Military Review

Pentagon redeployed B-52 bombers to Qatar to fight ISIS

85
The US Air Force yesterday transferred B-52 strategic bombers, which are planned to be used in operations against terrorists in Iraq and Syria, to the al-Udeid airbase in Qatar, reports RIA News Post by American General Charles Brown.




Earlier it was reported about the intention of the Pentagon to replace those participating in the anti-terrorist campaign B-1 with B-52 aircraft.

“The B-52 bombers demonstrate our continued desire to pressure Daesh and protect the region under any circumstances in the future,” said Brown.

According to him, “the aircraft will carry out several types of operations, including providing direct air support and conducting operational attacks using weapons high precision. "

Another US Air Force general, Chris Kars, said he would not name the number of aircraft sent to Qatar “for security reasons.”

The agency notes that B-52 was based in the Middle East for the first time since 1991.
Photos used:
http://www.wowjournal.ru/
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr April 10 2016 10: 32
    +11
    To combat Daesh. Introducing a new strategy. One Amer general already suggested that the enemy would scatter and capitulate from a single F-35 type. Decided to start the test with a show of veterans?
    1. BilliBoms09
      BilliBoms09 April 10 2016 10: 38
      +1
      The U.S. Air Force deployed B-52 strategic bombers, which are planned to be used in operations against terrorists in Iraq and Syria, yesterday at the al-Udeid air base in Qatar,
      They would have used atomic weapons! Yes, I remember that our airborne forces used TU 160 and TU 95, but this was a test of new weapons and the operating time of using strategists in a combat training environment. And why Americans overtook the strategists, I do not understand. They used them in both Iraqi companies, and in Vietnam, and in Yugoslavia. So experience and best practices are higher than the roof. They probably want to once again show who is the boss in the house. I think after the work of the Russian Air Force, the American Air Force will not succeed! hi
      1. Oleneboy_
        Oleneboy_ April 10 2016 10: 55
        +7
        They want to cling to Russia as in World War II. It smells like fried. Our capital of the IG will take them without them. They don’t like it
        1. Iline
          Iline April 10 2016 11: 09
          +6
          “Airplanes will carry out several types of operations, including providing direct air support and carrying out operational attacks using high-precision weapons”

          Some sort of overkill. Strategists for immediate air support? Operational attacks?
          Most likely, the fingers are bent with a fan.
          1. cniza
            cniza April 10 2016 11: 32
            +4
            Quote: oleg-gr
            To combat Daesh. Introducing a new strategy. One Amer general already suggested that the enemy would scatter and capitulate from a single F-35 type. Decided to start the test with a show of veterans?


            The United States thinks that with a demonstration of 52 you can defeat Daesh, they will immediately run away as they see ...
            1. Pirogov
              Pirogov April 10 2016 11: 54
              +4
              Quote: cniza
              The United States thinks that with a demonstration of 52 you can defeat Daesh, they will immediately run away as they see ...

              Apparently the question is that old ammunition is easier and cheaper to throw at least at someone than to dispose of.
              1. Kite
                Kite April 10 2016 14: 06
                -1
                Quote: Pirogov
                ..... old ammunition is easier and cheaper to throw at least at someone than to dispose of

                - will train, "high-precision" carpet bombing work out wassat since their "smart" bombs are overly smart and choose the easiest targets on their own, such as schools and hospitals. belay
              2. 73bor
                73bor April 10 2016 16: 28
                0
                Yes, here the main thing is to fit a larger bombing vehicle!
        2. Mareman Vasilich
          Mareman Vasilich April 10 2016 16: 53
          +2
          Not to cling to, but to bombard Assad with carpet bombing under the guise of striking ISIS.
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null April 10 2016 16: 55
            0
            Quote: Mareman Vasilich
            bombard Assad with carpet bombing under the guise of striking ISIS

            Do you think it will work out? wink
            1. 0255
              0255 April 10 2016 19: 10
              0
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Quote: Mareman Vasilich
              bombard Assad with carpet bombing under the guise of striking ISIS

              Do you think it will work out? wink

              In fact, the United States continues to bomb Syria despite the presence of Russia. And no one knocks them, but sorry ...
        3. kit_bellew
          kit_bellew April 10 2016 17: 50
          +2
          Quote: Oleneboy_ (2)
          They want to cling to Russia as in World War II.

