Military Review

Special operations forces. Anytime, anywhere! Part of 3

28
Previous articles in the series:
Special Operations Forces: Anytime, Anywhere! Part of 1

Special operations forces. Anytime, anywhere! Part of 2

Special operations forces. Anytime, anywhere! Part of 3

Helmets with open ears are becoming widespread among the special forces of different countries of the world. Its advantage lies in the increased comfort for the owner and the simplified integration of communications and headset hearing protection.

Sushi Equipment

As for the more traditional equipment of special operations forces (MTR), then there are their own trends. For example, “cut-off” combat helmets with open ears are in great demand, allowing to increase the level of awareness of the situation and integrate the headset. One of the most popular ballistic solutions that MTRs of many countries readily acquire is the Gentex Tactical Ballistic Helmet Mission Configurable (TBH-II MC) helmet. TBH-II MC is based on the popular ACH (Advanced Combat Helmet) helmet and according to the company, it is able to accept a large number of not only standard components, but various third-party systems in order to increase survivability and level of situational awareness. The design of the helmet includes the so-called "skeletal casing" to protect against blunt injuries, plus it allows you to install night-vision goggles (NVG). However, since the needs of the SSO are constantly evolving, this system of helmets is available with a high, medium, and cut-off crown.


Combat helmet TBH-II MC

Picatinny guide systems mounted on the side of the TBH-II MC helmet allow the integration of various accessories, including safety glasses; HE IS IN; headsets, such as the Silynx Boom microphone; devices of the "friend-alien" system, including the San Precision IFF Strobe; video cameras, such as the VholdR Contour High Definition and VIO POV1; and tactical lights, such as Insight M3, Surefire EIL, Surefire X300, Streamlight TLR-I and Princeton lighting kit.

Another trend, first identified by US Army Special Forces working in Afghanistan since 2012, concerns the integration of the Survivable Kit, the purpose of which is to increase the level of protection, especially in areas with IED threats. The survivability kit consists of a protective mask for protection against 9-mm ammunition and a mask for the lower part of the face in several variants; It is designed to protect the eyes and face from blunt injuries, ballistic threats and a shockwave. Finally, it is worth mentioning another additional accessory that is “above” of all these systems - the Mohoc hardened camera mounted on the helmet, currently widely used by the US and other countries. In fact, the Mohoc camera is a “militarized” version of popular sports cameras, such as the famous GoPro brand. According to the manufacturer, "orders for it from NATO special forces are measured in thousands of pieces," because they need a device to analyze the results of the actions taken, as well as exchange information in real time when performing combat missions.

2 May 2011, a US Marine Special Forces conducted an operation NEPTUNE SPEAR, which resulted in the death of al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden in his home in Abbottabad in northern Pakistan. After the publication of photographs of President Obama and his advisers in the White House’s operational room, international media assumed without a doubt that they were watching live reporting from this combat mission, including the shots with which Bin Laden was killed. But this assumption was subsequently refuted, although it is technically possible to transmit video with full movement from inside buildings through standard tactical radio stations, and from them to satellite communications with further transmission to any point on the globe.

However, the video of this raid was nevertheless recorded by the operators of the 6 group of sea lions, as required by the Site Sensitive Exploitation (SSE) information collection concept. In the US MTR, the entire special operation is divided into four stages: exit to the area of ​​operation, assault or forceful action, then the SSE stage itself — collection of all information materials (documents, computers, phones, flash drives, etc.) and, finally, exit from district. But we will return to SSE later.



Mohoc Camera

In addition, the ability to videotape a combat operation or combat training process with a full view of the movement in real time, and then watch the video, is an important tool for the development of tactics, methods and methods of combat operations for MTR, as they constantly direct their efforts towards achieving superiority over opponents and also the identification of mistakes made during combat training. According to the executive director of Mohoc, Connor Duncan, in recent years, special forces have been actively using sports cameras for such purposes, although models such as GoPro are not only not strong enough for military tasks, but are not optimized for them, since they emit light and produce a sound that endangers operators during an assignment.

