Military Review

This year, 6 C-400 regimental kits will arrive in the army.

65
The RF AUC is planning to receive in the current year 6 regimental sets ZRS-400 "Triumph", reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta With reference to the Commander-in-Chief of the All-Union Confederation of the Armed Forces Viktor Bondarev


This year, 6 C-400 regimental kits will arrive in the army.


"The industry is reaching its design capacity, so this year we will receive six C-400 complexes, and next year we will not reduce the pace,"
said the colonel-general in Novosibirsk on the action "Contract Service - your choice!".

“A C-400 regimental set of 16 launchers and a control point can fire up to 80 targets simultaneously. Launchers can be equipped with various types of missiles (there are six of them in the Triumph arsenal) to create a layered defense, ”the newspaper writes.

As stressed by Bondarev, "the complex is distinguished by high reliability and unique combat properties, confirmed by work in the troops."

Just one complex "Triumph", transferred to Syria, closed to outsiders aviation the entire territory of the republic. “We have everything to reliably close the air borders of Russia,” said the commander in chief.

According to the December 2015 newspaper, “The 25 of the С-400 battalions are in combat duty in the Moscow region and Leningrad region, in Kamchatka, Novaya Zemlya, near Kaliningrad, Novorossiysk and Novosibirsk”.

Photos used:
Ruslan Krivobok / RIA News
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. St Petrov
    St Petrov 27 June 2016 13: 20
    +29
    in the days have come. Such a news ...

    but it seems already commonplace

    They brought the country (s)

    I remember the time when one new board (no matter what plane) caused excitement and hope that not everything is lost
    And when they brought one torus to us, it was a holiday

    And now: 6 regiment sets - well, okay that year too. And the next will be. So what?

    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 27 June 2016 13: 40
      +4
      What time is the news already published about 5 or 6 regiment sets per year. Although since January we have not heard about income, but now June is ending.
      1. St Petrov
        St Petrov 27 June 2016 13: 46
        +9
        We need to introduce a rule, I have been proposing this for a long time - to write about technology only upon receipt. Blaz about soon put this is not the case yes.

        And about ships - writing about each new add-on or installing a new locator / gun is also nonsense.

        On the other hand, we should not know this at all. How much, when and where. And if Islyamov reads and sells information to the enemy for the euro o_O

      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 27 June 2016 15: 28
        +6
        Quote: Sith Lord
        Although since January we have not heard about income, but now June is ending.

        The cold warrior is coming, because where and how much has arrived, we will hear less and less.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 27 June 2016 16: 03
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: Sith Lord
          Although since January we have not heard about income, but now June is ending.

          The cold warrior is coming, because where and how much has arrived, we will hear less and less.

          I also do not understand why the military should report to the press about everything. Nonsense.
          1. KnightRider
            KnightRider 27 June 2016 16: 38
            +1
            Quote: Muvka
            I also do not understand why the military should report to the press about everything. Nonsense.

            Show taxpayers what their money is going to smile
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 27 June 2016 16: 45
              +3
              Quote: KnightRider
              Quote: Muvka
              I also do not understand why the military should report to the press about everything. Nonsense.

              Show taxpayers what their money is going to smile

              So maybe you need to arrange excursions to the places of deployment of the same Yars? Or let them go into the mines to make sure, yes, there are rockets, so the money is not cut. Some kind of insanity. They are military men and the less we know about it, the better for us.
  2. Fregate
    Fregate 27 June 2016 13: 24
    +1
    One C-400 regiment may include up to 8 and C-400 divisions. We seem to be forming a regiment in the 2 division. It turns out this year we will receive 12 divisions or I did not understand something?
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 27 June 2016 13: 37
      +6
      Quote: Fregate
      One C-400 regiment may include up to 8 and C-400 divisions. We seem to be forming a regiment in the 2 division. It turns out this year we will receive 12 divisions or I did not understand something?

      The SRP usually includes the 2-3 receiver. But there are exceptions, for example, as part of the 1530 th SRP (Komsomolsk-on-Amur / Lian) - formally 5 S-300PS divisions. However, the technique is not very new and far from all working.
      Only one complex "Triumph", transferred to Syria, was closed for flights of outside aviation the whole territory of the republic. “We have everything to reliably close the air borders of Russia,” said the commander in chief.
      Here Bondarev in his repertoire, he is pretty balabol. negative
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 27 June 2016 13: 46
        +2
        Quote: Bongo
        Here Bondarev in his repertoire, he is pretty balabol.

