Letter to Soviet Communists

264


Dear Soviet Communists!


I am not authorized to speak for everyone, because, quite possibly, someone in the USSR lacked bandits, prostitutes, cops-executioners, unemployment, corrupt officials, terrorist acts, inflation, ethnic conflicts, refugees, paid education and paid medicine, stupid serials and incompetent pop music on TV, churches, mosques and synagogues, drug addiction, pedophiles, Ksyusha Sobchak, Courchevel for some and dumps for others, defaults and economic crises, monetization of conscience and capitalization of humanity.

I can only speak for myself. Because personally, I did not need all of the above.

Between us, not everything worked out well for you, but something did it through the ass or not at all, but looking at what happened after you left, I have no more complaints about you. I officially declare that I was shooting them all that I had then. Because all the bad things that happened with you, it remained with us, it only increased and increased many times. And even your “our dear Leonid Ilyich” mumbled now is nicer to me than Dmitry Anatolyevich vigorous - then the first one fought, raised virgin lands and built cities, factories and BAM, and the second ate a hamburger and got an I-background on the ball. He also has all the records of the group "Deep Purple". That is, in fact, all that he has done in his life - and why he rules the Russian people, I, for the life of me, do not understand. And the CPSU, with all that little left of Lenin’s party, seems to be some kind of Areopagus of wise men and highly moral personalities - if you look at United Russia (yes, and I’m not going to talk about “ours” and about ” young guard "? because besides the mat about them, I can not write anything at all). Unfortunately, but everything that I wrote in the first lines of my letter to you was added.

But the good that was with you was no more and never will be.

So thank you for being. For the smile of Yuri Gagarin, for the red flag over Berlin, for the Soviet Army, equipped with first-class tanks and airplanes, for the belief that no one will ever attack my country, because they will get so little that it will seem, for atomic icebreakers, for keeping the great Russian classical culture - and the culture of other peoples of the Union - from vulgarity and laws of the market, for science, for observatories, for synchrophasotrons, for the journal “Astronomical calendar of a schoolboy” at the price of five cents and the magazine “Quant” at the price of ten cents, which my not-so-rich mother wrote out for the mountains of the North Caucasus, on which one could relax and ski without a fight I want to get a bullet from a bearded fanatic, for the free radio circle in which I assembled my first transistor receiver, for the doctors who performed the operation on my little daughter’s eyes for free, for the pride of the immensity of the country in which we live, because we were all our own - Russians, Ukrainians, Azerbaijanis, Armenians, Jews, Chukchi and another 150 different nations and nationalities, for an awesome feeling of equality between people - a thing that simply cannot be understood by those who did not live then.

And the most important thing is for the fact that we, as if not mowing down at times, built the best and most humane system in stories. If not for myself, then for our children. But not only for ours, by the way.

Now only either become a ghoul-bourgeois and suck the blood out of their workers - or the official parasite. This is the horizon of a dream that remains for us and the next generations.

Dirty, everything has become without you, dear Soviet communists, very dreadfully. And, most importantly, it will obviously be even trash. It is this period without you that showed that when everything “comes to life” the problems begin seriously - the authorities will run away. Like rats. Because they have where to run. That our country is generally not intended to live in it to the common man. Let it be modest. As with you.

That's all that I would like to tell you, comrades Soviet communists. Wherever you are, I hope you hear me.

Best regards,
Alexander Kommari, 1 / 260 is the millionth part of the former Soviet people.


264 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +53
    18 May 2013 15: 39
    There is nothing to add.
    1. +23
      18 May 2013 15: 54
      Yes, there’s nothing to add here ...
      1. +42
        18 May 2013 16: 07
        There is always something to add. But to argue the position is enough. Against the backdrop of modern gay-juvenile-efficient managers, the article adds fresh air.
      2. +26
        18 May 2013 17: 33
        Quote: AlexTarov
        Yes, there’s nothing to add here ...


        I will add,
        Messieurs communists sneaked socialism and not ordinary people betrayed it, and those party people who were closer to the feeder and now rule us spit everywhere - the former communist repainted in ER-SR so if it were a pity I wouldn’t spare all the mercenary-Judas


        1. +26
          18 May 2013 18: 41
          Who is this - Gorbachev a communist or what? Not all one size fits all. If Juda-Gorbachev had a party card, it does not mean that he was a communist in spirit, like his sycophantic entourage. And the late USSR has little in common with the Soviet socialist system - it has been poisoned by the West, led by the United States, for several years. And about "wherever you spit - a former communist repainted" - so nowadays more in power structures and business repainted crime, and not communists.
          1. +10
            18 May 2013 19: 08
            Quote: AlexTarov
            Who is Gorbachev a communist? You don’t need all to fit one comb. If Judah-Gorbachev had a party card, it does not mean that he was a communist


            Now everyone began to understand who is Judas and who is not, from the height of those who lived, so to speak, but then it turns out that the real communists did not go to the party

            Quote: AlexTarov
            so now crime repainted in power structures and business,


            Is this Medvedev crime with his party card? the first secretary of the Krasnogvardeisky district committee of the CPSU of the city of Leningrad Shepetovskaya Matvienko still went wherever
            1. +8
              18 May 2013 19: 45
              Now everyone began to understand who is Judas and who is not, from the height of those who lived, so to speak, but then it turns out that the real communists did not go to the party

              Then they also understood - I assure you. People were no more stupid than the current generation. Another thing is that over time, the result of the tragedy that has occurred hits more strongly, and therefore the indignation increases. And in the party there were plenty of real communists in good conscience - locally, in the regions, in small towns, state and collective farms. If in Moscow there were concentrated ki calling themselves communists, this does not mean that the whole system was like that. By the way - that was what the stake was - to compromise the socialist system with the deeds of "pseudo-communists".
              Is this Medvedev crime with his party card? the first secretary of the Krasnogvardeisky district committee of the CPSU of the city of Leningrad Shepetovskaya Matvienko still went wherever

              Medvedev is a generally ambiguous figure. But he was 65 years old, and at the time of the death of the USSR he was 26 years old - he was definitely not a communist and did not want to be one. But his current environment and the people whose interests he is lobbying for are another matter.
              1. +11
                18 May 2013 20: 11
                Quote: AlexTarov
                Medvedev is a generally ambiguous figure. But he is 65 years old, and at the time of the death of the USSR he was 26 years old - he is definitely not a communist


                At the university, D. A. Medvedev joined the party, remained a member of the CPSU until August 1991.

                And it’s not me who invented


                1. +7
                  18 May 2013 20: 51
                  At the university, D. A. Medvedev joined the party, remained a member of the CPSU until August 1991.

                  I know - he had a party card. I mean that he was not an ideological communist. He is already from another deck. When a party card was handed to him, socialism was already foreign to him.
                  1. YuDDP
                    +5
                    18 May 2013 22: 33
                    Quote: AlexTarov
                    I'm talking about being an ideological communist

                    I am 59 years old. And somehow I haven’t come across a single ideological communist for all those years on my life path. Everything is the same as now: if you want to get to the feeder, if you want career growth, join the CPSU.
                    Another question is that the official ideology of the party and state was then aimed at the social development of society and it was impossible to move away from it (and this is good). And now there is no such ideology, and the current members of the CPSU, sorry — United Russia, are actively working for themselves, and not for the masses.
                    But there were none ideological then, there are none even now.
                    ___
                    Anticipating the minusers: maybe I lived at the wrong time and in the wrong place again?
                    1. YuDDP
                      +1
                      18 May 2013 22: 57
                      Here they are - ideological:
                      1. nickname 1 and 2
                        -1
                        19 May 2013 21: 23
                        Quote: YuDDP
                        Here they are - ideological:



                        THESE O.B.O.S.P.A.

                        And HERE = Glory to the people, the great people of the USSR!
                        PEOPLE WHICH, contrary to all the efforts of the sales communists, lived the great way, created, created, plowed like a horse, loved it, didn’t, did it, defeated him, he was completely unhappy!
                        GLORY! GLORY! GLORY!

                        What about the communists?

                        And the Communists have long fallen, in the fateful struggle!
                        And THESE swindlers are well-disguised liars and hypocrites!
                        You can’t say one thing in the kitchen and another = long on the podium!

                        Of the real Communists accidentally preserved, those units that shot themselves in the collapse of the USSR!
                    2. +8
                      19 May 2013 06: 13
                      I am 59 years old. And somehow I haven’t come across a single ideological communist for all those years on my life path. Everything is the same as now: if you want to get to the feeder, if you want career growth, join the CPSU.

                      You simply were not lucky, and in my life I met a lot of good and disinterested people with party cards, serving not for access to the feeder, but for conscience. And there were more. I didn’t watch your video - there’s no reason, but I repeat - you shouldn’t judge the system and people by individuals. And career growth is not at all bad, even with a membership card, even without.
                    3. +10
                      19 May 2013 08: 53
                      Quote: YuDDP

                      I am 59 years old. And somehow I haven’t come across a single ideological communist for all those years on my life path

                      And I'm 55. At home I have my fathers' party card and a dilapidated crust with the inscription "VKP (b)". He was a real Communist. And there were many like him. Only careerists and traitors like Yeltsin, Gorbachev and other Judas were in power. Real communists lived, created, built and died for a bright idea.
                    4. SASCHAmIXEEW
                      +11
                      19 May 2013 09: 17
                      I am 47 years old, I was not in the party, although I was called in the Army! But I will tell you, what is an "ideological communist"? In my opinion, this is a simple conscientious person who lives according to God's Commandments and that's it! And there were and there are MOST like that in our country !!!! And the code of the builder of communism is written off, who remembers from 10 commandments !!!
                    5. nickname 1 and 2
                      +2
                      19 May 2013 13: 27
                      Quote: YuDDP
                      I am 59 years old. And somehow I haven’t come across a single ideological communist for all those years on my life path.


                      But I’ve met since the 45th, not that I haven’t met, more than that — I heard about them! They were but very modest.
                      Or - subtle.
                      Ideological = it is rather: an alien! After all, the ideological should charge with its idea, but it did not work to charge! Heroic everyday life was not enough. And not heroic REALITIES was in bulk!
                      Cold showers:: There would be completely different opinions if our shuttles hadn’t hauled in goods, and the states and geyrop had not brought in products. That they would hold on a starvation diet for a year, two ......!

                      Mistake came out! (by the way, about the birds ..... and they do not all work out smoothly)
                    6. +2
                      21 May 2013 17: 42
                      My Father was an ideological communist, and remains so, thank God ... and there were a lot of ideological ones ... When all this mess, with ruins began, he left the "active" life, built a house by the river, started a garden, a vegetable garden, a pond, and, with the motto - "You children, take a sip of capitalism, and when you get bored - come to me, I will always be glad when you are around", lives and receives a bunch of guests ...

                      In general, at the beginning, in the mid-90s, I tried to argue with him, like - "communism, it's certainly good, but you also have to live and work ... for the good ...", in response I received - "For the good of what and for whom? For the good of yourself, and a handful of chosen people, your circle, right? And the rest, do not care from the high bell tower?". I tried to log in, saying that so and so, people are so arranged that always live only for the good of themselves and their inner circle, for which he invariably received one single argument - "Life, for the sake of life, kills people, people in us. We have to live for the sake of an idea - but it is gone. It's just that the idea is good because a new idea immediately appears behind the first idea. .. for her one more and so on to infinity. And when you live in order to live, life very quickly becomes insipid and tasteless, and porridge and nonsense appear in your head. " In general, over time, I began to better understand what he wanted to say then - the example of the West, before everyone's eyes. West is an example life for life, without an idea ... Someone probably like this way of life, no question ... a matter of taste. It's just that such a way of life definitely leads to disaster. As an individual - a person wears out very quickly (I observed this when he lived in the USA. A very vivid example - 90 percent of the population does not need anything. 5 percent of the population, active - but very quickly "fizzle out" and die out or turn into "non-humans"), and to the public - a bunch of individual universes, with thin bridges between them, in the form of "legal formulation of relations between individuals." I don’t know, I don’t know ... I don’t see in such a relationship, not an ounce of humanity ...

                      So that's about it ...
                2. +9
                  19 May 2013 02: 16
                  In the article, a mistake, certainly not Medvedev, precisely rules the Russian people. Medvedev is the one whom Putin first appointed president instead of himself, to preserve the chair for four years, and then appointed prime minister. Or again, all the bribes from Putin are smooth and he is not to blame for anything?
                  And so, the article is correct. I myself lived and THAT TIME and I understand perfectly well that we lost and prosrali.
                  1. nickname 1 and 2
                    +1
                    19 May 2013 14: 42
                    Quote: Kombitor
                    I myself lived and THAT TIME and I understand perfectly well that we lost and prosrali.


                    Lived at the time where? How? if the mother (or) mother-in-law was a BASIS BASIS or a merchandiser in the Central Department Store (and all the difficide is under you, then YES).

                    It is NECESSARY to think about this:
                    the fall of the USSR and the birth of new technologies for growing vegetables and combine harvesters for grains - a happy coincidence (for someone, but not for those)
                    The fact that the USSR fed a lot of "devoted fighters for socialism" is not a secret (the USSR itself did not give it to its own), WOULD PROTECT THESE FUELED FROM THE USSR FROM RUNNING, DO NOT GET TWO PRODUCTS FOR A YEAR! But food has become easier in the world and the fatteners did not notice the loss of the breadwinner!
                    1. +2
                      19 May 2013 14: 57
                      Quote: nick 1 and 2
                      The fact that the USSR fed a lot of "devoted fighters for socialism" is not a secret (the USSR itself did not give its own people),


                      And how much money was thrown into the Arabs whom the Jews beat and beat, how much did the Communist Party feed all sorts of African cannibals? How many guys have lost in Afghanistan for the sake of a handful of Afghan "comrades"? The dope was immeasurable
                      1. nickname 1 and 2
                        -5
                        19 May 2013 19: 57
                        Quote: Vadivak
                        Duri was unmeasured


                        And the time of Stalin was sheer foppiness more than concern for the people. And Khrushchev is a clown.
                        How could you assign prod obyazalovka, how could you bring people to the point that the villagers began to feed BREAD on cows? How to buy eggs, milk from neighbors to donate to the state?

                        The people have achieved success, the people pulled everything out on their belly button despite wise leadership!
                        Who led the country QUESTION? Not the Communist Party - for sure!
                        Have you ruled the country ?????????????????? but covered the CPSU!
                    2. lucidlook
                      +2
                      19 May 2013 17: 06
                      Beginning with Khrushchev, governing the country followed an extensive path. This can be estimated at least by the level of investment in fixed assets or (indirectly) by the country's gold reserves.

                      The emergence of thieves' ties against the background of a deficit is the result of a lost ideological struggle with the rotten West, which, under the guise of the "American dream," slipped perverted values ​​from the series "a man of labor does not deserve any respect."
              2. SASCHAmIXEEW
                +1
                19 May 2013 09: 05
                He is definitely not a communist - he is a Jew, so they say. And if he was circumcised on the 8th day, then he is precisely programmed to fulfill the will of the Zionist lobby in "our", rather in "their" government, so that "THEY" would live better in OUR RUSSIA than WE, THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE !!!
          2. -5
            18 May 2013 20: 52
            Gorbachev is a conductor of the will of the Andropov clan, so what were you waiting for ?! It’s still happiness that everything is so, but it could have been much, much worse!
            1. SASCHAmIXEEW
              +1
              19 May 2013 09: 24
              "It could have been" yes, it could have been from the beginning, and then it would have become worse for those who got us into it, but they were lucky! It went according to their script and they captured everything without blood !!! Now the question is how to fix everything without blood ???
              1. nickname 1 and 2
                -1
                19 May 2013 16: 08
                Quote: SASCHAmIXEEW
                Now the question is how to fix everything without blood ???


                Yes easily! You just need to find, understand, come up = WHAT TO CHANGE? And then like clockwork!

