The war in Syria to be! Here we go

641
The war in Syria to be! Here we goTeam Gaza

And again in the air smell of chemistry. Chemistry of a big regional war with a taste of “anti-people” sarin, which has already replaced the rather outdated reasons for the impending war with Syria. Who already remembers how the claims of the West and its Middle Eastern allies began: support for anti-government rallies, demands for the leader of Syria to give more freedom to the people, stop the president’s wife to make luxury purchases ...

The essence of all these claims was reduced to one thing - the president should leave. But the president stayed. The requirements of the West fulfilled and even in parallel with varying success continued to tamp overseas militants throughout the Syrian Arab Republic.

Now, on the agenda is the frightened and too clumsy command of Gaza, which too clearly resembles Iraq ten years ago.

“In the UN furnace. In the furnace of these bureaucratic verbiage! ”Probably, this is how you can express the position of the United States in relation to the Syrian problem today. The US Secretary of Defense comes to the fore, announcing that he is waiting for only one thing - an order from the President “To bomb!”

In the fire of these bombings, all the arguments that the United States appeals today will dissolve. In the first place there will be only one goal - the expulsion or physical elimination of the recalcitrant leader of Syria. Too many similar examples in the last 15 years: Milosevic, Hussein, Gaddafi.

However, not all so simple. And the author of this opus took the liberty to fantasize a little, and what will turn the planned US event for the United States and its allies in the region.

Who for whom?

Apparently, the United States is planning to re-implement the Libyan scenario, the essence of which was to bombard key military and civilian objects and seize the capital of the state by special forces.

As seen from the latter NewsUS instructors have been training these units for the past six months. Created several camps in Jordan. The French media report that about a thousand "bearded graduates" trained by American instructors have already crossed the Syrian border.

With regard to the bombing, the United States, as in Libya, will again not be able to do without the support of its loyal allies in Europe and the Middle East.

Let's briefly list them: Great Britain, France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel, Jordan.

On the other side of the scale are the allies of the legitimate president of Syria: Iran, Russia, Venezuela, China, Kurdish, Lebanese and Iraqi armed militias.

Let there be a fight!

Implications for the UK and France

In addition to diplomatic wrangling with Russia and China, the freezing of many bilateral treaties, the above-mentioned countries may face the problem of the return of many and many "bearded sons of the Fatherland." There are only about a thousand of them in Syria just now. And of course, it would be more profitable for the French and the British if such a contingent was dissolved in the fire of international intervention in Syria ... But, right there, the leaders of these states declare the need for military intervention in the Syrian conflict.

Good. The Syrian Arab Army will be eliminated. The Syrian government will be biased. And what next? That's right, international sponsors will block the cash infusions of the militants. Destroy them simply will be no one. So, it will be time to return home, to London, to Paris, to dozens of other European cities.

Radically-minded young people who know how to handle different types of weapons and even have sarin production technology in handicraft conditions, on the streets and in poor densely populated quarters of European capitals are the rosy dream of tolerant Europe of the 21 century Europe that survived the attacks in London, Madrid, last year's French shooting special forces. The sharp increase in the threat of a repetition of these events is a fact.

What can we say about the arrival in Europe of thousands of Syrian refugees. By the way about them.

Jordan

Briefly and clearly. A state with a population of six million people has already accepted about a million Syrian refugees on its territory. This situation is extremely negative for the growth of social tension in Jordan, not to mention the cost of the treasury to maintain hundreds of thousands of people who do not work.

What will lead Jordan's armed intervention in the war in Syria? That's right, to a sharp increase in the flow of refugees to Jordan. And who knows how long the Jordanian treasury will last?


Turkey

The problem of the massive flow of Syrian refugees is also relevant for Turkey, the entire border area of ​​which has been turned into a mixture of refugee camps and camps for training and serving international terrorists.

This is clearly not to the liking of the local Turkish population. And in general, the majority of ordinary citizens of Turkey, whose hot temperament we had already met a month ago.

As far as socially explosive Turkey’s intervention is, it’s just scary to imagine if the whole Turkey boiled for about three weeks even because of possible cutting down of one city square.

Oh yes. Also the Kurdish problem. It so happened that Kurdish militias sometimes shoot or blow up Turkish border patrols. The latter, in response, carry out mass operations to clean up possible attackers. In general, the friendship does not work.

Mutual hostility will grow into what, if the Turkish government attacks the one who promised his own autonomy to several millions of Kurds, it is impossible to even imagine!

In addition to the revenge of the Kurdish militias, Turkey should be greatly concerned about the massive armed response of Syria. For boiling.

Israel

What threatens Israel? The refugees Transition of terrorists across the border in Israel. But besides this, there is also a massive rocket attack and terrorist attacks from not only Syria, but also from the fighters of the Lebanese Hezbal movement and, most importantly, from the only ally of Syria in the region - Iran.

Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Well, here Iran should already enter the business with its numerous promises to cut off the Gulf of Hormuz, through which the above-mentioned states transport about half of the total oil and gas produced in these countries.

Iran in this case is simply nothing to lose. As mentioned above, Syria is the only ally of Iran in the region. The countries have concluded a joint defense agreement in the event of an attack on one of these countries.. Finally, the Iranian government must clearly realize that after the fall of Syria, it will be Iran’s turn.

USA

There are only economic strikes that will affect the United States to a much greater degree than the fighter brought down by the Syrian air defense or a terrorist attack on one of the American military bases.

Debt obligations to China, a quarter of the total oil supplied to the United States from Venezuela.

For a country in economic agony, such blows can be much worse, and more important than the possible benefits of the war with Syria.

RESULTS

The above analysis is extremely superficial. The main consequences for the participants of the attacking side will be millions of Syrian refugees, possible popular unrest within the participating countries, economic strikes performed by Russia, China and Venezuela. Well, and in detail: a retaliatory strike by the armed forces of Syria and their allies, numerous terrorist attacks, as well as a mass exodus on the homes of foreign fighters who fought in Syria.

The author deliberately left open the question of the role of Russia in all this mess. The Libyan variant is possible, when the Russian leader behaved worse than a rag. The repetition of the South Ossetian variant, connected with the direct military intervention of the Russian army, is possible, but only one! The lack of a common border in Syria and Russia.

Possible variant of Iraqi neutrality and non-interference.

Who knows? Perhaps all this tension, as before, will be reduced to the next verbal battles of diplomats and a return to Quo's diplomatic status.

In the meantime, let's analyze the current situation.
641 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    26 August 2013 12: 14
    The USSR could knock with a fist or a shoe. A powerful army, advanced science, a strong economy, huge strategic reserves of raw materials and food. Now Russia buys up to 70% of the necessary food, industrial goods - only China. I must say that in reality China is not our ally, it got its economic power thanks to trade with the West and the United States; China's trade turnover with Russia is only a few percent. And even then China is only interested in oil and gas. China probably bought the latest technologies that Russia inherited from the USSR long ago. Therefore, if in a future war it promise part of our territory and mineral resources - then whose side will he be on? We must rely only on ourselves. What do we have now? An army tired of reforms, an economy that can produce several combat aircraft a year and a dozen warships in 20 years. But most importantly, our country has lost honest and decent people in the leadership of the country. Did any of them answer why our stadiums stand like aircraft carriers, and the roads are the most expensive and at the same time the worst in the world. In what zones are officials and admirals sitting who dismantled new ships for metal and those who destroyed Soviet science and industry. Now all this must be urgently restored. The world will only reckon with a strong Russia. After all, the USSR did not lose a single ally. And we - Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya.....
  2. gena7777777
    0
    26 August 2013 12: 28
    There will be war and this is a reality. The West needs it and all it needs is a reason, and if there is no reason, they will do everything to make this reason appear
  3. faraon
    0
    26 August 2013 12: 31
    Syria has promised to allow UN inspectors into Eastern Ghouta, where a chemical attack was allegedly carried out against civilians on August 22. The Russian Foreign Ministry announced that this agreement "was the result of our close work with Damascus."

    Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich expressed satisfaction with the “constructive approach of the Syrian leadership to establishing effective interaction with the UN mission,” which, according to the Russian leadership, “opens up opportunities for conducting a thorough, unbiased and objective investigation into all the circumstances of what happened in the suburbs of Damascus.”

    On August 23, it was Russia, together with China, that prevented the adoption of a UN Security Council resolution obliging the Syrian government to allow the UN mission into Eastern Ghouta. After the United States began to show signs of readiness for military sanctions against the Assad regime, the Russian Foreign Ministry began to “work closely” with Damascus, demanding that UN inspectors be allowed to the site of the alleged chemical attack.

    As recently as Sunday morning, the Syrian propaganda minister said that the UN mission in the country to investigate past reports of the use of chemical weapons did not have a mandate to investigate in Eastern Ghouta, and therefore the Syrian government would not allow them in because “that would be a violation state sovereignty of Syria." However, the Syrian Foreign Ministry soon announced that an agreement had been reached with the UN mission, and then a date had been set for the inspection trip - UN experts should arrive in Eastern Ghouta on Monday, August 26.

    The Russian Foreign Ministry accuses the West of trying to “impose the results of the investigation on UN experts in advance” and anticipates that the Syrian opposition, which controls part of the Eastern Ghouta region, may stage “armed provocations” against UN inspectors. “We appeal to everyone who has influence on the illegal armed groups operating in Syria to put appropriate pressure on them,” Alexander Lukashevich said in a statement.

    Russia calls on those who “announce the possibility of carrying out forceful action against Syria” to “show prudence and not make tragic mistakes.”

    British Foreign Secretary William Hague said that traces of the use of chemical weapons in Eastern Ghouta may have already been destroyed. The Syrian opposition said the Syrian Air Force had been bombing the area in recent days.
  4. +5
    26 August 2013 12: 36
    I read the comments carefully. There are a lot of representatives of Muslim countries who shout “RUSSIA must!” Shouldn't your countries? After all, your faithful brothers will be killed in Syria? Why are your governments and your public organizations silent? Why aren’t relief funds created? Not a single head of the Muslim state of the CIS has spoken out on the situation in Syria or are they very scared?
    1. +10
      26 August 2013 13: 00
      By Muslim country, do you mean Kazakhstan, or what?) Since when is KZ a Muslim country? I don’t consider it such, living in the capital. And as if according to the KZ constitution, there is a secular state. And given the situation, the President is always for a peaceful solution, but threatening the states of Kazakhstan is somehow ridiculous. Russia is another matter. And personally, I do not perceive Russia as a foreign state, in my mind we are still one country, excuse me. If I have to, they’ll call me up and I’ll go fight for our common Motherland.
      1. +1
        26 August 2013 13: 25
        I perceive Kazakhstan as an integral part of Muslim culture, just like Azerbaijan and the Central Asian states of the CIS. Their voices are not heard. Has Nazarbayev ever made official statements?
        1. smersh70
          +2
          26 August 2013 13: 36
          Quote: Andrey 447
          as well as Azerbaijan and Central Asian



          Our Wahhabis are being destroyed in the bud.....they are shaving their beards.....in general, they are persecuting....and as for Syria...there are statements from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs...and everything else..but fighting for Assad is not ours .....let him pay for his mistakes and for the mistakes of his father!!!!!!!!!!there are many communist-minded people....work for the USSR...but everyone forgets that Assad’s father destroyed the communists in 1983 and many do not want to remember this.....and now they are killing the murderer of their own comrades for building communism throughout the world!!!!!!!!!!
          1. +1
            26 August 2013 14: 44
            And so, at the state level, to note the policy of double standards of the “democratizers”, to draw the attention of the world community to the support and supply of weapons to the Islamists from the “friendly environment” and the beacons of democracy?
  5. 0
    26 August 2013 12: 36
    So far, only France has given full support to the states. I don't think I've heard anything more yet. England is clearly rubbing and crumpling... But where will they go? Although without enthusiasm, they will perform... Trouble...
  6. +1
    26 August 2013 12: 38
    Russia cannot fight now, and we cannot (there are no common borders, the Navy is weak) only by political methods (in my opinion, everything that Russia could do..) The Anglo-Saxons will now do anything (their image in the world is now below par_) They need another victorious war now (and they don’t care about the rest) If Iran gets into trouble, then somehow we can help militarily.. And it’s better for Russia not to flattery directly (this will be a provocation..)
  7. +3
    26 August 2013 12: 38
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: Denis
    could arm Syria

    Russia lacks the strength to confront the US and NATO, and what can Syria do, even if armed?


    Russia has enough strength and resources, but these funds go to where “democracy” comes from. When will you finally appear, Dad (White) Russian?
  8. +1
    26 August 2013 12: 39
    Syria has Yakhonts. And this is serious. If used correctly, you can inflict such losses on the enemy that it will be possible to dictate peace terms to him. Americans are very sensitive to losses.
    1. Constantine
      0
      26 August 2013 13: 41
      Augs are located in the Persian Gulf. Only support ships are located directly off the coast of Syria. hi
    2. lucidlook
      0
      26 August 2013 16: 20
      Drones and satellites will make an accurate map (if they haven’t already). They will send special forces to further reconnaissance of key points. This will be followed by a missile and bomb attack on command posts, air force and air defense radars, communications equipment and launchers. They will methodically plow with Tomahawks and KABs until they receive confirmation of the destruction of the targets. And only after that - a ground operation, if the regime does not throw out the white flag first.
      1. lucidlook
        0
        3 September 2013 12: 52
        To support the topic, a satellite photo of the territory of Aleppo controlled by Assad’s troops.
  9. Anti com
    +5
    26 August 2013 12: 40
    The situation in Syria will become a kind of test of Russia's maturity... If Syria is torn apart, and the Russian Federation only puffs out its cheeks, then it is worthless as a state with imperial ambitions. The confrontation with the West is not about Ukrainian sweets and cheeses... It requires balls of steel. In short, we'll see.
  10. +1
    26 August 2013 12: 45
    I read the comments, the article, in principle, what’s stopping you from bringing a couple of multi-purpose submarines to the amers’ augers and surfacing within sight, “they say you’re in our sights,” sending Peter the Great and everyone else 1164 to pull them into the middle-earth and let’s see how the mattress pads start singing. Send three tank divisions to Syria. I’m more than sure that after this the mattress covers will scream, scream and wipe themselves off.
    But if I were Russia, I wouldn’t cut up the remaining sharks, but urgently rework them as a mobile air defense system. How many missiles can they fit in? Try to restore the Kirov and the second ship in the series, and once again think about the vicamadrille.
    1. +1
      26 August 2013 12: 56
      Here the clock is already counting for a day, and you can’t do all this in such a period of time. Therefore, all measures must be taken in advance. And ours itch when a roast rooster pecks.
  11. +3
    26 August 2013 12: 54
    In addition, I now read that Syria has about 50 MiG-29s and about 200 MiGs of older modifications. If all this is not destroyed on the ground, as in Yugoslavia, then Syria has a chance. I remember that during the 1999 war, the Black Sea Fleet sent a reconnaissance ship to the Adriatic Sea, which warned the Serbs about the next wave of raids. It wouldn’t hurt to do the same now.