          During the Second World War, they did not cling to, but saved democratic Europe from the communist infection. A little off topic, but still interesting: what kind of world would we live in if Churchill had given the go-ahead to start Operation Unthinkable?
          And here, whatever one may say, it will not work to attach itself, unless a ground operation is carried out. Government forces will officially win "with the support of the videoconferencing the USSR Russia, implemented at the request of the current President of Syria"(deep. slang), that is, even we will have a very indirect attitude to victory. And no one called mattress makers at all, so don't care if they have stratofortresses and what they will do.
          It is quite possible, it’s wiser to look at a map of the world and figure out where these fools can generally reach from Qatar. It is possible Syria has nothing to do with it.
      2. Dimontius
        Dimontius April 10 2016 17: 59
        -2
        I don’t know if it’s a duck or not, but there is infa on a couple of sites that we sent one complex of YaRS to Syria
        1. Muvka
          Muvka April 10 2016 19: 44
          +5
          Quote: Dimontius
          I don’t know if it’s a duck or not, but there is infa on a couple of sites that we sent one complex of YaRS to Syria

          Rave. Just nonsense. Yars there is nothing to do there. Well, just nothing.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt April 10 2016 10: 41
      +11
      It seems that the US intends to take Racca so that there are no unnecessary witnesses left bully
      1. avt
        avt April 10 2016 10: 53
        0
        Quote: siberalt
        It seems that the US intends to take Racca so that there are no unnecessary witnesses left

        what Something more comes to the answer to our teachings in Tajikistan with the use of strategists. But they can also practice at Mosul, and at Raqqa. It is quite likely that they are backing up some sort of upcoming movement in Asian countries from ex-Soviet republics.
      2. forester
        forester April 10 2016 12: 11
        0
        Some witnesses will not remain (residents of Raqqa) and others in Turkey - then they will rest later or back to Karabakh or even turn out to be near Crimea - farther and not only have already stuttered about a possible complication of the situation in these regions if Russia does not go closer to the Turks (yesterday TVC broadcasts the same thing to one Turk) - they completely lost their fears as they started talking with a rotten geyropa - it’s not without reason that it was after the trip of the fart to the macaque
      3. askort154
        askort154 April 10 2016 13: 23
        +2
        sibiralt .... It seems that the United States intends to take Racca so that there are no unnecessary witnesses left

        Well, for the integrity of Syria, Raqqa is like Berlin in 1945. This is the finish line in Syria, so the Americans regrouped their air strike force.
        The B-1 was transferred to the United States, citing the "revision of the cockpit", and the B-52 was transferred in exchange. This was planned in February. Apparently, the rotation was done, first of all, because of the upcoming season of "dust storms". We also removed the "surplus"
        new aircraft. Sand and sea air, sharply "eats up" the resource.
        In these conditions, it is more reasonable to operate equipment with a small remaining resource.
        The required operating conditions for the "veteran" B-52 are much simpler and cheaper than the B-1.
      4. gergi
        gergi April 10 2016 15: 10
        -1
        What is the next meanness started by exceptional scum. I would not be surprised if a couple, three cities with a civilian population are erased into powder like Dresden. What good can you definitely not expect from them.
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain April 10 2016 10: 46
      +10
      Did they decide to use nuclear weapons to shandrah against ISIS? It seems that the laurels of our "White Swans" and "Bears" do not give rest to mattresses.
    5. Portolan
      Portolan April 10 2016 11: 16
      +14
      these little bombers were actually created to fight terrorist fighters in urban battles, one reset and there are no fighters with the city.
    6. Blondy
      Blondy April 10 2016 11: 48
      +2
      Our svh brought out as unnecessary. And they are introducing their strategists, how can Russia be noted in the Middle East, but to take closer control. Interestingly, they will explain what they mean for peace, and Russia is a threat of aggression.
    7. 73bor
      73bor April 10 2016 16: 27
      0
      It is called "from a cannon to sparrows!"
    8. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg April 11 2016 00: 34
      0
      Quote: oleg-gr
      To combat Daesh. Introducing a new strategy. One Amer general already suggested that the enemy would scatter and capitulate from a single F-35 type. Decided to start the test with a show of veterans?


