Military Review

Pyongyang declared readiness to start a "war of retaliation" against the United States and South Korea

108
The leader of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Kim Jong-un, once again showered the United States and South Korea with threats. According to the head of the DPRK, Washington and Seoul will face retribution if they do not give up their militaristic policy towards the North Korean people. Kim Jong-un's statements were also taken up by the North Korean Conciliation Committee on the Korean Peninsula and the unification of the North and the South.


Information Agency TASS cites the statement of the committee representatives:
The people of the DPRK do not intend to endure the reckless military provocations of the United States and South Korea. We declare the readiness of the revolutionary army to launch a war of retribution in order to destroy the United States and its South Korean supporters.


Pyongyang declared readiness to start a "war of retaliation" against the United States and South Korea


This harsh rhetoric official Pyongyang allowed himself in connection with the next stage of military exercises of the United States and the Republic of Korea, held in Kazakhstan. The next stage is the naval phase of the exercises, in which about fifty American and South Korean warships are deployed. The US Navy nuclear aircraft carrier John C.Stennis approached the shores of South Korea.



During the marine phase of the US-South Korean exercises, the marine aviation and marine forces of the two countries.

Recall that earlier in the Pentagon revealed part of the scenario of joint maneuvers on the Korean Peninsula. The script states that the main goal of the exercises is nuclear facilities and missile test sites of the DPRK. Such information and caused a new storm of indignation from Pyongyang.
Photos used:
http://www.kcna.kp, @aircraftcarrier
108 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Zeppelin ml.
    Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 12: 54
    -10%
    excellent ... Let the holivar begin in the branch!
    1. Samaritan
      Samaritan 23 March 2016 12: 59
      +1
      Yes, the holivar will not last long, like this war ... God forbid, of course!
      1. Pravdarm
        Pravdarm 23 March 2016 13: 00
        +13
        Oh, damn it, Gaddafi also threatened the jackals!
        True nuclear weapons were not!
        But dumbheads it can not stop, especially not on its own continent!
        Already planned and practiced in preemptive attacks on the strategic objects of the DPRK!
        Right now, the information war is being brought to an end: "Bloody regime of the tyrant, dictator NNA!" And at the end of the reign of LAMBas, like to blame everything on him anyway!
        And, they may very well begin! Oh, if only for nuclear war!
    2. Viktor_24reg
      Viktor_24reg 23 March 2016 13: 08
      +2
      But I don’t see anything great. Last time, the DPRK and the USSR came in for DPRK, and now who ??? Yes, the DPRK has weapons, but not as much as it seems, as a result, citizens will suffer, cities will be bombed. What is so good about it? I’m sure about the Russian Federation and the PRC, they won’t get involved and if they help, then secretly and to a minimum. The third world knows who needs it, and these are not the upper and lower neighbors of the DPRK ...
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 23 March 2016 13: 16
        0
        In the DPRK, there are a lot of weapons, and what Eun has in surprises - no one knows at all. Recently, they learned that North Korea is mining uranium ore in Namibia.
        1. Viktor_24reg
          Viktor_24reg 23 March 2016 13: 26
          -2
          You do not equate small arms with high-tech, high-precision, which is available on the second side. They will start from the launchers and command centers, then the liquidation of the leader, a couple of cities in ruins and that’s all over. I do not think that there are only fanatics and will resist to the last, they are not turned, like the supporters of ISIS and others like them. This is purely my opinion.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 23 March 2016 13: 40
            +1
            And oh yes, I forgot that the DPRK manufactured with the technology of the 70s cannot shoot small arms and all other weapons.
            1. Viktor_24reg
              Viktor_24reg 23 March 2016 14: 07
              0
              If you carefully read, then think: For what ordinary Koreans will fight, if the country's leadership does not, instead of cities there will be ruins, etc. THERE ARE NO FANS !!!. I repeat once again, they will be helped to a minimum, do not take into account the last war, I already wrote why above.
            2. 0255
              0255 23 March 2016 17: 43
              +2
              Quote: Vadim237
              And oh yes, I forgot that the DPRK manufactured with the technology of the 70s cannot shoot small arms and all other weapons.

              It can shoot, but it will not be able to resist the modern armies of the South Caucasus and the United States for a long time. Have you heard about obsolescence? If the ancient T-54/55/62, MiG-17/19/21/23 and Su-7, in your opinion, can repel the Americans, then why then they accept the Su-35, Su-34, PAK FA, "Armata" ?
              1. Vadim237
                Vadim237 23 March 2016 18: 23
                0
                Each manages what he can.
      2. hedgehog in the fog
        hedgehog in the fog 23 March 2016 13: 22
        +4
        The Yunovsky rockets will knock down mattresses, and then they will arrange massive shelling with cruise missiles, they will bomb the entire military infrastructure and that's it, the whole circus will end
        1. Viktor_24reg
          Viktor_24reg 23 March 2016 13: 30
          0
          Ahead. I also think that will go in a similar vein.
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 23 March 2016 13: 53
          +2
          The DPRK has radars and anti-aircraft missiles - although they are old, all DPRK missiles can cope with their function, and US ships cannot shoot down missile defense systems. The DPRK is a tough nut - this is not Iraq, not Libya, not even Yugoslavia - things will be cooler with them than with all the topics listed.
          1. Viktor_24reg
            Viktor_24reg 23 March 2016 14: 03
            0
            How do you get such confidence in this ?! You know real TTX weapons of the DPRK? I am not a supporter of either one or the other, but we must look at things soberly, without emotions. And the fighting will begin, then you will see your mistake.
            1. DIVAN SOLDIER
              DIVAN SOLDIER 23 March 2016 14: 17
              +3
              At least the DPRK artillery will reach Seoul, if it succeeds of course. Well, they will defeat the DPRK army, then they will still need to send troops, and there they will already be waiting for the partisan detachments.
            2. Vadim237
              Vadim237 23 March 2016 14: 26
              +2
              I know their performance characteristics from reference books on Soviet military equipment - for the DPRK has modified clones in this area. "And the hostilities will begin, then you will see your mistake" - this conclusion is too early.
              1. Viktor_24reg
                Viktor_24reg 23 March 2016 15: 53
                0
                Well then, remember about Saddam and his army. On the side of Kim, perhaps nuclear weapons. This is the only plus for him. I repeat the last time, I don’t see the point: the Russian Federation and China will not help (the experience of Vietnam and the first Korean fly away), there are no fanatics (the experience of Afghanistan and the like flies). What is one war in which a country that was not openly supported by anyone was able to prevail over a coalition of several countries, more powerful and advanced? PS the unbroken BV fanatics are not taken into account, because there are such in every country, and this does not mean that they are power.
                1. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 23 March 2016 16: 06
                  +2
                  "Name at least one war in which a country, openly supported by no one, was able to prevail over a coalition of several countries, more powerful and advanced ones?" - Yemeni Houthis are still giving good kicks to the coalition led by Saudi Arabia.
                  1. Viktor_24reg
                    Viktor_24reg 23 March 2016 17: 06
                    +1
                    Yes, what are the Hussites ?? !! What are you talking about? After all, I asked, without similar examples. In principle, such wars cannot be won. Bendera were with the Nazis at the same time? At the same time. Are their followers alive, continue to do their job? continue. It turns out the second world continues? In Dagestan and Chechnya, too, some resistance remains, it turns out that war is going on inside the Russian Federation ?! You give a specific COUNTRY as an example, do not give an example of a specific nation within a country (or rebels).
                2. avva2012
                  avva2012 23 March 2016 16: 15
                  +2
                  Quote: Viktor_24reg RU fanatics are not there

