Military parade in Bucharest (PHOTOS)

56

We present photos of the military parade in honor of the National Day of Romania, held in Bucharest on the Triumphal Arch Square. In a modest military parade, 1500 troops of the Ministry of Defense and other security agencies took part, but at the same time a rather large variety of military equipment was shown.

Among military equipment, M1114 HMMWV cars, armored vehicles for special operations URO VAMTAC (Spanish analogue of the HMMWV, adopted by the Romanian army in 2007), armored personnel carriers Piranha IIIC, TAB B33 Zimbrul (Romanian version of the BTR-80 with Model 1240 V8-DTS engine are seen) 268 hp, produced by CN RomArm SA), BMI MLI-84M1 Jderul with a 25-mm automatic gun Oerlikon KBA and ATGM Spike, Zep Gepard (36 units purchased), Tanks TP-85M1, coastal missile launcher Rubezh and others.

Aviation the equipment was presented by IAR-330 Puma SOCAT, IAR-330M Puma helicopters (2005 IAR-08L were modernized in 12-330), С-27J Spartan military transport aircraft (in December 2007, a contract for the supply of 7 aircraft was signed: the first aircraft delivered in July 2009, the second - in April 2010), self-developed training aircraft IAR-99 Soim and MiG-21 Lancer fighters.











Military parade in Bucharest (PHOTOS)













56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. dred
    -2
    22 December 2011 08: 28
    Parade class. That's just a pity that the Romanians are not for us.
    1. mitrich
      +1
      22 December 2011 19: 39
      DIFFICULT ROMANIAN ... insects! Parade from a series of the new Russian RZHUNIMAGU!
      1. +2
        23 December 2011 07: 43
        Yes and gypsies with bears are not enough wink
        1. Alexmos
          0
          27 March 2012 19: 06
          On the M16, it is clear that there was not enough money, they are marching with the Kalash, but now the old Migi will be vaped to Moldova and "re-armed" or they will hold another Parade wink
  2. Lech e-mine
    +10
    22 December 2011 08: 36
    A copy of the Saakashvili parade is cool guys with machine guns at the ready. However, the fighting spirit of these warriors is weak. History has repeatedly shown this.
    1. Corvalan
      0
      27 March 2012 19: 03
      It is difficult to determine morale by their faces, but the amount of money poured into the New Romanian army is not small.
      Although along with m1114 bpm1 are going, and in the hands of the soldiers "tactical" AKMs.
      and a form from all the NATO countries to feel ... DPM, Woodland, Desert DPM.

      In general, the only thing that can be said is the guys thoroughly prepared for the parade)
  3. Igor
    +4
    22 December 2011 08: 56
    Why do people camouflage in the parade belay
    1. olifus
      +5
      22 December 2011 09: 48
      Quote: Igorek
      Why do people camouflage in the parade

      so they look more "masculine and intimidating" wink
    2. 0
      22 December 2011 21: 19
      The Armenian parade was torn apart (there was an article on the site) plagiarists wink
    3. German
      +1
      23 December 2011 00: 43
      so that after the parade in the face not to get ... wink
  4. +7
    22 December 2011 09: 12
    Pretty ... no more.

    That the Romanians are not for us - I would not regret it. As well as the Hungarians. The warriors are still (historically).
    1. +1
      22 December 2011 13: 35
      nda really ..... the warriors still fight those civilians .... in the father’s Kerch in 43, the Romanian warrior tried to drown in a barrel of water ... the German non-military rescued ....
      1. +3
        22 December 2011 13: 54
        My mother lived in occupied Kerch, more precisely in Mikoyan, this village is 5 km from Kerch.
        She said that the Romanians robbed and stole cattle, and the German commandant's office just returned the cattle. This is not to say that the Germans were good and the Romanians were bad, but I was very surprised by this. In general, Romanians are often called gypsies. this is correct.
    2. +2
      22 December 2011 19: 27
      Bansheeromanians yes wink but the Magyars do not say - all the same, too, the warriors are nothing.
  5. +2
    22 December 2011 10: 37
    On the doors of the cars did they draw targets - for ease of aiming?
  6. +4
    22 December 2011 10: 56
    Gypsy woman in the chaise .... that they drove on and ride, rabble. We need to remind them of the 41st.
  7. patriot464
    +5
    22 December 2011 12: 06
    Terrible Romanians marched.
    1. +1
      23 December 2011 07: 46
      Terrible Romanians marched.
      and from the tread of their land trembled ...
  8. 0
    22 December 2011 12: 07
    But what is so much negativity in comments?
    I liked the MLI-84M1 Jderul infantry fighting vehicle with the Oerlikon KBA 25-mm automatic gun module and Spike ATGM
  9. Zynaps
    +3
    22 December 2011 17: 19
    Quote: rumpeljschtizhen
    But what is so much negativity in comments?


