Military Review

Solovyov delivered a crushing speech at the Federation Council

193
Vladimir Soloviev, a well-known Russian journalist and host of a popular socio-political program on the federal channel, accepted an invitation from the Federation Council and delivered a speech at the upper house of parliament.


The tragic event in the Siberian city of Kemerovo, where 64 people died in a fire less than a week ago, including more than 40 children, became a cornerstone in his speech. Soloviev attacked with criticism of the local authorities and proposed to significantly update the legislation in order to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The journalist also wondered about the place of Russia in the world, and the attitude of this world to our country. Soloviev expressed confidence that Russia should radically rethink its foreign policy. To do this, first of all, we need to choose our own ideological path, without looking at what is dictated from overseas.

193 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 29 March 2018 17: 42
    +63
    He made a speech, he made a speech and called the right problems and highlighted, but here is the question: "Did someone HEAR him?"
    1. Borik
      Borik 29 March 2018 18: 31
      +72
      And who is there to listen to? Most of those who have been sitting there have been wiping their pants for two decades now and it is not in their interests to change something in the country.
      1. Pravodel
        Pravodel 30 March 2018 08: 07
        +38
        For example, a lady like Narusova.
        1. sashok1951.21
          sashok1951.21 30 March 2018 08: 21
          +15
          And which one put her there, i.e. chose?
          1. Hyppopotut
            Hyppopotut 30 March 2018 09: 07
            +22
            Two questions on Narusova:
            1. Was she at least once in Tuva?
            2. Does she really consider a significant part of our history to be comparable with fascism.
            1. Stas157
              Stas157 30 March 2018 16: 20
              +34
              Quote: Hyppopotut
              Was she at least once in Tuva?

              It doesn’t matter if you enter the circle of associates. Yes, even if you are dull from House-2, you can easily become a presidential candidate! Any downshifter can become the head of Sberbank. And, any furniture maker - the Minister of Defense. And even if you are caught by the hand, then you will not end up behind bars ... You can even become president if you need a place to warm yourself. For people entering this narrow circle, limits simply do not exist! No personal achievements and superpowers, in this case, it is absolutely not necessary to have.
              And Solovyov made really spectacular. He told about everything, and at the same time about nothing. He called the problems that everyone already knows, but did not say how to solve them. Well, it’s quite clear that those people sitting in the hall are not capable of deciding anything. They are accustomed to approve directives issued from above ... From the executive branch! Here is such a looking glass.
              1. ramaolga
                ramaolga 30 March 2018 19: 36
                +5
                And who knows how to solve them? We will choose for president !!! ............ The question is, does our government want to resolve these issues?
                1. bulvas
                  bulvas 31 March 2018 12: 05
                  +8
                  The foundation is laid for toughening responsibility and restricting chatter and permissiveness,
                  to amend the constitution

                  Soloviev correctly expresses the thoughts expressed
                  Zhirinovsky, Bagdasarov, Kurginyan, Mikheev, Satanovsky and others

                  Change is waiting for us

                  1. valentin_s
                    valentin_s 31 March 2018 14: 50
                    +8
                    What changes, the same Kremlin six, soon Amnuel will move the river in the Duma, and we are waiting for changes ...
                    1. bulvas
                      bulvas 31 March 2018 15: 16
                      +7
                      Quote: valentin_s
                      What changes, the same Kremlin six, soon Amnuel will move the river in the Duma, and we are waiting for changes ...


                      It was necessary that Sobchak spoke, or Yavlinsky?
                      but no, you would like to see Grudinin there.
                      With or without a mustache?
                    2. Nick
                      Nick April 4 2018 13: 26
                      +1
                      Quote: valentin_s
                      What changes, the same Kremlin six,

                      And you pro-American seems ...
                  2. Left shot
                    Left shot 24 June 2018 07: 51
                    +2
                    Changes will be when the country will be senior, such as Grudinin, like Colonel Kvachkov, and the clique of Yeltsinoids, starting with Chubais’s main friend, will go either 2 meters into the ground, or to their kids and accounts. Well, their lackeys, of course.
              2. Bereginya
                Bereginya 31 March 2018 21: 22
                +5
                If the senators do not understand that it is time to act, then the people will demolish them.
              3. E_V_N
                E_V_N 31 March 2018 21: 34
                +2
                Quote: Stas157
                Well, it’s quite clear that those people sitting in the hall are not capable of deciding anything. They are accustomed to approve directives issued from above ... From the executive branch! Here is such a looking glass.

                Well, the Federation Council is an honorary pension for politicians and top business executives who have become unnecessary. In a discussion of the Winter Cherry tragedy, the phrase “why keep Tuleyev’s 73 year old patient as governor, didn’t he find a place on the Federation Council?” That is, he is no longer suitable for the governors, but the Federation Council just.
              4. Augustine Gladyshev
                Augustine Gladyshev April 1 2018 19: 50
                +3
                Russia, ALWAYS WAS AND WILL BE A MONARCHY, WITH A LOT OF DIGNISONS AT THE THRONE (even the GENERALS WERE NOT Actually Kings?)
                1. Left shot
                  Left shot 24 June 2018 07: 52
                  0
                  Only Gauleiters of the colony do not pull on monarchs. I prgo those who rule 27 years
              5. Tiksi-3
                Tiksi-3 April 2 2018 11: 25
                +3
                Quote: Stas157
                Any downshifter can become the head of Sberbank. And, any furniture maker - the Minister of Defense.

                laughing wassat blessed is he who believes ..... especially about Serdyukov .... do you know another version of his appointment and 100% of his task ??
            2. Turkestan
              Turkestan 31 March 2018 08: 27
              +14
              What is Narusova doing in the Federation Council? WHO HAS PUT HERE THERE?

