Military Review

Terrible Russia

139
Concerning Syria, statements in the world are not made every day, but almost every hour. And officials, experts and representatives of major mass media of the United States and the European Union are especially zealous in this. Russia also makes statements, including at the highest level, but much less often. Some analysts have noticed: Russia is laconic, and on other issues it even “keeps silence.” And they conclude: the time for talking is over.




On the portal owned by the New York radio station "Superstation95" (95,1FM), published an editorial devoted to "terse" Russia.

Over the past few days, journalists say, a whole storm has risen in the media over the events in Syria and the likely invasion of this country. As everyone knows, Syria is an ally of Russia, and Russia acts in this country with the permission of a legitimately elected government, the portal notes.

Despite the whole "whirlwind" of statements from several Arab states, from NATO and from the UN, Russia voiced only two points:

1. If any state enters land forces in Syria without the permission of Damascus, it will be a declaration of war.

2. Americans (more precisely, the American president and the Arab partners of the United States) must ask themselves whether they want to get permanent war.

In addition to these two public statements, Russia did not say anything. And this fact, according to American radio journalists, is quite indicative. Say something more and do not need. The time for talking is over!

The future will determine the action.

All this is “quite simple in reality,” the authors of the material say. It is said: if foreign ground forces enter Syria without the permission of Damascus, it will be a declaration of war.

This is a rarity in the modern world, when the power clearly holds its line.

Now it’s up to the rest of the world: should Russia take the statement seriously? That is, is it to believe that Moscow will do what it says?

Many can make a fatal mistake here, says Superstation95. For example, cunning Arabs, by virtue of their culture, do not understand at all that an absolute statement has been made by Russia. “No” means no.

Not understanding this, the Arabs are simply stupid. Apparently, they think, the editorial staff notes, that if they invade Syria with “sufficiently large force and quickly enough,” they will be able to seize the country. The idea of ​​a tactical nuclear strike, which "evaporate" their army, for some reason they do not even consider.

However, thanks to alternative English-language media, which have become very popular with users of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar and other countries in the Middle East, people are now “awakening”. They are concerned about the likely use of tactical nuclear weapons. weapons in the region.

The leadership of these states for some reason thinks that Russia "will not dare." Yes, dare, dare.

The worst will be Turkey. Her leader, Erdogan, is indicated in the material, "it seems to have become a maniac." Perhaps he suffers from some kind of psychic illusion, imagines himself to be “some kind of religious prophet,” and even Mahdi, who descended from heaven.

This “hot head” will be the first to go “on the march”. The editors of the radio station assume that the Russians will allow his army to cross the border and go deep into Syria, and there the Turks will overtake a blow.

He will be so strong that the Turks will not even understand what killed them. Few of Erdogan’s soldiers will come out alive.

The Arabs, seeing this, will flee in fear. All war will end.

The United States has neither the money nor the desire to go to war with Russia. In addition, in the White House, it is not the president who sits on the throne, but the “weak-willed weak.” This is rather an actor and a talker than a decisive politician: he is able to play and designate "red lines" (as was the case with "chemical weapons" in Syria), but when it comes to fighting, he hides in the bushes, behaves like a cowardly girl.

And it is possible that porridge in the Middle East brewed because of Obama. If he had not been a political rag, there would have been no such troubles there and around the world.

As for NATO, the Europeans are so “mentally weak” from their “political correctness”, and even with the money they became so bad that their “socialist systems” can no longer even protect their own borders! NATO is not able to answer "no" to all those "hordes of barbarians" that climb into Europe. What will these Europeans do if they ever start shooting at them on the battlefield? Yes they will run away.

In other words, NATO is “a joke”.

Over the next few days, the editors of Superstation95 are forecasting an "explosion of military operations in and around Syria." Turkey shines a "cruel defeat"; the same is waiting for saudi arabia. Then the point of view of “cold heads” will prevail “suddenly”. At least, it is to be hoped for.

In the film "Forrest Gump," the old saying sounded: "The fool is foolish." Obama and his left-wing liberals are just those fools, says the editors of the American site.

Russia is a superpower, and Obama on television called it a “regional” state. This is a "huge miscalculation." History recorded that since B.H. Obama spoke these words, the world went straight to hell. For the fool is foolish.

Surprisingly, we add from ourselves, but Barack Obama himself also believes that the coming days will be “critical.”

The site "BBC" A material has appeared that contains the latest statements by the US President.

Mr. Obama told reporters that a truce in Syria should be the first step towards ending the chaos: “The coming days will be critical, the whole world will be watching this. If we look more broadly: it will be a test that will show whether all parties are really ready for negotiations. ”

This statement was made by the president before the media after the meeting of the US National Security Council.

Mr. Obama also showed his determination and declared that Washington would end the "Islamic State." He stressed that the United States does not intend to go on a truce with the "IG" and will attack jihadists "on all fronts".

"We will destroy this barbaric terrorist organization", - quotes the president of "BBC".

Not satisfied with Washington and the person of Bashar Assad. Obama said the civil war in Syria will not end as long as Assad remains in power. He noted that on this issue, the United States has "significant differences" with Russia, Iran and some other regional players.

Here is a "hot head". Such is the sovereign of the “regional powers”. Here is a "player".

On the other hand, observers from Superstation95 speak about the “laconic” Russia and the “whirlwind” of statements by the West and its Arab “partners” for a reason. While Obama is smashing the "barbaric terrorist organization" in words, Russia is doing this in practice. And this, as they say, two big differences.

The future will be determined by actions, as rightly spoken on Superstation95.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
139 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 29 February 2016 07: 02
    66
    Turkey will be the worst. Her leader, Erdogan, is indicated in the material, "seems to have become a maniac."

    This is scary. The main Ottoman, having lost "all shores", can go to a military conflict with Syria, and therefore with Russia. There was such in history - Hitler. Erdogan reminds him a lot.
    1. Finches
      Finches 29 February 2016 07: 08
      38
      The situation in Syria is neglected, like cancer of the extreme degree, metastases have spread throughout the region, thanks to the constant medical errors of doctors from across the ocean! Now Russia has plunged into the treatment process and it has begun to succeed, American doctors decided to join, but mostly giggle from the outside, and there are also frenzied charlatans like Erdogan who do not believe in the power of Russian modern methods of treating terrorism, in every way interfering with their sinister blows in a tambourine ... Here's a metaphor!
      1. Sensatus
        Sensatus 29 February 2016 07: 13
        116
        And I like that in foreign policy we first do and then speak. Still in the domestic economic so began.
        1. cniza
          cniza 29 February 2016 08: 09
          14
          As long as Obama smashes the "barbaric terrorist organization" in words, Russia is doing this in practice. And these, as they say, are two big differences.



