Military Review

The Pentagon is exploring the possibility of production in the United States of Russian small arms

121
Special Operations Command (SOCOM), turned to American weapons firms to begin developing "non-standard types of weapons and ammunition," reports The Washington Post with reference to the representative of the command of Matt Allen.



“We are exploring the potential and capabilities of the American industry to assemble those types of weapons that many of our foreign partners use,” said Allen.

The newspaper clarifies that “non-standard” weapons should be understood as “an AK assault rifle, SVD sniper rifle, Russian medium and large caliber machine guns, as well as 14,5 mm caliber aircraft.”

At the same time, Allen noted that “the production of such weapons by American companies will not only be a good use of budget funds, but will also have a positive impact on foreign partners who are more familiar with such weapons.”

According to him, "it is not yet known what the value of" non-standard "weapons produced in the United States will be and how affordable and high-quality they will be." Nevertheless, it is obvious that this initiative "will allow the US government to better control the production and distribution of such weapons."
Photos used:
www.youtube.com
121 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 11 June 2016 11: 04
    +16
    Albright in the know? B .... old!
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 11 June 2016 11: 09
      +28
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      Albright in the know? B .... old!

      And, will Yankees buy licenses? Or will Albright be in kind?
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev 11 June 2016 11: 19
        +7
        Quote: Amurets
        Quote: Dmitry Potapov
        Albright in the know? B .... old!

        And, will Yankees buy licenses? Or will Albright be in kind?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Red_Hamer
          Red_Hamer 11 June 2016 14: 13
          +6
          What licenses? What are you speaking about? Forgot how they clone RPG-7? This is the other must observe, this does not apply to "Exceptional". It's one thing to shout loudly about it to the whole world, it's another to do it yourself. And yes, this is what most likely everything in the photo knows. The question is, why do they need it?
          1. Alf
            Alf 11 June 2016 17: 17
            +6
            Quote: Red_Hamer
            The question is different, why do they need it?

            The answer is simple, like a nail. Knock Russia out of traditional arms markets.
            1. poquello
              poquello 11 June 2016 18: 22
              -1
              Quote: Alf
              Quote: Red_Hamer
              The question is different, why do they need it?

              The answer is simple, like a nail. Knock Russia out of traditional arms markets.

              but not too late? our new designs with old virtues and better
              1. Alf
                Alf 11 June 2016 18: 50
                +2
                Quote: poquello
                our new designs with old virtues and better

                I agree, but how Pindocs can sell ... to retract their own, it can be very dangerous. F-35 as an example. The plane does not really fly, but is already for sale.
                1. poquello
                  poquello 11 June 2016 19: 03
                  0
                  Quote: Alf
                  Quote: poquello
                  our new designs with old virtues and better

                  I agree, but how Pindocs can sell ... to retract their own, it can be very dangerous. F-35 as an example. The plane does not really fly, but is already for sale.

                  ))) that's for sure
                2. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 11 June 2016 19: 48
                  +1
                  F 35 still flies, this plane has problems only with BERO, as it is too tricked out.
                  1. poquello
                    poquello 11 June 2016 20: 50
                    +1
                    Quote: Vadim237
                    F 35 still flies, this plane has problems only with BERO, as it is too tricked out.

                    when they will be heard, then I will believe, but now nothing is heard except their problems
        3. aikon1974
          aikon1974 12 June 2016 19: 07
          0
          Oooh How terrible she is.
      2. weksha50
        weksha50 11 June 2016 11: 25
        +6
        Quote: Amurets
        Will the Yankees buy licenses?



        But this little article surprised me, especially, in particular, about Kalash and SVD ...

        They have been producing them for a long time and selling them in private stores without any licenses (I can’t say anything for the quality of this weapon) ... There, the Kalashnikov concern tried to achieve something, but, it seems to me, to no avail ...

        So I don’t understand where the problem came from ...

