Military Review

Carter accused Moscow of "nuclear saber-rattling"

123
The head of the Pentagon, Ashton Carter, during a visit to Germany, said that Moscow “is rattling nuclear weapons", Returning to the days of the Cold War, reports Bi-bi-si.




According to Carter, Russia, building up nuclear weapons, "is moving in the opposite direction, towards a temporary stream."

The head of the Pentagon noted that he "has only to regret the strained relations between the United States and Russia," thanks to which "deterrence on the eastern flank of NATO remains a priority for the United States."

“Carter’s speech shows how much Russia’s relations with NATO have deteriorated now,” the author writes. In his opinion, “the position of Russia, its rearmament only encourage the alliance to strengthen its own security.”

Earlier, the US Secretary of Defense called “dangerous and unprofessional” the recent actions of the Russian VKS against the forces of the alliance in the Baltic Sea. “Such behavior of Russia in the military sphere separates it from Europe and from the USA,” he said.

Meanwhile, not so long ago, US Navy Chief of Staff John Richardson, commenting on the overflights of Russian aircraft near the destroyer Donald Cook, told reporters that “Russian pilots do not provoke incidents, but only“ send a signal ”to the American military about their presence.
Photos used:
AFP / BBC
123 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sever.56
    sever.56 4 May 2016 13: 33
    +32
    An eccentric - it is he who is trying to jabber with his "bells", which he does not have, talking about the mythical Russian threat to the West.
    For his information: - Russia does not chat, but does business, if necessary.
    An example of this is the work of our VKS and other specialists in Syria !!!
    1. oleg-gr
      oleg-gr 4 May 2016 13: 35
      +32
      Who else to blame? Not yourself, your beloved. He "regrets" the past 90s, when the Drunkard and his government crawled on their knees in front of the Americans ...
      1. The black
        The black 4 May 2016 13: 39
        +3
        Carter accused Moscow of "nuclear saber-rattling"
        Ashton, you're wrong, your bells ring with fear laughing
        1. evgenii67
          evgenii67 4 May 2016 14: 11
          +33
          I remembered the bike or not, in my opinion it was on VO, I will try to convey the essence.

          USSR, exercises, an atomic bomb is attached to a bomb on an external sling, the military, led by a general, are watching all this.
          the plane scatters along the takeoff and then the bomb falls off and starts jumping "rattling" on the concrete. All the people in panic rushed into the ditch, one general stood looking through binoculars and continued to stand.
          when nothing happened, people began to rise, dirty as pigs ...
          and then the general is asked why he didn’t jump with everyone else?
          and he told them: "WHAT IS THE SENSE? IT IS NUCLEAR!"
          1. Aleksey_K
            Aleksey_K 4 May 2016 14: 32
            -6
            This joke speaks only about the stupidity of the one who invented it. Seriously, the general should have said that it simply would not explode. The activation was not carried out, and the explosion occurs only at a certain height or depth (in the ground). A simple ground explosion is the most inefficient use of nuclear charges and has not been used for a long time.
            Examples of the fall (loss) of atomic and hydrogen bombs from aircraft in the world are simply in bulk. None have exploded yet.
            1. GSH-18
              GSH-18 4 May 2016 15: 00
              +3
              Quote: Алексей_К
              The activation was not performed, and the explosion occurs only at a certain height or depth (in the ground).

              I would not be as sure of this as you are. I just know that the primary detonation in a nuclear charge, leading to the implosion of fissile material, is carried out by the controlled detonation of a conventional explosive charge. This says that from the strike there is the possibility of an explosion of not nuclear material (although this is not excluded!) But a simple explosive, as a result of which the area will be contaminated with highly radioactive Pu238 or U235, not counting the consequences of the detonation of the chemical explosive itself!
              1. Asadullah
                Asadullah 4 May 2016 16: 04
                +1
                carried out by controlled detonation of a conventional explosive charge


                Yeah, there are various other adaptations, including mechanical ones. Damn, this would be the energy that people spend to develop mechanisms for destroying each other, yes to Mars ...
              2. Aleksey_K
                Aleksey_K 4 May 2016 20: 32
                +5
                Quote: GSH-18
                I would not be as sure as you are. I just know that the primary detonation in a nuclear charge, leading to the implosion of fissile material, is carried out by a controlled detonation of the usual explosive charge. These things say that from the shock there is the possibility of an explosion, albeit not nuclear material