          This is what the West cannot understand in any way - the time for conversation has passed.
          1. Pravdarm
            Pravdarm 29 February 2016 09: 33
            -7
            Quote: cniza
            talk time has passed.

            And I just saw on REN TV how Turkish women and other equipment, i.e. ground forces - near Kobani, IN THE TERRITORY of Syria !!! And yesterday in "Dobrovefir" the report sounded EXACTLY SO from the lips of a correspondent who was there !!! And on the shooting from Kobani it is clearly visible that equipped tank positions, i.e. - Turks, - a few hundred meters from Kobani!
            Now the report says: "on the border of Syria"! order - "correct" ??? !!!
            Russia announced only two points:
            1. If any state enters the ground forces to Syria without permission from Damascus, this will be a declaration of war.
            2 ....

            Well? WAR IS ANNOUNCED !!! What's next? Not noticeable? Syria will not notice too? Will militant statements be REALIZED? Or as usual - tyagomotin ?!
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 29 February 2016 10: 12
              11
              Quote: Pravdarm
              And on REN TV just saw

              Since when exactly has XREN TV become a credible source? Would you still refer to Deffka Files request

              Quote: Pravdarm
              Will militant statements be REALIZED? Or as usual - tyagomotin ?!

              And what, is it right to fight hotstsa? fool

              "I can't stand getting married", like ..
              1. Pravdarm
                Pravdarm 29 February 2016 10: 20
                +3
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                Since when exactly has XREN TV become a credible source? Would you still refer to Deffka Files
                REPORTER SHOT a video from COBANI !!! Eyes or something not to believe?
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                And what, is it so straightforward to make war on hotstsa? "I can't stand getting married", like ..
                EPRST I said, "WHAT'S NEXT?"
                Do not distort and see the report with your own eyes !!! TYPE ...
                1. Cat man null
                  Cat man null 29 February 2016 10: 59
                  +7
                  Quote: Pravdarm
                  Do not distort and see the report with your own eyes !!!

                  I looked. I did not see the invasion as such. In the picture - presumably the same place with Google-Map. Well, very similar wink

                  Read carefully and you will understand that the tanks and other garbage are BEYOND the Turkish border. And anyway - there has been this fuss for a month already ..

                  Quote: Pravdarm
                  Russia announced only two points:
                  1. If any state enters land forces in Syria without the permission of Damascus, it will be a declaration of war.
                  2 ....
                  Well? WAR IS ANNOUNCED !!! What's next? Not noticeable? Syria will not notice too? Will militant statements be REALIZED? Or as usual - tyagomotin ?!

                  That was exactly the reaction:

                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  And what, is it right to fight hotstsa?

                  You know, there is a saying: "A thin world is better than a good quarrel."

                  Not invented by us, but - for us (s) yes
                  1. Pravdarm
                    Pravdarm 29 February 2016 12: 39
                    -2
                    Ha Ha Ha !!! If you believe google maps ???
                    For example, see Uglegorsk, Amur Region. (or Tsiolkovsky!) So there is almost no smell of a spaceport !!!
                    on a Yandex map at least 2-3 years ago pictures !!!
                    Signed of course - Google-2016, Yandex-2016.
                    1. Cat man null
                      Cat man null 29 February 2016 12: 49
                      +8
                      Quote: Pravdarm
                      Ha Ha Ha !!! If you believe google maps ???

                      Dear, I was interested in exactly the position of the border between Turkey and Syria.

                      And for these purposes, it does not care, if only not a hundred years old .. um .. prescription yes

                      Total:
                      - You inattentively watch reports and then begin to cause panic
                      - You are not able to understand why the picture is attached ..
                      - For some reason, you always try to run into an opponent (IMHO)

                      What is not great No.
                      1. visitork67
                        visitork67 1 March 2016 05: 26
                        +1
                        You argue in vain. He is, after all, a Stopudovo root Kobanian (Kobanikeec, Kobanigorodts). He loves everything for sure, even what he has no idea about.
                  2. ver_
                    ver_ 1 March 2016 16: 46
                    0
                    ... in politics, one has to hurry more slowly to preserve intrigue and prevent the adversary from jumping crazy from unexpectedness - to mentally prepare, - to press slowly and persistently like a boa constrictor ...
                2. Valera999
                  Valera999 29 February 2016 16: 53
                  +4
                  Turkey has long invaded Syria (in separate special groups). The word is not for Putin, but for Assad. So it’s not yet ready for a conflict with Turkey. As long as there is a chance to set up a militant opposition against Turkey, Assad and Putin will make peace with the opposition, because Turkey offers the Syrians fighting against Assad to become part of Turkey, to benefit, sell the country to the Turkish flag.
            2. Nick
              Nick 29 February 2016 15: 18
              +3
              Quote: Pravdarm
              Well? WAR IS ANNOUNCED !!! What's next? Not noticeable? Syria will not notice too? Will militant statements be REALIZED? Or as usual - tyagomotin ?!

              Everything will happen on time. Exactly that, and then, when Russia will need it, and if you are unwilling, sign up for the Syrian militia and before ...
              1. PSih2097
                PSih2097 29 February 2016 18: 21
                +1
                Quote: Nick
                and if you don’t like it, sign up for the Syrian militia and before ...

                and then run away from our law enforcement agencies, which will stick you an article of mercenary, after Libya this already happened ...
                1. KaPToC
                  KaPToC 29 February 2016 19: 04
                  +1
                  Well, you’re not fighting for despicable metal, but for the idea
                2. Nick
                  Nick 1 March 2016 09: 32
                  +1
                  Quote: PSih2097
                  and then run away from our law enforcement agencies, which will stick you an article of mercenary, after Libya this already happened ...

                  So sign up for a militia, not a hire ...
            3. KaraBumer
              KaraBumer 29 February 2016 21: 20
              +1
              Shitty article you read ..... and tactics are weak (I will not say anything about the strategy!)
            4. demchuk.ig
              demchuk.ig 1 March 2016 06: 33
              0
              Quote: Pravdarm
              Well? WAR IS ANNOUNCED !!! What's next? Not noticeable? Syria will not notice too? Will militant statements be REALIZED? Or as usual - tyagomotin?

