The war in Syria to be! Here we go

641
The war in Syria to be! Here we goTeam Gaza

And again in the air smell of chemistry. Chemistry of a big regional war with a taste of “anti-people” sarin, which has already replaced the rather outdated reasons for the impending war with Syria. Who already remembers how the claims of the West and its Middle Eastern allies began: support for anti-government rallies, demands for the leader of Syria to give more freedom to the people, stop the president’s wife to make luxury purchases ...

The essence of all these claims was reduced to one thing - the president should leave. But the president stayed. The requirements of the West fulfilled and even in parallel with varying success continued to tamp overseas militants throughout the Syrian Arab Republic.

Now, on the agenda is the frightened and too clumsy command of Gaza, which too clearly resembles Iraq ten years ago.

“In the UN furnace. In the furnace of these bureaucratic verbiage! ”Probably, this is how you can express the position of the United States in relation to the Syrian problem today. The US Secretary of Defense comes to the fore, announcing that he is waiting for only one thing - an order from the President “To bomb!”

In the fire of these bombings, all the arguments that the United States appeals today will dissolve. In the first place there will be only one goal - the expulsion or physical elimination of the recalcitrant leader of Syria. Too many similar examples in the last 15 years: Milosevic, Hussein, Gaddafi.

However, not all so simple. And the author of this opus took the liberty to fantasize a little, and what will turn the planned US event for the United States and its allies in the region.

Who for whom?

Apparently, the United States is planning to re-implement the Libyan scenario, the essence of which was to bombard key military and civilian objects and seize the capital of the state by special forces.

As seen from the latter NewsUS instructors have been training these units for the past six months. Created several camps in Jordan. The French media report that about a thousand "bearded graduates" trained by American instructors have already crossed the Syrian border.

With regard to the bombing, the United States, as in Libya, will again not be able to do without the support of its loyal allies in Europe and the Middle East.

Let's briefly list them: Great Britain, France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel, Jordan.

On the other side of the scale are the allies of the legitimate president of Syria: Iran, Russia, Venezuela, China, Kurdish, Lebanese and Iraqi armed militias.

Let there be a fight!

Implications for the UK and France

In addition to diplomatic wrangling with Russia and China, the freezing of many bilateral treaties, the above-mentioned countries may face the problem of the return of many and many "bearded sons of the Fatherland." There are only about a thousand of them in Syria just now. And of course, it would be more profitable for the French and the British if such a contingent was dissolved in the fire of international intervention in Syria ... But, right there, the leaders of these states declare the need for military intervention in the Syrian conflict.

Good. The Syrian Arab Army will be eliminated. The Syrian government will be biased. And what next? That's right, international sponsors will block the cash infusions of the militants. Destroy them simply will be no one. So, it will be time to return home, to London, to Paris, to dozens of other European cities.

Radically-minded young people who know how to handle different types of weapons and even have sarin production technology in handicraft conditions, on the streets and in poor densely populated quarters of European capitals are the rosy dream of tolerant Europe of the 21 century Europe that survived the attacks in London, Madrid, last year's French shooting special forces. The sharp increase in the threat of a repetition of these events is a fact.

What can we say about the arrival in Europe of thousands of Syrian refugees. By the way about them.

Jordan

Briefly and clearly. A state with a population of six million people has already accepted about a million Syrian refugees on its territory. This situation is extremely negative for the growth of social tension in Jordan, not to mention the cost of the treasury to maintain hundreds of thousands of people who do not work.

What will lead Jordan's armed intervention in the war in Syria? That's right, to a sharp increase in the flow of refugees to Jordan. And who knows how long the Jordanian treasury will last?


Turkey

The problem of the massive flow of Syrian refugees is also relevant for Turkey, the entire border area of ​​which has been turned into a mixture of refugee camps and camps for training and serving international terrorists.

This is clearly not to the liking of the local Turkish population. And in general, the majority of ordinary citizens of Turkey, whose hot temperament we had already met a month ago.

As far as socially explosive Turkey’s intervention is, it’s just scary to imagine if the whole Turkey boiled for about three weeks even because of possible cutting down of one city square.

Oh yes. Also the Kurdish problem. It so happened that Kurdish militias sometimes shoot or blow up Turkish border patrols. The latter, in response, carry out mass operations to clean up possible attackers. In general, the friendship does not work.

Mutual hostility will grow into what, if the Turkish government attacks the one who promised his own autonomy to several millions of Kurds, it is impossible to even imagine!

In addition to the revenge of the Kurdish militias, Turkey should be greatly concerned about the massive armed response of Syria. For boiling.

Israel

What threatens Israel? The refugees Transition of terrorists across the border in Israel. But besides this, there is also a massive rocket attack and terrorist attacks from not only Syria, but also from the fighters of the Lebanese Hezbal movement and, most importantly, from the only ally of Syria in the region - Iran.

Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Well, here Iran should already enter the business with its numerous promises to cut off the Gulf of Hormuz, through which the above-mentioned states transport about half of the total oil and gas produced in these countries.

Iran in this case is simply nothing to lose. As mentioned above, Syria is the only ally of Iran in the region. The countries have concluded a joint defense agreement in the event of an attack on one of these countries.. Finally, the Iranian government must clearly realize that after the fall of Syria, it will be Iran’s turn.

USA

There are only economic strikes that will affect the United States to a much greater degree than the fighter brought down by the Syrian air defense or a terrorist attack on one of the American military bases.

Debt obligations to China, a quarter of the total oil supplied to the United States from Venezuela.

For a country in economic agony, such blows can be much worse, and more important than the possible benefits of the war with Syria.

RESULTS

The above analysis is extremely superficial. The main consequences for the participants of the attacking side will be millions of Syrian refugees, possible popular unrest within the participating countries, economic strikes performed by Russia, China and Venezuela. Well, and in detail: a retaliatory strike by the armed forces of Syria and their allies, numerous terrorist attacks, as well as a mass exodus on the homes of foreign fighters who fought in Syria.

The author deliberately left open the question of the role of Russia in all this mess. The Libyan variant is possible, when the Russian leader behaved worse than a rag. The repetition of the South Ossetian variant, connected with the direct military intervention of the Russian army, is possible, but only one! The lack of a common border in Syria and Russia.

Possible variant of Iraqi neutrality and non-interference.

Who knows? Perhaps all this tension, as before, will be reduced to the next verbal battles of diplomats and a return to Quo's diplomatic status.

In the meantime, let's analyze the current situation.
641 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Docklishin
    +66
    26 August 2013 08: 10
    It feels like the world is going crazy. That is WHERE the French, British and others climb .... The question is how we can restrain Western aggression against Syria? I’m quite serious, because I don’t have any healthy thoughts request . with 300 whether it is or not. Heavy weapons were not supplied. But political pressure by blocking resolutions in the UN Security Council ... they don’t listen. Where is China? Why is Iran silent? recourse Or something global really begins - debts are sometimes written off sysh as it should ...
    1. +29
      26 August 2013 08: 21
      Personally, I’m not very pleased to see what is happening, it’s the United States that took offense because of Snowden and decided to show that they are the owners and that they want to do something !? Just take and start a war, because they are so hot-tempered and do not even hide behind especially excuses !? The British understandably, their entire history was against us, and right now the main mainstream. But in this whole picture, I personally do not see allies in Syria except Russia and Iran (although Iran, under the new president, is not so eager to fight, where is the promised army under Ahmadinijad to help Syria !?). And countries like Venezuela and China generally nervously smoke on the sidelines, China has never been able and will not fight, especially from the United States, they can talk and talk there.
      In general, the picture is very muddy, for some reason it seems that the United States has seriously gathered to fight, but Russia cannot and will not stand aside ...
      1. Garyk701
        +9
        26 August 2013 14: 34
        Russia's main ally is Onishchenko! He urgently needs to check the space contracts of Russia and the United States, if the United States does not provide evidence that they do not take dangerous bacteria into space, then these contracts must be urgently suspended until the Syrian issue is resolved.
        1. Garyk701
          +4
          27 August 2013 06: 14
          The main news on Rambler: after all, Russia has changed its mind about selling rocket engines to amers ... Now let’s fly into space on brooms, you can run right from aircraft carriers.
      2. APOCALIPTIC
        -17
        26 August 2013 19: 01
        [quote = Romn] We’ve seriously gathered in the fight, but Russia cannot and will not stand aside ...
        Russ has merged Syria as well as Serbs and so on and so forth
        Lavrov: Russia will not enter into a military conflict over Syria
        Read more: http://www.rosbalt.ru/main/2013/08/26/1168459.html laughing
        1. +6
          26 August 2013 19: 10
          Quote: APOCALIPTIC
          Russ has merged Syria as well as Serbs and so on and so forth

          Do not wishful thinking.
          By the way, having seen the flag of registration of your entrance, I remembered

          Ss-adviser! Aren't you afraid to be next?
          First, put things in order, and then climb with tips ...
          1. APOCALIPTIC
            -16
            26 August 2013 22: 03
            And what are you arrows translate? Well, then declare here that your mid (Lavrov) is lying. Or how? Only without power there is about London, Zimbava and so on. In other words, you yap
            1. +7
              27 August 2013 18: 15
              Quote: APOCALIPTIC
              Well, declare here that your mid (Lavrov) is lying.

              Mmm.
              Somehow clumsy Your posts are being written. It seems you forget to distort the text not respected troll .
              Yes, regarding your question, not respected APOCALIPTIC (one nickname, what does it mean, have you stopped taking the prescribed medicine?), you need to understand that you are not there!
              It is more clear to say?
              Learn trolling from members of the forum with skulls on shoulder straps, otherwise even for your troll the tribe is uncomfortable, babble, not trolling!
              But back to the topic _ Lavrov, in my opinion, only said that Russia will not start the third world!
              Meaning?
              After all, from all the countries where he wonА NATO go coffins back to your countries, from everywhere you are shedding your tails with your tail!
              Recently laid out statistics of losses in Afghanistan, but there is still in Iraq!
              In general _ Forward
              a flag in your hands a drum around your neck an ax in the back and an electric train towards

            2. +3
              28 August 2013 13: 06
              You, half-venerable, should learn Russian. In the meantime, let me explain - the phrase "to fight over Syria" does not carry any ambiguity. Now, if Syria starts a war, we will not fight because of it. But if you and the United States start it, then BECAUSE of you we will quite fight for Syria. Do you see the difference?
          2. RUS-36
            +2
            28 August 2013 00: 05
            And that is not so. Serbs were given to the Amer to be torn apart ... Syria next 99%
        2. Garyk701
          +3
          27 August 2013 07: 50
          No one was going to fight in Russia. You can look for non-military leverage. In an extreme case, information will leak that the Syrians saw ordinary Club-S in ordinary sea containers, but who exactly and where ... ??? And to lose an entire aircraft carrier or AUG due to some kind of Syria ...
          So the question of the beginning of the operation can be postponed due to various sudden pop-up circumstances ...
        3. vladkust
          +2
          27 August 2013 12: 44
          Learn the Russian language, it will come in handy soon when you scream at the top of your tongue, give up! Don’t shoot !!! soldier
        4. IGS
          0
          31 August 2013 09: 31
          Woke up ... coffee ... read your favorite portal, we can argue with someone)) ... Saturday ... well. No damn it is a tolling miracle ... like a fly in coffee. Well, who called you here? and? Troll you suck. Now you’ll start to compose disgustingly badly, read Pushkin’s fairy tales. How did you compose ah? Has become a classic. You now think that they will spread links, facts, argue with you ... Nope. I woke up with my beloved woman, I’m fine, but your wife didn’t take Viagra for the night? We didn’t surrender or surrender anyone ... surrendered your henchmen. In your words there is some truth, we almost pr..li ... if you come to your senses in time. And here you are yours recently, but forever. Why? Yes, on the couch, because I RUSSIAN want so much, like 80% of those present here. So he went to his place with his amoebotolerant prime minister, he can only build our eyes and blush like a red maiden. And my wife poured a new coffee for me, having washed the cup well.
      3. +6
        26 August 2013 19: 34
        What does Snowden have to do with it? The states are trying not to be late for the forward train, where the drivers are not them.
      4. 0
        29 August 2013 17: 28
        Snowden was dragged to something. Obama announced Syria's military intervention in the case of the use of chemical weapons, when no one had yet heard of Snowden!
    2. +80
      26 August 2013 08: 25
      If, I repeat, if the USA and K attack Syria, the result is as simple as 3 penny:
      1. A pro-Western weak government.
      2. Sluggish civil war.
      3. PMO closes in tartus.
      4. Both China and Russia, due to economic circumstances, will put up with the loss of the ally.
      5. All.
      1. 0
        26 August 2013 08: 27
        Quote: Civil
        4. Both China and Russia, due to economic circumstances, will put up with the loss of the ally.


        Here, here is the hope for sanctions against American producers and debtors.
        1. +87
          26 August 2013 08: 34
          Quote: Karavan
          Here, here is the hope for sanctions against American producers and debtors.

          What kind of nonsense, who in general, after the US attack on Syria, will take Russia seriously?
          1. +27
            26 August 2013 08: 44
            Quote: Denis
            What kind of nonsense, who in general, after the US attack on Syria, will take Russia seriously?

            Delirium by type - you need to break all you write! Specifically, I ask you what Russia can do now, at the diplomatic level we have already done everything we could. Offer to join the warrior on the side of Syria? Then this is world 3 with all that it implies. The world does not burn for long and a lot of mind is not needed.
            1. +21
              26 August 2013 08: 48
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              . Offer to join the warrior on the side of Syria?
              Do you propose to let the bearded Wahhabism get out of Syria?
              1. +20
                26 August 2013 09: 04
                Quote: Karavan
                Do you propose to let the bearded Wahhabism get out of Syria?

                He had long crawled out of Syria, and it was not in Syria that he was born.
                1. +4
                  27 August 2013 22: 54
                  The militants in our territory are not the worst that can happen.

                  Let's pay attention to the spiritual clash on the Syrian battlefield. Honor and Courage against greed and cowardice. And this battle also went beyond Syria. And in our minds he goes! What will we do if Honor, Courage, Courage, all that on which the generations of our people stood, what if they fall? How will we live with this? The betrayal of these concepts is the desecration of the affairs of all our ancestors, who conquered our present with their lives and death.

                  Now information pressure will only increase. They will frighten, frighten. Either live without honor, yielding, or stand your ground for death.
              2. +6
                26 August 2013 11: 10
                Quote: Karavan
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                . Offer to join the warrior on the side of Syria?
                Do you propose to let the bearded Wahhabism get out of Syria?


                I propose to forward them to amers as a gift, even with personal weapons. Wait for the repetition of September 11 at the amers. Terroist number 1 P I N D O S T A N, their students and tear. There will be no sympathy for the amers.
              3. candy bar140105
                +4
                26 August 2013 16: 34
                Moreover, this "bearded Wahhabism" can easily reignite the Caucasus (it is necessary to put these monsters somewhere after Syria, not to return them really back to gayrope). They will pass through Georgia to Dagestan and Chechnya and greetings to Vova from Barak ... Previous wars will seem like flowers. At the same time, you can again visit South Ossetia (not necessarily, of course, but ...) in the hope that Russia will not have enough forces on all fronts ... In general, it is better to act now by all possible methods (I hope that there will be enough political and economic ones), then it will be too late and not before that, again the Olympics are on the nose .. And if you disrupt it, you can fly with a bunch of billions thrown into it ...
                1. +3
                  26 August 2013 18: 34
                  can through Central Asia. they can easily attack the 201st.
              4. +4
                26 August 2013 22: 42
                Wahhabis pawns, here others rule.
            2. +39
              26 August 2013 08: 49
              I’m answering you specifically, Russia will not do anything. You can fight with the wrong hands, you could arm Syria, as the United States arms Israel.
              1. +10
                26 August 2013 08: 58
                Quote: Denis
                I’m answering you specifically, Russia will not do anything.
                Specifically, only the president of Russia can do this. Here I left open the question of the nature of Russia's participation in the future mess. Thank you for your opinion.
                1. +12
                  26 August 2013 10: 21
                  Quote: Karavan
                  I left open the question of the nature of Russia's participation in the future mess.

                  In the case of a large kirdyk, Russia may accept the exiled Syrian government and evacuate the remnants of the Syrian frame to its territory.
                  Assad should take care of this in advance - appoint a successor and send to Russia + administration is needed, etc.
                  Russia and other allies should recognize this government as legal.
                  To some extent, these actions will make sense the physical elimination of Assad himself.
                  1. +7
                    26 August 2013 10: 31
                    Quote: antiaircrafter
                    In the case of a large kirdyk, Russia may accept the exiled Syrian government and evacuate the remnants of the Syrian frame to its territory.

                    And how will we evacuate citizens of Russia, of whom there are several thousand ?????
                    1. +3
                      26 August 2013 10: 53
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      And how will we evacuate citizens of Russia, of whom there are several thousand ?????

                      Here Shoigu MO with the Ministry of Emergencies will unite and everything will be in chocolate.
                      1. +19
                        26 August 2013 11: 22
                        Nothing prevents right now in the same Tartus to deploy a collection point for evacuated citizens and take them back with BDK return flights, or charter civil vessels.
                        At the same time, there are reasons to deploy an air defense group, declare a no-fly zone and shoot down everything that flies.
                      2. +13
                        26 August 2013 15: 12
                        Quote: antiaircrafter
                        nothing prevents already now in the same Tartus to deploy a collection point for evacuated citizens and take them back with BDK return flights, or charter civil vessels.
                        At the same time, there are reasons to deploy an air defense group, declare a no-fly zone and shoot down everything that flies.

                        Good decision. Logical. There was a precedent in Vietnam when the amers did not dare to bomb Soviet ships under unloading in Haiphong.
                        Well ... and if some "ToporoGavk" deviates from the goal - the carrier of this weapon will be destroyed - to protect the citizens of Russia is the direct duty of the army and the navy.
                      3. +11
                        26 August 2013 17: 42
                        stalkerwalker NO Today, 15:12 PM ↑

                        Quote: antiaircrafter
                        nothing prevents already now in the same Tartus to deploy a collection point for evacuated citizens and take them back with BDK return flights, or charter civil vessels.
                        At the same time, there are reasons to deploy an air defense group, declare a no-fly zone and shoot down everything that flies.

                        Good decision. Logical. There was a precedent in Vietnam when the amers did not dare to bomb Soviet ships under unloading in Haiphong.
                        Yes, with one caveat - "Soviet ships under unloading." The UNION is not Russia. The Union was ready and could fight with the WHOLE WORLD, Russia, unfortunately, does not have such power.
                      4. +8
                        26 August 2013 18: 38
                        Quote: ksan
                        . The Union was ready and could fight with the WORLD


                        the union could not only fight with the whole world, but also defeat it!
                      5. grafrozow
                        +4
                        26 August 2013 19: 11
                        Quote: lonely
                        . The Union was ready and could fight with the WORLD
                        Omar, I respect you, but remember how it ended — We will destroy the whole world of violence to the ground, and then we will see our new world ... How did it end?
                      6. +6
                        26 August 2013 21: 18
                        graph! I also respect you as a direct and honest person! I know how it ended. Today's Russia is not the USSR. I therefore wrote so that the patriots understood what was happening. They are not drawn into a military adventure because of Syria. This is unacceptable. The USSR could I’d allow myself such liberties. Russia cannot do this and honestly does not want to. If we would like to do all this long ago. It’s best to work and live, it’s better to die for your Fatherland than to be removed in a foreign land in order to be forgotten. hi
                      7. +1
                        26 August 2013 21: 32
                        Quote: lonely
                        Russia cannot and honestly does not want to. If we would like to do all of this long ago

                        Lavrov has already warned amers that in the event of a direct attack on Syria there will be unpredictable consequences for the entire Middle East. I understand that the 3-th World will not be yet. But China is silent about something ... belay
                      8. +2
                        26 August 2013 21: 48
                        China is interesting only one thing. how to invest in post-war Syria. I always wrote here that it is better to have an open enemy than to have China in allies.))
                      9. 0
                        30 August 2013 03: 29
                        Quote: chehywed
                        Avrov already warned the amers that in the event of a direct attack on Syria there would be unpredictable consequences for the entire Middle East. I understand that there will be no 3rd World War. But China is silent.

                        - I mean, Russia is not going to fight with anyone, but Lavrov also said about the fundamental unpredictability of the consequences of the strike on Syria. Now we are logically linking - we are not going, that is, we are not planning and we do not want -> but we do not know how it will actually turn out, it may be so that we will be eagerly doing what we did not intend to do and did not plan.
                        Diplomatic language is a separate art. It must be said so that later he himself could beautifully interpret and interpret his words in any development of the situation.
                        And yet - okromya Syrians no one will protect Syria! But no one canceled all-round informational, moral, political, reconnaissance, resource, economic and MILITARY-TECHNICAL (together with military experts in one bottle), and it is quite possible to render it to the Syrians in full scale. If the Syrians are as diligent as the Vietnamese in protecting their Homeland, there will be a result. Tested in the 60s of the last century!
                        It is also verified that no informational, moral, political, intelligence, resource, economic or MILITARY (together with military specialists in one bottle) help will help if your name is a coward and you have a hare’s heart. This is about the Egyptians of the 70s, if anything, the very ones who ran to hide during the first shots in the desert, but were afraid to fly on planes (Mubarak’s memoirs)!
                        This is all an analogy with raising a son. Does someone regularly pound and beat his son? You can go out and peace that baby that your son is offending. And you can teach your son to BE STRONG, that's all
                      10. grafrozow
                        +2
                        26 August 2013 21: 38
                        Quote: lonely
                        .Today Russia is not the USSR. I therefore wrote so that the patriots understood what it was. They weren’t getting into a military adventure because of Syria. This is unacceptable. The USSR could allow such liberties. Russia cannot and honestly admit it wants. if you would like to do all this long ago
                        The country will not pull the second Afghanistan, this is also understood in our government, but they are trying to make a good face with a bad game, such as 2 aces on a minuscule, not the end of the game.
                        Quote: lonely
                        It’s best to work and live, even if you have to die for your Fatherland, than to clean up in a foreign land in order to be forgotten.
                        +++ Who now remembers our Heroes of the war in Korea, Vietnam, Egypt, Laos, Cuba ..? We live today today, which was yesterday, we don’t remember. The trouble however.
                      11. +6
                        26 August 2013 14: 13
                        Quote: antiaircrafter
                        from Shoigu MO with the Ministry of Emergencies will unite and everything will be in chocolate.

                        Against the background of rumors about the unification of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Emergencies, this will be an enchanting sight!
                        After all, the evacuation must be carried out as soon as possible, that’s what they’ll send
                      12. +1
                        26 August 2013 14: 36
                        Quote: Cynic
                        Against the background of rumors about the unification of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Emergencies, this will be an enchanting sight!

                        How long have such rumors been around?
                      13. +1
                        26 August 2013 17: 43
                        Quote: nycsson
                        How long have such rumors been around?

                        Yes, it seems from the 22 of this month
                        To reorganize the EMERCOM of Russia and subordinate it to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation - the current head of the military department Sergey Shoigu made this proposal to the president. A source in the Ministry of Defense said that a decision on this issue will be made after analyzing the actions of the army and the Ministry of Emergencies, which are involved in the elimination of the consequences of the elements in the Far East.

                        wink
                      14. +1
                        26 August 2013 18: 26
                        Quote: Cynic
                        Yes, it seems from the 22 of this month

                        The most important thing is that Moscow Region is not connected to the Ministry of Emergencies! wassat wassat wassat
                      15. +2
                        26 August 2013 18: 55
                        Quote: nycsson
                        The most important thing is that the MoD is not connected to the Ministry of Emergencies

                        In life, Moscow Region is now in the wings of the Ministry of Emergencies. It seems we’re not fighting? Till .
                        I think Shoigu feel sorry for his former office.
                      16. grafrozow
                        +2
                        26 August 2013 19: 16
                        Quote: nycsson
                        How long have such rumors been around?
                        I’ll ask grandmothers near the entrance tomorrow. fellow wassat
                      17. grafrozow
                        0
                        26 August 2013 19: 02
                        Quote: antiaircrafter
                        Here Shoigu MO with the Ministry of Emergencies will unite and everything will be in chocolate.
                        Plus Elena Gromova will write what and how to do.
                      18. 0
                        26 August 2013 22: 31
                        wassat Well, yes, she will tell us for sure wassat
                    2. +2
                      26 August 2013 13: 20
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      And how will we evacuate citizens of Russia, of whom there are several thousand ?????

                      Seriously? and you don’t want a million (after all, not only Russians, but also their families will have to be evacuated)?
                    3. -1
                      26 August 2013 14: 24
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      And how will we evacuate citizens of Russia, of whom there are several thousand ?????

                      A few tens of thousands! belay
                  2. +5
                    26 August 2013 11: 13
                    Quote: antiaircrafter
                    In the case of a large kirdyk, Russia may accept the government of Syria in exile

                    By the way, this is a thought, the government in exile, ame6ry die from annoyance.
                    1. grafrozow
                      +1
                      26 August 2013 19: 19
                      Quote: Sandov
                      By the way, this is a thought, the government in exile, ame6ry die from annoyance.
                      They will not die, on the contrary they will be happy, we will feed this government.
                  3. +8
                    26 August 2013 12: 02
                    Quote: antiaircrafter
                    In the case of a large kirdyk, Russia may accept the exiled Syrian government and evacuate the remnants of the Syrian frame to its territory.

                    Well, why bother with Russia so indiscriminately everywhere? through each comment Russia Russia ... maybe we will be consistent?
                    1. Syria - Iran
                    2. Iran - China
                    3 China -
                    and between these countries there is still an additional sequence such as
                    Iran - Hormuz - United Arab Emirates - Qatar.
                    Iran - Turkey - Caucasus
                    The Caucasus - Russia and so on ... the whole region can blaze, and beyond it the whole Sharik.
                    and only then can we talk about Russia ... nefig run ahead of everyone and tear a vest on himself.
                    1. +2
                      26 August 2013 19: 25
                      Quote: Scoun
                      Well, why bother with Russia so indiscriminately everywhere? through each comment Russia Russia ..

                      The author asked the question - what can Russia do?
                      As be and answer it.
                  4. +11
                    26 August 2013 12: 05
                    Quote: antiaircrafter
                    Quote: Karavan
                    I left open the question of the nature of Russia's participation in the future mess.

                    In the case of a large kirdyk, Russia may accept the exiled Syrian government and evacuate the remnants of the Syrian frame to its territory.
                    Assad should take care of this in advance - appoint a successor and send to Russia + administration is needed, etc.
                    Russia and other allies should recognize this government as legal.
                    To some extent, these actions will make sense the physical elimination of Assad himself.


                    This is a bad omen to keep governments in exile, money is guzzling, and zero sense. They are addicted to this in the West. It’s better to rest against the horn and prevent an invasion.
                  5. +2
                    26 August 2013 18: 36
                    Can you indicate the route of the evacuation of the Syrian army to Russia?
                    1. +3
                      26 August 2013 19: 46
                      Quote: lonely
                      Can you indicate the route of the evacuation of the Syrian army to Russia?

                      Routes will indicate specially trained people.
                      No opportunity - then no opportunity.
                      The army will die heroically in its own land.
                      But for what purpose you are interested in routes it is not clear.
                      1. +1
                        26 August 2013 20: 16
                        the only one you can evacuate is Assad and his family. But the army will have to leave. it's almost impossible. that’s why I asked
                  6. grafrozow
                    +2
                    26 August 2013 18: 58
                    Quote: antiaircrafter
                    In the case of a large kirdyk, Russia may accept the exiled Syrian government and evacuate the remnants of the Syrian frame to its territory.
                    Dear, who will finance this government in exile, the budget of the Russian Federation? What will the remnants of the Syrian "Ramia" do on our territory, sow corn? Will they do "Gop Stop", a little hemorrhoid with their Caucasus? What are we thinking about?
                    1. +2
                      26 August 2013 19: 31
                      Quote: grafrozow
                      Who will finance this government in exile, the budget of the Russian Federation?

                      Syria's gold reserves can also be evacuated.
                      Quote: grafrozow
                      What will the remnants of the Syrian "Ramia" do on our territory, sow corn?

                      Yes, even bearded in the Caucasus to drive.
                      Although the channel to dig the Caspian - the Black Sea.
                      Well, they’re not needed - they will die heroes on their land.
                      I do not insist on mandatory evacuation.
                      1. grafrozow
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 21: 51
                        Quote: antiaircrafter
                        Syria's gold reserves can also be evacuated.
                        Can you tell me what this "gold reserve" looks like?
                        Quote: antiaircrafter
                        Yes, even bearded in the Caucasus to drive.
                        Although the channel to dig the Caspian - the Black Sea.

                        With the bearded in the Caucasus, they will smoke the "pipe of peace", but the channel already exists, Volga-Don.
                      2. +2
                        26 August 2013 22: 57
                        Quote: grafrozow
                        Can you tell me what this "gold reserve" looks like?

                        No I can not.
                        Do you have data on its complete absence?
                        Quote: grafrozow
                        With the bearded in the Caucasus, they will smoke the "pipe of peace"

                        Will you bring a light?
                        Quote: grafrozow
                        and the channel is already there, Volga-Don.

                        Two is better than one.
                      3. grafrozow
                        0
                        26 August 2013 23: 16
                        Quote: antiaircrafter
                        Do you have data on its complete absence?
                        Swiss banks do not give out their secrets.
                        Quote: antiaircrafter
                        Will you bring a light?
                        From the "poplar" will be smoked.
                        Quote: antiaircrafter
                        Two is better than one.
                        Excess horseradish is not a hindrance. So how do you understand?
                      4. +3
                        26 August 2013 23: 38
                        Quote: grafrozow
                        Excess horseradish is not a hindrance.

                        This is what you want. Everyone is responsible for his ass.
                        Only chur without propaganda!
                      5. +2
                        27 August 2013 02: 06
                        Quote: grafrozow
                        Swiss banks do not give out their secrets.
                        That was true 15 years ago
                2. +2
                  26 August 2013 10: 39
                  I agree with Denis: we cannot defeat the bearded in our country, we should not even think about Syria. The Bear and Volodya will make noise and there will be silence, especially over the past 20 years Russia has surrendered all its "allies."
                3. +7
                  26 August 2013 18: 35
                  no one will start 3MV because of Syria
              2. +8
                26 August 2013 09: 03
                Quote: Denis
                could arm Syria

                Russia lacks the strength to confront the US and NATO, and what can Syria do, even if armed?
                1. +21
                  26 August 2013 09: 11
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  and what can Syria do, even if armed?

                  Deal significant damage to aggressors.
                  1. +15
                    26 August 2013 11: 15
                    Quote: Denis
                    Deal significant damage to aggressors.


