Trump: The United States won two world wars and brought communism to its knees

December 9 2017 417

American President Donald Trump, speaking to supporters in Florida, said that the United States is a nation that won two world wars and brought communism to its knees, reports Fox Business channel.

Trump: The United States won two world wars and brought communism to its knees

We are a nation that dug the Panama Canal, won two world wars, sent a man to the moon and brought communism to its knees

- Leads the channel words Trump.

Trump also once again criticized the policies of the past president. In his opinion, during the years of Barack Obama’s leadership, “America showed weakness and did not go beyond the red lines.” If we went beyond the line, then Russia and Iran would not go to Syria. " At the same time, he praised himself for the 59 "beautiful missiles" that were released on Syria on April 7 in response to the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrian authorities.

13 July Trump considered himself the most productive president in stories USA. According to him, in a little over five months of being at the helm of the country, he managed to do more than any other American leader. RIA News

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

faterdom

+1

9 December 2017 20: 44

Well, God forbid... With such a sober assessment of the situation, the United States has a very bright future.
The comment was deleted.
The comment was deleted.
ser-pov

0

9 December 2017 22: 04

Zug,
What a weirdo you are..... I’m surprised how the earth still carries you.... A sent Cossack, shut your mouth.
1. Zug
  
  0
  
  9 December 2017 22: 47
  
  Don’t be rude - it’s better to teach your round butter churn on your shoulders to your mind
albert

+3

9 December 2017 22: 38

Zug,
Quote: Zug
This is when three Japanese aces hammered three 150 of our falcons for months. After which, through an alliance, we had to gather all our aces pilots and literally instruct the pilots in combat conditions. And it’s good that it’s peaceful

Exactly, assa. The Japanese were surrounded and destroyed at Khalkhin Gol, the losses of Soviet aviation during the entire period of the conflict amounted to 207 aircraft. Quit mushrooms, ass, otherwise you’re imagining all this nonsense in reality. Three Japanese shot down 150 planes, hmm. Japanese rudels and Hartmans.
1. Zug
  
  0
  
  9 December 2017 22: 45
  
  yes, yes, who told you these numbers? Ours gathered specialists from the union and sent them to the east! - so that at least they could train pilots on the spot! and if they were destroyed, who did our people fight in 45? A peace treaty was signed there on the destruction of the Kwantung Army. I don’t know anything at Khanin Gol. But the fact that we got stuck there and there were big losses is a fact!
  And besides, the Japanese pilots had 600 hours of flight time after graduating from college; ours even before the war, how much? - I think the result of such meetings with the Japanese is obvious...
  1. Svarog51
    
    +6
    
    10 December 2017 08: 13
    
    Who told you your numbers? The volunteers who returned from Spain and had combat experience in battles with the German Condor Legion all died at the hands of two Japanese aces, so what? And where did the Japanese get their aces? They appeared as a result of battles with the Chinese, and who didn’t really have an army, let alone aviation? As a result of the defeat of the Japanese at Khalkhin Gol, Japan never decided to attack the USSR. But the valiant Yankees carried out a “brilliant” landing operation to capture one of the islands in the Pacific Ocean. Losses amounted to up to 200 killed and wounded. The only problem is that there were no Japanese on the island at all; having captured the island, they considered it to have no strategic significance and evacuated the garrison from there.
    The Japanese pilots may have had some flying experience, but combat experience began to appear after the start of the war with the states.
    1. Zug
      
      0
      
      10 December 2017 10: 14
      
      The Japanese were defeated at the cost of significant losses; no one defeated them there. Further, they did not attack not because they were terribly afraid of us, but because their priorities were aimed at the Pacific Ocean and fighting another one (and they were already fighting with England, USA, Australia, etc.) and besides, I think they had a non-aggression pact with us back in 40... for 5 years or so... with the possibility of denoxing it. Regarding the nailed down Yankees, we also when ours the group near Kiev was destroyed and darling Zhukov took Yelnya - before taking it, they beat it with artillery for days on end... in an empty city - this is the result of poorly functioning reconnaissance (as was the case with us throughout the war) They shot at civilians (only now on their own) and entered the empty city - well, there were rearguards there, of course, but all the main units had left the city the day before and Zhukov missed all this...
      Look at the data on aviation losses at Khankhin Gol...A little shock awaits you))) By the way, during the Finnish war we showed ourselves in approximately the same way (command) - nothing surprising - it’s just that everyone knows about the Finnish company, but less about the Japanese company
      1. Svarog51
        
