Destalinization will destroy Russia
In Russia, they started talking again about de-Stalinization. Senator Narusova suggested equating the justification of Stalinism to the justification of Nazism. This is an attempt to destroy the entire Soviet past with the simultaneous demonization of Russia and the intensification of Russophobia in the West.
Senator Lyudmila Narusova said the intention to prepare a bill equating the justification of Stalinism with the justification of Nazism. “After what we were called for (Russian presidential candidate Maxim - Avt.) Suraykin, calling himself a Stalinist, honoring him, I believe that it is necessary, and in the near future I will come up with such legislative initiative to equate Stalin’s justification ", - said Narusova during a visit to the headquarters of her daughter, presidential candidate Ksenia Sobchak.
The senator recalled that in this election two people were “outspoken Stalinists” who called for a return to the USSR. “They talked about how they imagine it: the Baltic States, the Caucasus, Kazakhstan, it is clear that they will not run to the Soviet Union, which means there will be another war for the restoration of the Soviet Union,” said the senator. According to her, the people who stated this turned out to be outsiders on the preliminary results of the elections. Accordingly, it turns out that the supposedly overwhelming majority of the Russian population does not support Stalin’s policies and condemns it.
The de-Stalinization is a ban on Stalin’s positive characterization, a ban on mentioning the positive moments of the Stalin era, the desire to complete the de-Sovietization of the country, as already done in the Baltic countries, Ukraine, Georgia, etc. essence, and desovetizatsiyu) the desire to "reconcile society." They say, revolution, civil war and repression are long past. It is time for the citizens of Russia to abandon the "scoop", that is, on the Stalin era. It is necessary to give a political and legal assessment of the crimes of the Soviet era, to build memorials to victims of repression, deportations, totalitarianism. What is actively being done in the era of Yeltsin - Putin - Medvedev. The people must repent for the crimes of revolution, civil war, famine, collectivization, repression of 1920-1930-ies, etc. In this case, the church actively helps the liberals. Allegedly, without universal repentance, it is impossible to further develop the new Russia and its modernization, the unity of the people and the "elite", which is increasingly sympathetic to the orders of pre-revolutionary Russia, when everyone knew their place.
It is clear that the West is also very interested in this process. De-Stalinization and desovetizatsiyu held in the former countries of the socialist community, in the former republics of the collapsed Soviet Union. At the same time everywhere we see a sharp activation of Russophobia: hatred and fear of the Russian people and civilization. Russian and Soviet "crimes" unite, "Russian" and "Soviet" for the western man in the same place. Russia has been turned into a kind of “Russian Mordor”, which hangs over “civilized” Europe and the world through the efforts of Western media and politicians.
Why does Western and home-grown de-Stalinisers not give rest to the era of Stalin? The point is "repression"? When you begin to understand this question, you quickly find the answer: these are group, class, clan interests and goals, and the desire to remove obstacles to their realization with the help of the myths of “bloody Stalinism”. Under Stalin, he defeated the principle of social justice, began to create a society of service and creation. The man in this society was the creator, creator, served the great Motherland. Religions that divided people, nations, slowly died down and were replaced by the domination of the ethics of conscience. In the Soviet Union, they began to create a society of the future of all mankind, a society of the “golden age”, in which the oppression and parasitism of a small group of the “elect” is absent.
Obviously, this did not like social groups, classes, clans and individuals who were interested in maintaining the old order, when bourgeois capitalists, the "elite", small-town Khans-Bai, etc., can continue to exploit the broad masses of the people and stay on top of the “social pyramid”.
Also, Soviet civilization and society were hated by the masters of the West. The masters of the West since the times of Ancient Rome and Greece (in turn, leading the tradition of the slave-owning civilizations of the Ancient East and Egypt) create a global slave civilization, where society is clearly divided into caste strata of the “elect”, “masters of life”, their servants, including military mercenaries and intellectual servants and "two-legged weapons," slaves. The illusion of "democracy" has not changed anything. Only chains and dependence have become different - money, access to information, dependence on various dopemen, etc. This is not only a slaveholding, caste society, but also a consumer society, extermination and self-destruction. The West, like a huge cancer tumor, is devouring the planet, its resources, killing humanity. A man created in the image and likeness of God is suppressed, he is transformed into a two-legged cattle, a biomaterial.
