US Deputy Secretary of Defense: Russian Su-24 could collide with a seagull during a flight over the Donald Cook destroyer

126
US military officials continue to discuss Russia's actions towards aviation and US warships in the Baltic. This is primarily about the flight of the Russian Su-24 over the US Navy destroyer Donald Cook, as well as the interception of US reconnaissance aircraft by Russian fighters. This time, US Secretary of Defense Bob Wark made his comments on the matter. Portal www.defense-aerospace.com quotes Wark's statement:
It is obvious that the Russians are very aggressive in the Baltic and Black seas. Their planes flew so close that the slightest chance could lead to tragic consequences. An airplane, for example, could collide with a bird (gull) in the air, and Russia would later declare that it was shot down by the US military.


US Deputy Secretary of Defense: Russian Su-24 could collide with a seagull during a flight over the Donald Cook destroyer


In fact, Post-Factum prompted Erdogan what rhetoric he should have used after the attack on the Turkish Air Force of the Russian Su-24 bomber - they say, "collided with a bird" and "fell himself." Apparently, NATO must now adopt the arguments of a high-ranking Pentagon official.

According to the US Deputy Secretary of Defense, Russian military aircraft also fly close to US air borders, but American pilots, carrying out interceptions, operate, you see, extremely professionally.

So, perhaps, in order not to scare away the Baltic and Black Sea gulls, would it be more expedient for American destroyers to plow the expanses of the sea closer to their own borders in order to avoid "tragic consequences"?
126 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +30
    18 May 2016 06: 40
    Yes, finally change the diapers.
    Shoigu brought the poor pin @ dosovskih generals - write at night. You can’t do so with the wretched
    1. +51
      18 May 2016 06: 50
      Quote: Putin
      Yes, finally change the diapers.

      Well, the excuses went that it’s not the brave marines who have dirtied the whole deck, but the seagulls laughing but we know who it was ...
      In general, US gulls should not perform unprofessional and unsafe maneuvers in the area of ​​the Russian Aerospace Forces flights.
      1. +8
        18 May 2016 07: 12
        Quote: insular
        Quote: Putin
        Yes, finally change the diapers.

        Well, the excuses went that it’s not the brave marines who have dirtied the whole deck, but the seagulls laughing but we know who it was ...
        In general, US gulls should not perform unprofessional and unsafe maneuvers in the area of ​​the Russian Aerospace Forces flights.

        Seagulls are smarter than mattresses, unless Polish and sprat. lol
        1. +9
          18 May 2016 07: 54
          So, perhaps, in order not to scare away the Baltic and Black Sea gulls, would it be more expedient for American destroyers to plow the expanses of the sea closer to their own borders in order to avoid "tragic consequences"?


          Very correct advice, forget the way to us and nobody will scare you.
          1. +26
            18 May 2016 09: 34
            A plane, for example, could collide with a bird (seagull) in the air,

            No la la, the Baltic gulls are great at keeping the system laughing
          2. +1
            18 May 2016 10: 42
            Quote: cniza
            In fact, Post-Factum prompted Erdogan what rhetoric he should have used after the attack on the Turkish Air Force of the Russian Su-24 bomber - they say, "collided with a bird" and "fell himself." Apparently, NATO must now adopt the arguments of a high-ranking Pentagon official.

            The Americans have been "sucking on" the topic of intercepts by their Air Force and Navy for a long time! They are just working on options for the future of possible interceptions of their aircraft and ships of the Russian Air Force! This topic does not give them rest!
            1. +5
              18 May 2016 11: 46
              Quote: sergey2017
              The Americans have been "sucking on" the topic of intercepts by their Air Force and Navy for a long time! They are just working on options for the future of possible interceptions of their aircraft and ships of the Russian Air Force! This topic does not give them rest!

              laughing I don’t care, they forgot that their ships can also encounter whales, dolphins, sharks, etc. somewhere in the sea. and drown. And also a gas discharge may form under the ship and that stone will go under the water.
              1. 0
                20 May 2016 16: 12
                Quote: Corsair
                their ships may also collide somewhere at sea

                It will definitely be an iceberg. Iceberg Baltic. Baltic Iceberg Squadron. soldier
          3. +2
            20 May 2016 09: 29
            ours had to object that the destroyer could run into something too. On a German mine during the war or on a boat
        2. 0
          18 May 2016 10: 36
          They are not like deer, they are ashamed to compare them with moose, in one word, rams !!!
        3. +3
          18 May 2016 10: 54
          No-no! SU-24 could not collide with a seagull! Seagulls are not flies to fly to "Donald Cook"! laughing
          1. 0
            20 May 2016 18: 37
            Quote: BMP-2
            Seagulls are not flies to fly to "Donald Cook"!

