Military Review

Project "ZZ". War for war, power for power

49
The United States does not tire of portraying Russia as a source of world threat and thinking about how to “stop” Putin. However, analysts say that none of the potential US presidential candidates have any sensible ideas about the stop for Putin. Even the super popular billionaire D. Trump has no recipes, and he stopped talking about getting along with Putin and started talking about his “good relationship” ... with God. Indeed, something went wrong in the American kingdom, because even in the Washington Times, which can’t be called Putin’s mouthpiece, the White House and the US military-industrial complex are called militant institutions that destroy freedom and inculcate terrorism.



I did not get along with Putin, but I got along with God


Jennifer Rubin in Washington Post suggested that among the many strategic mistakes made by the Obama administration, the wrong policy stands out in relation to Russia. For example, B.H. Obama approved the role of Russia as an intermediary in the conclusion of an agreement on the Syrian chemical arms. Hillary Clinton, the former US Secretary of State, welcomed this decision. And in this spirit continues to this day - worse and worse for the United States.

This policy doesn’t like America’s Eastern European allies, who are watching Washington “give up pieces of Europe and the Middle East to Vladimir Putin” (in the original: chunks of Europe). As a result, the aforementioned Putin has already ceased to fear that he will have to pay for the aggression. They are afraid of others. The journalist writes bluntly: "Obama is afraid of him (Putin) to resist."

However, not only Obama is so cowardly.

Donald Trump is ready to be a friend to Putin. The emergence of Putin's troops in Syria, Trump publicly rejoices.

Presidential candidate H. Clinton, the columnist also entered the ranks of Putinists: after all, she allowed Putin to press the "reset" button.

What to do to the White House?

According to Jennifer Rubin, the new US president must demonstrate strength and keep Putin "under control." In the meantime, the Russian leader continues to "oppress his own people" and even tries to return to the Middle East as a "powerful player." In order for America to become great again, it must not “curry” against “dictators” and “throwing friends”.

In the meantime, Mr. Trump has noticeably reduced the “Putin” glow of his campaign speeches. As a matter of fact, in his last speech to Putin there was no place at all. It seems to us that Trump acted wisely: the more often he says Putin’s name, the more voters in the election will look for Putin’s name in the voting machines.

The extravagant billionaire said in an interview with CNN that he now leads a righteous lifestyle. “Good relations”, as it turned out, he established not with Putin, but with God.

"I live a completely different life, not the kind that most likely many imagine," he quotes. "Lenta.ru". - I'm talking about the last years. I try to live right, and I can do it. I have a very good relationship with God. ”

However, this “divine” candidate, as well as former Secretary of State Clinton, turned out to be the objects of the poisonous criticism of the journal. "Counter Punch".

Publicist Brian Lafly made fun of Hillary Clinton, who herself doesn’t know what she says when she declares: “The United States should do more to resist Russian President Putin,” since his “decisive policy” everywhere contradicts “American interests.” She believes that the US should "make concerted efforts" to deter Moscow. Last year, she told the British politician Boris Johnson that the Europeans were “too weak-minded in the fight against Putin” and said that if Putin continued to “expand his domination” completely and uncontrollably, he would recreate the Soviet Union. In addition, according to Clinton, the elimination of President Bashar al-Assad from power in Syria should be a "top priority". Presumably, the journalist notes, this lady set out to “eliminate” Assad in the same way as Gaddafi in Libya. Under the giggles.

“Maybe she prepared the same thing for President Putin?” The author asks.

If Clinton becomes president, the journalist continues, the confrontation with Russia will gain momentum.

US Republican presidential candidates from the Republican Party are no better.

Carly Fiorina is ready for the "restoration of the Sixth fleet”And“ the restoration of the missile defense program in Poland ”, and she also wants to“ regularly conduct aggressive military exercises in the Baltic countries ”. Then she will send "several thousand soldiers to Germany." She has nothing to talk with people like Putin.

Senator Marco Rubio spoke even more simply: “I have never met Vladimir Putin, but I know enough about him to say: he is a gangster.”

