Military Review

New ideological war

83
A bully on the street before an attack always insults his victim, blames something, for example, that she does not have a cigarette. The same happens in big politics: before the attack, the aggressor accuses his opponent that he is guilty, for example, of violating “human rights”, that he lacks something, for example, “civilization”, “culture” and, the last word in big politics, "democracy."




The ideological preparation of aggression is always conducted. Ideology is a kind of “engine of war”: it motivates the military, explains and justifies their cruelty, in other words, invests them weapon in hand. This training is no less important than the production of weapons, otherwise there will be no one to use it.

The situation on the ideological front is becoming aggravated today, and it is time for us to face the truth: The West is conducting ideological preparations for attacking Russia, accusing our country of violating “human rights” and in the absence of “democracy”, and simply declaring “aggressor” for “ polite "salvation of the Russian population of Crimea from the Bandera pogrom. From the fate of Donbass!

A commonplace in Western propaganda was the statement: "Russia defies democratization." If we translate this nonsense into a normal language, the West expresses disappointment over the failure of its attempts to establish control over Russia, to subordinate it to its will. To say this directly is not politically correct, and you have to lie about your highest “democratic values” that Russia does not perceive in any way to devalue it, declare it “uncivilized”, and thereby justify the impending attack.

Essentially, “European values”, they are “democratic values” - they are fake, the same as “communist values”, by the way, both are produced in the West. And, historically, originated from liberal values, it is easy to prove. And they are slightly different from each other, if you think about it.

If we discard the high-pitched propaganda spells, the “European democratic values”, in essence, repeat the slogans of the French Revolution, rewrite in very different ways the very indefinite logical, but sweet word “freedom”. Behind this liberal demagogy it is easy to discover the true European values ​​of today. Let's name some that are in plain sight.

1. Double standard is the main European value. That is, some "standards and values" for domestic consumption, and completely different, opposite, for example, rocket-bomb and "color" operations "to change modes" for export. Starting from the bombing of Yugoslavia, and up to operations on "regime change" in Syria and in Ukraine.

2. Arrogance and vanity, with an offensive taste Charlie Hebdo. For example: “Russia is Upper Volta with rockets, or a gas station with rockets”, and these insults belong to influential politicians of the West, but not to a satirical magazine. After such rudeness, the boor demands the right to impudently impose his only right opinion, because he is "democratic" to other countries, otherwise he refuses to be "civilized and democratic." Ultimately, this “euro value” is also reduced to operations on “regime change” and exemption from the “bloody dictators” of the Upper Volt and Gas Station, on denunciations of their own media. It is only in Russia that the missiles that came from nowhere interfere.

3. Actually, the spiritual “euro values” are today the values ​​of Sodom and Gomorrah, the rights of gay parades and gay man have become the main element of the West’s “human rights” policy, which, under the threat of sanctions, it exports to those still free from Sodom country.

4. “Crocodile tears” - for ideologically “right” victims, when it brings political or economic dividends. They are precisely “crocodile”, because for the “wrong” victims, the West is always silently silent or gives offensive comments in the press, like Charly Ebdo. Compare the attitude to the crash of the Malaysian Boeing over Ukraine and Russia over Sinai - this is heaven and earth. Indignation at the victims of the alleged “Assad regime” and the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria, and the silence about the crimes of the Kiev Bandera regime, the victims of the “ATO” in the Donbas, ignoring the blatant cases of genocide, like the Odessa Khatyn. As well as the consequences of the operations of the Pentagon in the hospitals of the Red Cross, and the outstanding role in the "fight against the" terror "of the US Guantanamo concentration camp." On the other hand, it is a kind of “double standard” value.

5. Technological advances are the only attractive values ​​of the West, however, they are material, not spiritual and moral, and it is the latter that justifies their “right to lead” the West. The advantage in the technologies of the West is historically determined; they have been developing for a long time in other countries, including Russia. At US universities, the majority of students today are from China, India and other "developing countries", the Americans themselves prefer to work as DJs on the radio. By the way, it was precisely at the expense of this value that Hitler hoped to defeat Russia; Today in his footsteps are strategists from Washington.

Chief of Staff of the US Armed Forces, Mark Millie, directly called Russia "the aggressor." From this it follows that the military in the United States has political power, perhaps even more than the current president, or anonymous government circles in the United States who stand behind the military. In essence, the USA is a kind of anonymous dictatorship of a group of individuals, Obama is a fake president. “Do not pay attention,” Secretary of State Kerry once told Foreign Minister Lavrov about his President Obama at a 20 meeting ...

The first statement was made by the newly appointed commander of the NATO forces, American General Kurthis Scaparotti, who replaced the scandalous Philip Breedlove: "if Russia cannot be intimidated, he is ready to fight with her." The self-exposing statement is actually telling what NATO actually does in relation to Russia: it is frightening. (By the way, the “terror” in translation into Russian is “intimidation.”) As the hybrid world war between the USA and Russia is already underway, it is obvious that Mark Milli and his subordinates are preparing for the “hot phase”.

Obviously, it’s time for Russia to respond on the merits to the "intimidation" of the West. We can recognize the countries that call the winners of Hitler a “totalitarian” or “authoritarian” regime as neo-fascist regimes under the democratic mask, under which the Hitler regime acted. Since Hitler blamed the “Stalinist Russia” for the first time, the “Western democracies” simply repeat after him.

It is time to remember that fascism was a pan-European and all-Western phenomenon, and not just German or Italian, it was born by Western democracy, a western national state. Apparently, the grains of fascism are permanently present in the Western "democratic civilized" society, and now they germinate again.