        +5
        
        10 December 2017 13: 14
        
        Yeah, I didn't destroy it. In 39 and 40 they signed an agreement. When did the war in the Pacific begin? Before this, the Germans were driven away from Moscow and Stalingrad was in full swing. And before that, the Japanese pushed the Yankees, Tommies and frogs out of their colonies in Southeast Asia and quite successfully. You say that Zhukov, before taking Yelnya, hammered it with artillery on the 41st day
        the result of poorly functioning intelligence (as was the case with us throughout the war)
        So why did your beloved Americans hammer Dresden in February, which had no strategic significance and was filled to capacity with refugees? Also from “lousy intelligence”? Or is it intentional? This is what I saw with my own eyes in the 80s.
        
        I don’t need to look at the loss data, here at VO everything has long been sorted out to the smallest detail. Continue reading your Rambler, the headlines alone are worth it. They have already found the Argentine submarine "San Juan", judging by the headlines, but when you start reading, they still don’t know anything - but they are trying to “deliver the latest news”. I gained my knowledge back in the late 70s by reading the memoirs of pilots who fought at Khalkhin Gol, during the Finnish and Great Patriotic Wars. And I personally knew one Hero of the Soviet Union from A.I. Pokryshkin’s regiment. He was very interested in learning about the airfield where the regiment was based on May 8, 1945; I served there as a conscript. Somewhere on Pikabu you would be considered an expert, but this will not work at Military Review, the contingent is not the same. There are people here from 40 and above in age and knowledge, unlike yours, much more.
        
        Zug
        
        0
        
        10 December 2017 13: 58
        
        [b] My dear 41 and my grandfather was a retired lieutenant colonel - the northern front and everything was filled with memoirs. So: Japan gave priority to the Pacific Ocean, even before Pearl. Why should I write about this? concluding a peace treaty with us or two. Have you heard anything about Zhukov’s execution orders at Khankhin Gol? How much did he sign? I also read the memoirs of the same veterans and their interviews about the Japanese, and many say that they were serious warriors, no worse than the Germans. It’s a fact that the company at Khankhin Gol was difficult! and losses - Especially in aviation, we suffered large ones at first - Stalin could not get through to poor fellow Blucher as he was drinking there in the steppe to his mother (so they knocked out Blucher's eye) Yes - and what does Dresden have to do with it? What does he have to do with Yelnya? And I also had a chance to read Pokryshkin’s “Sky of War” several times. review, contingent...hilarious...
        
        the lord
        
        0
        
        12 December 2017 04: 12
        
        How many orders did Zhukov sign there? In general, throughout the history of Russia, no matter how you start reading or listening to our officers and soldiers, the enemy is always strong. cunning, resourceful. Only everything loses, but it loses)))) Tradition, apparently, is like this. And yes, the Japanese showed tenacity in defense; they took fortifications when there was no one left alive. Was this just a consequence of the fact that they were so experienced and persistent, or was it a question of skillful fire defeat of the Japanese by ours.)))))
      2. the lord
        
        0
        
        12 December 2017 03: 08
        
        Once again I am convinced that glass wool is only a small part of your wishes. And when will the Liberoids die out? After all, they are carrying a storm, it’s really bad
RoTTor

0

10 December 2017 01: 09

He is right about one thing: it was the United States, which began to fight at random, that profited the most from both world wars, i.e. won economically - on someone else's blood! This is their SUCHNESS!
Conductor

0

10 December 2017 01: 15

He kind of looks like a toad. And the Panama Canal was dug by the Chinese.
Umnichka

+1

10 December 2017 01: 29

So that’s who taught dill to dig the sea with a digging stick! Trump will be applauded in Kyiv, a direct example of Ukrainian “thinking.”
LeonidL