The Mohoc camera has a small size and a low profile, which prevents its damage from knots and branches, and a simple fixation with a Velcro-type fastener (velcro) fastening allows you to mount the camera on any part of the helmet. “The shape of the CurveLock base of this camera coincides with the shape of the combat helmet and, in combination with the external streamlined shape of the Mohoc, allows you to minimize protrusion and eliminate damage from foreign objects, as well as significantly increase safety and simplify attachment to the helmet,” Duncan explained. “The rotating lens also means that the Mohoc camera can be mounted and adjusted on the side of the combat helmet in the event that the NVG or other devices restrict the camera's angle of view when mounted on top of the helmet.” The mounting of the Velcro also reduces the need for Picatinny rails. Mohoc has a simple three-mode user interface with vibration, signaling that the camera is active. The device is silent in operation in any mode and absolutely does not emit any light. The camera is also certified for diving to a depth of 10 meters.

In addition to the fact that the Mohoc camera shoots high-resolution video, it allows the operator to simultaneously take video and take photos in different modes: manual, a series of shots and frame by frame at certain time intervals. The camera also has a field of view of 140 degrees. The wireless connection is provided by USB and HDMI ports and software applications based on the Android operating system. The camera can work with a memory card on 128 gigabytes, and the rechargeable battery provides up to six hours of continuous operation. Mohoc camera is available in day and infrared versions for low illumination, but the company intends to develop a thermal imaging option in the future.

To date, an operational assessment conducted in the MTR units has expanded the use of the Mohoc camera by installing it on the body. The Velcro-type CurveLock mount makes it easy to mount it on the shoulder strap of unloading vests and body armor. Mohoc also has a special mount that allows you to mount it on service dogs. Similar techniques emerged during counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan, where dogs were used to enter buildings or closed areas in front of assault units. However, many special forces say it would be nice to use such a camera and similar technology in drones, on observation poles and onboard weapon systems.

As previously mentioned, the operational space continues to change. MTRs are now less used in assault operations, including for capturing important targets, and are returning to more traditional information gathering tasks. The NEPTUNE SPEAR operation to destroy Bin Laden is a prime example of this trend. For the SSE stage, a special helicopter was sent, which allowed the participants in the operation to load the assembled hard drives of computers, cell phones and documents into it, and then leave the site of the operation. This made it possible to use the information obtained for the subsequent malfunction and destruction of rebel networks. This concept of operation proved very successful during the operations of the coalition forces in Iraq and made it possible to detect and destroy the networks of factories for the production of explosive devices and the supply chain of terrorists.

The demonstration of the importance of this concept was the publication by the US command of special operations forces in September 2015 of the SSE technology requirement. The Request for Proposals provides for the development of various technologies that assist SSOs in performing SSE tasks, including passive radiation detection devices for making decisions on the presence of radioactive materials / radiation, a device for detecting, localizing, identifying radioactive substances and measuring radiation intensity to determine acceptable levels, as well as personal dosimetric instruments that can alert the wearer to the presence of potentially dangerous radiation during the SSE data collection phase.

In addition, the SSE requirement provides for the development of a biological material detection kit (Biological Agent Detection Kit) with minimal power consumption, capable of detecting biological warfare substances in a few minutes, as well as an Explosive Detection Kit capable of detecting explosives with a mass of less than five milligram. “Detectors should be installed on ground vehicles,” the USSOCOM Command’s request for information says with additional commentary that remote detection is necessary from a safe distance. Among the candidates considered by various SSO organizations are the universal detection kits for the explosive and initiating substances of the Ultra series manufactured by Field Forensics; they are small enough to carry in your pocket.



Field Forensics Ultra Sample Test and Kit

Field Forensics executive director Craig Johnson said that “Ultra series kits most of the time react to the presence of a chemical within a few minutes. The operator does not have to worry about the loss of components or the replacement and recharge of batteries, since each stand-alone testing system is mounted in a single durable and reliable case. " The hand-held Raman (Raman scattering) spectroscope manufactured by this company also allows the operator to identify explosives, initiators, drugs and other chemical compounds. HandyRam is powered by two AA batteries, providing up to 8 hours of operation. In addition, a TLC thin layer microchromatograph can be used for additional analysis. “These products are designed to simplify the work of the intelligence units by providing technologies that allow not only to get the necessary analyzes, but also are easy to use and maintain,” he explained, while acknowledging that the SSO servicemen have plenty of acute problems and technologies. who could take off some of them.


Heavy armored vehicles were used by the US MTR in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Despite the recent trend of transition to lighter and ITV category vehicles transported in helicopters, the SSO units continue to use heavy armored vehicles in counterinsurgency operations

Mortality

Whatever additional tasks are not set before the MTR fighters, the fundamental capabilities of the lethal systems retain their paramount importance for the soldier. There are of course exceptions, but minimal weapons a special unit soldier remains covertly worn by a pistol. The full set includes an assault rifle as the main weapon, a pistol as an auxiliary weapon and, finally, additional weapons suitable for MTR tasks, which can vary from shotguns, rifle-type 40-mm grenade launchers to anti-tank guided missiles, fragmentation grenades and explosive weapons for storming buildings.