In fact, fascism is the “value of superiority” on some basis. Hitler used the racial trait, today Western neo-fascists use the sign of "cultural and democratic" superiority over the putinoids, Colorado and "developing countries and democracies."

It is time to say that the “policy of democratization” is a policy of subordination of independent countries to the West. The West subordinated the relatively independent - “multi-vector” post-Soviet Ukraine, “euro-associated” with the help of the Nazi-Bandera, so they are democrats for the West, albeit neo-fascists.

By supporting Bandera fascism in Ukraine, Washington showed its real face. And it turned out to be quite neo-Fascist: tell me, as they say, who is your friend ... But he acted "unprofessionally", according to President Putin, by initiating a "regime change" on Russia's borders, possibly due to Brzezinski's "genius". This "gray cardinal" of Washington hoped that Russia would get bogged down in Bandera Ukraine, like the USSR in Afghanistan. However, instead, Washington consolidated Russia, instilled it from the neo-fascist tumor of Maidan, and stimulated the unification of a non-Western world around Russia.

Washington’s ideological preparation for the war against “Putin's Russia” says that Washington can at any time commit a perfidious attack on Russia, as Hitler did in relation to “Stalinist Russia”. Because he prepares an ideological justification for his perfidy, like Hitler.

The chance to prevent the Third World War is, perhaps, Donald Trump, today he is the only major politician and presidential candidate who explicitly speaks of the need to respect the interests of other countries of the world, primarily Russia and China. If he wins ... And if he does not suffer the fate of John F. Kennedy, who also advocated the normalization of US relations with the USSR-Russia ...

I'm fighting for the "Russian world"
Third year,
On the fronts of the Internet war,
Behind the post - the post ...

As the shells of the article fly,
Thoughts are torn like mines,
In the civilian after all,
And former relatives ...

Infoboy boils till morning
There is no loss ...
Only dizzy
And the soul hurts ...
Author:
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Teberii
    Teberii 11 May 2016 06: 28
    +22
    One thing is obvious. It’s time to justify oneself to go on the offensive on this front as well.
    1. Andrey K
      Andrey K 11 May 2016 08: 01
      +19
      I believe that ideological fuss, all kinds of mud pouring will end at the moment when the opponent knows precisely and confidently that he will rake so that there will be only one ideological line: to survive.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 11 May 2016 08: 15
        +38
        therefore, for the West, they are democrats, albeit neo-fascists.
        I do not quite understand the difference between a neo-fascist and a fascist. This is the deputy head of the Ukrainian police reform, mine is mine. Even in the SS Hitler’s military, I haven’t seen such people. As I understand it, a neo-fascist is worse than a fascist.
        1. taseka
          taseka 11 May 2016 10: 35
          +1
          Among this trash, in concentration camps, there were always collectors of human tattoos - I do not envy you Vadya !!!
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. gladcu2
          gladcu2 11 May 2016 17: 24
          +3
          Alexander Romanov

          What is fascism do not understand. I will explain this.

          The author noticed correctly. The ideology of the West is built on deception. Absolutely right. The right of the strong and the right of exploitation must be justified. On the one hand, this is equality, on the other hand, for some reason, someone is declaring more rights for himself. This is one situation. Another is legitimate fraud schemes. Since these schemes allow you to get super-profits, then these super-profits and give a resource to pass through state law. Make them legal.

          So what is fascism? Many do not understand due to the fact that under the USSR fascism went superficially into a definition, because fascism is the connection of private capital, the state and the proletariat. Yes, it is the proletariat.

          What is the negative role of fascism?

          Capitalism is a system of exploitation. You need to have someone all the time. Or the oligarchs tear each other under a strong state. Or the oligarchs tear the people when the state closes its eyes. Or the state, oligarchs and people (fascism) begin to tear the neighboring state.

          How to connect the exploiters and the people? Launch ideologies of external threat and national superiority.

          Fascism is an aggressor, as it is a form of capitalist competition for resources.
        5. Alexey-74
          Alexey-74 12 May 2016 09: 35
          0
          Pull up su ..... ku
      2. Vend
        Vend 11 May 2016 09: 35
        +1
        Quote: Andrey K
        I believe that ideological fuss, all kinds of mud pouring will end at the moment when the opponent knows precisely and confidently that he will rake so that there will be only one ideological line: to survive.

        The time of the open warrior of superpowers has passed. Ideological and economic wars have long come to the fore. They have proven their effectiveness. And military confrontation is for small countries that can be destroyed and pumped out resources.
        1. alicante11
          alicante11 11 May 2016 12: 29
          +5
          Ideological and economic wars have long come to the fore


          A long time ago. And they did not cancel the ordinary wars.
          For example, Germany before WWI was very strongly demonized (Huns, Teutons), in response, the Germans frightened their children with "Cossacks" and despised the "frogs". The same applies to economic wars. Germany began to be destroyed after the British had no hope of an economic victory over the 2nd Reich. The struggle around "naval coefficients" shows this very well. The Germans offered a 10:16 ratio on LC, while the British insisted on 2: 1, thus. trying to preserve their superiority at sea by non-economic methods. And only during the war did they manage to realize and even overfulfill their desired ratio. 10 superdreadnoughts (5 Queen Elizabeth and 5 Royal Soverines) versus 4 (only 2 completed) Bayerns.
          The same is true for WW2, only here the Stalinist USSR has already "slowed down" the industrialization.
        2. gladcu2
          gladcu2 11 May 2016 20: 05
          +3
          Vend

          Open or not open war they will always be present as long as there is competition for material resources.

