American attache was summoned to the Russian Defense Ministry for "debriefing"

135
The military attache at the American embassy was called on Monday to the Russian military department in connection with the incident with the reconnaissance aircraft RC-135 in the Far East near the Russian border, reports RIA News message of the Ministry of Defense.

American attache was summoned to the Russian Defense Ministry for "debriefing"


"A spokesman for the US Department of Defense indicated that 22 was detected by Russian air defense weapons in May, the US Air Force reconnaissance aircraft RC-135, which carried out aerial reconnaissance over the Sea of ​​Japan near the state border of the Russian Federation," the release said

It is noted that “The flight of the US Air Force created a danger of collision with civilian aircraft, since it was carried out with the transponder turned off and at the level of heights intended for regular civilian flights aviation».

In addition, "the crew did not inform the dispatching services of the region about the route," the press service added.

The ministry stressed the need to "take action by the American side to eliminate such situations when flying reconnaissance aircraft near the Russian borders."
135 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    24 May 2016 08: 23
    Feel the adversaries our borders and reaction. Intelligence is her mother.
    1. jjj
      +5
      24 May 2016 08: 33
      Another one is going to the bottom of the ocean
      1. +21
        24 May 2016 08: 35
        Tell me, do you want war so much? Or is war enough?
        I’ll answer right away: yes, minus mine.
        The answer to such actions can only be the polite smiles of our pilots at the side of the reconnaissance and off the coast of the United States, from that they have adrenaline in their blood, and a lot in their pants. And hope "to the bottom" ... no, no need
        1. -2
          24 May 2016 08: 58
          08.35. The best answer would be an accidental rocket launch at the scout's course. And then an apology from us. Oh! This is an accident! Our technique is so unreliable, so unreliable! You excuse us! And such insecurity every time the Americans approach. So what to do!? Our technology is not only not reliable but also very shy! Here the Americans are also very fearful people. After all, they are threatened by everything and they are moving NATO towards our borders out of fear. Well, we are also the same as the Americans and also very shy. Therefore, out of fear, after all, we can bring down some sort of plane similar to the American one! winked
          1. +5
            24 May 2016 09: 08
            34 region,
            but I just didn’t decide if I miss a bit (really a bit, within neutral waters) past the landfill in Kamchatka, then what will be more - pluses or minuses? Of course I would like, but the consequences are ambiguous.
            1. 0
              24 May 2016 10: 05
              09.08/XNUMX. I understand. But still. Why can't we shoot them down by accident? They bomb and planes shoot down accidentally and nothing. Well, maybe they will apologize, or maybe not. We can apologize too. You see, even rockets are falling here. And here you will not believe? Quite by accident flew out and hit. Well, do you understand us? Yes? After all, you also have many accidents. Is not it? Well, it will be possible for them to announce the entire list of their accidents. Or do you have to make standard moves?
              1. +4
                24 May 2016 10: 54
                Yes, fantasizing about this topic is damn nice. But it painfully resembles the habits of a gopota: he waved, and scratched the back of his head.
                So let's leave the "accidents" to the gopota, but we should have it as my hand-to-hand teacher once said: swinging - hit, but better hit without swing; the blow should be such that there would be no more troubles on the other side. Everything else is left to sports and the circus.
            2. 0
              24 May 2016 12: 06
              Quote: andranick
              if you miss a bit (really a bit, within neutral waters) past the landfill in Kamchatka, then what will be more - pluses or minuses?


              It depends on whom ... I mean - who has pros, who have minuses ...