              Here is read.
              As a result of long deliberation, Narusova comes to a disappointing conclusion: “I’m thinking where is the real side of evil? Maybe the Russian people in its current incarnation are the EVIL itself !!!? ”
              What to do with this world "evil"? The ex-senator finds the recipe immediately: “To exterminate! All without exception, less people more oxygen! The Russian people are bothering you, they need to be eliminated! ”
              And then she corrects politically correct: “I do not call for a change of power! I call for a change of people! ”
              As a result, Lyudmila Narusova regrets the fact of the high survival rate of the Russian people on the example of Russian homeless people: “Not one nation in the world has as many homeless people as in the Russian. Why do you want to survive in any way? ”
              1. iggrimnir
                iggrimnir April 1 2018 20: 37
                +11
                A statement to the prosecutor’s office has already been written to Narusov (to Sobchak too), and this process is carefully monitored. She needs to be planted, along with Sobchak, and for a long time, the road to Magadan, as they say.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. vik669
            vik669 30 March 2018 14: 32
            +1
            And there in the warehouse of such BAT “Which one put it there, that is, elected?” - most of these
            1. Bereginya
              Bereginya 31 March 2018 21: 24
              +2
              I believe that from now on the people will be more serious in the election of their leaders.
        2. Valery Nikitin
          Valery Nikitin 30 March 2018 12: 24
          +17
          Such loafers as Narusova and her loafers, it is high time to drive to work in the national economy for production, and then they have completely forgotten what work is and are engaged only in verbiage !!!
          1. Okolotochny
            Okolotochny 30 March 2018 13: 51
            +13
            Actually, it’s time to think about a single-chamber parliament, leaving only the State. To the Duma. The Federation Council was conceived as a counterbalance to the State Duma, with "representing the interests of the regions." There are elected representatives, so let them work. How much money we’ll save.
            1. Alber
              Alber 30 March 2018 19: 47
              +8
              Quote: Okolotochny
              Actually, it’s time to think about a single-chamber parliament, leaving only the State. To the Duma. The Federation Council was conceived as a counterbalance to the State Duma, with "representing the interests of the regions." There are elected representatives, so let them work. How much money we’ll save.

              Need a Supreme Council. Like in the USSR ...
              1. Okolotochny
                Okolotochny 30 March 2018 21: 42
                +9
                The name is just another. The general meaning is the same - people's representatives, without any representatives of the regions. It seems that the regions and the people living in them are different concepts.
              2. Bereginya
                Bereginya 31 March 2018 21: 26
                +4
                Everything goes to this. Only under the name of the State Council.
          2. vik669
            vik669 30 March 2018 14: 45
            +3
            What kind of national economy is something like a national state. Taiga is completely overgrown and there is no one to weep here ...!
          3. Paranoid50
            Paranoid50 31 March 2018 20: 50
            +4
            Quote: Valery Nikitin
            Narusov and her like loafers, it’s time to drive to work in the national economy for production,

            Why do you hate the national economy and domestic production? wassat Pension, only pension, and let the grandchildren sit nursing. And, most importantly - let it be silent. yes
        3. gendowar
          gendowar 30 March 2018 14: 10
          +9
          What are you, she’s Samogo’s girlfriend.
          1. vasya.pupkin
            vasya.pupkin 30 March 2018 14: 17
            +7
            Quote: gendowar
            What are you, she’s Samogo’s girlfriend.

            Former neighbor and godfather ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. Alber
                Alber 30 March 2018 19: 58
                0
                Ugh, damn you! What's up with the tablet? That does not add text. And then it turns out it gives out 2 takes ... And remove does not give a second take ...
      2. Tatyana
        Tatyana 30 March 2018 08: 21
        +14
        Solovyov’s performance is very good. It is hard to disagree with him.

        The domestic political problem before modern Russia is formulated by Solovyov absolutely correctly. It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.
        1. your1970
          your1970 30 March 2018 11: 00
          +1
          Quote: Tatiana
          It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.
          - in which colonial articles ????
          in relation to international law? so it is there from the USSR Constitution of 1977:
          "Article 29. Relations between the USSR and other states are built on the basis of observance of the principles of sovereign equality; mutual renunciation of the use of force or threat of force; inviolability of borders;
          territorial integrity of states; peaceful settlement of disputes; non-interference in internal affairs; respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; equal rights and the rights of peoples to control their fate; cooperation between states;
          conscientious fulfillment of obligations arising from generally accepted principles and norms international lawfrom international treaties concluded by the USSR."
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 30 March 2018 11: 16
            +21
            Quote: your1970
            Quote: Tatiana
            It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.
            - in which colonial articles ????
            regarding international law?

            How did you listen to Solovyov? He called the article 15, paragraph 4 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
            Constitution of the Russian Federation Article 15:
            4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

            This article directly, in particular, is tied to freedom from the state of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Those. power in the Russian Federation is in the hands of bankers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
            Namely, for example, if the Central Bank in Russia is offended by a bad Government, it goes somewhere “beyond the hill” and begins to complain to the international court there. And an international court under Russian law takes precedence over our Russian one.
            I explain in detail.
            The highest authority in the country, according to Russian law, is in fact with the leaders of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. You can call it "dual power." Namely.

            After ratification of the Bialowieza Accords, Russia turned into a colony of a unipolar world led by Washington. One of the most important instruments for managing Russia as a colony was the new credit and financial system (CFS) of Russia.
            On 20 of December 1991, the State Bank of the USSR was abolished. All assets, liabilities and property of the USSR State Bank on the territory of the RSFSR were transferred to the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. A few months later, the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia) was renamed the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia).
            The very first version of the law "On the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia)" was adopted on December 2 of 1990 of the year, after Yeltsin B.N. by a huge margin, he won the election and became the first president of Russia, and after six months of his presidency he signed Federal Law No. 1990-02.12.1990 of 394. The law was modified and supplemented, but in general its essence was preserved.
            The betrayal of the national sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the field of finance was laid down and reinforced in its very Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12 1993, which was compiled under the EBN under the patronage of Washington.
            Officially, the authors of this colonial Constitution of the Russian Federation from the 1993 of the year were: Sergei Shakhrai, Anatoly Sobchak, Sergey Sergeyevich Alekseev and the Constitutional Meeting of the Russian Federation.
            The Constitution of the Russian Federation from 1993 of the year only consolidated the colonial position of the Russian Federation in this matter.
            1. Alber
              Alber 30 March 2018 20: 03
              +3
              Quote: Tatiana
              Quote: your1970
              Quote: Tatiana
              It is primarily of an ideological nature, namely, the dominance of the ideological system of supreme governance of Russia on a colonial basis in accordance with the colonial articles laid down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the main law of the country.
              - in which colonial articles ????
              regarding international law?