                If only it wasn’t for soap! And the one that did not begin to revive.
          3. DPN
            +7
            18 May 2013 21: 46
            I completely agree with you in power mainly in crime, some of which sat down in the late 90s, and what’s smarter went to power. In every region of Russia there are local people who know this, so you don’t have to blame everything on the Communists.
            Nemtsov, for example, became the youngest governor, for holding an offended, and in the future, a drunken eBN, now he became an offended oppositionist having lost power.
        2. +4
          18 May 2013 18: 58
          Quite rightly said !!! There are no words.
        3. +23
          18 May 2013 19: 36
          Come on first - the communists built this socialism. And forgive us forgive ourselves - together, when the State Emergency Committee was bombed, when the White House was smashed. When for the sake of rags we decided - we will starve, but we will go branded in rags, when we were allowed to plunder the country with vouchers, when dollars became the permitted currency, when we voted for Yeltsin and Gorbachev. My father was a communist - an ideological communist - he didn’t waste anything. Too much money was spent to overthrow the Communists, and too much who worked that money.
          1. +8
            18 May 2013 20: 21
            Quote: dddym
            And forgive us forgive ourselves - together, when the State Emergency Committee was bombed, when the White House was smashed.



            Sorry, but I didn’t take the oath of military authority and did not support Yeltsin
            Quote: dddym
            Too much money was spent to overthrow the communists


            Come on, Valery Boldin, once one of the closest people to Gorbachev, and maybe just the closest in the apparatus, demonstrated one striking material evidence during interrogations in the GKChP case in 1991. Gorbachev’s checks for 100 thousand US dollars received in 1991 from the President of South Korea, Ro Dae U. 100 thousand dollars registered checks.

            However, to whom and a hundred thousand bucks for the national happiness is a fantastic amount
            And for the most part, the country of the marasmatics trampled their way in 1979 when they flooded to Afghanistan, in the USA Brzezinski did not die of joy, he promised to "give advice to their own Vietnam" and gave it, although intelligence warned, but the party said it was necessary ...

            And in general, with the departure of Stalin, the construction of socialism at the top quietly came to naught.


            1. +21
              18 May 2013 20: 31
              Imagine the same :)

              As a citizen of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, joining the Armed Forces, I take the Oath and solemnly swear: to be an honest, brave, disciplined, vigilant warrior, to strictly keep military and state secrets, to unquestioningly comply with all military charters and orders of commanders and commanders
              I swear to conscientiously study military affairs, to cherish military and national property in every way, and to the last breath to be devoted to my People, my Soviet Motherland and the Soviet Government.
              I am always ready, on the orders of the Soviet Government, to defend my Homeland - the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and, as a warrior of the Armed Forces, I swear to defend it courageously, skillfully, with dignity and honor, not sparing my blood and life itself to achieve a complete victory over enemies .
              If I break my solemn oath, then let me suffer the harsh punishment of Soviet law, the universal hatred and contempt of the Soviet people.
              1. +5
                18 May 2013 21: 04
                In the same way, I took the oath only once. On the parade ground in KDVO.
            2. +3
              19 May 2013 13: 04
              And here is the oath. They swear primarily to the Motherland. I swore in 1992 that now I should be a member of the Yeltsinists or Chubais? Or do you now consider yourself free from the oath?
              1. +1
                19 May 2013 13: 48
                T-73

                You're not right. The oath here, just, and.
                Because in the event of a turmoil (civil massacre), you will not be able to be charged with betraying the interests of the state (after all, you did not swear allegiance to it, despite your citizenship). If you swore allegiance to the USSR, and serve the Russian Federation, then this is a purely contractual relationship from the point of view of the law. So, this is a purely legal, but very important "squiggle".
                Of course, you can say that the Russian Federation is the legal successor of the USSR. To this I will answer you - but, at the same time, they asked me? I took the oath of the USSR and the point! And the second time I didn’t take the oath (of the Russian Federation), but served under the contract (i.e., the Russian Federation hired me).
                For example, in Ukraine everyone swore allegiance (even forced pensioners) to be loyal to "Batkovshchina".

                “I, a citizen of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, entering the ranks of the Armed Forces, take the oath and solemnly swear to be an honest, brave, disciplined, vigilant warrior, strictly keep military and state secrets, unquestioningly comply with all military regulations and orders of commanders and commanders.

                I swear to conscientiously study military affairs, to protect military and national property in every possible way and to be loyal to my People, my Soviet Homeland and the Soviet Government until the last breath.

                I am always ready, by order of the Soviet Government, to defend my Homeland - the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and, as a warrior of the Armed Forces, I swear to defend it courageously, skillfully, with dignity and honor, not sparing my blood and life itself to achieve a complete victory over enemies .

                If I violate my solemn oath, then let me suffer the harsh punishment of Soviet law, the general hatred and contempt of the Soviet people. "

                Find here a mention of the Russian Federation?

                In your case, you swore allegiance to the Russian Federation. And from the point of view of the law are obliged to be responsible for its implementation to the Russian Federation.
              2. +4
                19 May 2013 21: 19
                For me, the USSR was and remains the Motherland. I don’t know another Power!
          2. korm-yurii
            +13
            18 May 2013 21: 09
            At the referendum, I voted for the Soviet Union, like all many of us in all the republics. It was Yeltsin who immediately called old Bush from the Pushcha: "The Soviet Union has ceased to exist."
        4. +7
          18 May 2013 21: 48
          I completely agree with the author's words, but with comments like Vadivak’s commentary, I don’t. I would not be so categorical towards all the members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, who, allegedly, were closer to the trough and "pushed socialism." Remember the failed coup attempt, weren't the communists from the CPSU Central Committee taking part in it? Not everyone agreed with Gorbachev and his policy of openness and transparency, which led to the death of the USSR. Yeltsin had nothing to forgive at the 19th party conference, when he swore allegiance to communist ideals and socialism, and he himself held a stone in his bosom. Gorbachev and his entourage in the person of Shervanadze, Yakovlev and others, are guilty of what happened. And nobody else.
          1. +4
            18 May 2013 23: 44
            Quote: starshina78
            the putsch, didn’t the Communists from the Central Committee of the CPSU participate in it?

            Excuse me, but you are mistaken, perhaps quite sincerely. Get acquainted with the materials on the State Emergency Committee. Not with the propaganda of the liberals, but with the memoirs of Kryuchkov at least ... Why didn’t they have the determination to act, and not just sit in front of the cameras? that moment was there. The army, the police .... And how did it end? They vied with themselves, who had time to rush to the same Gorbachev in Foros. Because none of them sat down, it was all (as it were, to put it mildly) a kind of staging . Planned with the consent of the same Gorbachev.
            1. nickname 1 and 2
              0
              19 May 2013 23: 04
              Quote: Tverichanka
              it was (as it were, to put it mildly) a certain statement. It was planned with the consent of the same Gorbachev.


              Why, why did PUGO shoot himself ???

              Quote: Tverichanka
              and with Kryuchkov’s memories at least


              What for? I remember everything myself.
        5. -2
          19 May 2013 15: 45
          The Social Democrats (b) first in London (!) For the money of “simple” English Samaritans organize their party (2 congress of the RSDLP - 17 (30) of July - 10 (23) of August 1903), and then they supported the defeat of Russia for the next tranches during the Russo-Japanese War, they organized revolutionary terrorism in the country, killing and maiming from 1901 to 1911 a year about 17 thousand people (of which 9 thousand during the 1905-1907 revolution, in 1907 a year, an average of up to 18 people died every day) . And then, after a short break, according to the plan of Alexander Lvovich Parvus (Israel Lazarevich Gelfand) according to the “Memorial of Dr. Gelfand”, for the money of the German (and not only ...) government, comrade the Bolsheviks organized the October Revolution, smoothly flowing into the fratricidal Civil War. Thus having arranged, “the day before the Victory,” the defeat of the country in the First World War and having deleted from the memory of the people of 5 the millions of dead Russian soldiers.
          Ditching the color of the nation in the Civil War - more than 10 million people died and died during epidemics, more than 4 million people became disabled and more than 2 million people emigrated to other countries. And, having destroyed the country “to the ground” - more than a quarter of national wealth was lost, national income decreased by 2,75 times compared to 1917, the gross output of small industry dropped to 43% of the pre-war level, gross grain harvest to 67%, metal processing products amounted to 7% of the 1913 level, pig iron production a little more than 2%, due to the lack of fuel and raw materials, most enterprises were idle, railways carried out no more than 12% of the 1913 transportation volume, mail and communication practically did not work - com unisty with damaged control system, but "with burning eyes" took the people "to a brighter future," which decided to build his own, people, hands.
          And since they didn’t promise to feed on the way, then on the way they “lost” another 5 million from starvation in 1920-21. and more than 7 million people in 1932-33
        6. -1
          19 May 2013 15: 50
          The Social Democrats (b) first in London (!) For the money of “simple” English Samaritans organize their party (2 congress of the RSDLP - 17 (30) of July - 10 (23) of August 1903), and then they supported the defeat of Russia for the next tranches during the Russo-Japanese War, they organized revolutionary terrorism in the country, killing and maiming from 1901 to 1911 a year about 17 thousand people (of which 9 thousand during the 1905-1907 revolution, in 1907 a year, an average of up to 18 people died every day) . And then, after a short break, according to the plan of Alexander Lvovich Parvus (Israel Lazarevich Gelfand) according to the “Memorial of Dr. Gelfand”, for the money of the German (and not only ...) government, comrade the Bolsheviks organized the October Revolution, smoothly flowing into the fratricidal Civil War. Thus having arranged, “the day before the Victory,” the defeat of the country in the First World War and having deleted from the memory of the people of 5 the millions of dead Russian soldiers.
          Ditching the color of the nation in the Civil War - more than 10 million people died and died during epidemics, more than 4 million people became disabled and more than 2 million people emigrated to other countries. And, having destroyed the country “to the ground” - more than a quarter of national wealth was lost, national income decreased by 2,75 times compared to 1917, the gross output of small industry dropped to 43% of the pre-war level, gross grain harvest to 67%, metal processing products amounted to 7% of the 1913 level, pig iron production a little more than 2%, due to the lack of fuel and raw materials, most enterprises were idle, railways carried out no more than 12% of the 1913 transportation volume, mail and communication practically did not work - com unisty with damaged control system, but "with burning eyes" took the people "to a brighter future," which decided to build his own, people, hands.
          And since they didn’t promise to feed on the way, then on the way they “lost” another 5 million from starvation in 1920-21. and more than 7 million people in 1932-33
          1. +1
            19 May 2013 16: 49
            you throw up very interesting fried facts, well then you will sound others: the Russian population of the RSFSR 1991 118834 approximately thousand Russian population according to the 2011 census Russian population of the Russian Federation (despite the fact that many fled from the republics and including those who took Russian citizenship while abroad 111 million as a result, we lost only 8 million Russians (in fact, these figures are even worse, because if we count the return to Russia of Russians who could not stay where they lived, then all 30 million will come out), not counting the rest. including foreign ones registered 142856536 and in 1991 (only the RSFSR) 148543 thousand.The average life expectancy in 1970 is 70-71 years today (they forgot about the 90s because, honestly, it can be compared with revolutionary Russia) according to unesco 64,4 years So we haven’t even realized what was a great evil. And if we’re talking about money, then you can at least imagine for what money all these Gorbachevs were bought,Yeltsins, etc. destroyers of communism?
        7. The comment was deleted.
        8. -1
          19 May 2013 15: 53
          And I ask the question, why and who needed all this? If after 74 of the year we were back in ... well, in the same place, like the 17 and 21-23 years?
          Most of all in this story, Muscovites surprise me. At first, they, with selfless foolishness, oppose the state of emergency for the collapse of the Union, then they act as funny extras for the Western media during the execution of the White House tanks, supporting Benya Yeltsin. Then with the same childlike directness they oppose him, accusing him of all mortal sins. Now, with the same self-denial and sacrifice in their eyes, they are opposing Putin, the Russian government and parliament. M-d, "Russia cannot be understood by the mind" ...
          One thing is clear - the Communists took the empire that hundreds of generations of our ancestors created (by the way, 7521 is now coming from the Creation of the World) led by the tsars they hate (for minuscule people, put the full title of the Russian emperor and note what remains of this!) destroyed millions of RUSSIAN people, betrayed the allies, and now they again want power. For 20 years, the former MEMBERS of the Communist Party - the current "slaves in the galleys" - shit-managers, led by Yeltsin, Putin, Medvedev & K, rob Russia and build developed capitalism in individual FAMILIES. Maybe enough of the 74-year “revolutionary” experiments on Russia and the 22-year “democratic” experiments on its peoples ?! I am sure of one thing - only the return of the AUTHORITY-MONARCHY-TESTED INSTITUTE TESTED FOR CENTURIES will save Russia!
        9. +1
          20 May 2013 21: 18
          To the point, Comrade!
    2. -53
      18 May 2013 16: 15
      There is always add.
      Who was at the construction sites? And who was on business trips? Do not call the Communists horrible.
      The Leninist party was once divided into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks. Who remembers the reasons?
      Then the Leninist Party was divided into Trotskyists, Zinovievites, Bukharinets. Who knows the causes of contention?
      Most of those who left comments do not understand what they are writing about.
      The article is a big r ...
      1. +8
        18 May 2013 16: 22
        Vasya

        I don't even know whether to "plus" your comment or "minus".
        And the article is good - in vain you are so!
      2. +41
        18 May 2013 16: 30
        And I will boldly put a minus to Vasya. And I will explain why - the author does not care about the Trotskyists, Zinovievites, Bukharintsev and all that trash that has never been translated. He writes about the fact that in the USSR there were still more decent people in power than scoundrels. Until the very last moment, until the balance was not disturbed, not without the help of ghouls from behind the hillock. That is why decent, honest people lived well in the USSR. There was a field for honest work and creativity. Thanks to the author for the kind words.
        1. +25
          18 May 2013 16: 47
          If there were more decent people under power, then the USSR would live and prosper. Ordinary workers, peasants, engineers were for the prosperity of the country. Because they knew that the richer the country, the better for their families. Salaries increased. Prices went down. Well, temporarily there were not enough goods for the people, but factories were being built, houses were being built (for relocation from the barracks). And in England there were still food cards.
          1. Che
            Che
            +18
            18 May 2013 16: 56
            The article is certainly huge +. What is happening now is a bad dream (according to Turgenev). How to get rid of it now? The cunning Angles work very subtly, by the way their work against Russia did not stop even for a minute.
            1. +5
              18 May 2013 21: 05
              The trait of the Russian man is to blame the Angles, Saxons, Jews, but not himself.
              We pissed off the country, and pissed it off by the fact that when the authorities harked at our faces, the people simply wiped themselves out and went into a market economy. Like in 1996, when Yeltsin won miraculously
              1. SASCHAmIXEEW
                +1
                19 May 2013 10: 00
                A TAMPERED people were led into the temptation of a sweet life, and is it his fault? It was necessary to continue the work of Stalin and to kill the lives of the Zionists! They destroyed the USSR !!! The struggle of Zion has been going on for centuries with the whole world !!! And so he won with us so far! But I think we can handle it !!!!
          2. +5
            18 May 2013 17: 13
            Vasya:
            Read my post carefully again. I wrote "while the balance was kept."
            I recommend an article to everyone interested "Elite groups, their origin and evolution". There is a wonderful mathematical model that describes various scenarios of the behavior of elite groups. Quote:
            Let us again turn to the Nomenclature of the Administrative System with its mechanism “applicant - recommender”, but now we will take into account another aspect of their relationship - personal. In A. Beck’s novel, there’s a nomination for the post of minister. The recommender is Onisimov going up to the rise. “Onisimov chose Cichony; he was capable. But not only. He was the most complaisant, the most obedient among the capable. Therefore, the very first cycle of personnel changes in the System takes into account not only business, but also personal diligence, devotion, complaisance. However, after all, Stalin himself saved Onisimov from repressions and appointed him People's Commissar precisely taking into account personal devotion. Personal diligence in the Administrative System merges with personal devotion inextricably “(G. Popov). The next step, as we know, will worsen the group and lengthen, as we see, the chain of informal ties in it. We emphasize: informal. By formal ties, a system organized as a pyramid with the Boss at the top is already densely stitched through and through. Thanks to these ties, a hierarchically organized leadership should look like a coalition, but there are two processes going on from step to step - the degradation of business qualities and the strengthening of personal interdependence, which sometimes erodes formal ties. As a result, nomenclature, ceasing to be an elite, can become a clique.

            I allow myself to hypothesize: degrading elite groups, ending evolution, turn into very stable cliques. Stability, as is known, is generally characteristic of systems with negative feedback. Test this hypothesis, to sociologists.