                  Something that reminds me.
                  Yes, the Germans, somehow they wrote, "Bolshevik hordes, fanatics driven by the commissars - f-mi".
                  The Germans did not believe that Russian subhumans could experience feelings such as patriotism. Do you also think that Koreans living in the north are subhuman?
                  "On the side of Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria, militia from the DPRK is fighting," says the head of the delegation of the High Committee for Negotiations of the Syrian opposition at the talks in Geneva, Asaad al-Zoubi. "There are even two groups (militias - ed.) From North Korea," said he is at a briefing listing foreign supporters of President Assad.
                  According to al-Zoubi, these North Korean units are "deadly."
                  source:http://rusvesna.su/news/1458675847 Ah, these are not fanatics, just professionals. Do you think they are few?
                  1. Viktor_24reg
                    Viktor_24reg 23 March 2016 17: 14
                    -3
                    I think that there will be many less if something happens. And here are subhuman ?! Do not overdo it. Here we are talking about the fact that the DPRK has no chance. And they have no chance, soberly look at things. Patriotism is good, I am behind both hands. But the DPRK does not have enough funds.
                    1. avva2012
                      avva2012 23 March 2016 18: 23
                      0
                      In the United States, even a conventional bomb never arrived. It is necessary to see if Kim's submarine with nuclear weapons comes to the US coast, and what will happen if, as a result of "fanaticism", the coastal city is washed away. 21, not iron. You, do not compare them with our bassoot. In the face, the acre of Pearl Harbor, not received in history. So, their associations can work. Those Asians and these too.
                      1. Vadim237
                        Vadim237 23 March 2016 21: 26
                        +1
                        It is possible, the more so there is an assumption that the DPRK also has low-power nuclear torpedoes.
          2. 0255
            0255 23 March 2016 17: 47
            +1
            Quote: Vadim237
            North Korea has radars and anti-aircraft missiles - although they are old, they will cope with their function

            Time S-75 or S-125 has already passed, no matter how sad. They will not help in anything; the United States has experience in suppressing them after Iraq and Yugoslavia.
          3. although
            although 23 March 2016 20: 21
            0
            Is it okay that Iraq had the most powerful army among the "third" countries?
        3. atalef
          atalef 23 March 2016 21: 34
          -2
          Quote: hedgehog in the fog
          The Yunovsky rockets will knock down mattresses, and then they will arrange massive shelling with cruise missiles, they will bomb the entire military infrastructure and that's it, the whole circus will end

          For that clown will remain
      3. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 23 March 2016 15: 04
        -2
        Quote: Viktor_24reg
        But I don’t see anything great. Last time, the DPRK and the USSR came in for DPRK, and now who ???

        As before, Russia and China, only this time we and the Chinese will be the first to carry the launch installations of the DPRK missiles.
        Both we and the Chinese do not need a nuclear apocalypse at our borders.
        1. avva2012
          avva2012 23 March 2016 16: 22
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov As before, Russia and China, only this time we and the Chinese will be the first to carry the launch installations of the DPRK missiles.

          Truth? That is, first giving technology and missing materials to the DPRK, receiving rare earth materials in return, and now they will bomb? I personally respect the North Korean people for their steadfastness, but I have great doubts that they could, "all by themselves."
          1. padded jacket
            padded jacket 23 March 2016 16: 32
            +4
            Quote: avva2012
            That is, first giving technology and missing materials to the DPRK, receiving rare earth materials in return, and now they will bomb?

            May neither Russia nor China "bomb" the DPRK, fantasies on this topic mature only in the minds of some "liberals"
            Quote: avva2012
            I personally respect the North Korean people for their resilience, but I have great doubts that they could, "all by themselves."

            Of course, not all of them and the USSR and China helped them, and indeed many countries for which their own opinion is more important than the opinion of different Washington and Tel Avivlov.


            In the DPRK showed a new scientific and technical complex
            A large scientific and technical complex has opened in Pyongyang on the Tedongan River flowing through the North Korean capital.
            http://vz.ru/photoreport/775124/#ad-image-0
    3. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 23 March 2016 15: 06
      -12%
      Well, where are these two trolls, who are constantly odes here singing in praise of the frostbitten Kim. Where are you??? One from Kazakhstan and the second is not clear from where at all.
      Che not that Temko, cheers to a chubby half-ass you will not shout.
      1. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 23 March 2016 15: 16
        +3
        And to whom odes of praise to write in your opinion ??? The monkey from the white house ???
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 23 March 2016 15: 27
          -3
          Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
          And to whom odes of praise to write in your opinion ??? The monkey from the white house ???

          When a monkey from the White House begins to threaten the DPRK with a warrior, then I will pour a bunch of slops on the monkey from the White House.
          So far, the monkey from the White House, receives for his other affairs, in other parts of the world’s arena. But the monkey from Pyongyang swollen with fat, cut to the end. Hiding behind the fact that it borders on Russia and China.
        2. Viktor_24reg
          Viktor_24reg 23 March 2016 15: 31
          +1
          Yes, no need to scream odes. Objectively, one must look at things, objectively. Kim, too, bends slightly.

          By the way, "As before Russia and China, only this time we and the Chinese will be the first to destroy the missile launchers of the DPRK" is quite a possible option, if diplomacy does not work. Better this way than nuclear third.
  2. evil partisan
    evil partisan 23 March 2016 12: 57
    +3
    Such a serious Commander in the photo ... sad
  3. drilled
    drilled 23 March 2016 12: 57
    -11%
    Yeah. It would be funny if the World Nuclear War over the DPRK begins.
    1. Abbra
      Abbra 23 March 2016 13: 06
      +4
      Many will not have time to laugh ... So it's better not to even think about it.
    2. gray smeet
      gray smeet 23 March 2016 13: 11
      +1
      Quote: Burieway
      Yeah. It would be funny if the World Nuclear War over the DPRK begins.

      Until the DPRK poses a real threat to the United States - there will be no war, but maneuvers - each of the participants in this "conflict" will seek benefits from these maneuvers. That was a real threat to the security of the United States, during the Cuban missile crisis, the United States was ready to start a nuclear war with the USSR (!, this is not North Korea), and after all, the experience of Hiroshima, Nagasaki suggests.
      So the question is, why did the DPRK leadership begin nuclear tests? The whole world holds a moratorium, but it was their job! After all, before that there was no such activity in the USA and South Korea? And there is a strange thing - the DPRK provokes a conflict from time to time, then speaks of the possibility of agreeing to close the nuclear program, but in exchange for food. And asks for food from the United States (!). Moreover, the southerners are ready to deliver products to them as humanitarian aid .... request

      Take Cuba again - they live there even longer under US sanctions, near the USA - Cubans do not have nuclear weapons, and Cuba is still independent! Yes, they live poorly, but they don’t die of hunger as in the DPRK, and medicine is at the highest level
      1. drilled
        drilled 23 March 2016 13: 48
        0
        And who is talking about the States? Comrades Koreans can provoke, yes. Rumble over the speakers - and come
    3. kit-kat
      kit-kat 23 March 2016 13: 17
      0
      It is unlikely that there will be a world because of Korea. Just let Amers roll Koreans and all. I think this will be limited.
    4. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 13: 45
      +1
      Quote: Burieway
      Yeah. It would be funny if the World Nuclear War over the DPRK begins.