              How did you listen to Solovyov? He called the article 15, paragraph 4 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
              Constitution of the Russian Federation Article 15:
              4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

              This article directly, in particular, is tied to freedom from the state of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Those. power in the Russian Federation is in the hands of bankers of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
              Namely, for example, if the Central Bank in Russia is offended by a bad Government, it goes somewhere “beyond the hill” and begins to complain to the international court there. And an international court under Russian law takes precedence over our Russian one.
              I explain in detail.
              The highest authority in the country, according to Russian law, is in fact with the leaders of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. You can call it "dual power." Namely.

              After ratification of the Bialowieza Accords, Russia turned into a colony of a unipolar world led by Washington. One of the most important instruments for managing Russia as a colony was the new credit and financial system (CFS) of Russia.
              On 20 of December 1991, the State Bank of the USSR was abolished. All assets, liabilities and property of the USSR State Bank on the territory of the RSFSR were transferred to the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. A few months later, the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia) was renamed the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia).
              The very first version of the law "On the Central Bank of the RSFSR (Bank of Russia)" was adopted on December 2 of 1990 of the year, after Yeltsin B.N. by a huge margin, he won the election and became the first president of Russia, and after six months of his presidency he signed Federal Law No. 1990-02.12.1990 of 394. The law was modified and supplemented, but in general its essence was preserved.
              The betrayal of the national sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the field of finance was laid down and reinforced in its very Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12 1993, which was compiled under the EBN under the patronage of Washington.
              Officially, the authors of this colonial Constitution of the Russian Federation from the 1993 of the year were: Sergei Shakhrai, Anatoly Sobchak, Sergey Sergeyevich Alekseev and the Constitutional Meeting of the Russian Federation.
              The Constitution of the Russian Federation from 1993 of the year only consolidated the colonial position of the Russian Federation in this matter.

              What prevents the "new" president from changing the constitution written by the enemy into a normal, RUSSIAN?
              1. signifera
                signifera 31 March 2018 19: 05
                +3
                Probably, all these years he has interfered.
            2. Cossack 471
              Cossack 471 30 March 2018 21: 01
              +3
              We and the Constitution wrote a fraudster. Shahrai translated from Ukrainian --- fraudster.
      3. Alber
        Alber 30 March 2018 09: 30
        +10
        Quote: Borik
        And who is there to listen to? Most of those who have been sitting there have been wiping their pants for two decades now and it is not in their interests to change something in the country.

        Quote: The Truth
        For example, a lady like Narusova.

        Quote: sashok1951.21
        And which one put her there, i.e. chose?

        Whoever elected her there should have put her in a good way ...
        And the parliament itself, both the upper and lower houses, has completely outlived itself. And "in life" they were a worthless layer
      4. medvedron
        medvedron 30 March 2018 09: 34
        +9
        And what other people gathered there? Or do you want to say that ordinary people from the street are much smarter and more moral than those who gathered in the hall? I hasten to disappoint you, about eighty percent of people when asked what you would do in the place of these deputies say that they would steal in the same way, and maybe even more. Solovyov is right in that, having destroyed the Soviet ideology, they did not give anything in return. And it is high time to work out this ideology. Otherwise, what happened in Kemerovo will happen only on a much larger scale, I’m not talking about the fire, I mean the rally and how people behaved.
        1. vik669
          vik669 30 March 2018 14: 38
          0
          Some and Nadia Savchenko have the rights, well, they have what they have and who have what!
          1. medvedron
            medvedron 30 March 2018 17: 10
            0
            What do you propose to talk about Savchenko here?
        2. Sidor Pyatnitsky
          Sidor Pyatnitsky April 1 2018 11: 23
          +2
          Develop an ideology ???
          Which one? Examples! At least approximate !!!
          Such things are not done from the ceiling and just do not arise. The ideology of society is a deep, informed behavior, it is a whole set of norms and rules of society, often unwritten!
          Try to create an ideology ... Nothing happens! This is basically impossible to do!
          Soviet ideology was born and matured in the minds, for decades, if not centuries, built “through I can’t”, through torment and deprivation, through war!
          The colossal breakthrough that the USSR made in the shortest possible time by historical standards is the result of this most serious and deep ideology of society!
          The collapse of the Soviet Union was the result of the destruction, undermining of this very ideology, and its total defamation! Many people, including the authorities, took this as truth, believed it. Today all this has surfaced and opened in the mind. But the country is no more!
          Here is the price of losing ideology!
          To create a new one is unlikely to succeed, and there is no need, for what was created has been ripening for centuries!
      5. Alexey Ivanov_2
        Alexey Ivanov_2 30 March 2018 22: 01
        +8
        You're right! After all, Nightingale suggested changing them. Senators, God forgive me! Russia contains a pack of useless ones. but very expensive loafers! And this Federation Council is quite possible to replace with meetings of governors (once a quarter. Or once every six months). The mere presence of Madame Narusova there requires immediate dispersal of this assembly
    2. antivirus
      antivirus 29 March 2018 18: 53
      +4
      about 1 \ 2 in speech is eccentricity.
      there is no IVS or EBN-GDP, there is a mentality of peoples, diverse and vectorial.
      10 years ago it was said - the country is ruled by a guard (about Putin). they determine at the working level how to develop.
      Including taking into account the possible collapse -unification, and the tasks necessary to perform here and for the period up to ... year.
    3. renics
      renics 29 March 2018 19: 10
      +2
      And what did he speak only to check the hearing of people sitting in the hall as a journalist?
    4. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker 29 March 2018 19: 19
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      but here is the question: "Did someone HEAR him?"

      The speech is not given in full, in any ....
      But....
      In his latest program, he stated clearly and definitely that the dissemination of knowingly false information on the virtual fields of the Internet should be called to account as strictly as the journalists of the media.
      1. Vita vko
        Vita vko 30 March 2018 04: 20
        +18
        Quote: stalkerwalker
        In his latest program, he stated clearly and definitely that the dissemination of knowingly false information on the virtual fields of the Internet should be called to account as strictly as the journalists of the media.

