When their destroy their

28
In 2004, in June, they celebrated the anniversary of the landing of allied troops on the territory of Western Europe (World War II) - the British and Americans, as well as the opening of the second front. And few people know that in the course of this operation, many soldiers were killed by their own comrades ...
Over the existing stories Wars There are similar incidents when their kill their own. However, in the history of 2-th World War until today, there are numerous gaps, such "white spots", and all the information that can shed light on them, everything is under the heading "Secret." One of the most terrifying and tragic pages of this war is directly related to the British Devon.

When their destroy their
Tank Sherman - a monument to those killed in Operation Tiger


It is known that the Allies delayed the opening of the second front up to 1944 year (summer). And before these events, Day-D operation (landing in Normandy), which took place on June 6, was thoroughly tested.

However, before that, another day happened, namely: April 27 1944, when the United States "rehearsed" this landing in the south of Britain. And a lot of young American men in uniform were killed near Slapton Sands (Devon, Britain). Note that these were only teachings.

Almost all the participants and witnesses of those events that took place more than 60 years ago, are already in the grave. Nevertheless, it was still possible to collect materials on this tragic event. On that very day, the waters at Slapton Sands were stained with blood, countless dead bodies swayed on the surface, and all of them were then laid on the sandy shore. And then buried in a mass grave. And all these guys fell at their hands! The authorities' acknowledgment of what happened on that day, April 27 of 1944, in Devon, has never been heard.

According to official data, all the victims were “written off” as an Allied convoy (codename T-4), which was unexpectedly attacked by 28 on April 1944, by German boats. It is known that at least 700 people were killed off the coast of Dorset. And, by the way, this is the very operation that is called the "Tiger" - that is, the dress rehearsal of the landing of troops in Normandy. For a long time, its parts were considered “military secrets”, and the operation itself was declassified only in 1986 year. However, so far the unofficial and official versions of those events still drastically differ from each other. And, of course, in relation to a few early tragedies that occurred at Slepton Sands, which are generally kept silent about.

Nevertheless, the journalists of the newspaper The Observer (Britain) for many years have collected various testimonies of people who know the truth. And in the 2009 year, 16 May, an article was published in which they tried to answer whether the Allies killed hundreds of American soldiers under Slapton.

The situation was as follows: at that moment, when thousands of American soldiers rushed from the landing craft to the shore, they were met by heavy fire, which came from their own comrades, who played the role of the German defenders. For a strange, unknown, and incomprehensible reason, all these “Germans” were given a charged combat weapon.

Edwin Wolf, a lieutenant colonel from Baltimore (USA, Maryland), who followed and observed the landing, while at the observation post that was located nearby, said: "I was surprised by the moment that the infantrymen fell and then remained motionless."
A rain of bullets struck Hank Aaron (West Virginia), during the exercises he served as a driver for the general. H. Aaron barely managed to crawl out from under the fire.

Jim Corey (engineer of the army of Britain) saw how a huge number of American soldiers who rushed in a continuous stream from the landing craft were killed and "mowed down like pins." D. Corey then said: “Later we all learned that a monstrous error had occurred. They had to get a weapon that is loaded with idle. I counted at least 150 dead bodies before I could get out of there. ”

The picture that D. Corey saw that day tormented him to the end of his life (he died in 2003 year). And, as his wife Mary assures, “he always believed that he would receive an official response”.

Also, any official explanations about the tragedy desperately wanted to get and Maurice Lund (London firefighter), who recorded on the tape of the tape story about the bodies of American soldiers who remained on the waves of the surf.

But be that as it may, in the official documents of the army there is not a single mention of the dead bodies at Slepton Sands. However, the Pentagon also never mentioned the victims in Devon.

There is one more mysterious detail, namely: where did all the dead Slepton Sands go? The then head of the railway station in Kingsbridge (eight kilometers from Slepton Sands) claims that in 1944, in July-August, three trains were equipped and secretly loaded and removed the bodies of American soldiers. The said trains "were completely packed with people who had been dug up from mass graves" - this is also noted by Ken Williams (local railways historian). He commented: “The dead were dug up much after the so-called“ Day-D ”. One of my friends was well acquainted with the person who participated in this exhumation. And now he's long dead. ”

George Williams (father of the historian) served in the Royal Navy during the war. He said that the sailors then also saw the dead bodies of hundreds of dead, whom the waves threw ashore.

Outside the strip of the beach, in the desert fields there is ample space for graves. And there is no doubt that eyewitnesses to this action could take place. Suspicions that the Americans had secretly buried the dead around the nearby Blackout, were 20 years ago.

Dorothy Sikinz, the daughter of a baker who supplied the troops with bread during the exercises, claimed that she saw with her own eyes whole trucks full of the bodies of soldiers of the American army who were buried near the village. Her description of the place of burial and the circumstances completely coincides with the story of Francis Berden (the farmer) - another eyewitness that supplied the milk to the Americans. One morning, in the 1944 year, in the month of April, he overcame a narrow path that led from Blackouton, and suddenly saw the US military dig a giant pit. He also saw large boxes in which people could easily fit. These boxes stood nearby. It is worth noting that today a small hill towers over this place.

