In Yeysk for the NITKA simulator Spetsstroy builds a military airfield

36
In Yeysk, Spetsstroy is building a new military airfield, on which there will be a NITKA-type simulator designed for the training of pilots-deckers. A similar simulator is now operating in the Crimea, referring to Grigori Naginsky, director of the Federal Agency for Special Construction of the Russian Federation (Spetsstroy), reports RIA News.

"In Eisk, an airfield is being built, on which a special runway will be erected. In Russia, such facilities were not built over the last 30 years," he said.

At the airport, according to Naginsky, a NITKA-type simulator complex will be built to practice deck take-off / landing aviation. In Crimea is the only training complex of this type.

The director of Spetsstroy also said that "the construction of the airfield is planned to be completed in 2012, and the test site as a whole - by 2013."

NITKA is a special ground-based training complex that mimics the deck of an aircraft carrier. Its main purpose is to train pilots to take off / land aircraft on an aircraft carrier.

Igor Kozhin, Commander of the Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy, previously reported that immediately after the commissioning of the training complex a group of Northern pilots will be sent to Yeysk fleet. Among them are young pilots who will pass the initial stage of special. training (mastering the practice of landing on the deck of a cruiser). The simulator will work year-round.

According to Igor Kozhin, the completion of construction in Eisk of the airline complex for MA is scheduled for 2015.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. dred
    +8
    19 December 2011 16: 29
    The news is very good.
    1. rysich
      +8
      19 December 2011 17: 13
      Good news, I think that the idea of ​​building your own aircraft carrier fleet is starting to be realized (I really want it to be so). For the training of pilots "Admiral Kuznetsov, the Crimean" Thread "would be enough, and if more ships appear then Yeisk is just the way. The main thing that would have reached the end is the construction of aircraft carriers.
      1. +3
        19 December 2011 19: 52
        And how do the Ukrainian military worry?

        On the air of the Ukrainian Radio Liberty, Mikhail Samus, deputy director of the Kiev Army, Conversion and Disarmament Research Center, said that Ukraine should determine the highest possible price for using the NITKA training ground in Russia, and it pays relatively little for renting the Ukrainian facility of the Russian Federation - about 500 thousand. With such a lease amount of 15 billion rubles allocated for the construction of its own training and testing base in Yeysk, it will be enough for more than 100 years of operation of the Thread in Crimea. The restoration of friendly ties with Kiev does not prevent the Russian leadership from taking measures aimed at reducing its dependence on defense enterprises and the military infrastructure of Ukraine.

        And what will prevent Ukraine from tearing up rent 10 times? IMHO of course
        1. UV58
          +1
          20 December 2011 05: 10
          nothing prevents, especially the demand (which creates supply) is growing - the Chinese also now have an aircraft carrier, but there are no training sites.
  2. +7
    19 December 2011 16: 38
    Cool!!! Yes, and in their own land! In the summer I am going to Dolzhanka. Pilots there often entertain travelers. I'll stop by to see. I’ll grab the binoculars if they don’t let me close.
    1. pokermen
      0
      20 December 2011 10: 31
      Well, actually, the Yeisk Flight School was disbanded this year, the airfield too ..... so it's not a fact that you will see.

      I’m just curious ... why build a new one, if now the old one can be modernized.
      1. puffnutiy
        0
        20 December 2011 17: 39
        I didn’t know about the fact that the school was disbanded, it’s sad (Could something be built on its basis, the thread without disbanding.
  3. Desert Fox
    +12
    19 December 2011 16: 41
    So I suppose, soon they will tell us that on the STAR, they will lay a couple of TAVKRs by the side of the transport for the Navy.
    1. +9
      19 December 2011 16: 46
      It is likely that it will be so, but only when shipyards with adequate facilities are built.
    2. olifus
      +2
      19 December 2011 18: 00
      Quote: Desert Fox
      So I suppose, soon they will tell us that on the STAR, they will lay a couple of TAVKRs by the side of the transport for the Navy.