Jeb Bush claims that “without American leadership in the world, any other country in the region [in the Middle East] is beginning to change its priorities.” It is sad, he believes, that "already Iraq and other countries are now negotiating with Russia." “Not so long ago, Russia had no influence in the region at all,” he recalled. Not Russia, but the United States "must lead in all directions."

Finally, Donald Trump. Its author calls the "grotesque figure of the sinister comedy." Hard to believe, believes the journalist that Trump is in his right mind. No, this is an “obvious madman,” but it constitutes the most serious competition to all other Republican candidates. This type believes that you should act "together with the president of Russia."

Such a position of Trump is presented to the author as “evil joke”. In his opinion, there is no difference at all who will be the next president of the United States, Trump's “evil prankster” or Clinton’s “poisonous and vicious”. In any case, the planet will continue to observe "the continuation of uncompromising pressure on Russia," up to the growing threat of "military confrontation."

The author advises the US ruling circles to "listen" to what President Putin said at a meeting of the UN General Assembly last September. Brian Lafley is convinced that Washington continues a policy based on self-conceit and belief in its own exclusivity - with complete impunity. This policy was carried out before. The US is not going to stop. Each of the likely candidates for the presidency of the United States "believes" in this policy, "built on conceit, exclusivity and impunity." It appears that the future president of the United States will launch aggressive actions against Russia. The consequences of the confrontation may well lead to a total catastrophe.

Beggars American aggressive state system and newspaper The Washington Times.

Bruce Fain writes: “All empires are the same. All of them are born from the DNA of those species that crave power for the sake of power. And this evil remains unchanged from the time of Adam and Eve. ”

In its development, the United States, the author believes, "predictably followed" the model of ancient Rome.

First, the Americans fought against the British (in self-defense). Later, they fought on the side of the Allies in the First World War. Then, in the same XX century, they "invented their allies" and rushed to defend them. So it was, for example, in Vietnam, Kuwait or Somalia. And since then the war began, which has no end to the edge. And its goal is not a victory over international terrorism.

“The American Empire,” the journalist writes, refuses to admit the fact that the endless foreign interventions of the United States created a host of enemies for America.

The US military-industrial complex has made trillions of dollars in wars. The author calls the US military-industrial complex a “terrorist” complex that “thrives on eternal war and imaginary fears about threats.”

Bruce Fain gives advice to the White House. "The United States," he writes, "will become much freer, richer and safer if they withdraw all their troops from the Middle East and deploy them in their homeland to protect their own borders, shores and sky."

“Our militant state,” the publicist continues, “has nurtured the military-industrial-terrorist complex and in turn is fed by them, is a great destroyer of freedom.” And here are the fruits of this terrorist cohabitation: state supervision, national bankruptcy, secret government, disintegration of the constitutional system of checks and balances.

* * *


War for the sake of war, power for the sake of power - this is what today's United States is alive. Criticism of this state of affairs is increasingly appearing on the pages of American newspapers, including the major and non-“alternative” press. Some months remain before the presidential elections, and the voices of the disgruntled will be heard more and more often, becoming louder. However, will something change after the election? No, no. All the same “terrorist” military-industrial complex will dictate the rules of the game to the White House, as well as to the congressmen.
Author:
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. sa-ag
    sa-ag 18 January 2016 09: 10 New
    19
    "... if Putin continues to" reign supremely and uncontrollably "to expand" his dominance, "then he will recreate the Soviet Union."
    Here are the visionaries, they immediately show the straight lines and do not watch press conferences with Putin :-)
    1. Haettenschweiler
      Haettenschweiler 18 January 2016 09: 49 New
      11
      - I can imagine why such articles are in the USA, but I don’t understand why they are on VO, where Putin’s rating among users is already unprecedentedly high despite everything that happens inside the Fatherland.
    2. Now we are free
      Now we are free 18 January 2016 10: 00 New
      17
      Quote: sa-ag
      "... if Putin continues to" reign supremely and uncontrollably "to expand" his dominance, "then he will recreate the Soviet Union."
      Here are the visionaries, they immediately show the straight lines and do not watch press conferences with Putin :-)