      Good if it's for the bearded. It seems to me to bomb government troops, as always. Then they should cut their wings ...
  2. avvg
    avvg April 10 2016 10: 33
    +6
    Americans bomb everything - weddings, excavators, hospitals or the desert, but not Daesh (ISIS) and there is no doubt that they will continue in this spirit.
  3. killganoff
    killganoff April 10 2016 10: 34
    +7
    Beautiful car, you can’t say anything.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech April 10 2016 10: 53
      +12
      Beautiful car, you can’t say anything.


      Oh yes ... (just like Messerschmt-109) ... however, this machine participated in the bombing of YUGOSLAVIA, VIETNAM ... in general, this machine is our potential enemy.
      Therefore, it is better to see them falling to the ground ... than dropping bombs on the heads of defenseless civilians.
      1. Delink
        Delink April 10 2016 18: 27
        +1
        Could not release the chassis?
        They effectively manage to crash planes
    2. SSR
      SSR April 10 2016 11: 24
      +3
      Quote: killganoff
      Beautiful car, you can’t say anything.

      And if I understood the picture correctly, then the chassis with a half-turn retract into the fuselage .... So what? It will be necessary to search from an Internet PC)))
      Я
      Found it!

      2. The chassis is a bicycle type, with four main two-wheel racks and two auxiliary racks at the ends of the wing. When cleaning, the wheels of the main struts rotate 90 degrees. The right posts retract, the left - forward. All racks are hydraulically operated. When landing, all wheels touch the runway at the same time.
      1. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher April 10 2016 13: 47
        0
        Look better at the main struts of the Su-34 in action. It's like Michael Bay's "Transformers" laughing Very cool good
  4. jovanni
    jovanni April 10 2016 10: 36
    +10
    "... provide close air support and carry out rapid attacks using high precision weapons."
    Cool! B-52 mattresses now have an attack aircraft ...
  5. newcomer
    newcomer April 10 2016 10: 37
    +2
    do these halfwits want to arrange Vietnam in Syria? or they are haunted by the laurels of our strategists.
    1. forester
      forester April 10 2016 11: 43
      +2
      Rather, something like the 2nd front, as during the Second World War, followed by the division of Syria into zones of influence and the capture of the main oil-bearing regions. There was information about the Turkish special forces crossing the Syrian border and the upcoming transfer of US ground forces to Syria. It looks like we have started a plan. " B "
  6. Same lech
    Same lech April 10 2016 10: 39
    +6
    Pentagon redeployed B-52 bombers to Qatar to fight ISIS

    Suitable for areal bombing ... dimly however, I can imagine how he will chase ISIS carts.
    1. 0255
      0255 April 10 2016 19: 13
      +1
      Quote: The same Lech
      Pentagon redeployed B-52 bombers to Qatar to fight ISIS

      Suitable for areal bombing ... dimly however, I can imagine how he will chase ISIS carts.