Soviet (Russian) civilization offered a different image of the future. The conquest of space, going beyond the earth's cradle as the main path of human development. Healthy spiritually, intellectually and physically people. Suppression of parasitic needs, promotion of the healthy: physical culture, communication with nature (tourism), the reading nation, the people who are totally interested in chess, and much more. People are creators, creators, honest workers, serving their Fatherland. Therefore, the Soviet culture and showed the heroes of that era: scientists, teachers, pilots, soldiers, people of work, the foundation of society, those on which everything rests. Take for comparison the “heroes” of 1990 - 2000's: gangsters, prostitutes, acting actors, idols of pop culture (culture of decay), etc.
It is obvious that the Soviet civilization aroused interest throughout the world. Dozens of countries began to follow the path of creating a socialist, just society. The Western slave-holding “new” world order began to collapse. This terrified the owners of the West. They began to play a big game - the struggle for the place of the “king of the hill” on planet Earth. The masters of the West organized Hitler's “crusade”, giving the Nazis almost all of Europe, including France. Outside the "European Union" of Hitler, only England remained - one of the command posts of the Western project, and the country-banks, the caches of stolen goodness - Switzerland and Sweden. At the same time, London concluded a secret agreement with Hitler that “there will not be a second front until the Third Reich destroys the USSR. Then it will be possible to agree on a new world order, without the USSR-Russia already.
However, the Soviet Union defeated the “brown and black plague” - European fascism and Nazism, which were the most vivid embodiments of the ideals of the Western world. Hitler and his associates clearly showed the ideal of the Western project - the division of countries and peoples into "elected" and "elected" and servant countries (satellites) and colonies, "subhumans", "racially inferior." At present, this is clearly trying not to show, but the essence has not changed. There are countries of the “golden billion”, mainly Western states, the core of the capitalist system. For them to flourish, all of humanity works for them, from third world countries, semi-colonies pump out resources (including valuable workers). In the very “golden billion” there is a “brilliant million” - hundreds of families of billionaires and multimillionaires, who own most of the national wealth. Among them are the real masters of the West, who hide behind the cover of democracy. They nominate parsley jesters - presidents, prime ministers, ministers, governors, senators, deputies, mayors, etc. Official power is only the tip of the iceberg, the true pyramid of power and knowledge.
As a result, the majority of the population in Central and South America, Africa and Asia live in poverty or complete poverty. This same infernal world is being pushed by the peoples of the former USSR, where the overwhelming majority of people are doomed to poverty, or extinction and flight to the countries of the “golden billion”. The most vivid example: the formerly flourishing republic of the USSR is Ukraine, where the people are rapidly dying out and running to the West as servants. Attempts by non-Western countries to create a consumer society following the example of “developed countries” lead to the terrible destruction of the biosphere. The consumer society is killing the planet. In fact, it is a society of extermination and self-destruction. A person becomes a consumer, a “two-legged tool,” a slave to the system, the western matrix. His spiritual and intellectual needs are distorted and suppressed. After the destruction of the Soviet civilization, humanity stopped developing, involution, simplification and degradation began (including digital idiocy).
After the elimination of Stalin and the nomination of the latent Trotskyite Khrushchev, the masters of the West managed to begin de-Stalinization - the destruction of a just society in the USSR-Russia. The party-state elite, the process of decomposition of which Stalin restrained by repression and "rejuvenation of blood" of the elite, with the advancement of the best military, business executives, etc., frightened the Stalinist course. She was comfortable at the top of a powerful Olympus, she wanted stability, a “beautiful life” modeled on the Western rich. There was a desire to transform power into property, capital, profitable to attach children, wives, mistresses. And for this it was necessary to stop the development and destroy the society of service and creation, in which there was no place for social parasites, to “agree” with the West in order to become part of the world “elite”, to enter the global “pyramid”.
True, Khrushchev did not have time to complete the first "perestroika" -destalinization. Decomposition of the "elite" has just begun. Unreasoned decisions of Khrushchev led to destabilization, unpredictable destruction. Therefore, he was sent to retire. Brezhnev conserved the situation, retained the possibility of a scientific and technological breakthrough into the future space civilization. The second “perestroika” was launched under Gorbachev. Under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, the degenerate elite dismantled the Soviet project, the state. And people's property, wealth, was in the hands of a very small group of people. Thus, at present, 2-3% of the population of Russia own the overwhelming part of the country's national wealth and continue to withdraw capital to the West, since they consider themselves to be part of the Western capitalist system.