      Greetings sa-ag hi
      Actually, it doesn’t matter what they’re talking about all the more (especially in the election race), all the thoughts of American politicians are no more than PR and the more noticeable (striking) the politician’s greater chances of winning. absolutely any PR (VV Zhirinovsky’s Syndrome) with which Trump, by the way, is very similar in his election actions, is suitable for this.
      Trump himself plays on ultra liberalism and at the same time the conservatism of Americans, the main thing is that this and that should reach its climax in his speeches and, oddly enough, not only combine, but also logically connect ...
      1). He wants to become a friend (Tirana, the strangler of democracy) to Putin -Ultra liberalism emerging from the general trend of US policy, especially now in the period of confrontation with Russia.
      2). He is very categorical with refugees (regardless of the country from where they arrived in the USA) and with Muslims in particular, and for the "good old" way of life of America -Ultra Conservatism playing on Americans hyperpatriotism - "America on a mustache" ...

      In any case, speaking of Trump:
      1). -If he becomes the president of the United States, this does not mean absolutely that he will carry out his election slogans on the normalization of relations with Putin / Russia. (And which of the American presidents generally kept his campaign promises? ..).
      2). -There is a big fear that Trump was introduced into the election race as a jester and at a decisive moment the advantage will be on the side of such a person as “Madame Klimaks” Hilary Clinton or even worse (Negotiated election). By the way, in the USA, neither the residents of the USA nor the electors choose the president ... The latter are much smaller than the US residents and it is much easier to influence them in order for them to make the “Right” decision.

      In general, we look at this "cheap circus" called the US election race, eat popcorn, laugh BUT we wind it on our whiskers, that we - We see what (someone wants) to see us, and not what really happens .. .

      I’m afraid the Russophobian lobby, or rather the lobby of the military and oil magnates, in the end, as always, will win and saddle the old but still pulling horse - the “External Enemy” / “Russia - the Empire of Evil” (Hello Roni Reagan) with whom America must ultimately fight on this horse since 1914 ... And I have never tried to transfer to another ...
      1. dauria
        dauria 18 January 2016 11: 56 New
        +1
        laugh BUT shake on the mustache that we - We see what (someone wants) for us to see, and not what is really happening ...


        And we think, think, think: “And what are we worse? Isn't that what we are doing?” laughing Yes, we also eat popcorn ... (or better, mushrooms under a hundred)
    3. Yura
      Yura 18 January 2016 11: 57 New
      0
      Quote: sa-ag
      "... if Putin continues to" reign supremely and uncontrollably "to expand" his dominance, "then he will recreate the Soviet Union."

      It’s just what they fear more than anything in the world and this fear creeps out of them no matter what, both to and from place. I propose to just laugh, the sharp word of Oleg Chuvakin directly has to do this:
      I try to live right, and I succeed. I have a very good relationship with God. ”
      With all due respect to Vladimir Vladimirovich, Trump flatters him, I understand that he wants to indicate his high place.
      Bruce Fain writes: “All empires are the same. All of them are born from the DNA of those species that crave power for the sake of power. And this evil remains unchanged from the time of Adam and Eve. ”
      Mr. Fein is wrong and very strong, the DNA of Adam and Eve has nothing to do with it, since they owned everything without any thirst for power, simply because they were then alone.
      Bruce Fane gives advice to the White House. "The United States, he writes, will become much freer richer and safer if they withdraw all their troops from the Middle East and deploy them in their homeland to protect their own borders, coasts and sky ”
      Dear Bruce here directly says that in the USA there is essentially no freedom, because there is either freedom or it does not exist and there are no options.
      “Our militant state,” continues the publicist, “has nourished the military-industrial-terrorist complex and, in turn, has nourished them, is a great destroyer of freedom».
      How can you destroy what is not?
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 18 January 2016 14: 00 New
        +1
        You need to understand that the article is mainly about candidates for the presidency of the United States? Well, if this is so, then there is nothing to be surprised at - in their election promises, they simply try to guess the mood of the electorate. That's all. Now you represent the mood of American voters. As they say - God is their judge. Whoever they choose will be their brains again for the blues.
    4. iouris
      iouris 18 January 2016 21: 24 New
      0
      A politician and diplomat uses language to hide thoughts.
      The USSR, of course, cannot be restored, but without that part of Russia, which for some reason has become Ukraine, and now Anti-Russia, the market will not work.
      1. Aryan
        Aryan 18 January 2016 23: 29 New
        0
        one minus set article! I told you that Obamych is registered in the topvar!
  2. afdjhbn67
    afdjhbn67 18 January 2016 09: 12 New
    -8
    War for war, power for power - that’s what living today