            This work explains the stalemate and staff shortage that has developed in modern Russia and the late USSR.
            We read and draw conclusions.
            Link: http://aftershock.su/?q=node/6095
            1. +2
              1 June 2013 18: 50
              And V. Stalin did not pay attention to personal loyalty. His business qualities were interesting. Especially during the war. But I agree with this comment. Because Stalin was kind and trusting. He believed Khrushchev when he "renounced" Trotskyism. I believed the military after the purges 37 - the result was the defeat of 41 (I had to introduce commissars and reassign special departments to the NKVD again). I feel sorry for Stalin, like Putin
              1. fatty
                -1
                10 June 2013 19: 01
                quite right, Vasya, I’m talking about the same thing.I.V. Stalin, he is a dzhugashvili, he is a worthy person., and for me, a great one. I hate the communists, filthy, and hitherto thieves today
          3. +7
            18 May 2013 17: 21
            History does not know the subjunctive mood. But we can compare what happened and what is.
            1. ole
              ole
              +1
              18 May 2013 20: 23
              The article class, catches, I can add this:

              The head of the enterprise shot his subordinate in the Vologda Oblast in the head. The suspect was put on the wanted list.


              The incident happened on May 13 at one of the bases for the production of materials for road construction in the village of Irdomatka, Cherepovets district. There was a conflict between the director of the enterprise and one of the employees. A 28-year-old man shot his subordinate. A bullet hit the head. The 31-year-old victim was taken to the hospital, according to IA SeverInform, citing the press service of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs in the Vologda Oblast.


              The attacker has disappeared from the scene of the crime, now they are looking for him. A criminal case has been instituted on the fact of the incident.
          4. SASCHAmIXEEW
            +1
            19 May 2013 09: 41
            The deficit was included in the plans of 5 columns led from abroad! Zhi. Zionists were everywhere, in supply, trade, planning in the KGB !!! And the Chekists carried the "party gold" for the cardon, maybe they used them in the dark, or maybe not !!
      3. +18
        18 May 2013 16: 43
        Quote: Vasya
        The Leninist party was once divided into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks.

        You are confusing something here, the Bolsheviks are the Leninist Party. Article plus, in some places even a mate would be appropriate.
        1. 0
          1 June 2013 18: 53
          I wanted to say that she was officially divided once, and then how many different fractions were there? Even the opinion of the Politburo was divided about the entry into Afghanistan, and then they behaved accordingly
      4. YARY
        +18
        18 May 2013 17: 19
        for an awesome sense of equality between people - a thing that simply cannot be understood by those who did not live then.


        Fed the hungry - no way
        Time will pass, and a new generation with brainwashed will surrender the country. So our enemies desire on all continents and within the country.
        Therefore, it is necessary, like air, to work with young people, from diapers to infinity. Already much is perceived by them as legends and tales of the elderly, and enemy geeks inside and abroad continue to pour rot on OUR history.
        Comrade, be vigilant!
        Remember all the enemies that worked and are working on the approaching death of our country.
        The time will come.
        1. +7
          18 May 2013 20: 33
          Quote: Ardent
          The time will come.


          The only pity is to live in this beautiful time
          I don’t have to - neither to me nor to you

          From the poem "Railway" (1864) N. A. Nekrasov

          1. Vladimir_61
            +3
            18 May 2013 23: 43
            Quote: Vadivak
            The only pity is to live in this beautiful time
            I don’t have to - neither to me nor to you

            Let's not lose heart. Still as it should. The fate of our country will not follow the patterns of the rotten West and homegrown traitors.
          2. SASCHAmIXEEW
            0
            19 May 2013 10: 04
            NOT YET EVENING...!!!!!
        2. Che
          Che
          +1
          18 May 2013 22: 54
          Furious while we have the Kvachkovs and Budanovs we are invincible.
      5. +19
        18 May 2013 17: 37
        Your words, Vasya, once again convince us that the Communist Party is a living organism and in it, like in any other organism, various pests always start, from which it is necessary to be released and cleaned in a timely manner. And this would have happened if Gorbachev-Yeltsin had been vilely betrayed, as a result of which the USSR was destroyed during takeoff. What is 70 years old? This is just the life of one person. And for the state this is a moment. And how many communists, leading the country, managed to do in that moment and the author writes. Thanks to him.
        1. +3
          18 May 2013 20: 29
          Quote: gorez
          various pests are started, from which it is necessary to be timely released, cleaned.


          But how. Article 58 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR. "Counter-revolutionary activities" took effect on February 25, 1927.
          1. dmb
            +6
            18 May 2013 20: 51
            Do you think this article should not have been ?. Then get Gozman, who publicly equated SMERSH with the SS, and the overheard Gozmanoids, young u..kov who were photographed on the graves of those who died with a porno doll. It is not worth pledging that the spiritual education of a person lies only in the plane of exhortations, sometimes the punishment of evil is very conducive to this education.
        2. +1
          1 June 2013 19: 12
          I agree with your words. It just happened the separation of words and deeds. The party leadership turned into a caste, appointment to certain posts, including in power structures, became possible only with membership in the CPSU. Khrushchev and his followers perverted the Lenin-Stalin case. They stopped perfecting ideology (why the hell were the institutions of Marxism-Leninism?), Etc.
          My father is a communist. He was at a congress of the Central Committee, but criticized the system of managing the national economy. Because of this, I had to change my place of residence.
      6. +7
        18 May 2013 19: 42
        Quote: Vasya
        washi

        Vasya, Vasya .... Take a walk, Vasya ...
        I thought you were smarter ... And sometimes you supported .....
        Live and learn.....
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      7. Reasonable, 2,3
        0
        19 May 2013 01: 11
        Eh-Vasya, Vasya, I didn’t understand the article, d ..... to you, Vasya.
      8. lucidlook
        +1
        19 May 2013 17: 14
        Quote: Vasya
        The Leninist party was once divided into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks.

        Wow ... I did not know. And how exactly Lenin (and not Plekhanov’s) party divided into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks?
      9. fatty
        -1
        31 May 2013 20: 44
        okay, do not bzdi, I'm with you, Vaso.
        1. fatty
          0
          3 June 2013 20: 21
          Vasya, you said what you think is necessary, you’re right, I’m with you, take care of yourself, with respect, Mikhail.
    3. redwar6
      +7
      18 May 2013 16: 43
      The plastic world won.
      The layout turned out to be stronger
      The last boat has cooled down.
      The last flashlight is tired.
      And lumps of memories sniff in the throat ....
      1. +20
        18 May 2013 17: 17
        article plus, but a couple of generations will change and no one will remember that there was such a country. Especially for Vasya I traveled half the country with the union, and under the Russian Federation, I only went on a business trip to the neighboring region. Therefore, to say that everything has changed for the better is not necessary. Yes, for the best, but which one? The children of officials had more rights, now they have every right to call YOU cattle, crush with their cars, etc. etc., which was unacceptable during the union.
        1. +1
          1 June 2013 19: 20
          Sorry, but I did not write that has changed for the better. I wrote that the party had many currents and its composition, without purges, had many opportunists and grabbers, and most importantly, members who perverted the party’s charter and decisions of congresses.
    4. M. Peter
      +21
      18 May 2013 17: 10
      Everyone wants to wake up, so tired of this drawn out nightmare, when is morning comrades? recourse
    5. +21
      18 May 2013 18: 19
      Quote: smel
      There is nothing to add.

      But I will add: I was incredibly lucky that I managed to live in the USSR for 33 years! And no money (and I get a lot) can not replace that unforgettable feeling of reliability, inviolability of being in a mighty country, where everyone was confident in the bright future of their own and their children ... Therefore, recently my favorite toast (he invented) - "For our bright past "!
    6. +3
      18 May 2013 19: 02
      and what to add) they urinate Medvedev) to see really ordered)
    7. bezumnyiPIT
      0
      18 May 2013 19: 31
      But what is it to grieve for these very Soviet Communists? Well they all sit in the Duma, but in London laughing
      1. +6
        18 May 2013 20: 17
        Quote: bezumnyiPIT
        But what is it to grieve for these very Soviet Communists? Well they all sit in the Duma, but in London laughing

        Don't write comments without brains! Most of those in the Duma and London do not pull on the Soviet Communists by age! And many on the item "involved"!
        1. +10
          18 May 2013 20: 49
          Quote: Homo
          Most of those who are in the Duma and London by age do not pull on the Soviet Communists!



          Valentina Ivanovna Matviyenko is the first secretary of the Red Guard District Committee of the CPSU of the city of Leningrad.
          4th Chairman of the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
          from September 21, 2011


          Sergei Evgenievich Naryshkin At the KGB Institute. Andropova, where he studied, joined the Communist Party
          4th Chairman of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
          from December 21, 2011

          Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin
          He joined the CPSU at LSU and remained a member of the CPSU until it was banned in August 1991.
          I already wrote about Medvedev

          and their name is the legion ...


        2. bezumnyiPIT
          +2
          18 May 2013 20: 50
          Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky- were they not former party members?
          1. 0
            18 May 2013 20: 58
            Well, you really - what Zyuganov in power or what? But Zhirinovsky organized his party in the USSR in general.
          2. RUS
            RUS
            +1
            19 May 2013 09: 32
            Zhirinovsky was never a member of the CPSU.
      2. SASCHAmIXEEW
        0
        19 May 2013 10: 11
        I won’t say it for everyone, but I personally don’t worry about these earcaps, why worry about Dr.Mo! But for the USSR ... !!!
    8. honest jew
      +4
      18 May 2013 21: 48
      It’s all filthy without you, dear Soviet Communists, very filthy .... :-) What can I say? We better ask the question to the Communists ...

      Who ruined the USSR and why no one did anything to save the USSR?

      And the communists themselves and ruined !!!!

      Look who is in power now ... All former Communists !!! !, nothing has changed ... just changed the sign of the CPSU to other LDPR, United Russia, the Communist Party, Fair Russia and so on .... The composition of the parties are all former communists or Komsomol members !!! And it was they who destroyed the USSR and created controlled chaos in order to seize the people's bowels of the country, plants, factories, mines, mines ...

      The USSR had powerful intelligence services in the form of the KGB and the GRU and the Ministry of Internal Affairs !!!

      Why didn't they do anything to prevent the collapse of the USSR? but because there were the same communists who were striving for the collapse of the USSR. After the collapse of the USSR, the entire top of the special services began to divide the national property and became "new Russians"!

      It is interesting whether the author of the article came out to support the GKChP of the USSR or stayed at home in front of Swan Lake?

      Or threw Molotov cocktail in Russian infantry fighting vehicles and tanks GKChP?

      Most likely the last option !!!

      I remember how everyone shouted then, disconnect from all the freeloaders of the USSR republics, Create Russia and live like in the West !!!!

      Only the communists divorced the people as suckers, the people did not quit anything except grief and tears ...
      1. +4
        18 May 2013 21: 59
        Quote: Honest Jew
        Communists who sought the collapse of the USSR.


        It is necessary to replace the Communists with agents of influence. Now these people are called liberals, the names are changing, but they have one essence - betrayal.
        1. fatty
          -1
          7 June 2013 19: 39
          you are probably honest, but I trust exclusively Anatoly Alexandrovich Wasserman, whom I appreciate, respect and love very much.
      2. +10
        18 May 2013 22: 22
        Why are you hanging all the dogs on the Communists? If a bunch of corrupt top-managers betrayed the people, that doesn’t mean that they decided for all the Communists - it’s good to throw labels on them - just a little - the Communists are to blame. And who went to the barricades - the communists or something ??? Who traded jeans in the market? Who sold and bought dollars from under the floor? Communists or what? All to blame and the Communists - absolution?
        1. +1
          19 May 2013 11: 05
          Quote: dddym
          Why are you hanging all the dogs on the Communists?


          Yes, because in truth, whoever was in power is to blame. You can’t leave, and do not hide behind slogans. In China they could, but ours sold us, and now they are pouring mud from the stands, for which their fathers and grandfathers fought
          1. +2
            19 May 2013 12: 39
            And the authorities were - specifically:
            Boris Yeltsin (November 6 1991 [5] [6] - June 15 1992)
            Yegor Gaidar (acting) (15 June 1992 [7] - 15 December 1992 [8])
            Gennady Burbulis (November 6 1991 [9] - April 14 1992 [10])
            Yegor Gaidar (2 March 1992 [11] - 15 December 1992 [8])
            Vladimir Shumeyko [12]
            Alexander Shokhin [13]
            Yegor Gaidar (November 6 1991 [14] - March 2 1992 [15])
            Victor Chernomyrdin [16]
            Sergey Shakhrai (December 12 1991 [17] - April 20 1992 [18], from November 11 1992 [19])
            Mikhail Poltoranin (22 February 1992 [20] - 25 November 1992 [21])
            Valery Makharadze (2 March 1992 [22] - 23 December 1992 [23])
            Gregory Hija [24]
            Anatoly Chubais [25]
            Boris Saltykov [26]
            Victor Mikhailov [28]
            Boris Furmanov [31]
            Victor Barannikov [33]
            Victor Barannikov (December 19 1991 [35] - January 15 1992 [36])
            Viktor Yaroshenko (acting)
            Peter Aven (22 February 1992 [39] - 23 December 1992 [40])
            Andrey Dunaev (November 14 1991 [41] - January 15 1992 [36])
            Victor Erin [43]
            Leonid Cheshinsky (acting)
            Andrey Vorobyov (November 14 1991 [45] - acting from October 23 1992 [46])
            Andrey Kozyrev [47]
            Evgeny Sidorov [49]
            Evgeny Sidorov [51]
            Evgeny Sidorov [51]
            Valery Shubin [53]
            Boris Saltykov [55]
            Boris Saltykov [56]
            Boris Yeltsin (acting) (16 March 1992 [58] - 18 May 1992)
            Pavel Grachev (from May 18 to 1992 [59])
            Eduard Dneprov (November 10 1991 [61] - December 4 1992 [62])
            Evgeny Tkachenko (acting) (since December 5 1992 [63])
            Victor Danilov-Danilyan [64]
            Mikhail Poltoranin (December 3 1991 [65] - November 25 1992 [21])
            Mikhail Poltoranin [66]
            Alexander Titkin [67]
            Gennady Fadeev [69]
            Vladimir Bulgak (acting)
            Victor Khlystun
            Gennady Kulik (acting)
            Ella Pamfilova [72]
            Vladimir Bulgak [73]
            Vladimir Lopukhin (November 10 1991 [74] - May 30 1992 [75])
            Alexander Khlystov (until 5 December 1991)
            Stanislav Anisimov (November 10 1991 [78] - September 16 1992 [79])
            Vitaly Efimov [80]
            Alexander Shokhin (acting)
            Gennady Melikyan [83]
            Alexander Shokhin (November 10 1991 [84] - June 14 1992 [85])
            Igor Lazarev (acting)
            Yegor Gaidar (February 19 1992 [88] - April 2 1992 [89])
            Vasily Barchuk (from April 2 to 1992 [90])
            Nikolai Fedorov [91]
            Evgeny Saburov (until 5 December 1991)
            Andrey Nechaev [88]
            Egor Gaidar [92]
            Victor Danilov-Danilyan [93]
            Victor Danilov-Danilyan [94]
            Victor Ivanenko (November 26 1991 [96] - January 15 1992 [36])
            Victor Barannikov [43]
            Victor Ivanenko [97]
            Vitaliy Ermolenko [98]
            Victor Gerashchenko [99]
            Leonid Bochin (since 7 of September 1992 - acting [100], from 30 of November 1992 - fully [101]
            Boris Furmanov From August 9 to 1991 of the Year [102]
            Dmitry Fedorov (until 5 December 1991)
            Nikolai Malyshev (acting)
            Alexey Poryadin (acting)
            Anatoly Arzamastsev (until 5 December 1991)
            Victor Khlystun (acting)
            Semyon Voloshchuk (acting)
            Viktor Yaroshenko (until December 5 1991)
            Vladimir Vozhagov (until 5 December 1991)
            Andrey Sharonov (until December 5 1991)
            Yuri Vishnevsky (until 5 December 1991)
            Valery Tishkov (February 27 1992 [105] - October 15 1992 [106])
            Sergey Shakhrai (since November 11 1992 [19])
            Pavel Grachev
            Evgeny Belyaev (until 5 December 1991)
            Vladimir Kuramin [108]
            Semyon Voloshchuk (November 20 1991 [109] - May 5 1992 [110])
            Vasily Wozniak (from 20 July 1992 [111])
            Anatoly Kruglov [112]
            Anatoly Chubais [113]
            Vasily Machuga (until 5 December 1991)
            Sergey Shoigu [114]
            Vladimir Mashchits [116]
            Alexey Golovkov [118]
            here from them and ask and not from 12 of the millions of remaining communists :(
            1. +2
              19 May 2013 18: 44
              Dmitry hope for socialism collapsed earlier, with the departure of Stalin, and you listed scumbags with party cards, so sorry for the harshness
              1. 0
                19 May 2013 21: 49
                What is the sharpness? Correctly scumbags and listed only in this list, not all Communists.
        2. -1
          19 May 2013 13: 50
          just the Communists and were in the forefront ... or rather non-ordinary Communists
          1. +2
            19 May 2013 14: 00
            in the forefront were fighters against communism - that is, ideological enemies! Wow, how modern democrats have powdered your head — you know that scoops are scolded even for oligarchs and bad roads and for Yeltsin — yes, they’ve atone for nothing — there are concrete guilty people and not millions of people who are not guilty of the collapse of the USSR or shock therapy. The communist is not a nomenclature! This is an ideological platform, as you cannot understand!
      3. M. Peter
        +1
        19 May 2013 06: 28
        Quote: Honest Jew
        And the Communists themselves ruined !!!! Look who is in power now ... All the former Communists !!! !, nothing has changed ... just changed the sign of the CPSU to other LDPR, United Russia, Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Fair Russia and so on .... The composition of the parties are all former communists or Komsomol members !!! And it was they who destroyed the USSR and created controlled chaos in order to seize the people's bowels of the country, factories, factories, mines, mines ... The USSR had powerful special services in the form of the KGB and the GRU and the Ministry of Internal Affairs !!! Why did they do nothing to prevent the collapse of the USSR ? but because there were the same communists who were striving for the collapse of the USSR. After the collapse of the USSR, the entire top of the special services began to divide the national property and became "new Russians"! I wonder if the author of the article came out to support the State Emergency Committee of the USSR or was sitting at home in front of the Swan Lake? Most likely he was sitting out, like the majority of the Russian population, as they say, my house is on the edge, I don’t know anything! Or was he throwing a Molotov cocktail into Russian BMPs and tanks of the State Emergency Committee? Most likely the latter I remember how everyone then shouted that we will disconnect from all the haliavschikov republics of the USSR, Let's create Russia and live like in the West !!!! Only the communists threw the people up like suckers, the people got nothing but grief and tears ...