            But seagulls often haunt ships and ships in the hope of profitable edible. Are you sure that with Donald Cook nothing of interest to the seagulls flies overboard ???
      2. +4
        18 May 2016 08: 30
        Russian Su-24 could collide with a seagull while flying over the destroyer "Donald Cook"

        C a UFO, too, could - so the scope for imagination is not exhaustive.
        1. +3
          18 May 2016 10: 27
          And the meteorite could fly not to Chelyabinsk, but directly to Donald.
      3. +3
        18 May 2016 12: 11
        Quote: insular
        In general, US gulls should not perform unprofessional and unsafe maneuvers in the area of ​​the Russian Aerospace Forces flights.

        “Well, they were our competent seagulls.” The USA has no gulls - solid cormorants. And, as it turns out, in the classrooms too. laughing
    2. +25
      18 May 2016 06: 54
      Seagulls are well-aimed and treacherous birds! They fly and crap right in their pants to American soldiers.
      1. KOH
        +13
        18 May 2016 08: 29
        So then a cook can fly into a reef ...))))))
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. avt
      +1
      18 May 2016 10: 12
      Quote: Putin
      Yes, finally change the diapers.

      Pampers with? See the whole deck in the shit, just remember about the seagull - you have to write off the occupied deck on someone.
    6. +1
      18 May 2016 10: 43
      Quote: Putin
      Yes, finally change the diapers.
      Shoigu brought the poor pin @ dosovskih generals - write at night. You can’t do so with the wretched


      This is not the point, swimming and flying all over the planet, the gringos did not meet any opposition and even the military. And here you are an unexpected person ..
    7. +3
      18 May 2016 13: 05
      Our seagulls are there and they have "friend or foe" laughing
  2. +47
    18 May 2016 06: 41
    yeah, and their destroyer would then collide with a "log" and sank
    1. +15
      18 May 2016 06: 48
      The destroyer could even be attacked by a UFO disguised as SU-24. From these aliens everything can be expected! wassat
      1. +11
        18 May 2016 06: 52
        Quote: Karasik
        The destroyer could even be attacked by a UFO,

        by the way, there have already been precedents, several years ago, the South Korean corvette "Cheonan" disappeared, the reason was not established ...
        1. +2
          18 May 2016 07: 17
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          The South Korean corvette "Cheonan" disappeared, the reason was not established.

          Well, so they wrote about the torpedo attack of a North Korean submarine?
        2. 0
          18 May 2016 07: 56
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          South Korean corvette "Cheonan" disappeared, the cause was not established ...

          How is it not installed ?? fool Found: drowned as a result of the destruction of karma sad . And karma was destroyed, presumably from Rezh ... Yes
          Hello saboteur! drinks
          1. +5
            18 May 2016 08: 09
            Quote: Angry Guerrilla
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            South Korean corvette "Cheonan" disappeared, the cause was not established ...
            How is it not installed ?? Found: drowned as a result of the destruction of karma. And karma was destroyed, presumably from Rezh ...

            Moreover, the younger Kim personally destroyed karma by the strain of thought and the creation of a giant mental impact on the ship of the Navy of the South Korean capitalist apostates by using the reserve of thought accumulated by the older Kimi! am
            Juche ideas rule - just like Tagil!
            Hello to the partisan saboteurs! drinks hi
            1. +2
              18 May 2016 09: 26
              Quote: andj61
              Hello to the partisan saboteurs!

              Hi Andryukha! drinks
              Quote: andj61
              the younger Kim personally destroyed the karma by the strain of thought and the creation of a gigantic mental impact on the ship of the Navy of the South Korean capitalist apostates by using the reserve of thought accumulated by the older Kims!

              belay
              Well, you bent ... what
              1. +2
                18 May 2016 09: 46
                Quote: Angry Guerrilla
                Well, you bent ...