                    To inflict such losses from which the amers lose all desire to rob on the high road.
                  2. +3
                    26 August 2013 21: 06
                    I completely agree with you. Plus, I will add: "There are many who want to kill for money, but there are no fools to die for money." Since NATO's "army" only knows how to kill, the war in Syria, where it is necessary to die, will seem like a very bad idea to the Amerovites. But the Syrian army is very ready to die for their homeland, so the chances of Syria are very good.
                    1. grafrozow
                      -3
                      26 August 2013 21: 57
                      Quote: Patriot8482
                      I completely agree with you. Plus, I will add: "There are many who want to kill for money, but there are no fools to die for money."
                      Do you relate yourself to whom, to those who wish, or who not?
                2. +19
                  26 August 2013 09: 34
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Russia lacks the strength to oppose the US and NATO

                  It’s not mean to admit it, but that’s how our affairs are.
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  and what can Syria do, even if armed?

                  "Sell" your mortal body at such a price that those at the helm in the "golden billion" think 100500 times how much it is needed and what it might cost.
                3. +2
                  26 August 2013 12: 22
                  Let me disagree with you, NATO is essentially a bunch of jackals ... And what can jackals do against a bear ??
                  1. Jin
                    +8
                    26 August 2013 14: 00
                    Quote: Clever man
                    And what can jackals do against a bear ??


                    Unfortunately, the bears were poisoned by dogs and dogs ... how sad it is (((
                    1. +5
                      26 August 2013 16: 04
                      There is one thing, BUT. Dogs cannot kill a bear, the hunter is needed and is rather quick. Have you ever seen what happens to dogs during the persecution of the toes, if something went wrong.
                4. +4
                  26 August 2013 12: 59
                  do we oppose them?
                  can I find out where and when?
                  maybe in South Ossetia?
                5. Jin
                  +4
                  26 August 2013 13: 59
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Russia lacks the strength to confront the US and NATO, and what can Syria do, even if armed?


                  Sasha, I can drink a lot of gallons of blood, do a lot of millions of damage, I want the mattresses to get into the blood bath ... that they would wash themselves with their blood, for the whole world lawlessness.
                6. +2
                  26 August 2013 14: 39
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Russia does not have enough strength to oppose the US and NATO,

                  Where did they go? It was necessary to build up strength all these years, and not engage in nonsense.
                  By the way, Alexander! Here are links to ratify START-2.
                  http://www.bbc.co.uk/russian/0411_2.shtml
                  http://www.utro.ru/articles/politics/2000/04/14/200004140336111154.shtml
                  http://www.ng.ru/world/2000-04-15/1_snv.html
                  http://www.1tv.ru/news/social/117478
                  Enlighten yourself ....... hi
              3. Luger
                +13
                26 August 2013 09: 12
                I agree 100%! When they had a chance to drag in defensive weapons, they missed it (I won’t be surprised if our GDP was promised not to attack Syria, but he believed), now it’s too late, the train left.
                1. +1
                  26 August 2013 09: 43
                  Quote: Luger
                  I agree 100%! When they had a chance to drag in defensive weapons, they missed it (I won’t be surprised if our GDP was promised not to attack Syria, but he believed), now it’s too late, the train left.

                  Why do I think that they promised not to boycott the Olympics, not a lot of money on investments in it,
                  1. +11
                    26 August 2013 09: 56
                    Hi Igor!
                    Quote: igor67
                    Why do I think that they promised not to boycott the Olympics,

                    Yes, the Olympics have nothing to do with it, they will boycott and go with them. Not that scale and shitty in this case they will do, only to themselves.
                    1. +2
                      26 August 2013 10: 07
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Hi Igor!
                      Quote: igor67
                      Why do I think that they promised not to boycott the Olympics,

                      Yes, the Olympics have nothing to do with it, they will boycott and go with them. Not that scale and shitty in this case they will do, only to themselves.

                      Hi San, I don’t know! It’s too expensive both the Olympics and the cancellation of Syria’s debt, and then to lose, because it falls on ordinary people, taxpayers, and the oil industry traders
                      1. +15
                        26 August 2013 10: 33
                        Quote: igor67
                        because it falls on ordinary people, a taxpayer

                        Igor, how will it financially affect the fact that the United States will not go to the Olympics? Yes, they do not care about them, there will be less trash in Russia. Now the question is more expensive than money. There are many of our citizens in Syria, and this is another story.
                      2. +8
                        26 August 2013 10: 41
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Quote: igor67
                        because it falls on ordinary people, a taxpayer

                        Igor, how will it financially affect the fact that the United States will not go to the Olympics? Yes, they do not care about them, there will be less trash in Russia. Now the question is more expensive than money. There are many of our citizens in Syria, and this is another story.

                        At the expense of the Games, there not only amers but also other financial countries can subscribe, but okay with that, about citizens, the main ones are women, in my opinion, a dozen, if not a lot more, thousands of Syrian cadets who were married, just to blame the Union of Russia, and if the government so much wanted to protect them, then in Tartus there would be no BDK, but something more serious,
                      3. +4
                        26 August 2013 12: 01
                        Quote: igor67
                        At the expense of the Games, there not only amers but also other financial countries can subscribe,

                        Well, subscribe and what will change? Igor, in this matter they are completely defeated.
                        Quote: igor67
                        , and if the government so much wanted to protect them, then in Tartus there would be no BDK, but something more serious,

                        If the government does not protect them, then such a government is worthless.
                      4. +2
                        26 August 2013 14: 55
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        If the government does not protect them, then such a government is worthless.

                        Our government is worthless without it.
                      5. +1
                        26 August 2013 19: 46
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Well, subscribe and what will change? Igor, in this matter they are completely defeated.

                        Sasha, forgive me, but these are hats.
                      6. +1
                        27 August 2013 05: 02
                        Quote: Pimply
                        Sasha, I'm sorry

                        Forgive winked
                        Quote: Pimply
                        but these are caps

                        Hats ??? Eugene, forgive me, but believe me, they don’t give a damn what Amers will come up with, generally!
                      7. +4
                        26 August 2013 12: 20
                        The Olympics are not the worst. The worst thing:
                        a) loss of confidence in the Russian Federation (they forgot about Venezuela right away), who will talk to us at all, if we give our friends in this way.
                        b) Qatar - Turkey oil pipeline. with all the consequences.
                        My opinion is to go to the end, put Peter the Great + Moscow + nuclear submarines there. Veto we + China.
                      8. +1
                        26 August 2013 17: 41
                        Quote: a52333
                        My opinion is to go to the end, put Peter the Great + Moscow + nuclear submarines there.

                        Quote: Evgenij Evtushenko, music by Eduard Kolmanovskogo
                        Do Russian wars want to happen?
                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yU54x55AJUg
                      9. -3
                        26 August 2013 19: 52
                        Quote: a52333
                        a) loss of confidence in the Russian Federation (they forgot about Venezuela right away), who will talk to us at all, if we give our friends in this way.

                        For starters, there are no friends in politics. There are allies.
                        Secondly, the allies - this or that benefit. In strategy, tactics, etc.
                        China, investing money and influence - receives the return handsomely, the USA, France, England - as well. Russia, investing, follows the path of the USSR - big expenses with a minimal chance of getting a return. And this is bad because it is inefficient.
                      10. S_mirnov
                        +9
                        26 August 2013 19: 59
                        Quote: Pimply
                        Russia, investing, follows the path of the USSR - big expenses with a minimal chance of getting a return.

                        You have slipped into the American worldview - the main profit, goods - money, profit. The worldview of the Russian people is built on other concepts, first of all, Conscience! Honor, decency, friendship are not measured by money!
                        Therefore, the West hates us, and we beat and will beat, while we live with these concepts!
                      11. 0
                        26 August 2013 23: 02
                        Quote: S_mirnov
                        The outlook of the Russian people is based on other concepts, first of all, Conscience! Honor, decency, friendship are not measured by money!

                        Do not rush in big words. The reality is that you can’t just spend without getting anything in return. Syria has cost Russia $ 14 billion in recent years. Under such conditions, anyone will be friends. Which in general was.
                        And usually the state has goals, and not hectic fiddling "should be annoying mattress makers."
                      12. S_mirnov
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 23: 30
                        In contrast to England, Soviet policy was not based on the robbery of colonies, but on the development of the Union republics at the expense of the center. And during the Second World War, this policy responded with a unanimous patriotic impulse that had taken all Europe! With the exception of some minorities who have suffered well-deserved punishment.
                      13. -1
                        27 August 2013 02: 09
                        Quote: S_mirnov
                        In contrast to England, Soviet policy was not based on the robbery of colonies, but on the development of the Union republics at the expense of the center. And during the Second World War, this policy responded with a unanimous patriotic impulse that had taken all Europe!

                        And caps again
                      14. S_mirnov
                        +1
                        27 August 2013 17: 22
                        Quote: Pimply
                        And caps again

                        hats do not win the war! You are not a stupid guy, stop thinking in categories imposed on grief by "historians".
                      15. S_mirnov
                        +4
                        26 August 2013 12: 52
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Igor, how will it financially affect the fact that the United States will not go to the Olympics?

                        But no way! We have already ruined a lot of state money for the Olympics that is unnecessary for Russian citizens! Who was at the trough already limped. It doesn’t matter if that Olympiad is there - it won’t be, FSU!
                      16. +1
                        26 August 2013 13: 38
                        Quote: S_mirnov
                        But no way! We have already ruined a lot of state money for the Olympics that is unnecessary for Russian citizens!

                        You don’t need her, so sit and don’t speak for everyone.
                        Quote: S_mirnov
                        It doesn’t matter if that Olympiad is there - it won’t be, FSU!

                        Yes, I personally didn’t surprise you at all.
                      17. S_mirnov
                        +4
                        26 August 2013 20: 06
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        itata: S_mirnov
                        But no way! We have already ruined a lot of state money for the Olympics that is unnecessary for Russian citizens!

                        You don’t need her, so sit and don’t speak for everyone.

                        Oh, comrade Romanov, you are terribly far from the People! Light everything from bucks, rave about fat.
                        For the majority of Russians, the Olympics are much more important - so that they can repair the sewers in their city, water supply, storms, and that housing and communal services tariffs do not increase and fall! And so that gasoline does not rise in price!
                        And if the Olympics are more important for our leaders, then they must be driven with a pissed broom !!!
                      18. 0
                        27 August 2013 04: 57
                        Quote: S_mirnov
                        - then you need to drive them with a pissed broom !!!

                        I think they will start with you! Niksson writes beside him, but often starts from facts, and you’ve just read MK and Vedomosti as a racket and nothing more. Spit in Russia for more important than the country itself. Cho didn’t throw mud at the planes, he fled here again
                      19. S_mirnov
                        +1
                        27 August 2013 17: 27
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Cho with planes didn’t throw mud at me, he fled here again

                        Romanov, you are a maniac smile ! It seems like the hatred in you has eclipsed the mind. Reread my first comment about airplanes. I don’t affirm the truth of the duck there, but I say what needs to be done with corrupt journalists or with incompetent commanders-in-chief. And nothing more!
                      20. +2
                        26 August 2013 14: 43
                        Quote: S_mirnov
                        We have already ruined a lot of state money for the Olympics that is unnecessary for Russian citizens!

                        I support. A feast among the plague. It would be better to build a couple of military-industrial complex factories for the production of arms and military equipment.
                      21. +2
                        26 August 2013 19: 14
                        S_mirnov (2) SU Today, 12:52 PM ↑

                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Igor, how will it financially affect the fact that the United States will not go to the Olympics?

                        But no way! We have already ruined a lot of state money for the Olympics that is unnecessary for Russian citizens! Who was at the trough already limped. It doesn’t matter if that Olympiad is there - it won’t be, FSU!
                        The question of how much money "wasted" and the "unnecessary" Olympics are two different things. But the Olympics certainly need it and the country's prestige and infrastructure will remain.
                      22. S_mirnov
                        +2
                        26 August 2013 23: 04
                        Quote: ksan
                        But the Olympics certainly need this and the country's prestige and the entire infrastructure will remain.

                        Stadiums will remain - the contents of which are unprofitable by definition. Much more needed are new plants that generate profit and provide jobs for the population!
                      23. 0
                        26 August 2013 19: 43
                        Trade Disruption
                      24. +17
                        26 August 2013 10: 41
                        What is expensive there? well spent 50-60 billion pieces of paper think! Do you really think that someone thinks that the Olympics will bring any money, and at least somehow it will pay for itself? They swelled into the Russky Island no less and what? Forgot and okay. and here at least something was done for the region and thanks for that, we could immediately withdraw money to the west and it’s the end, but if you throw the last ally in the BV it will bring losses in the trillions and you’ll have to fight at home ..
                      25. +8
                        26 August 2013 10: 53
                        Quote: max702
                        What is expensive there? well spent 50-60 billion pieces of paper think! Do you really think that someone thinks that the Olympics will bring any money, and at least somehow it will pay for itself? They swelled into the Russky Island no less and what? Forgot and okay. and here at least something was done for the region and thanks for that, we could immediately withdraw money to the west and it’s the end, but if you throw the last ally in the BV it will bring losses in the trillions and you’ll have to fight at home ..

                        If we leave an ally ???? The war has been going on for two years now, what kind of assistance to the ally is it? Remember the Odyssey with helicopters ??? We drove through the "Arctic", etc.
                      26. +4
                        26 August 2013 19: 48
                        That's it! ALLY! In two years, it’s time to understand that this is a reliable ally who, despite everything, has been kept in almost complete isolation for 2 years, and he can and should help! These are not other countries of the region who threw weapons at the first bunch and fled through the huts and auls, but really a real ally I will not be afraid and I’ll say the Middle East analogue of Vietnam that has become across the throat of the entire liberal world, this country and this people will not drop weapons and we don’t give them them spit on the help of our country and remember it for a long time if it survives, it's time for our leaders to understand if they want to continue to be at least a little bit independent in their affairs and actions, otherwise tomorrow the same thing for us and the guts of the leaders on the Kremlin wall is very likely the picture (either the bandits that come will be released. Either the people are unforgiving betrayal, or the owners overseas surrender).
                      27. +2
                        26 August 2013 20: 08
                        Quote: max702
                        That's it! ALLY! In two years, it’s time to already understand that this is a reliable ally who, in spite of everything, keeps the 2 of the year in almost complete isolation, and he can and should be helped

                        So what is an ally? What is fighting the 2 of the year, so I will give you a dozen countries where they are fighting for the 10 of the year, do you write the same in the allies? The ally has forgiven more than 20 billion loans, he also scored these and I'm sorry, the ally with whom the goods turnover is just scanty (even an order of magnitude less than with Israel (as an example)) - so what is the ally of?

                        Quote: max702
                        but really a real ally I’m not afraid and I’ll say the Middle East analogue of Vietnam

                        Well, this analogue has gone through all the 5 wars and lost territories laughing
                      28. +1
                        26 August 2013 20: 19
                        Quote: atalef
                        still typed and these sorry

                        it will not be forgiven, but simply will not be returned.
                      29. -1
                        26 August 2013 21: 55
                        Quote: atalef
                        an ally with whom the goods turnover is just miserable (even an order of magnitude smaller than with Israel (as an example)) - so what is the ally then? ... he has spent all 5 wars ...

                        And what kind of trade is possible with them? What do they produce besides bearded terrorist bastards? And what do they buy besides weapons, which they "cheat" with unenviable regularity?
                      30. -3
                        26 August 2013 19: 54
                        Say you're ready to burn a hundred bucks. Yours, from the salary.
                      31. +3
                        26 August 2013 21: 23
                        beat half a liter?)))))))))) wassat
                      32. 0
                        26 August 2013 19: 43
                        The boycott of the Olympics is a land. This is unlikely to go.
                    2. +1
                      26 August 2013 14: 30
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Yes, the Olympics have nothing to do with it, they will boycott and go with them. Not that scale and shitty in this case they will do, only to themselves.

                      Well yes. If this shushera does not trample us ...
                    3. +5
                      26 August 2013 15: 47
                      If I don’t confuse anything, the country boycotting the Olympic Games is never invited to them anymore. Now it’s so. Let’s boycott it. Especially Americans who will do worse.
                      1. -2
                        26 August 2013 15: 58
                        Most likely, this is not true infa. The thing is that the games are held for the contributions of the participating countries. Each participating country pays some money.
                2. d_trader
                  +10
                  26 August 2013 11: 30
                  Quote: Luger
                  I agree 100%! When they had a chance to drag in defensive weapons, they missed it (I won’t be surprised if our GDP was promised not to attack Syria, but he believed), now it’s too late, the train left.

                  In the midst of the Syrian crisis, Russian journalists met in Damascus with President Bashar Assad.

                  “I want to say that all the concluded contracts with Russia are being implemented. And neither the crisis nor the pressure of the United States, Europe and the Gulf countries prevented their implementation. Russia supplies Syria with what is required to protect it, and to protect its people. When a country's security is weakened, this leads to a weakening of the economic situation. And what Russia supplies Syria with military contracts will certainly lead to an improvement in the economic situation in Syria. Russian support for our right to uphold our independence from the very beginning has helped our economy. A number of states opposing the Syrian people have caused serious damage to our economy, primarily due to the economic blockade, because of which we are now suffering. Russia, however, acted completely differently, ”Assad said in an interview with Izvestia.
                3. +2
                  26 August 2013 16: 17
                  You can not put on Putin (by the way, fashionably say). but you shouldn’t consider it naive, do not underestimate the employees of the Union Department, you know, the selection was serious.
                4. +1
                  26 August 2013 18: 55
                  Luger RU Today, 09:12 ↑

                  I agree 100%! When they had a chance to drag in defensive weapons, they missed it (I won’t be surprised if our GDP was promised not to attack Syria, but he believed), now it’s too late, the train left.
                  Do you think the BDK drove there one by one empty? They dragged as much as they could. Only against the AUG of NATO, and even the Turks with the Jews threaten to get in. Against such an alliance (God forbid) Syria will not stand.
                  1. loisop
                    +2
                    26 August 2013 20: 39
                    The armament of the BDK is really weak against the AUG. But how much they, these BDKs, managed to train Onyxes (aka Yakhont, aka Bramos) to Syria - only some comrades know very well. Can an unpleasant surprise for the indicated AUG go out.
              4. +15
                26 August 2013 09: 45
                Quote: Denis
                I’m answering you specifically, Russia will not do anything. You can fight with the wrong hands, you could arm Syria, as the United States arms Israel.

                Indeed, it’s not necessary to enter the war on our own, with good military support from Syria, NATO itself will break its teeth with all its might .. remember Vietnam ..
                1. +2
                  26 August 2013 09: 57
                  Quote: DEfindER
                  remember vietnam ..

                  Well remembered what ??? Look at the geography of where Vietnam is and where Syria is. How do you imagine the constant supply of arms to Syria during active military operations?
                  1. -1
                    26 August 2013 14: 52
                    Quote: Alexander Romanov
                    Well remembered what ??? Look at the geography of where Vietnam is and where Syria is. How do you imagine the constant supply of arms to Syria during active military operations?

                    Yes what the conversation is about. At first I was also swaggering, they say, let's "dive" there, and then I thought, no options. BDK and BOD will not trample against their fleet.
                  2. +1
                    26 August 2013 15: 50
                    Quote: Alexander Romanov
                    Well remembered what ??? Look at the geography of where Vietnam is and where Syria is. How do you imagine the constant supply of arms to Syria during active military operations?

                    There was no common border with Vietnam, and you can go to Syria via the Iran-Iraq-Syria route, although I agree with you that there will be problems, the amers will take Iran into the ring and not allow Syria to help it ..
                2. +6
                  26 August 2013 12: 34
                  Not so simple: Vietnam = an ideal place (landscape and jungle) for guerrilla warfare. In Syria, you can only catch on settlements - 80% of the territory of the desert.
                  1. NOBODY EXCEPT US
                    +6
                    26 August 2013 13: 27
                    You forgot one more thing, the Vietnamese are very brave and hardworking people, like ants, which I can’t say about the Arabs, they sit and wait for them to feed and protect them ..... well, I don’t like them, for some reason ....
                    1. +2
                      26 August 2013 17: 49
                      Quote: NOBODY EXCEPT US
                      You forgot one more thing, the Vietnamese are very brave and hardworking people, like ants, which I can’t say about the Arabs, they sit and wait for them to feed and protect them ..... well, I don’t like them, for some reason ....

                      Yeah, Arabs, they are such Arabs ...
                      Quote: Abba Eban, Israeli Foreign Minister
                      Arabs never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity
                3. +2
                  26 August 2013 16: 09
                  Quote: DEfindER
                  with good military support from Syria, NATO itself is breaking its teeth with all its might .. remember Vietnam ..

                  With the support of Vietnam, huge funds went from the pockets of the entire population of the USSR. In Russia, a hundred million fewer people and sometimes even enough money for their army. Syria also does not have such an amount of funds to pay everything at once. Add here the capabilities of Russian industry. For ourselves, sometimes we do not have time to do it.
              5. +8
                26 August 2013 11: 15
                It is necessary to arm not only Syria, but also Iran, and it will help Syria.
                1. 0
                  26 August 2013 20: 01
                  Tell me, whose money? Or money bullshit, pieces of paper?
                  1. +1
                    26 August 2013 20: 16
                    Pimpled (1) RU Today, 20:01 ↑ New

                    Tell me, whose money? Or money bullshit, pieces of paper?
                    Iranian money. Or do you think Iran is a beggar? Now Syria is largely due to the help of Iran and holds on.
                    1. 0
                      27 August 2013 02: 01
                      That's funny, only at the moment, Russia gives loans.
              6. Jin
                +2
                26 August 2013 13: 55
                Quote: Denis
                You can fight with the wrong hands, you could arm Syria, as the United States arms Israel.


                I agree to repeat the Vietnamese losses for the Amer’s Air Force from our air defense ... something about 200 from downed planes ... this will be the number.
            3. +28
              26 August 2013 08: 56
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Offer to join the warrior on the side of Syria? Then this is world 3 with all that it implies.


              Fear? Well then, you don’t need to shout at every corner about the revival and power of Russia. We are afraid of joining the war, and the Yankees bomb left and right and put them on everyone.
              The USSR was not afraid to join 3MB, since the Yankees also understand and do not want war.
              1. +7
                26 August 2013 09: 01
                Quote: Veter
                Fear?

                There is no fear, just those who sit, write and do not think that they can happen.
                Quote: Veter
                Well then, you don’t need to shout at every corner about the revival and power of Russia

                We are reborn, but so far we have little strength.
                Quote: Veter
                .We are afraid of joining the war.

                No, we are not afraid! We do not want warriors!
                Quote: Veter
                USSR was not afraid to join 3MB

                And the USSR also did not want warriors!
                Quote: Veter
                since the Yankees also understand and do not want war.

                They do not want warriors ????? And then the soldiers are unleashing?
                1. +12
                  26 August 2013 09: 11
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  There is no fear, just for those who sit, write and do not think what might happen

                  Amer does not have it either. Because they understand that there will be no distinct assistance to Syria from the Russian Federation.
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  We are reborn, but so far we have little strength.

                  With this approach, we may not have time

                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  No, we are not afraid! We do not want warriors!

                  In the 41st also did not want ...., however ....

                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  And the USSR also did not want warriors!

                  I didn’t want and was not afraid of two different things
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  They do not want warriors ????? And then the soldiers are unleashing?

                  I'm talking about 3MB. And they unleash local wars because see paragraph 1
                  1. +3
                    26 August 2013 11: 16
                    Quote: Veter

                    Amer does not have it either. Because they understand that there will be no distinct assistance to Syria from the Russian Federation.

                    Yes, what will God forbid our citizens begin to die under US bombs? How many of them do you live there?
                    1. +18
                      26 August 2013 11: 29
                      Alexander Romanov

                      I understood your attitude to this problem. We do not lean out. My hut with the edge, etc.
                      How can one cross the great striped nation. They say we will surrender all the few allies with giblets and mop up. Not the first time.

                      I repeat once again. If you stutter about rebuilding Russia as a strong state, then you need to act appropriately, and not sit out in the bushes.
                      1. +3
                        26 August 2013 12: 04
                        Quote: Veter
                        I understood your attitude to this problem. We do not lean out. My hut with the edge, etc.

                        You don’t understand a damn thing! The case can result in 3 world with all the consequences.
                        Quote: Veter
                        I repeat once again. If you stutter about rebuilding Russia as a strong state, then you need to act appropriately, and not sit out in the bushes.

                        I’m afraid that you and I will have the opportunity to sit not in the bushes, but on the front line. Wipe a military ticket from dust.
                        And consider that this is an announcement of warriors, according to the modern hi
                        Britain will not be guided by the opinion of the UN Security Council in resolving the Syrian issue
                        Britain will not be guided by the UN Security Council in resolving the Syrian issue, reports Reuters

                        This statement was made by British Foreign Secretary William Hague, adding that this position is due to the fact that the countries represented in the Security Council did not show unanimity when it became known about the chemical attack.

                        Earlier it was reported that Turkey will support any action against the Assad regime.
                        Talk time has passed
                      2. +3
                        26 August 2013 12: 24
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Britain will not be guided by the UN Security Council in resolving the Syrian issue, reports Reuters

                        This statement was made by British Foreign Secretary William Hague, adding that this position is due to the fact that the countries represented in the Security Council did not show unanimity when it became known about the chemical attack.

                        Russia will not be guided by the opinion of the EEC Security Council in resolving the English question, reports Reuters

                        This statement was made by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, adding that this position is due to the fact that the countries represented in the EEC did not show unanimity when the Anglo-Saxons became aware of the start of World War III.
                      3. +1
                        26 August 2013 13: 47
                        Quote: Scoun
                        Russia will not be guided by the opinion of the EEC Security Council in resolving the English question, reports Reuters

                        What is this?
                      4. +4
                        26 August 2013 14: 07
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        What is this?

                        so ... Dreams, Dreams that someday the day will come .. when Russia will start, without looking back at anyone, will start to put bloodsuckers in place of the presumptuous "democratizers" ... the same naglo-Saxons who allow themselves such categorical statements and actions. In fact, the Naglo-Saxons openly sent the UN in three letters ... that is, even symbolic decency is not observed ...
                      5. -2
                        26 August 2013 20: 04
                        Quote: Veter
                        We do not lean out. My hut with the edge, etc.
                        How can you cross the great striped nation

                        Is it more important for you to cross the striped nation or be an influential country?
                      6. +4
                        26 August 2013 20: 30
                        Quote: Pimply
                        Is it more important for you to cross the striped nation or be an influential country?

                        "... both that, and another. And if possible, without bread ...".
                        Winnie the Pooh and Piglet.
                      7. 0
                        27 August 2013 02: 02
                        Russia is currently not the USSR. It's a little expensive to be a superpower
                      8. +3
                        27 August 2013 02: 41
                        Quote: Pimply
                        Russia is currently not the USSR. It's a little expensive to be a superpower

                        Will it be cheaper to fight off the attacks of the "bearded" ones in Russia later, when Syria is being quartered?
                2. +9
                  26 August 2013 09: 38
                  They really do not want a war in which there may be big losses such as Vietnam, you are used to understand throwing Tamgawks.
                3. Gur
                  +37
                  26 August 2013 11: 05
                  Yes, indeed, after so many comments on the site, - "Hurray, Syria, we are with you, Assad urine of the fighting men, give Syria weapons, etc." And now this is - "Well, what can you do, we are weak, the rest don't want war , 3M is not needed, forgive Assad "Bl d, the USSR did not want war not when, but he understood with all his gut that if we give slack and allow the United States to increase the circle of influence, then sooner or later we will get pi ... ts, and therefore we drove our fleet to Egypt, so we drove the fleet to India, supplied weapons and taught the Vietnamese to fight, because if our influence does not remain in the world, we will simply die in a hostile environment. Do we need to build a picket fence on all borders from nuclear missiles now? And in the days of the USSR, we also had problems, but we had the will and understanding of all this.
                4. +5
                  26 August 2013 12: 09
                  No, we are not afraid! We do not want warriors! [Quote = Veter]
                  We do not want war .. therefore we are afraid ..
                5. 0
                  26 August 2013 15: 03
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  There is no fear, just those who sit, write and do not think that they can happen.

                  Our government had to think about all these years and forecast the foreign policy situation. And what she was doing history is silent. am
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  We are reborn, but so far we have little strength.

                  In what branch of economy do you think we are reviving? request
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  No, we are not afraid! We do not want warriors!

                  The fact of the matter is that we are afraid.
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  And the USSR also did not want warriors!

                  But not afraid.
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  They do not want warriors ????? And then the soldiers are unleashing?

                  They fulfill their goals. The end justifies the means of its achievement.
                6. +3
                  26 August 2013 16: 06
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  We are reborn, but so far we have little strength.

                  Well, this is no reason, so as not to defend their interests, the amers are still cowards, they attack like jackals only on countries weakened and torn by war. If they are afraid of attacking the DPRK, then I think all the more afraid to enter into an open conflict with us. And so what's the point in the Army if you keep dancing to the tune of potential enemies ..
              2. Luger
                +5
                26 August 2013 09: 13
                Direct confrontation does not always show the degree of courage of courage and mind, sometimes a cold calculation is much better than a hot head.
                1. +7
                  26 August 2013 09: 27
                  Quote: Luger
                  sometimes a cold calculation is much better than a hot head.


                  Something is hardly believed that the whole situation is the Kremlin’s calculation. Amers arrive, bomb them, that's the whole calculation
                  1. +2
                    26 August 2013 09: 59
                    Quote: Veter
                    Amers arrive, bomb them, that's the whole calculation

                    Well abandoned, and then what? If Assad really apply chemistry ??? This is not a calculation. This is idiocy.
                    1. +5
                      26 August 2013 10: 31
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Well abandoned, and then what?

                      +1 country to the piggy bank of the West, and we sit and puff out our cheeks
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      If Assad really apply chemistry ???

                      Against amers? No, it will not be decided.
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      This is not a calculation. This is idiocy.

                      Read carefully the post of the interlocutor and my answer.
                      Quote: Luger
                      sometimes cold calculation much better than a hot head.

                      cold settlement on our part is unlikely, and not the calculation of amers
                      1. -2
                        26 August 2013 20: 12
                        Quote: Veter
                        +1 country to the piggy bank of the West, and we sit and puff out our cheeks

                        Being a superpower is very expensive. You are not up to date. In addition, the West is not one country. But Russia does not currently have the same bloc.
                    2. essenger
                      +4
                      26 August 2013 12: 54
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Well abandoned, and then what? If Assad really apply chemistry ??? This is not a calculation. This is idiocy.

                      Hello, Alexander. Maybe we’ll open some kind of fund and for all those who want to fight, we’ll buy a ticket to Syria? wink
                      1. +3
                        26 August 2013 13: 48
                        Quote: Essenger
                        . Maybe we’ll open some kind of fund and for all those who want to fight, we’ll buy a ticket to Syria?