        Sergei! But you weren’t mistaken. Maybe he talked about paintball. It’s closer to him.
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 27 June 2016 13: 52
          +3
          Quote: Amurets
          Sergei! But you weren’t mistaken. Maybe he talked about paintball. It’s closer to him.

          Damn, why should you bear such a whole Colonel General. Maybe as a pilot he was not bad at the time, but as a commander ... wassat Sometimes it’s better to be silent - it’s a smart one.
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 27 June 2016 13: 55
            +1
            Well, there will be a native of anti-aircraft defense - he will throw up nonsense about the Air Force. This is normal.
            Well this is not Wasserman. Weigh and ponder every word or even a syllable and navigate in all areas

            1. Bongo
              Bongo 27 June 2016 14: 00
              +2
              Quote: s-t Petrov
              Well, there will be a native of anti-aircraft defense - he will throw up nonsense about the Air Force. This is normal.

              No not ok No. He also "blurted out" about the Air Force several times, which only cost his statements about the T-50 and Su-35S. A person holding such a position must control and be responsible for what he is broadcasting. In other matters, as it was said in due time - we do not need smart ones, we need faithful ones. The current personnel policy is carried out in this vein.
              1. St Petrov
                St Petrov 27 June 2016 14: 01
                +1
                Well, I would also take the faithful. smart enough. But loyalty in our time, quality is very necessary
                Although I think there doesn’t smell of fidelity there. So. Stairs. And loyalty there is about one plus minus seems to me.

                1. Bongo
                  Bongo 27 June 2016 14: 04
                  +2
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  Well, I would also take the faithful. smart enough.

                  So it turns out that smart officers do not stay in the army. And as for "fidelity" - the zealous d.u.r.a.k. often worse than the enemy.
          2. Amurets
            Amurets 27 June 2016 14: 18
            +1
            Quote: Bongo
            Quote: Amurets
            Sergei! But you weren’t mistaken. Maybe he talked about paintball. It’s closer to him.

            Damn, why should you bear such a whole Colonel General. Maybe as a pilot he was not bad at the time, but as a commander ... wassat Sometimes it’s better to be silent - it’s a smart one.

            Sergei, do you remember the old saying “With a clever deputy and an eccentric, the boss looks like a clever one.” But Bondarev does not trust either the deputy or the deputy is the same.
  3. Same lech
    Same lech 27 June 2016 13: 30
    0
    Only one complex "Triumph", transferred to Syria, closed the entire territory of the republic for flights of outside aviation. “We have everything to reliably close the air borders of Russia,” the commander-in-chief said.


    Encouraging ....
    I hope the S-400 is used not as a piece of goods but as an element of a unified air defense ...
    An air defense system is already at least some sort of guarantee of protection.
  4. Rostislav
    Rostislav 27 June 2016 13: 47
    +2
    An air defense system is already at least some sort of guarantee of protection.

    Is humiliation more than pride? An air defense system is already much more than "at least some kind".
    I am glad that there is more and more positive news about our successes, and the number of publications on the topic "how bad things got there with the imposition of sanctions against Russia ..."
    It is clear that while they had little to boast of, they focused on "their" problems.
    But the information field must be formed precisely on the example of the successes and achievements of Russia, and not on the negative from the West.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 27 June 2016 14: 03
      -1
      Is humiliation more than pride? An air defense system is already much more than "at least some kind".


      I apologize hi if you hurt your feeling ...

      But all the same, the story of the Rusta plane is still getting on my nerves, and then the USSR air defense was very developed.
      1. Odysseus
        Odysseus 27 June 2016 14: 12
        +10
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        But all the same, the story of the Rusta plane is still getting on my nerves, and then the USSR air defense was very developed.

