Military Review

Mass media: in 2015, Russia delivered 200 ASM X-59MK to China

31
Until the end of last year, Russia delivered the PLA about 200 X-59MK anti-ship missiles, reports Military parity with reference to the resource "thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com".


Mass media: in 2015, Russia delivered 200 ASM X-59MK to China
Reset X-59МК2 from Su-30МК

It is noted that "the missiles come into the arsenal of Su-30MK2 attack aircraft (a specialized Su-30 family attack aircraft designed for China, NATO code - Flanker-G)."

According to the Swedish SIPRI Institute, aviation The Chinese Navy received two types of missiles - X-59MK and X-59MK2.

Publication reference: “X-59МК is an anti-ship missile with a range of 285 km, maximum speed 0,9М, mass of 320 kg warhead, equipped with active radar seeker ARGS-59 (ARGS-59).

The X-59MK2 is an advanced version of the X-59MK and is designed to hit stationary coastal targets at a distance of up to 285 km, depending on the configuration, it can be equipped with penetrating warheads 320 kg and fragmentation warhead 285 kg. ”

X-59MK2

Su-30MK2 of the Chinese Navy Aviation
Photos used:
forum.militaryparitet.com, KNAAPO, Vitaly Kuzmin
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Meckajiuhe
    Meckajiuhe April 15 2016 11: 55
    +9
    A subtle hint to Western partners?)))
    1. shinobi
      shinobi April 15 2016 11: 59
      +7
      Rather, the Japanese. hi
      1. cniza
        cniza April 15 2016 12: 06
        +8
        Quote: shinobi
        Rather, the Japanese. hi


        And their patrons are the United States.
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 April 15 2016 12: 03
      +9
      Why? Not. The Chinese simply took a full-time weapon kit. Under their C-802 (in the latest versions of 285kg warhead, 230 km of range, 0,9 M, 3 meters at the final stage of approach) - they did not begin to upgrade it. Unlike J-15 (Su-33) - which already shone with C-802.

      C-802 itself is Exoset, which is also a very good RCC subsonic.

      Why, and the anti-ship missile has a wagon.
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz April 15 2016 12: 10
        +3
        Why, and the anti-ship missile has a wagon.

        Moreover, two-thirds of the carriage was spied on from us. They have their own calibers, they have their own onyxes, what else is there? There is even "their own UKSK", and they, unlike us, managed to cram "their missiles" into it
        1. Stalker.1977
          Stalker.1977 April 15 2016 12: 14
          +2
          Yes, they have everything, and what they don’t buy and unlock in the nth number
          1. Kasym
            Kasym April 15 2016 19: 44
            +1
            I would pay attention to the delivery time and quantity - until the end of last year 200pcs.
            1. A couple of years ago, they started straining with bulk islands. And according to the Western press, a military airfield with air defense was built on the islands. Until recently, the United States had never been credited with Beijing as the "main threat". A couple of years ago, they began to build up their forces.
            2 missiles. I remember that Argentina had only 200-7 anti-ship missiles against the English fleet and they were able to sink something. And here are 10 pieces. Given the training launches, enough for 200 large ships (50 per ship). The PRC is not visible before Xerox such a number, they need in kind and now, in fact.
            Surely everyone noticed that many not-so-advanced countries like to brag about some achievements of their military-industrial complex. A Turkish tank and a helicopter (but they are fighting by strangers), Iranian and Korean missiles, 5th generation Chinese planes (they take Su-35), Indian and Iranian tanks, etc. But in fact, where? Why take China on the side (by investing in other countries) and spoil the image of a major player, if you have your own developments? I think they are raw, to put them into service. hi
  2. From Samara
    From Samara April 15 2016 11: 56
    +18
    I do not believe in friendship with China ...
    1. Dam
      Dam April 15 2016 12: 04
      +15
      But do not believe. So far, it is beneficial for us that China divert part of the Amer fleet and resources. We know two friends: the Army and the Navy
      1. cniza
        cniza April 15 2016 12: 08
        +5
        Quote: From Samara
        I do not believe in friendship with China ...


        And we don’t need to be friends with them, we need to make mutually beneficial decisions and deals, but not to be friends.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Error
      Error April 15 2016 13: 53
      0
      Yes, of course, no one believes them; they replicate everything! But the trick is that if you always copy in the role of catching up
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 April 15 2016 14: 03
        0
        Quote: Error
        But the trick is that if you always copy in the role of catching up