              I think that the Turks need to be skipped a little further, so that later there would be no tantrums that they were destroyed by nuclear weapons in the territory of Turkey!
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Stanislas
          Stanislas 29 February 2016 08: 56
          37
          Quote: Sensatus
          Still in the domestic economic so began.
          At that moment I thought: if we all lived in Russia for 50 years in wealth and in perfect order, what would we be like? The same soft-bodied and ready for any conditions at the first danger of a drop in living standards by 5%? And if our country, its authorities at this time brought devastation and grief all over the world, even in the same Syria, would the media get in to understand and protect some Syria from the interference of our Foreign Ministry and the military in the affairs of "those Papuans"? Would citizens oppose the prospect of "inheriting the Earth" opening in their minds? So, in order to clean out 7 billion rogue ecologically, and to live with might and main, knowing that after us our children, grandchildren, etc. will live in peace and dispose of all the riches of the planet ... Until now, Russia was defended by the people who have never lived richly. There is an assumption that wealth brings with it not only nishtyaks, therefore it is said: "It is difficult for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven." Atheists! Ayu. Don't sleep! laughing
          1. dorogvalera
            dorogvalera 29 February 2016 09: 11
            +5
            We don’t sleep, but put a plus :)
            1. Stanislas
              Stanislas 29 February 2016 09: 26
              0
              Quote: dorogvalera
              Do not sleep
              Then, sorry, not at the address, but also put a plus)) Capitalists! Aww. Do not sleep!
          2. kos2910
            kos2910 29 February 2016 09: 27
            12
            and I agree, the Roman Empire collapsed when everyone was mired in joys and sins. Byzantium also fell in many ways because of this, the mercenaries were not eager to die for it, and the citizens were already living well, they were afraid to sacrifice their personal sake for the sake of society, as a result everyone lost everything ...
            1. ver_
              ver_ 1 March 2016 16: 55
              -4
              ... the Roman Empire never existed - this is just a myth ...
          3. weksha50
            weksha50 29 February 2016 09: 40
            +8
            Quote: Stanislav
            Until now, Russia has been defended by a people who never lived richly. There is an assumption that wealth brings not only nishtyaks,


            So ... not only Russia ... always with a spear-rifle-machine gun the poor went ahead ...
            And the rich - only cry when the poor protect their wealth ...

            PS Although not for everyone, but 90-- dashing years gave many the necessary hardening and antidote against Western values ​​... And the people (and not its rich people) will defend Russia stiffly ...
            1. Stanislas
              Stanislas 29 February 2016 10: 01
              +1
              Quote: weksha50
              Duc ... not only Russia.
              So successfully defend a huge country for centuries? Other warriors in history (I do not take the war of the wealthy colonialists against the natives with spears) had another factor weakening the tempering of the spirit and body. In Russia, the most severe climate of all existing states, similar in size. The horde came to Russia from a sharply continental climatic zone, came poor; therefore, perhaps, she taxied on the side for a while, walked up the fat, and she stayed here.
              1. weksha50
                weksha50 29 February 2016 11: 48
                0
                Quote: Stanislav
                So successfully defend a huge country for centuries?



                But THIS applies specifically to Russia ...

                PS Only now the war with Turkey (if that happens) will most likely not be on Russian territory ...
          4. Winnie76
            Winnie76 29 February 2016 12: 25
            0
            What about Switzerland? Not a poor state like. And try to poke around - they are nostrilizing, you can’t collect the bones. Or Singapore, Japan - not whipping boys
          5. Koshak
            Koshak 29 February 2016 18: 07
            +1
            To live
            Quote: Stanislav
            in wealth and in perfect order
            , at least see how it looks ...
          6. Starley from the south
            Starley from the south 29 February 2016 18: 18
            +2
            Quote: Stanislav
            "It is difficult for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven."

            There it says differently: "It is easier for a camel to crawl through the ears of a needle than for a rich man to get into the Kingdom of Heaven." But I completely agree with you.
            1. Stanislas
              Stanislas 1 March 2016 00: 03
              +3
              Quote: Starley from the South
              But I completely agree with you.
              So what am I leading to, we need to thank our authorities for all our internal disorders and poverty, for the fact that it does not allow us to float and get lost in the annals of history with fat. laughing But seriously, Putin has put together some kind of vertical of power, no longer "seven bankers", and our "partners" immediately laid bare their predatory breed. As long as there is such a situation in the world, we must maintain our power, and not engage in internal squabbles. There will be confidence that no one wants to put pressure on Russia anymore, then we will start to completely cleanse all branches of power.
            2. ver_
              ver_ 1 March 2016 17: 43
              -1
              ... this is a perversion: .. A camel - Camel - a rope .. It’s easier to pull a rope through the eye of a needle .... - ..this is the proverb and our brains in it .. scientists of all stripes
        4. NordUral
          NordUral 29 February 2016 09: 02
          +5
          You no longer need to speak inside, but act. The timer is ticking louder and louder.
          1. Stanislas
            Stanislas 1 March 2016 00: 24
            0
            Quote: NordUral
            The timer is ticking louder and louder.
            This is Kashpirovsky’s alarm clock. As it rings, you need to go for little need. yes
        5. gergi
          gergi 29 February 2016 11: 14
          +2
          Western warriors are accustomed to fighting the language, one Breedlaw is worth it! Macedonian! It’s a matter of doing, not tripping. Donning to the whole world how strong, fearless and beautiful you are.
        6. max702
          max702 1 March 2016 20: 15
          +1
          Quote: Sensatus
          I like that in foreign policy we first do and then speak. Still in the domestic economic so began.

          But it seems to me that the foreign policy of Russia for the world kulovods is not a set of complications .. Something like letting out steam while cooking on the stove .. so annoying costs and other trifles .. but if Russia is seriously engaged in domestic politics and will change the pro-Western course here it will be big problems for the world behind the scenes, and the bet is made on just that .. without a strong rear you won’t fight for a long time, and you won’t stand your ground in foreign policy .. And the GDP is trying to play this in the interests of your country .. Maybe something this is it But it’s time to take care of the internal affairs and the situation here is very threatening ..
      2. Averias
        Averias 29 February 2016 07: 32
        39
        Quote: Finches
        thanks to the constant medical errors of doctors from across the ocean!

        It's like in an old joke about cowards:
        A guy sits at an appointment with a surgeon and cries. A cleaner approaches him and asks:
        - Why are you crying?
        - Last time one egg turned black, the doctor amputated it, now the second has turned black!
        - Show me.
        Nothing to do showed. Grandma slobbery finger, rubbed an egg and said:
        - Son, yes your cowards are molting!
      3. Name classified
        Name classified 1 March 2016 11: 08
        0
        Oh, the shaman Erdogan will get a tambourine for blows to a tambourine ...
    2. Alekseev
      Alekseev 29 February 2016 07: 14
      16
      Quote: aszzz888
      Was in history - Hitler. Erdogan reminds him very much.

