Military Review

In Primorye, for the first time, live firing from the "Bastion" BRK

42
The coastal troops' rocketeers of the Pacific Fleet completed the first launch of the "Bastion" complex, which recently entered service with the compound, reports press office Eastern District.


In Primorye, for the first time, live firing from the "Bastion" BRK


"In accordance with the combat training plan fleet the missile division, having made a 200-kilometer march from a permanent deployment point to one of the ranges in Primorye, immediately deployed the complex to an unequipped position and launched a missile at a sea target. Later maritime aircraft aviation and the control ships involved in providing live firing confirmed a successful hit on the target, ”the release said.

A total of about 200 military personnel (along with support services) and 20 combat and auxiliary equipment were involved in the event.

It is noted that "to ensure the safety of navigation in the area of ​​the rocket firing, temporarily closed for civilian shipping, more than 10 ships and vessels carrying the PF were involved."

Coastal missile systems "Bastion" is planned to be put on combat duty in August of this year.

Help press service: "BRK" Bastion "is designed to protect the coastline over the length of 600 km. It is capable of striking surface ships of various types and classes under conditions of intense fire and electronic countermeasures. Ammunition of one complex can include up to 36 Onyx missiles. ”
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 23 July 2016 11: 33
    +4
    Demonstration of Bastion for "partners". Obama has long declared the priority of the Pacific theater of operations. Russia and China are like a thorn in the eye.
    1. Lt. Air Force stock
      Lt. Air Force stock 23 July 2016 11: 39
      +2
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Demonstration of Bastion for "partners".

      In the photo on the launcher 4 missiles are placed, although in reality for some reason 2 are placed. The bastion complex consists of 12 launchers with 24 missiles on them.
      1. Uryukc
        Uryukc 23 July 2016 19: 31
        +3
        "In the photo, 4 missiles are placed on the launcher, although in reality, for some reason, 2 are placed each. The bastion complex is 12 launchers with 24 missiles on them."

        Yes, the photo is not the topic, this is a modification of Iskander for cruise missiles Caliber NK.
        1. drunkram
          drunkram 25 July 2016 09: 16
          0
          Does this modification support the launch of 4 Caliber NK missiles? it's cool, although the range is reduced ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 23 July 2016 11: 50
      +5
      I am very glad that Bastions have arrived in the Far East. especially after Obama's statement that the main zone of US interests is moving from the Middle East to the Pacific Ocean.
      RMB on the image and "Open"
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. siberalt
      siberalt 23 July 2016 11: 55
      +3
      Any fleet "learns" faster under Bastin fire. laughing
      1. Khariton
        Khariton 23 July 2016 12: 17
        -7
        Quote: siberalt
        Any fleet "learns" faster under Bastin fire. laughing

        Serious system ..! As I understand it, just like that we won’t give up ... The maximum damage to the enemy will be inflicted .. And then we’ll go into the woods! And then it will begin ...
        1. Dr. Vlado
          Dr. Vlado 23 July 2016 22: 42
          -1
          Khariton. And do you seriously believe that we simply or not just like that (no, we have the right) to give up? !!!
        2. Dr. Vlado
          Dr. Vlado 23 July 2016 22: 42
          0
          Khariton. And do you seriously believe that we simply or not just like that (no, we have the right) to give up? !!!
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 23 July 2016 11: 33
    +3
    Hey Samurai, have you seen? But this is a mobile complex, and it is not difficult to transfer it to the South Kuril Islands. To avoid, so to speak, bad thoughts. am
  3. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock 23 July 2016 11: 37
    +1
    It is not clear why the coastal missile system with Calibers cannot be made as a replacement for Balu. All the same, Uranus missiles are significantly inferior to Calibers in the power of the missile warhead and electronics (Calibers in a salvo can distribute targets and operate as a "flock" of Uranus), in addition, there are missiles that accelerate to Mach 2,9 in the final section.
    1. Tu-214R
      Tu-214R 23 July 2016 12: 42
      +5
      Because ground-based cruise missiles are prohibited by the INF Treaty. For Iskander-K, how much stink of the Americans. By the way, in the photo of the article is not the Bastion.
      PS What is the word p.s. doctorate in VO is not a censored word, VO are you serious?
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock 23 July 2016 12: 49
        +2
        Quote: Tu-214P
        Because ground-based cruise missiles are prohibited by the INF Treaty.

