May: Britain sends 23 Russian diplomat and does not invite Lavrov to London

292
British Prime Minister Theresa May said that 23 Russian diplomats must leave the country. She said this during a speech in parliament, reports RT

May: Britain sends 23 Russian diplomat and does not invite Lavrov to London




UK will send 23 Russian diplomat
- declared May. She clarified that diplomats are given a week to pack. This is the biggest expulsion of diplomats in more than 30 years.

We gave Russia the right to explain what happened, but they demonstrated a complete disregard for the severity of the incident. They did not provide any explanation of how this substance turned out in the UK
- says May

According to her, this "measure is a response to the actions of Russia."

In addition, the UK suspends all bilateral contacts with Russia, and also withdraws the invitation to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to visit London.

We have a very simple approach in relations with Russia: “Trust, but verify.” I still believe that it is not in our state national interests to interrupt all kinds of dialogue between Russia and Great Britain, but after this disgusting act against our country, relations can no longer remain the same. We will suspend all planned high-level bilateral contacts between Russia and Britain.
- she said.

The premier stressed that the British side would also withdraw the invitation to Lavrov to visit the UK.

And make sure that neither members of the royal family, nor members of the government are not present at the World Championships 2018 of the Year in Russia
- added May.

Earlier media reported that the British Prime Minister May may announce the expulsion of Russian diplomats from the country in connection with the poisoning in Salisbury.
292 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    14 March 2018 19: 07
    Let them send oligarchs to us with diplomats of stolen money, or wagons. Why do we need just diplomats?
  2. +2
    14 March 2018 19: 18
    What nonsense...... is she talking about.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    14 March 2018 19: 27
    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs will answer an interesting one or they will wipe it off again and swallow it like the Yankees =\
  5. 0
    14 March 2018 19: 36
    It’s somehow suspicious, why are traitors to Russia (Lugovoi, now this one) only on the “Filthy Island” and nowhere else? It's dangerous to run there.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    14 March 2018 19: 53
    Anechdot.
  9. +1
    14 March 2018 19: 58
    Russia's "successes" in foreign policy continue.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +2
    14 March 2018 20: 07
    This is a classic of the genre, making the enemy nervous, making mistakes... and then just panic) is a masterpiece.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. 0
    14 March 2018 20: 26
    Just hysteria... obviously no one loves her... and against the backdrop of menopause... it’s creepy.
  14. +1
    14 March 2018 20: 28
    Some poop or zilch, what's next?
    The Englishwoman does shit, and she pollutes the atmosphere with a vile amber.... fortunately, she has become a little small, however, she has allies that are no less smelly, they can, they can ruin the atmosphere for us.
    We'll see, for now you can get by with a simple clothespin on your nose, it's easy to jump over a bunch, but what next??? request
  15. +2
    14 March 2018 20: 29
    eh!!! Grandma won't come!!! How will we continue to live??? wassat
  16. +1
    14 March 2018 20: 59
    Looks like the shores are confused. Let's see how the guarantor responds... Let's stock up on popcorn
  17. 0
    14 March 2018 21: 00
    Quote: groks
    They poked our top people's noses into the shit. And if it weren’t our elite, we could even have fun. But it’s ours. They are spitting in our faces.

    This whole performance with supposed poisoning, and even such a substance - it smells like an ordinary production, the victims must be. much more than 2-3 people. Stanislavsky is not on them with his “I don’t believe it!” Western intelligence services began to work clumsily if a person under their round-the-clock protection/control is so easy to poison. Only Euromorons can eat this! fool
  18. +1
    14 March 2018 21: 11
    just like that, in one fell swoop, she put all the members of the royal family in their place - that is, without a place at football! oh how!
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      15 March 2018 00: 19
      Where are the results of the Boeing investigation? And the tub of shit is on our head.
  21. +1
    14 March 2018 21: 44
    What policy? What common sense? What investigation?
    A tiny “victorious” war (they didn’t invite the enemy to the battlefield, in case they probably would have lost) and voila, universal support in parliament!!!!
    And it’s a shame that the country is a mess, men are shying away from women in go - blue - the city birds are repainting!!! Soon there will be no white Britons left, there will be yellow-swarthy-black-skinned!!! Trimmed, trimmed and other joys of liber - toler and other dermocrastia!
    Should we feel sorry for the swaggering, arrogant British community? Do they want to be at the beck and call of the striped herd? A flag in their hands and a carrot in... in short, where they need it!
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. +1
    14 March 2018 21: 47
    Quote: AID.S
    Quote: voyaka uh
    A serving cost more than $ 10 million and was made on
    nuclear center Sarov

    The check is preserved?