        It is not necessary to start with journalists, the root cause is the giving of knowingly false promises by politicians during election campaigns. And this is not just misinformation or sabotage in the case of the media, it is an open political fraud with the aim of taking office and lobbying the interests of economic groups, including criminal ones.
        The deputies understand all this, therefore they will nod like tin soldiers and continue to do nothing in the interests of the people. Not for this they were put in soft chairs ..
      2. shoemaker
        shoemaker 31 March 2018 22: 14
        +3
        Well, Mr. Soloviev spoke. He generally speaks a lot. Only with the passage of time does this Mr. change his point of view to the opposite. Here is a cut from Soloviev’s speeches https://vk.com/video-57424472_456247192
        Citizens do not read Soviet newspapers before dinner and do not listen to Mr. Solovyov
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. vfwfr
      vfwfr 29 March 2018 23: 27
      +1
      For the 2nd half of the time .. you can hear the background of people talking in the hall .. maybe even "smiling"
    7. Blondy
      Blondy 30 March 2018 06: 48
      +5
      Yes, Soloviev, maybe something is wrong there on his radio and TV is broadcasting. But the first time I saw how the people should "go into the janitor's house" to talk with their servants (Although, in my opinion, the blondes are too soft, Jewish, and the time has come to ask in a not so soft - Russian way.)
      1. flicker
        flicker April 1 2018 20: 15
        +2
        too soft, Jewish, manner,
        winked Hmm, for some reason I thought that the "Jewish manner" is still not softness lol
        1. Blondy
          Blondy April 3 2018 03: 46
          0
          Compare with Russian - everything is relative.
          1. flicker
            flicker April 3 2018 10: 39
            +1
            "Russian manner", as it seems to me, is "from the heart", right - which can be expressed both rudely and with great warmth. The "Jewish manner" is rather a trick, with a double bottom, hidden - if soft, then in shape, essentially cruel enough.
            Z.Y. Although the "habitat" is no no, it takes up ethnic influence.
    8. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 30 March 2018 09: 23
      +4
      Yeah ! Everything passed by the ears. Zhirinovsky also says a lot of practical, but they do not hear him.
    9. Dugumbumbu
      Dugumbumbu 30 March 2018 10: 09
      +3
      And you see, we are so stupid, we don’t know how to live. We ourselves do not know when, where, to whom what to say .. We do not know what is happening in the country. But Soloviev knows everything, and knows how to say it. What would we do without these Nightingales, huh? He opens our eyes straight. How he worries about us. I feel sorry for him. Poor how he is tormented ... "Did someone HEAR him?" I, DAAAA !!!!!
      1. _Sergei_
        _Sergei_ April 2 2018 08: 20
        +3
        Dugumbumbu (Yermolai) March 30, 2018 14:09 p.m. ↑
        And you see, we are so stupid, we don’t know how to live. We ourselves do not know when, where, to whom what to say .. We do not know what is happening in the country. But Soloviev knows everything, and knows how to say it.

        Only you are not invited to the Federation Council.
    10. serge dill
      serge dill 30 March 2018 12: 17
      +5
      So the main thing he noted is that they would not be forgotten, and then you at least beat your head against the wall, the loot dripped to him .....
    11. Ermak
      Ermak 30 March 2018 15: 09
      +3
      Quote: svp67
      He made a speech, he made a speech and called the right problems and highlighted, but here is the question: "Did someone HEAR him?"

      I think, in itself, Solovyov’s speech is indicative. Maybe this is the beginning of changes in relation to the domestic policy of Russia. For some reason, I believe that Solovyov to some extent reflects those thoughts that are actively worked out by the supreme power and possibly with a view to their subsequent implementation.
    12. Every
      Every 31 March 2018 09: 14
      +5
      Quote: svp67
      He made a speech, he made a speech and called the right problems and highlighted, but here is the question: "Did someone HEAR him?"

      Those who are not indifferent to the events taking place, they heard (look at the number of views).
      And if a person is an infantile amoeba, then at least shout under his ear ori. Useless. Not heard.
    13. Whowhy
      Whowhy 31 March 2018 13: 37
      +1
      And even if someone heard, then who will be able to solve them? After all, serious questions have been raised - right up to the amendment of the Constitution. That's how much work! Simple decrees do not get off.
    14. Maz
      Maz 31 March 2018 15: 53
      +5
      They didn’t give me a pension. Yeah .. enough. A retired KGB regan gave me advice. - Write to Putin. I did not believe it, but wrote. A letter of last hope. You should have seen my eyes when to me all these creatures that kicked me for three years - answered in writing. They appointed a pension, reported the account number in Sberbank and how much money they transferred there .... And they apologized and threatened that at least one mistake and they would stop paying it to me with pleasure. I wrote a statement to them again. - ignored. I am from the old memory in the administration - to get it, five answers. apologies and again a polite warning. Right now, they answer every one of my e-mails within a week. And just wrote a letter to Putin ... And then a whole city. Yes, they will shake them right now, the heart will refuse, they will die in batches. This is how Beria came to visit Georgia. Everything worked right away, they gave water, light, and the products were delivered ... laughing
    15. Flyer_64
      Flyer_64 April 6 2018 17: 03
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      "Did someone HEAR him?"
      Of course they did. And most likely he will become a senator.
  2. vanavatny
    vanavatny 29 March 2018 17: 52
    +12
    E. Ya. Satanovsky spoke there yesterday ... I hope these unknowns, called senators, did not sleep and understood what the two were talking about
    1. Dead duck
      Dead duck 29 March 2018 18: 27
      +16
      Quote: vanavate
      Am and E. Ya. Satanovsky spoke yesterday.

      he constantly appears there ...
      1. renics
        renics 29 March 2018 19: 12
        +2
        And what sense should be, in your opinion, you probably know him well but have kept it secret.
        1. Dead duck
          Dead duck 29 March 2018 20: 04
          +5
          This is not in my opinion, but in general.
          And to have a general concept and idea, it is enough to listen to what he said ....
          and then turn on the head and logic. As well as it’s enough to have an idea of ​​why this is being done and what should be done after that, and not translate into other arrows acting like a wise guy asking stupid questions.
      2. Terenin
        Terenin 29 March 2018 19: 22
        +16
        And that Soloviev spoke in his direction, explained his position as a journalist. He is neither a legislator nor an official. He said everything correctly, expressed the position of the majority of the country's inhabitants. But the State Duma and the Federation Council are just as ossified as the executive authority. Why would she be different? They too, hell, need to change and really legally uphold the interests of people and the country. In general, they used to learn about deputies, only by scandals or when they fled abroad and were killed.
  3. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 29 March 2018 18: 08
    +6
    1. Threats - in our technological disasters.
    2. Threats - terrorism.
    3. "Every crime has a financial footprint."
    4. If in the first case the trace (-), then in the second (+).
    5. The result is one - people are dying.
    6. The punishment should be the same.
    7. It is time for deputies to work for 20 hours. We need laws, laws, laws.
    1. Vard
      Vard 29 March 2018 19: 15
      +17
      In Russia, the laws are holy ... yes, the executors of adversaries ...
      1. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 29 March 2018 20: 04
        +2
        Quote: Vard
        In Russia, the laws are holy ... yes, the executors of adversaries ...