      yes wait with the world, Korean is not over yet. The world, as far as I know, is not signed between the Koreans)
  4. maxim1987
    maxim1987 23 March 2016 12: 58
    +2
    the interlocutor from YONA is good, but the loader is not very laughing
  5. avvg
    avvg 23 March 2016 12: 59
    +2
    The provocation conceived by the Americans on the Korean Peninsula will never lead to good, the situation has become pre-war.
  6. salad
    salad 23 March 2016 13: 02
    +4
    That's the turn)) that's who has the iron eggs in the world))
  7. Lieutenant Izhe
    Lieutenant Izhe 23 March 2016 13: 05
    0
    Even this North Korean bobblehead DOESN'T LIKE me!
    negative
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 23 March 2016 13: 35
      -2
      Quote: Lieutenant Izhe
      Even this North Korean bobblehead DOESN'T LIKE me!
      negative

      To many on the site, he is like a god! At war with the USA !!! Would you think why this Bobblehead is engaged in provocations from time to time, and then asks the United States for food? Well, look at all the information for the last 20 years, look at the chronology of all these "conflicts" - and draw conclusions about this family of Bobbleheads.
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 23 March 2016 13: 57
        -2
        1. DPRK asks Britain to help with food
        05:15 03.04.2011
        MOSCOW, April 3 - RIA News. Chairman of the DPRK Supreme People’s Assembly Choi Tae Bok asked the UK to send food aid to his country, faced with a shortage of food, the Renhap agency said.
        According to Choi Tae Bok, the next two months will be especially difficult.
        The politician paid a visit to the UK from March 28 to 31 at the invitation of the UK-North Korea inter-party group of the British Parliament.
        North Korea faced food shortages in the 1990s when famine swept the country. Since then, the DPRK has regularly received humanitarian assistance from international organizations.

        RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/world/20110403/360529942.html#ixzz43cYTgGai


        2. As a result, North Korean Red Cross partners Republic of Korea (Southerners!) было a proposal was sent to "supply compatriots for humanitarian reasons" 10 thousand tons of corn, 20 tons of powdered milk and a batch of medicines. If official Pyongyang agrees, these will be the first deliveries to the North since President Lee Myung-bak came to power in February 2008, who stipulated the delivery of state aid to Pyongyang by his real progress in nuclear disarmament.
        http://www.rodon.org/polit-091113105134

        3.DPRK asks the US to help with food. Washington Rejected Pyongyang's Request
        Pyongyang's request was transmitted to Washington through the UN channels in the last days of December.

        http://telegraf.by/2012/01/kndr-prosit-ssha-pomoch-s-prodovolstviem-vashington-o



        tklonil-prosbu-phenyana


        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 23 March 2016 15: 07
          0
          Quote: gray smeet
          DPRK asks Britain to help with food

          Nehru eat, that's what they ask.
      2. Zeppelin ml.
        Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 14: 02
        +1
        Quote: gray smeet
        and then the US asks for food?
  8. APS
    APS 23 March 2016 13: 06
    -2
    Waving arms against the United States and Co., hopes that at some stage it will be possible to draw in both Russia and China? Or does Eun hope to win the war? There are no winners in the war that he wants to unleash ...
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 23 March 2016 13: 23
      0
      The USA will definitely not use ICBMs against the DPRK, since this could provoke our Strategic Rocket Forces to strike, and the DPRK has a huge advantage in the region, in the form of thousands of tactical, ballistic, ICBMs, which, indeed, can carry nuclear charges - both of which DPRK is already in mass production.
      1. chikenous59
        chikenous59 23 March 2016 13: 46
        -3
        Quote: Vadim237
        and the DPRK has a huge advantage in the region, in the form of a thousand tactical, ballistic, ICBMs

        Where did they get so much good from? Do not tell me? laughing
        Most of all, I am outraged that you so confidently claim this as a fact, as if you really know about the quantity tactical, ballistic and of course ICBMs laughing
        1. Zeppelin ml.
          Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 14: 06
          0
          Quote: chikenous59
          Where did they get so much good from? Do not tell me?

          from the magazine "Korea" winked
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 23 March 2016 14: 09
          +1
          The guys have been doing them for a long time, one of the statues on this subject is http://ttwar.ru/92372-ballisticheskoe-klonirovanie.html
          1. chikenous59
            chikenous59 23 March 2016 14: 15
            -1
            Quote: Vadim237
            The guys have been doing them for a long time, one of the statues on this subject is http://ttwar.ru/92372-ballisticheskoe-klonirovanie.html

            And where is the money for such a weapon?
            Money from the export is taken, and the DPRK's GDP seems to be a little over 10 billion dollars.

            Here either someone pours money and technology into them, or these thousands of missiles never reach their targets, they will deafen the fish in the Pacific pond to the maximum
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 23 March 2016 14: 33
              +1
              If it has been manufactured and flies for a long time, then there is money for all of this, all the more the bulk of this country's GDP goes to the army and weapons, it must be admitted that yes - money and technology bypassing all sanctions are poured into the DPRK through left-wing schemes.
              1. Zeppelin ml.
                Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 14: 49
                -4
                Quote: Vadim237
                then there’s money for all this

                the main breadwinner-importer joined the sanctions. If Kimusik in his trolling shore beguiled, then he will completely lose him. Islamists will start to sell plutonium? And what?
                Quote: Vadim237
                through the left circuits.
                The enemy is common.
        3. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 23 March 2016 15: 08
          -1
          Quote: chikenous59

          Where did they get so much good from? Do not tell me?

          I recommend you not to argue with this person, he, according to his words, receives information from the most reliable sources. In one subject, he pushed this out, neighing all the Sait.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 23 March 2016 16: 08
            +1
            I pushed in - and you advanced.
  9. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 23 March 2016 13: 07
    0
    Quote: avvg
    The provocation conceived by the Americans on the Korean peninsula will never lead to good.


    And this one is also good, it’s being conducted for a clear provocation. I hope the Chinese are watching over what is happening, and ours, would not hurt, although we have without this, a lot. The fact that Americans are noble provocateurs is well known to everyone, the main thing is that Kim would not do stupidity.
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 23 March 2016 13: 40
      -4
      Quote: Observer 33
      Quote: avvg
      The provocation conceived by the Americans on the Korean peninsula will never lead to good.


      And this one is also good, it’s being conducted for a clear provocation. I hope the Chinese are watching over what is happening, and ours, would not hurt, although we have without this, a lot. The fact that Americans are noble provocateurs is well known to everyone, the main thing is that Kim would not do stupidity.


      Well, look at the chronology of events in the extreme conflict - Pyongyang made a nuclear test! The whole world holds a moratorium - and this is necessary! Before that, it was calm, no one (USA) went anywhere ..
      1. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 23 March 2016 14: 14
        +2
        And if you "look at the chronology" in a slightly wider time period? No, myopia?
        I suggest. Why the hell with S. Korea? Not against the southerners, indeed. Who is bombing with us who wants and when he wants? They are the only ones on the planet, it is difficult to mix up ...

        "Before that, it was calm, no one (the United States) did not go anywhere .."
        Truth? Are they sitting at home? Staying straight ... fool
        1. gray smeet
          gray smeet 23 March 2016 14: 24
          -2
          Quote: Observer 33
          And if you "look at the chronology" in a slightly wider time period? No, myopia?
          I suggest. Why the hell with S. Korea? Not against the southerners, indeed. Who is bombing with us who wants and when he wants? They are the only ones on the planet, it is difficult to mix up ...