        This is if you copy only on one side. They copy everything. 20 years ago, Chinese technology was considered sucks, today in the first place. In all sectors. Since 2002, China has increased arms exports 8 times, and we are only 20%. Not a good call for us. hi
        1. shans2
          shans2 April 15 2016 21: 13
          -2
          we increased deliveries from 3 billion dollars to almost 15 ..... without knowing the numbers, do not take them from our heads ....
  3. iliya87
    iliya87 April 15 2016 11: 56
    +1
    Are we selling Sushi with Khibiny to China? Very similar aggregates at the ends of the wings.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 15 2016 12: 05
      0
      I can be mistaken, but for a long time the Khibiny have been exported
  4. maxim1987
    maxim1987 April 15 2016 11: 57
    +3
    welcome to the south china sea
    1. SklochPensioner
      SklochPensioner April 15 2016 12: 17
      0
      Quote: maximNNX
      welcome to the south china sea

      By the way, Lavrov is now in Japan. All in time smile
  5. samoletil18
    samoletil18 April 15 2016 11: 59
    +1
    It would be nice of the Chinese to experience the American AUG. So, it’s pure: oh, we’ve got the target ship, forgive us, aircraft carrier, we will no longer. And no war. repeat
  6. Wiruz
    Wiruz April 15 2016 12: 08
    -1
    But does it make sense to use such missiles against surface ships? Of course, I did not pick it with a screwdriver - I don’t know all the subtleties, but the subsonic flight speed immediately casts doubt on its effectiveness.
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 April 15 2016 14: 06
      0
      Quote: Wiruz
      But does it make sense to use such missiles against surface ships?

      The complex has. If the attack is carried out from different angles, and with different types of ammunition, even the USA AUG will not be able to fight back. hi
    2. shans2
      shans2 April 15 2016 21: 15
      0
      Do the Yankees have supersonic sea and land based?
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 April 16 2016 17: 58
        0
        Quote: shans2
        Do the Yankees have supersonic sea and land based?

        In a couple of years there will be. They make RCC from an air defense missile.
  7. SklochPensioner
    SklochPensioner April 15 2016 12: 10
    0
    Wishing China: To each bite in a row!
  8. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 15 2016 12: 11
    +1
    Here's the answer for Kerry about our flights. That's right, they don’t understand Russian, they will understand Chinese.
  9. askort154
    askort154 April 15 2016 12: 43
    +2
    The worst thing is if the Anglo-Saxons "quarrel" between China and Russia. As history shows, this has already happened.
    "Moscow-Beijing - friendship for centuries" collapsed. Khrushchev did not like Mao's love for Stalin, whom he presented as a "usurper" (although he himself was at his "dancer"). Mao could not forgive Khrushchev for this. The Anglo-Saxons quickly exploited this "division" and took China into their own hands through the "economy."
    I am afraid that China may once again become the "trump six" between the Anglo-Saxons and Russia. They easily calculate the "sleepy" policy of China.
    1. just exp
      just exp April 15 2016 13: 44
      +1
      China is on its own mind and so far the West cannot control it. in any case, there are secret levers, but not so much as to steer China.
  10. Egevich
    Egevich April 15 2016 13: 07
    0
    mmm ... does she have special warheads?
    1. Leto
      Leto April 15 2016 13: 15
      +1
      Quote: Egevich
      mmm ... does she have special warheads?

      If so, it’s not Chinese honor ...
  11. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 15 2016 13: 08
    +1
    China is actively and seriously preparing to defend its interests.
    Apparently accumulated enough potential ...
    1. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 April 15 2016 17: 04
      +1
      And rightly so. By the way, what kind of copier are we talking about. In principle, physics itself makes all copiers do the same. And China is on the rise. The slogan and rule. Cadres decide everything works at full strength. The country launching its own astronaut on its own ship and rocket is serious. He is no longer trying to make a copier himself. It’s prestigious to be a specialist there. By the way, an official with Windows on his computer quits. By law. And we have an iPhone on the go. Lovely !!.
      1. sherp2015
        sherp2015 April 15 2016 19: 41
        0
        Quote: igor.borov775
        an official with Windows on his computer quits. According to law


        What kind of law? And why is Windows dangerous, for example, to us?
        1. igor.borov775
          igor.borov775 April 18 2016 12: 39
          0
          This is a prescription for civil servants. China has its own system and control. We just bothered and there already. full force works.
  12. Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn April 15 2016 13: 13
    0
    Another argument on the issue of islands in the South China Sea.
  13. Leto
    Leto April 15 2016 13: 21
    -1
    Extremely ugly creature. With such a mass, rather modest characteristics.
    The namesake that was recently shown at the MAKS is much more aesthetically pleasing and better in performance. If of course it really exists, and not the work of modellmix ...
  14. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa April 15 2016 13: 39
    0
    Well, I think ours didn’t work badly on the supply.
  15. Sergg
    Sergg April 16 2016 06: 28
    0
    I would very carefully trade military equipment with China. A very unreliable partner, if Russia is in a difficult position, a knife will be stuck in the back. China must be treated with extreme caution and balance, and certainly not supply China with the latest weapons. There should be no illusions that there should be a large friendly neighbor next to us in the east.