      Just faintly reminiscent.
      Hitler, unlike the "Saltan", defeated all of Europe, the Wehrmacht generals observed Red Square with binoculars ...
      And this one just let the stink go. Well, the Turkish army, if the erdogashka is completely dead, you need to evaporate on occasion, that's for sure! wink
      1. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 29 February 2016 07: 45
        -4
        For the use of nuclear weapons, the most serious reason is necessary. And conventional weapons (I do not mean "sofa") will not work. There would be time to protect your own at the airbase .. And in general, "evaporate, etc." in today's situation is a very stupid statement.
        1. paxil
          paxil 29 February 2016 07: 52
          27
          Well let's say this.
          1. dorogvalera
            dorogvalera 29 February 2016 09: 18
            +4
            Got it, I don’t .. well, all questions have been removed, I'm leaving for the monastery :)
        2. andj61
          andj61 29 February 2016 08: 16
          14
          Quote: dmi.pris
          For the use of nuclear weapons, the most serious reason is necessary. And conventional weapons (I do not mean "sofa") will not work. There would be time to protect your own at the airbase .. And in general, "evaporate, etc." in today's situation is a very stupid statement.

          To begin with, these are statements not from our side, but from "THAT" side. This is the first thing. And second, as soon as there is a serious threat to our forces in Syria from any local regional power - read - Turkey or Saudi - any means of deterrence will be used. It makes no sense to compete with them with conventional weapons - having understood this - that is, that our extreme arguments will not be used, and the Americans will try to get in. And we don't need it. yes
          And here it is clear - do not touch us - and we will not touch. bully But if you touch it, we won’t let it go ...
          The main thing is that Russia has not directly voiced this position - but the Western media have already informed the various inhabitants, and all sorts of different Erdogans and Gulf monarchs. fellow
        3. Red_Hamer
          Red_Hamer 29 February 2016 08: 19
          +9
          In Russia there is not nuclear weapons of comparable power, but in some ways superior to nuclear weapons.
        4. Cap.Morgan
          Cap.Morgan 29 February 2016 08: 58
          11
          Quote: dmi.pris
          For the use of nuclear weapons, the most serious reason is necessary. And conventional weapons (I do not mean "sofa") will not work. There would be time to protect your own at the airbase .. And in general, "evaporate, etc." in today's situation is a very stupid statement.

          Why stupid.
          The use of nuclear weapons is part of Russia's military doctrine.
          Otherwise, why recreate strategic nuclear missile weapons?
          What steps can the West take, for example, when destroying an invading Turkish group on Syrian territory? Really get into a fight with Russia.
          I do not believe.
          Here is why.
          We do not have many conventional weapons, and therefore a normal war will be at least exhausting for us. The usual long-term trench warfare is exactly what the partners expect from us. Starting a dozen neutron landmines will solve all problems immediately and forever.
          1. dmi.pris
            dmi.pris 29 February 2016 12: 30
            +3
            The use of nuclear weapons in our doctrine is, let's say, the last argument. The invasion of Turkish forces is not such an argument and no one will use neutron bombs .. And the Turks will invade completely, although they have already invaded under the guise of destroying Kurdish terrorists. Before a direct attack on the airbase, I think will not work, but under the guise of the Turks chopping off a piece of territory, and ours, unfortunately, will not be able to stop them. There are of course extreme options - the Western "partners" will do anything to push us and the Turks in a direct clash, they can do it ..
            Quote: Cap.Morgan
            Quote: dmi.pris
            For the use of nuclear weapons, the most serious reason is necessary. And conventional weapons (I do not mean "sofa") will not work. There would be time to protect your own at the airbase .. And in general, "evaporate, etc." in today's situation is a very stupid statement.

            Why stupid.
            The use of nuclear weapons is part of Russia's military doctrine.
            Otherwise, why recreate strategic nuclear missile weapons?
            What steps can the West take, for example, when destroying an invading Turkish group on Syrian territory? Really get into a fight with Russia.
            I do not believe.
            Here is why.
            We do not have many conventional weapons, and therefore a normal war will be at least exhausting for us. The usual long-term trench warfare is exactly what the partners expect from us. Starting a dozen neutron landmines will solve all problems immediately and forever.
          2. PSih2097
            PSih2097 29 February 2016 18: 26
            +3
            Quote: Cap.Morgan
            We don’t have many conventional weapons and therefore ordinary warfare will be at least exhausting for us.

            Seriously? Have you ever been to Mobilization Warehouses? believe there is enough weapons for two wars, the USSR tried. A people trained and willing to fight for their homeland would be enough.
    3. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 29 February 2016 07: 14
      +4
      Small new Hitler ... And NATO doesn’t really want to harness for it ...
      1. 79807420129
        79807420129 29 February 2016 07: 42
        14
        Quote: sergeyzzz
        Well, another statement of the fact that you can’t remove a monkey from a branch and make it president. laughing

        Yes, this monkey is just the talking head of Wall Streete and other mattresses of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, until they give it to the ears, the presidents will smack the monkey.
      2. ver_
        ver_ 1 March 2016 17: 53
        0
        ... you might think that this Nata has something serious .. They’re not here .. They have their own shirt so close to the body, and she has already used all her sanctions .. and they don’t get at all unbuckled with a bag of cuffs ...
    4. electrooleg
      electrooleg 29 February 2016 08: 43
      +4
      And he’ll just climb. For the rest, it seems, the brain works. According to the prophecies, there will be nothing left of Turkey. Everything goes to this.
    5. vodolaz
      vodolaz 29 February 2016 08: 49
      +2
      Quote: aszzz888
      Turkey will be the worst. Her leader, Erdogan, is indicated in the material, "seems to have become a maniac."

      This is scary. The main Ottoman, having lost "all shores", can go to a military conflict with Syria, and therefore with Russia. There was such in history - Hitler. Erdogan reminds him a lot.

      Hitler really had a powerful army and industry, this truth also has all this, but by no means to the same extent, besides Iran is next to one of the most powerful armies in the region, and also ideologically motivated. I don’t need to say anything about ours, everything is clear.
      1. ver_
        ver_ 1 March 2016 17: 29
        -3
        ... in that region, all leaders periodically experience spring aggravation .. Turkey, then Iran, then the Saudis ... but the climate there is ..
    6. weksha50
      weksha50 29 February 2016 09: 32
      +4
      Quote: aszzz888
      may go to a military conflict with Syria, and therefore with Russia. Was in history - Hitler.



      The situation is completely different ...
      We have a buffer on the land border, there remains only a direct collision of the fleets ... But, in spite of, to put it mildly, the best Black Sea Fleet combat capability in front of the Turkish fleet, do not forget about the unsinkable aircraft carrier 0 Crimea, from whose territory it is not a problem to get the Turkish fleet ...

