Solovyov delivered a crushing speech at the Federation Council

193
Vladimir Soloviev, a well-known Russian journalist and host of a popular socio-political program on the federal channel, accepted an invitation from the Federation Council and delivered a speech at the upper house of parliament.

The tragic event in the Siberian city of Kemerovo, where 64 people died in a fire less than a week ago, including more than 40 children, became a cornerstone in his speech. Soloviev attacked with criticism of the local authorities and proposed to significantly update the legislation in order to prevent similar incidents in the future.



The journalist also wondered about the place of Russia in the world, and the attitude of this world to our country. Soloviev expressed confidence that Russia should radically rethink its foreign policy. To do this, first of all, we need to choose our own ideological path, without looking at what is dictated from overseas.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    193 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +63
      29 March 2018 17: 42
      He made a speech, he made a speech and called the right problems and highlighted, but here is the question: "Did someone HEAR him?"
      1. +72
        29 March 2018 18: 31
        And who is there to listen to? Most of those who have been sitting there have been wiping their pants for two decades now and it is not in their interests to change something in the country.
        1. +38
          30 March 2018 08: 07
          For example, a lady like Narusova.
          1. +15
            30 March 2018 08: 21
            And which one put her there, i.e. chose?
            1. +22
              30 March 2018 09: 07
              Two questions on Narusova:
              1. Was she at least once in Tuva?
              2. Does she really consider a significant part of our history to be comparable with fascism.
              1. +34
                30 March 2018 16: 20
                Quote: Hyppopotut
                Was she at least once in Tuva?

                It doesn’t matter if you enter the circle of associates. Yes, even if you are dull from House-2, you can easily become a presidential candidate! Any downshifter can become the head of Sberbank. And, any furniture maker - the Minister of Defense. And even if you are caught by the hand, then you will not end up behind bars ... You can even become president if you need a place to warm yourself. For people entering this narrow circle, limits simply do not exist! No personal achievements and superpowers, in this case, it is absolutely not necessary to have.
                And Solovyov made really spectacular. He told about everything, and at the same time about nothing. He called the problems that everyone already knows, but did not say how to solve them. Well, it’s quite clear that those people sitting in the hall are not capable of deciding anything. They are accustomed to approve directives issued from above ... From the executive branch! Here is such a looking glass.
                1. +5
                  30 March 2018 19: 36
                  And who knows how to solve them? We will choose for president !!! ............ The question is, does our government want to resolve these issues?
                  1. +8
                    31 March 2018 12: 05
                    The foundation is laid for toughening responsibility and restricting chatter and permissiveness,
                    to amend the constitution

                    Soloviev correctly expresses the thoughts expressed
                    Zhirinovsky, Bagdasarov, Kurginyan, Mikheev, Satanovsky and others

                    Change is waiting for us

                    1. +8
                      31 March 2018 14: 50
                      What changes, the same Kremlin six, soon Amnuel will move the river in the Duma, and we are waiting for changes ...
                      1. +7
                        31 March 2018 15: 16
                        Quote: valentin_s
                        What changes, the same Kremlin six, soon Amnuel will move the river in the Duma, and we are waiting for changes ...


                        It was necessary that Sobchak spoke, or Yavlinsky?
                        but no, you would like to see Grudinin there.
                        With or without a mustache?
                      2. +1
                        April 4 2018 13: 26
                        Quote: valentin_s
                        What changes, the same Kremlin six,

                        And you pro-American seems ...
                    2. +2
                      24 June 2018 07: 51
                      Changes will be when the country will be senior, such as Grudinin, like Colonel Kvachkov, and the clique of Yeltsinoids, starting with Chubais’s main friend, will go either 2 meters into the ground, or to their kids and accounts. Well, their lackeys, of course.
                2. +5
                  31 March 2018 21: 22
                  If the senators do not understand that it is time to act, then the people will demolish them.
                3. +2
                  31 March 2018 21: 34
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Well, it’s quite clear that those people sitting in the hall are not capable of deciding anything. They are accustomed to approve directives issued from above ... From the executive branch! Here is such a looking glass.

                  Well, the Federation Council is an honorary pension for politicians and top business executives who have become unnecessary. In a discussion of the Winter Cherry tragedy, the phrase “why keep Tuleyev’s 73 year old patient as governor, didn’t he find a place on the Federation Council?” That is, he is no longer suitable for the governors, but the Federation Council just.
                4. +3
                  April 1 2018 19: 50
                  Russia, ALWAYS WAS AND WILL BE A MONARCHY, WITH A LOT OF DIGNISONS AT THE THRONE (even the GENERALS WERE NOT Actually Kings?)
                  1. 0
                    24 June 2018 07: 52
                    Only Gauleiters of the colony do not pull on monarchs. I prgo those who rule 27 years
                5. +3
                  April 2 2018 11: 25
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Any downshifter can become the head of Sberbank. And, any furniture maker - the Minister of Defense.

                  laughing wassat blessed is he who believes ..... especially about Serdyukov .... do you know another version of his appointment and 100% of his task ??
              2. +14
                31 March 2018 08: 27
                What is Narusova doing in the Federation Council? WHO HAS PUT HERE THERE?

                Here is read.
                As a result of long deliberation, Narusova comes to a disappointing conclusion: “I’m thinking where is the real side of evil? Maybe the Russian people in its current incarnation are the EVIL itself !!!? ”
                What to do with this world "evil"? The ex-senator finds the recipe immediately: “To exterminate! All without exception, less people more oxygen! The Russian people are bothering you, they need to be eliminated! ”
                And then she corrects politically correct: “I do not call for a change of power! I call for a change of people! ”
                As a result, Lyudmila Narusova regrets the fact of the high survival rate of the Russian people on the example of Russian homeless people: “Not one nation in the world has as many homeless people as in the Russian. Why do you want to survive in any way? ”
                1. +11
                  April 1 2018 20: 37
                  A statement to the prosecutor’s office has already been written to Narusov (to Sobchak too), and this process is carefully monitored. She needs to be planted, along with Sobchak, and for a long time, the road to Magadan, as they say.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +1
              30 March 2018 14: 32
              And there in the warehouse of such BAT “Which one put it there, that is, elected?” - most of these
              1. +2
                31 March 2018 21: 24
                I believe that from now on the people will be more serious in the election of their leaders.
          2. +17
            30 March 2018 12: 24
            Such loafers as Narusova and her loafers, it is high time to drive to work in the national economy for production, and then they have completely forgotten what work is and are engaged only in verbiage !!!
            1. +13
              30 March 2018 13: 51
              Actually, it’s time to think about a single-chamber parliament, leaving only the State. To the Duma. The Federation Council was conceived as a counterbalance to the State Duma, with "representing the interests of the regions." There are elected representatives, so let them work. How much money we’ll save.
              1. +8
                30 March 2018 19: 47
                Quote: Okolotochny
                Actually, it’s time to think about a single-chamber parliament, leaving only the State. To the Duma. The Federation Council was conceived as a counterbalance to the State Duma, with "representing the interests of the regions." There are elected representatives, so let them work. How much money we’ll save.

                Need a Supreme Council. Like in the USSR ...
                1. +9
                  30 March 2018 21: 42
                  The name is just another. The general meaning is the same - people's representatives, without any representatives of the regions. It seems that the regions and the people living in them are different concepts.
                2. +4
                  31 March 2018 21: 26
                  Everything goes to this. Only under the name of the State Council.
            2. +3
              30 March 2018 14: 45
              What kind of national economy is something like a national state. Taiga is completely overgrown and there is no one to weep here ...!
            3. +4
              31 March 2018 20: 50
              Quote: Valery Nikitin
              Narusov and her like loafers, it’s time to drive to work in the national economy for production,

              Why do you hate the national economy and domestic production? wassat Pension, only pension, and let the grandchildren sit nursing. And, most importantly - let it be silent. Yes
          3. +9
            30 March 2018 14: 10
            What are you, she’s Samogo’s girlfriend.
            1. +7
              30 March 2018 14: 17
              Quote: gendowar
              What are you, she’s Samogo’s girlfriend.

              Former neighbor and godfather ...
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
                1. 0
                  30 March 2018 19: 58
                  Ugh, damn you! What's up with the tablet? That does not add text. And then it turns out it gives out 2 takes ... And remove does not give a second take ...
        2. +14
          30 March 2018 08: 21
          Solovyov’s performance is very good. It is hard to disagree with him.