          "Before that, it was calm, no one (the United States) did not go anywhere .."
          Truth? Are they sitting at home? Staying straight ... fool


          What is another segment? - During the years 95-98, up to 800 tons of people died of starvation in North Korea (up to 3 million people are transmitted by Western media). About 18 million people go hungry annually in North Korea. No war needed! Kim is fighting with her own population much more successfully than the United States. And for comparison - take Cuba - they have sanctions longer than the Korean ones, and when they have not been canceled - They live poorly, but the population does not die like flies and medicine - we care about it before the moon!
          And to justify an inadequate person who is killing his own people at the shocking pace is abnormality! They also entrusted nuclear weapons to this - am
  10. Vladimir57
    Vladimir57 23 March 2016 13: 07
    +2
    North Koreans brought up on anti-Americanism, but open talk about the war - yes-ah ... what
  11. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 23 March 2016 13: 16
    +1
    After this, it seems, the shooting begins. But it only seems. In this particular situation, Eun will not attack South Korea. Just because as long as there is no war, he MAY EAT three throats and feel like a living god on this part of the land. And when the bullets whistle, he will become a hare on the hunt. And he has no place to hide. And he likes to live. You can see by the face wassat
  12. DON-100
    DON-100 23 March 2016 13: 19
    -6
    A hypertrophied parody of the Soviet Union brought to the point of absurdity, led by the next offspring of the "Leaders of the People" family. There is no one to strangle this pig, this whole clique and free the people from slavery.
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 23 March 2016 13: 42
      -2
      Oh-oh-oh, they’ll be minded .. Here his admirers in full force ... And nothing Koreans (northerners) die of hunger like flies, and Pyongyang asks for food from the USA.
      1. 0255
        0255 23 March 2016 18: 06
        0
        Quote: gray smeet
        Oh-oh-oh, they’ll be minded .. Here his admirers in full force ... And nothing Koreans (northerners) die of hunger like flies, and Pyongyang asks for food from the USA.

        So Kim’s fans are sure that everything is fine in the DPRK, there is no hunger and, in principle, there can’t be, and if there is, then it’s okay, they threaten the USA itself, which threatens the USA and it’s not a sin to starve. They believe that Kim forbade everything correctly, although they themselves use the Internet, have their own car - which a simple North Korean can only dream of. And minus offers to go to your favorite DPRK for permanent residence, the DPRK is easier to love at a distance wassat
        1. padded jacket
          padded jacket 23 March 2016 18: 46
          +2
          Quote: 0255
          Kim has forbidden everything, although they themselves use the Internet, have a private car

          I think absolutely in all countries, state leaders have the Internet and a personal car. So blaming them for this is simply stupid.
          Quote: 0255
          And minus offers to go to your favorite DPRK for permanent residence, the DPRK is easier to love at a distance

          Although I didn’t minus you, I really want to ask why YOU are still not in rich and stable South Korea?
          Or are you just lazy and do not want to stand behind the Samsung assembly line from morning till night? smile
          South Koreans are the largest workaholics on Earth. The workweek is longer than anywhere else in the world. South Koreans spend 55,1 hours a week on average

          South Korea - Number of working hours per year: 2357, 10 days off, 11 public holidays.
          1. 0255
            0255 23 March 2016 20: 24
            0
            Quote: quilted jacket

            I think absolutely in all countries, state leaders have the Internet and a personal car. So blaming them for this is simply stupid.

            To prohibit all this to their citizens is also stupid.
            Although I didn’t minus you, I really want to ask why YOU are still not in rich and stable South Korea?

            I don’t admire her so much as you all admire North.
            Or are you just lazy and do not want to stand from the Samsung pick-up line from morning till night? smile

            To do this, it is not necessary to go to the UK; you can get a job at Samsung factories in your Russian Federation
  13. pts-m
    pts-m 23 March 2016 13: 22
    0
    Pendosy! Do not tease the “hungry” lion in the cage! If it pops up, then do not drive it back, it can evaporate in the clouds of nuclear weapons.
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 13: 34
      +4
      Quote: PTS-m
      Do not tease the “hungry” lion in the cage!

      I apologize, of course, but who is the lion?
      Quote: PTS-m
      If it pops up, then do not drive it back, it can evaporate in the clouds of nuclear weapons.

      laughing I laugh at the phrase.
      Why pound if he evaporates?
  14. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 23 March 2016 13: 24
    0
    In North Korea, the policy of the insignificance of the human personality has long been traced. There the people are like an aggregate for fulfilling the orders of the "great" KIMs! Hence these irresponsible statements. They don't give a damn about their country and the consequences.
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 13: 42
      -1
      Quote: dchegrinec
      .Tam people, as a unit for fulfilling the orders of the "great" KIMs!

      forgive, but here some especially nostalgic and we are demanding the same fate with their constant whining "return Stalin", "introduce censorship", "increase the production of barbed wire and start building some channel", "take away and divide", "lower the iron curtain back "and other" long live! " and "death to all who disagree with me!"
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 23 March 2016 19: 39
        0
        Representative of the Memorial? ABOUT!
        It has not been heard for a long time. What do you do, rehabilitate victims of repression? It's hard for you, sorry. Bandera and forest brothers are waiting. And also other tofarischi.
  15. Air defense Valga
    Air defense Valga 23 March 2016 13: 26
    +3
    Behind these statements is a complete zero, it is designed only for intra-Korean consumption. Everyone (except, of course, the North Koreans) is well aware that Kim is deprived of the possibility of preventive action, China is holding on to the pulse firmly. But this does not mean that in the event of a serious provocation or an open invasion, Kim will not easily lay the whole nation down. Blood will be the sea, and from all sides.
  16. Koresh
    Koresh 23 March 2016 13: 37
    +5
    Pyongyang fulfills the norm of threats in a month, so comrades calmly, this has become stability.
  17. Kupez4
    Kupez4 23 March 2016 13: 59
    +1
    At least someone may not suck at the Americans, but at least tickle their nerves.
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 23 March 2016 14: 10
      +2
      Quote: Kupez4
      At least someone may not suck at the Americans, but at least tickle their nerves.

      Maybe - CUBA. Raul Castro - sent Obama directly over the days with his pat on the shoulder, as he does Poroshenko, Merkel, etc.

      Say there is that something that inspires respect for the Cubans!

      And Kim is alarming ... no matter how Kim does not cause delight - that's for sure!
  18. roskot
    roskot 23 March 2016 14: 14
    0
    Korean leader snot does not chew. And will chew so crushed.
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 14: 29
      +1
      Quote: roskot
      Korean leader snot does not chew. And will chew so crushed.

      it is striking how much retrograde romance of "nuclear strikes", "radioactive ash" and other attributes of the apocalypse is present here. Guys, in the courtyard of the XXI century, the methods of Moltke and Schlieffen have been in mothballs for a long time, hybrid wars are the current trend) Kimusik must try to maintain isolation (especially informational) and curtail, fuck, his NEP experiments - voila, it will hold out for another ten years. But the first McDonald's will be opened in Pyongyang, which means Khan and Kim, and applied Juche studies. What the fuck are rocket bombs? What kind of war? What did the States forget there? An oil puddle or vegetable dye for dollars?
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 23 March 2016 15: 05
        +2
        Quote: Zeppelin ml.
        Quote: roskot
        Korean leader snot does not chew. And will chew so crushed.

        it is striking how much retrograde romance of "nuclear strikes", "radioactive ash" and other attributes of the apocalypse is present here. Guys, in the courtyard of the XXI century, the methods of Moltke and Schlieffen have been in mothballs for a long time, hybrid wars are the current trend) Kimusik must try to maintain isolation (especially informational) and curtail, fuck, his NEP experiments - voila, it will hold out for another ten years. But the first McDonald's will be opened in Pyongyang, which means Khan and Kim, and applied Juche studies. What the fuck are rocket bombs? What kind of war? What did the States forget there? An oil puddle or vegetable dye for dollars?