        It's like that. The law that draws where he turned, it turned out there. Do not fight with the strong, do not sue the rich.
        From the beginning, laws, then the main Law: Justice is above the law.
        And let everyone in the West strangle themselves.
    2. sashok1951.21
      sashok1951.21 30 March 2018 08: 28
      +2
      What laws are few? The main thing is to comply with laws. And this is the business of those for whom these laws are intended. And regulatory authorities must monitor the implementation of laws. Much use of the law on banning smoking in public places? They smoked like they smoked. Including deputies. At bus stops, there are only "bulls." There is no where to go. And next to the policeman, the same chicken. What else is the law when thinking where to throw bulls?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Alber
        Alber 30 March 2018 09: 40
        +6
        Quote: sashok1951.21
        What laws are few?

        There are many worthless, but even more harmful
        Quote: sashok1951.21
        The main thing is to comply with laws. And this is the business of those for whom these laws are intended.

        Lawless lawmakers write laws
        Quote: sashok1951.21
        And regulatory authorities must monitor the implementation of laws.

        There was a normal organ in the USSR: KNK (People’s Control Committee). Unfortunately eliminated. How much good
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Beltasir matyagu
    Beltasir matyagu 29 March 2018 18: 34
    +13
    Who started the jester with tv?
    1. renics
      renics 29 March 2018 19: 15
      +14
      The jesters are those who, for whatever reason and without reason, sharpen and invent all kinds of nonsense.
    2. Clumsy
      Clumsy 29 March 2018 20: 57
      +20
      Quote: Beltasir Matyagu
      Who started the jester with tv?

      The truth is easy to offend, a well-known and respected journalist by many, who will never know or hear about you. How did self-esteem rise?
      1. myobius59
        myobius59 29 March 2018 22: 50
        +14
        And you have not heard how this "famous and respected" in his broadcast on the radio insults his listeners? And I heard, and more than once. And you should listen, he often does it.
        Then maybe you change your mind about him. Although unlikely. After all, he is "famous and respected," and therefore he can do it. Truth?
        1. vlanis
          vlanis 29 March 2018 23: 49
          +8
          In such cases, you need to quote at least
        2. Clumsy
          Clumsy 30 March 2018 06: 20
          +11
          Quote: myobius59
          And you have not heard how this "famous and respected" in his broadcast on the radio insults his listeners? And I heard, and more than once.