                The scheme for detonating an aircraft atomic bomb is something like this:
                1 - bomb drop (10000 m.);
                2 - activation of automatic blasting (in 15 seconds after reset);
                3 - turning on the radio altimeter (2000 m.);
                4 - charge detonation from a radio altimeter (500 m.).
                All figures are approximate.
                But there are bombs exploding from shock fuses. This is to eliminate underground bunkers. But they do not explode just when they fall. The process of turning on these mechanical fuses also occurs in a certain sequence. Otherwise, they just dropped a bomb at the airbase at loading and there is no airbase. All nuclear charges have multi-level protection against accidental explosion and fools.
                And lastly, explosives are used in all types of bombs, which do not detonate when dropped even from a great height.
                There were even cases in modern aviation when the rocket did not go off the rails (jammed). The planes landed and did not explode, the rocket was removed and it did not explode again.
                So do not think about self-detonating nuclear aerial bombs or about their dirty explosion.
                Not a single case during the existence and accidental fall of aircraft nuclear bombs.
                1. evgenii67
                  evgenii67 4 May 2016 21: 02
                  +1
                  Quote: Алексей_К
                  The scheme for detonating an aircraft atomic bomb is something like this:
                  1 - bomb drop (10000 m.);
                  2 - activation of automatic blasting (in 15 seconds after reset);
                  3 - turning on the radio altimeter (2000 m.);
                  4 - charge detonation from a radio altimeter (500 m.).
                  All figures are approximate.
                  But there are bombs exploding from shock fuses. This is to eliminate underground bunkers. But they do not explode just when they fall. The process of turning on these mechanical fuses also occurs in a certain sequence. Otherwise, they just dropped a bomb at the airbase at loading and there is no airbase. All nuclear charges have multi-level protection against accidental explosion and fools.
                  And lastly, explosives are used in all types of bombs, which do not detonate when dropped even from a great height.
                  There were even cases in modern aviation when the rocket did not go off the rails (jammed). The planes landed and did not explode, the rocket was removed and it did not explode again.
                  So do not think about self-detonating nuclear aerial bombs or about their dirty explosion.
                  Not a single case during the existence and accidental fall of aircraft nuclear bombs.


                  So we understood everything. It's just a bike drinks
                  it's like in the movie "Features of the national ..."
                  when Kuzmich smuggled a cow on a bomber, and the general told him: "Kuzmich, this is a bathhouse"
                2. GSH-18
                  GSH-18 4 May 2016 21: 54
                  -1
                  Quote: Алексей_К
                  And lastly, explosives are used in all types of bombs, which do not detonate when dropped even from a great height.

                  Sorry, but it’s very funny for me to read such conclusions from an amateur in chemistry. I apologize for being straightforward. A small educational program for a teapot. Simply, for understanding: the detonation of the chemical charge of the secondary explosive in nuclear weapons is carried out by detonator caps that contain INITIATING explosives (I don’t want to describe their properties, you can easily find them in the Internet). So, an explosion from a blow is POSSIBLE precisely because of the presence of these detonators in the system. And I don’t need to paint here what is written on Wikipedia. I studied these things at the Soviet Academy, and I know for sure that nuclear weapons should not be thrown about biton, unless of course you are a crazy idiot-suicide. Once again I apologize for the syllable.
                  Quote: Алексей_К
                  Not a single case during the existence and accidental fall of aircraft nuclear bombs.

                  Pray for this to continue.
                  In Chernobyl, they were also sure that the reactor was accident-free.
                3. el coyote
                  el coyote 5 May 2016 12: 08
                  0
                  The conversation is not about, but that if I or anyone else saw a bomb or a rocket fall off an airplane, while hardly having any special knowledge about the mechanics of detonating such a warhead (apparently the general in this case is an expert in this matter), the instinct of self-preservation would certainly first send me into the ditch.
                4. RuSFr
                  RuSFr 6 May 2016 15: 21
                  +3
                  You are right.
                  "Comedians" don't understand what you are talking about
            2. Ivan Ivanych
              Ivan Ivanych 4 May 2016 15: 23
              0
              is he a general?)
            3. FREGATENKAPITAN
              FREGATENKAPITAN 4 May 2016 16: 07
              +7
              Alexey .... well, firstly ...... the anecdote cannot be taken literally ... but in the sense that you still cannot run away from fate ....., and secondly .... 27 .04. 86 years ... the lowering of the compensating grids in the 4th unit of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant was supposed to lead to the shutdown of the reactor ... and it turned out like ...
              1. Aleksey_K
                Aleksey_K 4 May 2016 20: 44
                +1
                Quote: FREGATENKAPITAN
                27 .04. 86 of the year .... lowering the compensating gratings in the 4-m unit of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant should have led to the jamming of the reactor .. and it turned out like .......