          I suggest you compare several social devices so that you can draw the right conclusions.

          Capitalism is a system of competition for material resources. It is characterized by the property of the so-called "means of production". Please do not be intimidated by this term, this is not the possession of a lathe. But the presence of a mechanism for making a profit in any area, including banking.

          Capitalism is constantly in contact with the following things. The state as a restriction of the freedom of capitalism in the framework of laws. And the people, in essence whom the capitalists are robbing.

          Imperialism, the merger of big capital and the state, a typical representative of the United States.

          Fascism, the merger of the state, big capital and people under the ideology of an external threat or national superiority.

          Socialism is the merger of the state and people in the absence of private capital. Means of production belong to the state.

          Socialism is the highest stage of capitalism. There is a transition from capital accumulation to its applied use. The following conditions have been created. The people are freed from material dependence through the equitable distribution of material wealth. The vacant natural interest in hoarding redirects to competition in the scientific field. There is an increase in basic sciences, a general increase in the education of the population, which leads to unlimited development opportunities. Development can be stopped by the absence of matter itself. Therefore, under Soviet socialism there were no status things. Since in order to satisfy the needs universal equality is necessary.

          All social protection under capitalism is only an imitation of the USSR. With the collapse of which there was a fall in social protection as an unnecessary form of consumption of material resources.

          Choose what and how to do. The points over i are placed.
          1. gladcu2
            gladcu2 11 May 2016 20: 44
            0
            According to K. Marx, the highest stage of capitalism is imperialism.

            But I ask you to consider a different interpretation, as the highest stage of capitalism - socialism. In this case, it is easier to perceive the stages of development of society.
    2. Finches
      Finches 11 May 2016 09: 22
      +17
      Foggy Albion is a rotten and stinking incubator that generates from decade to decade various ideological monsters so that the Anglo-Saxons could rule the rest of the world! All shit ... oh, like fascism and national socialism, but after all, communism was invented in the same place, they muddied another dregs called "European values" and everything in order to completely rule countries and even continents! And only Russia is still resisting that drives the Anglo-Saxons into a rage ... When the cadets bought on the vine and their sympathizers destroyed the empire, the Bolsheviks took power to save the country, the Anglo-Saxons smiled secretly rubbing their sweaty palms - pushing through their emissaries, such as Trotsky, the idea of ​​the 4th International and the world revolution, which foreshadowed for the Anglo-Saxons the complete submission of our country, but an intelligent Georgian came and ruined everything, burying the ideas of Trotsky and Lev Davidovich himself ...
      Then the Anglo-Saxons gave birth to Hitler, but there was a bummer ... When our country was reborn instantly from the ashes, which the Anglo-Saxons did not expect at all: a nuclear bomb, space ... They even lost their temper and did not spare their protege Kennedy by shooting to to hell with dogs, because he didn’t decide on the Third World War ... Then permanent squeals about the Evil Empire and finally Victory! Recruited (most likely) by the Anglo-Saxons even in his youth Mechanny with his sl ... Raisa is breaking up the USSR with the active help of Yeltsin and others, it seems everything is in the ointment, but ....! Again Russia turned out!
      Now there is a promotion of a brand new for Russia, thanks to which Europe has long lost its independence - "European values"! This is a many-headed hydra: capitalism, atheism, liberalism, national
      l-socialism, homosexual culture ... etc.! When there is a lure with a beautiful wrapper, a substitution of concepts, memory is blotted out, the peculiarities of a nation are lost ..., there is simply a total fooling and de-stifling of the people! This is what we are facing today and our "Immortal Regiment" is one of the answers against such an ideology imposed on us by the West!
      1. Corporal Valera
        Corporal Valera 11 May 2016 14: 23
        +6
        That's right, but I do not agree with this:
        it’s a fake, the same as “communist values”,

        Why are they bad:
        Peace, labor, freedom, equality, fraternity?
      2. gladcu2
        gladcu2 11 May 2016 20: 28
        +3
        Zyablintsev

        You correctly described the course of history. But I want to add that you understand the principle of development.

        The Bolsheviks, Lenin in the beginning launched capitalism. NEP. This was necessary to concentrate the material resource. Further electrification plan GOERLo, educational program. With the development of the means of production, nationalization of capital by the state takes place (all factories were squeezed from private owners). A fair redistribution of the resource from each according to his ability, to each according to work. Shortened working hours.
        Organization for the Development of Science.

        But of course war, an aggressive form of capitalism is fascism. Capitalists are able to defend their ideas and needs.

        The seizure of power in the USSR, the collapse, the looting of the largest owner on the planet of the USSR.

        Return to primary capitalism.
        1. Finches
          Finches 11 May 2016 20: 46
          0
          This is detailing! I am without "n" hi
      3. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 12 May 2016 09: 42
        0
        everything is well noticed ... so it is
    3. Alf
      Alf 11 May 2016 22: 21
      +3
      Quote: Teberii
      . Enough to justify time to go on the offensive on this front.