    We will not be able to fight for Syria, but we are obliged to help. Information and technology. Especially if they start without UN sanction, it will be considered pure aggression.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 19: 25
      What are the chances? What can Migi-23 Migi 21 do against this air armada? Do you know the losses of the Syrian Air Force during the conflict?
    2. 0
      28 August 2013 22: 59
      Patriot systems are installed in Jordan and Turkey. plus ships in the Mediterranean Sea. It will be difficult to fly. Eh.. 3-4 Shkval torpedoes into the Persian Gulf, but what to launch them from?
  12. +2
    26 August 2013 13: 02
    Syria is no longer a loss in the economy, not a social aspect with refugees, not a logistical one with the lack of common borders. Syria is already politics. Politics of survival. The politics of place in the world. If you surrender Syria, Russia will become a political corpse and will have to threaten with nuclear weapons on any issue.
    So Syria cannot be surrendered. Especially China if it wants disputed islands...
    1. -1
      26 August 2013 13: 07
      What does China have to do with it? The islands on the Amur have long been divided with China. There is one disputed area left in Altai.
      He definitely has nothing to do with Syria.
  13. 0
    26 August 2013 13: 14
    One more thing. There was a contract with Syria for 26 Yak-130s. In June, news broke that the planes were being prepared for departure. According to some reports, one of the secondary goals of the aggression may be the capture of one or two such aircraft for ferrying them to the United States and research.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 15: 10
      They are easier to buy.
    2. 0
      27 August 2013 09: 28
      What is there to explore? super new fighter? Yes, its double is produced in Italy, with the same avionics, and the radars and sights there are simple. It is a training aircraft with the function of a light attack aircraft.
  14. Ruslan Bear
    0
    26 August 2013 13: 22
    send our fleet to the shores of Syria and declare a no-fly zone
  15. +1
    26 August 2013 13: 39
    China will provide assistance to Syria. China, like Russia, has no other way. Iran, one of the main suppliers of hydrocarbons to China, is next in line for the “democratization” of Syria. Closing this supply channel is critical for China. It is practically impossible for them to find a second such channel. The Chinese can seriously “choke the bit.” Until the collapse of candy wrappers, especially since the barter system with Iran has been functioning for a long time. Well, trade with Russia for rubles and yuan is in its infancy. Europe on the eve of winter is practically without money and liquid resources.
  16. 0
    26 August 2013 13: 41
    In addition to speeches from political platforms, it would be nice to transfer a powerful naval strike squadron to the Syrian shores. Perhaps Russian naval pennants are on the horizon and will be able to cool down the hotheads. History is full of examples when the very fact of presence stopped aggression. And as for China, these are still “dark ones”. It’s hardly worth counting on them.
  17. Garyk701
    0
    26 August 2013 13: 54
    If the United States decided to take a military action in Syria, this means that they have already prepared everything. Syrian generals have been bought, US special forces are already in Syria to neutralize the possibility of using air defense and missile systems. Russia and China are covered up...
    Otherwise, there is no point in starting this adventure.
    Again, you can’t wait any longer, because... soon government troops will finish off the tired Arab and Chechen partisans.
    The election of a new “peacemaker” is just around the corner, but the horse has not yet been laid low in Iran. At a minimum, with the current “peacekeeper” it is necessary to create a springboard for raids on Iran. Otherwise, it’s not at all clear where the US taxpayers’ money was spent during 2 presidential terms...
  18. 0
    26 August 2013 14: 06
    What can the Russian Federation do against the backdrop of a worsening situation? Oppose NATO fleets with your own in the Mediterranean Sea? Judging by the reports, our main combat units are the large landing craft, especially the Nikolai Filchenko, which is of advanced age. So they will act as a Human Shield. All that remains is to withdraw all combat-ready SSBNs to the Arctic Ocean and bring all armed forces to a state of heightened combat readiness. This is how it was done during the USSR. Special operations on their bases. The arms trade is starting to sound like India and its ilk. Would anyone argue that this is also profitable? Criminal, yes.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 20: 50
      If you don’t know, let me explain: trade with India and China helped at least somehow, during the hungry years, for the military-industrial complex enterprises not to cower completely. And to stake out a place in the arms market, which is never empty.
  19. coserg 2012
    0
    26 August 2013 14: 15
    I would like to hope that the United States will break its teeth, and Russia will adequately and competently defend its interests. It seems the moment of truth is coming.
  20. 0
    26 August 2013 14: 22
    Of course, the field of solutions is narrowing rapidly.

    I see only one option. And it must be done immediately. If the S300 has already been delivered to Syria, then there is no time to train personnel. And there is no point in taking risks at all. The installations must be equipped with Russian crews. On the political field, the USSR's 1973 demarche must be repeated. Then Gromyko clearly voiced the position of the USSR. If the fighting does not stop immediately, the USSR will not object to sending volunteers to Egypt. Then Kissinger shouted over the phone to Golda Meir, “We are not going to start the 3rd World War because of the 3rd Egyptian Army.”

    Sending “volunteers” to Syria (for example, combat crews of S300 complexes) can cool many heads.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 20: 47
      Quote: Bakht
      The installations must be equipped with Russian crews.

      Where can I get them, these calculations?
  21. Vtel
    +2
    26 August 2013 14: 23
    The article is good, but its optimistic title hurts. Based on the history of the past days, it is becoming very tense - Yugoslavia - nuclear submarine "Kursk" - Libya. Thank God South Ossetia was not abandoned. May God grant health and strength to the entire Syrian people, shame on the Jewish Masons and their jackals. Most Holy Theotokos, save long-suffering Syria!
  22. netMolotov
    0
    26 August 2013 14: 23
    RUSSIA must urgently declare an embargo to the USA. The Russian embargo and the debts of the pins will lead the world to the fall of the USA and to the victory of the legitimate President Assad. The star of “Holy Rus'” will rise again.
  23. NOBODY EXCEPT US
    +3
    26 August 2013 14: 28
    Yes, there are many on the site who want to fertilize the sands of Syria with the bones of our soldiers, many have already forgotten and many did not know that the corpses of our tank crews were lying on the streets of Grozny for a long time until the dogs took them away,,,, grinding your tongue behind the clave does not move the bags, moving your shoulders does not hurt... ..If there are so many who want to help Assad, go to the Iranian embassy or the like and they will transport you there, although they will not write about it in the newspapers and your mother will not know your resting place, but these are such trifles against the desire to help your brothers, the flag is in your favor hands......and I don’t want my sons to die, no one knows where and no one knows why....
  24. smiths xnumx
    +5
    26 August 2013 14: 30
    Well, Russia is not sitting idle either
    On August 19, the Bosporus passed in the direction of the Mediterranean Sea, followed by the large landing craft of the Pacific Fleet Peresvet and the large landing craft Admiral Nevelskoy. On August 17, the Bosporus "Alexander Filchenkov" passed, heading towards Novorossiysk.
    Baltic Fleet BDK "Alexander Shabalin" under loading at NVMB

    but here it is already passing the Bosphorus on August 22, heading to Syria.