                You wrote about this case very briefly, and therefore this is not entirely true. Automation did not have time to lower these rods to the end. The zone was already hot and partially melted. By the way, therefore, there was no super nuclear explosion of the reactor, because most of the reactor was no longer ready for an explosion. And that insignificant molten part, too, could not explode on an atomic basis, like in a bomb. There are certain laws in nuclear physics, which physicists only after Chernobyl began to guess, and after the Chelyabinsk nuclear accident.
            4. evgenm55
              evgenm55 4 May 2016 16: 34
              +4
              But that’s not the point. It’s just that people said that if it explodes, then everything is useless. And whether it explodes or not is another question.
              1. Aleksey_K
                Aleksey_K 4 May 2016 20: 46
                +1
                Quote: evgenm55
                But that’s not the point. It’s just that people said that if it explodes, then everything is useless. And whether it explodes or not is another question.

                Yes, an atomic bomb will not explode if accidentally dropped. At least how many stupid jokes therefore invent the case. What are you really holding nuclear designers for idiots?
            5. wow
              wow 4 May 2016 16: 40
              +3
              All the "losses" of nuclear weapons in the world are associated with amer's strategic nuclear forces, such as: B-52 (with a full nuclear warhead), their own SSBNs with nuclear ballistic missiles, which by the way no one found .... So DECEIVE writing THIS!
            6. unsinkable
              unsinkable 4 May 2016 20: 52
              +2
              Quote: Алексей_К
              This joke speaks only about the stupidity of the one who invented it.

              My friend, you may need to read it two times and slowly, then you will understand that this is an anecdote and not a scientific work on options for activating a bomb. hi
              1. Aleksey_K
                Aleksey_K 4 May 2016 22: 16
                +3
                Quote: unsinkable
                Quote: Алексей_К
                This joke speaks only about the stupidity of the one who invented it.

                My friend, you may need to read it two times and slowly, then you will understand that this is an anecdote and not a scientific work on options for activating a bomb. hi

                This is not a joke, but an attempt to defraud the military personnel of the Russian army. Imagine them stupid, not understanding anything. And at the same time, an attempt to ridicule Russian military equipment, in which bombs fall off during take-off, by the way from a closed bomb-gate. Liberalists came up with an anti-Russian joke and you rejoice with the enemies of Russia. Maybe you are one of them?
            7. skeptic
              skeptic 5 May 2016 08: 48
              +2
              Quote: Алексей_К
              This anecdote speaks only of the stupidity of the one who invented it. Seriously, the general should have said that it just won't explode.


              Everything is much simpler - there is no point in diving into the dirt while in the epicenter of a potential explosion.
      2. Wolverine
        Wolverine 4 May 2016 14: 02
        +8
        At a time when Russia was surrounded by red flags like wolves along the perimeter, we have no choice but to defend ourselves with all available measures, including nuclear potential.
        1. weksha50
          weksha50 4 May 2016 14: 41
          +1
          Quote: Wolverine
          At a time when Russia was surrounded by red flags like wolves around the perimeter, we have no choice but to defend ourselves with all available measures including nuclear potential.


          Shoigu announced the deployment of three new divisions in the western direction ... There are no details yet, however, I think they will be equipped with tactical nuclear weapons ...

          Let Ashton Carter think about what was the root cause of this step by the Russian Federation and its Armed Forces ...
          1. vladimirw
            vladimirw 4 May 2016 15: 51
            +1
            Carter deeply does not care what we are going to peck at Gayrope and the US troops in it, just not to
          2. wasjasibirjac
            wasjasibirjac 4 May 2016 16: 59
            +1
            Quote: weksha50
            Shoigu announced the deployment of three new divisions in the western direction ... There are no details yet, however, I think they will be equipped with tactical nuclear weapons ...
            divisions are formed from what is, and not from new units. the number of troops does not change.
            1. weksha50
              weksha50 4 May 2016 17: 16
              0
              Quote: wasjasibirjac
              divisions are formed from what is, and not from new units. the number of troops does not change.



