An act of aggression against a sovereign state. Putin's oral reaction

683
Russian President Vladimir Putin commented on the missile attacks against Syria by the United States, Britain and France. According to Vladimir Putin, these blows were based on the dramatization of the use of toxic substances in Eastern Gute.

An act of aggression against a sovereign state. Putin's oral reaction




President of Russia:
Again, like a year ago, when the United States attacked the Shairat airbase in Syria, the pretext was used to stage the use of toxic substances against civilians - this time in the Duma, a suburb of Damascus. Russian military experts, having been on the site of the alleged incident, did not find traces of the use of chlorine or other toxic substances. No local resident confirmed the chemical attack.


According to the president, the rocket attacks on Syria are suffering the people of the country, provoke a new wave of refugees and ultimately indulge the terrorists.

Putin:
14 in April, the United States, with the support of its allies, launched a missile attack on the facilities of the armed forces and civilian infrastructure of the Syrian Arab Republic. Without the sanction of the United Nations Security Council, in violation of the UN Charter, the norms and principles of international law, an act of aggression was committed against a sovereign state, which is at the forefront of the fight against terrorism.


In the course of the briefing, the representative of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, General Sergey Rudsky, sounded specific information about the launched and intercepted missiles.

Rudskoy:
Duvali airfield - 4 missiles fired, all shot down. Dumeyr airfield: 12 missiles - all shot down. (Another military airfield) 18 missiles - all shot down. Shairat - 12 missiles, all shot down. Damage to the infrastructure of these facilities is not caused.


General Rudskoy continued:

Of the 9 missiles fired at the unused Mezze airfield, 5 was shot down. From 16 missiles at Homs airfield destroyed 13. 30 missiles (in Damascus areas) - 7 shot down. The objects on which the blow was struck are partially destroyed. The Ministry of Defense keeps the situation under control. Thanks for attention!


683 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Onebar
    Onebar
    0
    April 14 2018 12: 51
    For some reason, no one is considering the version of stupid money making, including Trump. Now the exchanges are not working, on Monday when they open there will be a huge gap in oil and possibly in the reserve currencies yen and franc. Those who knew about the shocks took care of the corresponding purchases and sales in advance. Everything is the same as it was with North Korea. Also, think about who benefits from expensive oil...
  2. chessrook
    chessrook
    0
    April 14 2018 13: 04
    The whole world is already tired of the American gop-stop regime
  3. Awaz Rank
    Awaz
    +1
    April 14 2018 13: 08
    The most unpleasant thing is that even the ICAO knew about the upcoming attack (that is, it was warned) and promptly banned aircraft flights over this part of Syria just for the duration of the alleged attack. However, the authorities of the Russian Federation and the special services could not think of anything like this, and cheers the patriots the other day said that the sky was closed.
    And yet, in this situation, the Russian authorities really screwed up very badly. I understand that they operate strictly according to international rules, but until when is it possible? Among other things, even before the attack, the Russian authorities should have warned that US troops, illegally located in Syria and being occupiers, could also suffer if the US authorities continue to wage war with Syria. I think, of course, to destroy the US fleet, which is generally located in neutral waters - and it is not legal (be that as it may), and in fact there is nothing to do, but to launch massive missile and bomb strikes, from all sides of the perimeter, against the concentration of American soldiers in Syria , finding both missiles and planes is not so difficult.
    Or we must admit that there is neither the strength nor the political will for this..
    1. ruivit1988 Rank
      ruivit1988
      +3
      April 14 2018 13: 36
      I think that in the foreseeable future the “international community” will tell us that we support the criminal regime of Syria. Moreover, they will offer us to get out of here so that we don’t interfere with the United States’ ability to act properly. The Russian Federation will only be able to leave Syria with concern or respond to the bombardment of bases with concern again. They will even anxiously demand the convening of the UN in the event of the defeat of the fleet guarding our bases. Since our military budget is something compared to 700 billion, this is the second time we have a weak fleet. And thirdly, we again have weak original thinking. They will confirm that one cruiser will be built next year; we will build eight in ten years at best. As long as our economy and military potential are simply slag, we will blush with concern. It's simple.
  4. Grigory b Rank
    Grigory b
    +4
    April 14 2018 13: 08
    What kind of war, what kind of response, who will agree to do this if all the offspring of the elite live in England, France and the USA. It’s good to make my heel laugh.
  5. Seaflame Rank
    Seaflame
    +1
    April 14 2018 13: 11
    You must answer according to the Armed Forces of Ukraine! Beat our allies, we'll kill yours. There must be an answer.
    1. aslanxnumx
      aslanxnumx
      +3
      April 14 2018 13: 16
      It’s time to change the country’s coat of arms, from an eagle to an ostrich with its head in the sand. It’s not for nothing that assistant Peskov.
  6. Bypassed Rank
    Bypassed
    +4
    April 14 2018 13: 16
    Does Russia not abandon its own?
    Is it so:
    1. ships captured by Ukraine
    2. Syrians of Assad
    3. tourists who inspected the oil plant, pressed down by curls

    I’m embarrassed to ask - will Russia do the same with its CSTO allies?
    1. Vadim237 Rank
      Vadim237
      +1
      April 14 2018 13: 19
      In the event of a resumption of hostilities between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Russia will definitely stand on the sidelines.
    2. Brut Rank
      Brut
      +1
      April 14 2018 13: 45
      Quote: PASSED BY
      I’m embarrassed to ask - will Russia do the same with its CSTO allies?

      This is interesting to me too.
      1. Roman 11 Rank
        Roman 11
        0
        April 14 2018 22: 15
        Quote: Brut
        This is interesting to me too.