                I did my best! feel
                Willpower plus character, long, hard training, constant work on yourself! wink
              2. +2
                18 May 2016 17: 43
                Quote: Angry Guerrilla
                giant mental impact on the ship

                belay I’ll probably go and have a drink ....
          2. 0
            18 May 2016 17: 41
            Quote: Angry Guerrilla
            Hello saboteur!

            belay you cho ... you understand that we are being followed !!! well old ... failed to attend all appearances ... am
      2. +13
        18 May 2016 07: 31
        Quote: Karasik
        The destroyer could even be attacked by a UFO disguised as SU-24. From these aliens everything can be expected!
        1. +1
          18 May 2016 08: 13
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Quote: Karasik
          The destroyer could even be attacked by a UFO disguised as SU-24. From these aliens everything can be expected!

          Either it just seems to me, or these aliens clearly went in cycles in phallic symbols - the central rod directed upwards in the middle and two balls on each side! Scary - already scary!wassat
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          18 May 2016 17: 45
          Th then, the "object" is a bit short ... recourse
      3. +3
        18 May 2016 08: 19
        Well, in the sea there is also the concept of "Stranded" and "Reefs".
        1. +2
          18 May 2016 09: 46
          And also mines of the 2nd world
    2. +3
      18 May 2016 06: 49
      Quote: ivagulin
      yeah, and their destroyer would then collide with a "log" and sank
      Moreover, all logs in the water area are stopped by GOS
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +16
      18 May 2016 07: 03
      Quote: ivagulin
      collided with a "log"

      In the Baltic, a particularly aggressive smelt population, it will nibble on any side. Yes
    5. +4
      18 May 2016 07: 06
      And they would notice a Russian torpedo in the boat. hi
    6. +4
      18 May 2016 08: 22
      533mm, if I'm not mistaken, the diameter of the "log". feel
  3. +10
    18 May 2016 06: 41
    For the United States, it is better that the seagulls sit on their nests during the flight of Russian aircraft. And then you never know what.
  4. +11
    18 May 2016 06: 42
    Well then, "Donald Cook" could collide with one of the "stones"
    1. +27
      18 May 2016 06: 48
      Quote: trenitron
      Well then, "Donald Cook" could collide with one of the "stones"

      The echo of war, however. bully
      1. +2
        18 May 2016 09: 49
        They read the idea downright! And there are still darkness of such "echoes" in the Baltic and the Black Sea. Amer would need to take into account such ferrous metal. +
  5. +11
    18 May 2016 06: 44
    A plane, for example, could collide with a bird (seagull) in the air, and then Russia would say that it was shot down by the US military.

    So do not swim to places where you can be offended and scared request laughing
    And even if it weren’t for the seagulls that had hit the destroyer, it could fall apart and drown from the thunder of the engines of the Russian Su-24. laughing
    1. +3
      18 May 2016 07: 14
      Quote: K-50
      A plane, for example, could collide with a bird (seagull) in the air, and then Russia would say that it was shot down by the US military.

      So do not swim to places where you can be offended and scared request laughing
      And even if it weren’t for the seagulls that had hit the destroyer, it could fall apart and drown from the thunder of the engines of the Russian Su-24. laughing

      That's right, just swimming. lol
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +2
    18 May 2016 06: 45
    Su-24 - they say, "collided with a bird" and "fell himself." Apparently, NATO should now adopt the arguments of a high-ranking Pentagon official.
    So after all, their destroyer may suddenly "suck in the sea", it is so easy to "suck in" and that's it (a funnel formed at the bottom, that's what it sucked in). laughing
  8. +9
    18 May 2016 06: 45
    The Baltic Sea is so unpredictable, there are so many bad things at the bottom since the days of the two world and Finnish war - you can easily jump on an untrained bottom or floating mine. Such a nuisance can happen, and even in neutral waters, we are so upset, we’ll get tired of sending condolences, and about five minutes before ...
  9. +2
    18 May 2016 06: 46
    To avoid collisions with the NATO "seagull" our pilots have "Kaira"
  10. +22
    18 May 2016 06: 46
    A little off the topic, but still. In the United States, a bugger has been appointed minister of the ground forces, who does not hide his orientation. At the meeting, he probably said "you..bu, zh..poo tear" will have a completely different meaning. The mattress covers have survived.
    R.s. And how to greet such a hand in official meetings, let’s say ours?
    1. +3
      18 May 2016 07: 42
      Quote: RuslanNN R.s. And how to greet such a hand in official meetings, let’s say ours?