    For some reason I thought it was about us ...
    1. Kolka82
      Kolka82 18 January 2016 10: 22 New
      +6
      What is more suitable for us is that after the decimal point ... (I’ll borrow from you a few "minuses")
    2. nekot
      nekot 18 January 2016 11: 19 New
      +1
      Maybe about you))))
      1. Kolka82
        Kolka82 18 January 2016 12: 29 New
        0
        Fortunately not. I belong to the category of "mere mortals" :)
  3. ImPerts
    ImPerts 18 January 2016 09: 16 New
    11
    Poor Americans, they can do nothing with a bandit and a bully. Have you tried push-ups? Especially in his presence? To demonstrate power)))
    I would suggest another race to run, to demonstrate a stunning speed and your health!
    1. Pereira
      Pereira 18 January 2016 09: 28 New
      +4
      Rather, an aging gangster looked at the appearance of a national warrior threatening to disperse his gang.
      1. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 18 January 2016 11: 18 New
        +2
        Quote: Pereira
        Rather, an aging gangster looked at the appearance of a national warrior threatening to disperse his gang.

        «Not so long ago, Russia had no influence in the region at all."He reminded. Not Russia, but the United States "must lead in all directions."
        I would like to remind Bush that quite recently, by historical standards, Europe did not even know about the existence of America, and the Indians lived in America itself, and not at all the descendants of the Anglo-Saxons, Negro slaves and other Italian Germans.

        And the bandit is not aging - an old and decrepit toothless bandit sits on the British Isles. This thug is a young accelerator, who grew up with his fists and the rest of the quirks, only his brain remained childish, at the level of five years - to slander and run away. And then dump everything on Vovka. Only he is against an experienced fighter, who has already been tried more than once to break, not an opponent ... Like a carpenter versus a carpenter ...
  4. Voha_krim
    Voha_krim 18 January 2016 09: 22 New
    +1
    Fox News: The US President will win ... Putin
    Although the Americans still need to wait until November to find out who will be the next president of the United States, "however, in a sense, the winner of the 2016 presidential election is already clear - this is Vladimir Putin." About this in his article for the Fox News website writes Douglas Sean, a political analyst, writer and public opinion expert who worked for US President Bill Clinton.

    https://russian.rt.com/inotv/2016-01-17/Fox-News-Na-viborah-prezidenta
  5. nimboris
    nimboris 18 January 2016 09: 23 New
    +6
    Any American president will be injected with big capital contrary to his election promises. They have a pre-election company, this is a resume when they are employed as top managers in front of the largest shareholders of a company called the United States of America.
  6. Boos
    Boos 18 January 2016 09: 24 New
    -1
    The teachings of the Marxist platforms prove to us that Putin represents one of the divisions of imperialism, only the United States solves its problems based on the well-being of its people (although this can be disputed), and Putin is trying to solve it by robbing his people, if he is his own, of course. .. (which can also be disputed).
    Quote: afdjhbn67
    War for war, power for power - that’s what living today

    For some reason I thought it was about us ...
    1. guzik007
      guzik007 18 January 2016 09: 33 New
      +4
      And Putin is trying to solve by robbing his people,
      -------------------------------------------------- ----
      What are you, as possible, just when the treasury is impoverished, the rulers magnanimously offer their people to share, rally to shrink and tighten their belts, so that at their expense they can correct their own failures mediocrity and shortsightedness.
      Axiom. And here, the current ones are by no means original.
      1. evge-malyshev
        evge-malyshev 18 January 2016 10: 45 New
        -2
        Quote: guzik007
        And Putin is trying to solve by robbing his people, ---------------------------------------- -------------- What are you, as simple as possible, when the treasury is impoverished, the rulers magnanimously offer their people to share, rally, shrink and tighten their belts, so that at their expense they can correct their own mistakes, lack of talent and shortsightedness. Axiom. And here, the current ones are by no means original.


