The Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China submitted to the UN Security Council a draft resolution on combating chemical attacks of terrorists

Russia and China submitted to the UN Security Council a draft resolution on the prevention of the use of chemical weapons in Syria, reports TASS With reference to the Russian Permanent Representative Vitaly Churkin.

“We submitted a Russian-Chinese draft resolution on tightening the nuts against terrorists who are preparing to apply chemical weapon in Syria ",

said Churkin.

The diplomat participates in a closed meeting of the Security Council on the use of poisonous substances in Syria. At the end of the meeting, he promised to tell in more detail about the Russian-Chinese initiative.

The agency recalls that on April X, Al-Ihbariya Channel (Syria) reported that Daish (IG) militants used “mustard gas (mustard gas) against soldiers in Deir ez-Zor province”.

After that, the State Department confirmed the "responsibility of the IG for the use of a small amount of mustard gas in Iraq and Syria during the attacks." The ministry also said that they are holding consultations with Russia on this matter.

In turn, the UN Secretary General expressed concern about the “possible access of terrorists to nuclear and chemical materials or even weapons.”

Comments

[neri73-r]

You, what is good gas from good terrorists, how can you forbid it, it’s not democratic !!! Wooooooon, Russia and China from the UN Security Council!

[tiredwithall]

And who and where did the baboons get mustard gas and other delights? Syrian chem. weapons destroyed long ago and clearly under the control of the same mattresses.

[demo]

There are quite a lot of middle-class scientists in the world who are completely unburdened with conscience and want to cut money.
And equipment and technology is not a problem.
Biological weapons are already harder.
Although if you want to find - not a problem. There are many organizations that have at their disposal strains of such terrible diseases that there will be tens of thousands of victims.
And after all, there may be someone who buys another hundred thousand bucks.
Well, the most difficult, of course, nuclear weapons.

[Freelancer7]

Deliveries from Turkey are quickly reliable, not expensive. Follow the news - there was recently infa.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: Thrall

Palau and Ukro-Gabon will be against

Yes, the new states will clearly be against it.

Quote: neri73-r

this is good gas from good terrorists, how can you forbid it, it's not democratic !!!

All the more so "using small amounts of mustard gas during attacks in Iraq and Syria", well, think the boys sprinkled a lot of maninks, what’s wrong with that?

[PKK]

I note that Big Dad said that they used a "small" amount of mustard gas. If the Syrians would use mustard gas, it would be more than from mustard gas. The United States is reluctant to give its wards under the knife, but it will have to.

[nazar_0753]

I predict that the resolution will be blocked. Do not go to a fortuneteller. Although if I am mistaken, I will only be glad

[APASUS]

Why predict it?
That this weapon is being boiled on the knee or baked in the barbecue. It is supplied by the same Turks or Saudis, maybe by the Americans. Yes, given the training, this is not for ordinary Bedouins

[demiurg]

Speaking of chemical attacks, why are our kosher friends (this nifiga is not an insult, but the true truth, it just sounds ridiculous) do not bomb terrorists with chemical weapons?

[Olegater]

The resolution is another big nail in the UN coffin. You see, the Korean blank is worried. If he were to slip him under the gas attack of the boarded jackals and see how later he would be worried that he would get his narrow guns out (you can put a minus, etc., but such facts as blocking projects aimed at destroying terrorists and banning the use of chemical and bacteriological weapons are simply outraged) the blocking of the project will be - my opinion.

[Mountain shooter]

To heat them in sulfuric acid, who uses chemical weapons. Slow! Even slower.

[Olegater]

Absolutely meeeeeed.

[demiurg]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

To heat them in sulfuric acid, who uses chemical weapons. Slow! Even slower.

You are inhumane and impractical. It is necessary to disassemble them into organs, for the sake of humanism under general anesthesia. For the sake of practicality, gradually.

[In100gram]

Quote: demiurg

It is necessary to disassemble them into organs

Bodies "that are not real (s)". How can others live with these organs later? Remember "Heart of a Dog". If disassembled, then cut into pieces for dogs alive. But this is not humane. Sorry for the dogs