        And there were no more communists. The communists in the 41st went to death, died for the people, people went to death and said, if I don’t return, consider me a communist. And in the 80s there was already a nomenclature that only covered itself with beautiful, screaming slogans and only advanced to warm places. And the country was left only out of envy of the capitalists, who have yachts, villas, factories, factories, parades.
        And it turned out this way, because a generation has grown up that has not seen cold and hunger, for them the "coming bright future" is just nonsense for the old people who have outlived them, who again took their warm places ...
      4. SASCHAmIXEEW
        +1
        19 May 2013 10: 20
        In your words, the people were buried by the women. Osionists, they were confused, for the money of the Jews from the Fed and various funds, but it’s not yet evening and the gentiles will give you bloody diarrhea!
    9. Atlon
      -5
      19 May 2013 11: 12
      Quote: smel
      There is nothing to add.

      Do not add, but I will say! Article custom, provocative and wrecking! The author appealing to your feelings and nostalgia, smuggles swamp ideas and claims. Article minus.
      1. -1
        19 May 2013 11: 16
        Atlon

        Yes, he does not appeal. He just gives the FACTS. And you analyze and draw conclusions.
    10. nickname 1 and 2
      -2
      19 May 2013 12: 55
      Quote: smel
      There is nothing to add.

      How is it nothing?
      Why the hell did you have to close the borders? But what the hell was it necessary to keep us in complete ignorance and how does he live this rotting capitalism?
      And why did our "best" go behind the Cardon and drag suitcases with junk from there?
      And why it was necessary to create "Birches" and how can I remember there yet, but the foreign exchange shops in which there were all kinds of rags and so on?
      And why were there flea markets in Lvov and in Obessa and in other cities where "worn out" panties were sold.
      And why were the shoes cool, not just ours?
      Why did we get rid of this image of a SUCCESSFUL WEST and NOT ALL SUCCESSFUL EAST ???

      What kind of sweet whining by what was not, or rather filtered?

      What is this scream about? ABOUT SALE PARTY FUNCTIONERS?
      Where, finally, are they - who is this scream about, where were they when this squeak - GKChP appeared? Why was he not supported by the powerful roar of powerful party members?
      Where, where did the BEST KGB truths hide in the world?
      in the world
      Why didn’t anyone want to kick the mug for everyone there Makarevich who stood in the ring at the White House?

      This is another fornication - this article! No need to fake!
      Socialism is a wonderful O. system, it just got to the wrong people!
  2. Shuriken
    +36
    18 May 2013 15: 46
    I’m ready to subscribe to every word! And I’m sure that millions and millions of normal people are with me !!
  3. +4
    18 May 2013 15: 53
    Reasonably, but debatable.
    Everyone has their own opinion.
    But there is something in it (for those who remember how it was). It was good and bad. I recall more good.
    And ... Nostalgia for those times when the country was still one of the world powers (whoever said that!), And not a gas and oil pipe for the west.
    But there were a lot of mistakes! And the most important thing is the collapse of the USSR. Moreover, few of the Communists objected. And why? The referendum does not count (this is the opinion of the people, not the party)!
    1. +4
      18 May 2013 16: 56
      The principality of Moscow did not object. And they didn’t listen to the rest. There was an option - a civil war. Moscow and St. Petersburg as a result of the landfill. The capital in Siberia. The West of Russia is a branch of India or the Caucasus.
      They did not want to fight against their own.
      And now they remain their own, but soon their grandchildren will be strangers
      1. +2
        18 May 2013 17: 13
        Vasya

        I can not agree with you. Maybe ordinary communists did not listen, but the party leadership had its own opinion. And who will argue with the General?

        Then, at the First Congress of People's Deputies of the USSR, it was only about the abolition of the leading role of the CPSU. One could and should have objected. But everyone wanted democracy, including the communists. Remember "Materials of the XXVIII Congress of the CPSU" (July 1991). One of the questions - "Program statement of the XXVIII Congress of the CPSU" Towards a humane, democratic socialism "".

        And about the civil war, the question arose when the GKChP attempted in August 1991. Then, indeed, it could blaze! He himself was a witness while on alert.
        1. +2
          18 May 2013 17: 35
          Amendment: at the III Congress of People's Deputies of the USSR (March 1990).
        2. 0
          1 June 2013 19: 27
          It began to blaze back in Alma-Ata in 1986, it seems (I do not remember exactly) when Gorbachev set Kolbina. There, local bais began to excite.
  4. +8
    18 May 2013 15: 53
    I completely agree with the author. The current mess and the talking room have already gotten.
    1. +5
      18 May 2013 15: 58
      The authorities did not have normal business executives who grew up from masters of production, and not from the Komsomol. The ideology of the CPSU was only a burden for a normal business executive, and now the Komsomol remained in power, managed by the secretaries of the regional committees (city committees) - the current business leaders.
      1. +8
        18 May 2013 16: 02
        Let me introduce myself. In the past Komsomol school hi
        1. +6
          18 May 2013 16: 07
          Sorry, Gleb. I know, respect and support your ideological position (by comments). When I referred to a certain shoble as a Komsomol, I didn’t mean people like you, but those who sat in district committees, city committees, regional committees — in short, those who are now in the Duma and in the executive branch — ochlocracy.
          1. +4
            18 May 2013 16: 11
            I understood. Yes, and there was already little left of ideas .. I just remembered myself. Yes, and they chose it only because there were more boys in two classes than girls. By voting, they excelled wink
            1. +4
              18 May 2013 16: 17
              The school Komsomol, if the guys are so active, was a legal, encouraged and supported way of self-organization. There were only pluses in this. Cultural trips, camping trips, discos - everything is like at all times in the youth environment. It was shitty when a teacher appeared at school - an old maid and a sworn commune, and the social activity of the guys was not up to par. Then carcasses of light, meetings, Leninist readings, Lenin offsets, climbing into souls ... As you recall, you will tremble. laughing
              1. +10
                18 May 2013 16: 39
                Yes, and the camp remembered. Komsomol agents and pioneer leaders were sent. In fact, the camp was listed as the "Regional school of the Komsomol activists", but in fact the rest camp.Bliiiin .. I kissed there for the first time !!!!!
                here is still a ticket
                1. +5
                  18 May 2013 16: 47
                  Cool memories !!!
              2. 0
                1 June 2013 19: 30
                I am 14. they started to get it6 "why aren't you entering the Komsomol?" We got it. Applied. I come to the city committee and hear: We have a shortage of supplies this month, so I got into the plan.
        2. +9
          18 May 2013 16: 12
          Gleb

          All of us, for the most part, were someone in that country. I've been a Komsomol member. I do not regret it.
          1. +6
            18 May 2013 16: 35
            similarly. I do not regret
            1. +1
              18 May 2013 17: 24
              he never joined the Komsomol, although they chased after me for several years, but judging by your Komsomol, are you from Central Asia, if not a secret, where did you come from?
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. +1
                18 May 2013 17: 37
                Kazakhstan
  5. redwar6
    +18
    18 May 2013 15: 56
    Although I was not lucky enough to be born in the USSR, but thanks to everyone who built that country, thanks for everything. There really is nothing to add ..
  6. +18
    18 May 2013 15: 57
    I join the author as the 2nd 1/260 millionth part of the Soviet people. Everything will return, it will surely return again, and will return means we will live.
    1. +16
      18 May 2013 16: 06
      Well then I - 3 / 260 millionth part!
      1. AdAAkRuSS
        +8
        18 May 2013 17: 05
        4/260 millionth part!
    2. +26
      18 May 2013 16: 22
      A long history but nevertheless relevant as never before in meaning.
      I was then 19 years old, serving in ZabVO, wrote a request to accept me as a candidate for membership in the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. What do you think, what would be the result? They refused, the reason is most obvious, they didn’t come out of age. I asked the question how does the line in the charter state that a candidate can be with 17-ti and a full member with 18-ti. Silence is in reply. I don’t know, but it seems to me that even then in the 80-s something inside the party and the state broke down, the mechanism state and party machine began to fail. Then, already studying at the Higher School of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the SS SR, there have been repeatedly proposals for entry, but this time I flatly refused. As it may not seem strange to you, I had serious reasons:

      1. One thing is desire; another thing is proposal; agree that there are two different things.
      2. It was already late for the reason that I don’t know about you, but I knew for certain that Gorbachev would smash the country to pieces. I always judge people not by words but by deeds. You can speak one thing and perform certain actions differently. Most importantly, he did not prevent separatism. The Americans knew perfectly well the strengths and weaknesses of the USSR. They knew for certain that the Achilles' heel of the USSR is a multinational people.
      3. The most important thing is how to join the ranks when the head of the Communist Party is a traitor to the Motherland.
      Having written all this, I categorically do not want my words to be interpreted as the country and the party have lost such a patriot. No, a goal-oriented policy was pursued not only by Gorbachev but also by his team "Gorbachev and SB" on the purposeful destruction of the party and, therefore, the state. Remember article 6 These were not just words, they had a great meaning, namely, thanks to the party, the state was held.

      Now, as for the article itself. Everything is correctly and clearly written. Everyone understands the meaning of the above in his own way and in his own understanding. I understand this appeal and appeal to all sane people of the former once powerful and impregnable state of the USSR. Unite in the name of your bright future children and neighbors. Unite, in this saving word the enormous meaning of life is laid, namely the instinct of self-preservation.
      1. Livan
        +2
        18 May 2013 16: 42
        AXILLESOVA PYATA --- MNOGONACIONAL6NIY NAROD ??? 4TO ZA BRED? NAOBOROT MNOGONACIONAL6NIY NAROD BIL KOST6YU V GORLE AMERIKE ... PO ETOMU ONI RAZVALILI SSSR.
        1. +12
          18 May 2013 17: 34
          Quote: livan
          AXILLESOVA PYATA --- MNOGONACIONAL6NIY NAROD ???


          You apparently did not delve deeply into the meaning of what I wrote. Under the Achilles' heel, a vulnerable point, it was meant to divide and conquer, one of the slogans of the ancient Romans.
        2. bezumnyiPIT
          +5
          18 May 2013 20: 54
          Buy a keyboard with the Cyrillic alphabet, I understand, in the states it is difficult to get it, but you try
      2. 0
        18 May 2013 22: 27
        And I remembered mine. The party organizer followed me in 1984 and persuaded me to write a statement.
  7. +8
    18 May 2013 15: 59
    For me, the capital of Moscow is a viper who collected all the negativity from all over Russia, illiterate, uneducated people, but who learned to grab and live for today
    1. RUS
      RUS
      +5
      18 May 2013 16: 39
      Do not confuse power with ordinary Muscovites
      1. folds
        +8
        18 May 2013 19: 28
        And how many ordinary Muscovites are left, RUS? All the cream of the regional leadership - to the capital, the majority of migrant workers - to the same place, to thieves and bandits - the most expanse where most of the money of the whole country revolves.
        1. RUS
          RUS
          0
          19 May 2013 09: 37
          Believe me, the Muscovites remained normal in all respects, I personally know many adequate people without any pathos and Ponte.
      2. +1
        18 May 2013 21: 17
        Soon the indigenous Muscovites in the Kunstkamera will show
      3. +8
        18 May 2013 22: 32
        And even in the days of the USSR, I noticed the difference between Muscovites and Leningraders - ask a Muscovite how to get somewhere, poke a finger and run on, ask a Leningrad citizen - he will stop, he will explain in detail.
  8. +3
    18 May 2013 16: 00
    I will not say that I agree with everything, but the syllable is good
  9. vladsolo56
    +16
    18 May 2013 16: 05
    I will subscribe, I am sorry for modern children who have had their heads full of money, clothes, and other show-offs since childhood.
    1. RUS
      RUS
      +4
      18 May 2013 16: 41
      What parents, such and children.
  10. +23
    18 May 2013 16: 07
    Already his throat was seized when he read everything and remembered everything. We really didn’t have good clothes and different tsatsk, but there was always confidence that our country, the most powerful and the best in the world, and this gave a feeling of happiness, because most people of the Soviet country sought to become necessary for their country and do something for it big and good. Thank you for writing to the author.
    1. +12
      18 May 2013 16: 34
      Come on you! Did not have. Everything was. Father served in Baku. Quietly, and jeans were bought, and imported suede jackets. And other clothes. He brought several sheepskin coats from Kushka. Yes, there were distribution problems. But all this was solved. There was no misery.
      1. RUS
        RUS
        +9
        18 May 2013 16: 51
        I have "new beggars" living in my village - they do not work, they drink, although there is work and there is for everyone, but they were relaxed by the authorities - "they have to dig a well for us, block the roof, they don't pay for the light, there is no money, they steal electricity, but local the authorities turn a blind eye to this - they are poor, etc., and they owe everything: the village council, rich Muscovites, etc. Before the elections, they patched them up at home, laundered the money and everyone is happy.
      2. +2
        18 May 2013 19: 43
        Quote: Iraclius
        There was no misery.

        Nobody spoke to you for poverty. Yes, from under the floor you could buy almost everything, but I speak for that spirit of striving to be ahead of the rest, and you're talking about sheepskin coats from under Kushki ....
        1. +8
          18 May 2013 20: 41
          You wrote that there were no good clothes and tsatseks. I wrote that there was everything - and household appliances, and clothes, and tsatski. If we survived until the 2000's, we would have had our own PCs, cell phones and more.
          Therefore, to say that our population lived poorly, but aspired to the future, is wrong.
          1. +7
            18 May 2013 22: 42
            Moreover, the bios in these PCs would be in Russian. Babayan’s developments led to this. Yesterday I watched a film about our TU160, so it turned out to have its own navigation on satellites, and this was at a time when we had not heard of any jeepies.
          2. +2
            19 May 2013 07: 13
            pc we had! Corvette, bk, dvk and even somewhat faster and better than foreign samples. The architecture, for example, bk was directly addressed to 4 mb and its competitor, the syncler, to 48 kb and could hardly be added to 128kb. The corvette was an order of magnitude faster than its main competitor - 386 processors from Intel. In terms of counting and speed of graphics, Intel was ahead of Intel even after the discontinued production of the vaunted Pentium 1. Unlike convenient and easy-to-understand architecture, compared to sinclair and ibiem, it allowed to master machine code in a couple of evenings.
        2. +1
          18 May 2013 22: 38
          And why is such an aspiration bad? Then, not only the desire was, but in fact were in many ways ahead of everyone.
      3. +3
        18 May 2013 22: 35
        There was definitely no poverty, there was no such theft (in our North), for three years I didn’t even have a lock on my house, I bought it when I went on vacation.
  11. igor12
    +9
    18 May 2013 16: 07
    But we are free, they say. Although I do not understand now the meaning of this word is appealing to the citizens of my country.
    1. +3
      18 May 2013 16: 17
      Quote: igor12
      But we are free, they say. Although I do not understand now the meaning of this word is appealing to the citizens of my country.