      Well, the question of the NATO bloc, of which Turkey is a member .... How it will behave ... It’s one thing to yell at all angles about the upcoming crushing victory over Russia, and it’s quite another to really run into the Russian army ...
      1. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 29 February 2016 12: 36
        +3
        And when did we have a comparable fleet with Turkey? In the naval component (with the possible exception of the Soviet period), they always surpassed us ... in the number of ships ... but they did not mind. The second half of the 19th century, the Russian-Turkish war ... Russian steam boat "Joke" is the name of what, a pole mine sinks a Turkish steamer .. And so at all times ..
        Quote: weksha50
        Quote: aszzz888
        may go to a military conflict with Syria, and therefore with Russia. Was in history - Hitler.



        The situation is completely different ...
        We have a buffer on the land border, there remains only a direct collision of the fleets ... But, in spite of, to put it mildly, the best Black Sea Fleet combat capability in front of the Turkish fleet, do not forget about the unsinkable aircraft carrier 0 Crimea, from whose territory it is not a problem to get the Turkish fleet ...

        Well, the question of the NATO bloc, of which Turkey is a member .... How it will behave ... It’s one thing to yell at all angles about the upcoming crushing victory over Russia, and it’s quite another to really run into the Russian army ...
      2. KaPToC
        KaPToC 29 February 2016 19: 16
        +1
        Can you tell us by what parameters you compared the Russian and Turkish fleets? Unless, if by the number of pennants. And you compare the missiles that are in service with the fleets. The Turks simply have nothing to oppose to Russian supersonic heavy missiles.
    7. silver_roman
      silver_roman 29 February 2016 10: 32
      +5
      Do not do honor to Erdogan by comparing him with Hitler.
      Understand correctly: both are scum, but the second is much more elegant and creative.
      That and Turkey with the 3rd Reich is not correct to compare.

      But underestimating NATO is a real miscalculation.
    8. 933454818
      933454818 29 February 2016 11: 45
      +3
      Erdogan is unlikely to resemble Hitler. Germany and the Germans stood behind Hitler, and this is far from the same as Turkey and the Turks ...
    9. 222222
      222222 29 February 2016 13: 52
      +1
      Terrible Russia
      Today, 06:56 "
      Have you seen a brown bear running through the trees? Me not!! he silently does his kingly deeds !!
      The Turkish wolf has spoken too much and continues to carry verbal husk ... does not fit the wolf .. so whine ...
      "- Akella missed!" "..
      . tobacco ..... "And we will go to the north, and we will go to the north .."! "
      (("Mowgli" Jackal Tabaki)) laughing
    10. Valera999
      Valera999 29 February 2016 16: 44
      +2
      N-yes, Hitler didn’t swim in vain, this ghoul got his servants, but he drank enough blood. 4 years of war have really forgotten. The Turks are certainly not Germans, but they can run into a couple of mushrooms. In the 21st century, in reality, Russia may become the first one to put into practice nuclear weapons, and I don’t really want to see this.
    11. siberalt
      siberalt 29 February 2016 20: 41
      0
      "Laconic Russia"? And what to say, we must do! And not only outside, but inside. Something like this. hi
    12. Alfizik
      Alfizik 1 March 2016 22: 33
      0
      Hitler is a trial balloon, a tester. Erdogan knows about that "test" and will not get into a fight. He will only fire at the border and journalists. For show-off - they say cool.
  2. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod 29 February 2016 07: 04
    +7
    Of course, we will not bomb the nuclear bomb, but let them think that everything is possible
    1. free
      free 29 February 2016 07: 35
      10
      why not? everything is possible!
      1. paxil
        paxil 29 February 2016 11: 12
        0
        Quote: free
        why not? everything is possible!
        Reply Quote Report Abuse

        Ага.
        I know for sure the impossible is possible
        Go crazy, go crazy so carelessly
        The grass doesn't let me go day and night
        Everything impossible is possible, I know for sure. wassat
        So something rolled laughing
    2. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 29 February 2016 07: 41
      +4
      Why is it not going to be? The use of tactical nuclear weapons in this theater is quite possible and even necessary if some idiots decide to send their troops to the territory of Syria contrary to the desire of the country's legitimate government and the editorial staff of the radio station, pmsm, is right in this.
      ... The editorial staff of the radio station suggests that the Russians will allow his army to cross the border and go into the depths of Syria, and there the Turks will be hit.

      And a little clarification or question appeared. The article says:
      ... and Russia acts in this country with the permission of a legally elected government, the portal notes.

      With permission, however, or at the request? If with permission, it turns out that Russia raised the question of introducing the videoconferencing system, and then Damascus resolved it. If Damascus asked for it, then it’s different.
      1. subbtin.725
        subbtin.725 29 February 2016 10: 38
        +3
        Do what you must and be what happens.
  3. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 29 February 2016 07: 05
    +8
    today Oleg, your patriotism is just going wild! smile and Obama-rag, and Europeans-mentally weak, and Arabs are cowards ...))))))
  4. Ramzes33
    Ramzes33 29 February 2016 07: 06
    +7
    Article plus. Short and capacious. And let enemies scratch their turnips.
  5. sergeyzzz
    sergeyzzz 29 February 2016 07: 11
    +7
    Well, another statement of the fact that you can’t remove a monkey from a branch and make it president. laughing
  6. parusnik
    parusnik 29 February 2016 07: 12
    +1
    The United States does not intend to agree to a truce with IS and will attack the jihadists "on all fronts.".. Yeah .. Tobaccos: We are accepting the battle! They shouted .. Sherkhan: Fools .. And we will go north and wait there ..
  7. kodxnumx
    kodxnumx 29 February 2016 07: 12
    +3
    So in the USA, they saw the light, the time was over to chat, the time came to act, Russia is now firmly relegating the United States to their exceptional ones, not a demon, so guys get ready!
  8. Ramzes33
    Ramzes33 29 February 2016 07: 15
    +5
    Russia is strengthening its group with four more SU-24M bombers.
  9. SklochPensioner
    SklochPensioner 29 February 2016 07: 19
    +2
    Look ... Closer and closer to adequate.
    About tactical nuclear weapons, it may be too much, but the essence is captured correctly!

    Fools, fortunately, only speak foolishly so far ...

