Quit american

36
Quit american


World news Agencies are full of headlines that the United States will withdraw its troops from Iraq before the end of this year. This was reported by both representatives of the Barack Obama administration and Pentagon officials. At the beginning of November, the Iraqi Committee for Defense and Security prepared a statement stating that American troops would be withdrawn from Iraq before next year. Whether the withdrawal of troops will be complete, or the Americans will nevertheless leave a certain amount of force "for every fireman" in Iraq - this is one of the main intrigues of the "joint" US-Iraqi decision.

So, December 12, Prime Minister of Iraq, Mr. Al-Maliki, together with US President Obama signed an agreement that, before 31 December of this year, American troops leave Iraq after more than eight years of war, first with the Saddam Hussein regime, then with terrorism and extremism for democratization country. Such language suggests that Barack Obama considers the US army to be the undisputed winner, and the current Iraqi leadership, in principle, is not against this kind of vanity. In the characteristic manner of the main world leader, Barack Obama, at a joint press conference, he expressed the view that the Allied army brought true democracy to Iraq, and that the Iraqi people should know that in this world they have someone to rely on.

I wonder if Obama himself considers his words weighty and whether there is at least one sane person in the world who is inclined to think that the American eight-year-old (even almost nine-year-olds) in Iraq worked for the good of this Middle Eastern state. Let us assume that we took Mr. Obama’s words at face value, and now we will do a small comparative analysis of the situation that was in Iraq before the beginning of the “democratization” and after its “triumphal march” through the streets of Iraqi cities and villages.

One of the indicators of the "success" of American actions in Iraq is the reduction of the level of education to critical indicators. If in the 2002 year, Iraqi higher education was considered almost the benchmark in the entire Arab world, then according to recently published data, about 15% of modern Iraqi youth refused even to start studying in regular schools. Many of them motivated their decision by the fact that truly religious schools should be created in Iraq and they are not going to study in secular schools. One can imagine what forces “prompted” to seven-year-old Iraqis to announce the creation of religious schools. It is also possible to imagine what kind of education young Iraqis will receive in such schools. Every year, starting with 2003, the number of non-literate Iraqis is increasing. And if initially it seemed that such a trend could be reversed, today a generation of young people has grown up who don’t understand at all why they need to learn to read, count and write, if any question can be solved with the help of weapons. The actions of the American contingent have become a vivid example for many young Iraqis.

Let us turn to the demographic situation in Iraq. During the time the Americans and their allies decided the future of Iraq, a huge number of people left this country, most of whom were educated people. More than four million people in Iraq were forced to go abroad (in Syria alone, according to the most conservative estimates, today there are more than nine hundred thousand Iraqis who fled from the endless war of recent years). In addition, nearly two million Iraqis were forced to become refugees within their own country, that is, they had to go to other parts of Iraq due to the loss of shelter caused by the fighting.

In some Iraqi provinces, the number of inhabitants has been halved. At the same time, the unemployment rate, for example, in the northern territories of Iraq reaches 40%! It turns out that almost half of the population of these areas has no productive peaceful occupation, and, therefore, the war has recently become the only source of income for them. This also applies to endless abductions and the arms trade. And after the withdrawal of American troops, these people will have to look for a new use for themselves, without releasing the weapons of their hands. And you can not go to the fortuneteller, but say at once that the future of these people is the same extremism, and the same terrorism that Barack Obama “defeated”.

In addition, in today's Iraq almost no one can feel safe. Inter-ethnic and interfaith disunity has escalated. The country remains a huge number of undocumented weapons that members of terrorist associations will never surrender, and it is unlikely that someone will succeed in getting them to do it. In order to adjust the familiar life of the Iraqi leaders will have to look for compromises between individual clans, make economic concessions. This is manifested today. Additional millions are allocated from the American treasury in order for the US troops to be allowed to quietly leave the tribal representatives, under whose control the Baghdad-Kuwait highway is under control. Wow winners - pay a defeat contribution to blow their feet! ..

Let's not forget that the departure of Americans from Iraq cannot be called 100%. The Pentagon says military advisers and other representatives of the United States Army will remain in Iraqi cities to help the new Iraqi authorities keep the situation under control. And to keep the situation under the control of the Iraqi authorities is unlikely to succeed, since the level of corruption in the country is such that even a positive initiative turns into a farce. So it turns out that “fallen democracy” on Iraq will result in a new chaos, which, possibly, the neighboring states will overwhelm. This is very likely, if only because Iraq has already been "chosen" by Islamic fundamentalists who want to show who will now be the main one in the country. Therefore, the words about the bright future of Iraq, to ​​which Barack Obama and his predecessor George W. Bush have led, look silly.