"AND. V. Stalin and K. Ye. Voroshilov in the Kremlin. ” Painting by Soviet artist A. Gerasimov, created in 1938 year
It is worth noting that one of the main accusations towards Stalin is repression. But here you just have to figure it out, examine the true history and understand how they lied to us and continue to lie.
In 2000 — 2010-s there appeared quite a few serious and unbiased studies of even the Stalinist studies of the Stalin period in general and the struggle for power and repression in particular. They present a completely different picture than what Khrushchev portrayed at the 20th and 22nd CPSU congresses, Solzhenitsyn in the Gulag Archipelago, professional propagandists in the West, Soviet dissidents, as well as perestroika anti-Sovietists, Russian liberals-Westerners and the democratic public after 1991.
For example, a good analysis of the problem of the Stalin era in general and of repression in particular can be noted in the works of Y. Mukhin, I. Pykhalov, A. Martirosyan, S. Kara-Murza, Y. Zhukov, etc. What can be identified in these work? First, Khrushchev, Solzhenitsyn and other liars greatly exaggerated the scale of the repressions - there were no tens of millions killed and repressed. This lie continues today.
Secondly, people are not informed that a significant part of the repression was justified by the current situation. There was indeed a powerful “fifth column” in the country - hidden Trotskyists, military conspirators (followers of Tukhachevsky), traitors in the depths of special services (including the leaders of the NKVD G. Yagodu and N. Yezhov), Ukrainian and Baltic Nazis, Basmachi in Central Asia, etc. They were just waiting for the moment when the West would launch an invasion in order to raise a rebellion inside the country, to break it apart. Just before the war, it was possible to neutralize most of the "fifth column". As a result, Hitler and his armada were met not by a loose colossus, as was expected in the West, but by a steel monolith. No large-scale uprisings and riots in the rear. Already under the heel of the invaders, traitors raised their heads in the Baltic States, in Ukraine, in the Crimea, but the scale was much smaller than our enemies had expected.
Thirdly, repression is part of any state apparatus. For example, in the current United States there is such a powerful repressive-punitive machine that the Stalinist apparatus for the suppression of hostile, subversive forces clearly loses the American one.
To be continued ...
Senator Lyudmila Narusova said the intention to prepare a bill equating the justification of Stalinism with the justification of Nazism. “After what we were called for (Russian presidential candidate Maxim - Avt.) Suraykin, calling himself a Stalinist, honoring him, I believe that it is necessary, and in the near future I will come up with such legislative initiative to equate Stalin’s justification ", - said Narusova during a visit to the headquarters of her daughter, presidential candidate Ksenia Sobchak.
The senator recalled that in this election two people were “outspoken Stalinists” who called for a return to the USSR. “They talked about how they imagine it: the Baltic States, the Caucasus, Kazakhstan, it is clear that they will not run to the Soviet Union, which means there will be another war for the restoration of the Soviet Union,” said the senator. According to her, the people who stated this turned out to be outsiders on the preliminary results of the elections. Accordingly, it turns out that the supposedly overwhelming majority of the Russian population does not support Stalin’s policies and condemns it.
The de-Stalinization is a ban on Stalin’s positive characterization, a ban on mentioning the positive moments of the Stalin era, the desire to complete the de-Sovietization of the country, as already done in the Baltic countries, Ukraine, Georgia, etc. essence, and desovetizatsiyu) the desire to "reconcile society." They say, revolution, civil war and repression are long past. It is time for the citizens of Russia to abandon the "scoop", that is, on the Stalin era. It is necessary to give a political and legal assessment of the crimes of the Soviet era, to build memorials to victims of repression, deportations, totalitarianism. What is actively being done in the era of Yeltsin - Putin - Medvedev. The people must repent for the crimes of revolution, civil war, famine, collectivization, repression of 1920-1930-ies, etc. In this case, the church actively helps the liberals. Allegedly, without universal repentance, it is impossible to further develop the new Russia and its modernization, the unity of the people and the "elite", which is increasingly sympathetic to the orders of pre-revolutionary Russia, when everyone knew their place.