    August 11, 2013. BDK 127 "Minsk" accompanied by RCA R-60 (955) passes the Bosphorus

    But this photo was taken on the railway section near Novorossiysk on June 23, 2013. Shooting time: 18-05.S-300PMU2 “Favorite”? In the camouflage of the Syrian desert"? With the 96L6E "sand-colored" radar of the S-400 "Triumph" air defense system? Or is the "Triumph" simply deployed to its permanent base? Or is the "Favorit" equipped with a radar from the "Triumph"?

    Something like that. Yours faithfully! hi
  25. escobar
    +1
    26 August 2013 14: 32
    England, France, and the United States deliberately violate all UN norms. And when Russia and China take retaliatory measures, the Westerners will declare the UN illegitimate and here it is: the NEW WORLD ORDER that the Saxons and Jews will create for themselves.
  26. netMolotov
    0
    26 August 2013 14: 43
    Assad has a XNUMX% chance of victory. He must urgently appeal to Putin with the admission of Syria into Russia and let Assad’s enemies take a bite for themselves....!
  27. +1
    26 August 2013 15: 07
    There was a good opportunity to show who is who after the beating of the Russian ambassador in Qatar - to sever diplomatic relations and launch a missile strike on the oil and gas structures of Qatar.
  28. 0
    26 August 2013 15: 12
    Quote: mhpv
    Yes, the Americans have calculated everything again! Russia, with this oh Olympics, which is essentially useless to anyone, will now have to put up with the upcoming redivision of the world. It started with attacks on LGBT people and they were promised that they would not be touched, which means that since the Olympics are important for Russia, they can attack Syria, because if Russia gets involved, then a complete boycott of the Olympics, Syria will not be sucked in. This is what the race for money leads to.
    But hope dies last, perhaps this is a provocation, after all, an attempt to get Russia into the ring, something will have to be sacrificed. For me, these Olympics are long overdue to be closed; they do not correspond to their status and are subject to politics, and they have become much more uninteresting than any championships throughout the year , which are much more spectacular.

    And there’s also the 2018 World Cup, so they’ll merge anyone for the sake of money
  29. +2
    26 August 2013 15: 18
    Quote: Denis
    Quote: Karavan
    Here, here is the hope for sanctions against American producers and debtors.

    What kind of nonsense, who in general, after the US attack on Syria, will take Russia seriously?


    A very accurate expression! Having gone all-in recently in the confrontation with the United States, Putin’s retreat would immediately mean complete collapse and all that remains is to become a slave of the Americans. Forever a political corpse. Russia will not back down.
  30. +1
    26 August 2013 15: 41
    Quote: antiaircrafter
    In the case of a large kirdyk, Russia may accept the exiled Syrian government and evacuate the remnants of the Syrian frame to its territory.

    In my opinion, the smartest idea. This is much better than if Assad dies heroically. In Syria, government troops can properly prepare for their guerrilla war. At the same time, do not give up the base in Tartus. Leave it behind, period! The Americans left Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. Tartus should be preserved under the pretext of evacuating all those who do not want to live in Wahhabi Syria.
  31. The comment was deleted.
  32. 0
    26 August 2013 16: 03
    Lavrov is calling a press conference on Syria today. But I’m afraid the jackals have already decided the fate of Syria. The word is ours.
  33. 0
    26 August 2013 16: 06
    If US aggression against Syria begins, it will receive active information support from all the world’s media. Therefore, at this time, Putin can “quietly” begin to purge our government, our media, etc. of the liberal scum. Those. strengthen the sovereignty of the Russian Federation. He may even try to nationalize the Central Bank of the Russian Federation with harsh measures against the backdrop of the global uproar in Syria. What do you think?
  34. +1
    26 August 2013 16: 13
    Attention! I don't know if it was or not:

    MOSCOW, August 26 – RIA Novosti. Turkey will join any coalition against the regime of Bashar al-Assad, even if there is no official decision from the UN Security Council, Reuters reported on Monday, citing the country's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.

    Another jackal.
  35. 0
    26 August 2013 16: 31
    You know, it seems to me that all our troubles are due to weakness. Previously, we, or rather the USSR, could bang our fists on the table in any region of the world. And the point is not in nuclear weapons, and not in long-range aviation, but in the fleet, powerful and ocean-going. And now... they openly laugh at us. On Inosmi 2 years ago I read a boastful Turkish article. The Turks boasted that if anything happened, they would block the Russian straits and the south of Russia would die under an economic blockade. And the Russian fleet, they say, is dead. They cannot print the straits. But the Russian land army will not reach Turkey; there are no common borders. Something like this. Such an evil article.
  36. 0
    26 August 2013 16: 45
    The USA, Russians, Euro, China and Iran will be directly or indirectly involved in the confrontation,
    the Russians will not get into the slaughter, why is this not our war, Arabs, Kurds, Jews and Turks are killing each other,
    where is the interest of the Russians among this bunch)), explain the urishki, only without forecasts about the Caucasus and Central Asia - this is all about the enemies at the gates from Syria, see Afghanistan = where are the Taliban au)))
    the gambit will be played out like this, the amers will be dragged into the slaughter, we are already in the black good
    The Russians transfer the technologies of the 3rd World War to Iran and China and conclude an agreement on mutual defense against weapons of mass destruction and external aggression, Iran joins the SCO, becomes an observer in the Customs Union and the CSTO, China solves problems with India and Taiwan, Vietnam, enters into diplomatic and economic confrontation with Japan and Australia, directly threatening the western beach of the United States with their naval forces,
    Russians and Iran are dividing Central Asia - strictly according to the amers' patterns, these are the real consequences of the war
    total = the Americans are in the massacre, but the winners are the Russians, Iran and China))
  37. 0
    26 August 2013 16: 53
    Turkey will join any international coalition in the event of military intervention in Syria, even in the absence of a corresponding UN Security Council mandate. According to Reuters, this was stated by the head of the country's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ahmet Davutoglu.
    http://www.warandpeace.ru/ru/news/view/83077/
  38. serge
    +1
    26 August 2013 17: 08
    At a press conference, Lavrov, in response to a question about Russia’s actions during the aggression against Syria, said that we are not going to fight with anyone, and with that he ended the press conference.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 19: 30
      Now everything is clear. Syria was surrendered.
  39. 0
    26 August 2013 17: 08
    US Navy in the Mediterranean. Get off yourself. In the Falklands War, one, just ONE British submarine drove the ENTIRE Argentine navy into ports in a matter of days.
  40. +1
    26 August 2013 17: 15
    There's a rat under the nickname "Nitup"
    For something he is quietly downvoted... without argument.
    Hey, Nitup, “come out and fight one on one... I won’t hit you on takeoff...”
  41. +1
    26 August 2013 17: 41
    Sometimes you get the feeling that a person is speaking, but in fact there were no words. Just now I watched Lavrov’s press conference, I highlight the second part of the phrase - she wasn't there.
    "Russia will not participate in hostilities" but they won’t find it enough- Am I the only one who had this feeling?
  42. Stepnogorets
    +1
    26 August 2013 17: 46
    Is this option possible: Govt. Assad surrenders all his chemicals. weapons (i.e., abandons them) in order to gain time and deprive the Western aggressors of the trump card. And continue to fight against terrorists by enlisting military and technical support from Russia on legal contracts, strengthening the military presence in Tartus! What will the experts say?
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 19: 31
      It’s too late. This should have been done a long time ago. The West will not wait to give Assad time to maneuver.
  43. +1
    26 August 2013 17: 51
    The Americans are stuck. “Carthage must be destroyed,” they once said in Rome. So it is with Obama and the Camerons and so on. trying to overthrow Assad. Are they blind? After all, the people support him, there will be a lot of blood. I would like to hope that the Syrians will fight to the end. I wish them Victory. Here the media calculated that there are now more than four hundred cruise missiles against Syria; will the Syrians have enough missiles for the S-300 complex?
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 19: 16
      Quote: Arkan
      The Americans are stuck. “Carthage must be destroyed,” they once said in Rome. So it is with Obama and the Camerons and so on. trying to overthrow Assad.

