Election results: who, with what and how satisfied

533

Who did you vote for?

V. Putin - 2445 (56.89%)
56.89%
P. Grudinin - 1232 (28.66%)
28.66%
V. Zhirinovsky - 98 (2.28%)
2.28%
K. Sobchak - 44 (1.02%)
1.02%
Another option is 143 (3.33%)
3.33%
Did not go to the polls - 322 (7.49%)
7.49%
Election results: who, with what and how satisfied


As we think, there will be a lot of talk on past elections. Therefore, we decided, in order to avoid unnecessary, senseless and merciless flood, to offer you, dear readers, to exchange information on the subject "Who, for whom and how and how voted."



And, of course, to make plans for the future, and to conduct disputes with opponents.

The only thing I would like to wish for is not to go beyond the rules. Regardless of the election results and the personal attitude of each to the one who wins.

Let us proceed first of all from the fact that the elections were held, and we have what we have, according to our will.
533 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +52
    19 March 2018 06: 48
    It seems that those who are dissatisfied with the election of an exceptional majority of the president will talk a few days and calm down a bit. Someone is leaking from the site, because registered exclusively for the election, someone will continue to muddy the country and the president.
    not go beyond the rules
    We have to try, although I would like to answer some comments sharply in Russian.
    1. +78
      19 March 2018 07: 02
      a few days will calm down and calm down a bit.

      Nothing unpredictable happened. The population, as always, has confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness under the dominance of pro-government SMRAD (mass media, agitation and misinformation.)
      1. +89
        19 March 2018 07: 14
        Quote: populist
        The population, as always, confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness

        Again populists the wrong people got caught ... laughing
        Personally, I voted for Putin and therefore I have a holiday! Ours took - to fool the people, despite all the efforts of some, failed. As for the Communist Party, the true values ​​of socialism were proclaimed by Suraikin, but by no means the Communist Party.
        1. +17
          19 March 2018 08: 05
          Quote: Boris55
          the wrong people caught
          And not even the people, but like that - population.
          Quote: Boris55
          I have a holiday!
          Congratulations from the bottom of my heart, although this does not promise an easy life.
          1. +55
            19 March 2018 08: 16
            Thank you country! Thank you for voting the way you want! Now we are faced with a difficult task: to preserve and increase the backlog, which, thanks to us and our president, is at this moment! Everything will be fine, as if our ill-wishers would sprinkle with saliva. I especially want to say about the State Department singers and sympathizers on this site: gentlemen, it's time to go on academic leave, until the next election! This also applies to trolls. Here you have no place, on someone else's holiday! Suitcase, train station, State Department!
            1. +35
              19 March 2018 08: 29
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              Everything will be fine, as if our detractors do not splutter with saliva. Especially I want to say about gosdepovskih sang along with them and sympathizers on this site: gentlemen, it's time to go on academic leave, until the next election! Trolls are also concerned. There is no place for you on someone else's holiday! Suitcase, station, State Department!


              You are quieter there. This is just an election were.
              1. +14
                19 March 2018 08: 32
                Quote: Banshee
                You are quieter there. This is just an election were.

                Greetings, Roman! But unfortunately, these may be the last “my choices”! So, let me at least on these come off in full. laughing hi
                1. +3
                  19 March 2018 10: 34
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  But unfortunately, these may be the last “my choices”!

                  Jinx, you'll have to go to the polls for another 30 years. Or 50 ...
                  1. +11
                    19 March 2018 11: 17
                    Quote: 97110
                    Jinx, you'll have to go to the polls for another 30 years. Or 50 ...

                    I agree for Putin! good
                2. +9
                  19 March 2018 11: 33
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  But unfortunately, this may be the last "my choices

                  On holiday, more optimism!
                  With the victory of you! hi
                  1. +3
                    19 March 2018 13: 36
                    Quote: Nikitin-
                    On holiday, more optimism!
                    With the victory of you!

                    Mutually, Nikita! hi hi
                3. +3
                  19 March 2018 18: 26
                  But unfortunately, these may be the last “my choices”!
                  Long years to you, Alexander. Despite intolerance to a different opinion from you.
                  Poem from the web (inspired by your comment)

                  I read it - and that hour burst into tears!
                  I will say "not quite to the court":
                  Under Putin, I was not born,
                  Under Putin-just die!

                  No matter what year
                  Death is my moment -
                  I know: He will be! He is eternal!
                  He is OUR FOREVER PRESIDENT
              2. +7
                19 March 2018 08: 35
                Quote: Banshee
                You are quieter there. This is just an election were.

                I’m Roman, about five hours already laughing ...))
                1. +15
                  19 March 2018 08: 57
                  Quote: Romulus
                  I’m Roman, about five hours already laughing ...))

                  Ask relatives, let them call an ambulance! Yes
                  1. +5
                    19 March 2018 11: 44
                    After 2-3 hours, he might arrive if in the city!
                    1. -2
                      23 March 2018 16: 37
                      Who is to blame for this ???
                      Well, guess what.
            2. +58
              19 March 2018 10: 09
              Quote: SRC P-15
              Thank you country! Thank you for voting the way you want! Now we are faced with a difficult task: to preserve and increase the backlog, which, thanks to us and our president, is at this moment! Everything will be fine, as if our ill-wishers would sprinkle with saliva. I especially want to say about the State Department singers and sympathizers on this site: gentlemen, it's time to go on academic leave, until the next election! This also applies to trolls. Here you have no place, on someone else's holiday! Suitcase, train station, State Department!

              Special thanks to those who voted for the commodity economy, for the pro-Western government, for the oligarchs taking profits abroad, for the wise policy of the Central Bank, because there is no inflation. there is no consumer demand due to poverty of the population, thanks to the liberal leadership of the country for the unrequited and missed slap from the west, we will tolerate nothing. I would like my sarcasm to be groundless in the new term, but for 18 years I could not, and therefore did not want to fix anything.
              1. +30
                19 March 2018 10: 28
                Something the UAE and other commodity economies do not bathe in these terms, and China also has to buy all the raw materials. I myself work in the oil industry for the construction of pipelines, etc. and I can tell you that oil is not extracted by buckets, but by highly technological equipment. And for the production of large-diameter pipes (which was not the case in the USSR), plants were built, as well as for the production of large-diameter gate valves, but I'm not talking about the equipment of oil filling stations, etc. .d. So the extraction of raw materials is a powerful development of production, these are roads, infrastructure, new villages as well as the arrangement of existing along the pipeline. And why spank pots (who will buy them) when there is enough oil and gas for 300 years. It is necessary to develop the processing of these products, cars convert to gas, etc.
                1. +6
                  19 March 2018 13: 22
                  Quote: Valery Saitov
                  So the extraction of raw materials is a powerful development of production, these are roads, infrastructure, new villages as well as the arrangement of existing along the pipeline.

                  And to me here recently, at a forum, one individual argued that ferrous metallurgy is just raw materials, not industry, and MMK is not technological production, and so, the indulgence of oligarchs ...
                  1. -1
                    23 March 2018 16: 38
                    These are those who did not have anything technological in their hands except the oyphon gifted by their mother.
                2. +6
                  19 March 2018 18: 28
                  Something the UAE and other commodity economies do not bathe in similar terms

                  Therefore, they are all only the UAE.
                3. +4
                  19 March 2018 22: 40
                  So the extraction of raw materials is a powerful development of production, these are roads, infrastructure, new villages as well as the arrangement of existing along the pipeline
                  And if a little to the side, it's like, people do not live there ... wink And for 300 years - it's you, my friend (or young man), a little bent ... laughing
                  1. +4
                    19 March 2018 23: 34
                    it’s not small there, it’s complete, and villages stand next to the gas pipeline and without gasification, and not somewhere, but in the Lena oblast, but at the oil refinery, to find the Russian nameplate, you need to try very hard, I’m silent about all kinds of catalysts, without which cracking won't happen
                    and when all of a sudden you do not sell it will be 300 years to eat oil and gas laughing
                4. +4
                  21 March 2018 13: 43
                  And for the production of large-diameter pipes (which was not in the USSR)


                  Excuse me, the Khartsyzsk pipe plant was not in the USSR?
              2. +27
                19 March 2018 10: 31
                We lived for 18 years with noodles on our ears, we are already used to it .. We will continue to live .. lol
                1. +22
                  19 March 2018 10: 47
                  The country voted for who deserves to be our president. And about noodles on your ears - this is just your private opinion. You have the right to think so and that is important, you have the right to express your opinion.
              3. +17
                19 March 2018 10: 34
                I envy cavalrymen in economics and politics. They know best what to do and how. Then, however, decades are needed to recover. But these are trifles. The main thing is to promise a sweet and comfortable life.
                I admire our president. To be able to make so many available means without any significant drop in the standard of living of the population is worth a lot. The party, which he began more than 10 years ago, goes into the endgame. I am waiting for its victory.
                1. +27
                  19 March 2018 11: 32
                  Please specifically what made “so many available means without any significant drop in the standard of living of the population” Statistics (state body, by the way), speaks of another thing — about the decline in the standard of living of the population of almost 10 quarters. I would like specifics about so much done (almost 500 of newly opened enterprises in 2017 had almost 2500 bankrupt, also statistics)
                  I’ve been on the commission yesterday. So even those who tried to tell me (in the same commission 1,5 a year ago) to say the same thing as you are now beginning to sing differently. Rhetoric from enthusiastically eulogistic is shifting to the side (as people like you like to write) to "chef, that's all disappeared ".. And two" businessmen ", a small spill interviewer, complained to each other that they were getting a little bad, they don’t pay, these, they scored a budget for them (there’s simply no money there). Yes, and the people caught them bad, does not want such a bastard to work without days off and on 12 hours a day. Well, of course, they are white and fluffy, they give such an opportunity, to earn money, but whose people do not want it.
                  1. +16
                    19 March 2018 12: 31
                    Do not want to see - you will not see. As an example - 2500 bankrupt enterprises. They disappeared or changed the owner? Is bankruptcy exclusively Russian or is it still an internationally recognized state of an inefficient enterprise? For every foolish owner, you need a president who will work for him? See how many questions.
                    I see a change. They make me happy. I drive along good roads and can not help but rejoice. They were gone, now they are. And there will be more. Only there will never be that people pay not for the results of labor, but for sitting out at the workplace. The state should take care of state employees and pensioners. Today, this is an order. A healthy and competent employee himself can and must decide where to work and how much to earn.
                    Dissatisfied with the employer - create your own company, work for yourself. Moreover, today for such taxes - you can’t imagine better. And then only one nagging and hopelessness.
                    1. +14
                      19 March 2018 13: 42
                      Quote: GUKTU76
                      The state should take care of state employees and pensioners. Today, this is an order.

                      Quote: GUKTU76
                      The state should take care of state employees and pensioners. Today, this is an order.

                      Yes? Looks like you are not a state employee or a pensioner. Here you live to a well-deserved retirement, see how your speeches change
                      1. +5
                        19 March 2018 15: 19
                        Both me and my wife are senior citizens. The wife of a budget employee is a medic. Children of state employees are teachers. I’m not a state employee alone. Retired for the fourth year. I continue to work.
                      2. -1
                        23 March 2018 16: 41
                        I am a state employee. And my wife too.
                        The way it was 10 years ago and now is incomparable. You can live.
                    2. +18
                      19 March 2018 15: 25
                      And I drive through the M-4 every week. Which is almost all paid. And with each trip, there is more and more thunder from a good road. Regarding the same bankruptcy. We went bankrupt KMZ (boiler-mechanical). -2 years ago. He did not change the master-workers fired-factory-for metal. Bankrupt bakery, but this is a social enterprise, then pulled out.
                      About taxes on the enterprise and about the opportunity to create, they themselves tried it. First, taste these charms (not me drawer but in life) then sing.
                      A healthy and competent employee cannot decide anything special - there is nowhere to work. Well, if near Moscow or St. Petersburg. And I worked as a shift near Nizhnevartovsk, Megion. We worked with guys (locksmith, electricians) mainly from Bashkiria. I ask that here, for 3 thousand versts for 28 thousand you go (shift 15 days — 28 thousand, 2 shifts — a month there, then a month for free at home — on average for a month 28 thousand) Answer — at my place —17 and then you still need to get on it, and so 12-14. My partner on shift-ASUshnik, also from there, is also a salary of miserable. Moreover, many have loans, and a couple of our Asushniki (from other points) worked on the 3 of the month without a break.
                      You would tell them about the whining and hopelessness.
                      1. +3
                        19 March 2018 17: 46
                        About paid M4 - I know only one payment point in the Rostov region in front of the border with the Krasnodar Territory. Along the edge there is not a single one. Conclusion - you said a lie for all paid M4, you lied in a simple way.
                      2. +3
                        19 March 2018 18: 03
                        You would tell them about the whining and hopelessness.
                        I noticed that the most rabid cheers patriots and zaputintsy mostly attack during the day. This means that for the most part retirees and “schoolchildren” (dependents) who are either not working, who either do not need anything or have not needed it yet.
                      3. +4
                        20 March 2018 07: 03
                        I have been tasting these charms since 2008. I am an individual entrepreneur. The boss himself is the worker himself. Absolutely everything suits me.
                        Russia is big. And in a big country there are always places that can be cited both as a positive and as a negative example. At one time I went to Bashkiria to work. Something like a watch. It turned out to earn more than at home. The wife's patience was enough for a year. I had to find a job with a lower salary, but at home.
                        I understand that the example of your ASUshnikov is very revealing. They are being driven on watch under machine guns. Anyone who chooses to work himself works where he agrees with the conditions - the regime and level of remuneration.
                    3. 0
                      23 March 2018 11: 19
                      Welcome to the Pacific East (Far East and Siberia), here it’s not always expensive, only directions.
                    4. +1
                      18 June 2018 11: 00
                      What pensioners will the state take care of now if they do not live to be 65?
                  2. +1
                    22 March 2018 10: 46
                    Wait ... nothing has begun yet.)))) With the initiative of everyone !!!!!)))) MOSCOW, March 22 - RIA Novosti. At one of the first meeting after the election, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev discussed the possibility of raising income tax, the newspaper Vedomosti writes with reference to federal officials.
                    RIA Novosti https://ria.ru/economy/20180322/1516980232.html. Summer residents separate greetings and with an increase in the retirement age! Hooray!!!!)))
                2. +7
                  19 March 2018 16: 50
                  Quote: GUKTU76
                  goes into the endgame.

                  Rather positional Zugzwang. With such an anti-people comprador pr-v to victory, as to the moon on foot. With opportunities like Putin’s, Russia could be turned into the Emirates. An example of China is before us.
                  1. +6
                    20 March 2018 07: 06
                    We once tried to turn Russia into the Emirates. To do this, half of the factories were destroyed and focused on energy. It is better to turn Russia into Germany in the sense of developing industry and technology.
                3. +2
                  20 March 2018 13: 47
                  Quote: GUKTU76
                  To be able to make so many available means without any significant drop in the standard of living of the population is worth a lot.


                  A couple of times lower the ruble as in 2014 and you can no longer wait for the victory.
                  1. +5
                    20 March 2018 14: 28
                    He survived both 1998 and 2014. He did not fuss. I can’t say that I really felt it. In 1998, as there was no money before, so did not increase after. In 2014, as there was money before, it remained after. Maybe their purchasing power has decreased, but for a fairly short time. Then the prices of some domestic products fell even more than before the fall of the ruble. A particularly vivid illustration of this is poultry meat. Housing and communal services prices, as they were growing before, are growing after the same rate.
                    But you can’t prove anything to the “all-crawler”. I feel sorry for you. You are not lucky to be born in the right country.
              4. +14
                19 March 2018 11: 49
                Quote: lis-ik
                I would like my sarcasm to be groundless in the new term, but for 18 years I could not, and therefore did not want to fix anything.

                What is 18 years old? These are the childhood of youth. During this period, its character and, accordingly, future behavior are laid. You do not demand adult actions from your children in your youth? Putin's 18 years is the formation of the "character" of Russia. And the fact that this formation was successful, we see by the way the West treats us: this can be said in words from the fable - "he sees the eye, but the tooth is numb." In impotent rage, they again and again embark on different adventures in order to pinch us at least somehow. If our Russia was supple, it would not have existed for a long time - it would be torn to pieces. It was Putin who did not let this happen! And precisely for these 18 years! Well, now our country (according to your chronology) enters adulthood, which means that it will respond to Western claims as an adult. So, let’s help our president do this, and not scream the previous years of his reign.
                1. +1
                  21 March 2018 10: 52
                  Quote: SRC P-15
                  Quote: lis-ik
                  I would like my sarcasm to be groundless in the new term, but for 18 years I could not, and therefore did not want to fix anything.

                  What is 18 years old? These are the childhood of youth. During this period, its character and, accordingly, future behavior are laid. You do not demand adult actions from your children in your youth? Putin's 18 years is the formation of the "character" of Russia. And the fact that this formation was successful, we see by the way the West treats us: this can be said in words from the fable - "he sees the eye, but the tooth is numb." In impotent rage, they again and again embark on different adventures in order to pinch us at least somehow. If our Russia was supple, it would not have existed for a long time - it would be torn to pieces. It was Putin who did not let this happen! And precisely for these 18 years! Well, now our country (according to your chronology) enters adulthood, which means that it will respond to Western claims as an adult. So, let’s help our president do this, and not scream the previous years of his reign.

                  It didn’t stay stubborn for a long time to jump for joy, we’ll see how you get out and begin to justify the brightest very soon.
                2. 0
                  27 March 2018 21: 17
                  Well .... damn it, compared! "Children and Youth" 18 years.
                  And how do you like “children’s” from 1945 to 1955? Or 1945 - 1965, Akurat 20 years.
                  Putin was not born 18 years ago ... much earlier, as you know.
                  I remembered Putin's "galleys." I was still interested - if Putin, according to his confession, worked as a slave in these very galleys, then who was at the helm at that time, who was plotting the course?
                  And then, it has long been known that the work of a slave is not very effective. And sometimes it’s useless.
                  And another “period” from 1965 to 1985. If there were Putin's "galleys" like that, then Europe, together with the USA, would be far from the back. In all respects. And there would be no unemployment. And there was no security in every school and store, and bars on the windows. There wouldn’t be much.
                  But "Yeltsi Putins" came and we have what we have.
                  And this is for you - infa for consideration https://zen.yandex.ru/media/burckina-new.livejour
                  nal.com/chislo-jertv-pravleniia-elcina-5aa94af957
                  906a1eac661d26
              5. +8
                19 March 2018 14: 08
                Not 18, but 14. What destroyed 15 years (from 1985 to 2000), to restore, respectively, 30 years, at least. And this is in the absence of resistance from any liberal-democratic scum. But this resistance is, and very strong.
              6. +5
                19 March 2018 15: 07
                Quote: lis-ik
                for 18 years he could not, and therefore did not want to fix anything.

                Well, if your family now lives the same way as in the 90s, then I can only sympathize with her: instead of a breadwinner, a whiner and a parasite.
              7. +1
                19 March 2018 19: 06
                Quote: lis-ik
                Quote: SRC P-15
                Thank you country! Thank you for voting the way you want! Now we are faced with a difficult task: to preserve and increase the backlog, which, thanks to us and our president, is at this moment! Everything will be fine, as if our ill-wishers would sprinkle with saliva. I especially want to say about the State Department singers and sympathizers on this site: gentlemen, it's time to go on academic leave, until the next election! This also applies to trolls. Here you have no place, on someone else's holiday! Suitcase, train station, State Department!

                Special thanks to those who voted for the commodity economy, for the pro-Western government, for the oligarchs taking profits abroad, for the wise policy of the Central Bank, because there is no inflation. there is no consumer demand due to poverty of the population, thanks to the liberal leadership of the country for the unrequited and missed slap from the west, we will tolerate nothing. I would like my sarcasm to be groundless in the new term, but for 18 years I could not, and therefore did not want to fix anything.

                He who has ears, let him hear; he who has eyes, let him see. If not, then arguing is useless.
              8. +4
                21 March 2018 19: 02
                Quote: lis-ik
                Special thanks to those who voted for the commodity economy, for the pro-Western government, for the oligarchs taking profits abroad, for the wise policy of the Central Bank, because there is no inflation. there is no consumer demand due to poverty of the population, thanks to the liberal leadership of the country for the unrequited and missed slap from the west, we will tolerate nothing. I would like my sarcasm to be groundless in the new term, but for 18 years I could not, and therefore did not want to fix anything.

                Forgive me, dear lis-ik, but with all the wealth of choice, there just wasn’t ... (this is the most important). And if you spend some precious time and try to understand what has changed in the country over the past 18 years, then I think that you will change your mind a little. And I advise you to analyze a little what goods were exported (abroad, and not to the socialist countries) in the USSR at the moment. Good luck in understanding the historical moment. Yes, and even a small, but very interesting question for me - who did you personally consider as a worthy candidate (I think you can even not from the electoral list). Thank you in advance for your reply! Sincerely.
            3. +8
              19 March 2018 13: 32
              Shiz mowing our ranks?
              "Now we have a difficult task: to preserve and increase that reserve, which, thanks to us and our president, is at this moment!" - for sure! We will save and increase our CORRUPTION and imperious lawlessness !!! Hooray, comrades!
              "I especially want to say about the State Department and I sympathized with them on this site: gentlemen, it's time to go on academic leave, until the next election! Trolls are also affected. Here you have no place, on someone else's holiday! Suitcase, train station, State Department!" - So I am "on this site", I also have a "suitcase-station-state department"? And at whose expense? Will they give out free tickets?
              And yes, "Thank you, country!" The turnout was amazing, I noticed. I have not seen such crowds for a long time.
              1. +7
                19 March 2018 13: 43
                Quote: alexxxz
                Shiz mowing our ranks?

                Your ranks are not mowed by a schiz! Until you yourself choke on your bile! No.
                1. +9
                  19 March 2018 15: 46
                  "No schiz will squint your ranks" - and yours? ))))) You’re just so funny saying, “We have a task ...”, “This is not your place!” ... As if you are the navel of the Russian land! Who are you? I think that you are nobody, and your name is nothing. And nothing personally depends on you in Russia! And that is why it is up to you to decide your efforts for the entire Russian people — the essence of a clinical case for psychiatry. And then it becomes clear to me a lot of where the "only right and irreplaceable" candidate has so much support. It’s just that in the medical institutions of the 18th "Open Day" was held. It's ridiculous! What bile? What are you speaking about? It's a shame to me, simple. It's a shame for the power! I do not scoff at the choice of country! I MUCH over the future of my children !!! It looks beautiful to you in pink glasses, but I broke my own long ago.
                  1. +5
                    20 March 2018 08: 41
                    We have swapped places. I, just like you today, in the 90s was depressed and disappointed with the choice of the Soviet people. I knew what the country would lead to, I knew that I would have at least a dozen and a half years of lack of demand in the specialty in which I was a leading specialist in the country. And that I have to look for a new field of activity.
                    And how happy I am today that finally common sense prevailed in my country. She has a great future. Of course, it differs from what liberal "universal people" painted and paint for us. Only the results of their drawing, we have already experienced in our own skin.
                    1. +2
                      20 March 2018 11: 44
                      Your words, but to God’s ears! Wait and see. But while OCG is at the helm, do not wait for good.
                    2. +1
                      27 March 2018 21: 55
                      And Putin, which of the "camps" do you attribute to?
                      "Common sense" prevailed on October 25, 1917.
                      A.F. Kerensky is also a lawyer. Fortunately, he moved to Canada.
                      By his own admission - ... if not for the Bolsheviks, there would have been no Russia ...
                      This is it about the intervention of 1918 and the war of 1941-1945.
                      Putin, unfortunately, is no longer capable, and has never been capable of CREATION. In economics, he is a complete ignoramus, as a politician, he surrendered ALL positions on ALL fronts. In the worst years of the USSR, we did not know such a shame in the international arena.
                      Looking back at the past 18 (read 25) years and having what we have, there is no certainty, not even hope, that under Putin’s “control” Russia will spend another couple of years.
                      A cancerous tumor in the face of the Kremlin, KobMin and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation has given such metastases that surgery can not be dispensed with. 50% of GDP in offshore annually ... Russia is still alive only because of territories and natural resources.
                      If Putin and Medvedev were to be sent with their Cabinet to Germany, the Germans would go naked in three months.
                      Remember - TWO YEARS ... this is the limit.
                      I will be happy if I turn out to be wrong.
                      But there is no reason for optimism. I don’t see ... the reasons.
              2. +4
                19 March 2018 15: 12
                So this is not a holiday. This is the coven. Hope you know what it is.
            4. +6
              19 March 2018 14: 35
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              Here you have no place, on someone else's holiday! Suitcase, train station, State Department!

              Stop thumping, otherwise you’ll miss all the “new” achievements of your master.
              Here is your victory.
              1. +6
                19 March 2018 15: 34
                And really! So that she does not build a bridge? And to Agafya Lykova lay a railway ...
                1. 0
                  19 March 2018 19: 08
                  Quote: GUKTU76
                  And really! So that she does not build a bridge? And to Agafya Lykova lay a railway ...

