Letter to Soviet Communists

264


Dear Soviet Communists!


I am not authorized to speak for everyone, because, quite possibly, someone in the USSR lacked bandits, prostitutes, cops-executioners, unemployment, corrupt officials, terrorist acts, inflation, ethnic conflicts, refugees, paid education and paid medicine, stupid serials and incompetent pop music on TV, churches, mosques and synagogues, drug addiction, pedophiles, Ksyusha Sobchak, Courchevel for some and dumps for others, defaults and economic crises, monetization of conscience and capitalization of humanity.

I can only speak for myself. Because personally, I did not need all of the above.

Between us, not everything worked out well for you, but something did it through the ass or not at all, but looking at what happened after you left, I have no more complaints about you. I officially declare that I was shooting them all that I had then. Because all the bad things that happened with you, it remained with us, it only increased and increased many times. And even your “our dear Leonid Ilyich” mumbled now is nicer to me than Dmitry Anatolyevich vigorous - then the first one fought, raised virgin lands and built cities, factories and BAM, and the second ate a hamburger and got an I-background on the ball. He also has all the records of the group "Deep Purple". That is, in fact, all that he has done in his life - and why he rules the Russian people, I, for the life of me, do not understand. And the CPSU, with all that little left of Lenin’s party, seems to be some kind of Areopagus of wise men and highly moral personalities - if you look at United Russia (yes, and I’m not going to talk about “ours” and about ” young guard "? because besides the mat about them, I can not write anything at all). Unfortunately, but everything that I wrote in the first lines of my letter to you was added.

But the good that was with you was no more and never will be.

So thank you for being. For the smile of Yuri Gagarin, for the red flag over Berlin, for the Soviet Army, equipped with first-class tanks and airplanes, for the belief that no one will ever attack my country, because they will get so little that it will seem, for atomic icebreakers, for keeping the great Russian classical culture - and the culture of other peoples of the Union - from vulgarity and laws of the market, for science, for observatories, for synchrophasotrons, for the journal “Astronomical calendar of a schoolboy” at the price of five cents and the magazine “Quant” at the price of ten cents, which my not-so-rich mother wrote out for the mountains of the North Caucasus, on which one could relax and ski without a fight I want to get a bullet from a bearded fanatic, for the free radio circle in which I assembled my first transistor receiver, for the doctors who performed the operation on my little daughter’s eyes for free, for the pride of the immensity of the country in which we live, because we were all our own - Russians, Ukrainians, Azerbaijanis, Armenians, Jews, Chukchi and another 150 different nations and nationalities, for an awesome feeling of equality between people - a thing that simply cannot be understood by those who did not live then.

And the most important thing is for the fact that we, as if not mowing down at times, built the best and most humane system in stories. If not for myself, then for our children. But not only for ours, by the way.

Now only either become a ghoul-bourgeois and suck the blood out of their workers - or the official parasite. This is the horizon of a dream that remains for us and the next generations.

Dirty, everything has become without you, dear Soviet communists, very dreadfully. And, most importantly, it will obviously be even trash. It is this period without you that showed that when everything “comes to life” the problems begin seriously - the authorities will run away. Like rats. Because they have where to run. That our country is generally not intended to live in it to the common man. Let it be modest. As with you.

That's all that I would like to tell you, comrades Soviet communists. Wherever you are, I hope you hear me.

Best regards,
Alexander Kommari, 1 / 260 is the millionth part of the former Soviet people.


264 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    21 May 2013 16: 38
    Quote: aviamed90
    Apologet.Ru

    Well, don’t idealize Nicholas II. It’s not for nothing that he got the nickname “Bloody”! For famous deeds, as we all know. One Khodynka upon accession to the throne would be enough!