      So our people don't say hello. And, apparently, they won't say hello. "Cold War", again on hearing. No matter how hot it gets. And what to do, you can't explain to the boys. Politics is politics, and the same Sergei Kuzhugetovich was brought up on the Soviet street.
    2. +4
      18 May 2016 09: 11
      KVN "he threatened them with a terrible punishment, which is considered the norm in Holland .."
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +2
      18 May 2016 10: 22
      R.s. And how to greet such a hand in official meetings, let’s say ours?
      How, how - putting on medical rubber gloves. Like a doctor’s appointment. Demonstratively putting them on before a handshake and taking off when moving on to the next greeter.
  11. +8
    18 May 2016 06: 46
    If a seagull had hit the Su-24, your destroyer would have been bitten by a mosquito!
  12. +2
    18 May 2016 06: 48
    It all comes down to one thing: How to hide crap underpants ...
  13. +2
    18 May 2016 06: 49
    After flying our plane over an American vessel, it stinks for a very long time. Chefs need to feed the crew less, but whose do you think for yourself.
  14. +4
    18 May 2016 06: 52
    Russian Su-24 could collide with a seagull while flying over the destroyer "Donald Cook"

    Recently, "I am tormented by vague doubts" (words from the movie) -Is Ukraine learning from the United States or are the Americans mastering the Ukrainian experience of presenting information?
  15. +2
    18 May 2016 06: 52
    “It is quite obvious that the Russians are very aggressive in the Baltic and Black Seas. Their planes flew so close that the slightest accident could lead to tragic consequences. The plane, for example, could collide with a bird (seagull) in the air, and Russia later would declare that he was shot down by the American military "

    then Donald Cook might have collided with an anti-ship missile, and indeed after the war the mines still remained, and meteorites are constantly falling to the ground ....
    1. cap
      +1
      18 May 2016 07: 10
      "Then Donald Cook might collide with an antiarable missile, and indeed, after the war, mines still remain, and meteorites are constantly falling to the ground .... [/ quote]"

      As for the meteorite, a good idea ... I hope the ammunition is found. DK has already got it. Seagulls from two seas have stolen .. and he’s not at all.
    2. 0
      18 May 2016 09: 08
      And also dolphins, they are like birds, only under water. And God forbid "Storm" will fly up - Khan Kuku.
  16. +2
    18 May 2016 06: 55
    "... it would be more expedient for American destroyers to surf the sea closer to their own borders ..."
    Quote: K-50
    So do not swim to places where you can be offended and scared


    That's it! "Yankee go home!"
  17. 0
    18 May 2016 07: 01
    Probably now the Americans will have guns shooting birds ... evil
    1. +3
      18 May 2016 07: 11
      Engrybeards they already have)))
    2. 0
      20 May 2016 16: 10
      And the movie "Angry Birds" was recently released. Cheto muddy along the way really with angry birds))))))))))))))))
  18. +3
    18 May 2016 07: 06
    And there’s nothing to swim here! What did you forget at our Baltic bases? We’ve come up with some gulls. There are a lot of mines in the Baltic, since WWII. Do not swim where it is not necessary - there will be less risk. laughing
    1. +2
      18 May 2016 07: 18
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And there’s nothing to swim here! What did you forget at our Baltic bases? We’ve come up with some gulls. There are a lot of mines in the Baltic, since WWII. Do not swim where it is not necessary - there will be less risk. laughing

      Throw them a map of the minefields of the Second World War and attribute that the water area was cleared by 0,0001%. lol
  19. +3
    18 May 2016 07: 12
    Announcement of a new version of the game Angry Birds? So we can play Chapaev. One click and no squadron.
  20. +1
    18 May 2016 07: 14
    Oh, these dreamers, everyone is trying to whitewash their Cook from emptying the personnel.
  21. +1
    18 May 2016 07: 18
    Are not mattress toppers afraid that "Cook" will fly into a dolphin and that's it? "Threw a viper and no Cook" (c) winked
  22. 0
    18 May 2016 07: 20
    This, by the way, is a direct warning, and the next time a flock of seagulls will take off from the deck of the destroyer in front of the SU-24, and if something happens later there will be no answer, because the seagulls, not the missiles, or the guns are to blame there
    1. +2
      18 May 2016 07: 24
      Well then let them blame themselves! In this case, the plane just falls on Cook))))
      And the "fighting" seagulls will have to swim on a basin and knock on the bell for help.
      1. -1
        18 May 2016 07: 37
        Quote: Delink
        Well then let them blame themselves! In this case, the plane will simply fall on Cook)