          No, I haven’t heard, although I listen almost every morning, but he’s not honored by the fifth column, but he constantly dunks (with facts) Guano and a company like that in facts. Mikheev generally well done.
          1. Andrey NM
            Andrey NM 30 March 2018 07: 58
            +8
            Who cares who is in which column. Solovyov on the radio imagines himself untouchable and the ultimate truth. The expression is absolutely not shy. A decent journalist should not behave this way. When he cannot answer, he begins to directly call the opponent names with words that are unacceptable on the air. Maybe this is his transfer format? He doesn’t act like that on television. The conjuncturist.
            And the performance is correct ...
            1. myobius59
              myobius59 30 March 2018 09: 56
              +4
              That's it. You wrote. everything is very accurate. I like the way he broadcasts on the body, and at the same time, he disgusts himself on the radio .. Disgusting .. Plus, this stupid laugh of Saffron. It is interesting to listen to their programs, I will not hide. But they must behave appropriately.
              And correctly you wrote that on television he does not behave like that. After all, you can get it in your ear, guys are very emotional with him.
              1. Irina Morozova
                Irina Morozova April 5 2018 13: 46
                +1
                I’m listening to Solovyov on the radio. It can be tough. If the bastards call or email him, then he calls them bastards. Sometimes even their phone numbers are voiced for the police. They certainly don't like it. And I have not changed my opinion about him. Solovyov V.R. - the smartest and most decent person.
        3. Irina Morozova
          Irina Morozova April 5 2018 13: 44
          0
          I’m listening to Solovyov on the radio. It can be tough. If the bastards call or email him, then he calls them bastards. Sometimes even their phone numbers are voiced for the police. They certainly don't like it. And I have not changed my opinion about him. Solovyov V.R. - the smartest and most decent person.
  6. Giharka
    Giharka 29 March 2018 19: 18
    +17
    More such appearances in the Federation Council and in the State Duma! It’s like history and literature lessons at school!
  7. Sergey777
    Sergey777 29 March 2018 20: 40
    +17
    Mock the guys! laughing But the man said correctly, I subscribe to almost every word, the main thing that would come to the boyars. I would like that he spoke not in vain. hi
  8. candidate
    candidate 29 March 2018 21: 38
    +7
    Solovyov is simply As
    Stuck cool cool - class !!!
    Strong and brilliant performance. The official as an object of the system has already outlived itself.
    In order to move to a new level, it is necessary to step-by-step replace officials with a computer service - from local to federal. Even the implementation of legislative activity is completely computer-controlled. It is enough to build a pyramid of subordination of laws based on the constitution and shift to algorithms. And everything will rely on logic - laws will no longer be vague for the sake of their compilers and there will be no loopholes. By and large, we are talking about creating an operating system for managing the country. The main driving force behind the breakthrough is the programmer. Im and cards in hand. May the Russian land not become scarce with talents!
    1. Lebedev
      Lebedev 30 March 2018 10: 27
      +1
      Great idea! I support!
    2. your1970
      your1970 30 March 2018 11: 21
      +1
      Quote: candidate
      To move to a new level, it is necessary to step-by-step replace officials with a computer service - from local to federal.
      - the idea is good, wonderful ..... but not feasible alas - this is how I like you official I say ...
      To eliminate us as a class, you need 100% guaranteed fulfillment by the other side of the process. Well, a calculator (citizen !!) cannot lie in Windows - otherwise the OS will not work.
      And in people (as on the other side of the process) EVERYTHING is possible - to break / lie / make mistakes / from evil do the opposite / out of kindness to cover / deceive / and so on ...AWARENESS (and knowing about the possible consequences.
      The traffic policeman taking a bribe is equally to blame - like the one who gives this bribe. Was the GAI officer removed (let's say) - did the second side stop violating the traffic rules? No (looking the truth in the eye) ...
      Those. some action will be necessary automatically punishing the violation (without the participation of an official).
      For example, it exceeded the speed by 20 km or after 2 solid, the locks worked right away - and you cannot get out of the car until you pay the fine or you will sit in the car for 15 days. Is it possible? Yes! Really? Yes! It’s just as real that there will immediately be craftsmen breaking these locks for a very small fee. Is it possible? Yes! Really? Yes!
      1. candidate
        candidate 30 March 2018 17: 50
        +2
        You are partly right. The system should be feedback, both in nature and technology. Already today, many use the online service and violations (tricks) are found. But there is also a punishment for false actions. Not everything is so gloomy, progress is inexorably taking its toll. Take, for example, driving a car on an unmanned basis. And the demand for the traffic police will disappear over time. So the thing is small - roll up your sleeves and work. Otherwise, the idea of ​​a breakthrough does not work.
  9. Observer2014
    Observer2014 29 March 2018 22: 35
    +6
    I applaud while standing! hi
  10. zlyk19
    zlyk19 29 March 2018 23: 43
    +8
    Well, what's wrong here? He nicely laid out our entire current domestic policy. By the way, as far as I know, he is financially very independent.
  11. komis55
    komis55 30 March 2018 01: 06
    0
    So, I digested a little of what was said, or maybe we’ll speed it up? Under Tambov, we’ll arrange a conflict for 5 years (or did I see enough of a new Torah?)
  12. Alexander Degtyarenko
    Alexander Degtyarenko 30 March 2018 04: 27
    +1
    performed well, but sitting there they do not have a common understanding, everyone will remain his own!
  13. sazhka
    sazhka 30 March 2018 05: 11
    0
    who's that???
  14. abrikotin
    abrikotin 30 March 2018 05: 45
    0
    Soloviev softly stretches, but I'm afraid he will sleep hard !!!
  15. Savignon
    Savignon 30 March 2018 06: 03
    +3
    Boring speech about nothing. I did not finish it.
    1. izNska
      izNska April 2 2018 13: 16
      0
      But noted, scribbled.
    2. ver_
      ver_ 8 July 2018 13: 50
      0
      ... it is not for us - for those who are behind the * hill * ..
  16. ilik54
    ilik54 30 March 2018 06: 17
    +5
    All the actions of our Western opponents are a consequence of the toothless foreign policy of Russia. And the first thing that needed to be answered was our behavior in the Olympic movement, they allowed them to pour dirt and slop on themselves, allowed them to treat us like criminals - here is the result!
    They can’t let anything down, not a single trifle, not a single word, not a single look! West, East, England, the USA and the rest of the bastard, they must be kept on a very short leash, our enemies should not be let down, otherwise they will sit on the neck, which they are essentially trying to do. They need to be taught to speak with Russia and the Russians on their knees, in a low voice and with their heads down. Took on tug - do not say that not a dozen! Death to the enemies and traitors of Russia! Go Russia!
  17. Mozdok 2017
    Mozdok 2017 30 March 2018 06: 27
    +7
    A voice crying in the desert. Absolutely correct analysis of our reality. The USSR was strong ideology (up to a point), but then the Americans managed (not without the help of our ossified state leaders) to undermine the trust of our citizens in power, and ultimately this led to the collapse of a great country.
  18. avaks111
    avaks111 30 March 2018 06: 31
    +4
    Oratory is very high! Respect!
  19. Siberian54
    Siberian54 30 March 2018 06: 38
    +7
    in the opinion of the amateur: Each legislator has behind him a tangle of financial and political obligations that most often do not (to put it mildly) agree with the interests of not only the country, but also the region that these uncles and aunts should cherish and protect. Tell them that they are in their own a lot of scoundrels are useless. EVEN AFTER THE DESTRUCTION OF EARLY CHILDREN IN KEMEROVO, THESE UNCLE AND AUNT WILL NOT TAKE LAWS WHICH SUCH KILLERS WILL PAY FOR THE VICTIMS OF MONEY THAT THEIR CHILDREN AND A LITTLE LITTLE SHEET. burnt children of the distant Siberian town of Kemerovo. ETERNAL MEMORY AND sincere condolences to them.
  20. GUSAR
    GUSAR 30 March 2018 07: 27
    +8
    Better look what he said about Putin at the beginning of the XNUMXs. Oh, there is a lot of interesting things! And now? Well, everyone needs money to buy houses in all sorts of Italy. I don’t understand how this evening booth can be watched?
  21. Sergius Stalingrad
    Sergius Stalingrad 30 March 2018 07: 33
    +3
    I agree. It’s time for Soloviev to go beyond journalism and go to power. He correctly says
    1. bulidoser
      bulidoser 30 March 2018 17: 46
      +3
      Probably a hangover?
  22. Old military officer
    Old military officer 30 March 2018 07: 43
    +1
    With whose filing or by whose order is this performance? Yes, and for whom? Really for Narusova and her comrades, she is by no means alone.
  23. kalibr
    kalibr 30 March 2018 07: 48
    +2
    For this, first of all, we need to choose our own ideological path, without regard to what is being dictated to us from across the ocean ...
    And he also canceled the "Maslow's pyramid of needs"?
  24. kalibr
    kalibr 30 March 2018 07: 49
    +3
    Quote: GUSAR
    Better look what he said about Putin at the beginning of the XNUMXs.