          The domestic political problem before modern Russia is formulated by Solovyov absolutely correctly. It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.
          1. +1
            30 March 2018 11: 00
            Quote: Tatiana
            It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.
            - in which colonial articles ????
            in relation to international law? so it is there from the USSR Constitution of 1977:
            "Article 29. Relations between the USSR and other states are built on the basis of observance of the principles of sovereign equality; mutual renunciation of the use of force or threat of force; inviolability of borders;
            territorial integrity of states; peaceful settlement of disputes; non-interference in internal affairs; respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; equal rights and the rights of peoples to control their fate; cooperation between states;
            conscientious fulfillment of obligations arising from generally accepted principles and norms international lawfrom international treaties concluded by the USSR."
            1. +21
              30 March 2018 11: 16
              Quote: your1970
              Quote: Tatiana
              It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.
              - in which colonial articles ????
              regarding international law?

              How did you listen to Solovyov? He called the article 15, paragraph 4 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
              Constitution of the Russian Federation Article 15:
              4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

              This article directly, in particular, is tied to freedom from the state of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Those. power in the Russian Federation is in the hands of bankers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
              Namely, for example, if the Central Bank in Russia is offended by a bad Government, it goes somewhere “beyond the hill” and begins to complain to the international court there. And an international court under Russian law takes precedence over our Russian one.
              I explain in detail.
              The highest authority in the country, according to Russian law, is in fact with the leaders of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. You can call it "dual power." Namely.

              After ratification of the Bialowieza Accords, Russia turned into a colony of a unipolar world led by Washington. One of the most important instruments for managing Russia as a colony was the new credit and financial system (CFS) of Russia.
              On 20 of December 1991, the State Bank of the USSR was abolished. All assets, liabilities and property of the USSR State Bank on the territory of the RSFSR were transferred to the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. A few months later, the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia) was renamed the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia).
              The very first version of the law "On the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia)" was adopted on December 2 of 1990 of the year, after Yeltsin B.N. by a huge margin, he won the election and became the first president of Russia, and after six months of his presidency he signed Federal Law No. 1990-02.12.1990 of 394. The law was modified and supplemented, but in general its essence was preserved.
              The betrayal of the national sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the field of finance was laid down and reinforced in its very Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12 1993, which was compiled under the EBN under the patronage of Washington.
              Officially, the authors of this colonial Constitution of the Russian Federation from the 1993 of the year were: Sergei Shakhrai, Anatoly Sobchak, Sergey Sergeyevich Alekseev and the Constitutional Meeting of the Russian Federation.
              The Constitution of the Russian Federation from 1993 of the year only consolidated the colonial position of the Russian Federation in this matter.
              1. +3
                30 March 2018 20: 03
                Quote: Tatiana
                Quote: your1970
                Quote: Tatiana
                It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.
                - in which colonial articles ????
                regarding international law?

                How did you listen to Solovyov? He called the article 15, paragraph 4 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
                Constitution of the Russian Federation Article 15:
                4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

                This article directly, in particular, is tied to freedom from the state of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Those. power in the Russian Federation is in the hands of bankers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
                Namely, for example, if the Central Bank in Russia is offended by a bad Government, it goes somewhere “beyond the hill” and begins to complain to the international court there. And an international court under Russian law takes precedence over our Russian one.
                I explain in detail.
                The highest authority in the country, according to Russian law, is in fact with the leaders of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. You can call it "dual power." Namely.

                After ratification of the Bialowieza Accords, Russia turned into a colony of a unipolar world led by Washington. One of the most important instruments for managing Russia as a colony was the new credit and financial system (CFS) of Russia.
                On 20 of December 1991, the State Bank of the USSR was abolished. All assets, liabilities and property of the USSR State Bank on the territory of the RSFSR were transferred to the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. A few months later, the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia) was renamed the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia).
                The very first version of the law "On the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia)" was adopted on December 2 of 1990 of the year, after Yeltsin B.N. by a huge margin, he won the election and became the first president of Russia, and after six months of his presidency he signed Federal Law No. 1990-02.12.1990 of 394. The law was modified and supplemented, but in general its essence was preserved.
                The betrayal of the national sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the field of finance was laid down and reinforced in its very Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12 1993, which was compiled under the EBN under the patronage of Washington.
                Officially, the authors of this colonial Constitution of the Russian Federation from the 1993 of the year were: Sergei Shakhrai, Anatoly Sobchak, Sergey Sergeyevich Alekseev and the Constitutional Meeting of the Russian Federation.
                The Constitution of the Russian Federation from 1993 of the year only consolidated the colonial position of the Russian Federation in this matter.

                What prevents the "new" president from changing the constitution written by the enemy into a normal, RUSSIAN?
                1. +3
                  31 March 2018 19: 05
                  Probably, all these years he has interfered.
              2. +3
                30 March 2018 21: 01
                We and the Constitution wrote a fraudster. Shahrai translated from Ukrainian --- fraudster.
        3. +10
          30 March 2018 09: 30
          Quote: Borik
          And who is there to listen to? Most of those who have been sitting there have been wiping their pants for two decades now and it is not in their interests to change something in the country.

          Quote: The Truth
          For example, a lady like Narusova.

          Quote: sashok1951.21
          And which one put her there, i.e. chose?

          Whoever elected her there should have put her in a good way ...
          And the parliament itself, both the upper and lower houses, has completely outlived itself. And "in life" they were a worthless layer
        4. +9
          30 March 2018 09: 34
          And what other people gathered there? Or do you want to say that ordinary people from the street are much smarter and more moral than those who gathered in the hall? I hasten to disappoint you, about eighty percent of people when asked what you would do in the place of these deputies say that they would steal in the same way, and maybe even more. Solovyov is right in that, having destroyed the Soviet ideology, they did not give anything in return. And it is high time to work out this ideology. Otherwise, what happened in Kemerovo will happen only on a much larger scale, I’m not talking about the fire, I mean the rally and how people behaved.
          1. 0
            30 March 2018 14: 38
            Some and Nadia Savchenko have the rights, well, they have what they have and who have what!
            1. 0
              30 March 2018 17: 10
              What do you propose to talk about Savchenko here?
          2. +2
            April 1 2018 11: 23
            Develop an ideology ???
            Which one? Examples! At least approximate !!!
            Such things are not done from the ceiling and just do not arise. The ideology of society is a deep, informed behavior, it is a whole set of norms and rules of society, often unwritten!
            Try to create an ideology ... Nothing happens! This is basically impossible to do!
            Soviet ideology was born and matured in the minds, for decades, if not centuries, built “through I can’t”, through torment and deprivation, through war!
            The colossal breakthrough that the USSR made in the shortest possible time by historical standards is the result of this most serious and deep ideology of society!
            The collapse of the Soviet Union was the result of the destruction, undermining of this very ideology, and its total defamation! Many people, including the authorities, took this as truth, believed it. Today all this has surfaced and opened in the mind. But the country is no more!
            Here is the price of losing ideology!
            To create a new one is unlikely to succeed, and there is no need, for what was created has been ripening for centuries!
        5. +8
          30 March 2018 22: 01
          You're right! After all, Nightingale suggested changing them. Senators, God forgive me! Russia contains a pack of useless ones. but very expensive loafers! And this Federation Council is quite possible to replace with meetings of governors (once a quarter. Or once every six months). The mere presence of Madame Narusova there requires immediate dispersal of this assembly
      2. +4
        29 March 2018 18: 53
        about 1 \ 2 in speech is eccentricity.
        there is no IVS or EBN-GDP, there is a mentality of peoples, diverse and vectorial.
        10 years ago it was said - the country is ruled by a guard (about Putin). they determine at the working level how to develop.
        Including taking into account the possible collapse -unification, and the tasks necessary to perform here and for the period up to ... year.
      3. +2
        29 March 2018 19: 10
        And what did he speak only to check the hearing of people sitting in the hall as a journalist?
      4. +2
        29 March 2018 19: 19
        Quote: svp67
        but here is the question: "Did someone HEAR him?"

        The speech is not given in full, in any ....
        But....
        In his latest program, he stated clearly and definitely that the dissemination of knowingly false information on the virtual fields of the Internet should be called to account as strictly as the journalists of the media.
        1. +18
          30 March 2018 04: 20
          Quote: stalkerwalker
          In his latest program, he stated clearly and definitely that the dissemination of knowingly false information on the virtual fields of the Internet should be called to account as strictly as the journalists of the media.