      To go on the offensive on this front, you need to have a strong rear in the form of state ideology, and now we officially do not have it. How can one advance if there is nothing to shoot?
    4. bondarencko
      bondarencko 11 May 2016 23: 01
      +1
      I don’t understand one thing. Is it really incomprehensible to everyone that everything that the "democrats from the USA" are carrying is a medical case, from GENETICS. Since the discovery of this continent, the "refined civilizers" of the Old World have brought "democracy" there by fire and sword. They reported and are now spreading to the rest of the world.
    5. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 12 May 2016 09: 34
      0
      In principle, everything is true. The West understands only power and fear. Unfortunately, they are generally near-minded people who have long deviated from universal human standards .... and Russia, according to their views, does not fit into the face of the Western world, which means it needs to be destroyed - everything is quite simple if all political tinsel is discarded: find a reason for blaming and strike. It’s time for Russia to stop making excuses, and to consolidate the states that have not yet come under the influence of the West and to attack
  2. vonWolfenstein
    vonWolfenstein 11 May 2016 06: 34
    +12
    Unfortunately, the leadership does not always and does not fully do what seems to us the most reasonable and acceptable. And the thoughts expressed in the article are obvious and they are shared by them, I think the majority on this site and in Russia
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. alicante11
      alicante11 11 May 2016 13: 26
      +1
      Unfortunately, the management does not always and fully do what seems to us the most reasonable and acceptable.


      Well, I would not particularly regret, after all, the management has a much greater degree of strategic information than most of "us" who look at the economy through the prism of their own wallet. As a result, for those who "joined the market" the 90s are a golden time and they build monuments to EBN, and for those who "did not join the market," EBN is a traitor and a robber. If the IVS looked into every wallet in the USSR, it would never industrialize.
  3. parusnik
    parusnik 11 May 2016 06: 37
    +11
    fascism was a pan-European and pan-western phenomenon... Yes, the Nazis trampled the Russian land of various nationalities from Europe ....
    1. Darkness
      Darkness 11 May 2016 08: 03
      +3
      We are now being led into fascism at a slow pace. Starting from more or less large companies and ending with the state itself.
    2. OlegV
      OlegV 11 May 2016 08: 09
      +11
      .... fascism was a pan-European and pan-Western phenomenon.

      this is how Odessa citizens act with provocateurs

      1. LeftPers
        LeftPers 11 May 2016 08: 27
        +9
        Super)) sorry a little pressed, it was necessary to put scum in injury for a couple of months.
        1. Grave With Cross 3
          Grave With Cross 3 11 May 2016 16: 12
          -1
          The Zionist plan works: Russians kill Russians. Everyone is happy: Americans, Chinese, Europeans ... Only Russians are woeful. Nikita Mikhalkov speaks very well about this.
  4. Tanya
    Tanya 11 May 2016 06: 44
    +9
    So it is. Nothing new. All this was already with the Nazis.

    The propaganda campaign, which included the staging of attacks by Polish units on German territory, was carried out by the Third Reich intelligence services and was code-named Operation Himmler.

    Hitler himself told his military leaders about this operation: “I am giving you the propaganda Casus Belli. Its veracity does not matter. The winner will not be asked if he is really telling the truth. "
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 11 May 2016 10: 42
      +6
      Quote: Tanya
      So it is. Nothing new. All this was already with the Nazis.

      Indeed, everything was. And not only among the Nazis. I'm interested in something else - for the same America, by and large, something is always in the way. They always have "at some point something went wrong." They always have one thing planned, but something completely different turns out. Why do they think that right now and it is with Russia that they are lucky? No one was lucky, no matter what tricky plans they came up with - and what if they were lucky ???

      Let them not be deceived - they will never be lucky with Russia. Moreover, the war with Russia is a practically guaranteed end to the heyday of the state. Well, who is Sweden now and who was she before Karl stuck his nose in Russia? This is not to say that the Third Reich could indeed become a millennium if Hitler had the wisdom not only to amuse his paranoia of world domination, but also to read history books and not meddle in Russia ...
      1. 34 region
        34 region 11 May 2016 11: 22
        +7
        Soldat A! 10.42. We also need to learn from our mistakes. And the most important thing is (I do not remember the author): Where the Russian flag was raised, it should not be lowered! And in my opinion this is true. As soon as our flag is lowered, morning begins in the village! The second lesson is the screening of the Gorbachevs when moving to power. It should be a servant of the country, not a slave of profit.
  5. cap
    cap 11 May 2016 07: 02
    +7
    Quote: Tanya
    Hitler himself told his military leaders about this operation: “I am giving you the propaganda Casus Belli. Its veracity does not matter. The winner will not be asked if he is really telling the truth. "


    History must be re-read to the gentlemen. We got carried away with making money. We have something to answer. Poster weapon of propaganda.
    poster

  6. Kos_kalinki9
    Kos_kalinki9 11 May 2016 07: 15
    +7
    From the article: Washington’s ideological preparation for the war against “Putin’s Russia” says that Washington can at any time commit a treacherous attack on Russia, as Hitler did in relation to “Stalinist Russia”.