        Today it has become a mystery, for the next presidential term what
    3. Business trip Rank
      Business trip
      +1
      April 14 2018 14: 42
      Well, in the original it’s a little different: Russians don’t abandon their own. And for what reasons did you decide that Russia abandoned them?
      Here are the Syrians celebrating their victory in Damascus and thanking Russia for its help. Or do you propose that the Russian Defense Ministry solve all current problems with Russian citizens.
      I’m sure all problems are being dealt with by the authorized bodies. So don’t worry wink
      1. Hlavaty Rank
        Hlavaty
        +2
        April 14 2018 21: 47
        Quote: Traveler
        Well, in the original it’s a little different: Russians don’t abandon their own.

        I would like to clarify right away: and who is OWN for the Russians?
        They are so much their own that they are ready to “fit in with their own”.
        Russians in the former Soviet republics seem to be much less “friends” than the Syrians “native” to Gazprom.
  7. viktor. Rank
    viktor.
    0
    April 14 2018 13: 21
    The vaunted NATO missiles do not reach the target, the obstacle is Soviet air defense, when they install the C 300, they will be able to shoot down all the flying Wunderwaffles and not forget about the neighbor with mouse-like actions, about Israel.
  8. viktor. Rank
    viktor.
    0
    April 14 2018 13: 25
    Quote: On The Armor Train
    Soviet = the best, not some old stuff. So far we have not seen anything new in action.

    What if the new Russian air defense lands 100%, can you imagine what will happen? at least chaos in the arms market Yes
  9. Gmooa Rank
    Gmooa
    +10
    April 14 2018 13: 33
    Of course, I understand that big politics is something more... But I don’t understand...

    Imagine the situation. You go out in the evening and see how one crazy woman with an ax is going to destroy your car, you are weakened and not very able to cope with her, you call a good muscular friend and ask for help... Your friend comes:
    1 - Your friend tells this crazy woman: “Don’t touch the neighbor’s car, if fragments from the car fly onto my car, I will take the ax from you.

    Crazy (America) begins to destroy your car... Mirrors, glass... The damage seems to be minimal, but it’s a shame... And now you’re trying to protect your car yourself, but you’re not very successful... Look at your friend, who is stocky, hefty, who could just take away the ax with just his left hand, without even touching the crazy woman herself... But instead, he stands and yells, “This is an Act of aggression, This is an act of aggression”...
    It’s all over, the crazy woman stopped destroying everything and left, promising to come back... You look at your neighbor, who continues to yell even more, “It was an act of aggression,” in response, those passing by say, “We don’t give a damn.”... In the end, this guy comes up and says “You’re great, you defended yourself well... My car wasn’t damaged, if it had been, wow, I would have questioned it!.........
    You ask him, “Why didn’t you intervene?” hearing in response “What if I had intervened, she would have burned down our apartment (a hint that this would have led to a big war).... your car was not badly damaged, my car is intact...

    Don’t you think that we can say with 100% certainty that this is not a friend, but just a coward...
    1. Anti-Corr. Rank
      Anti-Corr.
      0
      April 14 2018 13: 48
      Quote: Gmooa
      Gmooa (Alexey)

      Strong words!+100500 good
    2. a housewife Rank
      a housewife
      0
      April 14 2018 16: 07
      Only friend is a lawyer. With connections. And a couple of days later the woman is in a psychiatric hospital, and some fellows have signed over her apartment to you. And everything is decorous and noble... But if a friend had climbed on the crazy woman with an ax, he might have been injured, and he would have also been at fault, but the car would have already been wrecked anyway. Do you want to say that if you were this friend, you would rush into a fight with her? I'm sure - NO!!!
      1. Gmooa Rank
        Gmooa
        +1
        April 14 2018 23: 18
        I don’t argue that Friend (Russia) is well-connected, but the crazy woman has relatives in the police, courts and prosecutors (UN, Security Service, and other corrupt organizations).... This is where the problem arises with the use of jurisprudence.... Here it turns out anyone the option is bad, it’s just a shame that the United States always gets away with it... Always... They dropped an atomic bomb on Japan, and the Japanese are nothing like best friends... Poland cannot forgive us for the relative nonsense since the war....
    3. Roman 11 Rank
      Roman 11
      0
      April 14 2018 22: 06
      Quote: Gmooa
      Don’t you think that we can say with 100% certainty that this is not a friend, but just a coward...