          It is not necessary to start with journalists, the root cause is the giving of knowingly false promises by politicians during election campaigns. And this is not just misinformation or sabotage in the case of the media, it is an open political fraud with the aim of taking office and lobbying the interests of economic groups, including criminal ones.
          The deputies understand all this, therefore they will nod like tin soldiers and continue to do nothing in the interests of the people. Not for this they were put in soft chairs ..
        2. +3
          31 March 2018 22: 14
          Well, Mr. Soloviev spoke. He generally speaks a lot. Only with the passage of time does this Mr. change his point of view to the opposite. Here is a cut from Soloviev’s speeches https://vk.com/video-57424472_456247192
          Citizens do not read Soviet newspapers before dinner and do not listen to Mr. Solovyov
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. +1
        29 March 2018 23: 27
        For the 2nd half of the time .. you can hear the background of people talking in the hall .. maybe even "smiling"
      7. +5
        30 March 2018 06: 48
        Yes, Soloviev, maybe something is wrong there on his radio and TV is broadcasting. But the first time I saw how the people should "go into the janitor's house" to talk with their servants (Although, in my opinion, the blondes are too soft, Jewish, and the time has come to ask in a not so soft - Russian way.)
        1. +2
          April 1 2018 20: 15
          too soft, Jewish, manner,
          winked Hmm, for some reason I thought that the "Jewish manner" is still not softness lol
          1. 0
            April 3 2018 03: 46
            Compare with Russian - everything is relative.
            1. +1
              April 3 2018 10: 39
              "Russian manner", as it seems to me, is "from the heart", right - which can be expressed both rudely and with great warmth. The "Jewish manner" is rather a trick, with a double bottom, hidden - if soft, then in shape, essentially cruel enough.
              Z.Y. Although the "habitat" is no no, it takes up ethnic influence.
      8. +4
        30 March 2018 09: 23
        Yeah ! Everything passed by the ears. Zhirinovsky also says a lot of practical, but they do not hear him.
      9. +3
        30 March 2018 10: 09
        And you see, we are so stupid, we don’t know how to live. We ourselves do not know when, where, to whom what to say .. We do not know what is happening in the country. But Soloviev knows everything, and knows how to say it. What would we do without these Nightingales, huh? He opens our eyes straight. How he worries about us. I feel sorry for him. Poor how he is tormented ... "Did someone HEAR him?" I, DAAAA !!!!!
        1. +3
          April 2 2018 08: 20
          Dugumbumbu (Yermolai) March 30, 2018 14:09 p.m. ↑
          And you see, we are so stupid, we don’t know how to live. We ourselves do not know when, where, to whom what to say .. We do not know what is happening in the country. But Soloviev knows everything, and knows how to say it.

          Only you are not invited to the Federation Council.
      10. +5
        30 March 2018 12: 17
        So the main thing he noted is that they would not be forgotten, and then you at least beat your head against the wall, the loot dripped to him .....
      11. +3
        30 March 2018 15: 09
        Quote: svp67
        He made a speech, he made a speech and called the right problems and highlighted, but here is the question: "Did someone HEAR him?"

        I think, in itself, Solovyov’s speech is indicative. Maybe this is the beginning of changes in relation to the domestic policy of Russia. For some reason, I believe that Solovyov to some extent reflects those thoughts that are actively worked out by the supreme power and possibly with a view to their subsequent implementation.
      12. +5
        31 March 2018 09: 14
        Quote: svp67
        He made a speech, he made a speech and called the right problems and highlighted, but here is the question: "Did someone HEAR him?"

        Those who are not indifferent to the events taking place, they heard (look at the number of views).
        And if a person is an infantile amoeba, then at least shout under his ear ori. Useless. Not heard.
      13. +1
        31 March 2018 13: 37
        And even if someone heard, then who will be able to solve them? After all, serious questions have been raised - right up to the amendment of the Constitution. That's how much work! Simple decrees do not get off.
      14. Maz
        +5
        31 March 2018 15: 53
        They didn’t give me a pension. Yeah .. enough. A retired KGB regan gave me advice. - Write to Putin. I did not believe it, but wrote. A letter of last hope. You should have seen my eyes when to me all these creatures that kicked me for three years - answered in writing. They appointed a pension, reported the account number in Sberbank and how much money they transferred there .... And they apologized and threatened that at least one mistake and they would stop paying it to me with pleasure. I wrote a statement to them again. - ignored. I am from the old memory in the administration - to get it, five answers. apologies and again a polite warning. Right now, they answer every one of my e-mails within a week. And just wrote a letter to Putin ... And then a whole city. Yes, they will shake them right now, the heart will refuse, they will die in batches. This is how Beria came to visit Georgia. Everything worked right away, they gave water, light, and the products were delivered ... laughing
      15. +1
        April 6 2018 17: 03
        Quote: svp67
        "Did someone HEAR him?"
        Of course they did. And most likely he will become a senator.
    2. +12
      29 March 2018 17: 52
      E. Ya. Satanovsky spoke there yesterday ... I hope these unknowns, called senators, did not sleep and understood what the two were talking about
      1. +16
        29 March 2018 18: 27
        Quote: vanavate
        Am and E. Ya. Satanovsky spoke yesterday.

        he constantly appears there ...
        1. +2
          29 March 2018 19: 12
          And what sense should be, in your opinion, you probably know him well but have kept it secret.
          1. +5
            29 March 2018 20: 04
            This is not in my opinion, but in general.
            And to have a general concept and idea, it is enough to listen to what he said ....
            and then turn on the head and logic. As well as it’s enough to have an idea of ​​why this is being done and what should be done after that, and not translate into other arrows acting like a wise guy asking stupid questions.
        2. +16
          29 March 2018 19: 22
          And that Soloviev spoke in his direction, explained his position as a journalist. He is neither a legislator nor an official. He said everything correctly, expressed the position of the majority of the country's inhabitants. But the State Duma and the Federation Council are just as ossified as the executive authority. Why would she be different? They too, hell, need to change and really legally uphold the interests of people and the country. In general, they used to learn about deputies, only by scandals or when they fled abroad and were killed.
    3. +6
      29 March 2018 18: 08
      1. Threats - in our technological disasters.
      2. Threats - terrorism.
      3. "Every crime has a financial footprint."
      4. If in the first case the trace (-), then in the second (+).
      5. The result is one - people are dying.
      6. The punishment should be the same.
      7. It is time for deputies to work for 20 hours. We need laws, laws, laws.
      1. +17
        29 March 2018 19: 15
        In Russia, the laws are holy ... yes, the executors of adversaries ...
        1. +2
          29 March 2018 20: 04
          Quote: Vard
          In Russia, the laws are holy ... yes, the executors of adversaries ...

          It's like that. The law that draws where he turned, it turned out there. Do not fight with the strong, do not sue the rich.
          From the beginning, laws, then the main Law: Justice is above the law.
          And let everyone in the West strangle themselves.
      2. +2
        30 March 2018 08: 28
        What laws are few? The main thing is to comply with laws. And this is the business of those for whom these laws are intended. And regulatory authorities must monitor the implementation of laws. Much use of the law on banning smoking in public places? They smoked like they smoked. Including deputies. At bus stops, there are only "bulls." There is no where to go. And next to the policeman, the same chicken. What else is the law when thinking where to throw bulls?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +6
          30 March 2018 09: 40
          Quote: sashok1951.21
          What laws are few?

          There are many worthless, but even more harmful
          Quote: sashok1951.21
          The main thing is to comply with laws. And this is the business of those for whom these laws are intended.

          Lawless lawmakers write laws
          Quote: sashok1951.21
          And regulatory authorities must monitor the implementation of laws.

          There was a normal organ in the USSR: KNK (People’s Control Committee). Unfortunately eliminated. How much good
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +13
      29 March 2018 18: 34
      Who started the jester with tv?
      1. +14
        29 March 2018 19: 15
        The jesters are those who, for whatever reason and without reason, sharpen and invent all kinds of nonsense.
      2. +20
        29 March 2018 20: 57
        Quote: Beltasir Matyagu
        Who started the jester with tv?

        The truth is easy to offend, a well-known and respected journalist by many, who will never know or hear about you. How did self-esteem rise?
        1. +14
          29 March 2018 22: 50
          And you have not heard how this "famous and respected" in his broadcast on the radio insults his listeners? And I heard, and more than once. And you should listen, he often does it.
          Then maybe you change your mind about him. Although unlikely. After all, he is "famous and respected," and therefore he can do it. Truth?
          1. +8
            29 March 2018 23: 49
            In such cases, you need to quote at least
          2. +11
            30 March 2018 06: 20
            Quote: myobius59
            And you have not heard how this "famous and respected" in his broadcast on the radio insults his listeners? And I heard, and more than once.