        There is nothing to do with air defense. This was a purely political issue from the time of perestroika.
      2. Absurdidat
        Absurdidat 27 June 2016 18: 47
        0
        Sir, Rusta air defense was excellent, and the interceptor reported on visual contact. The subordinates were frightened, the strict boss, did not dare to report, because the intruder was not on a combat aircraft. Then, after all, a lot of people were flying, as now, and the Finns were gurgling, and ours, without permission, were flying all the time on corn corn. And so this flight was not a surprise, it was conducted tightly, according to the stories of some high-ranking military man from the Leningrad Region — it was better than the district worked on it in the exercises.
        1. albanian
          albanian 27 June 2016 23: 05
          0
          It seems that his poor fellow was treated with radars so that he still has not gotten children ...
      3. Operator
        Operator 28 June 2016 00: 57
        -2
        After the United States adopted the armament of cruise missiles, the missile component of the USSR air defense turned into a props - a radar field at low altitudes even on the western border of the USSR and in the center, where there was the highest density of air defense systems, consisted of almost only holes.

        Throughout the flight, the Rust plane from the border with Finland to Red Square with an intermediate landing near Staraya Roza only several times fell into the air defense surveillance radar operation areas for a short time - Rust flew at extremely low altitude to check the map with landmarks.

        If the USSR’s maritime border was violated, a pair of air defense fighters flew out to intercept Rust’s aircraft on air defense radar guidance, which could not find the aircraft above the sea (!).

        In reality, Rust's plane was intercepted only once by a pair of air defense fighters in the depths of Soviet territory. With such efficiency and a massive attack by cruise missiles, the number of fighters should approximately coincide with the number of missiles.
        1. Absurdidat
          Absurdidat 28 June 2016 09: 00
          +1
          Full crap
  5. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 27 June 2016 13: 58
    0
    Has the new missile plant reached its design capacity?
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 27 June 2016 14: 02
      +2
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      Has the new missile plant reached its design capacity?

      Figs knows him, but there are no new long-range missiles in the troops request
      1. sivuch
        sivuch 27 June 2016 16: 23
        0
        And Major General V. Gumenny says that there is
        http://sokol-ff.livejournal.com/277547.html
        He is a general, he knows better
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 28 June 2016 00: 41
          +2
          Quote: sivuch
          He is a general, he knows better

          Igor, the generals and politicians have a lot to say, only it’s not accepted to answer for your words. No.
          1. sivuch
            sivuch 28 June 2016 09: 00
            0
            Generally speaking, it was a rephrasing of Vysotsky’s song - a big giraffe, he knows better
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 27 June 2016 14: 09
    +2
    We have all witnessed with our own eyes how "democratizers" on the wings of fighters bring democracy to anyone. Only not for those who have normal air defense on duty. Our air defense is "at the level", and this cannot but please us, and cannot but strain our sworn friends.
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus 27 June 2016 14: 15
      +1
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      We have all witnessed with our own eyes how "democratizers" on the wings of fighters bring democracy to anyone. Only not for those who have normal air defense on duty. Our air defense is "at the level", and this cannot but please us, and cannot but strain our sworn friends.

      Rather, they do not climb to the one who can give back. The DPRK has no normal air defense, but there are no people who want to climb to them. "Bad dumb."
      But air defense is also, of course, an important factor.
    2. Bongo
      Bongo 27 June 2016 14: 16
      +4
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Our air defense is "at the level", and this cannot but please us, and cannot but strain our sworn friends.

      To the level of Soviet air defense we are like the moon on foot. The guarantor of our independence and territorial integrity are the Russian strategic nuclear forces. For those who disagree with this, here is the active link, try to refute the written here with reason. The article was written about a year ago, but little has changed since then.
      The current state of the Russian air defense system
      1. Operator
        Operator 27 June 2016 14: 45
        0
        Nobody had a normal missile defense yet - all existing and existing stationary air defense systems are suppressed at times by high-precision weapons. Plus, the absence of AWACS aircraft before the 1977 year made air defense blind to airplanes flying at low altitude (only targets during exercises fly at medium and high altitudes).

        The only combat-ready component of air defense was and is fighter aircraft.

        A change in the situation is expected only after the adoption of the S-350 Vityaz air defense system, sharpened for intercepting high-precision ammunition in the entire range of altitudes. To increase the distance of their detection, it will be necessary to start serial production of the A-100 AWACS aircraft with AFAR.