                        Not funny. Now it’s not funny
                      2. +1
                        26 August 2013 20: 14
                        Here people on the forum love to fight.
                    3. 0
                      26 August 2013 15: 20
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Well abandoned, and then what?

                      And then the fate of Milosevic or Gaddafi!
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      If Assad really apply chemistry ???

                      Will he use it on airplanes?
                    4. 0
                      26 August 2013 20: 07
                      And this is guaranteed to bury himself. Now, at least he has a chance at the Kosovo option.
              3. Grishka100watt
                -4
                26 August 2013 11: 12
                Not afraid to join 3MB?
                Your participation in the third world war may end on your chair, which has turned into molecules with you, without having begun.
              4. +9
                26 August 2013 12: 06
                I agree one hundred percent .. if we let everything down as before, then shit more to shout about how we are reborn .. moreover, we will have to lie under the homosexual, because even these subhuman people will cost more than the whole of Russia .. But account of how we must save Syria .. let Putin think this ... for this I always voted for him ...
                1. +1
                  26 August 2013 14: 04
                  Declare all non-civilian aircraft heading towards Syrian territory as a potential threat to the naval base of Tartus, and therefore a threat to Russian citizens, with the right to prevent this threat in all possible ways. angry angry angry I think that air defense systems, both Russian and Syrian (they can be combined into a single complex), will be enough in this region. I think that such a statement (or some similar one) can cool a little zealous overseas warriors. what belay
                  1. -3
                    26 August 2013 20: 15
                    And get an economic crisis, for example, and a sharp aggravation of relations.
              5. +2
                26 August 2013 12: 56
                Quote: Veter
                Fear? Well then, you don’t need to scream at every corner

                In in good good good and ally like China and so on. they stupidly sit out and that's it! it's just that all of this has gotten above the roof! but if nothing is done, NATO and the hedgehogs with them will muddy the water for a long time, and we will clap on the keyboard what they are ...! we are probably waiting for someone to come to us with a "SWORD!" and we have the CAUCASUS at our side! it will be more trenchant than the Second World War it is necessary to somehow dodge on the "navel" but not to allow all this mess!
                1. 0
                  26 August 2013 20: 17
                  Do you really consider China to be allies?
              6. +1
                26 August 2013 20: 03
                Because the Americans currently have the first economy in the world, and a strong army. And then - they think very hard whether to climb into adventure.
              7. 0
                26 August 2013 20: 10
                Maj.
                Veter SU Today, 08:56 ↑

                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Offer to join the warrior on the side of Syria? Then this is world 3 with all that it implies.


                Fear? Well then, you don’t need to shout at every corner about the revival and power of Russia. We are afraid of joining the war, and the Yankees bomb left and right and put them on everyone.
                The USSR was not afraid to join 3MB, since the Yankees also understand and do not want war.
                Do you want war? Another warrior of the 3rd world war. And the Yankees bomb because they always lay down on everyone with the device. But when there was a Union, they reckoned with its "presence" in this or that region. But now there is no union, and please do not compare the USSR and Russia, although WE are the "heirs" but the scale is not the same, the influence is not that, the military power is not the same , but EVERYTHING is wrong.
                1. +1
                  26 August 2013 20: 17
                  Quote: ksan
                  WE though

                  And here you Мы no need to speak, to WE You have nothing to do.
                  Rather to THEY .
                  hi
                2. 0
                  27 August 2013 02: 04
                  Exactly. In order to have the ambitions of a superpower, it is necessary to have its economy.
                  1. 0
                    27 August 2013 18: 20
                    Quote: Pimply
                    one must have its economy.

                    Or her legacy.
                    wink
            4. Crocodile
              +16
              26 August 2013 09: 02
              Just once again grab a portion of crap and hide behind tolerance? And then continue to bark from around the corner and "wonder" when the Balts will lower us? Perhaps, for a start, we demand back our gold and foreign exchange reserves from US banks? Or are our barefoots afraid for their villas on the Cote d'Azur and Miami? One thing is clear - the time has come to collect stones! Otherwise, we won't dare to declare war soon because of our neighbor on the landing!
            5. +7
              26 August 2013 09: 06
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Then it is 3 world with all that it implies. The world does not burn for long and a lot of mind is not needed.

              This is the whole "raisin" that some push the "horse" into the abyss with all their efforts.
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              The world went crazy earlier with attacks on Belgrade. It was then that the United States began to lie actively and laid on the UN.

              Significantly earlier, comrade, more significant-in several centuries.
              We started by burning witches at the stake.
              Quote: Civil
              4. Both China and Russia, due to economic circumstances, will put up with the loss of the ally.

              It’s not a question of losing an ally or of circumstances; it’s a question of what role the others have in the future. They will be in slavish service to the "golden billion" or "golden billion" they will cultivate the land with a plow and a spade nearby.
              1. +19
                26 August 2013 10: 19
                Quote: Papakiko
                There is no question of losing an ally

                And in the loss of an ally, as well.
                If aggression against Syria begins, Russia should intervene in the toughest way.
                Does not intervene. Russian authority in the world is the end.
                1. -1
                  26 August 2013 19: 58
                  And in the loss of an ally, as well.
                  If aggression against Syria begins, Russia should intervene in the toughest way.
                  Does not intervene. To Russian authority in the world is the end
                  "The toughest way" is how? Fight? Send your soldiers? And you probably will be the first to volunteer for the war? Russia already helps to the best of its strength and capabilities. Another thing is that it does not have as many of these "forces and opportunities" as it would like
            6. rolik
              +3
              26 August 2013 09: 43
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Specifically, I ask you what Russia can do now, at the diplomatic level we have already done everything we could.

              Present US debt for payment, and withdraw assets from the mattress in one day. It will be cleaner than the atomic bombing, and if China also pulls up, the mattress-beds will not be at all before the war.
              1. +5
                26 August 2013 09: 49
                Quote: rolik
                Present US debt for payment, and withdraw assets from the mattress in one day. It will be cleaner than the atomic bombing, and if China also pulls up, the mattress-beds will not be at all before the war.


                Yes, it will be a devastating blow to the amers. But alas, the Russian Federation and China will not decide on this.
                1. +2
                  26 August 2013 11: 22
                  So what? De Gaulle tried to exchange dollars for gold.
                  1. +5
                    26 August 2013 11: 56
                    And exchanged !!!! Gave the darlings not gone anywhere.
                    1. -1
                      26 August 2013 21: 57
                      They gave it away. And what is the result? The loophole was closed. You won’t eat gold.
              2. +1
                26 August 2013 10: 01
                Quote: rolik
                Present US debt for payment,

                The rejection of the dollar and the global collapse that will end with a grand warrior. Still there are options?
                1. rolik
                  +2
                  26 August 2013 23: 02
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  The rejection of the dollar and the global collapse that will end with a grand warrior

                  Suppose there will be no world war, mattresses will suddenly have such problems inside the country before which the current hemorrhoid will seem like a breeze. and they will no longer be before the world war. Concerns will be shown for filling the constructed concentration camps and stuffing plastic coffins for four people.
                2. Alejandro
                  +5
                  27 August 2013 00: 09
                  I think that, at a minimum, Rospotrebnadzor and Rostourism are obliged to STRONGLY recommend tour operators not to sell tickets and not to organize trips of tourists to countries to whose territory a possible military operation and the response of the Syrian authorities (Israel, Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon, Cyprus) can spread and warn them criminal liability in the event of the death of our citizens. Through diplomatic relations, to warn our “partners” that in the event of an attack on Syria without the sanction of the UN Security Council, we will unfreeze the supplies of S-300 systems and other DEFENSE air defense systems to Iran.
                3. The comment was deleted.
              3. Veles25
                -16
                26 August 2013 11: 04
                US don't owe money to Russia
                1. +10
                  26 August 2013 11: 14
                  Quote: Veles25
                  US don't owe money to Russia

                  What are you, how should it not? And Cho hid his American flag behind the flag of the USSR?
                  Finance Magazine has compiled a list of major US lenders. Russia entered the top ten with a share of debt of 2,5% - this is more than 65 billion dollars. In the first place were Japan and China (more than 40% of America's public debt).
                  1. Veles25
                    +3
                    26 August 2013 11: 19
                    investment. I am new to this site. so i made a mistake
                  2. Veles25
                    +3
                    26 August 2013 11: 30
                    In the first place were Japan and China (more than 40% of America's public debt). ????
                  3. Veles25
                    +4
                    26 August 2013 11: 39
                    Alexander Romanov. And who hid his American flag behind the flag of the USSR?

                    it's hard for me to use this site. because I need to translate into Russian
                    1. +13
                      26 August 2013 11: 56
                      Quote: Veles25
                      In the first place were Japan and China (more than 40% of America's public debt). ????

                      Well, if you consider that this is a clipping from an American magazine, then it’s clear why you rest so much. In fact. Whose cowards are you now? What about the shirt? What about the comp? It’s interesting, but whose gold are you now so calmly managing as yours? Yours as a Latvian only ...... and soul. The people of the Holodigans, who want the whole world to be made poor for the sake of their stomach. You can’t be so stupid and naive. Your country is just a zombie gut that has no conscience. There is only a fist, and that one is already drying out.
                      1. Veles25
                        -20
                        26 August 2013 12: 20
                        The people of the famine? which the whole world has done
                      2. +15
                        26 August 2013 12: 33
                        Quote: Veles25
                        The people of the famine? which the whole world has done
                        Deception and meanness. Remember who was sent to you. The country of slaves and bandits (oh sorry I’m not tolerant, African-Americans and exiled convicts) Yes, all your brotherhood and years, then all 200 with small copecks. All your gathering is younger than the city in which I had the honor to be born and live (I am already silent about our country). And all that you have achieved by deceit from healthy people is not quoted. When so many rogues gather in one place, this is considered a gang by the Criminal Code. So the whole sub-sector is just the biggest gang in the world. By the way, the behavior shows that they came, plundered, destroyed, raked, dumped. This is the principle of your society.
                      3. Veles25
                        -19
                        26 August 2013 12: 40
                        200 with small copecks. Russia is more than a thousand years old, and where is it now?
                      4. +15
                        26 August 2013 12: 47
                        Quote: Veles25
                        00 with small copecks. Russia is more than a thousand years old, and where is it now?
                        Where it was, on the spot. laughing
                      5. +3
                        26 August 2013 14: 02
                        where is she now?
                        For me, it’s as it was on the spot. there are certainly difficulties, but this is temporary bully
                      6. +3
                        26 August 2013 23: 10
                        Quote: Veles25
                        Russia is more than a thousand years old, and where is it now?

                        On the spot. But where would the United States be, had Russia not helped you out in the 18 and 19 centuries? The question is rhetorical. But where else will you find yourself ..?
                      7. +9
                        26 August 2013 12: 40
                        Zhenya, forget it. This Amer sits there and Obama admires gays.
                      8. +5
                        26 August 2013 12: 48
                        Not Sanya. I am curious. I like such laconic navels of the earth laughing
                      9. +5
                        26 August 2013 13: 22
                        Quote: Mechanic
                        I like such laconic navels of the earth

                        Eugene, well, he is an American and considers himself the main one, although Bush was not verbose, and when he tried to talk a lot, the whole world saw that he was completely fucked up laughing
                      10. Veles25
                        -8
                        26 August 2013 13: 01
                        there is no point in talking to you. all that you say about Obama and gays
                      11. +16
                        26 August 2013 13: 20
                        Quote: Veles25
                        there is no point in talking to you. all that you say about Obama and gays

                        Yes, we dared to call Obama a war criminal, and gays perverts. We call a spade a spade and your democracy is ordinary fascism!
                      12. Veles25
                        +3
                        26 August 2013 13: 32
                        and you are right. I am not saying that they are doing the right thing. this government they are all like that
                      13. +5
                        26 August 2013 13: 50
                        Quote: Veles25
                        The people of the famine? which the whole world has done

                        your quote
                        Quote: Veles25
                        I am not saying that they are doing the right thing.

                        Well turn around, turn around
                      14. Veles25
                        0
                        26 August 2013 14: 10
                        not right? ....
                      15. 0
                        26 August 2013 14: 50
                        What a government, such and the people who elected it.
                      16. NOBODY EXCEPT US
                        +7
                        26 August 2013 13: 37
                        You probably forgot Alexander Romanov as Putin and the company admired Obama when he made a clinton trumpet all his pipes, is he our friend and now we don’t admire him anymore? us now too
                      17. Veles25
                        +5
                        26 August 2013 13: 46
                        dirty politics
                      18. -2
                        26 August 2013 22: 11
                        Zhen, what are the exiled convicts? Do not confuse with Australia. America was built by Protestants. Vasp.
                      19. +3
                        27 August 2013 01: 38
                        The people of the famine? which the whole world has done

                        :) Dear, you have a small overdraft in the amount of $ 53. I don’t know what your income is, maybe these are little things for you, But for very tanned representatives of the African American Negroid race, I think this is not pleasant
                        surprise. So you are really a nation of holodroots. Sorry to tell you the truth.
                        Currently (March 2013), the US government debt per capita is about 53,000 dollars / person ... These economic indicators indicate a tendency to approach default.

                        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%EE%F1%F3%E4%E0%F0%F1%F2%E2%E5%ED%ED%FB%E9_%E4%E

                        E% EB% E3_% D1% D8% C0
                        In one thing you are right, you managed to bend the world and not for the first time. In the Russian Army there is such a saying "Dembel is not coming soon - this is a minus, but it is inevitable - this is a plus" I will paraphrase ... the collapse of the United States is inevitable - this is a plus "

                        Threat. My generation is fortunate enough to watch a lot of important events. This is the decline of the communist system, and the collapse of the USSR, the 90s (also that western) the appearance and development of computers, the change of centuries, the fall of meteorite .. I only changed 3 clothes uniform designs in the army (who else can boast of this :)) But what really pleases me is that I will see how Pendosnya will die and be given an anathema. Yankees are evil! And while the US exists, the planet is in danger.
                      20. -2
                        26 August 2013 22: 01
                        Where is the internet developed, which are you sitting at right now? Tablets, search engines, drugs? You have no idea what percentage of products manufactured in the US you consume every day.
                      21. +6
                        26 August 2013 22: 40
                        Quote: Pimply
                        Where is the internet developed, which are you sitting at right now? Tablets, search engines, drugs? You have no idea what percentage of products manufactured in the US you consume every day.

                        Produced and developed - different things. Not all of the above were invented and developed by the Americans.
                      22. +2
                        27 August 2013 01: 50
                        Where is the internet developed, which are you sitting at right now? Tablets, search engines, drugs? You have no idea what percentage of products manufactured in the US you consume every day.
                        Yeah, you still remember Popov’s radio, and the alternating current of the Serbian genius Nikola Tesla. dignity can be measured for a long time.

                        This is what I was going to say for a long time:
                        Here you are buying American goods (cars, iPhones, etc.) And the Yankees are killing Syrian children with this money. So everyone who buys US goods is essentially the sponsor of numerous US-sponsored killings.
                      23. -3
                        27 August 2013 02: 17
                        Quote: Muadipus
                        Popov
                        if you are not in the know, invented one of the elements of the radio.
                        The “father” of radio in the broad sense of the word is Hertz, the “father-distributor” of radio telegraphy is Marconi, who adapted the Hertz transmitter and receiver of Popov to the practical task of transmitting and receiving radio telegraphs by connecting the first with a telegraph key and the second with a printing telegraph apparatus. But in general, the question of the invention of radio in general (and not of radio telegraphy and other specific forms of its application), according to Nikolsky, is just as ridiculous as the question of the "invention" of gravity. And the Tesla Serb - like the Russian Sikorsky - was invented in the States. For the good of this country.

                        Quote: Muadipus
                        And the Yankees are killing Syrian children with this money.
                        Then chop off the computer, abandon the Windows, cut the phone on the android, refuse food (if you are not aware, a considerable part of it is stored and harvested according to American technology. Get the processor out of the computer. Forward.

                        Some Syrian children are being killed with American and Arab money, others with Russian and Persian. Which Syrian children do you regret?
                      24. +1
                        27 August 2013 22: 00
                        Quote: Muadipus
                        Yeah, you still remember Popov’s radio, and the alternating current of the Serbian genius Nikola Tesla. dignity can be measured for a long time.

                        The Intel Pentium processor was created by a Russian scientist, this is the most striking example ..
                    2. +1
                      26 August 2013 13: 09
                      Quote: Veles25
                      it's hard for me to use this site. because I need to translate into Russian

                      I apologize! Are you English? with respect! hi
                      1. Veles25
                        -2
                        26 August 2013 13: 15
                        No, I'm Russian.
                      2. +4
                        26 August 2013 13: 19
                        Quote: Veles25
                        No, I'm Russian.
                        Who are you?
                        Quote: Veles25
                        it's hard for me to use this site. because I need to translate into Russian

                        You are not my brother to me!
                      3. Veles25
                        +6
                        26 August 2013 13: 27
                        Alexander Romanov: You're not my brother to me!

                        I never said that. Did you smoke something?
                      4. +6
                        26 August 2013 14: 56
                        Russians all in Russia live in the post-Soviet space, and you are a so-so fugitive.
                      5. +3
                        26 August 2013 13: 28
                        Quote: Veles25
                        No, I'm Russian.

                        do not understand! and then why should you translate? hi
                      6. Veles25
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 13: 39
                        I came to the US when I was 8
                      7. +2
                        26 August 2013 13: 54
                        aaaaaaaa! everything is clear! I apologize! how old are you now? and the question is, how do you like usa? hi
                      8. Veles25
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 14: 00
                        25 .........
                      9. +1
                        26 August 2013 14: 03
                        Well, you could say a man! so what is my question! have you already been in the army?
                      10. Veles25
                        0
                        26 August 2013 14: 14
                        I like it here. No. I have never been in the army. there are friends that have been there more than once
                      11. +3
                        26 August 2013 14: 22
                        Quote: Veles25
                        I like it here.

                        in! this is something!
                        Quote: Veles25
                        I have never been in the army.

                        need to go! but in your I do not advise! there is a lot of PIDOR .. In! Do you know anything good about RUSSIA? hi
                      12. Veles25
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 14: 34
                        about RUSSIA? I read the news, like you. Russian news and in English. so I think we all know what is happening. I go to Russia sometimes just visit
                      13. +2
                        26 August 2013 14: 42
                        I’m wondering what kind of news channel you are watching? Are you going to come to Russia?
                        Quote: Veles25
                        I spoke good Russian. I just write it badly

                        nothing wrong!
                      14. Veles25
                        0
                        26 August 2013 14: 52
                        I travel there sometimes. http://etvnet.com/
                        Channel One: Time
                      15. 0
                        26 August 2013 15: 01
                        Quote: Veles25
                        I travel there sometimes.

                        and where were you in Russia? and what state do you live in?
                      16. Veles25
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 15: 19
                        Washington Seattle. Moscow St. Petersburg Chelyabinsk. Have you ever been to the US?
                      17. +8
                        26 August 2013 16: 51
                        Quote: Veles25
                        Have you ever been to the US?

                        We will be there !!!
                      18. +7
                        26 August 2013 17: 09
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        We will be there !!!

                        drinks good
                      19. +2
                        26 August 2013 17: 21
                        only the sculptural composition is out of place, a huge minus to the designer
                      20. +2
                        26 August 2013 17: 26
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        huge minus to the designer

                        I'm not a designer
                      21. The comment was deleted.
                      22. +1
                        26 August 2013 19: 18
                        but you have no complaints, although the composition is well known and in general the collage has some kind of darling
                      23. 0
                        26 August 2013 19: 30
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        collage has some kind of darling

                        Isn't this one?
                      24. +2
                        26 August 2013 19: 25
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        out of place sculptural composition

                        Why? To the place, but to another.

                        And we are old-fashioned
                      25. +2
                        26 August 2013 23: 11
                        The picture is certainly interesting, but only a nuclear explosion and flying helicopters somehow make you think. Yes and also the landing in the sky request
                      26. S_mirnov
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 23: 24
                        Here I like your composition more +!
                      27. +1
                        27 August 2013 10: 18
                        Quote: Veles25
                        Have you ever been to the US?

                        I have been in many places by the nature of my work, there was Alaska "SAC"
                      28. 0
                        27 August 2013 02: 05
                        IMHO, Troll, he sings too smoothly, for a person at the age of 8 who has changed his language environment.
                        I apologize in advance if I am mistaken, but in my opinion "the Cossack is sent"
                      29. +2
                        26 August 2013 15: 02
                        You have to live in Russia, then you can understand the Russian soul. "There is a Russian spirit, there is a smell of Russia" - A.S. Pushkin. And in the states - it smells of greenery.
                      30. rolik
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 23: 07
                        Quote: Veles25
                        about RUSSIA? I read the news like you

                        I advise you to look closely at RT ("Russia Today") there and you will see normal news.
                      31. Veles25
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 14: 36
                        I spoke good Russian. I just write it badly
                      32. +2
                        26 August 2013 14: 57
                        He only has a name - Russian, and the soul is American.
                      33. Veles25
                        +2
                        26 August 2013 15: 22
                        I am not religious.
                      34. +1
                        26 August 2013 13: 51
                        Quote: Far East
                        do not understand! and then why should you translate?

                        Because he is lying
                      35. +2
                        26 August 2013 13: 55
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Because he is lying

                        and we will check! hi
                      36. Veles25
                        +2
                        26 August 2013 14: 07
                        and I thought it was a good site. it should be called toppolitics. not topwar
                      37. Arabist
                        +3
                        26 August 2013 14: 16
                        Do not like it, do not visit it. What kind of love do Amers give advice to all.
                      38. 0
                        29 August 2013 09: 34
                        We like this site name more. Yes
                      39. +3
                        26 August 2013 14: 18
                        Quote: Veles25
                        and I thought it was a good site. it should be called toppolitics. not topwar

                        my dear American friend! and you are imbued with this site! and then you there the BRAIN is so cleaned on the whips "Aunt ASI" be open! and people will reach out to you! hi
                        Quote: Veles25
                        Are you stupid or what?

                        Are you me? my boy! hi
                      40. Veles25
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 14: 41
                        not for Alexander Romanov
                      41. +1
                        26 August 2013 14: 47
                        Quote: Veles25
                        not for Alexander Romanov

                        clear!
                      42. Veles25
                        -1
                        26 August 2013 14: 44
                        my dear American friend! and you are imbued with this site! and then you have there the BRAIN is so cleaned on the whips "Aunt ASI" be open! and people will be drawn to you.

                        Do not say how you know me.
                      43. 0
                        26 August 2013 14: 50
                        Quote: Veles25
                        Do not say how you know me.

                        not understood! I'm not talking about you but about "aunt ASI" this is a detergent! if anything!
                      44. +1
                        26 August 2013 15: 05
                        Do not be offended by the fellow, here everyone is "greeted by their clothes, but escorted by their minds." Russian folk proverb.
                      45. Veles25
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 15: 24
                        its all good
                      46. +4
                        26 August 2013 15: 52
                        Yes, buzzing. Very good. Expert Xp ...... So even your experts shout that our soldiers are a death to the undercovers both in training and endurance. And so your megaspil does not save traitors. Well, you are Victor, amusing yourself with the thought that in a global war, you won’t hang out like a traitor on a pillar.
                      47. Veles25
                        -2
                        26 August 2013 14: 01
                        Are you stupid or what?
                      48. +1
                        26 August 2013 15: 53
                        Quote: Veles25
                        Are you stupid or what?
                        The price of underestimating the enemy is death. Remember the boy.
                  4. Veles25
                    -4
                    26 August 2013 11: 56
                    2012........
                  5. +2
                    26 August 2013 13: 54
                    Quote: Alexander Romanov
                    What are you, how should it not? And Cho hid his American flag behind the flag of the USSR?
                    Finance Magazine has compiled a list of major US lenders. Russia entered the top ten with a share of debt of 2,5% - this is more than 65 billion dollars. In the first place were Japan and China (more than 40% of America's public debt).

                    Here you are naive. Just amazed. You still do not understand that this performance owed by the USA is a scam. The dollar will collapse and the US will forgive all its debts. Including forgive our money in the funds that lie there.
                  6. -1
                    26 August 2013 21: 58
                    Sasha, and this is what they invest in so that they work, and do not melt
                2. +9
                  26 August 2013 11: 31
                  Quote: Veles25
                  US don't owe money to Russia


                  Are you here on the forum representing US interests ?! laughing
                  1. Veles25
                    -1
                    26 August 2013 11: 45
                    Apollon I did not tell you a Alexander Romanovy
                    1. +10
                      26 August 2013 12: 03
                      Quote: Veles25
                      Apollon I did not tell you a Alexander Romanovy


                      Another" laughing .
                      Understand, ALL users on the site are equal and free in their desire (not desire) to communicate with any visitor.
                      1. Jin
                        +4
                        26 August 2013 14: 17
                        Quote: Corsair
                        Another"


                        At such a pace will soon be: "Another MINUS" ONE "...
                    2. +7
                      26 August 2013 12: 09
                      Quote: Veles25
                      I did not tell you a Alexander Romanovy


                      but are we talking here, we are rather write.
                      In your opinion, I can not write something in response to you ?! winked Your logic is strange.
                    3. +1
                      26 August 2013 13: 07
                      a little off topic, but I can not help but notice that your nickname with the American flag, to put it mildly, does not fit;)
                  2. Veles25
                    0
                    26 August 2013 13: 05
                    Are you here on the forum representing the interests of small Azerbaijan?
                    1. +6
                      26 August 2013 13: 14
                      Quote: Veles25
                      Are you here on the forum representing the interests of small Azerbaijan?
                      Yes, it is our union republic, and all that is told to you is a lie. We treat all who are separated from us well.
                      1. Veles25
                        -6
                        26 August 2013 13: 50
                        that's why the USSR fell
                      2. +4
                        26 August 2013 16: 00
                        Quote: Veles25
                        that's why the USSR fell
                        The USSR did not fall. He gobbled up sneakers, and now he understood. So the white-headed be afraid of the bear. Well, not with GDP, but when you get tired of bending before you, and then there will be an iron curtain and the Caribbean crisis.
                      3. -1
                        26 August 2013 22: 15
                        Zhenya, the USSR had a rather inefficient economy and accumulated internal protest. Corruption and inertia of power. That's all.
                      4. +2
                        26 August 2013 22: 35
                        Quote: Pimply
                        the USSR had a rather inefficient economy

                        in this inefficient economy, we had tariffs for housing and communal services which we cannot even dream of now, the entire children's assortment was subsidized and often sold at a price below cost, we did not have the social problems that we have now
                      5. 0
                        27 August 2013 13: 16
                        not really or not at all :)

                        The economy was of course ineffective (since any "one-sided" economy - even a purely market one, even a purely planned one in terms of efficiency will always lose to a mixed one), but it was the inertia and venality of the authorities that contributed to the collapse of the USSR. It was enough to carry out competent reforms on the gradual transition of certain sectors of the economy to market rails while maintaining the state plan in strategically important areas. And the same "glasnost" had to be introduced just as gradually, and not in the style of the marked - once and "everyone can do anything."
                      6. 0
                        29 August 2013 09: 41
                        Now it is waiting for the states, we have already passed it.
                      7. +1
                        26 August 2013 17: 19
                        What an American you are! Gulchatay! Show your face.
                      8. Jin
                        +1
                        26 August 2013 19: 58
                        Quote: Anatolich
                        What an American you are! Gulchatay! Show your face.


                        That troll is some kind of ... another ... the guys tore it up "once".
                    2. +2
                      26 August 2013 13: 46
                      Quote: Veles25
                      Are you here on the forum representing the interests of small Azerbaijan?


                      Quote: Veles25
                      небольшой
                      ????? soon ending th


                      for distorting the Russian language - minus.
                      1. Veles25
                        -2
                        26 August 2013 14: 23
                        for distorting the Russian language - minus.
                        I apologize badly with Russian
                      2. +1
                        26 August 2013 14: 30
                        Quote: Veles25
                        for distorting the Russian language - minus.
                        I apologize badly with Russian


                        Well then, I am ashamed of you.
                      3. Veles25
                        -6
                        26 August 2013 14: 45
                        go take care of yourself
                      4. +6
                        26 August 2013 15: 44
                        Quote: Veles25
                        go take care of yourself
                        Any aggression of the co-workers begins with this cry. By the way, we have mattress covers in the color of your flag. But you are not Russian. You are a mercenary who betrayed your homeland (well, although the one who took and raised is the same dad.) I often meet with your scientific elite, but my opinion does not change. Morons are your nation. All that is is stolen. Finding out questions about the origin of cockroaches is certainly cool. Honestly, I want the young guys to raise the flag over the white house with the help of weapons that our design bureau is working on. And enough can "flowers" cast a spell over the whole world? You can also grab a melon with a mace.
                      5. +1
                        29 August 2013 09: 45
                        Come to Russia, to the homeland of your ancestors, you will learn the Russian language, you will become a real Russian, you will even learn to swear. lol
                      6. 0
                        28 August 2013 17: 41
                        How does an American know about Azerbaijan?
                3. +1
                  26 August 2013 17: 09
                  Quote: Veles25
                  US don't owe money to Russia
                  Anyone who has dollars
                  is a direct lender to the United States, not to mention the state.
              4. The comment was deleted.
              5. Grishka100watt
                +1
                26 August 2013 11: 14
                Present US debt for payment, and withdraw assets from the mattress in one day.

                Yeah, that's what they gave.
              6. +2
                26 August 2013 11: 24
                Quote: rolik
                Present US debt for payment, and withdraw assets from the mattress in one day. It will be cleaner than the atomic bombing, and if China also pulls up, the mattress-beds will not be at all before the war.

                Yes, this is probably the best solution, amers must be bent at any cost. Forever desirable.
              7. S_mirnov
                -3
                26 August 2013 13: 05
                Quote: rolik
                Present US debt for payment, and withdraw assets from the mattress in one day.

                Such a development of events was possible under Stalin. The modern political regime can only languidly poke lips Lavrov! Giving more likely recommendations and not insisting on their implementation. Read the statement by the Foreign Ministry - nothing concrete, sheep’s bleating!

                I would also add to your list the expulsion of NATO from Ulyanovsk!
                1. Arabist
                  +3
                  26 August 2013 13: 08
                  What is a military base in Ulyanovsk? How does it bother you?
                2. +2
                  26 August 2013 13: 52
                  Quote: S_mirnov
                  I would also add to your list the expulsion of NATO from Ulyanovsk!

                  What base, show it. Sits and lies insolent
                  1. S_mirnov
                    -3
                    26 August 2013 14: 31
                    Yes, you call this indecency at least a transshipment point, at least a logistics center! All the same, this is cooperation with NATO! The transit of enemy military cargo through our country!
                    So, expressing angry US petitions from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and at the same time cooperating with NATO is somehow shameful, frankly speaking - it looks gay!
                    By the way, judging by the profile picture, you get a salary by the bucks and you see a lot? wink
                    1. -2
                      26 August 2013 15: 27
                      Quote: S_mirnov
                      So, expressing angry US petitions from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and at the same time cooperating with NATO is somehow shameful, frankly speaking - it looks gay!