The ability to penetrate the entrance to a building or to a fenced territory is very important for modern MTRs, especially in the fight against experienced and motivated rebels who can instruct trap mines at their intended entry and exit points. During the service in Afghanistan, NATO forces ’special forces almost daily encountered similar tactics, including one unnamed international unit that lost a dozen of its fighters during a single operation to detain a terrorist. Variants of assault methods range from manual tools, such as a sledgehammer, to shotguns, ATGM and shaped charges intended for breaking through concrete walls. The use of special means, as a rule, is practiced before the task is accomplished, and an important role in the success or failure of the operation is played by the preliminary reconnaissance of the target building, including its design.


EBF aisle making system manufactured by Israel Military Industries

In an effort to meet these MTR requirements, Israel Military Industries (IMI) recently introduced its Explosive Breaching Frame (EBF) blasting system. The charge of this system is designed to create holes in the hedges and walls of buildings, the dimensions of which are sufficient for the passage of the assault group. This EBF technology is already in service with the special forces of the Israeli army, which uses it, in particular, in urban operations to support the larger tasks of ensuring internal security. According to IMI, the EBF system is based on an elongated shaped charge, which can be formed in the shape of a door frame or frame for a wide opening. The charge is capable of piercing walls up to 0,2 meters thick; Rods or special adhesives are used to hold the EBF system against a hedge or wall.


Special units need cars that can be transported inside helicopters to perform various tasks. Therefore, the US Special Operations Command issued a contract to Polaris Defense to supply MRZR 2 and MRZR 4 vehicles.


CV-22B convertoplanes can be delivered on a suspension by special forces vehicles. Such combat use allows you to quickly use the car immediately after touching the surface

City operations

In the meantime, the increased need to act in cramped, overcrowded and aggressive urban space further enhances the value of small arms, while MTR personnel often take off high-tech optical gun sights and return to simpler collimator sights. The Swedish company Aimpoint has been providing these devices for several years with SSO. Commercial Director Fredrik Lyngren explained how recent operations and the future combat space define this trend. “The technology of collimator devices provides a better solution than laser devices, since they minimize any transmission of light, which can compromise the operation,” he explained, noting that the reduction in weight and power consumption has led to an increased demand even for collimator sights for pistols.


Micro T2 collimator sight from Aimpoint

Aimpoint’s holographic collimator sights of the T1 and T2 families, equipped with Picatinny trims for mounting on assault rifles, assault rifles and pistols, are designed to quickly capture melee targets up to approximately 100 meters in range. These sights can also be used in low light conditions, although they cannot highlight targets.

The collimator sights also allow the soldier to quickly capture the target due to the “side field of view”, with both eyes open and the sight directed along the barrel. The whole follower aiming in this case is significantly shorter compared to when the operator is looking at a closed optical sight, for example, Trijicon Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight (ACOG). However, the company Trijicon is developing ACOG sights, which can operate in two modes, in a holographic collimator or aiming grid. The sights of this series allow special forces soldiers to get a two-in-one solution. Now they can quickly hit targets at close range, as well as more accurately hit targets from their weapons at the maximum range of real fire.



A pair of models from the ACOG family

For surgeries with an increased risk of indirect loss of their forces or the civilian population (for example, rescuing hostages and search and rescue during hostilities), SSO men seek to choose a laser targeting device, such as for example AN / PEQ-15 Advanced Target Pointer Illuminator Aiming Laser (ATPIAL) from L-3 Insights, which is available in three configurations: standard, high power and ultra high power. This target designator with an infrared laser and a visible-range laser, as well as an infrared illumination device when mounted on a rifle, greatly simplifies the aiming process.


Aimpoint laser target designators are very popular with MTRs of many countries of the world.

Currently, Aimpoint offers its new Micro T2 collimator sight for unnamed European MTRs. During its development, combat experience gained with the previous version of Micro T1, which to this day is in service with some countries, was taken into account. The so-called “evolution” of the Micro T1 has absorbed many improvements, including snap-on protective caps on the front and rear lenses, specially added at the request of combat swimmers. The naval special forces requested these covers, since during the transition from the inputs to the land, the dirt fell on the optics.