    What are you ... not tolerant. Well, he said, and now he has changed his mind and says otherwise. Pleasant ...
  25. Achinet
    Achinet 30 March 2018 08: 05
    +3
    Everything is folding and figuratively, without hesitation, without a piece of paper. That's right, just like the snow is white and the sky is blue. There is no ideology, an unprecedented attack on the state, insecurity of citizens within the country, not the ability of the authorities to understand and hear their people - I agree! And why? Are there few laws? Not serious! Therefore, some understatement and a shift in emphasis prevents one from taking seriously what is heard. The performance is addressed not to those sitting in the hall (if there were any), but to the ordinary population, to TOK lovers - SHOW. Accordingly, I perceive what I heard as a continuation of one evening show on the central channel.
  26. Mengad
    Mengad 30 March 2018 08: 32
    +8
    A hypocrite and a liar. All that I think of Soloviev.
    1. gugol
      gugol 30 March 2018 10: 08
      +5
      Well, apparently you have only one gyrus in your brain and that one is straight!
  27. Irina Krivtsova
    Irina Krivtsova 30 March 2018 08: 44
    +8
    And what does this SF generally do? Here there is a Tuvan delegate of Narusova, who lives in St. Petersburg, what can she do in our country, which she and her daughter can’t stand, especially us
  28. Sergey Kamenev
    Sergey Kamenev 30 March 2018 08: 44
    +1
    In the Federation Council and the State Duma there must be authoritative people from the regions. And now, in particular, from the Smolensk region, Varangians are sitting: in the Federation Council, where Klintsevich came from, and in the State Duma - Neverov! People who really know the region and cheer for it are absent in the Federal Assembly. For these, V. Solovyov’s messages are needed!
  29. Laruss
    Laruss 30 March 2018 08: 48
    +3
    As always., Solovyov said everything - in fact ... I hope to hear his majority of citizens !!!
    1. Achinet
      Achinet 30 March 2018 09: 33
      0
      Undoubtedly! If he is heard in the blessed Andorra, then with us, then even more so, even without exclamation points. The goal is in doubt.
  30. Vladimir SHajkin
    Vladimir SHajkin 30 March 2018 09: 05
    0
    This one, like him, well there, but what, did he alone know about it or is he an oracle? To whom he spoke, bold to those who do not decide anything, but are a representative, these places are an honorable pastime after theft on vacation.
    Because his courage ... (all obscenities), and most importantly: - "... I refused for a long time ...", now everything will go differently - they heard.
    Hooray! Understood, redo, what else is needed, come tell me.
  31. Hyppopotut
    Hyppopotut 30 March 2018 09: 09
    +2
    The question is about our constitution. When and under whose dictation we wrote it we remember, but the youth are unlikely to realize whose interests the basic law is designed to protect. For five years now, conversations have been heard about the supremacy of OUR law, and not international. And nothing has changed.
  32. Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. 30 March 2018 09: 29
    +5
    Strange, he fell upon the regional authorities, and we don’t have a very good regional authority, he will only become a leader, as his wife begins to grow rich and climb into all holes. The question is, who determines the country's internal policy in general, not the regional government, but the CENTRAL one, that the shopping malls are burning, rockets are falling, rich Pinocchio cars crush ordinary citizens and children in their cars, and all these thieving governors, you think, without the knowledge of Moscow "comrades" could such billions, do not tell, you think the stool and the hooters are so alone in the government, in the highest power. Who prepares, determines, politics, laws - the central government, so it should bear the first responsibility for domestic policy in the country. which just failed. I am not a liberal, and this audience is terribly “I don’t like” poorly said, but whoever created such an atmosphere in the country for 28 years, those who are at the AUTHORITY. And there’s nothing to blame on the mirror, since the mug is crooked. From the head you have to start with the HEAD.
    1. Konstantin Yu
      Konstantin Yu 30 March 2018 13: 11
      +1
      Not one HEAD is the matter, you cannot put an inspector or educator to each, each HEAD is in its place, the question is what each one takes himself to do (no one pushes needles under his nails).
      The designer draws, to please, the expert closed his eyes, maybe he’ll blow it over, the builder will go like that, you can’t see it, the security guard is for that kind of money ... And all the victims of the circumstances are like a herd, but HE is to blame. Now, if they had flogged us, set up the guards, then we would have become honest and hardworking ....
  33. Alexey Kurgankov
    Alexey Kurgankov 30 March 2018 09: 59
    0
    I remember in 85m tagged, too, he said everything correctly ....., so, even I’ll point
  34. gugol
    gugol 30 March 2018 10: 01
    +4
    A strong, correct speech, as if conveyed to the senators the aspirations and thoughts of the absolute, in my opinion, majority of Russians and wise advice, only it would be great if there would be at least ten people in the audience who were endowed with power and shared his point of view and there was not a single person watching, during his speech, for example, stock news or a clip from YouTube ....
  35. Rado
    Rado 30 March 2018 10: 04
    +3
    The horror in Kemerovo (Winter Cherry) 2018, Kazan (Admiral) 2015 should not be repeated over and over again! Just EVERYONE should do what MUST! Checks to ensure the safety of people do not have the right to be carried out for checkmark reporting, they must be impartial!
  36. milaleon
    milaleon 30 March 2018 10: 21
    +4
    The speech is vivid, reasonable and convincing. Will only our legislators, such as Narusova, draw conclusions from the speech! I really wanted N. Mikhalkov to speak in the Senate!
  37. Peter_2 Belarus
    Peter_2 Belarus 30 March 2018 10: 22
    0
    Peter-2 Belarus
  38. Sineka
    Sineka 30 March 2018 10: 32
    +1
    It is necessary to change the nation-wide constitution for our country.
  39. Watchdog
    Watchdog 30 March 2018 10: 34
    +9
    Russia is a huge country with a multimillion population. This is not Liechtenstein. Soloviev talks about ideology, about the people and the service of the people. There can be no neutral ideology. She is either leaning left or right. Right now, I want to note our longboat got a serious roll to starboard. Here you and the Russian Orthodox Church and portraits of Nicholas II and sovereignty. However, this could well roll in the Russian Empire (and roll it to 2017 year). In a democratic country of the 21 century - not relevant! Of course, people are still being carried away by all these great power things, but they will soon cool off. Why? Because (I’ll write a terrible thing), Russia needs a strong, consistent, well-designed left-wing party. The fact that today we have in the form of the Communist Party is not a left-wing party, I am silent about the SR. Party of the people - the best opposition to the party of the elite! Internationalism, social guarantees, rationalism and aspiration for the future are the characteristics of the party of the people. But I'm sorry - these are the characteristics of the left party. Ideologies made in the offices of the research institute - I'm sorry, stupidity! It's just that our government is not ready to form a strong left wing. Firstly, he is afraid that the shadow of the CPSU will fall on him, and secondly, he is simply afraid of his people. Until a strong and adequate left movement is formed in our country, we will not be able to reach any new horizons. You need progress - this is the left idea. It is obvious. The right idea is stability. Stability will not lead anywhere. Defense wars do not win!
  40. Peter_2 Belarus
    Peter_2 Belarus 30 March 2018 10: 38
    +5
    I myself am a shipbuilder, already retired. He participated in the design, construction and acceptance of ships that were built on orders of the USSR abroad (Poland, Denmark, Norway, East Germany and others). Everything was built according to the Rules of the USSR Register, where everything is laid out on shelves from design to materials and operation. As a rule, there were 5-6 people at the shipyard who were selected for certain specialties from different fleets and we, about a special program drawn up during the design, participated in this complex process and at every stage, from bookmark to general acceptance, examined each part and installation put their signature on the corresponding act, which were stored throughout the life of the vessel. Something similar needs to be created during the construction of buildings and structures, including during the operation of this facility. All this is prescribed in these rules and there will be no need to create countless commissions when investigating accidents.
    1. Rado
      Rado 30 March 2018 11: 38
      +1
      Exactly! Everything is clear, concrete, and there will not be such terrible tragedies without references to the "human factor"!
    2. _Sergei_
      _Sergei_ April 2 2018 08: 38
      0
      There is such a paper called a building passport. There from the project and all changes should be stored. It's just that no one leads them, and some try to get a new one so that no changes are visible or hide the alteration.
  41. Mengad
    Mengad 30 March 2018 10: 49
    +2
    Quote: gugol
    Well, apparently you have only one gyrus in your brain and that one is straight!