        Until then, the most effective means of Russian air defense will remain the MiG-31 and Su-30.
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 27 June 2016 14: 55
          +4
          Quote: Operator
          Nobody had a normal missile defense yet - all existing and existing stationary air defense systems are suppressed at times by high-precision weapons

          I made a vow not to communicate with you, but I just can’t help myself No. Excuse me, what year were you born to draw such conclusions? They did not find Soviet air defense, no? Have you heard anything about low-altitude radars? And what about the means of countering anti-radar missiles? The Americans in 80 would wash themselves with blood from our air defense systems alone. Equal to the Soviet air defense system was not, but probably already will not be.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 27 June 2016 15: 06
            +4
            Quote: Bongo
            Equal to the Soviet air defense system was not, but probably already will not be.

            Good day, Sergey. drinks
            Above the nose. This is a matter of the will of the government and faith ... we really do. Of course, not in the volumes and quantities as in the USSR, but we are reanimating innovative thought and this is a fact. And in order to reach the same level as in the Union, , I suppose more of our research institutes to finance and support the design idea not only in words.
          2. Operator
            Operator 27 June 2016 15: 42
            -3
            You have never heard about the reaction time of the S-300 when working with ground-based "low-altitude" radars? About the seeker of anti-radar missiles with computer processing of radar signals and false targets and memorizing the coordinates of the radar after it is turned off? And about the counter-air defense operation "Artsav-19" in 1982 (מבצע ערצב - ask the Professor, he will paint you in colors)?

            You'd better not break your vow, otherwise I don't want to remember about the flight of Matthias Rust to the very "lair" of the Soviet air defense am
            1. sivuch
              sivuch 27 June 2016 15: 55
              +2
              Have you ever heard about the reaction time of the S-300 when working with ground "low-altitude" radars?
              I didn’t hear. Please tell
              And in 82, Syrian aviation worked it worse than air defense. So what is the comparison? (Does this also apply to Rust)
              1. Operator
                Operator 27 June 2016 17: 11
                -2
                "For what purpose are you interested?" (FROM)

                PS When you join the SCO, then you will find out bully
  7. NEXUS
    NEXUS 27 June 2016 14: 49
    +4
    The plans are good. It’s interesting how things are going with Nudol (A-235) ... when this missile goes into the army in series. And at what stage are the works on the S-500 ... although it’s clear that vultures are everywhere in these two issues .
    When Nudol and S-500 begin to enter the troops in series, then it will be possible to speak of a qualitative strengthening of our missile defense.
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 27 June 2016 15: 00
      +3
      Quote: NEXUS
      When Nudol and C-500 begin to enter the troops in series, then we can talk about the qualitative strengthening of our missile defense

      Hi Andrew!
      Of course, it is necessary to develop missile defense, but if it comes to missile defense it is completely ... belay Now we have much more urgent is the replacement in the troops of the worn C-300PS built during the Soviet era. God grant that it would be possible to replace them with new systems in the ratio 1: 1. But somehow Bondarev was broadcasting that one S-400 division could replace 3-4 S-300PS.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 27 June 2016 15: 16
        +1
        Quote: Bongo
        God forbid that we could replace them with new systems in a 1: 1 ratio

        I believe that capacities will increase. There is still export. Yes, and you see the rest in the world yourself ... that's why I mentioned Nudol and C-500, which are needed as air.
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 27 June 2016 15: 24
          +2
          Quote: NEXUS
          I believe that capacities will increase. There is still export. Yes, and you see the rest in the world yourself ... that's why I mentioned Nudol and C-500, which are needed as air.

          I don’t forgive the fact that missile defense systems in the near future will be able to work with 100% efficiency. No. That is, from our retaliatory strike, the American missile defense will not be able to protect. Under these conditions, an effective air defense system (and in the USSR it was precisely an air defense system) may be even more in demand.
          Quote: NEXUS
          Above the nose. This is a matter of the will of the government and faith ...

          You know Andrei, I perfectly remember what happened, and I see what became ... sad Something for the better is changing in terms of re-equipment, for example, new observation stations went and we finally got rid of the ancient "Defense", but the pace is not yet the same ...
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 27 June 2016 15: 31
            +3
            Quote: Bongo
            Under these conditions, an effective air defense system (and in the USSR it was precisely an air defense system) may be even more in demand.

            I agree with you, Serega ... unfortunately, the 90s still come to us today, although 25 years have passed ...
            Quote: Bongo
            but the pace is not right ...