Iraq, lying in ruins with incessant explosions and hostage-taking, incessant firefights and clan fighting - this is what, it turns out, is true democracy from the point of view of the United States.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    14 December 2011 07: 55
    but Iraq, like many other countries like it, who suddenly received humanitarian aid in the form of crap, will live and prosper (more precisely, bloom like mold), and they will leave more than one base, it is necessary to somehow control the oil, taking into account the increase in religiosity in the democratised Muslim countries, one can easily come to the conclusion that this was also one of the tasks of democratizers (maybe as a backup option) while they (Iraqis and others in their countries, Libyans, Egyptians) wipe each other's clan and other affiliations, only inciting enmity, Americans will sit on the bases and pump oil ........ Total: quietly, without noise and dust, they crushed under themselves in a fairly short time, or removed from the road and prepared a springboard for the "last of the Mohicans" in the person of Syria and Iran , the whole cortinent, with its resources, they have a lot under their control, and then there is little to do - they are Arabs - like the Indians they will root out in internecine strife, cut off the water for them, and arrange interruptions in food - and then there heat, epidemics are not far away, and so by chance the territories will become empty in front of the entire civilized world, just like that, as if by accident, they say - the savages themselves have sunk ...
  2. vadimus
    +11
    14 December 2011 07: 56
    "Going American" means shitting and fading ...
    1. Desert Fox
      +7
      14 December 2011 09: 53
      small amendment colleague. Shitting is coming in American. And whitie is just shedding when all the corners are already dirty am
      1. rysich
        +1
        14 December 2011 19: 40
        How he lifted up (to vomit) the American ches about democracy, especially against the background of ruins and corpses.
    2. Artemka
      0
      23 December 2011 20: 25
      Yes, it’s not when they came to shit, but when they leave, they will study something abruptly.
  3. +5
    14 December 2011 08: 24
    Question to the photo:
    And in the center they have a demobilization?
    What the rest of the walls are seated?
    1. +2
      14 December 2011 09: 58
      Yes, really noticed;);)
    2. +3
      14 December 2011 10: 12
      I also compared ... in Ilya there are no such luxurious armchairs wink
      1. +2
        14 December 2011 11: 42
        Who is so brave here ??? all zinnusheny appear Troll !!!
        1. marauder
          +4
          14 December 2011 11: 51
          Quote: urzul
          Who is so brave here ??? all zinnusheny appear Troll !!!

          The rat is somehow. right now, plus. I do not mind.
          1. +3
            14 December 2011 12: 25
            repelled the first attack)
    3. 0
      14 December 2011 21: 48
      Quote: timhelmet
      What the rest of the walls are seated?

      Yes, doves have spread on the walls! Watch carefully!
      1. marauder
        +1
        15 December 2011 00: 09
        Quote: APASUS
        Yes, doves have spread on the walls! Watch carefully!

        Right I didn’t guess right away. Wives are sitting on the walls. In the Pindo army, this is officially permitted.
  4. +2
    14 December 2011 08: 25
    now they will go home to return home chisburgers and back east to Iran or Syria
    1. +2
      14 December 2011 08: 44
      Quote: maksim
      chisburgers will eat and back east to Iran or Syria