    "Surrendered the State as command of a squadron..." (c) film "Two Lives"
  2. lexe
    0
    21 May 2013 17: 28
    For the preservation of Russian culture, a low bow. Our Russian culture has become a classic... but not a reality in the USSR. Do you want an anecdote? - We are still ruled by the communists) but with a new, so to speak, uh... slant) Medvedev's. Well, they should Somehow you come to Western terki, but there is etiquette - they won’t let you in if you haven’t indicated exactly who you are). So the Soviet flag was lowered deep into the ground in the Kremlin - don’t cry scoops, but wait for the signal from your leaders. Well, the leaders’ working methods have changed). .d.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Best novel
    0
    21 May 2013 19: 49
    True, there were also “bad” communists who shot the workers of Novocherkassk, dissatisfied Czechoslovaks, “treated” dissatisfied “bad Soviet citizens” in psychiatric hospitals, but these are few of them and this is the exception! Basically, they are all good, and all for the people. But exclusively for the people who agree with them.
  5. fatty
    0
    21 May 2013 20: 11
    no, commie, your zyugan, and other Marxist-Lenisk apologists are fine. Yes, you yourself probably don’t eat sour cabbage? the fact is that Comrade Staliin exterminated the Leninist-Trotsky psychopaths, with their permanent revolution, stopped theft from the Russian treasury to the Third International, which was essentially a gluttonous and thieving organization.
  6. +1
    21 May 2013 20: 36
    all this Gorbachev chatter about pluralism, glasnost, freedom resulted in the ugliest forms, because the opportunists then came to the fore more than ever. Everything was done for show. The persecution of Stalin was a big lie. irony for Brezhnev. In general, it turned out then that the USSR supposedly did not have a worthy past and the present is already beginning to lose meaning because of this... a general shortage as a consequence of weak power. But the goods were in the warehouse from there and were sold at an inflated price.. Pavlovsk monetary reform.. from this uncertainty about the future Prohibition, ethnic strife and anti-Sovietism against the backdrop of such power... In general, the people began to feel like they were in a flawed state. And tell me, what kind of future in the USSR did this envision for us? .... The past has been spat upon, the present has been trashed. There is no fulcrum from which we would step into the future with Gorbachev's perestroika!!! Gorbachev is a rare bastard...
  7. Seraph
    0
    22 May 2013 03: 44
    Aviamed90: “Bloody” Nicholas II in comparison with characters like the Socialist-Revolutionaries who hated him, the Social Democrats and our liberals, who just to justify their cannibalism need to make a bogey out of their predecessor - it’s simply nothing and about nothing. All the victims of Khodynka, the so-called "Bloody Sunday", all executions during his reign - this is a couple of days at 18 or 37: 1389 on Khodynka, 200 victims of "Bloody Sunday" and no more than several hundred executed during his reign (more 20 years). Are the Russians, who survived Trotsky, Khrushchev and Yagoda, not ashamed to repeat the clinical nonsense of our enemies about “bloody Nicholas”? The Russian Empire is bloody, Suvorov is bloody, Ivan the Terrible is bloody, the USSR is bloody, Yeltsin is bloody. Our veins should already be dry...
    Our haters churn out anti-Russian propaganda, and we, with open ears, listen to it and repeat it. It's a shame
    1. 0
      22 May 2013 10: 54
      Seraphim

      You didn't study history well and didn't analyze the facts. Or do you think that the revolution in Russia occurred solely because of the subversive activities of the Bolsheviks? You mixed everything together. And the Tsar, and Suvorov, and Trotsky.
      If you are a monarchist, I respect your opinion, but I don’t have to agree with you. I have my own opinion, which also deserves respect.

      Let's not talk about history books. Read at least V. Pikul’s book “Evil Spirits” (based on documents). And a lot will become clear to you.

