Military Review

NATO Summit as the starting point for a new cold war

69
The NATO Summit to be held in Warsaw from July 8 to 9 will become historical event. And not only because it will be about "collective defense" from the famous "aggressor". The meeting of the heads of state and government representatives of the North Atlantic Alliance will be held for the first time in the homeland of the Warsaw Pact, which united the socialist states led by the Soviet Union in the era of the bipolar world and ceased to operate in July 1991. Some analysts believe that the summit poses a threat to Russia.




Especially at the upcoming summit will be the Ukrainian question. No wonder the Ukrainian press devotes whole articles to the summit. Correspondent.net, for example, notesthat Ukraine will be at the event the only country not in the alliance.

The meeting participants will devote a separate meeting to Ukraine "at the highest level," the newspaper notes. According to Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavel Klimkin, Kiev is waiting for projects and decisions to fill trust funds for reforming the “security sector of Ukraine” from the Warsaw summit. True, the minister did not say what amounts are in question. It is only known that the projects, among other things, relate to the technical equipment and training of military personnel at the sites. He also said that some areas will be financed by NATO, and others - by individual NATO member states. “The final result of the summit should be a package of documents, a matrix of how to raise the entire defense sector of Ukraine to NATO standards. This should be a comprehensive assistance package, ”Mr. Klimkin explained.

As for Poroshenko, he intends to submit a strategic bulletin on the transition of the Ukrainian military industry to NATO standards.

And another interesting question is about the possible membership of Ukraine in NATO. For Ukraine’s accession to NATO, if a corresponding referendum were held in the country, 78% of Ukrainians would vote. Such data are provided by the Democratic Initiatives Foundation. In all macro-regions, excluding Donbass, the referendum “would have been won,” indicates the publication.

Poroshenko will hold talks with Barack Obama himself. Reports about it TASS.

The meeting will take place on the margins of the Warsaw Summit. The US President will participate in negotiations with the leaders of several European states and Poroshenko. This was announced by the deputy. Presidential National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes.

“One of the summit sessions will include a meeting of the NATO-Ukraine Commission. The President of the United States will meet with the President of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, in which the leaders of Great Britain, Germany, France and Italy will also take part, ”the Rhodes news agency quotes.

The purpose of the meeting, Mr. Rhodes called the opportunity to confirm support for "Ukraine, its territorial integrity and sovereignty."

Mr. Rhodes said nothing about money and any technical military assistance to Ukraine.

Obviously, we add that the representatives of Kiev go to the summit for money, not money, for promises. News that the NATO members are planning to accept Ukraine the alliance the other day, has not yet received. And the referendum here would not have helped Kiev. Countries with territorial problems, as you know, are not accepted into the alliance.

The money question, which only concerns Ukraine, and the entire alliance, more precisely, its members, was recently touched upon by US Secretary of Defense E. Carter. The topic of spending "on defense" of members of the alliance has long been concerned about it, since the United States spends much more money as a percentage of GDP and in absolute terms, too, than some European states in the "defense" bloc.

Therefore, Ashton Carter sees the discussion of the financial contributions of NATO members "to the common cause" as one of the main tasks of the Warsaw summit. At a meeting in Wales in 2014, the member states seemed to be conspiring to spend more money - to bring everyone's “contributions” to 2% of GDP. However, the US Secretary of Defense perfectly sees that the result of the “refinement” is far from ideal and notes with sadness that “there is still much to be done” in the area of ​​increasing defense spending.

According to Yevgeny Minchenko, Director General of the International Institute of Political Expertise, the desire to get more money for the "maintenance" of the alliance is behind the words of Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. The other day, he said that NATO does not want a confrontation with Moscow, but sees Russia as an immediate threat. “From the point of view of the factual Stoltenberg is certainly not right, but he is right from the point of view of ideological, pragmatic,” leads Minchenko’s opinion. "Moscow Komsomol". - Such statements, as a rule, set the task of obtaining additional NATO funding by the countries where the alliance forces will be deployed. The fact that the Secretary General is telling a lie, in my opinion, is obvious, but he does it for a completely understandable purpose. It’s like in the story with Sweden: as soon as the country needs to approve the military budget, they immediately begin to look for a Russian submarine. ”