              Specifically, nothing was said, except that by the end of 2016 "three New divisions "...

              And what they are - new, probably, we will soon find out ...

              Actually, I’m not used to the fact that such (and similar) news is easily announced ...
          3. Alexander_
            Alexander_ 4 May 2016 17: 28
            0
            This geyropovtsam need to think, Ashton does not care about Europe.
        2. ver_
          ver_ 4 May 2016 15: 34
          0
          ... Duc and we constantly screw them up "both in the grandmother and in the mother of God", if not for the moderator - who watches for the beauty of the great and mighty .. right up to replacing letters with dots, the palette would be more colorful and emotional ..
      3. sub307
        sub307 4 May 2016 15: 32
        +2
        "Than to consider gossips, to work is not better to turn to godfather ..." We recall Krylov and from where "legs grow" from the so-called "rattling". Let's remember Hiroshima .... So who started to "rattle"?
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. el coyote
        el coyote 5 May 2016 12: 01
        0
        I agree. Such statements are similar to the demands of mosquitoes to stop using the fly swatter, spraying insect repellents and installing sticky traps, as well as statements that in a free democratic society all mosquitoes should have free and equal access to the circulatory system of all creatures.
    2. Reserve officer
      Reserve officer 4 May 2016 13: 36
      +13
      "Earlier, the US Secretary of Defense called the recent actions of the Russian Aerospace Forces against the alliance forces in the Baltic Sea" dangerous and unprofessional. "

      And I'm very interested - what actions are "professional" from their point of view? Orchestra and joyous ecstasy at the sight of the Americans? Well, for this there are three pugs in the Baltic, so visit them ...
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik 4 May 2016 14: 53
        +14
        Quote: Reserve officer
        Well, for this there are three pugs in the Baltic, so visit them ...

        And it's not worth it until they pay off in gold. There is no need to steal what does not belong to the Balts themselves.
      2. Lelek
        Lelek 4 May 2016 19: 00
        +2
        Quote: Reserve officer
        And I'm very interested - what actions are "professional" from their point of view?


        Alex, hi
        Are you curious? Read excerpts from Brzezinski's opuses published on this portal, and everything will fall back on its shelves. And Carter, and the mummy-Brzezinski, and Clinton that does not close the jaws, and the "leaky ice hoe" McCain, and the clown Trump are essentially one broadcast of the program on different waves of the "most exclusive and inviolable" printing press called America. yes
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 4 May 2016 13: 49
      +4
      The usual distribution of Europe for the loot for the United States. Do not throw away your old trinkets, but through NATO they can be sucked into the Euros. laughing
    4. Prisoner
      Prisoner 4 May 2016 14: 05
      +2
      What kind of bells are there? When Biden was touching his little wife in front of all honest people, he stood as if it should be. The Minister of Defense could not defend his wife. smile
    5. Andrey K
      Andrey K 4 May 2016 14: 11
      +6
      This eccentric is not so simple, under the guise of incessant accusations against us, they quietly modernize tactical nuclear bombs. At Buchel airbase, in Germany, 20 units of B61-12 ... negative
      1. Michael67
        Michael67 4 May 2016 14: 17
        +1
        "The head of the Pentagon Ashton Carter, during a visit to Germany, said that Moscow is" rattling off nuclear weapons "- as always, turn everything inside out for the scoundrels.
        They themselves are building up and modernizing, and we are being charged.
        One word - ghouls.
        This yeshton does not sing his own songs. Capital pulls his strings, he sings.
        So far, nothing has changed.
      2. CORNET
        CORNET 4 May 2016 14: 33
        +7
        You gentlemen relaxed in the 90s .... Even medals were issued "for victory in the Cold War"!
        And this was such a maneuver to find out "If a friend suddenly turned out to be neither friend nor enemy, but so .."
        There were very informative years (80s-90s)!
        There are no more "naive and kind" Russians! Prepare to be held accountable for all gentlemen ... hi
        1. EvgNik
          EvgNik 4 May 2016 14: 57
          +8
          Quote: CORNET
          Even medals were issued "for the victory in the Cold War"!