        I repeat once again there will be nothing, since there was nothing to the Turks, then there will definitely be nothing to the seagulls in neutral waters :-)
        1. 0
          18 May 2016 11: 09
          nothing will happen, since the Turks didn’t have anything, then nothing will happen to the seagulls in neutral waters :-)
          Putin will have to remove his authority in this case (as a result of a military coup) ....... and he is smart ..... so Cook will get a torpedo in the barrel, and Putin will get a 99% rating (well, a couple more sanctions in the appendage) ....... why did the natives eat Cook?
  23. 0
    18 May 2016 07: 20
    A plane, for example, could collide with a bird (seagull) in the air, and then Russia would say that it was shot down by the US military.
    Yes, I could. And the crew of the destroyer Donald Cook could put in his pants and the destroyer sank from overload. So.
    fool
  24. +8
    18 May 2016 07: 24
    I read all the comments that catch the eye, it is that the members of the forum, without saying a word, "the Americans swim", and do not go on ships like normal people. drinks I support and join, "only d ... can swim."
  25. aba
    +2
    18 May 2016 07: 30
    Americans will have guns shooting birds ...

    Yes, those who produce aircraft have these guns:
  26. +2
    18 May 2016 07: 33
    It would be better to tell how many US sailors retired after this incident) .Well, a destroyer can easily encounter a mine from World War 2
    1. +1
      18 May 2016 09: 01
      If it approaches the territorial waters of Russia, many more mines floats.
  27. 0
    18 May 2016 07: 35
    If Drying collided with a seagull, then Cook would immediately hit a snag!
  28. +8
    18 May 2016 07: 36
    Do not be afraid, Americans, we just fly ...
  29. +2
    18 May 2016 07: 37
    "It is quite obvious that the Russians are very aggressive in the Baltic and Black Seas. Their planes flew so close that the slightest accident could lead to tragic consequences. The plane, for example, could collide with a bird (seagull) in the air, and Russia later would claim that he was shot down by the US military. "
    Let them say thanks that against the background of their ships, dangling where it is not necessary, we will not tow target ships to practice practical shooting. But seriously, all these bursts of manure in the media for readers. The military in this case does not reflect. Such overflights have long been the norm. There were cases when they drank some water at an ultra-low altitude, both of them. And the howl of the press and various officials on this subject is nothing more than a manifestation of an information war, i.e. the background for creating the image of the enemy in the eyes of the citizens of their countries, so that they will be less buzzing about the increase in defense items of budgets in peacetime.
  30. +3
    18 May 2016 07: 53
    Well, if the Su-24 could collide with a bird over the "Cook", then the "Cook" itself could well (and still can feel ...) collide with a German naval mine from WW2 smile .
    1. +3
      18 May 2016 09: 26
      Quote: Angry Guerrilla
      Well, if the Su-24 could collide with a bird over "Cook", then "Cook" itself could well (and still can ...) collide with a German sea mine from WW2.

      Brilliant idea. We have them, and not a few. Threw, and "ends in the water." Identified rusty fragments will show on Aloizych. From him and demand. smile
  31. +7
    18 May 2016 07: 57
    Historically, the Russians have always behaved aggressively towards "foreign tourists": 1240, 1242, 1380, 1612, 1812, 1941, but they missed the internal mold in 1991 .. ...
  32. +1
    18 May 2016 07: 57
    I'm sorry for the bird.
  33. +8
    18 May 2016 08: 11
    for some reason I recalled a joke -

    They ask the sailor:
    - Was there a case that you were really scared?
    - We transported something like a cargo - 10000 dolls. And got caught in a storm. And when the ship tilted to the right, all these 10000 dolls said in unison “Mom!” That's where I got fucked.
  34. 0
    18 May 2016 08: 20
    So, perhaps, in order not to scare away the Baltic and Black Sea gulls, would it be more expedient for American destroyers to plow the expanses of the sea closer to their own borders in order to avoid "tragic consequences"?