      STAR with its capacities is not suitable for such construction, there are only two options: SEVMASH or the construction of a new shipyard (the second option is expensive).
  4. Sergh
    +12
    19 December 2011 16: 45
    Ish, you mean, all the same, aircraft carriers will build soon! The breeze has changed to a passing one! And there the Su-50K deck will do (T-50), approvingly.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      +1
      19 December 2011 16: 53
      It’s interesting if there would be a deck varinat 50 tons, eh, there would be even more new pieces 4 so that if something is given to the Pindos to crap (dreamily sighs).
      1. +2
        19 December 2011 17: 07
        Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
        That's interesting, but will there be deck varinat t 50

        As far as I know - already being developed with might and main
        1. +1
          19 December 2011 22: 08
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          As far as I know - already being developed with might and main

          So they started back in 2009 - it is a heavy fighter with a standard take-off weight of about 30 tons, which is supposed to be equipped at the first stage with 117С engines with a thrust of 14,5 tons, and later more powerful turbines.
      2. Sergh
        +7
        19 December 2011 17: 16
        Deck kick (in abbreviation)
        To what class the promising Russian heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser will belong is still unknown. The large displacement suggests that catapults and aerofinishers will be installed on the ship. In this case, it is possible that the project 1143.7 Ulyanovsk ship, a CATOBAR-class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, whose development began in 1984 and was completed due to lack of funding in 1991, could be the basis.

        According to the project, the displacement of "Ulyanovsk" was supposed to be 74 thousand tons, and the ship itself was to receive four nuclear power plants. With a length of 323,7 meters, a width of 78 meters and a draft of 10,7 meters, the aircraft carrier was supposed to serve as a base for 70 aircraft, including the Ka-27 and Ka-31 helicopters, as well as the MiG-29K and Su-33 carrier-based fighters and aircraft long-range radar detection and control of the Yak-44. "Ulyanovsk" was supposed to be equipped with two catapults, a springboard and an aerofinisher.

        Earlier, some experts suggested that such a fighter could be a carrier-based version of the Russian T-50 (PAK FA), which is being developed by Sukhoi in the interests of the Russian Air Force. In particular, Vice Admiral Shlemov said this in 2009. Nevertheless, if such an aircraft is created, most likely it will not need a catapult for launch either - according to the officially announced characteristics, the PAK FA can use 400-meter runways for takeoff and landing. That is, the springboard for the deck version of the aircraft, obviously, should be more than enough.
  5. kPoJluK2008
    +5
    19 December 2011 16: 47
    I hope this is a blank for new aircraft carriers!
    The news is very good!
  6. stankomi
    +5
    19 December 2011 16: 47
    This year I visited there that training aircraft rarely flew, in comparison with 2007, when they drove day and night all day. It seems L39.

    1. +2
      19 December 2011 17: 44
      The air regiment disbanded. Su-24 relocated to Morozovsk. And most of the L-39 was dismantled, loaded onto Kamaz trucks and taken out. Most likely scrap. (I saw it personally)
  7. badabum
    +3
    19 December 2011 16: 54
    Rather, we will buy used Pendos (aircraft carriers for debts))))))))))
    Pendosovsky military-industrial complex will soon switch to conversion))))))))
  8. Nechai
    +4
    19 December 2011 16: 56
    Quote: mambito
    only when shipyards with adequate facilities are built.

    So, in SevMash, the construction of an ice-class oil and gas carrier, which is supposedly underneath the pier, has begun long ago, and, well, TARK, we’ll be able to.
    1. +1
      19 December 2011 21: 14
      If so, then with all my heart I will be glad.
  9. puffnutiy
    +5
    19 December 2011 17: 05
    Good news. In addition to the Crimea, you need to have something of your own under your ass.
  10. +5
    19 December 2011 17: 17
    A good kick for the development of Yeysk; maybe people will at least have some money
  11. Leonid94
    +1
    19 December 2011 17: 22
    Hello everyone. One question is, are there any other simulators other than Crimea and Yeisk?
    1. 0
      20 December 2011 10: 12
      Quote: Leonid94
      One question, are there any other simulators besides the Crimea and Yeysk?

      No, there are no other similar training complexes for training deck pilots. In general, THREAD is a simplified name, the correct one is IUTKKA, the Ship Aviation Test Training and Training Complex. There are funny stories with abbreviations and names of equipment (weapons). For example, Serpey anti-submarine torpedo missile. A strange name? But in fact the typist who typed the project document made a typo, it should have been "Perseus". The typo was not noticed and the document was approved. And so it remained.
  12. Neolexx1
    +1
    19 December 2011 17: 26
    I’ll repair the car, I’ll make a couple of pictures))) And with work in Yeysk, I’m deaf became more) ...

