Color revolution as the “star of death”
The color revolutions exported by the United States to independent countries are considered by experts as special operations to “change the regime” to pro-American through revolutionary technologies, with the inclusion in the revolution-coup d'etat of significant masses of people who are pro-Western media suggest that they deserve the best, and only the “corrupt” regime and retarded, is this obstacle.
At the same time the scale and destructive power of color revolutions amazes: they usually begin as peaceful protests and carnival, and end with a bloody civil strife with unforeseen consequences even for their organizers. In Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Georgia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Ukraine - everywhere we see, under a curtain of revolutions, assault groups of extremists, from Al Qaeda, Pora and Muslim Brotherhood to ISIL and Bandera's Right Sector, who, by the way, willingly cooperate with each other.
The fact is that revolutions, by virtue of their extremism, give rise to anti-systems, real “death stars” for the maternal national ethnic systems, according to the passionary theory of L.N. Gumilev. The national systems that have been invaded by the death stars are literally threatened with destruction to the ground, since the “star” is a social parasite that exists at the expense of the resources of the affected ethnic group, but does not create anything.
An anti-system, according to Gumilev, is “the integrity of people with a negative attitude, striving to simplify the maternal system, that is, to reduce the density of its systemic connections. In the limit, the density of system links is reduced to zero, which means the destruction of the system, whether it be a state or an ethnic group.
The antisystem develops a common worldview for its members. Regardless of the specific ideology, it produces one unifying attitude: the denial of the real world as a complex and diverse system in the name of some abstract goals. Among the members of the anti-systems are dominated by people with a futuristic sense of time, in which the future is considered the only real, the past - gone into non-existence, and the present is regarded as a threshold of the future. Thus, the realization of the goals of the anti-system is always related to the future.
The ideology of an anti-system always opposes itself to any ethnic tradition, which is understood as the hierarchy of stereotypes and rules of behavior. Consequently, the anti-system always strives for the moral destruction of the ethnic group, from among whose representatives it incorporates its new members. ” In fact, the anti-system simplifies the culture of the ethnos in Ukraine today to the folklore, embroidery and ideological consumer goods.
Due to the circumstances of the Soviet era, Gumilev explores anti-systems of deep antiquity, their characteristic feature, due to the underdevelopment of communications, was that they were born in the body of the system, and fought the maternal system one-on-one. This did not, by the way, give particular advantages to the maternal system, since the split of society could be very deep, and then the anti-system had chances of winning, and sometimes won. But then, in view of its destructiveness, it inevitably split up, gave rise to passionate consortia, which were reborn into a new, already creative system.
American colored "death stars" are distinguished by the fact that they are of a borderline, often intercivilizational nature, created for the abstract purposes of justice, human rights, but according to Western and American, "universal standards", by this their ideologists justify foreign intervention. Generally, it is not a big secret that the universal human rhetoric of the United States covers up the goal of subjugating independent countries and turning them into colonies; moreover, part of the indigenous elites and population agrees with this, hoping to receive benefits from the “civilized choice”, albeit colonial, American superpower. And betraying the national interests of his country, turning into a pro-American "fifth column".
However, the superpower's good intentions do not cancel the nature of the invasion of the “death stars”. It all depends on the size of the country: here size matters a lot. Sometimes the antisystem storm troopers (the so-called “bitch sons and“ moderate terrorists ”) Washington manage to pacify, as in a small Kosovo, but in large ethnic groups and states this turns into Al-Qaeda, ISIS and the“ Right Sector ”.
The first, and the largest, the size of a civilization, was the red “star of death” of the Russian revolution 1917 of the year. However, by virtue of her birthright, and since she was part of the planned even more ambitious World Communist revolution, her story unique: it repeated the path of the victorious anti-systems of antiquity: it was reborn through the split and “devouring the children of the revolution” of the anti-system (the Trotskyist permanent revolution) into the constructive Soviet system.
Led by a consistent supporter of the “world revolution” L. Trotsky, the red anti-system was, in part, destroyed in the gulag by Stalin, with the help of his “Bolshevik Party”, partly joined the Stalinist “socialism in a single country”. The rebirth of the red anti-system became possible due to the fact that the Russian revolution did not receive support from the World revolution, as a result of the blockade by the capitalist world, and, on the other hand, it mastered the resources of the entire Russian Empire.