    Russia's strategic nuclear weapons, I hope, will help them not to act foolishly!
  10. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 29 February 2016 07: 19
    15
    It's so scary when Putin is silent.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  11. Bayonet
    Bayonet 29 February 2016 07: 19
    +3
    Something the authors suffered - "The idea of ​​a tactical nuclear strike that will" vaporize "their army, they for some reason do not even consider", "Turkey will be the worst of all" ...
    And will not it be worse for Syria, on whose territory it is proposed to use Russian nuclear weapons? And in general, it will not be worse for everyone? Or does the belief that "NATO is" a laughing stock "" unties your hands? Before writing this, it would not be bad to read brochures about the damaging factors and consequences of the use of nuclear weapons! hi
    1. SklochPensioner
      SklochPensioner 29 February 2016 07: 42
      +4
      "Before writing this, it would be nice to read brochures about the damaging factors and consequences of the use of nuclear weapons!"
      Bayonet, of course, well done, unlike a bullet smile
      But here, TOTAL IS:

      "On the portal, owned by the New York radio station" Superstation95 "(95,1FM), an editorial was published on the" laconic "Russia."

      These, in contrast to the "regular" "singers of democracy" like CNN, BBC, understood: "This is not without reason!" smile
      And TNWs are remembered, well, ... with fright ... from the silence of Russia laughing
    2. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 29 February 2016 07: 49
      0
      Quote: Bayonet
      And Syria in whose territory they propose to use Russian nuclear weapons, will not it be worse?

      It will be, of course, we know, we passed it both near Semipalatinsk and in other places. The benefit of the territory is not that of Syria. Well, if it’s different, then Psaki v2.0 will be right and you have to shut up. Of course I would not want to get to this extreme measure, but maybe they’ll come to their senses even different wrongly done there ...
  12. Bacha
    Bacha 29 February 2016 07: 21
    +2
    And Americans say stupid, there are also those who think among them, as the article showed.
  13. Papapg
    Papapg 29 February 2016 07: 31
    +5
    Russia needs to be prepared for the unpredictable actions of coalition partners. Only hard and brutal force can reason these hypocrites.
  14. sergeyzzz
    sergeyzzz 29 February 2016 07: 37
    +5
    Quote: Papapg
    Russia needs to be prepared for the unpredictable actions of coalition partners. Only hard and brutal force can reason these hypocrites.

    For them, people are consumables until we scatter an army into atoms.
  15. valent45
    valent45 29 February 2016 07: 38
    +3
    May there be no tactical nuclear strike in Syria. But some need to scare
    to cool down a bit. And continue to silently wet the barmalei in outhouses and other places!
    1. Blondy
      Blondy 29 February 2016 08: 16
      +1
      Quote: valent45
      May there be no tactical nuclear strike in Syria. But some need to scare
      to cool down a bit. And continue to silently wet the barmalei in outhouses and other places!

      Why is it mandatory in Syria? From where they will climb there and will be. and impartially not TNW. Well, who said that, given the obligations assumed by Russia, the aggression into Syria is not a very serious reason? It was not for nothing that the West made it clear to Erdogan that if he climbs up for him they will not stand up for him (according to the same NATO charter). And even without a tactical nuclear one, there will be something to blame on hot heads, for example, "the daddy of all bombs" (44 tons in TNT equivalent, also not very weak) and its analogs of a volumetric explosion. It seems to me that ours will not particularly deal with retaliatory measures, who with what weapon and in what quantity has climbed. If it is said not to climb, it means not to climb. Well, they will deal with especially dull ones in addition, quickly and not at all painful.
  16. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 29 February 2016 07: 43
    +3
    Hello, common sense - you so rarely come to people's minds, especially now in many Arab countries, in the EU and the United States they forgot about you at all - go see them, or something ...
  17. Tartary
    Tartary 29 February 2016 07: 45
    +7
    Why immediately TNW? We also have a thermobaric BOMB "PAPA" ... wink
  18. Oleneboy_
    Oleneboy_ 29 February 2016 07: 58
    +6
    Maybe a bang?
    Be sure to bang. And more than once. The whole world is in ruin. But then. (C) DMB
  19. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 February 2016 08: 12
    +1
    And they conclude: the time for talking is over.

    Apparently, it really ended and the Americans finally realized this. But whether they will draw the right conclusions is very doubtful.
    1. feropont
      feropont 29 February 2016 08: 26
      +1
      The Americans understood one of them (su-35) and su-34 .... dozens as in Liechtenstein ..... where our armament is thousands of words in words .... and armament actually costs dozens of times cheaper ... . charge for boutique
    2. Briz
      Briz 29 February 2016 17: 44
      +1
      They made absolutely American conclusions - Erdogan was told that NATO would not support, they told us that we would be to blame for any violation of the process, and we ourselves would look after the situation ...
  20. Wolka
    Wolka 29 February 2016 08: 21
    0
    I frankly did not like the arguments and tone of the article, everything is much more complicated than the author of the article thinks, “bang”, “we’re not banging” is not an argument, the process of redrawing the entire Middle East is already irreversible, and one “banging” cannot contain it, most importantly, it should be directed in a positive direction, but the natural political shortsightedness of the Arabs, and the open cowardice of the West does not allow doing this ...
  21. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 29 February 2016 08: 30
    +4
    Often more stopped is not the use of force, but its threat. No one knows to what extent the use of force can be reached. Everything seems to be at stake. This is the stopping power. Do not learn to respect, make afraid!
  22. Monos
    Monos 29 February 2016 08: 35
    12
    The position of Russia can be expressed in one picture:
  23. Naum
    Naum 29 February 2016 08: 41
    11
    This "Syrian agreement" is very similar to "Minsk-2". It smelled fried and the Americans began to save their ISIS project. Another delay in time, allowing you to redeploy, replenish ranks and ammunition, lick wounds. The "peace agreement" will be violated by the barmaley every minute, but, of course, Russia will be guilty of this! .. There is no need to build anything new and bright prospects. The war only took a pause.
    1. ochakow703
      ochakow703 29 February 2016 18: 47
      +1
      I agree with you, Naum, one hundred percent. I don’t know how Comrade Lavrov views this position, but I see it as a postponement of the sentence. Moreover, we will have to "condemned" - to feed, drink, shoe and dress. And he will also squeal that the cabbage soup is not salty, but the spinjak is badly sewn. If you remember history, then there is not a single positive example in this method of conflict resolution. All such truces ended even more bloody. We would be better off according to our Russian tradition - all the way, to Paris or Berlin, and the signature in full bloom - "Ivan Ivanov worked here, and this powder used to be YGil"
      1. Naum
        Naum 29 February 2016 20: 59
        0
        As for Ukruina, let them clean up their own porridge themselves! They can. and they dream of declaring war on us in order to surrender the next day to the mercy (as well as feeding and restoration) of the winner, but for Russia it will be too much for Russia. Yes, and gratitude from the "broad" Svidomites should not be expected. They will rather throw grenades at the windows at night (as in Galicia until the end of the 50s). The same is with Syria - we will help from the air on targets, with intelligence, politically, and everything else - by ourselves. When you get something for nothing, it is somehow not appreciated. Help once - they will kiss, the second - as it should be, do not help the third - they will curse ...
  24. Zomanus
    Zomanus 29 February 2016 08: 54
    +4
    And pay attention, Russia acts as transparently as possible.
    Provides all the information, coordinates issues between the parties to the conflict,
    if they want to resolve these issues peacefully.
    That is, it shows that she does not intend to fan the conflict, bring it to
    sizes of world war.
    And in general, many of the adequate opposition are meeting,
    start discussing issues in peaceful ways.
    But the rest, who do not understand what respect is,
    have to strip.
    Obama ... don't give a damn about him. The main thing for him is that it would not be worse.
    1. Briz
      Briz 29 February 2016 17: 51
      0
      Yes, among other things, our strength is in maximum openness.
  25. rusmat73
    rusmat73 29 February 2016 08: 57
    0
    such articles warm our souls, that there are people who think with their heads, but ... in my opinion, with such articles they can warm up aggression and hatred of Russia and Russians - like arrogant and don’t listen to anyone except themselves .... hi
  26. nrex
    nrex 29 February 2016 09: 00
    +2
    There are still some types of non-nuclear weapons, but comparable in impact. For example, an electromagnetic bomb. If its effect is paralleled with the "DAD" then we get an almost complete analogue of a tactical nuclear charge. High power shock wave plus an electromagnetic pulse. In principle, only electromagnetic bombs dropped over power plants are enough to paralyze the entire energy structure of the aggressor country.
  27. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 29 February 2016 09: 01
    0
    If any state enters the ground forces in Syria without the permission of Damascus, this will be an announcement
    the war
    If any state enters the ground forces in Syria without the permission of Russia, this will be a declaration of war
  28. Stas157
    Stas157 29 February 2016 09: 23
    +2
    I put a minus article. Solid bravado, harmful in addition!
    For some reason, they don’t even consider the idea of ​​a tactical nuclear strike that will “vaporize” their army. The leadership of these states for some reason thinks that Russia "will not dare." Dare, dare.