0

10 December 2017 02: 31

Communism on its knees???? What about communist China, Vietnam, Cuba...
The comment was deleted.
Conductor

0

10 December 2017 07: 29

Who spoiled the air in the Duma - Trump, Trump.
alexleony

0

10 December 2017 08: 15

Zug,
You, dear sir, probably read about how our people were shot down like partridges in McCain’s memoirs. I’ll tell you a secret - he is a stupid person, and not so long ago, the rest of his brain was removed as unnecessary.
1. Zug
  
  0
  
  10 December 2017 10: 17
  
  Is it that you, the most petulant type, showed off your intellect? The perch will help you - sit there - ridge to the left..
  1. the lord
    
    0
    
    12 December 2017 04: 15
    
    Whoa, daddy's boy decided to show his teeth - it's a waste of time - chickens don't have teeth. So you better cut your comb, you are our glass wool, sip some broth from it and don’t be rude to your uncles anymore
Serzh_R

+1

10 December 2017 09: 00

We are a nation that
dug the Panama Canal,
won two world wars,
sent a man to the moon and
brought communism to its knees

And he never once told the truth.
Man on the Moon and two world wars -
Yes, if he had said that to the face of a communist of the 40s, he would have taken it to the fullest....and this is a stone in our history.
Yes, the fish rots from the head.
nikolaev

0

10 December 2017 11: 55

Great Israel is the Master of the USA, and not vice versa. Moreover, Israel is the master of all countries and controls them with the help of financial institutions - this is why two world wars were launched, in which Israel, in fact, became the winner. After these events, having suffered through centuries of ordeals, a Jew opens the door with his foot to any government offices of all countries.
Moreover, the era of revenge has come for the ordeals of the sons and daughters of Israel to all the gentiles - LGBT people, juvenile justice, the destruction of states, crowds of refugees and much more to come - reckoning
S_Baykala

+1

10 December 2017 13: 36

We are the nation that dug the Panama Canal, won two world wars, sent a man to the moon and brought communism to its knees

I rarely send anyone to the moon, more often to another place But it’s not a fact that they get there (or fly)...
alfa19638

0

10 December 2017 20: 37

self-satisfied, he is sure that everything is subject to him, but the disappointment of reality will be sobering
builder

0

11 December 2017 08: 36

Korolev,
They did not decide the war with little bloodshed and the atomic bombing did not intimidate them; their losses from conventional bombings were comparable. Japan capitulated after the USSR entered the war.
the lord

0

12 December 2017 03: 05

But here you are, stupidly engaged in filthy perverts and spouting completely unverified information. A million Primaks remained in the occupied territory. The general’s medical instructor teaches us that we didn’t retreat, but we fled. I’ll answer this fool and you glass wool - she may have fled, but the rest retreated. Read the history of Kursk, read about the battles near Rzhev. Still, you need to put glass wool in the grave, you need to
the lord

0

12 December 2017 03: 09

Zuglo: Somehow these 600 lard did not save them from shame in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Mossul alone is worth it)))))
Serzh_R

0

13 December 2017 15: 08

USA... brought communism to its knees

Ideologies are accepted by the population of independent countries and reflect the aspirations of the spirit of peoples at different times.
If the USA had at least some kind of ideology, then they would have something to fight for and something to lose besides their blue “values” .
the lord

0

18 December 2017 03: 50

Zug,
Here again and again lies from you, it’s like it’s creeping out of the dirt. There was no escape, there was a coordinated and well-organized attack. Where were the tanks? which Brest was counting on? - Yes, they were bombed. Or did the commander-in-chief of our Air Force just shoot himself? All serious concentrations of our troops were subjected to powerful artillery attacks.
Why was the concentration of Reich troops allowed? There were a lot of factors - everything was explained by the need to coordinate the advance to the English Channel by a powerful group away from British reconnaissance. And multiple agreements and treaties with Germany provided serious fuel for how these explanations were perceived. And there was no escape - this is evidenced by the defense of Mogilev and Kura, the defense of Odessa and Sevastopol. And much more - exported equipment from military factories. It would have been impossible if I ran away.