    No, after 22 hours without a receipt, products are released winked Well, seriously, theoretically ours could clean it up like this, even so dirty and demonstratively. But only if it was needed for a specific purpose, for example, as a demonstration. But on the eve of the elections, when the entire West is trying to change the leadership of Russia, even if If this horseradish really posed some kind of threat, it would have been cleanly removed, or it would have simply disappeared altogether. Then, after a couple of months, it would have been found in some channel winked So the answer to this is clear. As gentlemen liberals and all-pro-propaganda people say, this is all before the elections wink Only Great Britain and the USA no longer know what to do to discredit the bloody Russian KGB led by Putin.
  24. 0
    14 March 2018 22: 14
    Quote: Xscorpion
    But seriously, theoretically ours could clean it up like that, even so dirty and demonstratively.


    This is where you are wrong. This is obviously a crime that is far from “dirty”. I will express my personal opinion: this is aerobatics. “Poisons” of this type are extremely difficult to detect; they allow the criminal to leave no traces and give time to leave the crime scene (they give a significant head start). Not all countries would have figured out what was happening so quickly (if I’m not mistaken, initially it was all about fentanyl derivatives); even leading European countries would have been forced to use the help of more educated allies. It's not very easy.
    1. +1
      15 March 2018 00: 16
      Right. This is the signature “Made in USSR” stamp. So that no one would guess.
      1. 0
        15 March 2018 00: 54
        On the Internet, such humorous comments are usually called trolling. Or “every unpleasant comment should not remain unblocked,” I read something like that somewhere. But, oddly enough, in this case it is right on topic. Try to take something away from the answer, it might be useful.

        You've definitely heard about DNA, that every person has a unique DNA. You might be surprised, but any other chemical substance is unique. What makes it unique is the way it is made and... and here is the most interesting part. I am sure you have heard about our great compatriot D.I. Mendeleev, and you also know what his table is. Each cell contains an element. But Google it, and you will find out that many of these same elements have so-called isotopes. In principle, the set of isotopes for each element is to a certain extent standard, but it differs, by thousandths, but it is different. What if it differs for 3-5-10 elements? What if it is the same for these elements? This is called an "isotope signature". And it is much more accurate than fingerprints. The set, if it matches, is much more powerful as evidence than the "USSR" stamp. This is difficult, it may not always be accurate, but still, Google it, if you are interested in it, if you are attracted to it and you decide to connect your life with it, you will give our Motherland much more than writing useless comments (I looked at what you wrote). Go for it! Not too late. All in your hands.
        1. +1
          15 March 2018 01: 25
          Thank you for such close attention to my humble person. Also thank you for the educational program on chemistry, but still. I can’t catch your thought. I understand that each synthesized substance has its own signature, or rather the “handwriting” of the manufacturer. Is that right? If yes, then explain why it was necessary to use this particular substance, and even in England, which is not the most backward country from a scientific point of view? This is exactly what I meant when talking about the “made in the USSR” mark. Why use such a unique, I would say exclusive, poison, traces of the manufacture of which lead ONLY to our country? This is, forgive me, idiocy!
          1. +1
            15 March 2018 01: 57
            Not at all.

            I sincerely hope that Russia has nothing to do with this.

            I completely disagree with the voiced opinion of the British, how the use of BW is a game of terms, BW, as a term, is applicable only to weapons of mass destruction, in this case it is more appropriate to use the term “sabotage poisons”, this is the case in the history of various special .services of various states this has happened and, unfortunately, will continue to happen.

            This substance is rare and, more importantly, has a lethal concentration in extremely small quantities. When killing people, such an anti-scientific term as “detection limit” is very important; I say “anti-scientific” because “invisible” poisons do not exist in principle, there is only a certain possibility of detecting minimal quantities of substances, or, no matter how doubtful it may sound, indirect signs indicating a particular substance.