                  He was under the Communists, Putin destroyed him.
                  1. 0
                    21 March 2018 16: 35
                    Oh, I’m probably going to surprise you very much: everything material has a pre (end). I’m 150% sure that Putin didn’t have a hand here.
                    You get some Skripal right (Moscow, Kremlin, Putin).
                    1. 0
                      28 March 2018 13: 07
                      Read the Constitution. It is advisable - carefully.
                      And after reading, analyze through a prism: President - GUARANTEE OF THE CONSTITUTION.
                      In Russian - took up tug - do not say that not a dozen ...
                      You will soon Putin in the fold of saints to determine.
                      1. +1
                        28 March 2018 14: 43
                        So you yourself did not read the constitution. The book is thin - strain, read. You will learn the mass of the new. And most importantly - the guarantor of what exactly is the president (Putin or someone else, without binding to the surname, just the president)
                  2. +1
                    23 March 2018 01: 25
                    Yeah, and also the USSR ..... Moreover, personally, with a pickaxe laughing wassat
              2. +6
                19 March 2018 15: 47
                Stop thumping, otherwise you’ll miss all the “new” achievements of your master.
                Here is your victory.


                so you don’t like the tax “plato”; it is just created for such situations.

                To build bridges on which grandmothers will go for bread. There are many rivers - now they are building more bridges than with the UNION.


                1. +4
                  19 March 2018 18: 33
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  so you don’t like the tax “plato”; it is just created for such situations.
                  To build bridges

                  Do not tell the younger Rotenberg.
                  1. +3
                    19 March 2018 19: 54
                    16 of the 25 longest bridges in Russia were built after Vladimir Putin first assumed the presidency in 2000. The total length of all these bridges is 61379,5 m, and the length of new bridges (built after 2000) is 40000,5. XNUMX m, or two-thirds of the total length.


                    Yuri, why are you complimenting Rotenberg?

                    It turns out more effective than ... I won’t even say it out loud
                    1. 0
                      19 March 2018 20: 14
                      Quote: s-t Petrov
                      Yuri, why are you complimenting Rotenberg?

                      Well, how not to make compliments if a person, probably by virtue of his abilities, and not at all by acquaintance, has become a dollar billionaire in a couple of years. laughing And why did you give an example of a record bridge building, to which PLATO has nothing to do?
                      1. +3
                        19 March 2018 22: 27
                        but Rotenberg's companies are related to records in bridge building)

                        And they’ll build it on Sakhalin. No doubt. To manage a small business - not two fingers, as they say, medium - you can already turn gray.
                        And if he effectively manages several companies that build bridges, and they build bridges and not like in Kiev, then let them build. While seething around

                        Personally, I like the construction of the Crimean Bridge

                        And our country needs a lot of bridges. Let the companies be successful. Become larger, gain experience. I wish you only good luck

                2. +1
                  21 March 2018 10: 48
                  Quote: c-Petrov
                  Stop thumping, otherwise you’ll miss all the “new” achievements of your master.
                  Here is your victory.


                  so you don’t like the tax “plato”; it is just created for such situations.

                  To build bridges on which grandmothers will go for bread. There are many rivers - now they are building more bridges than with the UNION.

                  And the figures are weak to give? Plato is not like truckers, many of whom are simply simply apolitical, but for now.
                3. 0
                  28 March 2018 13: 10
                  Come on, SLEEP!
            5. +1
              19 March 2018 23: 58
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              Thank you country! Thank you for voting the way you want!

              You are welcome. But where are we going from this rut? There were elections in a slaveholding society: slaves were elected chief among the slaveholders and this was called "democracy."
            6. 0
              8 August 2018 18: 31
              And who is left let them work until the grave! Pension for centenarians!
          2. 0
            19 March 2018 10: 23
            Easy life no choices promise.
        2. +8
          19 March 2018 10: 15
          Identity for GDP. According to Suraikin, he is not from the Communist Party, he is from the Communists of Russia, this is a younger formation
          1. 0
            20 March 2018 00: 38
            Being called a communist and having a program for building communism in one particular country are two big differences. So which of these two is a communist?
        3. +15
          19 March 2018 10: 22
          Dear, Boris55 (Boris). The voting results surprised me. But "the voice of the people, the voice of God." The obtained figures should be considered as an objective reality at the current time. This is the choice of the people of Russia. These elections are a referendum on the choice of the country's development course. U V.V. Putin has huge potential for reform. Let’s see how he disposes of it.
          P.S. Yesterday I watched the ORT channel, somewhere after 23.00. The presenters received calls to the studio on the speakerphone from Russian citizens with orders to the president. Woman, 70 years old. Grammatically correct speech. Vladimir Putin congratulated him on his victory, and conveyed his wishes (close to the text): “We have a big village. The hospital has closed, the club has collapsed. There is no work in the village. Young people are leaving. If everything is corrected, then the salary should be added, then everything will be fine with us. "
          After this monologue, I remembered the words of Fedor Tyutchev - one cannot understand Russia with the mind. ("... The poem“ One cannot understand Russia with the mind "is very often quoted. The first line became a catchphrase to indicate a special Russian way of development. It is noteworthy that such an assessment of their country gave an experienced diplomat who knows European countries very well.At the time of writing the verse in Russia, only five years passed with a decree abolishing serfdom ... However, the most advanced technologies and ideas were combined with centuries of impassability, poverty and illiteracy. This contrast gives Tyutchev reason to argue that the development of Russia always follows its own special laws ... And the Russians themselves do not understand these laws, giving everything to the will of God. For centuries, Russia has developed a unique national character. The main peculiarity of a Russian person is to act not in accordance with the requirements of the mind, but at the behest of the heart ... ") (c)
          1. +9
            19 March 2018 10: 42
            Quote: AA17
            V.V. Putin has huge potential for reform. Let’s see how he disposes of it.

            Last May decrees were implemented by almost 95%. There is no reason not to trust that the new decrees will not be implemented as successfully.
            About the flaws. Putin in their message outlined and determined the direction of their solution. In our town, a month before the election, we closed the Sberbank branch and removed the ATM. Now, to withdraw money - you have to travel to the city. I am generally silent about the first-aid post - they removed it from the time of perestroika, although there are about six thousand inhabitants in the town ...
            In general, only the dead have no flaws.
            1. +15
              19 March 2018 15: 10
              One of the provisions of the May decrees dealt with 25 million new high-tech jobs. 95% is 23, 75 million. But do not tell me where and in which industries. For other provisions, also show where what and how. Apparently there was a mistake in the voice acting. 95% of the May decrees were NOT PERFORMED. This is much closer to the truth.
              1. +3
                19 March 2018 19: 15
                Quote: basmach
                One of the provisions of the May decrees dealt with 25 million new high-tech jobs. 95% is 23, 75 million. But do not tell me where and in which industries. For other provisions, also show where what and how. Apparently there was a mistake in the voice acting. 95% of the May decrees were NOT PERFORMED. This is much closer to the truth.

                Judging by the flag, dear, you are not a citizen of Russia, but you take an active part in pouring mud at the president and the people who elect him. There is such a village in the Tambov region. -Somovka. 12 km from the regional center of Mordovo. So, there was no electricity held until 1985. And such villages across Russia were left as a legacy of hundreds of red-flagged ones. And comrade Khrushchev promised communism in 1981. And where is it (and communism and the years of its construction)?
                1. +7
                  19 March 2018 23: 11
                  Well, if you can’t recognize the flag of the Air Force, well then the flag is in your hands. Yes, and I am familiar with the Tambov province; I studied 1985 on 1990 and studied at the Tambov Higher Military Aviation and Engineering School named after F. Dzerzhinsky, at the end of which he was awarded the rank of “lieutenant” and went to serve in the Far Eastern Federal District in 523 with the Red Banner Orders of Suvorov, Alutov, Kutzov . Nevsky Orsha Apib.
                  And we still haven’t gasified in our country (the same Far East Region is still liquefied) - Well, after 25, they didn’t reach after the red flag arms. Al the mind is not enough and hands do not grow from there. I’ll bring for you from “Fedot the Sagittarius” Filatov- “He thinks everybody else is a freak, no matter what himself.”
                  I have the honor.
                  1. +3
                    20 March 2018 08: 58
                    It looks like you are not very friendly with the economy. A gas pipeline is a very expensive thing and is justified only when there are many consumers. For remote settlements, it is more cost-effective to use liquefied gas. In general, gas liquefaction today is a global trend. And in this direction Russia already occupies a worthy place and continues to increase its production volumes.
                    And where it is economically feasible, of course, there is nothing better than a gas pipeline.
                    1. +2
                      20 March 2018 14: 14
                      I am familiar with economics. Vladivostok, Ussuriysk, Artem, Nakhodka are small villages and are not profitable there. No need to blame the other for what they themselves are incompetent. As in the issue with the flag and my whereabouts
                      1. +2
                        20 March 2018 14: 36
                        It is a great art to choose the most effective solutions. In order not to spray money, the economic result was maximum. With our limited resources, Wishlist have to moderate. Although, of course, "every gopher is an agronomist."
                    2. +1
                      20 March 2018 22: 00
                      Quote: GUKTU76
                      In general, gas liquefaction today is a global trend.

                      Forget about the "global trend of gas liquefaction" !!! Speak nonsense, but already an adult! This trend created a hegemon in view of the fact that you can’t lay pipes out of a mattress! There are almost no pipelines in Asia. Gas liquefaction plants cost billions of dollars, and pipelines still need to be brought to them, and terminals should be built at the loading and unloading sites. What is the price for such a gas?
                      1. +2
                        21 March 2018 07: 07
                        Higher than piping. However, it is much more mobile and efficient in areas where it is impossible to lay a pipe. Both from the "mattress" and into the "mattress". There has already been a precedent. So the trend is quite logical for itself. Already something, but the capitalists both ours and not ours know how to count.
                2. +2
                  21 March 2018 16: 15
                  Quote: captain
                  Judging by the flag, dear, you are not a citizen of Russia

                  I am a citizen of Russia. Doctor of the highest category, where are my 200% by region? I live in Novosibirsk. Whatever you swell from the calculations, it’s 70 thousand per bet. Then 40 would scrape one and a half.
            2. +3
              19 March 2018 18: 47
              Quote: Boris55
              Last May decrees were implemented by almost 95%

              An example of one of the items "MU".
              The teacher's salary should be at the average level in the region. Great. Just to get this you need to have at least 1 category and constant "merit before." If those are not enough, please get 17-20 tr. And more. The fall of the ruble at the end of the 14th, this increase is completely leveled. As our teachers received, in terms of bucks, about 500 to "MU", they get it now, after "MU"
              1. +4
                19 March 2018 21: 18
                Well, raise the category, have merits for the students and get a higher salary for the teacher, or do you want to get well done without doing anything?
              2. +3
                20 March 2018 09: 02
                What about the bucks? Do you spend your salary in America or at home?
          2. +13
            19 March 2018 11: 25
            Quote: AA17
            "We have a big village. The hospital closed, the club collapsed. There is no work in the village.


            Alas, the picture is ordinary. Yesterday, on duty, he was at a rural polling station from opening to closing. The whole picture is depressing. The once rather big village is slowly but surely dying. 80% of people voted are of retirement age, there are practically no youth. People flee the village as hell of incense and this is not surprising. There is no work, and therefore zero prospects! Dozens of houses are boarded up or simply abandoned. Rural public places are nowhere to go - you can’t look at the club and FAP without tears, there’s practically no mobile connection - you have to go to a certain place near the road to make calls, because if the arrangement of stars favors it sometimes catches BEELINE. They have never heard of the Internet there. In general, the picture is depressing. And there are countless such villages and villages throughout the country.
            1. +7
              19 March 2018 11: 47
              Quote: Alexey R
              Alas, the picture is ordinary. Yesterday, on duty, he was at a rural polling station from opening to closing. The whole picture is depressing. The once rather big village is slowly but surely dying. 80% of people voted are of retirement age, there are practically no youth. People flee the village as hell of incense and this is not surprising. There is no work, and therefore zero prospects!

              I don’t know how old you are, but it was still in the Non-Black Earth Region thirty years back.
              And it began in the 1930s: with all their might, EVERYTHING eager to break out of the village, from hopeless hard, almost unpaid work and poverty.
              Happiness of parents was when the children left for the city.
              1. +10
                19 March 2018 12: 07
                Quote: Nikitin-
                I don’t know how old you are, but it was in the Non-Black Earth Region thirty years ago.


                It was always and everywhere, but not on such a catastrophic scale. Of course, and in a time favorable for the village, some people sought to move to the city - not everyone saw themselves as machine operators, livestock breeders, etc. And those young people who remained in the village had good prospects. As an example, my aunt and uncle. In the early 80s they got married. After half a year, the state farm allocated them a new house for living !!! Citizens envied their salary. And this despite the fact that the uncle worked as a tractor driver, and the aunt on the farm. Very few villagers sought to the city, because normal, paid work was plenty at home. and somewhere in the mid-90s, both of them had to change their occupation, because their state farm ordered to live long, not having endured the hardships and trials of troubled times.

                And it began in the 1930s: with all their might, EVERYTHING eager to break out of the village, from hopeless hard, almost unpaid work and poverty.


                The 30s were a difficult time not only for the village, but for the whole country as a whole. People were drawn into a vein in order to build a new, just society and state. And as usual, this construction was carried out largely due to the village. But they stood and built. If not for war, then everything would be different!
                1. +3
                  19 March 2018 15: 06
                  Quote: Alexey R
                  It was always and everywhere, but not on such a catastrophic scale. Of course, at a time favorable for the village, some people sought to move to the city - not everyone saw themselves as machine operators, livestock breeders, etc. And those young people who remained in the village had good prospects.

                  In the USSR, there was neither normal work in the countryside, nor a normal salary, nor normal living conditions.
                  At the beginning 1980-x the flow of youth has dried up from the villages of the Non-Black Earth Region, although there stood Half a million empty houses. The youth is over.
                  The catastrophe was already then.
                  Now, the continuation.
                  Very few villagers sought to the city, because normal, paid work was plenty at home.

                  There was work, there was no salary.
                  The 30s were a difficult time not only for the village, but for the whole country as a whole. People were reaching out to build a new, just society and state
                  If you think that people then less than you wanted to live NORMALLY during your lifetime (and not in some distant future), then you are deeply mistaken. They were DRAWN, not they were dragged.
                  But they stood and built.

                  But the others did not build? And much better, but without pulling veins?
                  1. +5
                    19 March 2018 15: 10
                    Quote: Nikitin-
                    In the USSR, there was neither normal work in the countryside, nor a normal salary, nor normal living conditions.


                    Blah blah blah...
                    1. +1
                      19 March 2018 19: 20
                      Quote: Alexey R
                      Quote: Nikitin-
                      In the USSR, there was neither normal work in the countryside, nor a normal salary, nor normal living conditions.


                      Blah blah blah...

                      I then somehow read the communist comrades about the village saying. Like people worked for workdays and had their own gardens. This pier was very profitable. Well, if it was so profitable, then why didn't everyone who writes all sorts of nonsense about collective-farm happiness stayed there on the collective farm at one time? Or besides blah blah there is nothing in the language?
                      1. +2
                        19 March 2018 20: 12
                        Quote: captain
                        Or besides blah blah there is nothing in the language?


                        Dear, I have already voiced my opinion about past life in the village. I'm not going to chew it for you again.
                        Apparently for you, the village is clearly associated with collectivization. Grandfather fist put to the wall or sent to Siberia?
                  2. +1
                    19 March 2018 15: 24
                    Quote: Nikitin-
                    If you think that people then less than you wanted to live NORMALLY during your lifetime (and not in some distant future), then you are deeply mistaken. They were DRAWN, not they were dragged.


                    Say hello to Sobchak. You have one and a half percent.
              2. 0
                21 March 2018 16: 19
                Quote: Nikitin-
                I don’t know how old you are,

                Apparently you have a lot, but sometimes old age comes alone, wisdom, as it lags behind. Well, read how after the Second World War villages were raised when there were almost no men.
            2. +5
              19 March 2018 13: 47
              Quote: Alexey R
              The once rather big village is slowly but surely dying.

              About 9 thousand people now live in my village, in the 80s there were about 15 thousand. Young people are leaving, they are not returning from school. I do not consider this process abnormal, because now citizens have freedom, they are not sent to the place of work, they themselves choose where to live. Urbanization is a normal process ... In agriculture, there is no such demand for labor as 40 years ago, you don’t need 15 and a half mechanics and a whole staff of mechanics for them, they will be replaced by one KAMAZ or a foreigner who repair services, you do not need turners, spare parts in the store is plentiful and it’s cheaper to buy them than to keep a lathe and a forge; a modern combine will replace a dozen old ones in terms of productivity, with greater reliability and incomparably greater comfort. At the same level of processing areas, workers need 10 times less, the rest in the city, the city will find a place for everyone ...
              1. +1
                19 March 2018 14: 09
                Quote: raw174
                About 9 thousand people now live in my village, in the 80s there were about 15 thousand.


                Probably not quite a village. A minimum of PGT, as a maximum district center.

                Quote: raw174
                Young people leave, do not return from school.


                Partly agree. As a rule, a young man who has received a good education has nowhere to apply his abilities in small NPs. Therefore, the prospect is hooked in a large city for young people is attractive. Moreover, our people are free to choose where they live.



                Quote: raw174
                In agriculture, there is no such demand for labor as 40 years ago, 15 and a half cars and a whole staff of mechanics are not needed for them, they will be replaced by one KAMAZ or a foreigner,


                There is no demand because there are no jobs, because there are not as many agricultural enterprises as 40 years ago. Around my city there was not a piece of land uncultivated by kolkhs and state farms. Now these lands are either not cultivated and are overgrown with forest or given for private development.
                But you’re probably right, we don’t need so many villages and villages imprisoned for plowing and animal husbandry. In our time, productivity and livestock is achieved not by the number of workers, but by the perfection of equipment and technologies.
                But it’s still painful to look at the dying village, where not so long ago, life was in full swing, and where today there are grandfathers and old women living their lives.
                1. +4
                  19 March 2018 14: 47
                  Quote: Alexey R
                  at most district center

                  District Center. But this is a countryside represented only by agriculture.
                  Quote: Alexey R
                  Around my city there was not a piece of land uncultivated by kolkhs and state farms.

                  In our country, on the contrary, they even plowed up what was not used or used as pasture during the alliance. They grow wheat and products, often they get more than with the union, it depends on the yield. In the 90s, they hunted in abandoned fields, roe deer were immeasurable, now living creatures have become much smaller, everyone has been smelling, and they are also involved in chemical weeding ...
                  1. +2
                    19 March 2018 14: 54
                    Quote: raw174
                    They grow wheat and products, often they get more than with the union, it depends on the yield.


                    In general, it seems to me that the well-being and development of agriculture and the village as a whole depends not only on “Putin personally”, but also on the link working directly on the “land” - governors, mayors, and heads of rural settlements. Maybe this link is limping here? Although, we choose them ourselves.
                    1. +2
                      20 March 2018 06: 26
                      Quote: Alexey R
                      from the link working directly on the "land" - governors, mayors, heads of rural settlements. Maybe this link is limping here? Although, we choose them ourselves.

                      Yes, rather, even from the villagers themselves. Now, if somewhere there is good land, with the ability to get a crop, there are no special problems to start cultivating it. Depending on the regions, there are different support programs, only people who are not afraid to get dirty in dust and fuel oil are needed, but there are less and less of them ... By myself, I know that it is more pleasant to work in the office)))
          3. +20
            19 March 2018 11: 47
            Yesterday, as a member of the commission, I went with an urn And an interesting observation. Of the 56 voters at home, all pensioners are mainly under 70. Almost 50- for GDP- "he pays us a pension." Of the 318 who voted, 126 at home (this is the whole village, the whole plot) For GDP, 281 (88%), for Grudinin-21 (6,6%), for Zhirik-7, for Sobchak-3.
            Neighboring site (also villages, but more at the age of 30 +), commission through the wall. 389 votes. 318 for GDP9 81%) 69 for Grudinin (17%).
            Another plot (in the city). Total 745, For GDP-593 (79%), For Grudinin-112 (15%)
            The electorate is changing qualitatively. What used to be red (pensioners, of whom we have a population of three and who always actively vote in all elections) are leaving the "red". They only need to be paid a pension, they will at least vote for the devil. And the 30 + generation is becoming red. . Despite the fact that Grudinin, unlike GDP, is not media-promoted at all, and so much dirt has not spilled over the entire modern history of Russia on any candidate.
            1. +4
              19 March 2018 22: 47
              Despite the fact that Grudinin, unlike GDP, is not media-promoted at all


              now untwisted. believe me. hi I think in folk art he will overtake the entire Communist Party

            2. +5
              20 March 2018 06: 35
              Quote: basmach
              They only need to be paid a pension, they will at least vote for the devil.

              My mother is a pensioner and mother-in-law, they say: "Why do we need another president? We are not living badly. Children (me and my wife) are working, they are not delaying their pension, everything is in the store." People live quietly. Mother's pension is 11 thousand, mother-in-law has about 15, mother-in-law also has 15. This is quite enough in the village ... Everyone voted naturally for Putin, I generally know very little of those who did not vote for him ...
            3. 0
              20 March 2018 22: 32
              Quote: basmach
              Despite the fact that Grudinin, unlike GDP, is not media-promoted at all, and so much dirt has not spilled over the entire modern history of Russia on any candidate.

              I agree with you, colleague! Objectively and on the topic!
          4. 0
            20 March 2018 00: 44
            Quote: AA17
            But "the voice of the people, the voice of God."

            But what if you try to vote by popular vote to accept a flight program for the delivery of Russians to the moon in 2020? The points.
            The elections showed that in recent years there has been a negative selection of personnel and something urgently needs to be done. And then by 2024 we are up to mice ...
          5. +2
            20 March 2018 14: 01
            I will assume that Tyutchev did not understand Russia — when in Russia there are a lot of people with an engineer mentality (they set tasks and find solutions) in the country, the country’s rise as soon as the critical mass of executors (effective managers) stagnate, development stops.
        4. +8
          19 March 2018 10: 30
          Quote: Boris55
          then the true values ​​of socialism were proclaimed by Suraikin, but by no means the Communist Party.

          That's it: proclaimed. The Zyuganovites rushed about, they realized that you couldn’t collect grandmothers on the legacy of Marx, Lenin and Stalin, but the nimble guys with stolen eggs who died in Kiev caused a lack of understanding among the electorate. Grudinin - this abruptly reminded me of the "owners" who wouldn’t talk to the staff in any way. They were bored with talking to people who were supposed to make them rich yesterday ... Something I have never heard from the workers about the "communists". Hence the conclusion - these are nimble boys who realized that the niche of the working party is empty, it is necessary to occupy and cut down the attendants. And to work is superfluous, the bourgeoisie will take down the skull for OWN-BLOOD!
        5. +24
          19 March 2018 11: 15
          "people" and other (sometimes very insulting) epithets that you reward us with do not celebrate, he just has nothing to "walk" about an epoch-making event ... try to celebrate with your current pension 8 rubles, of which more than half goes to pay Housing and communal services ...
          Yes, the GDP won at the expense of those who have a “trough” and a resource subject to them, as well as drugged by TV propaganda, because those who were against the election did not go ... they have no one to order!
          yes, I voted for Grudinin, because he has a clear and feasible program, which I did not see in the GDP ...
          only slogans: "we will increase the welfare of the people!" , and what people do not specify if we
          "people", then this does not concern us ...
          I am not against Putin, I am against his team !!!
          against Kudrin, against Siluanov, Naibulina, Medvedev and other effective cheaters in power who do not languish with the goal of raising Russia, but seek to arrange their affairs ...
          how much I observe their “troubles” - I see only one thing, how they raise the country at the expense of new taxes and banal speculation: bowels, lands and weapons, frankly, this is the only thing we can do ....
          if he had changed his team, more people would have voted for him and quite sincerely ...
          it is clear that you will answer me, but you see LIFE from the window of a foreign car and you are not impressed with what happens to ordinary people, the main thing is warm and satisfying ... so celebrate your health, and we rejoice at the coming price increase, new taxes and other things "graces" of the gentlemen, as it were not from the hand ...
          1. +2
            19 March 2018 11: 22
            Quote: Azazel
            with the current pension, 8 rubles, of which more than half goes to pay

            You do not know our legislation well - no more than 22% of the total income of all registered. If you register 100 people in your living space, then you will not have enough of the whole pension.
          2. +6
            19 March 2018 11: 52
            Quote: Azazel
            to celebrate with the current pension 8 rubles, of which more than half goes to pay for utilities ...

