“Russia for Russians”: once it was built

573
“Russia for Russians”: once it was built


November 4 Russian nationalists will again come to the "Russian marches." They will demand the construction of "Russia for the Russians", believing that this is the only way to save the Fatherland. Walking through the streets of Moscow, St. Petersburg and other cities, they will not even think about the fact that the state of their dreams had already been built once. And it almost was the end of Russia.



The end of the trilogy, the beginning:

How to win the "war" in Ukraine: studying the Chechen experience

Russian global project: how to subordinate the world to your will

Russia is for russians

The idol of Russian nationalists is the emperor Alexander III. A real Russian patriot who, being offended, against Germans, Englishmen and ... for some reason Jews, decided to rebuild the motley empire of ancestors into the Russian national state.



However, it should be recognized that for the first time the national map in Russia was attempted to play even under his father, during the Polish uprising 1863 of the year, when the local intelligentsia who rebelled against Russian domination tried to raise the inhabitants of Right-Bank Ukraine against the empire by printing leaflets for them in the national language.

In fact, the idea of ​​the emperor was, at first glance, very sensible. Assessing how quickly the divided Germans were able to unite their forces around Prussia and formed a monolithic and powerful German Empire (the birth and formation of which took place almost before the eyes of the future Emperor Alexander III), he tried to transfer this experience to the Russian soil. He did not take into account only the "little things" - the Russians, they are not Germans.

In 1880, Russia begins the process of intensive Russification of the population, which immediately launched (not without the help of foreign “partners”) the growth of the “national identity” of not only foreigners of the empire, but also among the seemingly native Russian population.

How did it all end? By the standards of the middle of the XIX century, unthinkable. Some fifteen to twenty years passed, and the “Black Hundreds” appeared in the cities of Russia, whose main goal was to protect the Russians from non-Russians.




But, as shown story, it was just flowers.


Nothing changed fundamentally in the national policy of the empire and the son of Alexander III, Nikolai II. Under him, the Russian self-consciousness successfully developed in parallel with the self-consciousness of other peoples, and, as soon as the power in the empire weakened, it was literally ripped from the inside. Something incredible happened for Russia. A country where, over the 30 years before, all nations lived without knowing national dissension and didn’t pay much attention to the differences between themselves, broke up into more than a dozen national formations that immediately began to quarrel with all their neighbors (and mothers (RSFSR)).

It got to the point that in 1918 year in scientific literature (published, by the way, in the capital of the Bolsheviks Petrograd) have already met on a par with the Dontsians, Ukrainians and Belarusians, Siberians and Perm citizens, whom the European opponents of Russia also prepared for the role of separate nations.

Thus, the three-hundred-year-old Romanov empire collapsed, 270 years from whose history the state grew and flourished, as a common home in which many nations saw for themselves good and meaning. And for 30 in recent years, nationalists of all stripes (including Russians), were able to break it into a dozen national scraps.

Russian is a state of mind



At the beginning of the 20 century, the great Russian scientist Academician Vladimir Vernadsky developed the noosphere theory. One of its apologists, the Russian historian Lev Gumilyov, proved the inextricable link between the landscape and the people living in it. According to his theory, not only man influences the biosphere, but the biosphere constantly influences man.

The simplest example is very clear to understand and about which almost everyone has heard. During Soviet times, Japanese companies, receiving for the development of a plot of taiga, were taken from it, to the great surprise of the local population, not only logs, but even branches with twigs. And sawdust, by the way, too. Because for Japan, all this is the greatest value. At the same time, the Japanese, who lived in Siberia for twenty years, began to look at the value of taiga wood in pure Russian. And really, who needs sawdust in the taiga?

Thus, Lev Gumilyov explained the fact that on the territory of present-day Russia, where the population interfered many times, always won, we call it conditionally, the “Russian spirit”. The descendants of the Tatar princes became the Suvorovs and Kutuzovs. The Germans, the French and the Dutch very quickly in the cities forgot about their origin and considered themselves Russians (while often continuing to speak at home in their own language).

We will not delve into the distant past and confine ourselves only to the history of the house of the Romanovs.

- In the Russian-Polish war 1654-67. The bulk of the Russian army was the so-called regiments of the new system. The overwhelming majority of them were commanded by foreigners: Germans, Swedes, Scots, Dutch. Yes, and they often served as officers in the same foreigners who were accepted into the Russian service, whose children and grandchildren became the associates of Peter I.