    Well, about a direct military attack, something is doubtful (IMHO). The answer in the form of ICBMs and will be able to fly across the ocean. Crush the bastards will be economically likely. To weaken, well, then a few scenarios:
    Change of government
    Division into "principalities" can think of something else. Although in the matter of the defense of the Motherland, we cannot relax.
    1. Darkness
      Darkness 11 May 2016 08: 04
      +2
      They will also press ideologically.
  7. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 11 May 2016 07: 20
    +5
    Human rights in the understanding of the West: these are the rights of a "white" person over blacks, Latinos, Russians and various Serbs there. And this is not funny: they think so - and what is this if not fascism?
    1. Lyton
      Lyton 11 May 2016 07: 50
      +1
      Well, if the geyropu is settled by migrants at such a pace, then it will be very Muslim and no Turkey will save, but it doesn’t need it, and the Merikans alone can’t cope with us.
    2. Darkness
      Darkness 11 May 2016 08: 05
      0
      Fascism is a completely different thing.
  8. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 11 May 2016 07: 28
    +5
    This demonization of "unwanted" uzk is not the first time in recent historical time: Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya. Russia, in my opinion, has been demonized longer than any of these countries. The Americans have written one script for all.
  9. okunevich_rv
    okunevich_rv 11 May 2016 07: 33
    +6
    The article is correct, in fairness it should be noted that by 1941 in the USSR the population was much better prepared for military operations, DOSAF, OSOAVIAHIM and the education system played a role. To date, most potential recruits, to put it mildly, have a very vague idea of ​​weapons and tactics. Try to ask your relatives what they will do in the event of an alarm and where the bomb shelter is located, try to assess the chances of survival of your loved ones, as well as what you can do to survive and the subsequent struggle.
    1. Darkness
      Darkness 11 May 2016 08: 09
      0
      At the current level of armament, bomb shelters do little to help.
      1. okunevich_rv
        okunevich_rv 11 May 2016 08: 38
        +3
        You try to find them, they are busy with commercial organizations. They help from nuclear weapons, but they certainly will not help you. The goals of nuclear weapons are not bomb shelters, read, think!
        1. CONTROL
          CONTROL 11 May 2016 10: 13
          +4
          Quote: okunevich_rv
          You try to find them, they are busy with commercial organizations. They help from nuclear weapons, but they certainly will not help you. The goals of nuclear weapons are not bomb shelters, read, think!

          The GO vaults - buried in the 90s - began to revive after the 2000s; repairs there, equipment to update ... And the "merchants" there maintain their working condition, "drive" them out of there if necessary - quickly! And under lease agreements, radical re-profiling of civil defense structures is not allowed as a rule (unless - in violation of these agreements)!
          ... was engaged in GO shelters ...
    2. CONTROL
      CONTROL 11 May 2016 10: 08
      +1
      Quote: okunevich_rv
      The article is correct, in fairness it should be noted that by 1941 in the USSR the population was much better prepared for military operations, DOSAF, OSOAVIAHIM and the education system played a role. To date, most potential recruits, to put it mildly, have a very vague idea of ​​weapons and tactics.

      ... Everything is so ... But - when they shoot at you (at you ...), and you (you ...) have a "Kalash" in your hands, somehow surprisingly quickly you master both "tactics" and "strategy" ... And independently, without prompts! Self-education, so to speak - under the pressure of the external environment and circumstances!
  10. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 11 May 2016 07: 47
    +15
    Unfortunately, our "elite" is an ignorant greedy pro-Western rabble who considers patriotism an indecent word.
    Distortions of Russian and Soviet history that are offensive to Russia are commonplace in the speeches of politicians and the media.
    Until we have a unity of opinion within the country, at least in the history of the USSR, we won’t win the information war.
    1. Darkness
      Darkness 11 May 2016 08: 07
      +7
      But how to do it? If desovetization is at the highest level?
      1. Volzhanin
        Volzhanin 11 May 2016 08: 48
        +10
        The de-Sovietization has already taken place. Now there is de-Russification! And the "highest level" and in jail can be sent or better to the Arctic construction sites.
        I sleep and see how the devil cub with Kyle is writhing.
    2. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 11 May 2016 08: 45
      +1
      Right in the hole!
      When our authorities, especially the relevant officials at the official level, will voice the theses and quintessence of this article without respite, then only I will begin to understand that everything is not so bad and all is not lost!
  11. vjatsergey
    vjatsergey 11 May 2016 08: 01
    +4
    As long as they do not have one hundred percent certainty that they will not receive a response, they will insist on the whole world that the main threat to world peace is Russia. As soon as there is confidence that after a lightning strike against Russia they will not receive an answer - they will strike and will not bother.
  12. Basil50
    Basil50 11 May 2016 08: 17
    +12
    The author is wrong in defining * European values ​​*.
    The only value that everyone in Europe strives for is IMPUNITY. All the slogans about * democracy * and other calls appeared in countries with extensive colonies and many slaves. The ability to trade in people and other related knowledge and skills were not only in demand, but also revered. It was the understanding of the meanness of his deed and * inspired * the slave owners to hire those who can beautifully talk about ugly European phenomena, so even a description of the betrayal was * romantic *. So novels and other chivalrous * prettiness * were published about the Middle Ages.
    Similarly, all lamentations about * leadership * in technology *. Of course, cosmetics and other * amenities * of life are important, no doubt, and it’s a question of who * invented * and by whom it was created, but fundamental science, and everything connected with it, poses many questions. Everyone heard and read about patent thefts and other fraudulent actions of Europeans at the state level around the world. The most advanced NASA still can not do without SOVIET ENGINES. And such a situation in all sectors, already as a joke walks on how and how many secrets are stolen IN RUSSIA, and earlier in the SOVIET UNION. Recently, * democrats * from science generally agreed to the fact that only publications abroad determine the value * of a scientific discovery *.
    So it turns out that the main * product * produced by Europe is * piraism *, and the main producers * of European values ​​* - * piarasts *.
  13. Homo
    Homo 11 May 2016 08: 26
    +6
    The article is correct, but ...!
    "If you look at the essence," European values ​​", they are" democratic values ​​"- this is a fake, just like the" communist values ​​", by the way, both are produced in the West."
    “European values”, “democratic values” have already been “touched”, “smelled”, “tasted”. It turned out to be so d ... oh, that "not in a fairy tale, not to describe with a pen"! There are no options. But "communist values" is a completely different matter, no one has tried, seen, or "held in their hands." There are only ideas, hints, very timid views of how it should look. So how can you condemn something about which there is only a vague idea? This does no credit to the author, who claims to be an analyst who talks about such lofty matters as ideological war. The motives for such a "leveling" of the EC, DC and "communist values" are not entirely clear. Personal dislike of the author for everything Soviet, communist? hi
    1. then
      then 11 May 2016 08: 49
      +4
      European values, as time has shown, are XNUMX% fake, but communist: the right to work, decent wages, free education and health care that we lost is far from fake.
      1. Homo
        Homo 11 May 2016 17: 10
        +3
        Quote: sedan
        but the communist ones: the right to work, decent wages, free education and healthcare,