      Yes, everything is clear. We are all free to die. But after a couple of generations they will introduce a tax on oxygen, which will be given, and it will not be known whether you will be allowed to die for free from lack of it, or first "pay all taxes"?
      1. RUS
        RUS
        -11
        18 May 2013 17: 01
        The first "tax on oxygen" was invented by the Soviet government, when every currant bush, every apple tree, livestock and poultry was taxed.
        1. +15
          18 May 2013 18: 13
          Quote: RUS
          The first "tax on oxygen" was invented by the Soviet government, when every currant bush, every apple tree, livestock and poultry was taxed.

          This is the work of N.S. Khrushchev. But Khrushchev is not Soviet power!
        2. +3
          18 May 2013 19: 56
          Khrushchev tried - it was - only not for long. But now you pay the air tax and do not consider it an injustice - a property tax.
        3. bezumnyiPIT
          +2
          18 May 2013 20: 58
          fatty plus! One and a half sheep, if there are peasants on the site, they will understand
    2. M. Peter
      +12
      18 May 2013 17: 18
      For me, freedom is not when in the central area of ​​the country you can shout that the authorities are only fools, but freedom is when he went out on the street in the evening, afraid to get on the head, or fall asleep drunk in the park and wake up alive, healthy and undressed.
      1. +5
        18 May 2013 17: 50
        M.Petru

        You forgot to mention about detoxification. But an effective tool was!
        I myself, thank God, did not get in. But according to eyewitnesses - just lovely! They even made a film about it ("And in the morning they woke up").

        And people, indeed, rarely died on the street.
    3. +23
      18 May 2013 18: 12
      Quote: igor12
      But we are free, they say.


      "It is difficult for me to imagine what kind of" personal freedom "can be for an unemployed who goes hungry and does not find the use of his labor" I.V. Stalin
      1. Ataman
        0
        21 May 2013 20: 49
        Here's another one for the collection:
        "Freedom is a conscious need." K. Marx.

        "Freedom is not when you do what you want, but when you don’t do what you don’t want." (my favorite definition)
  12. +28
    18 May 2013 16: 09
    As modern history shows, capitalism is a dead end branch of the development of Mankind.
    My fault is that I, as a communist, did nothing to preserve the Great USSR ... We overlooked the Vile Treason of those who led the Party and the Country. Soviet Power was abolished from above, not from below - the majority of the people in the March 17 Referendum voted to preserve the Soviet Union. But the party functionaries needed to legalize their own ill-gotten wealth ... and all those ideals, thanks to which the Soviet Union was the Guiding Star of the Bright Future for all of Mankind, were rejected as interfering with the "prosperity" of those in power.
    1. +15
      18 May 2013 16: 16
      Old warrior

      Here you are right - overlooked. And I think that they still unconditionally believed the country's top leaders. And they were not ready for such a vile betrayal!
  13. +11
    18 May 2013 16: 14
    With his perestroika, Gorbachev unfastened those hungry dogs who were prevented by the Soviet regime from robbing their country and using dollars traded from under the floor. And these dogs are the generation of the so-called communists, who received their elite status by birth, and not by their deeds.
    1. folds
      +7
      18 May 2013 19: 32
      And Khrushchev with his perestroika after the death of Stalin, fed this whole pack.
      1. fatty
        0
        23 May 2013 18: 33
        the bastard Khrushchev was a Trotskyist, but besides this, still an opportunist. Khrushchev and his family after the death of Stalin officially seized power, killing Beria, which was a hundred orders of magnitude higher and smarter than Khrushchev, predetermined the collapse of the country. commies can love their Lenin and Marx, but Stalin and Beria were business executives! they made a great country, they said, enough revolutions, won one country, so let's restore and raise it. this is my vision of the situation. what the author of the article wanted to say, I did not quite understand, to be honest
  14. coriagin. keha
    +8
    18 May 2013 16: 15
    Fucking democrats scolded the Communists that they were robbing the working class, but how parliamentarians robbed us and there are no words. Leshik
  15. -17
    18 May 2013 16: 18
    His opinion (for young people - comments) left above and stupidly all zaminusely.
    Big article G .. (I apologize for the repetition)
    1. +9
      18 May 2013 17: 44
      How do I speak? "Eh Vasya, Vasya"
      1. fatty
        -2
        21 May 2013 19: 39
        and you, oldsmobil, do not dare to touch the vaska, pissed rickets.
      2. fatty
        -1
        21 May 2013 21: 12
        ok, Vasya, and the foolish bastard oldsmobil-let him suck as much as four stars long, well, honestly earned a suction.
        1. Ataman
          0
          21 May 2013 21: 32
          Why did you decide that Vasya needs your protection?
    2. builder
      0
      18 May 2013 23: 29
      I completely agree, a normal country will not fall apart. The USSR simply ended and the Communists are to blame
    3. +6
      18 May 2013 23: 50
      My grandfather didn’t hand over the ticket even after the collapse of the union. This is probably the difference between a real communist and pseudo. And regarding young people, I myself probably belong to it (a fourth-year student of the full-time department of the university), many of my friends and fellow students sincerely regret the collapse of the USSR, because the thinker of tomorrow, which the current government cannot provide, is much more important to the thinking person . And since communists ruled that mighty power, then a low bow to them and an article is a big plus!
      1. Ataman
        0
        21 May 2013 20: 34
        Stalin ruled a mighty power, and then did not rule, but prosir ...
        How exactly Stalin ruled I do not discuss, I simply state.
    4. fatty
      0
      21 May 2013 19: 20
      no, Vasya, if you express an opinion that is different from the majority, don't give a damn about what you think and get 1000 minuses, and don't give a damn about what you think. Still, I want to believe that this is a military-patriotic, public site, and not a communist or someone else’s rostrum. Everyone has the right to express opinions here, as well as to withdraw from your interlocutor.
      1. Ataman
        0
        21 May 2013 20: 40
        And if Vasya sends all the generals to the black list, then they won’t do anything to him. tongue
        1. fatty
          -2
          21 May 2013 20: 47
          and if you go to a mother of a certain quality, can I ask you to shut up? snotty?
          1. Ataman
            0
            21 May 2013 21: 00
            You would first learn how to correctly build phrases in Russian. There is nothing to skip school!
  16. +8
    18 May 2013 16: 19
    And I’ll add. I completely agree with the text and everything stated above. Besides one. Of course, the authorities can run away. But where?! To the west, in SyShyA, there’s nowhere to put your friends there! And life there isn’t here! Berezovsky’s example is not impressive! will help.
    1. bezumnyiPIT
      +2
      18 May 2013 21: 01
      So right they will return! If they did not have a conscience 30 years ago, now even more so, they have already gone to the limit
    2. +2
      18 May 2013 21: 26
      And what did Berezovsky live in London on a bench and die in a square or in a country estate?
      As the saying goes "So that I live like this"
      In fact, the authorities have fulfilled Ostap Bender's dream of "making" money in Rio de Janeiro.
    3. +6
      18 May 2013 22: 52
      Berezovsky died when the money ran out, so they would accept billionaires fleeing Russia in any country, squeeze money and a scarf around their neck.
  17. +17
    18 May 2013 16: 20
    There are many words, but they are all small. per article +. It’s a pity that one. What we do not value losing crying? We will not cry, we will restore. And we’ll not wind the snot on a fist, but the guts of those who cross our recovery. And to wind not theoretically, but practically. So that everyone remembers what kind of country we are. No not like this. What kind of country are we?
  18. +4
    18 May 2013 16: 23
    He wrote the whole truth. There’s nothing to add
  19. +6
    18 May 2013 16: 25
    Thank you for the correct words and epigraph in memory of Yegor Letov.
  20. +8
    18 May 2013 16: 27
    I fully subscribe to the above !!! I'm ready to subscribe to every word! But, I would like to ask the current leaders of the party, I hope they read the forum ... Why are not attempts to revive the former power of the party, there is no normal propaganda, there are no real deeds and the involvement of the masses in these matters. Many of us, both members of the CPSU and sympathizers, are ready to help in returning the country to its own path of development, and not "according to the Western scenario", which is similar to socialist ideals. Everyone has long been tired of thieves and idiots in power (Serdyukovs, Medvedevs, etc.), many are ready, for the sake of their children, to go far enough to change the system ... A leader is needed! Young, charismatic, with a head on his shoulders !!! After all, not much is left until the moment when there will be no people who lived under the Soviet Union, and then the crap propaganda will finally cover with mud, all the good that Socialism gave!
    1. +11
      18 May 2013 16: 48
      gav6757

      I think so - it's impossible. The "bacillus" of profit, stupidity, deceit and "freedom" has devoured most of society. And what is left and society cannot be called - separate disparate personalities. You can't re-educate people (especially young ones). What was inherent in childhood (90s and 2000s) you just won't forget.
      It is necessary to build a country based on the current situation. But she is not rainbow. And how to do it is the biggest question for Russia.

      Of course, you need a leader. A man whom a significant part of the country would follow.
      1. +4
        18 May 2013 18: 18
        How much can you say: "you need a leader, you need a leader." You cannot even support the current leader. And without popular support, Stalin would not have coped.
        1. +1
          18 May 2013 20: 07
          I am for Putin! I support! And how it came to good in the article on the KPI website it is written. 99% history coincides. Http://www.kpe.ru/partiinaya-rabota/nam-pishut/3865-vpechatlenija-ot-z
          nakomstva-s-kob
    2. +6
      18 May 2013 20: 07
      Leaders are not mushrooms - you can’t find them in the forest - you need to grow them. You can create a party now the benefit of all 500 people need - a party in alliance with the Communist Party. It is not the Communist Party but in the union, because the Communist Party, although it has a large electorate, unfortunately does not know how to take advantage of it, due to old habits. A leader needs to be grown!
      1. -3
        18 May 2013 21: 19
        The Socialist Workers 'and Peasants' Party of Russia, what is your name? :)
        1. +1
          19 May 2013 07: 28
          instead of a minus, they could also offer their name :(
  21. +4
    18 May 2013 16: 28
    I joined the CPSU in the mid-80s. I, as a young communist, was immediately appointed a party organizer of the workshop. Under my supervision were all engineers and technicians, there were only four people out of twenty communists, and here's what I can tell you - if the Komsomol literally boomed during these years (BAM, sports, amateur performances, tourism, Co.
    1. +1
      18 May 2013 16: 38
      My father, in those same years, was a party organizer in the army (not liberated). He was telling something else.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. +7
    18 May 2013 16: 57
    LP Beria once said: “It doesn’t matter what they do at night, if only they would not indulge in Trotskyism.”
  24. diesel
    +4
    18 May 2013 17: 07
    Thanks for the article, my throat was compressed.
  25. djon3volta
    -16
    18 May 2013 17: 22
    So why did the USSR collapse? The Dulles plan is naive ...
    CIA, Mossad, Mi-6 - the same .. why the KGB and the GRU did not corrupt and ruin the United States, Britain, Israel?
    Why is Radio Marty effective against Cuba, Radio Liberty against the USSR, but there is no similar answer?
    Conscience - I do not believe ... The possibility of 10-15 times destroying life on Earth somehow weakly correlates with a peaceful attitude.
    1. M. Peter
      +3
      18 May 2013 17: 26
      Apparently good only in fairy tales wins. Alas! sad
    2. +7
      18 May 2013 17: 27
      A progressive systemic crisis and mediocrity at the helm in the last period. And, here, the fact that mediocrity came to power by accident, in particular the tagged one - I strongly doubt it.
    3. +17
      18 May 2013 17: 31
      Eugene! log in
      1. +6
        18 May 2013 17: 40
        Gleb

        Opanki!
        One to one!
        Even the number of times too!
      2. optimist
        -5
        18 May 2013 17: 55
        I immediately realized that the "three-volt" is a paid Putin troll !!!
        1. +2
          18 May 2013 18: 00
          optimist

          Not that word...
          1. DeerIvanovich
            0
            18 May 2013 21: 07
            generally optimist trivolt colleague laughing
        2. +6
          18 May 2013 18: 07
          fasten offend
        3. djon3volta
          0
          18 May 2013 18: 08
          Quote: optimist
          I immediately realized that the "three-volt" is a paid Putin troll !!!

          take from the shelf pirazhki laughing
          Yes, I’m a paid Putininoid troll, one komment is 85 rubles, I already spoke about it, forgot something? 1848 comments I wrote on this site, multiplying by 85 rubles = 157 thousand rubles, and this is only on this site bully and you don’t pour something into Putin’s and Russia’s slop? I’m sorry, I wouldn’t do this in your place for free No. if only because of patriotism to the us and the west you are maesh this ..
          1. Yarbay
            +2
            18 May 2013 18: 22
            Quote: djon3volta
            Yes, I’m a paid Putinoid Troll, one koment 85 rubles

            and where you are recruited ??)))))
            Damn if they choose people like you, then poor * United Russia * !!
            Alas, to your President you are doing * a disservice *!
            1. +7
              18 May 2013 18: 47
              Quote: Yarbay
              and where you are recruited ??)))))

              Hi Alibek hi If you think that they are being recruited to the FSB, then you are mistaken request There, the last one was spanked at 39 by Beria’s personal order bully This is exclusively the CIA. fool And all because they created it under our leadership in the person of Philby and otherwise they will never work wassat
              1. Yarbay
                +1
                18 May 2013 20: 46
                Quote: Ruslan67
                If you think that they are being recruited to the FSB, then you are mistaken

                Hi Ruslan !!
                No, I'm sure those guys are doing more serious things))))))))))))
                1. The comment was deleted.
          2. optimist
            +4
            18 May 2013 18: 52
            Judah at one time did not have time to spend 30 pieces of silver ... So run shopping faster! tongue
          3. Rezun
            +3
            18 May 2013 19: 56
            "Is it okay, Grigory?
            -Excellent, Kostantin! "

            Burn John! ++++++++++ ....
          4. wax
            0
            18 May 2013 22: 03
            Are you kidding me? Or really corrupt?
          5. 0
            19 May 2013 12: 16
            Quote: djon3volta
            Yes, I’m a paid Putinoid Troll, one koment 85 rubles


            Well, this is understandable ... But what, in PZhiV only pay for the quantity? What about the quality? Or are there all such illiterate and dishonest Jews? Yes, but you can use this comment (I can't after such a "you") comment as a generalizing characteristic of all similar ...?
      3. Yarbay
        +3
        18 May 2013 18: 12
        Quote: Gleb
        Eugene! log in

        yeah))))))
        surprised !!
        A real scout, which I had no doubt before though !!
        scent, memory, accuracy !!
        Gleb to take off our hat is not accepted, applause, sparking!
        and what kind of site?
        1. +4
          18 May 2013 18: 18
          is it better to ask Eugene
          1. Yarbay
            +6
            18 May 2013 18: 26
            Quote: Gleb
            is it better to ask Eugene


            Found it myself !!

            http://nnm.ru/

            But three years have passed !!!
            Bravo Gleb !!!
            1. +7
              18 May 2013 18: 46
              I’ll step aside a little.
              The failure of hockey players was discussed yesterday. Many on the site say that the youth are not the same, the USSR is recalled, Lermonov’s poems are quoted. Meanwhile, yesterday the youth became European football champions. Football! Beating the Italians
            2. +6
              18 May 2013 20: 27
              Quote: Yarbay
              Bravo Gleb !!!

              I will support.
              Quote: Yarbay
              djon3volta

              Zheka, it's time for you to molt ...
              It’s not going to be interesting with you already, your thoughts are not formulated beforehand.
              1. +2
                18 May 2013 21: 35
                Quote: baltika-18

                It’s not going to be interesting with you already, your thoughts are not formulated beforehand.

                Quote: djon3volta
                The synthesis of all the best that was in Tsarist Russia and Soviet Russia is the only key to success. Only the combination of the political practice of Stalinism - selfless, sacrificial, merciless - with the primordial Black-Hundred, Orthodox-monarchical ideals of the Russian people can now lay the solid foundation of the new Russian Empire.