            And when EVERYTHING goes to housing and communal services, like the neighbors?
            Quote: Azazel
            yes, I voted for Grudinin, because he has a clear and doable program

            Impossible tale. The first thing that a sternum would begin with is: "Now you have to PATTER!"
            1. +11
              19 March 2018 12: 00
              Quote: Nikitin-
              now we have to tolerate! "

              Putin will tell you this, we will do everything together with the sauce, though the absolute majority will tighten the belt, and the grouchy minority will eat grouse (this is just the opposite, the sigh of joy that NOTHING will change is clearly heard from the moneybags), which is now in ecstasy yelling damn knows what.
              Housing and communal services prices have not fallen and will not fall, the rise in the minimum wage and meager supplements to pensions do not contribute to joy in any way, except for the tortured and artificial one among regular propagandists.
              In the Stavropol Territory there is an Accounts Chamber regarding the wildest prices for utility services, no sense, wife's pension of 8500, housing and communal services in winter, now-7500, a boiler room seven meters from the house.
              What are you happy about?
              Yes, Putin won the election, well, thereby taking on ALL responsibility for everything that happens, and not just for foreign policy, now it will be impossible to nod on the principle that the king is good, the boyars are bad.
          3. +5
            19 March 2018 12: 29
            Quote: Azazel
            yes, I voted for Grudinin, because he has a clear and feasible program, which I did not see in the GDP ..


            Maybe Grudinin has a good and feasible program, but this cadidat for the presidency is rotten. I can’t explain what exactly, apparently the sixth sense suggests. And he would not fulfill his promises, having found a bunch of reasons for this.
            1. +7
              19 March 2018 14: 24
              Quote: Alexey R
              apparently the sixth sense suggests.

              Weighty ... I would even say a killer argument. Do you have a third eye?
              1. +1
                19 March 2018 14: 28
                Quote: BecmepH
                Weighty ... I would even say a killer argument.


                Intuition usually does not fail me.

                Quote: BecmepH
                Do you have a third eye?


                And do you have?
                1. +2
                  19 March 2018 14: 35
                  Quote: Alexey R
                  Quote: BecmepH
                  Weighty ... I would even say a killer argument.


                  Intuition usually does not fail me.

                  Quote: BecmepH
                  Do you have a third eye?


                  And do you have?

                  Well, you know about intuition, but that the enlightened third eye does not open in the know.
                  You are not the case with TNT? Not a psychic? Tell the future
                  1. +1
                    19 March 2018 14: 42
                    Quote: BecmepH
                    Well, you know about intuition, but that the enlightened third eye does not open in the know.


                    Did I offend or insult you or did you cross the road? Or do you for the pro ..... th election of a communist millionaire insulting?

                    Quote: BecmepH
                    You are not the case with TNT? Not a psychic? Tell the future


                    I am not with TNT and generally have a minimal relationship to TV. And with the future, everything is fine with me (for me in particular), which apparently cannot be said about oasis.
                  2. +1
                    19 March 2018 14: 55
                    Quote: BecmepH
                    You are not the case with TNT? Not a psychic? Tell the future


                    You have such an avatar ... So you rather with TNT, not me)))
                    1. +1
                      19 March 2018 19: 24
                      Quote: Alexey R
                      Quote: BecmepH
                      You are not the case with TNT? Not a psychic? Tell the future


                      You have such an avatar ... So you rather with TNT, not me)))

                      He is from the afterlife judging by the flag. A debate with you from heaven leads you and you must either agree with the souls of the dead or forgive them everything in advance.
            2. +2
              20 March 2018 22: 46
              Quote: Alexey R
              Maybe Grudinin has a good and feasible program, but this cadidat for the presidency is rotten. I can’t explain what exactly, apparently the sixth sense suggests.

              Damn, what kind of people! Whatever a man, then Wang at least! Tired of writing already, honestly! I personally was and saw with my own eyes the Grudininsky state farm, though it was a couple of years ago, and a year before that I watched his performances on YouTube. Sensible person, competent leader, strong manager! Why do we vote for talkers and never for a person of business? They seem to us "rotten"! Why? Because you read a lot of bad things about them in the federal media? Dial Grudinin on YouTube, look at his speeches 3-5 years ago, when he did not even dream of being a candidate, but he always said and continues to talk about the actions of the government the same thing - the truth that few people love. I always remember a joke about this: True - like a prostitute - everyone wants to, but nobody loves!
          4. +2
            19 March 2018 15: 53
            Quote: Azazel
            clear

            And what do you understand? Did you answer whom? So I answer YOU - and this is understandable. And yours
            Quote: Azazel
            you see LIFE from the window of a foreign car
            Have you written to whom? I have a 13-year-old Shniva. The pension described by you more and there is still monetization of benefits. And the bow on the grille of Shniva - in short, bourgeois. I am also against the team. And also against the thieves capitalist society, which we have been lied to. But this is not a reason to vote for Ksyusha or Grudinin. I don’t like their ideas. And I see no reason to vote for nimble boys who are like communists. Because for now I see NOTHING there for the interests of the working class. For myself, my beloved, I see. So, if not difficult, address explicitly. How am I to you. And not into space. Like ALL! ALL! ALL!
        6. +5
          19 March 2018 11: 21
          Holiday is good! But it wouldn’t hurt to work ... for the country, and not for his friends and other Chubais
          1. +1
            19 March 2018 19: 31
            Quote: victor50
            Holiday is good! But it wouldn’t hurt to work ... for the country, and not for his friends and other Chubais

            And why didn’t you please Chubais. Father is a front-line soldier, he fought in the 4 POLITICAL MANAGEMENT of the Ukrainian Front, was awarded orders. After the war, he studied and became a colonel and head of the department of MARXISM-LENINISM! To the masses he carried the ideas of Marx, brought up by this worthy communist scientist two sons; each other is better. And Gaidar is the same from your breed; dad rear admiral political commissar. The editor of the journal "Communist" himself is the mouthpiece of the CPSU. All your kodlo venal people intoxicate and at the same time do not forget your pocket. Children and grandchildren of all CPSU general secretaries live in the USA or in Europe. Stop fooling people.
        7. 0
          19 March 2018 12: 41
          but the suraykin with his "guardians" behind his back looks more like left essers.
        8. +2
          19 March 2018 15: 34
          As for the Communist Party, one thing can be said - the Communist Party nominates a capitalist as a candidate, this is some kind of absurd theater.
        9. +5
          19 March 2018 17: 04
          I agree about Suraikin.
          What did Grudinin - the representative of the Communist Party - when the vote count showed his loss?
          He recognized the truth of Navalny and called the election dirty! Grudinin and Navalny - a new tandem? It’s very good that I lost. It’s bad that I could not adequately admit defeat.
          And I congratulate Putin on his re-election. Our Leader!
        10. +3
          19 March 2018 23: 01
          Your idol managed to fool the country. And who told you that we are waiting for a return to what was, without changes. I personally am quite happy with the option of soft socialism with a combination of planned state and elements of the private economy. It is quite real. This option was proposed by Grudinin.
        11. +1
          22 March 2018 15: 14
          Boris, "managed to fool the people, despite all the efforts of some,".
          The winner was a man who allowed a decline in the living standards of the people, especially that part of it that is below society, and besides, this part has grown in mass. In the Russian Federation there are working people - beggars. Invalid phenomenon. Under the slogan of the government, "there is no money, but you hold on," meaningless expenses are allowed to help banks that do not justify it. Healthcare costs reduced. Money is not returned from offshore. There is still no progressive taxation scale. Until now, there has been no confiscation of property for large financial violators, who have suffered heavy losses for the country, and from their close relatives.
          But there is merit in the defense industry, yes.
      2. +26
        19 March 2018 07: 20
        Quote: populist
        Nothing unpredictable happened. The population, as always, has confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness under the dominance of pro-government SMRAD (mass media, agitation and misinformation.)

        And you probably voted for Sobchak?
        1. +1
          19 March 2018 19: 33
          Quote: volodya
          Quote: populist
          Nothing unpredictable happened. The population, as always, has confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness under the dominance of pro-government SMRAD (mass media, agitation and misinformation.)

          And you probably voted for Sobchak?

          But what, a good chick. Zhirinovsky correctly called her.
      3. +11
        19 March 2018 10: 12
        SMRAD - clearly noticed!
        1. +1
          19 March 2018 11: 54
          Quote: Igor Polovodov
          SMRAD - clearly noticed!

          You apparently GUSTO like: Means of the Mass Agitprop of the Communists: "Pravda" where there was no truth and "Izvestia" where there was no news 30 years ago.
          1. +11
            19 March 2018 12: 23
            Tomorrow, those who voted for Putin yesterday will begin to complain about the arbitrariness of officials, the lack of medicine and utilities, about the rising cost of gasoline and food, etc.
            And, as usual, they will blame the damned pi.d.osov and NATO in all troubles.
            So they poked you right into the SMRAD account. It was dirtier only in the 1996 year.
            And in Truth there was much more Truth than in icteric Life and Izvestia, there was more truthful news than in yellow SMRAD that you believe.
            1. +4
              19 March 2018 13: 10
              Quote: badens1111
              Tomorrow, those who voted for Putin yesterday will begin to complain about the arbitrariness of officials, the lack of medicine and housing and communal services, the rising cost of gasoline and food, etc.

              I’ll tell you a secret, the population of all countries in the world does just that. To scold everyone and everything, this is the normal state of the layman, people everywhere are constantly dissatisfied with something. Just to see the problems and destroy the country, referring to your "discontent", these are different things. Such as you stood on the Maidan with pots on your heads and under the guise of your "holy discontent" supported the killing of your country. I am glad that in Russia the majority of people have not yet descended to the level of the herd.
              1. +6
                19 March 2018 13: 14
                Quote: Orionvit
                I'll tell you a secret

                The most dissatisfied is the one who does not go to the polls, dissuades everyone from the polls, and then screams loudest that he feels bad, now barely half has come to the polls — does that mean anything to you?
                Quote: Orionvit
                such as you stood on the Maidan with pots on their heads and

                I would recommend here to remove the pan itself and not pretend to be a patriot, only your elector Zhirinovsky will agree with your not-so-smart arguments.
                1. +2
                  19 March 2018 13: 26
                  Quote: badens1111
                  I recommended you

                  No need to teach me. I repeat, like you, with similar ideas I saw enough on the Maidan, and therefore I know what I'm talking about. Ukraine has been enough for me, that's why I am a patriot of Russia (and always has been). Here you pour mud on your own country, and hide behind your popular "indignation." You just don’t know what it is like to live badly in a country that you have almost completely destroyed by the hands of your kind. I read your comments and understand only one thing, that the "lovers of democracy" and various "changes" in Russia just naturally snickered. For you, the old Russian proverb is "To a dissatisfied serf, at least ..... th at ... pu." Putin won, and this only says that in Russia the majority of the population is still friends with their own heads, which can not be said about you and you.
                  1. +4
                    19 March 2018 13: 54
                    You temper ardor then.
                    And I'm not interested in what you picked up there in Ukraine and why you all rush about with that pan.
                    All that was worse than nowhere, Russia passed in the 90s, so it’s not for you to teach me and not for you to tell us about how you all lost.
                    If you think that you have snickered in Russia, then leave Russia alone, go to Ukraine and tell tales there. Somehow, without your notations, we will figure out what to do and how to prevent people like you from taking power.
                    The question is in choosing the country's path, you do not understand this.
                    And Putin, unlike you, understands this perfectly.
                    1. +2
                      19 March 2018 21: 17
                      Quote: badens1111
                      You temper ardor then.

                      If the experience of your neighbors does not teach you anything, and some of you, as I see it, are not able to take even elementary experience from life, a flag in your hands. Popular wisdom says that smart people learn from the mistakes of others, and fools from their own. Judging by your rhetoric, you belong to the second. And looking at the voting results on this patriotic website, you immediately realize that just about 40% of the registered judges do not go to discuss, or support the problems of Russia, it’s just that.
                      how not to allow you like to power
                      I do not aspire to power, but in Ukraine, democrats like you have already come to power. And it’s not for you to teach me, here you somehow feel it in your own skin.
                      The question is in choosing the country's path, you do not understand this.
                      I can not understand? These speeches in Ukraine have been heard for the fifth year. Oh well. : Live in your illusions further.
            2. +1
              19 March 2018 19: 36
              Quote: badens1111
              Tomorrow, those who voted for Putin yesterday will begin to complain about the arbitrariness of officials, the lack of medicine and utilities, about the rising cost of gasoline and food, etc.
              And, as usual, they will blame the damned pi.d.osov and NATO in all troubles.
              So they poked you right into the SMRAD account. It was dirtier only in the 1996 year.
              And in Truth there was much more Truth than in icteric Life and Izvestia, there was more truthful news than in yellow SMRAD that you believe.

              I agree with you. I remember, but I really remember how the Pravda newspaper wrote about Gorbachev; a true communist, Leninist (the same notes about Yeltsin, before his conflict with Gorbachev). . That is why I love your communist fraternity; you are lying and not blushing.
          2. +1
            19 March 2018 23: 05
            The saddest thing is that in Pravda there was truth, and in Izvestia - news. Only a little earlier than you designated in time. That is, as now
            There were errors, but the lie was not a system, as it is now.
          3. 0
            20 March 2018 22: 54
            Quote: Nikitin-
            "Truth" where there was no truth, and "Izvestia" where there was no news 30 years ago.

            Dear, it sounded like this: I do not read newspapers because there is no news in Pravda, and there is no truth in Izvestia!
      4. +2
        19 March 2018 11: 22
        What misinformed and targeted you? Do you know what you want?
      5. +2
        19 March 2018 11: 29
        Quote: populist
        The population, as always, has confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness under the rule of pro-government SMRAD

        How did the minority manage to avoid manipulation? belay
        Apparently a foil hat helped. Yes hi
      6. +6
        19 March 2018 11: 48
        I am an Australian citizen who has been living in this country for almost 30 years and it is difficult to suspect me of exposure to the Russian media. But if I had the opportunity, I would only vote for Putin. Well, there is no alternative to him in modern Russia. NO!
        1. +3
          19 March 2018 14: 12
          Our other contemporary, I.V. Stalin, said that "there are no irreplaceable people."
          1. 0
            19 March 2018 19: 38
            Quote: alexxxz
            Our other contemporary, I.V. Stalin, said that "there are no irreplaceable people."

            So he was replaced, first Khrushchev, and after a while Gorbachev.
        2. 0
          19 March 2018 23: 07
          There is such a joke - she died, she died. In relation to you - they fled, and condemn the problems of survival of the kangaroo, my friend.
      7. The comment was deleted.
      8. +1
        19 March 2018 14: 03
        Everything is true, except for the belonging of these "means." They are far from pro-government.
      9. +1
        19 March 2018 20: 58
        Quote: populist
        The population, as always, has confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness under the dominance of pro-government SMRAD (mass media, agitation and misinformation.)

        This 56 million showed insecurity? Or maybe it's time to protect your head for a long time?
    2. +39
      19 March 2018 07: 17
      mud country
      For me, a country is our whole story, from princes to presidents. And if I do not like individuals, then these are just individuals. You constantly spit in the Soviet past, blaming both the people and the country.
      1. +8
        19 March 2018 08: 14
        Gardamir
        You constantly spit in the Soviet past, blaming both the people and the country
        If you do this to me, then it is completely at the wrong place. Never spit in the Soviet past, because He lived half of his life in it.
        1. +7
          19 March 2018 08: 18
          Never spit
          Then I'm sorry, I'm confused in some nicknames, because it seems there is still a captain and esaul. Sorry again.
          1. +6
            19 March 2018 08: 20
            Yes there is a captain (in Cyrillic). He does sometimes sometimes express dissatisfaction with the Soviet past.
            1. +5
              19 March 2018 09: 42
              captain (in Cyrillic)
              I'll try to remember and no longer get confused. Agree at all times. there is something to be proud of in the history of our country. even in Yeltsin’s times, there was a throw at Pristina when our paratroopers frightened NATO warriors.
              1. +8
                19 March 2018 10: 02
                Quote: Gardamir
                Agree at all times. there is something to be proud of in the history of our country. even in Yeltsin’s times, there was a throw at Pristina when our paratroopers frightened NATO warriors.

                And today, what can you be proud of? The same though the Crimea.
                1. +12
                  19 March 2018 10: 22
                  And today, what can you be proud of? The same though Crimea
                  There is something, but not Crimea. I know the history of my country well. Such a tricky division of Krymnash, and Little Russia is now a country of 404. But this is also our land and our people.
                  1. +6
                    19 March 2018 10: 50
                    Quote: Gardamir
                    There is something but not Crimea

                    Do you cheat?
                    For you, a throw at Pristina, an event for pride, but no throw at the Crimea and Syria? By the way, Crimea and Syria, these events as markers or a prism that clearly separates who is who! Including you ...
                    But most importantly, these events eloquently testify and prove that Russia under Putin’s rule became, without reservation, a strong and successful country. And only limited people can not see these, more clearly, reinforced concrete facts and evidence.

                    Congratulations to all Russians with the right choice, 70% smart in the country is an excellent indicator and a serious bid for a great future, keep it up! good drinks fellow
                    1. +6
                      19 March 2018 12: 49
                      You cheat!
                      Donbass covered the Crimea with thousands of victims. In Syria, Turkey wringes north and not yet evening.
                      I know what victory our ancestors were proud of in 1945. What are you proud of?
                      1. +2
                        19 March 2018 13: 47
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        I know what victory our ancestors were proud of in 1945. What are you proud of?

                        Our ancestors heroically perished on the battlefields heroically, the elderly and half-starved children stood behind the machines, and you just whined on the Internet, how hard it is for you to live, there is no work, you do not have enough salary. With people like you, victory is generally meaningless.
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        Donbass covered the Crimea with thousands of victims. In Syria, Turkey wringes north and not yet evening.

                        It’s just not evening yet, at this stage of history, it is still a long way to victory, but Russia has already won some of the battles, Crimea and Donbass are some of them. What about the victims, so at that time Donbass was the territory of another state, and is Russia to blame for their death? or all the same nonhumans who gave the order to bomb? Those who contributed to the Maidan? But whatever it was, Russia still saved the Donbass.
                    2. +4
                      19 March 2018 14: 18
                      “Russia under Putin’s rule has become, without reservation, a strong and successful country” - about which you can wipe your legs with impunity, fabricating ridiculous accusations, and sticking sticks into the wheels of its industrial development.
                      What is your strength? In laudatory animated demos about the miracle weapon that everyone should be afraid of? But for some reason, no one is afraid ... The only thing to be proud of during the reign of the "great and terrible" is the return of Crimea. But here the Crimeans themselves did most of the work. And they did this not because Russia was so beautiful, but because Krajina became absolutely terrible.
                      1. +3
                        19 March 2018 14: 47
                        Putinists can not read this post and it is advisable not to comment. so as not to choke on poison and bile. Let them rejoice that they missed the chance to avoid shocks with their own hands and heads and to allow the country to break the Yeltsin-Putin impasse in an evolutionary way. I appeal to comrades from supporters of the bloc of national-patriotic forces of which there are many. No need to despair. We lost the battle, but not the war. The main struggle is all ahead. The inevitable most powerful social, political and economic crisis that is happening before our eyes as the bureaucratic-oligarchic elite grows in conditions of total decay from top to bottom and unprecedented pressure on it from the outside will certainly bring to ruin this corrupt and thoroughly false Putin system. Our main task is to give a damn about ideological differences and continue to unite all healthy patriotic forces in order to prevent the final elimination of Russia as an independent geopolitical unit under these difficult conditions. PDS NDSR should continue to work in this direction.
                      2. +2
                        19 March 2018 14: 52
                        Quote: alexxxz
                        about which you can wipe your legs with impunity, fabricating ridiculous accusations, and sticking sticks into the wheels of its industrial development.

                        You wonder why they do it? For what and what is the purpose of this bullying? Under Yeltsin, they didn’t. But what about impunity, what do you propose to do? There will be hundreds more such idiotic statements and accusations and what to react to every nonsense, tell me how it should be different than what the Kremlin is reacting to right now?
                        Quote: alexxxz
                        What is your strength? In laudatory animated demos about the miracle weapon that everyone should be afraid of? That's just, for some reason, no one is afraid ..

                        What is the strength? In truth, in smart people, in the army, at least the second on the planet, in territories, technologies, economics, gas, oil and other resources. They are not afraid, because good Russia, for now ...
                  2. 0
                    20 March 2018 10: 40
                    Not all at once, we will take away the former Ukraine. Do not fuss.
                2. 0
                  19 March 2018 23: 10
                  But there is something to be ashamed of - they passed Novorossia.
              2. +2
                20 March 2018 23: 01
                Quote: Gardamir
                there was a throw at Pristina when our paratroopers frightened NATO warriors.

                It is a pity that there was no use from this throw! A very glorious, meaningless operation that the EBN leaked!
            2. +1
              19 March 2018 19: 43
              Quote: rotmistr60
              Yes there is a captain (in Cyrillic). He does sometimes sometimes express dissatisfaction with the Soviet past.

              I do not express dissatisfaction with the Soviet past (I always wrote with respect about Stalin), but write that we should not confuse Lenin, Trotsky, Bukharin and other leaders of the CPSU (b) with Stalin and his period in power. It is necessary to separate the Russophobia from the great people. By the way, the Soviets came up with the Social Revolutionaries.
              1. +1
                20 March 2018 10: 46
                Stalin always called Lenin his teacher, why should we not believe him and treat him badly?
          2. +2
            19 March 2018 10: 42
            Quote: Gardamir
            Sorry then,

            Sorry, I’m not getting into my business .. But try to attach a quote to the author, well, like mine, or your opponent. There will be no question.
      2. +11
        19 March 2018 11: 10
        Sorry to wedge into this thread. But a new start is difficult.
        When Zyuganov nominated Grudinin, I wrote that I would not speak about him until the elections came. But if he does not get votes for the second round or at least does not repeat the result of Zyuganov, then all your posts about the popular candidate are just balabolstvo. Well, what is the scoreboard.
        Now I can say “communists” —this is so in quotation marks, because the members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation have nothing to do with those who founded the great country — the USSR — they consciously drain the electorate over the entire short history of their existence. You are not the heirs of Stalin, you are the followers of Gorbachev, only he merged the country and you slowly merge the idea.
        1. +2
          19 March 2018 15: 16
          You are not the heirs of Stalin, you are the followers of Gorbachev, only he is a country and you are slowly merging the idea.

          To the point, which is sad!
        2. 0
          19 March 2018 19: 45
          Quote: bk316
          Sorry to wedge into this thread. But a new start is difficult.
          When Zyuganov nominated Grudinin, I wrote that I would not speak about him until the elections came. But if he does not get votes for the second round or at least does not repeat the result of Zyuganov, then all your posts about the popular candidate are just balabolstvo. Well, what is the scoreboard.
          Now I can say “communists” —this is so in quotation marks, because the members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation have nothing to do with those who founded the great country — the USSR — they consciously drain the electorate over the entire short history of their existence. You are not the heirs of Stalin, you are the followers of Gorbachev, only he merged the country and you slowly merge the idea.

          Put a plus with pleasure. The thought is sober and correct.
        3. 0
          20 March 2018 23: 08
          Quote: bk316
          You are not the heirs of Stalin, you are the followers of Gorbachev, only he merged the country and you slowly merge the idea.

          And when did you personally hear about Grudinin? When and all, or earlier? If that's all, what result did you expect? The easiest way to blame after the fact! And given that the campaign to denigrate this candidate in all federal mass media was simply unprecedented, the result, in my opinion, is very high! And yes, none of us is related to those who founded the great country of the USSR due to age and life expectancy. A deputy is called because he is FOR the people and knows his aspirations.
    3. +1
      19 March 2018 07: 36
      Yeah, so I told you who I voted for, the secret of voting is then a secret.
      1. +15
        19 March 2018 07: 55
        Quote: krops777
        Yeah, so I told you who I voted for, the secret of voting is then a secret.

        And what will happen if everyone finds out who we voted for? Will they put us in prison? Will we be kicked out of work? Will they send us out of the country? In my opinion, nothing of the kind will happen, but the habit of shitting stealthily will remain.
        Are you sure that your vote is counted in the CEC the way you voted? And than prove it - the ballots are faceless incl. secret ballot it is only secret from us ...
        1. 0
          19 March 2018 13: 02
          And what will happen if everyone finds out who we voted for? Will they put us in prison? Will we be kicked out of work? Will they send us out of the country? In my opinion, nothing of the kind will happen, but the habit of shitting stealthily will remain.
          Are you sure that your vote is counted in the CEC the way you voted? And than prove it - the ballots are faceless incl. secret ballot it is only secret from us ...


          I know less sleep more. wink And by and large it’s impossible to be completely sure of anything, as the hero of one film said, there is always a catch.
        2. +4
          19 March 2018 14: 01
          Quote: Boris55
          Are you sure that your vote is counted in the CEC the way you voted?

          No, I'm not so sure. I’ll try to participate in the next elections as an observer. In general, for a long time I’ve been talking to a psychologist for a long time, so he said that a high voter turnout indicates that the population is dissatisfied with something, this is an indicator that changes are required in society. If voters were satisfied with everything in life, there would be no need to run away and express their will.
      2. +11
        19 March 2018 08: 31
        Quote: krops777
        Yeah, so I told you who I voted for, the secret of voting is then a secret.


        Lord, no one claims your MAIN SECRET. Take it easy.
        1. +2
          19 March 2018 10: 53
          Quote: Banshee
          let no one claim your MAIN SECRET.