            No, I haven’t heard, although I listen almost every morning, but he’s not honored by the fifth column, but he constantly dunks (with facts) Guano and a company like that in facts. Mikheev generally well done.
            1. +8
              30 March 2018 07: 58
              Who cares who is in which column. Solovyov on the radio imagines himself untouchable and the ultimate truth. The expression is absolutely not shy. A decent journalist should not behave this way. When he cannot answer, he begins to directly call the opponent names with words that are unacceptable on the air. Maybe this is his transfer format? He doesn’t act like that on television. The conjuncturist.
              And the performance is correct ...
              1. +4
                30 March 2018 09: 56
                That's it. You wrote. everything is very accurate. I like the way he broadcasts on the body, and at the same time, he disgusts himself on the radio .. Disgusting .. Plus, this stupid laugh of Saffron. It is interesting to listen to their programs, I will not hide. But they must behave appropriately.
                And correctly you wrote that on television he does not behave like that. After all, you can get it in your ear, guys are very emotional with him.
                1. +1
                  April 5 2018 13: 46
                  I’m listening to Solovyov on the radio. It can be tough. If the bastards call or email him, then he calls them bastards. Sometimes even their phone numbers are voiced for the police. They certainly don't like it. And I have not changed my opinion about him. Solovyov V.R. - the smartest and most decent person.
          3. 0
            April 5 2018 13: 44
            I’m listening to Solovyov on the radio. It can be tough. If the bastards call or email him, then he calls them bastards. Sometimes even their phone numbers are voiced for the police. They certainly don't like it. And I have not changed my opinion about him. Solovyov V.R. - the smartest and most decent person.
    6. +17
      29 March 2018 19: 18
      More such appearances in the Federation Council and in the State Duma! It’s like history and literature lessons at school!
    7. +17
      29 March 2018 20: 40
      Mock the guys! laughing But the man said correctly, I subscribe to almost every word, the main thing that would come to the boyars. I would like that he spoke not in vain. hi
    8. +7
      29 March 2018 21: 38
      Solovyov is simply As
      Stuck cool cool - class !!!
      Strong and brilliant performance. The official as an object of the system has already outlived itself.
      In order to move to a new level, it is necessary to step-by-step replace officials with a computer service - from local to federal. Even the implementation of legislative activity is completely computer-controlled. It is enough to build a pyramid of subordination of laws based on the constitution and shift to algorithms. And everything will rely on logic - laws will no longer be vague for the sake of their compilers and there will be no loopholes. By and large, we are talking about creating an operating system for managing the country. The main driving force behind the breakthrough is the programmer. Im and cards in hand. May the Russian land not become scarce with talents!
      1. +1
        30 March 2018 10: 27
        Great idea! I support!
      2. +1
        30 March 2018 11: 21
        Quote: candidate
        To move to a new level, it is necessary to step-by-step replace officials with a computer service - from local to federal.
        - the idea is good, wonderful ..... but not feasible alas - this is how I like you official I say ...
        To eliminate us as a class, you need 100% guaranteed fulfillment by the other side of the process. Well, a calculator (citizen !!) cannot lie in Windows - otherwise the OS will not work.
        And in people (as on the other side of the process) EVERYTHING is possible - to break / lie / make mistakes / from evil do the opposite / out of kindness to cover / deceive / and so on ...AWARENESS (and knowing about the possible consequences...
        The traffic policeman taking a bribe is equally to blame - like the one who gives this bribe. Was the GAI officer removed (let's say) - did the second side stop violating the traffic rules? No (looking the truth in the eye) ...
        Those. some action will be necessary automatically punishing the violation (without the participation of an official).
        For example, it exceeded the speed by 20 km or after 2 solid, the locks worked right away - and you cannot get out of the car until you pay the fine or you will sit in the car for 15 days. Is it possible? Yes! Really? Yes! It’s just as real that there will immediately be craftsmen breaking these locks for a very small fee. Is it possible? Yes! Really? Yes!
        1. +2
          30 March 2018 17: 50
          You are partly right. The system should be feedback, both in nature and technology. Already today, many use the online service and violations (tricks) are found. But there is also a punishment for false actions. Not everything is so gloomy, progress is inexorably taking its toll. Take, for example, driving a car on an unmanned basis. And the demand for the traffic police will disappear over time. So the thing is small - roll up your sleeves and work. Otherwise, the idea of ​​a breakthrough does not work.
    9. +6
      29 March 2018 22: 35
      I applaud while standing! hi
    10. +8
      29 March 2018 23: 43
      Well, what's wrong here? He nicely laid out our entire current domestic policy. By the way, as far as I know, he is financially very independent.
    11. 0
      30 March 2018 01: 06
      So, I digested a little of what was said, or maybe we’ll speed it up? Under Tambov, we’ll arrange a conflict for 5 years (or did I see enough of a new Torah?)
    12. +1
      30 March 2018 04: 27
      performed well, but sitting there they do not have a common understanding, everyone will remain his own!
    13. 0
      30 March 2018 05: 11
      who's that???
    14. 0
      30 March 2018 05: 45
      Soloviev softly stretches, but I'm afraid he will sleep hard !!!
    15. +3
      30 March 2018 06: 03
      Boring speech about nothing. I did not finish it.
      1. 0
        April 2 2018 13: 16
        But noted, scribbled.
      2. 0
        8 July 2018 13: 50
        ... it is not for us - for those who are behind the * hill * ..
    16. +5
      30 March 2018 06: 17
      All the actions of our Western opponents are a consequence of the toothless foreign policy of Russia. And the first thing that needed to be answered was our behavior in the Olympic movement, they allowed them to pour dirt and slop on themselves, allowed them to treat us like criminals - here is the result!
      They can’t let anything down, not a single trifle, not a single word, not a single look! West, East, England, the USA and the rest of the bastard, they must be kept on a very short leash, our enemies should not be let down, otherwise they will sit on the neck, which they are essentially trying to do. They need to be taught to speak with Russia and the Russians on their knees, in a low voice and with their heads down. Took on tug - do not say that not a dozen! Death to the enemies and traitors of Russia! Go Russia!
    17. +7
      30 March 2018 06: 27
      A voice crying in the desert. Absolutely correct analysis of our reality. The USSR was strong ideology (up to a point), but then the Americans managed (not without the help of our ossified state leaders) to undermine the trust of our citizens in power, and ultimately this led to the collapse of a great country.
    18. +4
      30 March 2018 06: 31
      Oratory is very high! Respect!
    19. +7
      30 March 2018 06: 38
      in the opinion of the amateur: Each legislator has behind him a tangle of financial and political obligations that most often do not (to put it mildly) agree with the interests of not only the country, but also the region that these uncles and aunts should cherish and protect. Tell them that they are in their own a lot of scoundrels are useless. EVEN AFTER THE DESTRUCTION OF EARLY CHILDREN IN KEMEROVO, THESE UNCLE AND AUNT WILL NOT TAKE LAWS WHICH SUCH KILLERS WILL PAY FOR THE VICTIMS OF MONEY THAT THEIR CHILDREN AND A LITTLE LITTLE SHEET. burnt children of the distant Siberian town of Kemerovo. ETERNAL MEMORY AND sincere condolences to them.
    20. +8
      30 March 2018 07: 27
      Better look what he said about Putin at the beginning of the XNUMXs. Oh, there is a lot of interesting things! And now? Well, everyone needs money to buy houses in all sorts of Italy. I don’t understand how this evening booth can be watched?
    21. +3
      30 March 2018 07: 33
      I agree. It’s time for Soloviev to go beyond journalism and go to power. He correctly says
      1. +3
        30 March 2018 17: 46
        Probably a hangover?
    22. +1
      30 March 2018 07: 43
      With whose filing or by whose order is this performance? Yes, and for whom? Really for Narusova and her comrades, she is by no means alone.
    23. +2
      30 March 2018 07: 48
      For this, first of all, we need to choose our own ideological path, without regard to what is being dictated to us from across the ocean ...
      And he also canceled the "Maslow's pyramid of needs"?
    24. +3
      30 March 2018 07: 49
      Quote: GUSAR
      Better look what he said about Putin at the beginning of the XNUMXs.