    children are the same. if the grandfathers-heroes once kicked the ass, the great-granddaughter-nerds sitting in front of the computers will surely defeat everyone. especially sloping away from the army and if you cut into all parts of Modern Warfare.

    Romanians are in NATO, they don’t drive their army into the ass, and they supply it with weapons at the norm. The Ukrainian military, for example, believes that in the current alignment of forces, Ukraine and its Romanian armed forces will merge unambiguously in the conflict. and they don’t giggle over modern Romanians and there’s no hatred.
    1. German
      +3
      23 December 2011 00: 47
      Zynaps,
      what is now in Ukraine an army can be called only a very large assortist
  10. Sirius
    0
    22 December 2011 17: 45
    And why are they marching along the street, and not over the square? When overthrown Ceausescu gathered in the square.
  11. saratt
    -3
    22 December 2011 18: 50
    in the first world romanians were in conjunction with the Entente, that is, with russia. and romania deposited all its gold reserves for the storage of tsarist russia. do you think she saw something back? and the question is who and when did he first betray.
    just so historical fact
    1. +2
      22 December 2011 19: 33
      sarattand you don’t know where the whole stock went? googled who and where and ours leaked their supply! wink
      1. saratt
        -3
        22 December 2011 20: 11
        that’s where the distrust came from. The agreement was between the states. So one should be offended only by oneself. And someone wrote about nerds and wrote correctly. A self-respecting person doesn’t squeeze such garbage out and don’t spit poison
  12. 0
    22 December 2011 19: 24
    Whoever doesn’t understand, this parade is primarily directed towards Ukraine! Almost like in Georgia. Problems with the islands do not give peace to some hotheads in Romania!
    1. saratt
      +1
      22 December 2011 20: 04
      in fact, this holiday is the day of national unity in Russia. And it dates back to 1918. What does Ukraine have to do with it?
      1. +1
        22 December 2011 20: 58
        Quote: saratt
        . What does Ukraine have to do with it?

        And really, and ........................ maybe Snake Island interested Romania as a golf course and oil has nothing to do with it?
        Everything in this world is interconnected and parades have always been a continuation of state policy !!!
  13. Orthodox
    +4
    22 December 2011 19: 27
    when there was a war in Transnistria, the romanians tried to attack our military unit, then only mince remained from them. There were no more attempts, probably after that they were offended by us))))))))
    1. saratt
      0
      22 December 2011 20: 09
      where did so much nonsense come from? Did the Romanians have been in Transnistria. So, ...... how old are you? How old are you?
      1. mitrich
        -1
        22 December 2011 20: 18
        Quote: saratt
        where did so much nonsense come from? Did the Romanians have been in Transnistria. So, ...... how old are you? How old are you?