        Well, it began ... They sat down on their favorite skate - to crap, crap and crap - "... the US is solving its problems based on the well-being of its people, and Putin is trying to solve by plucking his people ...".
    2. Riv
      Riv 18 January 2016 09: 59 New
      +3
      Something tells me that you just heard about Marxism. :)

      The capitalist owns the means of production on the basis of private property and appropriates the labor of others. He pays taxes to the state and the state protects him for it. Thus, it all boils down to transferring to the state a part (and for the most part) of the added value that the wage workers have produced (and of course the capitalist himself). Thus, the capitalist state can’t not rob its people. From the word "no way." This is its essence and mode of existence, and it does not matter what it is called: the USA, Russia, or some kind of your Israel.
      1. Boos
        Boos 18 January 2016 10: 06 New
        +5
        We do not have capitalists, there are people who have robbed the people, parasitizing on the buildings and developments of the Soviet Union.
        1. lukewarm
          lukewarm 18 January 2016 10: 21 New
          +3
          As a class, nevertheless, there are signs. And how they got the start-up capital, the degree of exploitation and the degree of stratification ... These are the particulars that really make our life unbearable.
        2. Riv
          Riv 18 January 2016 13: 01 New
          +1
          Do not call them, but it is the capitalists. In other countries, they are qualitatively no different.

          In general, if you look closely, Russia is not very far gone from the USSR. Our capitalism did not become developed. The state still has a controlling stake in giants such as Gazprom. On the one hand, this is good, because state control is definitely useful. On the other hand, the state is very tempted to become a monopolist. While monopoly is welcome in weapons production, for example, in the fuel industry, this leads to higher gas prices. And sometimes to something like "Plato."

          In the end, we seem to be returning to socialism. Not to Stalin, of course. Around the end of the 20s, with the remnants of the NEP and relative freedom of enterprise.
          1. Boos
            Boos 18 January 2016 14: 43 New
            +1
            In the 20s there was no socialism, it began to be embodied with the first five-year plans, after the victory over the Trotskyists.
            1. Riv
              Riv 18 January 2016 15: 04 New
              +2
              And what was ??? :) My friend, make a tattoo on your forehead and look in the mirror every day: "Under capitalism, the means of production are in private ownership, and under socialism, in the public." In Soviet Russia, they were owned by the state, but the NEP was that a private entrepreneur could either rent them or create new ones.

              There are still nuances like National Socialism, in which the means of production are privately owned, but its owners act in the interests of the state and are controlled by it. The extreme form of National Socialism, in which class contradictions are suppressed by force, is fascism. And if we were to be completely true, then the system that existed in the USSR, with the understanding of Marx, had little in common.
              However, perhaps this is too difficult for the generation-next? ..
            2. Cap.Morgan
              Cap.Morgan 18 January 2016 21: 15 New
              -1
              Then there was military COMMUNISM, replaced by a couple of years by the NEP, immediately after which socialism came. The miserable little factories and artels acted on the socialist principle.
              Trotskyism does not cancel socialism.
              1. Riv
                Riv 19 January 2016 12: 54 New
                0
                Well, tochnik: too complicated. :)
                War communism is an internal policy of the country, but not an economic system. It took shape during the civil war and was aimed at the survival of the state, and not at its normal functioning. War communism was just replaced by the New Economic Policy (NEP), which ensured the transition to normal trade.
                But in general, socialism has been, and has remained. RSFSR as you decipher?
      2. Cap.Morgan
        Cap.Morgan 18 January 2016 21: 12 New
        0
        Any state "robbing" the people.
        Both capitalist and socialist. In order to avoid “exploitation”, it is necessary to abolish the state, that is, introduce an anarchist model, in this case, each for itself.
  7. parusnik
    parusnik 18 January 2016 09: 25 New
    +8
    The author calls the US military-industrial complex a "terrorist" complex that "thrives on an eternal war and fictional fears of threats." And on January 17, 1961, President Dwight Eisenhower made a "farewell" appeal in which he warned Americans about the danger posed by the further development of the country's military-industrial complex: "We must strictly monitor to prevent such concentration in our government bodies the influence of its representatives, which would exceed their authority, regardless of whether the military-industrial complex is interested in using this influence or not. There are opportunities for a monstrous rise in power that is not in its place, and it will continue to grow. our freedoms or democratic processes. "
  8. HUMANOID
    HUMANOID 18 January 2016 09: 31 New
    +2
    Yes, their politics have not changed for centuries - SHARE AND POWER - everything else is hypocrisy
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. Stone
    Stone 18 January 2016 09: 40 New
    +5
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/430/regn995.jpg
    In Ukraine, another zrada ... Putin, he is everywhere wassat
    1. Alena Frolovna
      Alena Frolovna 18 January 2016 17: 46 New
      +2
      Indeed, Putin is everywhere.