Ground units also found this upgrade useful in the desert conditions of the Middle East. During operations in Iraq, coalition forces often complained of fine sand and dust, which incapacitated weapons and sights, which sometimes had a negative effect on the conduct of military operations. Micro T2 is also distinguished by increased shock resistance and 90 percent translucency, which allowed for optimum performance. Lyngren from Aimpoint explained: “The Micro T1 and T2 family of collimator sights were created for rescue operations of hostages and counterinsurgency tasks, for use with assault rifles and machine guns, they provide shooters with optical characteristics of a large sight, but in a smaller form factor. The company also designed a scope for use with pistols and is currently in talks with the manufacturers of pistols and holsters for the best integration of our scope with their systems. ” Speaking about promising developments, he stressed that users constantly require further improvements regarding mass, size and power consumption, as well as optical characteristics. Aimpoint's collimator sights have been on the market for about five years and have deserved success with special forces.



Conclusion

The MTRs give their countries the most elite combat capabilities, but the current operational environment makes these soldiers to act much thinner and smarter at the moment. Equipment and technology are aimed at addressing this issue, but from a fundamental point of view, choosing the right people for service in these units will ensure the best military superiority over current and future adversaries.

It is important to remember that the standards of military service cannot and will not decrease, therefore increasing the capabilities of soldiers seems to be the only way forward. Of course, this is what the USSOCOM command does, resolving the challenges of urban combat with its combat gear (TALOS Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit) - a robotic exoskeleton that may be ready for deployment in special units in the next five to ten years.

However, there are also its pitfalls. Governments can equip a soldier with the latest wearable computers, weapons and protection, but if he lacks ingenuity, desire for new and self-discipline, promoting the correct use of new systems, their effectiveness will tend to zero.

But a double-edged sword, and defense departments should be careful about any possible information overload, since the capabilities of future special operations forces will only expand from year to year.

Materials used:
www.socom.mil
www.baesystems.com
www.saabgroup.com
www.polaris.com
www.airborne-sys.com
www.supacat.com
www.gentex.com
www.mohoc.com
www.fieldforensics.com
www.imi-israel.com
www.aimpoint.com
ww.trijicon.com
www.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. chikenous59
    chikenous59 23 March 2016 06: 18
    -3
    Are experts still sleeping or what?
    Not a single comment that all this is bullshit American uniforms ... But here we have ...
    1. infantryman2020
      infantryman2020 23 March 2016 07: 20
      -2
      Ага.
      As well as a pair of diby uro-patriotic slogans and a portion of the flood.
    2. Maksus
      Maksus 23 March 2016 09: 40
      +4
      It is not regrettable to report, but in terms of equipment, the Americans are so far from us that they can not even imagine. In general, their attitude towards the soldier and his uniform is very good, the soldier is better. But the price is just ...
      1. chikenous59
        chikenous59 23 March 2016 10: 51
        +2
        Quote: Maksus
        It is not regrettable to report, but in terms of equipment, the Americans are so far from us that they can not even imagine. In general, their attitude towards the soldier and his uniform is very good, the soldier is better. But the price is just ...

        Elite units do not have any misery)
        1. Maksus
          Maksus 23 March 2016 13: 50
          +1
          And they have all the troops on the front line, not only these "haste-force". The normal marine is also well equipped. We are only approaching this.
        2. Kostyar
          Kostyar 26 March 2016 09: 44
          0
          Are experts still sleeping or what?
          Not a single comment that all this is bullshit American uniforms ... But here we have ...



          They Nazarovites outfit to the fullest! This is not to take away from them ....
          Only something this does not help them much to rob and kill a more or less armed enemy!
      2. RDX
        RDX 23 March 2016 12: 18
        +1
        Amer soldiers who received any injury will not receive insurance, if he was not equipped according to the charter, even if he had no tactical glasses, he could not see insurance, not to mention a helmet and other means of protection.
  2. Ros 56
    Ros 56 23 March 2016 08: 19
    +4
    Well, to hell with us, we should discuss striped equipment, who needs to know everything for a long time.
    1. chikenous59
      chikenous59 23 March 2016 08: 56
      -2
      Quote: Ros 56
      Well, to hell with us, we should discuss striped equipment, who needs to know everything for a long time.

