeed, how long has it been licking the western!
The comment was deleted.
sashka

+1

2 December 2013 09: 53

What is the difference between SMART MAN and WISE? One can find a way out of any situation. And the other will not allow such a situation from which it is necessary to look for a way out. Everything is simple ..
The comment was deleted.
sashka

0

2 December 2013 10: 05

What is the difference between SMART MAN and WISE? One can find a way out of any situation. And the other will not allow such a situation from which it is necessary to look for a way out. Everything is simple ..
Spnsr

0

2 December 2013 15: 43

I read the comments, and caught myself thinking that everyone is ready to criticize, just to show their trashy thoughts, which have not only no evidence, but also no reason.
the main half fancies themselves as politicians and management geniuses! Have you tried doing this yourself? Are there people here doing business? - a question for them, how easy is it to develop your business and not stumble anywhere? Is it really that easy to start and achieve a “great” result?
yes, and the next president will be “Navalny”, but what do you think, where will he start and how will he continue? if there is a change of course, then all the OPPA of Russia, all these squabbles and throwings that are suggested by those who advocate for Putin to leave, advocate for a new idea and a new course to come, you yourself assume what will happen to you, or you already have everything is arranged outside of Russia and you are ready to experiment with Russia
my opinion. Let there be Putin. If he manages to create a state that after him can stand like Russia after the USSR, for another 20 years, until a ruler capable of thinking comes, it will be his genius, if not, then he will blame you.
and not like in the bulk of comments, people who don’t do shit themselves, and don’t even have the slightest idea about it, talk all kinds of nonsense, breaking the consciousness and faith of those who believe, those who still believe, and those who ready to believe.
I don’t want to label things, but it seems that the comments are written by those who are either already abroad or working for those who need it, instead of uniting and ultimately setting the direction if Putin suddenly makes mistakes.
not a systemic opposition
brainkiller

+1

2 December 2013 15: 55

Quote: rsnv
The question arises: will they benefit the people? Doubtful. After all, over the past 14 years, raw materials have been sold for TRILLIONS of dollars, with these funds it would have been possible long ago to completely modernize the entire industry, build our own new full-fledged high-tech enterprises, update the housing and communal services... None of this has been done.
not done because the Russian Federation has not yet been allowed to spend this money “on itself.” The high price of oil is the merit of the United States, this is their idea and the income from this excess profit rightfully belongs to them. The truth of these words is supported primarily by the volume of purchases of US government bonds by Russia.
But there are positive signs (such as the president’s last address where he gave the go-ahead for investing money in infrastructure, and the law on national business that is currently being developed).
Lelek

+3

3 December 2013 09: 40

GDP is just a tool. It all depends on how it is sharpened and in the hands of which master it is. There are no absolutely independent politicians. I would like to believe that everything is in order with the master.
Slav

+1

3 December 2013 14: 05

I never voted for Putin.
Although I was glad of his election.
In the next elections I will vote only for him.
IOwTZ

0

3 December 2013 16: 21

When you're full, it's beautiful all around.
IOwTZ

0

3 December 2013 16: 21

When you're full, it's beautiful all around.
Vadim12

0

5 December 2013 11: 48

Some people criticize Putin. So it was not he who destroyed the superpower. He does a lot for Russia. Putting an ardent oppositionist at the helm will tear the navel, give up all national interests, sell the skeletons, and destroy the army. They shout - a lot of money is spent on the army... They beat the weak. Without a strong army and navy, no one will talk or count with Russia. Industry and agriculture, I am sure, will rise from their knees faster if we drive out the thieves.
Andriuha077

0

5 December 2013 21: 14

He is only a friend and roof of Serdyukov, the governor of Yeltsin and Chubais. Guarantor of collateral auctions.
Alexandr73

0

6 December 2013 12: 32

Quote: 31231
Smirnov, I did not understand something. Bulletins for whom and who stuffed? Papers like bulletins pop in front of the camera, so what? Are you ready to say that the ballots for Putin and one person voted on them? You are a forensic expert, what can you conclude from voting from this shoot?
Do not tell me how to make ballots from non-walking disabled people and people who vote in advance?

Gentlemen, comrades. What difference does it make who ticked what box and where? No one will ever falsify these pieces of paper. It is not necessary. The main thing is WHO WILL COUNT THEM!!! and it’s not easy to count how many people voted for which candidate at a polling station (no one will bribe these either. They can only order trusted people, and if there aren’t any at any polling station, then that’s okay.) THE MAIN MAIN THING IS THAT ALL THE DATA FROM THE SITES WILL BE COMBINED INTO ONE!!!!. So vote for whoever you want. I haven’t gone to the polls on principle since 1991. according to the data of the referendum, the USSR should have existed. Where is he? Does this mean that all power is illegitimate? Is that how it works?
sashka

0

6 December 2013 16: 07

He is only Putin
And no one else.. A tramp with bare legs. No intelligence, but no fantasies.. Have you tried treatment?