        PS It would be possible to make much more claims against China regarding the copying of our modern types of weapons, but there are no sound effects ...
        1. avg
          avg 11 June 2016 11: 37
          +22
          ... this initiative "will allow the US government to better control the production and distribution of such weapons."

          I immediately recognize the world's most honest merchants, guardians of the principles of the WTO and fighters against piracy.
          We need not complex, but absolutely officially replicate the necessary equipment, comp. programs, films and away.
        2. avt
          avt 11 June 2016 11: 53
          +2
          Quote: weksha50
          So I don’t understand where the problem came from ...

          They don’t want to buy for their own, they need full-time weapons in the form of Kalash and SVD.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 11 June 2016 13: 30
            +5
            Quote: avt
            They don’t want to buy for their own, they need full-time weapons in the form of Kalash and SVD.

            We decided not to reinvent the wheel, but stupidly produce ours ... maybe they expect to modernize our same AK and SVD, having received a qualitatively improved serial model of weapons without high research costs. on your shoulders "we will use your developments.
            Economists, damn it (through yat).
            1. Andrey K
              Andrey K 11 June 2016 16: 11
              +9
              Quote: NEXUS
              You there are Russians puff, develop new, and we "on your shoulders" will use your developments.
              Economists, damn it (through yat).

              Already launched a modernized AK Alfa, for the civilian market, from the arms company Kalashnikov USA negative
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 11 June 2016 17: 18
                +1
                Quote: Andrey K
                Already launched a modernized AK Alfa, for the civilian market, from the arms company Kalashnikov USA

                It looks elegant ... but at cost what is this product of the American pirate defense industry?
                1. poquello
                  poquello 11 June 2016 18: 24
                  0
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  Quote: Andrey K
                  Already launched a modernized AK Alfa, for the civilian market, from the arms company Kalashnikov USA

                  It looks smart ...

                  look at him? weaving in the hands is good, but this xs
                2. Andrey K
                  Andrey K 11 June 2016 19: 39
                  +5
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  It looks elegant ... but at cost what is this product of the American pirate defense industry?

                  My friend honestly say HZ, there is generally a wild mutnyak with the brand, with the organization of this particular production. Kalashi in the states were so produced, in small batches, with their markups, but produced. According to AK Alfa, silence, although it was spotlighted in January, at the Shot Show 2016 request
        3. Amurets
          Amurets 11 June 2016 13: 36
          +7
          Quote: weksha50
          So I don’t understand where the problem came from ..

          Most likely, there is not enough native Soviet, in NATO warehouses, only for its own special forces. Commercial, expensive because it is of high quality. And for Papuans and ape-like cheap fakes are suitable, besides, they can be stamped out of the "boil". Only in this way I see the problem, since we are talking about mass production. Our cartridges are also produced all over the world.
          1. poquello
            poquello 11 June 2016 13: 59
            +3
            Quote: Amurets
            Quote: weksha50
            So I don’t understand where the problem came from ..

            Most likely, there is not enough native Soviet, in NATO warehouses, only for its own special forces. Commercial, expensive because it is of high quality. And for Papuans and ape-like cheap fakes are suitable, besides, they can be stamped out of the "boil". Only in this way I see the problem, since we are talking about mass production. Our cartridges are also produced all over the world.

            most likely there aren’t enough Bulgarian etc. for friends and anonymity of supplies is needed, plus friends don’t really like to fight with their magic super-super rifles
          2. Red_Hamer
            Red_Hamer 11 June 2016 14: 23
            +2
            Well, I don’t know anything like that. They are already churning out RPG-7s, and their warriors are learning to use it. And I immediately remember all our closest "friends" from north to south (from the Baltic to the Black Sea) along the western borders. Whose population is accustomed to use, for the most part, just such a weapon. It's not that simple. Although what you have noticed is also relevant about stamping. A good bourgeois, must be able to pursue several goals at once, it is such a benefit.
            1. Amurets
              Amurets 11 June 2016 14: 52
              +2
              Quote: Red_Hamer
              Well, I don’t know everything like that. RPG-7 they are already stamping in full, and their warriors are learning to use it

              For themselves, the Yankees have long been producing our weapons in small batches. For market sales and for special forces and training centers. But there are not many weapons there. The price is not critical there. Another thing is when there is mass production, when every overpaid cent for production, the finished product brings a shortfall in profit in dollars.
            2. Andrey K
              Andrey K 11 June 2016 15: 36
              +7
              Quote: Red_Hamer
              Well, I don’t know everything like that. RPG-7 they are already stamping in full, and their warriors are learning to use it.