True, as some analysts admit, after the referendum on Britain’s withdrawal from the EU of “Western partners”, other problems should take up, rather than the Russian “threat”. “After the referendum on the withdrawal of Great Britain, all standard NATO statements on the“ Russian threat ”completely lose their meaning,” said Igor Nikolaichuk, head of the regional security sector at RISS, to Moskovsky Komsomolets. - The European Union is down. This is not the geopolitical and, most importantly, the number one geo-economic rival for the United States. From the point of view of regional security, geopolitics, we now live in a new reality. And I would not be surprised if one of the main issues at the summit of the alliance was the question of how soon Germany will withdraw from NATO. Already there was a statement by German Foreign Minister Frank Walter Steinmeier about the futility of “sabering weapons"Alliance, shortly before the NATO summit, and this says a lot."

However, the "threat" of some European politicians takes, and very much so.

On the eve of the meeting in Warsaw, the Minister of Defense of Poland, Anthony Maciesewicz, said that decisions would be taken at this summit aimed at strengthening the containment system of Russia.

“We can forget about fear, even though Russia is taking steps that threaten a regional and wider world,” he cites. "Mirror of the week". “A restraining force will be built at the summit that will force Russia to forget about the threats against Poland and other countries.”

Such statements about “forgetting fear” are based on Warsaw's confidence that one serious question will be resolved at the summit: the deployment of NATO on the so-called eastern flank, that is, in Poland and the Baltic countries, four battalions of total 4000 people (on rotational basis). The battalions must be commanded by people from the United States, Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Earlier it was reported that a separate American brigade will be located near the border of Poland with the Kaliningrad region.

The REGNUM news agency observer Stanislav Stremidlovsky, commenting for "Free Press" Statements made on the eve of the summit said: “The decision of NATO member countries to deploy four battalions in Poland and the Baltic states is not at all what Warsaw dreamed of. Poland needed permanent bases. But now the country's leadership and the speakers of the ruling party have to explain to the public why they have not really lost. Hence the bravura claims that one battalion of Americans — namely, the United States will allocate an additional contingent for Poland — will suffice to repel “Russian aggression”. Moscow’s response to this remains calm. Russian authorities have repeatedly stated that no one plans to attack Poland. I think that after the summit in Warsaw and in Poland they will behave more calmly. ”

Intensifying tension before the NATO summit does not at all appeal to Western society.

As the influential German newspaper recently reported "Frankfurter Allgemeine"The 64 percentages from the 2054 respondents support the position of Minister Steinmeier, who does not want the situation to escalate. Total 16 percent of respondents opposed the peace-loving minister. True, however, 49% of respondents consider the military actions of Russia (“like those that were two years ago in the Ukrainian Crimea”) against the Baltic countries are quite possible. 30% of respondents do not believe in such a scenario.

He does not want to "whip up" and complicate relations with the Russian Federation and Italy.

Roberta Pinotti, the Italian defense minister, said recently in an interview with Corriere della Sera that the summit in Poland will give green light to the deployment of military units in Eastern Europe, and this will be a real signal "to calm our allies." “But Italy insists that the agreements between Russia and NATO should not lose their force and the dialogue should continue,” Pinotti quotes. "Inopressa".

However, the tone for the summit seems to be set by the United States and Poland. And, perhaps, to some extent Ukraine, not participating in NATO. In the end, it is the “Ukrainian Crimea”, and also the South-East, that are the starting point for NATO (more precisely, American) strategists and talking heads in Europe, such as the notorious Russophobe Matzerevich, whom they say are not tolerated by compatriots. Americans want to force Europe to arm at the expense of Europe - and they are likely to achieve this. The thesis about the “Russian threat” has already been taken for the agenda, this was often spoken about through the mouths of NATO bosses.

As a result, the planet will be on the verge of the “officially declared” new Cold War, where Russia is the attacking enemy, and NATO is something of a defensive victim.

In this sense, holding a summit in Warsaw looks symbolic. I remember the era of the Warsaw Pact and the commonwealth of socialist countries. Only now European socialist countries are no longer there, and the USSR is not, and only Russia is among the strategic opponents of the present united Europe. It is a capitalist, with the bourgeoisie and the oligarchs.