      What are you ... not tolerant. Well, he said, and now he has changed his mind and says otherwise. Pleasant ...
    25. +3
      30 March 2018 08: 05
      Everything is folding and figuratively, without hesitation, without a piece of paper. That's right, just like the snow is white and the sky is blue. There is no ideology, an unprecedented attack on the state, insecurity of citizens within the country, not the ability of the authorities to understand and hear their people - I agree! And why? Are there few laws? Not serious! Therefore, some understatement and a shift in emphasis prevents one from taking seriously what is heard. The performance is addressed not to those sitting in the hall (if there were any), but to the ordinary population, to TOK lovers - SHOW. Accordingly, I perceive what I heard as a continuation of one evening show on the central channel.
    26. +8
      30 March 2018 08: 32
      A hypocrite and a liar. All that I think of Soloviev.
      1. +5
        30 March 2018 10: 08
        Well, apparently you have only one gyrus in your brain and that one is straight!
    27. +8
      30 March 2018 08: 44
      And what does this SF generally do? Here there is a Tuvan delegate of Narusova, who lives in St. Petersburg, what can she do in our country, which she and her daughter can’t stand, especially us
    28. +1
      30 March 2018 08: 44
      In the Federation Council and the State Duma there must be authoritative people from the regions. And now, in particular, from the Smolensk region, Varangians are sitting: in the Federation Council, where Klintsevich came from, and in the State Duma - Neverov! People who really know the region and cheer for it are absent in the Federal Assembly. For these, V. Solovyov’s messages are needed!
    29. +3
      30 March 2018 08: 48
      As always., Solovyov said everything - in fact ... I hope to hear his majority of citizens !!!
      1. 0
        30 March 2018 09: 33
        Undoubtedly! If he is heard in the blessed Andorra, then with us, then even more so, even without exclamation points. The goal is in doubt.
    30. 0
      30 March 2018 09: 05
      This one, like him, well there, but what, did he alone know about it or is he an oracle? To whom he spoke, bold to those who do not decide anything, but are a representative, these places are an honorable pastime after theft on vacation.
      Because his courage ... (all obscenities), and most importantly: - "... I refused for a long time ...", now everything will go differently - they heard.
      Hooray! Understood, redo, what else is needed, come tell me.
    31. +2
      30 March 2018 09: 09
      The question is about our constitution. When and under whose dictation we wrote it we remember, but the youth are unlikely to realize whose interests the basic law is designed to protect. For five years now, conversations have been heard about the supremacy of OUR law, and not international. And nothing has changed.
    32. +5
      30 March 2018 09: 29
      Strange, he fell upon the regional authorities, and we don’t have a very good regional authority, he will only become a leader, as his wife begins to grow rich and climb into all holes. The question is, who determines the country's internal policy in general, not the regional government, but the CENTRAL one, that the shopping malls are burning, rockets are falling, rich Pinocchio cars crush ordinary citizens and children in their cars, and all these thieving governors, you think, without the knowledge of Moscow "comrades" could such billions, do not tell, you think the stool and the hooters are so alone in the government, in the highest power. Who prepares, determines, politics, laws - the central government, so it should bear the first responsibility for domestic policy in the country. which just failed. I am not a liberal, and this audience is terribly “I don’t like” poorly said, but whoever created such an atmosphere in the country for 28 years, those who are at the AUTHORITY. And there’s nothing to blame on the mirror, since the mug is crooked. From the head you have to start with the HEAD.
      1. +1
        30 March 2018 13: 11
        Not one HEAD is the matter, you cannot put an inspector or educator to each, each HEAD is in its place, the question is what each one takes himself to do (no one pushes needles under his nails).
        The designer draws, to please, the expert closed his eyes, maybe he’ll blow it over, the builder will go like that, you can’t see it, the security guard is for that kind of money ... And all the victims of the circumstances are like a herd, but HE is to blame. Now, if they had flogged us, set up the guards, then we would have become honest and hardworking ....
    33. 0
      30 March 2018 09: 59
      I remember in 85m tagged, too, he said everything correctly ....., so, even I’ll point
    34. +4
      30 March 2018 10: 01
      A strong, correct speech, as if conveyed to the senators the aspirations and thoughts of the absolute, in my opinion, majority of Russians and wise advice, only it would be great if there would be at least ten people in the audience who were endowed with power and shared his point of view and there was not a single person watching, during his speech, for example, stock news or a clip from YouTube ....
    35. +3
      30 March 2018 10: 04
      The horror in Kemerovo (Winter Cherry) 2018, Kazan (Admiral) 2015 should not be repeated over and over again! Just EVERYONE should do what MUST! Checks to ensure the safety of people do not have the right to be carried out for checkmark reporting, they must be impartial!
    36. +4
      30 March 2018 10: 21
      The speech is vivid, reasonable and convincing. Will only our legislators, such as Narusova, draw conclusions from the speech! I really wanted N. Mikhalkov to speak in the Senate!
    37. 0
      30 March 2018 10: 22
      Peter-2 Belarus
    38. +1
      30 March 2018 10: 32
      It is necessary to change the nation-wide constitution for our country.
    39. +9
      30 March 2018 10: 34
      Russia is a huge country with a multimillion population. This is not Liechtenstein. Soloviev talks about ideology, about the people and the service of the people. There can be no neutral ideology. She is either leaning left or right. Right now, I want to note our longboat got a serious roll to starboard. Here you and the Russian Orthodox Church and portraits of Nicholas II and sovereignty. However, this could well roll in the Russian Empire (and roll it to 2017 year). In a democratic country of the 21 century - not relevant! Of course, people are still being carried away by all these great power things, but they will soon cool off. Why? Because (I’ll write a terrible thing), Russia needs a strong, consistent, well-designed left-wing party. The fact that today we have in the form of the Communist Party is not a left-wing party, I am silent about the SR. Party of the people - the best opposition to the party of the elite! Internationalism, social guarantees, rationalism and aspiration for the future are the characteristics of the party of the people. But I'm sorry - these are the characteristics of the left party. Ideologies made in the offices of the research institute - I'm sorry, stupidity! It's just that our government is not ready to form a strong left wing. Firstly, he is afraid that the shadow of the CPSU will fall on him, and secondly, he is simply afraid of his people. Until a strong and adequate left movement is formed in our country, we will not be able to reach any new horizons. You need progress - this is the left idea. It is obvious. The right idea is stability. Stability will not lead anywhere. Defense wars do not win!
    40. +5
      30 March 2018 10: 38
      I myself am a shipbuilder, already retired. He participated in the design, construction and acceptance of ships that were built on orders of the USSR abroad (Poland, Denmark, Norway, East Germany and others). Everything was built according to the Rules of the USSR Register, where everything is laid out on shelves from design to materials and operation. As a rule, there were 5-6 people at the shipyard who were selected for certain specialties from different fleets and we, about a special program drawn up during the design, participated in this complex process and at every stage, from bookmark to general acceptance, examined each part and installation put their signature on the corresponding act, which were stored throughout the life of the vessel. Something similar needs to be created during the construction of buildings and structures, including during the operation of this facility. All this is prescribed in these rules and there will be no need to create countless commissions when investigating accidents.
      1. +1
        30 March 2018 11: 38
        Exactly! Everything is clear, concrete, and there will not be such terrible tragedies without references to the "human factor"!
      2. 0
        April 2 2018 08: 38
        There is such a paper called a building passport. There from the project and all changes should be stored. It's just that no one leads them, and some try to get a new one so that no changes are visible or hide the alteration.
    41. +2
      30 March 2018 10: 49
      Quote: gugol
      Well, apparently you have only one gyrus in your brain and that one is straight!

      On what basis did you come to this conclusion? Argument! If there is no argument ... then please ... shut up! Thank you for your attention.
      1. 0
        30 March 2018 11: 15
        Do not worry so. Your opponent put himself in unfavorable conditions in advance - an air shock, similar to what was heard in Solovyov’s record, because the argument, in this case, must be confirmed by trepanation.
    42. +4
      30 March 2018 11: 04
      Decent speech, it’s a pity that it’s belated .. There’s no where to pull it all, they’ve played enough into globalization ... As usual, until the fried one pecks .. It’s time to draw up a constitution, and in fact, your own Russian spirit based on Our morality.
      If the West and Co., most importantly, have the Law over all (and who accepted how, guess), then Our morality should be at the core. If the law is immoral, it does not have the right to be. You cannot throw old people into the street, because they do not pay, you cannot refuse medical assistance if there is no insurance policy ... etc.
    43. +2
      30 March 2018 11: 09
      Quote: The Truth
      For example, a lady like Narusova.

      Is any Mizulin better than that?
    44. +3
      30 March 2018 11: 10
      Quote: sashok1951.21
      And which one put her there, i.e. chose?