              They not only learnfool
              This is such an "exceptional nation" that they manage to teach those who have the same RPG-7, has been in service since 1961 request
              Idiocy and overwhelming conceit wassat
            3. NDR-791
              NDR-791 11 June 2016 15: 47
              -1
              all our closest "friends" from north to south (from the Baltic to the Black Sea) along the western borders. Whose population is accustomed to use, for the most part, just such a weapon. It's not that simple. Although what you noticed is also relevant about stamping
              I think this is a very important point. China will not put anything into the tribalty, but for our garden THEIR "wunderwafli" is both expensive and not reliable! Well, about stamping - which of such cool commerce as the Yankees will give cattle an expensive disposable toy. So everything is in color.
      3. razmik72
        razmik72 11 June 2016 11: 41
        0
        Quote: Amurets
        Quote: Dmitry Potapov
        Albright in the know? B .... old!

        And, will Yankees buy licenses? Or will Albright be in kind?

        I wish you have a good time with this lady wassat in years. smile .
      4. dmitriyruss
        dmitriyruss 11 June 2016 11: 46
        +2
        What ..... license, the States are preparing for war. Our weapons need special operations forces to work on our territory ....
        1. Hon
          Hon 11 June 2016 12: 16
          +3
          For special operations, mass production may not be necessary; they need to arm partners
          1. dmitriyruss
            dmitriyruss 11 June 2016 12: 18
            0
            And where in the article is it about mass production?
            1. Hon
              Hon 11 June 2016 13: 08
              +2
              And they have been producing small batches for a long time.
        2. Amurets
          Amurets 11 June 2016 13: 51
          +1
          Quote: dmitriyruss
          What ..... license, the States are preparing for war. Our weapons need special operations forces to work on our territory ....

          Quote: Hon
          For special operations, mass production may not be necessary; they need to arm partners

          But correctly noted about mass production. For its special forces, NATO has weapons of our production. They got stocks of weapons from warehouses of the Warsaw Pact countries, in extreme cases, you can buy from the American company Kalashnikov with cyanide barrels and high-quality steel assemblies, according to the statement But the price immediately jumps up sharply. And here you can cash in on cheap fakes, and even declare our weapons bad.
        3. Bayonet
          Bayonet 11 June 2016 20: 07
          0
          Quote: dmitriyruss
          Our weapons need special operations forces to work on our territory ....

          Well, if you admit that the Americans will "work on our territory," then maybe we can arrange the production of NATO small arms for our future guerrillas? So that there were no problems with ammunition. laughing
      5. Hon
        Hon 11 June 2016 12: 14
        +3
        What for? Patents have long expired, AK is stamped by everyone
      6. Pimply
        Pimply 11 June 2016 12: 54
        +4
        Quote: Amurets
        And, will Yankees buy licenses? Or will Albright be in kind?

        What is the license for? For expired patents? And in the course that on the same AK hundredth series, now only new nodes and solutions are patented?
      7. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 11 June 2016 13: 56
        0
        Quote: Amurets
        Will Albright in kind be calculated?

        Are you ready to take it? belay
      8. iConst
        iConst 11 June 2016 14: 53
        0
        Quote: Amurets
        Will the Yankees buy licenses?

        There is a feverish search for a penny's earnings, while at the same time competing with Russia, plus the recognition that the price / quality ratio of Russian weapons is unrivaled.