      100% this is an outrage against Russia. Have you already broken down the act point by point?
      1. Sakashvili first killed the peacekeepers.
      2.Erdogos killed the Su-24 pilot
      3. last year they killed our allies
      4.in February PMCs of Wagner
      5. today again
      The group is sailing with Truman, remember? he dropped a bomb, and he himself is atomic - Trump is also making fun of our bag.
  10. demo Rank
    demo
    +2
    April 14 2018 13: 36
    I am increasingly tormented by one question - what can we oppose to such arrogant and categorical behavior?
    What do we have?
    A hastily concocted accusation that will not stand up to any serious scrutiny.
    Lack of desire to wait for the arrival of OPCW representatives.
    Haste and fuss when “churning” a coalition.
    Before this, there was an absurd accusation against Russia of poisoning the Skripals.
    But the most important thing is the success of Syria and its partners in liberating the country from the barmalei.
    The blow was inevitable.
    The ground is slipping from under the Americans' feet.
    But what can we do in this situation?
    I think that apart from intensifying the fight against the Americans in other countries, there is nothing more.
    There is Yemen, which beats the SA. Doesn't hit much. The weapon is a bit old. We need help.
    Let Riyadh find out what a bomb attack on the royal palace is like, with a couple of hundred corpses of the royal family.
    Kuwait complacently keeps US aircraft on its territory. We need to help realize the harmfulness of such a policy.
    The Emir should start biting his elbows.
    The Afghan Mujahideen have long been asking to fight the Americans.
    We need to look at the issue positively.
    The Libyans must start moving in the right direction - banging on American and British ships passing by Libya.
    Cyprus, which stationed British armed forces on its territory, should be punished by the Turkish part. It's time for the Kurds of Syria to decide who they are with - Assad or the Americans. Let the Turks help.
    Yes, in Iraq, the Americans need to sprinkle pepper under their tail so that the tail burns.
    And the last.
    Aren’t there a dozen or two patriotic pilots in Syria who can reach the side of a destroyer or aircraft carrier with a decent load of bombs? And let the Khibiny Mountains help them.
    When the impacts will rain down in dozens of places, it will be difficult to plan to do anything.
    And Paris and London have not heard machine-gun bursts for a long time, with which people from the Middle East and North Africa will remind them of their debts.
    Maybe the agility of our sworn friends will decrease.
    I didn't say a word about Israel.
    Well, here God himself ordered Hezbole, Iran, and the PLO to work.
    Stop sitting exactly on your fifth point.
    Why the hell do we need the Olympic Games and World Cup - if there is no profit from them and only losses?
    If we - Russia - are a Demon, then show what it can be.
    So show it to make everyone howl.
  11. Dembel77 Rank
    Dembel77
    0
    April 14 2018 13: 41
    US citizens. Your legally elected government has committed another act of aggression against a sovereign state. You, US citizens, will be responsible for this. After all, this is your government, this is your president. Excuse me, but I want America, in your person, to be cursed before God. You are a bloodthirsty nation and you have no place on our planet. And if something bad happens to you, then let it not evoke sympathy from the majority of sensible people on our best of planets.
  12. andr1966a Rank
    andr1966a
    0
    April 14 2018 13: 41
    Quote: RASKAT
    I agree, first of all, we are checked, we will answer or not? I don’t know how, but definitely it should be a tough force answer.
    Maybe a couple of American bases on the territory of Syria bombed, or in the Mediterranean Sea to whom to give on face? request
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. Strashila Rank
    Strashila
    0
    April 14 2018 13: 52
    Of course, the very fact of aggression is not permissible... but the assigned tasks have not been completed... Assad showed his resilience together with the people of Syria, the Syrian army proved its level of training... but the most significant thing is that weapons from the USSR era are able to withstand modern Western ... against the backdrop of reports from Saudi Arabia, where the sophisticated Patriots showed all their stupidity and worthlessness against single missile launches of the last century... then Syria with air defense weapons made by the USSR from the last century is repelling a massive missile attack by modern missiles of various bases from an entire coalition.
  15. Bashibuzuk Rank
    Bashibuzuk
    0
    April 14 2018 13: 56
    What are we even talking about here? The only time when everyone stayed to their own. And even win.
    Just imagine. 103 missiles were fired (our data or 110 according to foreign ones). 71 - shot down.
    American miracle-yuda-missiles, beautiful, smart, elegant, were shot down. With fringe and pendants.
    But the effectiveness of American weapons turned out to be less than three percent. ---- 3 percent.
    Out of 103 rockets, 3 Bedouins were wounded. Where they were wounded, whether it was precisely by rockets... it is not clear. This is exactly what it is - less than three (3, three) percent.
    But broken buildings or laboratories don’t count at all; the war has been going on there for 7 years now. With large-scale destruction.
    So what next?
    The Americans demonstrated to the whole world that they, wow, they, wow, can ban, annoy, and oppress anyone. True, the missiles are outdated - we should throw some money at development. Yes, to replenish the supply spent on 3 Bedouins.
    Are there benefits and profits? It’s obvious, but of course.
    The Syrians, using outdated air defense weapons dating back to the Soviet Union, showed an efficiency above 70 percent. This is in air defense!!!! And if they had S-300 systems... then what percentage would it be - 110?, 130?
    Isn't this an achievement? And a source of pride?
    Well, our achievements:
    - it turns out that we can move our mustaches and eyebrows so menacingly, Nebenzya, light Vasily, we can ruffle our hair so much - that not a single crazy missile wants to come close to the Russian borders. Either shoot it down or don’t shoot it down - the missiles won’t reach Russian positions. afraid.
    Achievement. What else?
    And in addition, this awesome trinity (three musketeers, damn it) - the States, England and France - with this stupid attack, this circus act, only created problems for themselves. And to your barmalei. Which indirectly speaks about the ability of our diplomacy to muddy the waters so much that the adversary is ready to testify against himself. And the main thing is to act to the detriment of yourself.
    Well, that’s the whole scenario of the “April 14 raid”.