                      Well, this is so that gullible Russians blur their eyes!
                      1. S_mirnov
                        -5
                        26 August 2013 16: 20
                        Quote: nycsson
                        Well, this is so that gullible Russians blur their eyes!

                        Yeah, you can see for the top business - there is business!
              8. -2
                26 August 2013 21: 45
                Quote: rolik
                Present US debt for payment, and withdraw assets from the mattress in one day. It will be cleaner than the atomic bombing, and if China also pulls up, the mattress-beds will not be at all before the war.

                Correctly. The whole world is in ruin. Remind me what happened with problems in one area in the USA? By the way, what do you invest in?
            7. Grigorich 1962
              +6
              26 August 2013 09: 53
              Yes, you are dusting .... World War III .... stupidity do not write America and all this trash will not substitute your head for no one knows ..... yes Obama was offended by Russia for Snowden .... yes the US needs a war since there are problems in the economy .... yes, you need to try to put Russia in its place ... but the third world ...... well, here it’s hardly .... not the case ...... but Russia ? .... yes, immediately it is necessary to send troops into Syria ...... to secure chemical storage facilities ..... to call for decisive action by China and Iran ..... and the whole catastrophe will end without starting ... ..and Obama will be forever about
            8. +2
              26 August 2013 11: 19
              On this and the calculation. Russia will join - world war and the dismemberment of Russia. Will not stand up - the implementation of separatist scenarios in the national republics, the dismemberment of Russia. There are many scenarios. The goal is one. This is the difference between the policy of small Britons, who for hundreds of years went to the goal of destroying Russia, and our "government", which cannot plan more than a year ...
            9. +4
              26 August 2013 11: 32
              Granites and Malachites urgently put, even though the aircraft carrier to the bottom.
              1. +6
                26 August 2013 11: 59
                Previously, it was necessary to deliver and not make flirts with the United States, because it was immediately clear that this wouldn’t stop with a club.
              2. +1
                26 August 2013 12: 41
                Quote: a52333
                Granites and Malachites urgently put, even though the aircraft carrier to the bottom

                Aircraft carrier is not difficult to sink, it will be difficult to prove that Russia has nothing to do with it.
                1. +4
                  26 August 2013 12: 45
                  The Israelis blew up one warehouse with the Malachites a month ago, I am sure he is not alone. But it’s time for us to get up with the knee-elbow. Peter the Great and Moscow to Tartus on duty. These kovs have one place, too, not iron, they will see the DECISIVE position of Moscow, they will also play OKNUMX.
                  1. +8
                    26 August 2013 16: 24
                    Quote: a52333
                    malachite warehouse blew up

                    And how many yachts really were there (it was like talking about them) and were they there at all?
                    If there "Bastions" are in place, then the AUG may seem sour, information that ALL anti-ship missiles were blown up can be a trick.
                    Z.Y:
                    In general, men, I think it’s a shame: Syria and Assad are fighting for their homeland no matter what, but already bury them and scream all gone. Let's tie it up already.
            10. +2
              26 August 2013 11: 35
              But why don't the USA think of World War 3?
              How much can you swallow pills?
            11. S_mirnov
              -5
              26 August 2013 11: 43
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              what Russia can do now, at the diplomatic level we have already done everything we could

              No, "everything we could" - we have already done for Libya!
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrtcVd1LASc
              This is a film about the "bold" actions of our rulers in the Libyan question. Who cares.
              1. +3
                26 August 2013 17: 13
                Quote: S_mirnov
                what Russia can do now, at the diplomatic level we have already done everything we could

                No, "everything we could" - we have already done for Libya!
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrtcVd1LASc
                This is a film about the "bold" actions of our rulers in the Libyan question. Who cares.

                Smirnov, whatever you write to Syria, our government hasn’t surrendered for the second year and is not going to donate, it’s not known how our people will answer it, and you’re already yelling that all the gypsum has been removed, they send heavy weapons to Syria insolent, with an escort in the form Peter the Great, Kuzi, Moscow and the 5-6 destroyers, and for the 3-4 snack the 949 submarines, not a single jackal will stop such a squadron!
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. S_mirnov
                  -2
                  26 August 2013 23: 53
                  Quote: 11 black
                  it’s not known how our people will answer this, but you’re already yelling.

                  And why is there unknown, we already washed our hands:
                  "Russia will not fight anyone over Syria. This was stated at a press conference in Moscow by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, answering the question of what Russia will do if Western countries launch military strikes against Syria."
                  If anything, always make noise for justice, and real affairs = 0
            12. +7
              26 August 2013 11: 44
              Yes, that will be ||| World Great Slaughter.
              We (Russia) are already included in the scenario of this confrontation.
              Let me remind distinguished comrades that the head of the Defenders of Russia Masson. which means Shoigu will "work out the script" ......
              It will start as a local conflict, BUT it will grow, first on the territory of TURKEY (This is mandatory)) ....
              And then the "Scenario" of the war will get out of control. We remember the mental potential of the "leaders" used (so-called)) - Medvedev, McCain, Obama (generally a Negro)) Oland (Gay European)) ... "Vova" strategist on versions of media and TV)))))
              We remember how the "grandmaster" started the 2nd world, in which Stalin (USSR)) was a VICTIM ...
              HAPPY - the goal is to "zero" the dollar ..., but before the conflict did not enter the territory of the Naglo-Saxons, wait, "internal conflicts" will escalate and there will be a war on the territory of the United States and Britain, they cannot escape this ....
              They understand this and built in the USA-CAMP and bought millions of plastic coffins (for 4 people))) ....

              Yes, and China, TNCs raised for good reason ....
              World Financial Capital, will try to survive compactly on this territory + Kazakhstan (the capital (AStana)) because "THEY" built it to bow to SATAN ... (and it was not the Kazakhs who built pyramids there)))
              Well, + Siberia-like a pantry of minerals ....

              BUT everything goes wrong ....
              A surprise will be for EVERYONE ...
              In their constructions did not take into account the main ...
              Capital-win ALWAYS can’t ...
              He fights "badly" and we have studied him enough, so wait, the "answer", including the military one, will have to be applied to him and contrary to the "scenario" ...
              ...................................................................
              1. +4
                26 August 2013 12: 01
                Well wrapped laughing I did not understand about Astana at all.
                1. essenger
                  +4
                  26 August 2013 13: 02
                  Quote: tilovaykrisa
                  Well wrapped laughing I did not understand about Astana at all.


                  These conspiracy therapists))) Astana - Satan
                  Like Obama said, Yes we can - thank you Satan;)
                  Again about the Masons
                2. 123123123
                  +1
                  26 August 2013 15: 56
                  And you look at the pictures from above on the buildings of the new Astana and you will see the pentograms ON WHICH THEY ARE BUILT
              2. 0
                26 August 2013 12: 41
                And what is wrong with Astana? what
            13. +5
              26 August 2013 12: 13
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              The world does not burn for long and a lot of mind is not needed.

              Not only Russians should think about this. You will justify the occupation of Russia in such a way, so as not to "burn the world".
              1. 0
                26 August 2013 13: 54
                Quote: Setrac
                ... You will justify the occupation of Russia in such a way, so as not to "burn the world".

                I can’t even imagine how your brains work. It’s just wassat
              2. 0
                26 August 2013 21: 01
                Setrac (1) RU Today, 12:13 ↑

                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                The world does not burn for long and a lot of mind is not needed.

                Not only Russians should think about this. You will justify the occupation of Russia in such a way, so as not to "burn the world".
                Well, the conclusion you made !! Romanov spoke out that we need to avoid the 3rd World War. And you're talking about the occupation of Russia, all in a heap. Strange logic, do not find. fellow
            14. 0
              26 August 2013 12: 57
              if our ships embark on the Tartus raid, there will be no war ...
            15. +2
              26 August 2013 14: 09
              In the light of a likely world war, there is an opportunity to deal with the fifth column in Russia. This is with liberal ministers + mass media, etc.
            16. +3
              26 August 2013 14: 16
              And what amers on Pont take us. limited counterparty must be introduced. the spilled drop of blood of a Russian soldier removes all obligations from Russia and gives rise to the introduction of the main forces up to tactical nuclear weapons. and spit on amers
              1. 123123123
                +1
                26 August 2013 15: 58
                I support !!
              2. +1
                26 August 2013 18: 02
                Already found whose drop will be?
                1. 0
                  26 August 2013 19: 18
                  of course. at the base in Tartus, in the officer’s canteen, the chef cut his finger. and away we go! on RT there are terrible reports about the shelling of the Russian naval base. There are wounded. one sailor was seriously wounded in the finger. here is the angry statement of the Foreign Ministry about violation of international standards by Syrian militants! The Security Council of the Russian Federation decides to strengthen the defense of its naval base and maintain a no-fly zone over the entire territory of Syria except the Syrian air force. Assistance to the Syrian army in the form of the provision of some intelligence and sending their military experts there in the form of DRB. and then you can tryndet at the UN.
                2. 0
                  26 August 2013 20: 50
                  So there are not a few fighters from the North Caucasus, are they not Russian citizens?
            17. +1
              26 August 2013 14: 23
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Specifically, I ask you what Russia can do now, at the diplomatic level we have already done everything we could.

              And what can she do with her army and navy? Nothing.
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Offer to join the warrior on the side of Syria?

              What to enter?
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Then it is 3 world with all that it implies. The world does not burn for long and a lot of mind is not needed.

              When there was a Pakistan-India crisis, we entered. The world was not burned, since we had a powerful fleet.
            18. +2
              26 August 2013 14: 52
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              it is 3 world with all that it implies.

              And you can’t fight and you can’t not fight. What to do?! To send troops to Syria urgently. And hope that the amers will not turn up. Afraid. And if they turn up, then there will be no alternatives. Let’s drop Syria - that’s it, we are next ... at most through one, but very quickly ...
            19. mcvdvlad
              +2
              26 August 2013 15: 31
              option one - an alliance agreement, the introduction of our troops at the request of a legitimate government (the UN mandate is not needed), the sweeping of Syria. and voila, there is no war and the face is saved
            20. 0
              26 August 2013 19: 57
              3 world, already coming. Do not be naive if our fleet enters Tartus, there will be no attack. Neither they nor we are ready for war. The West is preparing against us ... China!
            21. porevith
              +1
              26 August 2013 22: 52
              What is the third world ??? nobody will do it. And to help Syria, as the USSR, North Korea, Vietnam, Egypt helped. For example, you can use weapons and specialists.
              1. Arabist
                +1
                26 August 2013 22: 59
                Most likely it will. It’s not worth recalling the previous world wars, not even nuclear strikes are necessary — today the losses even from conventional weapons will be many orders of magnitude greater. In any case: the loss of Russia is almost everything, the loss of America is the same. And if still an atom, no one wants to die in a thermonuclear hell.
            22. The comment was deleted.
            23. RUS-36
              0
              28 August 2013 00: 08
              At least weapons and equipment to immediately throw Syria and more ...
            24. Vlad 1965
              0
              28 August 2013 16: 32
              And where did you get the idea that World War 3 will start at once like this?
              Burn down the world, but how does a horse fire differ from a ground or underground fire in peat bogs if you don’t take measures to extinguish it?
              In Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, everything went smoothly among the Amers, the appetite was exorbitant. So who should put an end to the mouth declared by the whole world, the beast, because of which the war does not stop for a minute?
            25. IGS
              -1
              31 August 2013 09: 42
              I feel proud when I read the lines:
              Quote: Alexander Romanov

              Delirium by type - you need to break all you write! Specifically, I ask you what Russia can do now, at the diplomatic level we have already done everything we could. Offer to join the warrior on the side of Syria? Then this is world 3 with all that it implies. The world does not burn for long and a lot of mind is not needed.
              We are still thinking about the whole world, and we don’t want trouble, sincerely ... But I’m afraid that we are less and less. In fact, we have a cruel leader of a drug addict (from an economic point of view) and his henchmen, who have great power, who at the time of breaking do what they want, only to get a dose. And something needs to be done with this. Otherwise, they will drag us all along ...
          2. artemiy
            +26
            26 August 2013 08: 56
            If we with China, Iran do not stand up for Syria, then the price is worthless to us! Anglo-Saxons generally lose fear and crawl on our neck!
          3. S_mirnov
            -9
            26 August 2013 10: 32
            Quote: Denis
            What kind of nonsense, who in general, after the US attack on Syria, will take Russia seriously?

            Soon we will see our tandem clowns on TV again, they will puff out their cheeks and try to save face.

            ps Who does not want the Kadyrov Mosque to become the face of Russia - go to the Russia 10 site
            http://10russia.ru/
            support the Kolomna Kremlin.
            1. +11
              26 August 2013 11: 30
              Quote: S_mirnov
              Soon we will see our tandem clowns on TV again,

              Putin is the president of Russia, not a clown. Got it, no? Or it’s harder for you to answer. I got it already, a day does not pass that I did not spit in Russia.
              1. S_mirnov
                -2
                26 August 2013 11: 37
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Putin is the president of Russia, not a clown

                Yeah, so many serious things!
                "The Vedomosti newspaper has learned about the distribution of grants that President Vladimir Putin has allocated to NGOs. The Institute for Eurasian Studies will receive the largest amount, 9,5 million rubles. on the study of the role of Caucasians in the liberation of the besieged Leningrad. The edition writes about this in the issue of August 26. The Stopham and Piggy Against projects will also receive large grants. "

                And here's even cooler!
                "At a meeting in Rostov-on-Don, the president expressed surprise that Rostov investors have invested considerable funds in Greece, which is experiencing economic difficulties, instead of his native Rostov region, where, in his opinion, a comprehensive system of business support, including small business, has been created. "
                http://expert.ru/2013/08/23/shapku-na-lob/?partner=23507329
                expressed surprise laughing
                1. +9
                  26 August 2013 11: 47
                  Quote: S_mirnov
                  Yeah, so many serious things!


                  Doubts ?!

                2. +3
                  26 August 2013 12: 02
                  bastard hobbits, stop reading statements.
                3. +2
                  26 August 2013 12: 43
                  Quote: S_mirnov
                  “The Vedomosti newspaper learned about the distribution of grants that President Vladimir Putin had allocated to NGOs.

                  And what has Putin got to do with it? Deal with the Vedomosti newspaper.
                4. +4
                  26 August 2013 12: 46
                  Quote: S_mirnov
                  "The newspaper" Vedomosti "learned about the distribution of grants,

                  Smirnov, so you say that you are a patriot of Russia. Here they are your "Vedomosti" and their owners, well, your admirers, as I understand it.
                  Newspaper "Vedomosti"

                  Independent Media, Prof-Media Publishing House

                  Derk Sower, Potanin [2]
                  1. S_mirnov
                    -5
                    26 August 2013 13: 01
                    Quote: Alexander Romanov
                    Newspaper "Vedomosti"

                    Independent Media, Prof-Media Publishing House

                    Derk Sower, Potanin [2]

                    So what? GDP stores gold-equivalent reserves in dollars! And I can’t read the newspaper? In addition, Potanin is a completely domestic oligarch, born and nourished by the political regime that has led our country since the collapse of the USSR and to this day!
                    Why are you so alarmed? Or do you have proof that there are no such grants? Maybe "Piggy against" (probably your idols wink ) for their money, life-size puppets sew?
                    1. +5
                      26 August 2013 13: 55
                      Quote: S_mirnov
                      So what? GDP stores gold-equivalent reserves in dollars!

                      They are calculated in dollars, not stored in them. How many bucks in Russia's gold reserves have already been laid out.
                      Why are you so alarmed?
                      Talking for the USA and Syria, and here you spit on Putin. It’s much better to see you when an NPO finances the State Department.
                      1. S_mirnov
                        -4
                        26 August 2013 14: 39
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        and here you spit on Putin.

                        Why command them to admire? Libya was leaked, and now it’s also draining Syria! Still rejoices at the presence of NATO in Afghanistan!
                        It’s amazing to me why you admire him?
                      2. 123123123
                        +3
                        26 August 2013 16: 05
                        Inadequate for some !!
                      3. S_mirnov
                        -1
                        26 August 2013 19: 52
                        And what is inadequate? Always ready for dialogue and discussion.
                      4. +1
                        26 August 2013 20: 12
                        Quote: 123123123
                        it is adequate !!

                        No, this is sophistry.
                        It’s a pretty decent way to talk obscenely.
                      5. +1
                        26 August 2013 20: 02
                        Quote: S_mirnov
                        Still rejoices at the presence of NATO in Afghanistan!

                        Why not
                        USA - 2266 people.
                        Great Britain - 444 people
                        Canada - 159 people
                        Spain - 90 people
                        France - 88 people
                        Germany - 58 people
                        Italy - 52 people
                        Denmark - 43 people
                        Australia - 40 people.
                        Poland - 40 people
                        Georgia - 29 people
                        Netherlands - 25 people
                        Romania - 23 people
                        Turkey - 15 people
                        New Zealand - 11 people.
                        Norway - 10 people
                        Estonia - 9 people
                        Hungary - 7 people
                        Czech Republic - 5 people.
                        Sweden - 5 people
                        Latvia - 4 people
                        Jordan - 2 people
                        Portugal - 2 people
                        Finland - 2 people
                        South Korea - 2 people
                        Albania - 1 person
                        Belgium - 1 person
                        Lithuania - 1 person
                        United Arab Emirates - 1 pers.
                        Slovakia - 1 person
                        Montenegro - 1 person

                        The total irretrievable losses of the Armed Forces of the coalition countries as of November 21.08.2013, 3438 amounted to XNUMX people.
                        Losses of private military and security structures operating in the interests of the coalition amounted to 3006 people.
                        Total irretrievable losses - 6444 people.
                        The operation continues. Losses will still be ...

                        Are you upset by this?
                        bully
                      6. S_mirnov
                        0
                        27 August 2013 14: 17
                        Fighting in Afghanistan and naturally incurring losses, NATO pursues its own personal goals, on our borders. To dream that our goals coincide with the NATO goals (I mean the goals of the People of the Russian Federation, not the government) is not very smart! Only very narrow-minded people, or those who want to deceive you, can rejoice at the current situation.
                        That's the whole logic.
                    2. 0
                      26 August 2013 18: 18
                      Whatever the case, the pigs and stopham are doing good deeds.
              2. -6
                26 August 2013 11: 41
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Putin is the president of Russia, not clown

                Vladimir Putin, the most influential world leader.
                Compared to him, Obama is a puppy.
                His word is law. He will say no to the war in Syria, it will never be.
                1. +11
                  26 August 2013 12: 04
                  I would like to believe, but unfortunately the reality is not so rosy. At the moment, the most influential world leader is "capital"
                2. +5
                  26 August 2013 13: 26
                  Quote: cosmos111
                  Vladimir Putin, the most influential world leader.

                  yes, let him three times "universal navel!" but how he treats his citizens! mater., abolish capital, raise the retirement age, tariffs for electricity., housing and communal services are growing oh .... whether! and all this in MY country! money they have like a fool MAHORKA! and every year we pull on the STRAP! and after that I have to vote for him, respect? NO! he needs to take care of the citizens of our country!
                  1. 0
                    26 August 2013 18: 30
                    Mat. capital has not yet been canceled, but I think it will not be canceled, I think GDP will not do it. Most likely they will postpone for an indefinite period, soon after all, the elections will be again. They will put daddy to him for signature, and he will threaten them with his finger and say no to the guys too early, and for the fourth term, well, okay.
                3. +5
                  26 August 2013 14: 35
                  Quote: cosmos111
                  Vladimir Putin, the most influential world leader.
                  Compared to him, Obama is a puppy.
                  His word is law. He will say no to the war in Syria, it will never be.

                  laughing Made fun of laughing
          4. Airman
            +10
            26 August 2013 10: 38
            Quote: Denis
            Quote: Karavan
            Here, here is the hope for sanctions against American producers and debtors.

            What kind of nonsense, who in general, after the US attack on Syria, will take Russia seriously?

            Lavrov in a telephone conversation with Kerry noted that a possible military intervention in Syria is fraught with extremely dangerous consequences for the entire Middle East. The Russian side called for abstaining from pressure on Damascus.
            Kerry promised to carefully study the arguments of the Russian side.
            And if these ARGUMENTS were supported by a powerful Russian fleet, then the Americans would obviously listen to them. But Obama does not solve this issue, he is a puppet in the hands of puppeteers.
            1. S_mirnov
              +1
              26 August 2013 12: 48
              Quote: Povshnik
              And if these ARGUMENTS would be supported by a powerful Russian fleet

              If yes, if only mushrooms would grow in your mouth! So far, these arguments have been reinforced by the American and English fleet in Syria! And our fleet is not there!
              And Lavrov said nothing concrete! All his words are the maximum recommendation! If only he would threaten the base in Ulyanovsk to liquidate or a transit point, or what is it customary to call Putiners there?
          5. +5
            26 August 2013 11: 47
            Quote: Denis
            What nonsense who after the US attack on Syriawill take Russia seriously?

            Actually .. after the US attack on Syria, China may appear just the same first.
            Debt obligations to China, a quarter of the total oil supplied to the United States from Venezuela.

            American debt has not yet gone anywhere and has not dissolved.
            For the country in economic agonysimilar blows may turn out to be
            so to speak, "saving straw", the United States will send China three letters ... "forgive" everyone their debts .... and then they will start the country from a "clean" sheet .... "overthrow" Babamka, put a new one will be called the United States - New The United States and ends in water .. it’s too big for them, well, they can’t pay it off .. the oligarchic financial elite will still steer if you do not shoot it.
          6. +2
            26 August 2013 14: 26
            Quote: Denis
            What kind of nonsense, who in general, after the US attack on Syria, will take Russia seriously?

            After we canceled the contract for the supply of C-300 to Iran, no one takes us seriously. crying
          7. +2
            26 August 2013 16: 31
            If Russia leaves Syria in trouble, it will "lose face", its political weight will fall to the level of the plinth. Who will trust such an ally? We have no way back. No.
          8. 0
            26 August 2013 21: 43
            It’s still a shame for fraternal Serbia .. but what has changed in our armed forces now in case there is a war? Is the country ready for it now? To direct conflict, I think not ..
            If we add to all of the article listed by the author the support of Russia and China and other government forces of Syria according to the Vietnam War scheme, then it is possible. One cannot cope with such an onslaught, one must be objective .. here along with the rest - there will be a completely different effect! My personal opinion..
        2. +3
          26 August 2013 11: 00
          what are the sanctions of Russia? Need a hard show of strength! For example, declare war on Qatar and Saudi Arabia. SASHA will shout but will not intercede. And to knock out the entire economy of these states that way for 10 years. There are other ways, but I'm afraid our elite is closer to accounts in Western banks! I have big doubts that Russia will move beyond words somewhere, time is lost. They talked a lot about the S-300, but is it still where the Mediterranean squadron is? Only words and taking on a show-off, even the pind0sy understood it, and are no longer afraid! In short, they pissed away (I still hope not) Syria! I remember Vanga's prophecy. “Repeatedly she spoke about the coming arrival of a new teaching in the world, although the prophetess called this teaching the most ancient.
          “Soon the ancient, wisest teaching will come into the world. People ask me: "Will this time come soon?" - No, not soon. Syria has not yet fallen! "
          And that was 20 years ago. You want to believe, but you want not.
          I wish Syria victory, its people peace, and pind0sam torment!
        3. +5
          26 August 2013 11: 18
          Business, especially a large one, is supranational and disgusting - for the sake of profit and relations with "partners" the mother will sell her own. What do we have, what do the Chinese have
      2. +10
        26 August 2013 08: 50
        Quote: Civil
        5. All.

        You have a mistake and it is very big.
        1. An attack on Syria will lead to retaliatory attacks on American bases, there is nothing to lose Assad. There are a lot of examples.
        2. Chemistry in Syria is enough for the whole region, including Israel.
        3. One Syria does not end, all the neighbors are drawn into the warrior.
        4. Fire throughout the region and you will not remember that there is a weak pro-Western government. It simply will not.
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 08: 59
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          1. An attack on Syria will lead to retaliatory attacks on American bases; there is nothing to lose Assad.
          Can I have at least one?
          1. +4
            26 August 2013 10: 02
            Quote: Karavan
            Can I have at least one?

            The nearest base in Jordan, Israel, Turkey.
        2. Luger
          +1
          26 August 2013 09: 14
          All that you describe still needs to be done, and this is a bare theory. request
          1. +1
            26 August 2013 09: 18
            Quote: Luger
            and so it’s a bare theory.
            Do not confuse theory with prediction based on trends that are already taking place, and will only intensify if a full-scale war begins.
        3. -6
          26 August 2013 10: 21
          2. Chemistry in Syria is enough for the whole region, including Israel.

          If Syria uses chemical weapons (WMD) against the same Qatar, that is, on US bases, then the USA will use nuclear weapons.
          1. +2
            26 August 2013 17: 31
            And besides the minuses, is it weak to substantiate your disagreement with my point of view? Or does anyone have the illusion that the United States is not capable of using nuclear weapons?
            1. MVS
              MVS
              0
              26 August 2013 22: 06
              Quote: Muadipus
              Or does anyone have the illusion that the United States is not capable of using nuclear weapons?

              American politicians are far from being idiots, they understand well that we all live on the same planet and they will also get it. The ground operation in such events is likely to be, but without the use of nuclear weapons.
          2. 0
            27 August 2013 22: 23
            Syria is not a huge country. There, Israel will flood up with radioactive fallout and fly to Turkey.
            Heavy metals deposited in the soil (not only in Syria) will reduce land fertility to "0". The situation is not the same for the use of weapons of mass destruction of such power.
        4. 0
          26 August 2013 16: 49
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Fire in the whole region

          The entire Middle East is on fire. What will happen there, neither God nor Allah knows. There will be a monstrous mess. The Kurds, on the sly, will want to chop off a piece for themselves, Israel will decide to "expand" and go and go. Forgotten grievances will immediately be remembered, the settling of scores will begin. I don’t even want to think about what the conflict in one small country could turn out to be for the world.
      3. Luger
        0
        26 August 2013 09: 10
        Most likely it will be so, but all other options are fraught with undesirable consequences for us. Although maybe something extraordinary will come up with ours. what
      4. +3
        26 August 2013 10: 55
        Quote: Civil
        4. Both China and Russia, due to economic circumstances, will put up with the loss of the ally.


        Nonsense, as you can imagine - two countries that position themselves as potential centers of power in our time after two years of defending their interests in the UN will simply give up their position, they say, "ah, we are tired of it - do what you want."
      5. 0
        26 August 2013 11: 04
        Most likely it will
      6. +10
        26 August 2013 11: 53
        I would add the sixth point .. All conversations about the revival of Russia can be forgotten .. we will simply cease to be considered .. if we could not protect the only ally who believes in us, what can I say .. all that remains is to lie under the gonsyatin and wipe our snot ..
      7. 0
        26 August 2013 13: 50
        Quote: Civil
        1. A pro-Western weak government.

        Is it with us? Who doesn’t understand this yet?
        Quote: Civil
        2. Sluggish civil war.

        Where?
        Quote: Civil
        4. Both China and Russia, due to economic circumstances, will put up with the loss of the ally.

        Well, where do we go?
      8. +2
        26 August 2013 13: 54
        Quote: Civil
        3. PMO closes in tartus.
        Maybe, so that the PMO in Tartus does not close, and the problem of aggression against Syria has become more problematic, Russia should have turned this PMO into a legal military base for a long time, and not rush about in doubts about its evacuation? The Russian military presence is a more weighty argument for serious intentions than efforts at the UN alone, especially since the United States on the UN decision has already wiped its smelly shoes. We will lose Syria, then there will be Iran, and the Yankees will come to the shores of the Caspian. Such a fucking movie ...
      9. -1
        26 August 2013 17: 30
        Civil (1) RU Today, 08:25 ↑

        If, I repeat, if the USA and K attack Syria, the result is as simple as 3 penny:
        1. A pro-Western weak government.
        2. Sluggish civil war.
        3. PMO closes in tartus.
        4. Both China and Russia, due to economic circumstances, will put up with the loss of the ally.
        5. All.
        In short, yes, I completely agree. Only it seems to me that THIS WAR will be much larger than the "Libyan". Russia and China will not openly intervene in the conflict, of course, but if Assad shows "worthy and lasting" resistance with weapons, they will help. Yes, and Iran you shouldn't write off with Hezbollah, so it won't work as quickly as in Libya.
      10. 0
        26 August 2013 17: 32
        The main thing is this quote:
        The above analysis is extremely superficial.

        Everything else is from the evil one.
      11. 0
        26 August 2013 22: 40
        It’s not so simple as it seems. Perhaps there are pitfalls, something like that ..
      12. mnn_13
        +1
        27 August 2013 02: 04
        ...
        5. All.


        Very superficially Comrade General, very short-sighted. It will not be all this will be just the beginning. Anglo-Saxons will stop if and only when they get a powerful fist in the face. When Wang said that the third world will begin after the fall of Syria, it was impossible to understand the meaning of these words. Now everything is getting more and more clear.
        Rossi’s problems are not what Tartus will lose in what happens after that ...
      13. +1
        27 August 2013 03: 40
        Quote: Civil
        If, I repeat, if the USA and K attack Syria, the result is as simple as 3 penny:
        1. A pro-Western weak government.
        2. Sluggish civil war.
        3. PMO closes in tartus.
        4. Both China and Russia, due to economic circumstances, will put up with the loss of the ally.
        5. All.

        And for now, everyone. And in a year or two the same story will repeat itself with Iran. Then they will cut Russia economically (unforgettable about the importance of the region in terms of oil wires) and then, even a little after that, they will climb Russia. They’ll just finish their missile defense and wait until our strategic nuclear forces are reduced to their guaranteed missile defense level. This must be understood today and act accordingly. And then everything looks a little more complicated than a 4-point puzzle. PS. I hope that upstairs there, it’s not the boys from the street who are sitting in the street, and they can calculate the situation for the long term. Maybe they put something in Syria so that it is guaranteed to crash the aircraft carrier, even if not to drown, but so that it was beautiful. This would most sober up the Americans and the most important thing is that we have nothing to do with it.
      14. Vasya Ivanov
        0
        27 August 2013 05: 43
        Not all. The credibility and trust in Russia will drop very much, and this is suicide for us.
    3. +6
      26 August 2013 08: 25
      Quote: DocKlishin
      It feels like the world is going crazy.

      The world went crazy earlier with attacks on Belgrade. It was then that the United States began to lie actively and laid on the UN.
      Quote: DocKlishin
      The question is, how can we restrain Western aggression against Syria?