        I read a note by A. Rogers about the fact that the Yankees are in a hurry in anticipation of the crippling priests. I have the same nonsense ... smile
    2. meriem1
      meriem1 11 June 2016 11: 10
      +15
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      Albright in the know? B .... old!

      There is a separate story about her. She forgot how the Serbs saved her little Jewish girl from the Nazis ... The debt payment was impressive ((((
    3. Juborg
      Juborg 11 June 2016 11: 16
      0
      Global thieves said the US will do or vice versa. The point is not changing.
  2. Barakuda
    Barakuda 11 June 2016 11: 07
    +1
    But what about the sanctions request As far as I understand, we are talking only about ammunition. The article is nonsense somehow. Or already "Igilovtsev" are running out of ..
    1. Berkut24
      Berkut24 11 June 2016 16: 15
      +3
      The newspaper clarifies that under the "non-standard" weapons should be understood as "AK assault rifle, SVD sniper rifle, Russian medium and large caliber machine guns.

      Dolbyotyatly! According to the statistics of use, all of the above is the most standard weapon in the world!
  3. meriem1
    meriem1 11 June 2016 11: 07
    +4
    The vaunted NATO standard hit the wall. Immediately I remembered the screeching of the minority of the Russian society ... about "backward" technologies! What people who think in Russian have come up with is hard to beat. You can't fly into space on an iPhone ... To be continued !!!
    1. sgazeev
      sgazeev 11 June 2016 11: 25
      +3
      Quote: meriem1
      The vaunted NATO standard hit the wall. Immediately I remembered the screeching of the minority of the Russian society ... about "backward" technologies! What people who think in Russian have come up with is hard to beat. You can't fly into space on an iPhone ... To be continued !!!

      It looks like the bottom sections of the former "allies" are empty. belay
    2. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 12: 21
      +2
      In Iraq, Afghanistan and others, there are no NATO standards, they have the most common ammunition 7,62x39 and 7,62x54, and they need weapons for them. NATO standards are necessary for unification, so that every country has weapons for a single ammunition, this simplifies the supply and reduces the cost of production.
      Therefore, tanks and cannons for one type of ammunition
      1. poquello
        poquello 11 June 2016 14: 15
        -1
        Quote: Hon
        In Iraq, Afghanistan and others, there are no NATO standards, they have the most common ammunition 7,62x39 and 7,62x54, and they need weapons for them.

        that's interesting, just in Afghanistan, we ran into a rake with a reduced, with a shifted center of gravity, spirits stupidly saved the bushes, everything flew past to tears
        1. Hon
          Hon 11 June 2016 15: 09
          +1
          In Afghanistan, after all, the junges are continuous
          1. poquello
            poquello 11 June 2016 15: 53
            0
            Quote: Hon
            In Afghanistan, after all, the junges are continuous

            - "The lieutenant is a butterfly!"
            1. Hon
              Hon 11 June 2016 17: 40
              +1
              You yourself saw the photo you posted? Rare bushes are certainly a serious obstacle. wassat
              1. poquello
                poquello 11 June 2016 18: 14
                +1
                Quote: Hon
                You yourself saw the photo you posted? Rare bushes are certainly a serious obstacle. wassat

                Have you read my post? from the bush everything is past
                1. Hon
                  Hon 11 June 2016 23: 24
                  0
                  Yes, Neger is not past there, in Chechnya, fights in the green took place more than once, and most of the machine guns in our troops were 5.45, by the way, the militants also used them. Bushes affect accuracy, but not so much as to consider them as a serious obstacle. There are more urban legends, cham reality
                  1. poquello
                    poquello 11 June 2016 23: 45
                    0
                    Quote: Hon
                    Yes, Neger is not past there, in Chechnya, fights in the green took place more than once, and most of the machine guns in our troops were 5.45, by the way, the militants also used them. Bushes affect accuracy, but not so much as to consider them as a serious obstacle. There are more urban legends, cham reality