      But no one justifies Trotsky, Stalin and Yeltsin. And don’t justify Nicholas II. He was still that gentleman! Read the story about how he ascended the throne and what kind of relationship he had with his mother, Maria Feodorovna (“Wrathful”). And Khodynka is just one episode from a long list of his sins.
      1. +1
        22 May 2013 23: 50
        You talk a lot about the sins of others .. but you don’t see the essence, namely the main thing.. Stalin saved Russia from Trotsky (study Leva Bronstein’s plans and speeches about Russia) then read saved the world from the brown plague... And if he had babysat then with the 5th column, I don’t think you were sitting here at the PC...
        1. fatty
          0
          31 May 2013 19: 52
          Vlad, I’m not against the Bronsteins and other worthy people, but Comrade Kasparov G.K. I frankly don't like him. Let him be your American, pro-German-disgusting-Chubais friend. Take care of this joy.
  8. lexe
    0
    22 May 2013 14: 09
    Yes, color blindness is flourishing.. No, come on, flies, cutlets separately. Stalin, the supreme scoundrel, was in the company of his friends Lenin and Trotsky. The executioners were literate and ideological. But we will only judge them in Russia, and not somewhere else there and without We will create all kinds of gozman Kremlin puppets and a wall, not crying but howling! At the same time, without any complexes of guilt, but with a feeling of complete satisfaction that we are not yet the end of the population, but we are still the people. And all the neighbors who also want to squeeze out money for our grief we will rudely send to...Our grandfathers paid off all the debts of the whole of Europe for 1000 years in advance - how long did Hitler want to live there?. Yes.. and I’m not a nationalist - I remember that in the trenches of the 2nd World War there are still Russians and Jews face west towards the common enemy.
  9. 0
    24 May 2013 17: 35
    Even if you call it a Principality of Russia, the main thing is HOMELAND! And no revolutions! I am impressed by the statement -...it was the “lumpen” who were the main driving force of any revolution - eternally dissatisfied and not
    people who wanted to work were ready to kill for the sake of a ghostly opportunity to get to the top and get the fattest pieces without working...
  10. fatty
    0
    31 May 2013 19: 29
    novels, no matter how you spin, but your commies are scoundrels, and thank God that a temple was built for Russian sailors in Kronshtat.
  11. +1
    1 June 2013 19: 44
    Thank you for your attention. I would like to quote a book from the history:
    , lately the Politburo has mainly relied on Soviets at various levels. The party reform, which Stalin and Zhdanov actively carried out, led to the liquidation of the republican communist parties, a reduction in the staff of regional and district Committees, and all work was transferred to lower party organizations. The 20th Party Congress, held last year, showed increased antagonism between the old Central Committee and the grassroots party organizations. Party officials, who after the reform found themselves without the “envelopes” they had received monthly since 1929, and who did not pay taxes on them, remembered the “past” with longing and launched a real attack on Stalin and Zhdanov. They were accused of anti-Leninist policies, talked about the leading and guiding role of the CPSU, accused of the wrong foreign and national policy of the USSR: refusal to support communist movements in other countries, the collapse of the communist parties of the republics. They had nothing to lose. A salary of 127 rubles/month is quite modest; in industry the salary was 400-500 rubles per month. But their proposals did not pass, criticism remained unheeded, since for the majority of the congress delegates, representatives of grassroots party organizations, the increase in well-being over the current five-year period amounted to 120-150%, at the same time the amount of reporting decreased, a clear vertical of power appeared, and local “party gods” disappeared. Yes, active work in a team was required, yes, an active position was required, it was required to be a leader, not a bureaucrat. Belonging to the party became an internal conviction, and not self-interest, since it did not particularly influence a future career in society. Stalin said at the congress that Lenin bequeathed to us to build a people's state, and we built it. The initial construction of both the party and the USSR along national lines is a tribute to the remnants of the past, which the party began to eliminate, starting with itself. There is a new community: the Soviet people, there is a new state of the USSR, which strives to move from a federal form to a unitary one. Otherwise, the nationalist petty-bourgeois currents, which have begun to strengthen, will tear the country apart. The national question must be removed from the agenda of a true communist once and for all. Those who do not support these policies are free to leave the party. We don't need such 'communists' in the party.
  12. DPN
    0
    12 June 2013 11: 29
    Why swear and blame someone? Our population simply did not grow up to socialism, people did not need equality, brotherhood and peaceful labor. We listened to radio freedom, voices of America and other chatter and as a result we got what we wanted. The states were jealous that every car they could live in, only we have WINTER, we need housing that was provided by the Soviet government, and not tin cans in the form of cars that are today you can buy it. Today they are expelled from housing, during the Communists this was not possible. It’s just that the Russian people came to the proverb; Man is a WOLF to man;. We got what we wanted.
  13. DPN
    0
    20 June 2013 07: 10
    There is no need to blame everything on the communists, you just need to look at yourself, the generation of the 60-70s, one might say, lived under communism. Everything was available, and the housing was built in the USSR, from which today’s businessmen and hustlers are driving people out, or the same houses are being sold in a place with the same people. It’s not the communists who are to blame for this, but WE ARE THE PEOPLE who immediately wanted to become rich, and are now building in 10 times less housing than in the USSR. The rich have already received everything, and the rest of the population is content with slums, like in the USA, only there the climate is warmer and you can sleep in the fresh air. The younger generation has been brainwashed by cars; they get more loans on credit, but the population of the country is shrinking. Instead of apartments, they began to get a place in the cemetery.
    So it’s not the communists who are to blame, but the greed of the people and cowardice; the authorities provided themselves with riot police for many years.
  14. DPN
    0
    20 June 2013 07: 19
    This letter is, in all likelihood, a CRY from the soul, a comrade has profited in a capitalist society, tasted all the fruits
    coup of 91-93.