At the end of the war, the field became owned by Nolan Topoup (a farmer), who was asked about the graves of American soldiers on his land before his death. N. Tope said: “Dorothy Sykings knew only a minimal amount of the entire amount of information. I swore to carry this mystery to the grave. ” Actually, he did.

Ken Small (local author), who wrote The Forgotten Dead, which was dedicated to the truth about the deaths of those participating in the Tigris, denied any rumors about the 27 of April for a long time. And just before his death (March 2003 year), he confessed to a historian named Williams that Dorothy Sickings was absolutely right.

However, despite all these facts, stories and arguments, many people now do not want to believe that hundreds of American army soldiers could be buried in the quiet steppes of British Devon almost 70 years ago. Perhaps you can understand this stubborn skepticism. But how then to explain the story of Joyce Newby (rural girl), who said that in the spring of 1944, she helped to make hundreds of lids for coffins, working in a nearby forest warehouse? And she claims that the only ones for whom they were intended were those who died in Slapton under heavy fire.
And how to relate to the story of Harold Mc-Ollie (ex-employee of the USA), who carried the dead soldiers from the shore and then helped them to bury them in a mass grave. They all had almost black faces, all because of burns and oil.

However, all these eyewitness accounts, as well as skulls and bones found on the nearest beaches in Slapton, are not capable of shaking the absolute conviction and confidence of Americans that there was no tragedy in Slapton Sands. The Pentagon also refuses to confirm this story.

But relatives at the same time cherish the hope that one day the whole truth will come out. After all, after the 40 years passed, the truth about the death of the T-4 convoy was revealed, it is quite possible that people will also soon learn about Slepton Sandz, even if it takes 40 more years. Nevertheless, this year in April, 27 numbers, in Slepton Sands served a prayer service for the repose of 749 souls by US soldiers who were recognized as victims of the tragedy called “The Tiger Teachings”. However, the true number of dead soldiers in the disaster that occurred in 1944, 27 in April, is still unknown today ...
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Lech e-mine
    +6
    2 January 2012 08: 17
    The Anglo-Saxons have learned to lie and deceive the whole world. Now lies and falsification of facts are their main weapon against us.
  2. 755962
    +1
    2 January 2012 09: 17
    Have we had such cases?
    1. Lech e-mine
      0
      2 January 2012 09: 20
      It is full of isolated cases. (Google on the Internet)
    2. +4
      2 January 2012 09: 26
      Fully full, especially in the first Chechen ...
      1. 0
        2 January 2012 23: 58
        During the Second World War, there was such a "case". Abruptly.
        Nevsky patch is called. Zhukov did not indicate the duration of the distracting maneuver. That’s the whole blockade of Leningrad on the battalion of people a day through the Neva and sent. Make an account yourself, the battalion’s personnel for the period of the blockade ...

        The tragedy is cleaner than Barvenkovskaya. There, at least part of the defeat can be attributed to military defeat.
        1. porese
          0
          4 January 2012 12: 28
          Lazha full of this patch, modern "our historians" lie better than the Anglo-Saxons, throw out Wikipedia and read it in normal sources.
  3. dred
    +1
    2 January 2012 09: 42
    Friendly fire or what?
    1. +4
      2 January 2012 09: 59
      The consequences of the .... distribution into which the EBN country plunged ...
    2. Artemka
      +2
      2 January 2012 15: 04
      This is unfortunate.
  4. alps
    +2
    2 January 2012 12: 08
    Quote: woland05
    Fully full, especially in the first Chechen ...

    What kind of Chechen doctrines shoot their own? And what does the EBN have to do with it, did he give out live ammunition instead of idle?
  5. 0
    2 January 2012 12: 23
    I served 1986-88 in the GSVG; according to the results of 1987, 360 coffins were taken home!
  6. TIPOK
    0
    2 January 2012 12: 30
    There were, in the second Chechen,
    "On March 2, 2000, at 10:30 am, on the outskirts of Grozny, a detachment of OMON from Podolsk and militiamen from Yekaterinburg opened fire on a convoy of OMON from Sergiev Posad, who had arrived to replace them. As a result, 22 police officers died from" friendly fire "and more than 30 injured. " from Wikipedia (I just read this article yesterday).
  7. 0
    2 January 2012 15: 36
    and this was enough for us, but not in the same way that several thousand in one day [left] [/ left] or like brave American marines shot each other all night in Iraq (the batteries on their night-lights went down and they made out their own [hide] [ / hide]
    1. klew
      0
      15 February 2012 09: 08
      The joke is this:
      How does the crew of an American tank define their own? Shoots at them from a 20mm "machine gun". If there are shouts on the air: "They opened fire on us!" - means your own. If they are silent - enemies
  8. Odesit
    0
    2 January 2012 15: 52
    Once again I’m convinced. that americos are the most lying creatures on the planet!
  9. +6
    2 January 2012 16: 52
    Explain how you can not see or mix up the military and idle cartridges that were given to the soldiers. These people knew that they would shoot the attacking assault using live ammunition, and it’s impossible to miss bullets in water and land.
    1. Odesit
      +1
      2 January 2012 18: 44
      Very correct remark! I can’t imagine how it happened. After all, the soldiers on the shore (of the defending side) must have had heavy machine guns - (well, for example, "Browning") - and there was belt feed and of course you can see what you shoot! Yes, and other soldiers changed clips - you can also see what they are equipped with. Either it was purposefully done and they knew who and what they were shooting at - but this is a crime. Or the landing went without warning and they were mistaken for a German landing in fright. Although what German landing could be in 1944. Defies explanation!
      1. Dervish
        0
        5 January 2012 22: 20
        It seems that the whole article is complete crap (or provocation)
  10. +2
    2 January 2012 18: 19
    Operation "Epic Fail" ....
  11. snek
    0
    2 January 2012 21: 14
    How interesting - there is not a single comment on the topic "the girls invented everything."
    1. Charon
      +1
      2 January 2012 23: 27
      Magazines invented everything.
      When the defenders loaded their weapons, they could not help but see that instead of single they received live ammunition.
      They could not but report to the officers.
      The officers could not give the order to conduct aimed fire.
      Seeing fountains from bullets and falling bodies, the most stupid soldier would have understood that things were amiss.
      I'm afraid we got stuffy stuff.

