Solovyov delivered a crushing speech at the Federation Council

193
Vladimir Soloviev, a well-known Russian journalist and host of a popular socio-political program on the federal channel, accepted an invitation from the Federation Council and delivered a speech at the upper house of parliament.

The tragic event in the Siberian city of Kemerovo, where 64 people died in a fire less than a week ago, including more than 40 children, became a cornerstone in his speech. Soloviev attacked with criticism of the local authorities and proposed to significantly update the legislation in order to prevent similar incidents in the future.



The journalist also wondered about the place of Russia in the world, and the attitude of this world to our country. Soloviev expressed confidence that Russia should radically rethink its foreign policy. To do this, first of all, we need to choose our own ideological path, without looking at what is dictated from overseas.

193 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    31 March 2018 18: 48
    Quote: Arkady Utenkov 2457
    Great. ... the time has come to introduce a special situation similar to the “wartime situation”...

    1) Did you understand what you wrote?
    Then you're the first to go to the wall!

    2) Who is the Popular Front?
    Butt-lickers trying to join the right movement in time?

    In principle, I agree with your fundamental theme, but not the “Popular Front” (which has nothing to do with the people).
  2. 0
    31 March 2018 20: 43
    As always. not a single word why the Russians or Russians live so badly. Apparently, if it sucks, then they will fight well. you won't get far with his Goebbels variation. Yes, tell me, smart girl, forgive me, God, that instead of salaries for Duma members, they will increase the salaries of many, but not you
  3. +1
    31 March 2018 22: 38
    I always respected him!!! I don’t remember exactly when it started, but somehow this respect only grew stronger.. I hope the Authority and its instruments will hear it.. There’s no other way...
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +3
    April 1 2018 10: 35
    A man who has nothing to do with the Slavs, raised children who live abroad and talks about patriotism and teaches someone to love Russia... I don’t understand. Purely Gus approach.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +1
    April 1 2018 18: 42
    Soloviev gave a devastating speech???????

    I didn’t see anything devastating.
    The usual conformist “nightingale droppings,” as the most popular presenter in Russia, Ivan Urgant, rightly noted.
  10. 0
    April 1 2018 19: 07
    How can we get out of the perestroika stagnation?
    1. There are a great many forms of government, and historically the peoples of all countries themselves. based on their customs, they arrange their own government, and do not bring in ready-made forms from outside. The smaller the state (polis) and the more isolated it is from others, the more democratic the laws.
    2. Historically, in all societies, the primary public power was Judicial, in peacetime, and in wartime - Strategic (operational). The judiciary also established laws on the basis of common (customary) and case law, stipulating the rights of the Strategist, which often occurs automatically in the event of external aggression.
    3. The market basis of the economy is one of the main forms of democracy, but the mutual rights and obligations between the State and the People are less stipulated in it and depend more on customary, economic and judicial rights; those. The state will only fulfill people's demands when they are economically beneficial to it, or when it becomes a state custom, or in pursuance of a court decision.
    4. The maximum possible (evolutionary) diversity of all possible social relations is also an important form of democracy. The main source of diversity is the personal initiative and responsibility of each person within the limits of his freedom and customary understanding of justice.
    5. Historically, the concept of ethnos (nation) is one of the most important manifestations of culture; but the main thing here should not be the border (it is always difficult to draw it between neighboring ethnic groups), but the Center, which is always easy to create. In this case, ethnic boundaries are considered conditional (floating, depending on the loeff. change in population density), while political boundaries remain unchanged.
    6. Due to the impossibility of making all education free, it is necessary to divide all education into paid and free, and in free education, reduce the number of teachers, so that they are replaced in turn by the pupils themselves (students), who are independently preparing to teach classes. The remaining teachers monitor the teacher. process and organize selective tests.
    7. Remove History and Literature from compulsory teaching - those who wish can learn them on their own, and at the expense of them expand the hours in more important subjects. Make physical education teaching more health-focused (rather than selective) by strengthening teacher training in medical education. Free teachers from mandatory educational functions.
    8. ....................
    1. +1
      April 6 2018 10: 35
      Remove History and Literature from compulsory teaching ------WHAT STUPIDITY
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +1
    April 1 2018 21: 12
    Some strange impression was left by Solovyov’s speech, which seemed fair in content, but poorly implemented in today’s Russia (choosing or searching for an ideological path), which, today, is more likely to exacerbate conflicts than to consolidate society - and at the same time begins to talk about the threat of color revolutions.
    For what purpose did Soloviev deliver his speech within the walls of the Federation Council? He is a well-known TV presenter who has the opportunity to broadcast his positions to a wide audience almost every day, why tell senators about this? The senators will scratch their heads and say, but Solovyov is right, we need to give the people a new ideology, we need to give up..., we need fair laws..., we need...
    What reaction was he going to get from the senators and why?
  13. +1
    April 2 2018 15: 00
    Ekarny Babai, why is everything in our country through the “era of change”? No matter who you talk to, all the “heroes” are ready to play revolution even tomorrow. And in their own entrance, those who piss in the elevator cannot be caught. What constitutions, revolutions, elections? The slave system, as it was for 2000 years, has not gone away. Its forms change, but the essence is the same. Previously, the owner at least fed the slaves, but now we look for food ourselves... Under the commies, at least huts and medicine were free. Also slavery, but stable. There are no prospects on this planet, and if that’s the case, there’s no point in twitching.
    1. +1
      April 3 2018 22: 40
      Well, rest in peace. May you rest in peace... Amen!
    2. 0
      20 June 2018 21: 06
      Well said!
      The only pity is that from the point of view of an offended slave, deprived of a hut and free analgin...
      Fortunately, the planet's prospects will not be determined by resentful slaves who are not even inclined to twitch.
  14. 0
    April 2 2018 17: 07
    Well spoken. Beautiful. But in our country there is no transparency. You can say whatever you want, speak at rallies, but no one hears anything. Power is deaf..... Glasnost is when a person spoke and was heard... Everything is deaf with us......
  15. 0
    April 2 2018 20: 38
    I always watch his programs, very interesting. My opinion, I don’t make any special claims. If America is a threat, why does our country keep its stabilization fund there, and not invest in its production, or how China buys all the liquidity. Why in the 90s they bought all the national property for pennies in the XNUMXs, in particular Neftegazprom and Norilsk Nickel, RAO UES, etc. If V.V. Putin had the courage to nationalize everything, maybe life would get better. But in general, despite the government, we somehow survive and give our loved ones everything we can!
    1. 0
      April 3 2018 22: 44
      The answer to this question can be easily found in our history, just find out when the first major acquisition of pendosaur government bonds took place
  16. +1
    April 3 2018 06: 28
    Quote: Hyppopotut
    Two questions on Narusova:
    1. Was she at least once in Tuva?
    2. Does she really consider a significant part of our history to be comparable with fascism.