- The army of Peter the Great is a unique symbiosis of Russian traditions and achievements of European military science.

- In the 1709 year, in spite of the fairy tale invented in the West and often repeated among Russian nationalists, Cherkasy Cossacks of Skoropadsky, not accepting betrayal of Mazepa, exhausted their opponents with fights and clashes, and on the day of the Poltava battle in the ranks of the Russian army they were order more than in the ranks of the Swedish Mazepa.



- A descendant of the Tatar family Alexander Suvorov was the greatest commander of Russia (who does not believe in the official pedigree of Alexander Vasilyevich, I recommend visiting the wax museum, as they say, his pedigree is literally written on his face), and the heir of Peter I, taken from Ethiopia, Alexander Pushkin, the greatest Russian poet.

- The German Barclay de Tolly developed a plan for the 1812 campaign of the year, effectively implemented by a descendant of the Tatars Mikhail Kutuzov who had once come to Russia. They, thus, once again saved Russia from the invasion of Napoleon.

- And in the famous Battle of the Nations near Leipzig, the tireless Kalmyk cavalry of the noyons Jamba Taisha Tundutov and the Sergedjab of Tyumen drove the enemy for the last time. I drove to Paris itself, where these amazing Russians made an indelible impression on advanced Europeans.


In the photo Khosheutovsky khurul in Kalmyks, built in memory of the dead Kalmyk soldiers in that great war. Doesn't it remind anyone?

- Pole Felix Dzerzhinsky created the Cheka and actually brought order to the chaos-covered country (which, as we saw above, was a result of the growth of "national identity", including the Russian people).

- Georgian Dzhugashvili raised the country from the ruins and ensured its prosperity for decades.

And where among all of them are “Russians”? As the emperor Alexander I would say (he himself is far from being a Russian by blood), "they were all Russians." And it is very regrettable that his great-nephew did not understand what the true strength of the empire he inherited was. Under him, nationalism began to eat away the greatest country and destroyed it during the reign of his son. And it is still unknown what would happen to Russia if the real Russian man Joseph Dzhugashvili, together with all the peoples of the USSR, did not literally revive her from the ashes.
573 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    4 November 2017 14: 08
    Quote: tasha
    I am also very happy for the residents of some regions. That is, the essence of the issue is the uneven distribution of budget funds?
    And, by the way, residents of Kamchatka receive a considerable share of subsidies... Where do they go?


    This is the first time I’ve heard that the Kamchadals were showered with money...
    1. 0
      5 November 2017 08: 15
      So it turns out that in the end all the fuss is about money...
  2. 0
    4 November 2017 14: 21
    Quote: tasha
    again the donors are Russians, but do not have the right to declare their nationality, but for some reason the republics within Russia have more rights than the rest

    Statements of this kind require evidence.
    If you go to Kazan, Grozny, and then to Irkutsk, Omsk, Khabarovsk, Chelyabinsk, there will be no questions...

    parents from other regions of the Urals Federal District know, can you tell me why?

    I won't tell you. Where am I and where is the Urals? You know better on the spot. If you know the answer to your question, write. If you don't know, start figuring it out...

    And I'll give you a hint. The center is pumping out all the money from the regions, God forbid they transfer Magnitogorsk to the center, the region will face the fate of Omsk. And for some privileged ones, for some reason, the money is left where it is,
    Therefore, everything is free for citizens, however.

    if somewhere they want to organize a Miss Russian competition

    I hope that it won’t come to such competitions in Russia. Unless the number of people who consider themselves Russians is equal to the number of people who consider themselves Tatars. Here's a question for you - is there an opportunity for a Russian girl to take part in the Miss Tatar contest? And why?
    An interesting example: “The Miss Russia – Australia – 2017 competition (Miss Russia AU-2017) is held among the Russian population of Australia and introduces the indigenous population to the culture and way of life of representatives of other cultures living in the country. Russian-speaking girls over 18 years old are allowed to participate in the competition from the countries of the former USSR, or having Russian roots and living in Australia. There are no external restrictions for participants."


    the rest without comment
    1. +1
      5 November 2017 06: 47
      If you go to Kazan, Grozny, and then to Irkutsk, Omsk, Khabarovsk, Chelyabinsk, there will be no questions...

      Not an argument. For some regions, of course, there are questions...
      Go to Surgut, Yekaterinburg, and then again to Irkutsk, Omsk and along the way to Ulan-Ude. I hope you have questions.