      Syria is no match for Carthage, it’s in the wrong weight category.
  44. 0
    26 August 2013 17: 54
    When the war began in South Ossetia, I thought and was afraid that it would be surrendered, like Yugoslavia. However, everything turned out differently. Still, there is hope that we will not sell Syria.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 19: 32
      are you comparing South Ossetia and Syria? In South Ossetia, the Georgians hit Russian peacekeepers and the civilians also had Russian passports.
  45. Stepnogorets
    +1
    26 August 2013 17: 59
    Quote: poquello
    Sometimes you get the feeling that a person is speaking, but in fact there were no words. Just now I watched Lavrov’s press conference, I highlight the second part of the phrase - she wasn't there.
    "Russia will not participate in hostilities" but they won’t find it enough- Am I the only one who had this feeling?

    I agree, the phrases are kind of veiled! The whole world and the entire Internet sees and knows what is happening there, and Lavrov chooses his words carefully (so as not to offend Western partners)!
    1. +1
      26 August 2013 19: 13
      Quote: Stepnogorets
      Quote: poquello
      Sometimes you get the feeling that a person is speaking, but in fact there were no words. Just now I watched Lavrov’s press conference, I highlight the second part of the phrase - she wasn't there.
      "Russia will not participate in hostilities" but they won’t find it enough- Am I the only one who had this feeling?

      I agree, the phrases are kind of veiled! The whole world and the entire Internet sees and knows what is happening there, and Lavrov chooses his words carefully (so as not to offend Western partners)!

      This is politics, and all real politicians are polite. What the Americans want to get in quickly is to have time to support two trained detachments before Assad overwhelms them, but in the future the worst will be for Israel and the American bases in the region.
  46. +1
    26 August 2013 18: 01
    Quote: Arkan
    Here the media calculated that there are now more than four hundred cruise missiles against Syria; will the Syrians have enough missiles for the S-300 complex?

    First, Harm takes out the radar, or chokes on interference, and then it doesn’t matter how many missiles there are
  47. Postovoi
    +1
    26 August 2013 18: 04
    As was said, we will analyze based on the real situation what will happen next, but it’s not the right word to insult Syria, you can’t say it...
  48. -1
    26 August 2013 18: 05
    Well! I remember someone there wrote, even argued, proved to me that the United States would not go into Syria, they say, but they are weak, they are using someone else’s hands and they can wave and now!! The dove of peace himself, with his entire retinue of the world’s henchmen who gave him this pompous little name, is going to welcome him to Syria, which has almost defeated the bandits! AND WHAT ? THAT'S ALL? no one can do anything!!!! and where are the loud statements! where are the optimistic forecasts and bright victorious statements in blogs! There is not!!! The USSR, for all its disadvantages, had a HUGE advantage: it was a guarantor of world peace! and this is undeniable, and that modern Russia can only take a position and put a spoke in the wheels, but can’t really help Syria with anything, except perhaps to give it the opportunity to sell its life at a premium and objectively blaming Russia for this, it doesn’t even work; it really can’t oppose anything to Amer’s already OPEN AGGRESSION in a possible war in Syria! Even China is keeping quiet with its views on the Middle East! and this is already the worst-case scenario for the development of events. The amers are no longer hiding behind masks and they spit on the UN and other world treaties. Sanctions are already an undisguised real aggression of the West against the whole world because after the fall of Syria, house music will begin in the entire Middle East with unpredictable consequences and being drawn into this the conflict of all regional countries, led by the world's main showmen, lovers of fishing in troubled waters, and also, concurrently, the world saviors of everyone from everything, the United States!!!
    (movie quote (election day)
    but this is house on caroble.
    yes house!
    That's why you're in charge!)
    Well, I’ll write again, anyway, in this situation there is nothing left to do except just hope for the best! After all, there must be adequate, sober-minded people in America who understand at least a little the consequences of all this lawlessness that the United States is doing in the world, who do not want to drag the world into the fiery house of war, but not all of them there are such DOVES OF PEACE WITH CRUISED MISSILES on the wings of this bird!! After all, everyone in these ruling classes of the United States could use all these gigantic funds that flowed to them after the collapse of the USSR for something really useful, peaceful space exploration, flight to Mars, for example, and not spend such money on starting the next wars, but no war is always more profitable than peaceful creation! and now they themselves are going down and dragging the whole world with them in the guise of world doves bringing death around the world - this is the hypocritical BEHAVIOR OF THE TRUE EVIL EMPIRE!!!
    p.s. and God forbid that I was wrong, so that this prelude to the Third World War remains a prelude, but...
    1. +1
      26 August 2013 18: 29
      your truth, but the true goal of hell in its manifestation in the United States is neither Syria nor the Muslim world, not even Russia, EUROPE is the goal of all conquerors,
      she sleeps and pretends that eternal high and LGBT are the highest manifestations of civilization,
      One push is enough in the form of the Russians redirecting energy flows, and moving their army to its borders, and there are pain points there - the Balts, Poles and some Swedes, this is to our advantage - we can poke them and cause a universal howl,
      Yes, even Yanukovych, and dad will play along,
      if you cheer it up, with constant exercises and quarrels with Little and White Russia, according to all the rules of the General Staff, they will be obliged to take the rails of confrontation, and this is our party, here we are at home, Paris always beckons))
  49. 0
    26 August 2013 18: 19
    The situation has escalated to the limit, point-blank I don’t understand why their sixes are joining the United States...after all, being called sixes is not proud and does not give any privileges...why? Well, the United States is already making my eye twitch...deb..i.ly squanderers ...I hope they die in my lifetime....that will be a joy
  50. 0
    26 August 2013 18: 23
    It's gone, just like with Libya!

    MOSCOW, August 26. /ITAR-TASS/. Moscow is not going to fight with anyone, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said today, answering a question about the Russian Federation’s reaction to the possibility of military strikes on Syria.

    At the same time, Lavrov expects that “after all, our Western partners will not determine their policy reactively, but strategically.”

    “We understand the limitations for strategic thinking associated with a very frequent electoral cycle, when it is necessary to satisfy the emotions of the voter - emotions that are fueled by the ruling circles themselves,” the minister noted. “Yes, this is life. But the fact that the foundations of international law are becoming less and less significant for our Western partners, at least for the leading Western countries, this is bad."

    “And anyone who thinks that in this way it will be possible to again establish the laws that existed in the era of lawlessness is thinking short-sightedly,” Lavrov added. “It will still come back to haunt you someday.”

    The head of the Russian Foreign Ministry noted that the campaign of intimidation against Syria has already begun, and the events in Iraq and Libya began in the same way. He emphasized that forceful intervention in the situation in Syria, bypassing the UN Security Council, “is a very dangerous path, a very slippery path.” According to the minister, Western leaders “are not going to wait for the results of the investigation, they have already decided everything.”
    1. +2
      26 August 2013 18: 59
      Quote: mhpv
      It's gone, just like with Libya!