Against the backdrop of the bloody actions of the “IG” terrorist cells in Europe, the aforementioned Europe, at the behest of the United States, has to consider and call Russia the aggressor. Russia, which has not attacked any of the NATO countries and effectively destroyed the militants of “IS” in Syria, is listed as an opponent of the West.

Absurd? Not. For the US military requires money. Much money. And for knocking out "a lot of money" of some kind of "IG" is not enough. Against the few terrorists from the "IG", intimidating Europe, there are police and special services. Russia is the enemy of big, with a big army. This is a very convenient enemy for stuffing the bastard with the big money from the state military-industrial complex. Therefore, against Russia, and calls for arming "exceptional hegemon."

Recall that the NATO summit will take place from 8 to 9 July. Eighteen presidents, twenty-one prime ministers, forty-one foreign ministers and thirty-nine ministers of defense will participate. In total, 65 delegations from the 28 alliance states and 26 partner states will arrive at the event in Warsaw. Representatives from the EU, the UN and the World Bank will also arrive at the meeting (without bankers anywhere). In short, the list is impressive. The summit, no doubt, will be historic and will give a new impetus to the Cold War. Militant Pan Matserevich there is something to tell reporters.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Teberii
    Teberii 8 July 2016 06: 23
    +5
    The eagle and its eagles will share the skin of an unkilled bear.
    1. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 8 July 2016 07: 04
      +6
      A bunch of paranoid people, or a fire in Crazy House 2?
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 8 July 2016 07: 58
        +11
        Rather, a bunch of pyromancers. This kodla is constantly stoking a fire of war around the globe. One doctor (Russia) cannot be cured. Here we need a consultation of doctors - Russia, China, Iran ...
        1. Tatar 174
          Tatar 174 8 July 2016 08: 08
          +7
          We need to get together the leaders of Russia, China, India, Iran and our other normal partners and declare an ultimatum to the West that if they do not dissolve NATO in the near future, we will begin to create a block that is polar opposite to them for defense against NATO ... It's a joke, of course, fantastic, but it will come to this, there is already the BRICS, the SCO, and the situation against the countries of these organizations is heating up slowly from NATO, what else remains to be done? Strength must be gathered strength, another has not yet been invented ...
          1. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 8 July 2016 09: 06
            +4
            Quote: Tatar 174
            we will begin to create a block that is polar opposite to them for defense against NATO ... The joke is of course fantastic, but it will come to this, there is already the BRICS, the SCO,

            come on, buddy! what "brixes and shos"? with them and economic relations stalled, and you mean "military blocs" ...
          2. 1536
            1536 8 July 2016 18: 37
            0
            Better to declare that all these countries together, in the event of a NATO attack, will hand over a million soldiers a day. NATO members will be delighted at first, but the flood will become thoughtful.
      2. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 8 July 2016 09: 04
        +1
        Quote: dmi.pris
        A bunch of paranoid people, or a fire in Crazy House 2?

        during the global crisis, the best way to "calm down" the people of any country is to find an external "aggressor", and by this, to convince the population to eat less, and pay more out of their own pockets, for the needs of any military industrial complex.
        1. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid 8 July 2016 09: 33
          +1
          Raise hysteria to unprecedented heights, when there is no reason and cut coupons for "defense" --- that's what NATO leaders do. They do it skillfully and assistants --- in addition --- Poland, prrrrbalty, pig ...
          1. Basarev
            Basarev 8 July 2016 12: 33
            +1
            Quote: Andrew Y.
            Quote: Tatar 174
            we will begin to create a block that is polar opposite to them for defense against NATO ... The joke is of course fantastic, but it will come to this, there is already the BRICS, the SCO,

            come on, buddy! what "brixes and shos"? with them and economic relations stalled, and you mean "military blocs" ...

            That's right. All these impoverished republics need Russia exclusively as a donor and supplier of cheap resources. And China also has territorial claims for almost all of Primorye. We would have to disown these holostany hypocrites and build relations exclusively with solid and wealthy countries that can really benefit us. And all this messianism, when at the expense of the Russians they pulled out all kinds of savages, neither the Russian Empire nor the USSR could stand it.
            1. Lyubopyatov
              Lyubopyatov 8 July 2016 23: 38
              0
              Mr. Basarev, you are certainly working for solid and rich countries, really trying to benefit them.
    2. GYGOLA
      GYGOLA 8 July 2016 14: 30
      0
      Whoever wishes, sign the petition for the dissolution and reorganization of our football team, at www.change.org
      1. Lyubopyatov
        Lyubopyatov 8 July 2016 23: 41
        0
        Football is opium for, and sometimes, it happens for the people.
    3. stas
      stas 8 July 2016 17: 11
      0
      Pin..sy are not eagles, they are vultures and scavengers.