    That's it!) At the American shores, gulls are probably more adequate ...))))
  35. +2
    18 May 2016 08: 23
    In 2000, the Russian Su-24 in the Pacific Fleet over the American aircraft carrier Kiti Hawk walked as long and as he wanted
    in the newspaper Red Star, the article was dry planes. Americans are wet (for some) the captain of the Aircraft Carrier saw the stars of the coffee and spilled coffee on his white uniform, the gulls did not interfere.
  36. The comment was deleted.
  37. 0
    18 May 2016 08: 28
    US Deputy Secretary of Defense: Russian Su-24 could collide with a seagull during a flight over the Donald Cook destroyer
    These are the aggressive seagulls ... They must have jumped on the "Donald" more than once ...
  38. 0
    18 May 2016 08: 35
    SU-24 could collide with a seagull, and the aforementioned US Under Secretary of Defense might not be born.
  39. +2
    18 May 2016 08: 38
    however, American pilots, performing interceptions, act, you see, exclusively professionally.

    That is, when intercepted, they do not come closer than the reach of Russian weapons!
    bully So that the bird does not fly into the nozzle.
    1. 0
      18 May 2016 08: 59
      They generally do not know how to fly, so they are afraid of everything. For them, aerobatics are dangerous maneuvers.
  40. +1
    18 May 2016 08: 44
    I hope to wait for news in the style of "such and such a US destroyer collided with a megalodon in the Baltic Sea and sank as a result of the damage;)"
  41. +1
    18 May 2016 08: 57
    Could, and from the destroyer would only give up the cookie. Do not stick your nose in foreign lands where you are not called.
  42. 0
    18 May 2016 08: 58
    Quote: Putin
    Yes, finally change the diapers.
    Shoigu brought the poor pin @ dosovskih generals - write at night. You can’t do so with the wretched


    ... or already ... start scaring the seagulls off your ships!
  43. +1
    18 May 2016 09: 27
    The Turks have already said about their helicopter that it fell for technical reasons. And you can’t argue, MANPADS Needle is really a technical tool). But in the USA they decided to go further, the seagull, well ... The Su-24 collided with the seagull and fell near the American destroyer, after 5 minutes the destroyer came across a floating turtle and sank ...
    1. 0
      18 May 2016 18: 34
      iliya87
      The Turks have already said about their helicopter that it fell for technical reasons ....
      And in the USA they decided to go further, a seagull ...