      Only by sending a military there, no more request
      Quote: DocKlishin
      with 300 whether it is or not

      With 300, the situation will not be reversed, and tamogafs will quickly drown them out.
      Quote: DocKlishin
      . Where is China? Why is Iran silent?

      If they hit Syria, everything will get out of control, what will not be known further, given how much chemistry Assad has and where the missiles can fly. A lot depends on Iran’s position now.
      1. Natalia
        +14
        26 August 2013 09: 38
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: DocKlishin
        The question is, how can we restrain Western aggression against Syria?
        Only by sending a military there, no more


        That's right, Sasha ... and you have to be complete idiots to let the Qatari people lay a gas pipe to Europe.
        Hi, by the way. wink
        At the same time, it is not necessary to fight with anyone (well, or at least with the United States) since they themselves will not attack the positions of the Russian troops.
        The winner will be the one who first occupies the territory. If the Americans are the first to take positions, we will not attack them, if we take them they will not risk us either. winked
        1. +4
          26 August 2013 09: 45
          Natasha hi
          Quote: Natalia
          .and you have to be complete idiots to let the Qatari people lay a gas pipe to Europe.

          Pipe in clubs sarin what Yes, the forests are laying, all fun for the terrorists laughing
          Quote: Natalia
          since they themselves will not attack the positions of the Russian troops.

          This is the only thing that can stop them, but ours will not be sent request
          Quote: Natalia
          The winner will be the one who first occupies the territory.

          Maybe we will immediately borrow Washington wink
          1. +5
            26 August 2013 11: 00
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Maybe we will immediately borrow Washington
            Not without Sparrow I will not go. You have not abandoned your dream of a paid toilet in the oval office? laughing
            1. +4
              26 August 2013 12: 19
              Quote: Mechanic
              You have not abandoned your dream of a paid toilet in the oval office?

              Cabins have already been purchased, you have 10 visits for free wink
          2. Natalia
            +1
            26 August 2013 11: 07
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            The pipe in the clubs Sarin Yes, the Forests are laying, all fun for the terrorists

            With your lips and honey to drink ... wink
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            This is the only thing that can stop them, but ours will not be sent

            here he is .....
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Maybe we will immediately borrow Washington

            come on then all over California bully
            Schwarzenegger will give me a heel massage, Brad Pete bring me slippers, and Jason Statham turn the lights on and off ... oh yes, and Sitven Seagal will be my personal cook bully
            1. +2
              26 August 2013 12: 21
              Quote: Natalia
              Schwarzenegger will give me a heel massage, Brad Pete bring me slippers, and Jason Statham turn the lights on and off ... oh yes, and Sitven Seagal will be my personal cook

              Hm, well, and your appetites wassat
              1. Natalia
                -1
                26 August 2013 17: 35
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Hm, well, and your appetites

                Yes, yes ... I have great appetites, although I don’t eat a lot of starchy foods (something dietary), that's why Steven Seagal will be my cook winked
                1. +1
                  26 August 2013 18: 36
                  Seagal is already old and doesn’t know how to cook, better I’ll be a cook :)
                  1. Natalia
                    -1
                    26 August 2013 19: 35
                    Quote: Anatolich
                    Seagal is already old and doesn’t know how to cook, better I’ll be a cook :)

                    laughing laughing laughing
                  2. +3
                    26 August 2013 20: 38
                    Quote: Anatolich
                    Seagal is already old and doesn’t know how to cook, better I’ll be a cook :)

                    Do you have bulletproof vest?
                    laughing
        2. +5
          26 August 2013 10: 27
          Quote: Natalia
          since they themselves will not attack the positions of the Russian troops.

          There are "bearded" ones. And "200 and 300" will go to Mother Russia.
          Quote: Natalia
          and you have to be complete idiots to let the Qatari people lay a gas pipe to Europe.

          Only a gas pipe question?
          Dozens of pipelines can be laid there.
          And who will consume the products of the Afghan collective farmers? Only in weak and not prosperous countries is it possible to repeatedly increase sales.
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Maybe we will immediately borrow Washington

          There will be a shortage without London. winked
    4. Veles25
      +3
      26 August 2013 08: 28
      .....................
      1. +3
        26 August 2013 08: 36
        Quote: Veles25
        Veles25 Today, 08:28 ↑

        Yes, Europe has long stuck its tongue in ... let them continue to be watched.
        1. +1
          26 August 2013 09: 29
          Quote: Denis
          Yes, Europe has long stuck its tongue in ... let them continue to be watched.

          It is true that Europe, like the United States, does not smell here, the main players in TNCs and Israel.
    5. artemiy
      +6
      26 August 2013 09: 33
      Here you can see who put the chemical weapons! 1.02!
      1. +3
        26 August 2013 11: 32
        Artemy, of course, everyone knew and knows that the army does not use chemical weapons, but the Amers do not care deeply about public opinion. These bandits can only be stopped by force.
    6. +7
      26 August 2013 09: 35
      Quote: DocKlishin
      It feels like the world is going crazy. Here WHERE the French, British and others climb ...

      They do not climb, but those who in fact run these states, This is Zionism.
      Quote: DocKlishin
      Why is Iran silent?

      Iran is just not silent, they warned the west.
      1. -6
        26 August 2013 09: 50
        Quote: ATATA
        Quote: DocKlishin
        It feels like the world is going crazy. Here WHERE the French, British and others climb ...

        They do not climb, but those who in fact run these states, This is Zionism.
        Quote: DocKlishin
        Why is Iran silent?

        Iran is just not silent, they warned the west.

        Dear, maybe change the plates, Zionism, Zionism, in Syria the interests of Gazprom (Russia) and Qatar clashed with Saudi Arabia, I live 40 km from the border with Syria and 1000 to Damascus, do you really think that Israel can benefit from a last but strong salvo of missiles, not water pipes.?
        1. +8
          26 August 2013 10: 15
          Quote: igor67
          that Israel can benefit from the last but strong volley of missiles, not water pipes.?
          Hi Igor. Believe me, those who decide on the lower tip of the tie and on you and on your neighbors and even on the neighboring country. The question is different. If the Yankees with the support of Israel and the Turks climb into Syria, this will be a direct termination of any relations with Russia, China, etc. They don’t care about the mattress covers, but Israel will have to squeeze it out for a long time (think how the economy of Israel will fuck it) then with its neighbors, and it will not seem to the Turks (it will most likely come out of them like Egypt).
          1. +1
            26 August 2013 10: 21
            Quote: Mechanic
            Quote: igor67
            that Israel can benefit from the last but strong volley of missiles, not water pipes.?
            Hi Igor. Believe me, those who decide on the lower tip of the tie and on you and on your neighbors and even on the neighboring country. The question is different. If the Yankees with the support of Israel and the Turks climb into Syria, this will be a direct termination of any relations with Russia, China, etc. They don’t care about the mattress covers, but Israel will have to squeeze it out for a long time (think how the economy of Israel will fuck it) then with its neighbors, and it will not seem to the Turks (it will most likely come out of them like Egypt).

            Hi Zhenya !! I think about it every day, I am drifting on the sky, I think I’m wondering .....? !!!!! drinks
        2. +7
          26 August 2013 10: 21
          Quote: igor67
          Dear, maybe change the records, Zionism, Zionism, in Syria, the interests of Gazprom (Russia) and Qatar clashed with Saudi

          Igor AU ??? What pipelines, they only plan. Nabucco is already built lol Not Qatar plays a role there, but the United States.
          Quote: igor67
          Do you really think that the last but strong salvo of missiles can benefit Israel?

          Judging by how events are developing, this is exactly so.In a telephone conversation with The Times of Israel, a representative of the Yarmouk Martyrs' Brigade (this group abducted UN peacekeepers in March and May), Laet Horan said: “We fight only with Assad. “We don’t need anything from Israel, and we want Israel to know about it.”
          “We have no complaints against third countries, we just want to deal with Assad,” Horan emphasized. In an interview with The Times of Israel, Horan went so far as not stingy with praise for Israel, which provides medical assistance to rebels wounded in border areas. Currently, about two dozen rebels are undergoing treatment in Israeli hospitals, and an Israeli field hospital has been deployed to provide immediate assistance to the wounded near the border.

          Israeli generals are not far behind

          Israel accuses Assad of using chemical weapons
          An Israeli general accuses the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad of using chemical weapons during a civil conflict. Brigadier General Itay Brun at a military conference said that Syria used such weapons
          1. +1
            26 August 2013 10: 28
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: igor67
            Dear, maybe change the records, Zionism, Zionism, in Syria, the interests of Gazprom (Russia) and Qatar clashed with Saudi

            Igor AU ??? What pipelines, they only plan. Nabucco is already built lol Not Qatar plays a role there, but the United States.
            Quote: igor67
            Do you really think that the last but strong salvo of missiles can benefit Israel?

            Judging by how events are developing, this is exactly so.In a telephone conversation with The Times of Israel, a representative of the Yarmouk Martyrs' Brigade (this group abducted UN peacekeepers in March and May), Laet Horan said: “We fight only with Assad. “We don’t need anything from Israel, and we want Israel to know about it.”
            “We have no complaints against third countries, we just want to deal with Assad,” Horan emphasized. In an interview with The Times of Israel, Horan went so far as not stingy with praise for Israel, which provides medical assistance to rebels wounded in border areas. Currently, about two dozen rebels are undergoing treatment in Israeli hospitals, and an Israeli field hospital has been deployed to provide immediate assistance to the wounded near the border.

            Israeli generals are not far behind

            Israel accuses Assad of using chemical weapons
            An Israeli general accuses the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad of using chemical weapons during a civil conflict. Brigadier General Itay Brun at a military conference said that Syria used such weapons

            I think Babama put pressure and very hard, until this minute Israel was officially neutral, but here, before the bombing, the barns need allies, if the UN does not agree to "democracy", ours and Abu Mazen sat down at the negotiating table, there, too, the games began
            1. 0
              26 August 2013 12: 23
              Quote: igor67
              but here, before the bombing of the barns, allies are needed, if the UN does not agree to "democracy"

              Already have it all hi Britain will not be guided by the UN Security Council in resolving the Syrian issue, reports Reuters

              RIA News. Turkey will join any coalition against the regime of Bashar al-Assad, even if there is no official decision of the UN Security Council, Reuters reported on Monday, citing the country's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu
        3. 0
          26 August 2013 16: 00
          Quote: igor67
          Dear, maybe change the plates, Zionism, Zionism, in Syria the interests of Gazprom (Russia) and Qatar clashed with Saudi Arabia, I live 40 km from the border with Syria and 1000 to Damascus, do you really think that Israel can benefit from a last but strong salvo of missiles, not water pipes.?

          Well, judging by the statement of your president that the world community MUST (again, something Israel should) withdraw chemical weapons from Syria, then yes. The rulers of Israel from Syria, something is needed.
          P.S. We all share Jews and Zionism, just as we separate Germans and fascism.
    7. Ruslan_F38
      +6
      26 August 2013 10: 04
      This is the third world, can not be called otherwise. Russia is unlikely to be able to do anything, too late, and the current leadership of the country will not have enough political will. I hope at least modern weapons have been put. In addition to armaments, you can transfer mercenaries to fight on Assad’s side, Hezbollah, Iran and other allies should do the same, and everyone who supports Syria. Do not give the opportunity to the United States, Israel to eliminate Assad and seize the country. In general, this is a spit in the face of Russia. World insanity.
      The next step, after the destruction of Syria and Iran, is waiting for the bearded men in Russia. Although they are already here now, for those who do not think so and are in euphoria from the Universiade and the "great accomplishments" of United Russia and our government, I propose to take off their eyes and cook their glamorous, liberal "point" if there is no dough to dump abroad ...
    8. smersh70
      -21
      26 August 2013 10: 27
      Quote: DocKlishin
      The question is, how can we restrain Western aggression against Syria?



      Yes, no matter how !!!! Everything is over .. earlier Assad had to think when the first demonstrations took place .. it was necessary to carry out reforms .... let off steam .... he doesn’t even have the strength to defend against some rebels - collective farmers, not to mention the US military machine !!!!!!!! look at his equipment, they are fighting without infantry, because the main part has fled ... so soon he will die .... hi
      1. Lech from ZATULINKI
        +12
        26 August 2013 10: 32
        Oh oh we give up.
        If the Vietnamese listened to such arguments, they would have long lost the war against the United States.
        Thank God there were people in VIETNAM able to give an organized rebuff to the US military machine.
        ASAD will fight to the end and surrender to the grace of the United States is not going to - well done and we must support him in all directions.
        1. smersh70
          +2
          26 August 2013 10: 42
          Quote: Lech s ZATULINKI
          If the Vietnamese listened to such arguments, they would have long lost the war against the United States.


          compared Vietnam and Syria !!!!!!!! at that time the USSR was behind Vietnam and not just standing ... but there was a confrontation between 2 systems ... and the USSR was helping both with armaments and people ... and money .... plus also China ... why don’t I see Russian calculations of the S-300 in Syria .... or Chinese volunteers .. fellow fighting for the construction of the communist system in Syria .... Probably Assad is definitely not Ho Chi Minh .... by the way, remember 1983, how his father shot the Communists .... where were you then ... by the way the Communist Party was banned there .. .. smile ..
          1. Lech from ZATULINKI
            +5
            26 August 2013 10: 49
            Of course, you know, the regimes supported by the USA also committed crimes.
            Moreover, these were massacres in the name of so-called democracy.

            As for assistance to ASADU, you are well aware of assistance from Iran, as well as about the supply of weapons to ASADU from RUSSIA (I emphasize the legitimate ones)
            in contrast to the illegal supply of weapons to killers and cannibals from the opposition (WEAPON GOES IN A POWERFUL FLOW from LIBYA from the warehouses of GADDAFI).
      2. +2
        26 August 2013 11: 33
        Remember my friend, a wounded beast is always more dangerous, because he has nowhere to go and he will fight to the last. Especially in the Assad army, people who lost their loved ones in this war, children and parents who were brutally killed by bandits with lousy beards are fighting. The Syrians are now taking revenge in the foreground and I am sure that it will be very difficult for the Amers to fight with this people, especially since the Syrian people can go to a guerrilla war, and it is very difficult and useless to fight a people who are not afraid of fighting. Amer if they enter Syria for being stuck there for a long time and no technology will help them.
        1. +1
          26 August 2013 16: 09
          this, of course, is all right and I would like it to be if these dumbheads climb into Syria, but they all said the same thing about Iraq and Libya, only where is Sadam and Gaddafi now, it's not fun
      3. +2
        26 August 2013 11: 40
        Quote: smersh70
        Yes, no matter how !!!! It's over .. earlier Assad had to think when the first demonstrations took place.


        There was taka in Spain - Dolores Ibaruri. Her words - Better to die standing than to live on your knees.

        And in a literal and figurative sense.
        1. smersh70
          +2
          26 August 2013 13: 29
          Quote: Sandov
          Better to die standing than to live on your knees.



          I agree! Super words !!!!!!!!
          but Ibarruri did not fulfill these words ... emigrated to the USSR where she died in the 80s ..... but her son heroically fought and died near Stalingrad !!!!!!!! .. so if you say high-flown the words ... must be carried out ...... by the way, but whoever minus do not go to Syria to write down Assad, I know inters ....... maybe you don’t know the way ... I can tell .... .....
      4. The Indian Joe
        +2
        26 August 2013 12: 22
        he doesn’t even have the strength to defend against some collective farmer rebels
        - nonsense. Wild ravings of a man who does not know the materiel at all and is not familiar with the situation in Syria would go superficially. Less to you.
        1. smersh70
          0
          26 August 2013 13: 14
          Quote: Native American Joe
          he doesn’t even have the strength to defend against some collective farmer rebels
          - nonsense. Wild ravings of a man who does not know the materiel at all and is not familiar with the situation in Syria would go superficially. Less to you.


          Oh well! And we didn’t know .. Asal controls all the entrances and exits of the country (border control, customs terminals ... cities, roads ....) .... look at the maps and information from the combat zones .... lost half of the country, if not more ...... or watch a video from battlefields .. tanks alone in the city, without cover ... infantry following tanks ..... no sweep groups can be seen .. battles already go 5 km from the international airport I understand, many here for it ... but the reality is .. whether you want it or not ..... the same thing you said here about Libya ... and about Turkey ..... that we will protect Ltviya that Erdogan will fall ... nothing of the kind happened ..... and soon he will be finished, although I am against Wahhabis ..... hi
    9. Dimonanet
      +5
      26 August 2013 10: 49
      It’s not easy, Russia got the right to host the Olympics, the World Cup 18 and a bunch of other championships at the highest level ... The United States and Europe thereby take away huge funds from the country for infrastructure development, rather than building up military force ... And then they also boycott ! In general, another tricky knight move and pressure lever!
    10. +1
      26 August 2013 11: 52
      The above analysis is extremely superficial


      Yeah, and very))

      Quote: Denis
      I’m answering you specifically, Russia will not do anything. You can fight with the wrong hands, you could arm Syria, as the United States arms Israel


      What makes you think that Russia will not do anything, can rational argument be given? The coordinated position of Hezbollah, Syria, Iran, Russia and China can block the United States, even at the military level. In my opinion, no one wants to bring the situation to a global crisis.
    11. Ruslan_F38
      0
      26 August 2013 12: 47
      "Turkey will join any international coalition that opposes Syria, even if a broader consensus on military action is not reached in the UN Security Council. This statement was made on Monday, August 26, by Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu." - another six bares its teeth.
    12. +1
      26 August 2013 13: 33
      The only adequate option is the introduction into Syria of a limited Russian-Iranian-Chinese peacekeeping contingent with its housing in areas outside of active hostilities. There will be VERY many howling Anglo-Saxon geeks, but they will not be able to do anything, and the open bombardment of Syria will already mean the direct start of the 3rd World War, no matter how crazy they are, they won’t do that
    13. -1
      26 August 2013 13: 48
      Quote: DocKlishin
      The question is, how can we restrain Western aggression against Syria?

      No way. This is a no brainer. Diplomacy ends. But there’s no muscle.
      Quote: DocKlishin
      Where is China? Why is Iran silent?

      Who wants to get on the rampage? Today in the world there is no force capable of withstanding the US army. I’m generally silent about NATO.
      Quote: DocKlishin
      debts then write off sysh as it should ...

      The USA has no debts. There is a scam for divorcing countries that are addicted to dollars.
    14. eplewke
      +2
      26 August 2013 14: 34
      Raise the entire Black Sea Fleet to high alert, and the Caucasian Military District, bring the Strategic Missile Forces and Space Forces into combat mode, and conduct exercises to relocate the SV to Novorossiysk. And Putin will make an urgent visit to Beijing. This will cool the hot heads of pseudo-democrats.
      1. +1
        26 August 2013 15: 35
        Quote: eplewke
        Raise the entire Black Sea Fleet to higher combat readiness,

        The entire Black Sea fleet is not suited to Turkish soles .....
        Quote: eplewke
        and the Caucasian Military District

        Southern Military District ...
        Quote: eplewke
        Bring troops of the Strategic Missile Forces and Space Forces into combat mode; Conduct exercises for the redeployment of SV to Novorossiysk And Putin will make an urgent visit to Beijing.

        And the Anglo-Saxons should block our accounts in their banks (both official and non-official; put under house arrest their children who live and study there; lower the price of a barrel of oil, at least 20 dollars, that's enough for us; refuse to purchase Russian gas and switch to Qatari; and also block the sale of food to us.
        Quote: eplewke
        This will cool the hot heads of pseudo-democrats.

        It will cool all our heads! wassat
    15. Basil123
      0
      26 August 2013 17: 58
      It seems to me that now it’s really 1 acceptable way to introduce a couple of regiments of peacekeepers and stupidly wait. So we will save the face of our country. Well, it will be clear what the West is seeking. To bomb the Russian military ................ means they want this. So at least the initiative will be with us. And to deliver weapons insolently. hi
    16. +2
      26 August 2013 18: 33
      the world is not crazy. Americans and their allies carry out their programs. Alas, but this is a real fact.
    17. +2
      26 August 2013 19: 33
      For the French, Italians, English, Africa and the Middle East are traditional patrimonies if you are not in the know. In particular, Syria is a former protectorate of France.
      China defends its interests, Syria is violet to him. More precisely, not quite at all - a mess is beneficial for China, because it weakens both Russia and the countries of the West.

      Iran is not silent, it actively sponsors Syria and sends military specialists.
    18. +1
      26 August 2013 19: 43
      Quote: DocKlishin
      The question is, how can we restrain Western aggression against Syria?

      Colleagues, I have found a solution to the problem.
      If Russia does not stand in direct confrontation with the NATO bloc (and not really necessary) and cannot defeat it completely and completely without significant losses, then I suggest that this NATO block is naeb .. in the sense of showing a military trick.
      The thought is simple to disgrace: Russia itself needs to declare war on Syria (or Syria of Russia) and quickly conquer this state within 2-3 hours, where human rights are so grossly violated. This war will go down in history not only as the fastest, but also the fastest bloodless - after all, during all 2 hours of the war, not a single person was injured or injured !!! Naturally bloody dictator Assad will be transported to Sochi where he will be detained from the guria in some strict 5-star prison hotel. After 20-30 years of meticulous proceedings of the crime will not be detected and he will be acquitted.
      Meanwhile, in order to restore order, restore democracy, human rights and the economy, the Russian Armed Forces OKV, parts of the IRGC to protect Iran’s borders and prevent the infiltration of militants, as well as 3-5 million Chinese volunteer workers to deal with the rubble will be introduced into captured Syria.
      And this is a completely different calico and it is unlikely that our sworn friends will go into the country where there are peaceful foreign specialists and where the parts and formations of peaceful Russian tractors are located.
      In the meantime, the countries will unanimously restore the Syrian economy, time will pass, and there you look and Assad will return home.
      Well something like that.
      Well, what is it, if there are football contractual matches, why not be a contract war? Politics, ep.
      1. +3
        26 August 2013 19: 54
        Quote: Onotolle
        Colleagues, I have found a solution to the problem.


        Quote: Onotolle
        Meanwhile, in order to restore order, restore democracy, human rights and the economy, the Russian Armed Forces OKV and parts of the IRGC will be introduced into captured Syria to protect Iran’s borders and prevent militant infiltration

        As I understand it, the son of ONOTOLE, the same udet is part of the contingent, and the pope will be glad if he gives his life for the freedom of Syria, like thousands of Russians like him.
        By the way, regarding the ksir - deuce to you - a miserable likeness of ONOTOL - Syria and Iran do not have a common border.

        Quote: Onotolle
        as well as 3-5 millions of Chinese volunteer workers to clear up the rubble.

        As I understand it, the same you will pay for these volunteers. And, that the Syrians are not accustomed to receive for free, now the Chinese volunteers will rake rubble for them
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 21: 18
          Quote: atalef
          By the way, regarding the ksir - deuce to you - a miserable likeness of ONOTOL - Syria and Iran do not have a common border.

          So if your quick wits could argue on an equal footing with your self-confidence, you would understand that in this situation it doesn’t matter: does Iran have a border with Syria, does Iran have a border with Syria, the main thing is that everything is fine with you.
          But the United States, with neither Libya nor Iraq, has a common border, nonetheless.
          Quote: atalef
          As I understand it, the son of ONOTOLE, the same udet is part of the contingent, and the pope will be glad if he gives his life for the freedom of Syria, like thousands of Russians like him.

          You say so, as if there was something bad about it.

        2. 0
          26 August 2013 21: 24
          Quote: atalef
          As I understand it, the same will pay for these volunteers.

          Well, I believe that 3-5 million Chinese will feed themselves, because there are so many small, but proud and rich countries.
      2. +1
        26 August 2013 20: 30
        remembered the janitor from "12 chairs"))) is it possible to get so drunk for a ruble? - you can.
    19. 0
      27 August 2013 13: 35
      What is one S-300 division? Air defense, able to repel an attack from the air say squadron fu-16. But if the fu-16s fly in their own airspace and each 3-4 missiles are launched from there, then the s-300 will not save. It will simply be destroyed. Of course, the same s-300 can bring down these aircraft, but then there will be a serious precedent - an attack on the air forces of a sovereign state, and in this case no one will help Syria. So the S-300 is essentially the Russian response to the West that we are not giving in. There is no question of defense here!
    20. The comment was deleted.
  2. faraon
    +4
    26 August 2013 08: 11
    I give a good article a plus, a good analysis. Thanks to the author for the work done.
    Just nothing to add.
  3. +2
    26 August 2013 08: 11
    The United States does not care about its allies, they are all on a short leash .. and Russia is far away.
    1. Airman
      +2
      26 August 2013 09: 05
      Quote: Denis
      The United States does not care about its allies, they are all on a short leash .. and Russia is far away.

      And here our powerful Navy with aircraft carriers that are not there would be useful. But BDK aircraft carriers and frigates cannot be stopped. We do not have the strength to confront the Americans at sea, with the exception of the submarine fleet. And I don’t think that the USA and Co. are bluffing.
    2. 0
      26 August 2013 10: 36
      Quote: Denis
      and Russia is far away.

      How many Russian citizens are in Syria?
      1. 0
        26 August 2013 12: 18
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        How many Russian citizens are in Syria?

        Does the USA care?
        1. -1
          26 August 2013 14: 00
          Quote: Denis
          Does the USA care?

          And you?
          1. 0
            26 August 2013 14: 09
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And you?

            Excites, and not only me alone.
      2. +3
        26 August 2013 19: 56
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        How many Russian citizens are in Syria?

        10 times less than in Israel (or maybe more), something has changed, now you want to breastfeed for Israel? By the way, there are more than a million Russian citizens in the USA, what will we do?
      3. -1
        26 August 2013 21: 32
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        How many Russian citizens are in Syria?


        And yet? How many? Is there a source on the site "close" to the Russian Foreign Ministry?
  4. +1
    26 August 2013 08: 11
    I do not believe that this will happen.
    1. +7
      26 August 2013 08: 12
      Quote: Ivan79
      I do not believe that this will happen.

      And who and what can prevent them ??? And most importantly, how?
      1. fedorovith
        +8
        26 August 2013 08: 59
        They can only be prevented by one furious blow, otherwise it will be infinite, because they need to live on something, and robbery of these people is the norm of life. They created their country in a similar way.
        1. -1
          26 August 2013 09: 02
          Quote: fedorovith
          They can only be prevented by one furious blow.


          Only nuclear weapons will save the world from bandits from the highway, and this is still unacceptable
        2. Andrey312
          +4
          26 August 2013 09: 47
          Instead of delivering anti-ballistic, anti-aircraft and anti-ship weapon systems to Syria, we clapped our ears and believed in the non-intervention of the West in the conflict. If there was a danger that not all taking off planes would return, and not all ships sailing to Syria would be able to sail, the United States and its allies would not have issued anything except formidable warnings ....
          1. +5
            26 August 2013 12: 26
            Quote: Andrey312
            Instead of delivering anti-ballistic, anti-aircraft and anti-ship weapon systems to Syria, we clapped our ears and believed in the non-intervention of the West in the conflict.


            I wonder what they carry "THERE"

            "Schedule" of the movement of Russian large landing ships to the shores of Syria:

            08.12.12 "Novocherkassk" and "Saratov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            27.12.12 "Azov" and "Nikolai Filchenkov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            01.01.13 "Novocherkassk" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            09.01.13 "Azov" and "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            09.01.13 "Saratov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            12.01.13 "Novocherkassk" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            14.01.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            17.01.13 "Azov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            2? .01.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            04.02.13 "Azov" and "Saratov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            07.02.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            21.02.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            25.03.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            12.04.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            14.04.13 "Azov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            ??. 04.13 "Nikolai Filchenkov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            23.04.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            30.04.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            05.05.13 "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            1? .05.13 "Azov", "Alexander Shabalin" and "Kaliningrad" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            19.05.13 "Azov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            ??. 05.13 "Nikolai Filchenkov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            23.05.13 "Admiral Nevelskoy" and "Relight" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            27.05.13 "Azov" and "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            17.06.13 "Nikolai Filchenkov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            20.06.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            01.07.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            13.07.13 “Alexander Shabalin” and “Kaliningrad” - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            ??. 07.13 "Azov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            26.07.13 "Azov" and "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            31.07.13 “Minsk” and “Alexander Shabalin” - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            ??. 08.13 "Nikolai Filchenkov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            11.08.13 "Minsk" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            17.08.13 "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.
            18.08.13 "Admiral Nevelskoy" and "Relight" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
            20.08.13 "Azov" and "Alexander Shabalin" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

            Photo: BDK "Alexander Shabalin" (110) of the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Federation in the Dardanelles
            1. lds040580
              0
              27 August 2013 11: 48
              I welcome, but do not tell me the link, where did you get this schedule?
        3. +1
          26 August 2013 18: 44
          can you indicate a document stating that Russia is the guarantor of Syria’s security?
          if there is no such document, and nothing will hinder to do, then they are going to do
      2. +1
        26 August 2013 09: 02
        And if our ships will shoot down Amer’s cruise missiles ?! What will happen?)
        1. Grigorich 1962
          +11
          26 August 2013 09: 58
          this is a question ...... it is necessary to embark on the Tartus raid to our ships ..... then we'll see .....
          political and military will is needed for this ..... in short we are weakly checked
          1. -2
            26 August 2013 10: 04
            Quote: Grigorich 1962
            this is a question ...... it is necessary to embark on the Tartus raid to our ships ..... then we'll see .....
            political and military will is needed for this ..... in short we are weakly checked

            Already stood last year during the London Olympics, so what? How much then they discussed on the site, because everyone left then both the Amers and the British, there is simply not political will, or maybe economic, all one lion's share of gas sales will go to Miller, maybe Chubais and K,
        2. +3
          26 August 2013 11: 44
          In principle, they could help the humanitarian people of Syria to destroy not only cruise missiles, but also natofascist aviation.
        3. 0
          26 August 2013 18: 46
          ships can only respond when the Russian PMTO is attacked in tartus or the ships themselves. but the us and the allies are not stupid. they will not go for it
      3. +14
        26 August 2013 09: 51
        Quote: Denis
        And who and what can prevent them ??? And most importantly, how?

        It’s elementary to put Moscow and Kerch on both Tartus’s roads (both have a 300F) .... drive a Warsaw woman (at least from the north, at least where + a couple of patrol guards + from the north to BPC + conduct ongoing exercises in the area and declare the area a no-fly zone in connection with the exercises) and gradually replace the carts from Tof or from the North + Baltic ... and so on for a year !!!! ...... No one dares to start flying overhead to Syria !!
        1. Volkhov
          -3
          26 August 2013 14: 28
          Quote: gispanec
          put on the raid of Tartus Moscow

          Bet - the virtual fleet is obedient ... and big already.
        2. +1
          26 August 2013 18: 48
          what Do you think they will not find where to bomb Syria from? There is still a border with Jordan, Turkey, Iraq, Israel. Will there also put ships on the roadstead?))
    2. 0
      26 August 2013 09: 00
      I wonder why they rolled me a minus? Does anyone really want the situation in Syria to be aggravated many times?
      1. 0
        26 August 2013 10: 08
        Quote: Ivan79
        I wonder why they rolled me a minus?