                    I believe that the balance of the bullet was changed to Chechnya, so as not to tumble so much
                    1. Hon
                      Hon 12 June 2016 18: 50
                      0
                      What is the balance of the bullet ??? What nonsense ???
        2. novobranets
          novobranets 12 June 2016 06: 21
          0
          Quote: poquello
          reduced rake with a shifted center of gravity

          This is all a myth. There is no "shifted center of gravity" in the world. Ballistics objects to this notion.
  4. Tusv
    Tusv 11 June 2016 11: 07
    +4
    You remember that. You have to pay for a license
    1. CORNET
      CORNET 11 June 2016 11: 37
      +2
      Quote: Tusv
      You remember that. You have to pay for a license

      Will have to pick it up again ...))))
      Russia, although a "generous soul", but everything has a limit ... hi
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 11 June 2016 12: 01
        0
        Quote: CORNET
        Russia, although a "generous soul", has a limit to everything ..

        Churchill is right! The Russian generous soul has its monetization when they spit on it hi
      2. Hon
        Hon 11 June 2016 12: 23
        +2
        What exactly are you going to pick up?
  5. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 11 June 2016 11: 08
    +4
    It can be seen that those to whom American aid is addressed (ISIS, the "democratic opposition") are unhappy with the weapons provided. Give them ours ... Here they are spinning what
  6. figwam
    figwam 11 June 2016 11: 11
    0
    That engines for missiles, now weapons, these are our developments, but they will not crack?
  7. Donlomakin
    Donlomakin 11 June 2016 11: 12
    0
    The newspaper clarifies that “non-standard” weapons should be understood as “an AK assault rifle, SVD sniper rifle, Russian medium and large caliber machine guns, as well as 14,5 mm caliber aircraft.”
    They plan to abandon the purchase of Russian rocket engines, and then they want to produce our weapons. Where is the logic? belay
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 11 June 2016 11: 23
      0
      Quote: Donlomakin
      They plan to abandon the purchase of Russian rocket engines

      - the news "sour" slightly: yes

      Quote: http://ria.ru/science/20160611/1445752871.html#ixzz4BFl0EWhS
      MOSCOW, Jun 11 - RIA News. US Senate reaches agreement on continued procurement of Russian rocket engines RD-180Senator Richard Shelby told Sputnik.
      "We have agreed on this issue. The deal (for purchases - ed.) Until 2022 and 18 rocket engines," Shelby said
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 11 June 2016 19: 55
        0
        18 rocket engines in 6 years - that's not enough.
    2. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 12: 24
      0
      The logic is that engines are bought from Russia and weapons will be produced at home
  8. Coconut
    Coconut 11 June 2016 11: 15
    0
    Quote: figvam
    That engines for rockets, now weapons, but does not crack crack?

    mattresses will not crack they have it stretching like your avatar lol
  9. APASUS
    APASUS 11 June 2016 11: 15
    +2
    I don’t know how much money we spent on an operation in Syria, and I don’t think we will know the exact data, but the consequences will probably last more than one year. If even the Americans recognized the excellent fighting qualities of our small arms, this is something new.
    1. weksha50
      weksha50 11 June 2016 11: 28
      +2
      Quote: APASUS
      Even if the Americans recognized the excellent combat qualities of our small arms, this is something new.



      Nothing new ... Among ordinary US citizens, the opinion about our Kalash and SVD has long been rather high ... In private stores, this weapon does not staleIt is produced by individual Amer companies, naturally, without licenses and not huge industrial parties on an army scale ...
    2. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 12: 26
      0
      They admitted the 7,62x39 cartridge, it is widespread everywhere, so it's cheaper to supply "friends"
      The operation in Syria was carried out by bombs and missiles, and they plan to produce small arms
  10. Altona
    Altona 11 June 2016 11: 18
    +1
    I can only say one thing - this weapon will be very expensive, several times more expensive than the original and at the same time not being the original. So commercial success is more than doubtful. In the USA, the Kalashnikov assault rifle is still being produced after our concern was rudely pushed out by "sanctions". As for the Russian and especially Soviet samples, if they are older than 1986, then they can not be registered and generally collected in their collection as an antic gun, well, like a flintlock gun of 1812, for example. So the fig knows whether this "business model" will go or not. Moreover, the Bulgarian "brothers" from Arsenal make replicas, the Serbian Zastava, the Czechs Zbroevka, the Romanians, the Chinese. what
    1. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 12: 27
      0
      This is why it must be expensive? In Russia, production is very expensive.
      1. Altona
        Altona 11 June 2016 14: 46
        0
        Quote: Hon
        This is why it must be expensive? In Russia, production is very expensive.