            I assume that such sabotage poison could have been used for the following purposes:
            a) its non-detection (for example, the Italian special services would not have found it with a probability close to 100%, and not only because of the small quantities, but also because of the complexity and closedness of the “formula” - such substances are determined by the “formula” or by "fragments" of the formula formed during the process of "decomposition" in the body, the so-called metabolites)
            b) in order to enable the performer to hide in the general turmoil.
            This is on the topic of why they used a rare substance.
            To be honest, I was happy for the British professionals, even in Russia, in a country that will give many a head start in such matters, such a speed of reaction would be commendable.
            1. 0
              15 March 2018 02: 33
              Against the background of the near-Syrian psychosis, the replacement of the concepts of “sabotage poisons” with “BOV” with their other comments that Russia has lost control even over its chemical weapons is quite harmonious, so it is clear from whose side the order was made
              they tried to mislead under WMD by saying that 13 people were injured

              A lot of people would like to make sure that the United States and its allies had nothing to do with the poisoning of Russia’s previous special representative to the UN.
              Also to the murder of the first director and owner of RT in the USA.
          2. 0
            15 March 2018 02: 31
            And further. Let me guess why the British blame the country and not the individuals.

            Calculating the required lethal dose is very difficult. Take Zorin as an example, its calculated doses are known and published, but the doses in its actual use (and unfortunately it was used more than once) differ from the calculated ones by several times, if not tens of times. You need to kill a person, kill him in such a way that as few outsiders as possible are harmed, and you need to ensure that the performer is not harmed. This is very difficult, very difficult, especially for a “new” and practically unstudied substance. For an ordinary criminal, this is unattainable. This all leads to unpleasant thoughts.
  25. +1
    14 March 2018 22: 15
    I didn't even read all the nonsense. Get the hell out of all the rubbish. Let them knock down the little things in Europe (I thought for a long time, maybe I should write Europe).
  26. 0
    14 March 2018 22: 38
    “Menopause presses” - as those who have already gone through it say..
  27. BAI
    0
    14 March 2018 22: 40
    I hope that the British will be deported within the same time frame, and will not wait for several months like with the USA.
  28. 0
    14 March 2018 22: 46
    and also withdraws the invitation to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to visit London.

    Well, Tortila will not come to us with a crown. Normal exchange!
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. 0
    15 March 2018 00: 31
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Why was polonium used to kill Litvienko in 2006?
    The portion cost more than 10 million dollars and was made at
    Sarov’s nuclear center on purpose, since rapidly decaying polonium cannot be stored.
    Could also be cyanide ...

    Well, why?
    From all points of view, it is absolute nonsense to use this particular substance. which costs a ton of money, is difficult to store. and easy to transport. It's obvious stupidity, isn't it?
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. +1
    15 March 2018 05: 04
    We kindly request you to deport all our thieves who have settled with you, preferably with the money they stole in Russia.
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. +2
    15 March 2018 06: 37
    Super performance wassat I'll get fat from popcorn watching such an exciting circus performance laughing There will be a special relish when our corrupt oligarchs begin to take off their shoes laughing
  36. The comment was deleted.
  37. 0
    15 March 2018 08: 08
    In the photo - an “alcoholic” who was not allowed to recover from her hangover... lol
  38. 0
    15 March 2018 08: 26
    Will everyone who lives on Le, Lavrov and Leps not go to live in London?crying
  39. 0
    15 March 2018 08: 30
    Quote: Wedmak
    Or maybe it's for the best. Recently, there’s nothing to talk about with shaving. Reply mirrored, that's all. We owe them nothing, ultimatoms don’t roll, the forest there is on X.
    And that ... stop supplying them with LNG. For nefig. Get along.


    What are you saying, where now is the “Governor of Chukotka” going to sue for his mother’s bryuliki with other feeding ghouls? winked
  40. 0
    15 March 2018 08: 30
    Every time I see this image on the screens, I never cease to be amazed at how low the level of English rulers has fallen. Are they recruiting them through advertisements from among graduates of mental hospitals? This stupid mug with a face, which in the old days (photo) people put in buffets so that children would not carry sweets, is trying to rule world politics, but she has a problem with her brain. But what kind of people ruled Great Britain, although they were not friends of Russia, but worthy of respect, at least Winston Churchill... Wonderful are your deeds, Lord!
  41. 0
    15 March 2018 09: 18
    I look at my surroundings - friends and comrades, and I understand that this British woman will significantly add votes to Zhirinovsky this Sunday. People are tired of listening to this, they want something more radical. They nod understandingly to all the arguments about not being serious, but say - let them... maybe at least he'll give them a hard time!
  42. 0
    15 March 2018 10: 05
    Quote: svp67
    Quote: Spartanez300
    old boor

    She is trying to "mow" under Thatcher, but not convincingly ... No, I do not believe it.

    With Thatcher, she can only copy the nickname, and even then not completely, “The Iron Fool,” for example.