      Do you know what your post reminded me of?
  51. 0
    26 August 2013 18: 32
    Sergei Lavrov spoke about Russia's reaction to possible military strikes on Syria

    http://www.itar-tass.com/c12/853186.html

    MOSCOW, August 26. /ITAR-TASS/. Moscow is not going to fight with anyone, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said today, answering a question about the Russian Federation’s reaction to the possibility of military strikes on Syria.

    At the same time, Lavrov expects that “after all, our Western partners will not determine their policy reactively, but strategically.”

    “We understand the limitations for strategic thinking associated with a very frequent electoral cycle, when it is necessary to satisfy the emotions of the voter - emotions that are fueled by the ruling circles themselves,” the minister noted. “Yes, this is life. But the fact that the foundations of international law are becoming less and less significant for our Western partners, at least for the leading Western countries, this is bad."

    “And anyone who thinks that in this way it will be possible to again establish the laws that existed in the era of lawlessness is thinking short-sightedly,” Lavrov added. “It will still come back to haunt you someday.”

    The head of the Russian Foreign Ministry noted that the campaign of intimidation against Syria has already begun, and the events in Iraq and Libya began in the same way. He emphasized that forceful intervention in the situation in Syria, bypassing the UN Security Council, “is a very dangerous path, a very slippery path.” According to the minister, Western leaders “are not going to wait for the results of the investigation, they have already decided everything.”
  52. 0
    26 August 2013 18: 34
    Yes, we can understand this kind of badly, but strategically it doesn’t concern us, that’s all
  53. 0
    26 August 2013 18: 35
    In accordance with international law still in force in the world, a country subjected to aggression, including even so-called “humanitarian bombings”, has a completely legal right to strike back at those who committed aggression, and against any military and other targets on the territory of the aggressor country, with all means of destruction available to it!
    Let's wait and maybe we'll see it soon...
    However, there are doubts that the United States and its accomplices from NATO and the Middle East will still decide to do this!
    Because the consequences of such aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic may turn out to be completely unpredictable and even global...
  54. 0
    26 August 2013 18: 37
    This way it will reach us, and they will rub it into us about multi-vectorism and strategic interests....
  55. 0
    26 August 2013 19: 00
    Quote: Colonelic
    In accordance with international law still in force in the world, a country subjected to aggression, including even so-called “humanitarian bombings”, has the absolutely legal right to strike back at those who committed aggression, and at any military and other targets on the territory of the aggressor country, with all means of destruction available to it!Let's wait and maybe we'll see it soon...

    Syria, on the verge of foreign intervention, threatens war with Israel


    DAMASCUS, August 26. If Syria is subjected to external aggression, a retaliatory strike will be inflicted primarily on Israel. This was stated by one of the leaders of the ruling Baath Party, Khalaf al-Miftah.
    In his opinion, politics It is Israel that is pushing the US to attack Syria, and therefore it is responsible for the aggression.
    As Kursor reports, al-Miftah believes that an armed attack on Syria will be a prelude to the third world war...
    More details: http://www.rosbalt.ru/main/2013/08/26/1168451.html
  56. 0
    26 August 2013 20: 00
    Quote: rolik
    Present US debt for payment, and withdraw assets from the mattress in one day. It will be cleaner than the atomic bombing, and if China also pulls up, the mattress-beds will not be at all before the war.

    Debt obligations are presented for a certain period, and not when someone gets into something crazy. Another thing is that as soon as the Ministry of Finance closes old obligations, it takes on new ones again, justifying itself by saying that “There are no more reliable and profitable financial instruments in the world.” And where will they come from if “their” people are sitting everywhere.
    1. 0
      27 August 2013 09: 38
      and in one day withdraw assets from the mattress
      Ha! they were exported to China a long time ago) and not only minke whales) the Germans were already convinced of this!
      The Chinese are great, they quietly paid back the debt from AI, while everyone was playing in the crisis, by locating production and gold)
  57. 0
    26 August 2013 20: 19
    This is not about Assad or Syria, but Russia specifically for pipelines to Europe from Qatar and Saudi Arabia, in order to cut off Russia from profits from the sale of oil and gas
  58. 0
    26 August 2013 20: 20
    This is not about Assad or Syria, but Russia specifically for pipelines to Europe from Qatar and Saudi Arabia, in order to cut off Russia from profits from the sale of oil and gas
  59. 0
    26 August 2013 20: 21
    This is not about Assad or Syria, but Russia specifically for pipelines to Europe from Qatar and Saudi Arabia, in order to cut off Russia from profits from the sale of oil and gas
  60. 0
    26 August 2013 20: 22
    This is not about Assad or Syria, but Russia specifically for pipelines to Europe from Qatar and Saudi Arabia, in order to cut off Russia from profits from the sale of oil and gas
    1. +1
      26 August 2013 20: 59
      there are no psheks, gas and Syria are an excuse to create the Warsaw province again, the Russians really need Warsaw and Szczecin, Danzig, the main goal is to deprive Poland of independence, and bring all the Poles to Siberia to clear away the snow)))
      Damn, here is a nation of prostitutes, everyone is looking for a place for themselves, fear the devils - the RUSSIANS ARE COMING!!!
      Well, no one even takes them into account, but you need to pay attention to yourself, clowns, but they do useful work, oooooo damn we’ll take over all of Poland again,
      Most importantly, more squealing!!!!
  61. Raven
    0
    26 August 2013 20: 49
    Well, the Libyan scenario begins. Now everything depends on whether the countries that are for Syria will take serious measures.
  62. +1
    26 August 2013 20: 59
    The head of the Russian Foreign Ministry said that Russia will not fight with anyone for Syria. This means either there will be no aggression or we have lost Syria. And soon Iran too.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 21: 06
      nothing will happen, and if it does, then it’s another goal in our favor,
      there will never be peace in Syria until the Russians decide this, quote from Ahmadinejad - we will be with Syria for as long as it is possible for the Russians,
      This is a war for all time, whoever gets in there will wash himself with bloody tears
  63. 0
    26 August 2013 22: 17
    The Middle East is a powder keg of the world. Or rather, oil. No one is interested in maintaining stability in this region, since the weak ones are located there, both economically and militarily. That is, the oil there does not have a firm owner. Therefore, the locals build up their own frail muscles, risking overstraining themselves, and the newcomers set the locals against each other. There will be no peace there until one person establishes itself, be it the states, China or us. I see the task of the GDP in this situation as to play the Syrian card in such a way as to drag the states into a protracted armed conflict, not giving them the opportunity to enjoy the fruits of the temporary occupation of Syrian territory, inflicting maximum losses on them in manpower, of course, with the wrong hands, and in every possible way to strengthen the work of our news channels broadcasting abroad in order to completely undermine:
    1. The faith of ordinary British, French and other European Swedes in their American partner
    2. The faith of ordinary staff members themselves in the justice of their attacks
    3. The most important thing is the faith of the entire world community in the military superiority of the states over their opponents.
    A couple of tens of thousands of coffins under the striped flag a month and a little truth about why they were killed there (meaning both “what they did there” and “why they came there”) will greatly complicate the lives of Barabama and those above him.
  64. 0
    26 August 2013 22: 36
    Quote: MVS
    Quote: Muadipus
    Or does anyone have the illusion that the United States is not capable of using nuclear weapons?

    American politicians are far from being idiots, they understand well that we all live on the same planet and they will also get it. The ground operation in such events is likely to be, but without the use of nuclear weapons.

