"9 thousand words of lies": in Denmark reacted to Putin's article

22 2020 June 286

An article in Russian magazine The National Interest by Russian President Vladimir Putin is "a mixture of warped facts and outright lies that sow discord and provoke evil rebuffs." This statement was made in an article for the Danish edition of Berlingske by an author named Emil Rottböll.

According to the author of the article, Putin wrote an article about World War II with a length of 9 thousand words, of which there is not a single truthful one, all of them are lies. It was Putin’s own interpretation of the war, and the article itself was prepared in advance and released specially for the celebration of the 75th anniversary of World War II, a parade in honor of which will be held on June 24.

Rottboll, calling the material of the President of Russia "9 thousand words of lies," emphasizes that the main idea of the "Putin article" was the assertion that war became inevitable after the Munich conspiracy of France and Britain with Hitler in 1938, and not the 1939 non-aggression pact between Stalin and Hitler. However, this is a lie, the author claims. Moreover, he draws on the allegations of the "famous historian" Sergei Radchenko from Cardiff University in Wales.

Putin is completing his historical observation call for objectivity. But this article itself is far from objective. She whitewashes key events and misinterprets historical evidence for fake claims

- he quotes the words of Radchenko.

In addition, Putin’s allegations that only the Soviet Union signed a non-aggression agreement with Germany are a lie, Poland signed the same pact.

The author, again referring to Radchenko, states that the meeting in Munich in September 1938, when France and Great Britain agreed to annexation by Hitler of the part of Czechoslovakia where ethnic Germans lived, was an important milestone on the road to war, but does not make any comparison in comparison with the 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. According to him, France and Great Britain did not participate in the Czechoslovak division, while the Soviet Union divided Poland with Germany.

If Putin were a historian, this article would never have been peer-reviewed. But he is not a historian. He simply sets out ideological stereotypes in support of his superficial claims to greatness - after all, he is trying to immortalize his rule. I put "unsuccessful"

- Rottboll quotes the words "historian from Cardiff."

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

shoroh

-1

24 June 2020 15: 24

Why are we discussing this s... but here? The Danes were very willing to lie under the Fuhrer and now have no moral right to say anything about the victors of world evil.
andrew42

0

24 June 2020 15: 32

This Danish “historian” would be better off keeping his mouth shut. It was not enough for us to conduct diplomacy and enter into discussions with Nazi henchmen. These are his compatriots - volunteers (!), but with the sanction of the official authorities of Denmark, they were SS, fought and killed Russian people on our Russian Plain. Denmark is a loyal province of the Nazi Reich. Putin voiced his speech too diplomatically. It was necessary in Stalin's way: Western plutocracies should not forget that they were accomplices and accomplices of the cannibalistic Nazi regime, whose task was an “anti-Soviet battering ram.” Russia should throw this at their well-fed hari at every opportunity - with deceitful liberals there is no other way , otherwise they’ll get impudent again.
nnz226

+1

24 June 2020 21: 34

The Danes better stick their tongues in the anal! Volunteers from this territory made up the personnel of the SS division (criminal according to the decision of the Nuremberg Tribunal) "Denmark" and several more!