Military Review

Airport "Komsomolsk-on-Amur" is preparing to sell at the price of a house in the suburbs

129
Against the background of the talk that Russia needs to develop a regional air transportation system, so that even the most remote corners of the country are involved in an efficient transport infrastructure, it was reported that Rosimushchestvo (the Federal Agency for State Property Management) decided to sell the airport Komsomolsk-on-Amur. The main idea of ​​those who decided that the state already has a lot of property is that, allegedly, after the full privatization of the air port in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, the efficiency of its use will increase manifold. Well, as usual, "efficiency is multiply increased" in our country after any other privatization of a strategically important object ...


It became known that every single share of the airport will be sold in one lot at auction. In this case, the auction will be held as if in the form of an open submission of proposals for the price of those applying for the purchase of an air port. Everything, they say, is open - come in and buy! ..

Previously, Rosimushchestvo experts estimated the cost of the airport and decided that this cost is 61 million rubles.

To be compared with anything, you can go to the website of ads for the sale of real estate in Russia. So, the cost of the airport in Komsomolsk-on-Amur in monetary terms almost completely coincides with the cost, for example, of a mansion house with a garage in the suburban village of Voshka. Do not think of a hidden advertising real estate in the suburbs - just, again, to compare categories ... Here is a house a few kilometers from Moscow costs almost as much as the airport, along with all its infrastructure in Komsomolsk-on-Amur .. .

Airport "Komsomolsk-on-Amur" is preparing to sell at the price of a house in the suburbs




No, of course, the price of an airport at an “open auction” can increase, only the practice of recent decades often shows that auctions are not as open as they are presented, and that the lot is more expensive than the initial amount is usually rarely sold. Although there are certainly exceptions.

Why did they decide to sell the airport to a private “efficient manager”? The fact is that “Rosimuschestvo” considered that the air harbor in Komsomolsk-on-Amur is unprofitable, and if that “effective manager” arrives, then of course everything will turn out like a fairy tale with a happy ending. The number of flights will increase by several times, the infrastructure will be transformed, the number of workplaces will increase, the salaries of personnel (and its about 140 people) higher.
The results of the audit of the airport from the Federal Property Management Agency: revenue for the 2014 year - 171, 4 million rubles. For 2015 year, about a third less. The net loss fluctuates at the level of 2,5-4,5 million rubles per year.

And it was precisely this net loss that seemed to the main ideologists of the privatization of the air harbor of the Far Eastern city enough to not try to change the logistics and attract investments to increase the efficiency of the airport, but simply to put it under the hammer. Apparently, today, according to the ideologists of the process, this is the easiest way out of the current situation.

In this regard, it should be noted that the Komsomol airport is not just a civilian airport. It is used by a state civilian operator together with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. And here is the Ministry of Defense? But the fact is that the airport is also a platform for basing military units aviation BBO. Khurba's dual-use aerodrome (the name of the object) was (was) for many years and could receive aircraft of various classes and types.

From the list of aircraft taken:
An (12, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 72, 74, 140) airplanes, Tu (154, 204, 214) airplanes, Yak (40, 42) airplanes, as well as IL-76, X-NUMX, X-NUMX, 737, 757, 100, 320, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX Boeing-XNUMX, Dry-Superjet-XNUMX, Airbus AXNUMX and others.

The airfield is capable of receiving all types of helicopters.

And now, the airfield, which is also used by the country's main defense department, can become a private shop in just 61 million rubles, because all previous management of this facility worked as if inefficiently. And although officially only the “civilian segment” (the building and infrastructure with the exception of the runway) goes under the hammer, the main problem is how can the civilian segment be clearly separated from the military in general at a dual-use airfield? Does it not turn out that the new manager (effective, “ess..esseno”) eventually decides to take over the segment that he does not belong to, and the Ministry of Defense will have to coordinate with this manager the takeoffs and landings of military aircraft. I am exaggerating, of course, but after all, everything has happened during the years of striving for the market. It also came to the fact that military airfields turned businessmen making money on the export of household waste into the object of desire ...

Persons fighting for the sale of the airport explain their opinion by saying that the air harbor is “almost inoperative”. Like, yes, from Komsomolsk "to the mainland" and airplanes no longer fly, and therefore it is necessary to immediately sell into private hands and generally be happy if someone buys. The logic is certainly entertaining. It turns out that finding a normal manager and changing the logistics of transport and passenger traffic, leaving at least 50% + 1 a share to the state, has suddenly become immeasurably more difficult than to just get rid of the air harbor. But after all, using such methods it is possible to bring any strategically important object to the handle (as was already the case in 90 and not only), and then declare that, they say, the state cannot cope - you need an “honest” private owner. Honest - it is, of course, good, only where are these honest private traders to take (at every business forum with lanterns they are looking for), when the majority of those who have “extra” tens of millions of rubles, hope for a momentary profit and spit on the word “ the acquisition will pay off in at least five years. ”
Author:
Photos used:
Avito, http://avia.pro, http://kms.ru
129 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ayujak
    Ayujak 19 May 2016 06: 20
    +39
    What nonsense ?! The Ministry of Defense should not leave it like that! What’s the benefit here? Especially 3-4 million rubles - a drop in the ocean. It is necessary to draw the property for wrecking.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 19 May 2016 06: 36
      +11
      Quote: AYUJAK
      e. It is necessary to draw the property for wrecking.

      Kicking the local administration with their feet. Horseradish piled on the Airport and here is the result.
      1. jjj
        jjj 19 May 2016 09: 41
        +7
        Most likely, the term "airport" in this case means the terminal building, platform, parking lot, checking account and seal. Fuel tanks and refueling infrastructure are separate. ATB base with hangars - separately. Air traffic control services - separately. WFP - separately. The military economy is separate.
        If this is true, then the sale of the station building and debts for the named amount is understandable. If for some reason everything is tied to one owner and put up for sale, then this is a crime
        1. Hon
          Hon 19 May 2016 09: 51
          +9
          Quote: jjj
          Most likely, the term "airport" in this case means the terminal building, platform, parking lot, checking account and seal. Fuel tanks and refueling infrastructure are separate. ATB base with hangars - separately. Air traffic control services - separately. WFP - separately. The military economy is separate.
          If this is true, then the sale of the station building and debts for the named amount is understandable. If for some reason everything is tied to one owner and put up for sale, then this is a crime


          The Federal Property Management Agency has approved the conditions for the privatization of 100% of the shares of Komsomolsk-on-Amur Airport JSC, according to the department's materials.