        Well, the Uranus rocket is also a cruise missile and it is land-based, for that matter, the supersonic Onyx is a ground-based cruise missile.
        1. Tu-214R
          Tu-214R 23 July 2016 12: 55
          0
          Maybe it's in the range
          1. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock 23 July 2016 14: 42
            0
            Quote: Tu-214P
            Maybe it's in the range

            The United States manufactured coastal missile systems with Harpoons, now it will be adopted by the LRASM anti-ship missiles, most likely this missile will also be placed on coastal launchers, with a range of 800 kilometers.
            1. Tu-214R
              Tu-214R 23 July 2016 15: 52
              0
              800 km, like an anti-ship missile, is data from free access. And the sea-based 370 km.
              In general, it is not necessary to believe in TX open for free access, this is done to keep within all kinds of agreements, so that the parties do not unnerve each other. It is already known that Caliber has a range of up to 2000 km, and now it’s definitely the coastal land complex with calibers that is covered by the agreement.
  4. Abbra
    Abbra 23 July 2016 11: 42
    +3
    Here's a bastion experienced
    Fuji blooms
    Evening over America ...
  5. Machete
    Machete 23 July 2016 11: 42
    0
    Two in one: both exercise and warning.
  6. PKK
    PKK 23 July 2016 11: 45
    0
    Coastal defense is a complex of various equipment and structures. And one BASTION on the entire coast, as it is alarming for border security.
  7. Aandrewsir
    Aandrewsir 23 July 2016 11: 48
    0
    Another small clove in Obama's black anus. Well done rocket men!
  8. Old26
    Old26 23 July 2016 11: 59
    +3
    Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
    Quote: oleg-gr
    Demonstration of Bastion for "partners".

    In the photo on the launcher 4 missiles are placed, although in reality for some reason 2 are placed. The bastion complex consists of 12 launchers with 24 missiles on them.

    The photo is actually not the Bastion launcher. This is a launcher for the Kalibr coastal anti-ship complex. This launcher was demonstrated several years ago at an exhibition in the Moscow region EMNIP.

    Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
    It is not clear why the coastal missile system with Calibers cannot be made as a replacement for Balu. All the same, Uranus missiles are significantly inferior to Calibers in the power of the missile warhead and electronics (Calibers in a salvo can distribute targets and operate as a "flock" of Uranus), in addition, there are missiles that accelerate to Mach 2,9 in the final section.

    There is no need for this. Coastal anti-ship complexes are a complex of means. Do not wake you on a ship with a displacement of 500-600 tons to spend "Caliber" or "Onyx"
    1. Kudrevkn
      Kudrevkn 23 July 2016 12: 16
      0
      Why not fuck around? The Americans fired 200 tons of "harpoons" and even "tomahawks" at the Libyan minesweepers and nothing - if there was a real threat to the ship? Yes, and our RTO on the "Georgian" sniffed "with a mosquito" and did the right thing - not to hell with our landing "with a bare saber on the embrasure"?
      1. Bongo
        Bongo 23 July 2016 13: 22
        +2
        Quote: KudrevKN
        even "tomahawks" at the Libyan minesweepers were fired at 200 tons and nothing

        Tomahawks? No. Are you sure?
        1. Kudrevkn
          Kudrevkn 23 July 2016 13: 26
          -1
          I'm sure you can read Alexander Shirokorad's. Maybe the commander of the American cruiser decided to "experiment"? Ask him ?!
          1. Bongo
            Bongo 23 July 2016 13: 43
            +1
            Quote: KudrevKN
            Maybe the commander of the American cruiser decided to "experiment"? Ask him ?!

            Really? No. And what kind of GOS was on this "Tomahawk"? In addition, it is you who write the comments, not the "commander of an American cruiser." So don't drive off ...
          2. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock 23 July 2016 14: 43
            0
            Quote: KudrevKN
            Tomahawks?

            There were anti-ship modifications of the Tomahawks.
            1. Bongo
              Bongo 23 July 2016 14: 47
              +2
              Quote: Lt. air force reserve
              There were anti-ship modifications of the Tomahawks.


              Maybe, of course, I'm not "in the know", can you tell me how this modification was designated, what kind of GOS did it have and on what media was it placed?
              1. Kudrevkn
                Kudrevkn 23 July 2016 20: 37
                -2
                "Bullfinch"?
                1. Kudrevkn
                  Kudrevkn 24 July 2016 13: 37
                  0
                  Thanks for the minus, but it was a joke! Do you need to check your sense of humor so that you don’t get lame? Good luck
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. Kudrevkn
              Kudrevkn 23 July 2016 20: 36
              0
              Thank you, colleague, for your solidarity! "
    2. Lt. Air Force stock
      Lt. Air Force stock 23 July 2016 12: 27
      0
      Quote: Old26
      Do not wake you on a ship with a displacement of 500-600 tons to spend "Caliber" or "Onyx"

      Well, the Uranus rocket is designed to destroy ships with a displacement of up to 5000 tons. Initially, the missile was created as a universal anti-ship missile system, so that an impressive amount of anti-ship missiles could be installed on small ships, and Uranus can also be launched from a helicopter.
      If in the Caspian Sea, Ball is an ideal option, then for the Baltic Fleet, the Black Sea, the North and the Pacific, it is already weak. Potential adversaries already have fairly well-armed fleets there.
    3. Manul
      Manul 25 July 2016 02: 06
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      The photo is actually not the Bastion launcher. This is a launcher for the Kalibr coastal anti-ship complex. This launcher was demonstrated several years ago at an exhibition in the Moscow region EMNIP.