    All in chocolate. All that remains is to replenish the supply...of chocolate. And back to work with renewed vigor. And a new turbidity.
    Well, well.... circus, damn it.
    1. someoneV Rank
      someoneV
      +2
      April 14 2018 16: 43
      The circus is your writing, “You’re talking about Yerema and you’re talking about Thomas,” learn to think.
  16. flicker Rank
    flicker
    +1
    April 14 2018 14: 00
    Without the sanction of the United Nations Security Council, in violation of the UN Charter, norms and principles of international law, an act of aggression was committed against a sovereign state that is at the forefront of the fight against terrorism.
    Once again, a violation of all international norms and principles has been recorded. The world has received yet another proof of the inadequacy of the world hegemon; each state can observe its own fate, its own fate, from the example of the attacks on Syria.
    One can, of course, assume that this is not enough: they say, so what if we saw it again? Like, this is not enough... but for some reason the world hegemon (!!!!) spends a lot of effort trying to convince the world that Russia is an aggressor country. Why do they need this? But because they understand that in order to defeat Russia they need to consolidate the whole world against Russia. This requires a DISPROPORIATELY CRUEL Russian response. A disproportionately brutal response will allow the world to be intimidated by the Russian threat. This threat can be used to consolidate the world against Russia and through this, win.
    We are fighting the Anglo-Saxon world order, not a specific warship. The answer must be appropriate.
    1. Medalist Rank
      Medalist
      +3
      April 14 2018 14: 22
      We are fighting the Anglo-Saxon world order, not a specific warship.
      The answer must be appropriate.
      Nonsense! There will be no answer!
      No one is fighting any world order. The oligarchic elite (essentially the occupiers of the USSR and the robbers of Our People) are trying to maintain their dominance over Our Country and are trying not to give up the “feeding trough” to the oligarchs of the West. They can say whatever they want, but they will never dare to take up arms against their real masters. These creatures have no homeland - they are “demonic proteges.” The Lord, for Our sins and the sins of Our fathers and grandfathers, allowed these monsters to temporarily seize the land of Holy Rus'. If Our People do not realize their disastrous situation and do not turn to the Lord God for help, then expect a big war - then maybe we will come to our senses...
      Lord,
      Forgive Us Our sins and deliver Your people from the “power of the enemy” - free them from the powers of the evil one!
      1. flicker Rank
        flicker
        0
        April 14 2018 23: 39
        Nonsense! There will be no answer!
        No one is fighting any world order. The oligarchic elite (essentially the occupiers of the USSR and the robbers of Our People) are trying to maintain their dominance over Our Country and are trying not to give up the “feeding trough” to the oligarchs of the West. They can say whatever they want, but they will never dare to take up arms against their real masters.
        I absolutely cannot stand these oligarchs. But any oligarch is, at its core, a predator, and if the Russian oligarchs feel that they can eat the Western ones, then they will eat them. The fact that the Anglo-Saxon world order is collapsing is an obvious fact, and many oligarchs sleep and see how they will appropriate the Anglo-Saxon inheritance for themselves.
    2. someoneV Rank
      someoneV
      0
      April 14 2018 16: 51
      So, in your opinion, you need to avoid angering the hegemon, but then how can you fight him and defend your statehood? It didn’t stop Hitler from “consolidating” Europe, then, by your logic, you need to quietly lie down under the hegemon.
      Quote: flicker
      Without the sanction of the United Nations Security Council, in violation of the UN Charter, norms and principles of international law, an act of aggression was committed against a sovereign state that is at the forefront of the fight against terrorism.
      Once again, a violation of all international norms and principles has been recorded. The world has received yet another proof of the inadequacy of the world hegemon; each state can observe its own fate, its own fate, from the example of the attacks on Syria.
      One can, of course, assume that this is not enough: they say, so what if we saw it again? Like, this is not enough... but for some reason the world hegemon (!!!!) spends a lot of effort trying to convince the world that Russia is an aggressor country. Why do they need this? But because they understand that in order to defeat Russia they need to consolidate the whole world against Russia. This requires a DISPROPORIATELY CRUEL Russian response. A disproportionately brutal response will allow the world to be intimidated by the Russian threat. This threat can be used to consolidate the world against Russia and through this, win.
      We are fighting the Anglo-Saxon world order, not a specific warship. The answer must be appropriate.
      1. flicker Rank
        flicker
        +1
        April 15 2018 00: 05
        So, in your opinion, you need to avoid angering the hegemon, but then how can you fight him and defend your statehood? It didn’t stop Hitler from “consolidating” Europe, then, by your logic, you need to quietly lie down under the hegemon.
        No. The point is that the hegemon, for some reason, before launching a missile strike on Syria, managed to spread a fake about a chemical attack by the Syrian Arab Republic. Those. a formal reason is needed (if there is none, they will invent one), once again, this means that even the hegemon needs it (a formal reason).
        Now, regarding our answer. The answer to what? The response to the launch of 110 missile launchers, which did not really cause any damage either to us or to Syria. Let's say we make a mirror response: we launch 110 Caliber so as not to hit a single gelding. Will you like this answer? I think no. Let’s assume another option: with one blow from the Dagger, we sink a US destroyer along with hundreds of sailors. Once again, they didn't hit a single Russian, and we kill 600 American sailors. How would the world media react to this? We would start, with facts in hand, demanding that China, India, Germany, South Korea, Egypt, etc., etc., join the sanctions. Moreover, the geldings would have the moral right to an unexpected nuclear strike. Now it’s the geldings that are the aggressor, and it’s the geldings that look inadequate.
        We must answer, but answer proportionately damage. In this case, the Americans did not give us a reason to retaliate against the carriers.
    3. Hlavaty Rank
      Hlavaty
      0
      April 14 2018 21: 57
      Quote: flicker
      Once again, a violation of all international norms and principles has been recorded.