    They will not get it, especially from the use of tactical nuclear weapons
    The warhead of the Tomahawk BGM-109A strategic nuclear missile system is the W-80 warhead (weight 123 kg, length about 1 m, diameter 0.27 m and power 200ct). Detonation is carried out by a contact fuse. The radius of the destruction zone is 3 km.
    It is one thing to fight each other with conventional weapons, and quite another thing to wage a war against a country that possesses weapons of mass destruction. A gopnik approach can work here, when a short guy jumps on you, and behind him are 20 big guys who will stand up for the short guy. Here you will think ten times whether to touch the nit or not. So it is with Qatar, with Israel - two spits on the world map, crushing which is not difficult, but you can get rid of it to the fullest. And if you use weapons of mass destruction against the United States directly, Tomahawks with a nuclear warhead will not keep you waiting. It’s easier to burn down areas than to look for chemical weapons in separate groups, especially in a country riddled with tunnels. God bless Syria!
  65. ZIS
    0
    26 August 2013 22: 37
    If the S-300 is not yet in Syria, then shame on Russia.... negative
  66. ZIS
    0
    26 August 2013 22: 43
    People!!! I'm new, can you tell me how to change a rag for a red flag? Maybe I missed something during registration? And for some reason the avatar is not displayed...
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 23: 48
      Quote: ZIS
      How to change a rag for a red flag?

      Personal account - my profile - edit profile - born in the USSR, check the box.
      Quote: ZIS
      The avatar is not displayed for some reason...

      Avatar available.
  67. fan dango
    +2
    26 August 2013 23: 06
    Everything will repeat itself as it has happened many times before. NATO will bomb and plunder Syria and will look for the next victim “to stimulate its military-industrial complex and fuel its economy.” And Russia will protest.
  68. lucidlook
    0
    27 August 2013 00: 19
    Of all the scenarios for the participation of the Russian Federation in the conflict, I personally think the most effective in terms of preserving its foreign policy image and minimizing the risk for both the fleet and the defense capability of the country as a whole is a symmetrical attack on the rebels. Those. Americans have one Tomahawk against Assad, the Russian Federation has one X-65 against a concentration of militants. Well, and at the same time help to shoot down everything that moves in the air in the direction of Syria.

    If the Amers are faced with another ground operation, and without the “rebels” this will be clearly necessary, the situation will be completely different - both in terms of money, and in time, and in terms of losses.

    And for Syria, of course, it would be ideal to launch a pre-emptive strike against the aggressor so that he would immediately experience all the delights of combat losses.
  69. 0
    27 August 2013 01: 57
    “Draining” Syria would be political hara-kiri for Putin... He cannot help but guess about it...
  70. 0
    27 August 2013 04: 34
    Today, some official from the American Department of Defense broadcast on cnn that the cost of one day of war will cost 1 billion, so before flattery to the Syrians it would not hurt to first develop a strategy, but Obama does not have one. In general, from the entire interview it was extremely clear that the military was against any operation and that it was time to settle down, there is no oil there, which means there is nothing to do there. It would be better if all interested countries agreed on how to help the population.
  71. KOH
    0
    27 August 2013 05: 52
    Quote: Scoun
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    What is this?

    so ... Dreams, Dreams that someday the day will come .. when Russia will start, without looking back at anyone, will start to put bloodsuckers in place of the presumptuous "democratizers" ... the same naglo-Saxons who allow themselves such categorical statements and actions. In fact, the Naglo-Saxons openly sent the UN in three letters ... that is, even symbolic decency is not observed ...


    Yes, this is not the first time they send the UN, they only understand force, remember Cuba..., in the USSR, Kuzka’s mother acted only like this, and now: the question is “What will Russia do if the coalition begins to take action against Syria?” answer “ Russia will not fight with anyone." "If the coalition starts hostilities, then this is bad." EVERYTHING!!!
  72. 0
    27 August 2013 06: 57
    There will be no winners. The Gulf countries are digging themselves a big hole. It seems that the whole idea with Syria will drag Russia into a war, and then, lo and behold, there will be a financial crisis. It is unlikely that Uncle Vova will fall into this trap. Russia, sadly enough, is benefiting from war throughout the Middle East. Everyone will get a sopatka, both Arabs and Jews.
  73. 0
    27 August 2013 07: 55
    Russia is not going to fight with anyone. Sergei Lavrov stated this when answering a question about the Russian Federation’s reaction to the possibility of military strikes on Syria.

    Online broadcast of Sergei Lavrov's press conference on the situation in Syria.
    http://www.rg.ru/2013/08/26/online-site-anons.html


    On the question of Russia's possible reaction. In general, I would not be surprised if, apart from words of censure, no sanctions follow against the aggressors.
  74. 0
    27 August 2013 08: 41
    The time has come for a big war. Well, these Anglo-Saxons have completely lost everything. When their stinking green pieces of paper are embargoed. Tired of your lawlessness. I would go to war myself, to kill these jackals with her democracy and the protection of LGBT rights.
  75. +2
    27 August 2013 10: 34
    Interesting and in many ways sad observations:
    1. Our political elite is silent, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs alone takes the rap for everyone, but where is the president, prime minister, and minister of defense? Even the ever-raging leader of the LDPR remains silent. And the result is simple - the average person does not see any political will. And there is no alternative to this swamp, the opposition is aw! - the same result.
    2. Syria is not our ally. At least once have you heard someone in power say “Syria is our friend” or “Syria is our ally.” We remain neutral (a complete abomination from my point of view).
    3. The latest meeting between Obama and Putin is a very alarming event. Only the lazy one didn’t write that our president was very “upset.” After this, all ties with the United States are severed, leaving only formal meetings to divert attention.
    4. The methods of our politicians are still very one-sided. Of course I'm a small person, but I don't understand why you can't play politics at the micro level:
    1) Pay 100 rubles to the students and take them to the square with banners saying “Yankees get out of Syria.”
    2) Hire 2 terrorists and blow up the US embassy in some third country, which will distract and scatter attention for a couple of days.
    3) Fly strategic bombers over Syrian territory.
    4) Conduct Russian-Syrian exercises.

    Optimistic forecast: There is a card up your sleeve that can be played, and everything else is a waste of resources.
    Pessimistic forecast: As has been said here many times, we are political corpses.
  76. Grigorich 1962
    0
    27 August 2013 13: 06
    The world is finally turning into chaos.....This is beneficial for the states and their schmucks.......under the USSR this was simply impossible. But since the STATES and their gay European friends became our “partners”, this state of affairs in international affairs has become the norm
    under the USSR this would have been simply impossible
  77. vladkust
    +1
    27 August 2013 13: 22
    Or maybe it’s time to light up this whole world with a third???? because these amers and their European jackals are already quite tired of their dermocracy! just yesterday Iraq, Libya, today Syria and tomorrow they will say that there is no democracy in my family and they are ready to restore order in my home?!!! Got it!!! My personal opinion is that I would go to Syria to strangle these democrats, otherwise tomorrow we will be fighting this infection on our streets!
  78. +1
    27 August 2013 15: 28
    The author deliberately left open the question of the role of Russia in all this mess. The Libyan variant is possible, when the Russian leader behaved worse than a rag. The repetition of the South Ossetian variant, connected with the direct military intervention of the Russian army, is possible, but only one! The lack of a common border in Syria and Russia.