              PS Only warhead plates fall on the landfill in Kamchatka ... Do you offer such a show ???
              1. +3
                24 May 2016 12: 31
                I do not offer (no, no), gloatingly dreaming. ;) And in dreams, and a blank is enough for a "miss", in no case otherwise, look for it later ...
            3. 0
              24 May 2016 22: 08
              What's the point? What is there in Alaska to miss there? All worthy goals for miss are not at all a bit near the Kura training ground.
          2. +16
            24 May 2016 09: 20
            It seems that again the divan troops intensified !!!
            Do you really think so, or just wanted to write something and did not know what?
            What rockets? Where to go?
            Provocation is the weapon of the Americans, and believe me, they do it not out of cowardice, and not out of cowardice they are moving their missile defense system towards our borders. The tactics are the same as those of Hitler: "Don't worry, we won't touch you, let's sign a non-aggression pact."
            And then, catch our rockets launched from the very borders !!!
            Maybe I didn’t catch the sarcasm in your comment, but UNDERSTANDING the enemy is silly!
            1. +2
              24 May 2016 10: 12
              Apostle! 09.20. Here Americans somehow do not bother with the principle of morality. Well, they bombed a hospital, a city, a wedding. They even shot down a plane (but it was like that). I'm not talking about Sushka brought down by the Turks. And about a passenger airliner shot down from an aircraft carrier. Even if you take a dryer. After all, the Americans were pointing at her. But it turned out, as it were, the Turks, and quite by accident.
          3. +2
            24 May 2016 10: 09
            Quote: 34 region
            Oh! This is an accident! Our technique is so unreliable, so unreliable!

            It's not gonna go. Praise to Raspletin. The banner of the best air defense system in the world must be carried proudly and not without ehidst: "You launched here in the Mediterranean Sea, but we were not warned. Ay, yay."
        2. +5
          24 May 2016 09: 00
          Quote: andranick
          The response to such actions can only be the polite smiles of our pilots on board the scout

          Our polite pilots really save them from death by a fierce. To fill up this birdie is the dream of any Pvoshnika
          1. +1
            24 May 2016 09: 19
            Yes you are right. And the other side also knows this, and will not provide opportunities. Korean Boeing is not yet forgotten. But to create a trick in a state (for example, under the guise of civilians).
            1. +3
              24 May 2016 09: 51
              Quote: andranick
              And the other side also knows this, and will not provide opportunities.

              The other side is well aware that a safe flight for the RC is 100 km from the border, but they are impudent to 70, and in this case, still hiding behind civilians.
              We need to carry out political information for regular pilots. Corpses from the refrigerator will not be rolled. Air defense troops are absolutely not polite. Six greetings will fly at a distance of 40 km from the three duty divisions (Schaz will be the Guardsmen waiting for the order from Moscow. It will leave). Well, to impress with demonstrations. Polite pilots sharply move away from the target being followed, immediately capture from three DCs
          2. +9
            24 May 2016 09: 54
            Quote: Tusv
            Our polite pilots really save them from death by a fierce. To fill up this birdie is the dream of any Pvoshnika

            And don't speak. He served in the RTV air defense, once the same krakozyabra flew in and let's cut circles, and she had 12 hours without refueling, and then another arrived. We didn’t sleep for a day and the flyers, too, flew out 10 times to intercept, so we need to lead ours too! In short, they zadolbali everything specifically and the desire was one "yes already knock him down someone" and give a shit on a vigorous war. While flying, at least sleep a little fellow
            1. +1
              24 May 2016 10: 44
              Quote: shuhartred
              and let's cut the circles, and she has 12 hours without refueling

              More than 10 it did not fly 12-14 it tr -1 Udvas. But just imagine how I love this one, when it flew all summer of 1988. Let's add that the station is heated up to 45 degrees
        3. +12
          24 May 2016 09: 15
          We demand to close the "Echo of Moscow"
          https://www.change.org/p/%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B5%D0%BC-%D0%B7%D0%B0
          %D0%BA%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%82%D1%8C-%D1%8D%D1%85%D0%BE-%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2
          %D1%8B-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5-%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82
          %D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8E?source_location=petitions_share_skip
          1. +3
            24 May 2016 09: 34
            Quote: Z.O.V.
            We demand to close the "Echo of Moscow"

            Although not at the box office, I specifically registered and voted to close this viper and no one could reproach what this totalitarian regime did.
            1. +1
              24 May 2016 10: 02
              Although not at the box office, but I specifically registered and voted
            2. +4
              24 May 2016 10: 04
              In my opinion, close the bottom. This infection performs its function by strengthening our immunity. Well, let's imagine, they closed it, and in 10-20 years, something similar will arise again, with its "fresh" thoughts. Forgot how the Union pro.rali. And what kind of revelations Solzhenitsyn poured on us then with his gulag. And all these liberte, egalite, bloody executioner from Gebni Beria, everything is allowed, which is not forbidden and that kind of crap.
            3. 0
              24 May 2016 10: 21
              Quote: Scoun
              Although not at the box office, I specifically registered and voted to close this viper

              And the meaning? Very useful nonsense
            4. 0
              24 May 2016 15: 41
              Quote: Scoun
              Quote: Z.O.V.
              We demand to close the "Echo of Moscow"

              Although not at the box office, I specifically registered and voted to close this viper and no one could reproach what this totalitarian regime did.