        -----------------------
        So they will be anyway more expensive. They are now assembling their Kalashnikovs from Bulgarian arsenal components.
        1. Hon
          Hon 11 June 2016 15: 10
          +1
          Why should it be expensive? They are able to organize production with minimal cost, taking into account high quality.
          1. lukke
            lukke 11 June 2016 17: 45
            0
            Why should it be expensive? They are able to organize production with minimal cost.
            and the Americans know how to equip their weapons with their sixes in a voluntary-forced manner. So from this we do not benefit from any.
            1. Hon
              Hon 11 June 2016 23: 26
              0
              India has signed a contract for the purchase of US attack helicopters. India is the sixth USA?
  11. aszzz888
    aszzz888 11 June 2016 11: 18
    0
    Why would Mackayushka say so? Or will his heartburn end? laughing
  12. mamont5
    mamont5 11 June 2016 11: 31
    +1
    Quote: Amurets
    And, will Yankees buy licenses? Or will Albright be in kind?

    What is the license? For a long time all the deadlines have passed.
  13. sgazeev
    sgazeev 11 June 2016 11: 33
    +1
    Kalash looks simple, they still have to work hard to find the manufacturing nuances. Romanians with Bulgarians make outright rubbish.
    1. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 12: 29
      0
      The most common AKs are made in China and not in Russia, and they are not inferior in quality
  14. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 11 June 2016 11: 35
    +2
    Americans have long respected the Kalashnikov. But here is the problem with the "allies". They do not want to shoot from the M16. Give them Kalashnikov, RPG-7 and RPK. But considerations of conscience and the rights of striped ears NEVER stopped. "This is business, baby"! That's the whole answer. And what else does the hegemon need 10 AUG for? And hundreds of military bases around the world? It is in order to resolve any issues ONLY in their favor. And if the rules of the game (through an oversight or circumstance) lead to a loss, to hell with the rules! And it doesn't matter that they were introduced by them ... Who introduced the WTO? How do economic sanctions correlate with it? Etc.
    1. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 12: 29
      0
      Cartridges for M16 in many regions are scarce
  15. oldzek
    oldzek 11 June 2016 11: 36
    0
    and maybe not for the Allies, but for themselves. I remember even during the Vietnam War, the Americans preferred the AK-47 to their M-14 and M-16 in the hope of trophy ammunition. This was written in their press.
    1. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 12: 31
      0
      And they got a bullet from their own, because in the jungle the shooting is often to the sound. And if somewhere near I plotted AK ...
  16. Smoke
    Smoke 11 June 2016 11: 37
    +9
    So it will reach the printing of rubles ...))
  17. Evil 55
    Evil 55 11 June 2016 11: 37
    0
    What about patent law and copyright infringement? Ping..dos want to "pile" on their cherished copyright laws?
    1. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 12: 31
      +1
      Dates are out
  18. Appraiser
    Appraiser 11 June 2016 11: 44
    0
    The Russian Federation should ban the United States, and if they disobey, apply sanctions to them ... soldier
    1. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 12: 32
      +2
      Which for example?
  19. behemot
    behemot 11 June 2016 11: 44
    -2
    about license fees do not forget, the Yankees are thieving.
  20. dmitriyruss
    dmitriyruss 11 June 2016 11: 48
    -1
    Another proof of preparations for war is the purchase of weapons of the alleged enemy. Their special forces will not be able to work on our territory with their weapons - ammunition .... where to get in the rear?
  21. shura7782
    shura7782 11 June 2016 11: 50
    0
    The Pentagon is exploring the possibility of production in the United States of Russian small arms
    This means that negotiations with Russia are possible. What's better? To give them the opportunity to do this for money or they will be riveted according to their understanding, without asking us.
    Of course, it is nice that the quality of our weapons is so highly rated. But I don't like this news.
  22. Ros 56
    Ros 56 11 June 2016 12: 00
    0
    Uh no. Exceptional should use only their own. Hey, the head is black, so how do you have it with exclusivity? What, everything is so exceptionally shitty with your M-16 and other crap. This is a zrad from zrad. And we won’t give you permission, but violate the law, we’ll bring it through the courts, and we’ll make such exceptional money.
  23. PBF
    PBF 11 June 2016 12: 13
    0
    Now in the US Army, a new puzzle. How to use a bayonet knife from AK to overcome a wire blockage. After all, wretched, or I’ll go crazy from thought or be crippled.
  24. Million
    Million 11 June 2016 12: 24
    0
    The U.S. state is a parasite on planet Earth. All evil from them
    1. dmitriyruss
      dmitriyruss 11 June 2016 12: 55
      0
      And the States are sincerely convinced that the problems of the "civilized" world are solely due to Russia
  25. 1536
    1536 11 June 2016 12: 31
    +2
    They want to organize large-scale provocations using fakes of our weapons in order to blame Russia for all their bloody crimes.
    I understand that patent protection will not work, will the theft of Americans be legalized? This is banditry at the state level, and the United States is a gang of gangs and nothing more.
  26. cap
    cap 11 June 2016 12: 47
    0
    “According to him,“ it is not yet known what the cost of “non-standard” weapons produced in the USA will be, and how affordable and high quality they will be. ”Nevertheless, it is clear that this initiative“ will allow the US government to better control the production and distribution of such weapons ” ...