        These are socialist values. But from this they do not become less significant!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Creotip
      Creotip 11 May 2016 11: 44
      0
      Yes, I agree. Only communist values ​​weren't Christ "formulated"? And they are very different from the "gay European".
      1. Weyland
        Weyland 11 May 2016 19: 35
        -2
        Quote: Creotip
        Only communist values ​​weren't Christ "formulated"?


        Tiny difference:
        Christ called the rich give your; communists urge the poor take someone else's
        1. Creotip
          Creotip 14 May 2016 14: 09
          0
          Take away someone else? - Where is this communist value recorded? They took it from the rich and gave it to the people! Well, the rich do not want to give Christianly.
  14. Darkness
    Darkness 11 May 2016 08: 30
    -7
    In fact, "fascism in essence" is the unification of all classes into a single organism for protection from an external "enemy".
    Those. and the oligarch and the simple worker must live by a single ideology.
    1. Basil50
      Basil50 11 May 2016 08: 49
      +1
      If you derive a phenomenon from the name, then * democracy * is the power of landowners with a mandatory * set * of slaves.
      1. Weyland
        Weyland 11 May 2016 20: 14
        +2
        Quote: Vasily50
        power of landowners with a mandatory * set * of slaves.


        The only way! Democracy - when all Hellenes are equal and free, and for everyone - not less than 5 slavesBecause a man forced to earn a living on his own is not truly free! (Solon)
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Homo
      Homo 11 May 2016 17: 12
      +2
      Quote: Darkness
      In fact, "fascism in essence" is the unification of all classes into a single organism for protection from an external "enemy".
      Those. and the oligarch and the simple worker must live by a single ideology.


      Fascism (Italian fascismo, from fascio - bundle, bundle, association) - ideology, political movement and social practice, which are characterized by the following [six] signs and features:
      [1] a racially motivated justification for the superiority and exclusivity of one dominant nation proclaimed by virtue of this;
      [2] intolerance and discrimination towards other “alien”, “hostile” nations and national minorities;
      [3] denial of democracy and human rights;
      [4] the imposition of a regime based on the principles of totalitarian-corporate statehood, single-party system and leaderism;
      [5] the assertion of violence and terror in order to suppress a political adversary and any form of dissent;
      [6] the militarization of society, the creation of paramilitary groups and the justification of war as a means of solving interstate problems.
      Fascism leads to the complete denial of human rights and freedoms; it carries a potential and real threat to the peace and security of mankind.
  15. uskrabut
    uskrabut 11 May 2016 08: 37
    +12
    No one has canceled the results of Nuremberg, therefore, relying on the Nuremberg decisions, Russia has the right to announce the persecution of fascist followers, wherever they manifest themselves. And he has the right to demand this from other participants in the Nuremberg trials. In addition, it is time to stop being embarrassed to call a spade a spade. The Americans smashed the hospital — declare them criminals and cheat on the entire media space, create Internet resources in English for the quick dissemination of information that is convenient for us (to post and repost), so that the world with a sheepskin appears to the naughty Saxons. In short, poke them, like naughty cats, in your own ... mo.
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL 11 May 2016 10: 26
      +1
      Quote: uskrabut
      In short, poke them, like naughty cats, in your own ... mo.

      ... And someone really weaned in this way the present - not the virtual-ideological! - cat, from this ... himself? ...
      As a real cat it is impossible to disaccustom naughty, poking his nose ... at this very thing! ... you can't wean them either! They have such a nature - with cats! And for "them" - too!
      ... If you have not taught them from "kitty", then - then just drown! Cruel, inhumane, but - ....!
    2. SlavaP
      SlavaP 11 May 2016 14: 30
      0
      Absolutely right. You may be surprised how many people in Britain are already watching Russia Today (RT) and drawing conclusions.
  16. Seraphimamur
    Seraphimamur 11 May 2016 08: 47
    +2
    I deeply doubt the likelihood of war. Not in Europe, not in America there is nobody to fight, they can only drive the Papuans. An example of a war with ISIS. Military hysteria is just a business: intimidating a layman, they pump money from the state budget of their countries. I am sure that Russia can be destroyed only from the inside by the hands of the Russians themselves. We have historical confirmation of this.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 11 May 2016 11: 37
      +1
      Seraphimamur! 08.47. An example of a war with ISIS ?! And what a good example, well they are fighting ISIS! Just as we fought in the Patriotic War. And then they came to share the cake. So it is here. ISIS does all the dirty work for them. hi
  17. GOGY
    GOGY 11 May 2016 09: 17
    +7
    We also supported the Bandera regime in Ukraine, making it a handshake am . I will not say for the whole of Russia, but the leadership is clearly trying to sit on two chairs, which is fraught with the possibility of one day taking the train. And this cannot be explained to any KhPP - there is a elementary decency and squeamishness - do not shake hands with scum and murderers, either we are against fascism and (again!) Half of the world, or we are pledging with an ukrofuhrer, one thing ... And you say war .. .
    1. atos_kin
      atos_kin 11 May 2016 09: 46
      +2
      It used to be that the world was honestly divided into "allies" and "enemies", but now all the "partners" are hands-on, ..t.
  18. then
    then 11 May 2016 09: 33
    +1
    Give Russia 30 years of peaceful life! We would have 5 years to hold out.
    1. atos_kin
      atos_kin 11 May 2016 09: 47
      +3
      Quote: sedan
      We would have 5 years to hold out.