It is clear that the West is also very interested in this process. De-Stalinization and desovetizatsiyu held in the former countries of the socialist community, in the former republics of the collapsed Soviet Union. At the same time everywhere we see a sharp activation of Russophobia: hatred and fear of the Russian people and civilization. Russian and Soviet "crimes" unite, "Russian" and "Soviet" for the western man in the same place. Russia has been turned into a kind of “Russian Mordor”, which hangs over “civilized” Europe and the world through the efforts of Western media and politicians.
Why does Western and home-grown de-Stalinisers not give rest to the era of Stalin? The point is "repression"? When you begin to understand this question, you quickly find the answer: these are group, class, clan interests and goals, and the desire to remove obstacles to their realization with the help of the myths of “bloody Stalinism”. Under Stalin, he defeated the principle of social justice, began to create a society of service and creation. The man in this society was the creator, creator, served the great Motherland. Religions that divided people, nations, slowly died down and were replaced by the domination of the ethics of conscience. In the Soviet Union, they began to create a society of the future of all mankind, a society of the “golden age”, in which the oppression and parasitism of a small group of the “elect” is absent.
Obviously, this did not like social groups, classes, clans and individuals who were interested in maintaining the old order, when bourgeois capitalists, the "elite", small-town Khans-Bai, etc., can continue to exploit the broad masses of the people and stay on top of the “social pyramid”.
Also, Soviet civilization and society were hated by the masters of the West. The masters of the West since the times of Ancient Rome and Greece (in turn, leading the tradition of the slave-owning civilizations of the Ancient East and Egypt) create a global slave civilization, where society is clearly divided into caste strata of the “elect”, “masters of life”, their servants, including military mercenaries and intellectual servants and "two-legged weapons," slaves. The illusion of "democracy" has not changed anything. Only chains and dependence have become different - money, access to information, dependence on various dopemen, etc. This is not only a slaveholding, caste society, but also a consumer society, extermination and self-destruction. The West, like a huge cancer tumor, is devouring the planet, its resources, killing humanity. A man created in the image and likeness of God is suppressed, he is transformed into a two-legged cattle, a biomaterial.
Soviet (Russian) civilization offered a different image of the future. The conquest of space, going beyond the earth's cradle as the main path of human development. Healthy spiritually, intellectually and physically people. Suppression of parasitic needs, promotion of the healthy: physical culture, communication with nature (tourism), the reading nation, the people who are totally interested in chess, and much more. People are creators, creators, honest workers, serving their Fatherland. Therefore, the Soviet culture and showed the heroes of that era: scientists, teachers, pilots, soldiers, people of work, the foundation of society, those on which everything rests. Take for comparison the “heroes” of 1990 - 2000's: gangsters, prostitutes, acting actors, idols of pop culture (culture of decay), etc.
It is obvious that the Soviet civilization aroused interest throughout the world. Dozens of countries began to follow the path of creating a socialist, just society. The Western slave-holding “new” world order began to collapse. This terrified the owners of the West. They began to play a big game - the struggle for the place of the “king of the hill” on planet Earth. The masters of the West organized Hitler's “crusade”, giving the Nazis almost all of Europe, including France. Outside the "European Union" of Hitler, only England remained - one of the command posts of the Western project, and the country-banks, the caches of stolen goodness - Switzerland and Sweden. At the same time, London concluded a secret agreement with Hitler that “there will not be a second front until the Third Reich destroys the USSR. Then it will be possible to agree on a new world order, without the USSR-Russia already.
However, the Soviet Union defeated the “brown and black plague” - European fascism and Nazism, which were the most vivid embodiments of the ideals of the Western world. Hitler and his associates clearly showed the ideal of the Western project - the division of countries and peoples into "elected" and "elected" and servant countries (satellites) and colonies, "subhumans", "racially inferior." At present, this is clearly trying not to show, but the essence has not changed. There are countries of the “golden billion”, mainly Western states, the core of the capitalist system. For them to flourish, all of humanity works for them, from third world countries, semi-colonies pump out resources (including valuable workers). In the very “golden billion” there is a “brilliant million” - hundreds of families of billionaires and multimillionaires, who own most of the national wealth. Among them are the real masters of the West, who hide behind the cover of democracy. They nominate parsley jesters - presidents, prime ministers, ministers, governors, senators, deputies, mayors, etc. Official power is only the tip of the iceberg, the true pyramid of power and knowledge.