        WERE. "Orthodox" exaggerated somewhat, but only slightly. Were, saratt.
        1. saratt
          -1
          22 December 2011 21: 01
          they helped Moldova with weapons, it’s true. but they themselves weren’t. And in general this comment is completely on the topic, and this is probably why they are offended by us. What’s the difference between Ukraine and Russia. It’s their country's day and there’s no insult
          and where there were such heroic battles in Transnistria? there were positional battles. sat on trenches. here that three 64 from the 14th army were knocked out in benders, it’s true. and they were knocked out from grenade launchers as there was no infantry support.
          1. mitrich
            -1
            22 December 2011 21: 30
            saratt,
            look at Art of War, a section on the war in Transnistria 1992, there are both memoirs and lists of the dead (I don’t remember already, Romanians or Moldavians). But that the Romanians participated in the war - 100%. I’m sorry, but apart from Art, I can’t recommend anything, because in Internet matters is not advanced.
            1. saratt
              -1
              23 December 2011 11: 59
              Okay, maybe the citizens of the Russian Federation took part as well as the Transnistrian side, and that's how those who cut out got into parkans. Benders and parkans are on different banks of the Dniester. Parkans are on the left. Benders are on the right and how could Moldovans get into parkans if they didn’t even control the benders, just as they didn’t control the bridge across the Dniester. it’s just some kind of sabotage operation
          2. Simon
            0
            23 December 2011 17: 36
            I would advise you to teach a history of the conflict before writing such comments. were Romanians there. as instructors, snipers, there were Romanian sabotage groups. there were romanian volunteers. on the network you can find a video about that war. at one of them the interrogation of a captured soldier of the Romanian army. in addition, in the summer of 92, after the fulfillment of the agreements on the withdrawal of troops from Bender, when the PMR troops were withdrawn, the Moldovan troops launched an assault on Bender (the graduation party was held in the city that evening). fighting began in the city, there were several centers of resistance that the Moldovan troops could not put out, one of them was the district executive committee. when trying to recapture the city 3 tanks were shot down, but they were handed over to the PMR armed forces at that time, after a long preservation, therefore they were not in very good technical condition. In addition, there were attempts to expand the bridgeheads near Dubosary, in the region of Kosnitsa, Kocier. In this war only Transnistria lost 850 people killed (military), no one considered civilians (it was not clear who managed to leave, who was killed), the Moldovan military killed more than a thousand (somewhere they say that about 5 thousand). Are there too many casualties in six months of positional battles?
            Here is an article about the Battle of Bender: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bender_Incident_ Incident_ (June_1992).
            Learn the story before you write nonsense
            1. saratt
              -1
              23 December 2011 18: 40
              or maybe 10000 thousand, the Moldovan side lost. for a republic with four million people, 5000 is quite a tangible loss. in general, it’s aware that the conflict started in a wallet and in Kochiera. There, the battalion’s forces were disbanded and the Moldovan police were sent to these villages. Or do you think that the Moldovan The police did not have the right to protect their citizens in their territory? The PMR forces still have the status of gangs if judged by international law
              and before you advise you to learn the history of the conflict, look at the map and how the Moldovan group found themselves in the parkans is not clear at all. to do this, it was necessary to force the Dniester, which was constantly monitored.
              and if, in essence, the Moldovan military could not exist at that time since the Moldovan army did not exist. Moldovan police and volunteers fought. And among the Moldovan police more than a third were Russians and Ukrainians of other nationalities
              1. Simon
                0
                25 December 2011 19: 47
                1. Note, I did not write about Parkana, wrote that the battles were in Bender and near Dubosary. 2. The Moldovan army suffered heavy losses from the Atsutara of the 14th army in the concentration of Moldovan troops before they again wanted to storm Bender (for the second time). How many troops were there, only the Moldovan leadership knew, but, naturally, it underestimated the numbers in order to give the conflict less importance.
                3. I lived then in the PMR. I saw off and met my relatives and neighbors to this war. I saw flows of refugees, wounded and killed civilians and fighters of the militia and guards of the PMR, flows of refugees who went not through Chisinau, but through Tiraspol and asked for protection from the "unbelted" fighters of the "Dniester". So I don't have to lie about who defended whom. This war was started on the basis of nationalism. all non-Moldovans were second-class people for the Moldovan authorities. it is all the more not a secret that in the Armed Forces of Moldova there were units of prisoners who fought, and then were released for this. They fought badly, but they cruelly mocked the peaceful. You were not there and close, most likely. you do not refer to sources of information. Do not argue with me, I am a living witness of those events. from afar, warmth and peace, it is always easy to talk about a war that you have not been to. that's why I wrote: "Learn the history of the conflict before arguing about it." too lazy to read - watch the video. in the films "bloody divorce", "General Alexander Lebed" (this is the first thing that came to mind). described these events, albeit with inaccuracies. as for the Moldovan police and its nat. composition: even at civilian enterprises directors, deputies, heads of workshops were fired, if they were not Moldovans, to say nothing of the police ..