                Russian folk line
                19.04.2013/XNUMX/XNUMX. The "Black Hundred" of President Putin
                Konstantin Dushenov, Russian folk line

                The synthesis of all the best that was in Tsarist Russia and Soviet Russia is the only key to success. Only the combination of the political practice of Stalinism - selfless, sacrificial, merciless - with the primordial Black-Hundred, Orthodox-monarchical ideals of the Russian people can now lay the solid foundation of the new Russian Empire.


                Joni is not the first time stealing
                1. dmb
                  +2
                  18 May 2013 23: 35
                  Honestly, it will be a pity if a three-volt citizen disappears from the site after such an affront. His militant ignorance, multiplied by sincere and judging by today's, well-paid love for the leader, not only entertained members of the forum, but also was an effective means of discrediting the leader himself. Who will support the power, which has such fans. This is the same as Nemtsov campaigning for liberal values, or gay men urging to strengthen the family.
                  1. djon3volta
                    -5
                    19 May 2013 07: 46
                    Quote: dmb
                    Who will maintain power

                    comrade, come to my senses, I’ll repeat it again and I will repeat it at the opportunity - 143 million people live in the country, of which 107 million are eligible to vote and how many of you are here on the site? you are here on the strength of 200-300 people below on the main you can see how much online laughing you here haters of the current government of 100-200 people laughing am i right? certainly right!
                    that after a boltoy rally, housing and communal services prices fell or salaries increased? can officials stop stealing?
                    so the virtual chatter of hundreds of hamsters in the 143 millionth country doesn’t play any weather. And you are well aware of this, which is why you are mad with impotence.
                    1. +3
                      19 May 2013 08: 03
                      You greatly underestimate the opinions of the people - it’s in Moscow and in the Tatars they vote for the current government, and in many regions the Communists have long won, if the elections are fair so don’t drive the bullshit
      4. +6
        18 May 2013 18: 47
        Both on! So it "surfaced"! good
  26. +6
    18 May 2013 17: 31
    All to the fight against capitalism and crap!
  27. optimist
    +8
    18 May 2013 17: 34
    It is written simply and rudely, but sincerely and sincerely! And the more people begin to think like that, the more likely it is that Russia will be able to break out of the ..opa where the current power of the Zhido-Masonic governors pushed it. I hope the point of no return has not yet been passed ...
    1. +3
      18 May 2013 17: 41
      optimist

      You are truly an optimist!
      1. optimist
        +1
        18 May 2013 17: 56
        Hope dies last! (After the one who hoped ... laughing )
  28. +7
    18 May 2013 17: 35
    The problem of capitalism is not that one person exploits another, but that the economy does not need such a large population. Labor productivity is growing, which means that the required number of jobs is constantly decreasing. The state is trying to attract the unemployed to services, tourism, and small business. But these areas remain only as long as the locomotives of the economy — industrial production — work. Once the crisis looms on the horizon, the whole pyramid crumbles. What we have now. What to do for those who did not have enough work? Starve to death or take up arms. Socialism puts everything upside down. Not the people for the economy, but the economy for the people.
  29. vladsolo56
    +15
    18 May 2013 17: 37
    By the way, I remembered the USSR, and thought, but in fact in the USSR there was more freedom than now. Now I feel clamped down on all sides by different laws, regulations, taxes, and even the devil knows what
    1. +7
      18 May 2013 17: 59
      vladsolo56

      And imagine - what is young?
      They see this whole mess and think that it is so! And the fact that it should not be so does not occur to them. And how to convince them?
    2. +1
      18 May 2013 19: 39
      vladsolo56: .. in the USSR there was more freedom than now.
      We knew what was possible and what wasn’t, and now we can sit down for both. Under the Bolsheviks, under the Communists we were a GREAT country! And now …
      PS And they were convinced that democracy is the power of oligarchs over the people.
    3. +1
      18 May 2013 22: 58
      There is a feeling ...
  30. RUS
    RUS
    +5
    18 May 2013 18: 00
    It’s enough to nostalgic for irrevocable times, and dream of returning the past. In the comments there is a lot of sentimentalism and resentment, we’ll reconcile that now is a new time and a new country, we need to look to the future and deal with new challenges, as the world is changing rapidly, fewer tears and words, more real affairs.
  31. +5
    18 May 2013 18: 09
    Look at how many officials have bred ... In Russia alone there are more than in the entire USSR ...
    And in those days, I believed that I didn’t just join the ranks ... It's a pity ... It's a pity ...
  32. MMZ
    MMZ
    +2
    18 May 2013 18: 43
    It remains only to regret that such a great country of the USSR
  33. waisson
    +4
    18 May 2013 18: 47
    I don’t enter into disputes; it’s a pity that it’s not ironic (there are no conscious elements) ---- the article certainly correct affects our patriotic interests
  34. Volkhov
    +4
    18 May 2013 18: 50
    Just "SOVIET COMMUNISTS"were Russian by way of thinking, they were removed from the Central Committee by Gorbachev in hundreds, now they are adherents of another god, destroyers of worlds.
    But destruction is the final process, after the catastrophe creators will be needed again, it will be clear even to the remnants of the electorate.
  35. +7
    18 May 2013 18: 52
    I watched the video with Pavka Korchagin, I remembered. the most precious thing in a person is life, it is given to him once, and it is necessary to live it in such a way that there is no excruciatingly embarrassing shame for the aimlessly lived Years, so as not to burn the shame for the small petty past, and so that you could say dying. All life, everything forces are given to the most important thing, the struggle for the liberation of mankind. what are the values ​​now?
  36. +8
    18 May 2013 18: 59
    Union of the indestructible republics free
    Great Russia forever.
    Long live the people's will
    A single, mighty Soviet Union!
    recourse
  37. -4
    18 May 2013 19: 02
    I read and became sad and I realized that there are people who live dreams of the past and they have no other life except in the past and I thought that Adam was less sad about the lost paradise than they were about his communist Eden since he had to fight for life and he was not worried about the lost
    1. +3
      18 May 2013 19: 05
      Yeah, the most unfortunate thing is to be happy in the past ...
  38. +3
    18 May 2013 19: 15
    This nostalgia already got us all.

    I found out that I
    There is a huge family -
    And tripod, and woods,
    In the field, each spikelet!

    River, the sky is blue -
    This is all mine!
    This is my motherland!
    I love all in the world!


    Vladimir Orlov "Native"
    1. The comment was deleted.
  39. +5
    18 May 2013 19: 21
    for the free radio circle in which I put together my first transistor receiver,



    And I'm on the lamps !!! In 1977 was at a review of the achievements of the DYUT circles.
    it was something !!! From large-scale models of aircraft and ships to robots and radio-controlled aircraft and high-speed cars! That would revive these circles ... The kids will be pulled there, I'm sure.
  40. Sosland
    +2
    18 May 2013 19: 22
    Quote: smel
    There is nothing to add.

    there is something to add, THANKS. And there is something to think about
  41. +3
    18 May 2013 19: 28
    Well, actually, Stalin predicted about these times and said that after all these upheavals in Russia, they would return to the former achievements of the social services. society ...
  42. fatty
    -12
    18 May 2013 19: 32
    Sorry, but I didn’t like the article. It’s odious, pompous and nothing. definitely minus.
    1. vladsolo56
      0
      18 May 2013 19: 36
      Someone about nothing, and someone about everything. if you look around us, it’s immediately clear to whom and about what?
  43. +5
    18 May 2013 19: 32
    "... come, dear grandfather, by Christ God, I pray you, take me from here ... Have pity on me, an unfortunate orphan .. my lost life is worse than any dog ​​... and boredom is such that I can't even say I'm crying ..."
    Not tired of nostalgia and tears to drench ?! What was then was both good and bad - all of ours! There is something to build on and go on! Well, let's go! Look more fun - we have something to do! Or will we write letters to our grandfather’s village and wind snot on a fist ?!
    1. fatty
      -16
      18 May 2013 19: 59
      plus your comment, but I stand my ground, the article is shit, the author-zyuganist is shitty ... honestly, I still haven't decided who is more disgusting than zyuganov or Germans with Chubais.
  44. dc120mm
    +15
    18 May 2013 19: 39
    smile I was beaten for 8 years when the USSR fell apart and I don’t remember well BUT! Father misses the USSR smile
  45. Alexander-81
    +3
    18 May 2013 19: 49
    all of the above was completely unnecessary. But then the good that was with you, is no more and will not be sad I have no words. auto RU hi hi hi
  46. -3
    18 May 2013 20: 06
    The article says first of all that Russia ALREADY VERY LONG LOSES INFORM.WARN !!! I think that this article would be VERY relevant to the year of commercials in 1917-19th in the midst of a bloody bacchanalia in which these same Communists pulled the Russian Empire, striking in the back of the warring Homeland. Only regret would not be about the Communists, but about the faithful Monarch. As the saying goes: What we have no regrets, having lost bitterly crying ...
    But with all this, I join the opinion of the author, he himself comes from the USSR.
    1. -2
      18 May 2013 21: 42
      It was not the Communists who betrayed the monarch, the situation at the front was catastrophic, whites were to blame for the bloody bacchanalia.
  47. +2
    18 May 2013 20: 20
    RUSSIA- ABOVE ALL !!!
    1. fatty
      -1
      18 May 2013 20: 34
      I agree with this, but let the commies go to history. This is not a communist party website.
      1. 0
        1 June 2013 19: 38
        history will show who is right
  48. Neolexx1
    +2
    18 May 2013 20: 26
    The article is huge + in solidarity with the author at 700%
  49. lexalex
    +2
    18 May 2013 20: 36
    And to me from this letter a little something else was noted) Why Dmitry Anatolyevich, and not Vladimir Vladimirovich) Again fear ... But how so, the Supreme authority cannot be mistaken .... Those who are to blame below ... These communists were, yes nobody listened to them ... And who THEN interfered with THEM to speak? KGB? Lying. I myself am a man of those times. Nobody could cope with principled people, and they didn’t get involved ... True, there are no such people left now ... Swamps, n and dosas, hamsters ... Among them there are those who are paid. But there are those who can’t tolerate this injustice. And we then sat on the pope and watched the country that gave us life die, and now we are watching how they dance on its bones ... I don’t exclude myself ... But and tearful articles I do not allow myself. No character - don't show it to others ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. lexalex
        -1
        18 May 2013 20: 49
        And you didn’t understand anything ((((As for fagots, look in the mirror) But hatred has not created anything in this world yet, but it has destroyed a lot ...
      2. lexalex
        -1
        18 May 2013 20: 50
        and yet, at least in Russian it is written separately)
  50. mosgeo1
    0
    18 May 2013 20: 46
    Dear X, we can recall how the libraries of institutes and universities in the USSR were ruined, burning their funds, of communism, Marxism, and all other creators of Our knowledge, no worse than the Gestapo. Who did not suit the newly minted Power - the October Revolution, the Komsomol members, the trade unions, and the party members of the CPSU, who have not yet turned into new converts. They were all taken out! I hope you remember this chronologically, in contrast to our modern "HISTORY" - being in absurdity. Not everything, but much is irretrievably lost! God forgive me for any outpouring, but Putin is the only one who was able to resist the Moscow mafia of idiots, break himself off, and make the people of the final idiots! Thank you for your thoughts!
    1. lexalex
      +8
      18 May 2013 21: 06
      I do not agree with your assessment of the role of Putin. You can’t be a little bit honest, but a little bit honest ... There is no half-truth. If a woman is unfaithful to her husband for money, or under duress, or simply for pleasure, or sometimes, but reluctantly, it does not matter to her husband. For him, she is no longer a wife ... So with the Sovereign ... Corrected there, but not there - relatives, lack of time, you will not see everything, then, not right away ...
      1. mosgeo1
        0
        19 May 2013 03: 03
        If "Mermaid" or "Ftop furniture" comes to you in the bathroom? - You broke on this. You seem to have not been honored. Are you offended? In vain! I respect you!
      2. 0
        21 May 2013 16: 13
        "I handed over the State as command of the squadron ..." (c) feature film "Two Lives". I'm talking about Nicholas II.
  51. +4
    18 May 2013 20: 47
    My friend, this is the cry of the soul of our people, except for a bunch of thieves!
  52. +7
    18 May 2013 20: 57
    Years pass and memory disappears:
    not everything worked out well for you, but some things turned out poorly or didn’t work out at all,
    . All that remains is:
    For the smile of Yuri Gagarin, for the red flag over Berlin, for the Soviet Army, equipped with first-class tanks and aircraft, for the confidence that no one will ever attack my country, because they will get it in such a way that it won’t seem a little, for nuclear icebreakers, for that they kept the great Russian classical culture - and the culture of other peoples of the Union - from vulgarity and the laws of the market, for science, for observatories, for synchrophasotrons, for the magazine "Astronomical Calendar of a Schoolchild" at the cost of five kopecks and the magazine "Kvant" at the price of ten kopecks, which my not very rich mother ordered for the mountains of the North Caucasus, where you could relax and ski,
    . Because I lived in this state, served in this Army, and traveled throughout the vast country, on business trips, as if it were my own street. Not a single glance from under his brows, not a hiss. And just God grant that the time comes for my children to feel such unity of a multinational family.
  53. +8
    18 May 2013 21: 04
    Normal letter. I am proud that I grew up in the USSR. Of course, you can't return the past.
    And I have only one oath of allegiance to the Motherland, a socialist one.
  54. ilya63
    +6
    18 May 2013 21: 13
    the article is valid, only a correction is there; the decomposition began with Khrushchev (the cult was debunked, the army was crap, the people were robbed - the reform of 1961, after which markets appeared, shortages and, as a consequence, double standards, a generation of intellectuals from the sixties, well, not a manager (Khrushchev did not command anything) , corn is good, why plow up the vineyards, rockets are good, but the “storm” is still more promising, etc.), and then such a swamp began, Stalin was right in many ways, the cadres decide everything, and periodically shook up the party cadres, after all a party without a shake-up is like an army without a war - it degrades, Stalin left behind worn-out boots, a pipe and a Great Victorious Power (2400 tons of gold by the way), and what can the current pygmies leave - at best a desert (like locusts)
  55. +4
    18 May 2013 21: 13
    The article is on point. But the “merits” of LADIES are not all listed. Alexander, you also forgot to change the clock hands in winter to summer time, praise the “effective” manager in the post of Minister of Defense Serdyukov, and most importantly his famous “business is not a nightmare”, as a result of which practically There is no quality control of manufactured products. Now we buy and eat what the “non-nightmare” business produces. For those who don’t understand, watch the TV shows “Habitat”, “Test Purchase”, etc.
  56. +3
    18 May 2013 21: 24
    Quote: albai
    Because I lived in this state, served in this Army, and traveled throughout the vast country, on business trips, as if it were my own street. Not a single glance from under his brows, not a hiss. And just God grant that the time comes for my children to feel such unity of a multinational family.

