Military Review

Today, in Feodosia, the laying of the new generation RTO "Storm" project 22800 will take place

27
Office of the press service and information chief defense department The country announces that today, 10 May 2016, the solemn laying of the small rocket ship "Storm" project 22800. Bookmark held at the Feodosia shipbuilding enterprise "More".


Designed by the XM of the 22800 project, specialists of PKB Almaz. The displacement of this type of ships is about 800 tons. Maximum speed - over 30 nodes. MRK "Storm" will be armed with a complex of high-precision rocket weapons and artillery installations.

From the message of the press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation:
During the design and construction of the RTOs of this project, the requirements of the Main Command of the Navy were implemented, which allowed to achieve a number of advantages. This is a high maneuverability, increased seaworthiness, as well as the architecture of superstructures and hulls, made according to the technology of low reflectivity. The ship will be able to perform tasks in the sea zone at a distance from the bases about 3 thousand miles.


Today, in Feodosia, the laying of the new generation RTO "Storm" project 22800 will take place


It should be noted that two RTOs of the same project are already under construction. These are the ships "Hurricane" and "Typhoon", which were laid at the shipyard "Pella" in the northern capital.

The order of the Russian Navy for ships of the 22800 project up to 2020 of the year exceeds 10 units.

Admiral Alexander Vitko, Commander of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation, and Vice Admiral Viktor Bursuk, Deputy Head of the Navy for Armament, will take part in the ceremony of laying the IRC "Storm".
Photos used:
http://function.mil.ru/
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alex777
    Alex777 10 May 2016 11: 42
    +5
    The third ship is being laid, but nothing is known about it.
    And this is not a strategic submarine. It’s clear, but why?
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 10 May 2016 11: 50
      +15
      On the European theater of operations, 10 RTOs are worse than the Borey! wink
      IMHO
      1. bulvas
        bulvas 10 May 2016 12: 00
        +8
        Quote: engineer74
        On the European theater of operations, 10 RTOs are worse than the Borey! wink
        IMHO


        And there is.

        In fact - a mobile launcher for Calibers, with a huge range, covering all waiting for NATO protection from the "Russian threat"

        Gauges from the western part of the Black Sea reach Great Britain and Norway, I think they will like it very much



        1. Alex777
          Alex777 10 May 2016 12: 14
          0
          When "Peter the Great" goes on a campaign on it there are only 4 special ammunition.
          Nobody will supply Karakurt with them - he himself will have to be protected.
          No need to compare anyone with Borey.
      2. Altona
        Altona 10 May 2016 12: 40
        0
        Quote: engineer74
        On the European theater of operations, 10 RTOs are worse than the Borey!

        -----------------
        It is good that they are building and re-equipping the Black Sea Fleet on the Black Sea coast, which has been burdened by all kinds of "international" agreements on the inadmissibility of modernization and increasing numbers. While the US churns out "Arlie Burkes" and saturates their fleets with them. A range of 3000 miles is sufficient, considering Mediterranean and tactical missile coverage of "closest friends" in Europe.
      3. donavi49
        donavi49 10 May 2016 12: 58
        +7
        Well, depending on how you count - 10 MPK = 2 Burke, the latter, in addition to 80 axes, will have 30 + DB air defense missiles each for self-defense + RIM-116 for wandered off.

        Again, the Americans in their time produced thousands of axes across Iraq and Yugoslavia.

        Do not make a cult of Caliber. This is quite a modern, high-precision and good subsonic CD.
        1. fzr1000
          fzr1000 10 May 2016 13: 42
          0
          The anti-ship gauge seems to accelerate to 2,3 M on approach, no?
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 10 May 2016 18: 25
            +2
            Quote: fzr1000
            The anti-ship gauge seems to accelerate to 2,3 M on approach, no?


            They are there 2. One subsonic anti-ship missile 3M54A. Another separates the head part for 40 km, which accelerates to 2,9M - 3M54A1 (formerly Turquoise).
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 10 May 2016 18: 55
              +1
              Quote: Alex777
              Quote: fzr1000
              The anti-ship gauge seems to accelerate to 2,3 M on approach, no?