    On what basis did you come to this conclusion? Argument! If there is no argument ... then please ... shut up! Thank you for your attention.
    1. Achinet
      Achinet 30 March 2018 11: 15
      0
      Do not worry so. Your opponent put himself in unfavorable conditions in advance - an air shock, similar to what was heard in Solovyov’s record, because the argument, in this case, must be confirmed by trepanation.
  42. Konstantin Yu
    Konstantin Yu 30 March 2018 11: 04
    +4
    Decent speech, it’s a pity that it’s belated .. There’s no where to pull it all, they’ve played enough into globalization ... As usual, until the fried one pecks .. It’s time to draw up a constitution, and in fact, your own Russian spirit based on Our morality.
    If the West and Co., most importantly, have the Law over all (and who accepted how, guess), then Our morality should be at the core. If the law is immoral, it does not have the right to be. You cannot throw old people into the street, because they do not pay, you cannot refuse medical assistance if there is no insurance policy ... etc.
  43. mavrus
    mavrus 30 March 2018 11: 09
    +2
    Quote: The Truth
    For example, a lady like Narusova.

    Is any Mizulin better than that?
  44. uncle Andrey
    uncle Andrey 30 March 2018 11: 10
    +3
    Quote: sashok1951.21
    And which one put her there, i.e. chose?


    The one who was her husband’s six
  45. uncle Andrey
    uncle Andrey 30 March 2018 11: 11
    +7
    I did not understand, but whom exactly and how did he “defeat” in this speech?
  46. v.levitskij2010
    v.levitskij2010 30 March 2018 11: 12
    +5
    Russian lawmakers are galley rowers who have absolutely no interest in where their ship is heading. Their interest is in good conditions and decent food.
    Russia has six years left. Or maybe even less.
    1. bulidoser
      bulidoser 30 March 2018 17: 40
      0
      cool comparison!
  47. Djtyyjt j, jphtybt
    Djtyyjt j, jphtybt 30 March 2018 11: 21
    0
    There is no ideology, we do not respect ourselves, we don’t know where we are going - I agree. So where do we go? V.I. Lenin said that imperialism is the last, decaying stage of capitalism. We feel the vices of monopoly on ourselves, which means that we have early abandoned socialist ideas. The monopoly that took place in the USSR, the current monopolism in Russia and in the world speak of the need to move towards socialism. Imperialism cannot be jumped over, it is necessary to “survive” the monopolism inherent in it. The power now belongs to those who own financial resources (federal officials and oligarchs), but it is necessary that the power be in the municipal authorities, where people live, where people's opinions are a source of law and justice. To delegate to the federal authorities only basic powers, for example, lawmaking, defense and law enforcement. Not a single president is able to keep track of landfills, shopping and entertainment centers, utilities and more. All this should be monitored by municipal authorities, and they have neither the means nor the real power. They would only have to share and report on the “handouts” launched from above. The system needs to be changed, but who is capable of this? Only the "king-father", we think. For six years, it is possible to create conditions for people to be busy, earn good money, so that disabled old people and children do not live in poverty. And if the president cannot? If the oligarchs and other powers that be do not want such changes, then who can the president rely on? Vicious circle? Without fuss and revolution, let us decide where to go, we need an idea and an appropriate ideology. How else to unite people.
    1. Cossack 471
      Cossack 471 31 March 2018 22: 13
      +1
      Of course . the president should not keep track of landfills. but he has a government subordinate. which he must force to build a plant for the production of waste recycling plants and sorting shops. Who is stopping to do this? For so many years we trample trash into the ground with tractors. and then we are surprised. where do the stinking streams run from? Yes, instead of the landfill we call the "landfill." As soon as I write some criticism. immediately there are people. who write to me "start with yourself" Do I also have to build factories?
  48. mavrus
    mavrus 30 March 2018 11: 23
    +2
    Quote: Sineka
    It is necessary to change the nation-wide constitution for our country.

    We have already been a quarter century as the "Tank" constitution. How to change it, without the help of tanks? :)))
  49. dDYHA
    dDYHA 30 March 2018 11: 23
    +6
    I wonder who he spoke to there. I mean, did other people appear on the Federation Council? Will they change something? This speech is Carlson's fiery speech against jam. And Solovyov today sings one thing and tomorrow another. He is a spineless, insignificant person. The Internet is full of videos of how he swears fieryly when they close the first NTV and its fiery incendiary market that Russia does not need Crimea. You can listen to it, but you should not believe it.
  50. Khairullo Makhmudov
    Khairullo Makhmudov 30 March 2018 11: 32
    0
    So witty, but the place of verbal presentation may not be entirely correct. Such an extremely complex and important thing for the state, it is not necessary to throw them into the air, it must be realized in silence. I would recommend this lecture to the special services for everyday listening. Although they probably know, but it doesn’t work, and therefore they are thrown into the air.