              Voted!
          2. 0
            24 May 2016 09: 51
            How does the earth carry them in general and who gave them the right to use the word "MOSCOW" in their names? the best in the Bermuda triangle ... the country will be cleaner.
            1. 0
              24 May 2016 12: 40
              Quote: masiya
              How the earth carries them in general and who gave them the right to use the word "MOSCOW" in their names

              Indeed, it is better to be called "ECHO WASHINGTON".
          3. +1
            24 May 2016 10: 13
            It’s not worth closing ... This menagerie should be known in person, and kept in public, they show themselves — so that they can not make mistakes with their imagination, know what real ghouls look like.
            1. 0
              24 May 2016 22: 19
              Do not close. That's for sure. But to force to rename - yes. Having pulled norms about the use of state symbols for dubious purposes.
          4. 0
            24 May 2016 10: 14
            What disgusting faces!
          5. The comment was deleted.
        4. 0
          24 May 2016 09: 43
          It would be nice to "intercept" them somehow far from the borders.
        5. +2
          24 May 2016 10: 29
          Yes, to hell with him with the attache and mattresses. Guys, 61 hit Kuzhugetych - this is a news occasion.
          Kuzhugetych, my congratulations and good wishes for health, well, all that should be attached to it.
        6. 0
          25 May 2016 15: 56
          I do not understand what the problem is. The fact that they called for analysis is understandable, but what is the problem? it was and will be. I have a good friend, having graduated from the Orenburg Flight School at one time, he flew an internship in Vladivostok in the early 90s. So they flew on the TU-95 across the Pacific Ocean to watch the lights of San Francisco from a distance of 20 miles, at the same time performing a combat mission. And they were always accompanied by the F-14 US coastal defense, and nothing. Simple practice. And Russian long-range aircraft in the North Sea and the Atlantic, always accompany (wanted to write intercept), NATO aircraft. See how many incidents there were in Soviet times. And nothing, everything is fine. It has always been so, they have flied and will fly, both ours and theirs. But to make sure that they wouldn’t find anything flying at our borders, this is the task of the army counterintelligence. Of course it is necessary to frighten them so that they do not relax.
        7. 0
          25 May 2016 17: 47
          just a little more and they will start to spit in our face, but "you want war" - wipe down further.
      2. +4
        24 May 2016 09: 18
        Quote: jjj
        Another one is going to the bottom of the ocean

        Nonsense! He did not violate the borders of Russia. Our planes do exactly the same with Americans at their borders, and wherever you can make Americans nervous. Nobody knocks anyone.
    2. +3
      24 May 2016 08: 33
      It is noted that "the flight of the US Air Force aircraft created a danger of collision with aircraft of civilian airlines, since it was carried out with the transponder turned off and at a height level intended for regular flights of civil aviation."



      They will say that they did not know this at best, and they will keep silent.
    3. +2
      24 May 2016 08: 46
      And what? After all, they can really drown a bird. And since it does not respond, then write off the destruction of the UFO. winked
      1. 0
        24 May 2016 09: 17
        Quote: siberalt
        And since it does not respond, then write off the destruction of the UFO.