As a result, the majority of the population in Central and South America, Africa and Asia live in poverty or complete poverty. This same infernal world is being pushed by the peoples of the former USSR, where the overwhelming majority of people are doomed to poverty, or extinction and flight to the countries of the “golden billion”. The most vivid example: the formerly flourishing republic of the USSR is Ukraine, where the people are rapidly dying out and running to the West as servants. Attempts by non-Western countries to create a consumer society following the example of “developed countries” lead to the terrible destruction of the biosphere. The consumer society is killing the planet. In fact, it is a society of extermination and self-destruction. A person becomes a consumer, a “two-legged tool,” a slave to the system, the western matrix. His spiritual and intellectual needs are distorted and suppressed. After the destruction of the Soviet civilization, humanity stopped developing, involution, simplification and degradation began (including digital idiocy).
After the elimination of Stalin and the nomination of the latent Trotskyite Khrushchev, the masters of the West managed to begin de-Stalinization - the destruction of a just society in the USSR-Russia. The party-state elite, the process of decomposition of which Stalin restrained by repression and "rejuvenation of blood" of the elite, with the advancement of the best military, business executives, etc., frightened the Stalinist course. She was comfortable at the top of a powerful Olympus, she wanted stability, a “beautiful life” modeled on the Western rich. There was a desire to transform power into property, capital, profitable to attach children, wives, mistresses. And for this it was necessary to stop the development and destroy the society of service and creation, in which there was no place for social parasites, to “agree” with the West in order to become part of the world “elite”, to enter the global “pyramid”.
True, Khrushchev did not have time to complete the first "perestroika" -destalinization. Decomposition of the "elite" has just begun. Unreasoned decisions of Khrushchev led to destabilization, unpredictable destruction. Therefore, he was sent to retire. Brezhnev conserved the situation, retained the possibility of a scientific and technological breakthrough into the future space civilization. The second “perestroika” was launched under Gorbachev. Under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, the degenerate elite dismantled the Soviet project, the state. And people's property, wealth, was in the hands of a very small group of people. Thus, at present, 2-3% of the population of Russia own the overwhelming part of the country's national wealth and continue to withdraw capital to the West, since they consider themselves to be part of the Western capitalist system.
"AND. V. Stalin and K. Ye. Voroshilov in the Kremlin. ” Painting by Soviet artist A. Gerasimov, created in 1938 year
It is worth noting that one of the main accusations towards Stalin is repression. But here you just have to figure it out, examine the true history and understand how they lied to us and continue to lie.
In 2000 — 2010-s there appeared quite a few serious and unbiased studies of even the Stalinist studies of the Stalin period in general and the struggle for power and repression in particular. They present a completely different picture than what Khrushchev portrayed at the 20th and 22nd CPSU congresses, Solzhenitsyn in the Gulag Archipelago, professional propagandists in the West, Soviet dissidents, as well as perestroika anti-Sovietists, Russian liberals-Westerners and the democratic public after 1991.
For example, a good analysis of the problem of the Stalin era in general and of repression in particular can be noted in the works of Y. Mukhin, I. Pykhalov, A. Martirosyan, S. Kara-Murza, Y. Zhukov, etc. What can be identified in these work? First, Khrushchev, Solzhenitsyn and other liars greatly exaggerated the scale of the repressions - there were no tens of millions killed and repressed. This lie continues today.
Secondly, people are not informed that a significant part of the repression was justified by the current situation. There was indeed a powerful “fifth column” in the country - hidden Trotskyists, military conspirators (followers of Tukhachevsky), traitors in the depths of special services (including the leaders of the NKVD G. Yagodu and N. Yezhov), Ukrainian and Baltic Nazis, Basmachi in Central Asia, etc. They were just waiting for the moment when the West would launch an invasion in order to raise a rebellion inside the country, to break it apart. Just before the war, it was possible to neutralize most of the "fifth column". As a result, Hitler and his armada were met not by a loose colossus, as was expected in the West, but by a steel monolith. No large-scale uprisings and riots in the rear. Already under the heel of the invaders, traitors raised their heads in the Baltic States, in Ukraine, in the Crimea, but the scale was much smaller than our enemies had expected.
Thirdly, repression is part of any state apparatus. For example, in the current United States there is such a powerful repressive-punitive machine that the Stalinist apparatus for the suppression of hostile, subversive forces clearly loses the American one.
To be continued ...
Information