      One thing is clear, this NATO coven for Russia will not bring anything good.
    4. Cat
      Cat 8 July 2016 20: 15
      0
      Basically true! In the nineties, our "friends" were convinced that they had won the Cold War. They even made medals for themselves, and then a "surprise" - "an owl open the bear came !!! And that we played the cold war, he" does not agree !!! "From the middle of the" zero "we tried to explain that this is absolutely it is nipolitically correct not to admit defeat, not in a European way somehow “these are the wrong bees” or “I’m a cloud, a cloud, a cloud, not a bear at all.” Well, what choice do our sworn friends have - either give medals, or self-indulge and shout “shoot heels ?! "
      Ps wrote and felt sick to "heels" that ours, his own, which used to be so dear and understandable in childhood, but now he will shoot and shoot at you. Sadly.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 8 July 2016 06: 25
    +2
    We, from this muck - the summit of NATO-Srovtsev and Co., have nothing good to expect. We must rely on our allies - on our Army and Navy!
  3. Yak28
    Yak28 8 July 2016 06: 29
    +4
    For NATO (USA), a cold war is needed, it will give orders to US military plants, sales of American weapons will increase, and the Cold War will rally NATO and prevent it from falling apart.
    But for Russia, the Cold War is not needed, we don’t have money for it and there are no workers who will rivet rivets in three shifts for the uncle’s rich arms. Plus, Russia is actually surrounded, NATO troops are against our border, there’s no buffer zone from other countries like in the USSR and this is not good. Yes, and in the number of people, military equipment, we are far behind the USA, and even more so from NATO
    1. berezin1987
      berezin1987 8 July 2016 07: 35
      +4
      In the nuclear missile era, the number of people does not play a big role. A nuclear warhead is cheaper than a tank or aircraft, and the damage from its use is gigantic. I am a supporter of the creation of a military bloc with the participation of China and Iran. In terms of military power, such an association would be equal to NATO on land and in the air.
      1. GYGOLA
        GYGOLA 8 July 2016 09: 12
        0
        The military bloc is burdensome, it takes away a certain part of the sovereignty of the state that is in it. Brew some porridge, I think I won’t need to ask anyone about anything (meaning India, China, Iran, Azerbaijan, Syria, Armenia, but ... no kidding, and of course Belarus.)
      2. Zulu_S
        Zulu_S 9 July 2016 04: 31
        +1
        Quote: berezin1987
        A nuclear warhead is cheaper than a tank or aircraft, and the damage from its use is gigantic.

        Leaving, loudly slam the door? So that the house falls apart?
    2. Beefeater
      Beefeater 8 July 2016 07: 59
      +4
      Quote: Yak28
      For NATO (USA), a cold war is needed, it will give orders to US military plants, sales of American weapons will increase, and the Cold War will rally NATO and prevent it from falling apart.
      But for Russia, the Cold War is not needed, we don’t have money for it and there are no workers who will rivet rivets in three shifts for the uncle’s rich arms. Plus, Russia is actually surrounded, NATO troops are against our border, there’s no buffer zone from other countries like in the USSR and this is not good. Yes, and in the number of people, military equipment, we are far behind the USA, and even more so from NATO

      Why?
      Everywhere they write that pour money in Russia. Our worthless footballers have such salaries, for example, that instead of them more than one regiment can be maintained. Chubais has a lot of money, he said.
      Correctly, workers and engineers in Russia are not enough, but if they were not prepared, they did not appear. This is a chance for us. Chance of rebirth. For the development and implementation of new technologies ... so who needs it is us. And not Americans whose aircraft carriers have nowhere to go. We must use the moment.
      NATO battalions. Note Poland does not increase its army - it is expensive, but asks allies. Nobody wants to bear the costs.
      1. CONTROL
        CONTROL 8 July 2016 09: 09
        +3
        Quote: Beefeater
        Everywhere they write that pour money in Russia. Our worthless footballers have such salaries, for example, that instead of them more than one regiment can be maintained. Chubais has a lot of money, he said.