          Yes? And the evil enemies from the United Kingdom? From the United States? They have a QUESTION- why did they vote for Sobchak? And not for Yavlinsky? And poison, easily poison. There, they write: they have there, in Salisbury, a whole plant chasing poison. And it’s probably poured into fanfares with the Hawthorn label.
          1. +2
            19 March 2018 14: 21
            "Yes? And the evil enemies from the United Kingdom? From the United States? And they will poison, they will easily poison." - And in which chamber do you have Napoleon? )))))))))))))))))))
            1. +1
              19 March 2018 15: 38
              Quote: alexxxz
              "and in which chamber do you have Napoleon?
              And where is the prosecutor - do not remember the source?
              1. 0
                20 March 2018 11: 47
                I remember perfectly! )))) "And then on the ruins of the chapel ..."
                "Well, chapel ... me too?"
                "No, it's up to you in the ... century"
          2. 0
            20 March 2018 23: 21
            Do not write nonsense. For two years already there has been no hawthorn.
      3. 0
        19 March 2018 23: 12
        I’m ashamed, probably? Or scary?
    4. +28
      19 March 2018 07: 41
      people live really badly, but vote for the oligarchs and the robbery of Russia? It can't be that way.
      1. +23
        19 March 2018 08: 21
        people live really badly
        By the way, I agree. People live so poorly that they are afraid of any changes, no matter how worse it becomes. But in the Union, they forgot a proverb from good. do not seek good.
        1. +7
          19 March 2018 10: 05
          Quote: Gardamir
          forgot the proverb, from good. do not seek good.

          There is another, do not wake famously, while it is quiet.
      2. +2
        19 March 2018 08: 52
        Quote: Artek
        It can't be like that
        This cannot be, because it can never be (A Letter to the Scientific Neighbor by A.P. Chekhov)
      3. +13
        19 March 2018 08: 55
        Artek (Pavel) Today, 07:41 ↑ New
        people live really badly, but vote for the oligarchs and the robbery of Russia? It can't be that way.

        From BYAD, then again, the wrong people fell ... laughing He is told to vote for Grudinin, and he rushing to vote for Putin and the oligarchs. And why so, nobody thought ?! Think at your leisure, maybe some clever idea will wander into your head.
        1. +11
          19 March 2018 08: 57
          Quote: Varyag_0711
          Artek (Pavel) Today, 07:41 ↑ New
          people live really badly, but vote for the oligarchs and the robbery of Russia? It can't be that way.

          From BYAD, then again, the wrong people fell ... laughing He is told to vote for Grudinin, and he rushing to vote for Putin and the oligarchs. And why so, nobody thought ?! Think at your leisure, maybe some clever idea will wander into your head.


          Already came and not only in my head, falsification is called.
          1. +17
            19 March 2018 09: 03
            Artek (Pavel)
            Already came and not only in my head, falsification is called.
            I somehow didn’t even doubt your fool mental abilities. Our liberoids are all primitive right up to nausea. But that's what a hitch, my wife was a member of the election commission. On its site, 1200 people with some kind of penny were supposed to vote. Voted 900 with something there. Of these, more than 700 are for Putin.
            Probably the site is not correct, and the people are dumb ... belay
            1. +5
              19 March 2018 09: 21
              Quote: Varyag_0711
              Artek (Pavel)
              Already came and not only in my head, falsification is called.
              I somehow didn’t even doubt your fool mental abilities. Our liberoids are all primitive right up to nausea. But that's what a hitch, my wife was a member of the election commission. On its site, 1200 people with some kind of penny were supposed to vote. Voted 900 with something there. Of these, more than 700 are for Putin.
              Probably the site is not correct, and the people are dumb ... belay


              but I don’t believe you ...
              1. +13
                19 March 2018 09: 29
                Artek (Pavel) Today, 09:21 ↑
                but I don’t believe you ...
                Yes, I somehow did not even doubt your answer. But the problem is that in all areas there are surveillance cameras. Many polling stations had smart ballot boxes. In general, there is nothing to show you, otherwise the universal high would have been raised a long time ago, however, like your foreign masters, they would not have stood aside.
                So you can whine further from the gateway, this will not affect the further fate of Russia.
                1. +6
                  19 March 2018 10: 30
                  Quote: Varyag_0711
                  Artek (Pavel) Today, 09:21 ↑
                  but I don’t believe you ...
                  Yes, I somehow did not even doubt your answer. But the problem is that in all areas there are surveillance cameras. Many polling stations had smart ballot boxes. In general, there is nothing to show you, otherwise the universal high would have been raised a long time ago, however, like your foreign masters, they would not have stood aside.
                  So you can whine further from the gateway, this will not affect the further fate of Russia.


                  yes what cameras / bins? These accesories of bourgeois democracy have long since fully shown themselves as petty decorations in this fake theater. The main action will be performed by Veshnyakov / Churov / Panfilov, so that Putin’s pathological liars, as you no longer believe, are boiled with ssy.
                  1. +5
                    19 March 2018 11: 16
                    Quote: Artek
                    at least boiling water piss.


                    Do not be afraid to burn your legs ?!
                    1. +2
                      19 March 2018 12: 54
                      Quote: B.T.W.
                      Quote: Artek
                      at least boiling water piss.


                      Do not be afraid to burn your legs ?!

                      Ed you just can not piss on the physiological characteristics of the leg, what are you talking about?
                2. +5
                  19 March 2018 10: 39
                  Where there were observers, up to 57% of the number of registered voters voted, and where there were none, up to 75%. That's all the results! There are probably “favorite” PECs and “not favorite” ones ... And cameras recorded ballot box stuffing ..
                  1. +2
                    19 March 2018 11: 18
                    Quote: neofit962
                    And the cameras recorded throws in packs of ballots ..


                    And you, have info, for whom the ballots were thrown, maybe they are for Grudinin or Yavlinsky ?!
                    1. +2
                      19 March 2018 15: 37
                      Quote: B.T.W.
                      And you, have info, for whom the ballots were thrown

                      Quote: Serge Gorely
                      Do you certainly have videos and photos?

                      I do not share the joy of the Zaputinites, but I congratulate them on the satisfaction of their own vanity, but if you need someone, look
                3. +2
                  19 March 2018 11: 40
                  Two CRITERIA for assessing the results of the election of the President of the Russian Federation
                  1. Voter turnout
                  2. The percentage of confidence in each candidate
                  All other criteria from Sly

                  We look at indicators according to these criteria

                  1. Voter turnout. "" 4 hours ago - Voter turnout in the Russian presidential election on Sunday amounted to more than 67 percent. This was announced by Deputy Chairman of the Central Election Commission of Russia Nikolai Bulaev on the basis of CEC data after processing almost a hundred percent of the protocols. "

                  2. Percentage of confidence in each candidate .. "According to the results of processing 99,75% of the protocols of precinct commissions, Vladimir Putin received 76,67% of the vote. The President of Russia has been elected for a period of up to 2024. World leaders are already sending congratulations.

                  The second place, having gained 11,79% of the vote, was taken by the Communist Party candidate Pavel Grudinin.
                  The LDPR leader with a result of 5,66% could not compete with him seriously.
                  Liberal candidates failed miserably. Ksenia Sobchak, Grigory Yavlinsky and Boris Titov for three gathered an insignificant 3,47% of the vote. ""
                  And a joke. From the Internet
                  1. +4
                    19 March 2018 11: 44
                    Quote: To be or not to be
                    The second place, having gained 11,79% of the vote, was taken by the Communist Party candidate Pavel Grudinin.

                    Interesting - will shave off a mustache? Or will Zyuganich grow a beard?
                    lol
            2. +7
              19 March 2018 09: 22
              I confirm. He himself worked in the election commission. According to the results of 73% for Putin.
              There is definitely no fraud.
            3. +5
              19 March 2018 10: 33
              Her people are not stupid, just not his mind, when one person drops a stack of ballots.
              1. +4
                19 March 2018 10: 42
                Quote: neofit962
                Her people are not stupid, just not his mind, when one person drops a stack of ballots.

                Do you certainly have videos and photos? Are you ready to contact the prosecutor? Or is it so simple to insert five cents?
            4. +1
              19 March 2018 12: 55
              specially for you, you probably missed it. in response to questions of the gdp, he confirmed that he was a liberal in his views.
          2. +7
            19 March 2018 11: 07
            Quote: Artek
            already came and not only in my head

            Oh wrong people got caught request
            Quote: Artek
            falsification is called.

            Well, who would doubt it laughing
            Know how to lose with dignity.
        2. +11
          19 March 2018 09: 55
          Mental degradation! Education only for grandmas! Here is the result! People have forgotten how to think, analyze and draw conclusions! Let me give you a concrete example, about 4 years ago on this site I read an article stating that a new hangar rocket is not needed by Roskosmos, that this rocket does not meet modern requirements! And now in 2018, I hear that they will not produce it, due to technical problems! I can give examples in any field: in machine-tool construction, how people are recruited to Sevmash through left-wing firms and about working conditions, about a high-speed helicopter, about the St. Coalition, about the artillery battalion, about the bankrupt kurgamash, about how they take the land and the Center to them. Khrunicheva! But you don’t need this, you don’t have to think, you don’t want to take responsibility for the country! The old generation of Soviet specialists will leave and see what happens!
          1. +2
            19 March 2018 10: 54
            Quote: TuM0305
            The old generation of Soviet specialists will leave and see what happens!

            You will excuse me, but the generation of Soviet specialists has already practically gone, many scientific and technical schools have been defeated, at the moment we have young specialists. It seems to cope.
          2. +4
            19 March 2018 12: 39
            Quote: TuM0305
            Education only for grandmas!


            But from now on in more detail ...
            Do we have nobody studying on the budget, or all schools are paid.?
        3. +5
          19 March 2018 10: 22
          A flock of sheep, I have one thought. This people is worthy of its ruler.
          1. +7
            19 March 2018 10: 39
            Quote: freddyk
            A flock of sheep, I have one thought. This people is worthy of its ruler.

            It's right. A ram always has a maximum of one thought!
          2. The comment was deleted.
        4. 0
          22 March 2018 15: 18
          Quote: Varyag_0711
          Artek (Pavel) Today, 07:41 ↑ New
          people live really badly, but vote for the oligarchs and the robbery of Russia? It can't be that way.

          From BYAD, then again, the wrong people fell ... laughing He is told to vote for Grudinin, and he rushing to vote for Putin and the oligarchs. And why so, nobody thought ?! Think at your leisure, maybe some clever idea will wander into your head.

          The people were not forced to vote for Grudinin. But Putin was forced to. Do not forget the bus to Luzhniki and the "fake" meetings with voters in advance on the list. Do not carry nonsense.
      4. +5
        19 March 2018 10: 16
        What does it mean bad !? Those who work live normally! Including me. Try to reduce your desires and be happy!
        I repeat, but my interpretation so you can refer. If earlier in Dahl's explanatory dictionary it was written that POVERTY is the lack of the ability to purchase the most necessary, now POVERTY is the lack of the ability to buy the desired!
        1. +6
          19 March 2018 10: 33
          Russia has turned into a country of philistines, that's what it's called. Personal well-being is paramount. And what will happen then? Yes, even a flood. It's a shame for the state. For our grandfathers, folded heads.
        2. +5
          19 March 2018 10: 41
          Quote: Rey_ka
          What does it mean bad !? Those who work live normally! Including me. Try to reduce your desires and be happy!
          I repeat, but my interpretation so you can refer. If earlier in Dahl's explanatory dictionary it was written that POVERTY is the lack of the ability to purchase the most necessary, now POVERTY is the lack of the ability to buy the desired!


          Well, yes this is desired, housing for young people, meat or fish, for the elderly, medicine and even milk is again a lie, there are a lot of liars.
      5. +5
        19 March 2018 10: 21
        Quote: Artek
        people live really badly, but vote for the oligarchs and the robbery of Russia? It can't be that way.

        1. People vote for stability in the country and their hope for the future of their children and grandchildren
        2. People voted for the respect of their country on the world stage. The peoples of Russia have always rallied for years for the country. despite the rulers
        3. The election of the President of the Russian Federation cannot change the form of state structure. The economic foundation — private ownership of the basic means of the state and the corresponding capitalist superstructure — How to live and prosper in this system is another matter
        4. The older generation still lives in that socialist system and is waiting for its principles in the new (old one since we were returned to socialism in the 90s from capitalism in the course of the creeping counter ..) formation. It doesn’t happen ..
        1. +8
          19 March 2018 10: 35
          Quote: To be or not to be
          1. People vote for stability in the country and their hope for the future of their children and grandchildren


          I like it, the stability of which, theft, extortion, deprivation of property, constantly rising prices, constantly rising taxes, for juvenile justice, for base vile feature films, about our history, because instead of the declared "friendship of peoples" we see that all property belongs NOT RUSSIAN? No, we do not need such stability.
          In general, if the mess begins with the West, this is not far away and the people will get weapons in their hands, I think everyone who creates this kind of "stability" will not be greeted.
          1. +6
            19 March 2018 10: 58
            Artek. "I like this, the stability of which, theft, extortion, deprivation of property, constantly rising prices, constantly rising taxes, for juvenile justice, for base vile feature films, about our history, because instead of the declared" friendship of peoples "we see that all the property belongs to NOT RUSSIAN? No, we do not need such stability. ""
            And you wanted to wake up in the house and communism. So it does not happen and will not .. How did the GDP begin and who commanded and used Russia Forgot about the SEMIBANKIRSHCHINA?
            The canonical version of the "seven bankers":
            Boris Berezovsky (United Bank),
            Vladimir Gusinsky (Most Bank),
            Vladimir Vinogradov (Inkombank),
            Alexander Smolensky (Capital Savings Bank),
            Mikhail Fridman (Alfa Bank),
            Mikhail Khodorkovsky (MENATEP),
            Vitaly Malkin (Russian Credit

            "Some are already gone, but those farther" ...
            1. +3
              19 March 2018 12: 50
              Quote: To be or not to be
              And you wanted to wake up in the house and communism. So it does not happen and will not .. How did the GDP begin and who commanded and used Russia Forgot about the SEMIBANKIRSHCHINA?



              you are even at a minimum, in appearance - a liar, a red flag and not according to the Russian clique, like in a frying pan.
              1. +1
                19 March 2018 14: 24
                Artek.
                "you are even minimal, in appearance-a liar, a red flag and not in the Russian clique, like in a frying pan."
                Not Russian or what? Then hello to California !! hi
                "Memento mori" - moment and at sea .. laughing laughing
                "The adverb" in Russian ", formed from the relative adjective" Russian "with the prefix -, is written with a hyphen"
                1. +1
                  19 March 2018 17: 14
                  Quote: To be or not to be
                  Not Russian or what? Then hello to California !!

                  I am russian. Russian is written with one _С_.
                  1. +1
                    19 March 2018 18: 29
                    Bravo!
                    RUS-root .SK-suffix .II-ending
                    Like grade 6
                    No, do not be your oligarch ... laughing
                    1. +1
                      20 March 2018 07: 12
                      Quote: To be or not to be
                      Bravo!
                      RUS-root .SK-suffix .II-ending
                      Like grade 6
                      No, do not be your oligarch ... laughing


                      _Russian_ proper name and grammar rules do not apply to it. There were no _RUSOV_, respectively, there is no root _rus_ and so on.
                      For you, the oligarch is a childhood dream?
            2. +2
              19 March 2018 14: 36
              “Where did the GDP begin?” When did you last see Volodya? I personally have long, very. When he could spar in several languages, he was taller and generally different. And now some clown mowing a fool in front of the whole country, so fiercely mowing, that he completely forgot languages ​​and all at once. What is Pacific Fleet in the know? Then answer; laws of which country operate in those same Pacific Fleet?
      6. +2
        19 March 2018 12: 58
        People live in every way. The worst are drunks and lazy people. Those who worked without registration and didn’t deduct anything to their retirement account live poorly. And now it’s offended that the pension is small, but they are reluctant to work or are not taken as unnecessary.
        And many live quite well. Especially those who have a good retirement, and even receive a good salary. And if there are two such pensioners in the family, then they simply have nothing to blame for Putin.
        Of course, I do not like that someone is "robbing" Russia. Only, unfortunately, there is no relationship between my wallet and the robbery of Russia. As the presence of 455 billion dollars in foreign exchange reserves does not affect my salary.
        1. +5
          19 March 2018 13: 02
          Quote: GUKTU76
          People live in every way. The worst are drunks and lazy people. Those who worked without registration and didn’t deduct anything to their retirement account live poorly.

          And who is to blame for the fact that from 90, people were paid in black without being deducted to the Pension Fund — the one who worked or the so-called business owners?
          Quote: GUKTU76
          And many live quite well. Especially those who have a good retirement, and even receive a good salary. And if there are two such pensioners in the family, then they simply have nothing to blame for Putin.

          And with what kind of pension they live well, do you name the size of the pension with which it is not bad and specify who has such a good pension-prosecutors. Judges and members of the State Duma, and not to offer as an example. 22 million beggars, this is where, from a good life in the country?
          Quote: GUKTU76
          And if there are two such pensioners in the family, then they simply have nothing to blame for Putin.

          Yes? Exactly? Have you tried? Try it, you won’t like it.
          Quote: GUKTU76
          Of course, I do not like that someone is "robbing" Russia. Only, unfortunately, there is no relationship between my wallet and the robbery of Russia.

          Right? Have you thought well?
          1. +2
            19 March 2018 13: 50
            Quote: badens1111
            And who is to blame for the fact that from 90, people were paid in black without being deducted to the Pension Fund — the one who worked or the so-called business owners?

            First of all, those who agreed to work this way. Who, if not the employee himself, should take care of his pension?
            I’m not offended that my pension is less than my wife’s. Because I just worked on gray schemes sometimes. However, our two pensions are already quite capable of ensuring a normal life (for our current expenses, one pension is enough for us). And, if we take into account our salaries, which are larger than our pensions, then our life and our income are quite satisfactory. And I don’t have to think - I live like that.
            For reference. I am an individual entrepreneur. Constructor Tax - 6 percent of income once a year minus social insurance is more than happy with me.
            1. +1
              19 March 2018 14: 32
              Quote: GUKTU76
              First of all, those who agreed to work this way. Who, if not the employee himself, should take care of his pension?

              Oh, how .. You surrender to a social Darwinist. I know such people from among the so-called entrepreneurs.
              1. +1
                19 March 2018 15: 23
                Try to become an entrepreneur with a different approach to employees. I only work one. Himself. And I can make all claims only to myself.
                1. 0
                  19 March 2018 15: 38
                  Do not be tempted to buy-sell.
                  1. 0
                    21 March 2018 13: 36
                    I am seduced, but there are no abilities. Therefore, I make a living by designing houses, metal structures and various equipment for construction.
      7. +1
        19 March 2018 23: 15
        Bullseye, Pavel! All the time I swear at those who didn’t come, at the innocence of those who voted for the guarantor of our doom, but our people are not so innocent that even after more than a quarter of a century they believe so much.
        This is a matter of technology.
    5. FID
      +18
      19 March 2018 08: 00
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Someone is leaking from the site, because registered exclusively for the elections, someone will continue to pour mud on the country and the president

      I apologize, are you not shedding? And, about the country .. You don’t have to take the whole country on yourself ... About the president - bang, but God forbid about the whole country ... And don’t need about the elections, you want, I’ll guess at one time who would become our president countries, if supporters came to the polls, well, Zimbabwe, let's say ...
      1. +10
        19 March 2018 08: 17
        No need to take on the whole country ...
        Is it too arrogant? Explain that if I don’t like how they blaspheme Russia, then I’m taking "the whole country" on myself? I expressed my opinion. What questions?
        You do not fade?
        And you look at the date of registration.
        1. FID
          +11
          19 March 2018 08: 34
          I understand that you DO NOT SLIN .... And I will have to repeatedly refute you, let’s say ...
      2. +9
        19 March 2018 09: 25
        Yes, but supporters of Russia, not Zimbabwe, came. And they voted for Putin.
        Perhaps those who did not go to the polls are supporters of other countries. Or your opponents.
        But in any case, if they wanted not to take part in the life of the country, now their opinion is all the more uninteresting.
        Would. We could. Well, why didn’t they come?
        1. FID
          +7
          19 March 2018 09: 39
          Quote: Mestny
          Would. We could. Well, why didn’t they come?

          What's the point ??? The choice was a foregone conclusion ... I do not participate in circus performances ... My voice is nothing, neither now nor in the future ... Read the post below ...
          1. +2
            19 March 2018 13: 57
            Quote: SSI
            What's the point ??? The choice was predetermined ... I do not participate in circus performances ... My voice is nothing, neither now nor in the future ... H

            The most dissatisfied voter is the one who does not go to the polls. But the loudest then is indignant that everything is bad.
            The elections were held in spite of you and those who screamed that they didn’t have to go to the polls, didn’t go for a boycott, didn’t vote, now you have no right to condemn and discuss anyone, you have made your choice.
            1. FID
              +1
              19 March 2018 17: 08
              Quote: badens1111
              The elections were held in spite of you and those who screamed that they didn’t have to go to the polls, didn’t go for a boycott, didn’t vote, now you have no right to condemn and discuss anyone, you have made your choice.

              Did I blame anyone? Go ahead, electors .... I, for more than 35 years, have given aviation and have been dragging, I emphasize, DELIVER existence ... Where are you, guardians, where are those that will raise the Tu-160M2 ??? I do not blame anyone, I already do .....
              1. 0
                19 March 2018 18: 34
                Quote: SSI
                I already do everything .....

                If so, then do not complain.
                1. FID
                  +2
                  19 March 2018 18: 44
                  Quote: badens1111
                  If so, then do not complain.

                  To whom? You? Yes, I don’t even ask for bread from you in a hungry year ... I’ll somehow get through even without this power ....
      3. +2
        19 March 2018 10: 27
        Over the whole country was not. "exceptional majority" These are the results. Eh ... We'll have to all unhappy to think how to develop the country in these conditions, and not to idle.
      4. +4
        19 March 2018 10: 49
        One must have a certain level in order to despise the people of their country. Of course, not the whole country is for Putin, but the most responsible part of its population. Which is not going to "molt" anywhere. And he will build a strong and rich Russia for his children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.
        1. +1
          19 March 2018 23: 19
          The country will be if they propose a real and honest plan. But no plans, no honesty. Some loud calls.
    6. +10
      19 March 2018 09: 30
      Today in the service, in the morning I already ran into the only active opposition in the team - "Zionism triumphed! Voices, parhaty, got it up ....!" laughing

      Speaking in relative numbers: out of 10 people, 8 voted for GDP, 1 person, that same oppositionist, voted for Grudinin and one young employee of my academic unit voted for Sobchak, but, let’s take it condescendingly - youth, a shortcoming that goes away, is unfortunately fast! Older aunts, everyone voted for GDP! We are betting on a military organization and, summing up, it turns out that the election figures reflect today's reality in Russia!