    How are they doing with licenses today.
    Can anyone enlighten in the subject?
    I heard that only Venezuela legally licensed for AKM.
  27. akims
    akims 11 June 2016 13: 02
    0
    Another proof of preparations for war is the purchase of weapons of the alleged enemy. Their special forces will not be able to work on our territory with their weapons - ammunition .... where to get in the rear?


    They are going to produce analogues of the AK-47 caliber 7,62. I do not understand what kind of rear are you talking about?
    And about the production and modernization ...
    At the discovery they filmed a test series - "Guys with Cannons".
    Recommend. There they made a sniper rifle from Kalash. The purchase price of the old Kalash - 100 bucks. After upgrading without a sight - 1500 bucks.
  28. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 11 June 2016 13: 07
    0
    Quote: figvam
    That engines for missiles, now weapons, these are our developments, but they will not crack?

    and we will copy their computer technologies temporarily until we create normal ones, and not this ge.
    and the day will come when they will try to copy in this area too.
    1. iouris
      iouris 11 June 2016 13: 20
      0
      Let copy, catch up. We must not catch up with them, but run in the cross. There is no point arguing with Americans about patents and intellectual property protection.
  29. Disorder
    Disorder 11 June 2016 13: 30
    +1
    And in the photo - AK-47.
  30. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 11 June 2016 13: 48
    +2
    “We are exploring the potential and capabilities of American industry to assemble the types of weapons that many of our foreign partners use,” Allen said.
    They just don't learn anything. Why do they need it? Now we are talking about AK, SVD, as well as Russian heavy and light machine guns and 14,5 mm aircraft machine guns. At the same time, they are already releasing RPG-7 clones in full, and there is no question of a license at all. They prepare "friends of Russia" from the territories closest to it, since the majority of the local male population knows how to use just such samples. And they teach their fighters to the weapon of a potential "partner". At the same time, they will try to squeeze out this "partner" (Russia) from its traditional arms markets (where we supply such).
  31. grandfather
    grandfather 11 June 2016 14: 14
    +1
    I propose to study the possibility of producing in the right quantities, the dollar and the yuan
  32. erased
    erased 11 June 2016 14: 52
    0
    Nobody talks about patents, the Yankees don't give a damn, and ours pretend that nothing happened. But here it is full of lovers of neighing over obsolete SVD, AKM not boring, KPVT and NSV / Kord unnecessary and so on.
    If it is decided to pay pensions not to our veterans, but to Israeli ones, then who will say a word in defense of the copyrights of some Asians there?
  33. Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 11 June 2016 16: 02
    0
    “We are exploring the potential and capabilities of American industry to assemble the types of weapons that many of our foreign partners use,” Allen said.
    Interesting girls are dancing - in fact they gave out that Russia, in this case, was in their partners! Although, after the story with the RD-180, one should not be surprised. It is a pity that the state of foreign investment in the economy is deplorable and almost impossible to adequately impose retaliatory sanctions.