              They are there 2. One subsonic anti-ship missile 3M54A. Another separates the head part for 40 km, which accelerates to 2,9M - 3M54A1 (formerly Turquoise).


              They look something like this ... hi
        2. dvina71
          dvina71 10 May 2016 13: 44
          0
          Quote: donavi49
          Well, depending on how you count - 10 MPK = 2 Burke, the latter, in addition to 80 axes, will have 30 + DB air defense missiles each for self-defense + RIM-116 for wandered off.

          And so it is not necessary to consider. Burke ships ekspiditsioonoy orientation, and RTOs purely defensive. Their task is to fly to the line, shoot quickly (judging by the video from the Caspian .. they do it very quickly) and just as quickly dump the coastal or connection under the umbrella of air defense.
          The value of these RTOs in USK. According to annals on Orlans such USK will be replaced instead of granite pu, and they are promised hypersonic anti-ship missiles. Add 2 + 2 and get .. Low-noticeable, high-speed, having an USK for 8 missiles .. For example, Burke will be able to fight off 8 hypersonic gifts ..? Something tells me that two is enough ..
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 10 May 2016 23: 26
            0
            From 12 will be beaten off. Do not hesitate, just read the SPY specifications.
        3. bulvas
          bulvas 10 May 2016 13: 59
          +2
          Quote: donavi49
          Well, depending on how you count - 10 MRK = 2 Burke, and the latter, in addition to 80 axes, will have 30+ DB air defense missiles each for self-defense + RIM-116 for extras


          Is there a difference, 1 RTO out of 10 or 1 Burke out of 2 destroyed?
    2. lelikas
      lelikas 10 May 2016 12: 00
      +2
      Quote: Alex777
      It’s clear, but why?

      I will open the "SCARY SECRET" - her name is the Internet, everything about the 22800 project can be found in it, well, or almost everything;).
      Now at the Black Sea Fleet, there will be its own, Bad Weather Division!
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 10 May 2016 12: 17
        0
        Mr. Marshal, I beg you! bully
    3. Samaritan
      Samaritan 10 May 2016 14: 25
      +3
      Quote: Alex777
      The third ship is being laid, but nothing is known about it.
      And this is not a strategic submarine. It’s clear, but why?

      Who cares:
    4. chunga-changa
      chunga-changa 13 May 2016 11: 09
      0
      "Bayan-M", modernized in the direction of simplification and cost reduction. In my opinion, the project was only discussed here a couple of times.
      Construction of series for the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Fleet is the most reasonable and timely solution.
  2. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 10 May 2016 11: 46
    +7
    Well, now the Crimean shipyards have earned for the benefit and prosperity of the Russian Navy.
  3. dsm100
    dsm100 10 May 2016 11: 48
    +9
    Handsome. All the same, the Soviet and Russian school of shipbuilding designs beautiful ships. Stylish contours, swift look.
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 10 May 2016 12: 01
      +2
      Quote: Spartanez300
      The armament of the ships of the project 22800 includes complexes of strike and anti-aircraft weapons, combat control systems, detection, target designation, communications. The basis of the shock weapons of a small missile ship of this project is the UKSK 3S14 vertical launcher, designed to store, transport and launch the Caliber and Onyx missiles. The launcher is located across the diametrical plane [1] [5]. The artillery weapons of the representatives of this project will be presented, according to various sources, with a 100 mm automatic universal artillery mount [5] or a 76 mm automatic universal artillery mount and two 30 mm guns [1]. "Karakurt" do not carry anti-submarine weapons. According to preliminary data, the air defense of the ship is provided due to the combat capabilities of the Broadsword "Broadsword" [5]. Radiotechnical weapons will include: Mineral-M radar, AMCOI Trassa-E, BIUS Sigma-E