        What are you so for + - worried?
        Are you here for their sake or do you defend your point of view?
        Quote: Ivan79
        Does anyone really want the situation in Syria to be aggravated many times?

        And there, and so not the "Maldives" and not the first day a loaf of bread crumbled to Syria, Iran, Russia.
        Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
        And if our ships will shoot down Amer’s cruise missiles ?! What will happen?)

        They will fly the other way.
        1. +2
          26 August 2013 10: 29
          Quote: Papakiko
          They will fly the other way.

          If you are hinting that in our direction, then I think that you got excited! hi
          1. +2
            26 August 2013 12: 00
            Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
            If you are hinting that in our direction, then I think that you got excited!

            Wai-wai some kind of joker panimaesh ZhPSi completely lost his mind and the rockets flew to drown, and there your ship was walking around a vokurat. How not Harasho happened. A-I-yay, A-Z-YA-y!

            Is Kursk not enough for you?
            1. 0
              26 August 2013 14: 03
              Quote: Papakiko
              Is Kursk not enough for you?

              There are many legends about "Kursk", and all with evidence, if you dig well in the internet, you can find a story that all this is the work of aliens! belay
              1. +1
                26 August 2013 14: 30
                Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
                that all this is the work of aliens

                Yes, of course, I am ready to "listen" to you all my biography.
                And in the video, too, UFOs fly.
                1. 0
                  26 August 2013 15: 03
                  I saw this for a long time, glory to our sailors, but what does this have to do with the Kursk and the missiles that will fly in our direction ?! Or do you want to say that the amers made a submarine such as a trireme, which rams enemy nuclear submarines (in particular "Kursk") ?!
                  1. +1
                    26 August 2013 15: 31
                    Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
                    Or do you want to say that the amers made a submarine such as a trireme, which rams enemy nuclear submarines (in particular "Kursk") ?!

                    Do not be foolish.
                    Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
                    I saw this for a long time, glory to our sailors, but what does this have to do with the Kursk and the missiles that will fly in our direction ?! ?!

                    And where are you on the resource with your thoughts?
                    1. -1
                      26 August 2013 15: 41
                      Quote: Papakiko
                      And where are you on the resource with your thoughts?

                      Nothing more to say ?! Then the topic is closed! hi
    3. +1
      26 August 2013 10: 45
      Nobody believed with Libya either .......
      1. 0
        26 August 2013 15: 05
        Quote: Igor39
        Nobody believed with Libya either .......


        I believe, I do not believe, sheer fortune-telling on "ryumashka" laughing , you can only trust the reports of the modern "Sorge" (I'm sure we have it!).
    4. Airman
      -1
      26 August 2013 11: 56
      Quote: Ivan79
      I do not believe that this will happen.

      Stalin, too, did not fully believe that Germany would attack the USSR.
  5. +8
    26 August 2013 08: 12
    Excerpts and courage B. Asad and the Syrian people! Article +
  6. Shumer
    +12
    26 August 2013 08: 12
    It seems to me lads, a geyropa with Syria specifically can interfere.
  7. +6
    26 August 2013 08: 13
    Syria, we are with you!
  8. Gur
    +12
    26 August 2013 08: 15
    Do you really rent again? If not why, then, the issue of bombing Syria is being discussed in the world, this should not be a priori. Where is our hard word, where is our NO? Where is the Chinese NO? Something tormenting me with doubts, yesterday Lebanon, today Syria? tomorrow is Kazakhstan with an American base? And when will we stop, when will we push our ass against the Kremlin wall?
    1. +2
      26 August 2013 08: 29
      Quote: GUR
      Do you really rent again?

      Now what can we do?
      1. nbw
        nbw
        +13
        26 August 2013 10: 09
        Pull warships to the conflict zone, become between Amer. fleet and our base, bring down the KR, finally, as mentioned above. The international bandits are too impudent.
        1. +1
          26 August 2013 10: 38
          Quote: nbw
          shoot down

          Imagine a common NATO group and their sixes, stupid missiles are not enough for us.
          1. +1
            26 August 2013 14: 07
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Imagine a common NATO group and their sixes, stupid missiles are not enough for us.


            Enough - NOT enough, the question is rhetorical, because it can be assumed that the DECISIVE actions of Russia will "knock the ardor" with the United States ...
      2. +8
        26 August 2013 10: 35
        Now what can we do?
        if the Yankees shit on the Russian-Chinese veto in the Security Council and international law ...... then hello freedom of action !!! send our fleet with full holds of air defense and anti-ship missiles, you can S-400 Triumph with our service staff and in all the media and at the diplomatic level we make an open statement that at the request of the legitimate government of Syria we are harnessing ourselves to fight international terrorism ........ ..amid such actions and such statements we’ll look at the gallant appearance of the Western ears of the terminators who have lived (they’ll bark, let’s go away, they still will have no other choice if they are not suicides) ..... if we confine ourselves to expressing deep indignation at UN meetings in New York, Russia will rise one step, according to international influence, with Cyprus and Tunisia
        1. Luger
          +1
          26 August 2013 10: 46
          just don’t need to say that you, dear, are also ready to go there, to serve triumphs and s-400 ... as we love to send everyone or write fiery speeches, but as for the matter, my mother didn’t let her go, then she’s flat-footed, or what excuse
          1. +10
            26 August 2013 11: 02
            you will not believe it - it’s ready ..... there is no flat feet, but there is a first discharge in boxing, 1 place in the category in the category up to 85 kg
            1. +2
              26 August 2013 11: 17
              Lavrov warned Kerry about the consequences of a possible intervention in Syria
              Updated: 11: 07 (Moscow time)
              Theme: Military conflict in Syria
              MOSCOW, Aug 26 - RIA News. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, in a telephone conversation with US Secretary of State John Kerry, noted that a possible military intervention in Syria is fraught with extremely dangerous consequences for the entire Middle East
              .......
              This is particularly relevant in light of the increasing evidence that the incident in East Ghout was the result of a staging of the implacable opposition in order to blame official Damascus for everything, the Foreign Ministry emphasized.

              Kerry promised to carefully study arguments of the Russian side. lol
              ........ everything seems to go according to the scenario
            2. Luger
              0
              26 August 2013 12: 05
              the first category in boxing is useful for you to drive homeless people out of the porch, and there you need the VUS-military specialty, and preferably, according to your needs, rocket men, tank crews, anti-aircraft gunners
              1. +2
                26 August 2013 12: 19
                just don’t say that you, dear, are also ready to go there
                I wrote to you about readiness, specifically at your request, ready to go - or not ready ........... there are the same homeless people, only bearded ones, they drive them on the same principle, and specialists in Russia without me there are many
            3. +3
              26 August 2013 18: 53
              )) will box with the tomahawks?)))
        2. 0
          26 August 2013 11: 58
          Quote: strannik595
          can S-400 Triumph

          We ourselves have how many of these C 400?
          1. +6
            26 August 2013 12: 23
            We ourselves have how many of these C 400?
            Alexander, if now we can manage with three or four S-400s, then tomorrow we won’t even have hundreds when we’ll knock on our door with a boot, about excess oil - a lack of democracy .....
          2. 0
            26 August 2013 12: 43
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            We ourselves have how many of these C 400?

            Wind, you set a minus here, justify or give figures, how many complexes we have.
        3. +1
          26 August 2013 13: 10
          Quote: strannik595
          that at the request of the legitimate government of Syria we are harnessing ourselves to the fight against international terrorism .........

          Russia can launch a missile strike at infrastructure facilities in Qatar and Saudi Arabia, well, one missile will "accidentally" sink something like Los Angeles, and no nuclear war will happen, sorry, let's pat on the shoulder and that's it.
          How is GLONAS already working?
        4. +1
          26 August 2013 18: 52
          First, do not forget to arm all air defense regiments located in RUSSIA with triumphs. Then send them to Syria
      3. Ruslan_F38
        +3
        26 August 2013 11: 40
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: GUR
        Do you really rent again?

        Now what can we do?

        You don't even need to fight the West. You just need to intervene. The Syrian leadership has previously appealed to the BRICS countries to send troops into Syria. If you bring in troops there, pull up the fleet - neither Israel, nor the United States, nor the boy "six" Cameron, let alone the "leaky" oland, I am silent about the Turks - they will not bomb Syria unambiguously, there will be provocations, but they will not "shoot" at Syria will be. But, I repeat, this requires political courage, and in general you need to have "eggs", it is not against Georgia to speak out.
        1. Ruslan_F38
          +4
          26 August 2013 12: 51
          The well-known Russian "geostrategist", president of the Academy of Geostrategic Problems, retired general Leonid Ivashov, believes that Russia will go to build up its naval grouping in the Mediterranean.

          Ivashov said the following: "Russia can strengthen the grouping of ships in the Mediterranean in retaliation. I think that there is nothing else left to prevent the development of the factor of aggression. We must more firmly declare non-interference in the internal affairs of Syria." - a reasonable offer.
        2. +1
          26 August 2013 14: 41
          To oppose Georgia is the same as adjusting the fleet to Syria. One to one. Amers are no less afraid of our 3-th world. To expose the fleet + diplomacy, then there will still be votes against (China. Iran, Venisuela, BRIC is possible) It is in this sequence. Not the first time. Understand that NATO is also not iron, it’s poured inside the Novodvorskiye bleed. And that’s all. But if on the contrary = tomorrow we will push our asses into the Kremlin.
  9. +13
    26 August 2013 08: 18
    This situation is starting to sound like Groundhog Day. Remember there was the same tension in the confrontation with Iran. It did not work to scare, but the face was not restored either. Now, from this intervention, the US callers will receive illusory advantages, which in fact will represent only a flurry of disadvantages, with no light in the future. For apricots, this is a stalemate and most likely the last dying breath.
    1. +3
      26 August 2013 11: 29
      True, this exhalation resembles the last exhalation of "Pzh" from the film "Kin-Dzadza"
      They need a good kick, and with a bang! angry
    2. +3
      26 August 2013 11: 38
      yes they have nowhere to go ..... if they do not blow off the soap bubble then the United States and they sang along with "tear" to shreds ..... war is a unique opportunity to write off debts. They are already trying this and that to turn their gamble ... If there is no war in the Middle East, then there will be a civilian in the United States with the introduction of Chinese troops ...

      In my opinion, they will still invade Syria, because they have no choice. Or try to keep the oligarchic regime from falling and further develop the idea of ​​world government, or become bogged down in a war with its own population .......

      As for Russia, we wait and see. Our leadership will not thoughtlessly throw troops into the furnace of war for the sake of ghostly prospects ... but one thing I can say for sure is the reaction will be harsh and unexpected for the United States and ... like the deployment of missiles in Cuba or joint Russian-Chinese exercises in the sea near Syria, UAE and so on .. We have real leverage. QUESTION IN OTHER WILL THEM APPLY?
  10. +17
    26 August 2013 08: 19
    Creatures, what creatures.
    1. Airman
      +3
      26 August 2013 09: 52
      Quote: Vladimirets
      Creatures, what creatures.

      Creatures are creatures, and they do what they want.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +8
    26 August 2013 08: 20
    ... The above analysis is extremely superficial. The main consequences for the participants of the attacking side will be millions of Syrian refugees, possible unrest within the participating countries, economic attacks by Russia, China and Venezuela. Well, on the little things: a retaliatory strike by the Syrian armed forces and their allies, numerous terrorist attacks, as well as a mass exodus into the homes of foreign fighters who fought in Syria ...
    Neither add nor diminish ...
    Just amazing as easy and simple as possible in the 21 century, to remove entire countries from the geopolitical map.
    And somehow strangely synchronously, one country is "knocked out" by military means, while the other - by "cajolement", promises and promises of paradise life in "future".
  13. Veles25
    +3
    26 August 2013 08: 20
    ..............................
    1. +2
      26 August 2013 09: 10
      The UN response would be something like this:
      Georgian judge for raping a boy ...
      Judge: - Tell me how it beat?
      - Sea - blue, blue; solntse - yellow, yellow; boy - ass pink, pink ... Eh !!!
      Judge: - Eh !!! Tell me again how it beat ...
      - Sea - blue, blue; solntse - yellow, yellow; boy - ass pink, pink ... Eh !!!
      Judge: - Eh !!! ... Malchik is to blame ...
  14. Boot under the carpet
    +2
    26 August 2013 08: 21
    God only knows what consequences await after the end of hell in Syria ... although God is no longer there.
    1. +2
      26 August 2013 16: 15
      Quote: Boot under the carpet
      God only knows what consequences await after the end of hell in Syria ... although God is no longer there.


      He is on the side of Syria. Syria defends its lands and sovereignty, and Syria is true.
  15. Crocodile
    0
    26 August 2013 08: 21
    The author deliberately left open the question of the role of Russia in this entire disaster. A variant of Libya is possible when the Russian leader behaved worse than a rag. A repetition of the South Ossetian version, associated with direct military intervention of the Russian army, is possible, but for one thing! The lack of a common border between Syria and Russia. A variant of Iraqi neutrality and non-intervention is also possible.
    A variant of South Ossetian - in this case - this is the third world!
    The Libyan or Iraq variant is the end of Russia as one of the world leaders!
    All this is a field of activity for diplomats, let's see who will outplay whom, but they are unlikely to start shooting ...
    1. +4
      26 August 2013 08: 26
      Quote: Crocodile
      All this is a field of activity for diplomats, let's see who will outplay whom, but they are unlikely to start shooting ...


      Given the cuts in the American army, do you think that the Americans and their allies will just so easily empty their ships to the other end of the world and back?
      1. +7
        26 August 2013 08: 29
        Quote: Karavan
        Given the cuts in the American army, do you think that the Americans and their allies will just so easily empty their ships to the other end of the world and back?

        Should we repeat the operation "Angara" - Is Mediterranean closer to the Caribbean?
        1. +1
          26 August 2013 08: 49
          Quote: stalkerwalker
          Should we repeat the operation "Angara" - Is Mediterranean closer to the Caribbean?


          More detail you can?
          1. +4
            26 August 2013 11: 54
            Quote: Karavan
            Quote: stalkerwalker
            Should we repeat the operation "Angara" - Is Mediterranean closer to the Caribbean?


            More detail you can?


            Cuba was saved from the destruction of p and n d about with and m and.
    2. +4
      26 August 2013 09: 00
      Quote: Crocodile
      A variant of Libya is possible when the Russian leader behaved worse than a rag. A repetition of the South Ossetian version, associated with direct military intervention of the Russian army, is possible, but for one thing! The lack of a common border between Syria and Russia.

      Rather, it is a Serbian scenario, the intervention can occur with the support of the UN and the leading roles of the United States, Great Britain and France. The United States is persistently seeking a UN Security Council mandate; the actual "legal" substantiations and without the UN, the states will find more than enough. And this is already one to one similar to the NATO operation in Kosovo ..
    3. 0
      26 August 2013 11: 34
      with your lips and honey to drink!
    4. 0
      26 August 2013 13: 16
      Quote: Crocodile
      A variant of Libya is possible when the Russian leader behaved worse than a rag.

      The Russian president behaved normally. Libya needed to enlist the support of Russia BEFORE the conflict began.
    5. consul
      0
      26 August 2013 14: 55
      Quote: Crocodile
      The lack of a common border between Syria and Russia.

      I suspect that a common border will be drawn as a result of attacks on Turkey, in this case. But the point is not that, but that Russia really does not want war, and those who run the United States want and in every way provoke it, as if someone or something drives them to this mess in the Middle East and along the entire coast of the Mediterranean Sea.
  16. +9
    26 August 2013 08: 25
    apparently, the backsides have already decided everything. probably they are waiting for a veto from Russia, and then they will start. will show the whole world that Russia should not be reckoned with, and along the way will solve their problems. it turns out to be an open confrontation between Russia and the "democrats", and if our leaders swallow it, that's all, the end.
  17. +18
    26 August 2013 08: 26
    Yes .... Jews, it’s not casual that a warehouse with yachts was bombed ......
    See all these sodomites (the United States and others like them) have already been planned ...
  18. optimist
    +22
    26 August 2013 08: 29
    This whole performance with "gases" is the same as the summer shot in Sarajevo in 1914. If we discard all emotions, then we should admit: the "hot" phase of the 3rd World War has already begun. Too many problems have accumulated in the world that cannot be solved by peaceful means. The author colorfully painted the "cons" for the American puppets, forgetting the phrase from the well-known anecdote: "The sheriff does not care about the problems of the Indians." The Stars and Stripes kids have already set the world with cancer twice in the last 100 years and had it to the fullest, removing the main "cream" from the two world wars. So why don't they do it again? As they say, nothing personal, just business. Well, Russia needs to prepare to meet this Muslim rabble on its borders (let's hope that there is still some time, like the 2 years that Stalin won against Hitler in 39).
    1. Crocodile
      +4
      26 August 2013 08: 35
      The fact of the matter is that we will not have two years ... And there will not be a year - after the start in Syria, either a chest in crosses or a head in the bushes!
  19. ramsi
    +15
    26 August 2013 08: 30
    what can I say to "our" thugs ... - "thanks" for the missiles not delivered
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 13: 09
      what can I say to "our" thugs ... - "thanks" for the missiles not delivered

      Delivered +, but to the point of these delivered missiles, when the Syrians are unlikely to use what they still have. They will probably bury their Bastion complex in the sand on the beach, like Hussein would bury his aircraft in Iraq. The same impression is with the existing Pantsir air defense systems. Even if we supply missiles there, it will be complete with service personnel as in Egypt, and we have no political will for that.
      1. Arabist
        +1
        26 August 2013 13: 14
        They delivered it to Egypt with personnel, but the Soviets fell into disgrace with Egypt and took the personnel out. As a result, the Arabs pissed off the Jews. So Egypt is not the best example, it still threw us and turned to the United States.
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 13: 23
          All the same, our calculations there Israeli planes beat. It is a fact. And the Arabs in every serious case strove to leave the position. That's the difference I mean. Well, if a friend, let Vietnam be an example then.
          1. Arabist
            0
            26 August 2013 13: 31
            Well, I agree. You're right.
  20. +10
    26 August 2013 08: 32
    csaty, lgbtshniki are also with them - went to war ... Debils !!! One, okay, they really need a war right now. The military budget was cut off and the loot was cut off the hotsa as before ... But I can't understand the brits and guardians, it's just that they don't think with their brains at all ... And about the pack of Saudi Turks in the face of Qatar (and where without God's chosen ) Isril even talk sickeningly these yapping where they show. By the way, as described in the article, they will suffer the most. It is a sin of course to think so ... And it serves you right! Sow the wind? then you will reap the storm. And there is no need to whine because Hezbollah is terrorizing you there. What would all the "valiant" invaders stay there.
  21. faraon
    +2
    26 August 2013 08: 38
    The Syrian authorities warned the United States against military intervention in this country and threatened that such a step "would create a fireball that will ignite the entire Middle East." So said the Syrian Minister of Information Omran Zoabi. In response to the growing threat of the US military operation, Syrian sources said that it "will not be a picnic for the Americans."

    Iran has also threatened America with "serious consequences" if it dares to intervene militarily.

    Until now, US President Barack Obama has refused a military operation in Syria, but after the recent (August 21) chemical attack on civilian objects, the implementation of which is suspected primarily of the Bashar al-Assad regime, pressure from proponents of intervention on the American administration has increased.

    Tomorrow, a delegation of UN controllers intends to visit the site where the chemical attack appears to have taken place. The security services of the United States and other Western countries "have almost no doubts" that the Assad regime used chemical weapons against citizens, including young children.

    A senior US official said Syria's decision to allow controllers access was "too late," and that the US administration had little doubt about the Assad regime's guilt.

    Russia welcomed Syria's decision to allow UN monitors free access to the site and warned the US that "hasty conclusions" about those responsible for the chemical attack "could lead to a tragic mistake."
    9tv.co.il
    1. +6
      26 August 2013 08: 44
      Quote: faraon
      Russia welcomed Syria's decision to allow UN monitors free access to the site and warned the US that "hasty conclusions" about those responsible for the chemical attack "could lead to a tragic mistake."

      What's the point, these same observers bought a chemical in Iraq. weapons ...
    2. Veles25
      -3
      26 August 2013 08: 49
      faraon Iran has also threatened America with "serious consequences" if it dares to intervene militarily.

      Iran will sit on its ass
      1. +2
        26 August 2013 09: 06
        Quote: Veles25
        Iran will sit on its ass

        Let's see who eventually sits on the ass.
      2. +2
        26 August 2013 14: 12
        Quote: Veles25
        Iran will sit on its ass


        Really learn how to use YOUR BACK for its intended purpose, and then you will have the right to talk about others ...
      3. +1
        26 August 2013 21: 35
        With her skinny ass on America's fat face ...
    3. +5
      26 August 2013 11: 41
      I immediately remembered Krylov's fable "the wolf and the lamb" and its ending "... your only fault is that I want to eat!"
    4. +1
      26 August 2013 11: 58
      The cunning amers have already declared the people of Syria guilty of all mortal sins. That’s who the terrorists are, and don’t have to go far. They are nearby.
      1. +2
        26 August 2013 15: 15
        Quote: Sandov
        The cunning amers have already declared the people of Syria guilty of all mortal sins. That’s who the terrorists are, and don’t have to go far. They are nearby.
  22. serge-68-68
    +19
    26 August 2013 08: 39
    Greetings to everyone who talks about the US "withdrawal" from the Middle East, its collapse, etc.! As I have said more than once, this oak will still make some noise (and at the same time it will win back in Syria for Russia's intractable position on Snowden).
    Now let's see further development?
    Will the US (and the allies) find a reason for this or that variant of the invasion of Syria? - Found it.
    Will the United States (and its allies) find forces for at least a limited (but certainly key) influence on the Syrian conflict? - found.
    Will they start hostilities? Unknown I would venture to suggest that everything will depend on: 1. The UN position on the use of ChemO in Syria. 2. The rigidity of the position of Russia.
    But: the rigidity of Russia's position is an unknown quantity. It's no secret that this position is largely a bluff. Objectively, the Russian Federation has neither the strength nor the means to confront the United States and its allies in Syria. Russia will not go to a global war for the sake of Syria
    Conclusion: the situation has become aggravated and will be resolved in the variant "who is bluffing whom", but with a little nuance - the United States is not quite bluffing.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 09: 03
      Quote: serge-68-68
      but with a little nuance - the United States is not completely bluffing.
      Good phrase! Need to remember!
    2. olviko
      +8
      26 August 2013 10: 09
      "Russia will not go to a global war for the sake of Syria"

      It all depends on the point of view - of course it won’t work for Syria, but for Russia ...?
      1. Ruslan_F38
        +6
        26 August 2013 10: 28
        Quote: olviko
        "Russia will not go to a global war for the sake of Syria"

        It all depends on the point of view - of course it won’t work for Syria, but for Russia ...?


        And for the sake of Russia, it will, if only the country's leadership has enough will to make such a decision. You don't even need to fight the West. You just need to intervene. The Syrian leadership has previously appealed to the BRICS countries to send troops into Syria. If you bring in troops there, pull up the fleet - neither Israel, nor the United States, nor the boy "six" Cameron, let alone the "leaky" oland, I am silent about the Turks - they will not bomb Syria unambiguously, there will be provocations, but they will not "shoot" at Syria will be. But, I repeat, this requires political courage, and in general you need to have "eggs", it is not against Georgia to speak out.
  23. Vespasian
    -3
    26 August 2013 08: 40
    US intervention in Syria is only beneficial to the "Saudis" who are campaigning and promote this topic. The Americos (especially the "dermocrats") clearly do not want to promote their projects, but so far there is nowhere to go. It seems that the statements on the build-up of the grouping in the Mediterranean Sea and the threats to start invasions are all limited. Beirut Americans remember very well.
  24. faraon
    +1
    26 August 2013 08: 43
    Amid reports of Pentagon preparations for a possible Syrian attack, Minister of Propaganda Assad Amran al-Zouabi sends warnings to the United States, Israel and other US allies in the region.

    Speaking on television, Zouabi said that the war against Syria will not be a “picnic” or “walk” for anyone, and it will not improve the situation, as it will have very dangerous consequences.

    “A ball of fire is burning in the Middle East,” said Assad, the Minister of Propaganda. “US pressure is not productive,” he emphasized. - This is a waste of time. Syria will not give up the fight against terror. "

    Earlier in an interview with the Washington Post, a senior official in the Obama administration said the United States would "act very purposefully," and the decisions of the American leadership "will serve US national interests and advance US goals in Syria." “When the facts are clarified, the president will make a sound decision on what to do,” he added
  25. +4
    26 August 2013 08: 43
    Bullshit, there will be no war, it’s already posture. Moreover, Merkel also supports Putin’s position on Syria. Yes, and our darkest still has more iron than Obama’s.
    1. +4
      26 August 2013 09: 09
      Quote: nemec55
      Bullshit, there will be no war

      It is never too late to untie a warrior. And why do you think it's too late?
      Quote: nemec55
      Moreover, Merkel supports Putin’s position on Syria

      And what does Merkel decide and who in Washington will listen to her?
      Quote: nemec55
      And our darkest still has more iron eggs than Obama.

      And that from this bomb will stop exploding?
      1. +2
        26 August 2013 09: 25
        Alexander. You shouldn’t underestimate Germany. It’s a very big argument in starting a war (the Americans simply simply will not start a war without its support). Late because the opinions of the countries of the world have already changed in our and Syrian favor. Well, the iron balls of the Darkest (after Georgia) show that they can and fuck. hi
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 10: 40
          Quote: nemec55
          You underestimate Germany in vain

          Alas, Germany is not the same and will not go against the position of Israel. Amer without Israel’s approval will not climb into Syria. If they climb then ... good received hi And by the way, Germany is already for
    2. slvevg
      0
      26 August 2013 10: 24
      nemec55
      Moreover, Merkel supports Putin’s position on Syria

      But what about double standards? wink
  26. faraon
    +2
    26 August 2013 08: 47
    Iranian news agency Fars reported that the deputy chief of the general staff of the Iranian army, Masood Jaziri, has demanded that America not try to resolve the Syrian issue by military means, warning that the move "would have serious consequences for the White House."

    At the same time, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Jawad Zarif said the Syrian government had promised his country that he would allow UN inspectors to visit areas where it was allegedly used chemical weapons against civilians. He made this statement in an interview with the Iranian channel in English Fars TV.

    "We are in close contact with the Syrians, and they have assured us that they did not use these inhuman weapons. They intend to cooperate with UN experts to visit the areas under discussion," Zarif said by telephone to Italian Foreign Minister Emma Bonino.

    Recall that US Secretary of State John Kerry held a telephone conversation on Saturday night with the Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Muall, during which he demanded that UN inspectors be immediately allowed to the scene of mass deaths in the vicinity of Damascus.

    Earlier, US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said that the army is ready for military intervention in Syria if it receives an order from President Barack Obama. However, most Americans do not support this intervention.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 12: 03
      Pharaoh. Amer’s incontinence in all international affairs is obvious. By and large, they do not care about the opinion of other states. The fact that after that they will lose face. So they have long lost it. Even in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, etc.
  27. Crocodile
    +10
    26 August 2013 08: 48
    Yes, the war has begun - but so far only information, a test of nerves ..
    At a meeting of the UN Security Council, which was hastily convened on the night of 22 in August, representatives of the United States and Western countries squealed that the chemical weapon was used and demanded a tough resolution. But Russia presented data from satellites, according to which the missiles were launched from the Duma area in 1-35 on the night of August 21. They were released from the territory, which is under the control of the militants, and came to areas that are also under the control of the "opposition". These were artisanal rockets similar to the one used in the Khan Al-Asal area of ​​Aleppo Province.


    The dampress.net website provides further details: the missiles may have been fired by an Islamist extremist organization called the Islamic Brigade, which is led by bandit Zahran Alush.

    After Russia's presentation of satellite data, the United States, despite the hysterical cries of France, began to make, although extremely contradictory, but still more restrained statements. Perhaps all the threats of the invasion sounding today are nothing more than a bluff, aimed solely at the psychological pressure on the Syrians.

    And - according to the latest reports - the UN Commission states that it does not intend to go to the province of Aleppo, ostensibly for security reasons. But she was called into the country for precisely this purpose - to investigate the incident in Khan Al-Asal ...


    If we lose this information war, then Syria will end!

    Well, do we have another check for WEAKNESS?
  28. cat-hipopotamus
    +11
    26 August 2013 08: 49
    The moment of truth is coming !!! Will Russia be able to defend the right of the people of Syria to fight terrorism, the right to a peaceful life without orders from Western countries, not only by means of diplomacy and the supply of equipment and ammunition to Assad's troops, will our president be able to give a strong-willed order and close the approaches to Syria by the forces of the Black Sea and Northern fleets? , thereby becoming the buffer through which neither the United States nor its allies dare to climb. It is high time, even under the most unfavorable scenario, to "stuff the brazen face of the West" with its double standards of democracy. Yes, the strength and level of our fleets will not be as strong as that of the amerikos and their allies, but we are Russians, savvy, courage wins in battles, and it’s true, as it is not banal. We will not be able to defend Syria now, we will deal with the same scum that operates in Syria, but already at our borders. Let there be accusations that Russia does not allow the "trial of the democratic West" to take place, but it is worth it, it is better to break the nose of the western pack of mad dogs now than to feel its teeth on your own neck tomorrow. We look forward to hearing from you, Vladimir Vladimirovich, this decision of the President of Russia.
  29. +2
    26 August 2013 08: 50
    And what will the head of the transport department say?

    That is, the UN? This essentially dying organization, which has ceased to influence anything in the world, is silent, like a fish on ice. If, even so, the Yankees and comrades venture to start a war in Syria, this stupid talking room will cease to exist as an organization created to maintain and strengthen international peace and security. And this, by the way, is its main function.
  30. faraon
    +3
    26 August 2013 08: 52
    And here is how the opaque cockerel sings
    The Syrian opposition rejects Damascus’s allegations that the rebels used chemical weapons.

    "We strongly reject false information disseminated by the Assad regime in order to divert attention from its crimes against the Syrian people," - said at a press conference the umbrella organization of the Syrian opposition, the Syrian National Coalition, its head Ahmed al-Djerba.

    He attacked Russia and China, which, in his words, "took the UN Security Council prisoner." Moscow and Beijing vetoed the UN Security Council's decision to send an official commission of inquiry to Syria to investigate the use of chemical weapons.