        The responder is on or off, the report on the DCT is the same: "Does not respond to the request" - the transponders have the wrong system
      2. 0
        24 May 2016 10: 09
        UFO destruction

        So this can happen in life. Pilot with NOT excellent knowledge
        silhouettes of aircraft can easily make a mistake and not recognize-UFO
        After all, as the news first appeared - "UNKNOWN AIRCRAFT with four engines ..."
    4. 0
      24 May 2016 15: 43
      The main thing is that Russia has finally begun to officially respond to this, just as they are used to doing it.
    5. 0
      25 May 2016 17: 51
      Such sorties take place almost daily. In this case, several types of reconnaissance aircraft are used. To take telemetry during the launch of ballistic missiles on the initial launch path - one, on the middle - the other, for reconnaissance of air defense systems - the third, etc. So on this occasion, you should not waste emotions. His (this departure), unlike others, our leadership simply wanted to single out, just as NATO has lately been constantly highlighting some of the usual flights of our equipment. So gentlemen gentlemen.
  2. 0
    24 May 2016 08: 23
    This was already a blatant American provocation and it was necessary to put this insolent into place.
    1. +6
      24 May 2016 08: 43
      Quote: avvg
      it was necessary to put this insolent into place

      A duty officer to shoot the American attache to hell with dogs right in the building of the Ministry of Defense? Common practice: we fly - they express protests, they fly - we protest. Routine.
      1. +7
        24 May 2016 08: 51
        Quote: avvg
        This was already a blatant American provocation and it was necessary to put this insolent into place.

        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Quote: avvg
        it was necessary to put this insolent into place

        A duty officer to shoot the American attache to hell with dogs right in the building of the Ministry of Defense? Common practice: we fly - they express protests, they fly - we protest. Routine.


        The term dangerous driving introduced? videos removed? now and here ... laughing will outline its rules how spies should fly spies and bring to the atache of all countries ... laughing and warn that there will be covert patrols by our planes without flashing beacons and color marking of the body, and catching violators .. laughing Well, you can enter the confiscation of the vehicle .. laughing
    2. +3
      24 May 2016 09: 30
      Quote: avvg
      This was already a blatant American provocation and it was necessary to put this insolent into place.

      Well, what’s the conversation about? Well, this mattress scout flew near our border ... now our bombers and scouts at their borders also fly regularly now. And with the alliance it was, and it didn’t cause much excitement.
      1. +1
        24 May 2016 09: 58
        Quote: NEXUS
        Well, this mattress scout flew near our border ...

        This NATO intelligence is 2 times worse than the B-10. 10 hours flew and there is no Libya
        1. +3
          24 May 2016 10: 41
          Quote: Tusv
          Quote: NEXUS
          Well, this mattress scout flew near our border ...

          This NATO intelligence is 2 times worse than the B-10. 10 hours flew and there is no Libya


          because tomahawks usually fly after him ..
          1. +1
            24 May 2016 10: 56
            Quote: vorobey
            because tomahawks usually fly after him ..

            Worse - Harmas
          2. +2
            24 May 2016 11: 34
            Quote: vorobey
            because tomahawks usually fly after him ..

            No hysterics, dear. On their axes are our Caliber. And on their HAARP, there is Sura.
            Or was it otherwise under the USSR?
            1. 0
              24 May 2016 11: 52
              Quote: NEXUS
              No hysterics, dear. Their axes have our Caliber.

              Not this way. There are air defense on axes and charms. Is it nothing in vain that they close their eyes to unnatural sneakers? Caliber is a bonus
      2. +2
        24 May 2016 10: 30
        Quote: NEXUS
        What is the conversation about

        here the fact is that the scout flew at heights and directions intended for civil aviation, our dispatchers had to redirect two aircraft to other routes to "fly over".
        the transponder is off, which means a civilian plane will not see the scout.
        Nobody has blamed ours for this.
        1. +3
          24 May 2016 11: 29
          Quote: iwakura
          Nobody has blamed ours for this.

          Ours was accused of something else, but the essence of reconnaissance air war and muscle games does not change from this.
          The very reason for the existence of NATO is a confrontation with Russia, a priori. During the EBN, we didn’t threaten anyone and the country breathed in the air, but even then the mattresses moved their bases east breaking all treaties and agreements. What is surprising in this incident? Another round of confrontation, which is not surprising. To catch the hysteria of the master’s mattress and you don’t have to become like European tantrums.
  3. +6
    24 May 2016 08: 24
    This is where the "Unprofessional and unsafe" behavior of the pilots comes in. American.
  4. +5
    24 May 2016 08: 25
    usually intelligence does not fly in civilian echelons .. mattress covers are greyhound .. we should also fly near their borders ...
    1. +1
      24 May 2016 08: 31
      who puts all this cons?
      1. +2
        24 May 2016 08: 46
        Quote: alekc75
        who puts all this cons?