By the way, the first blow to the red anti-system was delivered by its leader V.I. Lenin, when the catastrophic situation at the beginning of the 20s in Russia, after the victory in the Civil War, forced him to introduce the NEP, in fact, return to the old economic system. In this sense, having finished off Trotsky's "permanent world" antisystem, Stalin continued the "work of Lenin," and built, in fact, planned state capitalism under the control of the Bolshevik Party. The victory of Soviet Russia over German and European fascism in 1945 showed that Stalin had fulfilled his historic mission.
Today's colored "death stars" are not original and not independent in their development, unlike the first red "star", and are commonplace instruments of foreign intervention. One of the developers of the technology of color revolutions, the notorious American professor Gene Sharp, directly pointed out in his writings that he relied on the experience of the Russian revolution 1917 of the year.
The works of Gene Sharp can be found on the Internet, but, in general, the technology of creating a colored "death star" consists of literally five steps to make a revolution in any country, based on the "fifth" pro-western column inside the country. To this puppet, the US is demanding that they hand over power, blackmailing anything: from Western values and the visa regime, to the threat of bombardment in order to protect "the interests of democracy".
After the fall of the USSR, a long list of countries that Washington was throwing "death stars" was formed. The world’s exclusive superpower has put production of “color revolutions” under the pretext of “spreading democracy” in the world. The expansion of the USA that is happening before our eyes through the production of anti-systems has no precedent. In the words of the English historian A. Toynbee, this is “the archiagression of the West.”
Few countries were able to reflect the "death stars" because behind them was the financial and military might of Washington. If necessary, it is applied, as in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya and Syria. Among the few who managed to reflect the "death star" - Egypt, whose army weapons destroyed the "moderate terrorists" Muslim brothers Mursi. Syria has also survived, but it provides substantial assistance to Russia, the civil war in this country is still going on.
The largest “death star” was Bandera’s Ukraine, here its implementation and maturation operation, supported by 5 billion, according to V. Nuland, was successful and ended with the “national revolution” of February 22 of the year. Including thanks to the Bandera underground, preserved since World War II with German-European fascism. However, the Bandera "star" is also unique in that it is on the borders of Russia and the civilizational fault.
Western and Bandera strategists do not hide the fact that it is directed against Russia, with the aim of spreading the Bandera "star" to Russia. And, according to Gumilev, they have chances for “Maidan in Russia”, since the anti-system always seeks to destroy the entire ethnic group, and the Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarusians are just one superethnos. (Therefore, “Russian nationalists” adjoin Bandera, so there will never be peace between Bandera and Russia: this hostility is deadly for each of the parties.)
However, the Bandera "death star" collided with Russia, which has not only its own drive, but also the technological and military might of a great power, such as Yugoslavia did not have.
From the theory of passionarity it follows that any successful revolution creates an anti-system, thanks to which it, in fact, defeats the maternal system. But the color "death star" consists of two parts: the external anti-system, practically, the western agents, and the internal anti-system, the original, in this case, Bandera, which she uses, and then she needs to get rid of her.
After the victory of the “national revolution”, the internal anti-system always unfolds, and it starts to demolish everything wrong for it. Including the Western puppets of the external anti-system, when they find themselves in her way (“the regime of internal occupation”). A "regime", in turn, brings down the repression of Bandera Nazi-patriots.
This is the notorious phenomenon of “devouring its children by revolution”, according to another classification, the “night of long knives”. The deadly struggle between the revolutionary parties of the anti-system for the "real ideals of the revolution" is inevitable, no matter how it was postponed by external American curators.
Since the anti-system essentially does not give birth, it can only shout out slogans and fight, the Bandera anti-system will sooner or later rise up against the “internal occupation regime”, this will be a variant of the revolutionary civil strife, the second stage of the “national revolution”, it can also be called “Stalinist” a continuation. The second option: Bandera Ukraine will declare war on Russia, it can be called a permanent “Trotskyist” continuation of the anti-system revolution. Theoretically, we should see one of these scenarios soon. Is their combination possible? While the story does not know the answer to this question ...