  34. hunt1
    hunt1 11 June 2016 16: 28
    0
    but for some reason I thought that the Yankees have been stamping them for a long time because everyone can be special and whoever doesn’t like it has no democracy or oil has found worse.
  35. semuil
    semuil 11 June 2016 17: 15
    0
    They want to move us into the market of their own weapons. And what quality this weapon will not matter, they can sell. To every tribe who cares what is the resource of the barrel, and if not to never mind, they will be told that they’re awesome, they won’t believe the Americans? .
  36. Jackking
    Jackking 11 June 2016 17: 58
    +1
    Can not be ! But what about the best in the world, practically requiring no cleaning (first steps in Vietnam), M16. This is an icon of democracy !!! :)))
    1. Hon
      Hon 11 June 2016 23: 27
      0
      With cartridges, the problem is in some regions, and 7,62x39 heaps.
  37. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 11 June 2016 18: 03
    +2
    This was requested by commandos who work as instructors in Iraq and Syria.
    Everyone has AKMs there, and they have M-. They must be trained in shooting, therefore they themselves must
    train in advance with the same weapons that their cadets will have.
    1. poquello
      poquello 11 June 2016 18: 27
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      This was requested by commandos who work as instructors in Iraq and Syria.
      Everyone has AKMs there, and they have M-. They must be trained in shooting, therefore they themselves must
      train in advance with the same weapons that their cadets will have.

      and why didn’t you find it? ))))
    2. Parsec
      Parsec 11 June 2016 20: 07
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Everyone has AKMs there, and they have M-. They must be trained in shooting, therefore they themselves must
      train in advance with the same weapons that their cadets will have.


      In these your Internet and you will not understand who is kidding, and who is a real stupid person.
  38. potapych
    potapych 12 June 2016 01: 00
    +1
    so it is necessary to fake their ammunition and sell it cheaper to interested countries. am
  39. Bayonet
    Bayonet 12 June 2016 06: 37
    0
    In the 1950s, licenses for the production of Kalashnikov rifles (AKs) were transferred to the USSR to eighteen countries, mainly allies under the Warsaw Treaty. Then another eleven states launched the production of AK without a license. The number of countries in which AK was produced without a license in small batches, and even more so artisanally, can not be counted. To date, according to Rosoboronexport, the licenses of all the countries that previously received them have already expired, however, production continues, since all possible patent protection periods for the original AK (creation year 1949) and AKM (1959) have expired. year of creation). The production of AK clones was launched in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Europe and the USA, both under the license of Izhmash OJSC and without it.
    That’s the whole argument. Why wave your hands? request
  40. erik cartman
    erik cartman 13 June 2016 08: 07
    0
    Quote: Amurets
    Quote: Dmitry Potapov
    Albright in the know? B .... old!

    And, will Yankees buy licenses? Or will Albright be in kind?

    Madame Clinton pays off in kind, and of course Psaki after the decree.