        American pilot probably ..)))) bully
  5. +3
    24 May 2016 08: 26
    Something similar to the country under the general name "baltika 3" was tried to show us, I wonder what will be the reaction of mattress mats?
  6. +5
    24 May 2016 08: 27
    "The department emphasized the need" for the American side to take measures to exclude such situations during flights of reconnaissance aircraft near the Russian borders "- it seems that these frostbitten ones are on the drum.
  7. +8
    24 May 2016 08: 29
    And that there were no fighter interceptors nearby?
    They could be so scared that the American crew would walk and stutter to death. It would be much more effective than attache to ride on the ears.
    1. +2
      24 May 2016 08: 48
      It seems to be "intercepted" by his MiG-31, but the Americans are somehow not about ...
      1. +3
        24 May 2016 10: 44
        Quote: KudrevKN
        It seems to be "intercepted" by his MiG-31, but the Americans are somehow not about ...


        if not about ... then he knew what he was doing and what he was doing ... he was ready in general ... but for us it was new ... I am sure our flyers will come up with something "unprofessional" but ... next time about ... in full ..
        1. 0
          24 May 2016 22: 29
          Get in front of the cockpit at a minimum distance in an "unsafe manner". To jet exhaust straight into the cockpit. Better yet, into the engine. Let the surge rejoice. Until he screamed on the air. To which to answer that turn on the transponder and name yourself. Or leave the civilian train immediately. And compulsorily escort. With a live rebuff to civilian liners.
  8. +4
    24 May 2016 08: 34
    nothing new at all, the US and Russia have been flying like this for decades hi
  9. +1
    24 May 2016 08: 46
    It is necessary to turn on the "Krasuha" next time - fell into the sea and fell! Maybe the aircraft has an "emergency" avionics and all electronics "by itself" turned off? From "malfunction" on board? It happens that the technique "breaks down"!
  10. +2
    24 May 2016 08: 47
    Quote: KudrevKN
    You need to turn on "Krasuha" next time


    good joke good
  11. +2
    24 May 2016 08: 54
    They responded correctly to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, politely poked their noses at their bowel movements.
  12. +1
    24 May 2016 09: 00
    Wars usually begin with the pulling of military attaches and diplomatic missions.
  13. +3
    24 May 2016 09: 07
    Quote: Volzhanin
    And that there were no fighter interceptors nearby?
    They could be so scared that the American crew would walk and stutter to death. It would be much more effective than attache to ride on the ears.

    Here, Here, this is what they are waiting for. In the civilian echelon, to start a game of catch-up with frogs, and God forbid, it would hurt by chance or it would be dangerous for us not to get close to a civilian ship. Honest water provocation.
    1. +1
      24 May 2016 09: 21
      Quote: avg-mgn
      Honest water provocation.


      Yes, what a provocation, the absolute daily activity of reconnaissance aircraft.
  14. +1
    24 May 2016 09: 13
    Quote: sana_59
    next time send an interceptor


    You, apparently, did not notice that he flew "... at the echelon of heights intended for regular flights of civil aviation." And in such cases even minimal risk is unacceptable. Under all other conditions, as you probably remember, very effective interceptions were carried out ...
  15. 0
    24 May 2016 09: 13
    Drain kerosene or latrine on top. So ours once did.
  16. 0
    24 May 2016 09: 16
    That's right, kittens are so accustomed to the toilet, with their noses in a puddle.
  17. 0
    24 May 2016 09: 19
    And why is such a reaction, let's say, inadequate? For the Pacific theater of operations - the situation is so ordinary, well, our duty forces have trained, I doubt that the Fleet reported - this is the level of the operational duty.
  18. -2
    24 May 2016 09: 20
    Su-35 with hibs to intercept and turn them off nafig, let them not be scared to write to them they fly in diapers. laughing
    1. 0
      24 May 2016 09: 45
      Quote: paxil
      let them not be scared to write to them, they fly in diapers.