      I agree with you
    2. Blondy
      Blondy 23 March 2016 11: 56
      0
      Fight is not gadget. Jacob Kedmi had just listened on the radio — that’s how he said bluntly, giving the American intelligence services a comparative characterization: they are technically very well armed but operate schematically, and everyone is trying to solve at the expense of money. But you can’t buy everything for money.
      But in Hollywood films it looks cool like Arnie outfit, like a Christmas tree, outfit.
      Although you can’t turn a blind eye to the fact that in some gadgets, especially those associated with all kinds of electronics, they are ahead of us. Nevertheless, that’s all
      the factor is not decisive. I still recall the astonishment of journalists and our military when it turned out that at the joint exercises of the marines (back in those years), the vaunted American marinas were landing in two fragments of the slower. Despite its advanced outfit and its price. In general, the Yankees fight beautifully in Hollywood.
      1. bandabas
        bandabas 23 March 2016 15: 11
        0
        Firstly. Watch a movie less. Secondly. Read the yellow press even less. It doesn’t matter Russian or Western. What to watch or read? I can not tell you. But probably something from the classics. For example, Jack London.
    3. would
      would 23 March 2016 23: 37
      +2
      To know the equipment of a geopolitical enemy and current trends that, alas, in terms of equipment are not set by us, but by the United States. Only those who really need it know all this and they purposefully search, including in the English-speaking segment of the Internet. And a considerable part of people do not do this, but here "oops" and the article comes across.
  3. Cananecat
    Cananecat 23 March 2016 08: 50
    +2
    It would be nice to conduct a comparative analysis of the used equipment of our MTR with foreign ones. And so the article on the C grade, as they say, the topic of boobs is not disclosed.
    1. 31rus2
      31rus2 23 March 2016 09: 50
      +4
      Dear, you are so sure that our specialists are equipped with domestic systems, then you are a naive person, the article is good and correct, and the conclusion made by the author is undeniable
  4. erased
    erased 23 March 2016 09: 37
    +1
    Interesting good review. And about the sights - any type of fighters (except for snipers). So these toys are very good and needed. But in a dense urban battle, as well as in difficult conditions - caves, kyariz, dense woodland - they all rather interfere than help. Surprise, speed, density, a sharp change in the situation simply do not allow, do not give time to take aim. Even ordinary sights are not used, the front sight is not fully combined. Where to catch the silhouette of an enemy in a collimator or optics ?! In addition, concomitant factors - partial smoke, dense dust, sand or water suspension - also reduce the range of applications of optics.
    So it would be nice to add one more to all the characteristics of the scopes - quick release. Within a couple of seconds. I worked in the "hard" game, put it again.
    And so the trends are visible - smaller, lighter, inconspicuous. Soon, probably, virtual sights will appear in general. Type of projection keyboard.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 23 March 2016 17: 59
      +3
      We have a Tavor rifle - a standard collimator sight.
      No ordinary. War - often at short distances in
      urban conditions. And the soldiers are doing great.
      There is no return to the usual. Or a collimator, or attached
      quick-detachable 4-fold optical wide-focus, or night.
      And not only among special forces, but among ordinary infantry.
      It helps incredibly. It happened when in skirmishes only one cartridge was spent on one killed action movie!
    2. kostya_a
      kostya_a 24 March 2016 20: 06
      0
      Up to 50 meters with a collimator, it is faster to catch a target, verified empirically, more than 50 are already completely or adjustable optics.
  5. oldzek
    oldzek 23 March 2016 11: 13
    +3
    special forces, first of all, brains, and then everything else. We do not use our own captured weapons and equipment. We need to compare heads IMHO
  6. Crimson
    Crimson 23 March 2016 11: 30
    +6
    1. About helmets of the "Hi cut" type (high cut) - the cut is made not for the headphones, but mainly to facilitate the design. Almost any modern foreign-made helmet, even completely covering the ears, for example, MICH helmets, allows you to wear active headphones under it. As well as "rails" for the installation of additional equipment are placed on any helmets, not just "Hi cut". The interior of the helmets consists of cushions, which can be freely moved inside the helmet by means of Velcro, which allows you to achieve maximum comfort for each fighter, depending on his anatomical features. Also, the suspension system of the helmet allows for quick adjustment of the helmet in terms of volume, on the fighter's head, using a system similar to the BOA (twist, like on ski boots).