      So I say that really nothing is clear.
      100mm gun or 76mm? But what about the fact that the Navy sought to reduce the serviced nomenclature and thought how to completely get rid of 76mm?
      "Broadsword" no. And it will be, if (when) it will be, Pantsir M. For now, judging by the only picture similar to the truth and given in the article - 2 30mm machine guns. And they are similar to the modernized AK-306 (1000 rpm). This is not "Broadsword" at all, not even "Duet".
      And yes, the Arrows complement the "mighty air defense".
      About Caliber is understandable. There are no questions. hi
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 10 May 2016 11: 53
    +5
    The energy bridge to the Crimea quietly earned. Without much pump and fanfare. Now you can lay ships in shipyards, and tourists without restrictions accept. They sort of deal with water, I don’t know if it’s final. And which ships to lay - yes those that can build. Not very large, but very necessary.
    There you can build large ones in Kerch. Perhaps they will raise production there.
  6. razmik72
    razmik72 10 May 2016 11: 55
    +11
    If possible, the construction of fishing trawlers and leasing could be started at the same factory. I recently read that the Russian fishing fleet is 90% worn out.
    This would be much more effective than investing in state bonds.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 10 May 2016 12: 11
      0
      Quote: razmik72
      If possible, the construction of fishing trawlers and leasing could be started at the same factory. I recently read that the Russian fishing fleet is 90% worn out.
      This would be much more effective than investing in state bonds.


      Investing in US bonds is a guarantee for investors against our unpredictability (in their opinion).
      If you need investment, buy bonds. How much the state buys - how much the country will receive. And there - as you wish. hi
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 10 May 2016 12: 54
      +7
      What to build? For whom? What kind of money?

      In the North, at one time the 2 of the Koid-2 trawler and Arkhangelsk were built, in 2004 the customer abandoned them. In fact, for 10 years, at a busy military shipyard (Zvezdochka) - two hulls occupied the elings. They even wanted to cut them one time. As a result, for the 3 kopecks, both trawlers were fused with the help of the state. And by the way, for the saturation (gear, equipment for processing fish) they went to Norway.

      Amber bought a project from the Norwegians and is building an 3 + 4 trawler. It turned out quite economically in terms of money, efficiently, plus the state helped the customer with money for what I ordered in the Russian Federation.

      Pella, on the other hand, works on an economic justification; thanks to the modern center, they actually directly compete both in price and in the project, because this is a tracing paper of norga, again.


      The sea is not part of the USC - therefore, nobody will reset the projector for free, and the issue of price, Amber and Pella are re-equipped to a greater extent, but the Sea is frozen in 80's.
  7. x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 10 May 2016 12: 00
    0
    This seems to be the third "announcement". Let's lay it down first, and then we'll tell about it. Or jinx it.
  8. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 10 May 2016 12: 14
    +3
    The ship will be able to perform tasks in the marine zone at a distance from the bases of about 3 thousand miles.
    He has a range of 3000 nautical miles. If he leaves the base for 3000 miles, then he risks not returning back. Think zhurnalyugi what you write.
  9. evgeny1td
    evgeny1td 10 May 2016 13: 33
    0
    What lousy minus set !!!
    negative
  10. Zomanus
    Zomanus 10 May 2016 13: 42
    0
    Ships are just for the Black Sea Fleet. Small but biting.
    Of course, it’s not worth launching such products into the Mediterranean Sea,
    but Black’s water area will be kept under control.
  11. KnightRider
    KnightRider 10 May 2016 17: 20
    +3
    Today, in Feodosia at the shipyard "More" the laying of the small rocket ship "Storm" project 22800 "Karakurt" took place. The new MRK was developed by the Almaz Central Marine Design Bureau (St. Petersburg) and differs from its predecessor Project 21631 in better seaworthiness while maintaining the latter's shock capabilities. RTO "Storm" was the first warship laid down in the Crimea after its accession to Russia, earlier two ships of this project began to be built at the "Pella" Leningrad Shipyard.
    Series.
    OJSC Leningrad Shipbuilding Plant Pella
    Head No. 251 - laid down 24.12.2015 - Urahan
    Head No. 252 - laid down 24.12.2015 - "Typhoon"
    FSUE “Shipyard“ More ”
    Head No. 254 - laid down 10.05.2016 - "Storm"
    Ships inherited the names of river towing gunboats of the Shkval type, patrol ships of Project 2, and small missile ships of Project 1234, which at various times were part of the Russian Navy.