          One of the gentlemen of this medal:
    6. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 4 May 2016 14: 14
      0
      The head of the Pentagon noted that he “only has to regret the strained relations between the US and Russia”

      The activation of the US Armed Forces in Europe and the involvement of more and more countries in the NATO bloc -
      this is the main aspect of the strained relations between the USA and Russia!
      This is already an axiom!
      1. Warlock
        Warlock 4 May 2016 14: 25
        +1
        They pulled them, the poor, so they cry
    7. GSH-18
      GSH-18 4 May 2016 14: 49
      0
      Carter accused Moscow of "nuclear saber-rattling"

      While in Germany the USA is "quietly ringing" with new atomic bombs! am Where is the USA and where are their atomic bombs? fool
    8. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 4 May 2016 16: 35
      0
      Yeah, laaadno ... why are we "rattling" here ??? ... It is already impossible to warn that if you trample all NATO on us, then we will not bake Easter cakes for a long time ... we will fuck right away and for sure ... ) ... Better to warn than to collect garbage along the border with scoops ...)
    9. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 4 May 2016 16: 37
      +1
      "Russia is moving in the opposite direction, towards the flow of time ..." - how's that?
      You cannot move backward in time. This is a one-way road.
      If Russia is moving towards NATO, according to the logic of the Americans, they have nowhere to turn back, only forward.
      Hey, Carter, pay for the bumper, weirdo!)) Go there, as you drove before!
    10. Vitya Fishkin
      Vitya Fishkin 4 May 2016 16: 42
      0
      Cho there Old Man says, maybe it's time!
      I have already heard such words from a friend, we will wake up sometime in the morning in the train. before that he said, but no one is bombing us
    11. 222222
      222222 5 May 2016 13: 18
      0
      Carter accused Moscow of "nuclear saber-rattling"
      Cool! US plans to replace nuclear tactical weapons in Europe. ... and it rattles .... Russia !! laughing
  2. Wedmak
    Wedmak 4 May 2016 13: 34
    +2
    Russia's similar military behavior separates it from Europe and the United States.

    Of course it separates, it is not Russia that surrounded the United States with its military bases and continues to build up arms.
  3. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 4 May 2016 13: 40
    +1
    Correctly says the head of the U.S. Navy headquarters, our pilots indicate their presence. I would add and warn.
  4. Hubun
    Hubun 4 May 2016 13: 40
    0
    And I thought that we would fold our paws, but we will look into the eyes from the bottom up. Ho ho not ho ho. And we do not clatter, but proudly carry on a dress belt, but if we strip ...
  5. Yugra
    Yugra 4 May 2016 13: 40
    +3
    We rattled, we rattled and we will rattle. You cannot judge the bespectacled slave of the monkey ...
  6. Valter1364
    Valter1364 4 May 2016 13: 42
    +4
    The most proven indicator of the correctness of the conduct of Russia's foreign political activity is the intensification of cries from the West. yes
  7. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 4 May 2016 13: 42
    +14
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 4 May 2016 13: 45
    0
    Are they beeping? So we are doing everything right!
  9. Urgen
    Urgen 4 May 2016 13: 46
    +5
    O horror, terrible! Russian borders do not brazenly move away from American ships and aircraft! Instead, these very borders came close to NATO bases! Achtung!
    P.S. Some of us are clearly on the other side of the distorting mirror. wassat
  10. Yarik76
    Yarik76 4 May 2016 13: 47
    +7
    At home, we can rattle with anything 'but where did you gentlemen bring your rattles?
  11. wulf66
    wulf66 4 May 2016 13: 51
    +1
    Let them stuff their "regrets" into ... a purse ...
  12. NordUral
    NordUral 4 May 2016 13: 53
    0
    The head of the Pentagon noted that he "has only to regret the strained relations between the United States and Russia," thanks to which "deterrence on the eastern flank of NATO remains a priority for the United States."

    Mr. Carter, don't pull that tight. Then, as you say, Russia will not have to rattle. We do not come to you, but you to us.
  13. Beetech
    Beetech 4 May 2016 14: 01
    0
    A typical example of perverse logic. Of course, it is not NATO that has come close to our borders, it is not their destroyers and scouts who go "on the brink", and Russia is insidiously and shamelessly protecting its own interests ...
  14. lukke
    lukke 4 May 2016 14: 02
    0
    I still don't understand - is he a politician or a military man?
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 4 May 2016 14: 47
      +2
      Quote: lukke
      I still don't understand - is he a politician or a military man?