        Do not convince fans of Juche! This is a clinic already. The fact that North Korea will be bent without war, with such rulers, is a matter of time. Why South Korea, and especially the United States to fight the northerners? You just have to wait. How the US is waiting for Cuba.
        But comrades persistently erect Kim on a pedestal, like a fighter against US imperialism. And to open his eyes and look at China, which Mao went through and quietly abandoned his ideas, after that he built a powerful state - not leisure! China had Mao, North Korea had Kim! China refused quietly, DPRK - no! We look at the result, draw conclusions!
  19. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 14: 24
    0
    Quote: Oles
    In narrow circles, three types of srach are common around Korah. Often flow one into another.

    The battle is on, I would even say not three but two types .. The first two of the ones you named.
    As for this:
    Quote: Oles
    To any person who is at least minimally sane, however, it is obvious that the DPRK is currently in a state of chilling pi.dets

    So receivedconsider it simply because ALL media outlets constantly write it, including Russian and on the Internet .. But at the same time no one thinks about how much this corresponds to reality. Yes, this country is poor, no one disputes but no poorer than many others .. In general, it is customary for the Americans to demonize them before they start a military operation against any country, expose them as universal mordors, and their ruler as a bloody tyrant, etc. So it was with Milosevic, and with Saddam Hussein, and S Gaddafi, and Assad in the same way exhibited. Now they’re putting Kim out. To all these personalities, the set of claims of the Americans and liberal Westerners in general was and is the same .. I will not list it, it is known to everyone.
    Quote: Oles
    whether the current state of the DPRK is a "lesser evil", since many other banana republics, such as Somalia and Zimbabwe, live in a much deeper. The problem of the DPRK is that it is necessary to compare not with Africans, but with neighbors. And the neighbors of Kim Jong-un - nothing more than the CIA with a light hand - developed China, Japan, South Korea and Russia, in each of these countries live incomparably better.

    The problem is not who to compare with, the problem is that the DPRK neighbors live initially in much greenhouse conditions i.e. they do not experience such economic and political pressure. put them in the same conditions and little will be left of their development.
    Quote: Oles
    Second: did Stalin stir up the Korean War and, in general, who was more fluffy, South or North? The question about Stalin is very controversial, nowhere in the written form has the desire to stir up been fixed, but you can think up as much as you really planned Stalin.

    You can argue on this topic as much as you like, but there are historical facts on this subject that confirm that Stalin was just against this war.
    Quote: Oles
    During the war, only one side did little. Destruction of partisans, cleansing in newly captured territories, executions of prisoners in prisons during the retreat - all this was done by southerners and northerners.

    In that war, BOTH sides did a lot of things, and before that all the so-called "UN troops" were 98% American troops.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 23 March 2016 15: 10
      +1
      Quote: igorek4515
      igorek4515

      Oh, and here you are, well, it’s necessary, but I already wondered who would give praise to the fat-skinned Kim today. Come on, write what a good, beautiful, wonderful cretin he is.
      I am ready to listen.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 23 March 2016 16: 20
        0
        Compared to those who set up a meat grinder in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yugoslavia, Eun is just an angel.
        1. gray smeet
          gray smeet 23 March 2016 16: 30
          +2
          Quote: Vadim237
          Compared to those who set up a meat grinder in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yugoslavia, Eun is just an angel.


          But ISIS cut its heads to the British and Americans, the terrorists blew up people in the Belgian capital .... Do you have a question - to enroll ISIS into angels? It’s not my position to compare the incomparable - you started this process!
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 23 March 2016 18: 27
            0
            You didn’t understand - I didn’t talk about ISIS, but about the sponsors of all these companies and wars.
  20. krops777
    krops777 23 March 2016 14: 28
    +2
    In North Korea, the policy of the insignificance of the human personality has long been traced. There the people are like an aggregate for fulfilling the orders of the "great" KIMs! Hence these irresponsible statements. They don't give a damn about their country and the consequences.

    If only this Kim did not finally take the "roof", otherwise it will bring so many troubles for his country.
  21. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 14: 41
    0
    Quote: gray smeet
    And Kim is alarming ... no matter how Kim does not cause delight - that's for sure!

    And they do not need to be enthusiastic. It needs to be understood.
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    Kimusik should try to maintain isolation (especially informational) and curtail, fucking, his NEP experiments - voila, it will last at least a dozen years. But in Pyongyang they will open the first McDonalds - which means Khan and Kim, and applied Jucheistics

    let it be known to you there already have their own local "McDonald's", prada they are called differently.
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    What kind of missile bombs? What kind of war? What did the States forget there?

    Well, what have they been doing there for 70 years then ..? And constantly every year their aircraft carriers and strategic bombers drive there for exercises ..? First answer yourself to this question, only honestly.
    Quote: krops777
    If only this Kim did not finally take the "roof", otherwise it will bring so many troubles for his country.

    I’m afraid that his opponents might be able to tear down the roof, amid the fact that they believed that they could deal with the nuclear power with impunity with almost no loss. yes, yes a power, because it’s impossible to simply name a country with a nuclear weapon a country. even if many do not like it.
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 14: 46
      +1
      Quote: igorek4515
      It needs to be understood.
    2. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 14: 55
      0
      Quote: igorek4515
      let it be known to you there already have their own local "McDonald's", prada they are called differently.

      McDonald's, dear, is a metaphor. It is only a symbol of consumerism and at the same time an instrument of expansion. I do not like poppy - ok, we will replace the products of Hollywood that are uncensoredly twisted in the films of Pyongyang. Will it do?
    3. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 15: 01
      0
      Quote: igorek4515
      Well, what have they been doing there for 70 years then ..?

      yes, they have been "doing something" all over the world for 70 years. It is not necessary to make a pole of attraction out of the SC.
      Quote: igorek4515
      they believed that they could deal with a nuclear power with impunity with virtually no loss.

      they can. And the seemingly unnatural union of China, the Russian Federation and the United States (+ their fans and servants) is quite possible for the wit of the presumptuous troll.
  22. ovod84
    ovod84 23 March 2016 14: 54
    0
    Why fight, war is bad. Is it possible to agree on the abolition of South Korea’s border exercises and sowing missile launches. They still live better with us. If we lived in Africa, it would be better.
  23. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 15: 00
    0
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    McDonald's, dear, is a metaphor. It is only a symbol of consumerism and at the same time an instrument of expansion.

    And I am telling you in all seriousness that there are McDonald's analogues in Pyongyang. The so-called fast food restaurants. There is an Italian pizzeria and Vienna cafe .. so something like this. opened in recent years. And something that Kim’s regime doesn’t collapse from this, as you wrote above.
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    I do not like poppy - ok, we will replace the products of Hollywood that are uncensoredly twisted in the films of Pyongyang. Will it do?

    Do you like Hollywood products ..? I personally feel nauseous from her .. Personally, my opinion is that the North Koreans forbid her and do it right. There is nothing for citizens to hammer their brains with this garbage.
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 15: 12
      +2
      Quote: igorek4515
      so something like this. opened in recent years. And something that Kim’s regime doesn’t collapse from this, as you wrote above.

      and I talked about the Kimov reforms cautious. The sunset of the USSR also began with freedom of enterprise. If the process goes into irreversible form - this is a sentence to Kim, no matter how personally you would not like to see a thriving car park with Viennese cafes.
      Quote: igorek4515
      Do you like Hollywood products ..? I personally feel sick of her already ..

      and it’s not a matter of whether you personally feel sick or not. The question is that if you receive any specific, albeit half-enzyme, freedom, society, no matter how much communized or zapuchecheizirovanny, it will require more. And so exponentially.
    2. 0255
      0255 23 March 2016 18: 16
      0
      Quote: igorek4515
      Do you like Hollywood products ..? I personally feel nauseous from her .. Personally, my opinion is that the North Koreans forbid her and do it right. There is nothing for citizens to hammer their brains with this garbage.