    "Assad killed 2 people, most of women and children," the opposition leader continued, referring to the chemical attack in the Damascus area. "Everyone must stop the massacres that Assad is committing, otherwise you directly or indirectly support the killings."
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 12: 05
      Pharaoh.
      From a sick head to a healthy one. I think you yourself do not believe these rats.
  31. +3
    26 August 2013 08: 53
    Amers and their satellites are either not afraid of anything ... or just bluffing. Or under the guise of preparing for a war with SYRIA, they are preparing a larger-scale war against the main enemy of ISRAEL - IRAN! Moreover, the new Iranian president - a "pro-Western pragmatist" made an official statement - Israel must be destroyed!
    If they go on a "military campaign" against SYRIA, then in any case they will have to face the Iranian armed forces in a direct battle. Here they obviously want to "bang two birds with one stone" ... But as you know, if you chase two birds with one stone, you will not kill one!
    One thing is not clear ... at a time when the top officials of the USA, England, France express the position of their states, the mouthpiece of our state is the special representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Lukashevich. He is, of course, an official, but the word of the PRESIDENT IS GLAMOVER MUCH MUCH MUCH!
    It is, of course, understandable, on the eve of the G20 summit, Russia does not want an open confrontation and the collapse of this meeting ... hoping that it will again repel attacks on Syria, but it would not be too late ... After all, not only because of the NSA programmer (this is too shallow for the level of the two PRESIDENTS!), OBAMA refused to meet with our President ....
  32. +6
    26 August 2013 08: 54
    A variant of South Ossetian - in this case - this is the third world!
    The Libyan or Iraq variant is the end of Russia as one of the world leaders!

    In fact, everything that is being done in Syria, and in the Middle East in general, is directed against Russia. The situation is such that the third world seems to be inevitable, whether Russia will surrender Syria independently or not. Another conversation is to participate in it having allies or pounding alone. So the choice is Russia, the choice is ours.
  33. -1
    26 August 2013 08: 55
    nothing good will come of it. the main thing is not to get into this der - o. we know what Arabs are fighters at someone else’s expense and out of the blue. Israel is an example.
    1. +5
      26 August 2013 09: 10
      Quote: Mercenary
      the main thing is not to get into this der - o.

      When and which major warrior did Russia bypass?
  34. Docklishin
    +2
    26 August 2013 08: 58
    I liked the version of Operation Angara. And it's also good for everyone to gather all the forces of the Navy and demonstrate the pennants of Russia, China and what Iran has there. Iran to block the Strait of Hormuz and nafing to block the UAE, Qatar. Another 1 AUG will be delayed, and maybe a bomb. And there, in all possible ways, try to make some kind of revolution. Well, as a last resort. Kohl went to such a booze ... Who is to blame for the escalation of the conflict (well, except for the United States) - UAE, Qatar, Turkey. Are these countries ready to survive the attack by chemical weapons for defending the crap values ​​of amers. Something like this. Naturally, we will not enter into a direct collision, and even with all our desire, we cannot. If it doesn't work out, then VERY serious damage will be done to the image. We are waiting for the official announcement of the GDP and MIDA. recourse
  35. +17
    26 August 2013 08: 58
    I agree with the author that there will be intervention. The recent successes of the Syrian military, if they did not create the preconditions for the victory of the legitimate government, at least made the prospects for the victory of the militants extremely illusory. The United States and its satellites waste money in vain, and the capitalists do not like to do this. Hence the desire to "speed up the process." It is clear that the blow will be delivered from 3 sides
    a) Air operation involving the forces of the fleet (USA, Great Britain, France)
    b) Special Forces, PMC officers from Jordan in the direction of Damascus. Airborne assaults are possible.
    c) Actually fighters.
    But I do not share the optimism of the author about the weaknesses of the United States and the capabilities of the allies of the Syrian government.
    In China, they will not risk a direct military confrontation with the United States, they will limit themselves to help with money. Also with even greater reason concerns Russia. It is not serious to speak about Venezuela.
    Iran could really help, but the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is a de facto declaration of war. It is very doubtful that the Iranian authorities would do so.
    In these conditions, I think Assad needs to
    1) Make the most of the 3-4 remaining weeks to eliminate the militants
    2) Prepare for the defense of the capital (primarily from the south)
    3) Before the start of air strikes, disperse and mask all equipment as much as possible.
    4) Arm yourself with patience. Under the bombing, the main thing is patience. NATO's "contactless" war is extremely expensive. The army needs not to give up its positions for 3-4 weeks. Next, NATO will fizzle out. Of course, you need to try to inflict the maximum possible losses on NATO.
    5) Ask Iran if possible to transfer parts of the IRGC through Iraq.
    6) Try to negotiate with the Kurds by promising them at the same time the widest autonomy.
    7) Ask for at least some help from China and the Russian Federation (money, intelligence, weapons)
    1. Docklishin
      +1
      26 August 2013 09: 04
      Totally agree with you. However, Iran, like no other, will have to choose the least between two evils. In any case, unless of course they do not agree, they can become number 2.
    2. +4
      26 August 2013 09: 08
      Quote: Odyssey
      In these conditions, I think Assad needs to


      Very, very good analysis. BUT! Why does everyone think that Iran is reluctant to join its army for Syria? He also has nothing to lose. And to fight at once on two countries - the United States simply does not have enough strength. And yet - who is talking about the direct intervention of Russia and China? I spoke about economic sanctions against the United States.
      1. Veles25
        -5
        26 August 2013 09: 29
        Karavan And to fight at once on two countries - the USA does not have enough forces simply. And yet - who is talking about the direct intervention of Russia and China? I spoke about economic sanctions against the United States.


        What are you saying? economic sanctions against the US?
        1. +2
          26 August 2013 10: 41
          Quote: Veles25
          What are you saying? economic sanctions against the US?

          And what's not to like?
          1. Veles25
            -5
            26 August 2013 11: 11
            it's impossible. that's all
            1. 0
              26 August 2013 16: 50
              Quote: Veles25
              it's impossible. that's all
              A typical American affirmation of a boy from an under-ax community. Data?
        2. 0
          26 August 2013 16: 49
          Quote: Veles25
          What are you saying? economic sanctions against the US?
          Rather, an iron curtain. And then sit down with whom all reasonable Europe will remain. They quarrel with Russia inconvenient. And alas, your whole system is in a deep anus. And you were left with the partisans at your side, completely alone (yes, I didn’t forget the honor, without some of the states that now want to separate)
      2. +2
        26 August 2013 09: 57
        Quote: Karavan
        Why does everyone think that Iran is reluctant to join its army for Syria?

        It can send parts of the IRGC as volunteers. But it’s unlikely to block the Strait of Hormuz, or even less so, to attack US bases.
        The fact is that Israel is sleeping and sees how to get a good reason to attack Iran. It is not known whether sending volunteers to Syria will be such an occasion, but the closure of the strait will definitely become one. But Iran cannot fight against Israel and the United States in the current state of the Air Force and Air Defense. More precisely, it can, but with the use of weapons of mass destruction.
        And to decide on this given the nuclear potential of Israel is extremely difficult.
        Quote: Karavan
        And yet - who is talking about the direct intervention of Russia and China? I spoke about economic sanctions against the United States.

        About the economy. I agree with you that the PRC can create big problems for the United States. But the PRC economy also largely depends on the United States and its satellites.
        And then in the PRC right now, very careful strategists are at the helm. Because of Iran, they could go to a trade and economic war with the USA. But I strongly doubt about Syria ...
        As for Venezuela, they simply cannot radically reduce oil sales in the United States, even if they really want to.
        They can limit it, but no more than that. Russia simply has no levers of economic pressure on the United States.
        Of course, I would like to make a mistake, but it seems to me that Syria needs to rely only on itself and its strength more. They have chances to win.
    3. -1
      26 August 2013 19: 08
      Quote: Odyssey
      In China, they will not dare to go to a direct military confrontation with the United States, they will limit themselves to help with money.

      China is playing its game in the region and will act in its best interests.
      Quote: Odyssey
      1) Make the most of the 3-4 remaining weeks to eliminate the militants

      what is not done within 2 years, is it possible to do in 3-4 weeks?
      Quote: Odyssey
      2) Prepare for the defense of the capital (primarily from the south)

      a certain part of the suburbs in the hands of beards.
      Quote: Odyssey
      5) Ask Iran if possible to transfer parts of the IRGC through Iraq.

      the first to strike at air bases. There are no land borders with Iran.
      Quote: Odyssey
      6) Try to negotiate with the Kurds by promising them at the same time the widest autonomy.

      autonomy to the Kurds will destroy Syria as a country completely. Kurds are just waiting for this
  36. faraon
    +8
    26 August 2013 08: 58
    The continuation of the cock concert part two
    One of the leaders of the Syrian opposition calls on Israel to convince the West to intervene in the Syrian conflict and put an end to the atrocities of the army of Bashar al-Assad.

    In an interview with ynet, he said that "if Israel wants to prove its good intentions to the Syrian people, it must facilitate the early intervention of the international community to save Syria and the Syrian people from collapse and anarchy."

    According to this source who wished to remain anonymous, in the end, the international community will nevertheless go for a military operation and bomb Assad’s targets from the air.

    Earlier, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu called what is happening in Syria "a terrible crime of the regime against its own people." Israel openly recognized the Assad regime as a criminal and called on the West to put an end to the atrocities taking place in this country
    It is evident that soon the kirdyk will come to the entire appetizing shushar, that they have already begun to turn to Israel for help. Their comrade Assad is fucking not as a child but as an adult.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 13: 12
      Pharaoh.
      The atrocities of rats are obvious, but the Syrian army is not. So God help Comrade Assad, maybe Russia will help. Wait and see.
  37. Docklishin
    +2
    26 August 2013 09: 00
    Z.Y. SCO, BRICS countries - publicly condemn the militaristic inclinations of the United States. So it turns out what kind of informational retaliation.
  38. Valery Neonov
    +2
    26 August 2013 09: 04
    "In the meantime, let's analyze the current situation."-wick of the third world Amers lit, taking advantage of what was not on their mainland ... but GOD GIVE ALL THIS WILL TRANSFER TO THEM ...
    Pound rockets and like no risk, but RUSSIA WILL NOT LIKE SYRIA"Russia can strengthen the grouping of ships in the Mediterranean as retaliatory measures. I think that there is nothing else left to prevent the development of the factor of aggression," said L. Ivashov
  39. faraon
    +1
    26 August 2013 09: 05
    Quote: lewerlin53rus
    That is, the UN

    This is a very interesting organization, everything will be something like this: "who pays is the one who dances the girl (UN).
  40. vladsolo56
    +5
    26 August 2013 09: 05
    Preparation of attacks on Syria is actually a challenge to Russia. The West demonstratively shows that Russia will not intervene in the conflict. From which it follows that it is weak. Syria is a turning point in the political game. If Syria is destroyed, no one will believe in the power of Russia. Shaky authority in the global political arena will fall to zero. So let's see what happens, I think it’s not long to wait.
    1. +2
      26 August 2013 09: 10
      Quote: vladsolo56
      Syria is a turning point in the political game.


      Here I agree, for if Russia block the oxygen in Syria, then everything, the Mediterranean Sea, is completely lost to us.
      1. 0
        26 August 2013 09: 24
        Quote: Karavan
        , The Mediterranean is completely lost to us.

        Do we agree with the Greeks in vain?
        1. dmb
          +2
          26 August 2013 10: 13
          My soul is with you all and with Syria. But here's the reason ... Neither the supply of weapons, nor the money will help the Syrians resist the intervention. (Syria is not Vietnam, Russia is not the USSR). Threaten with the use of nuclear weapons? In my opinion, even this will not help. The USSR could, and this threat was real. And the current leadership and Snowden left under the condition that he would not oppose him, the leadership, PARTNERS. So, even if it puffs out its cheeks strongly, no one will reckon with it. Another thing is China, these can, but whether they want to. I think that it is much more profitable for them to drag the USA into yet another mess, and tossing firewood into the firebox, to achieve maximum losses by the States. including politically. Not a single conqueror, in any country, opposing the whole people, held power.
  41. +10
    26 August 2013 09: 07
    And everything will be as Vanga said ... in short, and in his own words, then "there will be a third world war, but Syria has not yet fallen ..." but then Russia will save everyone again, but there is not much left of Europe, and Russia will begin its victorious bloom "
    1. +1
      26 August 2013 09: 25
      Quote: Egoza
      "there will be a third world war, but Syria has not yet fallen ..

      Elena hi There seems to be not for 3 world. Although, maybe it will be so request
    2. soldier's grandson
      -8
      26 August 2013 09: 36
      and who will remain in Russia when populated by terrorists, Moskabbad example
  42. +5
    26 August 2013 09: 07
    It is bad if this happens - the next Iran and Russia. Bearded after Syria will be sent to Russia.
    1. lucidlook
      0
      26 August 2013 15: 59
      That's it. After Syria - to Iran, after Iran - to Lebanon or to Russia (if the locals do not cope on their own). But not to England and not to France.
  43. 0
    26 August 2013 09: 09
    What about S-300 shipments? Why are the media silent on this topic?
    1. +4
      26 August 2013 10: 06
      Quote: Nomad
      What about S-300 shipments? Why are the media silent on this topic?

      and who can say that they constantly carry the "Syrian Express" ?? our BDK tirelessly carry something and carry it .... carry it and carry it ... I don’t think there’s toilet paper ..... maybe there’s a surprise for tan and hedgehog with them .... I don’t exclude the possibility of presence on our air defense complexes of volunteers from the former USSR, and if so ?? ... then you are welcome ... ours are clearing the sky, the Iranians are clearing the Arab world, the Syrians and Kurds are hammering the Turks and clearing everything around the air defense systems ... well, something like that I think ..... although it was better if it all ended before it began
    2. 0
      26 August 2013 12: 29
      And the brotherly Muslim people of Kazakhstan do not want to help Syria? Well, for example, the supply of weapons?
      1. essenger
        +2
        26 August 2013 13: 20
        Quote: Andrew 447
        And the brotherly Muslim people of Kazakhstan do not want to help Syria? Well, for example, the supply of weapons?

        What kind of brothers are they to us ??? wink Nazarbayev supported Erdogan during his visit to Turkey. Turks are really brothers for us. Here the Syrians are against the Turks, the question on whose side we are probably obvious.
        1. Guun
          +1
          26 August 2013 13: 38
          No, Nursultan Nazarbayev will remain neutral to the last (which is right for us). We do not need war. Kazakhstan will choose Russia and China, but not the United States (we just maneuver from the United States, we don’t want to spoil relations with anyone) - it's just politics.
    3. 0
      26 August 2013 17: 31
      Quote: Nomad
      silent on this subject

      Probably because it is inexpedient to reveal to sworn friends what our ships carry to Syria.
  44. Vlad_Mir
    0
    26 August 2013 09: 13
    Isn’t it time to raise the bombers?
    1. Luger
      +2
      26 August 2013 09: 26
      What did the citizen gather to bomb?
  45. fklj
    +2
    26 August 2013 09: 13
    The moment of truth for the Kremlin. Let's see what the answer will be.
    1. +3
      26 August 2013 09: 26
      Quote: fklj
      The moment of truth for the Kremlin. Let's see what the answer will be.

      Is flaming Washington comfortable with you?
      1. +5
        26 August 2013 09: 35
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Is flaming Washington comfortable with you?

        Sarcasm is inappropriate in this case. For this is the moment of truth. Syria is the first line of defense for the Russian Federation.
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 10: 44
          Quote: Veter
          Sarcasm is inappropriate in this case.

          Sarcasm??? Everyone weighs everything in comments, but forget one thing. How many of our citizens live in Syria and what will Putin do if they begin to die under NATO bombs? Here is such a sarcasm hi
          1. +2
            26 August 2013 11: 20
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Sarcasm???

            Exactly!!!
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            What will Putin do if they begin to die under NATO bombs?

            If they bomb, then most likely nothing. But to prevent this from happening, we need to support Syria in every way, including direct military supplies, and specialists. And of course, the presence of our Navy at its borders.
            Well, if you sit back and shut up, as you suggest, fearing 3 MB, then of course they will bomb.
            The United States will never aggravate the conflict to the level of the outbreak of World War II, it is worthwhile to give an intelligible answer and they will back down. History for example.
          2. 0
            26 August 2013 21: 16
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Sarcasm??? Everyone weighs everything in comments, but forget one thing. How many of our citizens live in Syria and what will Putin do if they begin to die under NATO bombs? Here is such a sarcasm


            We are on the site "breaking lances" around the discussion of the situation around Syria, and I wonder if the General Staff of the RF Ministry of Defense, in the "Security Council" is the same "intensity"?
            What will be our "political shot" (I hope Lavrov's statements were only preliminary), and are other options possible?
  46. faraon
    -2
    26 August 2013 09: 17
    Today, August 25, in the evening in Jordan, a three-day series of meetings begins with the participation of the commanders of the armies of the USA, Great Britain, Germany, Canada, Italy, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. They will discuss the creation of an international coalition against Bashar al-Assad and a possible joint military operation against the Syrian army.

    Among the participants in the military summit is Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    Meanwhile, U.S. intelligence continues to gather evidence of the use of chemical weapons in Syria against civilians. According to experts, at least a few more days will pass before the exact establishment of irrefutable facts. During this period, the US administration and a potential international coalition will have to formulate their position and develop a plan for a military operation, if such a decision is nevertheless decided.

    In the photo: Martin Dempsey, one of the participants in the military summit in Jordan
    1. +3
      26 August 2013 09: 19
      Quote: faraon
      Meanwhile, U.S. intelligence continues to gather evidence of the use of chemical weapons in Syria against civilians


      Why are special services doing this, and not doctors or scientists?
    2. The Indian Joe
      0
      26 August 2013 12: 14
      Meanwhile, U.S. intelligence continues to gather evidence of the use of chemical weapons in Syria against civilians
      - more precisely, continues the fabrication of evidence proving that this weapon was not used by bandits, but Assad.
  47. +2
    26 August 2013 09: 17
    Damn, why is China silent? Alone, we now do not pull Syria in any way. And pull out the edge as needed!
    1. fklj
      +5
      26 August 2013 09: 24
      China fucking ally. In addition, it is closely connected with Europe and the states economically
      1. +1
        26 August 2013 14: 38
        Quote: fklj
        China fucking ally. In addition, it is closely connected with Europe and the states economically

        China is not an ally, China is a partner, China has not entered into allied relations with any of the states. China will act only on the basis of its interests.
    2. 0
      26 August 2013 09: 27
      Quote: Stiletto
      Damn, why is China silent?

      What will change the position of China?
  48. +3
    26 August 2013 09: 20
    the ring narrows friends .... the war is not against Syria, but against Russia and China.
  49. +5
    26 August 2013 09: 21
    If we merge Syria now, then in Sochi it certainly will not do without terrorist attacks ...
    1. slvevg
      +2
      26 August 2013 10: 31
      If we merge Syria now, then in Sochi it certainly will not do without terrorist attacks ...

      Then the Olympics in Sochi may not exist at all for many reasons, from a nuclear war, to the withdrawal of the right to host the Olympics by the "international" community in connection ... and then a million far-fetched excuses. hi
  50. +3
    26 August 2013 09: 22
    It is believed that the impetus for the global economic crisis that began in the USA on the 2008-2009 years was the defeat of the pro-American Georgian regime in the 5 day war of the 2008 year.
    If America loses the Syrian company, the whole American world empire may begin to pour in. This would be a manifestation of unacceptable weakness. Therefore, when the Syrian fighters are close to defeat, the Americans cannot allow this to happen. Most likely the war will go on according to the Libyan scenario. Much will depend on the position of Russia, China, Iran and other countries that do not want to endure American hegemony.
  51. Micex
    +6
    26 August 2013 09: 22
    I have already written on this topic once. Russia, represented by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Putin, consistently excluded Turkey and Israel from the game (the heads of these states had meetings with Putin, after which the rhetoric changed). These countries continue to support terrorists, but they will definitely not get involved in Syria. France and Great Britain should not be taken into account at all, they only make noise. It is unknown how Putin’s recent meeting with the envoy from the SA ended; most likely, Putin was offered Egypt in exchange for Syria. I would like to believe that we will get into Egypt without their help. In general, the actions of our politicians have turned off all unnecessary people except the United States (they cannot be turned off) and, as it always seemed to me, the United States is being lured into a trap. Let me explain - for the Amers to climb across the sea is the height of arrogance, it turns out that their planes will fly over the heads of the Russian military (Barack will sign up for this only under strong pressure from Congress), the same thing seems to be impossible to fly over Lebanon, a small piece remains open on the Israeli side ( see map) Therefore, for the amers, the only move is a land operation on the part of Jordan with the aim of capturing Assad, and this is the merit of Russian diplomats, and I sincerely believe that the Syrian military will not wait for them there. About 2 thousand military personnel have already been transferred to Jordan a long time ago, and the squadron in the Mediterranean Sea is for show-off, nothing more. If they start bombing from aircraft carriers, this is a complete finish and, in the event of the fall of Assad, the Russian Federation will only throw up its hands - in fact, there is nothing more to do. The article written by the author largely reflects his rich imagination - neither Iran, nor China, nor the Russian Federation will enter into open confrontation with the United States, and putting pressure on the United States economically is generally a rich imagination, of course :)
    1. +3
      26 August 2013 09: 26
      Everything is much simpler. The French have an aircraft carrier under repair, England no longer has one, and without the UN you can’t get much aviation.

      Now they will collect 300-400 axes, the British are already preparing the carriers for the campaign and 4+1 Berk is there. And they will work with them. Precision strikes. If there is an AUG, it will be 1+1 in the near reserve.
      1. +1
        26 August 2013 10: 27
        Quote: donavi49
        The French have an aircraft carrier under repair

        It came out of repair a month ago.
        Quote: donavi49
        Now they will collect 300-400 axes, the British are already preparing the carriers for the campaign and 4+1 Berk is there. And they will work with them.

        I agree about the axe, but there is also enough aviation there.
      2. +1
        26 August 2013 10: 45
        Quote: donavi49
        Now they will collect 300-400 axes,

        They will launch the planes of their sixes.
      3. slvevg
        +2
        26 August 2013 12: 29
        let's add to this:
        According to BSNews, on August 29, 2013, a visit to Sevastopol will begin in the framework of cooperation with Ukraine by the ships of the 2nd Standing NATO Mine Countermeasure Group in the Mediterranean Sea - Standing NATO Mine Countermeasure Group SNMCMG2.
        , do they want to mine the channel to block the Black Sea Fleet?
  52. Kovrovsky
    +5
    26 August 2013 09: 24
    Quote: 1goose3
    A variant of South Ossetian - in this case - this is the third world!
    The Libyan or Iraq variant is the end of Russia as one of the world leaders!

    In fact, everything that is being done in Syria, and in the Middle East in general, is directed against Russia. The situation is such that the third world seems to be inevitable, whether Russia will surrender Syria independently or not. Another conversation is to participate in it having allies or pounding alone. So the choice is Russia, the choice is ours.

    “Nobel Peace Laureate” Obama now needs a “small victorious war” so that the world will forget his humiliation from Putin. All this militaristic fuss is directed primarily against Syria, and secondly against Russia.
  53. +3
    26 August 2013 09: 30
    Help Syria at any cost. In addition to the S-300, it would be nice to supply some kind of ground-based anti-ship missiles in Syria.
    1. +3
      26 August 2013 09: 33
      It already exists - Bastions with Yakhont missiles. However, they will not get it, even if the reconnaissance ships of the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Fleet provide control centers.

      Tartus by the way.
    2. 0
      26 August 2013 14: 49
      Quote: dimon-media
      Help Syria at any cost. In addition to the S-300, it would be nice to supply some kind of ground-based anti-ship missiles in Syria.

      Medium-range tactical nuclear missiles will help Syria avoid an external US strike, and the Saudis would be more modest.
  54. TAGIR
    +3
    26 August 2013 09: 30
    Of course, Obama is to blame for everything; by talking about the “red line,” he thereby provoked the use of chemical weapons by the opposition. Now, if he had said “when the cancer hangs on the mountain”... Why was the USSR respected? For not being afraid to fight. If Russia remains silent now, then it will not see the status of a “superpower”. At the very first shot from destroyers in the Mediterranean Sea, they will mercilessly sink the American squadron with Syrian coastal defense systems...
    1. +4
      26 August 2013 09: 35
      They will shoot from under Turkey or Israel, shooting through all of Syria with axes. Coastal complexes are a maximum of 300-350 km, and then only with a command center.
  55. +1
    26 August 2013 09: 41
    Well, how can the NATO jackal, sensing the steps of the victors, not use the service of scavengers?
  56. +2
    26 August 2013 09: 44
    <<<Now on the agenda is the simulated and too clumsily presented “Gaza” team, too clearly reminiscent of Iraq ten years ago.>>>
    The intellectual power of the United States is clearly losing steam! For more than two years of pressure on Syria and the use of Islamic scumbags who staged terror there in order to remove Assad, they have not come up with anything smarter in search of justification for their direct military intervention in Syria, how to spread the same horror stories about weapons to the whole world mass destruction, as before their attack on Iraq! And now another US representative will appear at the UN and will shake test tubes from the podium, demanding the immediate intervention of the gamemocracy in the events in Syria, since the Islamic scumbag oppositionists they sponsor, bringing crap to Syria, are receiving such a rebuff from the Syrian army and the people of Syria that soon They will generally be thrown out of Syria!
  57. +2
    26 August 2013 09: 46
    My personal opinion is that the Pentagon budget cuts are to blame. The arms lobby, traditionally strong in the United States, is pushing the president to escalate tensions in the Syria-Iran direction in order to squeeze further allocations from the budget for the arms race.
    In essence, US external aggressions are a reflection of internal conflicts between elites and the aspirations of the arms lobby to increase the defense budget. This is pure business, to which US foreign policy is tailored and a constant search is being conducted for Enemy No. 1, whose place was empty with the collapse of the USSR.
    At present, Russia can counter the outbreak of a military operation against Syria only in the diplomatic field, since its fleet is not comparable to the total power of the fleets of the NATO bloc and Russia will not dare to engage in direct confrontation, since the consequence could be a global conflict. You shouldn’t really count on China’s help for obvious reasons. So, militarily, Syria is alone, except that Iran can and, as it were, should help. There are only diplomatic solutions left.
    The forecast is disappointing.
    1. Luger
      0
      26 August 2013 09: 53
      Regarding the military budget and the military industry lobby +100500, everything else is a multiplicity of variations in the development of the situation, nothing more.
    2. +1
      26 August 2013 19: 14
      Iran has nothing to oppose to the West. Air defense and air force are too old. tors hold nuclear facilities.
  58. olviko
    +2
    26 August 2013 09: 49
    USA

    “There are only economic blows that will affect the United States to a much greater extent than a fighter shot down by Syrian air defense or a terrorist attack on one of the American military bases.

    Debt obligations to China, a quarter of the total oil supplied to the United States from Venezuela.

    For a country gripped by economic agony, such blows could be much worse, and even more important, than the possible benefits from a war with Syria."

    The author forgot to mention about 80 nuclear power plants, several hundred large chemical and oil refineries, usually located near cities, centralized water supply sources for megacities and other objects interesting for sabotage.
  59. +3
    26 August 2013 09: 49
    Introduce an information war against them, sink an aircraft carrier with a submarine and blame everything on the Syrian *Bastion* and let them shit themselves to prove it.
    But seriously, everything is already obvious from the silence of our leaders and the Chinese....they would have said a long time ago that we would not allow force, etc., etc....and so we drain the silence :(
    1. +1
      26 August 2013 09: 55
      It is difficult to confuse Bastion with Granite, even based on the debris. Not to mention the objective control of radar, including neutral ships.
      1. 0
        26 August 2013 10: 16
        This is understandable, I say from the point of view of a distant theory to somehow spoil the Americans.
  60. +2
    26 August 2013 09: 52
    Quote: DocKlishin
    It feels like the world is going crazy. That is WHERE the French, British and others climb .... The question is how we can restrain Western aggression against Syria? I’m quite serious, because I don’t have any healthy thoughts request . with 300 whether it is or not. Heavy weapons were not supplied. But political pressure by blocking resolutions in the UN Security Council ... they don’t listen. Where is China? Why is Iran silent? recourse Or something global really begins - debts are sometimes written off sysh as it should ...


    A bad example is contagious!

    There was a scenario in Libya, it was successful, they decided to apply it in other places, the militants understood that if you promise the West to follow its course, they will help them create chaos in any country, and this will continue until they are destroyed, like the beginning of the 20th century, when the communists tried to start a revolution everywhere, but of course the latter were not such villains, but the scenario is similar, there is a network everywhere.
    If the government wins, many lost people will lay down their arms and live peacefully, but if the militants win, there will be more and angrier lost people.
  61. Bob
    +7
    26 August 2013 10: 01
    Russia has already intervened in the conflict in Syria - militarily, diplomatically, economically. Syria became a flash point in relations with the West, after which notes of the Cold War began to sound again. The real plans of the West are to create an arc of “madness” that would closely adjoin the borders of Russia and affect its pain points - Central Asia, the Caucasus, the South of the Russian Federation. Therefore, for Russia, Syria is a front line of defense that does not allow the rapid implementation of planned plans, in other words, Syria for Russia is also an opportunity to delay time and delay the “X” hour, when not only regional, but also national security will collapse, requiring the introduction of emergency measures territory of the country.
    In the event of armed intervention by the West in Syria - and this is inevitable, if you will (as stated by both Western and Russian politicians) - closer blocs of countries will be formed on both sides of the conflict, and relations between the blocs will sharply worsen, threatening to develop into a conflict. The fate of Syria is predetermined - the destruction of communications, strongholds, the elimination of large military formations in air defense, naval forces, tanks and others.
    How the participants in the conflict will behave can be predicted - especially noteworthy is the role of Turkey in this conflict, where the “Patriots” now stand, the center of the Syrian opposition is located, and many political, economic, and military “knots” are involved in Turkey. The West may well sacrifice its ally Turkey in order to realize its plans, and Turkey’s participation in the Syrian conflict will be the most significant, at least in connection with the Kurdish resistance, and therefore Turkey will be very active in terms of ground operations. Another thing is how other participants in the conflict will look at it - on the other hand - I mean Russia, China!?
    Most likely, both the Russian Federation and China will not like such an active participation of Turkey in strengthening their own, and therefore undermining someone else’s, regional security. Therefore, very decisive actions by the listed countries in military terms are quite possible in relation to Turkey. It’s even difficult to imagine where (in the Stone Age, in the Middle Ages or somewhere else) there will be an independent Turkey with the entry of the valiant and multi-million army of China..... And into whose hands Tsar-grad will be handed over after... Truly, the Turks do not know what they are doing and where they might end up...
    If we take into account another side of the conflict - Iran - then its determination to prevent the fall of Syria is understandable and predictable. The actions of Iran alone can temporarily blow up the world oil market.
    However, unfortunately, the world is increasingly sliding towards war in order to solve its economic, social, and political problems. And this is a trend, so it is impossible to prevent a catastrophe, you can only “slow down the movement of a maddened locomotive approaching a cliff.” You can slow it down - militarily, by sending your naval forces to the zone, acting actively in other problem areas for the enemy.
    1. slvevg
      +2
      26 August 2013 12: 38
      Bob, perhaps your vision of the situation is the closest to the truth, in terms of prediction too, a thousand pluses, drinks , but I feel sorry for people...
  62. Grigorich 1962
    +2
    26 August 2013 10: 08
    Obama received instructions from the “Committee of 300” to go to war with Syria....but the Americans are the only ones pissing to get involved.....now everyone who is nearby and whoever they care about will have to be pressed into becoming allies.
    Maybe I haven’t heard it yet... but Russia’s position is still not clear to me (I don’t take Lavrov’s words into account....6 no one will pay attention to this diplomatic babble......)
    UN with pangimun puppets.....only Russia and China are able to stop aggression
    By the way, what is China saying in this situation...is there any info??
    1. +3
      26 August 2013 10: 19
      Well, what could be the position? The Russian Federation is officially against it, it is necessary to conduct an investigation by the UN, Geneva, etc.