    ...the main thing is that she has been in the right apartments and her bitch appendage from someone else's yard - however, there is no way to violate the convention.. There is the lion's share of such *good* in those *paradise*
  17. 0
    April 3 2018 08: 56
    Solovyov throws pearls before swine
  18. 0
    April 3 2018 16: 38
    There are so many experts around, even a journalist teaches how to do it. So we know about the problems, what next? Nepotism is all around, so no matter what law is written, no one will implement it properly, since brother, matchmaker, relatives... and who writes the laws?
    The presidential candidates were not happy that they debated, but part of the population nominated them with their signatures. Yes, some of them are so-so candidates, but why were they put there? There must be an ideology, but it has now formed on its own: money and connections decide everything.
  19. +2
    April 3 2018 17: 39
    First, you need to cleanse all power of liberalism, the fifth column, and seriously take on the “people’s” conductors of the interests of the Anglo-Saxons, such as Navalny and various Venediktovs....
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. 0
    April 4 2018 13: 28
    Quote: Augustine Gladyshev
    Russia ALWAYS HAS BEEN AND WILL BE A Monarchy,

    Unfortunately this is not the case... I hope so far... wink
  22. +1
    April 4 2018 19: 48
    Quote: flicker
    "Russian manner", as it seems to me, is "from the heart", right - which can be expressed both rudely and with great warmth. The "Jewish manner" is rather a trick, with a double bottom, hidden - if soft, then in shape, essentially cruel enough.
    Z.Y. Although the "habitat" is no no, it takes up ethnic influence.

    Jewish style has a very specific name with a clear definition: “chutzpah”
  23. +2
    April 5 2018 15: 05
    The fact that he brought in “repressed peoples” here, repressed, does not mean that they were punished with prisons or executions. They were resettled for helping the Nazis during the Second World War. During the war, eviction was a correct and humane decision; during the war, there was no time to judge and sort out everyone individually. Afterwards, the same communists hated by Solovyov rehabilitated these peoples.
  24. +3
    April 5 2018 22: 02
    There is nothing more terrible than state ideology. In any case, this will lead to the suppression of dissent. Including physical suppression. This is precisely what Mr. Solovyov does not want to understand. And further. It’s in vain that Mr. Solovyov calls himself a journalist. Propagandist, agitator, TV presenter of a pseudo-political show. It's true. But not a journalist.
  25. +2
    April 6 2018 10: 26
    V. Solovyov, a wonderful, very well-read presenter, is very well versed in modern relations of leading countries, and it is even more unfortunate that he is rather weak in the history of Stalin’s reign, blaming him for all the repressions, but this is not entirely true, you need to read EVERYTHING, and not selectively, then on this issue he will not have a one-sided idea, about this, I’m not afraid of these words: THE GREATEST ruler of Russia!!!!!!!!!
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. +1
    25 May 2018 21: 38
    I agree with him 100%!
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. 0
    26 May 2018 19: 27
    It's actually amazing. A TV presenter is invited to try to reason with the deputies. There is simply no one else. Because no one is listened to, just like the people who elected them. It turns out that only a TV presenter can convey the truth of life. Why then are all these representatives of the President, legislative initiatives, ministers? Aren't deputies obliged to demand? Isn't it them, and not the TV presenter?
    And all because the deputies and others like them received very good funds so as not to take bribes)) And they send their children abroad, they keep the funds abroad. So maybe these are not our people at all?
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. 0
    31 May 2018 11: 29
    It’s unlikely that anyone there listened to him... The well-fed don’t understand the hungry... Everyone’s ryakhs are well-fed, polished, fattened...
    Now, if he started saying that these “servants of the people” need to increase their salaries, then EVERYONE there would listen to him with great attention and approval!!!
    If only they could be taken from there en masse and forced to live for a couple of months on the salary of an ordinary person...
    Maybe they wouldn’t have been re-educated, but their brains POSSIBLY would have started working differently! Maybe....
    And Solovyov is a WELL DONE!!! Respect and respect to him!!! hi drinks
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. 0
    20 June 2018 20: 57
    It seems that Solovyov decided to warm his hands on someone else’s grief and be known as a patriot who calls for “sowing the reasonable, the good, the eternal”?
    So let him get in line!
    There are countless such people in Russia.
    But there is absolutely no one to “sow” the above.
    Everyone is busy waiting for the harvest that they have not sown...