      It is unlikely. As you know, the operation against Iraq began when his leadership began to betray the closest circle, the same situation was in Libya. In Syria and Iran, this has not yet been observed, which means a military invasion has not yet been envisaged. But when the rats run, then wait for trouble ....
      1. CEO
        CEO
        +1
        14 December 2011 12: 00
        But the moyma has already begun .. To run, you need to prepare. And they are already cooking.
  5. +5
    14 December 2011 08: 35
    THEY got what they wanted. They have Iraqi oil in their pockets. The population of Iraq is impoverished and degraded (who needs smart and prosperous slaves). "Leave" - ​​this is for the rest of the world, Iraq with all the guts. Russia has a different scenario. In the beginning, the complete moronization of the youth, and, moreover, like the hands and "brains" of the Russians themselves (the authorities). And then according to the situation ... However, having released the genie from the bottle, THEY have no idea about its strength and intentions!
  6. Vadim
    +2
    14 December 2011 08: 48
    They act according to the noble pirate tradition - take battle and escape ["Pirates of the Caribbean"] wink
  7. Anatoly
    +2
    14 December 2011 09: 04
    Managed the whole world, and now they are trying to leave with dignity. Too bad the UN has become too sluggish. And he can’t show anything to anyone. In particular, to demand, before all countries, a US report on all operations and their results. Also the feasibility of their implementation.
  8. mitya
    +3
    14 December 2011 09: 06
    And in the photo in the first row there is a "victorious soldier" wink He painfully looks like the president of Estonia. Is not it a son? Probably flew home to his father. In our construction battalion, the faces of the soldiers are even more adequate. A black ass, even in a helmet is cold. And if it is in Siberia to us in a 30-degree frost? This Mowgli will generally move the bots.
  9. +1
    14 December 2011 10: 57
    Well, they will be brought out, then some of them will return there again, only not under the flag of the United States, but under the emblem of some kind of blackwater (Blackwater, which after a series of scandals was renamed Xe Services LLC) or some other similar office ... Especially since in Iraq there are now up to 50 private workers.
  10. badabum
    +3
    14 December 2011 11: 32
    But do not turn the states into 2 Iraq ???
  11. marauder
    +1
    14 December 2011 11: 56
    And where did you fly?
    They will probably be democrating elsewhere.
  12. Perch_xnumx
    +3
    14 December 2011 12: 05
    I subscribe to the article. Now American advisers and mercenaries will be very, very hot. It’s necessary to pay the terrorists whom they fought for 10 years — such is the sweetness of victory over terrorism.
    1. +2
      14 December 2011 12: 19
      Terrorists already exist with THEIR blessings and with THEIR money. Or someone thinks that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc. sponsor terrorism arbitrarily?
  13. gunship
    +4
    14 December 2011 12: 41
    I once studied with Iraqis who fled to Belarus after the American invasion. They talked about American atrocities, shooting, bombing. They also said that before the Amer invasion they had their own communism - cheap fuel, cars, good salaries. If you did not get into politics, you could live there. There was a law according to which everyone lived and it suited almost everyone. What is going on now is American democracy, and it turns out that the Iraqi people should still be grateful for their freedom.
  14. +3
    14 December 2011 12: 49
    "The Iraqi Defense Ministry has placed an order in the United States for an additional batch of 18 F-16IQ fighters. The potential deal is estimated at $ 2,3 billion. Iraq has previously acquired 18 American fighters, additional equipment and weapons for a total of $ XNUMX billion. "
  15. +2
    14 December 2011 13: 12
    In the characteristic manner of world leader Barack Obama, at a joint press conference, he spoke out in the spirit that the Allied army brought true democracy to Iraq, and that the Iraqi people should know ...
    If we accept as the thesis that “democracy” does not mean “benefit,” then everything falls into place. Then it turns out that Bardak Obama boasted to everyone that he brought down one more country with the help of democracy, and let the Iraqis rejoice that they did not do the same with them as with the Indians.
  16. Ivan Krasov
    +4
    14 December 2011 13: 22
    Most likely, B. Obama's words are "a good mine ...". The second wave of the global crisis is approaching, the internal turmoil in the United States does not decrease, the problem with finances remains, terrorism in Iraq has not gone anywhere. Therefore, withdrawal can be regarded as fatigue from this war and the need to save military spending. However, the option of regrouping is also possible.
  17. stas64
    0
    14 December 2011 17: 05
    who would doubt that the Yankees leave just like that !!!!!
  18. +1
    14 December 2011 19: 59
    If they left there, then soon they will appear somewhere ... sad
  19. 0
    14 December 2011 20: 09
    As the last link to .. are. And about pride, something pi ... woods!
  20. gambit
    0
    14 December 2011 20: 27
    I do not think that they will withdraw all the troops, let some remain "" After all, they will not leave their "feeding trough" so easily
  21. Lustrator
    0
    15 December 2011 01: 07
    mambito,
    What is the comment about? The army has done its job, now American companies will come - to rebuild the infrastructure destroyed by the Americans ... Or do you think the destruction of objects important for the social sphere was the result of erroneous orders? Now Iraqis SHOULD Americans, which is much worse, because It does not require the presence of troops in Iraq, and, as a result, the enormous cost of maintaining a huge gang of thugs. Plus a chance to realize part of the worn out ammunition, old weapons and other second-hand items.

    But do not forget that the American soldier is not a soldier for any "idea", but a banal mercenary who simply adapts to the system for the sake of profit, and should not shamefully "stigmatize" them: they are nothing better than the same corrupt deputies-hackers, bureaucrats-corrupt officials, cops-scammers, etc. shit, from which MUCH MORE harm to our countries ... So do not go overboard. The worst enemy is eating up the countries from INSIDE. It has always been that way.
    1. -1
      15 December 2011 01: 46
      I agree that their private army will be there, but what contingent (I do not know) Yes, and will they cope? And what about the authorities, I really can’t say anything.
  22. 0
    15 December 2011 01: 32
    maybe someday they will come to us
  23. 755962
    0
    15 December 2011 01: 56
    how much money was secured for so many years-horror. For this money you can buy oil peacefully. So no, everything is numb
  24. +1
    15 December 2011 02: 00
    and how much money did they quietly raise in Iraq? Foreign counts of sadamma and so on
  25. kostya
    +1
    15 December 2011 05: 30
    they ruined the country, put it on their knees, destroyed their education, and with a calm soul they went down .. go home, GOATS !!! if they could bring such a democracy, although their crime is not small, the police mostly eat donuts instead of catching criminals, and how fat he’ll run after the gangster. and education, he’s a true American and he’s so stupid, so I think everything is the same as in Iraq, but it’s not in ruins. Here it is true democracy!
  26. smirnyagin
    0
    15 December 2011 17: 46
    Yes, as someone remarked: I was thinking of robbing banks with them, but they just smash the window, and shit in the sandbox ...