At the same time the scale and destructive power of color revolutions amazes: they usually begin as peaceful protests and carnival, and end with a bloody civil strife with unforeseen consequences even for their organizers. In Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Georgia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Ukraine - everywhere we see, under a curtain of revolutions, assault groups of extremists, from Al Qaeda, Pora and Muslim Brotherhood to ISIL and Bandera's Right Sector, who, by the way, willingly cooperate with each other.
The fact is that revolutions, by virtue of their extremism, give rise to anti-systems, real “death stars” for the maternal national ethnic systems, according to the passionary theory of L.N. Gumilev. The national systems that have been invaded by the death stars are literally threatened with destruction to the ground, since the “star” is a social parasite that exists at the expense of the resources of the affected ethnic group, but does not create anything.
An anti-system, according to Gumilev, is “the integrity of people with a negative attitude, striving to simplify the maternal system, that is, to reduce the density of its systemic connections. In the limit, the density of system links is reduced to zero, which means the destruction of the system, whether it be a state or an ethnic group.
The antisystem develops a common worldview for its members. Regardless of the specific ideology, it produces one unifying attitude: the denial of the real world as a complex and diverse system in the name of some abstract goals. Among the members of the anti-systems are dominated by people with a futuristic sense of time, in which the future is considered the only real, the past - gone into non-existence, and the present is regarded as a threshold of the future. Thus, the realization of the goals of the anti-system is always related to the future.
The ideology of an anti-system always opposes itself to any ethnic tradition, which is understood as the hierarchy of stereotypes and rules of behavior. Consequently, the anti-system always strives for the moral destruction of the ethnic group, from among whose representatives it incorporates its new members. ” In fact, the anti-system simplifies the culture of the ethnos in Ukraine today to the folklore, embroidery and ideological consumer goods.
Due to the circumstances of the Soviet era, Gumilev explores anti-systems of deep antiquity, their characteristic feature, due to the underdevelopment of communications, was that they were born in the body of the system, and fought the maternal system one-on-one. This did not, by the way, give particular advantages to the maternal system, since the split of society could be very deep, and then the anti-system had chances of winning, and sometimes won. But then, in view of its destructiveness, it inevitably split up, gave rise to passionate consortia, which were reborn into a new, already creative system.
American colored "death stars" are distinguished by the fact that they are of a borderline, often intercivilizational nature, created for the abstract purposes of justice, human rights, but according to Western and American, "universal standards", by this their ideologists justify foreign intervention. Generally, it is not a big secret that the universal human rhetoric of the United States covers up the goal of subjugating independent countries and turning them into colonies; moreover, part of the indigenous elites and population agrees with this, hoping to receive benefits from the “civilized choice”, albeit colonial, American superpower. And betraying the national interests of his country, turning into a pro-American "fifth column".
However, the superpower's good intentions do not cancel the nature of the invasion of the “death stars”. It all depends on the size of the country: here size matters a lot. Sometimes the antisystem storm troopers (the so-called “bitch sons and“ moderate terrorists ”) Washington manage to pacify, as in a small Kosovo, but in large ethnic groups and states this turns into Al-Qaeda, ISIS and the“ Right Sector ”.
The first, and the largest, the size of a civilization, was the red “star of death” of the Russian revolution 1917 of the year. However, by virtue of her birthright, and since she was part of the planned even more ambitious World Communist revolution, her story unique: it repeated the path of the victorious anti-systems of antiquity: it was reborn through the split and “devouring the children of the revolution” of the anti-system (the Trotskyist permanent revolution) into the constructive Soviet system.
Led by a consistent supporter of the “world revolution” L. Trotsky, the red anti-system was, in part, destroyed in the gulag by Stalin, with the help of his “Bolshevik Party”, partly joined the Stalinist “socialism in a single country”. The rebirth of the red anti-system became possible due to the fact that the Russian revolution did not receive support from the World revolution, as a result of the blockade by the capitalist world, and, on the other hand, it mastered the resources of the entire Russian Empire.