        There is a lot of money in Russia! lots of...
        But - this is "non-working" money! This is money actively working for inflation; "unearned", "unproductive", speculative money! The lion's share of this money is the so-called. "personal capital", or money "under the cut" - budget allocations for the same Chubais! They are called "dead money" ...
        ---------
        ... In connection with what has been said, the question-proposal of Polygraph Poligrafich Sharikov - "Take away and divide ..." or - in Lenin's way: expropriation of the expropriators!
      2. Zulu_S
        Zulu_S 9 July 2016 05: 05
        0
        Quote: Beefeater
        This is a chance for us. Chance of rebirth. For the development and implementation of new technologies ... so who needs it is us. And not Americans whose aircraft carriers have nowhere to go. We must use the moment.

        Again guns instead of butter? Our country cannot once again enter the arms race! It is necessary to use any opportunities for dialogue. Finally, arrange the Russia-NATO summit. We have already achieved that NATO cannot speak with us from a position of strength. This is the stage with which we can defend our interests. Yes, they do not want to listen to us, but this is not a reason to be offended by the whole world.
    3. Lyubopyatov
      Lyubopyatov 8 July 2016 23: 44
      -1
      The Commander-in-Chief with the Minister of Defense should not miss a convenient moment to mobilize all the surprises that could knock out NATO’s brains on the mantelpiece in the Oval Office of the White House.
  4. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 8 July 2016 06: 34
    +6
    Mr. Poroshenko will hold talks with Barack Obama himself.

    I almost fell off the chair, why not right away: - the apostle Peter will negotiate with the Lord God himself!??
    1. inkass_98
      inkass_98 8 July 2016 07: 14
      +7
      Quote: avg-mgn
      I almost fell out of a chair

      You will be smejazzo, but TASS reprinted the message from the site of the administration like the president of ukroreich. But the Obama administration did not say anything like that. Apparently the meeting will happen just like the last time when Petya Baraka caught and tried to shake his hand near the toilet.
      1. Kos_kalinki9
        Kos_kalinki9 8 July 2016 07: 47
        +3
        Apparently the meeting will happen just like the last time when Petya Baraka caught and tried to shake his hand near the toilet.

        But antiresno. After the toilet, the barack will wash his hands, or let the pedra lick what ?????????
      2. Lyubopyatov
        Lyubopyatov 8 July 2016 23: 47
        0
        "... and tried to shake hands." Moreover, not yet washed.
    2. CONTROL
      CONTROL 8 July 2016 09: 12
      +1
      Quote: avg-mgn
      Mr. Poroshenko will hold talks with Barack Obama himself.

      the apostle Peter will negotiate with the Lord God himself!??

      Well, do not compare intelligence levels!
      Where are those - and where are THESE! ...
  5. knn54
    knn54 8 July 2016 06: 35
    +3
    Yankesov is beset by failure to establish control over the financial sector and hydrocarbon energy.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 8 July 2016 10: 43
      +1
      Quote: knn54
      Yankesov is beset by failure to establish control over the financial sector and hydrocarbon energy.


      And not only. Basically, they are enraged by the failure of plans for the Crimea and the southeast of the former Ukraine (which prevented the entry of the 404 country into NATO with the subsequent deployment of an American strike complex on the western border of Russia):
      (cry)
  6. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 8 July 2016 06: 35
    +4
    hi
    Quote: Teberii
    The eagle and its eagles will share the skin of an unkilled bear.