    I can subscribe to every word. I just want to say that you cannot step into the same river twice. You need to look back to avoid making previous mistakes. And the mistakes were not small! It is more correct now for both the white and red sovereign patriots not to throw mud at each other, but to find ways to consolidate the healthy forces of society. Now is clearly not the time for internal squabbles.
    1. DPN
      +2
      18 May 2013 22: 44
      I support YOU, but the task of the Russian media is to pit and stratify our people as much as possible among themselves, the grandchildren of princes, landowners, dispossessed, repressed, traitors and simply the working class, as well as the emerging allegarchs, and how to live in such conditions for the Russian people, about this Any political program on TV constantly reminds us how brains were trashed during Yeltsin’s time, respected professors of newly created institutes continue to do so.
  57. Dimkapvo
    +3
    18 May 2013 21: 35
    I read on another site the statements of our “elites” about Russia, I don’t know how much you can trust this resource - I came across it by accident... I really want to hope that this is at least 50% fabrications of the authors, otherwise it becomes simply scary to live in the country when such people walk among us, breathe the same air with us, occupy positions in society and the state... Why are they not deprived of citizenship, why are they not removed from their posts and driven out of the country with a filthy broom? During the USSR they did not stand on ceremony with such people!!!!
    PS I apologize for posting the comment again, but it really hurt!!!!

    http://open-eyes-russia.com/society/russia/439-russia-prevented-the-russians.htm

    l
    1. +2
      18 May 2013 21: 42
      They have a lot of dough and they haven’t stepped on the throats of the current behind-the-scenes cardinals; as soon as they do, they will immediately lose everything.
  58. +7
    18 May 2013 21: 48
    I will make my contribution to the common cause: regarding the CPSU, Academician Chelomey, once during some tests, said the following phrase (it ended up in a collection of aphorisms, where I found it): “For the system to be stable, it must be shaken.” . So, in my opinion, the whole problem of the CPSU is precisely that after I.V. Stalin, no one shook the CPSU as a system. As a result, being at rest, the CPSU as a system rusted, rotted and collapsed, and since, according to Article 6 of the 1977 Constitution, the CPSU had a leading and directing role in society, then a society without leadership collapsed. Of course, one can still speculate what would have happened , if, according to Stalin’s idea, the leadership role would pass to the Soviet bodies, and the party would only have personnel selection left, and the role of the economy would come to the fore, which Kosygin sought in his time, then then... As they say: if If my grandmother had a wow, she would be a grandfather.
  59. +5
    18 May 2013 21: 56
    I love the USSR, I was born there
  60. +4
    18 May 2013 22: 03
    To such an extent everything is true! Touches from the heart.
    Words are lost on oneself. Everything is complicated. I insert:
    General designer Arkady Geogievich Shipunov. 1927-2013 Father of "KORNET" Anti-tank guided missile system. Destroys all tanks and subsonic air targets. The “father” of the world’s lightest military pistol GSh-18, the Dirk complex, the Pantsir missile defense system and other sea, aviation and land-based products.

    Here are his words:
    “I still can’t understand how Stalin managed not only to restore the entire industry, but also to achieve its dynamic development. How was it possible to actually re-create science?! It doesn’t fit in my head: 1929, in fact, there is nothing , and in 1939 there is a completely modern scientific and industrial base, professionalism has been revived almost everywhere.
    Someone claims that then everyone worked out of fear of ending up in camps, or even being shot.
    But fear encourages slave labor, which is never productive, much less creative. And those years were precisely distinguished by unprecedented productivity and a real surge of free creativity."
    1. Komodo
      +1
      19 May 2013 05: 03
      The communists moved everything...
  61. DPN
    +3
    18 May 2013 22: 22
    The article is good and, in general, it is a reproach to current PENSIONERS and 50-year-olds who were too lazy to raise their butts in defense of the Soviet regime, as a result the majority of them lost almost everything. Everything that is listed in the first part of the article. I knew one family, the man worked as an operator with a good salary, his wife retired at the age of 45, their children studied at the Moscow Institute, then they did not pay tuition fees, and so the parents went to Moscow every weekend in their Zhiguli to visit their students, 400 kilometers away, and before this routine life got to them that this woman stood strongly for Nemtsov and Yeltsin. She was fed up with the communist power under which she received all the benefits that now the majority of the population of RUSSIA can only dream of.
    Maybe this is nostalgia, but few people need such freedom when young people cannot find a good job, and pensioners live very well on 5000 rubles. Having received the sweet word FREEDOM in the newspaper and on the fence, they lost almost everything.
  62. +1
    18 May 2013 22: 28
    Millions think so, but still not everyone understands why the majority of the Soviet people found themselves under the rule of pathological traitors, political cheaters and professional thieves. On this occasion, I published my own monograph “Assessments of the catastrophe or the collapse of the USSR”, the phased publication of which I will soon begin on my page in Prose.ru. Those interested will be able to familiarize themselves.
  63. pahom54
    +3
    18 May 2013 22: 35
    The letter was written from the heart... There was no freedom either here or here, but at that time people were kinder or something... Even though there was a tough ideology, we, in fact, did not know what drunkenness and drug addiction were in on such a scale as now... In general, the correct letter
    1. +3
      18 May 2013 22: 47
      Quote: pahom54
      There was no freedom either there or here,


      Where is ideal freedom? In the next world, too. But there was freedom to choose one’s destiny and freedom of creativity in the USSR. No matter who says anything. Today I saw in a restaurant decorated with a retro look the book “Labour Education of Schoolchildren” from 1985. publications He begged and took it. This is where the greatness of the USSR originated. Accustoming to work from an early age. Yes, this book can be parsed for quotes
      1. 0
        19 May 2013 08: 58
        retiree

        There was no permissiveness then!
  64. +1
    18 May 2013 23: 17
    Yes, good article in Soviet times, we all verbally built communism with slogans, banners, then it seemed funny, but in reality we lived under communism.
  65. +6
    18 May 2013 23: 20
    On March 21, 1991, the Supreme Soviet of the USSR reviewed the preliminary results of the referendum. He noted that in favor of preserving Of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 112 million people spoke, that is, 76% of those who voted, and, therefore, “the fate of the peoples of the country is inseparable, that only through joint efforts can they successfully resolve issues of economic, social and cultural development.” And then the pandemonium begins: At the extraordinary III Congress of People's Deputies of the RSFSR, a draft resolution “On Union of Sovereign Republics (Union Treaty) and the procedure for its signing”, in which taken into account “the will of the peoples of the Russian Federation, expressed in the results of the referendum on the preservation of the USSR”, and was designated “the determination of the RSFSR to sign the Treaty on Union of Sovereign Republics. A little bit, so the name was changed. Further, even stranger: In accordance with the results of the referendum, a working group authorized by the central and republican authorities within the framework of the so-called Novo-Ogarevo process in the spring-summer of 1991 developed a project to conclude a federation agreement “About the Union of Sovereign Republics", the signing of which was scheduled for August 20. But it was a referendum specifically on the USSR, the Union of Soviet Socialist, and not Sovereign. Next was the State Emergency Committee. On August 18-21, the State Emergency Committee made an unsuccessful attempt to forcibly remove M. S. Gorbachev from the post of President of the USSR, disrupting the signing of the Union Treaty. This was a must see. Visual aid entitled "How not to do a coup." And they didn’t sign the agreement, but sat down to develop a new one and, in the end, they did. In the fall of 1991, the working group of the Novo-Ogaryovo process prepared a new draft of the Union Treaty on the creation of a “Union of Sovereign States”, already, as confederation of independent states. Its preliminary signing was supposed to take place on December 9. But for some this was not enough. On December 8, 1991, the presidents of Belarus, the RSFSR and Ukraine, “noting that negotiations on the preparation of a new Union Treaty had reached a dead end, the objective process of the republics secession from the USSR and the formation of independent states had become a real fact,” concluded the Belovezhskaya Agreement on the creation Commonwealth of Independent States - intergovernmental organization, without state status. Other union republics later joined the CIS. And finally, a question. Does a party have the right to exist if it has allowed its organization to take such a form that at its helm there are scumbags who have merged both the state and the party that ruled it? what
    1. +1
      19 May 2013 00: 09
      Quote: perepilka
      And finally, a question. Does a party have the right to exist if it has allowed its organization to take such a form that at its helm there are scumbags who have merged both the state and the party that ruled it?
      In Russia, the role of the individual has always been fateful, especially when it came to governing the country. In the States, even if they elected a monkey as president, nothing would change, the system works, the shadow clan of ghouls, the true masters of the country, the masters of mercantile ideals and consumer morality, rules. The communists created the USSR, this is a fact, but the country was destroyed by opportunists and “personalities” unworthy of being the leaders they became by the will of circumstances. The truth is that at first people loved Gorbachev, he was popular, very different from the dogmatists who did not say a few words without a piece of paper. And Yeltsin, a drunk, was popular, because many shouted “Boriska for the kingdom!”... Everything is learned by comparison, probably, one had to go through this. What's next, are there former communists, real communists, and not these assholes - "where the wind blows"? Can KGB officers be former if they are not traitors? Will there be a PERSON in Russia who will be offended for the people and the state, and not for the perishable nonsense, that is the question.
  66. +2
    18 May 2013 23: 34
    I completely agree with much of what was said in the article, I partially agree with some statements, but with this statement by the Author “Now you can only become a bourgeois ghoul and suck the blood out of your workers, or a parasitic official. This is the dream horizon that remains for us and the next generations.” I don’t agree at all... A person is free to choose his own dream, and everyone is free to choose their own dream and go towards it. Even as an official, you can not be a parasite, but do your job for the common good; you can be a “bourgeois,” but not a ghoul, but a creator, creating new industries, new jobs, new goods and services for people. What kind of person a person will be depends not only on external circumstances and the environment, but largely on the person himself.
    What I mean is that under any government, you have to try, try, work to be a human and not an animal. We are people after all...
  67. builder
    +1
    18 May 2013 23: 41
    The communists knew that the country would fall apart. Since 88, they began to remove nuclear weapons from the union republics; Soviet power had become obsolete.
  68. +1
    18 May 2013 23: 45
    I printed it out for others. Very touching, although there are points in the article that can be argued about. Not all of us are parasites...And among the bourgeoisie and officials there are many decent ones. Shoigu alone is worth something.
  69. builder
    +2
    18 May 2013 23: 52
    listen to you, one general secretary is bad, the other is bad, the third is generally a traitor, and these are the best of the communists. What then are the rest?
  70. s1н7т
    0
    18 May 2013 23: 55
    I agree with the author 100%!
  71. mojohed
    0
    18 May 2013 23: 59
    Yes. The way we lived in the Union will never be the same. The Caucasus is already like a nuclear reactor on which water is poured, which can no longer cool it, because... The chain reaction of nuclear fusion continues after the reactor accident, and from abroad they pour more catalyst into this emergency reactor to strengthen the scope of destruction. But the main thing is that this water is human lives, destinies and nerves of the people, and radioactive steam and water flowing from the reactor is corruption, collapse and mismanagement.
  72. +1
    19 May 2013 00: 06
    Quote: Nick
    We are people after all...

    Here is the stone that bumped, the proud word MAN was smeared into people.
    If I changed the meaning, I’ll call you (meaning: sorry!/I’ll call you, don’t worry)
    I will continue:
    In total, they offer us evolution: caviar and belly to the sun, cocktails in crystal with umbrellas...
    I'm not a fan of Darwin's theory, but in some places it supports my suspicions. Like a crutch.
    So, in my opinion, communism (ideally) educated a person? HUMAN!
    Capitalism needs people and consumers.
    I have seen rare people for whom the iPhone is a tool, mostly a show off.
    Will a REASONABLE MAN pay for showing off?
    My condolences to those who bought an iPhone, I’m probably from another world, an atavism or something.
    1. Kostya pedestrian
      0
      19 May 2013 01: 29
      capitalism needs cheap labor, as well as auto-reset and restart of the computer when the cache is through the roof and there is not enough backdrive.
  73. Seraph
    +4
    19 May 2013 00: 11
    If the communist is Stalin, I'm for it. If the communists are Lenin, Trotsky, Tukhachevsky, Khrushchev, Andropov, Yeltsin, I am against them. A party cannot be monolithic, an ideology cannot sculpt identical people. There is always something good and something bad: it was the same in the Soviet period. Going back to the way things were is fantastic. But work on building a new Russia with the memory of everything that happened to us is necessary. Take the best from the Soviet system, sweep aside the bad (and at least the same community of wives of the early 20s). Don’t whine “everything is lost now, everything is wrong now!”, work on yourself, be a Citizen. As St. Seraphim of Sarov said: “Save yourself and thousands around you will be saved.” Become a Human and thousands around you will want to be the same. The main thing is what is inside the bang, its core, soul: what is there - rot or a strong spirit?
    Thanks to the Union for a happy childhood. The article is more of a plus than a minus. But we still need to live not in the past...
    1. Kostya pedestrian
      +1
      19 May 2013 01: 20
      I understand that there is a lot of information now, but it is always worth checking it out for yourself. And if something is wrong, and we are not satisfied, then history exists for this reason, so that it can be written by the victors - and there is no need to throw out the words from the song to please the West, or to be “sincere” with the executioners.

      There is an ancient Russian custom about those who have passed into another world: either only good things or nothing. After all, a tree grows from a root. Cut the root and the tree dies. And the victories of I.V. built on the ideology of the party of the people.
  74. +2
    19 May 2013 00: 14
    As long as the country is remembered, it is alive. I did not surrender my passport to the USSR.
  75. Kostya pedestrian
    +1
    19 May 2013 01: 16
    I add to the Rate:
    Look at one of the first works of the magnificent Gaidai “The Long Way” - excellent acting, excellent script and presentation, but I’m not talking about that in this case, just notice what kind of slave relations and “Japanese spinning” existed in pre-revolutionary Russia, when we, starting from 1812 did not win a single war, or rather, not a single local conflict. Not to mention the fact that the road for people like Mikhailo Lomonosov was practically closed, which was expressed in our attitude towards science and inventions; we were made zero, a kind of dark people in the face of the great Western engineering... But the communists changed this, so they hate them in the West, because they revealed the truth to people and helped them realize themselves.

    So Lenin is a personality. And the party he created is millions of valuable doctors, engineers, athletes, scientists, teachers and many, many priceless things... so if they had better searched (dug up around the world) for the “gold of the party,” then the Russians would have already conquered Mars today. they smiled at the earthlings, and if (I know that this point of view is unpopular, but I’ll risk expressing it) they accepted and cultivated the ideas of L.D. Trotsky about the international, and the Soviet people would also travel around the world like all “civilized” people, and would have worldwide popularity not only in the military-industrial complex of products, but also VAZs, MAZs and GAZs would now be driving around Belsvet, and not the Swedish Viking conquerors of Poltava.
    .
  76. fatty
    -5
    19 May 2013 03: 27
    If this and similar articles are a trend on the site, I am categorically against it! With the publications of Ryabov and Kaptsov, this propaganda bullshit is not close. It has nothing to do with military-patriotic topics, I ask you to bring up for discussion the feasibility of this kind of publication on the site.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      19 May 2013 09: 06
      fatty

      No one has yet prohibited thinking and discussing. This is what the forum was created for.
      And if the majority of people support the author, then what’s wrong with that? So this is their opinion! And at a minimum, you need to respect someone else’s opinion and, if you don’t agree, argue. Express your opinion (without insults)!
  77. +3
    19 May 2013 03: 43
    Yes, I would give a lot to return back to the USSR! forks the words that we love are invaluable...! To create something great you need work, sweat and time, and you can ruin everything in 5 minutes! Yes, if I had known in advance how this would all turn out, I would have personally stormed the White House with the army in 91 with all this Yeltsin rubbish and would have smashed it to pieces! I wouldn't give them any chance! Personally, I would have pressed the button with a missile aimed at this structure and my hand would not have wavered!! It’s a very shame to lose such a country, the further you go, the more you realize it with pain! We paid dearly for an imaginary freedom that still doesn’t exist! Yes, half the country would probably do the same thing if they could bring it back with their current memory!!! but there’s nothing left to return, you have to work with what you have, what’s left, you need to at least preserve it! The main thing is to preserve historical memory and learn to think soberly and have no time to avoid such mistakes and failures! and then, over time, maybe we will be able to restore the USSR 2.0 or something like that! Because it’s a pity that the USSR will probably never be the same as we knew it!
  78. +2
    19 May 2013 04: 26
    on all sites there are attacks on Stalin, the army is compared to the fascist one, and other abominations about the war, what kind of action is this?
  79. +1
    19 May 2013 06: 12
    There is nothing to comment, I just join what has been said. Especially in the part - YES.
  80. fatty
    +1
    19 May 2013 06: 45
    Otto Eduard Leopold Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand, etc. Ferdinandovich Bismarck very correctly said about Karl Genrikhovich Marx that Europe will still cry with this accountant. Unfortunately, Russia cried most bitterly. I cried tears of blood. So let the furry commies shut the gun.
  81. Gennadii Riga
    +4
    19 May 2013 07: 53
    Yeltsin came to power with the slogan of fighting the privileges of officials and party officials. Everything was well thought out. Against the backdrop of a general shortage, which they themselves created, this slogan was very effective for the consciousness of ordinary people. Subsequently, I saw the personal dacha of N.K. Ryzhkov, who at that time held the post of chairman of the government! So, this dacha, compared to today’s castles of mediocre officials, is a PATHETIC SHACK,
  82. +4
    19 May 2013 09: 58
    There was an ideology in the USSR, there was an understanding that we all work for OUR country and for the sake of OUR country. Yes, there was leveling and storming, there was cronyism and nomenklatura. But still, there was an understanding of OWN country. And now some don’t even have their own home, everything is on credit, everything is borrowed. And our children will not work for their own country, but for their uncle, company, corporation.
  83. wax
    +3
    19 May 2013 10: 10
    I have both Komsomol and party tickets. I also believe that the ideas of social justice will not disappear anywhere and will inspire people to fight against the owners of mineral resources and land, plants and factories, thieves and bandits, corrupt hacks, against the omnipotence of money, in defense of justice, decent education, health care, childhood, confidence in tomorrow. Moreover, I could not subscribe to the universal gratitude to the former communists before 1991, because in 1991, all party organizations meekly obeyed the EBN’s decree on dissolution.
    1. builder
      -4
      19 May 2013 12: 01
      were you confident about the future? Here it is, this day the communists gave it to you. Rejoice!!!
  84. Ataman
    +3
    19 May 2013 10: 49
    Why then did the USSR collapse, while communist China blooms and smells? Why was the USSR the bogeyman behind the Iron Curtain, and China the world's assembly shop? It's not a matter of the social system, but the presence of brains in the heads of the country's top leaders. Russia, the USA, China, Europe and many other countries differ only in the way the ruling elites are organized, but the people behind the machine are the same everywhere.
    1. +2
      19 May 2013 11: 03
      Ataman

      I will forward your question about the collapse of the USSR to Mr. Gorbachev and Yeltsin - they should at least answer for this!