            Sergei, you yourself understand that it is not so easy to spin this "machine" called "defense industry" after so many years of senseless standing ... I am sure that we are moving slowly, and then the pace will increase.
      2. Amurets
        Amurets 27 June 2016 15: 20
        +2
        Quote: Bongo
        Hi Andrew!
        The ABM course is necessary to develop, but if it comes to the ABM, the thing is completely ... belay Now we have much more urgent is the replacement in the troops of the worn S-300PS built in Soviet times. God forbid that it would be possible to replace them with new systems in a 1: 1 ratio. But somehow Bondarev was broadcasting that one S-400 division could replace 3-4 S-300PS.

        Sergey! I fully support! Over the Far East, the whole sky is in holes. Enough for a couple of missiles in conventional equipment for the Zeiskaya and Bureyskaya hydroelectric power stations and 2013 will seem like a stream. Previously, this area was closed by the same grouping as near Komsomolsk. Now, Operation Clear Sky. and nothing.
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 27 June 2016 15: 32
          +2
          Quote: Amurets
          Previously, this area was closed by the same grouping as near Komsomolsk. Now operation "Clear Sky". There is no one and nothing.

          Unfortunately this is the case! Previously, the Zeya hydroelectric power station was covered by the S-75 regiment. Moreover, one division was stationed near the dam, now there are only surveillance radars there. In general, in the Amur region with anti-aircraft cover, things are sad, there is one Buk brigade near Belogorsk in the entire region.
          1. Amurets
            Amurets 27 June 2016 15: 44
            +1
            Quote: Bongo
            In general, in the Amur Region, the situation with anti-aircraft cover is sad, for the whole region there is one Buk brigade near Belogorsk.

            Army headquarters are covered. And that’s it.
      3. Philip Staros
        Philip Staros 29 November 2016 23: 08
        0
        On the Internet, they write about the availability of about 1000 PU "Systems" in Russia. When delivered on duty, 96 (6 regiments) PU per year and the life cycle of machines in 30 years, as I understand it - a decrease in the number and does not smell :)
    2. An64
      An64 27 June 2016 16: 13
      0
      When Nudol and C-500 begin to enter the troops in series, then we can talk about the qualitative strengthening of our missile defense

      At the expense of missile defense - a rather controversial issue. We need a strategic missile defense, but these funds are not suitable for a strategic missile defense. And it seems to me that we do not need a non-strategic missile defense. What missiles and which enemy should she defend against? Look - how many BRDS, OTR and TR are in the world. Cruise missiles are much more dangerous! Generally - PRO toy, which is paid very much attention.
      1. Muvka
        Muvka 27 June 2016 16: 46
        0
        Are cruise missiles not rockets? Or do you think that the S-400 \ 500 can not bring down the KR?
        1. Operator
          Operator 27 June 2016 17: 13
          0
          C-400 can shoot down missile defense, but can’t shoot down small-sized gliding anti-radar bombs with an EPR of 0,001 sq.m and zero visibility in the infrared range.

          The S-350 Vityaz is intended for this.
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 27 June 2016 17: 32
            +1
            Quote: Operator
            C-400 can shoot down missile defense, but can’t shoot down small-sized gliding anti-radar bombs with an EPR of 0,001 sq.m and zero visibility in the infrared range.

            The S-350 Vityaz is intended for this.

            And tell me, why can the Knight, and the S-400 can not?
            1. Operator
              Operator 27 June 2016 17: 57
              +1
              In C-350, missiles and radars are sharpened for the defeat of small-sized high-precision munitions with small ESR at close range. The starting weight of the heaviest 9M96E2 rocket is 420 kg, warhead 24 kg.

              C-400 is designed to intercept at an increased distance aircraft and ballistic missiles with a larger EPR. The starting weight of the heaviest 40Н6Е rocket is 1890 kg, warhead 180 kg.
              1. Muvka
                Muvka 27 June 2016 19: 37
                +1
                Quote: Operator
                In C-350, missiles and radars are sharpened for the defeat of small-sized high-precision munitions with small ESR at close range. The starting weight of the heaviest 9M96E2 rocket is 420 kg, warhead 24 kg.

                C-400 is designed to intercept at an increased distance aircraft and ballistic missiles with a larger EPR. The starting weight of the heaviest 40Н6Е rocket is 1890 kg, warhead 180 kg.