    What eagles and eagles? Vultures and small scavengers! hi angry repeat
  7. siberalt
    siberalt 8 July 2016 06: 36
    +8
    Well, the referendum for NATO will win on the outskirts. So, what is next? They have a dilemma: either a civil war, or a tribunal over the Kuevo junta. Does NATO need it? What Obama and Putin talked about before the NATO "gangway" in Warsaw is not widely publicized. But for some reason the Kuevo propaganda denies even the fact of such. Hence the conclusion - Klimkin thinks a lot about himself laughing The same thing with Poroshenko, who was invited as a spectator to be humiliating to sit in a gallery.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 8 July 2016 06: 53
      0
      Quote: siberalt
      What Obama and Putin talked about before the NATO "gangway" in Warsaw is not widely publicized

      The conversation was mainly about Syria. Perhaps under the Minsk agreements, but no more.
      https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2154627.html
      http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201607080442-bra7.htm
      These are links to Regnum and TK Zvezda. There were more messages, but not quite intelligible.
    2. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 8 July 2016 07: 11
      +7
      Quote: siberalt
      Well, the NATO referendum will win on the outskirts .... Hence the conclusion - Klimkin thinks a lot about himself
      Whatever Klimkin thinks about himself, and what gallery Poroshenko would sit in, but the fact remains - almost 80% of Ukrainians are extremely anti-Russian. This I mean that many here are shouting "Do not quarrel our peoples! Ukrainians, for the most part, are positively disposed towards Russians" Yeah, positively, and NATO, where Ukrainians so dream of joining, well, purely a macrame knitting club and absolutely no Russia does not threaten.
      1. KOH
        KOH 8 July 2016 07: 57
        +3
        Well, Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, will enter, and so what? ..., here they are talking about the Russia-China military alliance, I think not from scratch, this will be a real NATE ... yes ))))))
  8. VICTOR-61
    VICTOR-61 8 July 2016 06: 52
    0
    Amerikosy used to in other countries, arrange their own orders. And here Russia dared to fight back everywhere. The mattress-makers lose their leadership in the eyes of Europe, and that's what infuriates them.
  9. parusnik
    parusnik 8 July 2016 07: 04
    +1
    As for Poroshenko, he intends to submit a strategic bulletin on the transition of the Ukrainian military industry to NATO standards.
    .. Yeah ... In Kharkov, Abrams and Leopards will release ...
  10. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 8 July 2016 07: 24
    +1
    Ukroina has long since accepted herself into NATO, only that the rest of the "members" agree with the presence in the ranks of an absolutely powerless and uncontrollable territory that imitates the state, which in fact is now ukroina.
  11. Izotovp
    Izotovp 8 July 2016 07: 24
    +7
    I just watched euronews: they really think there that we want to capture them for some reason! fool
    And then, it’s not at all comrade Svanidze who brought us nonsense that pressure on people is increasing in Russia, fears are increasing due to Yarovaya’s anti-terrorism law .... if only I read for a start and didn’t mess up people's brains! Not one person with whom I communicate doesn’t shake with fear of special services or the state ... maybe because my conscience is clear .... well .. more or less repeat
  12. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 8 July 2016 07: 26
    0
    On this "gangway of the lowered", that is, a gathering of imbeciles, they will approve the date for the beginning of the transition to a hot war against Russia if we do not return the peninsula to the Ukriks.
  13. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 8 July 2016 07: 27
    0
    As for Poroshenko, he intends to submit a strategic bulletin on the transition of the Ukrainian military industry to NATO standards.

    Well yes. All that remains is to restore production capacity, recruit qualified personnel and wean everyone away from spoofing (remember armored cars whose body is cracked or special vehicles with "eyes" from intercoms).
  14. Knowing
    Knowing 8 July 2016 07: 37
    0
    NATO Summit and Poroshenko’s meeting with Obama ... recourse ,- two sour friends... Both will do so .. repeat
  15. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 8 July 2016 07: 43
    +4
    "For Ukraine's entry into NATO, if the country held an appropriate referendum, 78% of Ukrainians would vote."

    And what does our "Ministry of Propaganda" do? First, they were allowed to "Ukraine is not Russia", then to Maydaun, now to "Ukraine is NATO." What's next? Is Belarus a NATO member? And the annual award to the leaders of this very "Ministry of Propaganda" in 300 million rubles? But who pays these super bonuses - apparently the Americans are based on the results.
    1. Schulz2
      Schulz2 8 July 2016 07: 48
      0
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin

      And what does our "Ministry of Propaganda" do?

      Works tirelessly
  16. dsm100
    dsm100 8 July 2016 07: 43
    +3
    Meeting of patients in a psychiatric hospital ...
  17. atos_kin
    atos_kin 8 July 2016 08: 01
    0
    In this sense, the holding of the summit in Warsaw looks symbolic.