      They will not give "theirs".
  19. sa-ag
    sa-ag 11 May 2016 09: 53
    +2
    Well, one ideology was described in the article, but with what ideology is it fighting?
    1. alicante11
      alicante11 11 May 2016 13: 39
      0
      Well, one ideology was described in the article, but with what ideology is it fighting?


      Yes, in principle, with the same. Only "our" democracy is still young, immature and imperfect. Therefore, he ignores pederast parades and is in no hurry to introduce juvenile justice. But wait, the West will "lower" the GDP and in twenty years we will have the same thing. However, the fact that even the IVS failed to "lower the West" is somewhat reassuring, so that GDP is even less likely to shine.
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 11 May 2016 18: 18
        0
        Quote: alicante11
        But wait, the West will "lower" GDP and in twenty years

        Now, in the age of information technology, the speed of events in my opinion is much faster :-)
  20. ivanovbg
    ivanovbg 11 May 2016 11: 04
    +6
    Excellent article, I sign under each sentence. And I hasten to please - in Bulgaria our next victories on the information front, I am already writing an article. Only slowly my creative work in a foreign language goes, I poke buttons like a talking horse poking buttons on a mobile phone to call the circus is very difficult :)))))))))
  21. taseka
    taseka 11 May 2016 11: 06
    +8
    In order to fight the ideology of the West, where it is based on financial profit, you must first have your own ideology, but I still do not see it - equality? Where do you see him with us? Friendship of nationalities - um! Here it’s generally muddy as it is quiet !!! Maybe someone else will say about our honest and humane court? Especially about 15 years, it’s conditional for a prosecutor who has stolen billions or a son to bring down a woman with a child at the transition! Patriotism is not an ideology, it is love for one’s Motherland. We had a Communist ideology and so far we haven’t given another one! Maybe liberal? So now this is a curse word! No sports - this is the health of the nation! So, so far we have one ideology, the ideology of the party United Russia, but here the question about the members is big? One army collapsed, another agriculture, a third member in the basement stored billions in boxes, yes, what is it, can we have a good education?
    1. Rivares
      Rivares 11 May 2016 13: 42
      0
      Quote: taseka
      I see - equality? Where do you see him with us?

      And where did you see him in nature? Equality is originally a false idea. It's time to replace it with justice.
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 11 May 2016 18: 20
        0
        Quote: Rivares
        Equality is originally a false idea.

        don't say there is no absolute equality, but relative why not
  22. GOGY
    GOGY 11 May 2016 11: 29
    +1
    Quote: sedan
    Give Russia 30 years of peaceful life! We would have 5 years to hold out.
    With such a government, 100 years will not be enough ... There is no time to sway ... So we arrived: neither time, nor sensible leadership, the situation is worse than 41 years old, thanks to the Communists, even though they left the nuclear legacy as we felt ...
  23. atamankko
    atamankko 11 May 2016 11: 46
    0
    It was necessary to be included in this struggle yesterday, but today is not too late.
  24. Obolensky
    Obolensky 11 May 2016 11: 53
    +1
    We need our own ideology. And their ideologists. Correct. Which will help unite the people, prepare them for the battle. I am not talking about war, because, initially, there will be a battle before the war. The very first, when we can throw off and discard those who surrounded us and are trying to disfigure our history and distort our reality.

    It's time to wake up and no longer listen to those who disfigure and distort. It’s not enough not to listen - they must be destroyed.
  25. Angor
    Angor 11 May 2016 11: 58
    +1
    Yeah, the West has always been able to do this, sell illusions. They are the best sellers of illusion in the whole world.
  26. RomanS
    RomanS 11 May 2016 12: 30
    0
    Any military action has a specific goal and objective. Capture of territories and material values. And most importantly, it is the establishment of a ruling regime accountable to the aggressor. Which state (or their community) is today capable of carrying out these tasks against Russia with the help of the armed forces? This is suicide for any aggressor, and in the camp of a potential enemy they understand this perfectly. It's easy to lay sacred sacrifices on the altar of "democracy", like Georgia or Ukraine. And to fight ourselves ...
  27. Dimy4
    Dimy4 11 May 2016 12: 39
    0
    In every era in the West, forces awaken, which our enormity haunts. And they think, forgetting about Napoleons and Hitlers and other "invincibles" who have found death in our open spaces, that this time they will definitely succeed.
  28. trantor
    trantor 11 May 2016 12: 42
    0
    And if he does not suffer the fate of John F. Kennedy, who also advocated the normalization of US relations with the USSR-Russia ...

    Well, with the DFK it was a little different - he decided to fight with the Fed (in fact a private organization), he attacked the holy of holies - the right to print money from the grandmother, but otherwise everything is correct.
  29. 0255
    0255 11 May 2016 13: 39
    +1
    The chance to prevent the Third World War is, perhaps, Donald Trump, today he is the only major politician and presidential candidate who explicitly speaks of the need to respect the interests of other countries of the world, primarily Russia and China. If he wins ... And if he does not suffer the fate of John F. Kennedy, who also advocated the normalization of US relations with the USSR-Russia ...