      Are you one of those who want to ban everything?
  24. RussianBear
    RussianBear 23 March 2016 15: 03
    +2
    Kim’s skull box is tightly closed for visitors, just like the country-prtzh. So it is not known what tricks this fruit can throw out. I really hope not a nuclear spill.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 23 March 2016 15: 29
      0
      Quote: RussianBear
      Kim's skull box is tightly closed for visitors

      Fat swam laughing
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 23 March 2016 16: 36
        -1
        Fat swam

        You still say fatty trust.
        It seems that in your childhood, there were problems with being overweight.
        I would have understood if you would not like fat women. Ah, there is a complete man.
        I do not really believe that you have all the emotions because you feel sorry for the Korean people. Yes, and the fact that you are afraid of the beginning of a nuclear conflict near the borders of Vladivostok, too. Ash stump, that despite the avatar, you are an adult.
        1. padded jacket
          padded jacket 23 March 2016 16: 46
          +2
          Quote: avva2012
          You still say fatty trust.
          It seems that in your childhood, there were problems with being overweight.

          Eun had hereditary diabetes in both childhood and adolescence.
          Little Eun with his father.
          1. avva2012
            avva2012 23 March 2016 16: 55
            0
            Quote: quilted jacket Eun had hereditary diabetes in both childhood and adolescence. Little Eun with his father.

            Type 1 diabetes is always hereditary.
            I’m not ashamed to laugh at a sick person (in my opinion, I’m really ashamed), I don’t understand why they hate him so much? Moreover, none of those present on the site was in the DPRK. All judged by the publications. At what, sometimes, they write comments against the liberals, the same as against Kim. Paradox? Or..
            1. Pissarro
              Pissarro 23 March 2016 17: 08
              +3
              The lackeys always hate individuals and states that defend their interests, and not the interests of the owner, nothing surprising. The DPRK lives in a total blockade and develops knowledge-intensive industries. It lives poorly, because the blockade, not communism
              1. padded jacket
                padded jacket 23 March 2016 17: 12
                +2
                Quote: Pissarro
                The lackeys always hate individuals and states that defend their interests, and not the interests of the owner, nothing surprising. The DPRK lives in a total blockade and develops knowledge-intensive industries. It lives poorly, because the blockade, not communism

                Strongly good
            2. padded jacket
              padded jacket 23 March 2016 17: 10
              +2
              Quote: avva2012
              I don’t understand why they hate him so much?

              Well there are a number of such individuals smile
              And they hate, maybe they just envy because they themselves could not realize themselves and were left out of work, so to speak, but maybe just some people have the psychology of a "slave" and they definitely need to "go under someone strong" under the USA or the UK. Eun, in spite of everything, does not succumb to blackmail and threats, and this "enrages" them.
  25. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 15: 09
    +2
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    yes, they have been "doing something" all over the world for 70 years. It is not necessary to make a pole of attraction out of the SC.

    Yes, the fact is that they need this "pole of attraction" with a much more serious geopolitical goal. Access to the borders of two of their geopolitical opponents, China and Russia.
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    they can.

    Well, if they can, then why haven’t they attacked yet? It’s not the first time Kim has threatened them ..? Just don’t tell me here about the patience and peaceability of the United States ..
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    And the seemingly unnatural alliance of China, Russia and the United States (+ their fans and servants) is quite possible

    This union would be very desirable for a certain category of citizens in Russia .. I just want to disappoint you, such a triple alliance is impossible for quite certain reasons.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 23 March 2016 15: 17
      -2
      Quote: igorek4515
      . Exit to the borders of two of their geopolitical opponents of China and Russia at once ..

      Campaign in Kazakhstan is not studied by everyone. This one didn’t study fool
      Quote: igorek4515
      Just do not tell me here about the patience and peace of the United States ..

      I think this person works at the embassy of North Korea in Astana. Well, a normal person cannot write such nonsense.
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 23 March 2016 16: 02
        -3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov

        I think this person works at the embassy of North Korea in Astana. Well, a normal person cannot write such nonsense.


        Maybe he is Korean? There were many of them in Kazakhstan. But then the reasonable question is - why does he so hate the Koreans, who Kim Jong-un is not holding for people?
        Or one of the Kim clan?
    2. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 15: 31
      -1
      Quote: igorek4515
      They need this "pole of attraction" with a much more serious geopolitical goal. Access to the borders of two of their geopolitical opponents, China and Russia.

      Come on, the 7th Fleet, two years after its formation, "went to the borders". States especially do not bother about the reasons to be on someone's coast.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. zenith
    zenith 23 March 2016 15: 25
    0
    Quote: Burieway
    Yeah. It would be funny if the World Nuclear War over the DPRK begins.

    Why because? He would not be a talker yet. And so the thing.
  28. The comment was deleted.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 23 March 2016 16: 02
      +4
      Despite the difficulties of the embargo and other restrictions, the Koreans and the DPRK people, Koreans were able to create an army armed with not very modern weapons but they were able to create nuclear weapons to counter such aggressive regimes as the United States and resurgent Japan that dream of destroying the DPRK and transforming its territory to the next base where Washington’s troops will be based.
  29. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 15: 59
    +2
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    come on, the 7th Fleet, two years after its formation, "went to the borders"

    What does the 7th Fleet have to do with it ..? The fleet is good, but serious fleets like China and Russia cannot be influenced by such a fleet alone.
  30. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 16: 06
    +4
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    The sunset of the USSR also began with freedom of enterprise

    Well .. In China, since 1989, free enterprise has also begun .. China has also "rolled back" ..? Why are you so sure that with the reform in the field of entrepreneurship and the economy in general, North Korea, in principle, is not able to transform ..?
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    The question is that if you receive any specific, albeit half-enzyme, freedom, society, no matter how much communized or zapuchecheizirovanny, it will require more. And so exponentially.

    Well, for this, it’s not at all necessary for society to give cheap Hollywood crafts. You can, for example, your freedom in the field of cinema, art, music, etc. to give. this is a much more productive way than to spread the Hollywood toll.
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 16: 32
      0
      Quote: igorek4515
      Well .. In China, since 1989, free enterprise has also begun .. China has also "rolled back" ..? Why are you so sure that with the reform in the field of entrepreneurship and the economy in general, North Korea, in principle, is not able to transform ..?

      Exporting a Chinese model to the UK? Ok, then start with Deng Xiaoping and then with all the stops, Gorby's visit to the PRC, "Down with bureaucrats!" etc. etc. to Tiananmen Square and a little further. China came to reforms completely different than it was under Mao - I hope this comparison does not hurt your ears? I, in fact, are talking about this, you see - the Kims will come to an end, reforms are beyond their power, forgive me for the skepticism. Do I consider the UK a reform-intensive country? Yes, hell knows, we'll see.
      Quote: igorek4515
      how to spread Hollywood filth.

      This Hollywood was given to you. Is my symbolism incomprehensible? Well - any other liberal symbol to choose from.
  31. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 16: 19
    +2
    Quote: gray smeet
    Maybe he is Korean? There were many of them in Kazakhstan. But then the reasonable question is - why does he so hate the Koreans, who Kim Jong-un is not holding for people?
    Or one of the Kim clan?