                As for the status of the armed forces of Transdniestria and Transdniestria as a whole, Transdniestria was not recognized by Russia, the top political leadership of the Russian Federation did not have the courage and political will to do so. The armed forces of Abkhazia and South Ossetia had exactly the same status before their recognition by Russia, as did the armed forces of the PMR.
                1. Simon
                  0
                  25 December 2011 20: 11
                  as for Cocier, there was a regiment of the Russian army's civil defense. the appearance of the Moldovan police there is due to this, they seized his warehouses, a military town. took the children and wives of Russian officers hostage. and they were rescued by Russian officers and Cossacks who fought for the PMR. Well, this is so on the topic of "protection" of civilians by the police on the left bank. As for the Cossacks, the Moldovans did not take them almost. they had a saying: "A Cossack is not a man!" and here's another one: "Suitcase-station-Russia" this slogan is not Moldovan for everyone (it was 92 years old. There were already few Ukrainians, Russians and other nationalities in the army of Moldova at that time. After the collapse of the USSR, a year or two had already passed). Russians were then blamed for all the troubles of the "unfortunate" Moldovan people, tired of the "yoke" of Russia.
                  1. saratt
                    -1
                    25 December 2011 20: 29
                    Well, yes, and therefore in Moldova there is still education in Russian because the rest are second-class people. Show me another country where state education is in a language other than state. It’s good to rave. This war was not at all national
                    and if we take the percentage in Moldova the ethnic composition has not changed much
                    1. Simon
                      0
                      26 December 2011 15: 40
                      Listen, it's good to lie here! Where is the education in Russian? Only individual schools (maybe several in Chisinau, but in small cities at best 1), in Chisinau at the Polytechnic (I entered there in 2006 for the second higher), Windows was in Romanian. On the right bank in villages, people don’t speak Russian. Adults know him, but those who were born after the 91st Russian DO NOT KNOW AT ALL. Here is an article about the Moldavian language: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CC%EE%EB%E4%E0%E2%F1%EA%E8%E9_%FF%E7%FB%EA. Quote from her:
                      In schools and universities of modern Moldova, the subject "Moldavian language" is completely absent. The subject is “Romanian language” [13]. The main language of teaching in educational institutions of Moldova is also called. The subject “Moldavian language” (in Cyrillic) is taught only in universities and secondary schools of Transnistria, starting from the second grade of Moldavian schools and from the fourth grade of Ukrainian and Russian schools.
                      Here is the article: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_In_Moldavia. I will quote:
                      State policy towards the Russians in the early years of independence was relatively harsh [4]. The outflow of its Russian-speaking citizens from Moldova began, which often was harassed or lost their jobs due to lack of knowledge of the Moldavian language [2]. But already in 1994, the liberalization of the language regime began, pressure on the population of the non-titular nation began to decline, national-language tension began to fade, but in mid-1997 it flared up again. Then the Moldovan government submitted to the parliament a number of projects aimed at tightening the language policy [4].
                      In 2001, after the parliamentary elections, the Communists came to power, whose campaign slogans on giving the Russian language the status of the state language resonated with large sections of the population. However, the Communists did not fulfill their program. (From myself: a large number of nationalists took to the streets in protest).
                      According to the 1989 census, about 600 thousand Russians lived in the Moldavian SSR [2]. In 2004, censuses of the population of Moldova and Transnistria were carried out, which revealed a sharp reduction in the number of Russians and Russian speakers in the formerly unified territory of Moldova [2]. In Moldova (excluding Transnistria) 201 thousand Russians were recorded, in Transnistria - 165 thousand [2]; Thus, over 15 years, the Russian population as a whole decreased by about 40% (from almost 600 thousand to 366 thousand) [2].
                      And some "clever men" still find the audacity to say that the war was not nationalistic on the part of Moldova, and there was no squeezing. Then another quote from the same article:
                      In Transdniestria, Russians practically do not feel national discomfort, their social status has not changed [9]. However, in Right-Bank Moldova, the state’s policy towards representatives of non-titular nationalities was tough [9]. According to the results of the 1996 survey, 79% of Russian citizens on the Right Bank considered that Moldovans and Romanians have clear advantages when taking prestigious and highly paid posts [9]. Among Russian Chisinau residents, 84% of respondents believed that when they enter universities, a similar situation arises [9]. Since the mid-1990s, with the establishment of statehood in Moldova, severe pressure on the Russian population has weakened [9]. In 2002, the Constitutional Court of Moldova CANCELED the decision of the Parliament on the use of the Russian language on a par with Moldavian as the state language in official documents [10]. At the same time, the Russian language retained the status of the language of interethnic communication in Moldova and received the status of an official language in Transnistria.
                      For Russians in the Right-Bank Moldova and Transnistria different types of identity are characteristic. Right-bank Moldova presents a national identity with a pronounced “inferiority complex”, as they were given the feeling that they were “extra citizens” [9]
                      I go there (in PMR) regularly. Any Transnistrian over 25-30 years old will confirm everything I have written here.
                      I ask people who read this argument out of interest to pay attention to the fact that my opponent does not refer to sources, does not operate on information, neither arguments, nor facts for you. Quite speculation, and then false. I value the opinion of every conscious person about my homeland. therefore, if you were not convinced by my words, then do not be lazy and go to the links provided by me, take a look at the video (if there is time and desire). then you will be convinced that my words are close to the truth, and my opponent is far from it.
                      1. saratt
                        -1
                        26 December 2011 19: 21
                        but because they don’t need to speak Russian, or can you force them to decide what language to speak? Yes, your facts are completely saturated with propaganda and operate with how much you want with your propaganda. Just answer me the question when there was mass emigration of the Russian population from Moldova from the right bank to Russia, for example, if they feel so bad on the right bank? Moreover, they do not emigrate to Transnistria, where everyone feels at ease like that))))))))))) But Russia makes it possible to obtain citizenship in shorter wed ki, provided the move to the territory rossii.vot is how to explain?
                        and what is the difference between Moldavian and Romanian if they understand each other 100%?
                        The Austrians do not say that they speak Austrian, but they speak German. There is only one language, and why 10 names in one language?
                      2. Simon
                        0
                        27 December 2011 13: 06
                        Yes, it is not I who force them to speak Russian, but they forced the inhabitants of the PMR to speak Moldavian !!! (after all, there were cases of attacks in Moldova on people only for the Russian speech, though in 89-92). They introduced the state language Moldavian, and demanded that all residents of the former MSSR speak it, but why is it to Transnistria, when 70-80% of the inhabitants of the PMR are Russian-speaking? (During the USSR, more than one generation of Moldovans by nationality who do not know the language). nat. composition: Russians-30,3, Ukrainians-28,8% and Moldovans-31,9%. He wrote: "Learn history", and you write all nonsense. In the PMR they are not forced to speak Russian, in the PMR there are officially 3 state officials: Russian, Ukrainian and Moldovan. If Moldova did not want to return the PMR under its control, I would not care what state they have there. And some "smart people" write that I decide for someone what language to speak to them. FOR ME LET THESE SOMEONE DO NOT DECIDE! I hope now it is clear who is forcing whom to speak a language other than their own?
                        Now with regard to migration and citizenship. It was not difficult to obtain citizenship both in the PMR and in Moldova. It was received by people of all nationalities that they wanted to go to work in the Russian Federation (recently, when the elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation were held in the Vremya program, they noted that Moldova ranks second in Europe in terms of the number of Russian citizens living and only half live in PMR). about migration to PMR - it is simply illogical. abandon all acquired property and leave where a war could start, where there is no official status, where there are disruptions in work and the economic blockade of Moldova and Ukraine since 2005 or 2006? What for? If you give up everything, then it is better to go to the Russian Federation, it is stable there, there will definitely not be a war. high pensions, a lot of work in large cities. However, I can give you an example of migration to the PMR. there is in the PMR the city of Rybnitsa on the banks of the Dniester. on the other side is the city of Rezina (this is already Moldova). they are separated by the length of the bridge (there from the center to the center 7-8 km). So in Rezina there is no heating and hot water for 15 years (there are interruptions with cold water, there were interruptions with light, but now it is not). and the residents of Rezina changed, sold their apartments and moved to Rybnitsa (not only Russians or Ukrainians). Now it is difficult to sell apartments in Rezina. so they move to Rybnitsa for a rented apartment for the winter. Moldavian is different from Romanian. I'm not an expert, but at the university the guys from the villages had problems with Romanian (although Moldovan is native to them), so I can conclude that Moldovan differs from Romanian, like Russian differs from Ukrainian (although here I could be wrong). By the way, about the university, they taught the history of Romania, as the history of their native land (the subject - the history of Moldova was absent). can you also say that the story is no different? For some reason, Ukrainian was separated from Russian, but Moldovan from Romanian cannot be separated? You argue with me so fiercely, but have you ever been to Moldova or PMR?
