Voice of allies
In this regard, A. Gali demands to oblige Russia to recognize the genocide against the Kazakhs.
“Russia should be obliged to recognize the genocide against the Kazakhs, to adopt a special law, as Jews and Armenians did, to build a memorial in memory of the victims of the genocide,” the scientist said.
At the same time, he asks the world community to pay attention to the fact of the genocide of the Kazakhs.
The national liberation uprising of 1916 of the year is a general popular uprising in Kazakhstan against the royal decree of 25 of June of 1916 of the year to mobilize into the army for the rear works of the “foreign” male population of Kazakhstan, Central Asia and partially Siberia from the age of 19 to 43.
The uprising was brutally crushed five months after it began.
This opus is posted on 7news.kz. Anyone can read it and reviews and understand how much we can count on the support of the allies.
I have a question for this scientist: why do you not demand that the period of the war 1941-45 be recognized as the genocide of the Kazakh people? After all, the Kazakhs, too, were drafted into the army, they carried on their shoulders war, giving up livestock to the needs of the army, someone worked in factories. You seem to be a scientist, you should study the development of the state system and, accordingly, understand that in a war, rebellion within the state, not cruelly suppressed in the bud, a priori leads to the collapse of this state, which actually ended. What is the genocide here? You refused to fulfill the duty to the Motherland in a difficult period, for which you paid. Of course, you do not consider the Russian Empire its homeland. Then vassal duty: you also did not fulfill it. So why didn't you have to be punished? All this time you lived carelessly in the open spaces of the steppe under the protection of the Russian army and the authority of the empire, which was enough so that no one could even think about offending you. And here came the moment to give back the debt, and you thought that you were freed from it, and at the most difficult moment.
You are talking about nuclear tests, but weren’t there in Russia? The new land, the Totsky range, the whole of the Urals, filled with chemical. repositories that poison the soil and water, and how many there were man-made disasters, you do not know? Apparently, the USSR still invented the perfect weapon, selective and, at the same time, atomic, or will the Russians living in East Kazakhstania also receive compensation? Or does it only affect the Kazakhs? Or is it just convenient for you? You say the Kazakhs were not allowed into the cities. Is it only the Kazakhs? Do not be cunning, you know perfectly well that the villages of Russian, Mordovians, the same Kalmyks, and not to list them all, have not been released simply, without issuing passports, and this is known to all.
Speak about atomic tests, but the fact that you were left behind from this, Kurchatov is a glorious town, it doesn’t mean that you couldn’t keep the specialists, now you are rebuilding it, and the factories that you currently have money for and whether it’s shaky to support your science? So ask Russia to take out the entire metallurgical and mining industry that it built, let it drive bulldozers at its own expense and ruin all the cities that bother you. People who raised virgin soil in this way also have the right to various kinds of compensation. Who owes them? In this case, the current Kazakhstan? THE USSR? Or Russia again? However, here you immediately say that it was not only the Russians who lived and worked in the union, built communism ... You don’t remember about the times of the empire. Forgive me, but I do not consider you a historian. You're using historical events for the sake of their mercantile, political goals and are not objective. It’s not even insult that speaks to you, not worries about your people, but a desire to become famous, to attract the attention of the public, pure PR, and this is an unprofessional approach. Moreover, through your actions, you are inciting ethnic hatred, which has recently begun to roll over. And most importantly, you are trying to drive a wedge into the relations of two states. Your crazy idea has caught your eyes to such an extent that you, a historian, cannot understand that Russia is your neighbor, and if you quarrel with it, you will only make yourself worse. We are very much tied to each other both economically and politically, I am not talking about interethnic relations. You dump all your lack of professionalism, emotions in the media, thereby provoking people to even bigger squabbles. Are you aware that the number of people leaving Kazakhstan is growing? And it is worth saying that these are not only Russians, a lot of the same Kazakhs are fleeing from here. And for some reason they are fleeing to Russia! In this hated by you, enslaving, oppressing state to all!
And now the question to us is with you: how long will we tolerate such an attitude to us? Well, from hostile states, they do not hide it, but from the type of allies. You know that in Kazakhstan for a long time and quite tightly control the Internet, and more than once there have been cases that people come to work and home and clearly explain what they should not write. And there are cases that sow "for inciting national hatred." So why to the author of the above article, the requirements of the questions do not have the KNB? Maybe it's time to clearly define who is our friend, and who only uses us?
Information