    And why did the author think that Russia will use nuclear weapons? Peskov suggested? Putin is a reasonably balanced person not to use nuclear weapons in foreign conflicts, and so far there are no attacks on the territory of Russia itself.
    Turkey will be the worst.

    She will be worse! Why fight with Turkey for this! As I understand it, the current truce was organized, in particular, so that Turkey would not send its troops into Syria.
    In other words, NATO is “a joke”.

    But it’s not very funny for anyone when the NATO forces are nearby.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Stanislas
      Stanislas 29 February 2016 12: 16
      0
      Quote: Stas157
      But it’s not very funny for anyone when the NATO forces are nearby.
      Are you talking about the Baltic states? They are no laughing matter now: all the lawns and flowerbeds are protected * by us, and they have not been ordered to clean it - immunity. smile
    3. Briz
      Briz 29 February 2016 18: 00
      0
      We, as it were, are not going to fight with Turkey first, but if it visibly enters Syria, then see above - Russia is laconic, and no one argues about Putin’s balance, but the war has its own laws ... everything can be.
  29. weksha50
    weksha50 29 February 2016 09: 23
    0
    "they don’t understand that Russia made an absolute statement"...

    Hmm ... Both points indicated in the article are like a nail in the lid of the coffin ... It’s rather capacious and unequivocal ...

    Plus, after past mistakes, military-technical cooperation with Iran is developing, which is confirmed by the Iranians themselves ... Let the Amers, Saudis and Turks ponder ... Although, in order to ponder, you need a sound brain, since they do not have it now ... Some kind of narcotic euphoria on the eve of "future victories" over Russia ...

    As the saying goes, "the blind man said - bastardly" ...
    1. DimerVladimer
      DimerVladimer 29 February 2016 10: 00
      +1
      What is the meaning of the "unfolding military-technical cooperation with Iran"?
      They have nothing to pay, they are worthless ally, both political and military (until recently they wanted to sue, for an undelivered S-300 air defense system - a good ally).
      The Iranian warriors are worthless (this was also shown by the US Navy's Operation Praying Mantis in the Gulf, when several boats and an Iranian destroyer were sunk during the assault on fortified platforms).
      Generally, being in Tehran (after the end of the Iran-Iraq war), it seemed to me that the people (Persians) were not warlike. They would have to deal with their problems - with internal dissatisfaction with the regime.
      1. weksha50
        weksha50 29 February 2016 12: 01
        +1
        Quote: DimerVladimer
        What is the meaning of the "unfolding military-technical cooperation with Iran"?


        Check out today's interview with the Iranian Minister of Defense ...

        Russia is finally supplying S-300 systems, and contracts for armored vehicles and combat helicopters are still being signed there ...

        And as for the peace of the Persians ... So our people are not bloodthirsty, but, if necessary, they fight so that enemies have to suck ...

        PS Although, as follows from history, at first we get in the face, we are angry, and - off - get your shoulder up ...
        And the Turks and other evil spirits have already been issued to us by preliminary plop ... So we'll see ... Both statements and the silence of Russia now say a lot ...
        1. DimerVladimer
          DimerVladimer 29 February 2016 12: 11
          +2
          Once again I say - the Iranians do not have money to pay even for the S-300.
          They want to get equipment on credit, planes and tanks to get technology and produce in Iran - sly Persians!
          1. weksha50
            weksha50 29 February 2016 13: 27
            +1
            Quote: DimerVladimer
            Once again I say - the Iranians do not have money to pay even for the S-300.



            I apologize, maybe I'm wrong, but it seems that at one time some part of the money even passed in advance for the S-300 ...

            PS And how then they filed a lawsuit against us (or were going to file), even if there was no prepayment?
            Well and still: so you suggest, to Persians to sell nothing? Be calm, and this niche will immediately be occupied (yes, China, for example), and then Iran certainly will never have business with us ... But do we need this ???
  30. de naturat
    de naturat 29 February 2016 09: 37
    0
    yes, provoke, and somehow childish request
  31. DimerVladimer
    DimerVladimer 29 February 2016 09: 41
    +3
    "Sofa" strategists should remember that any military confrontation with the Turks will make it impossible to supply the Syrian group through the Bosphorus. And it is difficult to supply by other means, for example, by ships through the Baltic, Murmansk, and it is not possible to transfer much by airplanes through Iran.
    It is quite possible to increase the air force of the airborne forces in Syria, but supplying it with ammunition for a full-fledged conflict is very, very problematic.
    1. weksha50
      weksha50 29 February 2016 12: 03
      +2
      Quote: DimerVladimer
      any military confrontation with the Turks will make it impossible to supply the Syrian group through the Bosphorus.