    Well, right, the Partnership Warsaw Pact.
  18. Stinger
    Stinger 8 July 2016 08: 06
    0
    In this sense, holding the summit in Warsaw looks symbolic

    More than. Vultures flocked to.
  19. skeptik2999
    skeptik2999 8 July 2016 08: 08
    +1
    The NATO Summit and its possible solutions are a serious enough threat to my country. Consolidation of pro-American forces in the face of serious problems within the European Union. The issuance of carte blanche of the Armed Forces for the offensive operation in the Donbass. We will look at the reaction of the leadership of our country to this threat. The resource base of opposition to the West, alas, is declining. The election company gives a chance to raise the voice of opponents of the current ruling team. So the results of the work of the Atlantic bloc’s summit and the further steps of the West regarding Russia cannot be taken easily: it’s only to knock out a denyuzhku and let Washington’s mongrel bark towards Russia.
  20. 1536
    1536 8 July 2016 08: 12
    +4
    The Russian Empire lost the First World War, ceasing to exist due to the betrayal of senior leadership. The USSR won the Second World War, becoming a superpower, the pole of the world. We lost the first cold war thanks to the betrayal of the country's top leadership. We will win the second cold war by changing the world beyond recognition.
    And most importantly, it will be necessary to prevent the creation of prerequisites for a third cold war (or world war). And therefore, for the Poles, for example, this is definitely the last war.
    And if there is any symbolism in the creation of a "new Warsaw Pact", it only underlines what has been said above.
  21. cheburator
    cheburator 8 July 2016 08: 14
    +2
    An adequate answer is needed, posted closer to the boundaries of the "puppeteer". Then this show will end.
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL 8 July 2016 09: 25
      0
      Quote: cheburator
      An adequate answer is needed, posted closer to the boundaries of the "puppeteer". Then this show will end.

      The "adequate answer" could be Cuba ... Argentina ... Brazil ... Panama ... and te teh ... Regionally so!
  22. Baloo
    Baloo 8 July 2016 08: 15
    0
    NATO needs to stop bullying the geyropa. The only way out of NATO is to dissolve and close America.
  23. Atenon
    Atenon 8 July 2016 08: 45
    +2
    I am now in Warsaw, I’ll tell you so much police I haven’t seen in my life. It is interesting that today we move on to the airsoft game combat alert (airsoft), it will be interesting to play there in Russian uniform;).
    1. Zulu_S
      Zulu_S 9 July 2016 12: 54
      0
      Quote: AtenON
      today we are moving on to the airsoft game combat alert (airsoft), it will be interesting to play there in Russian uniform;)

      Good luck. I wish you to WIN.
  24. CONTROL
    CONTROL 8 July 2016 08: 55
    +1
    NATO Summit as the starting point for a new cold war
    ... no matter how hot!
    “The final result of the summit should be a package of documents, a matrix on how to raise the entire defense sector of Ukraine to NATO standards. It should be a comprehensive help package ”, ...
    Do not wash, so ride! Still achieve their goal!
    In the same way, NATO seized the European sector of the defense industry of the Warsaw Pact countries (created, by the way, largely on money and with the technical assistance of the USSR!). Sim won? ... (By the way, a private conclusion: - having said "A", drink and "B" to bring the matter to its logical conclusion! Something must be decided with Ukraine BEFORE the start of "modernization and strengthening of its defense industry" - read, grabbing and pocketing defense enterprises by the Americans!)
    The strategy, tactics and mode of action - well, never "probable", but the real one - the enemy does not change!
    ----------------
    ... And the Poles with their noble ambition and "liberties" will come to a sad repetition of history - when there is almost nothing left of the mighty "Rzecz Pospolita" from the Baltic to the Mediterranean ...
  25. Wolka
    Wolka 8 July 2016 09: 16
    0
    hoo what a big talking room is planned, well, let them wander around and go wild, the park will be released ...
  26. Vadim237
    Vadim237 8 July 2016 10: 04
    0
    NATO is just an assembly of empty threats - in which case they quickly scatter.
  27. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 8 July 2016 10: 40
    0
    Some analysts believe that the summit poses a threat to Russia.