      Neither fish nor meat. Bad politician and even worse historian and physicist. I was not in the military. The post of defense minister in NATO countries is a place for unlucky gynecologists, historians, physicists. In general, those who have not proved themselves in the profession and in politics. Http: //www.aif.ru/dontknows/file/novyi_glava_Pentagona_Eshton_C
      arter_do
      they
      This is a link about his adventures in politics.
    2. EvgNik
      EvgNik 4 May 2016 15: 04
      +1
      Quote: lukke
      I still don't understand - is he a politician or a military man

      Politician. Education - history, physics. Was the deputy head of the Pentagon.
  15. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 4 May 2016 14: 04
    +3
    "According to Carter, Russia is building up its nuclear weapons"
    And in what place building up - then? The number of charges, however, remains unchanged ... The old ones write off, the new ones are accepted. Is not it so? Their number is known both here and there.
    1. AlexTires
      AlexTires 4 May 2016 14: 14
      0
      That's it, all his words are nonsense of a degenerate in a clown outfit ...
    2. Gray brother
      Gray brother 4 May 2016 14: 21
      0
      Quote: Observer 33
      And in what place building up - then? The number of charges, however, remains unchanged ... The old ones write off, the new ones are accepted. Is not it so?

      Americans have a wonderful habit of attributing to others what they do themselves.
      This is an infectious thing, which can be clearly seen on the example of any Europeans, Poles, Balts and other Euro-Hohols.
      All this leads to bad thoughts. Most likely, such statements jump out of the American mouth in order to justify their unilateral withdrawal from the INF Treaty.
      1. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 4 May 2016 14: 36
        +1
        Well, one-sided - then it will not work. Again, Europe has hit .. laughing
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 4 May 2016 15: 02
          +1
          Quote: Observer 33
          ... Once again, Europe has hit.

          This is not the United States, this is just meat that can be donated for the triumph of democracy.
          Although here, of course, there is a conflict of interest. The Americans want to use the meat for which they paid (this is, first of all, the so-called countries of the Russophobic belt), and the meat is waiting for the Americans to do everything for them and then take their supporters into the occupiers, or at least just allow them to plunder a little.
          The countries of old Europe are also not averse to plundering, but, as it seems to me, they are still afraid of getting unacceptable damage as a result of which they will have to heat their children with radioactive coals and, at the same time, they are afraid to be drawn into the conflict after the Young Europeans.
          At the same time, they are not afraid for nothing - the purely American presence in Eastern Europe is growing and the Americans have a chance to start a mess without taking into account the wishes of any Germany and France.
          1. 33 Watcher
            33 Watcher 4 May 2016 17: 30
            0
            So the "old woman", even in a non-nuclear conflict, will not find it enough. This is the horror of what will happen ... It may be desirable, but it injects too much. They all remember, they only pretend, and they know how to count.
  16. Alex Xorkam
    Alex Xorkam 4 May 2016 14: 11
    0
    A political prostitute is a political prostitute. In addition, there are signs of mental retardation common to many in the United States. The US rattles off with its inflated economic power, formed largely through deception and bribery of officials, and of course provokes asymmetrical responses. However, when asymmetric measures restrict the United States, they are offended like little children.
  17. AlexTires
    AlexTires 4 May 2016 14: 13
    0
    And who cares about his cough? request
  18. sir_obs
    sir_obs 4 May 2016 14: 16
    0
    It is necessary to start with the one who first launched and applied this nuclear weapon, and only then it will immediately become clear who is rattling them and how.
    In general, news like that blamed Russia, this one is already fed up, ... we need more news on the topic -Russia sent to ... this and that, and also a list, the list is published on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and all the Baltic states once again.
    The next piece of news should start with Russia expressing its discontent that everyone it ambassadors to ... is here again. Therefore, once again we remind you where to go all together and quickly.
  19. Taygerus
    Taygerus 4 May 2016 14: 17
    +2
    The Russian borders are miraculously moving towards NATO, while staying in place, miracles and nothing else, but seriously, don't fucking put our bases in front of our yard, the peacekeepers are lousy, well, but Russia does not rattle, but warns you, persons without gender and conscience
  20. maiman61
    maiman61 4 May 2016 14: 26
    +3
    Clattering? So this is great! When we clap our weapons, children sleep peacefully!
  21. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 4 May 2016 14: 33
    +1
    It's just that this is perhaps the last thing that can enlighten the Western Downs. After that, simply chopping off their heads may follow.
  22. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 4 May 2016 14: 34
    +3
    Carter accused Moscow of "nuclear saber-rattling"
    We have and NOT nuclear ... SMARK is called)))
  23. weksha50
    weksha50 4 May 2016 14: 37
    +3
    ""Russian pilots do not provoke incidents, but only" send a signal "to the American military about their presence""...