    Yeah, Trump said that it was necessary to shoot down the Su-24 flying next to the "Donald Cook" - such an awesome "normalization". You never know what he says there. Obama also threatened not to bomb anyone else, kept his promise?
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. SlavaP
    SlavaP 11 May 2016 14: 39
    0
    Yes, there is a danger of NATO aggression. Always has been and will be. But they can only turn to real affairs if 150% is sure of the success of the first (most likely nuclear) strike. They will never go to a covenant war, even having twice and more superiority both in technique and in manpower. The Russian (heroic) spirit has not yet been canceled, but they are molded from a much more fluid test. And the top of them understands this well. So I’m not very concerned about some snags around Armata or the 5 generation fighter, the main thing is the Strategic Missile Forces / VKS / Strategic Fleet.
  32. Charlemagne
    Charlemagne 11 May 2016 15: 47
    +3
    The opinion of a monolithic and homogeneous "West" against Russia is wrong. The "West", like Russia, are victims of the aggression of wild capitalism, international corporations, which, in pursuit of ever greater profits, grind any state into dust, destroying its history, traditions, everything, including the desire to reproduce. It is wrong to equate "Western values" with the entire Western civilization, which, despite a hopeless struggle, was devoured by the globalist Moloch. We have fought, and we are fighting as best we can, we rejected the European Constitution in a referendum, we protested against same-sex marriage, now we are trying to defend our labor legislation. We, ordinary inhabitants of Europe, betrayed by our governments, are not waging any ideological wars with Russia, on the contrary, we need your help !!! Help us, we are not your enemies !!!
  33. Forever so
    Forever so 11 May 2016 15: 56
    +2
    Correct article, good, although there are even more questions. After all, then the rewarding of Judah Gorbachev with the highest order of Russia, the opening of a center to a person who was distributing Russian resources to enemies, all this is the ideological work of the West to destroy Russia. Or am I missing something ??
  34. dobrovic
    dobrovic 11 May 2016 20: 21
    +1
    so that everyone clung to Trump so much, as if from the one who wins the election, something will change ... everything has already been decided and who will win and how much will change ...

    and here, what is changing the image of our country in the West, here is an example from today: I accidentally ended up in Prague at a conference. I get down to the metro, on the right and left are posters with images of Putin: on some, about Putin as Stalin, on others, as the king. I understand that this is just an advertisement of some books, but the picture and the main message remain in my head, so to speak, the message ... Either everyone in Prague does not want to read about anything else, as about our president, or this is a brainwash, but then the question arises, why is it? .. so I agree with the author in something ...
  35. Awaz
    Awaz 11 May 2016 21: 05
    0
    Europe has long turned into Sodom and Gomorrah and therefore Putin already has the legal right to destroy them))))
    1. Charlemagne
      Charlemagne 11 May 2016 21: 43
      +1
      And when your country turns into Sodom and Gomorrah, will you also need to be destroyed? And in the 90s, when Russia was Sodom and Gomorrah, did it have to be destroyed? Hitler-Igilovskoe some kind of thinking ...
      1. gizz
        gizz 11 May 2016 23: 27
        0
        Oh, do not fuss. The war will still be on our territory. Even if Europe suffers, then quite a bit (if the Americans do not "help" as they did last time, although it may not be up to them)). And at the expense of help, if the strength remains, we would fight back ourselves, and then how to do it. Try to organize yourself, come in handy anyway)
        1. gizz
          gizz 11 May 2016 23: 30
          0
          Gentlemen moderators, why is my British flag suddenly? I didn’t seem to have moved yet, I wasn’t even going to))
  36. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 11 May 2016 22: 01
    +2
    Quote: Weyland
    Quote: Creotip
    Only communist values ​​weren't Christ "formulated"?


    Tiny difference:
    Christ called the rich give your; communists urge the poor take someone else's

    This is not entirely true.
    The Communists did not urge to take away someone else's. The idea of ​​the revolution was that the results of labor belong to the working people. In the implementation of this just slogan, what happened was that they took away what they earned from those who honestly worked in the sweat of their faces. But as a result of the revolution, the people got the opportunity to live and develop normally: remember education, medicine, knowledge became available to any person, and this is getting a profession and work. Once, in the 70s, we accidentally talked at a dinner after another subbotnik — we were about 10 young specialists with higher education, from different parts of the country south, Siberia, outback (distribution was all-union) we all turned out to be descendants of dispossessed people, but we all had higher education. And how did those who were prevented from graduating from school learn after the war! Working, having a family, people went to evening school, then evening technical schools and institutes. Therefore, we can assume that the revolution was not in vain — the life of the people has changed for the better.
    Christianity and the Communists had the same values, only their priests promised in the afterlife, and the Communists achieved something in real life. Only they couldn’t keep it.
  37. Volksib
    Volksib 14 May 2016 13: 11
    0
    The point of throwing a bully to the ground without causing him pain and suffering if he rushes at you again and again with even more frenzy. You need to call a spade a spade. And this human attitude to the aggressors and their vassals is enough. Freed from fascism and that, someone that he remembers. Thank you, thanked for the most I don’t want. Excavations dig under the Host’s missile defense base. At the same time let them reserve places on other sites. They always wanted to, they want and will want to destroy us. War is a war of no mercy .All this herd of whining mongrels always needs owners. They quickly ran to the end of the Great Patriotic War on the side of the USSR (Romania example). From the ATS to NATO. And if you have to repeat the story, so that they remember at the genetic level. Too expensive price, to play pity again.