    Ohhh .. I see from the submission of Mr. Romanov the discussion flowed smoothly into the discussion of my humble person ..? Well, to all those guessing about my origin and political views, it would be better to directly ask me about this than to guess, and even more so discuss this with the moderator ..
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 23 March 2016 16: 28
      +1
      Quote: igorek4515 Well, it would be better for anyone guessing about my background and political views to directly ask me

      You can ask.
      Well, only by your comments you can judge that, you, not a democrat, that's for sure. Enough for me. I support. There, we'll see. In your face, hello to the people of Kazakhstan.
  32. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 16: 34
    0
    Quote: avva2012
    Well, only by your comments you can judge that, you, not a democrat, that's for sure. Enough for me.

    And according to your logic, if not a democrat, it means not adequate ..? and what exactly do you mean by the term democrat ..?
    Quote: avva2012
    In your face, hello to the people of Kazakhstan.

    Thank you to the residents of Kazakhstan, thank you very much ..!
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 23 March 2016 16: 48
      0
      Quote: igorek4515 And according to your logic, if not a democrat, it means not adequate ..? and what exactly do you mean by the term democrat ..?

      laughing Yes, okay, you. In my opinion, you can’t say hello to the residents and, at the same time, consider the person through whom you are doing this as not adequate.
      A democrat is not a representative of the US Democratic Party, but a person (not yet) who, in modern Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and other former republics of the united Union, advocates a civil war and the murder of normal people. Not a democrat, in my opinion, can adhere to different views on religion, state structure, but he is a person who understands correctly the saying: "Live yourself, let others live." good
  33. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 16: 54
    +3
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    Exporting a Chinese model to the UK? Ok, then start with Deng Xiaoping and then with all the stops, Gorby's visit to the PRC, "Down with bureaucrats!" etc. etc. to Tiananmen Square and a little further.

    I can tell you that the DPRK has been carrying out economic reforms both in agriculture and in industry for several years. Yes, a class of entrepreneurs has already emerged. True, all this is not quite "in Chinese", but nevertheless .. and note all this with the "inadequate" Kim Jong-un who is here all amicably accused of mass starvation of his people. But it was under him that since 2013 this country is fully self-sufficient in food and it is thanks to the reforms of the agricultural sector .. Etc. But at the same time, for some reason, contrary to popular belief, the citizens of this country do not even have a hint that the "regime" existing there would come to an end .. Rather, on the contrary .. Here is such a paradox ..
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    reform they can not do, excuse me for skepticism

    reform is already there. contrary to popular belief.
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    Is my symbolism incomprehensible? Well - any other liberal symbol to choose from.

    And why do you insist that any other choice should be necessarily liberal ..? An example of a liberal choice in Russia in the 90s does not mean anything ..?
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 23 March 2016 16: 58
      +3
      DPRK today



      Other photos can be viewed here.
      http://hanber.livejournal.com/3973026.html?thread=5038498
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. avva2012
      avva2012 23 March 2016 17: 02
      +2
      Quote: igorek4515 But at the same time, for some reason, contrary to popular belief, the citizens of this country do not even have a hint that the "regime" existing there would come to an end .. Rather, on the contrary .. Here is such a paradox ..

      Yes, there is no paradox here. As the USSR was afraid, all these fat people from the drunken blood of bedbugs from Wall Street, so now, they are afraid of little DPRK. They understand that, this is a different path of development. It can become attractive to its own citizens, who are not only interested in their own dupes. The DPRK, for them, is worse, unfortunately, than Russia with the NW and TNW, which is not regrettable for us.
    3. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 23 March 2016 17: 35
      0
      Quote: igorek4515
      But it was precisely with him that since 2013, this country has completely provided itself with food and precisely thanks to agricultural reforms.

      what does "agricultural reform" have to do with it? Two fruitful years. Health resorts in honor of Kim on this occasion remind
      Summer will come in winter -
      Thanks to the Party for this!

      In general, the conversation is pointless.
      Out and padded jacket pulled himself up with his popular images of Korean prosperity. So - draining in ecstasy, complete mutual understanding and mutual adhesion - "A splendid time is guaranteed for all" (The Beatles)
      Goodbye.
      1. padded jacket
        padded jacket 23 March 2016 17: 41
        +1
        Quote: Zeppelin ml.

        Goodbye.

        Yes, you would be better off and a citizen from the USA did not appear anyway, except for lies from you, there is nothing "useful" lol
    4. padded jacket
      padded jacket 23 March 2016 17: 48
      +1
      Quote: igorek4515
      The example of liberal choice in Russia in the 90s says nothing.

      The "liberals" who appeared and bred in our country under Gorbachev are outright "thieves and traitors" of our people who destroyed the country and plunged the people into poverty.
  34. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 17: 05
    +1
    Quote: quilted jacket
    DPRK today

    Russia went through this in the 90s, and the DPRK will also pass, unless of course the neighbors and the United States provoke a new war on this peninsula ..
    As for the current "news" under discussion and especially the interpretation in which it is presented in all media, here is a more accurate translation from Korean:

    http://russian.news.cn/2016-03/23/c_135216644.htm
    DPRK warns US and ROK against reckless actions

    Pyongyang, March 23 / Xinhua / - The Committee on the Peaceful Unification of the DPRK Homeland on Wednesday issued a statement condemning the military exercises of the United States and Kazakhstan aimed at attacking the North Korean leadership, and also warned the latter against reckless actions. This was reported by the Central Telegraph Agency of Korea / CTAC /.

    The statement says that on March 21, the United States and the ROK sent 16 bombers to practice the "targeted strikes" operation on the offices of the DPRK's top leadership, which is a serious provocation that offends the supreme dignity of the republic.

    The statement also notes that from that moment on, the North Korean army is ready to launch a retaliatory military action that could begin inside the presidential residence of Cheongvade or in the surrounding areas.

    Recall that on March 7, the United States and Kazakhstan launched the largest joint maneuvers in history on South Korean territory. About 15 thousand American military personnel and approximately 300 thousand South Korean military personnel take part in them.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 23 March 2016 17: 17
      +2
      Quote: igorek4515
      Russia went through this in the 90s, and the DPRK will also pass, unless of course the neighbors and the United States provoke a new war on this peninsula ..

      I completely agree that the DPRK artificially slows down and drives its people into poverty and hunger with sanctions and the fact that they created the atomic bomb is a huge success for its people and the leadership of this country.
      If we recall our grandfathers and fathers lived in poverty after the Second World War, but the country, despite all the hardships, was able to create nuclear weapons and ward off NATO attacks on it.
  35. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 17: 13
    +3
    Quote: avva2012
    A democrat is not a representative of the US Democratic Party, but a person (not yet) who, in modern Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and other former republics of the united Union, advocates a civil war and the murder of normal people. Not a democrat, in my opinion, can adhere to different views on religion, state structure, but he is a person who understands correctly the saying: "Live yourself, let others live"

    Well, here I’ll probably agree with you ..
    Quote: avva2012
    . DPRK, for them, unfortunately, is worse than Russia with the strategic nuclear weapons and tactical nuclear weapons,

    exactly.
    and worse for them, she again, by your own definition:

    Quote: avva2012
    They understand that, this is a different path of development.