      The one who was her husband’s six
    45. +7
      30 March 2018 11: 11
      I did not understand, but whom exactly and how did he “defeat” in this speech?
    46. +5
      30 March 2018 11: 12
      Russian lawmakers are galley rowers who have absolutely no interest in where their ship is heading. Their interest is in good conditions and decent food.
      Russia has six years left. Or maybe even less.
      1. 0
        30 March 2018 17: 40
        cool comparison!
    47. 0
      30 March 2018 11: 21
      There is no ideology, we do not respect ourselves, we don’t know where we are going - I agree. So where do we go? V.I. Lenin said that imperialism is the last, decaying stage of capitalism. We feel the vices of monopoly on ourselves, which means that we have early abandoned socialist ideas. The monopoly that took place in the USSR, the current monopolism in Russia and in the world speak of the need to move towards socialism. Imperialism cannot be jumped over, it is necessary to “survive” the monopolism inherent in it. The power now belongs to those who own financial resources (federal officials and oligarchs), but it is necessary that the power be in the municipal authorities, where people live, where people's opinions are a source of law and justice. To delegate to the federal authorities only basic powers, for example, lawmaking, defense and law enforcement. Not a single president is able to keep track of landfills, shopping and entertainment centers, utilities and more. All this should be monitored by municipal authorities, and they have neither the means nor the real power. They would only have to share and report on the “handouts” launched from above. The system needs to be changed, but who is capable of this? Only the "king-father", we think. For six years, it is possible to create conditions for people to be busy, earn good money, so that disabled old people and children do not live in poverty. And if the president cannot? If the oligarchs and other powers that be do not want such changes, then who can the president rely on? Vicious circle? Without fuss and revolution, let us decide where to go, we need an idea and an appropriate ideology. How else to unite people.
      1. +1
        31 March 2018 22: 13
        Of course . the president should not keep track of landfills. but he has a government subordinate. which he must force to build a plant for the production of waste recycling plants and sorting shops. Who is stopping to do this? For so many years we trample trash into the ground with tractors. and then we are surprised. where do the stinking streams run from? Yes, instead of the landfill we call the "landfill." As soon as I write some criticism. immediately there are people. who write to me "start with yourself" Do I also have to build factories?
    48. +2
      30 March 2018 11: 23
      Quote: Sineka
      It is necessary to change the nation-wide constitution for our country.

      We have already been a quarter century as the "Tank" constitution. How to change it, without the help of tanks? :)))
    49. +6
      30 March 2018 11: 23
      I wonder who he spoke to there. I mean, did other people appear on the Federation Council? Will they change something? This speech is Carlson's fiery speech against jam. And Solovyov today sings one thing and tomorrow another. He is a spineless, insignificant person. The Internet is full of videos of how he swears fieryly when they close the first NTV and its fiery incendiary market that Russia does not need Crimea. You can listen to it, but you should not believe it.
    50. 0
      30 March 2018 11: 32
      So witty, but the place of verbal presentation may not be entirely correct. Such an extremely complex and important thing for the state, it is not necessary to throw them into the air, it must be realized in silence. I would recommend this lecture to the special services for everyday listening. Although they probably know, but it doesn’t work, and therefore they are thrown into the air.
    51. +6
      30 March 2018 11: 45
      It is because of such talkers, who have foreign property and are vacationing overseas, but splashing with patriotic saliva, that everything is happening. They lead the darkest, shameful pages of Russian history.
    52. 0
      30 March 2018 12: 03
      Quote: Achinet
      Do not worry so. Your opponent put himself in unfavorable conditions in advance - an air shock, similar to what was heard in Solovyov’s record, because the argument, in this case, must be confirmed by trepanation.

      Thank you for your support.
    53. 0
      30 March 2018 12: 06
      I also agree with almost everything. As for the matter... Why not move the time of its broadcast to the evening, according to the title. There are 30-40 percent smart people there, and people need to listen to them in a normal way. Broaden the topic and remove the idiots representing Ukraine, this not Ukrainians. There are hot topics, but fundamental ones need to be broadcast more often. Why am I being clever here, he already knows everything. Everywhere we need to look for and promote great specialists with a narrow specialization and the deepest knowledge.
    54. 0
      30 March 2018 12: 40
      ...here you should set an example...
      especially for pensions laughing , as Solovyov noted.
    55. +1
      30 March 2018 12: 40
      Quote: ilik54
      All the actions of our Western opponents are a consequence of the toothless foreign policy of Russia. And the first thing that needed to be answered was our behavior in the Olympic movement, they allowed them to pour dirt and slop on themselves, allowed them to treat us like criminals - here is the result!
      They can’t let anything go, not a single little thing, not a single word, not a single glance! Death to the enemies and traitors of Russia! Go Russia!

      But Pasaran!!! soldier
    56. 0
      30 March 2018 12: 57
      Well done, got your head dirty...! He told the deputies everything superbly and clearly. Unfortunately, the level of understanding of everything he said provides for the emergence of a process of the representatives of the people’s own “thinking” for which many representatives are simply not ready. Everyone is accustomed to the generally accepted pattern of the leader. It’s easier not to think this way.
      Putin won’t be able to think for all of you for a long time. What will happen next ? Perhaps Soloviev....
      And the tragedy in Kemerovo is Medvedev’s jamb with his “unfinished” risk-oriented approach to business liberalization in state control measures. The Russian Cabinet of Ministers really DOES NOT have a strategy! One execution to solve current problems. In this case, another compensation for the victims. And the fact that some people in the federal civil service, performing important tasks for the third month, receive 13 thousand rubles, live on the bare idea of ​​patriotism. Many proper officials no longer have anything to declare their salaries with... only thoughts that no one needs are left.
    57. +1
      30 March 2018 13: 13
      To be honest, I admired this guy’s intelligence. When Putin was asked how he viewed changing the constitution, he was deeply disappointed with his answer. This is not an understanding of what needs to be done. It is very good that there are people like Solovyov, but it is very bad that people like Solovyov do not determine the policy of our state. Compared to Solovyov, Matvienko is no one’s name. Why is this nobody in the government, but Solovyov is not?
    58. +3
      30 March 2018 13: 38
      I never get tired of listening to Solovyov...he voices his words not with his voice but with his soul...
    59. +2
      30 March 2018 13: 48
      You have to expose yourself like that! This scumbag in the hall does not forgive such treatment.
    60. The comment was deleted.
    61. +5
      30 March 2018 14: 05
      He spoke, but there was no specifics on more than one issue, bang, bang and past. Not under any head of state has there been such a mess, we didn’t live as poorly as we do now, we’re all over the place, and there’s nothing to take, they steal so much that there’s lice on our heads I had a myocardial infarction. This is a shame for Putin’s entire team and himself. Of course Putin is doing something, but his ministers are not doing anything at all. Medvedev: there’s no money, but you’re holding on, and they haven’t removed what’s sitting there, Skvartsova: we have money to treat sick children. But we are still collecting money via SMS for some reason. We could continue, but there is NO good. And pensioners, they are generally in such a place (which of you gentlemen will live on 8000 rubles, raise your hand?????????? There is no joy in life........The USSR is all the best that remains !!!!!!!!!!!!
    62. +4
      30 March 2018 14: 20
      Say not to do. For the last 25 years, everyone has been talking a lot, but doing very little. And if they do, it is only in their own personal interests. One talker was playing around with the ears of other talkers. Everyone was happy.
    63. +2
      30 March 2018 14: 21
      Quote: Blondy
      Yes, Soloviev, maybe something is wrong there on his radio and TV is broadcasting. But the first time I saw how the people should "go into the janitor's house" to talk with their servants (Although, in my opinion, the blondes are too soft, Jewish, and the time has come to ask in a not so soft - Russian way.)

      For a blonde, you are too attentive. And what other manner did you expect from the circumcised Shapira/Soloviev/?
      1. 0
        30 March 2018 14: 23
        That's right.
    64. The comment was deleted.
    65. +3
      30 March 2018 14: 50
      Volodya, you can’t sit on two chairs. Don't touch Stalin. It's not for you to judge him. Time will come, he will judge. Don't be like the terry liberals.
    66. The comment was deleted.
    67. 0
      30 March 2018 15: 36
      Quote: Borik
      And who is there to listen to? Most of those who have been sitting there have been wiping their pants for two decades now and it is not in their interests to change something in the country.

      ...let them sit there better - under supervision... enemies need to be kept closer than friends - they will do less harm... - well, there is simply no other option...
      1. 0
        30 March 2018 16: 16
        Under whose supervision???
    68. 0
      30 March 2018 16: 06
      You wrote: "
      Quote: Tatiana
      It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.

      How did you listen to Solovyov? He called the article 15, paragraph 4 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

      4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

      This article directly, in particular, is tied to freedom from the state of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Those. power in the Russian Federation is in the hands of bankers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
      Namely, for example, if the Central Bank in Russia is offended by a bad Government, it goes somewhere “over the hill” and starts complaining to an international court there. And the international court under Russian law has priority over our Russian one."

      The thesis of the law is misunderstood by you and therefore misinterpreted.