    2. About collimator sights - ideally, it is understood that the level of shooting training of a special forces soldier (in particular the MTR) is such that the soldier fires a shot at a vskid. In practice, this means that the shot occurs when the butt touches the shoulder of the soldier, without aiming. The collimator sight, can significantly facilitate this task, because the magnification of its increase is 0 (although there are sights and with a slight increase, for example 3X), and the aiming takes place in the same way as with open sights (rear sight - front sight) with two eyes, which in turn will allow not to limit the review the situation in front of the fighter. And in view of the fact that it is not necessary to combine the rear sight and the front sight, but just aim the aiming mark of the collimator on the target, the aiming speed, again, increases. Some fighters, operators, install a collimator sight at an angle of 30 degrees from the main aiming axis of the receiver, which allows you to use simultaneously with a collimator, for example, a sight having a zoom ratio.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. Crimson
    Crimson 23 March 2016 11: 37
    +1
    Full helmet option, with rails and headphones.
  9. chikenous59
    chikenous59 23 March 2016 11: 53
    +3
    One thing is offensive: still our elite fighters still have to partially use overseas uniforms, because we cannot import many things so far.
    It comes to the ridiculous, you have to buy NATO berets for your own money, etc., there are many such nuances.
    And all due to the fact that Western counterparts thought out to the smallest detail.
    1. Crimson
      Crimson 23 March 2016 12: 06
      +3
      IMHO, of course -
      Most of the Western "gadgets", from equipment to items of uniform, are produced by private contractors, that is, people who have created their own business (without direct participation of the state) and part of the products of this business are purchased by NATO armies (I am now talking about special forces, not about combined arms formations) ... Therefore, I do not see a global problem. IMHO, the production of such things should not be dealt with by the State Defense Committee of the military-industrial complex, but by private traders, this will allow the production of advanced equipment and constantly move towards its modernization (competition and all that). But, unfortunately, our economic climate is not entirely favorable for the development of such a small - medium-sized business. Only a few companies cooperate with the ARF in this area, for example, Group 99, or the Survival Corps (not advertising).
      1. chikenous59
        chikenous59 23 March 2016 13: 57
        0
        Quote: Crimson
        IMHO, of course -
        Most of the Western "gadgets", from equipment to items of uniform, are produced by private contractors, that is, people who have created their own business (without direct participation of the state) and part of the products of this business are purchased by NATO armies (I am now talking about special forces, not about combined arms formations) ... Therefore, I do not see a global problem. IMHO, the production of such things should not be dealt with by the State Defense Committee of the military-industrial complex, but by private traders, this will allow the production of advanced equipment and constantly move towards its modernization (competition and all that). But, unfortunately, our economic climate is not entirely favorable for the development of such a small - medium-sized business. Only a few companies cooperate with the ARF in this area, for example, Group 99, or the Survival Corps (not advertising).

        The whole problem lies in the little things, which in their sum can affect the outcome of the entire operation. Ours can do well too, but the problem is exactly what is good. As for equipping a special fighter. units.

        I agree almost completely about the "Survival Corps", but Group 99 is a kindergarten compared to the same "SURVIVAL CORPS" (Survival Corps)
    2. utlyakov
      utlyakov 24 March 2016 14: 15
      0
      overseas uniforms, as we cannot import many things so far.

      let's cry for DEVGRU fighters using non-racially faithful HekklerKokhi and ZigZauers. US import substitute them also can not

      It comes to the ridiculous, you have to buy NATO berets for your own money, etc., there are many such nuances.

      Are you ready to speak on behalf of the entire 92154?
      1. would
        would 24 March 2016 21: 56
        +1
        let's cry for DEVGRU fighters using non-racially faithful HekklerKokhi and ZigZauers. US import substitute them also can not


        Why replace the normally priced products of a union state? :)
  10. Egor123
    Egor123 23 March 2016 20: 52
    0
    Thanks to the author, the article is very interesting!
    But I would also like to have an article about our MTRs, otherwise they speak little about them.
    1. chikenous59
      chikenous59 23 March 2016 21: 14
      +1
      Quote: Egor123
      Thanks to the author, the article is very interesting!
      But I would also like to have an article about our MTRs, otherwise they speak little about them.

      Why do you need to know? To ring all the information wherever possible?
      Therefore, they tell a little. If it’s interesting, there’s a lot of familiarization videos on the same YouTube.
  11. k_ply
    k_ply 24 March 2016 19: 05
    +1
    At the heart of the MTR are the same 7 brigades of the Special Forces of the GRU, with the same secrecy. Interesting! and what should radically change?
    Besides the so-called. "green" operations of a covert reconnaissance and sabotage character (deep reconnaissance), "black" operations of special forces, assault and seizure (open force intervention) were added a long time ago. There is only one thing, the MTRs are still operating in small groups (detachments), which contributes to quick adaptation to the situation and to the specified tasks.