          Shares will be sold in a single lot at an auction with an open form of submission of bids on the price, the starting price is approved in the amount of 61 million rubles.
          It is not a building or some separate property that is for sale, but the Joint-stock company on whose balance it is located, and that’s all from a strip to clerical clips
          1. sherp2015
            sherp2015 19 May 2016 11: 05
            +6
            Quote: Hon
            The Federal Property Management Agency has approved the conditions for the privatization of 100% of the shares of Komsomolsk-on-Amur Airport JSC, according to the department's materials.

            Shares will be sold in a single lot at an auction with an open form of submission of bids on the price, the starting price is approved in the amount of 61 million rubles.
            It is not a building or some separate property that is for sale, but the Joint-stock company on whose balance it is located, and that’s all from a strip to clerical clips


            Who has the money?
            The Zionists. So they will buy up the remaining property.
            Quote: yahont
            Wool is necessary not only for luxury property, but also for some members of our government, the part that deals with economics and finance.

            They also rule in the government
            1. Hon
              Hon 19 May 2016 11: 16
              +1
              Here are the bastards, the Jews, have bred corruption to us. It’s strange when, under Nicholas I, the Jews didn’t seem to be observed in the government, but for some reason they stole.
              1. PHANTOM-AS
                PHANTOM-AS 19 May 2016 11: 19
                +7
                Quote: Hon
                It’s strange when, under Nicholas I, the Jews didn’t seem to be observed in the government, but for some reason they stole.

                Theft, bribery and embezzlement are a supranational phenomenon, although in some nations it is most pronounced.
                1. Hon
                  Hon 19 May 2016 11: 22
                  -1
                  Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                  Theft, bribery and embezzlement are a supranational phenomenon, although in some nations it is most pronounced.

                  I'm afraid that this nation is Russian
                  1. afdjhbn67
                    afdjhbn67 19 May 2016 12: 47
                    +4
                    Quote: Hon
                    I'm afraid that this nation is Russian

                    Golikova's report in the State Duma: 516,5 billion flew into the pipe

                    Like an illustration ..
                  2. skeptic
                    skeptic 19 May 2016 12: 48
                    +5
                    Quote: Hon
                    Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                    Theft, bribery and embezzlement are a supranational phenomenon, although in some nations it is most pronounced.


                    I'm afraid that this nation is Russian



                    Everything can be ... If we take as a basis that all of humanity came from the Russian Adam and Eve. wassat

                    But among the Jews, it still turns out cooler. laughing
                  3. PHANTOM-AS
                    PHANTOM-AS 19 May 2016 13: 13
                    +5
                    Quote: Hon
                    I'm afraid that this nation is Russian

                    and don’t be afraid, ur / odes are everywhere enough sad
                    1. Hon
                      Hon 19 May 2016 15: 27
                      +4
                      Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                      and don’t be afraid, ur / odes are everywhere enough

                      I don’t know for others, but theft and corruption have been flourishing for centuries, but for some reason the Jews are to blame
                  4. sherp2015
                    sherp2015 19 May 2016 14: 41
                    +2
                    Quote: Hon
                    I'm afraid that this nation is Russian


                    Yes, you hate my friend!
                    1. Hon
                      Hon 19 May 2016 15: 28
                      +1
                      Quote: sherp2015
                      Yes, you hate my friend!

                      I just don’t understand why there is always someone from the side to whom our vices are attributed.
            2. Kenneth
              Kenneth 19 May 2016 12: 45
              +2
              And where do they take in the Zionists?
              1. afdjhbn67
                afdjhbn67 19 May 2016 12: 48
                +2
                Quote: Kenneth
                And where do they take in the Zionists?

                To be in the synagogue?
                1. Kenneth
                  Kenneth 19 May 2016 13: 09
                  0
                  Do they give out money there too? After all, the Zionists have all the money.
              2. sherp2015
                sherp2015 19 May 2016 14: 42
                0
                Quote: Kenneth
                And where do they take in the Zionists?

                Yes, you have long been there)))
                1. Kenneth
                  Kenneth 19 May 2016 20: 29
                  +1
                  Well then, I went to buy an airport. And while you dance boots.
          2. jjj
            jjj 19 May 2016 16: 40
            +4
            Quote: Hon
            Shares will be sold in a single lot at an auction with an open form of submission of bids on the price, the starting price is approved in the amount of 61 million rubles.
            It is not a building or some separate property that is for sale, but the Joint-stock company on whose balance it is located, and that’s all from a strip to clerical clips

            This Joint Stock Company actually has nothing. Even the land is leased from the municipality. In fact, the airfield is a military one. This is enshrined in the Presidential Decree back in 2010. And the former Minister of Defense Serdyukov, by his order, banned the civil exploitation of the Khurba until the completion of all property registrations. However, the case was pushed by local officials. And permits were given to receive civil aircraft. But according to the documents owned by the AO, there is practically nothing - the company is simply an operator.
            There is one curious nuance in this little scheme. If the matter of actually legitimizing the seizure of MO property burns out, then the potential owner will demand payment from the Ministry of Defense for take-offs and landings of aircraft. And their number, according to the military, will only grow. And why, then, civilian air travel, when you can do nothing to stitch military coupons
            1. Hon
              Hon 19 May 2016 19: 25
              +1
              Quote: jjj
              Serdyukov by his order banned the civil exploitation of the Khurba until the completion of all property registrations.

              Serdyukov famous property specialist ...
              The airport, as well as the take-off, belongs to the Federal Property Management Agency, and the Moscow Region has the right of operational management. Hence there were many complaints from the MO to various authorities, including the investigating authorities. Complaints regarding privatization, in particular, the MO was only interested in takeoff. Since 2013, the epic has been going on with privatization and complaints, now it is approaching its logical end.
              1. jjj
                jjj 20 May 2016 19: 26
                0
                Quote: Hon
                The airport, as well as the take-off, belongs to the Federal Property Management Agency, and the Moscow Region has the right of operational management.