      I want to notice a drop in the% of the candidate from the Communist Party in comparison with the previous elections - this says that the Communist Party continues to discredit itself in the eyes of sane people and can’t gain popularity among the young with its strike-breaker policy, burying the prospects for the near future from the good idea of ​​socialism-communism!
      1. +10
        19 March 2018 09: 58
        I’m not sure that reality is objectively reflected in the choice of your environment. Out of 78 of my comrades-in-arms, parents, classmates, friends and colleagues from military-historical resources from all over the country, 3 people voted for Putin and one for Sobchak (an officer of the Russian Guard, strangely enough, it might seem to someone), the remaining 74 for Grudinin. At work (working in construction), out of 7 people in my department, three for Putin and four for Grudinin. Although among the voters who did not vote for Putin, more than half are active servicemen or state employees of a different kind.
        It only says that the country is large and the situation on the ground, which people first of all take into account when choosing a candidate, can differ dramatically.
        1. +11
          19 March 2018 10: 02
          Nobody argues with you. Why not - how the same oligarch, who advocates a struggle with himself, gained his votes! And you done! Right up to the figure, you know how the voices of your friends were distributed - a lot of statistical work was done ...
          1. +5
            19 March 2018 10: 19
            Thank. This is not difficult, three groups for communication in Viber and WhatsApp where we constantly communicate and one military-historical forum. Question-answer, as well as on VO in this topic.
            1. +4
              19 March 2018 10: 21
              Then it is clear! hi
          2. +3
            19 March 2018 14: 00
            Quote: Finches
            Why not - like the same oligarch advocating

            Zyablitsov, stop already .., the elections have taken place, stop gossiping with gossip from Life and other things, finally learn the wording of what an oligarch is ..
            Have the ability to respect the choice of others, even if it makes you feel completely sour, and then others started talking about it on the networks, before the announcement of the enemies of almost a third of the population who did not vote for Putin ... completely ...
            1. +1
              19 March 2018 14: 06
              I can discuss with you the basics of the theory of Marxism-Leninism, where the essence of the system is laid down, but which the Communist Party does not use from the word at all, and then talk about oligarchy as an established platform of democracy since ancient Greece, but I won’t do it one at a time simple reason - the elections have passed, this time! Here you are right! And you didn’t understand anything - these are two! hi
              1. +2
                19 March 2018 15: 42
                You can discuss anything horrible, but not about what the Communist Party says and does.
                THE ELECTIONS HAVE BEEN PASSED, RIGHTS, but the sediment from the dirt remained. I would very much like for Putin to take measures against those who discredited the elections of his fuss-Gabrielyan, Bulaev, Grishina.
                So you seem to have really understood nothing of the elections.
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANQDvfsvkpI
                Have fun watching.
                1. +1
                  19 March 2018 21: 38
                  Okay! Do not be offended - you need to lose with dignity! But Grudinin, even pissed, to go to debates ... The GDP does not need to go to them, he is in power, but the guardian of "people's" interests still needed to speak on the first buttons ... And I don’t even know if it’s right the road goes multimillionaire Grudinin! laughing
                  Even Ksyusha, although she had crumbled, she stayed - a woman, albeit a fool, still liberal, but stronger, a peasant oligarch, turned out to be smart people understood everything! hi
                  1. +1
                    19 March 2018 23: 19
                    It doesn’t need to go, because there is nothing to say. And what you call debate is a booth and a self-respecting person will not go to them. If GDP appeared there, everything would be decent and you can debate. And to look at the splashing of water on physiognomy is an inheritance.
          3. +2
            19 March 2018 23: 21
            Is Grudinin an oligarch? You have a wild fantasy, however.
            1. +2
              19 March 2018 23: 39
              And who is he - the Wanderer-Silver-less? laughing However, perhaps he is an ordinary zits-chairman, but this does not paint the Communist Party all the more! However:"Conspiracy, my friend, once again a conspiracy!"just painfully funny!
      2. +1
        19 March 2018 23: 16
        I wrote tiut, but for you I will repeat. This is not a fall. That "Red" electorate-pensioners for whom GDP pays a pension went to him. And it is replaced by 30 +. Here I laid out my observations on the site above. Read, maybe you will understand ..
        1. +2
          19 March 2018 23: 25
          So I was on the site! And I’ll tell you, I didn’t hear from Grudinin, for whom, for his or my well-being, judging by his declaration, I didn’t come to him for nothing, but he refused to explain his position publicly? And you protect him! I will repeat it to you for the thousandth time - until people come to the Communist Party with the determination to go to the barricades for the sake of their ideals, the Communist Party will be a party of losers and a bedding for United Russia! And you just use it! GDP uses me, at least according to the Constitution and the Law, and here you can feel the presence of Russia as a state, and you just use it - just like that, for your greatness, all sorts of Zyuganovs and Grudinins, and you can only feel their villas in Spain .... Without insults! hi
          1. +1
            19 March 2018 23: 29
            And another question - where did you, the left, dig up the clown Suraykin - does he even know who Karl Marx is, not to mention his class theory? laughing Did he snatch 0,6 percent of the votes from Grudinin? Not communistically ....
            1. +3
              20 March 2018 11: 46
              Well, Suraykin appeared a year and a half ago, and he is just as left-handed as I am the king of Morocco. Kremlin project before the 2016 elections in the State Duma. Actually, no one recognizes him from the left. But it’s not clear to you; you are all in a single pile. Well, God bless him and your concepts. Here the question is something else. Here you are proud that you are being used, as a public girl, with feeling, plainly, arrangement. This is your destiny and the level of your mentality; everything only confirms my assumptions, which I have publicly expressed to you here. And you enjoy this process. Q, go ahead and with the song. Unlike you, Zu did not have me, does not have and will not have, neither he, nor others. I always have my own opinion and I'm not afraid to express it. and at meetings, because of which, in opposition to the leadership, only so many ordinary party members support me. Of course, you can’t believe it; November, back in October-November last year, at a general meeting I spoke out that Zu should leave, that the party’s structure does not correspond to reality, stupidly transferred from 80's and allows a bunch of "favorites" to take buns, that the party resembles a terminally ill patient, which medications will not help, only an operation. It’s time to stop the tradition of stepping forward with the post of General Secretary. Yes, they tried to sand me at the plenum of the city committee, because there were representatives of the administration at the meeting, such questions were necessary behind the scenes, at the plenum, without discussion at the meeting and other crap. But for me it is more important that after the meeting people came up, shook hands, approved, sharing my opinion. And for a long time our leadership has ignored me, trying not to give the floor, etc. Spit. That party died, Sue in this election made a control shot .. Only the idea remained, and people who support this idea. And they have no mentality — used — no offense. Everyone chooses for himself.
              1. +1
                20 March 2018 11: 52
                Here, in this post, sound thoughts are visible - I will even miss your insults, however, I have not paid attention to them for a long time! Indeed, it is extremely necessary that the CPRF’s internal reform is not too late - because a strong and popular left-wing party in the country is only for the good of Russia! Moreover, I have a pronounced Bolshevik heritage, and not lacquered to please the ruling elite!
                1. +2
                  20 March 2018 12: 25
                  And I don’t insult you, I just interpret your thoughts. After all, if tomorrow the left will come to power, you will be in the forefront of their admirers, the right will come, you will be in the forefront of those who support it. People like you (and probably you too) supported EBN with its "Now there is no alternative to Yeltsin. Then it will be, now it’s not." And now you pour shit. A new government will come and say -VVp was the enemy of the people and you will happily pick it up and will scream it everywhere. I remember your posts with attitude to socialism and the USSR, to the Bolsheviks. Now something has changed and you decided to bend in advance, starting to tell me about the party here, what is needed and what is not .. And suddenly - and here on the horse, it was always disguised as a bear.
                  Yes, and then you are offended by the truth, only fools are offended, and you are smart.
                  1. +1
                    20 March 2018 12: 41
                    I never supported Yeltsin, the last time I voted in the elections, in 1996, I voted for Zyuganov, but then, if you didn’t forget, Zyuganov “caved in a bit under the changing world”, speaking the language of Judas Makarevich and I’m disappointed now and in the Communist Party! But GDP fulfilled all my expectations ... so I began to trust him a bit more than fairy tales about the white (red) bull! And 6 years, I want the same stability, but the Communists have time to regain the confidence of the people or completely leave the political arena of the country - as an outdated phenomenon! Until better times ...
                    1. +2
                      20 March 2018 13: 14
                      Stability falling into the abyss. Have a nice touchdown.
                      1. +1
                        20 March 2018 13: 44
                        I think that in comparison with the 90s it’s planning, with chances to fall and soar, but if you obey you, then uncontrolled dive will begin ... That's what it is!
        2. +1
          20 March 2018 02: 01
          basmach (Konstantin) Yesterday, 23:16
          That "Red" electorate-pensioners for whom GDP pays a pension went to him.

          I confirm. My mother, born in 1939 this time voted for Putin, and not for the "communist".
          My father was born in 1939 after the “capitalist” was nominated by the Communist Party, he did not want to go to the polls (like me), but he went and voted for Grudinin to show the current government that it was too early for her to “rest on her laurels” (I did the same).
          Threat. Everyone made a decision on their own (without "agitation").
    7. +15
      19 March 2018 10: 25
      Frankly, I voted for Grudinin if the doctors want to get a penny, and the medicine is paid, if the teacher is a penny and the education is like the USA, if you want something off the road and they steal from them, if you want expensive gasoline where there is a lot of oil, if you continue discounts on the treatment of children who die! Then YOU have chosen. Putin already forgot what he carried before the election hi
      1. +2
        19 March 2018 23: 25
        To the very point! He shouted joyfully from the stands, waved his hand fainted. And ahead - ahead of the bulk of plans - the privatization is final, and with it the collapse of the country.
    8. +4
      19 March 2018 12: 21
      It seems that those dissatisfied with the election of an exceptional majority of the president
      by what majority? the cycle speaks of 56 million - the population of Russia is 145, because of happiness, do not lose touch with reality.
      Especially since openly shouting about exclusivity, in general, some kind of fascism laughing
      1. +1
        20 March 2018 11: 22
        Those. Do you seriously believe that everyone has the right to vote without exception, including newborns?
        At the moment, about 109 million people have the right to vote in the elections, not 145. Of these 109, about 67 percent appeared, i.e. about 73 million people. And what, 56 out of 73 - this is not the vast majority?
        1. 0
          21 March 2018 10: 55
          no, you should proceed from the number 109 (although there are 111) for they all voted some with their feet.
          well, taking into account 111 million eligible, the figure 56 is already too suspicious, and there is no talk of any overwhelming and close
    9. +3
      21 March 2018 05: 23
      It seems that those who are dissatisfied with the election of an exceptional majority of the president will talk a few days and calm down a bit. Someone is leaking from the site, because registered exclusively for the election, someone will continue to muddy the country and the president.

      I really hope that this will happen. (True, I believe in such an outcome of events with difficulty). I will do my best to amend the Constitution of the Russian Federation regarding the abolition of the restriction in the form of the so-called "two terms" for the President of the Russian Federation.
  2. +8
    19 March 2018 06: 55
    Well, how can you believe in this what Well, if they all voted for Grudinin, and you give them a GDP of 60% here! laughing good
    1. +7
      19 March 2018 08: 58
      Quote: You Vlad
      they all voted for Grudinin
      The Communist Party lost on this forgetful candidate a third of its supporters (almost 6%) compared with Zyuganov in 2012.
      1. +5
        19 March 2018 09: 13
        Quote: Stanislav
        The Communist Party lost on this forgetful candidate a third of its supporters (almost 6%) compared with Zyuganov in 2012.

        What can I say Stanislav? what
        In vain they changed the horse at the crossing lol
        1. +3
          19 March 2018 09: 27
          Quote: You Vlad
          In vain they changed the horse at the crossing
          Also, in vain they scored the horse’s class consciousness when choosing it.
        2. 0
          19 March 2018 10: 23
          Communist Party divided into Communists of Russia (Suraykin) and the Communist Party proper
        3. +1
          19 March 2018 13: 59
          If the horses were not changed, even more votes were lost. Would be next to Zhirinovsky. We love the offended. That's all offended and voted for the offended Grudinin.
      2. +2
        19 March 2018 09: 21
        Quote: Stanislav
        The Communist Party lost a third of its supporters on this forgetful candidate

        But for me, the choice was not great for them, as they said because of .. they all got together, get together, that’s the whole bunch and piled on!
        1. +2
          19 March 2018 10: 01
          Quote: You Vlad
          they had little choice
          A landowner loves his native land in a specific way, differently than, say, its protector. Patriots had to vote for Putin.
          1. +2
            20 March 2018 12: 03
            Quote: Stanislav
            A landowner loves his native land in a specific way, differently than, say, its protector.

            And who is LAND RANTIE? If you are talking about Grudinin, then if everyone who works on the earth did the same, we had no end to those who wished to obtain citizenship! hi
            1. +7
              20 March 2018 12: 07
              Quote: businessv
              if everyone who works on earth did as much

              Not everyone had several hectares of gold primkadovskoy dugout ...
              Here is the whole explanation for the success of a successful entrepreneur.
              1. 0
                24 March 2018 14: 46
                Quote: Golovan Jack
                Not everyone had several hectares of gold primkadovskoy dugout ...
                Here is the whole explanation for the success of a successful entrepreneur.

                Do you think that there was only one state farm in the Moscow Region? There were dozens, if not hundreds! And there were no less “dugouts” in them! But their chairmen didn’t have the desire to preserve state farms (collective farms), when it was possible to sell everything out and put money in their pockets - it was troublesome to work on the land! But to explain to you what it means under wild capitalism to preserve and raise an economy with a socialist system and that this is a very long and ungrateful undertaking, I will not - it is useless! hi
                1. +4
                  24 March 2018 14: 53
                  Quote: businessv
                  ... there were no less "dugouts" in them!

                  On the Moscow Ring Road?
                  Quote: businessv
                  ... under wild capitalism, maintain and raise a socialist economy ...

                  There is no "socialist structure" there.
                  There is a "Potemkin village", which, in my memory, has been untwisted for about 5 years, like a "type of socialism" shop window.
                  As recent events have shown, the idea has not paid off.
            2. +2
              20 March 2018 14: 42
              Quote: businessv
              if everyone who works on earth did the same
              Does this mean only land owners on the border with Moscow, or is it all working on the land, including seasonal workers near Volgograd?
              1. 0
                24 March 2018 14: 40
                Quote: Stanislav
                Does this mean only land owners on the border with Moscow, or is it all working on the land, including seasonal workers near Volgograd?

                This refers to the former heads of state farms who managed to save the state farm, people on the state farm and bring it to the advanced capitalist enterprises with a deep social program within the enterprise itself! hi And no matter where, even under Neryungri, the main thing is the result!
  3. +5
    19 March 2018 07: 05
    As I believe, the left forces have time to search for a worthy candidate, a new leader, in order to compete in this power and win in the next election.
    1. +7
      19 March 2018 08: 09
      They don’t have real candidates and they’re not expecting 10 years yet, they won’t master the majority in any way. Everything is old-fashioned, but the cheeks for past merits are inflated. Grudinin was put forward as a candidate in the wake of an increase in interest in Stalin, since the mustache is in profile on Kobu is like, that's all laughing
      1. +4
        19 March 2018 08: 30
        How happy we all are and gloomy
        But if you need to choose and the choice is difficult,
        We choose wooden suits,
        People, people ...
        We will be offered a long time - no miscalculation.
        - Ah! - they will say, - that you, you have not lived yet!
        You just have to start ... -
        Well, then they will offer: either-or.
        Or beaches, openings or even
        Steamers, in them filled with holds,
        Crews, races, events, voyages ...
        Or simply - wooden costumes.
        And they will be merry or gloomy,
        And they will be in the role of evil jesters or good judges,
        But we’ll be offered wooden costumes,
        People, people ...
        They may even offer us a smoke. -
        Ah! - remember, - you didn’t smoke for a long time.
        Yes, you have not begun to live ..
        - Well, then they will offer: either-or.
        The smoke of a cigarette evokes something ...
        One puff is more fun than a thought.
        Smoking is hunting, oh, smoking is hunting!
        But you have to choose wooden suits.
        And they will be polite and affectionate so -
        They will offer a happy life on a dish.
        But we will refuse ... And they beat cruelly,
        People, people, people ...

        V. Vysotsky
      2. +1
        20 March 2018 20: 55
        Quote: Proton
        They don’t have real candidates and they’re not expecting 10 years yet, they won’t master the majority in any way. Everything is old-fashioned, but the cheeks for past merits are inflated. Grudinin was put forward as a candidate in the wake of an increase in interest in Stalin, since the mustache is in profile on Kobu is like, that's all

        Does Grudinin have past merits too? Or are they not at all? Yes, if everyone worked like Grudinin, then the election could be treated formally! There are sensible candidates, but they have no chance because, as in the Russian proverb: "Do not fight with the strong, do not sue the rich!" And who is in power with us? Rich oligarchs! Will they give up power voluntarily? Do not give up! Is it profitable for them to change the current government, which them and which allows them everything? Unprofitable! And about 10 years old, my friend, you have not vindicated on business - after 6 years, the elections are back! We are not too lazy to go, there will be changes.
    2. +3
      19 March 2018 11: 05
      Quote: solzh
      the left forces have time for

      work with people. But this is troublesome and will not bring money. So the left forces still have to wait, a couple of generations, at least, When in your pocket is empty, sooner or later there will be a class consciousness. In the meantime, he is gone. So vote for Putin. Well, so as not to feed someone else's army.
  4. +16
    19 March 2018 07: 12
    The people showed the real price to all the opposition. The groans of the Strawberry King supporters are especially touching. The people in Russia are smart. This makes me happy.
    1. +8
      19 March 2018 07: 51
      Quote: Serge Gorely
      The people in Russia are smart.

      I would say that the people in Russia are conservative. People do not want turns. I myself from this number and the revolution do not want ... I'm still for evolution. Enough shocks and course changes. The Communists had a chance and achieved a lot, both in the social sphere and in everyone else, a low bow to them, but the system fell apart, they couldn’t take the chance, why give a second? .. Apparently the first generations of the Communists were enthusiastic, and kept it , but as soon as the generation was replaced, enthusiasm increased, everything collapsed.
      1. +6
        19 March 2018 09: 00
        Quote: raw174
        Quote: Serge Gorely
        The people in Russia are smart.

        I would say that the people in Russia are conservative. People do not want turns. I myself from this number and the revolution do not want ... I'm still for evolution. Enough shocks and course changes. The Communists had a chance and achieved a lot, both in the social sphere and in everyone else, a low bow to them, but the system fell apart, they couldn’t take the chance, why give a second? .. Apparently the first generations of the Communists were enthusiastic, and kept it , but as soon as the generation was replaced, enthusiasm increased, everything collapsed.

        Smart people are always conservative. As for the Communists, all the grave diggers of the USSR were party members.
        1. +4
          19 March 2018 11: 04
          Quote: Serge Gorely
          all the grave diggers of the USSR were party

          Attention question:
          "And where did these grave diggers go? Are they not now the basis of EdR? Betrayer once, will not betray twice?"
          Pradonte, got three questions.
          1. +4
            19 March 2018 11: 14
            Quote: uskrabut
            Quote: Serge Gorely
            all the grave diggers of the USSR were party

            Attention question:
            "And where did these grave diggers go? Are they not now the basis of EdR? Betrayer once, will not betray twice?"
            Pradonte, got three questions.

            Is Putin a member of EdRa? Did someone offer lustration because of membership in the CPSU? I am absolutely saying that the Communists profiled their historical chance. In 1991 - they did not save the USSR. In 1996 - Comrade Zyuganov leaked the election EBNu. In the 90s, having a "red belt" led by communists - governors and the majority in the Duma, all merged. In short, the Communists are losers. And no one likes losers.
            1. +1
              19 March 2018 15: 32
              Quote: Serge Gorely
              In short, the Communists are losers. And no one likes losers.

              Everything is much more neglected. According to political mentality, Russia is still in the 19th century. Well, our authorities do not perceive a real multi-party system, when the opposition breathes into the back of the head of power and prevents it from engaging in corruption. And if the current government has jambs, it wins it in the next parliamentary or presidential election. It is customary for us to get together, to create mutual responsibility, so that no one interferes with the personal enrichment of those in power. And partisanship with ideology has nothing to do with it.
              1. 0
                19 March 2018 15: 53
                Those. Was tsarist Russia with the Duma and a bunch of parties and partakes more democratic than the Brezhnev one-party USSR?
                1. 0
                  20 March 2018 21: 04
                  Quote: Serge Gorely
                  Was tsarist Russia with the Duma and a bunch of parties and partakes more democratic than the Brezhnev one-party USSR?

                  Dear, in tsarist Russia people were believers, therefore, until the end of the 19th century, there were not any significant parties and parteques in it! While the capitalists did not bother with the rise of Russia and began to create internal problems for it in the person of more or less - the Socialist-Revolutionaries and the others. Learn the materiel!
                  1. 0
                    23 March 2018 10: 38
                    Sssss thanks! I’m running to learn materiel! Are you a pro professor? Is it really an academician? Fathers, what kind of people are on the site, and I'm not in a tuxedo.
      2. +3
        19 March 2018 10: 31
        Quote: raw174
        do not want revolution
        And I want to. But not “from below” when (look to the left) the crowd “against all bad” overthrows the power in favor of the worst, but “from above” according to the project of transformations carried by the sovereign head of state.
      3. 0
        22 March 2018 15: 13
        I would say that the people in Russia are conservative. People do not want turns. I myself from this number and the revolution do not want ... I'm still for evolution. Enough shocks and course changes.

        Well, what ... right. If a country flies in full F ... what’s stopping it. Correctly???
    2. +5
      19 March 2018 10: 49
      The people .. They voted for him .. Where the observers were there, 57% of voters came, where there weren’t, 75% came there .. People went to where the observers apparently didn’t interfere ...
      1. +5
        19 March 2018 11: 25
        Quote: neofit962
        The people .. They voted for him .. Where the observers were there, 57% of voters came, where there weren’t, 75% came there .. People went to where the observers apparently didn’t interfere ...

        Yes. Yes Yes Yes! Where bloody gebnya did not look, there Grudinin had 80%. 40% at Sobchak. And Comrade Maxim scored 231% !!!!
      2. +4
        19 March 2018 12: 51
        Quote: neofit962
        Voted for him ..

        Lies! No, there are certain facts of violations, but this is purely isolated, their results will not be taken into account.
        Quote: neofit962
        Where there were observers there came 57% of voters

        Lies! At the polling station where I voted, there were 4 observers, from EdRa, the Communists, the Public Chambers and some other, without identities (the badge turned upside down), the turnout was more than 70%. Observers were everywhere! (if it wasn’t somewhere, it is again units with 100 people).
      3. +2
        19 March 2018 14: 03
        neofit962 You have already inserted this post about twenty times. Learned to copy, but you can’t think?
  5. +15
    19 March 2018 07: 12
    all the people have fun and exult ... ahead of that, 6 years are promised ...
    1. +16
      19 March 2018 07: 49
      They did not carefully listen to the message of the President. He did not promise happiness, he promised work, problem solving, stability, in a word - Russia's movement forward. I have not heard about happiness.
      1. +23
        19 March 2018 08: 02
        And before the previous deadlines, he promised the closure of hospitals and schools? The impoverishment of the people and an increase in the Russian Forbes list. So you think?
        1. +4
          19 March 2018 11: 15
          Quote: Vladivostok1969
          And before the previous deadlines, he promised the closure of hospitals and schools?

          In my opinion, these closures are an excess of zeal, but I want to please you, how many schools and medicine will return, and on a qualitatively new level.
      2. FID
        +12
        19 March 2018 08: 03
        Quote: St. Propulsion
        He did not promise happiness, he promised work, problem solving, stability,

        Those. The universe will exist for some time ... Hurray!
        1. +5
          19 March 2018 09: 23
          Quote: SSI
          Those. The universe will exist for some time ... Hurray!

          Oh no. The universe will collapse. Everything is bad. We all will die.
          1. FID
            +4
            19 March 2018 09: 42
            Quote: Winnie76
            Oh no. The universe will collapse. Everything is bad. We all will die.

            Have you really read Hawking? Maybe we will talk with you about the problems of space ... Ah, about dying ... I will soon ...
      3. +13
        19 March 2018 08: 23
        promised work, problem solving, stability,
        And who was the president who did not give work, did not solve the problem, there was no stability?
        1. +9
          19 March 2018 09: 30
          Quote: Gardamir
          And who was the president who did not give work, did not solve the problem, there was no stability?

          Borya or what? Missing the "holy nineties"? That was the life. Wow, in those years, was chattering on a scholarship ... And pensioners with state employees simply skated like cheese in butter.
          1. +5
            19 March 2018 12: 51
            Borya or something
            It’s cool when people don’t hesitate to make themselves look stupid just to be right. I’m talking about the president from 2012 to 2018.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +2
          19 March 2018 11: 09
          Quote: Gardamir
          And who was the president who did not give work, did not solve the problem, there was no stability?

          You seem young. Gorbachev and Yeltsin promised and turned out to be the 90s, tight obligations, I think Putin fulfilled, despite the fierce opposition of opponents, the global crisis and subsequent sanctions. Fulfillment of social obligations was a priority of the past term; for the current term, an increase in the well-being of people has been heard. Putin has never personally deceived me. Wait and see.
      4. +4
        19 March 2018 10: 25
        Quote: St. Propulsion
        They did not carefully listen to the message of the President. He did not promise happiness, he promised work, problem solving, stability, in a word - Russia's movement forward. I have not heard about happiness.

        Happiness is There is not is misfortune.
        1. +2
          19 March 2018 10: 52
          And stability, probably, is when they are handcuffed to oars on a galley. Stable is not going anywhere ...
      5. +1
        19 March 2018 10: 50
        Well, if work is not pleasure and not happiness, then this is probably work on the "galleys" ...
      6. +1
        19 March 2018 12: 45
        Well, why! In recent years, the guarantor lowers 5 percent on mortgage lending to 6% every year good In this, it seems like they gathered up to 7.
    2. 0
      19 March 2018 11: 10
      "Schaaastye" - it is with the farmers. And for Russia at this stage, economic stability and legal protection of the civilian population, building up industrial potential, and protection from external threats are important. What else on this stage is it fair to expect a candidate with a balanced attitude to the realities of today and having such management experience as a well-known candidate?
  6. +12
    19 March 2018 07: 12
    I have not experienced any particular illusions in the elections. Everything is predetermined. But it is necessary to state one’s position.
  7. +39
    19 March 2018 07: 14
    And I think the voting at the VO (Putin - 52, Grudinin - 32, did not go - 10%) is much closer to reality.
    Subtracted administrative resource element
    1. +9
      19 March 2018 08: 05
      According to the regional election commission in Primorsky Krai, more than 23% of voters voted for presidential candidate Pavel Grudinin
      1. +28
        19 March 2018 08: 08
        And we also have a lot for Grudinin.
        And it didn’t go much. And for them, the appearance - most importantly, the voices - that those who came with God's help will be safely divided)
        Therefore, at work: go vote so much, and then call - and report the fact. The main thing is to go, and for whom are the details already.
        1. +2
          19 March 2018 09: 29
          And we have few, only 11%. Russia is big, everything is different in it.
          1. +2
            19 March 2018 11: 20
            Quote: Mestny
            Russia is big, everything is different in it.