      This is a comfortable civilian board, just stuffed with good avionics
  19. 0
    24 May 2016 09: 32
    How to fly to military aircraft so well nafig, as to civilians so please. Intelligence intelligence but conscience must have! as if they don’t know the flight schedule and the reconnaissance aircraft do not monitor civilian vessels in flight. Explicitly deliberately doing such maneuvers. If ours were so close to a civilian ship 100 pounds of screech would have been, and still would have imposed some sort of restrictions on flights.
    1. 0
      24 May 2016 10: 26
      Quote: iliya87
      reconnaissance aircraft are not monitored by civilian vessels in flight.

      Yes of course. Passenger 707 is already gone, so they are like a thorn on the radar
  20. +2
    24 May 2016 09: 38
    Why is everyone so excited? IMHO, nothing extraordinary has happened.
    The Foreign Ministry deliberately raised the noise so that the situation REMEMBERED. Now, as soon as, because of a puddle, another concern is expressed over the flight of our military aircraft without a transponder, this "concern" is dipped in their own feces ....
  21. +2
    24 May 2016 09: 44
    Tell me, Dear: "Edenichka" comes out of Avachi, 2 "moose" immediately sit on its tail, now, probably, "Virginia" too. There is nothing to scare them with. Option number 2: something came out of Vladivostok and reached the La Perouse Strait - you are guaranteed an Orion overhead (he, such a viper, can also shut down two engines) and a very soon visit of the destroyer. Why don't they raise a cry here? I mean that the Pacific Fleet is so and so at gunpoint.
  22. +1
    24 May 2016 09: 44
    If they cannot be brought down under international law, then some kind of fine can be slapped for this violation / creation of an emergency situation for civilian courts / is it possible? Or will they otmazhitsya - "I am not me, and the mare is not mine"?)))
    1. 0
      24 May 2016 09: 49
      Quote: Flame
      a fine to slap for this violation / creation of an emergency of civilian courts / is it possible? Or will they otmazhitsya - "I am not me, and the mare is not mine"?)))

      Omazyutsya. For the fleet there is MPPSS-72 (international rules for preventing collisions of ships). With regard to aviation, I do not remember this.
  23. 0
    24 May 2016 09: 51
    It is necessary for ours to meet with Chaykometami .. type: .... and this flock from the cell will explode, and here the RS as a sin .... But if it is interesting ... it is necessary to develop and determine the norms of action or opposition from NATO, such cases,. so that then everything was: he himself came. This can be confirmed by an experimental method, but the hope of common sense dies last.
  24. +1
    24 May 2016 09: 52
    Frozen completely, reminds 1941 before the war, Fritz also tested the border for strength, but we are scientists now, we will not allow - we will not forgive ...
    1. 0
      24 May 2016 10: 43
      masiya
      Frozen completely, reminds 1941 before the war, Fritz also tested the border for strength, but we are scientists now, we will not allow - we will not forgive ...

      By the way, the Americans there were testing for strength.
      Toward the end of the Second World War, the best Soviet asu had to give a flying lesson to the presumptuous “allies” twice.
      Kozhedub replenished his combat account with two American F-51 Mustang fighters, which mistakenly tried to attack him over Berlin, but were immediately shot down while repelling the attack.
      As Ivan Nikitovich Kozhedub himself said, on April 17, 1945, having met the "Flying Fortresses" of the allies in the air, he drove off a couple of "Messerschmitts" from them with a defensive burst, but a second later he was attacked by American cover fighters.

      We must remind the "allies" of the pages of history. Of course it is not necessary to shoot down. But you need to nightmare to the fullest.
    2. 0
      24 May 2016 14: 50
      Yes, yes, only then there weren’t any incidents, and then go and figure out who violated what, and even more so, knocked down, there was no one willing to disentangle.

      If it doesn’t reach, then the border is not visible from the air, and when you try to intercept you can fly into someone else’s airspace, which also happened.
  25. +1
    24 May 2016 10: 17
    Quote: masiya
    Frozen completely, reminds 1941 before the war, Fritz also tested the border for strength, but we are scientists now, we will not allow - we will not forgive ...