                You voice the position of Komsomolsk Airport OJSC. True, they themselves spoke about the platform and taxiing No. 2. But the land plots under them are owned by the municipality. The ownership of the main land plots was generally not regulated at all, and the JSC accused the military of not conducting a cadastre and not registering the land as property, therefore, from the position of the airport, the land belongs to them. Rosimushchestvo owns shares. And there is little real behind these papers
        2. NordUral
          NordUral 19 May 2016 12: 30
          +6
          Do not persuade yourself and us. For this amount, they will sell everything to their loved ones. Not only this airport, but the homeland for a long time, this riffraff sold and resold for a long time.
      2. Evgeniy667b
        Evgeniy667b 19 May 2016 12: 35
        +1
        Someone rolled his lip on a tidbit. But the Roskomimushchestvo those dealers, they want to tear a good jackpot. It is best to transfer the structure of the airport to the defense department in full !!! It’s high time to deal with the criminal business in the Far East, but so far the same famous people are in power — hardly = and what will change.
      3. The point
        The point 19 May 2016 16: 19
        0
        People's Deputy Pankov has repeatedly spoken about the resignation of Mayor Klimov. There was even a rally (http://www.dvnovosti.ru/komsomolsk/2016/04/02/48709/). It all ended with Pankov's "associates" shaking hands (http://www.dvnovosti.ru/komsomolsk/2016/04/03/48715/).
        Of course, the reason for the rally was not the sale of the Hurba airport at all. Just got the theft of bureaucrats. And nothing has changed. hi
    2. yahont
      yahont 19 May 2016 07: 52
      +17
      Wool is necessary not only for luxury property, but also for some members of our government, the part that deals with economics and finance.
      1. vladimirZ
        vladimirZ 19 May 2016 08: 51
        +29
        The current oligarchic state of Russia, which put at the forefront MINIMUM PROFIT, FINANCIAL REVENUE, completely forgot about the people, the strategic importance of this or that object. They don’t need anything, only MONEY, MONEY, MONEY.
        All are guided by the instructions of the head of Russia - President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin: "The private owner is more efficient than the state one". Everywhere and in everything. And this is WRONG.
        Well said about profit I.V. Stalin to the question asked him
        "How to understand the category of profit in the USSR?"
        Stalin answered like this:
        “We need a known profit. Without profit, we cannot form reserves, accumulate, provide defense tasks, or satisfy social needs.. Here it is clear that there is labor for oneself and labor for society.
        The word profit itself is very messed up. It would be nice to have some other concept. But which one? Maybe - net income. Behind the profit category, we are hiding completely different content. We do not have a spontaneous overflow of capital, there is no law of competition. We do not have the capitalist law of maximum profit, as well as average profit. But without profit, it is impossible to develop our economy.
        A minimum profit is sufficient for our enterprises, and sometimes they can work without profit at the expense of the profit of other enterprises. We distribute our funds ourselves.
        Under capitalism, only profitable enterprises can exist. We have very profitable, and unprofitable, and completely unprofitable enterprises. In the early years, our heavy industry made no profit, and then began to give. In the early years, her enterprises themselves needed funds. ”

        In a large state, such as Russia, the profitability of all enterprises, especially those operating in remote, northern, Siberian sparsely populated areas, socially needed enterprises, cannot be ensured. Their work is obviously unprofitable or completely unprofitable, but it is needed in the highest interests of the state.
        And the state is obliged to redistribute financial resources in favor of such enterprises, and not get rid of them as "not profitable", not needed by the state.
        With such a "state policy," Russia will soon shrink to the size of a Moscow principality, people are leaving the regions of the North, Siberia, and the Far East. Who will take them? Is it really the highest state power in FIG?
        Then why do people need such power, a power that does not care about people, the infrastructure of their living, health care, social conditions?
    3. Dam
      Dam 19 May 2016 08: 04
      -9
      In vain, the article is superficial and populist. Take-off is for the Moscow Region, and the buildings of the unused airport are currently being stupidly destroyed and budget money is being vacuum cleaned. In such a situation, it is better to sell them, indicating a specific intended use. Something like this
      1. Hon
        Hon 19 May 2016 09: 57
        +4
        Quote: Damm
        Take-off is for MO

        And who said that the takeoff belongs to the MO? It is not the building that is being sold, but 100% of the shares of Komsomolsk-on-Amur Airport JSC.
      2. Hon
        Hon 19 May 2016 10: 26
        +1
        http://www.aviaport.ru/digest/2013/06/07/256715.html
        a little background on the struggle of the Moscow Region with privatization
      3. PHANTOM-AS
        PHANTOM-AS 19 May 2016 10: 39
        +13
        The worst thing is that now speculators, hucksters and thimbles are in power, they don’t care what to sell warships, airfields or icons.
        In their opinion, "money has no smell," they just lost their shores and forgot, or maybe they did not know, that there is a "cobblestone - the weapon of the proletariat", and for especially "gifted" - ice axes.
        1. EvgNik
          EvgNik 19 May 2016 17: 20
          0
          Quote: PHANTOM-AS
          , and for especially "gifted" - ice axes.

          Good weapons - time tested. Apply more often now.
      4. sherp2015
        sherp2015 19 May 2016 11: 08
        +11
        Quote: Damm
        In vain, the article is superficial and populist. Take-off is for the Moscow Region, and the buildings of the unused airport are currently being stupidly destroyed and budget money is being vacuum cleaned. In such a situation, it is better to sell them, indicating a specific intended use. Something like this


        In our country, the entire industry in the country was bankrupt under such a scheme, devalued as collapsing and bought up by Deribaska Abramovich and other Kolman-Kalomoy
    4. Nikolay K
      Nikolay K 19 May 2016 08: 16
      +12
      then for nonsense ?! The Ministry of Defense should not leave it like that!

      What does the Ministry of Defense have to do with it, if it is a CIVIL airport? The object is clearly sold to the customer. Now the main players in this area are Deripaska, Vekselberg and Rotenberg. Apparently, it's not a pity to sell for "friends" and for that kind of money.
      1. jjj
        jjj 19 May 2016 09: 46
        +6
        Since Soviet times, runways at peripheral airports have belonged to the military and were built exclusively according to their preferences. Exactly the same airport "Talagi" in Arkhangelsk. And there was a case when a concrete strip was built in Leshukonskoye, where the squadron was based. The military looked and ordered the strip to be shifted with a deviation of the axis by several degrees. And they redid it. The airport is civil and the lane is military
        1. Hon
          Hon 19 May 2016 10: 24
          +8
          Quote: jjj
          Since Soviet times, runways at peripheral airports have belonged to the military and were built exclusively according to their preferences. Exactly the same airport "Talagi" in Arkhangelsk. And there was a case when a concrete strip was built in Leshukonskoye, where the squadron was based. The military looked and ordered the strip to be shifted with a deviation of the axis by several degrees. And they redid it. The airport is civil and the lane is military

          But figs to you. Since the thirteenth year, the Ministry of Defense has been fighting against privatization, and it’s precisely because the take-off for sale has been lined up, and the Ministry of Defense has only the right of operational management, which means the owner of the Russian Federation, and the property of the Russian Federation is registered with the Federal Property Management Agency, but all complaints are not satisfied
      2. PHANTOM-AS
        PHANTOM-AS 19 May 2016 11: 17
        +6
        Quote: Nikolai K
        ... Apparently, it's not a pity to sell for "friends" and for that kind of money.

