Military Review

The Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China submitted to the UN Security Council a draft resolution on combating chemical attacks of terrorists

14
Russia and China submitted to the UN Security Council a draft resolution on the prevention of the use of chemical weapons in Syria, reports TASS With reference to the Russian Permanent Representative Vitaly Churkin.


The Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China submitted to the UN Security Council a draft resolution on combating chemical attacks of terrorists


“We submitted a Russian-Chinese draft resolution on tightening the nuts against terrorists who are preparing to apply chemical weapon in Syria ",
said Churkin.

The diplomat participates in a closed meeting of the Security Council on the use of poisonous substances in Syria. At the end of the meeting, he promised to tell in more detail about the Russian-Chinese initiative.

The agency recalls that on April X, Al-Ihbariya Channel (Syria) reported that Daish (IG) militants used “mustard gas (mustard gas) against soldiers in Deir ez-Zor province”.

After that, the State Department confirmed the "responsibility of the IG for the use of a small amount of mustard gas in Iraq and Syria during the attacks." The ministry also said that they are holding consultations with Russia on this matter.

In turn, the UN Secretary General expressed concern about the “possible access of terrorists to nuclear and chemical materials or even weapons.”
Photos used:
EPA / PETER FOLEY
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. neri73-r
    neri73-r April 14 2016 16: 32
    +7
    You, what is good gas from good terrorists, how can you forbid it, it’s not democratic !!! Wooooooon, Russia and China from the UN Security Council!
    1. tiredwithall
      tiredwithall April 14 2016 16: 35
      +5
      And who and where did the baboons get mustard gas and other delights? Syrian chem. weapons destroyed long ago and clearly under the control of the same mattresses.
      1. demo
        demo April 14 2016 17: 03
        +1
        There are quite a lot of middle-class scientists in the world who are completely unburdened with conscience and want to cut money.
        And equipment and technology is not a problem.
        Biological weapons are already harder.
        Although if you want to find - not a problem. There are many organizations that have at their disposal strains of such terrible diseases that there will be tens of thousands of victims.
        And after all, there may be someone who buys another hundred thousand bucks.
        Well, the most difficult, of course, nuclear weapons.
      2. Freelancer7
        Freelancer7 April 14 2016 22: 55
        0
        Deliveries from Turkey are quickly reliable, not expensive. Follow the news - there was recently infa.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets April 14 2016 16: 37
        +1
        Quote: Thrall
        Palau and Ukro-Gabon will be against

        Yes, the new states will clearly be against it.
        Quote: neri73-r
        this is good gas from good terrorists, how can you forbid it, it's not democratic !!!

        All the more so "using small amounts of mustard gas during attacks in Iraq and Syria", well, think the boys sprinkled a lot of maninks, what’s wrong with that? request
        1. PKK
          PKK April 14 2016 18: 10
          +1
          I note that Big Dad said that they used a "small" amount of mustard gas. If the Syrians would use mustard gas, it would be more than from mustard gas. The United States is reluctant to give its wards under the knife, but it will have to.
  2. nazar_0753
    nazar_0753 April 14 2016 16: 40
    +1
    I predict that the resolution will be blocked. Do not go to a fortuneteller. Although if I am mistaken, I will only be glad hi
    1. APASUS
      APASUS April 14 2016 19: 06
      0
      Why predict it?
      That this weapon is being boiled on the knee or baked in the barbecue. It is supplied by the same Turks or Saudis, maybe by the Americans. Yes, given the training, this is not for ordinary Bedouins
  3. demiurg
    demiurg April 14 2016 16: 48
    +1
    Speaking of chemical attacks, why are our kosher friends (this nifiga is not an insult, but the true truth, it just sounds ridiculous) do not bomb terrorists with chemical weapons?
  4. Olegater
    Olegater April 14 2016 16: 48
    0
    The resolution is another big nail in the UN coffin. You see, the Korean blank is worried. If he were to slip him under the gas attack of the boarded jackals and see how later he would be worried that he would get his narrow guns out (you can put a minus, etc., but such facts as blocking projects aimed at destroying terrorists and banning the use of chemical and bacteriological weapons are simply outraged) the blocking of the project will be - my opinion.
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter April 14 2016 16: 52
    +1
    To heat them in sulfuric acid, who uses chemical weapons. Slow! Even slower.
    1. Olegater
      Olegater April 14 2016 16: 56
      0
      Absolutely meeeeeed. am
  6. demiurg
    demiurg April 14 2016 16: 59
    0
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    To heat them in sulfuric acid, who uses chemical weapons. Slow! Even slower.


    You are inhumane and impractical. It is necessary to disassemble them into organs, for the sake of humanism under general anesthesia. For the sake of practicality, gradually.
    1. In100gram
      In100gram April 14 2016 19: 52
      0
      Quote: demiurg
      It is necessary to disassemble them into organs

      Bodies "that are not real (s)". How can others live with these organs later? Remember "Heart of a Dog". If disassembled, then cut into pieces for dogs alive. But this is not humane. Sorry for the dogs