    And for all these capitalist sharks, what is in Russia, what is in the USA, what is in South Korea a different development path different from theirs is categorically unacceptable as it poses a potential threat to their world domination. So it needs to be destroyed by ANY ways and means .. Unfortunately, this is exactly so.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 23 March 2016 17: 22
      +1
      DPRK Foreign Ministry: nuclear forces are the only way to prevent war with the United States
      Measures to strengthen the DPRK's nuclear forces "serve as the only means capable of preventing a war with the United States due to lack of trust" between the two countries. This is stated in a statement by a representative of the DPRK Ministry of Foreign Affairs, published in local newspapers, TASS reports.
      The document emphasizes that a nuclear deterrent force was created in the DPRK "to counter the nuclear threat from the United States." The statement also said that Pyongyang is making efforts to resume negotiations on the nuclear issue of the Korean Peninsula. However, the diplomat stressed, the United States is hindering the start of the dialogue by "putting forward all sorts of preconditions."
      The DPRK Foreign Ministry believes that Washington "has no right to criticize Pyongyang for strengthening its military potential in the interests of self-defense." The US should realize, the Foreign Ministry spokesman noted, that "Washington's policy towards Pyongyang, which is not going to threaten anyone, based on erroneous concepts, prevents the normalization of bilateral relations, as well as the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula."
      http://www.zakon.kz/4716191-mid-kndr-jadernye-sily-sluzhat.html
    2. avva2012
      avva2012 23 March 2016 19: 06
      +1
      It is not that it is not acceptable, it is deadly. And, therefore, hate him (them). Strange, but why sane people at VO do not understand this. I'm not a Juche supporter, I just don't know anything about it. I am an opponent of the path imposed by the West. And, if These, hate, then apparently not in vain. I don't want to thoughtlessly become like them. As Cord sang, "the worst thing that can happen ..."
  36. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 17: 42
    +3
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    what does "agricultural reform" have to do with it? Two fruitful years.

    Despite the fact that in 2015 in the DPRK was one of the leanest years in recent decades, but the country this year fully provided itself with food and humanitarian aid abroad did not take .. and the point is precisely in agricultural reforms and not in supposedly two fruitful years .
  37. igorek4515
    igorek4515 23 March 2016 17: 45
    +3
    Quote: Zeppelin ml.
    In general, the conversation is pointless.

    A "substantive" conversation in your opinion is when a general and unequivocal condemnation of a particular country without any attempt to understand the real state of affairs ..?
  38. Old26
    Old26 23 March 2016 18: 56
    0
    Quote: Vadim237
    The USA will definitely not use ICBMs against the DPRK, since this could provoke our Strategic Rocket Forces to strike, and the DPRK has a huge advantage in the region, in the form of thousands of tactical, ballistic, ICBMs, which, indeed, can carry nuclear charges - both of which DPRK is already in mass production.

    Thousands (actually sturgeon should be cut to hundreds) of tactical missiles - yes. That's just the number of launchers is 5-6 times less (or maybe 10). The overwhelming majority are liquid, with not long-stored fuel. So there may not be a second salvo.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 23 March 2016 21: 33
      +1
      We do not know all the secrets of the DPRK, in Iran no one knew before about underground missile launchers, at a depth of several hundred meters, surely there are such underground surprises in the DPRK.
  39. kam4atka
    kam4atka 23 March 2016 19: 58
    +1
    How many evil people, petty dirty tricks. It's good to sit at the computer and pour slop. At first, the DPRK was clamped down by the entire "civilized world", and now they want to do it as extreme. For me, the country is worthy of respect and good-neighborly relations.
  40. Warrior2015
    Warrior2015 23 March 2016 20: 10
    0
    Oh mother dear, such a discus about Kim, and without me?!? laughing

    Quote: Pravdarm
    Oh, if only for nuclear war!
    Well, just like that, if only it had not begun. I want to live, raise children ...

    Quote: hedgehog in the fog
    The Yunovsky rockets will knock down mattresses, and then they will arrange massive shelling with cruise missiles, they will bomb the entire military infrastructure and that's it, the whole circus will end

    Most likely it will be so. The Iraqi army was stronger, especially in the 91 year, and was also dispersed without any problems.

    Quote: gray smeet
    Pyongyang made a nuclear test! The whole world holds a moratorium - and this is necessary! Before that it was calm, no one (USA) went anywhere ..
    It is precisely thanks to such half-fools that the USA has quite clearly defined enemies and Pengaton is cutting out large funds from the budget for this topic. am

    Quote: avva2012
    I don’t understand why they hate him so much? Moreover, none of those present on the site was in the DPRK. All judged by the publications. At what, sometimes, they write comments against liberals

    Oh comrade, comrade - do not rush. I was in the South, and my relative was in the North. So do not.

    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    I think this person works at the embassy of North Korea in Astana. Well, a normal person cannot write such nonsense.
    Well, actually it can. I heard that the North Koreans are leading (trying! laughing ) active international propaganda of Juche ideas! this is one of their important state affairs! and even try to form information centers abroad (from local adherents of Jucheism, of course), which should glorify the great Kim family and "bring to the masses" their ideas!
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 24 March 2016 04: 25
      +1
      Quote: Warrior2015 Oh comrade, comrade - do not rush. I was in the South, and my relative was in the North. So do not.

      Oh, comrade, the percentage of those who were there and there, 0,0001%.
      Everything else is propaganda. At what completely brutal. One piece of news about the shooting of the minister from an anti-aircraft gun, which is worth it. And, after all, they believe, God forgive me. The question is, "why write such nonsense about the DPRK?" Answer: "dehumanize". This has already happened and not so far in history. And even now there is a lot of information about Russia. Read it. Or do you believe you live in Mordor?
      Humanize for one purpose, destroy. If not people live there, then humanism does not apply to them. Such an animal grin of capitalism, comrade. Yes, if a relative has been to the DPRK, it’s interesting there about Yu.Korea that they also write nonsense about anti-aircraft guns? If not, then who is the aggressor?
  41. Kulneff2009
    Kulneff2009 23 March 2016 22: 12
    +2
    Come on, Kimushka! God is for us!
  42. Warrior2015
    Warrior2015 24 March 2016 11: 00
    +1
    Quote: avva2012
    One piece of news about the shooting of a minister from an anti-aircraft gun, which is worth it.
    Well, someone believes, someone does not. No one says that South Korea has no tender friendly feelings for North.

    Quote: avva2012
    If not, then who is the aggressor?
    Now, as indeed happened several times before, North Korea. It was Kim who waved a nuclear baton; all the normal neighboring countries simply looked at him with horror.

    Quote: Kulneff2009
    Come on, Kimushka! God is for us!
    Your God is not interesting to him; he himself is a living embodiment of a deity according to his own approved doctrine.
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 24 March 2016 15: 07
      -1
      Quote: Warrior2015 It was Kim who waved a nuclear baton; all the normal neighboring countries simply looked at him with horror.

      Normal countries, who is this? The US and its allies?
      Congratulations! You do not need a St. George cross with white enamel, but just a white ribbon.
  43. Warrior2015
    Warrior2015 24 March 2016 16: 03
    +1
    Quote: avva2012
    Normal countries, who is this? The US and its allies?
    Congratulations! You do not need a St. George cross with white enamel, but just a white ribbon.

    Do you really want to insult a Russian patriot who has a look that is simply different from yours?

    In fact, read carefully -
    Quote: Warrior2015
    all normal neighboring countries simply look at him with horror.
    . NORMAL NEIGHBORING countries! Comrade, are you friends with geography? or forgot somewhere in the 7 class? where is the common neighboring border of North Korea and the USA?!?

    I also remind you, do you consider our President and equally our representative at the UN Churkin abnormal people? and it is they who vote for new sanctions against the supply of nuclear technology and dual-use materials to North Korea.