      And for some privileged ones, for some reason, the money is left where it is,

      Such statements require proof. See the statistics..
      I can also give an example of how supporters of one type of wrestling (more traditional for the local population) do not receive proper support compared to judo and sambo... Is it necessary?

      the rest without comment

      Here.
  3. 0
    4 November 2017 14: 24
    In general, since I wrote that our family is of different blood, I am not a nationalist and, of course, I consider my children and husband Russian. Russian is a living environment, thinking among people like you, and not in a distant mountain village or yurt, something like that
  4. 0
    4 November 2017 14: 26
    and why are comments that have nothing to do with the ignition so mercilessly deleted???? An elementary statement of facts!
  5. +5
    4 November 2017 14: 53
    I would compare the Russian people to the lead singer in a choir. The way he sings, the whole choir, the whole country will sing. And if he doesn’t exist... it won’t be Russia anymore.
    Having been born and lived among Russian people, a Tatar or German becomes Russian in spirit. Not always, but this is where Russian relations between people prevail. A German or a Jew will never become Kyrgyz in spirit in Kyrgyzstan or Chechen in Chechnya.
    But where does this come from? Why is this happening? There are many reasons, but the main one comes from the Russian people. And the fewer Russian people there are, the less Russian the country becomes. Coming, for example, to Moscow, we intuitively feel that this is not quite a Russian city. Something becomes alien, not native, not inherent in our golden-domed capital. Both Jews and Chuvash and Belarusians feel this - there are fewer Russian people and the city is already different. Maybe someone is happy that Moscow is becoming more like their native village or village or Chinatown, but for Russian people in spirit this is a loss... and a huge one. The fewer Russian people there are in a city or country, or they become serving people, the more aggression and anger there is among the new masters of life.
    Periodic festivals with girls in kokoshniks smoothly crawling from a restaurant to bed with abreks or bays are not support for Russian culture.
    The Russian person must be protected, roughly speaking, cultivated, like caring for a valuable flower in the garden.
    Sorry, everyone is different - but it is in your own interests to protect everything Russian in the country. Then Russia will remain as a country where all nationalities live.
    If the remaining majority in some places remains behind the Russian people, there will be no one.
    There will be no state of Tatarstan - from Kaliningrad to Nakhodka or Chechnya from Murmansk to Grozny.
    It’s not just necessary to preserve the Russian language - that’s not enough. We must preserve the source of Russia - the Russian people!
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      4 November 2017 17: 54
      The gentlemen from "Golden Rain" and "Echo of Moscow" laugh and spit in the eyes, watching how the Mongoloids - Finno-Ugrians - Muscovite faces tear each other's forelocks, destroying their self-identity, clapping their hands - Come on, come on! While you are figuring out which of you here, in terms of “state of soul,” is more Russian than the most Russian of Russians, in the Baltics, for example, in Ukraine and in other latrines, they wipe away their “state of soul.”
  7. +1
    4 November 2017 17: 17
    These marches of neo-fascists with slogans are aimed at the collapse of the Federation of more than 100 nationalities. No more, no less.
  8. +5
    4 November 2017 17: 25
    Something tells me that in our time Minin and Pozharsky would have been imprisoned for “incitement.” And a lot of “Russians at heart” with “mothers from Poland” labeled them “Nazis”.
  9. 0
    4 November 2017 17: 44
    Quote: Feldscher
    Dear Wend, just do not tell Elena that the Germans are also Slavs laughing

    ...Konnan - Barbarian..
  10. +1
    4 November 2017 20: 28
    Quote: Sergey Krotov
    And what kind of Russian cultural customs does this aunt carry? Stoparik drink before lunch? Different nonsense in Russian to clatter on the clave? (as you yourself, however)

    By the way... yes, I’m an aunt, I’m over fifty dollars. But I’ve never drank alcohol. Even at my wedding. I don’t drink beer. None. And non-alcoholic ones too. I graduated from a university, philology department.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    5 November 2017 12: 33
    Well, oh, but I have a question, what do these gentlemen of yours who march in marches want? Well, if we put aside the dregs for the stupid hamsters, then what are their specific requirements? What should be written on that piece of paper that should be turned into law. Any dissatisfaction should result in some specific actions, so what exactly do the local assholes want?
  13. +1
    5 November 2017 20: 09
    Quote: Elena Zakharova
    Stupid and provocative question.
    When complete assimilation occurs, the percentage cannot be determined.
    Well, half-breeds in any case are assimilated completely, with one or another nationality.