            But something hurts a lot for Grudinin draw. I would rather call such numbers for Sobchak. And what - if the head does not work, and the Communist candidate, the general director of the JOINT-STOCK COMPANY running away from voters, is considered a Communist candidate by nature, then Ksyusha's death, flatness, elongation and smells of female secretion should be natural. Brainless men must vote for her. And those who think - well, what, completely, Grudinin?
            1. +2
              19 March 2018 17: 07
              Enough already, the campaign has ended, the elections too ...
              You yourself are not tired of working on the same training manual?
              Something new would come up.
      2. +13
        19 March 2018 09: 19
        Quote: Vladivostok1969
        According to the regional election commission in Primorsky Krai, more than 23% of voters voted for presidential candidate Pavel Grudinin

        Out of Yakutia, in general, 27% (twice as much as last year), but the closer to the end of the general vote (western regions), the Putin’s rating suddenly began to grow sharply, and Grudinin’s decline. That is, we can conclude that either the request in the eastern regions for changes is much higher than in the western ones, or they included the new electronic system of the GAS election, or whatever it is.
        PS Voted with the whole family for Grudinin, an honest man has nothing to hide!
        The results of the survey on VO, a very conservative resource, in terms of users, are also eloquent lol
        1. +4
          19 March 2018 09: 51
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          Out of Yakutia, in general, 27% (twice as much as last year), but the closer to the end of the general vote (western regions), the sudden Putin’s rating began to grow sharply, and Grudinin’s decline.
          -in Yakutia don't know what is agricultural land. appointments and as in the 90s in the middle lane - at first OJSC-then bought up shares, then CJSC ...
          The middle lane knows this clearly - therefore, in the countryside they practically didn’t vote for him
        2. +2
          19 March 2018 10: 27
          it’s all just that my mother in the suburbs in the village gets up early. and as long as there’s not a lot of people running to the precinct to vote. In the village, yes, they voted a lot for Grudinin in the morning. I’ve already gathered in the afternoon (household chores in the morning, washing, etc.), so it’s understandable why the GDP pulled up to 75% in the afternoon
        3. +1
          19 March 2018 23: 35
          Also noticed a strange pattern with percentages. The system has worked.
    2. +1
      19 March 2018 09: 02
      Quote: Cheburator
      Subtracted administrative resource element
      Rather, added.
      1. +18
        19 March 2018 09: 28
        I mean - in VO in this article, when you vote, the element of the administrative resource is subtracted (in contrast to yesterday's real action).
        That is why here Grudinin - 32%, and not 11%
        1. +10
          19 March 2018 09: 46
          Cheburator (Mikhail) Today, 09:28 ↑
          I mean - in VO in this article, when you vote, the element of the administrative resource is subtracted (in contrast to yesterday's real action).
          That is why here Grudinin - 32%, and not 11%
          Yes, do not tell ... laughing Voting on the site is about nothing at all. Any result can be faked. Especially on the VO, which drowned for Grudinin as a steam locomotive. All the articles were just that for Grudinin, but only past the cash register. In the commentary above, I indicated how many and for whom they voted in the polling station where my wife worked as a member of the commission.
          So calm down already, the people really voted for Putin, whether you like it or not.
          1. +6
            19 March 2018 12: 53
            Quote: Varyag_0711
            people really voted for Putin, whether you like it or not.


            Alexey hi
            But Baba Yaga is still against ... laughing
          2. 0
            22 March 2018 15: 11
            Quote: Varyag_0711
            Cheburator (Mikhail) Today, 09:28 ↑
            I mean - in VO in this article, when you vote, the element of the administrative resource is subtracted (in contrast to yesterday's real action).
            That is why here Grudinin - 32%, and not 11%
            Yes, do not tell ... laughing Voting on the site is about nothing at all. Any result can be faked. Especially on the VO, which drowned for Grudinin as a steam locomotive. All the articles were just that for Grudinin, but only past the cash register. In the commentary above, I indicated how many and for whom they voted in the polling station where my wife worked as a member of the commission.
            So calm down already, the people really voted for Putin, whether you like it or not.


            And what about the election commission where your wife was fake the result is impossible. Yes, do not tell.
        2. +2
          20 March 2018 09: 27
          Quote: Cheburator
          on VO in this article, when you vote, the administrative resource element is subtracted
          Added same. See: the political position of the site’s administration is manifested in the selection of authors and content, which affects the percentage of Grudinin’s supporters registered on this site and participating in this vote. On the echo site, for example, an administrative resource promotes concentration of participants with other cockroaches; there the voting results would be different. No?
  8. +3
    19 March 2018 07: 16
    Yes, in fact, it is better to conduct a survey when the activity of bots decreases, or some headquarters went too far with them.
    And I didn’t go to the polls, for technical reasons.
    And he did not go to the polls and supported Navalny.
    1. +1
      19 March 2018 09: 11
      Quote: arhPavel
      And I didn’t go to the polls, for technical reasons.
      And did not go to the polls supported Navalny
      The first is about me, and the second statement is better without Navalny, and "I did not go to the polls for political reasons."
  9. +8
    19 March 2018 07: 16
    Quote: populist
    Nothing unpredictable happened. The population, as always, has confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness under the dominance of pro-government SMRAD (mass media, agitation and misinformation.)

    --------------------------
    I agree with you completely. All that was needed was turnout. The turnout took place, if you multiply the percentage of voters who voted for Putin by the percentage of turnout, it turns out that he would have a convincing victory of 52% of the vote if all voters voted.
    1. +4
      19 March 2018 07: 25
      Quote: Altona
      it turns out that he has a convincing victory of 52% of the vote if all voters voted.

      I apologize, but from which budun did you decide that all those who didn’t come would definitely vote not for Putin? If you do not divide the voters into all candidates, then only in proportion to the interest they have earned, it will be fair, but what you offer is a manipulation.
  10. +16
    19 March 2018 07: 18
    Yesterday at 22.00 I phoned 3 polling stations, my friends work for them (one is an observer from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation). There is only one picture, with a turnout of 55-67% for Putin, 75-85% of the vote, for Grudinin 10-12%. The observer from the Communist Party says that they (their headquarters) are satisfied with the result.
    The result is decent. I know that the leadership of the municipality was given the task of ensuring the turnout. Campaigning for candidates was prohibited, they worked only for the turnout, the plan in 79% did not fulfill ...
    I voted for Putin, as did my whole family.
    1. +3
      19 March 2018 09: 33
      Everything is so, only we have a higher turnout, at the level of 75%. But these are the details.
      The question is who prevented those who disagree from coming and voting for the same Grudinin. No, they decided to express a “protest” - they simply did not help either Grudinin or anyone else against Putin.
      It seems to me that here the ideologists of the opposition have outplayed. It was not worth urging citizens not to go to the polls. The idea of ​​no-show and automatic non-recognition of the results failed.
      1. FID
        +8
        19 March 2018 09: 48
        Quote: Mestny
        It seems to me that here the ideologists of the opposition have outplayed. It was not worth urging citizens not to go to the polls. The idea of ​​no-show and automatic non-recognition of the results failed.

        I apologize, but what if ALL the country's population would NOT come to the polls? Do you want me to guess the name of the president of Russia in this case? The turnout was needed only for the West, they had to prove LEGITIMITY, that's all ...
  11. +6
    19 March 2018 07: 19
    I’ll say it from myself. The weather yesterday in Burg was ... in truth, ice, snow, wind, snow and snowstorm, respectively, but people were walking, and in the morning. At 08.15 in my own area, I even had to wait a bit in line ...
  12. +19
    19 March 2018 07: 31
    He did not vote for Putin. Although the election result was known in advance and this is hard to deny. If the guarantor in April does not make global personnel changes in the government, then the stagnation period will continue. This is purely my personal opinion.
    1. +26
      19 March 2018 07: 35
      Quote: Nehist
      if the guarantor in April does not make global personnel changes in

      Will not do.
      1. +10
        19 March 2018 07: 38
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        Will not do.

        Andrei agrees, for - the Gospel of Luke: And no one pours new wine into old wineskins; otherwise, the young wine will break through the bellows, and it will flow out, and the bellows will be lost; but new wine must be poured into new wineskins; then both will be saved. And no one, drinking old wine, will immediately want a young one, for he says: the old is better. (let dsk envy)))
        1. 0
          19 March 2018 11: 16
          Quote: Romulus
          nobody pours new wine into worn bellows

          We do not have young “furs” for young wine. But there is a young wine that must be properly “aged”. But this, of course, is under the responsibility of the infusion.
      2. +3
        19 March 2018 07: 55
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        If the guarantor does not make global personnel changes in April

        No drastic movements can be made in politics and economics, Putin knows that. There will be a frame update, but without revolutions.
        1. FID
          +10
          19 March 2018 08: 08
          Quote: St. Propulsion
          No drastic movements can be made in politics and economics, Putin knows that. There will be a frame update, but without revolutions.

          Yes, what are you? Can we apply it? Okay, let's say he takes Dimon off, and then what? Kudrin ???
          1. +3
            19 March 2018 10: 10
            I’m looking after the President’s personnel policy a bit. No examples. There is a constant replacement of frames with more effective ones. I have no answer why Putin does not touch Dimon, Kudrin, Chubais, Fursenko, etc. .. Maybe they are not particularly harmful, or they know a lot, they bargained for themselves chairs. By quiet, I think, and they will leave. This is where politics begins, and this is darkness and confusion for us due to lack of information.
          2. +3
            19 March 2018 11: 24
            But Kozhugetovich he correctly placed. Is it harsh or not? There were revolutions? The defense industry is a sensitive industry.
            Tkacheva also at the Ministry of Agriculture - not much jerked, but there is a result (https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2017/10/17/urozhay-z
            ernovyh-v-rossii-perevalil-za-130-mln-tonn).
            Now, carefully, carefully and with safety net, replace the economic apparatus + people involved in the Ministry of Education + Health Care = and at a quiet pace, development will trample uphill.
      3. +1
        19 March 2018 09: 59
        already promised - after the inauguration
  13. +11
    19 March 2018 07: 44
    After the fight, they don’t wave their fists. Although there are many Western and pro-Western people who want to wave ...
    The main people correctly orientated in the conditions of a frenzied information-psychological war, and an ever-expanding economic war, chose the Commander-in-Chief, with whom Russia could defeat the Western adversary.
    Congratulations to all who look at the root!
    Sovereignty. Russia. Putin!
    1. +19
      19 March 2018 07: 54
      Quote: cedar
      Sovereignty. Russia. Putin!

      Evergreen - don’t you find that one word is superfluous here?
      Tra ta ta (drum roll) - Sovereignty?
      1. +7
        19 March 2018 08: 34
        Egor, you are wrong.
  14. +4
    19 March 2018 07: 47
    Well, I don’t know, he himself voted for Putin. I know a person who first wanted to vote for Grudinin, but changed his mind, and also voted for Putin because of foreign money. Everyone I know voted for Putin (only one lady voted for Sobchak out of female solidarity, but she is generally divorced from reality).
    But in general, Grudinin himself, who made him withdraw money abroad? Say fake? I will not believe. Why? Because this was the answer to the request of the CEC. A president who has such capital abroad is managed through this very money ... and the West does not even need to spend money on it. What for do we need such "happiness"? And this is all leaving behind brackets all its possible advantages or disadvantages, and everything is not so smooth there either.
    In general, we get strange choices. One behaves like a traitor (return Crimea = to be torn to pieces by the Nazis, etc. shoals), the other campaign decided that you can "buy" a President’s chair (well, at least I started to PR my state farm ahead of time ... I wonder why didn’t hear anything about this state farm?), the standard set of the "Old Guard" and a set of obscure personalities who did not at all clearly hope for because they were too vague and not clear.
    1. FID
      +21
      19 March 2018 08: 12
      A simple question, is Putin VERY poor? Or are his daughters poor? How do they earn a living? Like Alexei Rogozin?
      1. +3
        19 March 2018 10: 01
        But Titov is an orphaned orphan? What was he hoping for?
    2. +10
      19 March 2018 08: 34
      voted for Putin because of foreign money
      So I think if I threw foreign money would I vote for Putin?
      The president who has such capital abroad is managed through this very money.
      Elections have passed, people do not tell. And Sobchak, and Zhirinovsky, and the rest have money abroad.
    3. +1
      19 March 2018 09: 29
      Quote: kvarfax
      But in general, Grudinin himself, who made him withdraw money abroad?

      But how can he get it out? He might have wanted it, but who will give it to him if they held him for these same Faberge ..
  15. +1
    19 March 2018 08: 12
    Another highly intelligent Internet voting .... For those who are in the tank - a voice on the Internet costs less than a ruble ... I am on the Internet on any site, I can wind up a million votes for any candidate ... just give me money)
    1. +4
      19 March 2018 08: 20
      Quote: seos
      only give money

      Money, money ... and from the heart to spoil - weakly? laughing
      The fact that there are different opinions on the site, this indicates the healthy state of the site, its vitality.
  16. +3
    19 March 2018 08: 15
    There were a lot of screaming guards, forgery, brainwashed, falsified voices for the bourgeois oligarchs, and call a real person who could take the reins right now and hold the country as tightly as possible. Neta? Ay yayai. Which is not a task laughing
  17. +9
    19 March 2018 08: 19
    Quote: Boris55
    I apologize, but from which budun did you decide that all those who didn’t come would definitely vote not for Putin? If you do not divide the voters into all candidates, then only in proportion to the interest they have earned, it will be fair, but what you offer is a manipulation.

    -----------------------------
    And from what hangover do you think alternative voices? I believe in fact that there is 67% * 76,5 = 51,25%. What does not suit you? So you yourself are engaged in alternative manipulations.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 08: 34
      Quote: Altona
      I believe in fact that there is 67% * 76,5 = 51,25%.

      With this calculation, Grudilin gets 67% * 11,8 = 7,9%, and what next? What do you want to say with these?
    2. FID
      +5
      19 March 2018 08: 38
      Well, yes, well, yes ... 50/50 plus, minus 1%, and alternative voices .... Hooray!
  18. +13
    19 March 2018 08: 21
    Quote: kvarfax
    But in general, Grudinin himself, who made him withdraw money abroad? Say fake? I will not believe. Why? Because this was the answer to the request of the CEC. A president who has such capital abroad is managed through this very money ... and the West does not even need to spend money on it. What for do we need such "happiness"? And this is all leaving behind brackets all its possible advantages or disadvantages, and everything is not so smooth there either.

    -----------------------------
    What are you doing now at all? Then the CEC had to remove it altogether. Why didn’t he withdraw his candidacy? Apparently the accounts were still fake?
    1. +1
      19 March 2018 10: 24
      Quote: Altona
      Why didn’t he withdraw his candidacy?

      I got it from Pamfilova - for such jambs the candidate is not removed by law, Ella could only inform the candidate about dishonesty, which she did. The choice is ours. The Grudininsky headquarters burst, or they would have specially framed, would have announced contributions honestly - the percentage of votes would have been higher. The sword does not cut the guilty head.
      1. +4
        19 March 2018 11: 02
        Quote: St. Propulsion
        I got it from Pamfilova - for such jambs the candidate is not removed by law

        Read the law.
        Article 35.
        19. A candidate nominated by a political party shall, by the time of the submission of the documents required for registration of the candidate, close accounts (deposits), stop storing cash and valuables in foreign banks located outside the territory of the Russian Federation, and (or) alienate foreign financial instruments.
  19. +14
    19 March 2018 08: 22
    Quote: Proton
    There were a lot of screaming guards, forgery, brainwashed, falsified voices for the bourgeois oligarchs, and call a real person who could take the reins right now and hold the country as tightly as possible. Neta? Ay yayai. Which is not a task

    ----------------------------
    And what is strong in the country, money is flowing out of all the cracks. They will deliver you Kudrin with Gref and you will be the strongest country with a "good" king and bad boyars.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 10: 28
      Quote: Altona
      "good" king and bad boyars.

      The people see the concrete results of the work, and it’s not the people’s business to deal with the boyars. It may let the king have a headache.
  20. +1
    19 March 2018 08: 33
    Here, the rating of V. Putin and the rest, like scale of political orientation of site members.
    That’s why you are sometimes surprised at the content and focus of published articles and comments!
  21. +15
    19 March 2018 09: 01
    I will wait for the next Medvedev pearls - there is no money, but you hold on; Nabiulinna - with inflation of 2%, sponsoring all but her people; the ever-declining outskirts. Fools do not worry, I do not argue that compared with the 90s, we have become better. wink
    The king is good, this boyars are bad.
    1. +10
      19 March 2018 09: 08
      The king is good, this boyars are bad.
      - and the people didn’t succeed at all laughing
      1. 0
        22 March 2018 12: 57
        Quote: faiver
        - and the people didn’t succeed at all

        I do not share your opinion negative
        1. 0
          22 March 2018 15: 07
          you apparently are not familiar with such a concept as sarcasm? hi
          1. 0
            25 March 2018 12: 14
            Probably sometimes request
            Quote: faiver
            you apparently are not familiar with such a concept as sarcasm?
    2. +4
      19 March 2018 11: 05
      We will wait for new gestures of our generosity, we have written off 140 billion debts, we are still writing off. Who is left there?
      The great Russian people will tolerate, we will tighten the strap to new breakthroughs (water supply, sewage)!
  22. +8
    19 March 2018 09: 06
    heh, Yakutia - Putin 64%, Grudinin 27%, whom the head of the republic can’t sit in his chair until the summer hi

    he himself voted for the sternum, but for me this vote was not for someone (I do not believe in the sternum either - I choose not directly from anyone, but directly against the domestic GDP policy, I almost have no complaints about foreign policy, not counting the constant write-offs debt, something like this hi
  23. +3
    19 March 2018 09: 29
    At least I tried ...

    So said Jack Nicholson to the inhabitants of the insane asylum, playing the main role in the film "Flying Over the Cuckoo's Nest." At least I tried to push aside a heavy metal safe blocking the way to freedom.
    Failed.

    After that, the elder sister of this institution increased the dose of therapy and set the TV volume up with programs about the happy life of patients so that they better understand their happiness ...

    At least I tried - many people remember this moment, forgetting that this is not the end of the film. If you watch a movie, then there will be someone who will move the safe and open the road to freedom.
    But then not everyone will want to leave ...
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 10: 31
      Quote: akudr48
      If you watch a movie

      Maybe the safe will not have to be touched.
  24. +4
    19 March 2018 09: 32
    The elections were normal. Calm and confident. And the victory was won very confidently and calmly. Congratulate everyone! Even the spiteful critics for allegedly not fair elections! You, too, confidently, though not calmly, received your traditional interest! And the country is moving forward.)
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +5
        19 March 2018 09: 57
        Strangers need you to say. About the licked at you absolutely dissonant train of thought with a cockade on an avatar. You somehow restrain yourself! Do not dishonor Soviet symbols!
        1. FID
          +7
          19 March 2018 10: 12
          I apologize, but "You" is actually written with a capital letter ... And do not talk about Soviet symbols, you don’t have it!
          1. 0
            19 March 2018 10: 20
            You should not apologize yet. I did not notice the rudeness you said. And you are familiar with the recommendations for writing. I don’t need any kind of particularly polite treatment, but you should not poke. Regarding what I need and what is not, this is definitely not YOUR business at all.
          2. +7
            19 March 2018 10: 23
            Quote: SSI
            “You” is actually capitalized ...

            You, your pronouns are capitalized when referring to the same person in the texts of the following genres:
            - personal letter (the choice is determined by the writer himself, expressing / not expressing thus special respect for the addressee);
            - an official document (the relation of the writer to the addressee does not matter);
            - application form (addressee - non-specific person; the attitude of the writer to the addressee does not matter).
            The expression "personal letter" here serves as an alternative name for the epistolary genre. Those. a letter is called personal not because it is addressed to a specific person, but because it is personal (not public). The meaning of the word "personal" here is not as in the expression "personal appeal", but as in the expression "personal conversation". In fact, a personal letter is a written form of a personal conversation.
            In texts of other genres of the pronoun you, yours are written with a lowercase letter.
            When referring to several persons, the pronouns you, yours are written with a lowercase letter, regardless of the degree of respect for the recipients, or the genre


            Thus, the mandatory spelling of “You” with a capital letter when addressing, in particular, on the site, is a delusion request
            1. FID
              +6
              19 March 2018 11: 00
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Thus, the mandatory spelling of “You” with a capital letter when addressing, in particular, on the site, is a delusion

              But it is a sign of intelligence, or something, a sign of respect for the interlocutor ... But not a connoisseur of the Official Answer of the Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (with a seal and a stamp), which you undoubtedly are!
              1. +4
                19 March 2018 12: 54
                Quote: SSI
                But it is a sign of ... respect for the interlocutor ...

                Particular his respect. So the RAS considers request
                Quote: SSI
                ... whom you undoubtedly are

                I just don’t like it when freshly invented rules are passed off as the ultimate truth.
                This also applies to spelling rules.
                PS: on the site I use ... the rules adopted on the site.
                Best regards hi
                1. FID
                  0
                  19 March 2018 14: 53
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  I just don’t like it when freshly invented rules are passed off as the ultimate truth.

                  I'm sorry, I did not invent these rules, carried pa?
  25. +1
    19 March 2018 09: 41
    So where is 76%? Well, or at least close to that.
  26. +4
    19 March 2018 09: 42
    Voted for V.V. because at the moment there is no alternative. As stated in the comments on another topic - "Now we did not choose the president, but the commander in chief." And I agree with this statement.
  27. +2
    19 March 2018 09: 52
    Quote: faiver
    heh, Yakutia - Putin 64%, Grudinin 27%, whom the head of the republic can’t sit in his chair until the summer hi

    he himself voted for the sternum, but for me this vote was not for someone (I do not believe in the sternum either - I choose not directly from anyone, but directly against the domestic GDP policy, I almost have no complaints about foreign policy, not counting the constant write-offs debt, something like this hi

    So I voted for Zhirinovsky only for the same reason, there really is no one to choose from. As F. Ranevskaya said, "I don't understand grades of ***."
  28. +4
    19 March 2018 09: 54
    And what's the catch of this vote?
    1. FID
      +6
      19 March 2018 10: 13
      Not with anything! Just so in front of the Western "colleagues" you need ...
  29. +11
    19 March 2018 09: 55
    It’s not even the election itself. And the fact that back in the days of EBN a system was built that excluded the promotion of worthy leaders. Moreover, without disdaining any means
    Take the murder of the same Rokhlin.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 10: 37
      Quote: shuravi
      promotion of worthy leaders.

      The pragmatism of the people consists in trusting those who have proven themselves by business. Remember Gogrbachev, Yeltsin - what authority did they have? "To each according to his deeds ..." is a good principle.
      1. +4
        19 March 2018 12: 29
        Quote: St. Propulsion
        Quote: shuravi
        promotion of worthy leaders.

        The pragmatism of the people consists in trusting those who have proven themselves by business. Remember Gogrbachev, Yeltsin - what authority did they have? "To each according to his deeds ..." is a good principle.


        Do you really believe that our voices decide something? Remember the confrontation of Yeltsin-Zyuganov.
  30. +4
    19 March 2018 10: 09
    The results of our so-called blitz survey are very interesting. Obviously, they somehow do not agree with officialdom. And why? Are there really so many agents of the State Department and the fifth column?
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 10: 24
      Quote: sapporo1959
      Very interesting are the results of our so-called blitz survey.

      So it's not evening yet. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation still cannot fall asleep, since yesterday evening they have been clapping on the clave, but we have slept peacefully, without valerian. By evening, the true patriots of their country will catch up - however, they work, unlike some laughing
      1. +1
        19 March 2018 16: 06
        And don’t talk! Nowadays, it’s not a patriot to sit down when it’s all in labors and labors, because he who doesn’t work doesn’t eat. Yesterday, I’m looking at the Sakhalin fish, I’m selling affordable fish to voters, so halibut is 650 rubles for my pension at 11 thousand. Under the hot-smoked communists, the bull-calf snack was all the time, but now it’s already a overseas delicacy. So any arbyten is necessary!
  31. 0
    19 March 2018 10: 14
    Quote: Artek
    but I do not believe you

    Straight Stanislavsky.
  32. +1
    19 March 2018 10: 15
    At the polling station everything was decorous and calm, without violations (as I say, a former observer). Excellent sausage sold!
  33. 0
    19 March 2018 10: 19
    Quote: sapporo1959
    The results of our so-called blitz survey are very interesting. Obviously, they somehow do not agree with officialdom. And why? Are there really so many agents of the State Department and the fifth column?

    There is a very specific contingent slice in the survey. There are various points of view, varying degrees of boiling. And the election results reflect the opinions of people throughout the country. Otkinte from officialdom of 10%, and this will be an almost accurate result.
  34. 0
    19 March 2018 10: 19
    The results are good, the turnout in the Crimea is bad.
  35. +1
    19 March 2018 10: 20
    Quote: Servla
    Voted for V.V. because at the moment there is no alternative. As stated in the comments on another topic - "Now we did not choose the president, but the commander in chief." And I agree with this statement.