        First, the money will be credit and most likely irrevocable.
        The second bank "Russia" has the same "friends" among its founders. This bank played its role in the depreciation of the ruble, thereby significantly replenishing its assets.
        And what for them all is only 1 lam raccoons, when the budget of a freelance football club will be more.
      3. Amurets
        Amurets 19 May 2016 11: 28
        +4
        Quote: Nikolai K

        And here is the Ministry of Defense, if it is a CIVIL airport?

        In those days when I served the first year in Khurba, the airfield was military, there were IL-28s. Civilians flew only on local airlines: Khabarovsk, P. Osipenko, it seems Shantara.
      4. alicante11
        alicante11 19 May 2016 13: 23
        +2
        The object is clearly sold to the customer. Now the main players in this area are Deripaska, Vekselberg and Rotenberg. Apparently, it's not a pity to sell for "friends" and for that kind of money.


        I am afraid that Khurba is not a very tasty morsel for the "friends". There are really few flights there, and for objective reasons. It takes more than an hour to get from the airport to the city by bus. Moreover, Komsomolsk itself with a population of 250 thousand. a person will not be able to create a large cargo and passenger traffic to the West. It is easier for Komsomol residents to take an intercity bus, which in 5-6 hours will deliver them to the Khabarovsk airport. So it will be cheaper, because the more flights, the less (not in proportion, but ...) airport taxes and less ticket prices. Actually, this is why the plane flew from there only to Moscow regularly, and even then only in the summer.
        For local airlines, the airport is not profitable for the same reason, far to get to the city. Too expensive goes beyond such inconvenience. Again, easier by bus or train. He even traveled by train on a business trip for a day. Youth in the morning came in the evening left. All day to resolve issues. As a matter of fact, therefore, the Khurba airport still remained in state ownership, which no one needed. So it’s not a fact that the auction will take place at all.
        Of course, you can bring as a counterexample a / p Elizovo. Also to Petropavlovsk get dipped. And the city of Petropavlovsk is not great. But ... there is no such an air harbor as Khabarovsk or Vladivostok. And there are no buses and trains, aviation is a monopolist. And the whole MVL of Kamchatka is linked to this airport.
      5. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 20 May 2016 07: 50
        0
        Quote: Nikolai K

        What does the Ministry of Defense have to do with it, if it is a CIVIL airport? The object is clearly sold to the customer. Now the main players in this area are Deripaska, Vekselberg and Rotenberg. Apparently, it's not a pity to sell for "friends" and for that kind of money.

        Yes, where do you come from fool Khurba military airfield! Sell ​​the airport! Are you able to distinguish this at all or not?
        1. Ugrumiy
          Ugrumiy 21 May 2016 05: 49
          0
          Yes, they are selling the airport and they plan to also withdraw the lands that are in municipal ownership under it. But on these lands there is just a runway, fuel-filling infrastructure, access roads, air traffic control services, etc.
          So it turns out that the office controlled by the municipality buys an airport for 60-70 million, and in addition receives almost the entire airfield along with its runway and then sends the military away, or pounds money from them for rent. By the way, the RF Ministry of Defense is going to reconstruct this strip for the ministry’s money, only the land is municipal, and there the guys will wait for the end of the reconstruction and bring it into the ownership of the airport. In this way, they will also receive a new lane, and they will not spend money on it, unlike the Russian Defense Ministry. As a result of such fraud, there was already a million for 200 million. The military has been suing the Komsomolsk administration and the Federal Property Management Agency for several years now and can’t do anything, but you all look through the pink glasses!
    5. Nitarius
      Nitarius 19 May 2016 09: 19
      +8
      Most likely they buy the same and sell! PURE WATER CONSENT ... officials should be TAKEN FOR THE BACK AND SIT FOR THE DRAIN OF IMPORTANT OBJECTS!
    6. Hon
      Hon 19 May 2016 09: 47
      -3
      Quote: AYUJAK
      What nonsense ?! The Ministry of Defense should not leave it like that! What’s the benefit here? Especially 3-4 million rubles - a drop in the ocean. It is necessary to draw the property for wrecking.

      And what about the Defense Ministry in general?
    7. sodick
      sodick 19 May 2016 11: 19
      0
      Yeah, it’s the Ministry of Defense that won’t leave it ... Tales are dreams.
    8. Gilev georgy
      Gilev georgy 19 May 2016 12: 18
      +1
      I always liked how people today continue to reason in the logic of socialism, such as - how is it that the airport is a useful, necessary object for people, and what’s the benefit?
      The Ministry of Defense should not ... need to be scribbled!
      Since the beginning of the 90s, no one owes anything to anyone, and no one will wool except you (whatever the names). There is nothing to profit from, it is above all. Provide 10%, and the capital agrees to any use, at 20% it becomes lively, at 50% it is positively ready to break its head, at 100% it violates all human laws, at 300% there isn’t a crime for which he would not dare, at least under pain of the gallows.
      Provide 10%, and the capital agrees to any use, at 20% it becomes lively, at 50% it is positively ready to break its head, at 100% it violates all human laws, at 300% there is no crime that he would not risk, at least under pain of the gallows.

      Until we put things in order, we can only wonder what kind of nonsense is happening.
    9. arnulla
      arnulla 19 May 2016 12: 39
      0
      We have a lot of people in power who need to be scratched. Moreover, for a long time. Only the wool themselves must also be wool ..)))
    10. ibirus
      ibirus 19 May 2016 18: 16
      0
      I agree, it is necessary to wet these pests, sit on the hump of the people and crap.
    11. Bergweiss
      Bergweiss 21 May 2016 07: 23
      0
      An excellent chance for the Ministry of Defense to buy an airport from the Russian Property Agency at the price of a house in the suburbs.
  2. Bongo
    Bongo 19 May 2016 06: 21
    +19
    The infrastructure of the civil airport in Khurba requires significant investments and for a "private trader" who dares to buy shares, they will become a "suitcase without a handle" - it's a pity to throw it away, but it's hard to carry. It is extremely doubtful that anyone other than the state will be able and willing to invest in a dilapidated airport near Komsomolsk. No. However, our state has other priorities - holding "image" events, building Yeltsin centers, pumping budget funds into American securities, distributing deliberately bad loans, etc. am
    Quote: AYUJAK
    What nonsense ?! The Ministry of Defense should not leave it like that! What’s the benefit here? Especially 3-4 million rubles - a drop in the ocean. It is necessary to draw the property for wrecking.