      Eh, once again, again, many many more times...

      Quote: flicker
      You can, of course, think that this is not enough:

      Do you know why it’s not enough? Because in the quote you provided, “Without the sanction of the Security Council of the Organization...”, there is not a word about the attitude of the Russian Federation to this action. Just a statement of generally known facts. They even hesitated to use the word “condemn.” Just a shame.
      Just imagine that in 1941, Stalin, instead of his speech: “Brothers and sisters...” would simply read out an information report. Would this really inspire people?
      1. flicker Rank
        flicker
        0
        April 15 2018 00: 20
        there is not a word about the attitude of the Russian Federation to this action
        The very fact of the statement is already a relation. Appealing to international norms and principles is a way to set criteria for assessing the event under consideration, a method that is of course ineffective, but there is no other way. As for our military response, it must be proportionate to the deed - in order to sink a destroyer with hundreds of amers, we must present at least one injured Russian.
  17. serg.shishkov2015 Rank
    serg.shishkov2015
    +2
    April 14 2018 14: 03
    want to play World War 3? Please! but find ANOTHER planet for this! I learned the damaging factors of an atomic explosion at the age of five and went to bed, knowing that tomorrow I might not wake up because a war would start and my city would be destroyed AT THE SAME TIME as Moscow because then it was called Arzamas-16! because it was so simple - you’re walking down the street, the sun is shining, you’re in a good mood, and suddenly air raid sirens start howling and you don’t know whether it’s a training exercise or a war!!
    1. someoneV Rank
      someoneV
      0
      April 14 2018 16: 57
      With this reasoning, you need to live in the West, and you’re not the only one who was taught civil defense. The West will ask you whether you want war or not, in your opinion it’s better to be a slave, but don’t tell that to you for everyone.
      1. serg.shishkov2015 Rank
        serg.shishkov2015
        0
        April 16 2018 06: 04
        Muammar Gaddafi was braver, but he also failed in 1984 to sink 200 American aircraft carriers from the S-2 in the Gulf of Sidra when they got into his waters! knew that the Americans would then raze his country to the ground! How can you still not understand that any Russian strike on American targets will inevitably lead to a NUCLEAR war! Americans will not allow anyone to sink their ships with impunity, and at the same time they know very well that it is IMPOSSIBLE to defeat Russia without the use of nuclear weapons!
      2. serg.shishkov2015 Rank
        serg.shishkov2015
        0
        April 16 2018 06: 29
        P.S. Read my comment carefully! I didn’t learn THIS in GO lessons! and you will never understand what I felt while living during the Cold War era in the closed city of the Ministry of Medium Engineering!
  18. Weyland Rank
    Weyland
    +1
    April 14 2018 14: 13
    18 missiles - all shot down
    Why is not a single plane shot down, not a single destroyer sunk? am What's the point of shooting down missiles? without striking back! Whoever fights back will be doubly beaten!
  19. Pbs2 Rank
    Pbs2
    -1
    April 14 2018 14: 14
    Well, as I wrote, it has now become clear who is right - the Zaputinites or the Putinslivers. What’s typical is that Putin’s leakers were able to not only predict how it would end, but even told them new manuals in advance - about the fact that draining is a victory, Putin prevented a third world war, there are no losses, which means there is no need to intervene, especially since no one promised anything to Syria. Although it was not difficult to guess, because the manuals are actually already very old.
  20. Business trip Rank
    Business trip
    0
    April 14 2018 14: 33
    Quote: Heterocapsa
    I hope the moderators will nicely thin out these topics with Syria, there are a lot of insults to the president. You can express dissatisfaction with his actions as much as you like, but insulting should not be allowed. Lifetime IP ban

    Agree. It’s especially disgusting when some people allow themselves: Vova, Masha, etc. There is no basic respect for a person, especially for the president of the country. Even if you don’t agree with the president, you need to be a worthy person.
  21. Catfish Rank
    Catfish
    +3
    April 14 2018 14: 56
    Quote: Karabin
    Quote from rudolf
    Did anyone seriously think that Russia would respond?

    Read the comments of the last few days. It was off the charts! True, many of the ugly people today have changed their shoes and are quite satisfied with Putin’s oral reaction.


    All this reminds me of the recent story with the “cool paratrooper” Sheinin. Somewhere, in my opinion, in Italy, some ATO soldier spat in his face and... our brave hero simply wiped himself off. Everything is the same here. After all, it was not Syria that was struck, but Russia, the prestige of our state, and what in response? Talking again. If someone seriously thinks that there will be some kind of adequate reaction on our part, then God be their judge.
    Our eagles-leaders cannot figure out what has been going on around them for years, and those who, at their own peril and risk, went to fight against the Nazis in Donbass are already being slowly pressed. I don’t mean mercenaries, but volunteers. The National Guard is rummaging through the apartments of our “Ukrainians” supposedly for the purpose of checking. What do they achieve so that they are not loved even more than they are? I was not in Donbass, but my friends were there and I know how the authorities greeted them after returning to Russia.
    Why am I talking about this: there are more pressing problems in our own country than Mr. Assad’s problems in Syria. In my opinion, everything here is not nearly as prosperous as some would like to imagine. And first we would have to deal with the “weeds in our own garden”, and then go to the “neighboring village”.
    Naturally, I do not claim to be the ultimate truth, and I doubt that all the information that is held high at the top is brought to us, mere mortals. But a lot of things have already bothered me, and I’m not the only one. hi
    1. Terenin Rank
      Terenin
      +6
      April 14 2018 15: 59
      Quote: Sea Cat
      If someone seriously thinks that there will be some kind of adequate reaction on our part, then God be their judge.

      How, since our reaction is the most appropriate. And if you are inadequate, they won’t find you first.
  22. Business trip Rank
    Business trip
    0
    April 14 2018 14: 59
    Quote: Gmooa
    Of course, I understand that big politics is something more... But I don’t understand...

    Imagine the situation. You go out in the evening and see how one crazy woman with an ax is going to destroy your car, you are weakened and not very able to cope with her, you call a good muscular friend and ask for help... Your friend comes:
    1 - Your friend tells this crazy woman: “Don’t touch the neighbor’s car, if fragments from the car fly onto my car, I will take the ax from you.