      This is a photo of what? Did the seagull fall?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  44. +1
    18 May 2016 09: 34
    however, American pilots, performing interceptions, act, you see, exclusively professionally.
    Just American pilots are not able to perform aerobatics! So they envy our craftsmen, calling aerobatics unprofessional actions!
  45. +1
    18 May 2016 09: 54
    I really liked the end of the article good
    So, perhaps, in order not to scare away the Baltic and Black Sea gulls, would it be more expedient for American destroyers to plow the expanses of the sea closer to their own borders in order to avoid "tragic consequences"?
    Very clearly written !!!
  46. +1
    18 May 2016 10: 02
    And in general, in females lol gee gee !!!
    ~ For the first time, an open pederast became US Army Secretary ~
    Gee-gee-gee Here you can read in more detail! http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201605180532-y6gu.htm I apologize to the moderators feel that manenko is not the topic but ... I think what do not ban recourse
  47. +1
    18 May 2016 10: 40
    "could have collided with a seagull while flying over the destroyer Donald Cook"
    Yeah, then his gull would have another gull so shy on the crown ........
    1. 0
      18 May 2016 11: 42
      no, just another gull would have pierced its body through!
  48. +2
    18 May 2016 11: 03
    elevated lie
    official version of the state,
    is the truth and the national idea!?
    1. 0
      20 May 2016 17: 40
      This is called "propaganda".
  49. +2
    18 May 2016 11: 40
    American Aegis died, now goes into service Hollywood films about Indiana Jones where his dad with the help of an umbrella and gulls shot down a German plane!)))
    1. +1
      18 May 2016 15: 17
      So the Yankees would have fought (although what Yankees are there, they are African-Americans (I have nothing wrong with them) in the pavilions of Hollywood, on the Moon and Skyleb, and so on.
  50. +2
    18 May 2016 12: 22
    "Donald Cook" and his "valiant" crew, you can not imagine how much in the Baltic, and in the Black Sea, as well as in all the seas around Russia, underwater rocks, reefs, whirlpools, etc. There are also "Yakhonts" "Bastions", various torpedoes and mines!
    And the gull won't help with the cormorant and the pelican ... am
  51. +1
    18 May 2016 13: 00
    Arrogant Saxons! And you don’t wow.....by chance!
  52. +1
    18 May 2016 14: 03
    US Deputy Secretary of Defense: Russian Su-24 could collide with a seagull during a flight over the Donald Cook destroyer
    Shoigu: "The destroyer Donald Cook ran into a mine from the Great Patriotic War. And so - several times."
  53. 0
    18 May 2016 14: 53
    The Yankees are being aggressive. Some nervous lunatic from their ship could open fire on the plane and provoke a war.
  54. +1
    18 May 2016 15: 15
    I wonder what Donald himself might have encountered?
  55. 0
    18 May 2016 17: 07
    We must warn the Americans that next time the Donald Cook may accidentally collide with a mine from World War II... there are so many of these mines left in the Baltic Sea!
  56. 0
    19 May 2016 00: 49
    I have repeatedly observed the consequences of birds colliding with an airplane. A small one is smeared, but a large one is hit by an anti-aircraft shell. At such speeds, everything crumbles into dust. You can, of course, cheer up on the forum and make jokes about our pilots flying over American ships. God forbid. This is all for once.
  57. 0
    19 May 2016 15: 22
    ..It’s funny to you, but the Americans are probably inventing a rapid-fire tea launcher... the general spilled the beans. Ours needs lethal cage traps... just in case. We will turn on the anti-gull system so that they don’t multiply
  58. 0
    20 May 2016 07: 47
    As far as I understand, our combat aircraft have the best ejection seats in the world? so the pilot will be saved after a collision with the “seagull” and will calmly swim to the shore of the marquise puddle - there is no danger here. but cruising off distant shores where all the features of the seabed are not known seems to be a dangerous pastime.
  59. 0
    20 May 2016 09: 11
    Why did you come here?
  60. 0
    20 May 2016 11: 09
    And the destroyer "Donald Cook" could have stumbled upon the "Goldfish" and sank.
  61. 0
    20 May 2016 11: 23
    The collision of Russian planes with seagulls leads to the formation of numerous icebergs even in the warmest oceans. Everyone knows this, be careful. bully
  62. 0
    20 May 2016 12: 35
    The echo of war aboard them...... by accident request
  63. 0
    20 May 2016 14: 25
    There’s no point in feeding our seagulls with your cookies, then they won’t hover around your ships.
  64. 0
    20 May 2016 16: 01
    They still can’t calm down, right?)
    You need to repeat more times about the Russian aggression, you see, someone else will believe it.
  65. 0
    20 May 2016 16: 25
    Could a Russian plane collide with a seagull? Then the Donald Cook would collide with a sperm whale and go to the bottom.
  66. 0
    20 May 2016 16: 41
    Seagulls fly only not far from the shore. If harmless birds are so scary, then there’s no reason for the Amers to hang out there, sit in the open sea and no seagull, much less Sushka, will fly over and scare you.
  67. 0
    20 May 2016 17: 40
    The likelihood that an SU-24 will collide with a seagull 70 km from the coast is as high as the likelihood that Donald Cook will crash on the rocks there. Well, or something else.
  68. Mwg
    0
    20 May 2016 18: 59
    Here it is, a striking example of analogical thinking, which is ubiquitous among politicians in the United States. Either they have “resets”, or “desert storms”, or “axis of evil”... But this perverted way of thinking is characteristic of all liberals without exception - to talk not about facts, but about probabilities in their most frightening forms, but then using these tales to justify their wild actions as retaliatory measures. And how many of these there are in our country. Didn't you pay attention?
  69. 0
    21 May 2016 05: 48
    Quote: hort
    ours had to object that the destroyer could run into something too. On a German mine during the war or on a boat

    This has happened to them. 09/02/2001 The nuclear submarine USS Greeneville collided with a Japanese training trawler while surfacing and sank it.