    The 277-th bap on Su-24М in Khurb will remain in any case, we are talking only about the elimination of passenger traffic.
    About the Khurba airdrome is more detailed here:
    Khurba airfield
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 19 May 2016 13: 44
      +1
      Hello, Sergey! I read your article about Khurba, I remembered my youth. This is not about that. I'm talking about the Yak-28. In 1969-1970, when the 60th IAP was retrained for the Su-15, to strengthen the air defense of Komsomolsk temporarily, from somewhere in the North, Yak-28s were thrown. It simply did not attach importance and deleted the link. Their main airfield was Dzemgi, but they also landed in Khurba a couple of times. This year the VO had memories of veterans of that northern regiment and it was mentioned how they were transferred to Dzemgi. http://topwar.ru/83563-istoriya-763-istrebitelnogo-aviacionnogo-pol
      ka.htm
      l Found 763 IAPs. This is a link to an article about this part. In 1971, when I went on a demobilization, I did not hear about Yaki. Yesterday evening I dropped a tip in a PM about Syrian air defense.
    2. Ugrumiy
      Ugrumiy 21 May 2016 05: 55
      0
      The President ordered the government to reconstruct Komsomolsk, including the planned allocation of large budgetary funds to put the airport in Khurb in order. But only after the sale this loot will go to a private owner, who as a result will not spend a dime on the reconstruction, and even rub the budget dough in his pocket.
  3. Amurets
    Amurets 19 May 2016 06: 22
    +8
    It will be the same as with the Zavitinsk airfield. That is, there will be no airport. Zavitinsk was a reserve for the Khabarovsk civil airport and received Ruslans with turbines for the Bureyskaya hydroelectric station. Http://wikimapia.org/6069644/en/%D0%90%D1%8D % D1% 80% D0% BE% D0% B4% D1% 80% D0% B
    E% d
    0%BC-%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA
  4. saper2463
    saper2463 19 May 2016 06: 24
    +8
    The Japanese will buy)?
    In 2014, the military already had problems with the civilian airport (Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk) during the exercises, when the military airfield could not cope with the airflow.
    An object used in conjunction with Moscow Region for sale? Sounds like a crime ...
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 19 May 2016 06: 37
      +1
      Quote: saper2463
      An object used in conjunction with Moscow Region for sale? Sounds like a crime ...

      Take-off for the military, it's about the Airport.
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 19 May 2016 06: 59
        0
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Take-off for the military, it's about the Airport.

        Is it like? Military take-off, and the control room separately? Container type?
        1. Nikolay K
          Nikolay K 19 May 2016 08: 19
          -4
          Dispatchers are not privatized with us. And all takeoffs belong to the state, at least in Domodedovo, at least in Krasnodar. Airport complex for sale.
        2. Hon
          Hon 19 May 2016 10: 38
          -4
          Quote: Amurets
          Is it like? Military take-off, and the control room separately? Container type?

          the military has the right of operational management, and ownership of the property
      2. Hon
        Hon 19 May 2016 09: 59
        -3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Take-off for the military, it's about the Airport.

        Who says it even belongs to the military?
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 20 May 2016 07: 48
          0
          Quote: Hon

          Who says it even belongs to the military?

          This is a military airfield !!!!!!!!!!!!!
          1. Ugrumiy
            Ugrumiy 21 May 2016 06: 04
            0
            This is a dual-use airfield! And if the regiment commander manages the flights, this does not mean at all that the property and land automatically also belong to the military!
      3. Ugrumiy
        Ugrumiy 21 May 2016 06: 01
        0
        Take-off is on the land, which, in turn, is owned by the municipality! Thus, the take-off actually belongs to the municipality, and not to the military. The plot can be transferred by the municipalities to private hands at any time, they are not transferring now, because they’ll repair the strip for their money, but then ...
  5. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 19 May 2016 06: 27
    +12
    the right way, comrades! Urya !!! ugh ...
  6. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 19 May 2016 06: 34
    +15
    Dear Komsomol members, for your convenience, we have canceled flights from Komsomolsk to Moscow. Now you can safely fly to Moscow from our beloved regional capital, the city of Khabarovsk, having traveled only 400 km.
    With respect to you, the Administration of Komsomolsk-on-Amur.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 19 May 2016 11: 14
      0
      Business then. In Altai, everyone goes to the airport to Barnaul or to Novosibirsk. And this is from 200 to 600 km. one way. All local airports have long been poached. The same is with passenger transportation by other means of transport. Taxiing is not much more expensive, but much faster.
    3. sodick
      sodick 19 May 2016 11: 21
      +2
      We also travel to Moscow for 400-600 km by plane
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. siberalt
        siberalt 19 May 2016 11: 29
        +3
        With the Far East it’s cheaper to fly to Moscow via China. But China does not trade oil laughing
  7. _umka_
    _umka_ 19 May 2016 07: 35
    +4
    The bureaucrats must be given hands, 51% of the state is right, and then it will be seen.
    1. wanderer_
      wanderer_ 19 May 2016 08: 07
      +5
      I agree, following the example of "Batka" it is necessary to do the same as in Belarus. If you want an airport, buy it, but the main block of shares belongs to the state. Then it will be the case, and again we will waste everything with cursed auctions. fool
  8. free
    free 19 May 2016 07: 47
    +1
    such must be hung on lampposts!
  9. kostolom
    kostolom 19 May 2016 07: 48
    +7
    I was just glad that the GDP itself drew attention to my City! He says it is necessary to make a "candy" out of him ... And here it is, I am now on a business trip, flew away from this airport, how it is now incomprehensible back ... by taxi or bus ((So the government took over the city, they raise ... to throw harder probably ..
    1. Nikolay K
      Nikolay K 19 May 2016 08: 26
      +4
      Since Putin said, then they will give the airport to the Rothenbergs. And they will already master budget money, they can. Congratulations to the residents of Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Once the Rotenbergs come to you, it means that budget money for the city will be allocated with a fool. You look, and you get something
      1. sherp2015
        sherp2015 19 May 2016 14: 47
        +1
        Quote: Nikolai K
        Once the Rotenbergs come to you, it means that budget money for the city will be allocated with a fool. You look, and you get something