    But in previous comments, when I wrote that I was Russian by upbringing, place of birth, language, mentality, you denied me that I was Russian.
  14. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  15. +4
    6 November 2017 01: 07
    I read the article, the basis is of course controversial, but the idea is sound. Then I read the comments, the direct dominance of dolboslavs and other admirers of the Russian nation, who fundamentally do not understand the essence. For them, culture is nothing, but blood is everything. Although there is simply no understanding that even genes are not an indicator of nationality, much less a phenotype (that is, erysipelas). Where do you list the Russified peoples? How will you determine how and how clean the nation is, who is and by how much? Apparently everything is simple for you, but not for me. People like you who caused discord and the collapse of the Slavs, now we have phenomenal relations with our brothers. You are provocateurs who are ruining centuries-old ties. The largest white nation, well, let's bring the Babylonian pandemonium to life, let's fall apart into tribes. But what am I doing... Links are prohibited here, but I will leave the title of the video, where the geneticist explains that a people is not blood, that a population is not a people, and what unites us is not blood ties or affiliation, but our culture and worldview. Title: Scientists against myths 5-2. Oleg Balanovsky: We analyze myths about the genetics of peoples
  16. 0
    6 November 2017 06: 03
    Elena Zakharova,
    ..could not accept this faith - Rome had not yet been founded...
  17. +4
    6 November 2017 08: 50
    Russian is an “incurable disease” according to Western qualifications! And it doesn’t matter what nationality you are! So it was, is and will be.. Well, for the Russian soul, men.. drinks
  18. +1
    7 November 2017 00: 40
    So, in just two or three decades, on the ruins of Great Russia, dozens of nationalities appeared that had never existed before, but appeared after, while the Russians were deprived of their self-identity and the Russians no longer seemed to exist... I sincerely hope that the Soviet pseudo leaders are burning in hell. Subhumans who destroyed the people and destroyed Rus'.
  19. +1
    7 November 2017 11: 13
    Why didn’t the author remember about the collapse of the Soviet Union into many national states? In the Soviet Union there was no talk of “Russia for the Russians,” and Alexander III was called a reactionary. And vice versa, they constantly spoke about internationalism, friendship of peoples and more than a hundred friendly nations and nationalities living on the territory of the USSR. And it didn’t help, everything collapsed. So to see the cause of the collapse of the Russian Empire as the policy of Alexander III, who was pursuing a policy of strengthening it and strengthening internal unity on the basis of Russian culture and language (a course similar to the course of other European countries of that time) is a rather dubious, and perhaps even biased, historical view.
    In addition, the slogans “Russia for Russians” and “Russia only for Russians” should not be mixed. It is always about the first and never about the second. The first slogan is extremely relevant for modern Russia, where the state-forming Russian people, who are essentially the “foundation and frame” on which Russia arose and rests, are essentially pushed to the sidelines in their own country, and are not its masters. This is clearly visible in official propaganda. Even the word “Russian” itself is under an unspoken ban and is constantly replaced by “Russian” (although other peoples of Russia for some reason boldly call them by ethnic names, and not Russians). Russians are constantly being officially fooled by propaganda about the “multinational Russian ethnic group” and other Russophobic nonsense, from which it follows that in Russia there are all sorts of peoples, there are Tatars and Bashkirs, Chechens and Chukchi, Buryats and Karelians..., but the Russians are a fiction . This is a very clear demonstration that modern Russia is not for Russians. Therefore, for the modern demoralized Russian people, the slogan “Russia for Russians” is extremely important and is quite suitable for the role of a “national Russian idea.”
    Since all citizens of Russia are equal, regardless of nationality, the prosperity of the Russian people, who make up 80% of the country's population, is the prosperity of Russia, and therefore of all other peoples inhabiting it. And a country where the state-forming nation is degrading has, to put it mildly, very dubious historical prospects.
  20. +1
    7 November 2017 20: 21
    E_V_N,
    E_V_N,
    Quote: E_V_N
    Quote: Lyuba1965_01
    But actually, no one in either the comments or the article denies the existence of the Russian nation.