                In general, the S-400 can also be equipped with 9M96E2 missiles. What is the problem? I don’t know about the radar, but I doubt that it is more primitive than on a hero.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. Operator
                  Operator 27 June 2016 19: 57
                  0
                  The S-400 can indeed directly control the launcher of the 9M96E2 missiles. But, apparently, a decision was made to create a much more flexible air defense / missile defense system from two S-400 and S-350 air defense systems (plus Nudol for the future), linked into a network by an automatic tactical data transmission system.

                  C-400 covers a limited number of particularly important facilities, while the cheaper C-350 covers it from the WTO. Other C-350 divisions cover less responsible, but much more numerous facilities.

                  As far as one can understand from open information, the C-350 radar is superior in its short-range resolving capabilities to the C-400 radar.
                  1. Muvka
                    Muvka 27 June 2016 20: 04
                    0
                    Nobody argues with this, just the S-400 can shoot down the CR. And the fact that he will be more effective with Vityaz is no one disputes.
                    1. Operator
                      Operator 28 June 2016 02: 18
                      0
                      In fact, I compared the S-400 and S-350 complexes according to the price / efficiency criterion in the interception of high-precision ammunition.
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 27 June 2016 17: 34
        +1
        Quote: An64
        Cruise missiles are much more dangerous!

        Each threat should have its own "medicine" ... in addition to the S-400, there is also the S-350, for example, which copes well with the CD as well. I will say more, in my opinion, the replacement of the S-300 will go in three directions ... the first is the S-400, the second, the S-350 and the third, these are modernized 300s with new missiles that will be used on all air defense systems ...
        Plus, building up quantitative systems such as Shell-C1, Torus, Buk ...
        Well, the S-500 and Nudol goes a separate line ... for these systems the task is slightly different, or rather extended-near space, ICBMs, in the long term interception of hyper-sound aircraft.
  8. hunt1
    hunt1 27 June 2016 16: 22
    0
    Almaz-Antey will transfer five sets of the S-400 Triumph anti-aircraft missile system to the Russian Ministry of Defense ahead of schedule, the press service of the concern reported. “He (the general director of the concern Yan Novikov - RT) stressed that the work involved with preparation for the transfer of the S-400 Triumph air defense system to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation this year, it is planned to complete ahead of schedule: the 12th, 13th and 14th regimental kits of this system will be received by the Russian Ministry of Defense by the end of September 2016, the 15th and the 16th - during October 2016 ", - quoted by TASS message. SAM S-400" Triumph "is designed to eliminate the means of aerospace attack, including reconnaissance aircraft, ballistic missiles,
    This news was back in March from the Russian Defense Ministry!
  9. nemo778
    nemo778 27 June 2016 16: 47
    0
    Do not! Shy of their !!!! COMPLEXES !!! hi (chicken pecking a grain) !!! hi
  10. Pitot
    Pitot 27 June 2016 16: 54
    0
    They are quickly stamped .... happy. Well done everyone who is somehow connected with this action ...
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 27 June 2016 19: 38
      0
      Quote: Pitot
      They are quickly stamped .... happy. Well done everyone who is somehow connected with this action ...

      Well, if "one way or another," then well done, all taxpayers :)
  11. huntsman650
    huntsman650 27 June 2016 20: 44
    0
    The formula for calculating the detection of the DC is equal to 4.12 times the square root of the height of the target and the square root of the height of the antenna. For normal radar refraction. I checked the formula actually works. Read the report on the air defense of Yugoslavia. Ancient complexes, and tangible losses in NATO. 20 sec. Was given to the missile system to work, after turning off and changing places or ORS flew. Be sure to hang a corner, balloons. And if, under cover of s400, we push forward the frontal air defense in the direction of the blow, then in general the song will be received.
  12. proud
    proud 27 June 2016 22: 21
    +1
    Guys, get it at the beginning, put it on alert, and then write, and then I will sincerely congratulate you, but for now, the article is not about anything!
  13. Zomanus
    Zomanus 28 June 2016 04: 35
    0
    16 * 4 = 64 missiles in the regiment set.
    Maybe it can fire up to 60, and not up to 80 targets?
    Or mixed up with the maintenance of goals.
    Well, in general, we need such systems to write off all C-300
    and replace with new C-400.
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 28 June 2016 08: 28
      0
      Infa from Wikipedia about 12 deployed regiments. So: 3 divisions in 53 DPVO 1532 zrp Pacific Fleet (Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky), differs from the previously delivered by the presence of 24 launchers (3 divisions), deployed in 2015 [62];