        ))) Is there anything left after the Rottenbergs to the Russian people?
        You are a Kremlin dreamer however ...
  10. Slavin
    Slavin 19 May 2016 07: 48
    +12
    How did these rats get me, I'm going to vote for communists at all levels
    1. vladimirZ
      vladimirZ 19 May 2016 09: 29
      +7
      It is high time. The power of the oligarchs and corrupt officials of the liberal United Russia party, which works for the interests of the oligarchy, has gotten the whole people.
      The plans of the current government to increase the tax burden up to 20% on the income of individuals, transport, property taxes, raising the retirement age to 65 years for everyone (women until 63), limiting salaries and pensions, freezing them with a simultaneous increase in housing and communal services tariffs, immediately after State Duma elections are already being introduced into our lives.
      Enough to be silent and sit back at home on election days, you need to fight for your rights. Party of oligarchs and officials "United Russia" not a single vote!
      1. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K 19 May 2016 10: 48
        +7
        liberal party "United Russia"

        In fact, a liberal from the word freedom. Have you seen much freedom from United Russia lately? Ordinary crooks and thieves, always striving to crawl into power.
        1. vladimirZ
          vladimirZ 19 May 2016 11: 51
          +4
          In fact, a liberal from the word freedom ...
          - Nikolay K

          Well, if we argue that "liberal is freedom" and philosophize about it there will be no sense. Since there can never be complete freedom.
          The freedom of an individual, a narrow group of people should be limited by the rights of other citizens, society, the law, otherwise, as in Russia, this freedom will turn into the freedom of some to rob others, the freedom of individual swindlers, thieves, bandits to rob society, the state and people in the interests of a narrow group exploiters (it’s time to get used to the terms of Marxism of the period of the class struggle).
          We don’t need such freedom, but it is the LIBERAL "United Russia" that imposes such "freedom" on us, imposes on all the people, the state, pursuing a policy of the right of a strong, rich to own everything in Russia, including the people, mercilessly exploiting it mercilessly.
          1. vladimirZ
            vladimirZ 19 May 2016 13: 42
            +2
            I will add this, for example, says the leader of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation G.A. Zyuganov, about actions in politics and economics of ruling liberals.
            1. kirgudu
              kirgudu 19 May 2016 17: 59
              0
              Yes, this "communist" is from the same gang. They went to Navalny to fraternize ...
    2. goblin xnumx
      goblin xnumx 19 May 2016 21: 38
      0
      aaaaa :) - naive :)
  11. cccr51
    cccr51 19 May 2016 07: 52
    +4
    Dear comrade Volodin, please, the authors of the theft project in the studio, the country should know its ,, heroes ,,
    1. Nikolay K
      Nikolay K 19 May 2016 08: 28
      +7
      Authors of the Federal Property Management Agency. No wonder the newly appointed new leader. The former, you see, was in no hurry to comply with Medvedev’s instructions on the mass privatization of state assets.
  12. GUKTU
    GUKTU 19 May 2016 08: 11
    +4
    And now the question: "Is it as good in our country as it is shown on TV?" Officials need power only for one thing - enrichment !!! Normal leaders should be ashamed of the fact that helping the whole world, most of its citizens live below the poverty line and sheer poverty. We survived .... In order to collect the child for school, the parents take out a loan. SHAME AND SHAME you officials
    1. wanderer_
      wanderer_ 19 May 2016 08: 29
      0
      What the media broadcasts, oh, how far from the truth. I will not take the "mainland", only Crimea. Communicating with friends from all over Russia, sometimes I throw off information about Crimea, everyone unanimously says that they have never seen Crimea like this, so as the media show is completely drugoe.Flya all Russians, Crimea is just heaven on earth, and the truth is known only to the Crimeans about this "paradise".
  13. drop
    drop 19 May 2016 08: 15
    +13
    I was in charge of 6 GU MRP of the USSR, whose responsibility was "the commissioning of all airfields in the country, jointly with the USSR Ministry of Defense and the USSR MGA." Then only on the territory of the Russian Federation there were more than 1450 airfields. Currently, there are 254 civilians and 165 of the RF Ministry of Defense. Recently I published an essay "Letters from the Front" in "VO", where I gave information that out of the 40 airfields commissioned in the Murmansk region alone, about 10 remained. complete disgrace.
    I often happened to be in Komsomolsk on the Amur, also in my youth. He was the Chief Designer of the combat systems at SRI-33, it was necessary to take the aircraft at the aircraft factory. Even then, the city and the airport looked dismal. But this is a dual-use airfield, as well as in Ulyanovsk, for example. The owner of such objects should be the state or JSC with the state package. Then there will be order. I have the honor.
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 19 May 2016 12: 14
      +4
      Then there will be order. I have the honor. ,,
      You have it, but the government is not.
    2. tasha
      tasha 19 May 2016 13: 15
      0
      Imagine - you bought a car. There are two options - you drive yourself, or hire a special person who is instructed to monitor the car and carry you on various urgent matters.
      So the question is - in which case will the car last longer?
  14. Kamchatsky
    Kamchatsky 19 May 2016 08: 50
    +6
    The entire aviation structure does not tolerate anything other than government. Not a single "manager" from a private trader can cope with the tasks of managing, maintaining an air terminal complex, an airfield, etc. And the security? Yes, even to calculate the cost of heating the premises. Given that AVK is one company, fuels and lubricants are another, the band should be state-owned, but the traffic service is generally a different department! I consider it necessary to return to the USSR MGA system, where at least there was a centralized management of the industry. Aeroflot of the USSR in the late 70s was quite a profitable company.
    Sincerely.
    1. tasha
      tasha 19 May 2016 13: 18
      0
      And I would be glad to agree with you. Only where to get people to centrally manage the industry. What motivation mechanisms should employees have for a system to be reliable and efficient? There is still no answer to this question ... And this concerns not only air transportation, but basically everything ...
  15. Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. 19 May 2016 08: 50
    +13
    How tired of all this, in our country it is not power and government, but a bunch of stupid, mediocre, corrupt muda .... And all the talk of our first persons about a bright future comes down ultimately to only one, a bright future for a handful of people close to the body and sitting in the white house and the Kremlin. And the development prospects are simply not visible, these people are NOT ABLE to DEVELOP their inheritance to share and saw. Ugh is ashamed of the actions of this sharashkinoy office.
    1. Katman
      Katman 19 May 2016 12: 12
      +2
      Notice what the leaders of the state say when they show the meeting on TV? It is necessary to do so-and-so. Lord, who do they say this to, my dad is 86 years old pensioner, or am I 66 years old? If necessary, do it. You have both power and money. Lord, to whom am I saying this ....
  16. Damask
    Damask 19 May 2016 09: 00
    +6
    Well, yes, patriots in power, headed by the main patriotunum, are in power, they also care about the good of a great country
  17. 96423lom
    96423lom 19 May 2016 09: 34
    +4
    They give a hectare, but how to get to it? The Far East needs to be developed, not sold. The prosecutor's office should deal with such privatizers.
    1. wanderer_
      wanderer_ 19 May 2016 09: 57
      0
      I’m lucky, a whole hectare. I wanted a plot of several hundred square meters for the cottage, they didn’t give it, so there was a conservation zone around, only the mansions grow like mushrooms request
  18. Sanya Khabarovsk
    Sanya Khabarovsk 19 May 2016 10: 24
    +2
    Oh, Volodya. To write articles is not to turn over bags. Was it himself somewhere further than the Ring Road?
    I'm from Komsa. I’ll tell you a secret: a million in Moscow and a million in Komsomolsk, and even more so somewhere in the Kolyma, to put it mildly, completely different money. Then, if it’s so cheap - buy and enjoy the profits: from five flights a day. It’s deeply for people ... who is the owner - it is important that it works well. Something is not visible queue of buyers to buy for free. Balabolov in the letter pease is full, you all are indignant here, well, throw yourself in, put in your own dough, all the more very inexpensive, and go in for a high-margin business in the far east of Russia.
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 19 May 2016 12: 18
      +1
      invest your own dough, all the more very inexpensive, and engage in high-margin business in the far east of Russia. ,,
      Alexander, for this we have both the president and the government. They must be engaged in the development of both the country and the regions. And the journalist must cover what is being done or not being done.
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 19 May 2016 12: 27
        -3
        Quote: kotvov
        journalist should cover what is being done or not being done