    You did not carefully read the beginning of the discussion, it all started with the argument of Elena who claimed that the Russian nation exists, with the assertion of a “group of comrades” that there is no Russian nation, but only a “state of mind”.
    I agree that in the process of the dispute, Elena was sometimes expressed too emotionally, but essentially true.

    Emotions should not prevail over common sense, especially not even in a kitchen dispute, but in an open discussion. Now to the point. The fact that Russians exist as a nation is a truth that does not even require any debate. This is a fact. But it is also a fact the fact that, in addition to purely Russians, there are also those who are Russian in their way of thinking, in their actions, in the benefits that they brought to Russia at different times is also true. A small historical example. Gorchakov, (a real Russian by nationality, considered liberals of all suits of "great diplomas") proposed to Alexander the Second to sell Alaska to America, to which he readily agreed. There were three justifications: firstly, the "constrained situation of public finances" requires an urgent sale of something unnecessary, and there is no better place to find Alaska; secondly, these colonies “bring very little benefit”; and thirdly, over time, the strengthened United States will still take America away from the Russians someday, so it’s better to sell it ourselves while there is an opportunity. At that time there was a certain Baron Fyodor Romanovich Osten-Sacken, who then held a not particularly important position in the Asian Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which dealt with Russian America, he wrote a note to his superiors, where
    presented the arguments of the supporters of the sale of Alaska and put forward his objections, the validity of which was subsequently confirmed. He ended his report with the words: “As for the positive benefits, they really belong only to the future, but it would seem that the present generation has a sacred duty to preserve for future generations every a piece of land lying on the shores of the Ocean, which has worldwide significance." Osten-Sacken's German ancestors settled in Russia only in the first quarter of the 18th century - but "not at all" the baron was more passionate about the future of Russia than the Rurikovichs and Gorchakovs...Which of them is more Russian ? - I would be happy to ask this question to Elena Zakharova.
    It’s not worth talking about the Dane Bering, the Baltic German Bellingshausen, the descendant of the Swede Lermontov and the descendant of the Ethiopian Pushkin, as well as thousands of other purebred Russians. The benefit is that these are not “purely Russian”
    It is difficult to overestimate Russia. But from Elena’s point of view, they have no right at all to the word “Russian”, they are pitiful “half-breeds”, cosmopolitans, only looking for whichever nation is more profitable for them to cling to.
    And yet... Elena’s peremptory and categorical judgments are very annoying. She does not even want to listen to her opponent’s arguments. And this does not honor either her or her views and makes one doubt that her beliefs are hers and not those instilled in her. In some ways she resembles members of totalitarian sects who, having listened to their “teacher”, do not accept any other opinions
  21. 0
    7 November 2017 23: 57
    In my opinion, everything is simpler - if you want to be Russian, be one! As people from the USSR say, we are Russian Germans. Everyone is either Russian (Germans, Yakuts or blacks) or non-Russian.
  22. 0
    8 November 2017 10: 44
    E_V_N,
    Two or three hundred???? Do you even know how many Erazs (i.e. Yerevan Azerbaijanis, this is local slang) arrived in Baku almost simultaneously? Almost several thousand. It was useless to explain anything to them. You know, there are moments when even a flock of sheep should not stand in the way, they will sweep away and trample. The same goes for the eras. Why were there pogroms? Yes, in order to occupy apartments and houses of Armenians, and at the same time escalate the situation in the city. Nothing personal, as they say. But there were also real refugees from Armenia. Those who did not rob or kill local Armenians. It was they who lived subsequently in tent cities, they occupied empty land in the suburbs, they made a semblance of a house from boards, iron sheets, and dicta found in a landfill. But the Eraz pogromists... we talked a lot with our friends about this after quite a long time. And it seems to us that that someone was setting them up. I don’t know, openly or otherwise (there are a lot of psychotronic technologies now). It was as if they were commanded from a single center, they acted too harmoniously, their actions were too almost identical. And everything stopped as if on command. Of course , we can say that everything ended with the introduction of troops into Baku. But that’s not it. It seemed that all the preliminary actions were designed precisely for this. After all, it was after the introduction of troops that Azerbaijan demanded separation from the USSR, although before that no one had even talked about it, well, with the exception of a couple of hundred ardent nationalists. And in Russia after that Azerbaijan has an extremely negative opinion, because all the events were learned by Russians mainly from the press. In general, even after so many years, there are more questions than answers.
  23. 0
    8 November 2017 13: 43
    Quote: tasha

    And again, you got off with general words.
    Words again... As much as possible... More specifically, more specifically.