      The United States will bomb cities, as in Vietnam, possibly with Russian accusations.
  7. pv1005
    pv1005 April 10 2016 10: 42
    0
    Carpet bombing is all they can do. am
  8. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch April 10 2016 10: 43
    +2
    Assad is going to bomb those bombers, he wants to scrub the long-nose aerial shots. Just something began to improve - right there, what would they fail. Well, Putin said that we’ll be back in a few hours. Have to, it seems.
  9. igorek4515
    igorek4515 April 10 2016 10: 44
    -1
    The U.S. Air Force deployed B-52 strategic bombers, which are planned to be used in operations against terrorists in Iraq and Syria, yesterday at the al-Udeid air base in Qatar,

    Strategic bombers against militants ..? Well ... Russian strategists fired at least long-range cruise missiles .. And what will these be ..? Well, if the Tomahawks or like in Vietnam will be carpet bombardments to arrange .. For the most part, these ancient aircraft are not suitable ..
  10. gattus
    gattus April 10 2016 10: 47
    +1
    Apparently, the "correct" bombing of terrorists will now begin.
  11. Verdun
    Verdun April 10 2016 10: 47
    0
    I can’t imagine how strategic bombers can fight an army of terrorists using, for the most part, partisan methods. Is it possible to raise the morale of their soldiers? There is no sledgehammer needed, but a scalpel. Scalpel in the hands of an experienced surgeon. If we talk about aviation - attack aircraft and helicopters. Destroying jeeps with machine gunners that cost fifteen thousand on a market day with high-precision missiles, worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, is not the best way to reduce national debt.
  12. deja vu
    deja vu April 10 2016 10: 52
    -2
    What kind of animals are fighting in ISIS? And with what? Caliber, Tomahawks, strategic bombers, and they do not. wassat
  13. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 10 2016 10: 52
    +1
    B-52, which is planned to be used in operations against terrorists

    Decided to take advantage of the old experience of the Vietnam War? Or can it turn a desert into a plowed field?
  14. GSVG 86-88
    GSVG 86-88 April 10 2016 10: 55
    +1
    Another US Air Force general, Chris Kars, said he would not call the number of airplanes sent to Qatar “for security reasons,” because in Qatar there wouldn’t be a lot of them, or only if in a pile.
    1. eagle11
      eagle11 April 10 2016 11: 55
      +1
      Yeah, if anything, according to the operational capacity of the El-Udeid airfield, all B-52Hs armed with the 8VA KSU US Air Force can fit.
  15. Panabebis
    Panabebis April 10 2016 10: 58
    +1
    And will they themselves come into Syria?
  16. Abbra
    Abbra April 10 2016 10: 58
    0
    I would be glad if ISIS has a couple of Stingers in stock that the Americans sold to them ...
    1. VP
      VP April 10 2016 11: 39
      +2
      And what can stingers versus strategists?
      Or do you suggest that the 52nd will be on a shaving bomb?
      1. Abbra
        Abbra April 10 2016 12: 00
        0
        Mont Generale, I know the difference between FIM-92 and S-400. I can give a lecture on this topic. On horseradish minus?
        1. VP
          VP April 10 2016 12: 16
          +2
          I didn’t minus anyone.
          But there was no answer other than "I know everything".
          So, the stingers against the B-52 are interesting to listen to.
          1. Stabilization
            Stabilization April 10 2016 12: 45
            0
            In the area of ​​the aerodrome, for example, during take-off and landing. Clearly, the territory is specially protected, but technically it is possible. A shot from several positions with 4 missiles, for example ....
            1. VP
              VP April 10 2016 13: 04
              +4
              Yeah, in Qatar.
              Or slaughter a pilot. Or in slippers to the navigator .. on.
              All the same, I propose to wait for the "lecture" how this marshal sees the war of stigners and strategists.
  17. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 April 10 2016 11: 00
    +4
    Does anyone on the site know Qatar Square ?! How much B-52 is needed to cover the country with a shadow from planes --......... Sorry! hi
  18. Observer2014
    Observer2014 April 10 2016 11: 01
    +2
    Quote: Oleneboy_
    They want to cling to Russia as in World War II. It smells like fried. Our capital of the IG will take them without them. They don’t like it