    I agree!
  36. The comment was deleted.
  37. +1
    19 March 2018 10: 34
    Quote: Boris55
    With this calculation, Grudilin gets 67% * 11,8 = 7,9%, and what next? What do you want to say with these?

    ----------------------------
    In these elections, only turnout was needed. Putin has 70% there, with any kind of polls. At the moment, during the elections, Putin has 50 + 1% of the total number of voters. That is, full legitimacy, where not stick. One thing with 30% turnout, it will be only 21% of the total number of voters and 51%. There is a difference, especially for all kinds of non-Poltivites and Westerners. And how much Grudinin will have there is the tenth thing altogether. I generally came my ballot and intentionally ruined, but I created a turnout, although I did not want to go. That's all.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 11: 12
      Quote: Altona
      during the elections, Putin has 50 + 1% of the total number of voters

      It’s strange. The State Department however insists on 48%. laughing If it’s easier for you, then let it be so. Nevertheless, I consider it a pointless exercise to take into account the opinions of those to whom everything is on the drum.
    2. +1
      19 March 2018 11: 30
      What is the meaning of a spoiled ballot?
      1. 0
        19 March 2018 15: 44
        Quote: uskrabut
        What is the meaning of a spoiled ballot?

        “Dolce Vele” before the election issued an instruction on how to ignore the election. One of the five points just suggests spoiling the ballot. "Comrade" acts as directed.
  38. +8
    19 March 2018 10: 36
    Many Russians believe that they made their well-considered Choice, that they understand who will make their life better and everyone knows about all the candidates. But in fact, no one was going to give up power. Election is the tip of the iceberg. "Elections" were won in advance. Kremlin team worked perfectly. These are PR specialists, and chief editors and psychologists and political scientists. Their work is not visible, but the person "as if himself" makes the right choice. The PR and the impeccable reputation built by experienced people won. And they picked up candidates ... specific ... Take away Putin and in general it seems that the country is a madhouse (from the debate). Well and that. that P. did not participate in the debate, no one read his program ... Yes, and people who vote for him do not say that he did an excellent job with medicine, education, economics, etc. ... no, the main argument is "who." .. People became part of an experiment on the impact on their consciousness) Putin’s team with a victory .. Hit + - exactly at the intended percentage .. a little screwed up with Grudinin’s accounts, but this does not spoil the big picture) Well done !!!
    1. +4
      19 March 2018 11: 28
      Forgot to say about the two communist parties. It also worked well.
      1. +5
        19 March 2018 12: 12
        Quote: uskrabut
        Forgot to say about the two communist parties. It also worked well.

        So it is clear that very many want to keep the post and feeding trough. They showed some kind of caricature of the communists, which only Suraikin is worth ... The same Grudinin, yes smart, but what, there was no communist without accounts? And the right-wing ones ... it was necessary in our absolutely conservative country to nominate Sobchak .. Yes, even though she adopted 100 children and built 1000 schools ... she led DOM2 and thumped in Bali. EVERYTHING is a sentence for our people. Well, what to do, I don’t want to give up power, it’s okay, but to achieve that they would practically beg you not to leave is aerobatics. PR technologies do not stand still, they did everything beautifully, everyone really believes that they themselves voted))
        1. +1
          19 March 2018 15: 38
          yeah! and sick kids somewhere from the television disappeared. The way we have lunch, let’s throw off the news, and there’s silence before the elections.
      2. 0
        19 March 2018 12: 39
        and the criminal record of A.N.
        were afraid that Sobchak would take away all the votes?
        1. +1
          19 March 2018 15: 38
          Quote: reservist
          were afraid that Sobchak would take away all the votes?

          All two!
        2. +2
          19 March 2018 16: 43
          Quote: reservist
          and the criminal record of A.N.
          were afraid that Sobchak would take away all the votes?

          Of course, a criminal record was composed, as we see, if necessary, even bills abroad and children there are not a hindrance ... Just why take the risk, and then suddenly not 75 ... but 65% ... there is no need to take risks.
          In general, the one who owns the TV wins the election, so Putin took it in his hands right away .. But in general, if you completely remove clowns like J. and S., then give any of the candidates a word of mouth and the people will say that this is the best speech, and the rest is bottom.
  39. +11
    19 March 2018 10: 37
    Unfortunately, Russia has lost today. The guarantor of Serdyukov, Vasilyeva, Chubais remained in power.
    1. +2
      19 March 2018 11: 14
      Quote: aleks700
      Unfortunately, Russia has lost today.

      It was your Russia that lost, and ours only won!
      Serdyukov, a protege of Putin, modernized the army, which we are all proud of. Vasiliev, a protege of Medvedev, profited as best she could. Chubais is a Westerner, and while we are completely dependent on the West in financial matters, he will not go anywhere. Do not bother all in a bunch.
      1. +11
        19 March 2018 11: 28
        But Medvedev whose henchman, you are our naive? And what is the gain?
        1. 0
          19 March 2018 11: 47
          Quote: victor50
          And whose Medvedev

          He represents the interests of the bourgeois clan. And anticipating your answer, Putin represents the clan of the security forces. Their opinions on very many issues do not coincide. In particular, the bourgeoisie want for the opportunity to get a whip from the owner to surrender Russia, the security forces themselves want to rule in Russia.
          1. +5
            19 March 2018 12: 15
            Quote: Boris55
            He represents the interests of the bourgeois clan.

            He is just very dedicated. This is important, the rest is secondary. On what issues M vs P ??? What they say, they will do it ... and will not ask too much.
            1. 0
              19 March 2018 15: 49
              Quote: Semen1972
              On what issues M vs P ??? .

              At least for this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3KBIwsmfCk
              What do you think, if the bourgeois clan was in power, how soon would Syria fall and how much time would we have already fought in the Krasnodar Territory?
              1. +2
                19 March 2018 17: 15
                Quote: Boris55
                At least for this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3KBIwsmfCk
                What do you think, if the bourgeois clan was in power, how soon would Syria fall and how much time would we have already fought in the Krasnodar Territory?

                In power, and so the clan bourgeois. If you notice, then the friends of businessmen, the entire economy, are made by liberals, and his former colleagues are relegated to second roles. The head of the presidential administration of the president, Vayno AE, is a diplomatic worker, the first deputy Kiriyenko is from business. The same picture is in the cabinet, Ivanov and Yakunin were removed ... And as for the war ... If you notice, then no one is fighting except us ... Katay works great and trades, isn't it?))) Now if you climb everywhere, it's too early or later there will be more victims (terrorist attacks, aircraft, military casualties). Diplomacy is when strangers fight for you. And when you climb yourself, well, like yourself ... with the lives of guys you don’t know whom you don’t feel sorry for, it’s just vanity and ambition.
                1. 0
                  21 March 2018 16: 47
                  What is Katay?
      2. 0
        20 March 2018 11: 25
        Is this your Chubais? Isn't Shoigu dissolving this modernization? Well, or almost dissipated.
  40. +8
    19 March 2018 10: 37
    Most of all I liked the congratulation of Alexander Lukashenko. I quote: “On trust and support by the citizens of Russia of the course taken for the sustainable socio-economic development of the country ...” Well done, well, well, basically the voting electorate, of course. And the rest, as Grudinin was watered with lying shit, and this was what our headless people believed was not surprising. Look who has the audacity to climb into the presidency, so what to ask from completely illiterate people.
  41. +9
    19 March 2018 10: 41
    It all ended as it should have been. Fairy tales have a happy ending. The dragon dies, killed by a spear, the princess goes down the aisle .. That is, Putin goes to the presidency. His master is better than a colonizer. We continue to get chips in the international arena, we continue to poverty and die in the "castle". The syndrome of the “age of the golden Catherine”, with brilliant military victories, with large-scale geopolitical accomplishments, with brilliant reports, with the heyday of embezzlement in the caste of “managers”, is effective and not very, with the poverty of a population located in a hopeless “fortress” of lack of money. We go further. It seems that no new Crimean war is foreseen, - they slipped on the "military headquarters". You can’t expect any revolution either - it passed a long time under a different flag, and the developed NEP is tightly controlled by the new post-communist "elite". To white Negroes - to plow according to Leiba's testament, to Unknown fathers - to live and live.
    1. +1
      19 March 2018 12: 17
      Quote: andrew42
      His master is better than a colonizer.

      What?
  42. +10
    19 March 2018 10: 46
    Gender of the country are poor and low salaries, but voted for Putin? It's ridiculous! And the gangster system is built.
  43. +1
    19 March 2018 10: 57
    Quote: Stirbjorn
    The whole family voted for Grudinin, an honest man has nothing to hide!

    An honest person who has nothing to hide is voting for a dishonest one who is hiding ... It turns out interesting.
    1. +3
      19 March 2018 13: 06
      you are really so naive. the autopsy of the current president will now take place in 25 years, the sternum will not even pull on the baby. moreover, I’m not against Putin.
      1. +1
        19 March 2018 13: 57
        With my education and qualifications, I feel like a baby compared to Putin. But you are probably much more informed. You know in which banks and in what accounts its billions. Or are you simply convinced that good people, except you, do not exist in principle?
        1. +1
          19 March 2018 14: 17
          Well, who told you what exactly good people do not have savings abroad? calmly, it is not given to me, but I know people.
        2. +1
          19 March 2018 14: 21
          or how do you like the last case in the Supreme Court for the Savings Bank, which refused to issue 56 million. while when he took did not ask where the amount?
          1. 0
            19 March 2018 15: 28
            A good person with savings abroad cannot be the president of Russia. This jeopardizes our security. Fearing to lose accumulation, such a president can easily surrender a country to its enemies. Yanukovych is the most striking example of this. We do not need such a president.
            1. +2
              19 March 2018 18: 02
              but the president, prime minister, vice ... maybe a person whose family members have assets abroad or his children or grandchildren are studying? no need to fall to ...... one must face the truth and change the constitution. then the student abroad must take the history of his real homeland and receive grades in the russian federation, without which he could not. admitted to power structures
  44. +1
    19 March 2018 10: 58
    Everything went calmly and predictably. Congratulations to those who believed, did not believe and doubted. The show succeeded, the result is excellent. Social networks are still struggling in orgasms ...
  45. 0
    19 March 2018 10: 59
    I was pleased with the opportunity to take an absentee through public services. very comfortably
  46. 0
    19 March 2018 11: 10
    Quote: free
    So where is 76%? Well, or at least close to that.

    Do you have reason to consider the VO audience representative? I would be extremely interested to know the percentage of grandmothers on the site.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 13: 08
      the percentage of girls is 5-8.
      1. 0
        19 March 2018 14: 01
        This is the Ksenia electorate. And Ksyusha has less than a percent. So there are fewer girls. And women like Putin. Grudinin ... "He is kind of sweet. In a word - Romanian." (C)
  47. +5
    19 March 2018 11: 11
    I don’t know for anyone how, but for me Putin is good even because he famously carried out an operation of covering up Serdyukovschina. As a result, our army was restored, to the surprise of our Western partners. Partners in 2012 were sure that the Russian Armed Forces were already FSO, and here ... in 2014, "green men", damn it, tanks, planes, ships, missiles came from somewhere from these "tattered" with the economy torn to shreds ...
    1. +4
      19 March 2018 12: 34
      Quote: Boris63
      I don’t know for anyone how, but for me Putin is good even because he famously carried out an operation of covering up Serdyukovschina.

      Serdyukov is absolutely a loyal person. He transferred (he was not put in prison, he was not charged with any charges) to another well-paid job. Maybe tell me what he deserved a new post ????
      1. +1
        19 March 2018 13: 11
        what is good and able to share. borisa63 I do not support. he is either far away or not at all in Moscow, at best.
  48. +1
    19 March 2018 11: 13
    At 43, I’m a convinced communist. But besides my beliefs, I have children who are growing up. I have experienced what war is like and after the incumbent President, addressing the Federal Assembly, brought the whole Anglo-Saxon world to hysteria , I realized: Putin will not allow war in the coming years. For me and my children this is now the main thing. And the rest ... Break through! Therefore, I voted for him.
    1. +4
      19 March 2018 11: 59
      Do you really believe that a war with a nuclear power in our time is possible? Well, let's believe. And now such a question ... Russia will use nuclear weapons against countries where the children of officials live (and the highest), where their money is stored and their villas are idle on the shores of the seas?
      1. 0
        19 March 2018 13: 17
        according to the doctrine, the apple and their carriers, the places of their production, are the first to be destroyed. there you think and are the kids liberal? and probably in the villa there is no bunker in three floors at 50 meters.
        1. 0
          18 June 2018 10: 46
          YaB will destroy point, bang and no! You don’t have a shock wave, nuclear pollution, or a nuclear fungus. “And everyone stands agape,” well, they know how to work cleanly. The answer is simply not to come true! What !!! The children of our oligarchs and officials will hang out without noticing anything! Cool depict the start of a nuclear conflict! Well, just like a game on the computer! No game will not be !!!
          I don’t know what World War 3 will be like, but I know what it will be 4 - on bows and spears! Someone else said in the seventies of the last century ...
    2. +3
      19 March 2018 12: 35
      Quote: Gans Hunter
      in the coming years, Putin will not allow it. For me and my children this is now the main thing.

      Would Grudinin allow?
    3. +2
      19 March 2018 17: 52
      There was also no war against the Soviet Union at the end of the 20th century, and there were nuclear weapons and one of the best armies in the world, but ... there’s no country ...
      Definitely, as a result of these so-called elections, Russia lost. Lost her people. There was a real opportunity in an evolutionary way, completely legitimate and legal, to force the authorities to pay attention to the problems of the country's internal life. The fact that the incumbent president will win was not in doubt. The thing is how to win. And it seems that the vast majority, almost an order of magnitude. But the feeling remained after the pre-election “bedlam”, otherwise you won’t call (and here I fully support P. N. Grudinin) something “nasty”, unclean. They say rightly that politics is a dirty business. Personally, he and the family voted for P. N. Grudinin, or rather for the program of the Communist Party bloc, left-wing and national-patriotic forces.
  49. +2
    19 March 2018 11: 13
    Lyubertsy election commission - no words !!!!!!!!!!!!
  50. +2
    19 March 2018 11: 16
    Quote: Boris55
    It’s strange. The State Department however insists on 48%. laughing If it’s easier for you, then let it be so. Nevertheless, I consider it a pointless exercise to take into account the opinions of those to whom everything is on the drum.

    --------------------------
    And what about the State Department? The US Department of State is an analogue of the Department of Foreign Affairs if you do not know about it. His business is to engage in diplomacy, and not to voice their wishes. Let him want what he says. At least the State Department, even the Pentagon General, even the colonel who opens the doors to the Pentagon. The point is not whether it’s easier or not easier for me, but that the authorities need absolute legitimacy, it has done it. You either do not understand this, or you persistently want to sound your whistle in the spirit of "Baba Yaga against."
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 11: 40
      Quote: Altona
      the authorities need absolute legitimacy, it has implemented it.

      So what are you not happy with? By the fact that the overwhelming majority of caring citizens expressed their opinion on the future path of Russia? If the rest of the figs, let at least one come and decide where I will lead and that will be correct.
      1. +2
        19 March 2018 17: 02
        Quote: Boris55
        By the fact that the overwhelming majority of caring citizens expressed their opinion on the future path of Russia?

        The vast majority of citizens have no idea what will happen tomorrow. Can you devote about the future? What awaits us in economics, medicine, education, what will happen to taxes and pensions? The people in general do not care deeply for this, bad officials are responsible for this. Putin is responsible for how we bend pin-dos on TV, don't we?
        1. +1
          19 March 2018 18: 38
          Quote: Semen1972
          The vast majority of citizens have no idea what will happen tomorrow.

          It has. The overwhelming majority listened attentively to the first part of Putin's message and the people did not trust him in his words, he did not give such an occasion.
          Regarding the war in Syria (your koment above). If we had not intervened, Assad would not have been there for a long time. Where would America send all this frantic armed crowd of madmen? Guess from three times.
          1. +1
            20 March 2018 10: 53
            Quote: Boris55
            Assad would not be there for a long time. Where would America send all this frantic armed crowd of madmen? Guess from three times.

            If grandmother had ... she would be grandfather. Tell your theory to China.
          2. +1
            20 March 2018 10: 56
            Quote: Boris55
            It has. The overwhelming majority listened attentively to the first part of Putin's message and the people did not trust him in his words, he did not give such an occasion.

            Strange, but I didn’t ask anyone, everyone says "Because there are no others." You can say in a nutshell. how will the life of Russians change in the next at least two years? There he said something about GDP growth, how do you feel about Kudrin’s words, that it’s unrealistic, that according to this plan, more than China should show growth. You can ask how economic policy will change .. You know))) It’s true that now everything will be completely different .. well, as long as stagnation is observed, not growth
            1. 0
              21 March 2018 17: 03
              how do you feel about the words of Kudrin
              Just like the words of a street bum. Knowledge in the real economy is about the same. This character already had the opportunity to demonstrate them, it’s good that they removed him in time.
        2. 0
          21 March 2018 16: 57
          The vast majority of citizens have no idea that tomorrow will be

          Nevertheless, at the same time, you are ready to vote for anyone, for example, for Grudinin, who didn’t come from somewhere (it’s known whose money was used) and it’s not known where to go tomorrow. You are ready to entrust him with a nuclear button. Is this not idiocy?
        3. 0
          18 June 2018 10: 50
          There will be no pensions soon, no one will pay! Just the majority will not survive! Thank you for the vote of confidence in the new president!
  51. +5
    19 March 2018 11: 18
    Quote: Gans Hunter
    At 43 years old, I am a convinced communist.

    ---------------------------------
    At 43 years old, you are, unfortunately, a convinced bourgeois patriot.
  52. 0
    19 March 2018 11: 20
    The audience on the site, I’m not afraid to say, is smart. This is evidenced by the results of Volfovich and Ksyusha.
  53. +6
    19 March 2018 11: 21
    Quote: andrew42
    One cannot expect a revolution either - it took place long ago under a different flag, and the developed “NEP” is tightly controlled by the new post-communist “elite”. White blacks - to plow according to Leiba's behest, Unknown fathers - to live and be healthy.

    -------------------------
    In 1991, in fact, there was an open counter-revolution and a rollback to capitalism, which was carried out by crypto-capitalists who came to power, hiding behind party mandates. But in fact, the counter-revolution occurred under Khrushchev.
  54. 0
    19 March 2018 11: 23
    All candidates are Russian citizens, all presented programs for the benefit of Russia, and there are no foreign agents among the candidates. The elections took place, GDP won, as Rosstat predicted. Well, if another candidate had won, would a civil war have started? I doubt. It's just an election. And there is no need to throw mud at each other because of political preferences. There is only one thing that confuses me - the lack of adequate, recognizable and trusted leaders other than GDP. If something happens, will there be turmoil again? I wouldn't want to. And I wouldn’t want a repeat of Gorbachev.
    1. +4
      19 March 2018 12: 03
      You should be embarrassed by the fact that the information space has been cleared so that you see only Putin as “adequate”. If you sincerely believe that there are no “adequate” people, because Putin is so great and wonderful, then you are a very naive person.
    2. 0
      20 March 2018 18: 00
      Quote: uskrabut
      GDP won, as predicted by Rosstat.

      Rosstat predicted, Karl???!!! )))) EVERYONE knew, even Putin’s meetings had already been scheduled for half a year in advance.. It seemed like no one wanted elections, neither the people nor the Kremlin, it was just a ritual... just like New Year, such a show, that’s all. ..And Rosstat predicts that the new year will begin on January XNUMX?)))
      1. 0
        18 June 2018 10: 52
        True 1000%!!! good
  55. +1
    19 March 2018 11: 25
    Quote: Valery Saitov
    Something the UAE and other commodity economies do not bathe in these terms, and China also has to buy all the raw materials. I myself work in the oil industry for the construction of pipelines, etc. and I can tell you that oil is not extracted by buckets, but by highly technological equipment. And for the production of large-diameter pipes (which was not the case in the USSR), plants were built, as well as for the production of large-diameter gate valves, but I'm not talking about the equipment of oil filling stations, etc. .d. So the extraction of raw materials is a powerful development of production, these are roads, infrastructure, new villages as well as the arrangement of existing along the pipeline. And why spank pots (who will buy them) when there is enough oil and gas for 300 years. It is necessary to develop the processing of these products, cars convert to gas, etc.

    Whose equipment? Who produces it? In the UAE, oil production is said to be only 5% of GDP? It doesn't look like they're already a raw material appendage.
    1. +5
      19 March 2018 12: 08
      Answer to Valery Saitov, not Victor:
      I don’t know what kind of “oil industry” you work in, but personally, geophysicists all told me how sanctions hit fields that are “not produced in buckets.” There were even cases when foreign companies dismantled the equipment and left. What about ours? Now they just walk around this deposit, like Papuans, and raise their hands to the top - science is ruined, industry is ruined. So leave your tales about how cool everything is in the oil industry for the same “pro” oil workers like you.
    2. +1
      19 March 2018 13: 10
      Hush, hush. Don’t talk about the country of the equipment manufacturer. Don’t ruin people’s world. Let them live in it peacefully. The more expensive the price of insight will be.
  56. 0
    19 March 2018 11: 28
    I voted for Putin. No one else. It would be possible for Suraikin, but he wants to revive the USSR. Just imagine millions of black-assed people will rush to us on completely legal grounds. This may sound insulting, but they deserve it, although everyone on this earth should live well. Completely unscrupulous people. Putin revived the army, did not let Russia fall apart, and this is worth a lot. I think that his name will resonate for centuries. If he started to restore order within the country, he would be a great guy. I often scolded him for the fact that he is for capitalism, for the fact that he does not see the obvious. We are often shown America and told that for its existence we need expansion into other countries, so wait, then this will soon await us. Why are our snickering boors better than them? The scale is simply not the same yet. Capitalism is the dirtiest formation of humanity. But there is a way out, this is the path to God and not to the Lord, but to God. If we return to the Vedic understanding of life, then what was simply wonderful. It is the knowledge of our ancestors that would help us simply “take off.” But almost everything was burned by the priests. I would vote for a president who would be for the Russians, and if the Russians live well, other peoples will live well.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. 0
        19 March 2018 13: 09
        What's terrible? Or am I wrong about Asians? Or maybe you don’t like Old Believers? Due to your illiteracy, you may confuse them with the Old Believers. To object, you need arguments, but you, like that good pilot, are confusing trimmer with clapper.
    2. +4
      19 March 2018 14: 45
      Oh, Sasha! You have such views because of your own ignorance! You can’t see anything further than your nose! Read, at least on Wikipedia, about Turkmenistan. Do you think they will want to go back to the USSR? Or maybe you have seen a lot of migrant workers from Turkmenistan on the streets? No, well, I understand that for you, everyone who is not Slavic is black-assed!.. But I lived in the North Caucasus for 15 years... So I understand the varieties... I understand. We don’t have any Turkmens working for us. There are Uzbeks, there are Tajiks... But there are no Turkmen. Strange, right? Read, read, don’t think it’s hard work. Moreover, it is the “clear sunshine, bright Prince Volodimir” who supports the labor migration of “non-Slavs” to Mother Russia, because it is more fun to live with them. They can work for Doshirak! And as for the “non-Slavs” from the Caucasus here, for example in St. Petersburg, it’s generally like that!!! And everyone has Russian passports! What are you talking about, darling???!!!
      1. 0
        20 March 2018 12: 40
        What kind of Turkmen are they, you need to be able to read. I didn’t go to the polls and this time I shouldn’t have gone. I don't want to participate in this circus. I keep hoping maybe he’s been disguised all this time, otherwise they’ll just poison him like Stalin. The fact that he brings Asians here is true. And for whom, for the prostitute Sobchak? Regarding the “nose”, I have been studying ancient knowledge for many years and this is far from me. Is it commendable that you draw your knowledge from Wikipedia, which you created over the hill? And I draw knowledge from the Asgardian school, from Sergei Danilin, Yuri Gomonov and others. I think you don’t even know who actually baptized Rus' and why it was done? Where did Europe come from, what is our actual calendar? Who built Rome and Venice, who were the first pharaohs, what is the Russian Orthodox (not Orthodox) Christian Church of the Greek rite, etc. You are climbing into “Ivan Ivanovich”. There is a lot of good information on the Internet, but a lot of outright lies.
  57. +3
    19 March 2018 11: 31
    My girlfriend and I were observers at the elections... Well, what can I say... Putin won fairly, although his grandparents voted for him, the rest almost didn’t come (at least in our polling stations)...
  58. The comment was deleted.
  59. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  60. +5
    19 March 2018 12: 01
    Quote: Boris55
    Last May decrees were implemented by almost 95%. There is no reason not to trust that the new decrees will not be implemented as successfully.