                      3. Simon
                        +1
                        27 December 2011 13: 56
                        regarding propaganda: I wrote that I saw all this live, that there are many witnesses to those events, they can confirm this information. Okay articles, but there are photo and video documents, indisputable faxes. for starters, do not forget who attacked whom in that war. not the Transnistrians went on a march to Chisinau, but the whole Moldova crossed the Dniester near Dubossary and stormed Bender. Transnistrians had a lot of tension with weapons. if all parts of the Soviet army withdrew to Moldova, then the units on the left bank were Russian, in a state of armed neutrality. At the beginning of the militia, the PMR was armed with rebars manufactured at the MMZ; there were automatic rifles, but 1 for three, and somewhere less. then officers of the Russian army began to help the PMR guards with guns, or joined the PMR guards (because their families lived in the same cities that stormed and fired artillery on the Moldovan armed forces). When General Lebed A.I. was appointed commander, he quickly figured out who the aggressor was and stopped this massacre, striking at the troops from which the civilian population suffered (it was from the 14th Army of Russia that the Moldovan Armed Forces suffered the greatest losses)
                      4. saratt
                        0
                        27 December 2011 23: 19
                        where do you think I myself come from?)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) asked for help. and it was in my opinion on March 70, 2. or do you think that the Moldovan policemen shouldn’t be on a call? and there they ran into the guys from the Dniester battalion. Now explain to me what the police should have done if the Dniester battalion is a gang to the law? and if only everything were as you say, you just had to blow up the Dubosarsky hydroelectric power station and Tiraspol simply soap-by.i I liked the old lady from Prydnistrovia who said before the election that thought and then realized that she filmed and quietly said thank you to me now ubyut.
                      5. saratt
                        0
                        28 December 2011 01: 20
                        yeah and so in Transnistria 40000 tons of ammunition))))))))))))))))))))
                      6. Simon
                        +1
                        28 December 2011 12: 06
                        These are ammunition on the territory of the Russian units, these were arsenals for the entire 14th Army and the Black Sea Fleet in case of war with NATO, the PMR did not belong to these arsenals - this is a fact! they are in Russian units.
                        Even in winter, the Dniester does not always freeze so that it could be crossed on the ice (here I will not argue with you this subtlety, I don’t remember). Firstly, these were not just policemen, but oponovs with machine guns, grenades and vests. Secondly, there is 18 km in a straight line between Kosnitsa and Kochieri. Third, the policemen are good: they crossed the Dniester, attacked the warehouses of the Russian unit, attacked a military town and took the officers' families hostage! And, finally, the main thing: why did they have to cross the supposedly on call ?! Kosnitsa and Cocieri - Dubossary district, in Dubossary at that time there was a deportation of the Moldovan police, if someone turned to the police (which is doubtful), then the police had to come from Dubossar (and not 70 idiots in armored vehicles to shove on ice, because on the ice, they would be excellent targets, however, if there really was a Dniester battalion in these villages). But there is one "but". In Dubossary, a police car (Ministry of Internal Affairs of the PMR) was ambushed, leaving on call (March of the same year). during the confrontation between local residents and oponovites on the bridge (Dubossary), the first shots sounded from the left bank. It was all the work of the Dubossary police (Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moldova). Moreover, it is no secret that Moldovan sabotage groups operated on the territory of the PMR (for example, the Ilascu group, which was caught in the PMR, but how many of these groups were unknown). Even when residents, Cossacks and militiamen "drove out" the deportation from Dubossar, the policemen tried to provoke them to the slaughter (Cossack Zubov was killed by a shot from the police building). As for the "exit", any sane person knew that this "exit" was pure provocation, which would lead to an escalation of the conflict. The PMR was already talking about secession from Moldova (they had already held a referendum) and had the same right to this as Moldova, which seceded from the USSR.
                      7. Simon
                        0
                        28 December 2011 12: 39