      Berlin, spring 1945
  11. Taygerus
    Taygerus 18 January 2016 09: 45 New
    +1
    they will choose another talking head and a mustache, the omega politics will not change from this, they will also warm up their military-industrial complex by unleashing conflicts and coming up with new reasons for promoting their bloody democracy to the masses, bringing freedom from everything, from the right to life, sovereignty, etc.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 18 January 2016 10: 59 New
      +2
      Quote: Taygerus
      choose another talking head and truncated


      You are right.
      I recall an old joke. Leonid Brezhnev is visiting the Baobabu tribe. He speaks to the people in his own way, promises to build factories, farms, ships. In response, the people, dancing, yells: "namakakayku, namakakayku." The official ended, a fire was lit on the square, the audience stripped naked and began to jump over the fire (well, approximately, like on the Maidan in Kuev). The leader with a horseshoe in his nose approaches LIB and says in broken Swedish: "Sir, the audience asks her to respect, undress and jump over the ritual bonfire, this will be an expression of respect for our tribe." Nothing to do, undressed, fled, jumped - "OK." Here comes a black-and-white little girl of about 15 years old, fiddling with the LIB and broken English: “Such a big boss, and such a small MAKAKAYA”.
      Please forgive me for distracting someone from state thoughts. bully
  12. paxil
    paxil 18 January 2016 09: 54 New
    +3
    Presidential candidate H. Clinton, the columnist also entered the ranks of Putinists: after all, she allowed Putin to press the "reset" button.
    Only on the button it was written RESET AND NOT RESET laughing
    1. ImPerts
      ImPerts 18 January 2016 09: 59 New
      0
      Quote: paxil
      The observer also entered presidential candidate H. Clinton into the ranks of Putinists: it was she who allowed Putin to press the "reset" button.
      Only on the button it was written RESET AND NOT RESET


      She decided to improve)))
  13. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 18 January 2016 10: 05 New
    0
    If Trump used to talk about good relations with Putin, now he is talking
    "I have a very good relationship with God."
    The conclusion suggests itself that Putin is on the same side with God.
    1. lukewarm
      lukewarm 18 January 2016 10: 22 New
      +3
      If the conclusion is strongly pulled by the ears - then it begs. And Patriarch Cyril in the know,
      Quote: olimpiada15
      that Putin is on the same side with God.
    2. olimpiada15
      olimpiada15 19 January 2016 16: 34 New
      0
      It was necessary to put a smiley, a statement frivolous.
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 18 January 2016 10: 14 New
    0
    Truly, something has gone wrong in the American kingdom

    In the "kingdom", where reality is perceived through curved mirrors, and even fitted to kings (to see yourself healthy and beautiful against the backdrop of other-shriveled and ugly), it can not be otherwise.
    ... is a great destroyer of freedom

    Bruce Frein gave an excellent description of the United States, even commenting is not necessary.
  15. andrei.yandex
    andrei.yandex 18 January 2016 10: 25 New
    +1
    As a matter of fact, at the Kurganmashzavod I suggest switching to http://pandoraopen.ru/2016-01-17/realnost-kurganmashzavoda/
  16. Lelek
    Lelek 18 January 2016 10: 31 New
    0
    “The United States needs to do more to confront Russian President Putin,” because its “decisive policy” is everywhere contrary to “American interests.”