      Ahem ... It's looking at how and how this military confrontation will end ...
    2. Stena
      Stena 1 March 2016 00: 09
      0
      Quote: DimerVladimer
      "Sofa" strategists should remember that any military confrontation with the Turks will make it impossible to supply the Syrian group through the Bosphorus. And it is difficult to supply by other means, for example, by ships through the Baltic, Murmansk, and it is not possible to transfer much by airplanes through Iran.
      It is quite possible to increase the air force of the airborne forces in Syria, but supplying it with ammunition for a full-fledged conflict is very, very problematic.

      Tell me, what do you think - in our General Staff there is no plan for the deployment and destruction of key facilities in the event of Turkish aggression? A long time ago there are, and there are cruise missiles and other weapons (non-nuclear), which allows us to state with confidence - the chances of the Turks - zero point zero. Moreover, there is a civil war in Turkey. And Erdogan - he drove himself into a dead shout - when he can say something, but neither external allies support him, and there are internal forces ready at any moment to throw him off the throne ... So why equip the group in Syria with ammunition ( for alleged confrontation with Turkey), if on the first day cruise missiles and air strikes industry and key military installations in Turkey will be dusted? And she has nothing to counter such strikes - they do not have enough anti-ballistic missiles ...
  32. ruAlex
    ruAlex 29 February 2016 09: 44
    0
    I liked the article, but again, after reading it, there is a feeling that a large shecher is approaching. And with such feelings in conversations, it seems many live, IMHO
  33. Dryulea
    Dryulea 29 February 2016 10: 08
    +2
    A.A. Gromyko also said that if Turkey closes the straits for us, there will be a new strait in place of Istanbul!
  34. surrozh
    surrozh 29 February 2016 10: 28
    +1
    Article is a plus, and radio stations are a minus! Shapkozakidatelskie statements! Everything is not so easy and simple - TNW, fumes, NATO, the USA, rags, we will tear everyone apart. But the "regional power" - "What is this, the European part? Or the eastern part, where our neighbors are Japan and the United States, if we mean Alaska and China? Is this the Asian part? Or is it, say, the southern part? Or see to the north ”- V. Putin.
  35. Vetal999
    Vetal999 29 February 2016 10: 33
    0
    I understand that the main idea of ​​the article is: "USA, stop talking, it's time to do something"?
  36. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 29 February 2016 10: 40
    0
    in the White House, the president is not sitting on the throne, but "a weak-willed weakling."

    The United States has long been ruled by a world government. Any self-will of presidents is immediately suppressed. They shot and wounded Reagan, killed J. Kennedy, and imprisoned Carter.
    It's the same in Europe. Berlusconi was removed because of his friendship with Putin. There are many examples. At present, only those who have a "snout in the gun" and who are easy to manipulate are allowed to power.
    Russia is no exception in this regard.
    When Putin came to power, in the West they asked who he was (in the sense of why we have nothing to do with him?).
    1. Fat
      Fat 29 February 2016 16: 04
      0
      Quote: Pvi1206
      Carter was impeached.

      You haven’t misled anything by accident. When was the dilettante "eternal Jimmy" impeached?
      Z. Brzezinski formulated three main tasks of the Carter foreign policy.
      1. Strengthening US ideological dictatorship in the world.
      2. Emphasis on protecting "human rights".
      3. "Restoring America's Political Attractiveness to Third World Countries."
      Carter’s domestic policy has been largely unsuccessful.
      White Sheep Carter lost the 1980 elections to R. Reagan, after the failure of the 1979 hostage rescue operation in Iran. Then he "sighed with relief" lol
  37. The comment was deleted.
  38. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 29 February 2016 10: 51
    +1
    It is necessary to speak not often but clearly on the case, and not to drool as the State Department.
  39. Taygerus
    Taygerus 29 February 2016 11: 00
    +2
    If GDP is silent, then it should be so, let them go crazy!
  40. Pitot
    Pitot 29 February 2016 11: 23
    0
    And I think that if there are those on which tactical nuclear charges cry, then you need to tumble. In the end, if they are made from Russian barbarians, then we will act barbarously. We will not disappoint these perverts ....
  41. karcov
    karcov 29 February 2016 11: 30
    0
    What did the author smoke ?!
  42. Proud.
    Proud. 29 February 2016 11: 30
    +1
    "... Russia is a superpower, and Obama is on television
    called it a "regional" power ... "- Of course, regional. Since Russia itself defines the boundaries of its region. And this is TRUE.
  43. Navy7981
    Navy7981 29 February 2016 12: 13
    +1
    why a nuclear strike? We have ammunition for a volumetric explosion, which is quite comparable with the result of tactical nuclear munitions, only without contamination of the area.
  44. Senior manager
    Senior manager 29 February 2016 14: 56
    +1
    Our Supreme built his imperious life as a man of his word, and his course is clear to the whole world. Therefore, his warning weighs very heavily, and the GDP said at one time that RUSSIA has something to surprise its "partners" with. As they say in Russia - welcom.
  45. leshiy076
    leshiy076 29 February 2016 14: 59
    +1
    Quote: aszzz888
    Was in history - Hitler. Erdogan reminds him very much.

    Before Hitler attacked the USSR, the economy of all Europe worked on Hitler. Plus, Hitler was American capital. To compare Erdogan with Hitler is possible only in terms of mental illness.
  46. aleksey980
    aleksey980 29 February 2016 15: 25
    0
    Mr. Obama told reporters that a ceasefire in Syria should be the first step towards ending chaos: “The coming days will be critical, the whole world will follow this.

    What more! It hurts to keep track of Bark Khuseynich's "monthly". Although Europeans, they are such Europeans, who knows ... lol
  47. misterwulf
    misterwulf 29 February 2016 16: 45
    +1
    And Hitler secretly did not steal oil from the territories he had not occupied. All that he needed was given to him ...
  48. WERSTA.
    WERSTA. 29 February 2016 19: 12
    +1
    Lord, are there really no sober-minded politicians left in the USA?
  49. Robert Nevsky
    Robert Nevsky 29 February 2016 20: 35
    0
    GLORY OF RUSSIAIIIIIIIIIIIIII!
  50. Jogr1945
    Jogr1945 29 February 2016 21: 23
    -5
    Well, and are the Turks in Syria, so what? Well, the Americans bomb the Syrian territory, huh? Someone answered them? -Do you say shame on Washington? But silent Russia crowed that it would be all who illegally cross the Syrian border to shoot down, someone shot down? -Why did they bring these terrible strap-ons called C400? Someone to frighten them, they would bring a strap-on car and it would be more useless. - no one dares to bring down a Turkish or an American plane, never! -Why then, all these polysemantic statements? To keep quiet modestly then? Of course she is silent, they turn from words to deeds, and with us everything was limited to empty threats