    Or maybe it’s better not to do the same as the previous ones? Otherwise, formally on paper everything is messy, but in reality it has only gotten worse. (both personal communication and the negative channel - reflection program) I’m not even talking about statistics, when the rules change on the fly. Until they talked about raising the retirement age, the life expectancy of men was in the region of 62-64 years, but as soon as they started talking, it miraculously jumped over 70. And so on many indicators, and all sorts of government experts, albeit reluctantly, say that the calculation methodology has changed. And then think for yourself.
  61. +1
    19 March 2018 12: 06
    There were some dog lovers on the VO website - but they definitely don’t belong here. They didn’t see the video of her waking up in the sobering-up station - but there is one. And there is a video of her political tours abroad. And there are videos of her campaign activists’ “apartments” in the capitals. It absolutely accurately and unambiguously positioned itself as a translator of Western technologies for the collapse of Russia from the inside, for causing damage to the defense capability, economy and constitutional system of the Russian Federation. In fact, she openly declared herself and her supporters enemies of the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation. This will not be tolerated and there should be strict legal consequences. Her trolls on the VO website should also encounter opposition from the local people. harsh (towards me, in particular) strangely disposed moderators.
  62. +3
    19 March 2018 12: 07
    Quote: Boris55
    You don’t know our legislation well - no more than 22% of the total income of all registered

    Do you believe this yourself? Try to get something if there is no one behind you. And these, unfortunately, are not isolated cases.
  63. 0
    19 March 2018 12: 58
    Putin promised a reshuffle in the government after the inauguration! Let's see, Putin needs to fire Medvedev and the entire economic bloc!
    1. +4
      19 March 2018 13: 21
      You are not an orthodox communist by any chance. Putin clearly said in his election program that he is a liberal. There will be progress in the government and programs, but no more.
  64. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 13: 44
      The Russian government betrayed not only Ukraine (although, more correctly, Little Russia). She betrayed all the Slavs because there are only habbatniks there. Are you yourself not cut out for that?
    2. +1
      19 March 2018 18: 11
      when the adult population is not involved in raising their children, but relies on teachers and the president, what happened in Ukraine happens, while having relatives there, even during the USSR, they looked askance at the Russians. history is a terrible thing if you distort it
  65. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 13: 40
      I’ll see, they’re only Jews. Long life to them.
      1. 0
        19 March 2018 18: 14
        I can congratulate them on the elections, but I can’t promise long life, looking at London and their assets abroad.
        1. 0
          20 March 2018 11: 46
          I'm joking.
  66. +3
    19 March 2018 14: 06
    Friends, I congratulate everyone on the completion of a stage of life in which for the next 6 years we will not have to break our spears and argue on the topic: if not ON then?!?! The choice of our Country took place and I think that the error was very small, no matter who said otherwise. There are more patriots at VO, so there will inevitably be more votes for Grudinin here. Yesterday, based on the preliminary results, I already wrote that I would like the Garant to still hear the voices of voters who did not vote for him. Grudinin’s 20 steps, IMHO, would solve all the main problems of the country, but we can only wait and see what will change and whether it will change at all. Return money and mineral resources to the country, ensure a decent life for Russians, and primarily pensioners, restore order in healthcare and push thieves and bribe-takers to Kolyma (forgive me, local residents), improve the well-being of the Motherland! Yes, 76% is very cool, it would be even cooler if the Russians’ expectations were met by the same amount! Well, or at least 75%! God bless him, the 1% can be forgiven. smile
  67. The comment was deleted.
  68. +5
    19 March 2018 14: 34
    But I’m curious about one thing! Can any of those who voted for GDP explain to me why they are so furiously trying to convince everyone around them that their choice is the only correct one? Well, let! You are right, but the rest are wrong! Go ahead, take a swing and calm down! Yours took it! You have won again! Let's continue to dive into the anus! We save and increase!
  69. +3
    19 March 2018 15: 50
    SPACE,
    “In truth, in smart people, in the army at least second on the planet, in territories, technology, economy, gas, oil and other resources” - is it true in resources? Who has more oil and gas, really? Where are these our technologies? Maybe our economy is fantastic? But the truth alone, excuse me, will not satisfy you...
  70. +2
    19 March 2018 16: 41
    Lord, this madhouse is finally over! Now a decade of victories awaits us!!!
  71. +4
    19 March 2018 16: 44
    This is the most SHITTY election ever. All employees of government agencies and factories were forced to go to the polls and were forced to report by telephone.
  72. The comment was deleted.
  73. +8
    19 March 2018 17: 12
    I’m sorry for you all, very sorry... It’s a pity because you, in general, are not stupid, for the most part educated people do not understand not simple, but even elementary things.
    Your joy “now we will raise Russia” is based not on the real capabilities of the country and people, but on a fierce desire for this, multiplied by some speculative “victories” of Putin-Russia in recent years. In fact, everything is, let's say, mildly, somewhat differently.
    So: to modernize a country as an economic unit, people are needed first and second, and money third. What kind of people are needed first? First of all, we need non-standard, creatively thinking “shapers” of new economic micro-models at the “company-region” level. Let us ask ourselves: can such people appear in Russia today?
    Or let's put it another way: are there conditions for the appearance (or manifestation - if they already exist) of such people?
    The answer is no.
    No, because the system of economic relations built by the current government cannot, in principle, allow the emergence of independently thinking and acting economic elements. mechanism - after all, they are not controlled “from above”, but operate in their activities with their own views on “what is good and what is bad.”
    It is clear that the majority of those present here consider that what benefits the abstract “state” is good. But the problem with this view of life is that the local, specific interests of a particular person or group very often over a certain period of time can come into conflict with this very “state”.
    These are the basics on which the well-being of many Western countries is built. This dilemma is solved by a high level of local self-government, which makes it possible to formulate an economic agenda on a local scale, the implementation of which makes it possible to solve, again, a local problem mainly at the expense of local resources.
    But! It is necessary to understand that this requires a normally elected and, most importantly, controlled government by the local population. Are you, dear ones, able to control at least something in your city/village?
    It’s unlikely, because you are completely dependent on local bosses. Shout (for the sake of order), make some noise and quietly go home.
    But the main thing, again, is not this: you, it is you, who will not allow people with new ideas and thinking to appear, because it is they who will be forced to fight the local authorities by pushing through their ideas. Don't understand why you won't support?
    But everything is very simple: local authorities come to Putin through a chain of “appointments”. Do you support him? OK. Get what you have.
    And don't be outraged.
    There will be no new people - there will be no ideas. Because YOU won't allow this.
    Now "people" comes second. These are all citizens, people, population - whatever. The majority of the population in Russia is directly or indirectly financially dependent on the state. There are quite a few countries with this “feature”, but here’s the problem: these are countries with a low standard of living for the population (we won’t consider the UAE). It’s not a matter of corruption: it’s just that organizing life requires enthusiasm, effort and money, and economically dependent citizens will ALWAYS sit and wait for commands - after all, they are paid not for work, but for executing a command. In fact.
    The third condition is money.
    There will be no money. Because no one will give them to Russia today or in the foreseeable future. Neither the West (which is understandable), nor China - no one. The existing economic model, created with such diligence in recent years, will not be able to earn money on its own - only to maintain the existing - and even then with difficulty - level, but not for development. And it won’t be possible to “take it away” from the oligarchs - after all, they are the very supporting backbone on which this very model stands and rests. And where, and most importantly, in whom will this money be invested? After all, the emergence of creative people in the existing administrative reality is impossible...
    About the “fulfillment” of Putin’s promises. Yes, nothing that was promised - in the global state plan - has been fulfilled. All sorts of missiles, guns, tanks are not results. It's buulshit. In reality, there is a rapid marginalization of a huge percentage of the population, pushing it beyond the line of normal life into survival, which makes it possible to make it even more controllable and powerless. And it will not be possible to invest the results of defense achievements in peaceful industries: this requires a system that has been established over generations for the flow of these very achievements into already created and long-running commercial industries. There are no such industries operating with decent profitability, nor is there time for their formation and development.
    In just a few years, the country has fallen from 6th place in terms of GDP to 12th, this is not even a shame. This is a complete and final failure of the existing economic policy, a complete misunderstanding of the goals and objectives of the development of the state as an economic mechanism, taking into account real, and not just made-up, threats to the country.

    With your permission, I am ceasing my presence on the site. Thanks for communication.


    You know, I support the election of VV Putin. This is what you need and what you deserve
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 18: 19
      I’m glad that in the end you came to the axiom: every nation deserves its own ruler, and at this stage of its development this is gdp.
    2. +1
      19 March 2018 18: 27
      and liberal managers of all stripes are aimed at appropriating or co-authoring advanced technologies and ideas. Yes, this is disgusting, but development will be slower in comparison with a socially developed (socialist) state.
  74. +1
    19 March 2018 19: 28
    Quote: Boris55
    The previous May decrees were implemented by almost 95%. There is no reason not to trust that the new decrees will not be implemented equally successfully

    maybe it's better not to. Otherwise, they formally fulfilled it, but in reality, incomes fell. When the decrees are not worked out and everything is not laid out as to who is at what expense and where to get it and who is responsible - then it’s all a piece of paper. This is what happened in real life and not in reports. You can say halva as much as you like - it won’t make your mouth any sweeter.
  75. +3
    19 March 2018 19: 38
    Quote: businessv
    but we can only wait and see what will change and whether it will change at all

    It is highly doubtful, since it has already been said, “the government has done even more than it could, and deserves a good assessment,” and also, “everything is fine with us, why change anything.” Finish! A curtain!
  76. +4
    19 March 2018 19: 56
    The current government has again used the 1996 scenario, I have written about it here several times! Only this time Grudinin acted as the scapegoat. The modern government, which took “power” from Yeltsin, remained just as illegitimate as Yeltsin’s, which received “power” as a result of the coup. The arguments of the local propagandists, as at that time, were at the level of emotions, not reason, fear, not reflection. And Putin has done nothing for 18 years to consolidate the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION!
  77. +1
    19 March 2018 21: 12
    Quote: romey
    Let them rejoice that with their own hands and heads they missed the chance to avoid shocks and allow the country to get out of the Yeltsin-Putin dead end in an evolutionary way.

    No, there will still be comments! Apart from loud words about national patriotism, in what evolutionary way is this and where are you going to go? To do this, who should you vote for? Do people live the same for you under Yeltsin and under Putin? Where was your national-patriotic union when Gorbachev and Yeltsin were collapsing the Soviet Union? Now are you going to destroy Russia through some kind of evolution? No, gentlemen, revolutionaries, train somewhere abroad, in another country you are itching, and leave Russia alone.
  78. +4
    19 March 2018 21: 15
    Quote: GUKTU76
    I admire our president. To be able to make so many available means without any significant drop in the standard of living of the population is worth a lot. The party, which he began more than 10 years ago, goes into the endgame. I am waiting for its victory.

    [b][/b][i][/i] I have to ask, then why are we in 90th place in the richest country in the world in terms of living standards? African countries come after us, but in terms of corruption they are in 135th place. For example, Finland, a former republic within the Republic of Ingushetia (albeit conditionally), has not been among the top 10 leading countries in terms of this indicator for many decades. What is the phenomenon of not having gas and oil? Dear, there won’t be a $65 barrel for so long and there won’t be a $100 barrel anymore, for that they will increase it further with taxation.
    1. +1
      19 March 2018 21: 22
      Quote: 406ppmp2gv
      Then why are we in 90th place in terms of living standards in the richest country in the world. African countries come after us, but in terms of corruption they are in 135th place. For example, Finland, a former republic within the Republic of Ingushetia (albeit conditionally), has not been among the top 10 leading countries in terms of this indicator for many decades.

      Before pointing at the Finns, saying, “Everything is OK with them,” try going there, or other Scandinavian countries, and living there for 5-10 years....
      When you return, join the movement “It’s time to get out of here!”
  79. +1
    19 March 2018 21: 24
    Quote: andrej-shironov
    The current government has again used the 1996 scenario, I have written about it here several times! Only this time Grudinin acted as the scapegoat. The modern government, which took “power” from Yeltsin, remained just as illegitimate as Yeltsin’s, which received “power” as a result of the coup. The arguments of the local propagandists, as at that time, were at the level of emotions, not reason, fear, not reflection. And Putin has done nothing for 18 years to consolidate the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION!

    But what about the 56 million Russian citizens who voted for him? Isn’t this a consolidation of the majority?
  80. +1
    19 March 2018 21: 31
    Quote: Boris55
    Before the elections, Dolce Vele published instructions on how to ignore the elections. One of the five points specifically suggests spoiling the ballot. "Comrade" acts according to instructions

    -------------------------------------------
    What does Deutsche Welle have to do with it? There was not a single candidate on the ballot for me that suited me. And secondly, spoiling a ballot is not such a disregard for elections. I signed for him, which means I created an appearance. Turnout was important to the authorities; the result was already guaranteed. You apparently read the manuals carefully, since you are so knowledgeable. For your information, I myself have sat on election commissions more than once, if that happens. I know very well what the real results are in my area.
  81. 0
    19 March 2018 21: 59
    Quote: populist
    a few days will calm down and calm down a bit.

    Nothing unpredictable happened. The population, as always, has confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness under the dominance of pro-government SMRAD (mass media, agitation and misinformation.)

    and this is the same opinion, but this is what the ENEMY says for RUSSIA!
  82. 0
    19 March 2018 22: 42
    Quote: lis-ik
    Quote: SRC P-15
    Thank you country! Thank you for voting the way you want! Now we are faced with a difficult task: to preserve and increase the backlog, which, thanks to us and our president, is at this moment! Everything will be fine, as if our ill-wishers would sprinkle with saliva. I especially want to say about the State Department singers and sympathizers on this site: gentlemen, it's time to go on academic leave, until the next election! This also applies to trolls. Here you have no place, on someone else's holiday! Suitcase, train station, State Department!

    Special thanks to those who voted for the commodity economy, for the pro-Western government, for the oligarchs taking profits abroad, for the wise policy of the Central Bank, because there is no inflation. there is no consumer demand due to poverty of the population, thanks to the liberal leadership of the country for the unrequited and missed slap from the west, we will tolerate nothing. I would like my sarcasm to be groundless in the new term, but for 18 years I could not, and therefore did not want to fix anything.

    Regarding the resource economy. Everything in the world is moving towards the fact that in the not very distant future, oil and gas will replace some alternative sources. They are now more expensive than conventional gas and oil, but science is moving forward and, perhaps, their cost over time will become much more profitable. And who will need all this then? So while there is demand for it, we need to seize the moment.
    1. 0
      22 March 2018 01: 37
      Oh, how you started talking just now...
      I remember during the Soviet Union, communists were mercilessly scourged, saying they were “eating the future of our children.” And now it turns out “... we need to seize the moment.” Only then all the money for raw materials went to the state treasury, that is, to the people, and now only a small fraction in the form of excise taxes and taxes (and even then, some of the “rockers” manage to optimize).
      1. 0
        5 August 2018 12: 20
        I don’t argue about revenues to the treasury. But we ourselves wanted such an economic system and we ourselves voted for the Constitution, which stated that mineral resources can also belong to private individuals. So, having taken off your head, you don’t cry over your hair.
        1. 0
          5 August 2018 12: 25
          Quote: Lyuba1965_01
          They themselves voted for the Constitution, which stated that mineral resources can also belong to private individuals.

          If you, devil forbid, are talking about the Russian Federation, then:
          - in the Constitution of the Russian Federation there is not a word about who owns the subsoil.
          - but there is a special Law on Subsoil, in which it is written in black in Russian that subsoil in the Russian Federation belongs to the state. And they cannot belong to anyone else.
          Please don't cast a shadow on the fence.
          1. 0
            7 August 2018 18: 44
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            Quote: Lyuba1965_01
            They themselves voted for the Constitution, which stated that mineral resources can also belong to private individuals.

            If you, devil forbid, are talking about the Russian Federation, then:
            - in the Constitution of the Russian Federation there is not a word about who owns the subsoil.
            - but there is a special Law on Subsoil, in which it is written in black in Russian that subsoil in the Russian Federation belongs to the state. And they cannot belong to anyone else.
            Please don't cast a shadow on the fence.


            According to Article 9, paragraph 2 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: “Land and other natural resources may be in private, state, municipal and other forms of ownership.”
            That is, the equal right to the subsoil of private and state property is clearly stated here.

            The right of ownership as the right of specific subjects to certain objects (property) comes down to three powers: the right of possession, the right of use and the right of disposal.
            These powers together constitute the legal right of ownership. .
            The right of disposal is the opportunity given to the owner, at his own discretion and in his own interests, to take actions that determine the legal fate of the property.
            This means that, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, a private owner, having the same right to subsoil as the state, can sell his property to subsoil for possession, use and disposal to any other legal entity, including foreign companies.
            This directly affects Russia's national security and independence.
  83. +2
    19 March 2018 22: 54
    Quote: Peter Ivanov
    Quote: populist
    a few days will calm down and calm down a bit.

    Nothing unpredictable happened. The population, as always, has confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness under the dominance of pro-government SMRAD (mass media, agitation and misinformation.)

    and this is the same opinion, but this is what the ENEMY says for RUSSIA!


    I would say this, looking from the outside, the elections have passed. Calm down, wait for the inauguration of the President, the appointment of a new government. Next - look... And throwing around words about enemies is the last thing, some people are already going through this.
  84. +4
    19 March 2018 22: 55
    I voted for Grudinin, naively believing that we, the people, are not... But I was wrong, I didn’t expect such impudence with interest rates, although I understood that Putin would win (hope glimmered, though in the minds of the people). I thought the percentages would be about 50-something for Putin, 30-40 for Pavel Grudinin.
    This voting confirmed my expectations (I’m not talking about the maximum).
    But the organized crime group in power managed to survive and zombify us, not to mention the purely technical methods of cheaters in power.
    To my shame, I admit that Navalny was right (I am in no way his supporter). These elections, illegal from the very beginning, if we respect the Law, had to be boycotted.
    What's next - here are the questions again. The referendum is a nationwide one (I think with mandatory attendance and voting). Because those who did not come to vote are certainly not Putin’s supporters. And only 100% turnout at the elections would not have allowed the result to be so brazenly falsified). And so there is a turnout and a cloud of blank ballots for deception. Or something else, I don’t know. I only know one thing - the country has signed its own death warrant with this thieving occupation regime.
  85. +1
    19 March 2018 22: 59
    Okolotochny,
    The first payment point in the Moscow region, between the Domodedovo district and Kashira, then at the entrance to the Tula region, then in the Bogoroditsky district. In the Lipetsk region (by the way, a toll section to the Voronezh border appeared for the first time there). But I won’t list everything. Open the Yandex card (I have it open) and look at the M-4 from Moscow. All toll sections there are signed. And further. An intelligent person understands that his lack of knowledge of certain facts or events does not mean their absence in nature, and accordingly, attributing deception to someone because of his ignorance of these facts will characterize him as a narrow-minded person.
    Open the card and see for yourself.Okolotochny,
  86. +4
    20 March 2018 08: 41
    If anything depended on the elections, we would not have been allowed to participate.
    M. Twain.
  87. +1
    20 March 2018 11: 52
    Who, what and how are you satisfied? All candidates are completely satisfied. Voters, not so much.
  88. 0
    20 March 2018 13: 51
    Quote: s-t Petrov
    so you don’t like the “plato” tax

    About Plato, back in Chipollino, the lemon said: “Recently, the income of our state has decreased. After the air tax was introduced, you began to breathe less. This is outrageous! Keep quiet!”
  89. +1
    20 March 2018 14: 41
    SPACE,
    I'm not suggesting "doing" anything. I'm not the Foreign Minister! I don’t speak languages... Like in that joke. But I’m sure there are mechanisms. It’s just that our position is like this... knee-elbow... - if you can’t change anything, relax and try to have fun.
  90. 0
    20 March 2018 15: 16
    Quote: Valery Saitov
    Something the UAE and other commodity economies do not bathe in these terms, and China also has to buy all the raw materials. I myself work in the oil industry for the construction of pipelines, etc. and I can tell you that oil is not extracted by buckets, but by highly technological equipment. And for the production of large-diameter pipes (which was not the case in the USSR), plants were built, as well as for the production of large-diameter gate valves, but I'm not talking about the equipment of oil filling stations, etc. .d. So the extraction of raw materials is a powerful development of production, these are roads, infrastructure, new villages as well as the arrangement of existing along the pipeline. And why spank pots (who will buy them) when there is enough oil and gas for 300 years. It is necessary to develop the processing of these products, cars convert to gas, etc.

    Do you know if there are tanks at your well, or if planes are not allowed out? wassat
  91. +1
    20 March 2018 16: 26
    [quote=Karabin] Just as our teachers received, translated into dollars, about 500 before “MU”, that’s what they get now, after “MU”
    As the best prime minister of all time said: “If you want money, go into business.” Simple and tasteful.
  92. 0
    20 March 2018 19: 16
    Quote: Gennady Yakovlev
    We lived for 18 years with noodles on our ears, we are already used to it .. We will continue to live ..

    Well, if you’ve been living with noodles on your ears for 18 years, you’ve already gotten used to it and don’t notice that you put these noodles there yourself, and you don’t have to sign for everyone, continue to shake the noodles, good luck to you.
  93. 0
    20 March 2018 19: 31
    Quote: basmach
    And we still haven’t gasified in our country (the same Far East Region is still liquefied) - Well, after 25, they didn’t reach after the red flag arms. Al the mind is not enough and hands do not grow from there. I’ll bring for you from “Fedot the Sagittarius” Filatov- “He thinks everybody else is a freak, no matter what himself.”
    I have the honor.

    I don’t know what they taught you at your school, and during your service in the aviation regiment you could have learned to assess the situation more realistically, but alas, engineers - in tactical terms, they are not always real military men. That’s why you follow the “critics”, and this is the easiest thing, you can calmly evaluate everything without getting up from the couch.
  94. 0
    21 March 2018 11: 23
    Quote: Anatoly Pobedinsky
    Russia has already suffered enormous damage, comparable to the losses in the Second World War. In addition to the destroyed economy, the former best science, education, and healthcare in the world are being destroyed, the population has decreased since 1991. The Russian government has betrayed Ukraine, now the United States is in charge there, there is a war and Russian people are dying . Russia may not be able to withstand another 6 years of this government.

    Yes good hi
  95. 0
    21 March 2018 11: 27
    Quote: NordUral
    I voted for Grudinin, naively believing that we, the people, are not... But I was wrong, I didn’t expect such impudence with interest rates, although I understood that Putin would win (hope glimmered, though in the minds of the people). I thought the percentages would be about 50-something for Putin, 30-40 for Pavel Grudinin.
    This voting confirmed my expectations (I’m not talking about the maximum).
    But the organized crime group in power managed to survive and zombify us, not to mention the purely technical methods of cheaters in power.
    To my shame, I admit that Navalny was right (I am in no way his supporter). These elections, illegal from the very beginning, if we respect the Law, had to be boycotted.
    What's next - here are the questions again. The referendum is a nationwide one (I think with mandatory attendance and voting). Because those who did not come to vote are certainly not Putin’s supporters. And only 100% turnout at the elections would not have allowed the result to be so brazenly falsified). And so there is a turnout and a cloud of blank ballots for deception. Or something else, I don’t know. I only know one thing - the country has signed its own death warrant with this thieving occupation regime.

    I fully share your opinion! hi
  96. 0
    21 March 2018 14: 01
    Right now the liberals are at a loss. Again their people did not understand. The Washington Regional Committee gave instructions and scolding institutions working in Russia on what to base their policy on next and what instructions to give to liberals and the fifth column. Now the system will work and everything will go its way.
  97. 0
    21 March 2018 20: 11
    The elections showed that we have psychotropic weapons!!! And they are not cartoonish, but real!!! Now I don’t give a damn about NATO!!!
  98. 0
    22 March 2018 15: 24
    Quote: volodya
    Quote: populist
    Nothing unpredictable happened. The population, as always, has confirmed its vulnerability to manipulation of consciousness under the dominance of pro-government SMRAD (mass media, agitation and misinformation.)

    And you probably voted for Sobchak?

    I like it when gentlemen like you reproach others with Sobchak... and don’t you, good sir, remind you that Sobchak’s father Putin didn’t carry a briefcase in his time? So it would be better to keep quiet. Otherwise, your stupidity is sickening to read.
  99. 0
    22 March 2018 15: 54
    Quote: rennim166
    But they were forced to do it for Putin. Let’s not forget the buses to Luzhniki and “fake” meetings with voters in advance according to the list. No need to talk nonsense.

    So you’re talking nonsense, what kind of buses? What kind of “fake” meetings? That there is nothing else to justify your loss other than spreading fake news?
  100. +1
    22 March 2018 15: 58
    Quote: faiver
    heh, Yakutia - Putin 64%, Grudinin 27%, whom the head of the republic can’t sit in his chair until the summer hi

    he himself voted for the sternum, but for me this vote was not for someone (I do not believe in the sternum either - I choose not directly from anyone, but directly against the domestic GDP policy, I almost have no complaints about foreign policy, not counting the constant write-offs debt, something like this hi

    Does Grudinin even know what foreign policy is, did he practice it on his state farm? So you simply voted for no one, since you don’t trust your candidate.
    1. 0
      22 March 2018 16: 35
      And that Putin immediately began to understand foreign policy. Lukoshenko is also an agrarian and WHAT?. According to British analysts, Lukoshenko is the most independent president in Europe.