      An international treaty in itself cannot prevail over the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
      It must first be accepted and ratified by the Russian Federation Council.
      If even a previously adopted international treaty causes damage to the Russian economy, then Russia has the right to withdraw from it. Russia is absolutely free in its choice of actions, both regarding its accession to the implementation of any international treaty, and regarding its withdrawal from it. And therefore, no coloniality can be traced in her right of free choice.
    69. +3
      30 March 2018 16: 12
      Our "elite", including the Duma, as well as major officials, keep their main assets (money, securities, real estate) in England, America, Canada, including gold reserves and stabilization. fund, that’s why the Anglo-Saxons behave so confidently and are rude. As long as someone else's uncle manages our money, we will only express protests. EVERYONE understands: take away the opportunity to withdraw money and assets - the country will flourish, but who among the thieving officials needs this?
    70. 0
      30 March 2018 16: 34
      For Russia, which has taken the lead in the process of reconstruction, renewal of the entire human society, and has resumed, taken upon itself and developed this process, it will be true to say that the change in the very moral climate in the country, in Russia, and thereby, consistently and inevitably, on the entire planet , this is probably the main task, the main mission of the Proletarians of the Mind. The main task of the current moment.
      ... the proletarians of Reason are probably still solving the main task of the revival, formation and development of morality in human society, which cannot be American, British or Russian morality. Morality can only be human! And the Proletarian of Reason, first of all, is probably a moral person!

      PROLETARIANS OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!!!
      http://www.proza.ru/2013/04/09/59
    71. The comment was deleted.
    72. +2
      30 March 2018 16: 51
      Yes, that’s right, stop looking at the West with your mouth open, that we can’t live without them? Vladimir Solovyov should have been at the head of the Government for a long time.
    73. 0
      30 March 2018 16: 58
      There is law, but there is no justice. There is always someone more right. There are many laws, but there is always someone above the law, and law enforcement practice is the drawbar...and further in the text.
    74. +1
      30 March 2018 16: 59
      Well, informational preparations for changing the constitution from colonial to adequate have finally begun!
      This time Solovyov made a very correct speech - a minimum of emotions and a maximum of facts and conclusions.
      The most important thing is to rewrite the colonial articles of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and legislatively formulate the national idea, as well as ways to implement this idea and promote all this in life.
      This should be done within this six-year period, I hope it will be done.
    75. +1
      30 March 2018 17: 23
      Soloviev, you are a harmful microbe. Started for health, ended for peace.
      First, the army with its fat generals discredited itself, and so did the judicial system. The reaction of people to this topic on social networks is not fake, not propaganda - a manifestation of a healthy beginning among the people. Your fornication is harmful. From the rostrum of the Federal Assembly you are fooling people. You are setting up the President, He is part of this people. As a result of his reaction to what happened, changes occurred in the army, but, alas, not in the judicial system. It's a pity that he didn't set his priorities correctly. First, the rules by which we must live must be fulfilled. Everything else is secondary.
    76. 0
      30 March 2018 18: 28
      I agree about ideology; I expressed a similar position on the events in Kemerovo:
      "I can’t stand aside and want to share my thoughts on the causes and consequences of the tragedy, as well as possible ways to solve this problem:

      The fight against “bribe takers” today is one of our key mottos, but for some reason we don’t really see the results of the fight (and I’m not talking about the fact that there are not enough demonstrative “landings” for the purpose of:
      a) show the work of investigative authorities;
      b) intimidate other dishonest people;
      c) eliminate it altogether.
      no, not about that, but in fact - the extensive anti-corruption activities are not working or are working too slowly and it is not known where and what else is rotten in each specific city, place and case, along with the wiring in this shopping center! I believe that in order to achieve the desired results in this fight, it is necessary to first understand, I want to emphasize UNDERSTAND - why this is happening, what motivates people who commit this kind of crime, the thirst for profit? - I don’t think so, I think this is the result of a systemic flaw. What I mean by systemic flaw is, in short, the ideological decomposition of society, as a result of the substitution of ideals. After all, today we live in a world full of temptations and opportunities, people sitting in a communal apartment can see how others - in their opinion, people who are no different from them (not physiologically, of course) relax on the ocean shore, drive around in expensive cars and they want it and the temptation to achieve this at any cost becomes great. Not everyone is given the gift of being successful businessmen, not everyone can be oligarchs and stars; this requires talent, courage, enterprise and a number of other qualities that few possess - this is normal, otherwise who will repair pipes or treat people, etc. - I stretched the essence of the idea too much in that the root of this problem is in state ideology, I personally think that too little time is devoted to this problem, but it is very important.
      After all, to say that the reason why that security guard did not insist to his management about the need to immediately repair the fire alarm was dictated by his fear of losing his job and simply not living up to his salary in a new job, which he would have to look for if he had not obeyed the management of the shopping center for at least 2 months - 3. (to survive here means that you and I are loaded with taxes, utility bills and loans in such a way that we live from paycheck to paycheck and cannot afford the opportunity to sit on our fifth point for 2-3 months while looking for work). To sum up this paragraph, I want to say that it would not hurt to raise people’s salaries (and I think that this is achievable - taking into account the existing inequality of classes or segments of the population), however, I believe that work on ideology should be large-scale and this is the key to success in defeating corruption!!! "
    77. The comment was deleted.
    78. +1
      30 March 2018 19: 25
      Almost Prokhanov... Much has been said correctly... but... even without him, many have already been saying this for a long time. What is new, what is salt? In Solovyov's pathos? Perhaps yes, and perhaps that’s all.
    79. 0
      30 March 2018 20: 38
      Quote: Stas157
      Quote: Hyppopotut
      Was she at least once in Tuva?

      It doesn’t matter if you enter the circle of associates. Yes, even if you are dull from House-2, you can easily become a presidential candidate! Any downshifter can become the head of Sberbank. And, any furniture maker - the Minister of Defense. And even if you are caught by the hand, then you will not end up behind bars ... You can even become president if you need a place to warm yourself. For people entering this narrow circle, limits simply do not exist! No personal achievements and superpowers, in this case, it is absolutely not necessary to have.
      And Solovyov made really spectacular. He told about everything, and at the same time about nothing. He called the problems that everyone already knows, but did not say how to solve them. Well, it’s quite clear that those people sitting in the hall are not capable of deciding anything. They are accustomed to approve directives issued from above ... From the executive branch! Here is such a looking glass.

      good good good hi
    80. +1
      30 March 2018 20: 48
      Yes, you can say a hundred times that the system needs to be changed, you can install new mayors a hundred times, elect deputies and so on. But this will not solve the problem, because people’s mentality needs to be changed. Did they send us officials from beyond Bugr? No! They grew up with the people, the majority in the USSR, where helping each other and love for the country stood above all else, but how did it happen that many stupidly neglect their responsibilities and start stealing? My version, power changes a person, was even proven, roughly speaking: the structure of the brain. That is, if a person was g...before power, he will be even more g...after power. We need to somehow teach people to live not for themselves, but for others. Maybe the officials don’t believe in the beauty of the future of the country, that’s why they want to make money faster and it’s hard to judge here, you need to go to the top and understand how and what’s going on there.
      1. +1
        30 March 2018 21: 09
        A strange picture emerges; First, the whole country elects deputies to the Duma. then the whole country cannot force them to work in our interests. We haven't heard anything about the rotation of deputies. and it is unrealistic to recall a thief or a lazy person
    81. +2
      30 March 2018 21: 14
      Quote: Deadush
      This is not in my opinion, but in general.
      And to have a general concept and idea, it is enough to listen to what he said ....
      and then turn on the head and logic. As well as it’s enough to have an idea of ​​why this is being done and what should be done after that, and not translate into other arrows acting like a wise guy asking stupid questions.

      And you explain to us, unreasonable ones, what he said that was so new that we wouldn’t constantly talk about here? winked wassat
    82. +2
      30 March 2018 22: 15
      blah blah blah...just talk and no sense, as the people were poor and will remain poor until something fundamentally changes....he speaks well, only his salary is 100 times more than all of you...what is he talking about You can talk to him... it would be better to talk about everyday matters... otherwise it’s all water!
    83. 0
      30 March 2018 23: 42
      I listened to Solovyov's speech. I am ready to subscribe to every word he says, except one. At the genetic level, we still have a preserved ideology: this is the motto “for the TSING, for the MOTHERLAND, for the FAITH.”
      Whatever this king is called, prince, tsar, secretary general, or president. Homeland, and that says it all. I believe. Faith in Lenin, Stalin, communism, socialism or Our Lord-GOD. I have met sincere communists who believe in God, but who do not believe in church officials. If you begin to say that they are nothing more than the guardians of this faith, and nothing human is alien to them, then misunderstanding has begun.