    There are still sane high-ranking military personnel even in the United States ... It is a pity that they are few ...

    And then most of the sane are already retired, out of work ...
    1. TOZ-34
      TOZ-34 4 May 2016 14: 49
      +3
      It seems that the brain is being taken away for the duration of the service. And only after retirement do they begin to reasonably judge the real state of affairs.
  24. cergey51046
    cergey51046 4 May 2016 14: 45
    0
    Thank fate that I am not the president of Russia, as these weapons rattled through your cities and windows.
  25. Dam
    Dam 4 May 2016 14: 56
    +3
    We need what you would drive into your dull mattress head, we do not rattle with weapons, we do not need to expand, but we will respond to any aggression in full
  26. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 4 May 2016 14: 56
    0
    and laughter is heard after this statement. laughter of a crazy crankcase.
  27. sergo1914
    sergo1914 4 May 2016 15: 14
    +4
    It's just that we are too different with them.
    How would you put a bench in your dacha?
    And they are like this.
    1. tiredwithall
      tiredwithall 4 May 2016 17: 44
      +1
      These are probably followers of Buddhism. There, too, one guy looked at the fence without interruption for about 15 years. They say that he received his sight.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  28. HAM
    HAM 4 May 2016 15: 16
    +1
    As I understand it, if the actions of the Russian pilots were unprofessional, "Donald Cook" and the spy planes would already feed future sprats in the Baltic. belay
  29. Berg berg
    Berg berg 4 May 2016 15: 19
    0
    Don't like this your right! We live on our territory, and you quickly gathered on your continent!
  30. atamankko
    atamankko 4 May 2016 15: 28
    0
    The usual transfer of blame from a sore head to a healthy one,
    such a policy of the United States and others like them.
  31. Forever so
    Forever so 4 May 2016 15: 29
    0
    Illiterate gayropean ass. It is impossible to rattle a nuclear weapon, it seems that the chatter of its trembling bells has hammered our ears. And nuclear weapons can only be tapped, for example with a hammer))
  32. Flinky
    Flinky 4 May 2016 15: 31
    +1
    Dude, we don't bang them. Since we are not bullshit, unlike. It will be necessary - we will get it. But you won't even have time to understand that we got it.
  33. Yun Klob
    Yun Klob 4 May 2016 15: 38
    0
    Do not rattle, but delicately remind.
  34. Yak28
    Yak28 4 May 2016 15: 42
    0
    What else to rattle? Carter is stupid or something
  35. 4ekist
    4ekist 4 May 2016 15: 47
    0
    "... the chief of staff of the US Navy John Richardson, commenting on the flights of Russian planes near the destroyer Donald Cook, told reporters that" Russian pilots do not provoke incidents, but only "send a signal" to the American military about their presence "- this is an adequate statement professional military man.
    And so everyone has the right to "send signals".
  36. Kibl
    Kibl 4 May 2016 15: 47
    0
    Yes! The American black soil is rich, since such morons grow there! Does not excise the fertile layer !!!
  37. t118an
    t118an 4 May 2016 15: 57
    0
    Next time Carter will say that it was Russia * rattling off nuclear weapons * in the skies over Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Poor s ..
  38. Haloperidol
    Haloperidol 4 May 2016 15: 57
    0
    The United States is deploying Tomahawk cruise missiles along the borders of Russia, including those with nuclear warheads, but of course Russia is to blame for everything ... Go and drown yourself in the Gulf of Mexico, American geek, there is your place!
  39. am808s
    am808s 4 May 2016 16: 01
    0
    This amerovskoy balalaika has a long ago defined goal, and in Europe he rattles his tongue not because we are arming ourselves, but because he is afraid that the EU will jump out from under them and think and do on its own.
  40. WHITE CAT
    WHITE CAT 4 May 2016 16: 23
    0
    Whom else should they blame? They got a goal in life: the opportunity to cut a denyuzhku and get other buns. For the sake of this, they will blame us for anything if only they would not be sent off from the feeder.
  41. Verdun
    Verdun 4 May 2016 16: 23
    0
    Carter accused Moscow of "nuclear saber-rattling"
    A classic case when an insolent bully, believing that he will remain unpunished, rushes with his fists at a passer-by that he does not like, shouting "He pushed me!"
  42. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 4 May 2016 16: 24
    +1
    It’s very difficult for the alliance to understand that this is not the 90s and Russia has long been a different country, that with regard to rattling, I think that the regional committee with sixes understands only power.
  43. evgenm55
    evgenm55 4 May 2016 16: 44
    0
    Quote: EvgNik
    Quote: CORNET
    Even medals were issued "for the victory in the Cold War"!