    This is the question that interests me most. I think that it would be nice for our leader to pull a detachment of ships to the Syrian sea border.
    It would be nice to temper the ardor of the tolerant jackals a little with the rattling of Russian weapons.
  79. 0
    27 August 2013 16: 15
    MOSCOW, August 27 – RIA Novosti. The United States has already decided on a military strike on Syria, head of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs Alexei Pushkov said in his microblog.
  80. 0
    27 August 2013 17: 47
    The motivation of the lawless man is impunity. Someone must, at some point, deprive the main lawless leader, that is, the United States, of such motivation.
  81. +1
    28 August 2013 02: 18
    What to do today, you had to think when this mess just started, and today you need to think what to do when all this is over. after they defeat Syria and find chemical weapons, “Israel will help” and then the bloody regime of Assad will begin to be fanned in the media, and who helped him oppress the Syrian people, poison and kill women and children, who supplied him with weapons? that’s why Putin and Medved are silent, that’s why there are no arms supplies. because everything has already been decided. but that's how it is IMHO
  82. +1
    28 August 2013 04: 17
    Quote: tetatus
    Who for whom?

    Apparently, the United States is planning to re-implement the Libyan scenario, the essence of which was to bombard key military and civilian objects and seize the capital of the state by special forces.

    As can be seen from the latest news, US instructors have been training such units for the last six months. Several camps have been established in Jordan. French media report that about a thousand “bearded graduates” trained by American instructors have already crossed the border into Syria.

    With regard to the bombing, the United States, as in Libya, will again not be able to do without the support of its loyal allies in Europe and the Middle East.

    Let's briefly list them: Great Britain, France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel, Jordan.

    On the other side of the scale are the allies of the legitimate president of Syria: Iran, Russia, Venezuela, China, Kurdish, Lebanese and Iraqi armed militias.

    Let there be a fight!


    If this fight starts, it will be complete F....

    I will express my thoughts in more detail:

    1) Everyone understands that Bashar has already announced live that he is giving away gas and oil fields to RUSSIA. And if we take control, over these deposits, accordingly, RUSSIA will control the majority of the world’s reserves. And all the GREEN MATTRESSES spent will simply turn into pieces of paper. Now they will dig with their hoofs to start this war. France, England, Qatar and those like them who are present JACKALS, everyone is waiting for their piece. How is it that RUSSIA will regulate the pricing policy for oil and gas?!
    2) This whole pack gave it all a political overtone. Well, correctly, there is nothing more to cover, all the arguments have already been exhausted.
    3) About economic sanctions: Well, I don’t know, I’ll say in the words of a classic: “There are MORE GOOD PEOPLE, BUT THE BAD PEOPLE ARE BETTER ORGANIZED.” As practice shows, our allies have always become rivals, with the exception of a few, the question is price. There are plenty of both normal and sensible cynics and radical pragmatists everywhere. There is no need to flatter yourself.
    4) If the BRICS countries are united by FAITH, and not typical pragmatism, political and territorial concessions, I mean CHINA, and IRAN, VENEZUELA and the former republics of the union join them, we will stand and win... otherwise we will simply or choke or the 3rd world war will begin

    PS If WE and OUR allies don’t stop them now, we will simply become a colony of MATTRESSES or derail the WHOLE EARTH.

    THEN, ALLOW ME TO LEAVE....HERE'S SOMETHING LIKE THIS...MAYBE SOMEONE KNOWS ANOTHER SCENARIO? SHARE... hi
  83. KOH
    0
    28 August 2013 05: 10
    4) If the BRICS countries are united by FAITH, and not typical pragmatism, political and territorial concessions, I mean CHINA, and IRAN, VENEZUELA and the former republics of the union join them, we will stand and win... otherwise we will simply or choke or the 3rd world war will begin

    As has always been the case, people rally when the ass starts to burn, apparently it’s tolerable, it doesn’t burn much yet... In general, will these mattresses ever drown in blood?
  84. +1
    28 August 2013 07: 02
    Quote: CON
    4) If the BRICS countries are united by FAITH, and not typical pragmatism, political and territorial concessions, I mean CHINA, and IRAN, VENEZUELA and the former republics of the union join them, we will stand and win... otherwise we will simply or choke or the 3rd world war will begin

    As has always been the case, people rally when the ass starts to burn, apparently it’s tolerable, it doesn’t burn much yet... In general, will these mattresses ever drown in blood?


    IT’S HIGH TIME TO HAMMER NAILS INTO THEIR COFFIN....And I wouldn’t be surprised if the flag of the Russian Airborne Troops soon flies over their Capitol and is inscribed as the Reich Chancellery in May 1945.
  85. HERMAJOR4IK
    0
    28 August 2013 11: 35
    are you kidding me? about six months ago I had the urge to go to the room of reflection in common parlance das ist sartiren) well, it’s boring to sit there empty-handed, so I took the first book that caught my eye, it turned out to be the book of the year, 2005, it was called GREAT PROPHETS AND CLAIRVOYERS Well, I read it there_mostly empty of course Nostradamus Casey their predictions were deciphered after the fact of the events that happened and the rest are quite vague_but now I got to the predictions of VANGA made by her in 1979, a lot of years ago_and here’s an interesting moment I read there_when she was asked about her fate humanity and the third world war, she answered literally the following_they say there will certainly be a third world war, but added that SYRIA HAS NOT FALLEN YET and this was in 1979_by the way, for skeptics, a book from 2005 when no one gave a damn about Syria, including the Americans_let's draw conclusions, gentlemen, jurors) don't give too much of a plus, don't I want to be a private, then I’ll have to screw myself up again to get into the minus smile
  86. Drosselmeyer
    0
    28 August 2013 12: 18
    Syria can already be written off. Now we have to think who's next.
  87. 0
    28 August 2013 22: 28
    The day of a serious exam is coming for Russian-made air defense, and for the entire rocketry industry. It’s a pity that the consumables, as always, will not be the wine residents. Or maybe they won't. If not a single missile can fall on Syrian territory, the effect will be worse than Kuzka’s mother.
    1. 0
      28 August 2013 22: 31
      Quote: Muadipus
      If not a single missile can fall on Syrian territory, the effect will be worse than Kuzka’s mother.

      Unfortunately, this is unlikely; it will most likely not be possible to repel the attack 100%, which is a pity
      and if only we could sink which thread of the tub of which production
      1. Zheka Sibiryak
        0
        29 August 2013 08: 43
        The whole world is afraid of this

        Ours are already in Syria
  88. Zheka Sibiryak
    0
    29 August 2013 08: 46



    Ours are already in Syria
  89. 0
    1 September 2013 01: 09
    God, save Russia from idiots and traitors, and we ourselves will somehow cope with the American soldiers!!!
  90. Ryzhikov
    0
    1 September 2013 16: 03
    Quote: Nagan
    Quote: atalef
    an ally with whom the goods turnover is just miserable (even an order of magnitude smaller than with Israel (as an example)) - so what is the ally then? ... he has spent all 5 wars ...

    And what kind of trade is possible with them? What do they produce besides bearded terrorist bastards? And what do they buy besides weapons, which they "cheat" with unenviable regularity?

    Dear overseas guest, they don’t produce anything and they buy weapons because CIs like your government don’t give them LIFE am(it’s strange that an Amer can write U.B.L.Yu D Ki and I don’t have double standards)
  91. lucidlook
    0
    5 September 2013 00: 35
    Well, that's it, the decision has been made. I believe the warriors are already ready.
    “It is reported that 10 senators voted in support of air strikes on Syria, 7 people voted against. US President Barack Obama has repeatedly asked Congress to support military action against the regime of Bashar al-Assad. According to him, the purpose of the air strikes is retaliation for the alleged the use of chemical weapons, which, according to the White House, killed 1400 people."
    http://russian.rt.com/article/14967