      The UN Security Council is reliably blocked by the PRC and the Russian Federation on one side and the USA and Britain on the other.

      China is far away, it is always happy to veto the UN and help with a loan. But he won’t go seriously, it’s not his area of ​​interest. Now, if they trample on East Africa or start redistribution in Asia, then the PLA will go on a campaign wink .
  63. Vorkot cat
    +1
    26 August 2013 10: 16
    The Israel Lobby in US Foreign Policy


    March 2006

    John Mersheimer, Department of Political Science, University of Chicago

    Stephen M. Walt, School of Government, Harvard University


    Pp. 1

    US foreign policy shapes the picture of events in every corner of our planet. This applies most of all to the Middle East, a region with constant instability and important strategic importance.

    US national interests must be the focus of US foreign policy. However, in recent decades, especially since the end of the Six-Day War in 1967, relations with Israel have occupied a central place in US foreign policy in the Middle East region. The United States' immense support for Israel and related attempts to introduce democracy in all countries of the region caused unrest in the Arab-Muslim world and threatened the security of the United States
  64. Alexandr0id
    -9
    26 August 2013 10: 16
    OK it's all over Now. Now NATO will equate the Assadites with the opposition, and then we will see what the Alawite army is worth without aviation and heavy equipment.
    This is not very good for Russia, the Qataris will still lay their own gas pipeline and Gazprom’s monopoly will be shaken, which means prices will have to be reduced, the budget will not receive enough money, something will have to be cut. on the other hand, there is a silver lining - one less beggar, there will be no need to come up with imaginary unpaid contracts for the supply of weapons to a Syrian friend, maybe your army will get more.
    1. +1
      26 August 2013 14: 51
      Yeah, the Qataris will take this and roll out the gas pipeline like a fire hose.
  65. The comment was deleted.
  66. soldier's grandson
    -10
    26 August 2013 10: 17
    the West doesn’t respect Russia, no matter how pro-Putin cheerleaders shout here, we don’t have time to re-equip the army, the Chinese are not warriors, after a slight NATO asshole they will turn on us or won’t go anywhere at all, we’ll have to fight back ourselves, and this despite the fact that the country is crammed with pro-Wahabi motivated youth
    1. +4
      26 August 2013 10: 48
      Quote: Soldier's grandson
      the West does not respect Russia, no matter how pro-Putin jingoistic patriots shout here

      I haven’t heard such crap about how the West respects Russia, even from the most avid jingoists.
      1. lucidlook
        0
        26 August 2013 16: 08
        In this case, the word “respects” should be understood in the sense of “fears”.
    2. olviko
      +3
      26 August 2013 11: 18
      Could you please clarify, you are the grandson of a soldier from which country? The fifth column began to drown in its own tears and snot!
      1. soldier's grandson
        -1
        26 August 2013 17: 51
        and you are at the fifth column and ask, I don’t know this one
    3. -1
      26 August 2013 15: 16
      Quote: Soldier's grandson
      and this despite the fact that the country is crammed with pro-Wahhabi youth

      It remains to figure out who stuffed her ships?! am
      1. soldier's grandson
        -1
        26 August 2013 17: 50
        you seem to have fallen from the moon here, you see nothing except the great achievements of GDP and "Edra"
  67. Shep
    +2
    26 August 2013 10: 19
    Theoretically, you don’t even have to go to war if, together with China, you throw on the market all the Amer’s securities, which China and Russia have enough to bury the Yankee economy in one hour!
    But this is just a theory.....
    1. Alexandr0id
      0
      26 August 2013 10: 26
      this is not even a theory, but nonsense
      1. essenger
        +1
        10 September 2013 22: 59
        Quote: Alexandr0id
        this is not even a theory, but nonsense

        A person wants to earn some pluses from the jingoistic patriots, why bother? =)
  68. +8
    26 August 2013 10: 20
    If NATO invades Syria, and our leadership behaves “worse than a rag,” the loss of support among its own population and in the international arena for this leadership, as a result of such a decision, will be irreparable. Syria is our last and most reliable ally in the Middle East. Our fathers, who have forgotten, already fought for him, shoulder to shoulder with the army of Syria. It would be unworthy of their memory to abandon the Syrians now to the mercy of Eurobandits. If this suddenly happens, I will be the first to turn away from such leadership of the country.
  69. -1
    26 August 2013 10: 22
    It would be nice if a war started, Russia would supply weapons and instructors to Syria, I don’t know about China, but Iran may well become our ally in the fight against evil spirits, the main thing is to protect Syria from NATO terrorist air raids, with militants with comprehensive support from the Syrians themselves they will cope, unless of course NATO starts a ground operation because then we will not be able to stop them, we will have to evacuate the government to Iran or to us in Russia and start a long guerrilla war with the invaders according to the Afghan scenario, of course all this is possible if normal leadership is at the helm in Russia , and not Washington’s proteges mixed in by thieving idiots.
    1. +5
      26 August 2013 10: 36
      Wouldn’t it be nice if a war started?! My dear, have you lost your mind? Only a madman, or a person with a completely knocked down scale of moral values, can rejoice at war. And yes, the war has been going on there for a long time. And I sincerely sympathize with you.
      1. +1
        26 August 2013 11: 00
        Do you know how to read? Did you take Literature and Speech Development at school? I’ll give you a hint, the key word is not “Good”, but “If”, the word “Good” does not refer to the war, but to the phrase “Russia supplied” - subject and predicate, therefore the phrase “if war started” is highlighted on both sides with commas and explains the subsequent part of the complex sentence. negative
    2. +2
      26 August 2013 10: 52
      Quote: Standard Oil
      Of course, all this is possible if there were normal leadership at the helm in Russia, and not Washington’s proteges mixed in by thieving idiots.

      Correctly noted. Putin will not soon disperse the pro-Western and pro-Caucasian authorities, but he is getting old
    3. The comment was deleted.
  70. +3
    26 August 2013 10: 26
    Which is to be expected. Realizing that the bandits will not defeat Assad on their own, even with enormous help, the United States will definitely escalate the conflict. The bad economic situation in the States is also pushing us towards this. There will be no direct invasion, there will be targeted strikes on the infrastructure of the Syrian Armed Forces. A hundred "Tomahawks" and other "delights" will do their job. Most likely, the blow will be struck regardless of the conclusions of the UN commission. For the sake of decency, the West will play “concern and democracy” for a while longer. A month or two in the best case scenario. Yes, the task facing our politicians is very difficult.
  71. 0
    26 August 2013 10: 28
    Quote: DocKlishin
    It feels like the world is going crazy.


    I assume that something similar happened before the Second World War in Europe.
  72. +4
    26 August 2013 10: 29
    Everyone needs war:
    1. The states because they have a crisis and need to get out of it.
    2. Europe - because the States told them “fas”.
    3. To the Arabs - because the “owners” said “fas”.
    4. Israel - because it’s scary and they need to have time to strike first.
    5. Russia - but Russia doesn’t need war - but where would it be without us? negative .
  73. +5
    26 August 2013 10: 29
    The American fascist regime has finally “gone crazy”... But it has no choice - it can’t turn on the back one. Well, we’ll see..
  74. +4
    26 August 2013 10: 45
    After Judas (Serdyukov), if Putin surrenders Syria, then he will have no faith.... although there is little faith in our officials, few of them love Russia, and they do not know the feeling of Homeland.
  75. 0
    26 August 2013 10: 46
    In a word ******
  76. 0
    26 August 2013 10: 50
    Quote: Civil
    If, I repeat, if the USA and K attack Syria, the result is as simple as 3 penny:
    1. A pro-Western weak government.
    2. Sluggish civil war.
    3. PMO closes in tartus.
    4. Both China and Russia, due to economic circumstances, will put up with the loss of the ally.
    5. All.

    It's difficult to make predictions now. Unpredictable. And you shouldn’t think in advance: well, like always... Time does not stand still and Russia is no longer the same as it was during Libya. And you and I are actually waiting for something else, so why such sentiments in advance?
  77. +5
    26 August 2013 10: 51
    We can no longer retreat back - I think it was no secret to anyone in the General Staff that after an open confrontation with the United States they would begin to put pressure in Syria. And I think that certain measures have been taken... For Russia to retreat now means ruining the country - then we will be consistently and continuously squeezed out wherever possible, Syria is, so to speak, our last red line, I think everyone understands this. In any case, you need to snap back, one way or another, but not give up your position. I don’t think that the United States is bluffing; local hawks will most likely push through Obama, and the attacks will most likely begin. The situation now is not at all the same as it was before, when there were only verbal threats, it’s in the air. They will do this to try to put us in our place, and no expenses in the US economy will stop this, because if the US loses face in this situation, they will ultimately lose much more than a few dozen fighters and possibly several damaged ships. But the dilemma is much more complicated - whoever starts a war here will ultimately lose it on a strategic scale, Obama understands this, so he is delaying the decision, but most likely it will be made. I’m afraid that if we look at things objectively, we most likely will not be able to save Syria, but the very fact of resistance will be a serious contribution to the future. But if we hand over everything there, that will be the end. The question is up to the country's leaders; they won't have to wait long...

    PS. And again everything is in August... (((
  78. 0
    26 August 2013 10: 51
    Of course, there will be no world war - NATO countries will eliminate their opponents one by one. The civil war in Syria has already weakened the Assad regime. Even Iran's support would not make a significant difference now, since it was clear that Iran was next on NATO's list. At the moment, politicians and coalition headquarters are assessing the likely damage to the region as a whole with the outbreak of hostilities. Israel will take an active part in the conflict on the side of NATO forces. The entry of Russian ships into the conflict zone will mean that we are a belligerent party. With all the ensuing consequences.
    1. +7
      26 August 2013 10: 56
      The entry of Russian ships into the conflict zone will mean that we are a belligerent party. With all the ensuing consequences.


      I wonder what the failure to bring in ships and sad contemplation from around the corner, at a distance, will mean when your friend or comrade is killed...?
      1. -1
        26 August 2013 11: 18
        How smart you are. There were no calls in my comment. Therefore, do not fantasize from around the corner and from a distance.... What call will you shout when rising to attack an enemy aircraft carrier - “for Assad” or “for Putin”? If you ask me about my comrades, then I can say that we are all ready again defend your homeland. I wish you success in battle.
    2. Bob
      +4
      26 August 2013 11: 47
      Quote: piston
      The entry of Russian ships into the conflict zone will mean that we are a belligerent party. With all the ensuing consequences.

      The Russian Navy is already in the conflict zone, and this is what has so far restrained the aggressor from active operations.
      The Mediterranean squadron was created in order to ensure regional security, to indicate the Russian presence in the region militarily, economically, politically, as well as to restrain its strategic enemy, and of course to ensure that our ships can reach operational spaces in the Indian and Atlantic oceans. But not at all in order to turn a blind eye to how Russian Tartus is being bombed.
      Why else do Russian ships maintain combat power there, if not to ensure the security of their facilities in the Mediterranean, to support their citizens...?
      1. -1
        26 August 2013 12: 36
        It’s not worth it to pass off as valid. It is obvious to our military and foreign partners that a couple of outdated ships will not hold back the NATO naval group being created. NATO ships will not be the first to open fire on ours, but one random shot in their direction will not leave us a single chance. This is the danger of such conflicts.
        PS Please do not consider me the root cause of this military conflict.
  79. +2
    26 August 2013 10: 52
    Everything fits into the logic of the behavior of the fascist US regime: after all, we need to save the dollar and war is the best remedy. Apparently this rabble-raff country was completely pinned down if overt provocations and the desire to start killing as quickly as possible were used. And this rabble is led by no less than a Nobel Peace Prize laureate. Well, just a fabulous irony of fate.
  80. +2
    26 August 2013 10: 52
    another country will be turned into territory, Iraq, Libya and now Syria. Why doesn’t anyone speak out against minke whales? They have starving people like in Africa, more than 200 cities are bankrupt, and they are throwing trillions of dollars of these fleeced taxpayers down the drain. Are they (the US population) completely zombies there?
  81. 0
    26 August 2013 10: 59
    Vanga's predictions are beginning to come true. "The mess will begin after the fall of Syria.."
  82. +2
    26 August 2013 11: 11
    Hello.
    We can only wait to see what response measures our government will take, either Putin will turn into a rag like the bear was, or aircraft with heavy equipment will go to Syria, not paying attention to the threats and whining of the West.
  83. +1
    26 August 2013 11: 15
    Eh, Khrushchev and his “Kuzka’s mother” are not enough for them! I would knock and say: just try... but these are just dreams.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 14: 01
      What about Khrushchev? I only knew how to knock...
  84. 0
    26 August 2013 11: 25
    China tactfully decides to remain silent! China? what about China...
    1. +1
      26 August 2013 11: 29
      Syria is not a zone of influence of the PRC. They can only help with a loan or veto, but also express general regret. Now, if anyone goes into East Africa or the Asian zones of influence of the PRC, then yes.
    2. 0
      26 August 2013 19: 19
      If you think about it, China has a benefit. after the conflict, Chinese investors will flow in rivers to Syria. Don’t forget that for China, economic priorities always come first
  85. Guun
    0
    26 August 2013 11: 28
    I see only politicians and strategists gathered. It would be fine if the USA were alone, but England and France plus a couple of jackals, isn’t that too much for Russia alone? Tell me, what can Russia do alone against the whole world? How do you imagine a fight in the ring where one boxer (very good) is simultaneously standing against a heavyweight nigga and two middleweights, and it’s also possible that a dozen more will join in and they all don’t give a damn about the rules of boxing - they kick and get into the fight. Russia and those countries that do not need war will use all means to solve everything without firing a shot - the forces are unequal.
  86. +2
    26 August 2013 11: 28
    A press conference from Lavrov, exclusively on the SAR, today, a lot about our position will become clearer.

    About the press conference of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia S.V. Lavrov
    August 26 at the Press Center of the Russian Foreign Ministry (Building No. 1, Smolenskaya-Sennaya Square, 30, building 2, located to the right of the Central building of the Ministry) A press conference will be held by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on the topic of chemical weapons in Syria and the situation around the Syrian Arab Republic.
    Representatives of Russian and foreign media are invited (simultaneous translation into English is provided).
    Starts at 16:00.
    Accreditation for Russian journalists
    Accreditation for foreign journalists
    Accreditation until 14:30 on August 26.
    Entry until 15:40.
    1. vladsolo56
      +4
      26 August 2013 11: 55
      He has already previously voiced Russia's position. And as always, neither yours nor ours, streamlined formulations such as a military solution will lead to anything good. When and where did it stop US aggression? Yes, they didn’t care about Syria and what would happen to it, and even what would happen in the entire Middle East. Kindergarten and not foreign policy.
      1. 0
        26 August 2013 15: 05
        So, do you need to behave like Ahmadinejad?
        Lavrov is not talking to you, Lavrov is talking to diplomats. Believe me, they understand each other, although they pretend not to.
        1. vladsolo56
          0
          27 August 2013 03: 42
          The results of Lavrov’s press conference are already known and, as expected, Russia gives the green light to the United States and everyone else for aggression in Syria, such are the things.
    2. -1
      26 August 2013 14: 19
      Quote: donavi49
      A press conference from Lavrov, exclusively on the SAR, today, a lot about our position will become clearer.

      All that remains is to shake the air.
  87. +1
    26 August 2013 11: 28
    The irritating thing is that when the confrontation is at the level of the words of diplomats - we defend, if transitions from words to deeds begin - they won’t crap themselves!
  88. +1
    26 August 2013 11: 31
    There will be no intervention in Syria.

    1 The United States has been calling for military intervention for 3 years and does nothing.

    2 At the beginning of the conflict, when Assad’s situation was worse, they did not dare, and now, when the “opposition” has switched to guerrilla and terrorist actions, they will not dare.

    3 Unlike Iraq and Libya, Syria actually has weapons of mass destruction. And it can arrange a “chemical apocalypse” for any of its “bad neighbors.”
    1. vladsolo56
      +2
      26 August 2013 12: 01
      all three points are not convincing, one might even say frivolous. One point will outweigh all the above by 200%. The United States and its allies have invested not only millions, but probably billions in this war, and it’s so easy to just spit and forget. No, they will finish what they started. The money must be worked off and returned, and as is customary in the USA, returned with interest. So, only direct intervention from Russia, or even a promise of direct intervention, as was the case in South Ossetia, can stop them. And even if someone thinks that even this will not stop the United States, I am sure that it will even stop it. Question? Will Russia, represented by Putin, want to voice such an ultimatum? 99,9% no. who disagrees with me?
      1. 0
        26 August 2013 16: 31
        A month ago, the United States and its allies did not invest “billions” in the war, but a year ago, or two?
        Give at least one convincing and serious point why the intervention did not take place earlier, but will happen now.
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 17: 12
          Quote: Chelicera
          A month ago, the United States and its allies did not invest “billions” in the war, but a year ago, or two?
          Give at least one convincing and serious point why the intervention did not take place earlier, but will happen now.

          America, for the defector, he took offense at us.
        2. vladsolo56
          0
          27 August 2013 05: 50
          It's simple. America prefers above all to rake in the heat with someone else's hands. Maybe you haven’t noticed that there has been an intervention in Syria for 2 years now, and the United States has invested a lot of money in this intervention. The United States was confident that this would be enough to overthrow Assad. So right now it has finally become clear to everyone that terrorist mercenaries will not be able to cope with the Syrian army. The collapse of the mercenaries is predetermined. Therefore, the need arose for attacks by more powerful forces than those hysterically collected from all over the world. Time is over. The United States understands that it is time to finish and it is time to finally return the money invested. In addition, Russia was checked for the loyalty of such an action. Now everything has become extremely clear.
  89. 0
    26 August 2013 11: 34
    The article is nonsense! Iran will not enter the war 100%, they will sit and hope that it can pass... Russia and China will not provide any military assistance to Syria - 100%, Neither China nor Russia will apply economic sanctions to me, because it is fraught... And in general, no matter how sad and disgusting it is to realize this, the amers will still devour Assad and most likely without major losses (except economic ones. You can argue as much as you like about how expensive all these Arab wars are for me, but the EXPECTED BENEFITS are WAY GREATER! All the links in this chain lead to one thing - the redivision of the world!And the Americans know what they are doing.
    1. Arabist
      +2
      26 August 2013 12: 17
      Will Iran sit and hope that it will pass? Yes, you are a leading expert, it’s immediately obvious. That Iran will become next is clear to everyone, since the target is Iran, Syria is just its main ally in the region.
  90. -1
    26 August 2013 11: 34
    99.9% there will be no US attack on Syria. Barack Husseinovich Obama doesn’t, he doesn’t care about Syria. In the USA there is a covert struggle going on and someone wants to make Khuseinovich look like a fool. The aggressor attacked, bypassing the UN Security Council, but did not attack and was afraid of Syria. How everyone loves to shout about NATO, but where is Germany I ask. Germany is the locomotive of the EU, Merkel has elections and she somehow doesn’t want to meet the corpses of German soldiers. France and England are mongrels tugging at Huseinovich, but if Germany says “Ugh,” the dogs England and France will run into their doghouses. And much is still unknown. I think with a chemical attack they will make some kind of extreme gang that fights against the Syrian government and against the tame animals of the West. The CIA probably already came up with photos and other crap.
  91. andru_007
    0
    26 August 2013 11: 36
    I'm afraid to be right, but if the Americans start a war, it will be September 1...
  92. minimum
    +2
    26 August 2013 11: 38
    ohoh, here especially hotheads are proposing to fight for Syria so as not to lose face in the dirt? Guys, excuse me, but it’s better to slap dirt in the face 20 times, but there’s no need to get involved in a nuclear war and a conflict with NATO, which will smear us all over the wall. If you itching like that, go and fight and take Washington, but outside of Russia.
    and so, if the United States starts, then Assad will end, no matter what they say, and Russia with the elites who sent their children to the USA and Europe is unlikely to fight with those who have their children and grandmothers. So, they will talk about lack of spirituality and wrongness, then they will talk about how the United States will soon collapse 569 times, gays, and that’s where all Russia’s revenge will end.
    I say all this because Russia objectively now does not have the strength to play such large-scale global games, they simply don’t exist and that’s all. it's time to wake up.
  93. +1
    26 August 2013 11: 38
    Good. The Syrian Arab Army will be eliminated. The Syrian government will be biased. And what next? That's right, international sponsors will block the cash infusions of the militants. Destroy them simply will be no one. So, it will be time to return home, to London, to Paris, to dozens of other European cities.

    in fact, this is what the Europeans need, because it will allow the authorities to tighten the screws very seriously, such as the fight against terrorism, etc.

    I still recommend that many people watch V for Vendetta, where, according to this scenario (they carried out the terrorist attacks themselves), the screws were tightened for the population
  94. wax
    +3
    26 August 2013 11: 49
    It seems that the anti-Syrian hysteria is just a camouflage for a sudden massive Israeli strike with NATO support against Iran. Western armies will not enter Syria; all strikes will be carried out remotely: against air defense systems, chemical weapons warehouses, and Assad’s residence. Then the no-fly zone will allow the clearing of both Assad’s and al-Qaeda’s forces by the opposition FSA, supported by modern weapons. At first, only special forces will be on Syrian territory with the task of removing Assad at any cost. But the main blow is precisely against Iran.
    These are my thoughts. IMHO?
    1. vladsolo56
      0
      26 August 2013 12: 04
      Look at what is happening in Iraq, and you will not make such forecasts.
  95. Kowalsky
    +1
    26 August 2013 11: 53
    What does NATO currently have in the Syrian coast area, who knows? In that sense, I’m asking - have they started to gather fleets there or not yet?
  96. slvevg
    +2
    26 August 2013 11: 59
    Let's turn our heads back and see the whole history of the Syrian confrontation. All actions of the allies and the United States are moving towards the intended goal along a curve, skirting Russia’s diplomatic attacks. There is a plan and it is adhered to flexibly adjusting to geopolitical the situation, even the unrest in Turkey and Egypt, is part of the plan, to indicate a place for some in the general order, for others to divert some of the forces and attention from another problem. And all this as a tool of influence on Russia with its ambitions (it’s hard to admit the awakening of the bear).
    And discussions about who will be worse off as a result, like a fantastic story, how much imagination is enough, that’s why it’s chaos, it’s only moderately controllable. But one thing is certain: whoever conducts is one step ahead. what are the goals of chaos, and one is an endless sluggish war in countries with resources. It would seem like a chaotically rotating ball, but it flies along a trajectory towards the target.
  97. 0
    26 August 2013 11: 59
    We need a fulcrum for subsequent containment of US aggression... It’s her dear one that we can’t see. Take the fleet to the Mediterranean Sea? Threaten Kuzka's mother? Well, one can only dream of economic sanctions!
  98. The Indian Joe
    +5
    26 August 2013 12: 01
    Syria/Iran, next is Russia. I don’t know what they promised Putin for non-interference - but you CANNOT trust the West.
    1. 0
      26 August 2013 13: 59
      Quote: Injun Joe
      Syria/Iran, next is Russia.

      There is an opinion that Iran has been postponed. Next Russia.
  99. +2
    26 August 2013 12: 08
    There is only one way to prevent Anglo-Saxon aggression in Syria - to clearly, clearly and unambiguously show that Russia, in the event of a war, will not be shy in choosing the supply of weapons to both Syria and Iran. And not giving a damn about the different ones operating there for someone sanctions and other formalities...If some spit on internationally accepted rules of behavior, then why should Russia adhere to them?!! Fuck those rules!
  100. +7
    26 August 2013 12: 09
    "...Apparently, the United States is planning to once again implement the Libyan scenario..."

    And we, in turn, will bring our scenario to life, as in Yugoslavia and Libya.
    Let's frown, wag our fingers, condemn the aggression and... publicly humiliated and insulted, we'll leave without a slurp.

    1. +5
      26 August 2013 13: 57
      Quote: Samsebenum
      And we, in turn, will implement ours, as in Yugoslavia and Libya...
      Let's frown, wag our fingers, judge and leave without a slurp...

      Valera Hello. So it will be. I remember how the jingoistic patriots here, foaming at the mouth, argued that we would not destroy Syria. Against the backdrop of our shaking the air in the UN Security Council. We were in the minority then, they completely minused us. Syria will be torn apart like hell. hi
      1. +3
        26 August 2013 14: 11
        What? Has Syria already been leaked?
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 14: 16
          Quote: arnulla
          What? Has Syria already been leaked?

          Not yet. But everything is moving towards this. The Americans will not leave them alone, and we have nothing to oppose.
          1. +2
            26 August 2013 14: 33
            Wait and see...
        2. APOCALIPTIC
          -3
          26 August 2013 19: 09
          Quote: arnulla
          What? Has Syria already been leaked?


          What did you think, scattered into the bushes, just like other friends?

          Lavrov: Russia will not enter into a military conflict over Syria
          Read more: http://www.rosbalt.ru/main/2013/08/26/1168459.html
          1. 0
            26 August 2013 20: 40
            Are you proposing to start a war with NATO over Syria? What will it develop into next? Have you ever thought about it?
          2. 0
            28 August 2013 12: 48
            Quote: APOCALIPTIC
            What did you think, scattered into the bushes, just like other friends?

            This is said by a representative of one of the American colonies, and their “brave”, “warlike” squeals are carried out from behind each other, from the entire newly assembled NATO rabble. Syria is a fighter, NATO is a cowardly, worthless rabble, consisting of elements, alone nothing They don’t represent themselves. It’s interesting what England can do without NATO and its other members - look at the history of the Second World War.
      2. +1
        26 August 2013 14: 22
        nycsson

        Alexey, my friend, I shake your hand!!!!

        When people are foaming at the mouth, it's time to see a doctor. Either rabies, or hysteria, and often this is a neurologist’s client...

        Syria seems to have been sentenced... Help can only come from three directions:
        -from God
        -from Allah
        -from Russia and China
        The last option is the most realistic, but this is only for tough guys...
        1. 0
          26 August 2013 15: 09
          Quote: Samsebenum
          -from Russia and China
          The last option is the most realistic, but this is only for tough guys...

          Valer! Now, I have to give you some credit. hi I never tire of being amazed by your wit. Well, nothing to add! At least leave some options for me so that I can assent! laughing As they say, a psychologist is a psychologist in Africa too! good
          PS This is not to wet everyone in the toilet..... wassat
          1. +1
            26 August 2013 16: 32
            Alexey, thank you for your support!!!!!!!!
            Damn, it's nice to read reviews like this.
        2. Guun
          +2
          26 August 2013 15: 50
          Actually, God in Arabic is Allah, and in Hebrew, Ella.
        3. +1
          26 August 2013 19: 20
          GOD AND ALLAH are one and the same.
      3. smersh70
        +7
        26 August 2013 14: 35
        Quote: nycsson
        Quote: Samsebenum
        And we, in turn, will implement ours, as in Yugoslavia and Libya...
        Let's frown, wag our fingers, judge and leave without a slurp...

        Valera Hello. So it will be. I remember how the jingoistic patriots here, foaming at the mouth, argued that we would not destroy Syria. Against the backdrop of our shaking the air in the UN Security Council. We were in the minority then, they completely minused us. Syria will be torn apart like hell. hi



        and in the sequel they are now downvoting me wassat
        1. +4
          26 August 2013 14: 57
          Yes, the Americans have calculated everything again! Russia, with this oh Olympics, which is essentially useless to anyone, will now have to put up with the upcoming redivision of the world. It started with attacks on LGBT people and they were promised that they would not be touched, which means that since the Olympics are important for Russia, they can attack Syria, because if Russia gets involved, then a complete boycott of the Olympics, Syria will not be sucked in. This is what the race for money leads to.
          But hope dies last, perhaps this is a provocation, after all, an attempt to get Russia into the ring, something will have to be sacrificed. For me, these Olympics are long overdue to be closed; they do not correspond to their status and are subject to politics, and they have become much more uninteresting than any championships throughout the year , which are much more spectacular.
        2. +1
          26 August 2013 15: 50
          smersh70
          Quote: smersh70
          and in the continuation now they are minus me wassat


          Don't drift, buddy!!
          Let's throw some pluses... Guys, let's support the guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      4. Volkhov
        -6
        26 August 2013 14: 35
        Quote: nycsson
        Syria will be destroyed

        By the forces of the Russian Federation, which is where it will burst...
        1. -1
          26 August 2013 15: 10
          Quote: Volkhov
          By the forces of the Russian Federation, which is where it will burst...

          Translate......or explain..... belay
          1. Volkhov
            -3
            26 August 2013 16: 02
            In Beyond the Screen, it is the Russian Federation that is at war with Syria, has lost half of its fleet, mountains of weapons, crowds of contract soldiers - soon MAX, under its hype, will begin the next stage.
            Any mechanism has a load limit - then destruction, which is where we are heading.
            1. Arabist
              +6
              26 August 2013 16: 09
              Volkhov, and you are here. As I see it, you are an ardent supporter of the theory of “fucked up all the polymers” and see other worlds. Write a list of the ships that we lost in Syria during the war with it and the “crowds” of contract soldiers.
              1. Volkhov
                -2
                26 August 2013 19: 51
                Make a list of what is left over and subtract from what you had at Easter.
                Collect photos of burned militants - you'll get a normal crowd.
                1. Arabist
                  +1
                  26 August 2013 22: 09
                  According to my calculations, not a single ship was lost. Facts to the studio. Are the militants our contract soldiers? Where do you even get your information from? Echo of Moscow?
            2. Zheka Sibiryak
              0
              29 August 2013 08: 39
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGs4auTG-Eg&feature=share&list=UUHtwlPVVNzxgLhnBD
              Rsqk3w
              Russian flags fly in Syria with the support of Syrian special forces

              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STAyv0L7S20&feature=share&list=UUHtwlPVVNzxgLhnBD
              Rsqk3w
              Max 2013