    Pathetic. True, the Americans have been engaged in aerial reconnaissance here for 60 years already. Here is the exchange of "bash for bash". They shot down our board AN-12 in 1953. We missed the Shootingstar strike on the Sukhaya Rechka airfield. 1950. The RB-29 reconnaissance strategist shot down over the island of Askold, 1952. In general, there are many cases, let the aviators write better.
  26. 0
    24 May 2016 10: 32
    Feeling .... bastards ....
    Shark also circles.
    In general, it is necessary in the face. After the Baltic, in order for our VKS not to do anything, they covered themselves with civilians. Well, and how do they differ from ISIS?
  27. +7
    24 May 2016 10: 37
    Many years ago, the stripes pulled the air defense of the Far East. We jerked when Osipovich dumped KAL007.
    Patience to the guys in the air defense, but it is necessary to crush these bastards, otherwise they will cut through completely.
    1. 0
      24 May 2016 10: 49
      Quote: Pete Mitchell
      Patience to the guys in the air defense,


      This is their daily service. It has been so since time immemorial hi
  28. 0
    24 May 2016 10: 38
    Quote: jjj
    Another one is going to the bottom of the ocean

    ..bottom .., well, if tokma joke manenko - turn on for a moment 21 for a few seconds the hibiny ...
    1. 0
      24 May 2016 10: 47
      Quote: ver_
      instant 21

      Yes, surround yourself. Where do you find such rarity here laughing
  29. +1
    24 May 2016 10: 44
    You can’t shoot down, but loudly and often to declare to the whole world about these incidents! At all levels and most importantly LOUD !!!
  30. +1
    24 May 2016 11: 29
    Quote: "it (the plane) was carried out with the transponder turned off and at the altitude level intended for regular civil aviation flights."
    The states are well aware that he will appear outside the zone of the echelon of civil aviation heights, our aircraft necessarily accompanied him until he left the zone of neutral waters! And a U.S. reconnaissance plane specially maneuvered in the echelon of civil aviation heights, that is, hid (covered) behind civilian airliners! If our Air Force flew up to him, it would be obsolete ... and then the stink would be in all the news!
    1. -1
      24 May 2016 15: 34
      Quote: sergey2017
      off transponder and at the level of heights intended for regular flights of civil aviation. "


      And, for, civil aviation? Well, if the board has a military designation, warning, control cannon line, at the rate. The second warning, on the course. The third is fire, to defeat.
  31. 0
    24 May 2016 13: 06
    This is trolling =). In our Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense they know how to pry "partners" for sensitive places and their own lard and their musals.
  32. 0
    24 May 2016 13: 09
    And they thought to hell. And an unidentified plane, like the "Flying Dutchman" or "Malaysian" flies in the sky, and threatens all the rest of the collision. And it's just Obama flies around his possessions on the full moon! But if "what", then our air defense has a good "aspen stake" in the form of S-300 and S-400.
  33. -1
    24 May 2016 14: 03
    Why are there notes to fart ?? He walks along one route, so as not to open the main air defense, plant it with an arrow. Get Tunguska out and let them have fun.
  34. -1
    24 May 2016 14: 46
    In recent years, our Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense have learned to masterfully troll; it is impossible to communicate with these stubborn in a different way.
  35. 0
    24 May 2016 15: 35
    It was necessary to bring him down, and not to call the attache. Insolently s completely.
    1. +2
      24 May 2016 16: 09
      And then write that the air conditioner is dirty and here is the result :)
      Amerdakos sure would not have disdained to create a catastrophe for a civilian ship. With them it will become.
  36. +1
    24 May 2016 17: 17
    Quote: A.Anatol
    Quote: andranick
    so go and do something
    Grandson suggests DYE THEM going in front
    let out not smoke, but paint and get used to
    paint in colors of the RUSSIAN FLAG


    Install terrible caliber paintball markers on the interceptors and paint the adversaries up and down!
    Grandfather for a smart grandson +++
  37. 0
    24 May 2016 22: 00
    There is a cold war going on .... A dangerous war ... Here, like in poker - who is bluffing, who actually has a couple of aces ... But the main thing is endurance. Gave slack, broke, nerves floated - write wasted. And no "sofa" bleating like - oh, we made a mistake, missed will not save. Fill up the enemy scout, and he will return an airliner with passengers. And calmly he will answer with the same words - and we were mistaken ... we missed ...
  38. Mih
    0
    24 May 2016 22: 47
    "The US Air Force reconnaissance aircraft RC-135, which carried out aerial reconnaissance over the Sea of ​​Japan near the state border of the Russian Federation," the release said.