    Crazy (America) begins to destroy your car... Mirrors, glass... The damage seems to be minimal, but it’s a shame... And now you’re trying to protect your car yourself, but you’re not very successful... Look at your friend, who is stocky, hefty, who could just take away the ax with just his left hand, without even touching the crazy woman herself... But instead, he stands and yells, “This is an Act of aggression, This is an act of aggression”...
    It’s all over, the crazy woman stopped destroying everything and left, promising to come back... You look at your neighbor, who continues to yell even more, “It was an act of aggression,” in response, those passing by say, “We don’t give a damn.”... In the end, this guy comes up and says “You’re great, you defended yourself well... My car wasn’t damaged, if it had been, wow, I would have questioned it!.........
    You ask him, “Why didn’t you intervene?” hearing in response “What if I had intervened, she would have burned down our apartment (a hint that this would have led to a big war).... your car was not badly damaged, my car is intact...

    Don’t you think that we can say with 100% certainty that this is not a friend, but just a coward...

    Excuse me, but everything is too simple for you. The time will come, we may have to intervene. Who told you that this was the last missile strike? You can’t be frantic and wave your fists. We must act calmly. And your conclusions about Russia’s fear of a big war are stupid. At the moment I think everything is not bad. The United States did not achieve its goal (according to the justifications of the Western military). Unfortunately, many VO hawks are from Israel, etc. The US and allies warned us in advance and were afraid to attack our bases. I wouldn’t be surprised if they gave the coordinates of the objects being attacked in advance. lol
    1. someoneV Rank
      someoneV
      +2
      April 14 2018 17: 00
      Well, they started making excuses, I’m wondering if it’s because they’re stupid or if they paid?
  23. akula Rank
    akula
    +1
    April 14 2018 14: 59
    We cannot give in. We must respond, one way or another. If we surrender Assad, we will be crushed further, on the other side is Ukraine.
  24. akula Rank
    akula
    0
    April 14 2018 15: 02
    Quote: meandr51
    You continue to take revenge like this. Don't vote for him. Only Sobchak! He doesn’t find a place for himself, he only thinks about you... That’s how you win.

    You are sick?
  25. akula Rank
    akula
    0
    April 14 2018 15: 08
    Quote: Dembel 77
    US citizens. Your legally elected government has committed another act of aggression against a sovereign state. You, US citizens, will be responsible for this. After all, this is your government, this is your president. Excuse me, but I want America, in your person, to be cursed before God. You are a bloodthirsty nation and you have no place on our planet. And if something bad happens to you, then let it not evoke sympathy from the majority of sensible people on our best of planets.

    Oh!!!! The cry of the soul. Everyone wants this. But wanting is not enough - you have to do it.
  26. sanych Rank
    sanych
    +2
    April 14 2018 15: 15
    Golovan Jack
    1. Syria and Israel, formally, are still at war. Climbing into the showdown Assad with the Jews of the Russian Federation did not sign. This is clear?
    2. The Russian Federation does not have an agreement on military assistance with Syria. Accordingly, the dismantling of Assad with the Americans is Assad's problems. This is clear?
    3. Your examples on garbage cats, bedding and porches speak only about your, no doubt, high intelligence ...
    Staseg engineer wassat[/ Quote]
    Roman, can I go point by point? 1. Germany and Poland, formally, are still not at war. The USSR did not sign up to get involved in Hitler’s showdown with the Poles. It's clear?
    2. The USSR does not have an agreement on military assistance with Poland. Accordingly, the showdown between the Poles and the Germans is the problems of the Poles. It's clear?
    The novel is a copy of 1939... Am I wrong?
  27. viktor. Rank
    viktor.
    +1
    April 14 2018 15: 29
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    I wish you would wake up in the morning, drink some coffee, and not die along with your family

    What is true is true hi Thank you to us armchair warriors, we need to say that we are warm and on the couch and not on the front line drinks
  28. Gardamir Rank
    Gardamir
    0
    April 14 2018 15: 43
    bulvas,
    division of resources between capitalist states. But Syria has already been divided. No Syria. Assad is alive and okay.
  29. andrej-shironov Rank
    andrej-shironov
    +1
    April 14 2018 15: 54
    Well, Putin has recorded an act of aggression against a sovereign state, and then what?
    1. myrzilka Rank
      myrzilka
      +1
      April 14 2018 17: 44
      Quote: andrej-shironov
      Well, Putin has recorded an act of aggression against a sovereign state, and then what?

      And then... that's it. All that remains is for Lavrov to express his concern and our mission to protect Syria is completed)))))
  30. andrew xnumx Rank
    andrew xnumx
    0
    April 14 2018 15: 56
    There is an urgent need to strengthen Syria's air defense! Soon a huge naval group will approach and a massive strike of 500 - 600, possibly more missiles will be launched, which not only the Syrian, but also our air defense will not withstand. There just won’t be enough missiles in stock, especially if they organize a naval blockade or close the Turkish straits. Another option is also possible. They will not touch us, but week after week they will consistently hit military targets in Syria. Under this massive cover, the terrorists will go on the attack, recapture the country, and all our efforts to liberate it may be in vain. This is also a scary option. We will find ourselves powerless in this situation and unable to protect the last ally in this world. Our reputation will be destroyed forever.
    1. Roman 11 Rank
      Roman 11
      0
      April 14 2018 21: 45
      Quote: andrew 07
      Under this massive cover, terrorists will go on the attack and take over the country again

      There is land through Iran.
  31. 16112014nk Rank
    16112014nk
    +4
    April 14 2018 15: 57
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Putin also has to think about you,

    Putin thinks only about himself and his daughters in Europe and perhaps about Medvedev’s vineyards in Tuscany. Because the USA promised to strike - and they did. Russia threateningly, in the person of the Chief of the General Staff, promised to shoot down and sink everyone - so what? And as always - nothing. They drained it and wiped it off.
    "It's a shame for the state!" ©
  32. seal78 Rank
    seal78
    +1
    April 14 2018 15: 58
    In total, 71 missiles were shot down. If there were only 100 of them, the result is very good.
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. aleks.29ru Rank
    aleks.29ru
    +2
    April 14 2018 16: 05
    It started with a plane shot down by the Turks. With impunity.Trump saved face by smearing the face of the GDP. What, it was not possible to shoot down at least one plane? With the words “he threatened us.” From macho to just one step. And it's done.
  35. aiden Rank
    aiden
    0
    April 14 2018 16: 31
    We need to start hunting white helmets and kill them all
  36. New Year day Rank
    New Year day
    +1
    April 14 2018 16: 34
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Only your questions, as a rule, suggest exactly the answers that you need.