    So it is! Ours still half a year and almost all of Syria without daish. And these are in the best traditions of their history, at the end of the war, to draw their eyes. You need to talk about it everywhere. And not any negotiations with their participation. And especially not some French and other rags.
  19. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 April 10 2016 11: 01
    0
    They want to prove that they, too, know how to do something, but they are so far from Russian pilots.
    1. ametist415
      ametist415 April 10 2016 11: 58
      0
      It is so excusable for a simplified domestic Russian to think, but if the pilot also thinks like I'm so cool that I can do it all ... he will lose. The Americans have a very large flying hours, although there are problems. Last year in Russia, a military plane crashed every week for several weeks in Russia in the summer. (about five planes crashed in peacetime)
      1. Stabilization
        Stabilization April 10 2016 12: 50
        +5
        By the way, you forgot to add that the number of NATO flyers who fell due to accidents last year was large or approximately equal.
      2. Thronekeeper
        Thronekeeper April 10 2016 15: 31
        +1
        It is unclear tactically the presence of these missile-bombers there. KR beat can be cheaper with EM URO. Carry Mosul? Convert to ganship like AC-130? There is no tactical niche there for them now; they and Phillipin can carry out all tasks with launching the Kyrgyz Republic, why in Qatar?
  20. urik62
    urik62 April 10 2016 11: 04
    +4
    Quote: The same Lech
    Beautiful car, you can’t say anything.


    Oh yes ... (just like Messerschmt-109) ... however, this machine participated in the bombing of YUGOSLAVIA, VIETNAM ... in general, this machine is our potential enemy.
    Therefore, it is better to see them falling to the ground ... than dropping bombs on the heads of defenseless civilians.

    All this is certainly cool, if not for people's lives
  21. Funnels
    Funnels April 10 2016 11: 07
    +3
    And how many air defense systems were sent there-85, and how much is needed to land this "democrat"
    1. VP
      VP April 10 2016 11: 41
      0
      MANPADS reach several kilometers, a maximum of 5-6. Enough for the helicopter, the strategist to sneeze.
  22. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter April 10 2016 11: 08
    +1
    A monstrous machine. In all respects, and use high-precision weapons from it? Did the striped ears finally decided that it was time for the world to show that their "strategists" were alive and could also do something. Like launching a cruise missile. Are there still goals for them? Our assault helicopters are already being used, hinting that the targets have become quite "small" and require sniper accuracy, and the dinosaurs were impatient to show mattresses. Incomprehensible demonstration. Is there really nothing else? As the jackal Tabaki shouted: "Shame on the jungle!"
    1. VP
      VP April 10 2016 11: 42
      0
      Barmaleev there tens of thousands, enough for everyone.
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh April 10 2016 12: 16
      -9
      "Our already attack helicopters are using, hinting that the targets
      became very "small" and require sniper accuracy "////

      Helicopters began to be used because precision bombs ended
      about 2-3 weeks after the start of the operation, CR is very expensive,
      and the FABs give a spread of up to 100 m from a height of 4-5 km.
      Helicopters were required to achieve accuracy.
      1. VP
        VP April 10 2016 13: 06
        0
        Was this the TV reported to you?
      2. Stabilization
        Stabilization April 10 2016 13: 14
        +2
        Su24 / 25 of the latest modifications that were in Syria, use fabs with an accuracy of 3-5 m. That was the essence of their modernization.
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh April 10 2016 14: 28
          +2
          for Stabilization:
          "fabs are used with an accuracy of 3-5 m. This was the essence of their modernization." ///

          A bomb is either free-falling or controlled. In the last
          case, attachments are mounted on it, including a control system and
          wings guiding it toward the target. But then she is no longer FAB.
          Even military GPS bombs give a 3 m circular deviation

          for thronekeeper:
          "Precision bombs and missiles Kh-25 / Kh-29 with laser, television,
          Infra-optic CH in warehouses in Russia, even eat a booty, half of it was released during the Soviet Union. "////