    By the way, we had Perdyukov the other day ... Silent glancing into the city I crept in and looked and dumped until no one knew)))))
  13. Russian officer
    +3
    19 December 2011 18: 07
    Leonid94,
    No. True, the Chinese quietly "photographed" the Crimean THREAD and are now building a similar one for their pilots.
  14. +2
    19 December 2011 18: 28
    good news, but as I understand it, they will soon ask from Ukraine whether NATO will train there
    1. +4
      19 December 2011 19: 40
      from then I will arrange for them :) I live not far there .... I will grease the springboard with grease;)
    2. Anatoly
      +1
      19 December 2011 22: 01
      They have already slipped once. Local gave them a decent rebuff bully
  15. +1
    19 December 2011 20: 22
    It's time to build a simulator for a modern aircraft carrier. And then all the talk about Thread and around Thread!
  16. +1
    19 December 2011 20: 50
    I read about the construction of the springboard in "popular mechanics" in 2007, but they began to build it in 2010
  17. Sergh
    +2
    19 December 2011 21: 54
    Here's another dig:

    Su-27SM3 and Su-30M2 fighters tested in the Kuban

    December 19 2011

    /AVIA.RU/
    December 19, AVIA.RU - Test flights of six new modernized fighters took place at an airbase located near the city of Krymsk. Four Su-27SM3 and two Su-30M2 took to the air, "Rossiyskaya Gazeta" writes.

    Two Su-30M2 and 12 Su-27SM3 were delivered to the Kuban as part of the state defense order. As already reported, the last four "dryers" arrived in early December from Komsomolsk-on-Amur.

    This summer, the pilots underwent retraining at the Lipetsk center for retraining flight personnel, where they learned to operate these machines.

    “So that the base does not remain without pilots, the classes were held in three stages, - says pilot of the Crimean air base Vladislav Pavlov. - Now the entire flight crew has mastered both models. It took a week to study and memorize the location of monitors, switches and levers. we practiced skills on the simulator. "

    The cockpit of a combat vehicle is reproduced on computer monitors with millimeter precision. Everything is as close to reality as possible - the electronic panel has indicators of speed, course, altitude. And if the "student" has forgotten something, then you can refer to the most detailed reference materials.

    Su-27SM3 is a deep modernization of the Su-27 aircraft and belongs to the fourth generation fighters. It has a more powerful engine, increased maneuverability and range.

    But the Su-30M2 is a two-seater combat vehicle, which significantly exceeds its predecessors. Such aircraft can simultaneously hit several targets at once, moreover, not only in the air, but also on the ground or in the water.

    According to the pilots, these winged cars are some of the best in the world. The Su-30M2 is equipped with a refueling system in the air and therefore is able to stay in flight without landing for about eight hours. In addition, liquid crystal screens are installed here, which allows to obtain more complete and accurate information about the systems and position of the aircraft during flight.

    At the beginning of next year, according to Colonel Igor Gorbul, the head of the press service of the Southern Military District, the air base will receive ten more new Su-30M2 fighters.
  18. +1
    20 December 2011 01: 50
    Recently there was news that the Moscow Region abandoned ekranoplans. But it’s a pity that they can actually be built faster than aircraft carriers. And this is the real control of the ocean, the transfer of troops in a short time to large distances.
  19. 0
    20 December 2011 06: 55
    Would rather have built. As the great Lenin bequeathed: to study, study and study again!
  20. 0
    20 December 2011 09: 43
    Nicely! Honestly, already joyfully in my soul! Pride in our Air Force and in general the Armed Forces !!!
    1. pokermen
      +1
      20 December 2011 11: 35
      Why rejoice, in the summer at this place the flight school and the airfield were disbanded
  21. galeo88
    0
    23 March 2012 15: 00
    Shamanov will be appointed Minister of Defense, then the rearmament of the army and navy will really go, the head of the Defense Ministry should be a person with character, and most importantly a patriot.
  22. serjio777
    0
    13 June 2012 01: 18
    Maybe someone will explain why our aircraft carriers did not begin to make a catapult at least on the second "oblique" takeoff? After all, only combat ones will take off from the springboard, and then with incomplete tanks and load. And support? At least the same AWACS do not need something - Or are we so cool that no one will pick us up?