                        As for the explosion of the dam, whether the whole of Tiraspol would be washed away or not is a question, but villages and towns along the Dniester would definitely be washed away (both Transnistrian and Moldovan ones). They would have destroyed the Dubossary and Dnestrovskaya GRESs. would have left without energy PMR, Moldova and part of the Odessa region. It's good that there was a military leader in Moldova, who thought of this before, unlike you. As for the grandmother - there are all kinds of people. On TV, the PMR and TSV also show Moldovan citizens scolding the authorities in Moldova and praising the TMR authorities. They showed stories when Moldovan citizens in Bendery turned to the police and said that they were robbed by policemen, policemen called observers from the Russian Federation, the OSCE, everyone went together and took the policemen red-handed. but I did not pay attention to such "dirty tricks" in this discussion. As for where you are from .. Yes, after reading everything you wrote, I would have thought that from anywhere, but not from the PMR and not from the districts of Moldova bordering the PMR. It seems that even if you lived in Moldova, you fled from there in the year 90 - 92. You write what they showed you on TV, and this is true by 50 percent at best. and sometimes you just talk nonsense (for example, you wrote that the war did not start because of Moldovan nationalism).
                      8. Simon
                        0
                        28 December 2011 18: 41
                        And does it not seem strange to you that in the villages opposite Cocier and Dubossar, suddenly, during the "call", it turned out to be a platoon of opon from your words (how many I do not know). But when there was a confrontation on the bridge, there was a Chisinau opposition, and these villages are located upstream and downstream of Dubossary. a feeling that the oponovtsy tried to cut off Dubossary, going from the villages to the highway (in 92 there was such an attempt). All of the above allows us to conclude that the opon was brought there in advance. besides, the question was, was there ice then? if not, then they had to prepare the boats
                      9. saratt
                        -1
                        31 December 2011 10: 26
                        I’m saying propaganda. read, apart from the propogandist sources, other sources of the beginning of the conflict. Transnistria’s hydroelectric power stations mined it and everyone knew about it and the Moldovan authorities could use it so well if they were so bloodthirsty. And you think I didn’t communicate with people from Transnistria and I don’t know how they think
                        everything is based on fear and people are tired of it
                      10. saratt
                        -1
                        31 December 2011 10: 31
                        he said he was kicked out by the police. you know, the referendum was civilized at first. and it was nothing more than an attack on the authorities. so draw conclusions who and how started this war. there are civilized methods. don't act like cattle, and then help us offend. low this
                      11. Simon
                        0
                        8 January 2012 19: 36
                        I have already made conclusions. I was there at that time, and my point of view was not formed on newspaper materials, unlike you. therefore, you would turn on the brain and think before reading the heresy justifying nationalists
      2. Orthodox
        0
        22 December 2011 21: 17
        my father-in-law fought in the PMR, and the Romanians fought on the side of Moldova, and then Moldovans and mercenaries cut out the prom for schoolchildren in parkans; there is such a village in the PMR.
        1. Simon
          0
          22 December 2011 22: 22
          they hit Bender that evening when the graduation party was in violation of the truce. and if the war starts there again, then Romania will again help Moldova, but no one will help the PMR ....
  14. JIGIT
    0
    22 December 2011 19: 51
    The Saak parade was more colorful, and there seemed to be more modern technology ...
  15. Lustrator
    +2
    22 December 2011 21: 59
    Compilation from the Soviet-NATO secondhand. Until NATO (or American racial Jewish financiers?) Wave the baton, Romania will not show its small teeth. But for the "great plan" that the Romanians, that the Poles, that other "former Slavs" are just a consumable. Yes, we do not want to live "democratically", and leave us alone!

    Whose cities will be the first to burn when the Nattis trample the rest, I think everyone understands. But the political elites of the same Romania don’t give a damn about how many citizens R. will receive. Profit is the main thing, people are secondary.

    For me personally, R. is a neighbor not scary, but restless, given the policy of Ukrainian dolls.
  16. +2
    23 December 2011 01: 14
    here to read comets all are not Russian warriors around us ....... and almost every of our neighbors gave us duley at one time .......... (but the fact of course is that they were later answered to all of them) .. but time is changing relax not worth it
  17. Stron
    -2
    23 December 2011 01: 24
    the parade is used as a kind of psychological weapon on a certain side in its own way .... and this is not a demonstration of the Romanian armed forces, but is more like a NATO parade only in miniature ... and as for the types of weapons, yes it’s the most natural collection and in some kind secondhand degrees ...
  18. saratt
    +2
    23 December 2011 18: 52
    and to be honest, I’m amazed. there are terrible experts. the only type of strike weapons in the parade is the modification of the T-55 of a Romanian production that is quite modernized. and who can be intimidated with such weapons? there is a feeling that there are a lot of paranoids waiting for something bad and be afraid