    Do you know what answers I need? Stirlitz is resting. Once again I bow to you! love
  37. Operator
    Operator
    +3
    April 14 2018 16: 38
    If the data of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces are correct, then the American steam has blown laughing

    There is no need to worry about Syria - it is just our situational ally, Russia cooperates with it only in the destruction of international terrorists, we have not taken upon ourselves any obligation to defend Syria from foreign state aggression (that is why Syrian targets are still being shelled by Israel, Turkey, the USA, Britain, France, etc.).

    There are several reasons - Assad does not want to implement all of Moscow’s recommendations without exception, the Syrian opposition against Assad in the civil war relies on the majority of the country’s population (Sunnis), the Syrian leadership does not know how to organize combat-ready armed forces, Bashar Assad’s father traded him for nothing in the mid-1980s USSR to Western countries.

    Therefore, it is absolutely unprofitable for Russia to fit 100% behind Assad, but for little money to develop new types of weapons, mix the cards of the West in the geopolitical game, drive millions of Arab refugees to Europe, cause a split in the Western political elite (to confront/not to confront Russia on brink of World War 3) - that's it.
  38. The comment was deleted.
  39. Usher
    Usher
    +1
    April 14 2018 16: 49
    I don’t understand the West at all, they kill people live, i.e. Are they simply and brazenly destroying the country and no one gives a damn?
  40. Abrascha Rank
    Abrascha
    +1
    April 14 2018 16: 55
    Oh, okay, I don’t understand why everyone got so nervous. In this purely commercial war, Russia acts as a simple mercenary. She has a contract to make perfume, and she honestly carries out her tasks. Russia does not have a war contract with NATO; Assad, Israel and Gazprom do not have the money to pay for such a contract. If someone, for example China, has the money to pay for such a large contract, then we will go to war with the United States. This is called pragmatism in foreign policy. Russia is paid, it fights, Russia is not paid, it does not fight. Everything is fair
    1. Karabin Rank
      Karabin
      +3
      April 14 2018 19: 48
      Quote: Abrascha
      This is called pragmatism in foreign policy.

      Crap. It used to be called prostitution
  41. Grigory b Rank
    Grigory b
    0
    April 14 2018 17: 24
    Pentagon report, not a single one of the missiles fired was shot down, all reached their target, not a single plane was shot down. It’s not clear who to believe.
  42. huntsman650
    huntsman650
    0
    April 14 2018 18: 13
    Essentially:
    1. gained valuable experience in calculating air defense systems
    2.copied the guidance and control parameters of the missile launcher
    3. The frequencies of our air defense systems were not illuminated (not the time)
    4. Electronic warfare was not used in active mode because air defense systems were operating against the Kyrgyz Republic.
    5. Now de jure we can deliver the S-300 or something more serious to Sirte.
    6.Trump and Teresa still have to explain themselves to Parliament and Congress. (It’s unknown how it will end)
    7. If you believe our Defense Ministry, the strike did not reach its target.
    1. Roman 11 Rank
      Roman 11
      0
      April 14 2018 21: 32
      Quote: huntsman650
      5. Now de jure we can deliver the S-300 or something more serious to Sirte.

      My friend, have you eaten too much henbane? Or don't you have a calculator? Do people in our country want to receive pensions?

      You think what you write, if we start delivering S-300, etc., Trump will immediately put it on the counter - we will inflate our budget not for pensions but for the opening of new missile factories
      Since Trump will strike weekly..... by the way, the main goal of this joke is to drive us into a race so that we ourselves break the backbone, after all, we provide for Syria, and also restore it. Trump can quickly exhaust us in the missile race, they have all sorts of Australia, Canada and others, we have no one !
      1. huntsman650
        huntsman650
        0
        April 14 2018 22: 15
        Alarmist and coward.
    2. Roman 11 Rank
      Roman 11
      0
      April 14 2018 21: 38
      Quote: huntsman650
      7. If you believe our Defense Ministry, the strike did not reach its target.