    It is likely that precisely this thesis was attempted to somehow be voiced by the expansive fatty Nuland in an interview with Surkov in Pionersk.
    (cry.)
  17. satris
    satris 18 January 2016 10: 54 New
    +2
    I have never met Mark Rubio, but judging by his statements, he is an I.D.O.T.T.
  18. NordUral
    NordUral 18 January 2016 10: 55 New
    +1
    They will lose, but only if we, the people of Russia, force the liberals out of power, and a nationally oriented government carries out nationalization. The economy will become planned and socially oriented. And this is with a high level of defense of the country.
  19. L. A. A.
    L. A. A. 18 January 2016 11: 05 New
    0
    The US specifically scares Russia.
  20. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 18 January 2016 11: 22 New
    +2
    Such as trumping friends because of the childbearing organ, but to the museum. To be friends with you, the country will fall apart in general. Better we ourselves will somehow survive.
  21. Stinger
    Stinger 18 January 2016 11: 59 New
    0
    However, will something change after the election? No way.
    That's for sure. Moreover, not only Trump says: I have a very good relationship with God. There, apparently, everyone got along with him. Therefore, they play tricks on the sweet babble of human rights. World gendarme of democracy.
  22. mgfly
    mgfly 18 January 2016 12: 05 New
    +1
    now it amazes me (and for a long time) - with the SGA and occupied Europe we seem to be in a confrontation, and we continue to measure goods and services in dollars and euros; we panic for each + kopek to the price of evergreens ... somehow it does not fit ...
  23. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 18 January 2016 12: 27 New
    +1
    To develop the United States needs some kind of goal. On the moon they already "were." Mars is too far away. Then you need to appoint / choose a worthy enemy and defeat him. Why did you choose Russia and not China, for example. The USA has a very large turnover with China. Introducing sanctions against China is like spitting against the wind. With Russia, commodity circulation is practically zero. By imposing sanctions, the United States is pushing Russia and Western Europe - its main economic competitor. Since Russia is vast and has great potential in all areas (especially in the military), the US goal is long-playing. And the US government is gaining some sense of its existence, under which you can plan big expenses.
    1. Riv
      Riv 18 January 2016 17: 26 New
      0
      You have some kind of strange concept. :) What does “need a goal” mean? Just like that - is that all? For some reason, Afghanistan, in which the presence is on the contrary declining, or Iraq, is not suitable as a goal. It is Russia, which, as it were, has a full-fledged nuclear triad. How will this help the economy?

      Why do you think Hitler started World War II? Not because he had nothing to do, and not because he was furious. Have you read Mine Kampf? No? Be sure to read. Hitler wrote this book in the prime of his life and mental abilities. The Reich development program was clearly and clearly stated: the formation of the armed forces, the seizure of living space, the ability to withstand any external threats. This requires industry. Industry needs raw materials. All Wehrmacht operations were aimed at capturing and ensuring the safety of the raw material base.

      Now the question is: what specific raw materials are missing from the States and why did they "choose Russia as their target"? Answer: no one chose anyone as their goal. States and so are the strongest world power. They have everything that is needed for the maintenance and development of the army and navy. It’s just that the United States, oddly enough, is now the defender. They are actively trying to push them off the world pedestal. And do you really think that Russia is doing this?
  24. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 18 January 2016 12: 33 New
    0
    Great article, thanks to Oleg for it.
  25. Ivan Ivanovich
    Ivan Ivanovich 18 January 2016 12: 34 New
    0
    http://www.interfax.ru/business/490090 certainly out of place, but very interesting ...
  26. Starik72
    Starik72 18 January 2016 14: 56 New
    0
    No matter how the presidential candidates defecate in verbiage, and whoever they choose, the U.S. policy will not change. It is not the president who rules but the MILITARY OLIGARCHY and the JEWISH FINANCIAL OLIGARCHY, and the president is only the mouthpiece of what they tell him to say.
  27. thinker
    thinker 18 January 2016 16: 42 New
    +1
    An extravagant billionaire said in an interview with CNN that he now leads a righteous lifestyle.

    Something like this.
    1. Elena2013
      Elena2013 19 January 2016 11: 46 New
      0
      Its 5 cents ...