      Of course, we need to start with changing the Yeltsin constitution. In fact, Russians are not alien to Real Socialism, with a multi-structured economy. This is where the real nostalgia for Stalin comes in. And indeed: not everything was bad with him. So why not throw away all the bad things and take all the good things with you into the future. After all, personally, I can’t even compare Stalin’s times and the “dashing 90s”, when without war, they ruined the country.
    84. +3
      30 March 2018 23: 46
      Someone else is looking at the nightingale. I even feel sorry for the people. I remember well how he sucked up to Luzhkov, who gave him a couple of fathers in his own way. How Luzhk was thrown off - no one could “kick the lion” better than Shapira. For one statement, in the style of Kyiv - founded by them / well, you understand /, they threw another one off TV. And this one took root as “Good night” + “Good morning”. Now he’s tearing his throat out to be let into a warm puddle, to a full feeder and an indulgence from court if he gets into trouble.
    85. +1
      30 March 2018 23: 47
      Quote: Vasily Mishakov
      You wrote: "
      Quote: Tatiana
      It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.

      How did you listen to Solovyov? He called the article 15, paragraph 4 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

      4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

      This article directly, in particular, is tied to freedom from the state of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Those. power in the Russian Federation is in the hands of bankers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
      Namely, for example, if the Central Bank in Russia is offended by a bad Government, it goes somewhere “over the hill” and starts complaining to an international court there. And the international court under Russian law has priority over our Russian one."

      The thesis of the law is misunderstood by you and therefore misinterpreted.

      An international treaty in itself cannot prevail over the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
      It must first be accepted and ratified by the Russian Federation Council.
      If even a previously adopted international treaty causes damage to the Russian economy, then Russia has the right to withdraw from it. Russia is absolutely free in its choice of actions, both regarding its accession to the implementation of any international treaty, and regarding its withdrawal from it. And therefore, no coloniality can be traced in her right of free choice.

      In fact, the state is the state, and has the right to nationalize anything if it contradicts the interests of the country and the people. The same should be done with the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and oligarchs who do not work for the country. So a change in the constitution is finally overdue.
    86. The comment was deleted.
    87. 0
      31 March 2018 00: 10
      We've had enough of our brats. Instead of making excuses, Teresa should have been accused at the UN of attempted murder of our citizens. And in Syria we need to do the same thing - accuse the states of genocide. Where did they take Safronkov!? They opened a kindergarten in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs! And in general, we need to do everything the American way - say one thing and do another.
    88. +1
      31 March 2018 01: 44
      The beginning seemed normal, but as soon as the conversation turned to foreign policy and some kind of ideology, everything was immediately clear—propaganda motives again! What the hell is an ideology if there are no ways to implement your plans? People are paid money mainly for living, there are no high technologies, science and education smoke bamboo... There is still a birth crisis coming, but Solovyov is unaware of this. Plus, our healthcare is not fulfilling its functions. So, in 5 years...
    89. The comment was deleted.
    90. The comment was deleted.
    91. The comment was deleted.
    92. 0
      31 March 2018 11: 19
      Bravo Solovyov!!! Everything is said correctly and objectively! Our newly elected President really has a lot of work ahead of him to restructure the State, which he did not have time to do in previous periods, because the resulting system of anarchy cannot be left to posterity, lest it happen like after the reign of Ivan the Terrible... The country must be preserved, at least in existing borders and prevent it from falling apart, for which it is necessary to strengthen government institutions and bring laws into line with the Russian mentality, preserving Russian values ​​- Justice, Equality of all before the Law, Respect for your ancestors, Love for your neighbors and Love for the Motherland! To teach to do not what is not prohibited, but what is allowed - by Nature, Religion and the Laws of the Russian State - Russian Laws within the Country are higher than all the Laws of the World, while it is necessary.. to strive and support the Laws of International Law... It is imperative to strengthen the passage system for deputies, especially for the highest position - Head of State - a test of loyalty to Russia. values, access to secrets, attitude towards the Peoples of our Country - in case of any discrepancy, remove those who did not pass and nominate new ones, so as not to clog the Deputy Corps with enemies of our State... The courts, before judging, must determine the total damage caused to a person, a region , State in the amount of imprisonment and in the economic amount, for this damage the perpetrators must be found and only then the degree of guilt of everyone must be determined - in the end someone will be imprisoned, someone will receive a fine, someone will be deprived of their license, another will sweep streets for 15 days, someone will be put on trial, etc. , then, when they see violations, they will not pass by, but will stop themselves or invite the appropriate services to resolve the issue... Of course, during the next rotation in the Duma, all deputies who are not loyal to our Peoples and our values ​​should be removed from work - that there must be people working for the benefit of the entire people and not just for some group... And the most important Value is the definition of our general line of movement towards a certain Goal and our ideology from which the People would understand - What is good and what is bad... That's roughly what I think...
    93. The comment was deleted.
    94. 0
      31 March 2018 11: 49
      Everything is clear, professional, competent as always. It is important that whoever sits there not only listens, but also HEARS
    95. +1
      31 March 2018 12: 10
      I liked the speech, a lot was said.

      I don’t know how much of what was said was heard by legislators, but judging by the comments (I managed to read it before writing my own), few Internet listeners reached it.
      Sadness.
      And statements (in comments) are often slogans, nothing more.
      I understand that the forum is a place for flooding and self-promotion, but still...

      1. There are many theses about reference to international treaties.
      What is actually (in my understanding) written in this article of the Constitution (and COPYED INTO MANY of our laws in areas of life):
      Our society should live according to such and such rules and such and such, except for cases written down in certain international treaties (including those signed due to certain temporary situations).

      Absurd. So let’s agree to the point that “thou shalt not kill unless it is written down in some kind of agreement with another country.”
      How to fix: Rewrite more than half of the Laws, starting with the Constitution.
      Really? There are doubts that someone will take it on and bring it to fruition.

      2. Equality of all before the Law.
      First the Law must be such that it can be applied to everyone.
      Here, too, not everything is so “simple”.
      It is necessary:
      a) A clear, unambiguous interpretation of the text of the Law by EVERYONE.
      b) 100% consistency of one Law to another.
      c) Absence of lobbying of private interests in the text of the law
      d) Repeal of “unworkable” laws
      e) Prohibition on the adoption of the Law in connection with the local situation that has arisen.

      etc.

      Solovyov was correct when he said that a national idea is needed.
      The Constitution and the Laws and the attitude towards them need to be adjusted to suit the idea.
      And the attitude should be the same, regardless of who you are - President, deputy or miner, legal entity or individual, state or private enterprise.

      I think that 6 years is not enough to develop a national idea and implement it.
      But it is extremely necessary to work in this direction.
      It is quite possible that many people in the hall and on the screens understand this, but no one is brave, who will take it?!
      The job is for many years, and in power, by definition, all are temporary workers...
      And it's a dangerous job.
    96. +1
      31 March 2018 12: 51
      interesting times. Satanovsky, Solovyov, Kedmi Russians, ethnic Jews teach us Russians to love Russia. By their example. By your behavior. With their attitude. And they do it right.
    97. +2
      31 March 2018 13: 18
      It seems to me that it would be nice if the patriot (in the good sense of the word) V. R. Solovyov first told where the proceeds from the sale of natural resources go.
    98. The comment was deleted.
    99. 0
      31 March 2018 18: 38
      Great. Just what is relevant now. Vladimir is simply a truth teller. I think that, speaking about the system and legislation, he suggests that in order to counter the growing threat to Russia and our people, he proposes something similar. I think that in Russia the time has come to introduce a special situation similar to the “wartime situation”, in which all leaders, including local leaders, must be in the structure of the PEOPLE FRONT (PF) and, as in the army, in the uniform of the PF and in responsible subordination to the PF. The NF should conduct control similar to the control of the CPSU in the USSR. With a call to the carpet, reprimands, etc. The NF should become a controlling and administrative-punishing structure with direct subordination to the Supreme Commander-in-Chief. The NF can transfer control materials to the prosecutor's office and judicial authorities, which are an integral part of the NF. In the NF, take the oath of Russia, as in the Russian army. For non-compliance and corruption (looting) confiscation, deportation, and in especially serious cases and crimes - execution, in accordance with the mobilization regulations.
      CONCLUSION - introduce a “time of mobilization situation” in Russia for 6 years and the strictest responsibility of the entire leadership team. During this time, carry out all the necessary reforms and modernization of the economy.
    100. 0
      31 March 2018 18: 45
      Quote: Victor Zubkov
      It seems to me that it would be nice if the patriot (in the good sense of the word) V. R. Solovyov first told where the proceeds from the sale of natural resources go.

      What will this give you?

      The options are:
      1) On the salary of teachers, doctors, etc.
      2) For fuel and ammunition in the Syrian contingent
      3) Somewhere else.

      So what do you answer?
      Or (I repeat) what will this answer give you?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"