          And their shelf life did not pass?
          1. Muvka
            Muvka April 10 2016 15: 57
            +2
            Quote: voyaka uh
            for Stabilization:
            "fabs are used with an accuracy of 3-5 m. This was the essence of their modernization." ///

            A bomb is either free-falling or controlled. In the last
            case, attachments are mounted on it, including a control system and
            wings guiding it toward the target. But then she is no longer FAB.
            Even military GPS bombs give a 3 m circular deviation

            for thronekeeper:
            "Precision bombs and missiles Kh-25 / Kh-29 with laser, television,
            Infra-optic CH in warehouses in Russia, even eat a booty, half of it was released during the Soviet Union. "////

            And their shelf life did not pass?

            Read what SVP-24 is and do not carry nonsense.
            1. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh April 10 2016 17: 06
              0
              Whatever the exact sight (SVP-24), telling when exactly to reset
              a bomb depending on the speed of the aircraft and altitude,
              after the bomb comes off - it is a free-falling object, depending
              primarily from wind flows at different heights.
              The bomb, for example, was dropped from 5 km, and the wind flow passes at an altitude of 3 km. The sight cannot know about it.
              A strong impulse will carry her aside, and this cannot be prevented.
              Therefore, all countries are gradually (due to their high prices) moving to guided bombs.
      3. Thronekeeper
        Thronekeeper April 10 2016 14: 06
        0
        You can eat high-precision bombs and missiles X-25 / X-29 with laser, television, infra-optic warheads in warehouses in Russia, even half you eat, half of them were produced under the USSR.
        Helicopters also quite use high-precision weapons - for reference - KVO "Attack" 9M220M and 9M120M at 10 and 8 km is no more than 2,5 m. Even more interesting is the Hermes 20/45 / 100-200 km and 18 kg of HMX for a snack. From verts to 45.
        Nevertheless, sometimes they use UR based on S-8 S-8TK and S-8DK controlled by radio links. Since both our and the American project with LGSN, and ours with infra-optics failed because of the banal smoke of the GOOS windows remaining in the missile block after each launch. So far this problem is being solved but slowly.
        The goal is not to spend a full-fledged ATGM on APCs and BMPs, and to avoid casualties among m / p and an Eight or Hydra-70 attack even with ODBC, the Americans have now noticed that especially the use of UAVs with Heli with an excessively powerful OB or TB ODBC leads to big casualties MF
        In your country, Israel, it seems, the 102mm SD was specially made to kill terrorists in (***) settlements, on the basis of a rather controversial LURAHATRON CURV. Nevertheless, you sent several Hamas leaders to the Guriyam, and the peacekeeper was not injured. Why didn’t they use hellfire or mevrik? This is a rhetorical question.
        The question is that for work in populated areas, "Attack" is preferable, even with a high-explosive or thermobaric ODBCH, rather than 300kg warheads X-29 or adjustable FAB-500 and 1500. -500OD or X-25, which actually happens. And satellite munitions against moving targets are unsuitable, they are "geographic", not "target", de facto - a step back from sprite and even correlation infra-optical seeker "shot-zabиl "
  23. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn April 10 2016 11: 34
    0
    «B-52 bombers demonstrate our continuous desire put pressure on Daesh, ”Brown said.

    And to dump on DAISH instead of bombs packs of diapers for fun.
  24. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer April 10 2016 11: 35
    0
    Cold War symbol designed to deliver thermonuclear bombs anywhere in the USSR against ISIS? Oh well.
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. volodya
    volodya April 10 2016 11: 45
    +1
    Well, now it will definitely be like in Vietnam, there will be carpet bombing and oranges!
    1. Corsair5912
      Corsair5912 April 10 2016 12: 14
      +2
      Quote: volodya
      Well, now it will definitely be like in Vietnam, there will be carpet bombing and oranges!