    But the plane of the Russian Federation made a “barrel” and the amer pilots immediately began to change diapers - you can not scare American citizens, they may not have time to change their underwear on board the airplane. This is contrary to all geyropeyskim norms. This is not by the rules. The freedom to change diapers in mid-air is recorded in the Vienna Convention. In short - the Russian aggressor. Poor American pilots. laughing
  39. +2
    25 May 2016 02: 45
    Quote: 34 region
    09.08/XNUMX. I understand. But still. Why can't we shoot them down by accident? They bomb and planes shoot down accidentally and nothing. Well, maybe they will apologize, or maybe not. We can apologize too. You see, even rockets are falling here. And here you will not believe? Quite by accident flew out and hit. Well, do you understand us? Yes? After all, you also have many accidents. Is not it? Well, it will be possible for them to announce the entire list of their accidents. Or do you have to make standard moves?

    There is such a concept "I will not be like", and so, any trash has nothing to be like, you must have your own pride and your own strength. I hope you understood me correctly hi
    1. 0
      25 May 2016 06: 21
      You got it right. I agree.
    2. 0
      25 May 2016 10: 01
      That's right - you can’t shoot down! If Russia opens an account, then NATO will open it. They are waiting for this in order to pit us with a geyropa and Ukrainians, whom they will use as a battering ram! But Russia still has not resolved the Turkish-Syrian issue. And the Army did not rearm!
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. 0
    25 May 2016 09: 57
    It is necessary to take mirror measures - the link of missile carriers off the coast of Alaska!
  42. 0
    25 May 2016 12: 29
    It's time for our pilots to master the boarding technique! Fasten this American with anchors and put him on the ground so that they know where you don’t need to fly anymore !!!
  43. 0
    25 May 2016 12: 29
    and if there were problems on the civilian side, the Russians would be to blame! you can’t shoot down and so you can’t leave it - the dilemma however!
  44. 0
    25 May 2016 16: 03
    Quote: Rokossovsky
    Read what the consequences were for the USSR after the South Korean Boeing in 1984 year

    And you can from this moment in more detail!

    Simple in more detail. Reagan declared the USSR an evil empire. But that’s why it was a provocation, it didn’t work out once, it will work out in another. In my opinion, everything was done correctly, and it was necessary to shoot it down over Kamchatka. Nowadays, as then, getting lost in the air is simply not possible, especially since there are navigators, radars, and more than one radio station on board.
  45. 0
    25 May 2016 16: 14
    Quote: Winter Cherry
    Drain kerosene or latrine on top. So ours once did.

    You can see far from aviation. Kerosene can be drained, although there is no effect, but this is fuel. It is good if you are not far from the Native airfield. And as for the latrine, you must have beguiled the navy. There is no toilet on military aircraft, but an ordinary bucket attached, maybe they splashed through the porthole in flight?
  46. +1
    25 May 2016 17: 37
    The main thing done! They spotted, recorded, made public.
  47. 0
    26 May 2016 12: 22
    Maybe it's time to deploy a link of our scouts in Cuba and in the same way turn off the blood of an "exclusive" nation ..
  48. +1
    26 May 2016 19: 27
    Dear Sirs! In any case, one should keep a sober thought and iron logic. I don’t think the pilots were not ready for destruction. There were, and if such a command came in, I have no doubts about its implementation. Today I take off my hat to the leadership of the country and the army. rest assured that PUTIN and SHOYGU know exactly what they are doing. Done what is needed. No more and no less. Of course I would very much like to "bang", but apparently the time has not come.