      You are wrong about the scarecrow. What, now the USA is not a scarecrow? And then there was a confrontation between two systems. Who will win! That's all.

      China is a separate matter. Having the leadership of the CPC, they actually accepted the capitalist ideology. The only question is the sign and the names. Example: Hitler's party was also called the National Socialist Workers' Party of Germany. And what?

      About the machine and those behind it is a controversial issue. But it seems to me that there is a difference, and a significant one. It’s one thing to blame a private “uncle”, and another to blame society (that is, directly the state). Labor productivity, of course, varies. But this can also be explained. Nobody is saying that socialism doesn't have problems. But there are significantly fewer of them than under capitalism. The smart book “Capital” writes about this in detail (and it is very respected in the West).
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Ataman
        0
        21 May 2013 17: 49
        I will be happy to answer.
        Quote: aviamed90

        You are wrong about the scarecrow. What, now the USA is not a scarecrow? And then there was a confrontation between two systems. Who will win! That's all.

        The USA is a bogeyman for the whole world. China is a bogeyman for Asia, and Russia and the United States are a little anxious. Russia with China and Iran are a pain in the ass of the North Atlantic alliance, etc. etc. The question is that they cooperate with some scarecrows, have joint productions, make investments, while others only bought oil and gritted their teeth in despair. Those. The question is the level of international (worldwide) cooperation and openness. As they say, “a bad peace is better than a good war.”
        Quote: aviamed90

        China is a separate matter. Having the leadership of the CPC, they actually accepted the capitalist ideology. The only question is the sign and the names. Example: Hitler's party was also called the National Socialist Workers' Party of Germany. And what?

        That's exactly what I said. It's not about the name! Capitalism with signs of socialism or socialism with signs of capitalism... Brains are needed, competent management of the country.
        From your point of view, is there socialism or capitalism in China? Or at least in which country exactly is there socialism, and in which exactly is capitalism? Or, for simplicity’s sake, do you know many types of “socialist” countries in which the level of social guarantees would be higher than in “capitalist” types?
        Quote: aviamed90

        About the machine and those behind it is a controversial issue. But it seems to me that there is a difference, and a significant one. It’s one thing to blame a private “uncle”, and another to blame society (that is, directly the state). Labor productivity, of course, varies. But this can also be explained. Nobody is saying that socialism doesn't have problems. But there are significantly fewer of them than under capitalism. The smart book “Capital” writes about this in detail (and it is very respected in the West).

        I think the book "Capital" is smart, but incorrect. For example, it does not take into account what you wrote about: “Labor productivity, of course, is different.” Marx's theory is beautiful and attractive, it's a pity that it is a utopia.
  85. +3
    19 May 2013 11: 07
    Quote: vjatsergey
    And I remembered mine. The party organizer followed me in 1984 and persuaded me to write a statement.

    But here in Latvia, it was exactly the opposite, I wrote an application to join the party in 83, and they told me that the volume of Russians had been recruited, this year only national personnel, I joined in 84, in 85 I went to work in the prosecutor’s office, as an intern , a year later I was already a full-fledged investigator. And in 1989 I came to the prosecutor of Riga for a sanction to arrest the daughter of the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Latvian SSR, under the article of bribery, and a search warrant was needed, since the lady had lost her fear and took bribes with gold items, but she didn’t fulfill her promises, and the victim brought me checks and tags for the gold items that he presented to her, for registration in an emergency room. The case was taken away from me right away, I wrote a letter of resignation, and they handed it to me right away, without processing. The case fell apart, and The prosecutor then left Latvia and got a job at the Moscow prosecutor's office.
    1. +3
      19 May 2013 11: 21
      Homeless

      You have a good and useful profession!
      As for the sanctions, remember the story with Brezhnev’s daughter. You're not the only one. Nobody is saying that this didn't happen. But this did not happen to the same extent as now.
  86. +2
    19 May 2013 12: 37
    Quote: Homeless
    I wrote an application to join the party in 83, and they told me that the volume of Russians had been recruited, this year only national personnel,

    This is one of the main reasons for the collapse of the USSR. Thanks to such a personnel policy, the Gorbachevs and Shevardnadzes and many, many more who still spit on the country appeared!
  87. +5
    19 May 2013 12: 52
    Touched. Despite all the gloom in society, there are nevertheless positive developments, and I think that sooner or later they will gain their critical mass. And the second flowering of socialism in Russia will not only become impossible, but even inevitable. This is the only road that the country needs and will come to.
  88. DmitriRazumov
    +7
    19 May 2013 12: 53
    Thank you very much for the article, dear Alexander Kommari. It is written succinctly, accurately and quite emotionally. I would also like to note that under the USSR there were social elevators, which is not and never will be under capitalism, under our Russian wild, mossy thieves' capitalism, which grew from the plunder of socialist property created over decades by generations of workers, Soviet intelligentsia, peasantry, military, etc. d. In Soviet times, all doors were open to those who, for example, studied well or worked; society needed specialists, competent specialists, so many careers were made precisely on this basis. Now specialists mainly serve freaks and thieves, who don’t really need them. In order to steal, you don’t need specialists and scientists, but you need thieves who completely lack the concepts of morality and morality, which are not taught now either in school, or in college, or, especially, in offices. Such a society, which does not have a moral foundation, is doomed to extinction. It is fragile, because... stability is not guaranteed by any mutual obligations. There is only one principle - PCHV (man is a wolf to man) or the principle of the chicken coop: climb higher, push your neighbor, shit on the lower one.
    True, there remains hope that there will be healthy forces who, like the author of the article, are not indifferent to the fate of society, the state and the fate of their own children. will live in this society...
    With respect and great gratitude to the author, member of the CPSU since 1982.
  89. +2
    19 May 2013 12: 57
    Article +. You can agree or not, but this is the author’s opinion. Why insults? There was a Great country - it’s gone. This is a huge tragedy. True. The fact that for many a hamburger has become the meaning of life is also true. We are definitely losing the information war. But We ourselves are largely to blame. Yes, and those in power in Russia have been beyond the jurisdiction from time immemorial.
  90. RF citizen
    +4
    19 May 2013 13: 32
    Well done author! I wrote everything in simple, understandable and accessible language. There is essentially nothing to add. Everything is clear to everyone.
    I believe that the Soviet past will return no matter what. What turbulent times our Motherland has not experienced. And the rebellious age, and royal coups, terrible wars, etc. It seemed that this was all, only the name would remain from Rus'. But they got out. Why are we worse than our ancestors? It seems that they are not completely stupid, they have a head on their shoulders, they have a historical memory. There are still warm hearts and smart heads among us. Maybe it's just not time yet? We need to wait a little until, as they say, “it reaches everyone.”
    We, Russians, Belarusians, and Ukrainians cannot live apart. We have always been together.
    And at the end of my comment I will add this:
    Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin: “New generations will come year after year. They will again raise the banner of their fathers and grandfathers and give it to us in full. They will build their future on our past.”
    I am sure it will be so.
  91. cooper
    +1
    19 May 2013 14: 59
    well, yes. it was a strong, successful country and suddenly disappeared? covered his eyes to this.
    1. Sun-faced
      -3
      19 May 2013 15: 02
      This breed is too unteachable to understand simple truths, and since they cannot understand them, everyone blames poor Gorby.
  92. Ruslan_F38
    +4
    19 May 2013 15: 37
    Everything was in the USSR, both good and bad, of which, in my opinion, there was more than bad. I just want to note that people were kinder, more sympathetic and simpler at times, and most importantly, they helped each other in trouble, not like now.
  93. 0
    19 May 2013 15: 55
    The Social Democrats (b) first in London (!) For the money of “simple” English Samaritans organize their party (2 congress of the RSDLP - 17 (30) of July - 10 (23) of August 1903), and then they supported the defeat of Russia for the next tranches during the Russo-Japanese War, they organized revolutionary terrorism in the country, killing and maiming from 1901 to 1911 a year about 17 thousand people (of which 9 thousand during the 1905-1907 revolution, in 1907 a year, an average of up to 18 people died every day) . And then, after a short break, according to the plan of Alexander Lvovich Parvus (Israel Lazarevich Gelfand) according to the “Memorial of Dr. Gelfand”, for the money of the German (and not only ...) government, comrade the Bolsheviks organized the October Revolution, smoothly flowing into the fratricidal Civil War. Thus having arranged, “the day before the Victory,” the defeat of the country in the First World War and having deleted from the memory of the people of 5 the millions of dead Russian soldiers.
    Ditching the color of the nation in the Civil War - more than 10 million people died and died during epidemics, more than 4 million people became disabled and more than 2 million people emigrated to other countries. And, having destroyed the country “to the ground” - more than a quarter of national wealth was lost, national income decreased by 2,75 times compared to 1917, the gross output of small industry dropped to 43% of the pre-war level, gross grain harvest to 67%, metal processing products amounted to 7% of the 1913 level, pig iron production a little more than 2%, due to the lack of fuel and raw materials, most enterprises were idle, railways carried out no more than 12% of the 1913 transportation volume, mail and communication practically did not work - com unisty with damaged control system, but "with burning eyes" took the people "to a brighter future," which decided to build his own, people, hands.
    And because They didn’t promise to feed us on the way, but along the way they “lost” another 5 million from hunger in 1920-21. and more than 7 million people in 1932-33. Due to the amateurism of the ruling layer of the Bolshevik Party and the Soviet state, consisting of people who had no experience in real economic activity, the quality of management decisions made was extremely low, and the concentration of management of all sectors of the national economy in the hands of the state contributed to the swelling of the apparatus and the growth of bureaucracy. In addition, along with disinterested adherents of the Bolshevik idea, there were many careerists and even “socially close” criminals in government bodies. The expulsion from power of representatives of opposition non-Bolshevik parties contributed to the lack of control among leaders who were convinced that “everything is permitted” to them, “the end justifies the means,” and otherwise “why was blood shed?!” In short, there were many foremen, but few professional builders, because... the number of workers decreased by 6-7 times, and since “the salvation of drowning people is the work of the drowning people themselves” - then, “Your word, Comrade Mauser!” and the cleansing terror struck! “Let the storm blow harder!” As a result, more than 1 million 700 thousand people were arrested and at least 725 thousand of them were shot during the Great Terror of 1937–1938, when the Bolshevik state killed an average of a thousand (!) of its citizens every day. Having finally achieved, through incredible efforts and sacrifices after 17 years by the 40th year, the indicators of the 13th year of Imperial Russia, the country found itself on the brink of war, if not with the Anglo-French coalition, then with the countries of the Central Axis, for sure. Due to illiterate troop management and repression in the Army before the war, most of the 28 million people who died occurred precisely in the first period of the Great Patriotic War, and this is not counting those deported and expelled... I will not dwell on a further excursion into the history of the country sold by its apologists for green candy wrappers of overseas funds. And I’ll ask the question, why and who needed all this? If, after 74 years, we find ourselves again in... basically the same place as in 17 and 21-23?
  94. 0
    19 May 2013 16: 20
    Apologet.Ru

    Well, don’t idealize Nicholas II. It’s not for nothing that he got the nickname “Bloody”! For famous deeds, as we all know. One Khodynka upon accession to the throne would be enough!
    1. -1
      20 May 2013 00: 47
      Apparently you don’t know much, if he was so bloody, he would be covered in blood, but he wouldn’t give up power. So, just the opposite, he abdicated the throne very quietly and quickly...
      1. 0
        22 May 2013 11: 10
        Apparently you think it’s not his fault:
        - riots of 1905 and executions of demonstrators;
        - lost in the Russo-Japanese War;
        - mediocrity in the position of Commander-in-Chief in World War I, etc.

        Isn't there enough blood spilled for you? Do you still believe in a good king?

        And listen less to the film director Mr. Mikhalkov. He is clearly not a historian.


        And there is a lot of literature about the tsar (including the memoirs of his contemporaries). I recommend reading it.
        1. 0
          22 May 2013 23: 38
          Listen, what world are you in anyway? Do you realize what time it was then? There were times then when the Narodnaya Volya members sent packs of senior dignitaries to the next world... and those who were engaged in propaganda against the tsarist system were sent into exile where they lived happily ever after, which did not stop them from escaping from there. The empire was collapsing. And in general, learn to think about what power is? what is it for? and why?.. If in difficult times she gives in to those who overthrow her, then what is she worth... This is the level of a banana republic and not an empire...
  95. builder
    0
    19 May 2013 23: 07
    Quote: Cooper
    well, yes. it was a strong, successful country and suddenly disappeared? covered his eyes to this.

    strong countries don’t fall apart, that means they were weak
  96. -2
    20 May 2013 00: 23
    one of the main reasons for the collapse of the USSR was the Iron Curtain... We had no idea about real life in the West We had just seen beautiful clothes, music and heard their stories about freedom on the radios. As for Gorbachev, he removed from the Politburo everyone who would give him trouble in the wheels and of course there were people like him left, that is, pure opportunists.. And he just showed off in the stands without thinking about the consequences The disintegration in power and in the country was in full swing A general shortage in goods as a consequence of that And of course, Prohibition, to be honest, he morally he simply killed. In general, under such management, Soviet power was then completely discredited in the eyes of the people..
  97. 0
    20 May 2013 17: 40
    Greetings to everyone, I can only say one thing, I was born in the USSR, my childhood passed carefree, and then the dashing 90s... I remember pioneer ties, gas supply for pennies, all natural products, games until late at night on the street, and chimes striking at 12 at night, I remember the radio station “Mayak” and the voice on the receiver “Moscow time 6 o’clock”. I remember the lightning in the camp and the Pioneer fire, I remember the friendship of peoples, the respect of the elderly, but now, everything is for sale, money plays the main role everywhere, some law enforcement officers have no concept of the Honor of the Uniform, the Honor of the Officer. You are afraid to let your children go outside; there are drug addicts and drunks in the hallways. And sales policies!!!
  98. +1
    20 May 2013 18: 51
    Unfortunately, we were first led into a swamp (late 80s), and then they promised a bright path.
  99. 0
    21 May 2013 16: 19
    Quote: Captain45
    I will make my contribution to the common cause: regarding the CPSU, Academician Chelomey, once during some tests, said the following phrase (it ended up in a collection of aphorisms, where I found it): “For the system to be stable, it must be shaken.” . So, in my opinion, the whole problem of the CPSU is precisely that after I.V. Stalin, no one shook the CPSU as a system. As a result, being at rest, the CPSU as a system rusted, rotted and collapsed, and since, according to Article 6 of the 1977 Constitution, the CPSU had a leading and directing role in society, then a society without leadership collapsed. Of course, one can still speculate what would have happened , if, according to Stalin’s idea, the leadership role would pass to the Soviet bodies, and the party would only have personnel selection left, and the role of the economy would come to the fore, which Kosygin sought in his time, then then... As they say: if If my grandmother had a wow, she would be a grandfather.


    Who knows... maybe communism...)))
  100. +1
    21 May 2013 16: 29
    Quote: Dmitry
    on all sites there are attacks on Stalin, the army is compared to the fascist one, and other abominations about the war, what kind of action is this?


    There is a substitution of concepts. If Stalin is the same as Hitler, then it means there was neither the USSR’s Victory in the war, nor the achievements of Socialism, scoundrels...