Election results: who, with what and how satisfied

533

Who did you vote for?

V. Putin - 2445 (56.89%)
56.89%
P. Grudinin - 1232 (28.66%)
28.66%
V. Zhirinovsky - 98 (2.28%)
2.28%
K. Sobchak - 44 (1.02%)
1.02%
Another option is 143 (3.33%)
3.33%
Did not go to the polls - 322 (7.49%)
7.49%
Election results: who, with what and how satisfied


As we think, there will be a lot of talk on past elections. Therefore, we decided, in order to avoid unnecessary, senseless and merciless flood, to offer you, dear readers, to exchange information on the subject "Who, for whom and how and how voted."



And, of course, to make plans for the future, and to conduct disputes with opponents.

The only thing I would like to wish for is not to go beyond the rules. Regardless of the election results and the personal attitude of each to the one who wins.

Let us proceed first of all from the fact that the elections were held, and we have what we have, according to our will.
533 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. rruvim Rank
    rruvim
    0
    22 March 2018 17: 02
    On the Elections 2018 website there is a map (I’m writing from memory) of voter turnout at polling stations.
    For example, Moscow is 52%, and the Moscow region is 65%. But Moscow and the Moscow region (as a resident) are now practically the same. 13% difference is incomprehensible. The same goes for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region... All cities with a population of over a million had a lower turnout than the regions around them. Although from my own experience, voting in rural areas is more difficult than in a large city. A turnout of more than 70-75% was shown by strange entities, such as the republics of Tatarstan, Barkoshtostan, Dagestan, Stavropol Territory and all the North Caucasus republics. The entire industrial Center, the Urals and the North-West had a turnout of less than 60%. 67% of the turnout was due to these strange republics. At my polling station in the Moscow region, only 29,8% of voters voted. Maybe our site was just unlucky...
  2. shura7782 Rank
    shura7782
    0
    22 March 2018 22: 48
    Many thanks to the author for the opportunity to vote on the site. For the first two, the percentage ratio was expected even before the elections. It is correct. Everything that we were given on TV was from the Evil One. The way the United Russia “worked” outraged even people indifferent to the elections. I voted for Grudinin and I don’t consider myself a loser, just as I don’t consider those who voted for GDP to be winners. In fact, our cabinet edros won. They can easily fatten for another six years.
    I would like to practice such voting or polls on VO. There will be less controversy.
    +++++++
  3. andy.v.lee Rank
    andy.v.lee
    0
    23 March 2018 11: 22
    This has already happened, Putin’s program for the next 6 years: "Understand what is really happening in the country"!
  4. 1536 Rank
    1536
    0
    23 March 2018 17: 09
    I think that the victory of GDP will be leveled out in the media in the same way as, say, the victory in Syria, the “Crimean Spring”, the construction of a bridge to Crimea, the creation of new weapons or flights into space. The State Duma has already been deprived of the right to cover its activities, the government, which is due to change in a month and a half, is saying things completely opposite to what the president said, and it is unknown who will be the chairman of the next government. Yes, I voted for GDP, knowing that expectations would not be realized and the next six years would be years of “survival”, just like the previous ones.
    1. Edvid Rank
      Edvid
      0
      24 March 2018 00: 03
      I voted for Grudinin, or more precisely, for his program. He didn’t have rally mantras like others: “.. we need to improve this and that.., it is necessary to increase.., develop,.., an economic breakthrough is required.. etc.” Everyone knows that “it is necessary, required, necessary, etc.,” from the janitor to most officials. Only Grudinin and Yavlinsky had programs that outlined specific steps HOW and HOW they were going to implement these very “improve, enhance, develop...” We must give the Supreme his due - he is successful in foreign policy, but as for economic affairs, then one gets the impression that he feels like a complete layman, so he gave the reins to “specialists” who, apart from raising, inventing new taxes and transferring money to foreign banks, have not come up with anything. A typical example is Stolypin. He proposed his economic program to Nikolai Romanov, firmly and successfully pushed for its implementation from officials; in a short time, he brought Russia to first place in the world in terms of development rates and production volumes.