      Goal No. 1 of our MO is keep your salaries.
      1. huntsman650
        huntsman650
        0
        April 14 2018 22: 16
        Envy and Sabotage. Roma you are the skin
  43. Wolka Rank
    Wolka
    0
    April 14 2018 18: 26
    and now it’s time to create a new international tribunal to try war criminals from the US and NATO who gave criminal orders for the destruction of Syria
  44. zoolu350 Rank
    zoolu350
    +3
    April 14 2018 18: 47
    As I said, another miserable leak of the Russian oligarchy in Syria took place. While the oligarchy of the Russian Federation “heroically does not allow” war, the owners of the Federal Reserve System are successfully waging it. Now I’ll stupidly make fun of the adherents of the KhPP, who will now begin another “whitening” of the wretched actions of the Russian oligarchy.
  45. Loess Rank
    Loess
    +1
    April 14 2018 18: 48
    For many years now, the RF Armed Forces have been chasing the US's fosterlings in the person of various terrorists across the Syrian sands. Their losses amount to tens of thousands of people (if you call the Barmalei people). In response, states strike Syrians approximately every two to three months. Moreover, each subsequent blow is more powerful than the previous one, but less effective. But in this case, everything is generally simple: Trump agreed with Putin in order to save face, the Americans deliver a powerful blow to pre-named targets, while everything more or less valuable is removed from these objects in advance. As a result, everyone is happy: Putin, because the states did not dare to give rise to a large-scale conflict, Assad, because the losses in the confrontation with the states are insignificant, Trump, because he saved face and can tell everyone about his coolness, the British, because there is an opportunity to hush up the failed Skripal scam. And even the local all-goers are happy because you can howl out loud how bad everything is, the main thing is not to try to think and analyze the situation.
  46. andrej-shironov Rank
    andrej-shironov
    0
    April 14 2018 18: 49
    Well, Putin stated an act of aggression against a sovereign state, and then what? In general, the shelling of Syria with missiles reminds me of a theatrical production, when a bunch of actors have their own gesheft without detriment to other actors laughing
  47. The comment was deleted.
  48. SHOCK. Rank
    SHOCK.
    0
    April 14 2018 18: 57
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Quote: Stas157
    And then if the enemy strikes inside Syria itself (USA and Israel), what difference is it external or internal?

    Pts big ... You will not believe.
    1. Syria and Israel, formally, are still at war. Climbing into the showdown Assad with the Jews of the Russian Federation did not sign. This is clear?
    2. The Russian Federation does not have an agreement on military assistance with Syria. Accordingly, the dismantling of Assad with the Americans is Assad's problems. This is clear?
    3. Your examples on garbage cats, bedding and porches speak only about your, no doubt, high intelligence ...
    Staseg engineer wassat

    It is unfortunate that the cons have been canceled!
  49. Xscorpion Rank
    Xscorpion
    +1
    April 14 2018 19: 21
    Quote: AnpeL
    According to what document is Syria our ally?

    In fact, Syria is an ally. And perhaps the only one in that region.
    Or maybe you’ll tell on the basis of what documents the SPA bomb Syria


    Russia's allies are members of the CSTO. In relation to their protection, we have the right to use military force, including nuclear weapons. Syria is not yet a member of the CSTO. Only a treaty of friendship and cooperation is in force. So, in fact, Syria is just a friend, not an ally.
  50. The comment was deleted.
  51. Vladimir K. Rank
    Vladimir K.
    +1
    April 14 2018 20: 56
    Will there be an answer from ours? God bless them with their ships and planes (carriers), but why not rush around terrorist training bases in American-controlled territory? Here, in the end, the Syrian authorities and our troops are in their right, because this is the temporarily seized territory of a sovereign state that is a member of the UN.
  52. The comment was deleted.
  53. Earnest Rank
    Earnest
    0
    April 14 2018 22: 54
    Quote: Ramzay121
    After the night bombing, they are no longer allies. It became not profitable. I wonder what the Syrians are thinking right now?

    Do you really believe that the Syrian army ITSELF uncovered and repelled a massive missile and bomb attack? lol
  54. Catfish Rank
    Catfish
    0
    April 14 2018 23: 30
    Quote: Terenin
    Quote: Sea Cat
    If someone seriously thinks that there will be some kind of adequate reaction on our part, then God be their judge.

    How, since our reaction is the most appropriate. And if you are inadequate, they won’t find you first.


    What is adequacy, grind your tongue? But you don’t need to look for me, I didn’t miss the service and didn’t run away from the draft.
  55. nikolaev Rank
    nikolaev
    +2
    April 15 2018 00: 45
    The Russian leadership was publicly brought to its knees and spanked with rods on its bare ass. At least that’s what they got for betraying Donbass.
  56. nikolaev Rank
    nikolaev
    0
    April 15 2018 00: 50
    The Russian leadership was brought to its knees in front of the whole world and publicly spanked with rods on its bare ass.
    What's next?
  57. nikolaev Rank
    nikolaev
    +1
    April 15 2018 00: 57
    our poor and worthy warriors! How will they look the Syrians in the eyes now? It’s not their fault, but it’s a shame and shame for the country.
  58. sieras Rank
    sieras
    0
    April 15 2018 01: 28
    brilliant American plan. elevate Russia in terms of weapons “unparalleled in the world” and belligerence. then plunge Russia into shit to the whole world and show that no one will help against America, not even the presence of the Russian army on your territory. Thank you, America's agents played the role of intimidating China. you can disperse.
  59. L10n77 Rank
    L10n77
    0
    April 15 2018 02: 20
    Quote: Nil
    This is what is now stopping famous people from throwing away chlorine somewhere near Donetsk (pictures and videos will be prepared) and blaming who knows who. Well, it doesn’t matter that 4 times there is no evidence, the United States will say - we suspect the DPR authorities did this in order to prevent their citizens from returning to Nenka’s fold, and Russia is vilely covering for them. Here our leaders will probably clearly mark the red line, or something like that, intimidate them more confidently, perhaps...

    But children living abroad and money in Western banks from our leaders are in the way.
  60. gaura Rank
    gaura
    0
    April 15 2018 05: 32
    Andrey K,
    Why these ostentatious empty bombings - “well, we should sit quietly, monitor the situation and everything would be fine...”.

    So they didn’t just sit there, they flew and bombed. America will continue to slide into the city for many more years before it realizes that it is not the ruler of the world. There will still be enough bombings for our lifetime. And the only thing that bothers me is that he doesn’t answer for his words. You can't trust them