    Well, what are you, Mr. “taskha” fool, turning on? You understood everything perfectly and correctly. I explained the essence of the question to you in the CORRECT words and legally PERFECT. Moreover, BRIEFLY and TO THE CASE, and most importantly SPECIFICALLY! Nowhere to be more specific.
    I explained the topic to you, referring to specific analogies and precedents of actually existing national states. Including such a classic nation-state as Israel. Models of the modern nation state exist perfectly well and have shown themselves to be viable organisms. We need to use their experience. Why reinvent the wheel?
    What's unclear here? The concept of Russia as a Russian state is built on actually existing precedents. Therefore, do not ask a hundred provocative questions that no one will answer. Firstly, why on earth should the work of provocateurs be made easier, and secondly, one fool can ask so many questions that not even a hundred wise men can answer.
    Want detailed details? A flag in your hands, a drum around your neck and a computer to boot. Click on the search engine button, study the specifics of the national state in Israel, Estonia, Japan and Kazakhstan and you will be happy. Expand your horizons! No one is going to chew for you.
  24. 0
    8 November 2017 14: 59
    Quote: badens1111
    Quote: E_V_N
    And it turns out strange, we have the Russian Federation, the Tatars, the Chechens... and so on... there are republics. but there is no republic of the most numerous people, the Russian Republic.

    Mr. liar, are you again, after skipping fifth grade geography and ethnography lessons, spouting heresy?


    E_V_N don’t pay attention to this balabolka “Badens 1111”. This is a completely pathological individual. All the comments are nothing but rudeness, verbal diarrhea, and the stench of a skunk. No logic! In the same comment he managed to yap at Russian nationalists, and at Jews, and at Europe, and at Asia. He cannot formulate any questions or answers constructively, and at the same time he boasts that he was a good student at school and has a “honorable” diploma.
    I was just curious: how can one be such a purgon-bearer with a honors diploma? I read the comments of the “graduate student” and realized that Sherlock Holmes and his deductive method cannot be used here. Imagine how Sherlock Holmes would describe this feathered wonder.
    Something like this: Elementary Watson! He may have a diploma (bought in an underground passage) but no profession. Accordingly, there is no work. And I want to eat it!
    So this “graduate student” joined the Olga trolls. Knock on the keyboard, earn some bread. There is no time for principles and no time for logic. The main thing here is to have time to type more letters. But that's not all.
    This character's comments clearly indicate that he did not serve in the army. Consequently, this “graduate student” is a white ticket holder, registered in a mental health center. It follows from this that we have not some kind of conscious Russophobe enemy, but actually a not entirely adequate troll. Lowest category.
    In addition, since all trolls (of the lower category) are unprincipled losers and chronic beggars, they are constantly looking for a more satisfying feeder. And which trough is now more funded than others? That's right, LGBT feeder!
    Consequently, our shoot is nourished there too. And, since only our own people are included in LGBT, this means that our “honored diploma student” is a person with a non-traditional sexual orientation in the passive version.
    So E_V_N You did the right thing in not responding to his yapping. It’s a waste to contact such bastards. Which does not change the fact that in a personal meeting (if it happens), he needs to give a couple of good kicks from all over the leg. Definitely a must!
  25. +2
    12 November 2017 09: 43
    Russia is for russians! drinks
  26. 0
    11 March 2018 19: 25
    The article is periodically thrown onto the first page....... Why? It has long been clear that being Russian is a “state of mind.” Anyone who doesn’t believe in this is not a patriot, the enemy is worse than Hitler, and if he put the punctuation marks in the wrong place, then he’s generally scum..... Once upon a time there was a pig... ....All the pigs are to be slaughtered, but she couldn’t, she has a certificate: “state of mind - “Ahal-Teke horse.” A nation has taken place if it has a state, and if there are trawls in the head, then everything goes according to plan... . to someone else. They haven’t learned anything, since they started selling and giving away in the 90s, they still can’t stop to this day. They just dig up the seas, since the Sumerians have a state of mind, it’s understandable why such idiots need their own country if they promise in the evening a free vat of Batvinya for every day. And across the river live the “patriots". Their best Chubais have been working for thirty years on the invention of the nanodevice “Identifier for Russian State Strangler.” From the enthusiastic grunts of the back cases of the investigators, who is Russian here and who is not, it is clear that completion of work on the device is already at the finish line..... good .