"Quickly and Suddenly": The USA has developed a scenario of a NATO preemptive strike on the Kaliningrad region

296
"Quickly and Suddenly": The USA has developed a scenario of a NATO preemptive strike on the Kaliningrad region

The US Naval Analytical Center (Center for Naval Analyzes) has developed a scenario of a "preemptive strike" on the Kaliningrad region, involving the elimination of four main components of the enclave's defense. Writes about this Over Defense.

According to this scenario, the main task of destroying military targets and seizing territory rests with NATO forces, represented mainly by the Polish army, which must act "quickly and suddenly".



For the operation to succeed, NATO units will need to destroy the four defenses of the Russian enclave. First of all, the Iskander-M launchers should be destroyed in order to prevent Russia from launching a "tactical nuclear war." To destroy them, it is proposed to use the experience of the destruction of the Iraqi Scuds.

The second target is the ships and infrastructure of the Baltic fleet, which must be struck with anti-ship missiles and long-range howitzers. This is a "long-term" task, so you first need to lock the fleet at the bases and then take action to destroy it.

The third target is the S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems, capable of controlling the airspace over half of Poland's territory. For the destruction of anti-aircraft systems, it is proposed to strike with MLRS.

The elimination of the Russian zone of restriction and denial of access and maneuver opens the skies for air strikes against forces trapped in the Kaliningrad boiler, eliminating heavy equipment and causing irreparable damage to the defensive capabilities of mobile motorized units

- experts plan.

And the fourth task is to destroy the remaining forces in the region "to ensure security in the Baltic states and the Suwalki corridor."

At the same time, it is emphasized that the best Polish military units numbering 30 thousand soldiers must participate in the rapid offensive. However, they may face difficulties in overcoming the terrain and come under fire from Russian artillery.

Any action that weakened the Russian military in the early days of any conflict could be critical to the future of the war in Central Europe

- experts say, while noting that full-scale military operations in the Kaliningrad region are "unlikely" today.
296 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Gennady Fomkin Rank
    Gennady Fomkin
    0
    31 January 2021 08: 35
    Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
    They are purposefully intimidating Russians! First, the coronavirus epidemic, according to the attack scenario. Kaliningrad region! There is no epidemic in Russia! But they don’t think about the consequences of the scenario! Information terrorism!

    Another Covid-diet.
  2. V1er Rank
    V1er
    0
    31 January 2021 09: 24
    Somehow the “guys” don’t think at all what will follow these actions. Iskanders and S-400s are not only available in Kaliningrad.
  3. dosimeter Rank
    dosimeter
    +1
    31 January 2021 10: 42
    "Quickly and suddenly":

    The United States has little guts for such things...Russia is already different and the hand will not tremble to answer if anything happens soldier
    1. u4gr8Kk6p8 Rank
      u4gr8Kk6p8
      -1
      31 January 2021 13: 53
      NATO preemptive strike on the Kaliningrad region. At first glance it sounds wild and funny, but this plan looks wild only with a strong and independent Russia. But this plan seems quite logical and, moreover, the only correct one in a different situation. For example, China launches multiple strikes deep into Russian territory, Japan captured the Kuril Islands along with Sakhalin and landed troops on Kamchatka, and the rest of the neighboring states began to carve out territory from Russia. In this situation, it is quite logical for NATO to liquidate the Kaliningrad enclave, and generally take control of the European part of Russia. As former US Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry said, China by itself is one state, but China and Siberia are a completely different state.

      I understand this is not a pleasant scenario, but what if it blows over? No, it won’t, in politics only strength matters, not verbal fluff.
  4. Paranoid50 Rank
    Paranoid50
    0
    31 January 2021 13: 21
    the main task of destroying military targets and seizing territory is assigned to NATO forces, represented mainly by the Polish army, which must act “quickly and suddenly.”
    That's what needed to be proven. That is, like this - at the very beginning of the DB, the Polish army is written off entirely to the BP. And the current Polish under-gentry, due to their feeble mind, have already decided that they stand like full popes, on a par with the aces of this world. And the overlords simply merge them at the start, and in a very harsh form - through fragmentation and annihilation. In this case, a fourth partition of Poland is not expected - it will go entirely as reparation to the winner. Perhaps Belarus, as an ally, will lose a couple of regions.
    However, the Poles have a chance to jump out. The NATO bosses themselves, without meaning to, tell them the direction to the exit, in the part where they call for “quick and sudden” actions. Yes, a quick and sudden surrender (exit from the war) will allow Poland to exist for some more time.
  5. Suslin Rank
    Suslin
    0
    31 January 2021 13: 23
    Another feverish delirium of Ov’s strategists! As always, other people's soldiers should fight, and their own should comment and give T.U.!
  6. AB Rank
    AB
    +1
    31 January 2021 14: 07
    NATO wants to fight until the last Pole. They must have forgotten that there will be a retaliatory strike at all points of decision-making.
  7. EEE226 Rank
    EEE226
    +1
    31 January 2021 15: 01
    Their whole calculation and hope is to strike when there is no power in Russia. Under Putin they won’t hit, because there will definitely be a response. They will be waiting for a new Gorbachev!
  8. wow Rank
    wow
    0
    31 January 2021 17: 38
    Iskander is not SKUD, and Russia is not Iraq.
  9. Ax Matt Rank
    Ax Matt
    0
    31 January 2021 19: 36
    "...in the first days..." Really stupid guys. fool There will be no "days"! There will be only watches (for Poland and others like it...). Maximum of a day (for the USA)... And we, like, will sit and smoke and watch...
  10. victor_47 Rank
    victor_47
    0
    31 January 2021 22: 08
    In the event of aggression, Russia has a much broader task: 1) destroy the attacking group of NATO countries; 2) destroy the military infrastructure of NATO countries participating in the aggression in Europe and other parts of the world; 3) destroy administrative and military-industrial facilities of NATO countries participating in aggression and its support.
  11. Alexander Dubinin
    Alexander Dubinin
    0
    1 February 2021 01: 27
    I wonder how Poland feels about being prepared for slaughter
  12. perm23 Rank
    perm23
    0
    1 February 2021 07: 52
    What's most interesting. so the Poles will be and not the vaunted US army and there is a problem. where to shoot, either in Poland or in the USA. with whom to wage war?
  13. Danske75
    Danske75
    0
    1 February 2021 10: 08
    Can you read the plan itself? Somehow I didn't find it ...
  14. Sergey Grishechkin Rank
    Sergey Grishechkin
    0
    5 February 2021 15: 35
    This is not even worth commenting on... An attack on any part of our Motherland is a war, with all the ensuing consequences for the enemy and the whole world. Based on our military doctrine, the use of all types of weapons to repel aggression is permitted. It’s better not to talk about the consequences for the world...