      I would suggest that the defenders were informed that this was a German landing. Then everything is more or less logical, although here a lot of questions arise.
      1. J_silver
        +2
        2 January 2012 23: 57
        Indeed, it is unlikely that so many people did not immediately distinguish between combat and single and did not think about anything ...
        I believe more in the version with the defeat of the landing on the sea - here my own ships could have smashed everything by mistake in stormy weather ...
        The story of the huge victims in rehearsals has repeatedly come across in the literature, but now I can’t remember exactly where exactly ...
        The Allies especially suffered from friendly fire ships and aircraft, although the case of the bombing by strategists of their own units, prepared for the offensive, when even a multi-star general was killed, is widely known ...
  12. resdnl
    0
    2 January 2012 23: 27
    by the way, in the largest naval battle of the Second World War, the British destroyed the French ... but probably we should admit that compared to what was done with our soldiers after captivity, these are still flowers
    1. J_silver
      0
      2 January 2012 23: 58
      Do you mean the execution in Oran? Why is it so big compared to the battles in the Pacific?
      1. Charon
        +1
        3 January 2012 21: 40
        What matters is not the absolute technical scale, but the political consequences. More precisely, the possible consequences and moral damage. However, remorse is completely unusual for the British.
        The fact that the French swallowed does not color them in any way.
        In short, both sides came out of this story dirty.
        1. klew
          0
          15 February 2012 09: 12
          So what do the French do? England as an ally, but they have actually lost the war and signed the defeat
    2. Charon
      +3
      3 January 2012 21: 36
      what was done with our soldiers after captivity is still a flower
      Very big suspicions that this is propaganda of liberals.
      I am not inclined to idealize the Stalinist regime, but human rights defenders have come across so many times that they have no faith. We need independent sources from the Washington Regional Committee.
    3. porese
      0
      4 January 2012 12: 36
      and what did they do according to 101 decree? They sorted out the filter, if he surrendered himself with a weapon in his hands, then this is a crime but not the one for which they were shot (demoted, deprived of awards and sent to privates to the front not in a penal battalion), but if with weapons against their own ..... Understand there weren’t enough people wildly and no one shot former prisoners of war, after the filter they got up again. Read less democratic vyser in the yellow newspaper. And by the way, what's the difference in what you’re in front of, that the penal battalion, that the combat ... the battle conditions are the same, and the notorious detachments (there wasn’t such a word in the Second World War, the liberals came up with it) played completely different roles that the liberals shout about, they didn’t allow the penetration of saboteurs , and in the case of breakthroughs, they performed the functions of the next echelons of defense and, like everyone else, died.
    4. klew
      0
      15 February 2012 09: 11
      Well, there they justified themselves by destroying the ships that went to the Germans
  13. 0
    3 January 2012 22: 13
    Yes, probably just the British took Amers for the Fritz, there are no other explanations in my opinion.
  14. Astral
    0
    5 January 2012 18: 44
    Another genocide against their own people. In order to enrich and strengthen power in the world of Pendo politicians and the rich.
  15. Wolkin
    0
    13 January 2012 17: 56
    Muddy article.
    Confusion, both in war and in exercises, is not a rare case. But three trains of soldiers "chopped". And they are like zombies, so they climbed under the bullets and climbed.
    The commanders and leadership, as I understand it, were neither among the attackers nor the defenders. Major exercises without guidance. Very entertaining. There were no optical devices either, and communication was even more so. And a blank cartridge from a military one, poor pendos cannot be distinguished at all.
    The only option, it seems to me, is a deliberate "setup". And that is doubtful.
  16. 0
    24 December 2012 13: 30
    Everything is dull, and it is not clear. I am inclined to believe that they were mistaken for the Germans. Yes, and in shape they look like each other from afar. And fear, as you know, has large eyes. So they "came off", defenders ...