        - the joke is that a similar article (well, just without comparison with the price of a "house in the village") was on April 15 of this year. on Interfax, for example .. and not only there (http://www.interfax.ru/business/503940)
        - there that article is ... it is such an article laughing
        - in this particular case - I would kill myself against the wall in the place of a journalist .. somehow
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 19 May 2016 15: 07
          0
          Minusanter (and indeed everyone) - explanation:

          - the text of the article is stripped from an Internet
          - nothing new has been introduced there
          - good, fit journalists don't do that laughing

          The result of checking the uniqueness of the text:
          1. wanderer_
            wanderer_ 19 May 2016 17: 53
            -2
            I see that you are familiar with editorial affairs, it’s hard to edit an article under a unique one, so a lot of copyright is laid out with minor changes. It’s not about who wrote the article and when, but rather that they sell mother to Russia slowly. And the Far East and Siberia are generally a sore subject .
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 19 May 2016 18: 26
              -2
              Quote: wanderer_
              I see you are familiar with editorial affairs

              - I ... umm ... I know a lot of things ... The bridge was once painted, railway, 220 meters long and 22 high, alone, for a month laughing ... eg laughing
              - with Plagiarism - there was a period when I tried to earn extra money by rewriting. There uniqueness is below 85% - just not a channel, yeah
              - on the link one floor above - an article on InterFax dated March 15 (!!!) this year, the content is practically 1: 1

              I understand yet?

              Quote: wanderer_
              The point is not who wrote the article and when, but that mother is being sold to Russia slowly.

              - You have already been answered above, I repeat:

              Quote: Sanya Khabarovsk
              Oh, Volodya. To write articles is not to turn over bags. Was it himself somewhere further than the Ring Road?
              I'm from Komsa. I’ll tell you a secret: a million in Moscow and a million in Komsomolsk, and even more so somewhere in the Kolyma, to put it mildly, completely different money. Then, if it’s so cheap - buy and enjoy the profits: from five flights a day. It’s deeply for people ... who is the owner - it is important that it works well. Something is not visible queue of buyers to buy for free. There are a lot of balabolov in the letter pease, you all are indignant here, well, take a break, put in your own dough, all the more very inexpensive, and go in for a high-margin business in the far east of Russia

              Hi Volodin, when you see each other wink
          2. Hon
            Hon 19 May 2016 19: 28
            -1
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            Minusanter (and indeed everyone) - explanation:

            - the text of the article is stripped from an Internet
            - nothing new has been introduced there
            - good, fit journalists don't do that

            The result of checking the uniqueness of the text:

            Journalists often reprint each other’s articles, there’s nothing wrong with that, normal practice for all media
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 19 May 2016 19: 52
              0
              Quote: Hon
              Journalists often reprint each other’s articles, there’s nothing wrong with that, normal practice for all media

              - yeah ... just do not put their signature under the article. And they put a link to the original.
              - or I missed something in this life
  19. Belousov
    Belousov 19 May 2016 10: 46
    +5
    It is impossible to make such remote airports cost-effective. Impossible !!! There is low passenger traffic, high costs. How can I increase profitability? It will not work to reduce costs, it remains to raise prices. As a result, the ticket will be simply unbearable, the airport is bent and closed, there are 3-4 dozens of major civil airports in the country + a hundred military, which in case of war are covered by the enemy in the first minutes and hours. So the issue is not only and not so much in the economy, it is a matter of outright wrecking, sabotage and Nazism. But the main thing is not this, the main thing is that who needs a high rating. And they don’t give a damn that the doctors are again starting to delay their salaries, they don’t give a damn that there are no places in kindergartens, they don’t give a damn about the fact that there is no real free education in the school, I don’t give a damn ...
  20. Cat man null
    Cat man null 19 May 2016 11: 56
    +1
    Compare the "article" with this one:

    Quote: http://www.interfax.ru/business/503940
    ECONOMY 12:01, April 15 2016
    Federal Property Management Agency announced the sale price of Komsomolsk-on-Amur airport
    Moscow. April 15. INTERFAX.RU - The Federal Property Management Agency has approved the conditions for the privatization of 100% of the shares of Komsomolsk-on-Amur Airport JSC, according to the department's materials.