By the way, the first blow to the red anti-system was delivered by its leader V.I. Lenin, when the catastrophic situation at the beginning of the 20s in Russia, after the victory in the Civil War, forced him to introduce the NEP, in fact, return to the old economic system. In this sense, having finished off Trotsky's "permanent world" antisystem, Stalin continued the "work of Lenin," and built, in fact, planned state capitalism under the control of the Bolshevik Party. The victory of Soviet Russia over German and European fascism in 1945 showed that Stalin had fulfilled his historic mission.
Today's colored "death stars" are not original and not independent in their development, unlike the first red "star", and are commonplace instruments of foreign intervention. One of the developers of the technology of color revolutions, the notorious American professor Gene Sharp, directly pointed out in his writings that he relied on the experience of the Russian revolution 1917 of the year.
The works of Gene Sharp can be found on the Internet, but, in general, the technology of creating a colored "death star" consists of literally five steps to make a revolution in any country, based on the "fifth" pro-western column inside the country. To this puppet, the US is demanding that they hand over power, blackmailing anything: from Western values and the visa regime, to the threat of bombardment in order to protect "the interests of democracy".
After the fall of the USSR, a long list of countries that Washington was throwing "death stars" was formed. The world’s exclusive superpower has put production of “color revolutions” under the pretext of “spreading democracy” in the world. The expansion of the USA that is happening before our eyes through the production of anti-systems has no precedent. In the words of the English historian A. Toynbee, this is “the archiagression of the West.”
Few countries were able to reflect the "death stars" because behind them was the financial and military might of Washington. If necessary, it is applied, as in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya and Syria. Among the few who managed to reflect the "death star" - Egypt, whose army weapons destroyed the "moderate terrorists" Muslim brothers Mursi. Syria has also survived, but it provides substantial assistance to Russia, the civil war in this country is still going on.
The largest “death star” was Bandera’s Ukraine, here its implementation and maturation operation, supported by 5 billion, according to V. Nuland, was successful and ended with the “national revolution” of February 22 of the year. Including thanks to the Bandera underground, preserved since World War II with German-European fascism. However, the Bandera "star" is also unique in that it is on the borders of Russia and the civilizational fault.
Western and Bandera strategists do not hide the fact that it is directed against Russia, with the aim of spreading the Bandera "star" to Russia. And, according to Gumilev, they have chances for “Maidan in Russia”, since the anti-system always seeks to destroy the entire ethnic group, and the Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarusians are just one superethnos. (Therefore, “Russian nationalists” adjoin Bandera, so there will never be peace between Bandera and Russia: this hostility is deadly for each of the parties.)
However, the Bandera "death star" collided with Russia, which has not only its own drive, but also the technological and military might of a great power, such as Yugoslavia did not have.
From the theory of passionarity it follows that any successful revolution creates an anti-system, thanks to which it, in fact, defeats the maternal system. But the color "death star" consists of two parts: the external anti-system, practically, the western agents, and the internal anti-system, the original, in this case, Bandera, which she uses, and then she needs to get rid of her.
After the victory of the “national revolution”, the internal anti-system always unfolds, and it starts to demolish everything wrong for it. Including the Western puppets of the external anti-system, when they find themselves in her way (“the regime of internal occupation”). A "regime", in turn, brings down the repression of Bandera Nazi-patriots.
This is the notorious phenomenon of “devouring its children by revolution”, according to another classification, the “night of long knives”. The deadly struggle between the revolutionary parties of the anti-system for the "real ideals of the revolution" is inevitable, no matter how it was postponed by external American curators.
Since the anti-system essentially does not give birth, it can only shout out slogans and fight, the Bandera anti-system will sooner or later rise up against the “internal occupation regime”, this will be a variant of the revolutionary civil strife, the second stage of the “national revolution”, it can also be called “Stalinist” a continuation. The second option: Bandera Ukraine will declare war on Russia, it can be called a permanent “Trotskyist” continuation of the anti-system revolution. Theoretically, we should see one of these scenarios soon. Is their combination possible? While the story does not know the answer to this question ...
Information