      In Vietnam, 13 US aircraft and helicopters were shot down, including 000 B-34s; over 52 years, air defense missiles have become much more advanced, and the low-speed B-40s are still the same. Their main advantage is low cost - $ 52 million, compare: F-15 Raptor $ 22 million. F-145 "Night Hawk" $ 117 million
      1. volodya
        volodya April 10 2016 14: 33
        +2
        That's right, but it’s not so easy to transfer B-52 there!
      2. VP
        VP April 11 2016 05: 55
        0
        Quote: Corsair5912
        13 U.S. planes and helicopters shot down in Vietnam

        Something takes doubt in such a figure.
        The United States has so many helicopter planes, after the Second World War, most likely it never happened. Even if it happened, it turns out that in Vietnam they ruined everything they had at all air bases and aircraft carriers?
        A thousand or two, hardly more.
  27. pts-m
    pts-m April 10 2016 12: 11
    -1
    Here are the pendosy !? however they thought of it. Now they will be with their bombers “to put the Shadow on the fence”, since the fuselage of this letak allows you to do this.
  28. bloh2
    bloh2 April 10 2016 12: 29
    -1
    And what is yellow on the wings?
    1. Svetlana
      Svetlana April 11 2016 09: 16
      0
      Quote: bloh2
      And what is yellow on the wings?

      Is it polyurethane foam or polyisocyanurate foam or polyurea - closed cell foam waterproofing coatings?
  29. Bramb
    Bramb April 10 2016 12: 42
    +1
    Americans as always: when it is known for certain that victory is inevitable - they are right there! Recall WWII.
    This is a sure sign from the other side: we win!
  30. Stabilization
    Stabilization April 10 2016 12: 52
    +1
    The American war machine is much worse than any igil ...
    1. Hyppopotut
      Hyppopotut April 11 2016 09: 10
      0
      No, not a military machine (it just scares only the weak). But those money bags that control politics are really scary !!!
  31. krops777
    krops777 April 10 2016 13: 35
    +2
    What? Carpet bombing is back in fashion. request
  32. Kibl
    Kibl April 10 2016 13: 37
    0
    That "carpet" bombing will iron the bearded or just another cut of the dough!
  33. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 April 10 2016 14: 28
    0
    with such an accurate bandura, you can simultaneously tear to pieces and road equipment and a hospital and a wedding and a water pump from one go and into dust
  34. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho April 10 2016 14: 44
    +2
    A good B-52 is such a B-52:
  35. Hyppopotut
    Hyppopotut April 10 2016 15: 12
    0
    What mattresses are preparing, one god knows. Zigzags of their strategic thoughts are difficult to predict.
    However, as I understand it, the ATS government did not invite them to its territory. So their use in Syria can be regarded as aggression, with all the ensuing consequences ... Our anti-aircraft missile systems remained there ... Yes, and SAR air defense has its own means. So in Syria they will not work. In terms of courage, these warriors have no equal: they are heroes against those who can not send anything to the screwdriver.
  36. Papapg
    Papapg April 10 2016 19: 59
    0
    Quote: Pirogov
    Quote: cniza
    The United States thinks that with a demonstration of 52 you can defeat Daesh, they will immediately run away as they see ...

    Apparently the question is that old ammunition is easier and cheaper to throw at least at someone than to dispose of.


    Now the land of Syria will be polluted by depleted uranium and water like a goose.
  37. mvg
    mvg April 10 2016 22: 12
    +2
    Quote: Dimontius
    I don’t know if it’s a duck or not, but there is infa on a couple of sites that we sent one complex of YaRS to Syria

    What for??? He will fly from the Urals to any point of the BV SAM himself, why is he in Syria? To surrender to the enemy?
  38. crasever
    crasever April 11 2016 07: 01
    0
    Well, let them try to kill the flea with a tank engine.