    Shares will be sold in a single lot at an auction with an open form of submission of bids on the price, the starting price is approved in the amount of 61 million rubles.

    The report said that this price corresponds to the market value of the package, which was evaluated as of October 2015, XNUMX.

    According to the materials of the Federal Property Management Agency, the JSC’s revenue for 2014 amounted to 171,4 million rubles, for ten months of 2015 - 94,8 million rubles. Net loss for 2014 amounted to 4,5 million rubles, net profit for January-October 2015 - 1,95 million rubles.

    The company employs 137 people.

    JSC "Komsomolsk-on-Amur Airport" is a civil operator using the Khurba airfield, jointly with the Russian Air Force, 17 km south of Komsomolsk-on-Amur. According to the SPARK-Interfax database, the JSC has a high financial risk index. The company's assets as of January 1, 2015 amounted to RUB 24 million.

    Currently, according to Yandex.Raspisaniya, the airport serves two weekly flights to Moscow of VIM-Avia, as well as two flights of Khabarovsk Airlines, which fly from Nikolaevsk-on-Amur to the regional center with an intermediate landing at Komsomolsk.

    As they say for-rub-hedgehog, "know comments".. laughing
  21. eleronn
    eleronn 19 May 2016 12: 02
    0
    I am proud that I never voted for Putin and his EDRosnyu! And, as I understand now, he did the right thing.
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 19 May 2016 12: 32
      -1
      It's a shame that in the next elections the majority of local patriots will go and vote for Putin, because he is such a fine fellow, he smears America, he returned the Crimea, he is bombing Syria, and in general there is no one else.
    2. Cat man null
      Cat man null 19 May 2016 12: 39
      +1
      Quote: eleronn
      I am proud that I never voted for Putin and his EDRosnyu! And, as I understand now, he did the right thing.

      Why did you say that here?

      "Advertising", like? wink
  22. kirgudu
    kirgudu 19 May 2016 12: 12
    +4
    Oh, how everyone is in a hurry for the autumn elections ...
    Be afraid that in 17 of them all under the ass with his foot.
    1. Petr petrov
      Petr petrov 20 May 2016 03: 47
      +1
      And by the year 17 .......
      Also, the National Guard (like Ukrainians !!!!) create ......
  23. atamankko
    atamankko 19 May 2016 12: 14
    +1
    This is wrecking or gagging on the part of the Federal Property Management Agency,
    but you can’t let such things go by themselves.
    Already already effective managers have killed hundreds of airports and airfields
    big and small in Russia, stuffing their pockets, and how people live on the outskirts
    they don’t know, and they don’t want to know.
    Their defense also does not bother them; they will live beyond the hill.
  24. ksv36
    ksv36 19 May 2016 12: 24
    0
    Guess the first time who will buy! CHINESE.
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 19 May 2016 17: 48
      0
      There are several options. But what a thief is for sure.
  25. NordUral
    NordUral 19 May 2016 12: 27
    +1
    The julie in power filled all the cracks.
  26. Kenneth
    Kenneth 19 May 2016 12: 48
    0
    Today (April 2016) the state of the airport reflects the general decline in which the city of Komsomolsk-on-Amur has been located since the early 1990s. In fact, the airport is closed: air traffic with Moscow was interrupted (the flight of the VIM-Avia airline was canceled from April 1, 2016), and from June 1, the flight to / from Khabarovsk is also canceled. The air terminal building, built in 1974, has not been reconstructed since the opening, it is significantly outdated both morally and physically.
    In short, sold on the fact of unused property
  27. Luka Mudischev
    Luka Mudischev 19 May 2016 13: 15
    +3
    The classic scheme around the world - when the state needs money, it sells state property at a low price, and always starts from airports. In France, they sold Aéroports de Paris (Charles de Gaulle, Eagles, Le Bourget), now regional airports are slowly under the knife ... Welcome to the wonderful world of globalization am
  28. AlexSam
    AlexSam 19 May 2016 13: 54
    +2
    it seems that Chubais's people are sitting in Rosimushchestvo, so his business lives on and wins ...
    1. sherp2015
      sherp2015 19 May 2016 14: 53
      +3
      Quote: AlexSam
      it seems that Chubais's people are sitting in Rosimushchestvo, so his business lives on and wins ...

      and there is! sit and win.
  29. erofich
    erofich 19 May 2016 14: 58
    +3
    Kudrin was returned and the leadership of the economy begins anew. We got kaazly !!!
  30. Demeter
    Demeter 19 May 2016 16: 36
    +1
    Again, the honest '' Chubais criminals '' plunder state property ...
  31. Koshak
    Koshak 19 May 2016 17: 50
    +1
    But in Komsomolsk-on-Amur there is a large aircraft plant (well, it was under Soviet power), and if it works, will it fly along the river or on its own to the consumer? fool
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 20 May 2016 02: 01
      +2
      Quote: Koshak
      But in Komsomolsk-on-Amur there is a large aircraft plant (well, it was under Soviet power), and if it works, will it fly along the river or on its own to the consumer?

      There are two aerodromes in Komsomolsk. Read this:
      Dzomgi airfield
  32. alessio
    alessio 19 May 2016 19: 26
    0
    They will sell themselves through the trash)))
  33. keeper03
    keeper03 19 May 2016 20: 52
    +1
    A sad situation, if not gloomy!
  34. kaban7
    kaban7 19 May 2016 21: 34
    0
    I propose to privatize the Federal Property Management Agency, with all its most responsible employees, the conditions and reasons are the same.
  35. Petr petrov
    Petr petrov 20 May 2016 03: 45
    +2
    Who would have doubted ....... That with such power everything is sold, of course, to "theirs" ......
  36. kav669
    kav669 20 May 2016 12: 46
    0
    Airport, as in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Take-off is used by the Ministry of Defense. In view of the lack of funds from the state, this decision may be relevant.
  37. Mykl
    Mykl 23 May 2016 04: 38
    0
    It turns out that finding a normal leader and changing the logistics of transport and passenger transportation, leaving at least 50% + 1 share to the state, today it suddenly became immeasurably more difficult than simply taking and getting rid of the air harbor.

    So after all, this is an effort to make, pay a salary. And then shell out for the costs of passenger service, cargo handling, fuel, maintaining the suitability of the objects for work, payments to supervisory authorities etc, etc. Who needs this? It has long been known that the most economical structure of an enterprise is the head + chief accountant. Got, shared and ends in water.