    Is anyone still in doubt?
  28. pavelty
    pavelty 8 July 2016 10: 40
    0
    I don’t know guys, everything apparently goes to the fact that my index finger has not been lying on the trigger for a long time. Although this is a pessimistic option ... And I'm shooting well))
  29. Sargaras
    Sargaras 8 July 2016 10: 50
    0
    Quote: avg-mgn
    Mr. Poroshenko will hold talks with Barack Obama himself.

    I almost fell off the chair, why not right away: - the apostle Peter will negotiate with the Lord God himself!??

    So let Ukraine be admitted to NATO, there will be fun. Especially if you remember what the Mazepa Cossacks did in the army of Charles XII during the Northern War.
  30. Pitot
    Pitot 8 July 2016 11: 12
    0
    Yes, they can’t be accepted into NATO until there is peace with the DPR and LPR. But he will not be. Although, the Americans can make an exception again. And then blaze on all the smelly kaklain. Sorry, and we will not stay away .....
  31. standing
    standing 8 July 2016 12: 54
    0
    Well, NATO has reached our borders, well, rested, what's next? I hope they will not be invited to join the Kursk and Rostov regions. They are now stewed in their own juice. All we have to do is to bump into more Iskanders near the borders and fiercely promise all our former neighbors to create a “buffer zone” of them, if anything happens, in five minutes.
  32. Super Black
    Super Black 8 July 2016 13: 45
    +1
    As usual, the war during the Olympics will begin
  33. ioann1
    ioann1 8 July 2016 14: 27
    0


    States at all costs want to provoke NATO into a war with Russia. But they don’t really want to be the first to get the teeth. Such an imitation of threats will bring NATO to the grave.
    1. Essex62
      Essex62 8 July 2016 18: 18
      0
      NATO is, in fact, the army and fleet of mattresses. The rest are in the fairway (Britons, Germans). Well, the mongrel malleable type of zheks and other riffraff. Do you think they provoke themselves? Bullshit, the grandmother of the military-industrial complex of America - this is the main mover of the current hysteria. Not the first and not the last. Masson decided to attack only by introducing the next labeled one, who will try to finally cut our nuclear otvetku into sn parts. Only ktozh let them do it?
  34. atamankko
    atamankko 8 July 2016 16: 35
    0
    Time will tell who was right.
  35. Antiprogressor
    Antiprogressor 8 July 2016 19: 56
    0
    We must remember the hot. There is no Europe. There is no Moscow with Peter. There are no Washington DCs with New York. Tokyo ... but Tokyo there, there are no islands at all ... Careers, Montreal do not exist, Beijing triumphs, finishing Delhi.
    1. Zulu_S
      Zulu_S 9 July 2016 12: 57
      0
      I also read Clancy, God rest his soul.
  36. Maxim73
    Maxim73 8 July 2016 21: 12
    +1
    And I'll tell you so - they want to fight with us, let them try. Tired of being afraid - not to leave fate.
  37. Olegater
    Olegater 8 July 2016 21: 43
    +1
    Dear forum users, I have an idea - it consists in forecasting the results of this gathering in Poland.
    My prediction:
    1. An increase in NATO spending for Europe.
    2. Russia threat number 1 as never before
    3. The implementation of the supply of arms in 404.
    4. possible adoption as associative friends (in short mongrel at hand) Moldova Ukraine Georgia.
    5. Deployment of new large NATO and lice bases there.
    6. The increase in bases in Japan and Korea (against China).
    7. And as a science fiction they’ll come up with something regarding Kaliningrad.
    And so do your predictions and at the end of the coven we will see who was closer to its results.
  38. eleronn
    eleronn 8 July 2016 23: 46
    0
    Infinitely inflating the NATO bubble is impossible! Sooner or later it will burst (there must be an exhaust). The question is how this exhaust will be? They will not climb to the Russian Federation, but it can very well begin to bring democracy to Syria or Iran. Maybe an attempt to draw us into an armed conflict through third countries? All this is dangerous ...
  39. iouris
    iouris 9 July 2016 16: 39
    +1
    The Cold War is a form of peaceful coexistence of the world socialist system led by the USSR and the world capitalist system led by the United States. The Russian Federation is not a state with a communist ideology. The Russian Federation, like the United States, is an anti-communist state. The official ideology of the Russian Federation is the same as in the USA: our ruling class also only believes in the dollar.