    One of the gentlemen of this medal:

    Well, this creature also from OUR HOMELAND send a bar of soap and three meters of tender rope.
  44. behemot
    behemot 4 May 2016 17: 04
    0
    separates it from the EU and the USA. Yes thank God! away from homosexuals!
  45. kolexxx
    kolexxx 4 May 2016 17: 14
    +3
    - Dad, how long to America to fly? - About twenty minutes, son. Mom from the kitchen: - He asks you about the plane, and not about your "Poplar"!
  46. Ros 56
    Ros 56 4 May 2016 17: 48
    0
    Not all Carters are idiots, Jimmy was smarter.
  47. tiredwithall
    tiredwithall 4 May 2016 17: 51
    0
    "According to Carter, Russia, while building up its nuclear weapons, is" moving in the opposite direction, towards the flow of time. "

    I would like to draw the people's attention to this historic act. Before us is another milestone in superscience. For the first time, it was possible to combine time and weapons production. The last invention in the field of fundamental concepts was made by an unnamed warrant officer of the Soviet Union, combining time and space and time: "Dig from the fence until lunchtime"
  48. BOB044
    BOB044 4 May 2016 18: 08
    +1
    Carter accused Moscow of "nuclear saber-rattling"
    You mister Carter have beguiled something. It is you who are jingling your eggs and thinking that you have them made of iron. And on them oh how painful.
  49. vmo
    vmo 4 May 2016 18: 19
    +1
    Ashton, you're wrong, your bells ring with fear

    Silly, it’s your American soul that is shaking, you’re used to fighting women, children and peasants (although it didn’t work with the peasants, I don’t get it).
  50. Olegmog
    Olegmog 4 May 2016 19: 01
    +2
    I don’t know how to rattle with a weapon, but to twitch the bolt on a Kalash,
    and instantly hot and drunken head cools, just the sound!
    1. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 4 May 2016 22: 31
      +3
      Quote: Olegmog
      I don’t know how to rattle with a weapon, but to twitch the bolt on a Kalash,
      and instantly hot and drunken head cools, just the sound!

      Right! I had a smaller case, being on guard at night I heard that someone was walking past the equipment. I hid a little so that I could not be seen and issued: "Stop, I will shoot!" And in response to me: "You, young man, you have no cartridges in your machine (you have not yet taken the oath)." And I in response to him defiantly lifted the shutter, at night in silence it is clearly audible and I say: "Now we will check." The old man, returning from the girl, through the park of military equipment instantly stopped and no longer even tried to move.
      1. RuSFr
        RuSFr 6 May 2016 15: 45
        +3
        It was a very similar situation. Senior Lieutenant returned to the unit after Afghanistan. When he was on duty in the unit, he constantly checked the posts and came up with different tricks (we only later understood his man who fought, and so the boys were and were fooling around). I used to stand with a friend - he guarded the vehicle fleet, I - the NZ warehouse (one side of the perimeter was common). When you regularly go on guard, you already know where and when the figures of the shift are flickering. And you count how many people go out of boredom and for verification. Once together they entered the guard with this officer (he was on duty for the part). They replaced me and went to the car park. and our breeder was a tall guy under 190cm. I look on duty on part of him recalled, said something and went first, then two sentries and the last distributing one.
        A friend immediately understood who was the first to go through the gate into the perimeter, removed the magazine fastening latch and pulled one edge of the magazine out of the receiving slot. Traditionally he asked who was going.
        The duty officer answered - the breeder with a shift and went to the sentry (15 meters was before him). The guard shouted, lighten his face and jerked the shutter. Then he quietly inserted the store. Silent scene - to put it mildly very uncomfortable. The breeder was older and immediately lit his face, then the sentry was changed.
        Duty friend - you have a cartridge in the barrel - discharge
        friend - you are wrong
        the officer on duty took the machine gun for inspection and of course the cartridge was not there. Then we served in this unit for a month and a half and all this time we did not hear him check the guard outside the cacao premises.
        Stupid we were