      This photo is from an article about "Bastion" on VO.
  9. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 23 July 2016 12: 09
    0
    Islands-islands ... There is such a song. I'm kind of waiting for you, islands. Wait wassat . This is what happens only in the movies now. And under the USSR, not really.
  10. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 23 July 2016 12: 10
    0
    Terrible equipment with an effect of up to 600 km, which you can’t get rid of. This is not for Americans right away. So they should forget their current priority - the Far Eastern direction. That is why now the anti-Russian doping war against us has intensified. It is a pity that the black monkey has a lot of sixes, that they play along to him impudently, without even worrying about hiding the true reason for the attack on Russia.
  11. dr.star75
    dr.star75 23 July 2016 12: 19
    0
    Yapi have superior weapon systems to attack. They have dofig of ships and just UDC. Overwhelming advantage. Proceeding from this, their samurai wants to meet with GDP and conclude a peace treaty, trying to squeeze out 2 islands so far. Well, we are arming our islands heavily.
  12. Old26
    Old26 23 July 2016 13: 13
    +2
    Quote: KudrevKN
    Why not fuck around? The Americans fired 200 tons of "harpoons" and even "tomahawks" at the Libyan minesweepers and nothing - if there was a real threat to the ship? Yes, and our RTO on the "Georgian" sniffed "with a mosquito" and did the right thing - not to hell with our landing "with a bare saber on the embrasure"?

    If there is nothing else, you can use the "ax" and the "Mosquito". But if there is a possibility - why waste a heavier and more long-range one on trifles. As elsewhere, "Bastion" and "Ball" will replace "Redoubt" and "Rubezh". Each complex complements the other and each has its own priorities.

    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    If in the Caspian Sea, Ball is an ideal option, then for the Baltic Fleet, the Black Sea, the North and the Pacific, it is already weak. Potential adversaries already have fairly well-armed fleets there.

    If you use only "Ball" - perhaps rather weak, if in combination with others ("Bastion") - quite.

    Quote: Anchonsha
    Terrible technology with an action of up to 600 km

    Not with a range of 600 km. BRK "Bastion" is designed to protect the sea coast length over 600 km.
    1. Kudrevkn
      Kudrevkn 23 July 2016 13: 32
      0
      And if the "bug" is only really small? And he himself can bite very painfully? The same "Georgian" of Ukrainian production ("Leninskaya Kuznitsa", 140 tons) with "termites" was and really approached our detachment - a convoy to "bite"? No, it would probably be possible to "save money" and sink an adversary with "well-aimed artillery" fire? What do you think is a reasonable "economy"?
    2. Kudrevkn
      Kudrevkn 23 July 2016 20: 46
      0
      Respected! It is good to talk on the couch - to rant about "Balls" and "Bastions", "Redoubts and Rubezhi", but in 1988, on convoys in the Strait of Hormuz (max. Width 80 km. Min 20), go alone under the "lumbago", guarding 4-5 tankers of our own and another 10-15 stray ones (do you understand what it means when super tankers "huddle" to each other at a distance of 400-500 meters)? Before your very eyes, someone's plane (Iranian or Iraqi) flies in and hits the extreme Japanese tanker with a "Flying Fish". 150 tons? With all due respect to you, dear comrade, but your sarcasm is not the right place !? Sorry for the emotions!
  13. isker
    isker 23 July 2016 13: 41
    0
    Quote: Abbra
    Here's a bastion experienced
    Fuji blooms
    Evening over America ...


    Spit so

    Here "Bastion" was tested:
    Fuji smokes
    And America ... is cooling down!
  14. 76rtbr
    76rtbr 23 July 2016 14: 04
    0
    good news for me, I invite you to fishing in the Primorsky Territory !! Ilya Lagutenko, listen, sailboats are a sight for us !!!!
  15. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 23 July 2016 15: 13
    0
    For Primorye, good news !!! that is, it covers almost the entire coast of the region. It's time to close the Far East for all kinds of adventurers, especially regional committees.
  16. Old26
    Old26 23 July 2016 17: 23
    +1
    Quote: KudrevKN
    And if the "bug" is only really small? And he himself can bite very painfully? The same "Georgian" of Ukrainian production ("Leninskaya Kuznitsa", 140 tons) with "termites" was and really approached our detachment - a convoy to "bite"? No, it would probably be possible to "save money" and sink an adversary with "well-aimed artillery" fire? What do you think is a reasonable "economy"?

    Well, consideration of the situation should not be brought to the point of absurdity. For example, I have never argued that if the "cheap" is not at hand, then one should not use what is, but try to destroy it with artillery fire. They used what was. If there were a Vulcan, they would use a Vulcan (if the minimum range would allow).
    The question is not about where to and where not to put the "Caliber" currently in the language (I'm afraid soon where it is necessary and where it will not be necessary to offer to put "Zircon"). The question is whether "Caliber" is needed where there is "Uranus". Will it not be redundant? And then decide whether diversification by types of anti-ship missiles is needed. Probably not the most stupid people are developing the structures of anti-ship coastal units and an assortment of weapons.
  17. MACCABI-TLV
    MACCABI-TLV 23 July 2016 20: 26
    0
    Could put the videos from the shooting.